Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Psalms 45:6
Thy throne, O God, [is] forever and ever: the scepter of thy kingdom [is] a right scepter.
6. Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever ] (1) This appears to be the sense given by all the Ancient Versions, for though it has been argued that in the LX X is not the vocative ( Thy throne O God) but the predicate ( Thy throne is God), the words do not appear to have been so understood by any of the ancient commentators, and the construction is certainly not an obvious one. But this rendering involves serious difficulties, whether it is taken as an address to the king or to God. ( a) Can the king who is the subject of the Ps. be addressed as Elohim, ‘God’? The older expositors, who regarded the Psalm as directly Messianic, of course felt no difficulty, and saw in the words a recognition of the Deity of Christ. But the tone and contents of the Psalm make it clear that it is addressed to some actual king. Could such a king be so addressed? It is argued that judges were called gods (Exo 21:6; Exo 22:8-9; Exo 22:28 (?); 1Sa 2:25); that the theocratic king as the representative of God was said to sit “on the throne of Jehovah” (1Ch 28:5; 1Ch 29:23); that a prophet can predict that the house of David should be as God (Zec 12:8); that Elohim is applied to men in the sense of divine or supernatural (Exo 7:1; 1Sa 28:13); that Isaiah speaks of the Messianic king as El gibbr, ‘mighty God’; and that the words of the next verse (where doubtless Jehovah thy God originally stood) preclude the possibility of misunderstanding. But it is doubtful whether judges are actually called gods (see R.V. of the passage quoted): certainly they are only so called as the mouthpieces of God, Who is regarded as the fountain of judgement: and after all that has been urged in favour of this interpretation it seems hardly possible to suppose that the king is directly addressed as Elohim.
( b) The Targum regards the words as addressed to Jehovah, ‘The throne of Thy majesty, O Jehovah, abideth for ever and ever.’ Jehovah’s throne may mean His heavenly throne (Psa 145:13; Lam 5:19), or the throne which He has established on earth as its counterpart and representative. But this interpretation seems to be excluded by the context. The king is addressed in the preceding and following verses, and it seems hardly possible to suppose that in this verse alone Jehovah is abruptly addressed.
(2) In view of these difficulties it is necessary to consider whether the words are correctly translated. Various other renderings have been proposed, taking Elohim as the subject or predicate of the clause instead of as a vocative. ( a) God is thy throne: i.e. thy kingdom is founded upon God. In support of this are quoted such phrases as “Jehovah is my refuge and my fortress” (Psa 91:2), or, “The eternal God is thy dwelling-place” (Deu 33:27). But the expression, to say the least, would be a strange one. ( b) Thy throne is God, i.e. divine. But though Hebrew uses substantives as predicates in a way which our idiom does not allow, this particular instance seems scarcely admissible. ( c) Thy throne [is the throne of] God (R.V. marg.). It is a disputed point whether this rendering is grammatically legitimate; but good authorities decide in the affirmative. It gives an excellent sense, and if the text is to be retained is the most satisfactory explanation of it. The theocratic king occupied the earthly throne of Jehovah as His representative (1Ch 28:5; 1Ch 29:23), ruling by His power (1Ki 3:28), and in His Name; and the justice of this king’s government (6 b, 7) stamps him as a worthy representative of Jehovah.
(3) Various emendations have been suggested, for the most part introducing a verb to give the sense, God hath established thy throne. The most ingenious is that of Bruston, who supposes that the Elohistic editor misread YHVH, Jehovah, for YHYH, shall be, and according to his usual custom substituted Elohim. Thy throne shall be for ever and ever would be an echo of the promise in 2Sa 7:16 b.
Whatever may be the precise rendering, there can be little doubt that the words contain a reference to the promise of eternal dominion to the house of David, which was fulfilled in Christ. See 2Sa 7:13; 2Sa 7:16; Psalms 89; cp. Psa 21:4; Psa 72:5.
Psa 45:6-7 are quoted in Heb 1:8-9. “It is commonly supposed that the force of the quotation lies in the Divine title ( ) which, as it is held, is applied to the Son. It seems however from the whole form of the argument to lie rather in the description which is given of the Son’s office and endowment. The angels are subject to constant change, He has a dominion for ever and ever; they work through material powers, He the Incarnate Son fulfils a moral sovereignty and is crowned with unique joy. Nor could the reader forget the later teaching of the Psalm on the Royal Bride and the Royal Race. In whatever way then be taken, the quotation establishes the conclusion which the writer wishes to draw as to the essential difference of the Son and the angels.” Bp. Westcott in loc.
the sceptre &c.] R.V. rightly, A sceptre of equity is the sceptre of thy kingdom. The sceptre is the symbol of royal authority; and the authority of the true king, like that of Jehovah, is exercised in righteousness and equity. Cp. Psa 67:4; Psa 89:14 with Isa 9:7; Isa 11:4 ff; Psa 72:2 ff, Psa 72:12 ff, and numerous passages in which righteousness is named as a fundamental attribute of God and an indispensable characteristic of His true representative on earth.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever – This passage is quoted by the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews in proof that the Messiah is exalted above the angels, and it is, beyond all question, adduced by him as having original reference to the Messiah. See the passage explained at length in the notes at Heb 1:8. I do not perceive, after an interval of nearly twenty years since those notes were written, that it is necessary to alter or to add anything to what is there said in explanation of the passage. It is undoubtedly an address to the king here referred to as God – as one to whom the name God – ‘Elohiym – may be properly applied; and, as applied to the Messiah by the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews, it clearly proves that Christ is Divine.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Psa 45:6-7
Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever.
The kingdom of Christ, an everlasting kingdom, and ruled with perfect justice and equity
I. Show that Zions king is God.
1. He is expressly called God in Scripture (Isa 9:6; Rom 9:5).
2. Such attributes are ascribed to Him in Scripture as are competent to God only.
(1) Eternity (Mic 5:2).
(2) Immutability (Heb 1:10).
(3) Omniscience (Joh 21:15; Joh 2:24-25).
(4) Omnipresence (Joh 3:13).
3. Divine worship, which is due to God only, is to be performed unto Him (Heb 1:6; Psa 2:12; Psa 45:11; Joh 5:22-23).
4. Works are done by Him which none but an infinitely powerful agent can perform (Col 1:16; Joh 11:25).
II. The lasting and permanent nature of the kingdom of Christ.
1. General observations.
(1) Our Lord Jesus has an essential kingdom, which is that absolute supreme power and authority which He exercises over all creatures in heaven, earth and hell (Psa 103:19).
(2) He has a kingdom and throne of grace (Eph 1:22).
(3) The kingdom of grace or the Church of Christ may be considered either as set up and administered in the world, or as set up in the hearts of men.
(4) He has a throne and kingdom of glory.
2. This kingdom is to endure for ever.
(1) Observe some things more generally concerning the perpetuity of the Church. The kingdom of our Lord Jesus was from everlasting in design; the King Himself is from everlasting, an eternal and mutable King; yea, He was chosen King of Zion from everlasting (Psa 89:19). It will continue through all succeeding ages and generations. Though the kingdom of Christ, considered as to its present form of administration in the world, consisting in the preaching of the Word, the dispensation of the sacraments, will come to an end; these ordinances being no further necessary, once that the saints are perfected; yet, substantially considered, it shall be for ever and ever (Psa 89:35; Psa 89:37).
(2) Show in some particulars that the Church is for ever and ever. As the King is for ever and ever, so are the subjects of His kingdom (Rom 5:17). They are all united to Him, and death cannot dissolve that union. When they have served their generations in this world according to His will, He will make them fixed pillars in His Fathers house above (Rev 3:12). The laws of the kingdom are for ever and ever. The treasures of the kingdom are for ever and ever. These are the unsearchable riches of Christ (Eph 3:8). The revenue of the kingdom is for ever and ever. The united praises of the saints is the revenue of the kingdom (Psa 146:2). The charter of the kingdom is for ever and ever (Isa 54:10; Tit 1:2; Rev 4:3).
III. Show that the kingdom of our Lord Jesus is ruled in the most just and equitable manner.
1. There is a righteous Prince upon the throne. He came to the throne in a just and righteous manner; it was by the appointment of God the Father (Psa 2:6).
2. The laws of the kingdom are right.
3. Our Lord Jesus effectually promotes and advances the spiritual welfare and advantage of His true subjects by all His dispensations toward the Church.
4. The sceptre of the kingdom must be right; for the King loves righteousness, and hates iniquity with a most perfect hatred; and elsewhere the psalmist saith, The righteous Lord loveth righteousness.
5. The sceptre of Immanuels kingdom will appear to be a right sceptre when it is considered that the King not only loves righteousness, but is perfectly in case to act according to the desire of His heart.
IV. USE–
1. Of information.
(1) We may see what a weighty and important work it was to redeem the Church, gather her from among the world lying in wickedness, wrest her out of the hand of Satan, rule and defend her from all her enemies, when none but an infinite Person was equal to the undertaking.
(2) We may see the dignity, safety and happiness of all the true subjects of Christ. It is their highest dignity to have Him for their King. Their life and safety lies in their union with, and relation to Him.
(3) See how absurd and impious it is to oppose the kingdom and interests of Christ, and molest His true subjects. The sceptre of His kingdom is a right sceptre, and therefore to oppose His rule and government is in the highest degree both sinful and dangerous.
(4) Is the sceptre of Christ a sceptre that is right? then we may see how unbecoming His subjects it is to quarrel with, fret and repine at any of His dispensations, either toward the Church in general, or themselves in particular.
(5) We may see that those who are determined by grace to give up themselves to Christ, to be saved by Him, and serve Him, are not such fools as the world takes them to be. He is managing all things in His kingdom for the advancement of His own glory, and the real good of His subjects, whether for the time they see him to be doing so or not.
(6) Hence, see the need we have of faith to believe that Zions King is doing all things well, even when His way is in the sea and His paths in the deep waters.
(7) Is the sceptre of Immanuels kingdom a right sceptre? then see how much it concerns all the subjects of His kingdom, to endeavour to imitate their King in acting a faithful, just and righteous part in their places and stations toward Him, one another, and all with whom they have occasion to be conversant.
(8) We should be constantly upon our guard against judging rashly about any part of Christs management in His kingdom that may for the time appear unaccountable to us (Act 1:7).
2. Of trial and examination. It concerns you, therefore, to try whether you be among the true subjects of Christ or not; and if you are really so, Zions King has the throne of your hearts; He possesses the highest room there, and Satan is dethroned (Luk 11:21). You are in some measure acquainted with spiritual light and liberty.
3. Of exhortation.
(1) We exhort you who are the true subjects of Zions King to be thankful to God for erecting a kingdom of grace in the world, and particularly that He has set it up in the Gentile world (Isa 24:16).
(2) We exhort all who are yet enemies to Zions King, young and old, poor and rich, to consider the sinfulness and danger of continuing in that condition. (T. Bennet.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 6. Thy throne, O God, is for ever] kisacha Elohim olam vaed. “O God, thy throne is for ever, and eternal!” The word Elohim here is the very first term or name by which the Supreme God has made himself known to the children of men. See Ge 1:1; and this very verse the apostle, Heb 1:8, has applied to Jesus Christ. On this I shall make a very short remark, but it shall be conclusive: If the apostle did not believe Jesus Christ to be the true and eternal God, he has utterly misapplied this Scripture.
The translation in the old Psalter, and the paraphrase will, on this controverted text, be considered of some importance: Thi settil God in werld of werlde: wande of ryghtyng wande of thi kyngedome. Here he loues [celebrates] God Crist —– of dome. Thi settil of demyng and of kynges pouste. God es werld of werld for al that he demes es noght chaunged and that byfalles the, for the wande that es ceptre and the governyng of thi kyngdom es wande of ryghtyng, that ryghtes croked men this es the wand of goddes evenes that ay es ryght and never croked that reules ryghtwis men and smytes wiked men. The reader will observe a blank space between the word Crist and of dome: it is the same in the original. A word has been so carefully erased with the scalpel in the above place, that not a vestige of a letter is left. From the following words I should suspect it to have been kynge or lard. Here he praises God, Christ, king of judgment. However this may be, it is evident that this ancient commentator understood the word God to be applied to Christ. I have given the sentence as it is pointed in the original.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
O God: it is most evident that the speech is still continued to the same person, whom he calls King, Psa 45:1,11, and here
God; which change of the title was very expedient, and in some sort necessary, to give us a true understanding of this Psalm, and to assure us that he doth not speak of Solomon, (to whom neither these, nor the foregoing, nor the following words agree, because his reign was peaceable and short, and stained with many and great iniquities,) but a far greater King, even of the Messias, who is not only a man, but also the mighty God, as he is called, Isa 9:6, and as the apostle solidly proves from this place, Heb 1:8. For though the name of Elohim, or God, be sometimes given in Scripture to some creatures, yet in those cases it is always clogged with some diminishing expression, signifying that they are only made or called gods, and that only for a certain time and purpose, as is manifest from Exo 4:16; 7:1; Psa 82:6; and it is no where put simply and absolutely for any person, but him, who is God blessed for ever, Rom 9:5. Is for ever and ever, to wit, properly and in thine own person, in which as he lives for ever, so he must necessarily reign for ever; whereas David, whose throne is said to be established for ever, 2Sa 7:16, was a mortal man, and therefore that promise was not intended of, nor could be fulfilled in, his person, without including his posterity. And as he here gives to the Messias the name of God, which was never given to David nor Solomon, so he ascribes an everlasting kingdom to him in such a sense as it was never given to them. So Dan 2:44; 7:14.
The sceptre of thy kingdom is a right sceptre; it is not strange that thy throne is not liable to the same uncertainties and casualties with the thrones of earthly princes, because their sceptres are commonly managed with great injustice and manifold iniquities, which lay the foundation of their overthrow; whereas thou rulest with exact righteousness and equity, whereby thy throne is established, Pro 16:12.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
6. No lawful construction can bedevised to change the sense here given and sustained by the ancientversions, and above all by Paul (Heb1:8). Of the perpetuity of this government, compare 2Sa 7:13;Psa 10:16; Psa 72:5;Psa 89:4; Psa 110:4;Isa 9:7.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Thy throne, O God, [is] for ever and ever,…. This verse and
Ps 45:7 are cited in Heb 1:8; and applied to the Son of God, the second Person in the Trinity; and therefore are not an apostrophe to the Father, as some have said; nor will they bear to be rendered, “thy throne is the throne of God”, or “thy throne is God”; or be supplied thus, “God shall establish thy throne”. But they are spoken of the Son of God, who is truly and properly God, the true God and eternal life; as appears by the names by which he is called, as Jehovah, and the like; by his having all divine perfections in him; by the works which he has wrought, and by the worship which is given unto him; and to whom dominion is ascribed, of which the throne is an emblem,
Ge 41:40. And this his government is either general, over angels, good and bad, and over men, even wicked men, and over the greatest among men, the kings of the earth; or special, over his own church and people, and which is exercised by his Spirit and grace in them; by his word and ordinances among them; and which will be in a glorious manner in the latter day; and in heaven, though not in the same manner as now, and that to all eternity: for to this government duration for ever and ever is attributed; Christ will have no successor, he will die no more; nor can his government be subverted or taken out of his hands, or he be removed from his throne by any of his enemies, or by all of them; and though his kingdom will be delivered up to the Father, it will not cease, it is an everlasting one;
the sceptre of thy kingdom [is] a right sceptre; meaning either the Gospel, which is the golden sceptre of mercy and grace, stretched out and held forth for the encouragement of sensible sinners; and is a sceptre of righteousness, as it directs to the righteousness of Christ for justification, and encourages works of righteousness to be done by men: or rather the righteous administration of Christ’s government is meant, the sceptre being an emblem of dominion and government,
Ge 49:10.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
(Heb.: 45:7-8) In order to avoid the addressing of the king with the word Elohim, Psa 45:6 has been interpreted, (1) “Thy throne of God is for ever and ever,”, – a rendering which is grammatically possible, and, if it were intended to be expressed, must have been expressed thus (Nagelsbach, 64, g); (2) “Thy throne is God (= divine) for ever and ever;” but it cannot possibly be so expressed after the analogy of “the altar of wood = wooden” (cf. Psa 45:9), or “the time is showers of rain = rainy” (Ezr 10:13), since God is neither the substance of the throne, nor can the throne itself be regarded as a representation or figure of God: in this case the predicative Elohim would require to be taken as a genitive for , which, however, cannot possibly be supported in Hebrew by any syntax, not even by 2Ki 23:17, cf. Ges. 110, 2, b. Accordingly one might adopt the first mode of interpretation, which is also commended by the fact that the earthly throne of the theocratic king is actually called in 1Ch 29:23. But the sentence “thy throne of God is an everlasting one” sounds tautological, inasmuch as that which the predicate asserts is already implied in the subject; and we have still first of all to try whether cannot, with the lxx , , , be taken as a vocative. Now, since before everything else God’s throne is eternal (Psa 10:16; Lam 5:19), and a love of righteousness and a hatred of evil is also found elsewhere as a description of divine holiness (Psa 5:5; Psa 61:8), would be obliged to be regarded as addressed to God, if language addressed to the king did not follow with . But might by any possibility be even addressed to the king who is here celebrated? It is certainly true that the custom with the Elohim-Psalms of using Elohim as of equal dignity with Jahve is not favourable to this supposition; but the following surpassing of the by renders it possible. And since elsewhere earthly authorities are also called , Exo 21:6; Exo 22:7., Psa 82:1-8, cf. Psa 138:1, because they are God’s representatives and the bearers of His image upon earth, so the king who is celebrated in this Psalm may be all the more readily styled Elohim, when in his heavenly beauty, his irresistible doxa or glory, and his divine holiness, he seems to the psalmist to be the perfected realization of the close relationship in which God has set David and his seed to Himself. He calls him , just as Isaiah calls the exalted royal child whom he exultingly salutes in Psa 9:1-6, . He gives him this name, because in the transparent exterior of his fair humanity he sees the glory and holiness of God as having attained a salutary of merciful conspicuousness among men. At the same time, however, he guards this calling of the king by the name Elohim against being misapprehended by immediately distinguishing the God, who stands above him, from the divine king by the words “Elohim, thy God,” which, in the Korahitic Psalms, and in the Elohimic Psalms in general, is equivalent to Jahve, thy God” (Psa 43:4; 48:15; Psa 50:7); and the two words are accordingly united by Munach.
(Note: The view that the Munach is here vicarius Tiphchae anterioris (Dachselt in his Biblia Accentuata) is erroneous, vid., Accentuationssystem, xviii. 4. It is the conjunctive to , which, in Heidenheim and Baer, on the authority of the Codices, has Tiphcha anterior, not Athnach as in the editions heretofore published. The proper place for the Athnach would at first be by ; but according to Accentuationssystem, xix. 6, it cannot stand there.)
Because the king’s sceptre is a “sceptre of uprightness” (cf. Isa 11:4), because he loves righteousness and consequently ( fut. consec.) hates iniquity, therefore God, his God, has anointed him with the oil of joy (Isa 61:3; cf. on the construction Amo 6:6) above his fellows. What is intended is not the anointing to his office (cf. Psa 89:21 with Act 10:38) as a dedication to a happy and prosperous reign, but that God has poured forth upon him, more especially on this his nuptial day, a superabundant joy, both outwardly and in his spirit, such as He has bestowed upon no other king upon the face of the earth. That he rises high above all those round about him is self-evident; but even among his fellows of royal station, kings like himself, he has no equal. It is a matter of question whether the writer of the Epistle to the Hebrews (Heb 1:8) has taken the first of the expression as a vocative. Apollinaris does not seem so to have understood him; for he renders it , and the Greek expositors also take here as a nominative.
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
| Majesty and Glory of Christ. | |
6 Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever: the sceptre of thy kingdom is a right sceptre. 7 Thou lovest righteousness, and hatest wickedness: therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows. 8 All thy garments smell of myrrh, and aloes, and cassia, out of the ivory palaces, whereby they have made thee glad. 9 Kings’ daughters were among thy honourable women: upon thy right hand did stand the queen in gold of Ophir.
We have here the royal bridegroom filling his throne with judgment and keeping his court with splendour.
I. He here fills his throne with judgment. It is God the Father that says to the Son here, Thy throne, O God! is forever and ever, as appears Heb 1:8; Heb 1:9, where this is quoted to prove that he is God and has a more excellent name than the angels. The Mediator is God, else he neither would have been able to do the Mediator’s work nor fit to wear the Mediator’s crown. Concerning his government observe, 1. The eternity of it; it is for ever and ever. It shall continue on earth throughout all the ages of time, in despite of all the opposition of the gates of hell; and in the blessed fruits and consequences of it it shall last as long as the days of heaven, and run parallel with the line of eternity itself. Perhaps even then the glory of the Redeemer, and the blessedness of the redeemed, shall be in a continual infinite progression; for it is promised that not only of his government, but of the increase of his government and peace, there shall be no end (Isa. ix. 7); even when the kingdom shall be delivered up to God even the Father (1 Cor. xv. 24) the throne of the Redeemer will continue. 2. The equity of it: The sceptre of thy kingdom, the administration of thy government, is right, exactly according to the eternal counsel and will of God, which is the eternal rule and reason of good and evil. Whatever Christ does he does none of his subjects any wrong, but gives redress to those that do suffer wrong: He loves righteousness, and hates wickedness, v. 7. He himself loves to do righteousness, and hates to do wickedness; and he loves those that do righteousness, and hates those that do wickedness. By the holiness of his life, the merit of his death, and the great design of his gospel, he has made it to appear that he loves righteousness (for by his example, his satisfaction, and his precepts, he has brought in an everlasting righteousness), and that he hates wickedness, for never did God’s hatred of sin appear so conspicuously as it did in the sufferings of Christ. 3. The establishment and elevation of it: Therefore God, even thy God (Christ, as Mediator, called God his God, John xx. 17, as commissioned by him, and the head of those that are taken into covenant with him), has anointed thee with the oil of gladness. Therefore, that is, (1.) “In order to this righteous government of thine, God has given thee his Spirit, that divine unction, to qualify thee for thy undertaking,” Isa. lxi. 1. 1. The Spirit of the Lord God is upon me, because he has anointed me. What God called him to he fitted him for, Isa. xi. 2. The Spirit is called the oil of gladness because of the delight wherewith Christ was filled in carrying on his undertaking. He was anointed with the Spirit above all his fellows, above all those that were anointed, whether priests or kings. (2.) “In recompence of what thou has done and suffered for the advancement of righteousness and the destruction of sin God has anointed thee with the oil of gladness, has brought thee to all the honours and all the joys of thy exalted state.” Because he humbled himself, God has highly exalted him,Phi 2:8; Phi 2:9. His anointing him denotes the power and glory to which he is exalted; he is invested in all the dignities and authorities of the Messiah. And his anointing him with the oil of gladness denotes the joy that was set before him (so his exaltation is expressed, Heb. xii. 2) both in the light of his Father’s countenance (Acts ii. 28) and in the success of his undertaking, which he shall see, and be satisfied, Isa. liii. 11. This he is anointed with above all his fellows, above all believers, who are his brethren, and who partake of the anointing–they by measure, he without measure. But the apostle brings it to prove his pre-eminence above the angels, Psa 1:4; Psa 1:9. The salvation of sinners is the joy of angels (Luke xv. 10), but much more of the Son.
II. He keeps his court with splendour and magnificence. 1. His robes of state, wherein he appears, are taken notice of, not for their pomp, which might strike an awe upon the spectator, but their pleasantness and the gratefulness of the odours with which they were perfumed (v. 8): They smell of myrrh, aloes, and cassia (the oil of gladness with which he and his garments were anointed): these were some of the ingredients of the holy anointing oil which God appointed, the like to which was not to be made up for any common use (Exo 30:23; Exo 30:24), which was typical of the unction of the Spirit which Christ, the great high priest of our profession, received, and to which therefore there seems here to be a reference. It is the savour of these good ointments, his graces and comforts, that draws souls to him (Son 1:3; Son 1:4) and makes him precious to believers, 1 Pet. ii. 7. 2. His royal palaces are said to be ivory ones, such as were then reckoned most magnificent. We read of an ivory house that Ahab made, 1 Kings xxii. 39. The mansions of light above are the ivory palaces, whence all the joys both of Christ and believers come, and where they will be for ever in perfection; for by them he is made glad, and all that are his with him; for they shall enter into the joy of their Lord. 3. The beauties of his court shine very brightly. In public appearances at court, when the pomp of it is shown, nothing is supposed to contribute so much to it as the splendour of the ladies, which is alluded to here, v. 9. (1.) Particular believers are here compared to the ladies at court, richly dressed in honour of the sovereign: Kings’ daughters are among thy honourable women, whose looks, and mien, and ornaments, we may suppose, from the height of their extraction, to excel all others. All true believers are born from above; they are the children of the King of kings. These attend the throne of the Lord Jesus daily with their prayers and praises, which is really their honour, and he is pleased to reckon it his. The numbering of kings’ daughters among his honourable women, or maids of honour, intimates that the kings whose daughters they were should be tributaries to him and dependents on him, and would therefore think it a preferment to their daughters to attend him. (2.) The church in general, constituted of these particular believers, is here compared to the queen herself–the queen-consort, whom, by an everlasting covenant, he hath betrothed to himself. She stands at his right hand, near to him, and receives honour from him, in the richest array, in gold of Ophir, in robes woven with golden thread or with a gold chain and other ornaments of gold. This is the bride, the Lamb’s wife, whose graces, which are her ornaments, are compared to fine linen, clean and white (Rev. xix. 8), for their purity, here to gold of Ophir, for their costliness; for, as we owe our redemption, so we owe our adorning, not to corruptible things, but to the precious blood of the Son of God.
Fuente: Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary
6. Thy throne, O God! is for ever and ever. In this verse the Psalmist commends other princely virtues in Solomon, namely, the eternal duration of his throne, and then the justice and rectitude of his mode of government. The Jews, indeed, explain this passage as if the discourse were addressed to God, but such an interpretation is frivolous and impertinent. Others of them read the word אלהים, Elohim, in the genitive case, and translate it of God, thus: The throne of thy God But for this there is no foundation, and it only betrays their presumption in not hesitating to wrest the Scriptures so shamefully, that they may not be constrained to acknowledge the divinity of the Messiah. (158) The simple and natural sense is, that Solomon reigns not tyrannically, as the most of kings do, but by just and equal laws, and that, therefore, his throne shall be established for ever. Although he is called God, because God has imprinted some mark of his glory in the person of kings, yet this title cannot well be applied to a mortal man; for we nowhere read in Scripture that man or angel has been distinguished by this title without some qualification. It is true, indeed, that angels as well as judges are called collectively אלהים, Elohim, gods; but not individually, and no one man is called by this name without some word added by way of restriction, as when Moses was appointed to be a god to Pharaoh, (Exo 7:1.) From this we may naturally infer, that this psalm relates, as we shall soon see, to a higher than any earthly kingdom.
In the next verse there is set before us a fuller statement of the righteousness for which this monarch is distinguished; for we are told that he is no less strict in, the punishment of iniquity than in maintaining justice. We know how many and great evils are engendered by impunity and license in doing evil, when kings are negligent and slack in punishing crimes. Hence the old proverb, That it is better to live under a prince who gives no allowance, than under one who imposes no restraint. To the same purpose also is the well-known sentiment of Solomon,
“
He that justifieth the wicked, and he that condemneth the just, even they both are abomination to the Lord.” — (Pro 17:15)
Just and rightful government, therefore, consists of these two parts: first, That they who rule should carefully restrain wickedness; and, secondly, That they should vigorously maintain righteousness; even as Plato has well and wisely said, that civil government consists of two parts — rewards and punishments. When the Psalmist adds, that the king was anointed above his fellows, this is not to be understood as the effect or fruit of his righteousness, but rather as the cause of it: for the love of uprightness and equity by which Solomon was actuated arose from the fact, that he was divinely appointed to the kingdom. In ordaining him to the honor of authority and empire, Jehovah, at the same time, furnished him with the necessary endowments. The particle על-כם al-ken, therefore, as in the former instance, is to be understood here in the sense of because; as if it had been said, It is no wonder that Solomon is so illustrious for his love of justice, since, from the number of all his brethren, he was chosen to be consecrated king by holy anointing. Even before he was born, he was solemnly named by a divine oracle, as successor to the kingdom, and when he was elevated to the throne, he was also adorned with princely virtues. From this it follows, that anointing in respect of order preceded righteousness, and that, therefore, righteousness cannot be accounted the cause of the anointing. The royal dignity is called the oil of gladness, because of the effect of it; for the felicity and welfare of the Church depended upon the kingdom promised to the house of David. (159)
Hitherto, I have explained the text in the literal sense. But it is necessary that I should now proceed to illustrate somewhat more largely the comparison of Solomon with Christ, which I have only cursorily noticed. It would be quite sufficient for the pious and humble simply to state what is obvious, from the usual tenor of Scripture, that the posterity of David typically represented Christ to the ancient people of God; but as the Jews and other ungodly men refuse to submit cordially to the force of truth, it is of importance to show briefly from the context itself, the principal reasons from which it appears that some of the things here spoken are not applicable fully and perfectly to Solomon. As I intimated at the outset, the design of the prophet who composed this psalm was to confirm the hearts of the faithful, and to guard them against the terror and alarm with which the melancholy change that happened soon after might fill their minds. An everlasting duration, it might be said, had been promised to this kingdom, and it fell into decay after the death of one man. To this objection, therefore, the prophet replies, that although Rehoboam, who was the first successor of that glorious and powerful king, had his sovereignty reduced within narrow limits, so that a great part of the people were cut off and placed beyond the bounds of his dominion, yet that was no reason why the faith of the Church should fail; for in the kingdom of Solomon God had exhibited a type or figure of that everlasting kingdom which was still to be looked for and expected. In the first place, the name of king is ascribed to Solomon, simply by way of eminence, to teach us, that what is here said is not spoken of any common or ordinary king, but of that illustrious sovereign, whose throne God had promised should endure as long as the sun and moon continued to shine in the heavens, (Psa 72:5.) David certainly was king, and so were those who succeeded Solomon. It is necessary then to observe, that there is in this term some special significance, as if the Holy Spirit had selected this one man from all others, to distinguish him by the highest mark of sovereignty. Besides, how inconsistent would it be to commend very highly warlike valor in Solomon, who was a man of a meek and quiet disposition, and who having ascended the throne when the kingdom enjoyed tranquillity and peace, devoted himself only to the cultivation of those things that are suitable to a time of peace, and never distinguished himself by any action in battle? But, above all, no clearer testimony could be adduced of the application of this psalm to Christ, than what is here said of the eternal duration of the kingdom. There can be no doubt, that allusion is here made to the holy oracle of which I have already made mention, That as long as the sun and moon shall endure in the heavens the throne of David shall endure. Even the Jews themselves are constrained to refer this to the Messiah. Accordingly, although the prophet commenced his discourse concerning the son of David, there can be no doubt, that, guided by the Holy Spirit to a higher strain, he comprehended the kingdom of the true and everlasting Messiah. Besides, there is the name אלהים, Elohim, which it is proper to notice. It is no doubt also applied both to angels and men, but it cannot be applied to a mere man without qualification. And, therefore, the divine majesty of Christ, beyond all question, is expressly denoted here. (160)
I now proceed to notice the several parts, which however I shall only refer to briefly in passing. We have said that while this song is called a love song, or wedding song, stilldivine instruction is made to hold the most prominent place in it, lest our imaginations should lead us to regard it as referring to some lascivious and carnal amours. We know also, that in the same sense Christ is called “the perfection of beauty;” not that there was any striking display of it in his countenance, as some men grossly imagine, but because he was distinguished by the possession of singular gifts and graces, in which he far excelled all others. Nor is it an unusual style of speaking, that what is spiritual in Christ should be described under the form of earthly figures. The kingdom of Christ, it is said, shall be opulent; and in addition to this it is said, that it shall attain to a state of great glory, such as we see where there is great prosperity and vast power. In this description there is included also abundance of pleasures. Now, there is nothing of all this that applies literally to the kingdom of Christ, which is separated from the pomps of this world. But as it was the design of the prophets to adapt their instruction to the capacity of God’s ancient people, so in describing the kingdom of Christ, and the worship of God which ought to be observed in it, they employ figures taken from the ceremonies of the Law. If we bear in mind this mode of statement, in accordance with which such descriptions are made, there will no longer be any obscurity in this passage. It is also deserving of our notice, that, after the Psalmist has commended this heavenly king for his eloquence, he also describes him as armed with his sword. As, on the one hand, he governs by the influence of persuasion, those who willingly submit to his authority, and manifest docility of disposition; so, on the other hand, as there have been in all ages, and will continue to be, many who are rebellious and disobedient, it is necessary that the unbelieving should be made to feel in their own destruction that Christ has not come unarmed. While, therefore, he, is alluring us with meekness and kindness to himself, let us promptly and submissively yield to his authority, lest he should fall upon us, armed as he is with his sword and with deadly arrows. It is said, indeed, with much propriety, that grace is poured into his lips; for the Gospel, in its very nature, breathes the odour of life: but if we are stubborn and rebellious, this grace will become a ground of terror, and Christ himself will convert the very doctrine of his salvation into a sword and arrows against us. From this also there arises no small consolation to us, that the multitude and insolence of the adversaries of Christ may not discourage us. We know well with what arrogance the Papists reject Jesus Christ, whom, nevertheless, they boast to be their King; we know also with what profane contempt the greater part of the world deride him, and how frowardly the Turks and Jews reproach him. In the midst of such disorder, let us remember this prophecy, That Christ has no want of a sword and arrows to overthrow and destroy his enemies. Here I will again briefly repeat what I have noticed above, namely, that however much the Jews endeavor by their cavillings to pervert the sense of this verse, Thy throne, O God! is for ever and ever, yet it is sufficient of itself to establish the eternal divinity of Christ: for when the name אלהים, Elohim is ascribed either to angels or men, some other mark is at the same time usually added, to distinguish between them and the only true God; but here it is applied to Christ, simply and without any qualification. It is of importance, however, to notice, that Christ is here spoken of as he is
“
God manifested in the flesh,” — (1Ti 3:16.)
He is also called God, as he is the Word, begotten of the Father before all worlds; but he is here set forth in the character of Mediator, and on this account also mention is made of him a little after, as being subject to God. And, indeed, if you limit to his divine nature what is here said of the everlasting duration of his kingdom, we shall be deprived of the inestimable benefit which redounds to us from this doctrine, when we learn that, as he is the head of the Church, the author and protector of our welfare, he reigns not merely for a time, but possesses an endless sovereignty; for from this we derive our greatest confidence both in life and in death. From the following verse also it clearly appears, that Christ is here exhibited to us in the character of Mediator; for he is said to have been anointed of God, yea, even above his fellows, (Isa 42:1; Heb 2:17.) This, however, cannot apply to the eternal Word of God, but to Christ in the flesh, and in this character he is both the servant of God and our brother.
(158) See Appendix.
(159) “ Promis a la maison de David.” — Fr.
(160) It is somewhat strange, after making the above observations, that Calvin should consider this beautiful psalm as referring primarily to Solomon, and to his marriage with the daughter of Pharaoh. That this is an epithalamium or nuptial song, is readily admitted; but that it refers to the nuptials of Solomon with Pharaoh’s daughter, there seems no just ground for concluding. If Solomon could not be described as “fairer than the children of men,” as “a mighty warrior,” as “a victorious conqueror,” as “a prince, whose throne is for ever and ever;” — if the name “God” could not be applied to him; — if it could not be said that his “children,” in the room of their father, were made princes in all the earth,” (verse 16;) that “his name” “would be remembered in all generations,” and that “the people would praise him for ever and ever,” (verse 17;) — if these things could not be spoken of him without much incongruity, it may well be doubted whether the primary application of this psalm is to him. Besides, although Solomon was a type of Christ, he was not so in all things, and there is nothing in this poem, nor in any other part of Scripture, which can lead us to regard the marriage of this prince with the daughter of Pharaoh as an image or type of the mystical marriage of Jesus Christ to the Church. We therefore agree with Rosenmüller, that “the notion of Rudinger and Grotius,” and other critics, “that this song is an epithalamium — a song in celebration of the marriage of Solomon, and his chief wife, the daughter of Pharaoh, (1Kg 3:5,) is altogether to be abandoned;” and that it applies exclusively to the Messiah, and to the mystical union between him and his Church; set forth in an allegory borrowed from the manners of an Eastern court, and under the image of conjugal love, he being represented as the bridegroom, and the Church as his bride. — See Appendix.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(6) Thy throne, O God, is for ever and ever.This is the rendering of the LXX., Vulg., and of the versions generally. But whether they supposed the words to be addressed to the Divine Being, or that the theocratic king is thus styled, is uncertain. The Christian use of the verse as applied to the Messiah (Heb. 1:8, Note, New Testament Commentary) does not help us to explain how the monarch, who is the poets theme here, could be addressed as God. The use of Elohm in Psa. 82:6; Psa. 97:7, Exo. 22:28, hardly offers a satisfactory parallel, and even 1Sa. 28:13 (where we should render, I saw a god, &c) hardly prepares us to find such an emphatic ascription to an earthly king, especially in an Elohistic psalm. Two alternative renderings present themselves(1) Thy throne of God is for ever . . . i.e., thy divine throne. (Comp. Psa. 31:2, thy refuge of strength.) (2) Thy throne is of God for ever, which is grammatically preferable, and with which may be compared 1Ch. 29:23, the throne of the Lord.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
6, 7. From the king in war, (Psa 45:3-5,) the poet now turns to the king in peace his rank and the quality and perpetuity of his government.
Thy throne, O God The title “God,” , could apply to Solomon only in the theocratic sense, as the representative of God, or, as Calvin says, “because God hath imprinted some mark of his glory in kings,” and thus the same title is sometimes used. Exo 7:1; Psa 81:1; Psa 81:6, compare Joh 10:34. But the historic view falls far into the background, and the language passes clearly into the typically prophetic, as quoted in Heb 1:8, where see note. Messiah, not Solomon, is now the theme.
God, thy God This, as Perowne says, makes a distinct personality of this theocratic king from God himself. The pronoun refers to Messiah, the perpetuity of whose throne is for ever and ever, or to eternity and eternity, applying to David’s throne only as a type, 2Sa 7:16, Psa 89:36, and as it merges and reappears in Christ.
Act 2:30. The terms right, righteousness, hatest wickedness, are characteristic of the king and government, and are a pledge that sin will be punished and obedience lovingly rewarded two elements of all perfect government and of the gospel kingdom. Joh 3:35-36; 2Th 1:7-10.
Anointed thee with the oil of gladness Not as a coronation ceremony, but as a token of joy and the reward of a righteous administration, as the therefore, stating the reason of this anointing, and the past tense of the verbs, indicate.
Fellows Thy companions, associates. See this fulfilled in Solomon, 1Ki 3:12; 1Ki 4:30-31; and in Christ, Eph 1:20-22; Php 2:9
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
From the description of the King’s majesty the writer now turns to a hymn of praise and worship.
v. 6. Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever, v. 7. Thou lovest righteousness and hatest wickedness, v. 8. All Thy garments smell of myrrh and aloes and cassia, v. 9. King’s daughters were among Thy honorable women,
Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann
Psa 45:6. Thy throne, O God, &c. In Heb 1:8 this verse is immediately applied to Christ. The word here rendered God, is elohim, in the plural; concerning which, see the note on the 1st verse of the 1st chapter of Genesis. In agreement with this verse, St. Paul says of him, that He is over all, God blessed for ever, Rom 9:5 and we are told, Luk 1:33 that of his kingdom there shall be no end. The sceptre of his kingdom is a right sceptre; i.e. “His laws are all righteous and good.” It is translated by Houbigant and others, A sceptre of equity.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Here we find Christ returned from the holy war, and sat down on the seat of the Conqueror. And we have God the Father speaking to this glorious Mediator, this triumphant king in Zion, and declaring the eternity and righteousness of his kingdom. Reader, do not forget, in this view of the Lord Jesus, that what is here said of him, and to him, is as Mediator: not as God only, but as God in Christ; the union of the manhood with the Godhead, to whom, as Jesus said himself, all power is given, in heaven and in earth; Mat 28:18 . It is of unspeakable importance to preserve alive in the mind this view of Christ’s throne: the felicity, salvation, and everlasting welfare of the whole Church, depends upon it: Rev 3:21 . And observe what a confirmation of this blessed truth we have in what follows: He loved righteousness, and hated iniquity. Of whom but the One chosen out of the people is this declared, to whom God spake in vision, even his Holy One, Christ as Man, as well as Christ as God? for it is by the union of both in one person; that he is Christ. Psa 89:19 . Hence the Spirit, which was given, not by measure, unto him, was poured out upon him above, or for, his fellows; also, that he might be the first born among many brethren, and in all things might have the pre eminence. What blessed scriptures these are, and how sweetly do they illustrate and explain each other! Hence, in this light, thus beholding Christ as the Mediator; is it to be considered, and in no other could it be said, that God is his God, from whom this anointing came, who hath set him as his King in Zion, and as a Priest upon his throne, and as the Prophet of his people. Joh 3:34 ; Exo 3:22Exo 3:22 ; Psa 133:2 ; Rom 8:29 ; Col 1:18 ; Psa 2:6 ; Zec 6:13 ; Deu 18:15 ; 1Sa 2:35 ; Act 3:22 .
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Psa 45:6 Thy throne, O God, [is] for ever and ever: the sceptre of thy kingdom [is] a right sceptre.
Ver. 6. Thy throne, O God ] Here the prophet directeth his speech not to Solomon (who never took upon him the name of God, as did Sesostris, king of Egypt, Antiochus Y , Caligula, and some other proud princes), but to Christ, Heb 1:8 , who is God, blessed for ever, , not so called by an excellence only, as the angels are, Psa 8:5 Heb 2:1-9 , nor by office and title only, as magistrates are gods, Psa 82:6 , nor catachrestically and ironically so called, as the heathen gods, nor a diminutive god, inferior to the Father, as Arius held, but God by nature, every way co-essential, co-eternal, and co-equal with the Father and the Holy Ghost, Joh 1:1 Phi 2:6 1Jn 5:20 . Hold this fast; for it is the rock, Mat 16:16 ; it is of the very foundation; so that if we believe it not there is no heaven to be had, 1Jn 5:20 . As for his kingly office here described, it belongeth to him as Mediator, and what is here spoken of him is to be understood of his whole person; for so is he Head of the Church, and King of Israel, for ever.
The sceptre of thy kingdom, &c.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Psa 45:6-9
6Your throne, O God, is forever and ever;
A scepter of uprightness is the scepter of Your kingdom.
7You have loved righteousness and hated wickedness;
Therefore God, Your God, has anointed You
With the oil of joy above Your fellows.
8All Your garments are fragrant with myrrh and aloes and cassia;
Out of ivory palaces stringed instruments have made You glad.
9Kings’ daughters are among Your noble ladies;
At Your right hand stands the queen in gold from Ophir.
Psa 45:6-9 Here again is a strophe that addresses both YHWH and His royal representative in a unified way.
Psa 45:6
NASB, NKJV,
NRSV, LXXYour throne, O God
NRSV marginYour throne is a throne of God
TEVThe kingdom that God has given you
NJBYour throne is from God
JPSOA, RSVYour divine throne
REBGod has enthroned you
NEBYour throne is like God’s throne
You can see from the variety of translations that the Hebrew text is uncertain (JPSOA footnote). In a monotheistic (see SPECIAL TOPIC: MONOTHEISM ) OT context this cannot be asserting deity to the King, but it is asserting that all the King is and has comes from his relationship to YHWH. The King is YHWH’s earthly representative, as is the High Priest (cf. Zechariah 4).
YHWH’s throne (cf. 1Ch 29:23; Lam 5:19) is forever (cf. Psa 93:2; see SPECIAL TOPIC: FOREVER (OLAM) . The King’s throne is for a lifetime. The Messiah is the special coming King (see SPECIAL TOPIC: OT TITLES OF THE SPECIAL COMING ONE ). This phrase has one connotation in the OT and a fuller one in the NT!
Psa 45:7 One wonders if this is royal hyperbole or this Psalm truly addressed a godly King. If it is addressed to Ahab, it is royal hyperbole; if Solomon, it was true at first but not later; if David it was true at first and at last but not during his sinning period (i.e., Bathsheba, Uriah).
We must always be careful of attributing God’s blessing based on human performance. God anointed the King for His own purposes of redemption and revelation (see SPECIAL TOPIC: YHWH’s ETERNAL REDEMPTIVE PLAN ).
One last thought, Psa 45:7 shows clearly that Psa 45:6 is not attributing deity to an Israeli king. Heb 1:8-9 sees it as a Davidic royal typology!
As YHWH loves righteousness (cf. Psa 11:7; Psa 33:5), so too, should His earthly representative, the Israeli king (i.e., His anointed, cf. Psa 2:2).
Psa 45:8
NASB, NKJV,
NRSVcassia
TEV, NJB,
REB omits word
This spice (BDB 893 I) is mentioned only here in the OT. It may refer to a cinnamon fragrance.
Psa 45:9 Does this verse imply that at the current wedding there were already
1. royal daughters
2. other wives/concubines
3. a Queen (rare word, BDB 993, cf. Neh 2:6)
Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley
Thy throne, O God. Quoted in Heb 1:8, Heb 1:9. Several attempts are made by certain commentators to get rid of this reference to Christ’s Godhead; but not only would Heb 1:8, Heb 1:9 have to go, but Isa 9:6, and Jer 23:6; Jer 33:16 as well.
kingdom. Compare Psa 20:21, Psa 20:24. Luk 1:31-33, &c.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Psa 45:6-7
Psa 45:6-7
“Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever:
The sceptre of equity is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
Thou hast loved righteousness, and hated wickedness:
Therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee
With the oil of gladness above thy fellows.”
We have no respect for the devices which men use in order to soften these words, or change their meaning. We know what the meaning is, because the inspired author of the Book of Hebrews has told us. The Hebrew passage reads:
“Who maketh his angels winds,
And his ministers a flame of fire:
But of the Son he saith,
Thy throne, O God, is forever and ever;
And the sceptre of uprightness is the sceptre of thy kingdom.
Thou hast loved righteousness and hated iniquity;
Therefore God, thy God hath anointed thee
With the oil of gladness above thy fellows” (Heb 1:8-9).
In this New Testament passage, the inspired writer quotes from this 45th psalm, affirming that it speaks of “The Son,” namely, the Christ, the Son of God; and the feeble voice of unbelievers denying the truth of this is of no significance whatever. Christians who allow so-called `scholars’ to pervert the meaning of this passage are making the same mistake that Eve made when she allowed Satan to explain God’s Word to her.
Some have tried to make the passage here mean, merely, that “God’s throne is forever and ever”; but as Rhodes pointed out, “The poet here uses the word God as he addresses the king. Of course, Rhodes went on to add that, “This does not mean that the poet regarded him literally as God.” However, the author of Hebrews affirms that such was indeed his actual meaning; and we have no doubt whatever that the author of Hebrews was correct. The King addressed prophetically here is Christ; and he had every right to be called “God.” Indeed Christ is called by that title no less than twelve times in the New Testament.
“Therefore God, thy God, hath anointed thee with the oil of gladness above thy fellows” (Psa 45:7). This is a second time that Christ is prophetically addressed here as God. It is not true that “thy God” is merely a parenthesis; no such parenthesis was necessary to explain the identity of God, there being only one. Therefore, the first God here is a direct address to the Messiah, prophetically.
And this anointing? What is that? It is a reference to the anointing of Christ with the Holy Spirit upon the occasion of his baptism, when the Spirit of God in the form of a dove descended, alighted upon him, and remained. This interpretation derives from the typical anointing oil which was used in the case of Aaron the High Priest.
If this Glorious One loves righteousness and hates iniquity, “It is because God has anointed him with the oil of Gladness”; and, of course, there was never any `oil’ that could do such a thing. It refers to the Holy Spirit which was typified by the oil that anointed Aaron.
E.M. Zerr:
Psa 45:6-7. Again the Spirit saw such a likeness between David’s personal experiences or circumstances and those to happen to Christ, that a noted prophecy of the latter was dictated to the psalmist. This paragraph is quoted in Heb 1:8-9 and applied to Christ. He is here referred to by the name of God because that is the family name and he is a member of the divine family. It is a prophecy of the eternal character of his kingdom, and the same that is predicted in Dan 2:44. A scepter is a sort of baton or rod that a king on the throne holds, somewhat after the manner of a judge’s gavel. It indicates authority to call a session to order and then preside. In the present case the scepter was held rightfully because the ruler not only loved righteousness but had hated wickedness. Oil of gladness is a figurative expression. In ancient times it was a custom to pour olive oil on the head of a person who was to become a ruler or other important public servant. Olive oil was the sole material for artificial light, and the pouring of it over the head of a prospective ruler signified that he was endowed with the light of truth so that he could administer his office efficiently. When oil is referred to figuratively it means the person is showered upon with special favors resulting in his feeling of gladness.
Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary
throne: Psa 89:29, Psa 89:36, Psa 89:37, Psa 93:2, Psa 145:13, Dan 2:44, Luk 1:32, Luk 1:33, Heb 1:8
O God: Isa 9:6, Isa 9:7, Jer 23:5, Jer 23:6, Joh 1:1, 1Ti 3:16
the sceptre: Psa 72:1-20, 2Sa 23:4, Jer 33:15, Jer 33:16, Rev 19:11
Reciprocal: Num 24:17 – a Sceptre 2Sa 7:16 – General 2Sa 8:15 – David executed 1Ki 10:18 – a great throne Psa 2:6 – Yet Psa 8:5 – hast Psa 9:4 – right Psa 37:28 – loveth Psa 45:11 – Lord Psa 47:8 – throne Psa 72:2 – He shall Psa 89:14 – Justice Psa 97:2 – righteousness Psa 99:4 – strength Psa 110:1 – until Psa 145:11 – the glory Pro 16:10 – A divine sentence Isa 11:4 – But with Isa 32:1 – king Isa 42:6 – called Lam 5:19 – thy throne Eze 1:26 – the likeness of a Dan 7:14 – an everlasting Zec 9:9 – he is Zec 12:8 – the house Joh 8:16 – yet Joh 20:28 – My Lord Act 10:36 – he is Rom 9:5 – who is Eph 4:24 – righteousness Phi 2:9 – God 1Ti 1:17 – the King Rev 12:10 – the kingdom
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Psa 45:6. Thy throne, O God, &c. It is evident that the speech is still continued to the same person whom he calls king, Psa 45:1; Psa 45:11; and here God, to assure us that he doth not speak of Solomon, but of a far greater king, who is not only a man, but the mighty God, Isa 9:6. For though the name Elohim, or God, be sometimes given in Scripture to some creatures, yet, in those cases, it is always clogged with some diminishing expression, signifying that they are only made, or called gods, and that only for a certain time and purpose; (see Exo 4:16; Exo 7:1; Psa 82:6; and it is nowhere put simply and absolutely for any person but him, who is God, blessed for ever, Rom 9:5. Is for ever and ever Namely, properly, and in thine own person, in which, as he lives for ever, so he must necessarily reign for ever; whereas David, whose throne was said to be established for ever, 2Sa 7:16, was a mortal man, and therefore that promise was not intended of, nor could be fulfilled in, his person, without including his seed, and especially the Messiah. And, as he here gives to the Messiah the name of God, which was never given to David nor Solomon, so he ascribes an everlasting kingdom to him, in such a sense as was never given to them. So Dan 2:44; Dan 7:14. The sceptre of thy kingdom is a right sceptre The sceptres of earthly princes are often swayed with great injustice and manifold iniquities, which lay the foundation of their overthrow; but thou rulest with exact righteousness and equity, and therefore thy throne is established, Pro 16:12.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
45:6 Thy {e} throne, O God, [is] for ever and ever: the sceptre of thy kingdom [is] a right sceptre.
(e) Under this figure of this kingdom of justice is set forth the everlasting kingdom of Christ.
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
The writer addressed his human king as "God" (Elohim). He did not mean that the king was God but that he stood in the place of God and represented Him. Compare Exo 21:6; Exo 22:8-9; and Psa 82:1 where the biblical writers called Israel’s judges gods because they represented God. [Note: See also ibid., p. 266, n. 17.] This is an extravagant expression of praise for the king. God had blessed this king because he had represented the Lord faithfully by ruling as Yahweh does. God had given the king a double anointing, the writer affirmed. He had made him king, and He had blessed him with great joy as king.
The writer of the Epistle to the Hebrews used these verses to point out the superiority of the Son of God to the angels (Heb 1:5-7). He also used them to argue for the exaltation and righteous rule of Jesus Christ (Heb 1:8-9). He viewed the anointing not so much as an event (Mat 3:16-17) as the permanent state of the King (Isa 11:1-2). He viewed these verses as prophetic of the eternal rule of David’s greatest Son (cf. Psa 45:6). What the writer of the psalm said of his king will happen when Jesus Christ returns to earth and sets up His kingdom that will endure forever.