Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Jeremiah 49:27
And I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Ben-hadad.
27. I will kindle a fire ] Cp. Num 21:28; Deu 32:22. Benhadad (son of Hadad) was the name of several kings of Syria.
palaces ] See on Jer 6:5.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
See the marginal reference and 1Ki 11:14 note.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Verse 27. The palaces of Ben-hadad.] Damascus was a seat of the Syrian kings, and Ben-hadad was a name common to several of its kings.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
I will bring a judgment that shall burn in Damascus like a consuming fire, and it shall reach to the royal seat of Benhadad; either that which was the royal seat of Ben-hadad, 2Ki 8:7, or else Ben-hadad (signifying the son of Hadad, which was their idol) was the common name of all the kings of Syria, as Pharaoh was to the kings of Egypt, Amo 1:4
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
27. palaces of Ben-hadadthatpalace from which so many evils and such cruelty to Israel emanated;thus implying the cause of Damascus’ overthrow. Not theBen-hadad of 2Ki 13:3; Amo 1:4;it was a common name of the Syrian kings (compare 1Ki15:18; meaning “son of Hadad,” the idol).
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus,…. Signifying either that, a breach being made there the destruction of the city should begin, and be carried on until it was completed; or it may be understood literally, that first the houses built upon the wall should beset on fire by the Chaldeans, through the divine permission, and according to his order and wilt, and therefore ascribed to him, which should proceed further. Compare with this 2Co 11:32;
and it shall consume the palaces of Benhadad; not only the houses of the common people in general, but particularly the palaces of their king and his nobles; Benhadad being a name of one of the kings of Syria, 1Ki 20:1; and which, according to Kimchi, was the name of the king of Syria at the time of the destruction of Damascus by Nebuchadnezzar. Some think that this was a common name of the kings of Syria, as Pharaoh and Ptolemy with the Egyptians. It signifies the son of Hadad, which was the name of their idol; from whence their kings might be called, as was usual with the Assyrians and Babylonians.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Here God himself speaks, and declares that he would be the author of the destruction of which Jeremiah prophesied. And he employs the similitude of fire, because there is nothing more violent or more dreadful than burning; for we know that the greatest cities are soon consumed and reduced to ashes when fire begins to blaze. God then compares the destruction of the city to burning, though no fire was applied to destroy the walls and the palaces of the king; but the Prophet means by this metaphor, that such would be the destruction of the city, as though it was consumed by fire. He at the same time reminds the faithful of God’s judgment, that they might know that whatever happened to the Syrians proceeded from his hand; because such calamities would have availed but little, except this doctrine was also added, that just punishments are inflicted by God on the wickedness of men.
But when he speaks of the palaces of Ben-hadad, he briefly points out the cause why God would deal so severely with the Syrians. We have said already that they had been always hostile to God’s chosen people. They first tried to overthrow the kingdom of Israel; afterwards they confederated with the kings of Israel, but it was for the purpose of overthrowing the kingdom of Judah; and many were the confederacies for this end. But Ben-hadad, as we read in the first book of Kings, grievously distressed the Israelites. We indeed learn from the history of those times, that there were many kings of Syria who bore this name, for it was a common name, as the kings of Egypt were called Pharaohs; and other kings also took a popular name, as the emperors of Rome called themselves Caesars. But we read that the last Ben-hadad was the son of Hazael, who was also the king of Syria; and as I have said, it was not a private name. Since, then, sacred history clearly shews that there were many who were called Ben-hadad, the Prophet, I have no doubt, refers to the first who began to disturb and harass the Israelites. He then points out the cause why God had determined to destroy Damascus, for he had in his forbearance borne for a long time with the Syrians. But when he saw that they did not repent, but on the contrary added sins to sins, at length ascending his tribunal, he says, that the fire which he would apply to the walls of Damascus, would also consume the palaces of Ben-hadad, that is, the palaces whence so many evils had proceeded, and so much cruelty, by which the miserable Church had been distressed. This is the meaning. It now follows, —
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(27) It shall consume the palaces of Ben-ha-dad.Three kings of the name appear in Old Testament history; one as warring against Omri (1Ki. 20:34), another as a contemporary of Elisha (2Ki. 8:7), a third as the son of Hazael, and therefore belonging to a different dynasty (2Ki. 13:3). It is possible, as the name was thus associated with the greatness of the kingdom, that it may have been borne also by later kings. It appears in the form Ben-hidri in Assyrian inscriptions. The prophets words are, at any rate, a proof that the palaces of Damascus were either built by one of them, probably the first, or at any rate bore their name.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
Jer 49:27. The palaces of Ben-hadad The name of several kings of Syria. See 1Ki 15:18; 1Ki 15:34.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Jer 49:27 And I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of Benhadad.
Ver. 27. And I will kindle a fire. ] See on Amo 1:4 .
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Ben-hadad. Three kings of Damascus bore this official name. See 1Ki 15:18. 2Ki 13:3, 2Ki 13:25.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
I will: Amo 1:3-5
Benhadad: 1Ki 15:18-20, 1Ki 20:1-22, 2Ki 13:5
Reciprocal: Jer 17:27 – then Jer 50:32 – kindle Amo 1:4 – I will
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Jer 49:27. Ben-hadad was the name of three great kings of Syria. The destruction of the palaces therefore would mean a thrust at the very vitals of the kingdom.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
49:27 And I will kindle a fire in the wall of Damascus, and it shall consume the palaces of {b} Benhadad.
(b) Who was king of Syria, 1Ki 20:26 and had built these palaces which were still called the palaces of Benhadad.