Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 2:24
And to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons.
24. A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons ] The offering appointed was a yearling lamb for a burnt-offering, and a young pigeon or turtledove for a sin-offering, which were to be brought to the door of the tabernacle and with which “the priest made an atonement for her and she shall be clean.” But the Law of Moses, with that thoughtful tenderness which characterises many of its provisions, allowed a poor mother to bring two turtledoves instead; and since turtledoves (being migratory) are not always procurable, and old pigeons are not easily caught, offered the alternative of “two young pigeons.” Lev 12:6-8. (Tristram.)
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
And to offer a sacrifice … – Those who were able on such an occasion were required to offer a lamb for a burnt-offering, and a pigeon or a turtle-dove for a sin-offering. If not able to bring a lamb, then they were permitted to bring two turtle-doves or two young pigeons, Lev 12:6, Lev 12:8.
Turtle-doves – Doves distinguished for having a plaintive and tender voice. By Marys making this offering she showed her poverty; and our Saviour, by coming in a state of poverty, has shown that it is not dishonorable to be poor. No station is dishonorable where God places us. He knows what is best for us, and he often makes a state of poverty an occasion of the highest blessings. If with poverty he grants us, as is often the case, peace, contentment, and religion, it is worth far more than all the jewels of Golconda or the gold of Mexico. If it be asked why, since the Saviour was pure from any moral defilement in his conception and birth, it was necessary to offer such a sacrifice: why was it necessary that he should be circumcised, since he had no sin, it may be answered:
- That it was proper to fulfil all righteousness, and to show obedience to the law, Mat 3:15.
- It was necessary for the future usefulness of Christ. Unless he had been circumcised, he could not have been admitted to any synagogue or to the temple. He would have had no access to the people, and could not have been regarded as the Messiah.
Both he and Mary, therefore, yielded obedience to the laws of the land, and thus set us an example that we should walk in their steps. Compare the notes at Mat 3:15.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Luk 2:22; Luk 2:24
The days of her purification
The presentation in the temple
I.
1. Consider the inner meaning of the law which was here fulfilled by the Infant Jesus. Ever since the day that Israel had been delivered from bondage by the death of the first-born of the Egyptians, the first-born had been considered especially dedicated to the service of God.
2. Here the First-born, not of Mary only, but of all creation, is presented to the Father. Is He not the Only-begotten Son, begotten before all worlds? Now that He has come in the substance of our flesh He is the true Head of the human race, the First-born of a restored humanity. It is as such that He makes His first visit to Jerusalem–type of the heavenly Jerusalem–the Church of the First-born; and His first entry into the Temple, the Home of God upon earth.
3. Unto us a Son is given; as the Son of Man, the Hope of the Human Race, our First-born, He is presented to the Father as our best and only offering. From this day forward He is in the presence of God for us.
4. Inasmuch as we are members of Christ, we too are presented in His presentation. We also become the first-born, joint-heirs with Him, the first-fruits of creation, a royal priesthood, a chosen nation.
II. 1. Realize that we are ever being presented in the Temple of God through our union with our Head, even Jesus Christ.
2. Realize this especially in the Holy Eucharist, in which we plead before our Father the one perfect and sufficient sacrifice and oblation for the sins of the whole world, and at the same time, sharing in His life, we offer and present ourselves a reasonable, holy, and lively sacrifice.
3. Realize that as the first-born is especially claimed for the service of God, this sacrifice of ourselves must include the offering of our first-born, our best energies, our truest thoughts, our highest talents, our richest possessions. (Canon Vernon Hutton, M. A.)
Dedication to God from early youth
In congratulating Simeon and Anna on having seen the salvation of Israel, we should not overlook the fact, that by long preparation and longing they made themselves worthy of embracing the Saviour. If you desire the same happiness, make the same preparation Do not defer it to your old age, but in order to ensure the friendship of Jesus then, devote yourself to Him now
I. THIS IS A SACRIFICE EXCEEDINGLY WELCOME TO GOD.
1. God has a predilection for youth, and selects them as His instruments to attain His designs. Joseph, David, Daniel, Stephen.
2. The young are eminently fit for heaven (Mat 14:14).
3. So much the more does He value the self-sacrifice of youth, the devotion to Him from childhood being
(1) Firstlings (Gen 4:4). He who dissipates him youth, and in old age turns to God, offers fruits of which the sweetest have been tasted by the devil; and ears, the best grain of which has been taken by him.
(2) A sacrifice free from selfishness.
(3) A. stainless offering (Mal 1:8).
(4) An example to others.
II. VERY PROFITABLE FOR ONESELF.
1. Because you are led to perfection, which is the true beauty and riches of man.
(1) Virtue is a tree that strikes deeper roots in young hearts. Greater susceptibility–fewer storms internal and external. The coldness and miseries of life are not so much felt. The soul is not yet enervated by passions, nor petrified by custom and stupidity.
(2) The stem of this tree is harder and more solid. Virtue, like vice, is hardened into habit and passion. The conversion of old age is often unstable.
(3) This tree bears more delicious fruits, and in greater measure. The wine first taken from the press is the most delicious. Virtue is an art acquired by exercise.
2. Because you will gain happiness here on earth.
(1) Inner peace–the consciousness of being Gods friend.
(2) The prospect of proximate, abundant, eternal reward.
(3) The love and esteem of all who are of good will.
3. Happiness in the next world. (Q. Rossi.)
Consequences of good education
Mary is the happiest mother, because she carried in her arms the best Child. Where is there a father or mother who would not desire to have good children? The attainment of this wish is often frustrated by parents themselves. Yet they would find urgent motives to realize it, if they would consider the happy results of giving a wise and religious education to their children.
I. CONSEQUENCES TO THE PARENTS. Children well educated are–
1. An honour to their parents. Their good name reflects on those who brought them up.
2. Their joy, consolation, and help, in every condition of life.
3. Their eternal crown.
II. CONSEQUENCES TO THE CHILDREN. Parents wish nothing more than to see their children happy. Now it is on good education that–
1. Their temporal happiness depends.
2. Their eternal weal. You have planted for heaven, and in heaven, therefore, you will reap your reward. No dowry equals this.
III. CONSEQUENCES TO FESTIVITY.
1. In regard to the family (Psa 3:2; Psa 3:8).
2. In regard to civil society. Good and bad morals are rapidly spread and are kept up for a long time. (Tirinus)
The purification
The question meets us, If the blessed Virgin conceived the Son by the operation of the Holy Ghost, and if He Himself were absolutely and entirely pure, then what need of purification? What defilement was there, from which the Virgin Mother could be purified? And an answer is ready to hand which seems abundantly sufficient, namely, that as Jesus was circumcised, so Mary was purified; in each case there was submission to the letter of a Divine law, and there was no desire and no attempt to establish an exception. Our Lord was a Jewish boy, and was treated as Jewish boys were treated; Mary was a Jewish mother, and acted as Jewish mothers were wont to act. Our English version speaks of the days of her purification, and this is what we might have expected, but it should not be concealed that the best copies of the original Scriptures give, some of them His, some of them their purification; and there can be little doubt that this last form of the sentence is the correct one (so Revised Version). It would seem to indicate that, in the popular belief and feeling of the Jews the sacrifice which was instituted for the purification of the mother (Levit. 12.) did in reality also apply to the child; and this being so, St. Luke appears not to have hesitated to use a phrase, which, literally interpreted, would imply the need of purification on the part of our blessed Lord Himself. This is only another instance of the complete and unreserved manner in which the Head of our race is identified with ourselves. Perhaps the most interesting point in these verses is the incidental testimony to the poverty of the Holy Family. The offering might be a lamp and a turtle-dove if the parents were rich, and two doves or two pigeons if they were poor. Hence the mention of the pair of turtle-doves or two young pigeons marks the worldly condition of the Blessed Virgin and Joseph; they came with the poor mans and poor womans offering; and thus again the poverty of our Lord was declared in the most striking manner during His infancy. (Bishop Goodwin.)
The days of purification
When the fixed time of purification was passed (seven days for a boy and fourteen for a girl), the mother still remained at home thirty-three days for a boy and sixty-six for a girl. Then she went up to the Temple. (E. Stapfer, D. D.)
Her forty days were no sooner out than Mary comes up to the Holy City. She comes with sacrifices, whereof one is for a burnt-offering, the other for a sin-offering; the one for thanksgiving, the other for expiation; for expiation of a double sin–of the mother that conceived, of the Child that was conceived. We are all born sinners, and it is a just question whether we do more infect the world, or the world us. They are gross flatterers of nature that tell her she is clean. But, O the unspeakable mercy of our God I we provide the sin, He provides the remedy. Every poor mother was not able to bring a lamb for her offering; there was none so poor but might procure a pair of turtles or pigeons. God looks for somewhat of every one, not of every one alike. Since it is He that makes differences of abilities (to whom it were as easy to make all rich), His mercy will make no difference in the acceptation. The truth and heartiness of obedience is that which He will crown in His meanest servants. A mite, from the poor widow, is more worth to Him than the talents of the wealthy. The blessed Virgin had more business in the temple than her own. She came, as to purify herself, so to present her Son. Every male that first opened the womb was holy unto the Lord. He that was the Son of God by eternal generation before time, was also, by common course of nature, consecrated unto God. It is fit the Holy Mother should present God with His own. Her first-born was the first-born of all creatures. It was He whose temple it was that He was presented in, to whom all the first-born of all creatures were consecrated, by whom they were accepted; and now is He brought in His mothers arms to His own house, and, as man, is presented to Himself as God. Under the gospel we are all first-born, all heirs; every soul is to be holy unto the Lord; we are a royal generation, an holy priesthood. Our baptism, as it is our circumcision, and our sacrifice of purification, so is it also our presentation unto God. Nothing can become us but holiness. O God! to whom we are devoted, serve Thyself of us, glorify Thyself by us, till we shall by Thee be glorified with Thee. (Bishop Hall.)
No myth
A mythus generally endeavours to ennoble its subject, and to adapt the story to the idea. If, then, the gospel narrative were mythical, would it have invented, or even suffered to remain, a circumstance so foreign to the idea of the myth, and so little calculated to dignify it as the above. A mythus would have introduced an angel, or, at least, a vision, to hinder Mary from submitting the child to a ceremony so unworthy of its dignity; or the priests would have received an intimation from heaven to bow before the infant, and prevent its being reduced to the level of ordinary children. (A. Neander.)
Early dedication to the Lord
The old Romans used to hold the face of all their new-born infants towards the sky, to denote that they must look above the world to celestial glories. We solemnly and prayerfully dedicate our children to God in baptism, &c. And, remembering their immortality and the uncertainty of their life, should we not also constantly devote them to God, and train them for Him and for heaven! My dear mothers prayers with and for me influenced me more to what is good than any earthly thing besides ever did. Richard Cecil spoke of his mother as one that had great nearness to God in prayer, and he says she was to him as an angel of God in her counsels and prayers, which most deeply impressed him. At a college were one hundred and twenty young men were studying for the ministry, it was found, as the result of special inquiry, that more than a hundred of them had been converted mainly through a mothers prayers and labours. But Sunday-schoolteachers, ministers, church members, young people themselves, and everybody should join in loving, prayerful efforts to present young people and others to the Lord. And if Gods grace be obtained for them, will they not be restrained from evil, and also led to good? Then children themselves should humbly, earnestly, lovingly, and through faith in Christ, present themselves to the Lord. A dear boy, who was soon after killed in a moment, prayed, Lord, make me quite, quite ready, in ease Jesus comes for me in a hurry. (Henry R. Burton.)
Early piety a safeguard
In one of the public enclosures of Philadelphia the fountain was recently left to play all night. During the hours of darkness a sharp frost set in; and those who passed by next morning found the water, still playing indeed, but playing over a mass of gleaming icicles. But that was not all. The wind had been blowing steadily in one direction through all these hours, and the spray had been carried on airy wings to the grass which fringed the pool in which the fountain stood. On each blade of grass the spray had fallen so gently as hardly to bend it, descending softly and silently the whole night long. By slow and almost imperceptible processes each blade became coated with a thin layer of ice; by the same noiseless processes each layer grew thicker, until in the morning what before had been a little patch of swaying grass was a miniature battleground of upright, crystal spears, each holding within it, as its nucleus, a single blade of grass, now cold, rigid, and dead. In human life, in like manner, it may seem a light thing leave a young heart outside of Christs fold, and exposed to the cold winds of the worlds great unbelief. There is no violent transformation of the character in such a case. Yet silently and surely the worlds frost settles upon the flowers of the heart, covering them with the chill spray of doubt, binding them with soft bonds which harden into chains of ice, encasing them in a coat of crystal mail, polished, cold, and impenetrable. You have met persons in whose heart this freezing process has been accomplished. You have seen beneath the icy surface the nucleus of good which might have grown to so fair a harvest, just as you have seen the dead blade of grass preserved at the core of the icicle. You can do little now for either the person or the plant: nothing but heavens sunshine can melt the ice which holds them in its deadly thrall. But you can take care that none of those for whom you are responsible will be left out in the worlds cold, to suffer so deadly a change. You can bring them within the warm influences of Christian life, where no frost will gather upon them, and where the souls highest powers will be gently wooed to their best growth.
Training children for the Lord
An aged Christian, a widow of fourscore years, relates the following experience of her early days. When she first entered upon her married life, she and her husband could lock their cottage door, and go together, forenoon and afternoon, to the house of God. After the birth of their first son they had to enjoy this privilege in turn; one going in the forenoon, and the other in the afternoon. But the sickness or fretfulness of the child not unfrequently detained the mother at home during the whole of the Sabbath. This she felt to be a great privation. On one such occasion a neighbour, coming in to inquire about her welfare, found her in tears. The dejected young mother was a Christian; she had early been brought to the knowledge of the truth as it is in Jesus; she was a lover of the Lords house, and of the Lords day; she trusted in Jesus as her Saviour; but she had not yet learned lovingly to accept all His discipline. There were things connected with it too painful for her. She did not know what was to compensate her for tile want of the days in the courts of the Lord; and so she told her neighbour the cause of her dejection. Woman, replied her neighbour, in the broad dialect of that land, dye no mind the word that says, Take this child, and nurse him for Me; and I will give thee thy wages? It was a word in season; and, with greater or less power, it sustained and comforted that mother during the whole of her subsequent nursing of ten children. Her home in the valley of the Tweed was long ago exchanged for one on the banks of the Mohawk. But the God whose Word thus comforted her in early womanhood is with her still when she is old and greyheaded; and she can gratefully speak of her eleven children, nursed for Him, as all walking in the ways of God on earth, or taken away to another home into which sickness and death can never come. (Mothers Treasury.)
Holy education of children
Good laws will not reform us, if reformation begin not at home. This is the cause of all our misdeeds in Church and State, even the want of a holy education of children. (R. Baxter.)
Permanence of early impressions
The late Rev. Richard Knill, a most devoted and useful missionary in Russia, returned home to his native village. It so happened that he slept in the chamber where he had slept as a boy. All night long he lay awake thinking of the mercy and goodness of God to him through life. Early in the morning he looked out of a window, and saw a tree in the garden beneath which his mother had prayed with him forty years before. He went out, and on the same spot knelt down and thanked God for a praying mother. Here was the reward of a mother who trained her children in the way to heaven.
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 24. And to offer a sacrifice] Neither mother nor child was considered as in the Lord’s covenant, or under the Divine protection, till these ceremonies, prescribed by the law, had been performed.
A pair of turtle doves, c.] One was for a burnt-offering, and the other for a sin-offering: see Le 12:8. The rich were required to bring a lamb, but the poor and middling classes were required to bring either two turtle doves, or two pigeons. This is a proof that the holy family were not in affluence. Jesus sanctified the state of poverty, which is the general state of man, by passing through it. Therefore the poor have the Gospel preached unto them and the poor are they who principally receive it.
Though neither Mary nor her son needed any of these purifications, for she was immaculate, and He was the Holy One, yet, had she not gone through the days of purification according to the law, she could not have appeared in the public worship of the Most High, and would have been considered as an apostate from the faith of the Israel of God; and had not He been circumcised and publicly presented in the temple, he could not have been permitted to enter either synagogue or temple, and no Jew would have heard him preach, or had any intercourse or connection with him. These reasons are sufficient to account for the purification of the holy virgin, and for the circumcision of the most holy Jesus.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
22, 24. her purificationThoughthe most and best copies read “their,” it was the motheronly who needed purifying from the legal uncleanness of childbearing.”The days” of this purification for a male child were fortyin all (Lev 12:2; Lev 12:4),on the expiry of which the mother was required to offer a lamb for aburnt offering, and a turtle dove or a young pigeon for a sinoffering. If she could not afford a lamb, the mother had to bringanother turtle dove or young pigeon; and, if even this was beyond hermeans, then a portion of fine flour, but without the usual fragrantaccompaniments of oil and frankincense, as it represented a sinoffering (Lev 12:6-8;Lev 5:7-11). From theintermediate offering of “a pair of turtle doves or two youngpigeons,” we gather that Joseph and the Virgin were in poorcircumstances (2Co 8:9), thoughnot in abject poverty. Being a first-born male, they “bring himto Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord.” All such had beenclaimed as “holy to the Lord,” or set apart to sacred uses,in memory of the deliverance of the first-born of Israel fromdestruction in Egypt, through the sprinkling of blood (Ex13:2). In lieu of these, however, one whole tribe, that of Levi,was accepted, and set apart to occupations exclusively sacred (Nu3:11-38); and whereas there were two hundred seventy-three fewerLevites than first-born of all Israel on the first reckoning, each ofthese first-born was to be redeemed by the payment of five shekels,yet not without being “presented (or brought) unto theLord,” in token of His rightful claim to them and theirservice (Num 3:44-47; Num 18:15;Num 18:16). It was in obedience tothis “law of Moses,” that the Virgin presented her babeunto the Lord, “in the east gate of the court called Nicanor’sGate, where she herself would be sprinkled by the priest with theblood of her sacrifice” [LIGHTFOOT].By that Babe, in due time, we were to be redeemed, “not withcorruptible things as silver and gold, but with the precious blood ofChrist” (1Pe 1:18; 1Pe 1:19),and the consuming of the mother’s burnt offering, and the sprinklingof her with the blood of her sin offering, were to find their abidingrealization in the “living sacrifice” of the Christianmother herself, in the fulness of a “heart sprinkled from anevil conscience,” by “the blood which cleanseth from allsin.”
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And to offer a sacrifice,…. That is, when the time of purification came, the parents of our Lord brought him from Bethlehem to Jerusalem, to present him in the temple to the Lord as his, and to redeem him; and not only so, but to offer the sacrifice required of child-bed women:
according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, Le 12:8
a pair of turtle doves, or two young pigeons: if the person was able, she was to bring a lamb of the first year for a burnt offering; and a young pigeon, or a turtle dove, for a sin offering; but in case of poverty, then the above sufficed, and one of them was for a burnt offering, and the other for a sin offering; which shows not only that the virgin offered for herself a sin offering, being ceremonially unclean, but also her mean estate and poverty, in that she offered the offering of the poorer sort; see Le 12:6.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons ( ). The offspring of the poor, costing about sixteen cents, while a lamb would cost nearly two dollars. The “young of pigeons” is the literal meaning.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
A pair of turtle doves, or two young pigeons. The offering of the poor. While the lamb would probably cost about one dollar and seventy five cents, the doves would cost about sixteen cents. She would not bring the creatures themselves, but would drop the price into one of the thirteen trumpet shaped chests in the Court of the Women. Young pigeons : lit., young ones of pigeons [ ] . Wyc. has culver birds; culver being an old English term for dove. So Spenser :
“More light than culver in the falcon’s fist.”
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “And to offer a sacrifice,” (kai tou dounai thusian) “And (his parents are) to give a sacrifice,” to acknowledge their personal sins, as parents of the child, that they have been and are defiled and need inner cleansing, and thanksgiving for their Son.
2) “According to that which is said in the law of the Lord,” (kata to eiremenon en to nomo kuriou) “According to, or in compliance and harmony with, what is said in the law of the Lord,” as set forth. A lamb for a: 1) Burnt-offering and 2) A pigeon for a sin-offering, Lev 12:6, at the door of the tabernacle of the congregation unto the priest.
3) “A pair of turtle-doves or two young pigeons.” (zeugos turgononon e duo nossous peristeron) “A pair of turtledoves or two nestlings,” or two squabs (young pigeons). This was an alternate sacrifice offering which might be made by one too poor to offer the lamb, which cost about five shekels or three and a half dollars, a price that Mary and Joseph simply did not seem to have, while a pigeon could be bought for about 8 cents, Lev 12:8. Mary and Joseph brought the latter sacrifice offering, evidently too impoverished to buy a lamb for a burnt offering, 2Co 8:9. Jesus Christ and His parents exemplified strict obedience to the Law of Moses, Rom 5:19, an example that we should walk obedient to His commands, 1Pe 2:21.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
24. And that they might offer a sacrifice This sacrifice belonged to the ceremony of purification; lest any one should suppose that it was offered for the sake of redeeming the first-born. When the Evangelist mentions a pair of turtle-doves, or two young pigeons, he takes for granted that his readers will understand, that Joseph and Mary were in such deep poverty, as not to have it in their power to offer a lamb. For this exception is expressly mentioned:
“
If she be not able to bring a lamb, then she shall bring two turtles, or two young pigeons,” (Lev 12:8.)
Is it objected, that the Magi had very recently supplied them with a sufficiency of gold to make the purchase? I reply: We must not imagine that they had such abundance of gold as to raise them suddenly from poverty to wealth. We do not read, that their camels were laden with gold. It is more probable that it was some small present, which they had brought solely as a mark of respect. The law did not rigorously enjoin, that the poor should spend their substance on a sacrifice, but drew a line of distinction between them and the rich, as to the kind of sacrifices, and thus relieved them from burdensome expense. There would be no impropriety in saying, that Joseph and Mary gave as much as their circumstances allowed, though they reserved a little money to defray the expenses of their journey and of their household.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(24) A pair of turtle doves.The law of Lev. 12:8 allowed these to be substituted for the normal sacrifice of a lamb as a burnt-offering, and a pigeon or dove as a sin-offering, when the mother was not able to offer the former. We may see, therefore, in this fact, another indication of the poverty of Joseph and his espoused wife. The offering had, like all other sacrifices, to be made in the Temple. It seems all but certain that this visit to Jerusalem must have preceded the visit of the Magi. After that, it would have been perilous in the extreme, and the narrative of Matthew 2 implies an immediate departure for Egypt after they had left.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
24. A pair of turtle doves The proper sacrifice was a lamb, a young pigeon, or a turtle dove. Or if the mother be not able to bring a lamb, then two turtle doves or two young pigeons. The deep poverty of the holy family is not proved by this. They had been weeks from home upon expenses, and this alone may have rendered larger offerings undesirable.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Luk 2:24. A pair of turtle doves, &c. This was the offering appointed for the poorer sort, Lev 12:6-8. It is evident, therefore, that although Joseph and Mary were both of the seed royal, they were in very mean circumstances. The Evangelist mentions the presentation of the child to the Lord, before the offering of the sacrifice for the mother’s purification; but in fact this preceded the presentation, because, till it was performed, the mother could not enter the temple; accordingly St. Luke himself introduces both the parents presenting Jesus, Luk 2:27.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Luk 2:24 . ] continues the narrative after the interposed sentence Luk 2:23 : and in order to give an offering.
. . . .] Lev 12:8 .
] On the later form rejected by the Atticists, (so Tischendorf), see Sturz, Dial. Mac. p. 185; Lobeck, ad Phryn. p. 206 f.
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
24 And to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons.
Ver. 24. A pair of turtledoves ] Christ’s mother was not rich enough to bring a lamb. Let this comfort poor Christians. I know thy poverty, saith Christ, but that is nothing, thou art rich, Rev 2:9 . Smyrna, the poorest Church, hath the highest commendation.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
24. ] The offering (ref. Levit.) was, a lamb for a burnt-offering, and a pigeon for a sin-offering: but if the parties were too poor to bring a lamb, then two pigeons . But as Bleek remarks, we are not hereby justified in assuming extreme poverty to have been the condition of our Lord’s family. This no where appears from the gospel history.
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Luk 2:24 . : parallel to , indicating another of the purposes connected with the visit to Jerusalem. The mother went to offer her gift of thanksgiving after the days of purification were ended. , in Lev 12 , where alternative offerings are specified: a lamb, and a turtle dove or a young pigeon; and in case of the poor two turtle doves, or two young pigeons, the one for a burnt offering, the other for a sin offering. Mary brought the poor woman’s offering. The question has been asked, why any purification in this case? and the fact has been adduced in proof that the original document used by Lk. knew nothing of the virgin birth. , Luk 2:27 , has been used for the same purpose ( vide Hillmann, Jahrb. f. pr. Theol. , 1891).
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
A pair, &c. Lev 12:2, Lev 12:6.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
24.] The offering (ref. Levit.) was, a lamb for a burnt-offering, and a pigeon for a sin-offering: but if the parties were too poor to bring a lamb, then two pigeons. But as Bleek remarks, we are not hereby justified in assuming extreme poverty to have been the condition of our Lords family. This no where appears from the gospel history.
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Luk 2:24. , a sacrifice) viz. that of the poor, Lev 12:8.- ) LXX. Lev 12:8, . The same Translators however have , …, Lev 5:11.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
A pair: Lev 12:2, Lev 12:6-8, 2Co 8:9
Reciprocal: Gen 15:9 – General Lev 1:14 – of fowls Lev 5:7 – two turtledoves Lev 12:8 – she be not able to bring a lamb Lev 14:30 – General Psa 84:7 – strength to strength Mat 21:12 – doves
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
4
In verse 8 of the chapter in Leviticus cited, it can be seen that a woman was permitted to offer these birds only in case she was not financially able to offer a larger sacrifice, such as a four-footed animal of the clean description.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
And to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons.
[A pair of turtledoves; etc.] I. “The turtles were older; and of a larger size”: pigeons less, and younger. For it is said of pigeons, two young pigeons; but not so of turtles.
This was called the offering of the poor; which if a rich man offered, he did not do his duty. And when the doctors speak so often of an offering rising or falling; it hath respect to this. “For the offering of the richer sort was a lamb; but if his hand could not reach to a lamb, then he offered a pair of turtles, or pigeons. But if he was poor; he offered the tenth part of an ephah: therefore is the oblation said to be rising or falling.”
“King Agrippa came one day to offer a thousand burnt offerings; but a certain poor man prevented him with two turtledoves. So, also, when one would have offered a bullock, there was a poor man prevented him with a handful of herbs.”
II. Of the two turtledoves or young pigeons; one was to be offered as a burnt offering, the other as a sin offering. But as to the particular appointment of the one for the burnt offering, the other for the sin offering, that is, which should be which, it is disputed among the doctors whether it lay in the breast of him or her that offered it, or the priest, to determine it.
By the way, we may observe that the blessed Virgin offers a sin offering for herself. Now what the meaning and design of a sin offering was, is evident from Leviticus_4-5.
Fuente: Lightfoot Commentary Gospels
Luk 2:24. According, etc. The offering was, according to Lev 12:6 : a lamb of the first year for a burnt-offering, and a young pigeon, or a turtle-dove, for a sin-offering. In the case of poverty: A pair of turtle-doves, or two young pigeons (Lev 12:8). Joseph and Mary were not rich, but extreme poverty is not to be inferred from this offering. If they, while sojourners in Bethlehem, had also to pay five shekels at this time, there would be a sufficient reason for their availing themselves of this provision of the law for those who were not rich. Mary cannot bring a lamb for an offering: she brings something better, even the true Lamb of God, into the temple. (Van Oosterzee.)