Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of John 1:30
This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me.
30. of whom ] The best text gives, in behalf of whom.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Joh 1:30-34
This is He.
The Redeemers identification
I. IN HIS WORK as the Lamb of God.
1. The object offered in sacrifice. The Lamb of God applies to Christ
(1) in His personal character.
(2) In His sacrificial character.
2. The object or effect of the sacrifice taketh away, etc.!
3. The burden removed by the sacrifice: the worlds sin.
II. IN HIS PERSON (Joh 1:30). These words meet us for the third time. The human and Divine natures are exhibited in one sentence. How profoundly the Baptist believed in the pre-existence of Christ.
III. THE MODE OF IDENTIFICATION.
1. I knew Him not. He did indeed know Him, and hence hesitated about baptizing Him (Mat 3:14). The son of Elizabeth must have known the Son of Mary. The Baptist means that he did not know Him as Messiah.
2. Jesus was revealed to John by the descent of the Holy Ghost.
(1) The sign. The Dove emblematized the consecration of the Redeemer to His Divine work.
(2) The two baptisms–the one in water, the other in the Holy Ghost–the one that Christ might be made manifest unto Israel, and unto repentance for the remission of sins; the other not a sacrament that Christ was to institute for the Church, nor which any priest or minister could give; it was a baptism of regenerating grace–such a baptism as Simon Magus never had although baptized with water; such a baptism as the dying thief enjoyed although not baptized with water. (Prof. Croskery.)
Notice
1. The evidences of Christs excellency and Godhead when He came into the world are not cunningly devised fables, but most certain and infallible truths, for John bare record, saying, I saw, etc.
2. Christ in His solemn entry to His offices was sealed from heaven, that so the Church may learn to embrace Him with all respect. Therefore doth the Spirit descend upon Him in this visible way, and the Father bear witness to Him (Mat 3:1-17), all the persons of the Trinity manifesting themselves on Jordans bank.
3. Christ is endowed with the Spirit from on high for executing of His offices, and it is made manifest that the Spirit is to be found on Him and sought from Him; for I saw the Spirit descending from heaven upon Him, where the Spirit, who filleth heaven and earth, is said to descend in respect of that visible manifestation and sign of His presence.
4. The Spirits descending like a dove, a meek, harmless and affectionate creature, pointed out what Christ is in His own nature to them that come to Him, even meek, harmless, loving, and not dreadful; what He is in the execution of His office, even He in whom the Father is well pleased and pacified, and He who bringeth the good news of assuaging the deluge of wrath, as Noahs dove of the drying up of the flood; and what He is in the operations of His Spirit upon His people, that they are made meek, harmless, and lowly as doves, not like birds of prey.
5. Albeit all Christs members do receive of the Spirit in their measure, yet it is Christs prerogative to have the Spirit resting on Him; not only as God is the Spirit of one essence with Him, proceeding from the Father and Him, and so is ever present with Him. But even as man by virtue of the personal union, the Spirit floweth and resteth on Christ, and efficaciously worketh in Him all Divine graces and virtues without measure, and immutably, so that none can come wrong to Him at any time for receiving of His Spirit: Therefore, it is said, it abode upon Him (Isa 11:2-3).
6. Christ, in taking on our nature, did so cover His glory with the veil of our flesh and common infirmities that He could not be known by bodily sight from another man without Divine revelation and evidences from God; for, without this, John saith, I knew Him not (Mat 16:17).
7. The Lord is very tender and careful of His servants, to encourage and confirm them in their calling and message; and will not fail to perform what He hath promised for that effect when He sendeth them out; for, John saith, he saw this sign in a peculiar way, as being to him an accomplishment of that promise given to him; for God had said to him, upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, etc., and now it was accomplished.
8. The Spirit resteth upon Christ, and was manifested to be on Him by a visible sign, not only for Himself and to point out His excellency, but for the Churchs good, and to certify them that He received the Spirit to communicate unto His people. (G. Hutcheson.)
The Dove of God
We have here
I. THE CORONATION OF THE KING.
1. The actual descent of the Spirit. It is unnecessary to ask what was the objective material reality here. It is enough that this was no fancy, born in a mans brain, but an actual manifestation, whether through sense or apart from sense, to consciousness of a Divine outpouring and communication.
2. The purpose of this descent. The anointing of the Monarch. But a man is king before he is crowned. Coronation is the consequence and not the cause of royalty. And so the first purpose of this great fact is distinctly stated as having been the solemn pointing out of Messiah for the Baptist first, but in order that he might bear witness of Him to others. But this was not the beginning of His Messianic consciousness, nor of His Sonship. Before His baptism, and ere the heavens opened, or the dove fluttered down, He from everlasting was Son in the bosom of the Father. Christs baptism was an epoch in His human development inasmuch as it was His first public assumption of His Messianic office, and inasmuch as an advance was made in the communication to his manhood of the sustaining Spirit as fully equipped Him for new calls. His manhood needed the continual communication of the Spirit, and because it was sinless it was capable of a complete reception of that Spirit. So we see in Christ the realized ideal of manhood.
3. The meaning of this symbol. To John the coming of the King was first and chiefly a coming to judgment. John sees two wonders: the Messiah in his Carpenter Cousin and the Spirit, which he thought of as searching and consuming, like a dove. The same as in Gen 1:2, where the word employed describes accurately the action of the mother bird with her soft breast and outstretched wings quickening the life that lies beneath. What then does it proclaim as to the character of the King.
(1) Purity, as the very foundation of His royalty.
(2) Meekness and gentleness, as the weapons of His conquest and the sceptre of His rule. The dove will outfly all Romes eagles, and all rapacious unclean feeders with their strong wings, talons and beaks.
II. THE GIFTS OF THE KING TO HIS SUBJECTS.
1. Christ has nothing that He keeps to Himself. He received the Spirit that He might diffuse Him through the whole world. Salvation is more than escape from wrath, more than pardon. We must rise higher and feel if we would understand the unspeakable gift which is the totality of the gifts of His indwelling Spirit.
2. Therefore Christian met, are spoken of in the same language which is used in reference to their Master. Sons of God, Priests, Lights of the World, Anointed.
3. How full of rebuke and instruction is the symbol in reference to ourselves. The dove-like Spirit is offered to us.
(1) Our hearts are like the wild chaos; but He will come, if we will let Him, and brood over our nature and recreate the whole.
(2) The dove again was pure and fit for sacrifice: the heavenly dove comes as the Spirit of holiness, and then there is purity in the receiver and self-sacrifice.
(3) The Dove that crowned the King dwells in the subjects and makes them, too, meek and gentle, and imparts the true force of Christian character.
(4) Noahs dove came back with one leaf in his beak–the prophecy of a whole world of beauty and verdure. The Dove that comes to us, bearing some leaf plucked from the tree of life, is the earnest of our inheritance until the day of redemption. All the gifts of that Divine Spirit–gifts of holiness, gentleness, wisdom, truth–are forecasts of heavenly perfectness. To us sailing over a dismal sea, He comes bearing with Him a message that tells of the far-off land and the fair garden of God in which the blessed shall walk. (A. Maclaren, D. D.)
As a dove did at that time bring tidings of the abating of the water, so doth it now of the abating of the wrath of God upon the preaching of the gospel. (Augustine.)
The Holy Spirit manifested Himself here as a Dove; and at the day of Pentecost in tongues of fire; in order that we may learn to unite fervour with simplicity, and to seek for them both from Him. (Augustine.)
The dove, the symbol of innocence and purity (Mat 10:16), the abiding and the tranquil hovering over Christ, expressed the tranquil and equable movement of the power of the Spirit in Him, in contrast with the detached impulses given to the prophets (Isa 11:2). (Tholuck.)
The Great A toner the Great Baptizer
The work of Christ, according to the Baptist,was to take away the sin of the world and to baptize with the Holy Ghost. It is not possible for believers to think too much of the first part; but it is quite possible for them to think too little of the second. These are the two pillars of our faith. The atoning sacrifice was offered and completed on Calvary once for all; but the baptism of the Holy Ghost is ever going on. Our Saviour died to be the Atoner; He lives to be the Baptizer. And our Saviour lives and reigns to baptize us not occasionally, but permanently; not fitfully and uncertainly, but surely. Were this baptism fully realized, there would be a vast increase of holiness, power, and success in ministers and churches: of Christian unity and charity. What encouragement have we for expecting this baptism? The announcement that Christ is as much Baptizer as Atoner, not the one without the other, or He would have laid the foundation and built nothing upon it. The atonement is the rock: the baptism builds the Church. So the gospels run up to the atonement, but the Acts start from the baptism. And so as the sinner seeks the one for salvation, so should the saint seek the other for service and testimony. (C. Clemance, D. D.)
The four baptisms
There are four baptisms mentioned in the Bible. The baptism of water, of repentance, of the Holy Ghost, and of fire. The baptism of water is the emblem of all, but that would be nothing without the baptism of repentance which it was intended to express; and the baptism of repentance will be unavailing for peace, holiness, heaven, unless it is accompanied by the baptism of the Holy Ghost, and that is never far separated from the baptism of fire. The four make one complete whole, and are the basis of the Christian life. (J. Vaughan.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
And (saith he) this is he of whom I said, (as Joh 1:15), He cometh after me in order of time and ministry, but is more excellent than I am.
See Poole on “Joh 1:15“.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
This is he, of whom it is said,…. Either the day before, as in Joh 1:27, or some time before that, Joh 1:15, when he first began to baptize, even before Christ came to be baptized by him, and before he personally knew him; see Mt 3:11.
After me cometh a man; not a mere man, but the man God’s fellow: and this is said, not because he was now a grown man, or to show the truth of his human nature; but seems to be a common Hebraism, and is all one as if it had been said, “after me cometh one”, or a certain person: for the sense of this phrase, and what follows,
see Gill “Joh 1:15”.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Of whom ( ). Not , but . “On behalf of whom.” John points to Jesus as he speaks: “This is he.” There he is. See verse 15 for discussion of these words of John.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
1) “This is he of whom I said,” (houtos estin huper ou ego eipen) “This is he with reference to whom I said; Three times these words confront us; In this statement the human and Divine natures are set forth, as John the Baptist affirmed the preexistence of the Messiah, Joh 1:15; Joh 1:27.
2) “After me cometh a man,” (opiso mou erchetai aner) “After me there comes of his own choice a mature man,” Jesus was a man, not an effeminate male. He was a man of His own people.
3) “Which is preferred before me:- (hos emprosthen mou gegonen) “Who has become or existed before or prior to me, before my existence,” expressed above, Joh 1:15; Joh 1:27; Luk 2:25-26; Luk 2:38.
4) “For he was before me.” (hoti protos mou en) “Because he existed first (in priority) of me,” or antecedent of me, as The Word, Joh 1:1; Joh 1:14; as the Creator, Joh 1:3; as the Light and Life, Joh 1:4-5; Joh 8:12; Joh 14:6.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
30. This is he of whom I said. He comprehends every thing in a few words, when he declares that Christ is the person who, he said, was to be preferred to him; for hence it follows that John is nothing more than a herald sent on his account; and hence again it is evident that Christ is the Messiah. Three things are here stated; for when he says that a man cometh after him, he means that he himself was before him in the order of time, to prepare the way for Christ, according to the testimony of Malachi,
Behold, I send my messenger before my face, (Mal 3:1.)
Again, when he says that he was preferred to himself, this relates to the glory with which God adorned his Son, when he came into the world to fulfill the office of a Redeemer. At last, the reason is added, which is, that Christ is far superior in dignity to John the Baptist. That honor, therefore, which the Father bestowed upon him was not accidental, but was due to his eternal majesty. But of this expression, he was preferred to me, because he was before me, I have already Spoken. (37)
(37) See page 49.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(30) This is he.These words meet us here for the third time. They come in Joh. 1:15, and in part in Joh. 1:27. Here, as before, they are a quotation of an earlier and unrecorded statement of the Baptist, uttered in proverbial form, and to be understood in their fulfilment. (Comp. Joh. 3:30.)
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
30. This is he See note on Joh 1:15.
I knew him not See note on Mat 3:14. But how was it possible that John should be the cousin of Jesus and he personally unacquainted with him. Must they not have met at some of the Passovers in Jerusalem? We might reply that John, according to Luk 1:80, was required by a special dispensation to dwell in the wilderness. He may, by a divine speciality, never have attended any Passover; or at least any at which Jesus was present. But if even he had seen Jesus, and had known from human information his whole history, he yet had no right according to the divine order to him given, officially to know and proclaim him as Messiah. As it was the Apostles’ office to be eye-witnesses and not reporters from hearsay, so it was John’s office to be not a second-hand, but an immediate witness from the Holy Spirit himself. He could therefore know the Messiah only as God revealed him.
‘This is He of whom I said, after me comes a man who is become before me, for He was before me.’
John the Baptiser now expands on what he has said. Here was the One for whom he was preparing the way, the One who ranked before him because of His inherent superiority and who by right of that superiority would take over.
‘Who is become before me’. Jesus has not yet emerged into the limelight, but John already recognises that The One Who is to come is classed as his superior and is placed ‘before him’ by inherent right. And this right lies in His total genuine superiority, and in His pre-existence – ‘for He was before me’.
Joh 1:30. For he was before me. For he existed before me. See Joh 1:15.
does not refer to Joh 1:26-27 , where John bears his witness before the deputies from the Sanhedrim, but to an earlier testimony borne by him before his disciples and hearers, and in this definite enigmatic form, to which Joh 1:15 likewise refers
Joh 1:30 does not refer to Joh 1:26-27 , where John bears his witness before the deputies from the Sanhedrim, but to an earlier testimony borne by him before his disciples and hearers, and in this definite enigmatic form, to which Joh 1:15 likewise refers. So essential is this characteristic form, that of itself it excludes the reference to Joh 1:26-27 (De Wette, Hengstenberg, Ewald, Godet, and others). The general testimony which John had previously borne to the coming Messiah , here receives its definite application to the concrete personality there standing before him, i.e . to Jesus .
] not again, as in Joh 1:15 , for Jesus is now present .
] possesses the emphasis of a certain inward feeling of prophetic certitude.
] as coming from the Baptist, more reverential and honourable than . Act 17:31 ; Zec 6:12 ; Dem. 426. 6; Herod, vii. 210; Xen. Hier . vii. 3.
This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me. (31) And I knew him not: but that he should be made manifest to Israel, therefore am I come baptizing with water. (32) And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit descending from heaven like a dove, and it abode upon him. (33) And I knew him not: but he that sent me to baptize with water, the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining on him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost, (34) And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God.
There is somewhat very interesting from the simplicity and artlessness in which the Baptist relates the account of his knowledge of Jesus. It appears very plain from what is here said, that Christ and his servant John had never met until about the time of Christ’s baptism. For we read that John was in the deserts until the day of his shewing unto Israel. Luk 1:80 . And Jesus is said to have lived at Nazareth. Hence when Christ went to Jordan for baptism, John was then preaching in the wilderness of Judea. And John’s account of his discovery of Christ, by the marks wherewith he was told he should know him, these were the only testimonies John received for the knowledge of his Lord. He that sent me to baptize, (said John,) the same said unto me, Upon whom thou shalt see the Spirit descending, and remaining upon him, the same is he which baptizeth with the Holy Ghost. And I saw, (saith John,) and bare record that this is the Son of God. Doth the Reader ask who sent John? Let him once more read the 6th verse of this chapter, (Joh 1:6 ) and probably he will be inclined to think with me, that it was God the Holy Ghost. There was a man (saith the Evangelist) sent from God, whose name was John. Reader! will you not feel increasing cause, as you pass on from one evidence to another, to bless God the Holy Ghost for the testimony of this man? Think, I beseech you, how that Almighty Lord hath watched, and is watching over the interests of his Church and people, in affording such a cloud of witnesses wherewith we are encompassed? Again I say, Blessed be God the Holy Ghost for the preciousness of such a testimony in the present day of a Christ-despising generation!
30 This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me: for he was before me.
Ver. 30. Preferred before me, for he was before me ] Much ado the Baptist had to persuade this, the common did so admire him for his strict and holy life; for John did no miracle, Joh 10:41 . Holiness hath reverence. Of God himself it is said, “Holy and” therefore “reverend is his name.”
30. ] See on Joh 1:15 .
Joh 1:30 . . Pointing to Jesus he identifies Him with the person of whom he had previously said , etc. Cf. Joh 1:15 . “After me comes a man who is before me because He was before me.” The A.V [30] “which is before me” is preferable though not so literal as the R.V [31] “which is become before me”. The words mean: “Subsequent to me in point of time comes a man who has gained a place in advance of me, because He was eternally prior to me”. refers rather to space than to time, “after me,” but with the notion of immediacy, close behind, following upon. As certainly, refers to position or dignity; He has come to be in front of me, or ahead of me. So used sometimes in classic writers; as . , preferred before justice. Dem., 1297, 26. , assigning the ground of this advanced position of Jesus: He was before me. For see chap. Joh 15:18 , “If the world hateth you, ye know ,” and Justin Martyr, 1 Apol. , 12. It is difficult to escape the impression that something more is meant than would have conveyed, some more absolute priority. As are the chief men or leaders, it might be supposed that John meant to say that Christ was his supreme, in virtue of whom he himself lived and worked. But it is more probable he meant to affirm the pre-existence of the Messiah, a thought which may have been derived from the Apocalyptic books (see Deane’s Pseud. and Drummond’s Jewish Mess. ).
[30] Authorised Version.
[31] Revised Version.
of. All the texts read huper (App-104), instead of peri (App-104).
I said. See verses: Joh 1:15, Joh 1:27.
30.] See on Joh 1:15.
Joh 1:30. , a man) Great, peerless.-, prior [to me]) Notes, Joh 1:15.
Joh 1:30
Joh 1:30
This is he of whom I said, After me cometh a man who is become before me: for he was before me.-He again states this of whom he had spoken, as born after he was, yet existing before him.
Joh 1:15, Joh 1:27, Luk 3:16
Reciprocal: Mat 3:11 – but Luk 20:5 – Why Joh 3:31 – is above
0
This is the same as verse 15.
Joh 1:30. See the note upon Joh 1:15. Here, as there, the words refer to testimony given by the Baptist to Jesus at some point of time and on some occasion not recorded.
Joh 1:30-34. This is he, &c. I now point out to you the very person of whom I formerly said, After me cometh a man which is preferred before me Being incomparably greater and more excellent than I; for he was That is, he existed; before me Dr. Hammond abundantly vindicates this interpretation. Had , rendered before, signified chief here, as in some other places, , is, not , was, would have been joined with it, and John would have said he is, and not he was, my chief, which would have been a very flat tautology instead of a reason; whereas Christs having existed before John, though he was born after him, was a most convincing proof that he was a very extraordinary person, and was the strongest reason that could well have been assigned, to show that he was worthy of their superior regard. And I knew him not When I testified concerning the Messiah that he was soon to appear, and was a much greater person than I was, I did not know that this was he: I only knew in the general, that my mission and baptism were designed by God as the means of making the Messiah known to the Israelites. See the note on Mat 3:14. The Baptist made this declaration, lest the surrounding multitude should have imagined that Jesus assumed, and that he gave him, the title of Messiah, by private concert between themselves. But how surprising is this that John here asserts, considering how nearly they were related, and how remarkable the conception and birth of them both had been. But through the peculiar providence of God, it was ordered that our Saviour should live from his infancy to his baptism at Nazareth, while John lived all that time the life of a hermit, in the deserts of Judea, ninety or more miles from Nazareth. Hereby that acquaintance was prevented which might have made Johns testimony of Christ suspected. And John bare record, saying, I saw the Spirit From the time that the Baptist had the Messiah discovered to him by supernatural revelation, and the appearance of the sign which God had told him of, he openly pointed him out to the Jews, declaring, at the same time, the ground on which he proceeded in this matter, namely, the descent of the Spirit, which was the sign mentioned by God himself.
Ver. 30. This is he concerning whom I said: After me cometh a man who has preceded me, because he was before me.
This saying, while applying to Jesus as present (this is he) the testimony uttered on the preceding day in His absence (Joh 1:26-27), is designed to solve the enigma which that declaration contained: He who follows me was before me. The last clause explains it; see on Joh 1:15. It is difficult to decide between the two readings , in respect to, and , on behalf of, both of which are suitable. The word (a man in the strength of his age) which is not found in the quotation of this saying in Joh 1:15, is suggested to the forerunner by the sight of Jesus present before his eyes. Lucke, Meyer, Keil think that in Joh 1:30 the Baptist refers, not to the testimony of the day before (Joh 1:26-27), but to some other previous saying which is not mentioned, either in our Gospel or in the Synoptics.
They are condemned to this absurd supposition by their servile dependence on the Alexandrian text, which in Joh 1:27 omitted the words: who has preceded me. Weiss attempts to escape this difficulty by making the formula of quotation: he of whom I said, Joh 1:30, relate simply to the words: cometh after me, and not to those which follow, who has preceded me, an unfortunate expedient which cannot satisfy any one. For the emphasis, as the end of the verse shows, is precisely on the words which Weiss thus treats as insignificant. The systematic partisans of the Alexandrian text must, therefore, bring themselves to acknowledge, in this case also, that that text is no more infallible than the Byzantine or the Greco-Latin.
But how can John the Baptist have the boldness to give such a testimony to this mere Jew, like all the rest whom he had before him there, and to proclaim Him as the Redeemer of men, the being whom God had drawn forth from the depth of eternal existence that He might give Him to the world? He explains this himself in Joh 1:31-33 :
Verse 30
Of whom I said; as stated in John 1:15.
Probably some of those to whom John addressed these words were present and witnessed his conversation with the priests and Levites the previous day. John now identified Jesus as the person he had hinted at the day before.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Fuente: Godet Commentary (Luke, John, Romans and 1 Corinthians)
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)