But the Chaldeans’ army pursued after them, and overtook Zedekiah in the plains of Jericho: and when they had taken him, they brought him up to Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon to Riblah in the land of Hamath, where he gave judgment upon him.
5. the plains of Jericho ] the W. side of the Arabah.
Riblah ] ( Ribleh) between the mountain ranges of Lebanon and Hermon. It was a suitable halting-place for Nebuchadnezzar, as being on the high road between Babylon and Palestine and lying “on the banks of a mountain stream in the midst of a vast and fertile plain yielding the most abundant supplies of forage.” Robinson’s Bible Researches, III. 545.
gave judgement upon him ] lit. spake judgements with him. See on ch. Jer 1:16.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Verse 5. To Riblah] This city was situated on the northern frontier of Palestine, and Hamath was a large city belonging also to Syria. See Ge 10:18.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Thus God by his providence fulfilled his threatening by his prophet Ezekiel, Eze 17:12. Riblah was upon the borders of Canaan, as appeareth from Num 34:11; it was in the land of Hamath, of which we read 2Ki 17:24, being one of those provinces in the dominion of the king of Assyria, from whence he brought men to place them in the land of Israel after that he had conquered the ten tribes. It is not usual for princes upon conquests to sit in judgment upon princes conquered, but the reason of it in this case was because Zedekiah was a tributary to the king of Babylon, and so subject to his power, having made a covenant with him, and secured his allegiance by his oath to him, and then rebelled against him, as we read, Eze 17:13-18.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
5. Riblahnorth of Palestine(see Jer 1:14; Num 34:11).Hamath is identified by commentators with Antioch, in Syria, on theOrontes, called Epiphania, from Antiochus Epiphanes.
gave judgment uponhimliterally, “spake judgments with him,” that is,brought him to trial as a common criminal, not as a king. He hadviolated his oath (Eze 17:13-19;2Ch 36:13).
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
But the Chaldean army pursued after them,…. Being informed of the flight of them, by those who surrendered to them, as Josephus says; or not finding the king, his family, nobles, and guards, at the palace, where they expected them; and, knowing which way they must take, pursued after them; not the whole army, only a part of it; for some must remain at Jerusalem to demolish the city, and take the spoil of it:
and overtook Zedekiah in the plains of Jericho; not far from it, as Josephus says; and who also observes, that when his friends and generals saw the enemy near, they left him, and shifted for themselves, and only a few were with him when overtook:
and when they had taken him they brought him to Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon to Riblah in the land of Hamath: which is generally thought to be Antioch in Syria; whither he had retired from the siege of Jerusalem, having left it to his generals to refresh himself in this pleasant place, as it seems it was; or that he might be nearer his own kingdom, if any troubles should arise in it during his absence; however, here he was, and here the army brought Zedekiah to him, and those they took with him; which must be very agreeable to the king of Babylon to have this perfidious and ungrateful prince in his power:
where he gave judgment upon him: or passed sentence on him, which was to have his eyes put out: or, “spake judgments with him” i; he severely chide him, and upbraided him for the injury he had done him; the perfidy he had been guilty of in breaking his oath and covenant. So Josephus says,
“after he came to him, Nebuchadnezzar began to call him a wicked man and a covenant breaker, unmindful of promises he had made to preserve the country for him; he reproached him with ingratitude, in receiving the kingdom from him he had taken from Jehoiakim, and given to him, who had used his power against the giver; but, says he, the great God that hates thy manners has put thee into our hands.”
i “et locutus est cum eo, [vel] ipso judicia”, Pagninus, Montanus, Cocceius, Schmidt.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
The Chaldeans pursued the fugitive king, no doubt, through a hidden impulse from above. It is, indeed, probable that he was betrayed by his own people; and this often happens in a disturbed state of things; but however, he might have escaped, had he not been given up by the hand of God. These things are therefore narrated, that we may know that the ungodly, by their evasions, gain no other thing than really to acknowledge that God is true ill his threatenings as well as in his promises. They believe not his word, it is therefore necessary that they should be convinced by actual experience. Zedekiah then is here set before us as an example, so that we may know that as soon as God announces any calamity, we ought to tremble and to humble ourselves under his mighty hand, for he holds us on every side completely shut up, so that if hiding places and refuges be open before us, they can yet avail us nothing.
The Prophet then tells us, that he was taken in the deserts of Jericho This circumstance also is important, for he had gone forth beyond the sight of men, even into solitude; for that plain was not so fruitful as to support many inhabitants, but it was as it were a desert. It is then a wonder how the Chaldeans found him in that solitude, but they had God, as it were, as their guide. Hence then it was, that Zedekiah fell into the hands of the Chaldean army. The Prophet adds, that they brought him into Riblah, which is thought to have been Antioch. It is also called Hemath; but this name designated the country and not the city. And yet in Amo 6:2, it means the city, when it is said,
“
Go to Calneh, go to Hemath the great.”
But it may be, that the dignity of the city was the reason why the country was so called; and no doubt Pliny, in his fifth book, calls that part of Syria Antiochean; and as to what he says shortly before, that Antioch was that part of Syria toward Cilicia, that place seems to me to have been corrupted. I rather read thus, that it was a part of Syria, for, as I have said, he calls it Antiochean. And it was not unsuitable that the city should be called Hemath and Riblah, and that the name of the city should be given to the country. Interpreters indeed agree, that Riblah was Antioch. Jerome says, that in his day, the first station towards Chaldea still retained its ancient name, though, by changing some letters, they called it Emmaus. But he doubts not but it was Antioch, which was formerly called Epidaphne, and had also the name of Hemath. There then Zedekiah was brought to Nebuchadnezzar, who spoke judgments with him, that is, who brought him as a criminal before his tribunal, that he might pronounce sentence upon him; for to speak judgments means the same as to minister justice or to pass judgment.
Now this was very inconsistent with royal dignity, for though, as a conqueror, he was angry with his enemy, he might yet have been content with his death alone. Kings are not wont to deal in this way with kings, for they respect themselves, and are not disposed to degrade royal dignity. But Jeremiah says, that Zedekiah was by no means dealt with royally; for he was constrained to plead guilty, and was condemned by a solemn sentence. Then to speak judgments is the same as what we call in French former proces criminel. And this indignity increased the weight of his calamity and his punishment; for Zedekiah not only had to bear many reproaches, while the king of Babylon expostu-lated with him, but he was also brought to judgment, so that punishment, according to the common practice, was allotted to him. For Nebuchadnezzar had made him king, and imposed tribute on him. He therefore condemned him as guilty of perfidy and perjury. This is the degradation which the Prophet points out, when he says, that he spoke judgments with him, or acted towards him judicially; and he repeats the same expression in the last chapter. It follows —
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(5) In the plains of Jericho.Here again we have the distinctive word, the Araboth of the Jordan, the enlargement of the Jordan valley, three miles wide, near Jericho. The intention of the king was apparently to make his way to the ford near Jericho, cross the river, and escape to the open country of Gilead.
Riblah in the land of Hamath.The city of Hamath stood on the Orontes, about half-way from its source, near Baalbek, to the bend which it makes at Jisr-hadid, and commanded the whole valley of the river to the defile of Daphne, below Antioch. It was a well-known city at the time of the Exodus (Num. 13:21; Num. 34:8), and in that of David was the capital of a kingdom, which became tributary to him and Solomon (2Sa. 8:10; 1Ki. 4:21-24). Riblah (still retaining its name, Ribleh), also on the Orontes, and near its source, was a centre from which the great lines of traffic led by the Euphrates to Nineveh, by Palmyra to Babylon, by Lebanon and the coast to Palestine and Egypt, and through the Jordan valley to the Holy Land. It was, therefore, a natural post of observation for the Chaldan king while his generals were carrying on the sieges of Tyre and Jerusalem. So when Pharaoh-necho was for a time, before the battle of Carchemish, master of the Assyrian territory, it was to Riblah that he summoned Jehoahaz, and there imprisoned him (2Ki. 23:33). In this instance Zedekiah was brought before Nebuchadnezzar as a vassal prince who, having received his authority from the Chaldan king (2Ki. 24:17), had rebelled, and met with scant mercy.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
5. Riblah is situated on the right bank of the Orontes, on the great road between Baalbec and Hums, about thirty-five miles from the former place.
It is fully identified and bears its original name. Dr. Robinson points out the advantages of this locality as a place of encampment for a great army.
“From this point the roads were open by Aleppo and the Euphrates to Nineveh, or by Palmyra to Babylon by the end of Lebanon and the coast to Palestine and Egypt, or through the Bukaa and the Jordan valley to the centre of the Holy Land.”
Gave judgment Compare Jer 1:16.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Jer 39:5. To Riblah in the land of Hamath Most interpreters suppose this city to be the same which was called Antioch in after-times, when it was taken by Seleucus: in this sense the Jerusalem Targum upon Numbers 34 understands the words. See Lowth and Calmet.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Jer 39:5 But the Chaldeans’ army pursued after them, and overtook Zedekiah in the plains of Jericho: and when they had taken him, they brought him up to Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon to Riblah in the land of Hamath, where he gave judgment upon him.
Ver. 5. But the Chaldeans pursued. ] See on 2Ki 25:5 .
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Jericho. Thus, Jericho was the scene of Israel’s first victory (Jos 6), and final defeat.
Riblah. Now Hibleh, on the east bank of the Greekntes, thirty-five miles north-east of Baalbek, the base and headquarters of Nebuchadnezzar. Some twenty-two years before, Jehoahaz was put in bonds here by Pharaoh-nechoh, to be led captive to Egypt. See 2Ki 23:33.
gave judgment = pronounced sentence: i.e. for his perjury. See 2Ch 36:10, 2Ch 36:13. Eze 17:15, Eze 17:18.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Chaldeans’: Jer 32:4, Jer 32:5, Jer 38:18, Jer 38:23, 2Ch 33:11, Lam 1:3, Lam 4:20
in the plains: Jer 52:8, Jos 4:13, Jos 5:10
Riblah: Jer 52:9, Jer 52:26, Jer 52:27, 2Ki 23:33, 2Ki 25:6
Hamath: Num 13:21, Jos 13:5, Jdg 3:3, 2Sa 8:9, 2Ki 17:24
gave judgment upon him: Heb. spake with him judgments, Jer 4:12, Eze 17:15-21
Reciprocal: Num 34:8 – the entrance Num 34:11 – Riblah Deu 28:36 – bring thee 2Ki 19:13 – the king 2Ki 25:5 – and overtook Isa 29:2 – I will Jer 4:9 – that the heart Jer 34:3 – And thou Jer 44:30 – as I Lam 4:18 – hunt Eze 17:20 – I will spread Eze 23:24 – I will set Hab 1:7 – their judgment
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Jer 39:5. Zedekiah did not get very far until the Babylonians overtook him in the plains of Jericho. He was seized and taken for a hearing before Nebuchadnezzar who waa stationed at JUb- lah, This was a place on the way from the Babylonian country to Palestine and Egypt. The occasion for Zedekiahs being brought to this place will be understood better by a quotation from Smiths Bible Dictionary. “Riblah In the land of Hamath, a place on the great road between Palestine and Babylonia, at which the kings of Babylonia were accustomed to remain while directing the operations of their armies in Palestine and Phoenicia, Here Nebu-chadnezzar waited while the sieges of Jerusalem and of Tyre were being conducted by Ills lieutenants.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
39:5 But the Chaldeans’ army pursued them, and overtook Zedekiah in the plains of Jericho: and when they had taken him, they brought him to Nebuchadnezzar king of Babylon to {c} Riblah in the land of Hamath, where he gave judgment upon him.
(c) Which is called Antioch in Syria.
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
The Chaldean soldiers spotted Zedekiah fleeing and finally caught up with him in the plains near Jericho. They captured him and took him to Nebuchadnezzar, who was at Riblah, an ancient city located on a highway between Egypt and Mesopotamia on the Orontes River in central Aramea (cf. 2Ki 23:33). Riblah stood about 50 miles south of Hamath and 65 miles north of Damascus. There Nebuchadnezzar passed sentence on his rebellious vassal. Nebuchadnezzar evidently did not personally participate in the siege of Jerusalem; his headquarters during this campaign was at Riblah.