Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Ezra 2:21
The children of Bethlehem, a hundred twenty and three.
21. Beth-lehem ] or ‘the house of bread’: sometimes called Bethlehem of Judah to distinguish it from the Bethlehem in Zebulon (Jos 19:15). Its name implies the fruitfulness of the soil. The name of Ephrath or Ephratah by which it was known in earlier times has also the meaning of plenty (cf. Gen 35:19; Mic 5:1; Rth 1:2). The story of Ruth lies in Bethlehem. Ibzan the Judge was a native of Bethlehem (Jdg 12:8). Its greatest fame in the O. T. is derived from its having been the birthplace of David (1Sa 17:12) and of the sons of Zeruiah (2Sa 2:32). It was only a village, but the prophet predicted its glory in the Messianic future (Mic 5:1), in words, of which the literal fulfilment is recorded in Mat 2:1 &c.; Luk 2:1 &c.; cf. Joh 7:42.
It is situated about 5 miles S. of Jerusalem on high ground, some 2500 ft. above the level of the sea.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Verse 21. The children of Beth-lehem] The inhabitants: see before.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Either of a man called
Beth-lehem, or the Beth-lehemite, by way of eminency; or of the place so called. And so these were the remainders of the inhabitants of that city. And the like may be said of the two following names, Netophah and Anathoth, or others of the like nature.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
[See comments on Ezr 2:3].
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
3. Next it includes people identified mainly by their towns.
TEXT, Ezr. 2:21-35
21
the men of Bethlehem, 123;
22
the men of Netophah, 56;
23
the men of Anathoth, 128;
24
the sons of Azmaveth, 42;
25
the sons of Kiriath-arim, Chephirah, and Beeroth, 743;
26
the sons of Ramah and Geba, 621;
27
the men of Michmas, 122;
28
the men of Bethel and Ai, 223;
29
the sons of Nebo, 52;
30
the sons of Magbish, 156;
31
the sons of the other Elam, 1,254;
32
the sons of Harim, 320;
33
the sons of Lod, Hadid, and Ono, 725;
34
the men of Jericho, 345;
35
the sons of Senaah, 3,630.
COMMENT
Note that the phrases, the men of, and the sons of, are used interchangeably. The proper names are all, or nearly all, the names of communities, though Elam in Ezr. 2:31 presents a puzzle. The same name, with the same number of persons, is mentioned in verse seven, among the individuals. This may be only a remarkable coincidence, though some regard it as a repetition; the Bible writer himself indicates that he is aware of the similarity of the name at least, for he uses the phrase, the other Elam, in Ezr. 2:31.
We are particularly interested in the mention of some of the towns in this list. Here is Bethlehem (Ezr. 2:21), never very large, but memorable as the ancestral home of David and his royal descendants.
And Anathoth (Ezr. 2:23), once the home of Jeremiah. Here the prophet had bought a piece of property at Gods direction (Jeremiah 32), in the face of his own predictions of the destruction and captivity of his nation. This was his way of showing his faith, and Gods assurance, that the land would be valuable again. So he had invested in the future for his nephews and nieces; now his faith and his obedience is being vindicated!
Here is Ramah (Ezr. 2:26); Samuel had judged his people at Ramah (1Sa. 7:17).
And Geba (Ezr. 2:26). At least once this is another spelling of Gibeah,[14] just a few miles from Ramah. At Gibeah Saul had set up the kingdom of Israel. Most likely Geba and Ramah are grouped together because they were close to each other, as were Bethel and Ai in Ezr. 2:28.
[14] Jdg. 20:10 in Hebrews; also Jdg. 20:33, where Maareh-geba may be translated field (or plain) of Geba. Note that the surrounding verses all deal with Gibeah.
Bethel (Ezr. 2:28) would recall the lives of Abraham and Jacob; both of them had built altars there (Gen. 12:7; Gen. 35:1).
Nebo (Ezr. 2:29), across the Jordan, afforded Moses his only view of the Promised Land before he died (Deu. 34:1). Here, however, it probably denotes a small town in Judah.
The walls of Jericho (Ezr. 2:34) had echoed the march of Joshua and all Israel shortly after (Joshua 6).
So the people who returned would have remembered many other hallowed events from their past, as they took up residence once more in the land of their ancestors.
WORD STUDIES
ZERUBBABEL: a seed of Babylon: a reminder that God preserved a seed of His people through the Babylonian Captivity, from which His nation would once again spring to life,
TEMPLE SERVANTS (Ezr. 2:43): literally, the Nethinim: those given. The word is a plural form; it comes from the word Nathan. These were the persons given to the priests to assist with the menial tasks of preparing for sacrifice and worship.
JESHUA, or its variant, JOSHUA: Jehovah is Salvation, or Salvation from Jehovah. This is the Hebrew equivalent of the Greek name, Jesus.
MINA: the basic meaning is to divide out, or measure out, or number. Money originally had to be measured, or weighed, at each transaction. This is the word Mene in the handwriting on the wall, in Dan. 5:25 f. Note that the consonants are the same as those in our word money, and in reverse order, the first two consonants in number. Can you find the two letters hidden in the denomination of a bill? In numismatics? Now you are looking at the building blocks of language!
Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series
Enrolled By Domicile.
We now come to those families who submitted their numbers in terms of domicile. This may simply have been as a consequence of the choice of the particular submitter, or it may have been though custom. Or, indeed, it may have been because it was easier to prove connection with a pre-exilic town than it was to prove family connection. It may be significant that most of the towns are Benjamite towns, whilst the exceptions, Bethlehem and Netophah, are very close to Benjamite territory. It will be noted that in these cases some submitters spoke of ‘the sons of –’ while others spoke of ‘the men of –’. Each was then listed as submitted. Thus these differences are no reason for not seeing the list as a unity. In Nehemiah 7 these descriptions are regularised so that Ezr 2:26-33 (Ezr 2:21-29) are all listed as ‘men of –’, with what follows being ‘sons of –’. This suggests again that the list in Nehemiah comes later than that in Ezra. It is difficult to see why the regularised pattern should have become disorganised, but easy to see why someone should seek to regularise the pattern.
It should, however, be pointed out that in what follows most, but not all, of the towns and cities are identifiable. Some therefore see these verses as a mix of domicile and family connection.
Ezr 2:21
‘The sons of Beth-lehem, one hundred and twenty three.’
Bethlehem (of Judah) was a town nine kilometres (five miles) south of Jerusalem. The name means ‘house of food (bread)’. It was the town in which David was reared, and one of the places in which Samuel offered sacrifices. This is the first mention of an incoming group in terms of its town. In Nehemiah 7 the sons of Bethlehem and the men of Netophah (Ezr 2:22) are listed together as ‘the men of Bethlehem and Netophah’. This suggest that at the time of the second list one submitter submitted the increase in the number of the two groups as a combined figure, necessitating the conjunction of the two in the list. In Nehemiah 7 they number in total one hundred and eighty eight, as against a sum of one hundred and seventy nine here. The increase of nine may be due to comings of age, or to a few more of the clan arriving with the later arriving sons of Azgah.
Ezr 2:22
‘The men of Netophah, fifty six.’
Netophah was seemingly also in Judah and was the birthplace of two of David’s heroes, Maharai and Heleb (2Sa 23:28-29), and also of Seraiah the son of Tanhumeth the Netophathite, one of the captains who came to offer allegiance to Gedaliah (2Ki 25:23; Jer 40:8). In 1Ch 9:16 “the villages of the Netophathites” are mentioned as the dwellingplaces of certain Levites, whilst in Neh 12:28 they are the dwellingplaces of some of the “sons of the singers.” Being placed in the list between Bethlehem and Anathoth it would appear to be in the vicinity of Bethlehem, something confirmed by the uniting of the numbers in Nehemiah 7. The change to ‘the men of –’ was probably the consequence of the description used by the one who submitted the numbers. Others said ‘the sons of –.’
Ezr 2:23
‘The men of Anathoth, one hundred and twenty eight.’
Anathoth was a town which lay between Michmash and Jerusalem (Isa 10:30), in the territory of Benjamin, being about two and a quarter miles north east of Jerusalem. It was assigned to the Levites (Jos 21:18). It was the native town of Abiathar (1Ki 2:26), and of the prophet Jeremiah (Jer 1:1; Jer 11:21 ff, etc.), and it was in the vicinity of Anathoth that Jeremiah bought a field in order to demonstrate that land would once more be bought and sold in Judah (Jer 32:7 ff). Two of David’s distinguished soldiers, Abiezer (2Sa 23:27) and Jehu (1Ch 12:3), also came from Anathoth. As we gather here, it was again occupied by Benjamites after the return from the Exile (compare Neh 11:32, etc.). It is identified with `Anata, a small village of some fifteen houses which contains remains of ancient walls.
Ezr 2:24
‘The sons of Azmaveth, forty two.’
Nehemiah 7 has ‘the men of Beth-azmaveth’, which suggests the name of a town. Azmaveth was the name of one of David’s 30 mighty men (2Sa 23:31; 1Ch 11:33), and of the father of two warriors who joined David at Ziklag (1Ch 12:3). It was also the name of a descendant of Jonathan, the son of Saul (1Ch 8:36; 1Ch 9:42), and of one who was set over David’s treasures (1Ch 27:25). No town of this name is known, but there may well have been such a town, (in those days people were often named after the town with which they were connected), and this would appear to be confirmed by the wording in Nehemiah 7.
Ezr 2:25
‘The sons of Kiriath-arim, Chephirah, and Beeroth, seven hundred and forty three.’
The only difference between this and the reference to it in Nehemiah 7 is that Nehemiah 7 has ‘the men of –.’ Indeed Nehemiah 7 regularises all the references in regard to cities in Ezr 2:21-29 to ‘the men of –’. These three cities (the first as Kiriath-jearim – the city of the forests) were members of the Gibeonite confederacy (Jos 9:17), and were in Judah/Benjamin (Jos 15:60; Jos 18:14; Jos 18:25-26; Jdg 18:12). Kiriath-jearim was on the border of Judah and Benjamin, and was also known as Kiriath-Baal) (Jos 18:14-15). In Jos 15:9-11 it was also known as Baalah). It had clearly been a sanctuary of the Canaanite god Baal. It was in Judah, although if we identify it with Kiriath, it was also seen as in Benjamin (Jos 18:28). It was in Kiriath-jearim that the ark rested for twenty years (1Sa 7:1-2). The prophet Uriah, who was martyred by King Jehoiakim in the days of Jeremiah, was born there (Jer 26:20). The site is as yet unidentified. Chephirah and Beeroth were both in Benjamin (Jos 18:25-26).
Ezr 2:26
‘The sons of Ramah and Geba, six hundred and twenty one.’
Nehemiah 7 has ‘the men of –’. Ramah (‘the height’) was Ramah of Benjamin, near Bethel, in the area of Gibeon and Beeroth (Jos 18:25). It was here that the Levite and his concubine planned to rest for the night (Jdg 19:13). Deborah the prophetess lived close by (Jdg 4:5). Here Baasha of Israel built a fortress, which Asa of Judah demolished (1Ki 15:17; 1Ki 15:21-22). It was here that Nebuzaradan gathered the people being taken into exile after the fall of Jerusalem, and from which Jeremiah was released (Jer 40:1). Geba (‘a hill’) was in Benjamin, eleven kilometres (seven miles) north of Jerusalem. Its modern name is Jeba. It was assigned to the Levites (Jos 21:17; 1Ch 6:60), and from its slopes Jonathan, with his armour-bearer, revealed himself to the Philistines in a daring attack (1Sa 14:1 ff.). It was fortified by King Asa (1Ki 15:22) as on the northern border of Judah (2Ki 23:8). From here came some of ‘the sons of the singers’ who sang at the dedication of the wall of Jerusalem (Neh 12:29). Both Ramah and Geba are both described as occupied by the sons of Benjamin in the time of Nehemiah (Neh 11:31; Neh 11:33).
Ezr 2:27
‘The men of Michmas, a hundred and twenty two.’
Michmas was also known as Michmash. It was a town in the territory of Benjamin, and its settlement by Benjamites after the exile is confirmed in Neh 11:31. It was apparently not of sufficient importance in the time of Joshua to secure mention in the list of cities given in Jos 18:21 ff. Michmash first appears as occupied, along with the Mount of Bethel, by Saul with 2,000 men, at the time when Jonathan, advancing from Gibeah, smote the Philistine garrison in Geba (1Sa 13:2). To avenge this injury, the Philistines came up in force and encamped in Michmash (1Sa 13:5; 1Sa 13:16), from which they sent out ‘spoilers’. Saul and Jonathan with 600 men meanwhile held Geba, which had been taken from the Philistine garrison (1Sa 13:16). During the Assyrian advance on Jerusalem in Isa 10:28, they ‘laid up their stores at Michmash, crossed the pass, and spent the night at Geba’. Thus the two sites are fairly close to each other. Michmash is represented by the modern Mukhmas, which is about 12 kilometres (7 miles) North of Jerusalem.
Ezr 2:28
‘The men of Beth-el and Ai, two hundred and twenty three.’
The list of Nehemiah 7 shows one hundred less. This reduction in numbers may have been due to an outbreak of pestilence or violence, or it may have been caused by some who were dissatisfied with the situation and returned to Babylon. The ‘hundred’ may not have been an exact number. The submitter may well have simply used ‘a hundred’ as a round number signifying a fairly large number (a thousand, a hundred and a ten were often used to indicate groups of different sizes regardless of actual number, see Exo 18:25; Deu 1:15). This would then be used to alter the number as given in the Ezra list to produce the number in Nehemiah. The settlement of Bethel by the Benjamites is confirmed in Neh 11:31.
Ai was east of Bethel, but close enough for both to be seen from a mid-point (Gen 12:8). Bethel and Ai were the first two towns that the Israelites encountered when they went up the pass after destroying Jericho. Ai was taken but, while Bethel’s army was defeated, Bethel was probably not captured at that time (Joshua 8). Their sites are disputed although we can assess that Bethel (formerly called Luz) was about 19 kilometres (12 miles) north of Jerusalem. Abraham built an altar and offered sacrifices in its vicinity (Gen 12:8). It was in its vicinity also that Jacob had his dream of the steps leading up to Heaven. It is named as a border town in the lists of both Joseph (Ephraim) and Benjamin (Jos 16:1-2; Jos 18:13), and was possibly initially shared by the two tribes. The Ark rested there for a time in the early days (Jdg 20:18), and it was included in Samuel’s circuit as judge (1Sa 7:16). After the division into Judah and Northern Israel it became an important shrine in Northern Israel, and was roundly criticised by the prophets for its idolatrous associations (1Ki 12:29 ff; Amo 7:13). It became part of Judah in the days of Josiah (2Ki 23:15).
Ezr 2:29
‘The sons of Nebo, fifty two.’
Nehemiah 7 speaks of Nebo as Nebo Acher (or ‘the other Nebo’), and refers to ‘the men of –.’ This difference in name may suggest that what is found in Nehemiah may have been the submission of a different submitter, who used different terms. The town possibly had the longer name of Nebo Acher to distinguish it from Nebo in Reuben (Num 32:3; Num 32:38). From its position here it would appear to have been a Benjamite town. It may be represented by Beit Nuba, 19 kilometres (12 miles) northwest of Jerusalem.
Ezr 2:30
‘The sons of Magbish, one hundred and fifty six.’
These are omitted in Nehemiah 7. No town of this name is known, and it may have been a relatively small one. It may be that these sons of Magbish had decided to return to their fellow-clan members in Babylonia, or that the town had been raided and its inhabitants massacred. Alternately it may have been wiped out by a virulent disease. Some relate the name to Magpiash, one of the sealants of the sure covenant of Nehemiah (Neh 10:20) which, if it is correct, might suggest that some returned again later.
Ezr 2:31
‘The sons of the other Elam (or Elam Acher), one thousand, two hundred and fifty four.’
Compare Ezr 2:7 for an ‘Elam’, and see the note there. That may be why it speaks of ‘the other Elam’. On the other hand Neh 7:33 speaks of ‘the other Nebo’ or ‘Nebo Acher’, so that Elam Acher may, on the same basis, be the name of a town. Certainly from its position here Elam Acher would appear to be the name of a Benjamite town (a Benjamite of the name is mentioned in 1Ch 8:24), even though it is at this point that the writer in Nehemiah 7 reverts back to ‘the son of –’. The references to ‘the sons of Jericho’ and ‘the sons of Lod, Hadid and Ono’ appear to confirm that he is still speaking of domicile.
Ezr 2:32
‘The sons of Harim, three hundred and twenty.’
‘Sons of Harim’ are mentioned among those who married foreign wives (Ezr 10:31), and we find an Harim among those who sealed Nehemiah’s covenant (Neh 10:27), although it may be that it was sealed in the family name. In Neh 3:11 Malchijah, son of Harim, is mentioned as one of the wall-builders. These ‘sons of Harim’ may well, however, have been named after their town. Such a town is not mentioned elsewhere, but it may have been a small one.
Ezr 2:33
‘The sons of Lod, Hadid, and Ono, seven hundred and twenty five.’
In Nehemiah 7 this comes after the sons of Jericho, and they number seven hundred and twenty one, no doubt due to deaths. Ono and Lod with their ‘towns’ are said to have been ‘built’ (fortified?) by Shemed, a Benjamite (1Ch 8:12). The towns lay in the Shephelah (lowland hills), perhaps in ge ha-charashim, “the valley of craftsmen”, and their habitation by Benjamites after the Exile is mentioned in Neh 11:35. It was in one of the villages in the plain of Ono that Sanballat and his friends vainly tried to inveigle Nehemiah into a conference in order to do him harm (Neh 6:2). Ono is represented by modern Kefr `Ana, which lies to the Northwest of Lydda. In the New Testament Lod appears as Lydda. Here the apostle Peter visited the saints and healed the palsied Arenas, and from here he was summoned by messengers from Joppa on the death of Dorcas (Act 9:32 ff).
Ezr 2:34
‘The sons of Jericho, three hundred and forty five.’
Jericho was probably named after the god Yarich. It was in the Jordan rift valley in Benjamite territory (Jos 18:21), at the bottom of the pass that led up to Jerusalem, and was known as ‘the city of the Palm Trees’ (Deu 34:3; 2Ch 28:15). It was the first ‘city’ captured by Joshua after crossing the Jordan. Elijah had a school of the prophets there (2Ki 2:5). The men of Jericho, which was by then only a small town, assisted Nehemiah in the building of the walls of Jerusalem (Neh 3:2).
Ezr 2:35
‘The sons of Senaah, three thousand, six hundred and thirty.’
In Nehemiah 7 these number three thousand, nine hundred and thirty. This suggests that a fairly large party of them accompanied the later arrivals of the sons of Azgad, or came in their own caravan, the increase possibly being of three ‘hundreds’ using the non-numerative significance of ‘a hundred’. In Neh 3:3 the name occurs with the definite article, ha-senaah, referring to a wall builder. The people may be identical with the Benjamite clan Hassenuah (1Ch 9:7).
Some cavil at the number on the grounds of its size, but it is not so large as to be impossible, if we compare, for example the sons of Pahath-Moab who number two thousand eight hundred and twelve. Archaeology suggests that the Benjamite towns appear to have suffered less at the hands of Nebuchadnezzar, and Senaah, probably in the Jordan rift valley (it comes after Jericho), was not in the direct path of his advance. This may help to account for the numbers who had survived and been exiled.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Bethlehem: 1Ch 2:50-52
Reciprocal: 1Ch 2:42 – the father of Hebron Ezr 2:3 – children Neh 7:26 – Bethlehem
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
2:21 {f} The children of Bethlehem, an hundred twenty and three.
(f) That is inhabitants, for so this word (some) signifies when it is joined with the names of places.