Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Hosea 1:6

And she conceived again, and bore a daughter. And [God] said unto him, Call her name Lo-ruhamah: for I will no more have mercy upon the house of Israel; but I will utterly take them away.

6. bare a daughter ] The nation being personified sometimes as a man, sometimes as a woman.

Lo-ruhamah ] i.e., Uncompassionated.

but I will utterly take them away ] Rather, that I should forgive them.

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

Call her name Lo-ruhamah – The name is rendered in Paul not beloved Rom 9:25, in Peter, hath not obtained mercy 1Pe 2:10. Love and mercy are both contained in the full meaning of the intensive form of the Hebrew word, which expresses the deep tender yearnings of the inmost soul over one loved; as in the words Psa 103:13, As a father pitieth (yearneth over) his own children, so the Lord pitieth (yearneth over) them that fear Him. It is tender love in Him who pitieth; mercy, as shown to him who needeth mercy. The punishment, foretold under the name of the daughter, Unpitied, is a great enlargement of that conveyed under the name of the first son, God shall scatter. Judah too was carried captive, and scattered; but after the 70 years, she was restored. The 10 tribes, it is now foretold, when scattered, should, as a whole, be cut off from the tender mercy of God, scattered by Him, and as a whole, never be restored. Those only were restored, who, when Judah returned from captivity, clave to her, or subsequently, one by one, were united to her.

But I will utterly take them away – Literally, for, taking away, I will take away from them, or with regard to them, namely, everything . He specifies nothing; He excepts nothing; only, with that awful emphasis, He dwells on the taking away, as that which He had determined to do to the utmost. This is the thought, which He wills to dwell on the As a little while after, God says, that He would be nothing to them, so here, where He in fact repeats this one thought, take away, take away, from them, the guilty conscience of Israel would at once, supply, all. When God threatens, the sinful or awakened soul sees instinctively what draws down the lightning of Gods wrath, and where it will fall.

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

Hos 1:6

I will no more have mercy upon the house of Israel.

Mercy put in the background

There is a time when God will not have mercy upon a kingdom, or upon a particular people. There is a time for the decree to come forth against a kingdom; a time when, though Noah, Job, and Daniel should stand before Him, yet He will not be entreated; though they cry, cry early, cry aloud, cry with tears, cry with fasting, yet God will not be entreated. Gods mercy is precious, and He will not let it run out to waste; He will not be prodigal of it; a time wherein God will say, Now I have done, I have done with this people, mercy has had her turn. Men best know what the worth of mercy is, when mercy is taken away from them. Well, saith God, you shall have no more; you have taken no notice that it was My mercy that helped you before, but when My mercy is gone, then you will know it; but then I win not add more. God usually takes not away His mercy fully from a people, or from a soul, until after much mercy has been received and abused. It is just with God, when mercy is abused, that we should never know further what mercy meant. Mercy as it is a precious thing, so it is a tender thing, and a dangerous thing to abuse. There is nothing that more quickly works the ruin of a people, or of a soul, than abused mercy. (Jeremiah Burroughs.)

Gods mercy

Mercy is a modification of goodness. God is good to all, but is only merciful to the suffering sinner. Mercy not only implies suffering, but suffering arising from sin.

I. Mercy withheld from some. Burroughs says, There are three estates of the people, signified by the three children of Hosea: first, their scattered estate, and that was signified by Jezreel, the first son. Their low and weak condition, signified by the daughter. Their being rejected and carried away, signified by the third child. God now threatened to withhold mercy from Israel, and we know that when He did so the consequence was national ruin. My Spirit shall not always strive with men.

II. Mercy bestowed upon others. I will have mercy upon the house of Judah. This mercy was signally shown to Judah. When the Assyrian armies had destroyed Samaria, and carried the Ten Tribes away into captivity, they proceeded to besiege Jerusalem; but God had mercy on the house of Judah, and saved them; they were saved by the Lord their God immediately, and not by sword or bow. When the Ten Tribes were contained in captivity, and their land was possessed by others, they being utterly taken away, god had mercy on the house of Judah and saved them, and after seventy years brought them back, not by might or power, but by the Spirit of the Lord of hosts. And truly most signal was the mercy shown to Judah, when in one night one hundred and eighty-five thousand of the Assyrian warriors were slain. Looking at the words in their spiritual application they suggest two remarks in relation to mans deliverance.

1. It is of mercy. I will have mercy upon the house of Judah, and will save them by the Lord their God. The deliverance of man from the guilt, the power and consequence of sin is entirely of Gods mercy, free, sovereign, boundless mercy. It is suggested that mans deliverance is–

2. By moral means. Will not save them by bow, nor by sword, nor by battle, by horses, nor by horsemen. No material force can deliver the soul from its spiritual difficulties and perils. Not by might, nor by power, but by My Spirit, saith, the Lord. Conclusion.. Use mercy rightly while you have it. Its grand design is to produce reformation of character and meetness for the high service and lofty fellowship with the great God, here and yonder, now and for ever. (Homilist.)

The sin against love

Men say they cannot believe in hell, because they cannot conceive how God may sentence men to misery for the breaking of laws they were born without power to keep. And one would agree with the inference if God had done any such thing. But for them which are under the law and the sentence of death, Christ died once; for all, that He might redeem them. Yet this does not make a hell less believable. When we see how almighty was that love of God in Christ Jesus, lifting our whole race and sending them forward with a freedom and a power of growth nothing else in history has won for them; when we prove again how weak it is, so that it is possible for millions of characters that have felt it to refuse its eternal influence for the sake of some base and transient passion; nay, when I myself know this power and this weakness of Christs love, so that one day being loyal I am raised beyond the reach of fear and of doubt, beyond the desire of sin and the habit of evil, and the next day finds me capable of putting it aside in preference for some slight enjoyment or ambition–then I know the peril and the terror of this love, that it may be to a man either heaven or hell. Believe then in hell, because you believe in the love of God–not in a hell to which God condemns men of His will and pleasure, but a hell into which men cast themselves from the very face of His love in Jesus Christ. (Geo. Adam Smith, D. D.)

The time of mercy ended

The Macedonian king, Alexander the Great, observed a very Singular custom in his method of carrying on war. Whenever he encamped before a fortified city, and laid siege to it, he caused to be set up a great lantern, which was kept lighted by day and night. This was a signal to the besieged, and what it meant was that as long as the lamp burned they had time to save themselves by surrender, but that when once the light should be extinguished the city and all that were in it would be irrevocably given over to destruction. And the conqueror kept his word with terrible consistency. Now it is the good pleasure of our God to have compassion and to show mercy. But a city or a people can arrive at such a pitch of moral corruption that the moral order of the world can only be saved by its destruction. (Otto Funcke.)

Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell

Verse 6. Call her Lo-ruhamah] , “Not having obtained mercy.” This also was a prophetic or typical name; and the reason of its imposition is immediately given:

For I will no more have mercy] ki lo osiph od arachem, “For I will no more add to have mercy upon the house of Israel.” This refers to the total destruction of that kingdom.

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

And she, Gomer, the hieroglyphic wife, who was to be a sign to Israel,

conceived again, whether visionary or really it comes to one, and bare a daughter; which is to be a sign too, as was her mother. It is too nice which Ribera observes, that the state grew weaker, as appeared by the bringing forth of one of the weaker sex. This daughter was fit to be an emblem, and therefore it is a daughter rather than a son, though it will be next a son and no daughter. But

Lo-ruhamah is feminine, and in congruity of speech it must be a female who bears this name. God said unto him: as before God imposed, so now again he imposeth a name, signifying what he would do with Israel. Though God direct what it shall be, the prophet is to give the name. Lo-ruhamah, Not pitied. Israels name had been through many ages Ruhamah, i.e. Pitied. God had with marvellous patience forborne them, and with tender bowels pitied them, and saved them from enemies, but now Israel should be no more pitied as formerly, God would throw them up to the rage of usurpers, and to the merciless hands of prosperous conspirators; so Menahem mercilessly ripped up women with child in Tiphsah, 2Ki 15:16, and God gave up this bloody tyrant into the hand of Tiglath-pileser.

I will no more have mercy; I was wont to add mercy unto mercy for Israel, I was never weary of showing them mercy, but I will do no more so for them; my pity saved them in Jeroboams time, and raised them to a great height and glory, but now they shall, unpitied by me, sink lower and lower. Restraints of Divine pity are sure forerunners of destruction, Jer 13:14.

Upon the house of Israel: this to me seems a qualifying of the former threat; though the house of Israel as a body politic, as a kingdom, under this character, shall no more be as it hath been, pitied, yet many among them may obtain mercy in the days of gospel grace, and many of them had mercy showed to them by the Lord, when they joined with Judah in the return from Babylons captivity; but the whole house, the families of the ten tribes, united in a kingdom, shall no more be to God Ruhamah, but ever Lo-ruhamah. Thus it hath been through the long series of two thousand four hundred years and more.

I will utterly take them away; taking away I will take away, till the whole kingdom is utterly overthrown, and removed out of the land wherein. it once had flourished. Thus some were taken away by the sword of civil wars, some ruined by oppression of the prevailing faction in those divided times, whole cities and all the land of Naphtali was taken away by Tiglath-pileser, 2Ki 15:29, and at last all swept away by Shalmaneser, 2Ki 17:3-5.

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole

6. Lo-ruhamahthat is, “notan object of mercy or gracious favor.”

take . . . awayIsrael,as a kingdom, was never restored from Assyria, as Judah was fromBabylon after seventy years. MAURERtranslates according to the primary meaning, “No more will Ihave mercy on the house of Israel, so as to pardon them.”

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

And she conceived again, and bare a daughter,…. One of the weaker sex; denoting the weaker state of the kingdom of Israel after Jeroboam, as Kimchi thinks; Zachariah his son reigning but six months, and Shallum the son of Jabesh, his successor, reigned but one month,

2Ki 15:8:

and God said unto him, call her name Loruhamah; which signifies, “she hath not obtained mercy”: and what follows explains it to the same sense. The Targum is,

“and they added and did evil works; and he said unto him call their name, who obtained not mercy by their works:”

for I will no more have mercy upon the house of Israel; as he had heretofore, sparing them time after time, though they continued to sin against him; but now he would spare them no longer, but deliver them up into the hands of their enemies, as he did a part of them, first into the hands of Tiglathpileser king of Assyria, and then to Shalmaneser,

2Ki 15:29, otherwise, in the latter day, mercy will be shown them again, especially in a spiritual way, when they shall be converted, and believe in Christ, and all Israel shall be saved, as well as possess their own land again; see Ho 1:10:

but I will utterly take them away; out of their land, from being a kingdom and nation, which was done by Shalmaneser, another king of Assyria, 2Ki 17:6, or, “bringing I will bring into them”, or “against them” w; that is, an enemy, the same king of Assyria: or, “but forgetting I will forget them” x, as some render it, and remember them no more, till the fulness of time comes: or, “through pardoning I have pardoned”, or “spared them” y; that is, in times past. The Targum is,

“but if they return, pardoning I will pardon them;”

which will be done in the latter day.

w “adducendo adducam contra cos”, Munster; “importando importabo eis”, Drusius; so Kimchi and Ben Melech. x “Obliviscendo obliviscar eorum”, V. L. Pagninus. y “Quamvis omnino condonaverim eis”, Piscator; “quamvis haetenus condonando condonaverim eis”, so some in Drusius.

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

Verses 6-9:

V. 6, 7 first describe Gomer’s second conception by Hosea and the birth of a daughter named Lo-ruhamah which means “unpitied”. God gave the name for this girl as a token of how He would withdraw His mercy from Israel, His adulterous, repudiated wife, who had been untrue to Him; Though He loved her and took her unto Himself, Jer 3:6-8; Jer 3:20.

Yet in v. 7, God pledges to show mercy and save Judah, through whom more specifically, the Redeemer was to come, Gen 49:10; 2Ki 19:30-35. But this preservation was to be by Divine decree and Divine power, not by the physical force or mental ingenuity of men.

Vs. 8, 9 describe the birth of a second son to Hosea and Gomer. God directed them to name him Lo-ammi, which means “not my people”. For God determined to abandon Israel into captivity because of their adulterous infidelity toward Him, through their turn to idolatry. This concerned the northern kingdom of Israel specifically, not Israel as a chosen people.

Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary

The Prophet shows in this verse that things were become worse and worse in the kingdom of Israel, that they sinned, keeping within no limits, that they rushed headlong into the extremes of impiety. He has already told us, by calling them Jezreelites, that they were from the beginning rejected and degenerate; as though he said, “Your origin has nothing commendable in it; ye think yourselves to be very eminent, because ye derive your descent from holy Jacob; but ye are spurious children, born of a harlot: a brothel is not the house of Abraham, nor is the house of Abraham a brothel. Ye are then the offspring of debauchery.” But he now goes farther and says, that as time advanced, they had ever been falling into a worse state; for this word, Loruchamah, is a more disgraceful name than Jezreel: and the Lord also denounces here his vengeance more openly, when he says,

I will no more add to pursue with mercy the house of Israel רחם, rechem, means to pity, and also to love: but this second meaning is derived from the other; for רחם, rechem, is not simply to love, but to show gratuitous favour. By calling the daughter, then, Lo-ruchamah, God intimates that his favour was now taken away from the people. We know, indeed, that the people had been freely chosen; for if the cause of adoption be inquired for, it must be said to have been the mere mercy and goodness of God. Now then God, in repudiating the people, says, “Ye are like a daughter whom her father casts away and disowns, because he deems her unworthy of his favour.” We now, then, comprehend the design of the Prophet; for, after having shown the Israelites to have been from the beginning spurious, and not the true children of Abraham, he now adds, that, in course of time, they had become so corrupt, that God would now utterly disown them, and would no longer deem them as his house. He, therefore, charges them with something more grievous than before, by saying, ‘Call this daughter Lo-ruchamah;’ for she was born after Jezreel. Here he describes by degrees the state of the people, that it continually degenerated. Though they were at the beginning depraved; but they were now, after the lapse of some time, utterly unworthy of God’s favour.

I will no more add, he says, to pursue with favour the house of Israel. God here shows what constant forbearance he had exercised towards this people. I will no more add, he says; as though the Lord had said, “I do not now sally forth at the first heat of wrath to take vengeance on you, as passionate men are wont to do, who seize the sword as soon as any affront is given; I become not so suddenly hot with anger. I have, therefore, hitherto borne with you; but now your obstinacy is intolerable; I will not then bear with you any more.” The Prophet, as we see, evidently intimates that the Israelites had very long abused the Lord’s mercy, while he spared them, so that now the ripe time of vengeance had come; for the Lord had, for many years showed his favour to them, though they never ceased at any time to seek destruction to themselves. Hence we learn, as stated yesterday, that the Prophet’s vehemence was not hasty: for God had before given warnings, more than sufficient, to the Israelites; he had also forgiven them many sins; he had borne with them until the state of things proved that they were altogether incurable. Since, then, the forbearance of God produced no effect on them, it was necessary to come to this last remedy, that the Lord should, as it were, with a drawn sword, appear as a judge to take vengeance.

He afterwards says, כי נשוא אשא להם, ki neshua asha lem. This sentence is variously explained. Some think that the verb is derived from the root נשה, nesche, with a final ה, he; which means “to forget”, as though it was said “By forgetting, I will forget them;” and the sense is not unsuitable. The Chaldean paraphraser wholly departs from this meaning, for he renders the clause, “By sparing, I will spare them.” There is no reason for this; for God, as the context clearly shows, does not yet promise pardon to them; this meaning, then, cannot stand. They come nearer to the design of the Prophet who thus translate, “I will bring to them,” that is, the enemy; for נשא, nesha, signifies to take, and also to bring into the middle. But I prefer embracing their opinion who consider that להם, lem, is placed here for אותם, autem; for the servile letter ל, lamed, has often the same meaning with the particle את, at, which is prefixed to an objective case. Then the rendering is, literally given, “For, by taking away, I will take them away:” and the Hebrews often use this mode of speaking, and the sense is plainer, “By taking away, I will take them away.” Some render the passage, “I will burn them;” but this explanation is rather harsh. I am satisfied with the meaning, to take, but I understand it in the sense of taking away. Then it is, “By taking away, I will take them away.” (6)

And this is what the following verse confirms; for when the Prophet speaks of the house of Judah, the Lord says, “With mercy will I follow the house of Judah, and will save them.” The Prophet sets “to save” and “to take away” in opposition the one to the other.

We may then learn by the context what he meant by these words, and that is, that Israel had hitherto stood through the Lord’s mercy; as though he said, “How has it happened that ye continue as yet alive? Do you think yourselves to be safe through your own valour? Nay, my mercy has hitherto preserved you. Now, then, when I shall withdraw my favour from you, your ruin will be inevitable; you must necessarily perish, and be brought to nothing: for as I have hitherto preserved you, so I will utterly tear you away and destroy you.” A profitable lesson may be farther gathered from this passage, and that is, that hypocrites deceive themselves when they boast of the present favour of God, and, at the same time, exult without any fear against him; for as God for a time spares and tolerates them, so he can justly destroy and reduce them to nothing. But the next verse must be also joined.

(6) Though Newcome and others agree with Calvin in this sense, yet I still believe that the true rendering is that which is substantially given in the margin of our version. The verb here used, when followed by ל does not mean to take away, but to pardon, to forgive, and the particle כי is sometimes rendered, that, so that, ut. Then the two lines may be thus translated: —

“

I will no more show mercy to the house of Israel, That by pardoning I should pardon them.”

The main drift of the passage is still the same with what is assigned to it by Calvin. The version of Bishop Horsley favors what I have offered: he renders the last line thus: —

“

Insomuch as to be perpetually forgiving them.”

Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary

(6) Lo-ruhamah.Unloved, or, perhaps, unpitied. The prophets growing despondency about his countrys future is revealed in her name. The rest of the verse is best renderedFor I will no longer have pity on the house of Israel, that I should indeed forgive them.

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

6, 7. Birth of Lo-ruhamah. 6. The second child of the union was a daughter.

Lo-ruhamah Meaning She is not pitied, or loved; that is, she does not experience the love which is ordinarily bestowed by parents upon their children. The reason for giving this name is also stated. Israel, the child of Jehovah (Hos 11:1), is no longer loved or pitied by him to the extent that a child might expect love and pity; but Jehovah has not yet entirely cast off the people (Hos 1:9).

But I will utterly take them away Better, with R.V., “that I should in any wise pardon them”; a perfectly legitimate translation (Jer 12:1; compare Gen 40:15, G.-K., 166b). There is no grammatical necessity for the rendering, “No, rather I will surely pardon them,” which Marti makes the basis for omitting the clause as a later addition, because the thought expressed is out of place in this connection. His translation being unwarranted there is no necessity for omitting the words.

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

‘And she conceived again, and bore a daughter. And YHWH said to him, “Call her name Lo-ruhamah; for I will no more have mercy on the house of Israel, that I should in any way pardon them.”

Years having passed the people would have had time to ponder on the reason why Hosea had named his son ‘Jezreel’, something which had no doubt been made clear by Hosea (it would appear that at this time significant name-giving was a recognised prophetic practise. Compare how Isaiah, a younger contemporary of Hosea, would also give his children significant names – Isaiah 8). The consequence would be that the birth of his second child must have been awaited with interest. In the event it was a daughter, and Hosea was bidden by YHWH to name her ‘Lo-Ruhamah’, which meant ‘not pitied’ or ‘unloved’ or ‘no compassion’.

For a child in Israel to be given a negative name was a rarity (names were intended to indicate something positive), so that for a daughter to be named ‘unloved’ would have been seen as striking indeed. And it was clearly intended to be striking, for its whole point was that Israel were no longer to experience the compassion of YHWH. He would no longer pardon them. He had reached the end of His patience with them. This daughter’s name would thus be a continual indictment of Israel.

This was YHWH’s final plea to Israel. Had they repented they would yet have found mercy, for it will be noted that it was not until after she had been weaned (a period of two to three years) and another child had been born that He finally affirmed that they were ‘not His people’. As with Nineveh under Jonah’s preaching some years previously (see Jonah 3) He was through the naming of this daughter giving them a last chance to repent.

Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett

Hos 1:6. For I will no more have mercy, &c. For I will no more cherish with tenderness the house of Israel, insomuch as to be perpetually forgiving them. Bishop Horsley.

Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke

Perhaps the birth of a son first, and a daughter after, was intended to signify that both sons and daughters had alike corrupted themselves. Ruhamah is a beautiful name signifying beloved: but the Lo before it, putting a negative upon it, shows the solemn alteration wrought by sin in the human mind. But, Reader! do not overlook the gracious promise that follows, and the way by which the Lord engageth to accomplish it. The salvation promised is wholly by the Lord their God. Sweet thought! It is all in Jesus, for there is salvation in no other. Hos 13:9 ; Act 4:12 .

Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

Hos 1:6 And she conceived again, and bare a daughter. And [God] said unto him, Call her name Loruhamah: for I will no more have mercy upon the house of Israel; but I will utterly take them away.

Ver. 6. And she conceived again ] To show, in a continued allegory, the weak and woeful state of the ten tribes, when the Assyrian took from them all the land of Gilead and Galilee, together with all the land of Nephthali, and carried them captive, subduing, in a manner, five tribes of Israel: to wit, those without Jordan (who as they had first their inheritance given them, so they were now first carried captives), and the tribes of Zebulon and Nephthali, who were seated in the land of Galilee. And this was the first captivity of Israel: see 2Ki 15:29 Isa 9:1 .

And bare a daughter ] This age is compared to a daughter, because from that time forward, after the bow of Israel was so broken, as Hos 1:5 , they should be no more able to defend themselves than if they were a commonwealth of women. Their spirits should be so cowed out and emasculated, their backs so bowed down with unsupportable burdens and bondages, that there was scarcely place left of a worse condition, nor hope of a better. Like them were those we read of Isa 51:23 , that yielded to such as would but say to them, “Bow down that we may go over you.” Or as those in Nahum, Nah 3:13 , Their “men shall be as women,” A A , a timorous and cowardly, like Issachar’s ass, Gen 49:14 (whose lot fell in Galilee, Jos 19:18 ), or those fugitives of Ephraim, Jdg 12:4 , that therefore bare a brand of dishonour, because they would not rather die bravely than live basely. Of such it may be said, as of harts and stags, they have great horns and strength, but do nothing with them, quia de est animus, because their spirits are imbased: as the Israelites in Egypt were of old by Pharaoh, and as the Grecians are to this day by the Turk.

Call her name Loruhamah ] When God once calls a people or a person by this name, we may well write upon their doors (if any place be yet left for prayer, any good to be done by it), Lord, have mercy upon them: their condition is deplorable, if not desperate. Vade frater in cellam et dic, Miserere mei Deus, Brother, go into thy cell, and say, Lord, have mercy upon me, said Crantzius to Luther, when he began to declaim against the pope, for he looked upon him as an undone man, and yet he was not (Scaltet. Annal.). But those are doubly undone, to whom God shall say, as here to Israel,

I will no more have mercy ] Heb., I will add no more to show mercy: but my so often abused mercy shall turn into fury. That it is not so yet with this sinful nation, that we are not yet a Loruhamah, an Aceldama, that we are not already as Sodom, and like unto Gomorrah, even a place of nettles and salt pits, a perpetual desolation, as another prophet hath it, we may well cry out, O the depth, the fathomless depth of God’s dear love to England, Isa 1:9 Zep 2:9 . Certain it is that we have hitherto subsisted by a miracle of his mercy, and by a prop of his extraordinary patience. Certain it is that God hath not dealt with England according to his ordinary rule, but according to his prerogative royal. England (if one may so speak with reverence) is a paradox to the Bible. God grant that being lifted up to heaven with Capernaum in the abundance of blessings, she be not brought down to hell by the abuse of them; that God set not that sad impression of Loruhamah (worse than any black Theta) upon her, and make her know the worth of his undervalued favours by the want of them: why should it be said of us as once, Anglica gens est optima flens, et pessima ridens? why should we provoke the Lord so long till he shall resolve upon an evil, an only evil, i.e. without mixture of mercy, Eze 7:5 ; till the decree bring forth, Zep 2:2 , and God pronounceth that fatal sentence against us that he did once against the old world, Fiat iustitia, ruat mundus, Let justice be done, though the world be thereby undone. “Of all God’s attributes he can least abide an abuse in his mercy; God’s mercy is precious” (saith one), “and he will not let it run out to waste; he will not be prodigal of it. There is a time wherein God will say, Now I have done, I have even done with this people, mercy hath had her turn, &c. I will not always serve them for a sinning-stock, but will take another course with them: I will take my own and be gone: and woe be unto them when I depart from them.” When the sun is eclipsed, all creatures fade and flag here below. “Thou hiddest thy face, Lord, and I was troubled,” Psa 30:7 . David could not live but in the light of God’s countenance: he begs for mercy everywhere, as for life. Never did poor prisoner at the bar beg harder for a psalm of mercy than he doth, Psa 51:1 , and other places. Neither would common mercies content him, he must have such as are proper and peculiar to God’s own people, even the “sure mercies of David.” Oh, make sure of mercy, whatever you go without. And the rather, because there are a race of Loruhamahs, a sort of such among men as are excluded from mercy. God is not merciful to any wicked transgressors, Psa 59:5 , that go on in their trespasses, Psa 68:21 , that allow them and wallow in them. That last letter in God’s name had need to be well remembered, Exo 34:7 , “He will by no means clear the guilty.” And that terrible text should never be forgotten by those that are obstinate in an evil course, and bless themselves when God curseth them, Deu 29:19-20 . God’s mercy goes often times in Scripture bounded by his truth: and as the same fire hath burning heat and cheerful light, so hath God plagues for the obstinate and mercy for the penitent. Surely as he is Pater miserationum, the Father of mercies: so he is Deus ultionum, the God of vengeances: as he hath ubera, blessings, so he hath verbera, whip, treasures of punishments for those, especially that kick at his bowels, that despise his longsufferance, that argue from love to liberty, which is the devil’s logic. Cavete a Melampygo.

But I will utterly take them away ] Tollendo tollam, so Calvin renders it: and further tells us that some render it comburam, I will burn them; and indeed war is fitly compared to fire, that cruel element, and to extreme famine, Isa 9:19-20 . The Vulgate Latin translateth it obliviscendo obliviscar, I will utterly forget them, and that is punishment enough: as when one carried himself insolently toward the state of Rome, a grave senator gave this counsel, Let us forget him, and he will soon remember himself. Woe be to those to whom Christ shall say, “Verily, I know you not,” I have utterly forgotten you. Mercer rendereth it, Levabo, id est, proieciam, I will lift them up, that I may throw them down again with the greater poise. The LXX hath, “I will set myself against them in battle array.” Now “the Lord is a man of war,” Exo 15:3 ; yea, he is the Lord and Victor of wars, as the Chaldee there paraphraseth. But what meant the Chaldee here to render this text by parcendo parcam eis, sparing, I will spare them: is not this point blank against Loruhamah? How much better Tremellius, ut ullo pacto condonem istis, that I should any way forgive them. Have I not pardoned them enough already? may I not well by this time be weary of repenting? I will even break off my patience, and forbear to punish no longer: “I have long time holden my peace, I have been still and refrained myself; now will I cry like a travailing woman” (who bites in her pain as long as she is able), “I will destroy and devour at once: I will, I will,” Isa 42:14 The ten tribes never returned out of captivity, unless it were some few of them that came up with the other two tribes out of Babylon, Ezr 2:1 , by the appointment of Cyrus, and some others that fled home when Nineveh (where they were held captive) was destroyed; but for the generality of them, whether they abide in China or Tartary, or West Indies, I cannot tell you. Pareus rendereth it, nam tolerando toleravi eos, for I have a long while borne with their evil manners. And surely subito tollitur, qui diu toleratur, as an ancient saith, God’s patience will not always hold.

a Hom. II: sic Virg. Phrygiae, neque enim Phryges.

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Hos 1:6-7

6Then she conceived again and gave birth to a daughter. And the LORD said to him, Name her Lo-ruhamah, for I will no longer have compassion on the house of Israel, that I would ever forgive them. 7But I will have compassion on the house of Judah and deliver them by the LORD their God, and will not deliver them by bow, sword, battle, horses or horsemen.

Hos 1:6 Name her Lo-ruhaman Again the VERB is a Qal IMPERATIVE. The name means not pitied (BDB 520, cf. Hos 2:4; Hos 2:23). The term pity (or mercy NKJV note; compassion BDB) is used for God’s deep and tender feelings (cf. Psa 103:13). It will be used in a positive sense in Hos 2:19; Hos 2:23. God’s judgment does not imply a lack of love, just the opposite (cf. Hos 11:8-9; Heb 12:6-13).

that I would ever forgive them What a startling statement of the purposeful, unrelenting judgment of God (cf. Amo 8:7; Amo 9:4). Yet, in the prophets this note of finality is always balanced with salvation oracles (cf. Hos 1:10-11).

Grammatically this is a Qal INFINITIVE ABSOLUTE (BDB 669) followed by a Qal IMPERFECT (BDB 669), the same form as in Hos 1:2 c. This form intensifes the VERB (i.e., that I would ever forgive them).

Hos 1:7 on the house of Judah Hosea, like Amos, speaks to both kingdoms (cf. Hos 1:7; Hos 1:11; Hos 4:15; Hos 5:5; Hos 5:8-15; Hos 6:4; Hos 6:11; Hos 8:14; Hos 10:11; Hos 11:12; Hos 12:2). Here God promises to spare Judah from the Assyrian invasion. He did this several different times. The exact number of Assyrian invasions of Palestine during this period is uncertain.

Because this statement is so shocking in a book written to Israel, many scholars have assumed it is a later Judean scribal addition. However, it may have been a way to condemn the formation of the northern tribes at the split in 922 B.C. All of the prophets condemned the northern kingdom, especially because of the rival worship sites (golden calves) of Bethel and Dan.

It may also have been a way of warning Judah not to follow Israel’s path, but they did (cf. Jer 3:6-10).

I will not deliver them by bow, sword, battle, horses, or horseman God will deliver (BDB 446, KB 448, Hiphil PERFECT) Judah from the same military power to which Israel will fall, but not by natural means, rather supernatural means (cf. 2Ki 18:13 to 2Ki 19:37; 2Ch 32:1-23; Isaiah 36-37).

Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley

God. Supply “Jehovah” from the preceding verses.

Lo-ruhamah = not compassionated. Rendered “not beloved” in Rom 9:25, and “not having obtained mercy” in 1Pe 2:10. These latter are the Holy Spirit’s Divine interpretation of His own prophecy.

take them away. Supply the Ellipsis, “take away [the kingdom which belongs] to them”.

them. Hebrew. lahem = to them.

Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics

Loruhamah: that is, Not having obtained mercy, Hos 2:23, 1Pe 2:10

for: 2Ki 17:6, 2Ki 17:23-41, Isa 27:11

no more have: Heb. not add any more to have. but I will utterly take them away. or, that I should altogether pardon them. Hos 9:15-17

Reciprocal: 2Ki 14:27 – said not Isa 7:8 – that it be not a people Isa 9:14 – will cut Isa 17:3 – fortress Lam 5:22 – But thou hast utterly rejected us Hos 1:4 – Call Hos 2:4 – I will not Hos 4:6 – I will also Amo 9:8 – and I Zec 11:6 – I will no Mat 5:7 – for Mat 14:6 – birthday Luk 1:13 – thou Rom 2:28 – For he

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

Hos 1:6. A daughter was born to the house of Hosea and the Lord named her also with a word with an appro-priate meaning. The lexicon of Strong defines Loruhamah as not pitied. The meaning is that Israel continued in her idolatry, even after the birth and naming of the first child, so the Lord would not change His mind concerning what was determined to be done to the nation.

Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary

Hos 1:6. And she conceived again It has been observed, that the children which the prophets wife bore represent certain distinct parts, or descriptions, of the Jewish nation, of the whole of which the mother was the emblem. Of her three children here mentioned, the eldest and the youngest were sons, the intermediate child was a daughter. The eldest, says Bishop Horsley, I think, was the prophets son; but the last two were both bastards. In this I have the concurrence of Dr. Wells, acutely remarking, that whereas it is said, Hos 1:3, that the prophets wife conceived and bare a son to him, it is said of the other two children, only that she conceived and bare them; implying that the children she then bare, not being born, like the first, to the prophet, were not begotten by him. Now, as the name imposed, by Gods direction, upon the eldest child, the prophets own son, typified the true children of God, and heirs of the promises among the Israelites; so the two bastard children, the bishop thinks, typified those parts of the Jewish people that were not Jezreel, or the seed of God. The first of these, the daughter, whose sex was the emblem of weakness, was called Lo-ruhamah, which signifies, unbeloved, or unpitied, or, as it is in the margin, in conformity with all the ancient visions, not having obtained mercy. This daughter typified the people of the ten tribes, in the enfeebled state of their declining monarchy, torn by their intestine commotions and perpetual revolutions, harassed by powerful invaders, empoverished by their tyrannical exactions, and condemned by the just sentence of God to utter excision as a distinct kingdom, without hope of restoration: for so the type is explained by God himself, declaring, I will utterly take them away That is, I will cause them to be carried into captivity, never to return again in a body; and will utterly put an end to them, considered as a kingdom, or people distinct from Judah.

Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

1:6 And she conceived again, and bare a daughter. And [God] said unto him, Call her name {h} Loruhamah: for I will no more have mercy upon the house of Israel; but I will utterly {i} take them away.

(h) That is, not obtaining mercy: by which he signifies that God’s favour had departed from them.

(i) For the Israelites never returned after they were taken captives by the Assyrians.

Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes

After some time Gomer bore Hosea a daughter. Some scholars believed that Hosea fathered only the first child and that Gomer’s other children were born of fornication. [Note: E.g., Charles H. Dyer, in The Old Testament Explorer, p. 725; and F. F. Bruce, The Letter of Paul to the Romans: An Introduction and Commentary, pp. 184-85.] The Lord told Hosea to name this girl "Lo-ruhamah," meaning, "She is not loved," because He would not have compassion on Israel to forgive her for her sins. This was an outrageous name for a daughter. Yahweh had been very compassionate toward Israel in the past, but her persistent unfaithfulness to Him and His covenant with her made continuing compassion impossible.

Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)