Biblia

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Ezekiel 1:18

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Ezekiel 1:18

As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful; and their rings [were] full of eyes round about them four.

18. so high that they were dreadful ] lit. as for their rings, there was height to them and there was fear to them; R.V. they were high and dreadful. The word “fear,” however, nowhere means terribleness but always terror. Psa 90:11, “thy fear” is the fear due to thee, or, the fear inspired by thee. The statement also that the rings or felloes were high has little meaning, as in any case the living creatures were higher, and is strangely expressed. The text is possibly in some disorder. The main point of the verse is that the rings or felloes were full of eyes round about.

full of eyes ] as R.V. they four had their rings full of eyes round about. The eye is the expression of life and intelligence (ch. Eze 10:12).

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

Rings – The felloes (circumference) of the wheels: they were both high and terrible. The eyes may have been no more than dazzling spots adding to their brilliancy. But it seems more likely that they had a symbolic meaning expressing either the universal fulfillment of Gods will through His creation (2Ch 16:9; compare Eze 10:12), or the constant and unceasing praise which His works are ever rendering to Him Rev 4:8. The power of nature is no blind force. it is employed in the service of Gods Providence, and the stamp of reason is impressed all over it. It is this very thing that makes the power of nature terrible to him who is at enmity with God.

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

Verse 18. As for their rings] The strakes which form the rim or periphery.

They were dreadful] They were exceedingly great in their diameter, so that it was tremendous to look from the part that touched the ground to that which was opposite above.

Were full of eyes] Does not this refer to the appearance of nails keeping on the spokes, or strakes or bands upon the rim?

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

Their rings; the circumference of the wheels, the whole compass of the wheels, or the fellows (as a carter calls the whole roundle of his wheels).

They were so high; the two strakes, the thickness of hob and felloes, give us the height of a wheel from the earth on which it stands;

that they were dreadful; their very height impressed a fear on the beholder, but if we may suppose one near these wheels which so readily changed course, so easily overbearing all that none could turn them aside, (which might possibly be the prophets case in this vision,) it would increase the terror.

Their rings, the whole circumference or circle of these wheels,

were full of eyes: this added to the dreadfulness of their appearance: so unusual and supernatural a sight could not but affect the prophet, who in so mighty a wheel might expect multitudes of nails, but instead thereof discovers as great a multitude of eyes. One eye seen, or imagined to be seen, suddenly, and in the dark, hath amazed many a one, how much more so many as would fill up the circumference of these wheels! for they were round about.

Round about them four; every one of the four wheels were thus filled with eyes. Now this is too narrowly confined by some interpreters, who would have the greatness and policy of the Chaldean set out hereby; whereas the wheels, their motion, their height and eyes, signify the height, unsearchableness, wisdom, and vigilance of the Divine providence, in governing the affairs of the world and the church.

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole

18. ringsthat is, felloes orcircumferences of the wheels.

eyesThe multiplicityof eyes here in the wheels, and Eze10:12, in the cherubim themselves, symbolizes the plenitude ofintelligent life, the eye being the window through which “thespirit of the living creatures” in the wheels (Eze1:20) looks forth (compare Zec4:10). As the wheels signify the providence of God, so the eyesimply that He sees all the circumstances of each case, and doesnothing by blind impulse.

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

As for their rings, they were so high, that they were dreadful,…. The circles and circumferences of them were “high”: which may denote the visibility and extensiveness of the churches of Christ, especially in the latter day; when they shall be exalted above the mountains and hills, the kingdoms and states of this world; and there shall be such numerous additions to them, that the place will be too strait for the members of them to dwell in, Isa 2:2; and “they were dreadful”; terrible, as the churches of Christ will be to their enemies to look at, when they shall be in their exalted state,

Re 11:12; or the words may be rendered, “and they had fear” s; there was fear and reverence in them; the fear of God, and a reverential affection for him; they were waiting on him, and attending his worship with great reverence and godly fear:

and their rings [were] full of eyes round about them four; everyone of the four wheels, and each of their four semicircles, were full of eyes; expressive of the knowledge of the Gospel, and the truths of it, in church members; their continual looking to Christ for fresh supplies of grace and strength; and their constant watchfulness over each other.

s “et timor illis erat”, Cocceius; “et timor ipis”, Starckius; “and they were reverent”, so Dr. Lightfoot, Prospect of the Temple, &c. c. 38. p. 2055.

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

What he says about the circumferences of the wheels may seem superfluous, but he refers to the second clause of the verse, where he says, that these circumferences were full of eyes. Here, then, he now treats about their height and terrible aspect. It signifies that the wheels were large, for being round their length and breadth is equal. When he says they were lofty, he, doubtless, signifies that they inspire terror by their very appearance, as he afterwards expresses it.. The sum of the whole is, that these wheels were not common ones, but. they so exceeded the usual size that their magnitude was formidable. But all these things tend to impress the vision on the attention of the Prophet, because unless the Lord should, as it were, draw us violently to himself, we should become torpid through sloth. The Prophet then required to be so variously affected, that, as soon as he sees that no common vision is before him, he should apply all his faculties to its consideration. What he now says, that the circumferences of the wheels were full of eyes, signifies that all the wheels were not rashly but considerately put in motion. If the eyes had been in other parts, they had not been useful; but since the wheels turned by means of their felloes — that is, their iron hoops — there the Prophet saw the eyes fixed.

Now, therefore, we see in what manner God directs the world in various ways, and yet nothing’ is done without reason and plan. By the eyes, the Prophet understands, that providence which never wanders. He does not say, that every wheel had two eyes, but that the circumferences were full of eyes, which expresses much more than if he had said they possessed eyes: which means that there was not the least motion in the wheels unless arranged and governed with the utmost reason. And hence the error of those who think that years are intended by the entangled wheels is refuted. This idea they obtained, I suppose, front the Egyptians, for in their hieroglyphics the year is represented under the image of a serpent., which, being twisted round, bites his own tail. It is indeed true, that the continual series of time is so woven together that year draws year behind it, as Virgil also says in his second Georgic —

The year returns into itself by its own footsteps.”

But this is altogether out of place here, where the Prophet; signifies that motions which seem to us confused are yet connected, because God does nothing either rashly or inconsiderately. Now, therefore, we comprehend the sense of this portion. He adds —

Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary

(18) Their rings.The same word is used twice in this verse, and means what we call the felloes. They were both high and terrible, i.e., they had both these characteristics, but not, as seems to be implied in our translation, that one was the cause of the other. The height might be inferred from the fact that the wheel was upon the earth, and yet was by the living creatures (Eze. 1:15) who were seen in the cloud (Eze. 1:5). The terribleness was in keeping with all other parts of the vision, and its reason is explained in the circumstances which follow.

Full of eyes.In Eze. 10:12 it is said of the living creatures, their whole body, and their backs, and their hands, and their wings, and the wheels were full of eyes round about. It was the same vision in either case (Eze. 10:20-22), only in the effort to describe it, which the prophet evidently feels it impossible to do adequately, he mentions now one particular and now another. In the corresponding vision in the Apocalypse the four living creatures are represented as full of eyes within (Rev. 4:8). In both places alike the symbolism sets forth Gods perfect knowledge of all His works: here as showing the absolute wisdom of all His doings (comp. 2Ch. 16:9), there as resulting in perfect and harmonious praise from all His works. The Hebrew seers ever looked through all secondary causes directly to the ultimate force which originates and controls all nature, and which they represent as intelligent and self-conscious. To do this the more effectively, they often use in their visions such concrete imagery as this before us.

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

18. “They were high and dreadful” (R.V.). This verse is so difficult in the Hebrew that the Septuagint, Peshito, and Vulgate all differ in their attempt to translate it so as to make sense. The Revised Version gives perhaps the best guess of any. The emphasis of the height of these blazing circles would suggest that they were not underneath the chariot and “firmament” (Eze 1:22), but surrounded the living creatures with flashing cycles of light. The throne of God was guarded by these orbits of light as the gates of Eden by the circular blazing sword. The lower rim of these orbits was near the feet of the living creatures (Eze 10:2), but according to the prophet, the upper rim was “high and dreadful.”

Full of eyes The eye, with every ancient people, was the symbol of life, knowledge, and intelligence. (Compare Eze 10:12.) It was one of the most common and sacred symbols used in ancient Egypt and Assyria. Modern science has emphasized, in a way undreamed of by Ezekiel, the wakefulness and activity of the atoms which compose the material universe.

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

‘As for their rims (‘rings’) they were high and frightening, and they four had their rims full of eyes round about.’

This may suggest the huge size of the wheels as it sped on, ‘high and frightening’. No wonder the whole thing could be described as terrifying, for it raced towards him like a great juggernaut, a giant chariot-throne of God. Adding to the effect was the fact that the rims were full of eyes. The idea would seem to be that the chariot itself saw where it was going, and espied everything, communicating it to the living creatures, for the wheels were closely associated with the living creatures. We can compare the seven eyes on the stone set before Joshua, the High Priest (Zec 3:9), which indicated ‘the eyes of Yahweh, they run to and fro over the whole earth’ (Zec 4:10; compare also 2Ch 16:9; Pro 15:3; Rev 4:6).

Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett

Eze 1:18. Ringsrings Strakes.

Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke

Eze 1:18 As for their rings, they were so high that they were dreadful; and their rings [were] full of eyes round about them four.

Ver. 18. As for their rings they were so high. ] Apsides earum tam amplae seu altae ut propterea formidabiles. The rings or strokes, Heb., backs, of these wheels were so broad and high that they struck terror into the beholders. It is hard to take the altitude of second causes. Well might one write a book of the vanity of sciences, and another a tractate Quod nihil scitur. I would see the proudest of you all define the nature of a straw, as one preached in Cambridge to all the scholars; so of a flower, of a fly, &c. Well might David say, “Thy judgments, Lord, are a great deep,” Psa 36:6 such as hath neither bank nor bottom. Well might Paul cry out, “Oh the depth! how unsearchable are his ways.” Rom 11:23

And the rings were full of eyes. ] Instead of cart nails. Understand hereby God’s all-seeing providence, which never erreth, but always ordereth the world’s disorders to his own glory.

Round about them four. ] The Divine providence is like a well drawn picture, which eyeth all that are in the room. See 2Ch 16:9 Psa 34:15 Zec 4:10 Job 34:21 ; Job 36:7 Jer 16:17 ; Jer 32:17 .

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

high. In the sense of sublimity.

Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics

they were so: Job 37:22-24, Psa 77:16-19, Psa 97:2-5, Isa 55:9

rings: or, stakes

full: Eze 10:12, Pro 15:3, Zec 4:10, Rev 4:6, Rev 4:8

Reciprocal: 1Ki 7:33 – General Psa 66:5 – terrible

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

Eze 1:18. The rings were the felloes or rims, located at that part which is called the face in verse 15. They were high or lofty which corresponds with that quality of the eagle in verse 10. Dreadful is from a word that is defined reverence in Strongs lexicon. The rims or felloes were full of eyes and that indicates intelligence as per verse 10. It was appropriate for these eyes to be in tbe rims of the wheel since that was the part that would be outmost in seeing where to go.

Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary

The rims around these wheels had eyes all around them (cf. Rev 4:6). This gave the wheels an even more awesome appearance. Many eyes elsewhere in figurative language represent great intelligence and perception (cf. 2Ch 16:9; Pro 15:3; Zec 3:9; Zec 4:10; Rev 4:6).

Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)