Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Mark 1:22
And they were astonished at his doctrine: for he taught them as one that had authority, and not as the scribes.
22. not as the scribes ] The Scribes, Sopherm, first came into prominence in the time of Ezra. Their duty was to copy, read, study, explain, and “fence round” the Law with “the tradition of the Elders” (Mat 15:2). The Scribes proper only lasted till the death of Simon “the Just,” b. c. 300. In the New Testament they are sometimes called “lawyers” (Mat 22:35), or “Doctors of the Law” (Luk 5:17). Their teaching was preeminently second-hand. They simply repeated the decisions of previous Rabbis. But our Lord’s teaching was absolute and independent. His formula was not “It hath been said,” but “ I say unto you.”
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Mar 1:22
For He taught them as one that had authority.
Conviction of Christs authority through His servants teaching
Francis Junius the younger was a considerable scholar, but by no means prejudiced in favour of the Scriptures, as appears by his own account, which is as follows:-My father, who was frequently reading the New Testament, and had long observed with grief the progress I had made in infidelity, had put that book in my way in his library, in order to attract my attention, if it might please God to bless his design, though without giving me the least intimation of it. Here, therefore, I unwittingly opened the New Testament, thus providentially laid before me. At the very first view, as I was deeply engaged in other thoughts, that grand chapter of the evangelist and apostle presented itself to me (Joh 1:1-51): In the beginning was the Word, etc. I read part of the chapter and was so affected that I instantly became struck with the divinity of the argument, and the majesty and authority of the composition, as infinitely surpassing the highest flights of human eloquence. My body shuddered, my mind was in amazement, and I was so agitated the whole day that I scarcely knew who I was. Thou didst remember me, O Lord my God, according to Thy boundless mercy, and didst bring back the lost sheep to Thy flock. From that day God wrought so mightily in me by the power of His Spirit, that I began to have less relish for all other studies and pursuits, and bent myself with greater ardour and attention to everything which had a relation to God.
An earnest Preacher and an astonished congregation
I. The earnest preacher.
1. He recognized the Sabbath as the time for worship.
2. He recognized instruction as the best method of preaching.
3. He discarded all formality.
II. As astonished congregation. Astonished at His doctrine.
1. Because it was new to them.
2. Because they instinctively felt it to be true. (Joseph S. Exell, M. A.)
The authority of Christ
I. Let us ask how Christs authority was asserted and claimed.
1. By the tone of His teaching.
2. By His ministerial acts, e.g., the cleansing of the temple. This assumption of rightful power led to the inquiry of the chief priests and elders-By what authority, etc. He was the Lord of the temple because He was Son of God.
3. By His miracles. With authority and power commandeth He the unclean spirits, and they obey Him.
4. By the exercise of the Divine prerogative of pardoning sin, e.g., in the cure of the paralytic.
II. Consider upon what Christs authority is based. Christs authority is not based upon force, or craft, or popular regard; but upon right and upon conscience. When questioned, He answered inquiry by inquiry, and boldly declared, Neither tell I you by what authority I do these things.
1. His words are authoritative because they are true.
2. His commands, because they are righteous.
3. He wields the personal authority of peerless love. In all, His authority is Divine, as He is.
III. Inquire over whom and over what Christs authority extends.
1. Nature knew it.
2. Satan confessed it.
3. Angels recognized it, ministered to His wants, and stood ready to rescue and to honour Him.
4. Men felt it.
IV. Remark the advantages which follow the acknowledgment of Christs authority.
1. For the individual, the fulfilment of his true being, the harmony of obedience with liberty.
2. For the human race, its one only sure and Divine hope-In the name of Jesus every knee shall bow.
V. Observe how Christs authority affects all hearers of the gospel. The message of heaven is, indeed, an invitation and a premise. But it is also a command. (J. R. Thompson, M. A.)
The teaching of Christ
I. The subjects He taught.
1. He taught the doctrines of religion.
2. He taught the nature and necessity of experimental religion.
3. He taught the necessity of practical religion.
He stated that obedience was the only evidence of true discipleship, etc.
II. How He taught these things.
1. With direct plainness.
2. He was a faithful and earnest teacher (Mat 23:1-39).
3. He was an affectionate and tender teacher. He did not break the bruised reed, etc.
4. He was a diligent and persevering teacher.
5. He embodied all His instructions in His own blessed example.
Application:
1. True Christians are Christs disciples. They hear Him. This is both a duty and a privilege.
2. Whosoever will not hear Him must perish-How shall we escape, etc. (J. Burns, D. D.)
Christ the model of the Christian ministry
I. His doctrine.
1. View His doctrine of God.
2. His doctrine of man.
(1) Responsibility.
(2) Mans corrupt and sinful state.
II. His manner was in perfect harmony with the matter of His instruction.
1. The leading characteristic of our Saviours manner as a public teacher was earnestness.
2. The earnestness of Christ was evinced in the simplicity of His teachings.
3. The earnestness of Jesus was further evinced by the consistency of His life with His doctrine.
4. The earnestness of Jesus was still further manifested in the decision and boldness of His manner.
5. His tenderness. (J. A. Copp.)
The authority of our Lords teaching
I. Authority of goodness. Invitations. Beatitudes.
II. Authority of greatness. Claims universal audience. Superiority to Jonah, Solomon, and all the great names of the Jewish Church. Teaching declarative and dogmatic.
III. Authority of solemnity. His peculiar formula. His denunciations of woe.
IV. Legislative authority. Revises the Mosaic code. Asserts His superiority to law. Repeals existing economy. Controls laws of nature Himself, and confers the power on others. I say unto you, His new commandment. Not only enacts laws, but ensures obedience. Conclusion: His teaching exempt from all supposable circumstances unfavourable to authoritative teaching. Taught with the perfect conviction of the truth of His doctrine. His example enforced it. Cordial sympathy with it. Knew the ultimate principles on which His doctrines rested. And the supreme value of the truth He taught. The purity of His motives. The ultimate triumph of His doctrine. All this must have clothed His teaching, especially when contrasted with the prevailing mode of Jewish instruction, with commanding power. His disciples should be distinguished by reverence and docility. These dispositions to be sought and found at the throne of grace. (J. Harris, D. D.)
Christs authority largely derived from His moral atmosphere
The weight and impressiveness of a mans words largely depend ripen his air, his atmosphere, the mysterious efflux, exhalation, aerial development of his personality, the moral aroma of his character. This subtle influence can only be felt, and cannot be defined. Enter the assembly when young Summerfield is speaking, and there is upon you a power which it is the highest luxury and dearest blessing to feel. There is incense here, and the smell of sacrifice. It fills the entire space from the rafters downwards to the floor; nay, it pierces the walls and issues from the doors. And what shall we imagine concerning the atmosphere of that wonderful Being, who spoke as never man spake? It was not His look, nor His declamation, nor His fine periods; it was not even His prodigious weight of matter; but it was the sacred exhalation of His quality, the aroma, the auroral glory of His person. This is what invested Him with unimpeachable authority, lent to His words spirit and life, and gave to His doctrine its astonishing power. He took the human nature to exhale an atmosphere of God that should fill and finally renew the creation, bathing all climes, and times, and ages with its dateless, ineradicable power. (H. Bushnell, D. D.)
Ministerial authority
I. Men will teach well only as they teach under Christ.
II. Authority is impossible apart from association with the Master.
III. Authority of love must come from intensity of conviction.
IV. Hearers know the voice of authority.
V. The Christian teacher is to show his supremacy over all other teachers. (J. Parker, D. D.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 22. As one that had authority] From God, to do what he was doing; and to teach a pure and beneficent system of truth.
And not as the scribes.] Who had no such authority, and whose teaching was not accompanied by the power of God to the souls of the people:
1. because the matter of the teaching did not come from God; and
2. because the teachers themselves were not commissioned by the Most High. See Clarke on Mt 7:28.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
22. And they were astonished at hisdoctrineor “teaching”referring quite as much tothe manner as the matter of it.
for he taught them as onethat had authority, and not as the scribesSee on Mt7:28, 29.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And they were astonished at his doctrine,…. The nature and importance of it, it being what they had not been used to hear; only at best the doctrine of the law, and sometimes only the traditions of the elders, or an allegorical and traditional sense of the Scriptures, and things very trifling and unedifying: and also they were amazed at the manner of his preaching, which was with so much gracefulness, gravity, and majesty, and was attended with so much evidence and power:
for he taught them as one having authority, and not as the Scribes; or “their Scribes”, as the Syriac, Persic, and Ethiopic versions read. He did not go about to establish what he said by the authority of the Rabbins, as the Scribes did; saying, Hillell says so, or Shammai says thus, or such a doctor says thus and thus; but he spoke as from himself, as one sent of God, that had an authority from him, and was independent of man; and this was what they had not observed in others, and wonder at it; [See comments on Mt 7:28].
[See comments on Mt 7:29].
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
They were astonished (). Pictorial imperfect as in Lu 4:32 describing the amazement of the audience, “meaning strictly to strike a person out of his senses by some strong feeling, such as fear, wonder, or even joy” (Gould).
And not as their scribes ( ). Lu 4:32 has only “with authority” ( ). Mark has it “as having authority” ( ). He struck a note not found by the rabbi. They quoted other rabbis and felt their function to be expounders of the traditions which they made a millstone around the necks of the people. By so doing they set aside the word and will of God by their traditions and petty legalism (Mark 7:9; Mark 7:13). They were casuists and made false interpretations to prove their punctilious points of external etiquette to the utter neglect of the spiritual reality. The people noticed at once that here was a personality who got his power (authority) direct from God, not from the current scribes. “Mark omits much, and is in many ways a meagre Gospel, but it makes a distinctive contribution to the evangelic history in showing by a few realistic touches (this one of them) the remarkable personality of Jesus” (Bruce). See on Mt 7:29 for the like impression made by the Sermon on the Mount where the same language occurs. The chief controversy in Christ’s life was with these scribes, the professional teachers of the oral law and mainly Pharisees. At once the people see that Jesus stands apart from the old group. He made a sensation in the best sense of that word. There was a buzz of excitement at the new teacher that was increased by the miracle that followed the sermon.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
He taught ( )
The finite verb with the participle denoting something continuous: was teaching.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “And they were astonished at His doctrine,” (kai ekseplessonto epi te didache autou) “And they were astounded or amazed at His teaching,” since the Spirit of the Lord had come down upon Him, at His recent baptism, Mar 1:9-11; Mat 3:15-17; Luk 3:21-23; announced also in the Nazareth synagogue, Isa 61:1-2; Luk 4:16-21.
2) “For He taught them as one that had authority,” (en gar didaskon autous hos eksousian echon) “Because He was teaching them repeatedly or continually as one possessing authority or administrative rights,” in matters of teaching, worship, and Divine Service, as also asserted Mat 7:28-29; Mat 13:54; Luk 4:32.
3) “And not as the scribes.” (kai ouch hos hoi grammateis) “And not (at all) like the scribes,” taught, for His word, testimony “was with power,” Joh 8:25-29; Luk 5:23-26; Luk 8:25.
His teaching was not in the synagogues only. Tho Mark does not relate His teaching that He did in the Sermon on the Mount, Mat 5:1 to Mat 7:29, he seems to have alluded to it, by which the people were astounded, Mat 7:28-29.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
This demoniac was probably one of that multitude, which was mentioned, a little before, by Mat 4:24. Yet the narrative of Mark and Luke is not superfluous: for they relate some circumstances, which not only present the miracle in a more striking light, but also contain useful instruction. The devil dexterously acknowledges, that Christ is the Holy One of God, in order to insinuate into the minds of men a suspicion, that there was some secret understanding between him and Christ. By such a trick he has since endeavored to make the Gospel suspected, and, in the present day, he is continually making similar attempts. That is the reason why Christ rebukes him. It is, no doubt, possible, that this confession was violently extorted from him: but there is no inconsistency between the two suppositions, that he is forced to yield to the power of Christ, and therefore cries out that he is the Holy One of God, — and yet that he cunningly attempts to shroud in his own darkness the glory of Christ. At the same time, we must observe that, while he flatters Christ in this manner, he indirectly withdraws himself from his power, and in this way contradicts himself. For why was Christ sanctified by the Father, but that he might deliver men from the tyranny of the devil, and overturn his kingdom? But as Satan cannot endure that power, which he feels to be destructive to himself, he would desire that Christ should satisfy himself with an empty title, without exercising it on the present occasion. (344)
Mar 1:22
; Luk 4:32. And they were astonished at his doctrine The meaning of the Evangelists is, that the power of the Spirit shone in the preaching (345) of Christ with such brightness, as to extort admiration even from irreligious and cold hearers. Luke says, that his discourse was accompanied with power, that is, full of majesty. Mark expresses it more fully, by adding a contrast, that it was unlike the manner of teaching of the Scribes As they were false expounders of Scripture, their doctrine was literal and dead, breathed nothing of the power of the Spirit, and was utterly destitute of majesty. The same kind of coldness may be now observed in the speculative theology of Popery. Those masters do indeed thunder out whatever they think proper in a sufficiently magisterial style; but as their manner of discoursing about divine things is so profane, that their controversies exhibit no traces of religion, what they bring forward is all affectation and mere drivelling: for the declaration of the Apostle Paul holds true, that the kingdom of God is not in word, but in power, (1Co 4:20.) In short, the Evangelists mean that, while the manner of teaching, which then prevailed, was so greatly degenerated and so extremely corrupted, that it did not impress the minds of men with any reverence for God, the preaching of Christ was eminently distinguished by the divine power of the Spirit, which procured for him the respect of his hearers. This is the power, or rather the majesty and authority, at which the people were astonished.
(344) “ Mais pource que Satan ne pent endurer ceste vertue et puissance, aquelle il sait estre le destruire et ruiner, il voudroit bien que Christ se contenant d’un beau titre en l’air, se reposast, et se deportast de luy rien faire.” — “But because Satan cannot endure that power and might, which he knows to be to destroy and ruin him, he would rather wish that Christ, satisfying himself with a fine title in the air, should take repose, and refrain from doing any thing to him.
(345) “ En la facon d’enseigner de Jesus Christ;” — “in Jesus Christ’s manner of teaching.”
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(22) And they were astonished.The verbal agreement with Mat. 7:28 (where see Note) suggests the thought that St. Mark had heard or read that passage. For doctrine read teaching. Stress is laid, as in Mat. 7:28, on the manner rather than the thing taught.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
22. As one that had authority See Mat 7:29; Luk 4:32.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Mar 1:22 . Comp. Mat 7:28 f., where the notice of Mark is reproduced unaltered, but placed after the sermon on the Mount; and Luk 4:32 , where the second part of the observation is generalized and divested of the contrast. It is very far-fetched, however, in Hilgenfeld, who in Mar 1:22 sees a sure indication of dependence on Matthew, to find in the fact, that Mark already here makes Capernaum appear as the scene of the ministry of Jesus just as in Mar 1:29 , the Petrine character of the Gospel. See, on the other hand, Baur in the theol. Jahrb. 1853, p. 56 ff.
As to . and . , see on Mat 7:28 f.
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
22 And they were astonished at his doctrine: for he taught them as one that had authority, and not as the scribes.
Ver. 22. And they were astonished ] If it could be said of Dr Whittaker, that no man ever saw him without reverence, or heard him without wonder, how much more of Christ, since grace was “poured into his lips?” Psa 45:2 .
As one that had authority ] Seest thou a preacher deliver the word with singular authority (as Paul, “We believe, therefore we speak”), esteem him very highly for the work’s sake. The Corinthians are checked, for that they were unruly, and would reign without Paul, 1Co 4:8 . Zedekiah is blamed, 2Ch 36:12 , because he humbled not himself before Jeremiah, a poor prophet, speaking to him from the Lord.
And not as the Scribes ] Frigidly and jejunely (meagrely, insipidly). Didst thou believe thyself, thou wouldst never plead thy client’s cause so coldly and carelessly, said Cicero to his adversary.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
22. ] A formula occurring entire at the end of the Sermon on the Mount, Mat 7:28 , and the first clause of it, and, in substance, the second also, in the corresponding place to this in Luk 4:32 .
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Mar 1:22 . : they were amazed; a strong word, several times in Mk. (Mat 7:28 ). , etc.: a similar remark in Mat 7:29 (see notes there) appended to Sermon on Mount. Mk. gives no discourse, but only notes the impression made. “A poor substitute for the beautiful Sermon on the Mount” (Schanz). Doubtless, but let us be thankful for what we do get: a record of the impression made by Christ’s very first appearance in the synagogue, witnessing to a striking individuality . Mk. omits much, and is in many ways a meagre Gospel, but it makes a distinctive contribution to the evangelic history in showing by a few realistic touches (this one of them) the remarkable personality of Jesus .
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
at. Gr. epi. App-104.
He taught. Referring to the character of His teaching as setting Him forth as Divine. See note on Mat 7:29.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
22.] A formula occurring entire at the end of the Sermon on the Mount, Mat 7:28, and the first clause of it,-and, in substance, the second also,-in the corresponding place to this in Luk 4:32.
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Mar 1:22. , authority) comp. Mar 1:27. [Matthew observes the same fact in his ch. Mar 7:28. General truths of this kind are related by one Evangelist in one place and connection, and by another in another and different connection. So the people are compared to sheep left without a shepherd, in Mat 9:36, but at a subsequent time in Mar 6:34. Mark, however, in this passage, refers to the sermon on the mount; whence it is evident that the healing of the mother-in-law of Peter, which Mark transposes, followed the sermon on the mount, as we find the order of events in Matthew.-Harm., p. 235.]
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
they were: Jer 23:29, Mat 7:28, Mat 7:29, Mat 13:54, Luk 4:32, Luk 21:15, Joh 7:46, Act 6:10, Act 9:21, Act 9:22, 2Co 4:2, Heb 4:12, Heb 4:13
as the: Mar 7:3-13, Mat 23:16-24
Reciprocal: Mar 6:2 – he began Mar 11:18 – astonished Luk 2:47 – General Tit 2:15 – with
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
2
This verse is explained at Mat 7:28-29.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Mar 1:22. See on Mat 7:28-29; comp. Luk 4:32.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Verse 22
Doctrine; his preaching.–As one having authority; with great decision and energy.
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
Mark used a strong Greek word to describe the reaction of Jesus’ hearers, though he did not record what Jesus taught. The word is exeplessonto meaning that Jesus’ words astounded or overwhelmed the people. A distinguishing feature of Mark’s Gospel is his references to people’s emotional reactions (cf. Mar 1:27; Mar 2:12; Mar 5:20; Mar 5:42; Mar 6:2; Mar 6:51; Mar 7:37; Mar 10:26; Mar 11:18), even those of Jesus (Mar 6:6). It was Jesus’ great authority that impressed them. He was, of course, not a mere scribe (teacher of the law) but a prophet, even the greatest prophet ever to appear. Jesus proclaimed revelation directly from God rather than just interpreting the former revelations that God had given to others and reiterating the traditional rabbinic interpretations of the law.
"They [the scribes] habitually established their views by long learned quotations from other rabbis. At best, they could only claim an authority derived from their understanding of the law. Their teaching was generally pedantic and dull, occupied with minute distinctions concerning Levitical regulations and petty legalistic requirements." [Note: Hiebert, p. 52.]
"Fundamentally . . . Mark presents Jesus’ conflict with the religious authorities as one of authority: Does Jesus or does he not discharge his ministry as one authorized by God? As this conflict unfolds, it becomes progressively more intense, until it finally ends in Jesus’ death." [Note: Kingsbury, p. 67.]
"The narrator paints the authorities in a consistently negative light from their first mention as legal experts who teach without authority. The narrator builds their characterization on their opposition to Jesus. What the authorities say involves primarily questions which imply accusations or aim at trapping Jesus. As for what they do, they primarily work at plotting the destruction of Jesus. Neither Jesus nor the narrator says anything favorable about them. And the narrator’s inside views on their thoughts and feelings regularly distance the reader from the authorities. Apart from attributing a few favorable attitudes to Herod and Pilate, the narrator depicts the authorities as thoroughly untrustworthy characters." [Note: Rhoads and Michie, p. 117.]