Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Jeremiah 23:9
Mine heart within me is broken because of the prophets; all my bones shake; I am like a drunken man, and like a man whom wine hath overcome, because of the LORD, and because of the words of his holiness.
9. his holy words ] the words which He in the holiness of His nature had put forth concerning the wicked doings of the false prophets.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Jer 23:9-40. Condemnation of the prophets
Following on the prophecies relating to successive kings of Judah, we have a section dealing with the iniquities of a class who also grievously misled the nation. The passage doubtless contains much that is genuine, but, from the diffuseness of style, especially in the latter part, it may be safely inferred that additional matter has been inserted. Commentators, however, are by no means agreed as to the amount of the latter. Du. omits all after Jer 23:15, Co. nearly all after Jer 23:24, Gi. Jer 23:30-40, while the last-named also rejects Jer 23:18-21. Jer 23:9-17 and again 23 29 are in inah rhythm. Elsewhere metre is for the most part irregular or absent. The collection of utterances, so far as genuine, may have probably belonged to the last part of Zedekiah’s reign.
The section may be thus subdivided. (i) Jer 23:9-15. Jeremiah is undone and nerveless because of the Lord’s message to a land whose profligacy has brought on it a curse. The Temple itself is polluted by the iniquities of prophets and priests. They shall be as men driven in the dark along slippery ways till they fall. The prophets of Samaria led the people astray by alleged prophecies of their false deity, while the prophets of Jerusalem shock Jehovah still more by immorality, lying, and the encouragement of others in permanent evil-doing. They have reached the infamy of the cities of the plain. They have infected all the land; therefore shall wormwood and gall be their food. (ii) Jer 23:16-18. It is from the prophets’ own imaginations and not from Jehovah that their pleasing promises of immunity from evil come. Who is there who has visited His heavenly abode, there to learn His purposes? (iii) Jer 23:19-20. Jehovah’s wrath shall break, like a storm, on the head of the wicked, and shall not be recalled till His purpose is fully achieved. (iv) Jer 23:21-24. Those prophets were not commissioned nor inspired by the Lord; else they would have delivered His rebuke of the people’s sins. He is omnipresent. They cannot escape His observation. (v) Jer 23:25-29. How long shall they adduce dreams, dreams forsooth, in support of their lying predictions, making the real character of Jehovah to be forgotten by the people, even as their fathers thought of Him as though He were no better than one of the Baals? Let the dream be told, and let Jehovah’s message be told as well; but let the utterances which embody the two be sharply distinguished, as stubble from wheat. Jehovah’s word is as fire, and as a hammer which breaketh the rocks. (vi) Jer 23:30-32. He is against the prophets who steal their announcements from the true prophets, and with ready tongue claim that they are from Him, who lead His people astray with delusive dreams and claims to Divine authority. They have not His commission, and so are without value. (vii) Jer 23:33-40. When asked, What is the Lord’s burden, Jeremiah will answer, It is ye, and He will rid Himself of you as such. All who use the word “burden” shall be punished. The message shall be expressed in the simplest language, and your use of the word “burden” shall recoil upon yourselves. If ye nevertheless persist in its use, ye shall be banished for ever in disgrace from this ancestral city and from Jehovah’s presence.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Because of the prophets – Rather, concerning the prophets. These words should come first, as being the title of this portion of the prophecy Jer. 23:9-40.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Verse 9. Mine heart within me is broken because of the prophets] The first word of this clause is lannebiim, which we incorporate with the whole clause, and translate, “Because of the prophets.” But as a new prophecy begins here, it is evident that the word is the title to this prophecy; and is thus distinguished both by Blayney and Dahler, CONCERNING THE PROPHETS. This discourse was delivered probably in the reign of Jehoiakim.
All my bones shake] He was terrified even by his own message, and shocked at the profanity of the false prophets.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
The prophet having denounced the wrath of God against the wicked rulers of Judah under the notion of pastors, cometh here to discharge the like trust with reference to those orders of persons amongst the Jews, whose office it was, or at least who took upon them, to reveal the mind and will of God to people, and who were upon that account called
prophets: for these he declares a great passion and trouble; either for their sake, in prospect of that vengeance of God which he saw was like to be poured out upon them; or for the peoples sake, who had been deceived by their unfaithful revelations of the Divine will, and led into wickedness by their vile examples. For this he saith his
heart was broken, his bones shaked. And he was even astonished and stupified, and like a drunken man he knew not what he did; he was so stricken at the apprehensions of the wrath of the Lord ready to be revealed against them; and to consider what words the holy God had put into his mouth to speak against them.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
9. because of the prophetssothe Masorites and Targum. But Vulgate, Septuagint, c., makethis the inscription of the prophecy, CONCERNINGTHE PROPHETS: as inJer 46:2 Jer 48:1;Jer 49:1. Jeremiah expresses hishorror at the so-called “prophets” not warning the people,though iniquity so fearfully abounded, soon to be followed by awfuljudgments.
bones shake (Hab3:16).
drunkenGod’s judgmentsare represented as stupefying like wine. The effects of the HolySpirit also are compared to those of wine (Ac2:17). In both cases ecstasy was produced. This accounts for thedenial of wine to those likely to be inspired, Nazarites, &c. (Lu1:15). It was necessary to put it out of men’s power to ascribeinspired ecstasy to the effects of wine.
because of . . . words of . .. holinessbecause of Jehovah’s holy words, wherewith Hethreatened severe penalties, soon to be inflicted, against thebreakers of His law.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Mine heart within me is broken because of the prophets,…. The false prophets, as the Targum rightly interprets it. The Vulgate Latin version renders it, “to the prophets”; and makes a stop there; which agrees with the original l; so that it may be considered as the title of what follows; it being directed to them by the prophet, to let them know his concern for them; to expose their sin, and reclaim them; who was so affected with their case, that his “heart” within him was “broken” with grief and sorrow, because of their false doctrines and wicked lives; and because of the mischief they did the people, and the ruin they brought upon them, and themselves also:
all my bones shake; with dread and horror at the iniquities committed and the judgments approaching. The word, as Jarchi says, signifies such a fluttering motion as is made by the wings of a bird hovering over its nest. The same word is used in Ge 1:2; which Ben Melech refers to here. The prophet shuddered at their dreadful impiety, and at the thoughts of what was coming upon them on that account:
I am like a drunken man; that can neither speak nor stand; that knows not what to say, or which way to go; so confused and astonished was the prophet at what he saw was doing by them, and was likely to befall them:
and like a man whom wine hath overcome; or, “has passed over” m; like waves and billows, so that he is drowned in it, and mastered by it:
because of the Lord, and because of the words of his holiness: because of the dishonour done to his holy name, and holy truths; because of the profanation of both in the mouths of these false prophets; they pretending to come in the name of the Lord, and to speak his words; and because of the dreadful judgments which he, the prophet, was sent to denounce against them from the Lord.
l “ad prophetas”, V. L. “quod ad prophetat ipsos”, Junius Tremellius “ad prophetas quod attinet”, Piscator. m So Kimchi and Ben Melech. “pertransivit”, Vatablus, Montanus; “super quem transiit vinum”, Pagninus, Calvin; “penetravit”, Schmidt.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Against the False Prophets. – Next to the kings, the pseudo-prophets, who flattered the people’s carnal longings, have done most to contribute to the fall of the realm. Therefore Jeremiah passes directly from his discourse against the wicked kings to rebuking the false prophets; and if we may presume from the main substance, the latter discourse belongs to the same time as the former. It begins
Jer 23:9-11 With a description of the pernicious practices of these persons. – Jer 23:9 . “Concerning the prophets. Broken is mine heart within me; all my bones totter. I am become like a drunken man, and like a man whom wine hath overcome, because of Jahveh and because of His holy words. Jer 23:10. For of adulterers the land is full, for because of the curse the land withereth, the pastures of the wilderness dry up; and their course is become evil, and their strength not right. Jer 23:11. For both prophet and priest are profane; yea, in mine house found I their wickedness, saith Jahveh. Jer 23:12. Therefore their way shall be to them as slippery places in darkness, they shall be thrown down and fall therein; for I bring evil upon them, the year of their visitation, saith Jahveh. Jer 23:13. In the prophets of Samaria saw I folly; they prophesied in the name of Baal, and led my people Israel astray. Jer 23:14. But in the prophets of Jerusalem saw I an horrible thing, committing adultery and walking in falsehood, and they strengthen the hands of the wicked, that none returneth from his wickedness. They are all become to me as Sodom, and the inhabitants thereof as Gomorrah. Jer 23:15. Therefore thus saith Jahveh of hosts concerning the prophets: Behold, I feed them with wormwood, and give them to drink water of bitterness; for from the prophets of Jerusalem is profaneness gone forth over all the land.”
“Concerning the prophets” is the heading, as in Jer 46:2; Jer 48:1; Jer 49:1, Jer 49:7, Jer 49:23, Jer 49:28; and corresponds to the woe uttered against the wicked shepherds, Jer 23:1. It refers to the entire portion vv. 9-40, which is thus distinguished from the oracles concerning the kings, Jer 21:1-14 and 22. It might indeed be joined, according to the accents, with what follows: because of the prophets is my heart broken; but as the cause of Jeremiah’s deep agitation is given at the end of the second half-verse: because of Jahveh, etc., it is not likely the seer would in one sentence have given two different and quite separate reasons. The brokenness of his heart denotes the profoundest inward emotion yet not despondency by reason of sin and misery, like “a broken heart” in Psa 34:19; Psa 51:19, etc., but because of God’s wrath at the impious lives of the pseudo-prophets. This has overcome him, and this he must publish. This wrath had broken his heart and seized on all his bones, so that they nervelessly tremble, and he resembles a drunken man who can no longer stand firm on his feet. He feels himself inwardly quite downcast; he not only feels the horrors of the judgment that is to befall the false prophets and corrupt priests who lead the people astray, but knows well the dreadful sufferings the people too will have to endure. The verb occurs only twice in the Piel besides in the present passage; in Gen 1:2, of the Spirit of God that in the beginning of creation brooded over the waters of the earth, and Deu 32:11, of the eagle that flutters over her young – in Arabic rchf, to be soft. The root meaning of the word is doubtless: to be flaccid; here accordingly, to totter, to sway to and fro. “Because of Jahveh” is more fully explained by “because of the words of His holiness,” i.e., the words which God as holy has made known to him regarding the unholy ongoings of the pseudo-prophets. – From Jer 23:10 onwards come the sayings of God which have so terribly agitated the prophet. The land is full of adulterers. Adultery in the literal sense is mentioned by way of example, as a reckless transgression of God’s commands, then much in vogue, whereby the moral foundations of the kingdom were broken up. In Jer 23:14 the prophets are said to commit adultery and walk in lying, cf. Jer 29:23 and Jer 5:7. By reason of this vice a curse lies on the land, under which it is withering away. The clause “for because of the curse,” etc., is not to be taken as parenthesis (Ng.), but as co-ordinate with the previous clause, giving the second, or rather the chief ground, why Jeremiah is so deeply distressed. The reason of this is not so much the prevailing moral corruption, as the curse lying on the land because of the moral corruption of its inhabitants. is not perjury (Chald., Rashi, Kimchi), but the curse wherewith God punishes the transgression of His covenant laws, cf. Jer 11:3, Jer 11:8, Deu 28:15., Jer 29:19. The words are modelled after Isa 24:4.; and is not the population, but the land itself, which suffers under God’s curse, and which is visited with drought; cf. Jer 12:4. The next words point to drought. as in Jer 9:9. By the further description of the people’s depravity is attached to the first clause of the verse. Their course is become evil; their running or racing, i.e., the aim and endeavour of the ungodly. The suffix on this word refers not to “adulterers,” but ad sensum to the inhabitants of the land. Their strength is not-right, i.e., they are strong, valiant in wrong; cf. Jer 9:2. For – so goes Jer 23:11 – both prophets and priests, who should lead the people in the right way, are profane, and desecrate by their wickedness even the house of God, presumably by idolatry; cf. Jer 32:34. There is no reason for thinking here, as Hitz. does, of adultery practised in the temple.
Jer 23:12 For this the Lord will punish them. Their way shall be to them as slippery places in darkness. This threatening is after the manner of Psa 35:6, where are joined, changed by Jeremiah to the words in the text. The passage cited shows that we may not separate from , as Ew. does, to join it to the following . Their way shall resemble slippery places in the dark, when one may readily slip and fall. Besides, they are to be thrust, pushed, so that they must fall on the slippery path ( from = , Psa 35:5; “therein” to be referred to “their way”). The clause: “for I bring evil,” etc., is formed after Jer 11:23.
Jer 23:13-15 To display the vileness of the prophets, these are parallelized with the prophets of Samaria. The latter did foolishly ( , prop. of that which is unsalted, insipid, Job 6:6, hence irrational, insulsum), since they prophesied, being inspired by Baal the no-god, and by such prophesying led the people into error; cf. 1Ki 18:19. Much more horrible is the conduct of the prophets of Jerusalem, who commit adultery, walk in lying, and strengthen the wicked in their wickedness, not merely by their delusive pretences (cf. Jer 23:17, Jer 6:14; Jer 14:13), but also by their immoral lives, so that no one turns from his wickedness, cf. Eze 13:22. is here and in Jer 27:18, as in ex. 20:20, construed, contrary to the usage everywhere else, not with the infin., but with the verb. fin. As the prophets, instead of converting the wicked, only confirmed them in their sins, therefore all the inhabitants of Judah or Jerusalem are become as corrupt as Sodom and Gomorrah. “They all” are not the prophets, but the inhabitants of Judah or Jerusalem; and “the inhabitants thereof” are those of the capital, cf. Deu 32:32; Isa 1:10. On the seducers the Lord will therefore inflict punishment, because impiousness has gone forth from them over the whole land. With the punishment threatened in Jer 23:15, cf. Jer 9:14.
Jer 23:16-20 Warning against the lying prophecies of the prophets. – Jer 23:16. “Thus saith Jahveh of hosts: Hearken not unto the words of the prophets that prophesy unto you! They deceive you; a vision of their heart they speak, not out of the mouth of Jahveh. Jer 23:17. They say still unto my despisers: ‘Jahveh hath spoken: Peace shall ye have;’ and unto every one that walketh in the stubbornness of his heart they say: ‘There shall no evil come upon you.’ Jer 23:18. For who hath stood in Jahveh’s counsel, that he might have seen and heard His word? who hath marked my word and heard it? Jer 23:19. Behold a tempest from Jahveh, fury goeth forth, and eddying whirlwind shall hurl itself upon the head of the wicked. Jer 23:20. The anger of God shall not turn till He have done and till He have performed the thoughts of His heart. At the end of the days shall ye be well aware of this. Jer 23:21. I have not sent the prophets, yet they ran; I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied. Jer 23:22. But if they had stood in my counsel, they would publish my words to my people and bring them back from their evil way and from the evil of their doings.”
The warning against these prophets is founded in Jer 23:16 on the fact that they give out the thoughts of their own hearts to be divine revelation, and promise peace and prosperity to all stiff-necked sinners. , lit., they make you vain, i.e., make you to yield yourselves to vain delusion, seduce you to false confidence. This they do by their speaking visions, i.e., revelations of their heart, not what God has spoken, revealed to them. As an illustration of this, Jer 23:17 tells that they prophesy continued peace or well-being to the despisers of God. The infin. abs. after the verb. fin. intimates the duration or repetition of the thing. are words of the false prophets, with which they give out that their prophesyings are God’s word. Since we nowhere else find sayings of Jahveh introduced by , but usually by ‘ , the lxx have taken offence at that formula, and, reading , join the words with : . To this reading Hitz. and Gr. give the preference over the Masoretic; but they have not noticed that they thus get an unsuitable sense. For in prophetic language never denotes the Mosaic law or the “moral law” (Hitz.), but the word of God published by the prophets. By their view of “word of Jahveh” they would here obtain the self-inconsistent thought: to the despisers of divine revelation they proclaim as revelation. The Masoretic reading is clearly right; and Jeremiah chose the unusual introductory formula to distinguish the language of the pseudo-prophets from that of the true prophets of the Lord. ‘ is prefixed absolutely: and as concerning every one that walks…they say, for: and to every one…they say. On the “stubbornness of their heart,” see on Jer 3:17. With the speech of the false prophets, cf. Jer 14:13 and Jer 6:14. – In Jer 23:18 a more comprehensive reason is given to show that these prophets are not publishing God’s decrees. The question: Who hath stood? has negative force = None hath stood. By this Jeremiah does not deny the possibility of this universally, but only of the false prophets (Hitz.). This limitation of the words is suggested by the context. To the true prophets the Lord reveals His , Amo 3:7. are not to be taken jussively: let him see and hear (Hitz.), for the foregoing interrogation is not a conditional clause introducing a command. The imperfects with are clauses of consequence or design, and after a preceding perfect should be rendered in English by the conditional of the pluperfect. Seeing the word of God refers to prophetic vision. The second question is appended without at all conveying any inference from what precedes; and in it the second verb (with consec.) is simply a strengthening of the first: who hath hearkened to my word and heard it? The Masoretes have quite unnecessarily changed the Chet. .teh C into . In the graphic representation of the prophets, the transition to the direct speech of God, and conversely, is no unusual thing. The change of into , unnecessary and even improper as it is, is preferred by Graf and Ng. , inasmuch as they take the interrogative in both clauses in the sense of quisquis and understand the verse thus: He who has but stood in the counsel of the Lord, let him see and hear His word (i.e., he must see and hear His word); and he that hath marked my word, let him publish it (i.e., he must publish it). This exposition becomes only then necessary, if we leave the context out of view and regard the question as being to the effect that no one has stood in God’s counsel – which Jeremiah could not mean. Not to speak of the change of the text necessary for carrying it through, this view does not even give a suitable sense. If the clause: He that has stood in the counsel of the Lord, he must proclaim His word, is to be regarded as having a demonstrative force, then the principal idea must be supplied, thus namely: “and it is impossible that it should be favourable to those who despise it.” In Jer 23:19 Jeremiah publishes a real word of the Lord, which sounds very differently from the words of the false prophets. A tempest from Jahveh will burst over the heads of the evil-doers, and the wrath of God will not cease until it has accomplished the divine decree. “A tempest from Jahveh” is defined by “fury” in apposition as being a manifestation of God’s wrath; and the whole first clause is further expanded in the second part of the verse. The tempest from Jahveh goes forth, i.e., breaks out, and as whirling tornado or eddying whirlwind bursts over the head of the wicked. is to be taken in accordance with : twist, whirl, cf. 2Sa 3:29. “The thoughts of His heart” must not be limited to what God has decreed de interitu populi (Calv.); it comprehends God’s whole redemptive plan in His people’s regard-not merely the overthrow of the kingdom of Judah, but also the purification of the people by means of judgments and the final glorification of His kingdom. To this future the next clause points: at the end of the days ye shall have clear knowledge of this. “The end of the days” is not merely the completion of the period in which we now are (Hitz., Gr. Ng. , etc.), but, as universally, the end of the times, i.e., the Messianic future, the last period of the world’s history which opens at the close of the present aeon; see on Gen 49:1; Num 24:14, etc. is strengthened by yb dene : attain to insight, come to clearer knowledge.
Jer 23:21-22 From the word of the Lord proclaimed in Jer 23:19. it appears that the prophets who prophesy peace or well-being to the despisers of God are not sent and inspired by God. If they had stood in the counsel of God, and so had truly learnt God’s word, they must have published it and turned the people from its evil way. This completely proves the statement of Jer 23:16, that the preachers of peace deceive the people. Then follows –
Jer 23:23-29 Jer 23:23-32, in continuation, an intimation that God knows and will punish the lying practices of these prophets. – Jer 23:23. “Am I then a God near at hand, saith Jahveh, and not a God afar off? Jer 23:24. Or can any hide himself in secret, that I cannot see him? saith Jahveh. Do not I will the heaven and the earth? saith Jahveh. Jer 23:25. I have heard what the prophets say, that prophesy falsehood in my name, saying: I have dreamed, I have dreamed. Jer 23:26. How long? Have they it in their mind, the prophets of the deceit of their heart, Jer 23:27. Do they think to make my people forget my name by their dreams which they tell one to the other, as their fathers forgot my name by Baal? Jer 23:28. The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath my word, let him speak my word in truth. What is the straw to the corn? saith Jahveh. Jer 23:29. Is not thus my word – as fire, saith Jahveh, and as a hammer that dasheth the rock in pieces? Jer 23:30. Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets that steal my words one from the other. Jer 23:31. Behold, I am against the prophets, saith Jahveh, that take their tongues and say: God’s word. Jer 23:32. Behold, I am against the prophets that prophesy lying dreams, saith Jahve, and tell them, and lead my people astray with their lies and their boasting, whom yet I have not sent nor commanded them, and they bring no good to this people, saith Jahveh.”
The force of the question: Am I a God at hand, not afar off? is seen from what follows. Far and near are here in their local, not their temporal signification. A god near at hand is one whose domain and whose knowledge do not extend far; a God afar off, one who sees and works into the far distance. The question, which has an affirmative force, is explained by the statement of Jer 23:24: I fill heaven and earth. Hitz. insists on understanding “near at hand” of temporal nearness, after Deu 32:17: a God who is not far hence, a newly appeared God; and he supposes that, since in the east, from of old, knowledge is that which is known by experience, therefore the greatness of one’s knowledge depends on one’s advancement in years (Job 15:7, Job 15:10; Job 12:12, etc.); and God, he says, is the Ancient of days, Dan 7:9. But this line of thought is wholly foreign to the present passage. It is not wealth of knowledge as the result of long life or old age that God claims for Himself in Jer 23:24, but the power of seeing into that which is hidden so that none can conceal himself from Him, or omniscience. The design with which God here dwells on His omniscience and omnipresence too (cf. 1Ki 8:27; Isa 66:1) is shown in Jer 23:25. The false prophets went so far with their lying predictions, that it might appear as if God did not hear or see their words and deeds. The Lord exposes this delusion by calling His omniscience to mind in the words: I have heard how they prophesy falsehood in my name and say, I have dreamed, i.e., a dream sent by God, have had a revelation in dreams, whereas according to Jer 23:26 the dream was the deceit of their heart – “spun out of their own heart” (Hitz.). Jer 23:26 is variously interpreted. Hitz. supposes that the interrogative (in ) is made subordinate in the clause, and that the question is expressed with a double interrogative. He translates: How long still is there anything left in the heart of the prophets? as much as to say: how long have they materials for this? But there is a total want of illustrations in point for this subordination and doubling of the interrogative; and the force given to the is quite arbitrary, since we should have had some intimation of what it was that was present in their hearts. Even the repetition of the interrogative particles is unexplained, and the connecting of with a participle, instead of with the infinitive with , cannot be defended by means of passages where is joined with an adjective and the idea “to be” has to be supplied. L. de Dieu, followed by Seb. Schmidt, Chr. B. Mich., Ros., Maur., Umbr., Graf, was right in taking “How long” by itself as an aposiopesis: how long, sc. shall this go on? and in beginning a new question with , a question continued and completed by the further question: “Do they think,” etc., Jer 23:27. Is it in the heart of the prophets, i.e., have the prophets a mind to prophesy falsehood? do they mean to make men forget my name? Against holding Jer 23:27 as a resumption of the question there is no well-founded objection. Ng. affirms that after we must in that case have here as recapitulation of the subject; but that is rendered unnecessary by the subject’s being contained in the immediately preceding words. The conjecture propounded by Ng. , to change into : how long still is the fire in the heart of the prophets? needs no refutation. To make to forget the name of the Lord is: so to banish the Lord, as seen in His government and works, from the people’s heart, that He is no longer feared and honoured. By their dreams which they relate one to the other, i.e., not one prophet to the other, but the prophet to his fellow-man amongst the people. , because of the Baal, whom their fathers made their god, cf. Jdg 3:7; 1Sa 12:9. – These lies the prophets ought to cease. Jer 23:28. Each is to speak what he has, what is given him. He that has a dream is to tell the dream, and he that has God’s word should tell it. Dream as opposed to word of the Lord is an ordinary dream, the fiction of one’s own heart; not a dream-revelation given by God, which the pseudo-prophets represented their dreams to be. These dreams are as different from God’s word as straw is from corn. This clause is supported, Jer 23:29, by a statement of the nature of God’s word. It is thus ( ), namely, as fire and as a hammer that smashes the rocks. The sense of these words is not this: the word of God is strong enough by itself, needs no human addition, or: it will burn as fire the straw of the man’s word mixed with it. There is here no question of the mixing of God’s word with man’s word. The false prophets did not mingle the two, but gave out their man’s word for God’s. Nor, by laying stress on the indwelling power of the word of God, does Jeremiah merely give his hearers a characteristic by which they may distinguish genuine prophecy; he seeks besides to make them know that the word of the Lord which he proclaims will make an end of the lying prophets’ work. Thus understood, Jer 23:29 forms a stepping-stone to the threatenings uttered in Jer 23:30-32 against the lying prophets. The comparison to fire does not refer to the reflex influence which the word exerts on the speaker, so as that we should with Rashi and Ros. cf. Jer 20:9; the fire comes before us as that which consumes all man’s work that will not stand the test; cf. 1Co 3:12. The comparison to a hammer which smashes the rock shows the power of God, which overcomes all that is earthly, even what is firmest and hardest; cf. Heb 4:12. Its effect and accomplishment nothing can hinder.
Jer 23:30-32 Threatening of punishment. does not connect with Jer 23:29, but with the main idea of the previous verses, the conduct of the false prophets there exposed. , behold, I will be against them, will come upon them as an enemy; cf. Eze 5:8. The practice of these prophets is characterized in three ways, yet without marking out three classes of unworthy men. One habit of theirs is that of stealing the word of God one from another. Not inspired of God themselves, they tried to appropriate words of God from other prophets in order to give their own utterances the character of divine oracles. Another is: they take their tongues and say, God’s word, i.e., they use their tongues to speak pretended words from God. The verb occurs only here; elsewhere only the participle , and that almost always joined with in the sig. effatum Domini; here without it, but in the same sense. The root meaning of is disputed. Connected etymologically with , , it doubtlessly denotes originally, that which is whispered, Jahveh’s secret confidential communication; but it is constantly used, not for the word of God as silently inspired by God, but as softly uttered by the prophet. The meaning is not: their prophesying is “mere wagging of the tongue, talk according to their own caprice” (Graf); but: they give out their sayings for God’s, whereas God speaks neither to nor by them. Finally, their third way of doing consists in feigning revelations by means of dreams, which are but deceptive dreams. At this point the discourse falls back on the description in Jer 23:26. The words “and lead my people astray” refer to all their three ways of acting before characterized. is their boasting of revelations from God. Then comes
Jer 23:33-37 A rebuke of their mockery at Jeremiah’s threatening predictions. – Jer 23:33. “And when this people, or the prophet, or a priest ask thee, saying: What is the burden of Jahveh? then say to them: What the burden is – now I will cast you off, saith Jahveh. Jer 23:34. And the prophet, the priest, and the people that shall say: burden of Jahveh, on that man will I visit it and on his house. Jer 23:35. Thus shall ye say each to the other, and each to his brother: What hath Jahveh answered, and what hath Jahveh spoken? Jer 23:36. But burden of Jahveh shall ye mention no more, for a burden to every one shall his own word be; and ye wrest the words of the living God Jahveh of hosts, our God. Jer 23:37. Thus shalt thou say to the prophet: What hath Jahveh answered thee, and what hath He spoken? Jer 23:38. But if ye say: burden of Jahveh, therefore thus saith Jahveh: Because ye say this word: burden of Jahveh, and yet I have sent unto you, saying, Ye shall not say: burden of Jahveh; Jer 23:39. Therefore, behold, I will utterly forget you, and cast away from my face you and this city that I gave you and your fathers, Jer 23:40. And will lay upon you everlasting reproach, and everlasting, never-to-be-forgotten disgrace.”
The word , from , lift up, bear, sig. burden, and, like the phrase: lift up the voice, means a saying of weighty or dread import. The word has the latter sig. in the headings to the prophecies of threatening character; see on Nah 1:1, where this meaning of the word in the headings is asserted, and the widespread opinion that it means effatum is refuted. Jeremiah’s adversaries – as appears from these verses – used the word “burden” of his prophetic sayings by way of mockery, meaning burdensome prophecies, in order to throw ridicule on the prophet’s speeches, by them regarded as offensive. Thus if the people, or a prophet, or a priest ask: What is the burden of Jahveh, i.e., how runs it, or what does it contain? he is to answer: The Lord saith: I will cast you off, i.e., disburden myself of you, as it were – the idea of “burden” being kept up in the answer to the question. The article on the word prophet is used to show that the word is used generally of the class of prophets at large. The in the answering clause is nota accus ., the following phrase being designedly repeated from the question; and hence the unusual combination . The sense is: as regards the question what the burden is, I will cast you away. There is no reason to alter the text to fit the lxx translation: , or Vulg.: vos estis onus , as Cappell., J. D. Mich., Hitz., Gr., etc., do. The lxx rendering is based, not on another reading, but on another division of the words, viz., . – In Jer 23:34 the meaning of this answer is more fully explained. On every one that uses the word “burden” in this sneering way God will avenge the sneer, and not only on his person, but on his house, his family as well. In Jer 23:35 they are told how they are to speak of prophecy. Jer 23:36. They are no longer to make use of the phrase “burden of Jahveh,” “for the burden shall his word be to each one,” i.e., the word “burden” will be to each who uses it a burden that crushes him down. “And ye wrest,” etc., is part of the reason for what is said: and ye have = for ye have wrested the words of the living God. The clause is properly a corollary which tells what happens when they use the forbidden word.
Jer 23:38-40 In case they, in spite of the prohibition, persist in the use of the forbidden word, i.e., to not cease their mockery of God’s word, then the punishment set forth in Jer 23:33 is certainly to come on them. In the threat there is a manifestly designed word-play on . lxx, Vulg., Syr. have therefore rendered as if from (or ) instead: , ego tollam vos portans . One cod. gives , and Ew., Hitz., Graf, Ng. , etc., hold this reading to be right; but hardly with justice. The Chald. has expressed the reading of the text in its , et relinquam vos relinquendo . And the form is explained only by reading ( ); not by , for this verb keeps its everywhere, save with the one exception of , Psa 32:1, formed after the parallel . The assertion that the reading in the text gives no good sense is unfounded. I will utterly forget you is much more in keeping than: I will utterly lift you up, carry you forth. – With Jer 23:40, cf. Jer 20:11.
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
| Guilt of False Prophets. | B. C. 600. |
9 Mine heart within me is broken because of the prophets; all my bones shake; I am like a drunken man, and like a man whom wine hath overcome, because of the LORD, and because of the words of his holiness. 10 For the land is full of adulterers; for because of swearing the land mourneth; the pleasant places of the wilderness are dried up, and their course is evil, and their force is not right. 11 For both prophet and priest are profane; yea, in my house have I found their wickedness, saith the LORD. 12 Wherefore their way shall be unto them as slippery ways in the darkness: they shall be driven on, and fall therein: for I will bring evil upon them, even the year of their visitation, saith the LORD. 13 And I have seen folly in the prophets of Samaria; they prophesied in Baal, and caused my people Israel to err. 14 I have seen also in the prophets of Jerusalem a horrible thing: they commit adultery, and walk in lies: they strengthen also the hands of evildoers, that none doth return from his wickedness: they are all of them unto me as Sodom, and the inhabitants thereof as Gomorrah. 15 Therefore thus saith the LORD of hosts concerning the prophets; Behold, I will feed them with wormwood, and make them drink the water of gall: for from the prophets of Jerusalem is profaneness gone forth into all the land. 16 Thus saith the LORD of hosts, Hearken not unto the words of the prophets that prophesy unto you: they make you vain: they speak a vision of their own heart, and not out of the mouth of the LORD. 17 They say still unto them that despise me, The LORD hath said, Ye shall have peace; and they say unto every one that walketh after the imagination of his own heart, No evil shall come upon you. 18 For who hath stood in the counsel of the LORD, and hath perceived and heard his word? who hath marked his word, and heard it? 19 Behold, a whirlwind of the LORD is gone forth in fury, even a grievous whirlwind: it shall fall grievously upon the head of the wicked. 20 The anger of the LORD shall not return, until he have executed, and till he have performed the thoughts of his heart: in the latter days ye shall consider it perfectly. 21 I have not sent these prophets, yet they ran: I have not spoken to them, yet they prophesied. 22 But if they had stood in my counsel, and had caused my people to hear my words, then they should have turned them from their evil way, and from the evil of their doings. 23 Am I a God at hand, saith the LORD, and not a God afar off? 24 Can any hide himself in secret places that I shall not see him? saith the LORD. Do not I fill heaven and earth? saith the LORD. 25 I have heard what the prophets said, that prophesy lies in my name, saying, I have dreamed, I have dreamed. 26 How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart; 27 Which think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbour, as their fathers have forgotten my name for Baal. 28 The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell a dream; and he that hath my word, let him speak my word faithfully. What is the chaff to the wheat? saith the LORD. 29 Is not my word like as a fire? saith the LORD; and like a hammer that breaketh the rock in pieces? 30 Therefore, behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that steal my words every one from his neighbour. 31 Behold, I am against the prophets, saith the LORD, that use their tongues, and say, He saith. 32 Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams, saith the LORD, and do tell them, and cause my people to err by their lies, and by their lightness; yet I sent them not, nor commanded them: therefore they shall not profit this people at all, saith the LORD.
Here is a long lesson for the false prophets. As none were more bitter and spiteful against God’s true prophets than they, so there were none on whom the true prophets were more severe, and justly. The prophet had complained to God of those false prophets (ch. xiv. 13), and had often foretold that they should be involved in the common ruin; but here they have woes of their own.
I. He expresses the deep concern that he was under upon this account, and what a trouble it was to him to see men who pretended to a divine commission and inspiration ruining themselves, and the people among whom they dwelt, by their falsehood and treachery (v. 9): My heart within me is broken; I am like a drunken man. His head was in confusion with wonder and astonishment; his heart was under oppression with grief and vexation. Jeremiah was a man that laid things much to heart, and what was any way threatening to his country made a deep impression upon his spirits. He is here in trouble, 1. Because of the prophets and their sin, the false doctrine they preached, the wicked lives they lived; especially it filled him with horror to hear them making use of God’s name and pretending to have their instruction from him. Never was the Lord so abused, and the words of his holiness, as by these men. Note, The dishonour done to God’s name, and the profanation of his holy word, are the greatest grief imaginable to a gracious soul. 2. “Because of the Lord, and his judgments, which by this means are brought in upon us like a deluge.” He trembled to think of the ruin and desolation which were coming from the face of the Lord (so the word is) and from the face of the word of his holiness, which will be inflicted by the power of God’s wrath, according to the threatenings of his word, confirmed by his holiness. Note, Even those that have God for them cannot but tremble to think of the misery of those that have God against them.
II. He laments the abounding abominable wickedness of the land and the present tokens of God’s displeasure they were under for it (v. 10): The land is full of adulterers; it is full both of spiritual and corporal whoredom. They go a whoring from God, and, having cast off the fear of him, no marvel that they abandon themselves to all manner of lewdness; and, having dishonoured themselves and their own bodies, they dishonour God and his name by rash and false swearing, because of which the land mourns. Both perjury and common swearing are sins for which a land must mourn in true repentance or it will be made to mourn under the judgments of God. Their land mourned now under the judgment of famine; the pleasant places, or rather the pastures, or (as some read it) the habitations of the wilderness, are dried up for want of rain, and yet we see no signs of repentance. They answer not the end of the correction. The tenour and tendency of men’s conversations are sinful, their course continues evil, as bad as ever, and they will not be diverted from it. They have a great deal of resolution, but it is turned the wrong way; they are zealously affected, but not in a good thing: Their force is not right; their heart is fully set in them to do evil, and they are not valiant for the truth, have not courage enough to break off their evil courses, though they see God thus contending with them.
III. He charges it all upon the prophets and priests, especially the prophets. They are both profane (v. 11); the priests profane the ordinances of God they pretend to administer; the prophets profane the word of God they pretend to deliver; their converse and all their conversation are profane, and then it is not strange that the people are so debauched. They both play the hypocrite (so some read it); under sacred pretensions they carry on the vilest designs; yea, not only in their own houses, and the bad houses they frequent, but in my house have I found their wickedness; in the temple, where the priests ministered, where the prophets prophesied, there were they guilty both of idolatry and immorality. See a woeful instance in Hophni and Phinehas, 1 Sam. ii. 22. God searches his house, and what wickedness is there he will find it out; and the nearer it is to him the more offensive it is. Two things are charged upon them:– 1. That they taught people to sin by their examples. He compares them with the prophets of Samaria, the head city of the kingdom of the ten tribes, which had been long since laid waste. It was the folly of the prophets of Samaria that they prophesied in Baal, in Baal’s name; so Ahab’s prophets did, and so they caused my people Israel to err, to forsake the service of the true God and to worship Baal, v. 13. Now the prophets of Jerusalem did not do so; they prophesied in the name of the true God, and valued themselves upon that, that they were not like the prophets of Samaria, who prophesied in Baal; but what the better, when they debauched the nation as much by their immoralities as the other had done by their idolatries? It is a horrible thing in the prophets of Jerusalem that they make use of the name of the holy God, and yet wallow in all manner of impurity; they make nothing of committing adultery. They make use of the name of the God of truth, and yet walk in lies; they not only prophesy lies, but in their common conversation one cannot believe a word they say. It is all either jest and banter or fraud and design. Thus they encourage sinners to go on in their wicked ways; for every one will say, “Surely we may do as the prophets do; who can expect that we should be better than our teachers?” By this means it is that none returns from his wickedness; but they all say that they shall have peace, though they go on, for their prophets tell them so. By this means Judah and Jerusalem have become as Sodom and Gomorrah, that were wicked, and sinners before the Lord exceedingly; and God looked upon them accordingly as fit for nothing but to be destroyed, as they were, with fire and brimstone. 2. That they encouraged people in sin by their false prophecies. They made themselves believe that there was no harm, no danger in sin, and practiced accordingly; and then no marvel that they made others believe so too (v. 16): They speak a vision of their own heart; it is the product of their own invention, and agrees with their own inclination, but it is not out of the mouth of the Lord; he never dictated it to them, nor did it agree either with the law of Moses or with what God has spoken by other prophets. They tell sinners that it shall be well with them though they persist in their sins, v. 17. See here who those are that they encourage–those that despise God, that slight his authority, and have low and mean thoughts of his institutions, and those that walk after the imagination of their own heart, that are worshippers of idols and slaves to their own lusts; those that are devoted to their pleasures put contempt upon their God. Yet see how these prophets caressed and flattered them: they should have been still saying, There is no peace to those that go on in their evil ways–Those that despise God shall be lightly esteemed–Woe, and a thousand woes, to them; but they still said, You shall have peace; no evil shall come upon you. And, which was worst of all, they told them, God has said so, so making him to patronize sin, and to contradict himself. Note, Those that are resolved to go on in their evil ways will justly be given up to believe the strong delusions of those who tell them that they shall have peace though they go on.
IV. God disowns all that these false prophets said to sooth people up in their sins (v. 21): I have not sent these prophets; they never had any mission from God. They were not only not sent by him on this errand, but they were never sent by him on any errand; he never had employed them in any service or business for him; and, as to this matter, whereas they pretended to have instructions from him to assure this people of peace, he declares that he never gave them any such instructions. Yet they were very forward–they ran; they were very bold–they prophesied without any of that difficulty with which the true prophets sometimes struggled. They said to sinners, You shall have peace. But (v. 18): “Who hath stood in the counsel of the Lord? Who of you has, that are so confident of this? You deliver this message with a great deal of assurance; but have you consulted God about it? No; you never considered whether it be agreeable to the discoveries God has made of himself, whether it will consist with the honour of his holiness and justice, to let sinners go unpunished. You have not perceived and heard his word, nor marked that; you have not compared this with the scripture; if you had taken notice of that, and of the constant tenour of it, you would never have delivered such a message.” The prophets themselves must try the spirits by the touchstone of the law and of the testimony, as well as those to whom they prophesy; but which of those did so that prophesied of peace? That they did not stand in God’s counsel nor hear his word is proved afterwards, v. 22. If they had stood in my counsel, as they pretend, 1. They would have made the scriptures their standard: They would have caused my people to hear my words, and would have conscientiously kept closely to them. But, not speaking according to that rule, it is a plain evidence that there is no light in them. 2. They would have made the conversion of souls their business, and would have aimed at that in all their preaching. They would have done all they could to turn people from their evil way in general and from all the particular evil of their doings. They would have encouraged and assisted the reformation of manners, would have made this their scope in all their preaching, to part between men and their sins; but it appeared that this was a thing they never aimed at, but, on the contrary, to encourage sinners in their sins. 3. They would have had some seals of their ministry. This sense our translation gives it: If they had stood in my counsel, and the words they had preached had been my words, then they should have turned them from their evil way; a divine power should have gone along with the word for the conviction of sinners. God will bless his own institutions. Yet this is no certain rule; Jeremiah himself, though God sent him, prevailed with but few to turn from their evil way.
V. God threatens to punish these prophets for their wickedness. They promised the people peace; and to show them the folly of that God tells them that they should have no peace themselves. They were very unfit to warrant the people, and pass their word to them that no evil shall come upon them, when all evil is coming upon themselves and they are not aware of it, v. 12. Because the prophets and priests are profane, therefore their ways shall be unto them as slippery ways in the darkness. Those that undertake to lead others, because they mislead them, and know they do so, shall themselves have no comfort in their way. 1. They pretend to show others the way, but they shall themselves be in the dark, or in a mist; their light or sight shall fail, so that they shall not be able to look before them, shall have no forecast for themselves. 2. They pretend to give assurances to others, but they themselves shall find no firm footing: Their ways shall be to them as slippery ways, in which they shall not go with any steadiness, safety, or satisfaction. 3. They pretend to make the people easy with their flatteries, but they shall themselves be uneasy: They shall be driven, forced forward as captives, or making their escape as those that are pursued, and they shall fall in the way by which they hoped to escape, and so fall into the enemies’ hands. 4. They pretend to prevent the evil that threatens others, but God will bring evil upon them, even the year of their visitation, the time fixed for calling them to an account; such a time is fixed concerning all that do not judge themselves, and it will be an evil time. The year of visitation is the year of recompenses. It is further threatened (v. 15), I will feed them with wormwood, or poison, with that which is not only nauseous, but noxious, and make them drink waters of gall, or (as some read it) juice of hemlock; see ch. ix. 15. Justly is the cup of trembling put into their hand first, for from the prophets of Jerusalem, who should have been patterns of piety and every thing that is praiseworthy, even from them has profaneness gone forth into all the lands. Nothing more effectually debauches a nation than the debauchery of ministers.
VI. The people are here warned not to give any credit to these false prophets; for, though they flattered them with hopes of impunity, the judgments of God would certainly break out against them, unless they repented (v. 16): “Take notice of what God says, and hearken not to the words of these prophets; for you will find, in the issue, that God’s word shall stand, and not theirs. God’s word will make you serious, but they make you vain, feed you with vain hopes, which will fail you at last. They tell you, No evil shall come upon you; but hear what God says (v. 19), Behold, a whirlwind of the Lord has gone forth in fury. They tell you, All shall be calm and serene; but God tells you, There is a storm coming, a whirlwind of the Lord, of his sending, and therefore there is no standing before it. It is a whirlwind raised by divine wrath; it has gone forth in fury, a wind that is brought forth out of the treasuries of divine vengeance; and therefore it is a grievous whirlwind, and shall light heavily, with rain and hail, upon the head of the wicked, which they cannot avoid nor find any shelter from.” It shall fall upon the wicked prophets themselves who deceived the people, and the wicked people who suffered themselves to be deceived. A horrible tempest shall be the portion of their cup, Ps. xi. 6. This sentence is bound on as irreversible (v. 20): The anger of the Lord shall not return, for the decree has gone forth. God will not alter his mind, nor suffer his anger to be turned away, till he have executed the sentence and performed the thoughts of his heart. God’s whirlwind, when it comes down from heaven, returns not thither, but accomplishes that for which he sent it, Isa. lv. 11. This they will not consider now; but in the latter days you shall consider it perfectly, consider it with understanding (so the word is) or with consideration. Note, Those that will not fear the threatenings shall feel the execution of them, and will then perfectly understand what they will not now admit the evidence of, what a fearful thing it is to fall into the hands of a just and jealous God. Those that will not consider in time will be made to consider when it is too late. Son, remember.
VII. Several things are here offered to the consideration of these false prophets for their conviction, that, if possible, they might be brought to recant their error and acknowledge the cheat they had put upon God’s people.
1. Let them consider that though they may impose upon men God is too wise to be imposed upon. Men cannot see through their fallacies, but God can and does. Here,
(1.) God asserts his own omnipresence and omniscience in general, Jer 23:23; Jer 23:24. When they told the people that no evil should befall them though they went on in their evil ways they went upon atheistical principles, that the Lord doth not see their sin, that he cannot judge through the dark cloud, that he will not require it; and therefore they must be taught the first principles of their religion, and confronted with the most incontestable self-evident truths. [1.] That though God’s throne is prepared in the heavens, and this earth seems to be at a distance from him, yet he is a God here in this lower world, which seems to be afar off, as well as in the upper world, which seems to be at hand, v. 23. The eye of God is the same on earth that it is in heaven. Here it runs to and fro as well as there (2 Chron. xvi. 9); and what is in the minds of men, whose spirits are veiled in flesh, is as clearly seen by him as what is in the mind of angels, those unveiled spirits above that surround his throne. The power of God is the same on earth among its inhabitants that it is in heaven among its armies. With us nearness and distance make a great difference both in our observations and in our operations, but it is not so with God; to him darkness and light, at hand and afar off, are both alike. [2.] That, how ingenious and industrious soever men are to disguise themselves and their own characters and counsels, they cannot possibly be concealed from God’s all-seeing eye (v. 24): “Can any hide himself in the secret places of the earth, that I shall not see him? Can any hide his projects and intentions in the secret places of the heart, that I shall not see them?” No arts of concealment can hide men from the eye of God, nor deceive his judgment of them. [3.] That he is every where present; he does not only rule heaven and earth, and uphold both by his universal providence, but he fills heaven and earth by his essential presence, Psa 139:7; Psa 139:8, c. No place can either include him or exclude him.
(2.) He applies this to these prophets, who had a notable art of disguising themselves (Jer 23:25Jer 23:26): I have heard what the prophets said that prophesy lies in my name. They thought that he was so wholly taken up with the other world that he had no leisure to take cognizance of what passed in this. But God will make them know that he knows all their impostures, all the shams they have put upon the world, under colour of divine revelation. What they intended to humour the people with they pretended to have had from God in a dream, when there was no such thing. This they could not discover. If a man tell me that he dreamed so and so, I cannot contradict him; he knows I cannot. But God discovered the fraud. Perhaps the false prophets whispered what they had to say in the ears of such as were their confidants, saying, So and so I have dreamed; but God overheard them. The heart-searching eye of God traced them in all the methods they took to deceive the people, and he cries out, How long? Shall I always bear with them? Is it in the hearts of those prophets (so some read it) to be ever prophesying lies and prophesying the deceits of their own hearts? Will they never see what an affront they put upon God, what an abuse they put upon the people, and what judgments they are preparing for themselves?
2. Let them consider that their palming upon people counterfeit revelations, and fathering their own fancies upon divine inspiration, was the ready way to bring all religion into contempt and make men turn atheists and infidels; and this was the thing they really intended, though they frequently made mention of the name of God, and prefaced all they said with, Thus saith the Lord. Yet, says God, They think to cause my people to forget my name by their dreams. They designed to draw people off from the worship of God, from all regard to God’s laws and ordinances and the true prophets, as their fathers forgot God’s name for Baal. Note, The great thing Satan aims at is to make people forget God, and all that whereby he has made himself known; and he has many subtle methods to bring them to this. Sometimes he does it by setting up false gods (bring men in love with Baal, and they soon forget the name of God), sometimes by misrepresenting the true God, as if he were altogether such a one as ourselves. Pretenses to new revelation may prove as dangerous to religion as the denying of all revelation; and false prophets in God’s name may perhaps do more mischief to the power of godliness than false prophets in Baal’s name, as being less guarded against.
3. Let them consider what a vast difference there was between their prophecies and those that were delivered by the true prophets of the Lord (v. 28): The prophet that has a dream, which was the way of inspiration that the false prophets most pretended to, if he has a dream, let him tell it as a dream; so Mr. Gataker reads it. “Let him lay no more stress upon it than men do upon their dreams, nor expect any more regard to be had to it. Let them not say that it is from God, nor call their foolish dreams divine oracles. But let the true prophet, that has my word, speak my word faithfully, speak it as a truth” (so some read it): “let him keep closely to his instructions, and you will soon perceive a vast difference between the dreams that the false prophets tell and the divine dictates which the true prophets deliver. He that pretends to have a message from God, whether by dream or voice, let him declare it, and it will easily appear which is of God and which is not. Those that have spiritual senses exercised will be able to distinguish; for what is the chaff to the wheat? The promises of peace which these prophets make to you are no more to be compared to God’s promises than chaff to wheat.” Men’s fancies are light, and vain, and worthless, as the chaff which the wind drives away. But the word of God has substance in it; it is of value, is food for the soul, the bread of life. Wheat was the staple commodity of Canaan, that valley of vision, Deu 8:8; Eze 27:17. There is as much difference between the vain fancies of men and the pure word of God as between the chaff and the wheat. It follows (v. 29), Is not my word like a fire, saith the Lord? Is their word so? Has it the power and efficacy that the word of God has? No; nothing like it; there is no more comparison than between painted fire and real fire. Theirs is like an ignis fatuus–a deceiving meteor, leading men into by-paths and dangerous precipices. Note, The word of God is like fire. The law was a fiery law (Deut. xxxiii. 2), and of the gospel Christ says, I have come to send fire on the earth, Luke xii. 49. Fire has different effects, according as the matter is on which it works; it hardens clay, but softens wax; it consumes the dross, but purifies the gold. So the word of God is to some a savour of life unto life, to others of death unto death. God appeals here to the consciences of those to whom the word was sent: “Is not my word like fire? Has it not been so to you? Zech. i. 6. Speak as you have found.” It is compared likewise to a hammer breaking the rock in pieces. The unhumbled heart of man is like a rock; if it will not be melted by the word of God as the fire, it will be broken to pieces by it as the hammer. Whatever opposition is given to the word, it will be borne down and broken to pieces.
4. Let them consider that while they went on in this course God was against them. Three times they are told this, Jer 23:30; Jer 23:31; Jer 23:32. Behold, I am against the prophets. They pretended to be for God, and made use of his name, but were really against him; he looks upon them as they were really, and is against them. How can they be long safe, or at all easy, that have a God of almighty power against them? While these prophets were promising peace to the people God was proclaiming war against them. They stand indicted here, (1.) For robbery: They steal my word every one from his neighbour. Some understand it of that word of God which the good prophets preached; they stole their sermons, their expressions, and mingled them with their own, as hucksters mingle bad wares with some that are good, to make them vendible. Those that were strangers to the spirit of the true prophets mimicked their language, picked up some good sayings of theirs, and delivered them to the people as if they had been their own, but with an ill grace; they were not of a piece with the rest of their discourses. The legs of the lame are not equal, so is a parable in the mouth of fools, Prov. xxvi. 7. Others understand it of the word of God as it was received and entertained by some of the people; they stole it out of their hearts, as the wicked one in the parable is said to steal the good seed of the word, Matt. xiii. 19. By their insinuations they diminished the authority, and so weakened the efficacy, of the word of God upon the minds of those that seemed to be under convictions by it. (2.) They stand indicted for counterfeiting the broad seal. Therefore God is against them (v. 31), because they use their tongues at their pleasure in their discourses to the people; they say what they themselves think fit, and then father it upon God, pretend they had it from him, and say, He saith it. Some read it, They smooth their tongues; they are very complaisant to the people, and say nothing but what is pleasing and plausible; they never reprove them nor threaten them, but their words are smoother than butter. Thus they ingratiate themselves with them, and get money by them; and they have the impudence and impiety to make God the patron of their lies; they say, “He saith so.” What greater indignity can be done to the God of truth than to lay the brats of the father of lies at his door? (3.) They stand indicted as common cheats (v. 32): I am against them, for they prophesy false dreams, pretending that to be a divine inspiration which is but an invention of their own. This is a horrid fraud; nor will it excuse them to say, Caveat emptor–Let the buyer take care of himself, and Si populus vult decipi, decipiatur–If people will be deceived, let them. No; it is the people’s fault that they err, that they take things upon trust, and do not try the spirits; but it is much more the prophets’ fault that they cause God’s people to err by their lies and by their lightness, by the flatteries of their preaching soothing them up in their sins, and by the looseness and lewdness of their conversation encouraging them to persist in them. [1.] God disowns their having any commission from him: I sent them not, nor commanded them; they are not God’s messengers, nor is what they say his message. [2.] He therefore justly denies his blessing with them: Therefore they shall not profit this people at all. All the profit they aim at is to make them easy; but they shall not so much as do that, for God’s providences will at the same time be making them uneasy. They do not profit this people (so some read it); and more is implied than is expressed; they not only do them no good, but do them a great deal of hurt. Note, Those that corrupt the word of God, while they pretend to preach it, are so far from edifying the church that they do it the greatest mischief imaginable.
Fuente: Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary
Vs. 9-15: FALSE PROPHETS AND THEIR SINS
Having denounced the heads of state, Jehovah now turns to rebuke those leaders who dealt falsely in the religious life of the nation. It was the responsibility of the true prophet to speak out with courage, boldness and confidence, against the perversion of justice and righteousness on the part of the shepherds of Israel. But this is not what he saw happening among the professional prophets.
1. Jeremiah’s mind is boggled by the outright wickedness of the professional prophets in Judah, (vs. 9).
a. Their careless, unbelieving and mocking attitude toward the threatenings of divine judgment upon the nation is shocking!
b. So deep is his agitation that he pictures himself as trembling, staggering and swaying like a drunken man.
2. The corruption of prophet and priest is reflected in the utter corruption of the covenant people
a. Their immorality and idolatry had even found its way into the rituals being practiced in Jehovah’s own temple in Jerusalem, (vs. 11; 2Ki 21:5; Eze 8:16-18).
b. Worse than their counterparts in the northern kingdom had been, both prophets and priests, in Judah, approved and encouraged the heathenish, orgiastic rites of Baal – practicing adultery and walking in lies, while professing to serve Jehovah.
c. Small wonder, therefore, that Judah did not turn from her wickedness; and that God regarded her as Sodom and Gomorrah! (vs. 14b-c).
3. Jeremiah flatly charges the religious leaders with the responsibility of the immorality of the nation; nor shall they escape the judgment of the Lord! (vs. 12,15).
a. In darkness, they are following a slippery, perilous path to destruction.
b. The Lord will feed them with wormwood (bitterness) and give them poisoned water to drink (vs. 15a).
c. The REASON: “for from the prophets of Jerusalem is profaneness gone forth into all the land!” (vs. 15b).
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
The Prophet here again inveighs against the wickedness of the people; but as the prophets by their flatteries had then led astray the king and his princes, as well as the people, the Prophet directed his discourse to them, and says that his heart was troubled on account of the prophets We know that men think themselves half absolved when no one severely reproves them. When, therefore, the prophets ceased from their work, there was so great a security among the whole people, that there was no fear of God in them. This is the reason why the Prophet now says that his heart was troubled on account of so much indifference; for the prophets were, as it is said elsewhere, like dumb dogs; they overlooked the most grievous and the most atrocious sins, they made no effort to restore the people to the right way. Troubled, then, he says, is my heart for the prophets; a heavier judgment awaited them, for they ought to have been the instruments of God’s Spirit, the heralds of his judgments; they ought to have undertaken his cause by using exhortations, reproofs, and threatenings.
There is yet no doubt but that what is said ought to be extended to the whole body of the people. But Jeremiah wished to begin with the prophets, as though he had said that it was monstrous that the prophets boasted that they were God’s ministers, and yet were dumb in the midst of so much wickedness. On account of the prophets, (86) he says, broken is my heart Then he says that his bones were disjointed. In the first chapter of Genesis, when Moses speaks of the Spirit as moving on the waters, he uses the same verb, but in a different conjugation. However this may be, it is most suitable to say that his bones were disjointed. (87) And we know that the bones are tied together by sinews, that they may not be moved from their places; for the loosening of one bone renders the whole body almost useless. He meant, then, by this kind of speaking, to express the most painful perturbation of mind, as though he had said that what he had, as the firmost and strongest thing, was become weak and altogether feeble.
He afterwards compares himself to a drunken man; by which metaphor he understands that he was completely stunned, and that all his senses were taken from him. And he adds, over whom wine has passed The verb עבר, ober, means to pass beyond; but to pass over is its meaning here. He who is overcome by immoderate drinking seems as though he was drowned; for when one falls under the water, he is no more sunk than he who drowns his brain with wine; for drunkenness is like a grave, inasmuch as it holds the whole man under its power. Yet the Prophet meant no other thing than that this monstrous thing rendered those astonied who were of a sane and sound mind, and that it also shook and disjointed all the members, and terrified and confounded minds otherwise quiet and tranquil. For, certainly, Jeremiah was a wise man, and was also endued with courage, so that he would not have quailed under every evil though great; nor could he have been easily overwhelmed with stupor like a drunken man. Hence by these comparisons he shows how dreadful and monstrous it was, that the prophets were so unconcerned as not to say a word, when they saw that impiety and contempt of God were so rampant, when they saw the whole land defiled with every kind of wickedness, as we shall presently see.
Then he says, On account of Jehovah, and on account of the words of his holiness By saying, on account of Jehovah, he brings God before them as a judge and avenger; as though he had said, “If they believe that there is a God in heaven, it is a wonder that they are so brutish as to dare to boast of his name, and yet silently to allow heaven and earth to be mingled together. Where, then, is their reason, when they dare so heedlessly to profess a name so fearful and awful? for whenever God’s name is mentioned, there ought to come into their minds not only his goodness and mercy, but also his severity, and then his power, which is dreadful to all the wicked. As then these men dare thus to trifle with God, must not their stupidity be monstrous?” What, then, the Prophet means is this, — that it was a wonder that the prophets undertook their office, and yet had no concern for the glory of God.
And he adds, On account of the words of his holiness Men would seek easiness were not God to rouse them by his word. But as the Law had been written for the Jews, as these false prophets knew that if they wished rightly to perform their work, they ought to have been the expounders of the Law — as these things were sufficiently known, the Prophet justly refers here to the word of God, as though he would put a bridle in their mouths, lest they should, after their usual manner, evade what a bare profession of God’s name implied. Since, then, God had testified in his Law how he would have his people ruled, how was it that these prophets were not terrified by God’s words? And as hypocrites not only despise God himself, and depreciate his glory, but also disregard the doctrine of his law, the Prophet adorns God’s words with a remarkable encomium, calling his words the words of his holiness And he thus calls God’s words holy, and therefore inviolable, in order that the ungodly might know, that a dreadful vengeance was nigh them, because they disregarded both God and his holy words. It follows —
(86) These words are connected with the former verse in the Sept. where they seem to have no meaning. The Vulg. puts them as a heading to what follows, and Blayney has done the same, “concerning the prophets.” The Syr. connects them with the following words, as Calvin does, and our version, and also the Arab. and Targ. The most suitable rendering would be, —
For the prophets broken is my heart within me.
The sentence is otherwise hardly complete. It may be rendered “with regard to the prophets,” etc. — Ed.
(87) The idea of shaking or trembling is commonly given here to the verb: “are shaken,” Sept.; “have trembled,” Vulg., Syr., and Targ. The word “tremble” is the most suitable. — Ed.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
E. The Condemnation of False Prophets Jer. 23:9-40
The heading over Jer. 23:9 reads against the prophets. In this section of the book which deals with national leaders past, present and future a section concerning the prophets is to be expected. The question is, what prophets are addressed in this oracle? Jeremiah is not referring to the prophets of Baal (see Jer. 23:13; Jer. 23:27), nor is he referring to the so called sons of the prophets who are always described as true prophets of the Lord. As a matter of fact there is no positive proof that the institution known as the sons of the prophets which was founded by Elijah and Elisha was still in existence. The prophets against whom Jeremiah speaks out are men who were purporting to speak in the name of the Lord when they had received no revelation from Him. They are akin to those self-serving court prophets which appear in 1 Kings 22 as part of the court of Ahab. These pseudo prophets apparently enjoyed a large measure of popular support in the days of Jeremiah probably because they tickled the ears of the people with the kind of preaching which they craved. These men were perhaps the greatest hindrance to the effective proclamation of the revealed word of God. That there existed a mutual antagonism between the true messenger of God and these charlatans is evident in the passages where they are mentioned.[227] Jeremiah lashed out against them throughout his ministry. Here he points out the menace of false prophets (Jer. 23:9-15) and analyzes their message (Jer. 23:16-22) and their methods (Jer. 23:23-32). Finally he blasts them for the way they caused the people to mock the true messenger of God (Jer. 23:33-40).
[227] See Jer. 5:30 f; Jer. 14:13-18; Jer. 26:7-16; Jer. 28:1-17; Jer. 29:30-32; Jer. 37:18-21.
1. The menace of the fake Prophets (Jer. 23:9-15)
TRANSLATION
(9) Against the prophets. My heart is broken with in me, all my bones shake; I am like a drunk man, and like a strong man whom wine has overcome, because of the LORD, and because of His holy words. (10) For the land is full of adulterers; for the earth mourns because of a curse; the pastures of the wilderness have dried up . Their course is evil, and their strength is not right; (11) for both the prophets and the priests are profane; yea in My house I have found their wickedness (oracle of the LORD). (12) Therefore their way shall become to them as slippery places in deep darkness. They shall be pushed forward and fall on it; for I shall bring against them calamity, the year of their visitation (oracle of the LORD). (13) In the prophets of Samaria I saw unseemliness; they prophesied by Baal and caused My people Israel to err. (14) But in the prophets of Jerusalem I have seen an astonishing thing: committing adultery, walking in lies; and they have strengthened the hands of the evil ones, with the result that no one turns from his evil. They are all to Me like Sodom, and her inhabitants like Gomorrah. (15) Therefore thus says the LORD of hosts concerning the prophets: Behold, I am about to feed them wormwood and cause them to drink poison water; for from the prophets of Jerusalem ungodliness has gone out to all the land.
COMMENTS
Jeremiah did not fit the stereotype of the hell-fire and damnation preacher. As he contemplated the guilt of his people and their impending destruction his heart is broken, his bones shake in terror. He loses all self-control and becomes in that respect like a man who is intoxicated. Four reasons for the grief and distress of the prophet are given. (1) Jeremiah is upset because of the Lord and His word (Jer. 23:9). The knowledge that God is about to bring judgment upon the wicked and sinful people of Judah has caused the prophet much grief and no little perplexity. (2) Jeremiah is grief-stricken because of the sinfulness of the masses. The land is full of adultery. Both literal and spiritual adultery is doubtlessly meant. The course of the people, their way of life, that which they pursue is only evil. They use their might for that which is not right i.e., crookedness. (3) The condition of the land brings the prophet much distress. The land is under the curse of God because of the sin of its inhabitants. The curse here is that with which God punishes the wicked.[228] The earth mourns because it is unable to bring forth its produce. The pastures have dried up (Jer. 23:10). This passage may well date to the time of the drought mentioned in Jer. 14:1. (4) But the greatest burden to the heart of Jeremiah was the condition of the spiritual leaders of the land. Both the priests and the prophets were profane, unholy, disobedient to the commands of God. In the very Temple of God evidence of their wickedness could be found (Jer. 23:11). Just exactly what wickedness Jeremiah is referring to here is uncertain. Ezekiel tells of the totemistic worship of figures of animals in the inner chambers and of women weeping for the nature god Tammuz in the courts of the Temple (Eze. 8:10-14). These pagan practices could not have been going on without the active cooperation of the priests. The false prophets were probably preaching their perversions of the word of God in the Temple precincts. Being both priest and prophet, Jeremiah was keenly aware of the guilt of the men who occupied both of these offices.
[228] See Zec. 5:3; Dan. 9:11; Isa. 24:6; Lev. 26:14 ff.; Deu. 28:16 ff.
Up to this point the false prophets had pursued their evil course with assurance; but now God will make their way slippery and dangerous as they plunge forward into the darkness of sin. The imagery here is comparable to that of Jer. 13:16 and Psa. 35:6. By circumstances and by Satan these wicked men are driven forward to ever more treacherous ground until they finally will fall to their destruction. Their year of visitation i.e., time of their punishment, will overtake them (Jer. 23:12).
In the eyes of God the prophets of Judah were more wicked than the prophets of Samaria. Those Baal prophets of the north had been found to be unseemly (lit., unsalted, tasteless). They had caused Gods people in the north to err (Jer. 23:13). But the prophets of Judah were far worse. By professing themselves to be spokesmen for God they were in effect putting Gods stamp of approval upon the most terrible deeds. They themselves were immoral and unscrupulous and furthermore through their false prophecies they strengthened the hands of those who engaged in evil practices. They did not preach repentance or judgment and consequently no man turned away from his evil deeds. By constantly preaching peace and prosperity these prophets had succeeded in turning Judah into a virtual Sodom (Jer. 23:14). From the prophets of Jerusalem ungodliness had spread throughout the land. Good prophets may not have much of an impact upon society. But let reports of evil conduct on the part of clergymen spread throughout the land and every sinner will use it as an excuse to commit even greater evils. These prophets who preached such a disastrous message and set such a terrible example will be forced to partake of the wormwood and the gall, bitter poisonous plants which here symbolize divine judgment (Jer. 23:15). In Jer. 9:15 this same expression was used in reference to the judgment upon the people of the land. Here the preachers are depicted as suffering the same fate as the people to whom they preached. There is no exemption for the clergy when it comes to divine judgment!
Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series
(9) Mine heart within me is broken . . .The abrupt transition shows that we are entering on an entirely new section. In the Hebrew order and punctuation of the words this is shown still more clearlyConcerning the prophets: My heart is broken within methe first words being the superscription and title of what follows. The four clauses describe the varied phenomena of horror and amazement, and then comes the cause of the horrorthe contrast between the words of Jehovah and His holiness on the one side, and the wickedness of priests and prophets on the other. The whole section is the complement of that which denounced the wickedness of the pastorsi.e., of the civil rulersin Jer. 23:1-4.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
THE FALSE PROPHETS, Jer 23:9-40.
9. This verse is tamely rendered in the Authorized Version. Its opening sentences stand: Concerning the prophets, broken is my heart within me; all my bones shake. The same radical word which is here rendered shake, is, in Gen 1:2, “moved,” and in Deu 32:11, “fluttereth.” The sense here is, to shake in a helpless and tottering manner, and so is kindred to the following sentence: I am like a drunken man.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
1). Jeremiah Explains How Difficult He Is Finding It To Proclaim YHWH’s Holy Words Against The Prophets And Outlines The Consequences Of Their Prophesying On The Land. YHWH Himself Then Declares What The Consequences Will Be On The Prophets Themselves ( Jer 23:9-12 ).
Jeremiah’s diatribe against the prophets commences with an expression of the effect that what he is being called on to do is having on him. The ‘holy words’ that YHWH has given him to say against the prophets have affected him deeply, for he is only too well aware of who it is that the people put their trust in, and of what the people’s view of them is as those who are ‘holy to YHWH’. He knows that he is taking on the very people whom the people see as revealing to them YHWH’s mind, and must publicly declare them to be ungodly, profane and polluted, and the impression that we gain is that he himself did also see them as having a kind of ‘holiness’ which was why he needed ‘holy words’ with which to combat them.
Jer 23:9
‘CONCERNING THE PROPHETS.
My heart within me is disturbed (broken),
All my bones shake.
I am like a drunken man,
And like a man whom wine has overcome,
Because of YHWH,
And because of his holy words.’
The passage opens in an unusual way with a heading, ‘concerning the prophets’ demonstrating the importance that Jeremiah placed on this particular passage. Compare the later ‘concerning Egypt’ (Jer 46:2), ‘concerning Moab’ (Jer 48:1) and so on of other nations. In other words the guild of prophets were seen as on a parallel with great nations. Such was their importance.
The heading then introduces a long diatribe against these prophets, one which commences with an expression demonstrating Jeremiah’s concerns and how vividly and deeply they were affecting him. The conversation will, however, very quickly be taken over by YHWH speaking through him.
Jeremiah begins by describing the effect on him of both YHWH and of ‘His holy words’ which he has to pronounce. The burden imposed on him by them seemingly constantly oppressed him, and clearly affected him deeply. He was not finding the ministry to which he was called easy. There may have been a number of reasons for this, but in context the main reason was undoubtedly that of the problem of having to deal with the ‘holiness’ of the prophets, something about which he may well have been uncertain. (We can compare how difficult we may ourselves find it to distinguish between those who truly have the Holy Spirit and those who simply make great claims about it, fearful lest we cause despite to the Holy Spirit). But along with that were a number of related reasons:
Firstly he was deeply upset because he did not find it easy having to oppose the whole prophetic guild whom everyone saw as ‘YHWH’s messengers’ and as ‘holy’ and ‘untouchable’, especially as it was they who had the confidence of the people. Having to expound against them ‘YHWH’s holy words’ was not something that he found to be easy. In view of the long passage ahead devoted to his words against the prophets this would appear to have been a primary reason for his distress.
Secondly he would be distressed because he did not find it easy to have to recognise that there was a curse on his own native land as a result of the activities of those prophets (Jer 23:10). He knew that he had to proclaim it but it was not something that came easily.
Thirdly he would be distressed at the thought of the people’s spiritual condition, which arose as a further consequence of the activities of the prophets, and would be deeply upset at the thought of what was coming on them (Jer 23:10).
So concern about the ‘holiness’ of his opponents, awareness of the curse on the land, and anguish at the people’s spiritual condition would all, in a sensitive and essentially loving man, have contributed to his distress. Indeed had they not done so he would hardly have been a suitable person to carry YHWH’s ‘burden’.
Thus we learn that these factors disturb his mind and will (‘heart’) and cause his inner self to shake, (the bones were seen as representing men’s inner self), with the result that he senses himself as behaving like a drunken man, reeling under the words that he has to proclaim. But he is not drunk with wine, he is rather filled with the Spirit (Eph 5:18), not however in order to sing (even though he would sometimes do that when he worshipped in the Temple) but in order that he might convey YHWH’s message.
It may also partly be because he contrasts ‘the holy words’ which he himself has received from YHWH with their supposed ‘holy’ words, and shudders as he does so. That would have added to his distress as he thought of the way in which it would be seen by the people as both sets of adversaries claiming to wield ‘holy words’. It gave him a new sense of what his ‘holy words’ involved, the very truth of YHWH, and he longed that the people might appreciate the fact. Indeed he may have found it difficult that the prophets even dared to speak such words in the face of the holy words of YHWH. He probably saw their attempts as the equivalent of blasphemy, because they were downgrading the word of God, were interfering in a sphere into which they had no right to enter, and were uttering things that they had no right to say.
Jer 23:10-11
‘For the land is full of adulterers,
For because of the curse the land mourns,
The pastures of the wilderness are dried up,
And their course is evil, and their might is not right,
“For both prophet and priest are profane,
Yes, in my house have I found their wickedness,
The word of YHWH.”
He points out that it is in fact because of these ‘holy’ prophets with their ‘holy words’ that the land is full of adultery, something which they were quite happy to recommend under the guise of religious ritual. This was their kind of ‘holiness’, consorting with ‘holy’ prostitutes. The adultery would have been spiritual, indicating a seeking after idols as ‘lovers’, as well as physical in that the very worship encouraged perverted sex (compare Jer 29:23), or indeed both for the two went together. Everywhere people were copulating in the high places as they burned incense to Baal. And it is because of the curse which this behaviour has produced that ‘the land mourns because of the curse’ which is on it (in accordance with Deu 29:23-24; Isa 24:6-7; Amo 4:7-9), something which results in the pastures of the grazing lands being dried up (the ‘wilderness’ was where they grazed their cattle and sheep as opposed to the arable land on which they grew their crops). Furthermore the course that they recommended was evil (their course is evil) and what they put their strength and efforts and great influence into bringing about was not right (their might was not right). And that was because both priests and prophets were ‘profane’, that is, irreligious, polluted and godless, having been led astray by false teaching. Note in this regard the combination of prophets and priests, those who professed an inspired ‘word’ from YHWH, and those who supposedly expounded the Law. In the face of this what hope was there for the people? And it should be noted that YHWH Himself testifies to their wickedness as revealed in their activities in the Temple, and does it ‘by His sure and certain word’. This wickedness again included not only their idolatrous worship, but also the perverted sex with cult prostitutes, and the sex between worshippers, all aimed at persuading the gods to make the land fertile, something which had manifestly failed, together with their acceptance without protest of injustice and oppression. The prophets meanwhile no doubt kept a look out for the best looking girls, using their exalted office as a means of influencing them in their favour. A similar position is taken today by modern servants of idolatry, singers, sports personalities and the like, and even some religious personalities. They will all share the fate of these prophets.
Jer 23:12
“For which reason their way will be to them as slippery places in the darkness,
They will be driven on, and fall in them,
For I will bring evil on them,
Even the year of their visitation,
The word of YHWH.”
But the consequences for these prophets will be that they will find themselves walking in slippery places in the darkness, and being driven on and falling in them, because YHWH was bringing about their downfall. The idea would be a familiar one with them. Many a man’s body had been discovered when morning came because in seeking to descend slippery slopes in the darkness he had fallen to his death (compare Psa 35:5-6; Psa 73:2; Isa 8:22), and many would have experienced such dangers for themselves, and the awfulness, having slipped, of falling into darkness. But in that case, unlike here, they had not been driven on by YHWH. Here it is different. For it was YHWH’s intention to bring evil on them and visit them with His judgment in ‘the year of their visitation’ which is coming. And this is the sure and certain word of YHWH.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Jeremiah’s Diatribe Against The Prophets, Headed As ‘Concerning The Prophets’ ( Jer 23:9-40 ).
Having set right the vision of the future, Jeremiah now turns on those who had been distorting that vision in one way or another, the prophetic guild. Like the current ‘sons of David’ they too were inadequate. These were men who claimed to speak ‘the word of YHWH’ in the Name of YHWH in His very house (the Temple), but spoke all manner of falsehood and ungodliness in that Name. It was not that they did not conceive of themselves as genuine. Indeed we will soon learn of at least two who were prepared to die horrible deaths at the hands of Nebuchadrezzar because of their prophecies of his coming downfall (Jer 29:21-22), but we also learn at the same time learn that they spoke lies and their lives were dishonourable (Jer 29:23).
It is immediately made apparent how difficult Jeremiah is finding his task to be (Jer 23:9). In order partly to understand that we have to appreciate two things, and the first is the ‘holiness’ seen as connected with ‘prophets’. In spite of the boldness of various prophets through the ages in the face of arrogant kings of Israel/Judah the number who were actually killed by the authorities were comparatively few. We see them coming boldly into the presence of the most of evil kings and walking away unscathed (it was not Ahab who sought to kill Elijah, but Jezebel, who was not rooted in Yahwism). And the reason why this was so was because they were seen as relatively sacrosanct as ‘the prophets of YHWH’. It was considered that to attack them would be to directly attack YHWH. Like the vessels in the sanctuary they were ‘holy, set apart to YHWH’ and therefore untouchable except by those appointed by YHWH.
In our own day we see Jeremiah’s opponents as ‘false prophets’, but we must remember that to the people of Jeremiah’s day they were ‘the prophets of YHWH’ to whom they went for ‘a word from YHWH’, and it was Jeremiah who was questionable.. The other prophets were seen as YHWH’s mouthpiece and totally untouchable. They were ‘holy’, that is they directly represented YHWH, and therefore to attack them was to attack YHWH. Even kings walked warily when they dealt with such men. Thus when Jeremiah took them on he knew that he was taking his whole life and reputation in his hands with this spirited attack upon them. And that is why he saw his words spoken against the prophets as especially ‘holy’. To deal with such ‘holy’ men required special holiness.
His invective can be divided up into four subsections in which there is an intermingling of Jeremiah’s prophetic words with the actual words of YHWH:
1. Jer 23:9-12 in which Jeremiah explains how difficult he is finding it to proclaim YHWH’s holy words against the prophets, even to the point of shivering and quaking. But he then outlines what the consequences of their prophesying will be on the land (Jer 23:10). YHWH Himself then steps in and declares what the consequences will be on the prophets themselves (Jer 23:12). Note the twofold emphasis on the sure and certain ‘word of YHWH’ (neum YHWH).
2. Jer 23:13-20 in which YHWH calumniates the prophets (Jer 23:13-15) and questions what they teach (Jer 23:16-18), explaining again what the results of their prophesying will be (Jer 23:19-20) and emphasising that they were not sent or enlightened by Himself (Jer 23:16). They had not stood in the Council of YHWH (Jer 23:18; Jer 23:22).
3. je r23:21-32 in which YHWH rejects the testimony of the false prophets and reveals Himself as the all-knowing One (Jer 23:23-24), condemning the Temple prophets as false dreamers who cause the people to err in contrast with those who have the true word of YHWH which is like a fire and a hammer which breaks the rock in pieces (Jer 23:25-32).
4. Jer 23:33-40 in which YHWH tells Jeremiah that he himself must no longer have a burden for the people (Jer 23:33) and then forbids the false prophets, on pain of severe punishment, from falsely claiming that they have a similar burden from Him, (the kind of burden that the genuine prophets had had in the past – Isa 13:1 and often; Nah 1:1; Hab 1:1), .
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Against the False Prophets
v. 9. Mine heart within me is broken because of the prophets, v. 10. For the land is full of adulterers, v. 11. For both prophet and priest are profane, v. 12. Wherefore their way shall be unto them as slippery ways in the darkness, v. 13. And I have seen folly in the prophets of Samaria, v. 14. I have seen also in the prophets of Jerusalem an horrible thing, v. 16. Therefore, thus saith the Lord of hosts concerning the prophets, v. 16. Thus saith the Lord of hosts, v. 17. They say still unto them that despise Me, v. 18. For who hath stood in the counsel of the Lord, v. 19. Behold, a whirlwind of the Lord is gone forth in fury, even a grievous whirlwind! v. 20. The anger of the Lord shall not return, v. 21. I have not sent these prophets, v. 22. But if they had stood in My counsel and had caused My people to hear My words, v. 23. Am I a God at hand, saith the Lord, v. 24. Can any hide himself in secret places that I shall not see him? saith the Lord. v. 25. I have heard what the prophets said that prophesy lies in My name saying, I have dreamed, I have dreamed, v. 26. How long shall this be in the heart of the prophets that prophesy lies? Yea, they are prophets of the deceit of their own heart, v. 27. which think to cause My people to forget My name by their dreams which they tell every man to his neighbor, v. 28. The prophet that hath a dream, let him tell a dream, v. 29. Is not My Word like as a fire? saith the Lord, v. 30. Therefore, v. 31. Behold, I am against the prophets, saith the Lord, that use their tongues and say, He saith, v. 32. Behold, I am against them that prophesy false dreams, saith the Lord, v. 33. And when this people or the prophet or a priest, v. 34. And as for the prophet and the priest and the people that shall say, The burden of the Lord, v. 35. Thus shall ye say, every one to his neighbor and every one to his brother, What hath the Lord answered? and, What hath the Lord spoken? v. 36. And the burden of the Lord shall ye mention no more, v. 37. Thus shalt thou say to the prophet, What hath the Lord answered thee? and, What hath the Lord spoken? v. 38. But since ye say, The burden of the Lord, v. 39. therefore, behold, I, even I, v. 40. and I will bring an everlasting reproach upon you and a perpetual shame,
Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann
Jer 23:9. Mine heart within me, &c. We have here a new discourse against the false prophets, with whom afterwards the priests are joined: Jeremiah declares that, upon a view of the evils with which they are threatened, he is in trouble and agitation like that of a man who has lost his reason in wine; Jer 23:9-15. The words may be read, As to, or concerning the prophets, my heart is broken within me, &c. He then exhorts the people in the name of God not to listen to the words of the prophets that prophesied of peace, when evil was determined, and would infallibly take place, as would in time appear; and charges those prophets with speaking of themselves, and not from the divine commission, Jer 23:16-22. God asserts his omnipresence and omniscience; and reproves the audaciousness of the false prophets, who affected to place their own idle dreams on a level with the all-powerful and efficacious word of divine revelation; declaring himself against the several species of those impostors; Jer 23:23-32. In fine, he requires all sorts of persons to desist from an indecency in common use, of styling his word a burden; and threatens severely to punish those who in defiance of this command should continue to cast such a slur upon it.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
2. Against the False Prophets (Jer 23:9-40.)
a. The Blind Leaders of the Blind
Jer 23:9-15
9Against the Prophets:
Broken is my heart in my breast, all my bones quake,10
I am become like a drunken man, and a man whom wine has overcome.
Because of Jehovah and because of his holy words.
10For the land is full of adulterers.
(For on account of the curse11 the land mourns,
The pastures of the desert are dried up:)
And their course is become evil and their might not right.
11For both prophet and priest are profane,
Even in my house have I found their wickedness, saith Jehovah.
12Therefore their way shall be to them as slippery places in the dark;
They shall be driven12 that they fall therein;
For I shall bring calamity upon them in the year of their visitation,
Saith Jehovah.
13Also in the prophets of Samaria have I seen perversity.13
They prophesied14 by Baal and led my people Israel astray.
14But in the prophets of Jerusalem I saw what is horrible;
Adultery and dealing in falsehood,
They strengthened the hands of the evil-doers,
That they did not turn15 every one from his wickedness.
They are all become to me like Sodom,
And their inhabitants like Gomorrah.
15Therefore saith Jehovah Zebaoth thus concerning the prophets:
Behold, I feed them with absinthe [wormwood],
And give them poison-water to drink,
For from the prophets of Jerusalem profanation has gone out over the whole land.
EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL
The prophet begins by describing his feelings at the reception of this revelation. His sensations were those of a man of broken heart, or of a drunken man (Jer 23:9). By this introduction we obtain a standard, by which to measure the importance of the following passage. First the moral condition of the people is described as very bad, especially from the prevalence of adultery. (Punishment of this the prevalent drought) (Jer 23:10). How could it be otherwise when the spiritual leaders of the people, prophets and priests were themselves profane men, who even desecrated the sanctuary with their crimes? (Jer 23:11). Therefore in the corresponding period punishment must come upon them also (Jer 23:12). Even the prophets in Samaria had led the people of Israel astray by their scandalous behaviour (Jer 23:13). The prophets of Jerusalem, however, had in the point of popular seduction, accomplished something truly horrible. Not only had they gone before with their example of wickedness, but had actually strengthened the evil-doers in their wickedness and restrained them from conversion, so that the nation had become to the Lord like Sodom and Gomorrah (Jer 23:14). Therefore, as the profaners of the land, they must be given poison to drink and be fed with bitterness (Jer 23:15).
Jer 23:9. Against the prophets holy words. To connect, as indicated by the accents, broken with against the prophets, is not grammatically impossible (comp. ex. gr.Jer 31:20), but not altogether appropriate in meaning. For a broken heart does not signify anger or indignation (which is the only state of mind Jeremiah could be supposed to be in towards the false prophets), but humiliation, anxiety, care. Comp. Ps. 34:19; 51:19; 60:21; Isa 61:1. But it becomes perfectly clear that we have here a superscription before us, when we observe that evidently the whole section, Jer 23:9-40, as relating to the prophets, is opposed to the preceding as relating to the kings, that the title consequently states the main purport, not only of the next verses, but of the whole following discourse. Such superscriptions are moreover common in the book of this prophet: Jer 46:2; Jer 48:1; Jer 49:1; Jer 49:7; Jer 49:23; Jer 49:28.By holy words are meant the revelation contained in what follows. What shocked the prophet to such an unusual degree was doubtless a glance granted him into the depths of human depravity and on the other hand of the divine wrath. Comp. Jer 4:19; Jer 8:18 sqq.
Jer 23:10-12. For the land is full visitation, saith Jehovah.For is causal. But since the reason of the prophets great shock is not expressed in the next sentence only, but in the whole of what follows also, For is to be referred to the entire following discourse.Adulterers.
That this crime prevailed most extensively is evident from Jer 5:7-8; Jer 9:1; Jer 29:23. Where, however, in this respect is not discovered, it is difficult to find it in other respects, and especially in relation to God. Comp. rems. on Jer 5:1.For on account, etc. This sentence to dried up is to be regarded as a parenthesis. From the general calamity of drought may be argued the presence of a general guiltiness. Moreover, both the indication of the drought, which looks like a demonstratio ad oculos and the leading back to the false prophets (Jer 23:11), reminds us very strongly of Jer 14:2; Jer 14:13-18.And their course is connected with full of adulterers. Their thought and endeavor generally (their walking and running, comp. Jer 8:6; Pro 1:16; Isa 59:7; Rom 9:16) is directed to evil, therefore itself evil; they are strong only for that which is not right. Comp. rems. on Jer 8:6.For both prophet, etc. This sentence states the reason why the moral corruption is so general: it cannot be otherwise, since the teachers and leaders of the people are not only themselves profane and godless, but practise their ungodliness even in the sanctuary, the most influential centre of theocratic life. Therefore the prophet says directly in Jer 23:15, From the prophets of Jerusalem is gone forth profanation over the whole land. Evidently profanation is there used with reference to profane here. On the subject comp. Jer 32:34; Eze 8:3 sqq. The priests are moreover mentioned only incidentally; in the whole subsequent part of the discourse Jeremiah speaks only of the prophets. Perhaps the juxtaposition of the two is only a reminiscence from Jer 14:18, where alone the expression occurs.In the dark. Comp. Psa 35:6 [Thomson, The Land and the Book, I., p. 106].Year of visitation. Comp. Jer 11:23. It is apparent from this expression that the visitation is still in the indefinite future.
Jer 23:13-15. Also in the prophets of Samaria over the whole land. In these verses it is more particularly shown how the corruption extended from the prophets over the whole country. At the same time its merited punishment is announced to them.The here (Also) and at the beginning of Jer 23:14 (But) correspond, but the whole sentences are not parallel, for it could not be said: Both in the prophets of Samaria I see perversity, and in the prophets of Jerusalem what is horrible, the latter clause containing a climax. The expression is founded on a mingling of two ways of speaking, both in the prophets of Samaria I see what is bad, and in the prophets of Jerusalem, and in the prophets of Samaria I see , but in the prophets of Jerusalem even. Both are confounded in the sentence: both in the prophets of Samaria I see what is bad, and in the prophets of Jerusalem what is horrible.We cannot well render these modes of expression word for word. Comp. the parallel, equally unfavorable for Judah, in Jer 3:6-10.By Baal. Comp. rems. on Jer 2:8.Led astray. In this leading astray by moans of prophecy in the name of idols is the point of connection between Jer 23:10-11.Horrible. Comp. Jer 5:30.Strengthened, etc. They thus not only seduced the people into wickedness by their example, but sustained them therein by the authority of their example and detained them from repentance.The subject of are become is the prophets, while their must refer to JerusalemThe comparison with Sodom and Gomorrah is here as in Zep 2:9, yet with this difference, that they are here the emblem of moral corruption, there of outward desolation.Poison-water. Comp. Jer 8:14; Jer 9:14.Profanation. Comp. Jer 3:9. In this last causal sentence (for from the prophets of Jerusalem has profanation gone out), the fundamental though! of the strophe again comes out clearly.
DOCTRINAL AND ETHICAL
1. On Jer 21:2. King Zedekiah sends word to Jeremiah, that the Lord is to do according to all His miracles, that Nebuchadnezzar may withdraw. A demand rather cavalierly made in such evil circumstances. But the noble are so unfortunate! It is indeed as though it only depended on them to arrange matters with God; as if He were only waiting for them, as if it were a point of honor not to be over-hasty, but first to await a little extremity . It is a very necessary observance for a servant of the Lord, that he try his superiors, whether there is any trace remaining in them of having been once baptized, well brought up and instructed in the fear of the Lord. If he observe anything of this kind, he must insist upon it and especially not allow them to deal too familiarly with the Judge of all the earth, but plainly demonstrate to them their insufficiency and nothingness, if they measure themselves by Him. Though Zedekiah had spoken so superficially, Jeremiah answered him without hesitation, definitely and positively, and accustomed him to a different manner of dealing with the Lord. Zinzendorf. When the ungodly desire Gods help, they commonly appeal not to His saving power to heal them, but to His miraculous power to save them, while they persist in their impenitence. Starke.
2. On Jer 21:8. It is pure grace on the part of God, when He leaves to man the choice between the good and the evil; not that it is permitted him to choose the evil, but that he may choose freely the good, which he is under obligation to do, Deu 30:19. Starke. God lays before us the way of life and the way of death. The way of life is however always contrary to human reason, and that on which it sees merely death and shame. If thou wilt save thyself thou must leave the false Jerusalem, fallen under the judgment, and seek thy life where there seems to be only death. He who would save his life must lose it, and he who devotes it for the sake of the truth will save it. Diedrich.
3. On Jer 21:11-14. To be such a king is to be an abomination to the Lord, and severe judgment will follow. God appoints magistrates for His service and for the use of men; he who only seeks his own enjoyment in office, is lost. Jerusalem, situated on rocks in the midst of a plain, looks secure; but against God neither rocks avail nor aught else. The fire will break out even in them, and consume all around, together with the forest of cedar-houses in the city. The corruption is seated within, and therefore proceeds from within outwards, so that nothing of the former stock can remain. What shall a government do which no longer bears the sword of justice? What shall a church do which is no longer founded on Gods truth as its only power? Diedrich. Comp. moreover on the whole of Jeremiah 24. the extended moral reflections of Cyrillus Alex. . . Lib. I.
4. On Jer 22:1. Jeremiah is to deliver a sermon at court, in which he reminds the king of his office of magistrate, in which he is to administer justice to every man. Cramer.
It was no easy task for Jeremiah to go into the lions den and deliver such an uncourtly message to him. We are reminded of the prophet Jonah. But Jeremiah did not flee as he did.
5. On Jer 22:1-3. [But we ought the more carefully to notice this passage, that we may learn to strengthen ourselves against bad examples, lest the impiety of men should overturn our faith; when we see in Gods church things in such disorder, that those who glory in the name of God are become like robbers, we must beware lest we become on this account alienated from true religion. We must, indeed, desert such monsters, but we must take care lest Gods word, through mens wickedness, should lose its value in our esteem. We ought then to remember the admonition of Christ, to hear the Scribes and Pharisees who sat in Moses seat (Mat 23:2). Calvin.S. R. A.]
6. On Jer 22:10. [Dying saints may be justly envied, while living sinners are justly pitied. And so dismal perhaps the prospect of the times may be, that tears even for a Josiah, even for a Jesus, must be restrained, that they may be reserved for ourselves and our children (Luk 23:28). Henry.S. R. A.]
Nequaquam gentilis plangendus est atque Judus, qui in ecclesia non fuerunt et simul mortui sunt, de quibus Salvator dicit: dimitte mortuos sepelire mortuos suos (Mat 8:22). Sed eos plange, qui per scelera atque peccata egrediuntur de ecclesia et nolunt ultra reverti ad earn damnatione vitiorum. Hieron. Epist. 46 ad Rusticam. Nolite flere mortuum, sed plorate raptorem avarum, pecuni sitientem et inexplebilem auri cupidinem. Cur mortuos inutiliter ploramus? Eos ploremus, qui in melius mutari possunt. Basilius Seleucensis. Comp. Basil, Magn. Homil. 4 de Gratiarum actione post dimid.Ghislerus.
7. On Jer 22:6-9. God does not spare even the authorities. For though He has said that they are gods, when they do not rightly administer their office they must die like men (Psa 82:6) No cedars are too high for God, no splendor too mighty; He can destroy all at once, and overturn, and overturn, and overturn. Eze 21:27, Cramer.
Another passage from which it is seen how perverse and unjustifiable is the illusion that Gods election is a surety against His anger, and a permit to any wilfulness. The individual representatives of the objects of divine election should never forget that God can march over their carcases, and the ruins of their glory, to the fulfilment of His promise, and that He can rebuild on a higher stage, what He has destroyed on a lower. Comp. remarks on Jer 22:24.
8. On Jer 22:13-19. It is blasphemy to imagine that God will be frre et compagnon to all princes as such, and that He has a predilection for them as of His own kind. Does He not say to his majesty the king of Judah, with whom, in respect of the eminence of his dynasty and throne no other prince of earth could compare, that he should be buried like an ass, dragged and cast out before the gates of Jerusalem? This Jehoiakim was however an aristocrat, a heartless, selfish tyrant, who for his own pleasure trampled divine and human rights under foot. If such things were done in the green tree, what shall be done in the dry?
He who builds his house with other peoples property, collects stones for his grave. Cramer.
9. On Jer 22:14. [It was a proof of luxury when men began to indulge in superfluities. In old times the windows were small; for use only was regarded by frugal men; but afterwards a sort of madness possessed the minds of many, so that they sought to be suspended as it were in the air. And hence they began to have wider windows. The thing in itself, as I have said, is not what God condemns; but we must ever remember, that men never go to excesses in external things, except when their hearts are infected with pride, so that they do not regard what is useful, what is becoming, but are carried away by fondness for excess. Calvin.S. R. A.]
10. On Jer 22:15. God may grant the great lords a preference in eating and drinking and the splendor of royal courts, but it is not His will that these be regarded as the main things, but that true religion, right and justice must have the precedence;this is the Lords work. But cursed is he who does the Lords work remissly. Jer 48:10. Cramer.
11. On Jer 22:17. Description of haughty, proud, magnificent, merciless and tyrannical lords and rulers, who are accomplices of thieves. Cramer.
12. On Jer 22:19. [God would have burial a proof to distinguish us from brute animals even after death, as we in life excel them, and as our condition is much nobler than that of the brute creation. Burial is also a pledge as it were of immortality; for when mans body is laid hid in the earth, it is as it were a mirror of a future life. Since then burial is an evidence of Gods grace and favor towards mankind, it is on the other hand a sign of a curse, when burial is denied. Calvin.S. R. A.]
13. On Jer 22:24. Great lords often imagine that they not only sit in the bosom of God, but that they are a pearl in His crown; or as the prophet says here, Gods signet-ring. Therefore, it is impossible that they should not succeed in their designs. But God looks not on the person of the princes, and knows the magnificent no more than the poor. Job 34:19. Cramer.
14. On Jer 22:28. [What is idolized will, first or last, be despised and broken, what is unjustly honored will be justly contemned, and rivals with God will be the scorn of man. Whatever we idolize we shall be disappointed in, and then shall despise. Henry.S. R. A.]
The compliment is a very poor one for a king, who thinks somewhat of himself, and to whom it in a certain measure pertains that he be honored.But here it is the word of the Lord, and in consideration of these words it is declared in 2Ch 36:12, to be evil on the part of Zedekiah, that he did not humble himself before Jeremiah. Teachers must be much on their guard against assuming such purely prophetic, that is, extraordinary acts. It cost the servants of the Lord many a death, who were obliged thus to employ themselves, and when it is easy for one to ape it without a divine calling he thus betrays his frivolity and incompetence, if not his pride and delusion. Zinzendorf.
15. On Jer 22:28-30. Irenus (Adv. Hr. 3:30) uses this passage to prove that the Lord could not have been Josephs natural son, for otherwise he would have fallen under the curse of this passage, and appear as one not entitled to dominion (qui eum dicunt ex Joseph generatum et in eo habere spem, abdicatos se faciunt a regno, sub maledictione et increpatione decidentes, qu erga Jechoniam et in semen ejus est). Basil the Great (Epist. ad Amphilochium) endeavors to show that this passage, with its declaration that none of Jeconiahs descendants should sit on Davids throne, is not in contradiction to the prophecy of Jacob (Gen 49:10), that a ruler should not be lacking from Judah, till He came for whom the nations were hoping. Basil distinguishes in this relation between dominion and royal dignity.The former continued, the latter ceased, and this period of, so to speak, latent royalty, was the bridge to the present, in which Christ rules in an invisible manner, but yet in real power and glory as royal priest, and at the same time represents Himself as the fulfilment of the hope of the nations. In like manner John of Damascus concludes that according to this passage there could be no prospect of the fulfilment of the promise in Gen 49:10, if Mary had not virgineo modo borne the scion of David, who however was not to occupy the visible throne of David. (Orat. II. in Nativ. B. Mari p. med.)Ambrose finally (Comment. in Ev. Luc. L. III. cap. ult.) raises the question how Jeremiah could say, that ex semine Jechoni neminem regnaturum esse, since Christ was of the seed of Jeconiah and reigned? He answers: Illic (Jer 22:30) futuros ex semine Jechoni posteros non negatur et ideo de semine ejus est Christus (comp. Mat 1:11), et quod regnavit Christus, non contra prophetiam est, non enim seculari honore regnavit, nee in Jechoni sedibus sedit, sed regnavit in sede David. Ghislerus.
16. On Jer 23:2. Nonnulli prsmles gregis quosdam pro peccato a communione ceiciunt, ut pniteant, sed quali sorte vivere debeant ad melius exhortando non visitant. Quibus congrue increpans sermo divinus comminatur: pastores, qui pascunt populum meum, vos dispersistis gregem meum, ejecistis et non visitastis eum. Isidor. Hisp. de summo bono she LL. sentt. Cap. 46. Ghislerus.
17. On Jer 23:5-6. Eusebius (Dem. Ev. VII. 9) remarks that Christ among all the descendants of David is the only one, who rules over the whole earth, and everywhere not only preaches justice and righteousness by His doctrine but is Himself also the author of the rising [of the Sun] of righteousness for all, according to Psa 72:7 : , (LXX.) Cyril of Alex. (Glaphyr. in Gen. I. p. 133) explains as justitia Dei, in so far as we are made righteous in Him, not for the sake of the works of righteousness that we have done, but according to His great mercy. Rom 3:24; Tit 3:5.
18. On Jer 23:6. [If we regard God in Himself, He is indeed righteous, but not our righteousness. If we desire to have God as our righteousness, we must seek Christ; for this cannot be found except in Him. Paul says that He has been given or made to us righteousness,for what end? that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him. (1Co 1:30). Since, then, Christ is made our righteousness, and we are counted the righteousness of God in Him, we hence learn how properly and fitly it has been said that He would be Jehovah, not only that the power of His divinity might defend us, but also that we might become righteous in Him, for He is not only righteous for Himself, but He is our righteousness. Calvin. See also a long note in Wordsworth, to show that Jehovah our Righteousness refers to Christ;S. R. A.]
The character of a true church is when the Lytrum, the ransom-money of Jesus Christ, is known and valued by all, and when they have written this secret, foolish and absolutely inscrutable to reason, in the heart with the finger of the living God: that Jesus by His blood has taken away the sins of the world. O let it neer escape my thought, at what a price my soul was bought. This is the evening and morning prayer of every church, which is a true sister from above. Zinzendorf.
19. On Jer 23:5-8. The return under Ezra was also a fulfilment of this promise, but inferior and preliminary: not all came, and those who did come brought their sins back with them. They were still under the Law and had to wait for Righteousness; still in their return they had a pledge that the Messiah was yet to come and prepare the true city of peace. Now, however, all has been long fulfilled and we can enjoy it perfectly, if we have the mind for it. We have now a country of which no tyrant can rob us; our walk and citizenship is in heaven. We have been delivered from all our suffering, when we sit down at the feet of Jesus to hear His word. Then there is a power of resurrection within us, So that we can fly with our souls beyond the world and laugh at all our foes. For Christ has made us righteous by His daily forgiveness, so that we may also bring ourselves daily into heaven. Yea verily, the kingdom of heaven is come very nigh unto us! Jeremiah then longed to see and hear this more nearly, and now we can have it. Diedrich.
20. On Jer 23:9. Great love renders Gods servant so ardent, that he deals powerful blows on the seducers. He does not think that he has struck a wasps nest and embittered his life here forever, for he has a higher life and gives the lower one willingly for love. Yet all the world will hold him for an incorrigible and mad enthusiast, who spares no one. He says himself that he is as it were drunk with God and His word, when he on the other hand contemplates the country. Diedrich.
21. On Jer 23:11. They are rogues. They know how to find subterfuges, and I would like to see him who accuses a false and unfaithful teacher, and manages his own case so that he does not himself come into the dilemma. Zinzendorf.
22. On Jer 23:13-14. In the prophets of Samaria I see folly. This is the character which the Lord gives to error, false religion, heterodoxy. But in the prophets of Jerusalem I find abomination. This is the description of the or thodox, when they apply their doctrine, so that either the wicked are strengthened or no one is converted. Zinzendorf.
23. On Jer 23:15. From the prophets of Jerusalem hypocrisy goes forth into all the land. This is the natural consequence of the superiority, which the consistories, academies, ministers, etc., have and in due measure ought to have, that when they become corrupt they communicate their corruption to the whole region, and it is apparent in the whole land what sort of theologians sit at the helm. Zinzendorf.
24. On Jer 23:16. Listen not to the words of the prophets, they deceive you. Luther says (Altenb. Tom. II. p. 330): But a Christian has so much power that he may and ought to come forward even among Christians and teach, where he sees that the teacher himself is wanting, etc.; and The hearers altogether have the right to judge and decide concerning all doctrine. Therefore the priests and liveried Christians have snatched this office to themselves; because, if this office remained in the church, the aforesaid could retain nothing for their own. (Altenb. Tom. II. p. 508).The exercise of this right on the part of members of the church has its difficulties. May not misunderstanding, ignorance, even wickedness cause this to be a heavy and unjust pressure on the ministers of the word, and thus mediately tend to the injury of the church? Certainly. Still it is better for the church to exercise this right than not to do so. The former is a sign of spiritual life, the latter of spiritual death. It will be easier to find a corrective for some extravagances than to save a church become religiously indifferent from the fate of Laodicea (Rev 3:16).
25. On Jer 23:16. [But here a question may be raised, How can the common people understand that some speak from Gods mouth, and that others propound their own glosses? I answer, That the doctrine of the Law was then sufficient to guide the minds of the people, provided they closed not their eyes; and if the Law was sufficient at that time, God does now most surely give us a clearer light by His prophets, and especially by His Gospel. CalvinS. R. A.]
26. On Jer 23:17. The pastors, who are welcome and gladly seen at a rich mans table, wish him in fact long life, good health, and all prosperity. What they wish they prophesy. This is not unnatural; but he who is softened by it is ill-advised. Zinzendorf.
27. On Jer 23:21. [There is a twofold call; one is internal, the other belongs to order, and may therefore be called external or ecclesiastical. But the external call is never legitimate, except it be preceded by the internal; for it does not belong to us to create prophets, or apostles, or pastors, as this is the special work of the Holy Spirit. But it often happens that the call of God is sufficient, especially for a time. For when there is no church, there is no remedy for the evil, except God raise up extraordinary teachers. Calvin.S. R. A.]
28. On Jer 23:22. If I knew that my teacher was a most abominable miscreant, personally, and in heart the worst enemy of God in his parish; so long as, for any reason, he preaches, expounds, develops, inculcates the word of God; even though he should betray here and there in his expressions, that this word was not dwelling in him; if only he does not ex professo at one time throw down what at another time he teaches of good and true quasi aliud agendo: I assure you before the Lord that I should fear to censure his preaching. Zinzendorf.
29. On Jer 23:23. Gods essential attribute is Omnipresence. For He is higher than heaven, what canst thou do? deeper than hell, what canst thou know? Longer than the earth and broader than the sea (Job 4:8). And He is not far from every one of us (Act 17:27). Cramer.We often think God is quite far from us, when He is yet near to us, has us in His arms, presses us to His heart and kisses us. Luther. When we think the Sun of righteousness, Jesus, is not risen, and is still behind the mountain, and will not come to us, He is yet nearest to us. The Lord is nigh unto them that are of a broken heart. (Psa 34:19) Deus et omni et nullo loco Cuncta Deus replens molem se fundit in omnem. MS. notes to my copy of Cramers Bibel. Si vis peccare, O homo, qure tibi locum, ubi Deus non videat. Augustine.
30. On Jer 23:28. [When any one rejects the wheat because it is covered with chaff, and who will pity him who says that he has indeed wheat on his floor, but that it is mixed with chaff, and therefore not fit for food? If we be negligent, and think that it is a sufficient excuse for despising the Word of God, because Satan brings in his fallacies, we shall perish in our sloth like him who neglects to cleanse his wheat that he might turn it to bread. Calvin.S. R. A.]
He who cannot restrain his mouth or his ink let him expectorate. But let him say openly and honestly that they are his own dreams, which he preaches. The false prophets certainly know that mere falsehood is empty straw. They therefore always mingle some of the genuine word of God amongst it. An unavailing mixture! It is in this mingling that Satans highest art is displayed, so that he at the same time furthers his own work and testifies against himself. Comp. Genesis 3
31. On Jer 23:29. Gods word is the highest reality, life and power, while the dreams of the false prophets are pretence, death and weakness. Gods word is therefore compared to a fire which burns, warms, and enlightens, so that it burns up the hardest flint, melts the thickest ice, illuminates the deepest obscurities. It is compared further to a hammer which crushes the hardest rocks into sand.He who mingles Gods wheat among his straw, will find that the wheat will become fire and burn up the straw (1Co 3:12-15). He Who handles the word of the Lord purely, let him not despair if he sees before him hearts of adamant (Zec 7:12). He who seeks peace is not ashamed to bow beneath the hammer of the word. For the destructive power of the word applies to that in us which is opposed to God, while the God-related elements are loosed and set free by those very crushing blows.He, however, to whom the peace of God is an object of derision, may feed on the straw of this world. But how will it be when finally the day comes that God will come upon him with fire and hammer? What then remains to him as the result of his straw-diet, which is in a condition to withstand the blows of the hammer and the fire?
Help, Lord, against Thy scornful foes,
Who seek our souls to lead astray;
Whose mockeries at mortal woes
Will end in terrible dismay!
Grant that Thy holy word may root
Deep in our hearts, and richer fruit
May ever bear to endless day.
Gods word converts, all other doctrine befools. Luther.
32. On Jer 23:29. Gods word in general is like a fire: the more it is urged the more widely and brightly it extends. God has caused His word to be proclaimed to the world as a matter, which they can dispense with as little as fire. Fire often smoulders long in secret before it breaks out, thus the power of the divine word operates in its time. Gods word can make people as warm as if glowing coals lay upon them; it shines as brightly upon them, as if a lamp were held under their eyes; it tells every one the truth and purifies from all vices. He who deals evilly with Gods word burns himself by it, he who opposes it is consumed by it. But the word of God is as little to blame as a lamp or a fire when an unskilful person is burned by it. Yet it happens that often it will not be suffered in the world, then there is fire in all the streets. That is the unhappy fire of persecution, which is kindled incidentally in the world by the preaching of the Gospel. Jos. Conr. Schaller, Pastor at Cautendorf, Sermons on the Gospels, 1742.
33. On Jer 23:30. Teachers and preachers are not to steal their sermons from other books, but take them from the Bible, and testify that which they speak from their inward experience (Joh 3:11). False teachers steal Gods word, inventing a foreign meaning for it, and using this for the palliation of their errors. StarkeHinc illi at auctions, who can obtain this or that good book, this or that manuscript? Here they are thus declared to be plagiarios; and they are necessarily so because they are not taught of God. But I would rather they would steal from true men of God than from each other.Zinzendorf.
34. On Jer 23:33-40. When the word of God becomes intolerable to men, then men in their turn become intolerable to our Lord God; yea, they are no more than inutile pondus terr, which the land can no more bear, therefore they must be winnowed out, Jer 15:17. Cramer.
35. On Jer 24:5-7. He who willingly and readily resigns himself to the will of God even to the cross, may escape misfortune. But he who opposes himself to the hand of God cannot escape. Cramer.The captives are dearest to God. By the first greater affliction He prepares their souls for repentance and radical conversion, so that He has in them again His people and inheritance. O the gracious God, that He allows even those who on account of sin must be so deeply degraded and rendered slaves, even in such humiliation to be His people! The captives are forgiven their opposition to God; they are separated from the number of nations existing in the world, politically they are dead and banished to the interior. Now, God will show them what His love can do; they shall return, and in true nearness to God be His true Israel. Diedrich.
36. On Jer 24:7. [Since He affirms that He would give them a heart to understand, we hence learn that men are by nature blind, and also that when they are blinded by the devil they cannot return to the right way, and that they cannot be otherwise capable of light than by having God to illuminate them by His Spirit. This passage also shows, that we cannot really turn to God until we acknowledge Him to be the Judge; for until the sinner sets himself before Gods tribunal he will never be touched with the feeling of true repentance. Though God rules the whole world. He yet declares that He is the God of the Church; and the faithful whom He has adopted He favors with this high distinction, that they are His people; and He does this that they may be persuaded that there is safety in Him, according to what is said by Habakkuk, Thou art our God, we shall not die (Hab 1:12). And of this sentence Christ Himself is the best interpreter, when He says, that He is not the God of the dead, but of the living (Luk 20:38). Calvin.S. R. A.]
HOMILETICAL AND PRACTICAL
1. On Jer 21:8. This text may be used on all occasions when an important decision is to be made or on the entrance on a new section of life, as, e. g., at synods, diets, New Years, beginning of the church-year, at confirmations, weddings, installations, etc. What the present day demands and promises: I. It demands from us an important choice. II. It promises us, according as we choose, life or death.
2. On Jer 22:2-9. In how far the divine election is conditional and unconditional. I. It is conditional with respect to individual elected men, places, things. For 1, these become partakers of the salvation promised by the election only by behaviour well-pleasing to God; 2, if they behave in a manner displeasing to God, the election does not protect them from destruction. II. The election is unconditional with respect to the eternal ideas lying at the foundation of the single appearances, and their absolute realizations.
3. On Jer 22:24. [Payson:The punishment of the impenitent inevitable and justifiable. I. To mention some awful instances in which God has verified this declaration: (a), the apostate angels; (b) our first parents; (c) destruction of mankind by the flood; (d) the children of Israel; (e) Moses, David, the disobedient prophet, Christ. II. Some of the reasons for such a declaration. Not a disposition to give pain or desire for revenge. It is the nature and tendency of sin to produce misery.S. R. A.]
4. On Jer 23:5-6. The Son of David. What the prophet declares of Him is fourfold: 1. He will Himself be righteous; 2. He will rule well as king and execute judgment and righteousness; 3. He will be our righteousness; 4. Under Him shall Judah be helped and Israel dwell safely.
5. On Jer 23:14. [Lathrop: The horrible guilt of those who strengthen the hands of the wicked. 1. All sin is horrible in its nature. 2. This is to oppose the government of the Almighty. 3. It directly tends to the misery of mankind. 4. It supports the cause of the Evil Spirit. 5. It is to become partakers of their sins. 6. It is horrible as directly contrary to the command of God, and marked with His peculiar abhorrence.S. R. A.]
6. On Jer 23:23-24. The Omnipresence of God. 1. What it means. God is everywhere present, (a). He fills heaven and earth; (b) there is no removal from Him in space; (c) nothing is hidden from Him. 2. There is in this for us (a) a glorious consolation, (b) an earnest admonition. [Charnock, Jortin, and Wesley have sermons on this text, all of very similar outline. The following are Jortins practical conclusions; This doctrine 1. Should lead us to seek to resemble Gods perfections 2. Should deter us from sin. 3. Should teach us humility. 4. Should encourage us to reliance and contentment, to faith and hope.S. R. A.]
7. On Jer 23:29-30. Gods Word and mans word. 1. The former is life and power (wheat, fire, hammer). The latter pretence and weakness (dream, straw). 2. The two are not to be mixed with each other. [Cecil: This shows 1. The vanity of all human imaginations in religion, (a). What do they afford to man? (b). How much do they hinder? 2. The energy of spiritual truth. Let us entreat God that our estimate may be practical.S. R. A.]
8. On Jer 24:1-10. The good and bad figs an emblem of humanity well-pleasing and displeasing to God. 1. The prisoners and broken-hearted are, like the good figs, well-pleasing to God. For (a) they know the Lord and turn to Him; (b) He is their God and they are His people. 2. Those who dwell proudly and securely are displeasing to God, like the bad figs. For (a) they live on in foolish blindness; (b) they challenge the judgment of God.
Footnotes:
[10]Jer 23:9.. kal here only. Elsewhere Piel only occurs; Gen 1:2; Deu 32:11. The radical meaning seems to be flaccidus, debilis, mollis fuit. Comp. the Arabic rachapha=mollis, tenuis fuit, and .
[11]Jer 23:10.The LXX., Syriac, and Arab. read instead of . So also Hitzig and Meier. , however, merely designates the effect as indirect, occasioned by the curse, with reference to Deu 28:15-68; Deu 29:19-28.
[12]Jer 23:12. from , comp. Olshausen, 265 e.
[13]Jer 23:13., insulsum, insipidum [unsavoriness]. Besides only in Job 1:22; Job 24:12.
[14]Jer 23:13.. Comp. Naegelsb. Gr., 23, Anm. 9; Eze 37:10.
[15]Jer 23:14. . This construction is found besides only in Jer 27:18; Eze 13:3. In Eze 13:22, where these words are quoted, we read , but we are not therefore to assume an error here. The finite verb is admissible, because a condition, which actually existed, is to be designated.
Fuente: A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures, Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical by Lange
The Prophet is here representing the horrible state of false prophets, and the awful termination of such conduct. A portion suited not only to the days of Jeremiah but to all ages of the Church. Lord! give grace to all concerned to attend to it.
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Jer 23:9 Mine heart within me is broken because of the prophets; all my bones shake; I am like a drunken man, and like a man whom wine hath overcome, because of the LORD, and because of the words of his holiness.
Ver. 9. My heart within me is broken. ] Utitur exordiolo pathetico et tragico prorsus. Being to inveigh against the priests and false prophets, those great corrupters of the people, he useth this pathetic preface, Cordicitus et medullitus doles, I am grieved to the very heart, &c.
All my bones shake.
I am like a drunken man.
Because of the Lord.
And because of the words of his holiness.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Jer 23:9-12
9As for the prophets:
My heart is broken within me,
All my bones tremble;
I have become like a drunken man,
Even like a man overcome with wine,
Because of the LORD
And because of His holy words.
10For the land is full of adulterers;
For the land mourns because of the curse.
The pastures of the wilderness have dried up.
Their course also is evil
And their might is not right.
11For both prophet and priest are polluted;
Even in My house I have found their wickedness, declares the LORD.
12Therefore their way will be like slippery paths to them,
They will be driven away into the gloom and fall down in it;
For I will bring calamity upon them,
The year of their punishment, declares the LORD.
Jer 23:9-32 Jeremiah addresses the false prophets, as they surely condemned him (cf. Example in chapter 28).
Jer 23:9 The prophet is speaking of the physical effects of God’s message on him. This is much like what happened to Daniel (i.e., Dan 7:15; Dan 7:28; Dan 8:27; Dan 10:8; Dan 10:16).
1. broken heart (i.e., the center of the intellect, not emotions, cf. Jer 8:18)
2. bones tremble
3. like an intoxicated person (i.e., with YHWH’s revelation)
drunken man. . .a man overcome with wine Drunkenness here is a sign of confusion, but in Jer 25:15 it is a sign of judgment. See Special Topic below.
SPECIAL TOPIC: Biblical Attitudes Toward Alcohol (fermentation) and Alcoholism (addiction)
Lines 6 and 7 give the reason for Jeremiah’s distress. He believed God’s word! He knew it was true. I so wish modern believers would tremble at God’s word (cf. Isa 66:5). Do we grieve over our own sinful societies and the sure wrath of God that will come (i.e., Romans 1-2; Gal 6:7)?
Jer 23:10 adulterers In this context this could refer to
1. fertility worship (literal adultery), Jer 3:2; Jer 3:6; Jer 3:8-9; Jer 5:7-8
2. foreign alliances (spiritual adultery), i.e., lovers (cf. Jer 2:25; Jer 3:1; Jer 22:20; Jer 22:22)
land mourns This is parallel to 10c, dries up. This is part of the curses of Lev 26:4; Lev 26:19-20; Deu 28:23-24; Deu 29:20-21; and Rom 8:18-22!
NASBTheir course also is evil,
And their might is not right
NKJVTheir course of life is evil.
And their might is not right
TEVthey live wicked lives and misuse their power
NJBThey are prompt to do wrong,
Make no effort to do right
JPSOAFor they run to do evil.
They strain to do wrong
There is no VERB in these last two lines of Jer 23:10. It seems that Jeremiah has changed imagery from nature disrupted to humans disrupted! Neither is what YHWH intended in Gen 1:31!
Jer 23:11 It is a common theme in Jeremiah to condemn both prophet and priest (cf. Jer 2:8). What a terrible situation! The people only hear the false words.
The prophets of Israel are described in Jer 23:12 and the prophets of Judah in Jer 23:14. YHWH’s judgment falls on both in Jer 23:15.
One wonders about the historical setting of this strophe. It seems to assume Israel was still in the land. The time element of Hebrew VERBS is totally related to the context (see second opening Article: Brief Definition of Hebrew Verbal Forms that Impact Exegesis, p. iii). Jeremiah had his ministry soon after Josiah became king (+/- 626 B.C.). The northern kingdom of Israel was exiled in 722 B.C. by Assyria. This reference is not a history thing (western mindset), but a theme thing (eastern mindset).
Possibly the reason for mentioning the prophets of Israel is that the prophets of Judah should have learned from other’s judgment (cf. Jer 3:6-10; Eze 23:4-49).
Jer 23:12 slippery paths This is a Hebrew idiom of sinful living (cf. Jer 13:16; Psa 35:6; Psa 73:18; Pro 4:19). It is the opposite of faith, which is to be firm or to be sure (see Special Topic: Believe, Trust, Faith, and Faithfulness in the OT ). God’s word/will was like a clearly marked path (cf. Psa 119:105; Pro 6:23).
Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley
Mine heart, &c. Figure of speech Pathopoeia.
man. Hebrew. ‘ish.
a man = a strong man. Hebrew. geber. App-14.
wine. Hebrew. yayin. App-27.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Jer 23:9-15
Jer 23:9-12
CONCERNING THE FALSE PROPHETS
The wisdom of devoting most of the chapter to this subject appears in the fact that every generation has its quota of false prophets, and that such false teachers are the principal reason for the disobedience exhibited continually throughout history by the rebellious race of Adam. Our own generation needs this chapter as desperately as did the generation of Jeremiah. Note also, that despite the fact of the false teachers being the more to blame for the sins of the people, the sinful people also perished nevertheless. As Jesus said, “If the blind lead the blind, they shall both fall into the ditch.”
Jer 23:9-12
Concerning the prophets. My heart within me is broken, all my bones shake; I am like a drunken man, and like a man whom wine hath overcome, because of Jehovah, and because of his holy words. For the land is full of adulterers; for because of swearing the land mourneth; the pastures of the wilderness are dried up. And their course is evil, and their might is not right; for both prophet and priest are profane; yea, in my house have I found their wickedness, saith Jehovah. Wherefore their way shall be unto them as slippery places in the darkness: they shall be driven on, and fall therein; for I will bring evil upon them, even the year of their visitation, saith Jehovah.
Concerning the prophets…
(Jer 23:9). This is the title for the remainder of the chapter.
The message of these false prophets was summarized by Halley. “They delivered their messages ‘in the name of God,’ falsely claiming an authority they did not have. They cried, ‘Jeremiah is lying; we are prophets of God, and God has told us Jerusalem is safe.’ “
The land is full of adulterers…
(Jer 23:10). The adultery referred to here is not merely spiritual adultery in breaking the covenant with God, but it refers to the gross immorality of those godless men. Immorality always leads to godlessness; and the people were whole-heartedly following the evil example of their wicked leaders.
Jer 23:13-15
And I have seen folly in the prophets of Samaria; they prophesied by Baal, and caused my people Israel to err. In the prophets of Jerusalem also I have seen a horrible thing: they commit adultery, and walk in lies; and they strengthen the hands of evil-doers, so that none doth return from his wickedness: they are all of them become unto me as Sodom, and the inhabitants thereof as Gomorrah. Therefore thus saith Jehovah of hosts concerning the prophets: Behold, I will feed them with wormwood, and make them drink the water of gall; for from the prophets of Jerusalem is ungodliness gone forth into all the land.
In a word, the evil prophets shall suffer the summary judgment of God. The mention of Sodom and Gomorrah here is significant. Ezekiel even stated that Israel had become “worse” than Sodom and Gomorrah (Ezekiel 16).
Prophets of Samaria. prophets of Jerusalem …..
(Jer 23:13-14). Smith analyzed the denunciation of these prophets, noting that, The prophets of Samaria were open idolaters, whereas the prophets of Jerusalem professed the true faith but led immoral lives and lived in hypocrisy. Therefore they were more strongly condemned than the prophets of Samaria.
The Condemnation of False Prophets Jer 23:9-40
The heading over Jer 23:9 reads against the prophets. In this section of the book which deals with national leaders past, present and future a section concerning the prophets is to be expected. The question is, what prophets are addressed in this oracle? Jeremiah is not referring to the prophets of Baal (see Jer 23:13; Jer 23:27), nor is he referring to the so called sons of the prophets who are always described as true prophets of the Lord. As a matter of fact there is no positive proof that the institution known as the sons of the prophets which was founded by Elijah and Elisha was still in existence. The prophets against whom Jeremiah speaks out are men who were purporting to speak in the name of the Lord when they had received no revelation from Him. They are akin to those self-serving court prophets which appear in 1 Kings 22 as part of the court of Ahab. These pseudo prophets apparently enjoyed a large measure of popular support in the days of Jeremiah probably because they tickled the ears of the people with the kind of preaching which they craved. These men were perhaps the greatest hindrance to the effective proclamation of the revealed word of God. That there existed a mutual antagonism between the true messenger of God and these charlatans is evident in the passages where they are mentioned. See Jer 5:30 f; Jer 14:13-18; Jer 26:7-16; Jer 28:1-17; Jer 29:30-32; Jer 37:18-21. Jeremiah lashed out against them throughout his ministry. Here he points out the menace of false prophets (Jer 23:9-15) and analyzes their message (Jer 23:16-22) and their methods (Jer 23:23-32). Finally he blasts them for the way they caused the people to mock the true messenger of God (Jer 23:33-40).
1. The menace of the fake Prophets (Jer 23:9-15)
Jeremiah did not fit the stereotype of the hell-fire and damnation preacher. As he contemplated the guilt of his people and their impending destruction his heart is broken, his bones shake in terror. He loses all self-control and becomes in that respect like a man who is intoxicated. Four reasons for the grief and distress of the prophet are given. (1) Jeremiah is upset because of the Lord and His word (Jer 23:9). The knowledge that God is about to bring judgment upon the wicked and sinful people of Judah has caused the prophet much grief and no little perplexity. (2) Jeremiah is grief-stricken because of the sinfulness of the masses. The land is full of adultery. Both literal and spiritual adultery is doubtlessly meant. The course of the people, their way of life, that which they pursue is only evil. They use their might for that which is not right i.e., crookedness. (3) The condition of the land brings the prophet much distress. The land is under the curse of God because of the sin of its inhabitants. The curse here is that with which God punishes the wicked. See Zec 5:3; Dan 9:11; Isa 24:6; Lev 26:14 ff.; Deu 28:16 ff. The earth mourns because it is unable to bring forth its produce. The pastures have dried up (Jer 23:10). This passage may well date to the time of the drought mentioned in Jer 14:1. (4) But the greatest burden to the heart of Jeremiah was the condition of the spiritual leaders of the land. Both the priests and the prophets were profane, unholy, disobedient to the commands of God. In the very Temple of God evidence of their wickedness could be found (Jer 23:11). Just exactly what wickedness Jeremiah is referring to here is uncertain. Ezekiel tells of the totemistic worship of figures of animals in the inner chambers and of women weeping for the nature god Tammuz in the courts of the Temple (Eze 8:10-14). These pagan practices could not have been going on without the active cooperation of the priests. The false prophets were probably preaching their perversions of the word of God in the Temple precincts. Being both priest and prophet, Jeremiah was keenly aware of the guilt of the men who occupied both of these offices.
Up to this point the false prophets had pursued their evil course with assurance; but now God will make their way slippery and dangerous as they plunge forward into the darkness of sin. The imagery here is comparable to that of Jer 13:16 and Psa 35:6. By circumstances and by Satan these wicked men are driven forward to ever more treacherous ground until they finally will fall to their destruction. Their year of visitation i.e., time of their punishment, will overtake them (Jer 23:12).
In the eyes of God the prophets of Judah were more wicked than the prophets of Samaria. Those Baal prophets of the north had been found to be unseemly (lit., unsalted, tasteless). They had caused Gods people in the north to err (Jer 23:13). But the prophets of Judah were far worse. By professing themselves to be spokesmen for God they were in effect putting Gods stamp of approval upon the most terrible deeds. They themselves were immoral and unscrupulous and furthermore through their false prophecies they strengthened the hands of those who engaged in evil practices. They did not preach repentance or judgment and consequently no man turned away from his evil deeds. By constantly preaching peace and prosperity these prophets had succeeded in turning Judah into a virtual Sodom (Jer 23:14). From the prophets of Jerusalem ungodliness had spread throughout the land. Good prophets may not have much of an impact upon society. But let reports of evil conduct on the part of clergymen spread throughout the land and every sinner will use it as an excuse to commit even greater evils. These prophets who preached such a disastrous message and set such a terrible example will be forced to partake of the wormwood and the gall, bitter poisonous plants which here symbolize divine judgment (Jer 23:15). In Jer 9:15 this same expression was used in reference to the judgment upon the people of the land. Here the preachers are depicted as suffering the same fate as the people to whom they preached. There is no exemption for the clergy when it comes to divine judgment!
Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary
CHAPTER 23:9-40
Condemnation of the False Prophets
1. Jeremiahs lament on account of the false prophets (Jer 23:9-14)
2. The condemnation of these prophets (Jer 23:15-32)
3. Forgotten and forsaken (Jer 23:33-40)
Jer 23:9-14. The prophet is overwhelmed because of the wicked prophets, because in the LORDs house wickedness was found. The false prophets of Samaria had led the people into idolatry and the prophets of Judah were guilty of all kinds of immoralities. Like priests, like people; they all became unto the Lord as Sodom, and the inhabitants of Jerusalem like Gomorrah.
Jer 23:15-32. They will be fed with wormwood and will have to drink gall. On account of their false message of peace (Jer 23:17-18), the whirlwind of divine judgment will fall upon them and upon the head of the wicked. They prophesied lies in the name of Jehovah; they were prophets of the deceit of their own heart. They tried to make the people forget the Name of Jehovah. Such is today still the work of apostate teachers, who speak out of the deceit of their hearts, who prophesy lies and who aim at the Name which is above every Name. How different is the word of the Lord, from the idle dreams of these false prophets. Is not My word like as a fire? saith the LORD; and like a hammer that breaketh the rock in pieces? (Jer 23:29). Three times the Lord declares He is against these prophets (Jer 23:30-32) .
Jer 23:33-40. If they ask the question, What is the burden of the LORD? the answer is to be, I will cast you off. The burden, or word of the Lord is not to be mentioned again to them. They will be utterly forgotten and forsaken, with everlasting reproach and perpetual shame upon them.
Fuente: Gaebelein’s Annotated Bible (Commentary)
am 3399, bc 605
heart: Jer 9:1, Jer 14:17, Jer 14:18, 2Ki 22:19, 2Ki 22:20, Eze 9:4, Eze 9:6, Dan 8:27, Hab 3:16
because: Jer 5:31
like a drunken: Jer 25:15-18, Psa 60:3, Isa 6:5, Isa 28:1, Isa 29:9, Isa 51:21, Lam 3:15, Rom 7:9
Reciprocal: Psa 60:6 – God Isa 9:15 – the prophet Jer 2:8 – priests Jer 4:19 – My bowels Jer 10:21 – the pastors Eze 3:15 – sat Eze 13:22 – with lies Hos 4:5 – and the prophet Mic 3:5 – concerning Zep 3:4 – light 2Pe 2:7 – vexed 2Pe 2:19 – overcome
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Jer 23:9. Jeremiah is expressing his own feeling in this verse although the remarks also truly represent the attitude of the Lord. An inspired prophet is always speaking for the Lord even when the language sounds as if he were expressing only his own sentiments. However, Jeremiah was so unusually concerned about the affairs of his people that he would put himself into his speech at the same time he was speaking by inspiration. The prophets refers to the false ones who have been the object of much complaint from Jeremiah all along. Because of the Lord denotes that Jeremiahs disturbed condition of mind and body is caused by the disregard the prophets have for the words of the Lord,
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Jer 23:9. My heart within me is broken This seems to be the beginning of a new discourse against the false prophets, with whom afterward the priests are joined. The first word of it in the Hebrew, , is rendered by the Vulgate, Ad prophetas, To the prophets, as if it were the title of the following prophecy. In this Jeremiah describes the terror and concern which were upon him when he considered the horrible sin of these prophets in pretending a divine mission when they had received none, and in uttering as messages from God what were really their own inventions, and in direct opposition to every thing God had spoken. And he declares that, upon a view of their guilt, and of the evils they were bringing on themselves and their country, he was in trouble and agitation, like that of a man who had lost his reason through intoxication.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Jer 23:9-40. The Prophets.Jeremiah is overcome by the stern message given him to deliver. The evil of the land is encouraged by prophet and priest (Jer 6:13), even the Temple being dishonoured (2Ki 21:5); for this they shall be thrust down a dark and slippery way (Jer 23:9-12). The immorality of the southern prophets is worse than was the false religion of the northern (Jer 23:13). Hence their punishment (Jer 23:15; cf. Jer 9:15). They inspire baseless hopes (teach you vanity, Jer 23:16), which are without Divine warrant (Jer 14:14) and prophesy well-being (Jer 23:17, as mg.). They have had no entrance into Yahwehs heavenly council (Jer 23:18; cf. Jer 23:22, Job 15:8 mg.; whereas true prophets have, Amo 3:7). Jer 23:19 f., describing the ultimate judgment, appears to be an interpolation from Jer 30:23 f. The teaching of the true prophet can be known from its moral quality (Jer 23:22). But Yahweh is omnipresent and omniscient (Jer 23:23 f.) and knows the falsity of the appeal made by these prophets to their dreams as revelation (cf. Job 4:13 ff.). Let the dream be put forward for no more than it is; the (direct) word of Yahweh shall be known by its powerful effects (i.e. its appeal to the sanctions of history, Jer 23:29). Yahweh is against this imitative, second-hand prophecy (Jer 23:30), which is without inner confirmation (Jer 23:31, and see on Jer 20:9), and Divine commission (Jer 23:32). This passage is important for the study of the prophetic consciousness, especially of the distinction of true from false prophecy (cf. Jer 14:13 ff., Eze 13:1-16). The implied marks of false prophecy are superficial optimism (Jer 23:17), immoral teaching (Jer 23:22), futility of result (Jer 23:29), lack of originality and inner conviction (Jer 23:30).There follows (Jer 23:33-40) a rather obscure denunciation of the term burden, as used of an oracle, i.e. of something taken up on the prophets lips. When men scornfully ask about Yahwehs burden, the answer, playing on the term, shall be Ye are the burden (Jer 23:33 mg.). Men make their own words into Yahwehs burden (Jer 23:36 mg.). If men persist in using this term burden of Yahwehs oracles, he will take them up (Jer 23:39 mg., again with play on the word) and fling them away.
Jer 23:9. shake: be soft, i.e. strengthless.
Jer 23:10. Read mg.; for because . . . dried up interrupts the connexion.
Jer 23:13. folly: lit. unsavouriness, Job 6:6.
Jer 23:23. at hand: must be taken to mean locally limited, in view of context. Jer 23:26. The verse is corrupt: Driver suggests how long? is (my word) in the heart, etc..
Fuente: Peake’s Commentary on the Bible
23:9 My heart within me is broken because of the {g} prophets; all my bones shake; I am like a drunken man, and like a man whom wine hath overcome, because of the LORD, and because of the words of his holiness.
(g) Meaning, the false prophets who deceive the people: in which appears his great love toward his nation, read Jer 14:13 .
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
Prophecies about false prophets 23:9-40
Having given a true prophecy about the future, Jeremiah proceeded to announce God’s judgment on the false prophets who were misleading His people with false prophecies (cf. Jer 23:1). [Note: See Leon Wood, The Prophets . . ., ch. 7: "False Prophecy in Israel," for a good discussion of this subject, or Edward J. Young, My Servants the Prophets, ch. VII: "Prophets False and True."] This section consists of six different messages that Jeremiah delivered at various times, which the writer placed together in the text because of their common subject (Jer 23:9-40).
The first pericope is a general indictment of the false prophets (Jer 23:9-12).
Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)
Jeremiah had become like a drunken man, in the sense that the prophecies God had given him concerning the false prophets sent him reeling. They disturbed his mind deeply and broke his heart. This verse serves as a superscription for the entire series of prophecies about the false prophets that follows in Jer 23:10-40.