Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Ecclesiastes 5:6
Suffer not thy mouth to cause thy flesh to sin; neither say thou before the angel, that it [was] an error: wherefore should God be angry at thy voice, and destroy the work of thine hands?
6. Suffer not thy mouth to cause thy flesh to sin ] The “mouth” may refer either to the thoughtless utterance of the rash vow, such as that of Jephthah (Jdg 11:30) or Saul (1Sa 14:24), or to the appetite which leads the man who has made a vow, say of the Nazarite type, to indulge in the drink or food which he had bound himself to renounce. The former meaning seems more in harmony with the context. The latter clause is translated by many Commentators to bring punishment (the expiation for sin) upon thy flesh, but the A.V. is probably correct. The “flesh” stands as in Gen 6:3; Psa 78:39, and in New Testament language (Rom 7:18; Rom 7:25), for the corrupt sensuous element in man’s nature. The context forbids the extension of the precept to sins of speech in general, as in the wider teaching of Jas 3:1-12.
neither say thou before the angel ] The words have been taken by most Jewish and some Christian interpreters as referring to the “angel” in the strict sense of the term, who was believed in Rabbinic traditions to preside over the Temple or the altar, and who, it is assumed, would punish the evasion of the vow on the frivolous excuse that it had been spoken inconsiderately. 1Co 11:13 and 1Ti 5:21 are referred to as illustrations of the same thought. This interpretation, however, seems scarcely in harmony with the generally Hellenised tone of the book, and in Hag 1:13 and Mal 2:7 we have distinct evidence that the term had come to be applied to prophets and priests, as in 2Co 8:23 and Rev 1:20 it is used of ministers in the Christian Church, and this, it is obvious, gives a tenable, and, on the whole, a preferable meaning. The man comes to the priest with an offering less in value than he had vowed, or postpones the fulfilment of his vow indefinitely, and using the technical language of Num 15:25, explains that the vow had been made in ignorance, and therefore that he was not bound to fulfil it to the letter. Other commentators again (Grtz) look on the word as describing a subordinate officer of the Temple.
wherefore should God be angry at thy voice ] The question is in form like those of Ezr 4:22; Ezr 7:23, and is rhetorically more emphatic than a direct assertion. The words are a more distinct assertion of a Divine Government seen in earthly rewards and punishments than the book has as yet presented. The vow made, as was common, to secure safety or prosperity, could have no other result than loss and, it might be, ruin, if it were vitiated from the first by a rashness which took refuge in dishonesty.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Suffer not thy mouth … – i. e., Do not make rash vows which may hereafter be the cause of evasion and prevarication, and remain unfulfilled.
Before the angel – The Septuagint and some other versions render before the face of God, meaning a spiritual being representing the presence of God, a minister of divine justice Exo 23:21, such a one as inflicted judgment upon David 2Sa 24:17. Others, with less probability, understand the angel to be a priest, and refer to Mal 2:7.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Verse 6. Neither say thou before the angel, that it was an error] Nor think of saying “before the cruel angel, who shall exercise authority over thee in the judgment of the great day, that thou didst it through ignorance.” – Chaldee. I believe by the angel nothing else is intended than the priest, whose business it was to take cognizance of vows and offerings. See Le 5:4-5. In Mal 2:7, the priest is called the “angel of the Lord of hosts.”
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Suffer not thy mouth, by uttering any rash or foolish vow.
Thy flesh, i. e. thyself, the word flesh being oft put for the whole man, as Gen 6:12; Isa 40:5; Rom 3:20, &c. And it seems to have some emphasis here, and to intimate either,
1. That such vows were made upon fleshly or carnal, and not upon spiritual and religious motives. Or rather,
2. That the flesh or corrupt nature of man, which is oft called flesh, was exceeding prone to set itself at ease and liberty from such bonds, and to neglect the chargeable duties of religion.
The angel; either,
1. The blessed angels, the singular number being put for the plural, who are present in the public assemblies in which these vows were generally paid, Psa 66:13, where they observe both the matter and manner of mens religious performances, as appears from 1Co 11:10, who as they rejoice in the conversion of a sinner, Luk 15:10, so are displeased with the sins of men, and especially such as are committed in or against the worship of God. Or,
2. Christ, who in the Old Testament is frequently called an angel, as hath been oft noted before, and the Angel of the covenant, Mal 3:1 because even then he acted as Gods messenger, appearing and speaking to the patriarchs and prophets in his Fathers name, as a prosignification of his future incarnation, and who is and was in a special manner present in all religious assemblies; and being omniscient and omnipresent, exactly knew and observed all the vows which men made, and whether they did perform or violate them. Or rather,
3. The priest or minister of holy things, who was to require of the people the payment of their vows, to whom all sacrifices for sins of ignorance or errors about vows or other things were to be brought, Lev 5:4,5. For such persons are oft called angels, or, as this Hebrew word is commonly rendered, messengers, as Job 33:23; Mal 2:7; Rev 1:20. And this title seems to be given to the priest here, not without some emphasis, because the vow made to God was paid to the priest as one standing and acting in Gods name and stead, and it belonged to the priest, as Gods angel or ambassador, to discharge persons from their vows when there was just occasion so to do.
That it was an error; I did foolishly and unadvisedly in making such a vow, and therefore I hope God will excuse me, and instead of that which I had vowed, accept of a sacrifice for my ignorance, according to the law for sins of ignorance, Lev 4:2; 5:15; Num 15:26.
Wherefore should God be angry, why wilt thou provoke God to anger, at thy voice? either,
1. At the vows which thou hast hastily uttered with thy mouth, as he said above. Or rather,
2. At these frivolous excuses, wherewith thou deludest thy own conscience, and vainly imaginest that thou canst deceive God himself.
Destroy the work of thine hands; blast all thy contrivances, and labours, and estate gotten by thy labours, and particularly that work or enterprise for the success whereof thou didst make these vows, which being, as thou thinkest, finished, thou refusest to pay thy vows; but know that God can quickly undo that which thou hast done, and plentifully repay thine indignities and injuries offered to him into thine own bosom.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
6. thy fleshVow not with “thymouth” a vow (for example, fasting), which the lusts of theflesh (“body,” Ec 2:3,Margin) may tempt thee to break (Pr20:25).
angelthe “messenger”of God (Job 33:23); minister(Re 1:20); that is, the priest(Mal 2:7) “before”whom a breach of a vow was to be confessed (Lev 5:4;Lev 5:5). We, Christians, in ourvows (for example, at baptism, the Lord’s Supper, c.) vow in thepresence of Jesus Christ, “the angel of the covenant” (Mal3:1), and of ministering angels as witnesses (1Co 11:101Ti 5:21). Extenuate not anybreach of them as a slight error.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Suffer not thy mouth to cause thy flesh to sin,…. That is, himself, who is corrupt and depraved; either by making a rash vow, which it is not in his power to keep; or such is the corruption of his nature, and the weakness of the flesh, that he cannot keep it; or by making sinful excuses after he has made the vow, and so is guilty of lying, or false swearing, or other sins of the flesh. Jarchi by “flesh” understands his children, on whom his iniquity may be visited and punished; and the Targum interprets this punishment of the judgment or condemnation of hell; see Pr 20:25;
neither say thou before the angel that it [was] an error; that it was done ignorantly and through mistake: that it was not intended, and that this was not the meaning of the vow; and therefore desires to be excused performing it, or to offer a sacrifice in lieu of it. Interpreters are divided about the angel before whom such an excuse should not be made. Some think angel is put for angels in general, in whose presence, and before whom, as witnesses, vows are made; and who were signified by the cherubim in the sanctuary, where they were to be performed, and who are present in the worshipping assemblies of saints, where these things are done, 1Ti 5:21; others think the guardian angel is meant, which they suppose every man has; and others that Christ, the Angel of the covenant, is designed, who is in the midst of his people, sees and knows all that is done by them, and will not admit of their excuses; but it is most probable the priest is intended, called the angel, or messenger, of the Lord of hosts, Mal 2:7; to whom such who had made vows applied to be loosed from them, acknowledging their error in making them; or to offer sacrifice for their sin of ignorance, Le 5:4;
wherefore should God be angry at thy voice; either in making a rash and sinful vow, or in excusing that which was made;
and destroy the work of thine hands? wrought with success, for which the vow was made; and so, instead of its succeeding, is destroyed, and comes to nothing. Vows made by the Jews were chiefly about their houses, or fields, or cattle; see Le 27:28; and so the destruction suggested may signify the curse that God would bring upon any of these, for excusing or not performing the vow made.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
(6) The angel.It has been proposed to translate this word the messenger, or ambassador of God, and understand the priest (see Mal. 2:7); and it has been regarded as one of the notes of later date in this book that the word should be used in such a sense. But even in the passage of Malachi there is no trace that the word angel had then become an ordinary name for the priest, such as would be intelligible if used in that sense without explanation from the context. Neither, again, is there reason for supposing that the priest had power to dispense with vows alleged to have been rashly undertaken. The power given him (Leviticus 27) is of a different nature. I therefore adhere to the obvious sense, which suggests that the real vow is observed and recorded by a heavenly angel. It falls in with this view that the phrase is before the angel. If an excuse pleaded to a priest was intended, we should have, Say not thou to the priest.
Error.The word is that which describes sins of ignorance (Numbers 15). The tacit assumption in this verse, that God interposes to punish when His name is taken in vain, clearly expresses the writers real conviction, and shows that such a verse as Ecc. 9:2 is only the statement of a speculative difficulty.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
6. Suffer not to sin Allusion is made to keeping negative vows. A promise to abstain from any kind of meat or drink, if broken, brings sin upon the body; as when the eye is evil the whole body is full of darkness. One is here reminded of the sin of our first parents.
Neither say thou before the angel The Jews believed in the existence of vast numbers of angels. Of these, seven were archangels: Michael, the guardian of the Jewish people; Raphael, the angel of health; Gabriel, the messenger; Uriel, Phanuel, Raguel, and Sarakiel. They reckoned twenty-four elders or angels of the privy council, seventy angels of the council, and innumerable inferior ones. Wherever God was, angels attended him. So in his temple an angel watched the altar, and to this one the reference is here made. One is not to take a vow and afterward go back to the altar and claim that it was made by mistake and so not binding.
Thy voice Equivalent to thy idle talk. The displeasure of God was on several occasions mentioned in the Old Testament, manifested by destroying the work of the transgressor.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Ecc 5:6. Suffer not thy mouth to cause thy flesh to sin, &c. Let not thy mouth weakly excuse thee to no purpose, and do not say before the messenger [who is sent to require from thee what thou hast vowed] it was a mistake. Solomon advises any man who has made a vow to accomplish it, and not to look for excuses and pretences in order to avoid paying that debt. The motive he suggests to support this advice, viz. that the non-payment might be the means of kindling God’s wrath against a perjured man, is very proper; for there was a special law (Deu 23:21.) against any one who was slack in paying a vow; and such a man was particularly threatened with the anger of the Almighty. Every critic knows, that the word angel is literally the name of an office. , malak, is as often applied to men, as to those spiritual beings whom we call angels, and means a messenger. Now, as the priests kept a servant to levy their share out of the offering of the people, 1Sa 2:13-16 and as they were greatly concerned in seeing the vows punctually paid; it is probable that they kept messengers also to go and summon those whom they knew to have vowed any thing the payment of which would be profitable to them. I do not know but that an employment which we find in after-times established in the synagogues, without knowing when it began, might be the same in the main which is here alluded to. The Jews, who scrupled to handle money on the sabbath-day, used to bind themselves on that day to an officer sent by the rulers of the synagogue, to give such or such sum for alms, and that officer received the sum from them the next day. This conjecture is the more probable, as that officer, who was the chazan, or minister of the synagogue, is sometimes styled shaliach tsibbur, the messenger of the synagogue. Desvoeux. Archbishop Tillotson understands the passage in the general acceptation. The reader will find his sense of it in his 75th Sermon, on good angels.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Ecc 5:6 Suffer not thy mouth to cause thy flesh to sin; neither say thou before the angel, that it [was] an error: wherefore should God be angry at thy voice, and destroy the work of thine hands?
Ver. 6. Suffer not thy mouth to cause thy flesh to sin. ] Heb., Nec des, Give not liberty to thy mouth, which of itself is so apt to overflow and run riot in sinful and superfluous language. Rein it in therefore, and lay laws upon it, lest it “cause thy flesh to sin,” thyself to become a sinner against thine own soul. Say to it in this case, as Christ did to those Pharisees in the gospel, “Why temptest thou me, thou hypocrite?” or as the witch said to Saul, that sought to her, “Wherefore layest thou a snare for my life, to cause me to die?” 1Sa 28:9 Shall my prayer become sin, and my religious vows, through non-payment, a cause of a curse? Psa 109:7 When thou art making such an ill bargain, say to thy mouth, as Boaz said to his kinsman, “At what time thou buyest it, thou must have Ruth with it”; Rth 4:5 so thou must have God’s curse with it – for that is the just hire of the least sin, Rom 6:23 how much more of thy crimson crime! And let thy mouth answer, No, I may not do it; I shall mar and spoil a better inheritance; I shall anger the angel of the covenant, who, if his wrath be kindled, yea, but a little, “he will not pardon my transgression, for God’s name is in him,” Exo 23:21 who, as he is pater miserationum, “the Father of mercies,” so he is Deus ultionum, “the God of recompenses.” Psa 94:1 True it is that anger is not properly in God; “Fury is not in me”; Isa 27:4 but because he chides and smites for sin, as angry men use to do, therefore is anger here and elsewhere attributed to him, that men may stand in awe and not sin, since sin and punishment are linked together with chains of adamant.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
to cause, &c. : by vows made concerning the flesh, such as eating and drinking, marrying, &c.
angel = messenger. Compare Mal 2:7.
error. Hebrew. shagag. App-44.
wherefore . . . ? Figure of speech Erotesis. App-6.
voice. Put by Figure of speech Metonymy (of Cause), App-6, for the vain words uttered by it; referring to Ecc 5:1.
destroy = confiscate.
work. Aramaean, Septuagint, and Vulg, read “works” (plural)
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
angel
(See Scofield “Heb 1:4”)
Fuente: Scofield Reference Bible Notes
thy mouth: Ecc 5:1, Ecc 5:2, Jam 1:26, Jam 3:2
before: Or, “before the messenger,” hammalach, the priest whose business it was to take cognizance of vows and offerings. Lev 5:4, Lev 5:5, Gen 48:16, Hos 12:4, Hos 12:5, Mal 2:7, Mal 3:1, Act 7:30-35, 1Co 11:10, 1Ti 5:21, Heb 1:14
it was: Lev 5:4-6, Lev 27:9, Lev 27:10
destroy: Hag 1:9-11, Hag 2:14-17, 1Co 3:13-15, 2Jo 1:8
Reciprocal: Jos 9:18 – had sworn Job 31:30 – mouth Pro 10:17 – erreth Pro 15:28 – heart
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Ecc 5:6. Suffer not thy mouth By any rash vow, or in any other way; to cause thy flesh to sin That is, thyself: the word flesh being often put for the whole man; neither say thou before the angel That is, as some interpret the expression, before the blessed angels, (the singular number being put for the plural,) who are present in the public assemblies, in which these vows were generally paid, (Psa 66:13,) where they observe mens religious performances, (1Co 11:10,) and, as they rejoice in the conversion of a sinner, so are displeased with the sins of men. Or, 2d, Christ may be meant, the Angel of the covenant, as he is called Mal 3:1; who, even in these ancient times, acted as Gods messenger, appearing and speaking to the patriarchs and prophets in his Fathers name; and who was, and, according to his promise, is, in an especial manner, present in all religious assemblies, observing the whole conduct of all that worship in them. Or, 3d, as many think more probable, the priest, or minister of holy things, is here intended. Such persons are often called angels, or, as the Hebrew word here used is commonly rendered, messengers. And this title may be given to the priest here, because the vow made to God was to be paid to the priest, as one standing and acting in Gods name and stead; and it belonged to him, as Gods angel or ambassador, to discharge persons from their vows when there was just occasion. It was an error I did unadvisedly in making such a vow. Wherefore should God be angry Why wilt thou provoke God to anger by these frivolous excuses? And destroy the work of thy hands Blast all thy labours, and particularly that work or enterprise for the success whereof thou didst make these vows.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
5:6 Allow not thy mouth to cause thy {d} flesh to sin; neither say thou before the {e} angel, that it [was] an error: why should God be angry at thy voice, and destroy the work of thy hands?
(d) Do not cause yourself to sin by vowing rashly as they do who make a vow to live unmarried and such like.
(e) That is, before God’s messenger when he will examine your doing, as though your ignorance should be a just excuse.