Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Isaiah 5:2
And he fenced it, and gathered out the stones thereof, and planted it with the choicest vine, and built a tower in the midst of it, and also made a winepress therein: and he looked that it should bring forth grapes, and it brought forth wild grapes.
2. (Six lines.) The situation was all that could be desired: and labour had not been spared. Note the resemblances in Mat 21:33 ff.; Mar 12:1 ff. fenced it ] digged it (R.V. marg.). The word is not found elsewhere, but the meaning is certain. gathered out the stones thereof ] In Heb. a single word: lit “stoned it” (ch. Isa 62:10). The phrase “stone a field,” for “clear it of stones,” is said to be common in some parts of England. the choicest vine ] A technical name (collective) for the finest sort of grapes grown in Syria. The word occurs again in Jer 2:21; the corresponding noun of unity (fem.) in Gen 49:11. built a tower ] for the watchers; not a mere hut, as in Isa 1:8.
and also winepress ] yea, and hewed out a winefat ( , Mar 12:1). The yeqeb is the receptacle (here cut out of the rock) into which the juice flows from the winepress ( gath). (Cf. Joe 3:13; Pro 3:10; Neh 13:15, &c.) The emphasis on this clause calls attention to the owner’s confident expectation of a return for his outlay.
brought forth wild grapes ] Cf. Jer 2:21.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
And he fenced it – Margin, Made a wall about it. The word used here is supposed rather to mean to dig about, to grub, as with a pick-axe or spade. – Gesenius. It has this signification in Arabic, and in one place in the Jewish Talmud. – Kimchi. The Vulgate and the Septuagint understands it of making a hedge or fence, probably the first work in preparing a vineyard. And as a hedge is expressly mentioned in Isa 5:5, it seems most probable that that is its meaning here.
And gathered out the stones … – That it might be easily cultivated. This was, of course, a necessary and proper work.
And planted it with the choicest vine – Hebrew, With the sorek. This was a choice species of vine, the grapes of which, the Jewish commentators say, had very small and scarcely perceptible stones, and which, at this day, is called serki in Morocco; in Persia, kishmis. – Gesenius.
And built a tower – For the sake of watching and defending it. These towers were probably placed so as to overlook the whole vineyard, and were thus posts of observation; compare the note at Isa 1:8; see also the note at Mat 21:33.
And also made a wine-press – A place in which to put the grapes for the purpose of expressing the juice; see the note at Mat 21:33.
And he looked – He waited in expectation; as a farmer waits patiently for the vines to grow, and to bear grapes.
Wild grapes – The word used here is derived from the verb ba’ash, to be offensive, to corrupt, to putrify; and is supposed by Gesenius to mean monks-hood, a poisonous herb, offensive in smell, which produces berries like grapes. Such a meaning suits the connection better than the supposition of grapes that were wild or uncultivated. The Vulgate understands it of the weed called wild vine – labruscas. The Septuagint translates it by thorns, akanthas. That there were vines in Judea which produced such poisonous berries, though resembling grapes, is evident; see 2Ki 4:39-41 : And one went out into the fields to gather pot herbs, and he found a field vine, and he gathered from it wild fruit. Moses also refers to a similar vine; Deu 32:32-33 : For their vine is as the vine of Sodom; their grapes are grapes of gall; their clusters are bitter. Hasselquist thinks that the prophet here means the nightshade. The Arabs, says he, call it wolf-grapes. It grows much in vineyards, and is very pernicious to them. Some poisonous, offensive berries, growing on wild vines, are doubtless intended here.
The general meaning of this parable it is not difficult to understand; compare the notes at Mat 21:33. Jerome has attempted to follow out the allegory, and explain the particular parts. He says, By the metaphor of the vineyard is to be understood the people of the Jews, which he surrounded or enclosed by angels; by gathering out the stones, the removal of idols; by the tower, the temple erected in the midst of Judea; by the wine-press, the altar. There is no propriety, however, in attempting thus minutely to explain the particular parts of the figure. The general meaning is, that God had chosen the Jewish people; had bestowed great care on them in giving them his law, in defending them, and in providing for them; that he had omitted nothing that was adapted to produce piety, obedience, and happiness, and that they had abused it all, and instead of being obedient, had become exceedingly corrupt.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Isa 5:2
It brought forth wild grapes
Wild grapes
The history of the Jewish nation is written for our warning, and the lessons taught by this parable are sadly needed by the England of today.
There is not one word of this description of the vineyard at its best which is not true of this highly favoured land. This, too, is a very fruitful hill. Under the soil, what unheard of mineral riches, mines of wealth! Above the soil and in it what fertility, what productive power! Around us, from port and bay and harbour, our merchant fleets take and fetch and gather the riches of the earth! Here, too, is planted a chosen and favoured vine. Here God has planted the Anglo-Saxon race, so blended with some other tribal blood that, even our enemies being judges, we have been unequalled in hardy daring, conquering energy, splendid enterprise, and universal stretch of power. We, too, have been strangely fenced in by the providence of God. Our iron coasts, compassed by the inviolate sea, have largely made and kept us separate and safe. Out of this land have also been gathered the stones of idolatry, barbarism, despotism, bigotry, slavery. Here, too, the Husbandman hath built His tower and made His wine press. The temples of His grace, how beautiful they stand! Surely the Lord hath not dealt so with any people! To us He says, as well as to Israel of old, What more could I do to My vineyard, that I have not done? Why, then, when I looked for grapes, brought it forth wild grapes? Is not this indictment true? Wild grapes, offensive to God, mischievous to others, and ruinous to us, are being produced on every hand. The Husbandman describes some of them.
1. The excessive greed of gain (Isa 5:8). The sin lies not in the mere addition of house to house, by fair and lawful means, or a moderate gathering together of earthly good; but in that mad rush and scramble, that strife and struggle to lay hold of all the hand can grasp. Never was Nebuchadnezzars golden god worshipped with half the eager frenzy of today. Utterly reckless of Naboths honest claim to his little vineyard–regardless of the right of poorer neighbours to gain a livelihood, a powerful purse shall buy them out; huge estates shall be enclosed in an ever-expanding ring fence; rampant speculators shall starve the spinner and weaver by the cunning of a cotton corner. It is a moral wrong; it is a national calamity; it is a wild grape which wins a woe from God. The one gleam of hope lies in the fact that the monster will be its own destroyer. Of a truth, many such houses, great and fair, shall be without inhabitant.
2. Another wild grape is the crying sin of intemperance (Isa 5:11).
3. Another wild grape is the headstrong rush after pleasure; the follies and frivolities of the tens of thousands whose whole time and tastes and talents are wickedly laid on the shrine of sensual delights. A perpetual round of feasting, junketing, dancing, sightseeing, and sensational enjoyments is the be-all and end-all of their existence (Isa 5:12).
4. Another wild grape is sensuality in its grosser and fouler shapes. Woe unto them which draw iniquity with cords, and sin as with a cart rope. In this ease the silken threads which bound them to the gilded chariot of pleasure have been woven by the force of habit into strong cords and cables, and they are drawn by the baser passions into bestial sensuality, and within the veil of secrecy, and under the curtains of night, uncleanness reigns.
5. Another wild grape is infidelity. Woe unto them that regard not the work of the Lord, neither consider the operations of His hands. They deny His creating power, they question His existence, and as for the operation of His providence, not God but law and nature is the cause of all! And all this in England!
6. Another wild grape here mentioned is fraud and falsehood: and still another is dishonesty. Woe to them who put bitter for sweet, and sweet for bitter, and so on. Again, Woe unto them which justify wickedness for reward! Tricks of trade, scamped handiwork, adulterated goods, lying puffs and advertisements, commercial frauds, haphazard speculations–oh, tis a sickening list! What shall be the end of it? Must England, like Israel, perish, forsaken of her God? No nation that forgets God shall prosper: look on the ruins of Babylon, of Greece, of Israel, of Rome. No city that forgets God shall prosper: read the sad records of Nineveh, of Tyre, of Jerusalem, of Sardis, of Laodicea. No man that forgets God shall prosper: look at the graves of Pharaoh, of Ahab, of Saul, of Herod, of Napoleon. If England lives on, and grows in lustre as she lives, it must be because the King Emmanuel is undisputed Monarch of the national heart, uncontrolled Director of the national policy and the national will. (J. J.Wray, M. A.)
Isaiah an embodied conscience
Isaiah was speaking in the first years of the reign of Ahaz, who, by his luxury and effeminacy, was beginning to imperil the splendid results of the reigns of Uzziah and Jotham. Like most men who are embodied consciences, the prophet was looked upon as a busybody. Those are usually most hated who do that which is most needed. Having attracted attention by his parable of the vineyard and the grapes, Isaiah became a remorseless and terrible voice. The man seemed to have disappeared, while the voice spoke the retributions of the Almighty. This embodied conscience was terribly faithful. It is useless to attempt argument with a conscience. It can never be argued with–it must be heard. It utters its imperative, and you are heedless at your peril. Some things may be reasoned about; a matter of conscience, never. Furthermore, conscience is always and of necessity prophetic. Whenever conscience tells you that you are wrong, it tells you more than that–it tells you that you must turn or you will be punished. That is what makes it a terror. Not only does it point the finger of shame; it also points the finger of doom. So is it with the national conscience; it, too, is prophetic, and always speaks of judgment. Isaiah was the conscience of Judah speaking its imperative, as Wendell Phillips and William Lloyd Garrison were our national conscience in the days when the Republic protected slavery. Judah had grown rich; she was getting careless; she was trusting in her riches. Judah had been sadly disciplined. There had been earthquakes, loss of territory, defeat, and now there was approaching the spectre of an Assyrian invasion. For all this she boasted of her riches and neglected God. (Amory H. Bradford, D. D.)
Old foes with new faces
1. As soon as a people become rich, they usually begin to subvert the natural and Divine order to their own selfishness. The tendency of riches is to lead people to do wrong. That may be why it is so hard for a rich man to get into heaven. He makes the mistake of thinking he can buy his way anywhere, and finds at last that character, not gold, is the currency he needs.
2. The sternness of the prophet continues. Those who have grown rich have also grown luxurious. They have learned the pleasures of the wine cup; they tarry long at the wine. The land question is an old one; the liquor question is equally old. Again I ask, Who shall tell why, as soon as men begin to prosper, they begin to do what is worst for themselves and worst for the world? Read that fifth chapter from Isa 5:12-17. How true to life! The mean man is bowed down, and the great man is humbled. The low-bred fellow drinks his fiery liquor and wallows in the gutter; the high-bred and rich say that they can mind their own business, and go to the same disgusting squalor. But Isaiah was speaking of the nation rather than to individuals It was a national shame that such things were tolerated then; it is a disgrace that such things are tolerated now. If Isaiah were alive today, or, better, if Jesus Christ could have your attention for a moment, He would say, How can you justify yourselves in giving so much time to purely economic questions and so little to the devising of means for the abolition of what ruins the finest of our boys, blights homes that would otherwise be beautiful and full of love, and makes so many of our rulers more like swine than the sovereigns they were intended to be? These two old foes are still alive, with new faces–the land question and the liquor question. The lesson which we have to learn is the one which the prophet sought to impress in his time–that both individuals and nations are responsible to God; that responsibility is real; and that there is a judgment seat before which men and nations must stand. For all this His anger is not turned away, but His hand is stretched out still. Let us not forget that we–our community, our state, our nation–are in the moral order of God; that everything we do is making ourselves and all others better or worse; that we are all called to fellowship with the prophets and apostles and faithful souls in all ages, to do something toward bringing in the time when the good things of the world shall belong to all people. (Amory H. Bradford, D. D.)
A reasonable expectation
God expects vineyard fruit from those that enjoy vineyard privileges. (M. Henry.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 2. And gathered out the stones – “And he cleared it from the stones”] This was agreeable to the husbandry: “Saxa, summa parte terrae, et vites et arbores laeduct; ima parte refrigerant;” Columell. de arb. iii. “Saxosum facile est expedire lectione lapidum;” Id. ii. 2. “Lapides, qui supersunt, [al. insuper sunt,] hieme rigent, aestate fervescunt; idcirco satis, arbustis, et vitibus nocent;” Pallad. i. 6. A piece of ground thus cleared of the stones. Persius, in his hard way of metaphor, calls “exossatus ager,” an unboned field; Sat. vi. 52.
The choicest vine – “Sorek”] Many of the ancient interpreters, the Septuagint, Aquila, and Theod., have retained this word as a proper name; I think very rightly. Sorek was a valley lying between Ascalon and Gaza, and running far up eastward in the tribe of Judah. Both Ascalon and Gaza were anciently famous for wine; the former is mentioned as such by Alexander Trallianus; the latter by several authors, quoted by Reland, Palaest., p. 589 and 986. And it seems that the upper part of the valley of Sorek, and that of Eshcol, where the spies gathered the single cluster of grapes, which they were obliged to bear between two upon a staff, being both near to Hebron were in the same neighbourhood, and that all this part of the country abounded with rich vineyards. Compare Nu 13:22-23; Jdg 16:3-4. P. Nau supposes Eshcol and Sorek to be only different names for the same valley. Voyage Noveau de la Terre Sainte, lib. iv., chap. 18. See likewise De Lisle’s posthumous map of the Holy Land. Paris, 1763. See Bochart, Hieroz. ii., col. 725. Thevenot, i, p. 406. Michaelis (note on Jdg 16:4, German translation) thinks it probable, from some circumstances of the history there given, that Sorek was in the tribe of Judah, not in the country of the Philistines.
The vine of Sorek was known to the Israelites, being mentioned by Moses, Ge 49:11, before their coming out of Egypt. Egypt was not a wine country. “Throughout this country there are no wines;” Sandys, p. 101. At least in very ancient times they had none. Herodotus, ii. 77, says it had no vines and therefore used an artificial wine made of barley. That is not strictly true, for the vines of Egypt are spoken of in Scripture, Ps 78:47; Ps 105:33; and see Ge 40:11, by which it should seem that they drank only the fresh juice pressed from the grape, which was called ; Herodot., ii. 37. But they had no large vineyards, nor was the country proper for them, being little more than one large plain, annually overflowed by the Nile. The Mareotic in later times is, I think, the only celebrated Egyptian wine which we meet with in history. The vine was formerly, as Hasselquist tells us it is now, “cultivated in Egypt for the sake of eating the grapes, not for wine, which is brought from Candia,” c. “They were supplied with wine from Greece, and likewise from Phoenicia,” Herodot., iii. 6. The vine and the wine of Sorek therefore, which lay near at hand for importation into Egypt, must in all probability have been well known to the Israelites, when they sojourned there. There is something remarkable in the manner in which Moses, Ge 49:11, makes mention of it, which, for want of considering this matter, has not been attended to it is in Jacob’s prophecy of the future prosperity of the tribe of Judah: –
“Binding his foal to the vine,
And his ass’s colt to his own sorek;
He washeth his raiment in wine,
And his cloak in the blood of grapes.”
I take the liberty of rendering sorekah, for soreko, his sorek, as the Masoretes do by pointing iroh, for iro, his foal. ir, might naturally enough appear in the feminine form; but it is not at all probable that sorek ever should. By naming particularly the vine of Sorek, and as the vine belonging to Judah, the prophecy intimates the very part of the country which was to fall to the lot of that tribe. Sir John Chardin says, “that at Casbin, a city of Persia, they turn their cattle into the vineyards after the vintage, to browse on the vines.” He speaks also of vines in that country so large that he could hardly compass the trunks of them with his arms. Voyages, tom. iii., p. 12, 12mo. This shows that the ass might be securely bound to the vine, and without danger of damaging the tree by browsing on it.
And built a tower in the midst of it] Our Saviour, who has taken the general idea of one of his parables, Mt 21:33; Mr 12:1, from this of Isaiah, has likewise inserted this circumstance of building a tower; which is generally explained by commentators as designed for the keeper of the vineyard to watch and defend the fruits. But for this purpose it was usual to make a little temporary hut, (Isa 1:8,) which might serve for the short season while the fruit was ripening, and which was removed afterwards. The tower therefore should rather mean a building of a more permanent nature and use; the farm, as we may call it, of the vineyard, containing all the offices and implements, and the whole apparatus necessary for the culture of the vineyard, and the making of the wine. To which image in the allegory, the situation the manner of building, the use, and the whole service of the temple, exactly answered. And so the Chaldee paraphrast very rightly expounds it: Et statui eos (Israelitas) ut plantam vineae selectae et aedificavi Sanctuarium meum in medio illorum. “And I have appointed the Israelites as a plant of a chosen vine, and I have built my sanctuary in the midst of them.” So also Hieron. in loc. AEdificavit quoque turrim in medio ejus; templum videlicet in media civitate. “He built also a tower in the midst of it, viz., his own temple in the midst of the city.” That they have still such towers or buildings for use or pleasure, in their gardens in the East, see Harmer’s Observations, ii. p. 241.
And also made a wine-press therein. – “And hewed out a lake therein.”] This image also our Saviour has preserved in his parable. yekeb; the Septuagint render it here , and in four other places , Isa 16:10; Joe 3:13; Hag 2:17; Zec 14:10, I think more properly; and this latter word St. Mark uses. It means not the wine-press itself, or calcatorium, which is called gath, or purah; but what the Romans called lacus, the lake; the large open place or vessel, which by a conduit or spout received the must from the wine-press. In very hot countries it was perhaps necessary, or at least very convenient, to have the lake under ground, or in a cave hewed out of the side of the rock, for coolness, that the heat might not cause too great a fermentation, and sour the must. Vini confectio instituitur in cella, vel intimae domus camera quadam a ventorum ingressu remota. Kempfer, of Shiras wine. Amaen. Exot. p. 376. For the wind, to which that country is subject, would injure the wine. “The wine-presses in Persia,” says Sir John Chardin, “are formed by making hollow places in the ground, lined with masons’ work.” Harmer’s Observations, i., p. 392. See a print of one in Kempfer, p. 377. Nonnus describes at large Bacchus hollowing the inside of a rock, and hewing out a place for the wine-press, or rather the lake: –
[f. ] .
DIONYSIAC. lib. xii., l. 331.
“He pierced the rock; and with the sharpen’d tool
Of steel well-temper’d scoop’d its inmost depth:
Then smooth’d the front, and form’d the dark recess
In just dimensions for the foaming lake.”
And he looked – “And he expected”] Jeremiah, Jer 2:21, uses the same image, and applies it to the same purpose, in an elegant paraphrase of this part of Isaiah’s parable, in his flowing and plaintive manner: –
“But I planted thee a sorek, a scion perfectly genuine:
How then art thou changed, and become to me the degenerate
shoots of the strange vine!”
Wild grapes – “poisonous berries.”] beushim, not merely useless, unprofitable grapes, such as wild grapes; but grapes offensive to the smell, noxious, poisonous. By the force and intent of the allegory, to good grapes ought to be opposed fruit of a dangerous and pernicious quality; as, in the explication of it, to judgment is opposed tyranny, and to righteousness, oppression. gephen, the vine, is a common name or genus, including several species under it; and Moses, to distinguish the true vine, or that from which wine is made, from the rest. calls it, Nu 6:4, gephen haiyayin, the wine-vine. Some of the other sorts were of a poisonous quality, as appears from the story related among the miraculous acts of Elisha, 2Kg 4:39-41. “And one went out into the field to gather potherbs; and he found a field vine, and he gathered from it wild fruit, his lapful; and he went and shred them into the pot of pottage, for they knew them not. And they poured it out for the men to eat: and it came to pass, as they were eating of the pottage, that they cried out and said, There is death in the pot, O man of God; and they could not eat of it. And he said, Bring meal, (leg. kechu, nine MSS., one edition,) and he threw it into the pot. And he said, Pour out for the people, that they may eat. And there was nothing hurtful in the pot.”
From some such sorts of poisonous fruits of the grape kind Moses has taken these strong and highly poetical images, with which he has set forth the future corruption and extreme degeneracy of the Israelites, in an allegory which has a near relation, both in its subject and imagery, to this of Isaiah: De 32:32-33.
“Their vine is from the vine of Sodom,
And from the fields of Gomorrah:
Their grapes are grapes of gall;
Their clusters are bitter:
Their wine is the poison of dragons,
And the cruel venom of aspics.”
“I am inclined to believe,” says Hasselquist, “that the prophet here, Isa 5:2-4, means the hoary nightshade, solanum incanum; because it is common in Egypt, Palestine, and the East; and the Arabian name agrees well with it. The Arabs call it anab el dib, i.e., wolf grapes. The beushim, says Rab. Chai., is a well known species of the vine, and the worst of all sorts. The prophet could not have found a plant more opposite to the vine than this; for it grows much in the vineyards, and is very pernicious to them; wherefore they root it out: it likewise resembles a vine by its shrubby stalk;” Travels, p. 289. See also Michaelis, Questions aux Voyageurs Danois, No. 64.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Fenced it, that neither men nor beasts might spoil it.
Gathered out the stones thereof; which otherwise would have marred the land; of which see 2Ki 3:19. The sense is, He removed all hinderances, and gave them all the means of fruitfulness.
Built a tower, for the residence of the keepers, that they might be obliged and encouraged to watch over it with more diligence.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
2. fencedrather, “diggedand trenched” the ground to prepare it for planting the vines[MAURER].
choicest vineHebrew,sorek; called still in Morocco, serki; the grapes hadscarcely perceptible seeds; the Persian kishmish or bedana,that is, “without seed” (Ge49:11).
towerto watch thevineyard against the depredations of man or beast, and for the use ofthe owner (Mt 21:33).
wine-pressincludingthe wine-fat; both hewn, for coolness, out of the rocky undersoil ofthe vineyard.
wild grapesThe Hebrewexpresses offensive putrefaction, answering to the corrupt state ofthe Jews. Fetid fruit of the wild vine [MAURER],instead of “choicest” grapes. Of the poisonous monk’s hood[GESENIUS]. The Arabs callthe fruit of the nightshade “wolf grapes” (Deu 32:32;Deu 32:33; 2Ki 4:39-41).JEROME tries to specifythe details of the parable; the “fence,” angels; the”stones gathered out,” idols; the “tower,”the “temple in the midst” of Judea; the”wine-press,” the altar.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And he fenced it,…. With good and wholesome laws, which distinguished them, and kept them separate from other nations; also with his almighty power and providence; especially at the three yearly festivals, when all their males appeared before God at Jerusalem:
and gathered out the stones thereof; the Heathens, the seven nations that inhabited the land of Canaan, compared to stones for their hardness and stupidity, and for their worshipping of idols of stone; see Ps 80:8
and planted it with the choicest vine; the seed of Abraham, Joshua, and Caleb, who fully followed the Lord, and the people of Israel with them, who first entered into the land of Canaan, and inhabited it; such having fallen in the wilderness, who murmured and rebelled against God, Jer 2:21
and built a tower in the midst of it; in which watchmen stood to keep the vineyard, that nothing entered into it that might hurt it; this may be understood of the city of Jerusalem, or the fortress of Zion, or the temple; so Aben Ezra, the house of God on Mount Moriah; and the Targum,
“and I built my sanctuary in the midst of them:”
and also made a winepress therein; to tread the grapes in; this the Targum explains by the altar, paraphrasing the words,
“and also my altar I gave to make an atonement for their sins;”
so Aben Ezra; though Kimchi interprets it of the prophets, who taught the people the law, that their works might be good, and stirred them up and exhorted them to the performance of them.
And he looked that it should bring forth grapes; this “looking” and “expecting”, here ascribed to God, is not to be taken properly, but figuratively, after the manner of men, for from such a well formed government, from such an excellent constitution, from a people enjoying such advantages, it might have been reasonably expected, according to a human and rational judgment of things, that the fruits of righteousness and holiness, at least of common justice and equity, would have been brought forth by them; which are meant by “grapes”, the fruit of the vine, see Isa 5:7
and it brought forth wild grapes; bad grapes; corrupt, rotten, stinking ones, as the word s used signifies; these, by a transposition of letters, are in the Misnah t called , which word signifies a kind of bad grapes, and a small sort: evil works are meant by them, see Isa 5:7 the Targum is,
“I commanded them to do good works before me, and they have done evil works.”
s . The Septuagint render it “thorns”. t Maaserot c. 1. sect. 2. Vid. Maimon. & Bartenora in ib.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
2. And he fenced it. The incessant care and watchfulness of God in dressing his vine are asserted by the Prophet, as if he had said, that God has neglected nothing that could be expected from the best and most careful householder. And yet we do not choose to attempt, as some commentators have done, an ingenious exposition of every clause, such as, that the Church is fenced by the protection of the Holy Spirit, so that it is safe against the attacks of the devil; that the wine-press is doctrine; and that by the stones are meant the annoyances of errors. The design of the Prophet, as I have mentioned, was more obvious, namely, that by incessant care and large expenditure God has performed the part of an excellent husbandman. Yet it was the duty of the Jews to consider how numerous and diversified were the blessings which God had conferred on them; and at the present day, when the Church is represented under the metaphor of a vineyard, we ought to view those figures as denoting God’s blessings, by which he makes known not only his love toward us, but likewise his solicitude about our salvation.
In the verb planted the order appears to be reversed, for one ought to begin with planting rather than with the fence; but my explanation is, that after having planted, he did everything else that was necessary. Justly, therefore, does he charge them with ingratitude and treachery, when the fruits that ought to have followed such laborious cultivation were not brought forth. There is reason to fear that the Lord will bring the same accusation against us; for the greater the benefits which we have received from God, the more disgraceful will be our ingratitude if we abuse them. It is not without a good reason, or to enable them to make any idle display, that the Lord blesses his people; it is, that they may yield grapes, that is, the best fruit. If he be disappointed of his expectation, the punishment which the Prophet here describes will follow. The mention of his benefits ought, therefore, to produce a powerful impression on our minds, and to excite us to gratitude.
Besides, the word vineyard, and a vineyard so carefully cultivated, suggests an implied contrast; for so much the more highly ought we to value the acts of God’s kindness, when they are not of an ordinary description, but tokens of his peculiar regard. Other blessings are indiscriminately bestowed, such as, that he
maketh the sun to shine on the evil as well as on the good, (Mat 5:45,)
and supplies them with what is necessary for food and clothing. But how much more highly ought we to esteem that covenant of grace into which he has entered with us, by which he makes the light of the Gospel to shine on us; for his own people are its peculiar objects! That care and diligence, therefore, which the Lord continually manifests in cultivating our minds deserves our most earnest consideration.
Therefore he hoped that it would bring forth grapes (77) He now complains that the nation which had enjoyed such high advantages had basely and shamefully degenerated; and he accuses them of undervaluing the kindness of God, for he says that, instead of pleasant grapes, they yielded only wild and bitter fruits. It is undoubtedly true that God, to whose eyes all things are naked and opened, (Heb 4:13,) is not deceived by his expectation like a mortal man. In the Song of Moses he plainly declares that he well knew from the beginning what would be the wickedness of his people.
My beloved, says he, when she fares well and becomes fat, will kick. (Deu 32:15.)
It is therefore not more possible that God should be mistaken in his expectations, than that he should repent. Isaiah does not here enter into subtle reasonings about the expectations which God had formed, but describes the manner in which the people ought to have acted, that they might not lose the benefit of such excellent advantages. Thus God commands that the Gospel be proclaimed for the obedience of faith, (Rom 16:26,) not that he expects all to be obedient, but because, by the mere hearing of it, unbelievers are rendered inexcusable. Moreover, there is nothing that ought to excite us more powerfully to lead a devout and holy life, than to find that those duties which we perform towards God are compared by the Holy Spirit to fruits of exquisite flavour.
(77) And he looked that it should bring forth grapes. — Eng. Ver.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
DIVINE DISAPPOINTMENTS
Isa. 5:2. He looked that it should bring forth grapes, and it brought forth wild grapes.
I believe in God. Which God? The God constructed for us by philosophers, who is impassive, throned in eternal calm, unmoved by the crimes or the virtues of men, all of which He has foreseen from eternal ages, and which cannot in any way affect Him at the time of their occurrence; a God who towers above men, majestic and unchangeable, like an Alpine peak, which is the same whether sunlight cheers or clouds darken the valleys beneath? No, but the God of the Bible, who loves and hates, who rejoices with us in our gladness and sorrows with us in our griefs, who foresees and overrules all, and yet can hope and be disappointed.
I. That God can be disappointed is distinctly the implication of our text. He looked that it, &c.
1. Isaiahs parable recalls the privileges which God had conferred upon the Jews; and we know that He dealt with them as He did, in order that they might become a holy nation (Exo. 19:6; Deu. 7:6; Deu. 26:18-19). Was their persistent unholiness no disappointment to Him?
2. The same truth is implied in what we are told of Gods feelings in view of the wickedness of the antediluvians (Gen. 6:5-6). He had made man in His own image, in order that He might continue therein, and shine with the lustre of His own moral perfections; each man was to be a planet in the moral universe, reflecting the glory of the great central Sun; and when He saw man transformed into the image of Satan, and His purposes concerning him frustrated, He was filled with profound regret.
3. The same truth is implied in what we are told concerning Christ. He came unto His own (Joh. 1:11). For what purpose? Certainly not that He might be rejected, but that He might be received by them. But He was rejected! See how forcibly this is brought out in His parable (Luk. 20:9-15especially Isa. 5:13).
4. It is implied in Christs tears and lament over Jerusalem (Luk. 19:41; Mat. 23:37).
5. It is implied in the apostolic declarations, that God is desirous that all men should repent and be saved (1Ti. 2:4; 2Pe. 3:9). We must not minimise the force of . The strength of any ones desire is to be measured by what he will do or sacrifice to accomplish it; and God gave His only begotten Son in order that all men might have everlasting life. But all men are not saved. That the Scriptures teach that God can beand often isdisappointed, is clear.
II. But it is impossible that God can be disappointed, seeing that He is omniscient and foresees all things. Surprise, and consequently disappointment, is not possible to perfect knowledge.
1. This objection appears to be very reasonable, but against it there is this fatal objection, that we cannot measure God by our reason [586] We cannot tell how He will act or feel under certain circumstances: all we know is, that under all circumstances God will act and feel in a manner worthy of Himself. But what is, or is not, consistent with His attributes, we are not in a position to determine. Take, for instance, His omnipresence. If we were present when dastardly wrongs and great crimes are committed, and were clothed with power to prevent them, how certain it is that we should prevent them [589] But every day He stands by and sees such wickednesses perpetrated, and is silent, and gives no sign. Let us, then, not be in a hurry to decide that disappointment is not consistent with omniscience.
2. There is an experience very frequent among men, which may perhaps help us a little to understand what disappointment is in God. Evils may be long distinctly foreseenas, for example, the death of a dear friend suffering from an incurable diseasebut yet not realised until they actually occur. The blow is foreseen long before it falls, but it is felt when it falls. Every man knows that he must die, and yet how nearly a surprise is death to every man!
3. Whether we can understand it or not, it is our duty to accept this declaration, that in view of the ingratitude and sinfulness of men whom God has blessed and has sought to win to virtue and holiness, He is profoundly grieved and disappointed. Such declarations are not to be dismissed as anthromorphological. However much that is in them may be figurative, there is a reality behind the figures.
[586] God is to us, and to every creature incomprehensible. If thou couldst fathom or measure Him, and know His greatness by a comprehensive knowledge, He were not God. A creature can comprehend nothing but a creature. You may know God, but not comprehend Him; as your foot treadeth on the earth, but doth not cover all the earth. The sea is not a sea if you can hold it in a spoon. Thou canst not comprehend the sun which thou seest, and by which thou seest all things else, nor the sea, nor the earth, no, nor a worm, nor a blade of grass: thy understanding knoweth not all that God hath put into the least of these; thou art a stranger to thyself, both body and soul. And thinkest thou, that perfectly comprehendest nothing, to comprehend God? Stop then thy over-bold inquiries, and remember that thou art a shallow, finite worm, and God is infinite. First seek to comprehend the heaven and earth and whole creation, before thou think of comprehending Him to whom the whole world is nothing, or vanity.Baxter, 16151691.
[589] During one part of the trip our party was augmented by a redif, or soldier of the reserves, who was going home on leave of absence. He wore the uniform of the Turkish soldier, but I observed that in the evening he threw over his shoulders a womans robe, made of a soft thin kind of felt, worn by the women in this country, and beautifully embroidered in colours around the neck and bosom. I had the curiosity to inquire into the history of this gown, and could scarcely restrain my indignation at the story I heard. This soldier said he had got the gown at Saitschar. After the discovery of the evacuation of the place by the Servians, he and a party of four or five more entered the town. In one of the houses they found a Servian family that had decided to remain in their house, and throw themselves on the mercy of the Turks. This family consisted of an old man, a married daughter with two children, and a girl of fourteen, whose relationship to the rest of the family they did not take the trouble to inquire into. The husband of the woman, if she had one, was absent. They began by fastening all the doors, so that nobody could escape: then they thoroughly pillaged the house, and took and divided everything of value among themselves. They were in the house a day and a night, for it was a rich one apparently, and it took some time to get everything properly divided and packed; and besides, they were disposed to be merry and make a night of it.
I will not enter into the details of what they did during this night, because there are people who do not apparently object in the least to the commission of these deeds, who object to anybody lifting a finger to prevent them, or even to the expression of any indignation on the subject, but who are dreadfully shocked at the recital of them; and I wish to spare the feelings of these sensitive persons. Suffice it to say that the next morning the question arose as to what should be done with the two women, the two children, and the old man. Some of the party were in favour of letting them go; but the rest were of opinion that it would be amusing to kill them, and a discussion ensued, which lasted more than an hour, in presence of the weeping, trembling victims, who were wildly begging for mercy, and among whom, it should be remembered, there was a mother begging for the lives of her two children. The narrator said that he, with another of the party, had leant to the side of mercy, but that the majority were against them, and that they finally ended the discussion and the prayers of the victims by falling upon them with their sabres. I asked him how he had come by the gown, and he replied that, seeing what the result was going to be, he had stripped it from the girl while the discussion was in progress, before she was killed, so that it might not be blood-stained. He had taken a fancy to it, because it would just be right for his daughter, who was about the same age; and his companions, perceiving this, made him pay rather high for itfifty piastres. He was a heavy, dull-looking brute, and it seemed strange to think that he had a daughter, a pretty, tender, joyous little thing, perhaps, that would wear this gown with delight. He told the story in a quiet, phlegmatic manner, and spoke very freely, looking upon me as an Englishman, and therefore as a friend.Letter in the Daily News, Nov. 15, 1876.
III. Whatever mystery may attach to this declaration, consider how precious it is
1. A God who can be disappointed is precisely the God we need. How else could we be assured of His sympathy with us in the disappointments which so frequently come upon us, and which make up so considerable a part of the experiences of our life? Were God such a being as the philosophers have imagined, we might feel that He understood us, as an anatomist understands exactly how a frog on which he is operating will act when exposed to galvanic shocks, but we could not have had the inexpressible consolation of the assurance of His sympathy. It is only a mother who has been bereaved who can comfort a mother who is weeping over her dead child.
2. A God who is so much interested in us that our failures in virtue inspire Him with profound grief and disappointment, is again precisely the God we need. Of what value to us would be a God who looked upon us with as little emotion as a king may be supposed to do upon the ants who crawl across his path? It is because men do not think of God as He is revealed in our text, that they sin against Him; if they did but realise how He feels about them, it would be impossible for them to transgress as they do. I accept His declaration, that He is disappointed in view of human sin, and I try to measure His disappointment. I find help in this endeavour in this Old Testament parable: how profound would be the disappointment of a husbandman under such circumstances as are supposed! But I find yet more valuable help in the greatest of the New Testament parables. How bitter must have been the disappointment of the father of the Prodigal when he went away into a far country! Such disappointments break the hearts of tens of thousands of fathers and mothers, and brings down their grey hairs with sorrow to the grave; and precisely such disappointment it is, only vaster, deeper, sadder, that fills the heart of our Heavenly Father when His children go astray. It is thus that some of you have grieved Him; it is thus that some of you are grieving Him to-day by your contemptuous disregard of His offers of mercy and forgiveness. Oh, think what it is that you do, and surely your carelessness must give place to profound contrition, and you will resemble the Prodigal in your penitence, as you have done in your ingratitude and your guilt.
Fuente: The Preacher’s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell
(2) And he fenced it.In the fence we may recognise the law and institutions of Israel which kept it as a separate people (Eph. Ii. 14); in the stones that were gathered out, the removal of the old idolatries that would have hindered the development of the nations life; in the tower of the vineyard (comp. in a different context Isa. 1:8), the monarchy and throne of David, or the watch-tower from which the prophets looked forth (Hab. Ii. 1; Isa. 21:5-8); in the winepress, the temple in which the fruits of righteousness were to issue in the wine of joy and adoration (Zec. 9:17; Eph. 5:18). It was, we may note, one of the maxims of the Rabbis that the duty of a scribe was to set a fence around the law (Pirke Aboth, i. 1). In the last clause of the verse the pleasant song suddenly changes its tone, and the wild grapes (sour and hard, and not larger than bilberries) are types of deeds of harsh and cruel injustice on which the prophet proceeds to dwell.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
Isa 5:2. And he fenced it, &c. The state of the vineyard, with respect to the benefits conferred upon it by God, is described in the latter part of the first, and the former part of this verse; the consequence of that state, the expectation of fruit, and the disappointment of that expectation, are described in the latter part of it. The whole is expressive, by allegory, of the advantages, privileges, and blessings conferred by God upon the Jewish state and people.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Observe how God speaks of the church, and the blessedness of it. First its situation, in a very fruitful hill: secondly, its security from enemies of every kind, it is walled around: thirdly, the soil in which it was placed, all the stones being gathered out of it: and lastly, the choiceness of the vine. Reader, think of the grace, love, mercy, an favor of all the persons of the Godhead, towards our poor ruined nature, which are here set forth, under these several images! The wine-press and the tower built in it, are so many farther proofs of divine love; intimating the ordinances and institutions the Lord hath set up from age to age in his church. Oh! think what an awful state that soul, that church is in; which instead of bringing forth the sweet fruits of the Spirit, bringeth forth only the corruptions of unrenewed nature, which like the wild gourd, in the prophet’s pottage, produceth death, 2Ki 4:39-40 .
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Isa 5:2 And he fenced it, and gathered out the stones thereof, and planted it with the choicest vine, and built a tower in the midst of it, and also made a winepress therein: and he looked that it should bring forth grapes, and it brought forth wild grapes.
Ver. 2. And he fenced a it.] Maceria munivit; he hedged it in, or walled it about, protecting his people from the rage of enemies wherewith that country was begirt. God was “a wall of fire to them,” Zec 2:5 and a wall of water to them, as Exo 14:22 whence their land, though part of the continent, is called “an island,” Isa 26:6 not only because separated from other countries, but because secured and made media insuperabilis unda.
And gathered out the stones thereof.
And planted it with the choicest vine.
And built a tower in the midst of it.
And also made a winepress therein.
“ Fallitur augurio spes bona saepe suo. ”
Little good is done many times by the most pressing and piercing exhortations and argumeuts used by God’s faithful prophets.
And he looked that it should bring forth grapes,
And it brought forth wild grapes.
a Pro Sepivit alii vertunt Fodit, pastinavit, plantavit.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
vine. For Israel as this vine, See Isa 27:2-6. Jer 2:21; Jer 12:10. Psa 80:8. Hos 10:1; Hos 14:6-7, &c. One of the three trees to which Israel is likened: the fig = national privilege; the olive = religious privilege; the vine = spiritual privilege. See note on Jdg 9:8-13,
tower = a watchtower. winepress = wine-vat. Hebrew. yekeb, not gath, a winepress. See note on Pro 3:10.
wild grapes = bad grapes. Hebrew. beushim, from bashash, to stink. The Hebrew word occurs only in verses: Isa 5:2, Isa 5:4.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
fenced it: or, made a wall about it, Exo 33:16, Num 23:9, Deu 32:8, Deu 32:9, Psa 44:1-3, Rom 9:4
planted: Jer 2:21
the choicest vine: Sorek in Arabic, sharik certainly denotes an excellent vine; but some with Bp. Lowth, retain it as a proper name. Sorek was a valley lying between Askelon and Gaza, so called from the excellence of its vines. Jdg 16:4
and built: Isa 1:8, Mic 4:8
made: Heb. hewed
a winepress: Isa 63:2, Isa 63:3, Neh 13:15, Rev 14:18-20
he looked: Isa 5:7, Isa 1:2-4, Isa 1:21-23, Deu 32:6, Mat 21:34, Mar 11:13, Mar 12:2, Luk 13:7, Luk 20:10-18, 1Co 9:7
wild grapes: Deu 32:32, Deu 32:33, Hos 10:1
Reciprocal: 2Ki 18:8 – from the tower Ezr 9:9 – a wall Job 1:10 – an hedge Psa 80:15 – vineyard Ecc 3:2 – a time to plant Son 6:11 – to see the Jer 11:17 – that Jer 30:15 – for the Jer 45:4 – that which Mat 3:10 – is hewn Mat 20:1 – a man Mar 4:19 – unfruitful Rom 6:5 – planted Phi 1:11 – filled Jam 3:12 – the fig tree
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
A DISAPPOINTING VINTAGE
He looked that it should bring forth grapes, and it brought forth wild grapes.
Isa 5:2
I. Consider the distinguishing features which, in Gods allegory, separate the grape from the wild grape.(1) The good grape is not in a state of nature; the wild grape is. Either it has had no culture, or it has not responded to its culture. Therefore it is wild. The secret of its state lies in that one word wild. (2) The wild grape does not grow or ripen into use. It springs, it hangs on the bough, and it falls, for itself. No man is the better for it. None gathers strength or refreshment or delight there. (3) The wild grape has not the sweetness of the true. It is harsh and sour, because (4) the wild grape has never been grafted.
II. The first thing of all, without which everything else in religion is only a blank, is, and must be, a real, living union with the Lord Jesus Christ.By that union, the life which was unchanged, selfish, tasteless, or bitter, and without Christ, becomes a new, expansive, loving, Christ-like life, and the wild grape in the desert is turned into the true grape of paradise.
Rev. James Vaughan.
Illustration
This vineyard is, of course, Israel, whom God chose out of the rest of mankind for a very special purpose. Palestine was the very fruitful hill, as far as this earth was concerned, whilst the blessings of the Covenant gave the chosen people a priority among the nations of the world. The fences and hedges were not simply the physical mountainous configuration of the land, but the Divine care, which sheltered the people from the subjugation of the neighbouring nations.
Fuente: Church Pulpit Commentary
Isa 5:2. And he fenced it In this verse the prophet, carrying on the allegory, proceeds to express, in parabolical language, the singular favours which God had bestowed on the Jewish nation, and the peculiar care which he had taken of them. He separated them from other nations, took them into covenant with himself, gave them a variety of laws and ordinances respecting his worship and service, and became, in an especial manner, their protector and governor. Thus he fenced his vineyard; Hebrew, , circumsepsit eam, hedged it round on all sides. In removing the heathen nations, and destroying all the forms of their idolatrous worship, forbidding all idolatry, and all intimate friendship and intermarriages with idolaters, and by giving them plain and ample directions for their whole conduct, lest they should fall by error or mistake, he gathered out the stones thereof Which otherwise might have marred the land, (2Ki 3:19,) and injured the vines. In other words, he removed all the hinderances of fruitfulness. In that he formed his church of the posterity of those wise, holy, and faithful men, Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob, and purged and reformed the nation in the wilderness before he established them in Canaan, he might truly be said to plant his vineyard with the choicest vine Or, as the Hebrew is, the vine of Sorek, alluding to a valley between Ascalon and Gaza, running up eastward into the tribe of Judah, and famous for the best vines, and the richest vineyards. And he built a tower in the midst of it As edifices, termed towers by the Jews, were erected in vineyards, containing, as Bishop Lowth supposes, all the offices and implements, and the whole apparatus necessary for the culture of them, and the making of wine; and, doubtless, also serving for the accommodation and defence of the labourers; and as places of pleasure for the owners of the vineyards; so God provided his church with a most commodious and magnificent temple, furnished with all conveniences for every part of that worship and service which he required his people to perform to him, and affording every requisite accommodation for the residence, support, and comfort of the priests and Levites, while ministering in holy things, and employed in cultivating Gods mystical vineyard; and where he, the Lord of the vineyard, might be peculiarly present, as the protector and consolation of his people, their refuge and strength, and very present help in times of trouble or danger. Thus the Chaldee paraphrast: I have constituted them the plant of a choice vine, and built my sanctuary in the midst of them. So also Jerome interprets the clause. He also made a wine-press therein Hebrew, , which Bishop Lowth properly translates, And he hewed out also a lake therein; observing that the word means, not the wine-press itself, or calcatorium, (the vessel or place where the grapes were stamped, or trod for the wine, which is expressed by another word,) but what the Romans called lacus, the lake; the large open place or vessel, which, by a conduit, or spout, received the must (or new wine) from the wine-press. This place, he thinks, in very hot countries, it was necessary, or very convenient, to have under ground, or in a cave hewed out of the side of a rock, for coolness; that the heat might not cause too great a fermentation, and sour the must. Now this lake, made to contain the new wine, may here signify the great altar, made to receive the sacrifices and oblations, as the fruits of the spiritual vineyard. And he looked that it should bring forth grapes Real, genuine fruit, true, substantial piety and virtue, or godliness and righteousness; and it brought forth wild grapes Or, rather, poisonous berries, as Bishop Lowth translates , the word here used, which does not signify merely useless, unprofitable grapes, such as wild grapes; but grapes offensive to the smell, noxious, poisonous; such as those mentioned 2Ki 4:39-41. For, according to the force and intent of the allegory, To good grapes ought to be opposed fruit of a dangerous and pernicious quality; as, in the explication of it, to judgment is opposed tyranny, and to righteousness oppression. See an elegant paraphrase of this part of the parable, Jer 2:21.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
5:2 And he dug it, and removed its stones, and planted it with the choicest vine, {d} and built a tower in the midst of it, and also made a winepress in it: and he expected that it should bring forth grapes, and it brought forth {e} wild grapes.
(d) He spared no diligence or cost.
(e) In Isa 5:7 he declares what they were.