Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of John 5:31
If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true.
31. my witness is not true ] Nothing is to be understood; the words are to be taken quite literally: ‘If I bear any witness other than that which My Father bears, that witness of Mine is not true.’ In Joh 8:14 we have an apparent contradiction to this, but it is only the other side of the same truth: ‘My witness is true because it is really My Father’s.’
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
31 47. The unbelief of the Jews
31 35. These claims rest not on My testimony alone, nor on that of John, but on that of the Father.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
If I bear witness of myself – If I have no other evidence than my own testimony about myself.
My witness – My testimony; my evidence. The proof would not be decisive.
Is not true – The word true, here, means worthy of belief, or established by suitable evidence. See Mat 22:16; We Know that thou art true – that is, worthy of confidence, or that thou hast been truly sent from God, Luk 20:21; Joh 8:13, Joh 8:17. The law did not admit a man to testify in his own case, but required two witnesses, Deu 17:6. Though what Jesus said was true Joh 8:13, Joh 8:17, yet he admitted it was not sufficient testimony alone to claim their belief. They had a right to expect that his statement that he came from God would be confirmed by other evidence. This evidence he gave in the miracles which he performed as proof that God had sent him.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Joh 5:31-40
If I bear witness of Myself My witness is not true.
There is another that beareth witness of Me
The witnesses of the Son
I. A GREAT WITNESS, His forerunner. The Baptist as a witness for Christ was
1. Human (Joh 5:34; cf. Joh 3:31).
2. Brilliant. While he lasted he was like the lamp that gave light to the whole household of the Jewish people. So should every Christian in his place as parent, master, teacher, citizen, be a blazing torch, or, at least, a useful lamp, to guide others to Christ (Mat 5:16; Php 2:15).
3. Acceptable. For a time the people buzzed round him like moths round a Luk 3:15). He was therefore a witness of their own selection, and hence one that might be supposed to be impartial.
4. Transcient. So Christs witnesses can seldom count on protracted popularity (Heb 7:23).
5. Yet permanent (Joh 5:33). A word truly spoken for Christ never dies.
II. A GREATER WITNESS. His works.
1. More exalted in its origin (Joh 5:34; cf. Joh 3:31). Johns was from earth, Christs from heaven.
2. More direct in its expression. Christs works, being the Fathers, proceeded straight from Him without passing through a subsidiary messenger as John.
3. More conclusive in its significance. Johns was necessarily imperfect, he being but human. But Christs works were such as the Father only could Joh 3:2; Joh 14:10-11). The inference from Joh 5:36; Joh 5:39 wasirresistible that Christ was the Son of God.
III. THE GREATEST WITNESS. His Father.
1. The Scriptures the medium of the Fathers testimony (Joh 5:39; Joh 5:46).
2. The Scriptures the Fathers testimony par excellence. The Father speaks in them by the Holy Ghost. To reject them is to reject the last and highest form of evidence God can give. (T. Whitelaw, D. D.)
The witness bearer
We are not informed whether our Lords opponents expressed their feelings, but knowing all things, He replied to their secret objections that the testimony was valid, inasmuch as He was not alone in bearing it (Joh 5:31). Such testimony could not be given by any man (Joh 5:34); it could be given so as to be on a footing of equality with His own only by another such as Himself, viz., the Father. The testimony was
1. Of another, implying distinctness of personality, and yet equality of testimony in value.
2. That of the God of Truth, known to Christ, who is in the bosom of the Father as it cannot be known to men. Consider, then, the Fathers testimony to Jesus by John.
I. THEY HAD SENT TO JOHN (verse 33). Some of them, perhaps, had themselves been deputies (Joh 1:19). By taking this step they had manifested a high opinion of Johns testimony. What authority, then, ought that testimony to have on the subject they had submitted to him?
II. JOHN BORE WITNESS TO THE TRUTH. John repudiated the Messiahship of himself, but announced Jesus as the Lamb of God. Had they put by this testimony? They were now reminded of it.
III. THE AUTHORITY OF GODS TESTIMONY WAS NOT HIS, BUT THAT OF HIM THAT HAD SENT HIM (verse 34). Man of himself was not equal to the task of witnessing to the glory of Christ. No man knoweth the Son but the Father. Man may be employed to proclaim what God is pleased to communicate, but the authority is not his, but Gods. John was sent from God to bear witness of the light. How vain, then, to speak of the authority of the Church in the Roman sense. It abides in the Word which she is commissioned to proclaim, and in that only.
IV. JOHNS PLACE AND HONOUR IN SUCH A CAUSE (verse 35).
1. He was a burning and shining lamp, a vessel prepared and ordained to diffuse light. The oil of grace in his heart was kindled from above, not from below. All ministers of Christ are of a similar character.
2. The Jews had rejoiced in this light, and had acknowledged John as a messenger from God. It was for a season only, however. Johns ministry was short, and their willingness to rejoice in it was shorter still. When they found that he was the herald of no political deliverer, when they understood the conditions of entering the kingdom John predicted, and when he pointed to Jesus as the Lamb of God, they gave him up.
Lessons:
1. Have we received the gospel as the Word of God? It is only when we hear God in the Word that we hear at all.
2. Were we once more willing to rejoice in the gospel than we are now? (A. Beith, D. D.)
Christs witnesses
God alone can testify touching the nature of a Divine relation. Christ has the witness of
I. THE BAPTIST. His predicted forerunner.
II. HIS MIRACLES.
III. THE FATHER.
1. At His baptism (Mat 3:17).
2. At His transfiguration (Luk 9:35).
3. In the temple (Joh 12:29).
IV. THE HOLY SCRIPTURES.
1. Old Testament.
2. New.
V. HIS DISCIPLES in whom He dwells.
VI. HIS ENEMIES, the rancour and persistence of whose opposition is a testimony to His Person and worth. (J. W. Burn.)
The witness of the Old Testament Scriptures to Jesus Christ
I. They witness to Him BY THE GREAT NEED OF A SAVIOUR, revealed by the lives and expressed in the words of the noblest of men.
II. They witness to Him BY THE UNSATISFYING EXPEDIENTS to which men resorted to meet that need–law, ritual, sacrifice.
III. They witness to Him BY TURNING MENS THOUGHTS from the past and the present to the future. The golden age of Israel was ever before her, not behind.
IV. They witness to Him BY THE UNREALIZED IDEALS of Prophet, King, and Priest, which Christ alone fulfilled.
1. As Prophet, He spoke with authority.
2. As King, He wrought with authority.
3. As Priest, He forgave with authority. (C. M. Hardy, B. A.)
These things I say, that ye might be saved
Have an object
A minister once had the celebrated Andrew Fuller as a hearer. After service, both were invited to a neighbouring house for refreshment. The preacher, who evidently thought he had made no failure, was desirous to ascertain Mr. Fullers opinion of his effort. The veteran divine seemed unwilling to be drawn out upon that subject, and for some time took no notice of his younger brothers allusions and hints. At length a remark was made of so inviting a character as that Mr. Fuller could not well avoid making some reply. He said, I gave close attention to your sermon, and tried to ascertain at what you were aiming it: what was your object? Several years afterwards that preacher referred to Mr. Fullers inquiry as a cutting reproof which he deeply felt, and which had the effect of changing essentially the character of both his motives and his labours. (Clerical Anecdotes.)
He was a burning and a shining light
I. In the ANALOGY employed by our Lord we have the threefold characteristic of a Christian minister–light, heat, and lustre. Re is a living lantern. Light in the Lord.
1. The first qualification for a Christian teacher is that he sees. He has heard the voice, Let there be light, and the voice has divided the light from the darkness.
2. The Christian doctrine is that the world and human nature are dark, and that Christianity is a light shining in a dark place.
3. In harmony with this view, every Christian man, and especially the Christian teacher, should be a light-bringer, none the less so because his temperament and character are called to a different routine of duties, or develop a varied order of excellences. There may be more or less of the red flare of human passion or the beautiful white light of love. Light is one, but it shines through various affecting media. There is light
(1) In the eye, by which we know sensible objects;
(2) In the understanding, by which we know scientific relations and are able to reason, etc.;
(3) In the will, which affects the whole range of our moral vision;
(4) but we see most clearly when we see through our affections.
4. But the Christian, like John, must be a burning and shining light–the marriage of knowledge and zeal; the white and red lights of life; impetuosity and prudence; Peter and John going up to the temple; the jewels on the high priests breastplate; the gorgeous red of the ruby, the soft blue of the sardonyx, the cataract splendour of the diamond.
II. Our Lord permits the designation to wear the form of EULOGY. John was an extraordinary teacher every way.
1. When any insist on ecclesiastical authority, I like to point to John the Baptist. How strangely he must have startled the ordinary opinions of his day. To the priests his mission must have appeared most heretical and disorderly. How strange that the conservators of religion are ever the last to learn the meanings of a great revelation. But when the Word of the Lord burns in the heart of a prophet he cannot hold back.
2. John was no dreamer, but never did prophet appear more so, proclaiming the visionary kingdom at hand. In the nature of things the light would not be comprehended by the darkness. Suddenly, in the death state of the Jewish nation, John rose. The kingdom of heaven is at hand. Repent ye. Gods turning to man the plea for mans turning to God–the sum and seal of the gospel lies in that.
III. GENERALIZATIONS. The burning and the shining light was
1. Before his age. The age was one of formalism and religious apathy. John was the impersonation of reality and earnestness. The most dreadful sight on earth is that of a preaching machine, yet that is often preferred to a prophet.
2. He was banished from society by his convictions. All men who leave the formalism of the present moment must make up their minds for the desert. But it is there we learn our true strength and the meaning of our mission.
3. He died a martyr to his faithfulness. (Paxton Hood.)
Sacrifice and submission
Suppose it were certainly predicted of your child that he should grow up the servant of other men, that he should have none of this worlds honours, and that his life should be made up of sacrifice and submission; would you not conceive it a dreary prospect? This prospect was realized in John; but the Master pronounced it grand. The poet sings, Lives of great men all remind us, etc. Thousands of young people have read these lines with hopefulness; of full-grown persons with misgiving; of the old who have wished that they had never heard them. But what are the elements of a grand life? There are easy, pleasant, showy, restless, plodding, successful, and average lives; but of grand lives two only are possible, both realized in Christ and in those who are like Him.
I. THE LIFE OF SACRIFICE. There are those in this world whom God calls to live for others, and the wants of others are to them the gate of everlasting glory. It may be the poor, sick, penitent, orphan, ones country, church, household, pariah, city, or hamlet. Human want is everywhere. To resolve to live for others, to give time, wealth, prayers, that others not so fortunate may be helped, cared for, taught, and that not grudgingly or of necessity, nor for profession or pay or praise, and on the first motion, and in faith–that is the way to make life sublime. And it is sublime because
1. It contradicts the desires of the heart, which never go that way by themselves, and involves that most glorious of victories, the conquest of self.
2. Because it is like the life of Christ and of those who have loved Him best.
II. THE LIFE OF HOLY SUBMISSION. In this life there is what is called the inevitable. Often this takes a formidable shape, and seems as if it might wreck the whole life. The wider the range of this enemy of peace, the greater the trial to a sensitive and eager spirit. But submission to the inevitable must take the form of intelligent resignation to the will of God to ennoble life. To this end
1. The mind must be kept in check by the thought of God.
2. The spirit of complaint be checked.
3. The habit of cheerfulness cultivated.
Lessons:
1. One of warning to the prosperous: the one thing in their life which could have given it grandeur is lacking, and failure will be written on it at last without sacrifice and submission.
2. One of consolation to the unfortunate: acceptance of ones lot as from God, and making the best of it, makes it glorious.
3. Put, then, away mock heroic ideas of grandeur. There are lofty lives where the world cannot see, but God can; and noble lives, although covered with this worlds tinsel glory, which will one day utterly fade away. (Morgan Dix, D. D.)
Light
The Word is a hand-lamp. Candles of tallow were first used, then lamps with wicks of flax were universally substituted. The ancients, in the absence of tables, used candlesticks from twelve inches to five feet high, made of wood, bronze, marble, silver and gold, with several branches. That of Antiochus was adorned with jewels set in chains. They were made in the form of lilies, seals, vines, and other figures. Lamps were used in marriage ceremonies, and placed in sepulchres. Olive oil was used, which on festive occasions was highly perfumed. Sometimes the lamps were held by the domestics standing round the table. Emblematically ministers are called candles (Zec 4:1-14.; Rev 1:1-20; Rev 11:4). The Rabbis were called Candles of the Law; Lamps of the Light. Light and fire were symbols of Joh 1:4; Joh 3:20). Lamps are required only in the suns absence, so at Christs coming John disappears. The Church is symbolized under the sign of a candlestick (Rev 1:20). Caravans in the desert at night are preceded by a brilliant lantern, which lights all who follow. Should the bearer be careless, Let your light shine sounds from all. Christ was never called, like John, a light-bearer; the word light as applied to Him is entirely different. (W. H. Van Doren, D. D.)
The light and the lamp
Just as Christ was not a Light, but the Light, so John was not a lamp, but the lamp; he was the friend and servant of the Bridegroom, who was to go before Him with the torch of his testimony. Burning like fire, his call to repentance penetrated into the hearts of men; brightly shining, full of gospel truth, he went before, lighting the way which led to the Lamb of God. (R. Besser, D. D.)
The torch-bearer
John was not a permanent sun; he was the torch which cannot burn without consuming itself. Critics have interpreted the article as signifying the torch par excellence, as alluding to Sir 48:1, the word (of Elias) shone like a torch, and as comparing John to the well.known retch-bearer who walked before the bridegroom in a nuptial procession; but the article simply means the light, of which there never was more than one in the house, (F. Godet, D. D.)
The lamp that burneth and shineth
The two epithets express the same idea; that of the ephemeral brilliance of a torch which wastes as it gives light. The imperfect was proves that the torch is now extinguished. John was imprisoned or dead. (F. Godet, D. D.)
A lamp shines by burning, and burns in shining; the sun wastes not while raying forth its beams. (T. Whitelaw, D. D.)
Burning and shining lives
Some shine but do not burn; others burn but do not shine. True grace in the soul does both. Basil thundered in his preaching and lightened in his life. Of the martyrs Rogers and Bradford it was difficult to decide whether their eloquence or their holiness shone the brighter. (Van Doren.)
Let your light shine
As I have seen the glowworm at late evening, by the silent side of an empty English lane, mount some tall spike of grass and turn its tiny lamp, content to hang, head downwards, itself unseen, so that the exquisite soft green light which God had given it might be visible in its loveliness; so may one find in this worlds lowly and unfrequented paths Christs light-bearers, who shed each his own sweet love-light round a narrow circle of the dark, that the wayfarer who sees may praise, not his unsightly and, sooth to say, concealed self, but that great Father in heaven who lit this faint taper upon earth, even as He lit the nobler fires which burn far up in heaven. But just as I have shut the poor glowworm in a dark box or under an inverted dish, yet found that it spent all its radiance there unseen, only for sake of love, and because shine it must: so will the true soul, whom his Lord shall chance to imprison from shedding light on any human eye, rejoice no less to let his devout affections and gracious deeds be seen of Him who looks through the densest cover, and knows how to bestow an open reward. (J. Oswald Dykes, D. D.)
Christians must shine
Christians I it is your duty not only to be good, but to shine; and, of all the lights which you kindle on the face, joy will reach furthest out to sea, where troubled mariners are seeking the shore. Even in your deepest griefs, rejoice in God. As waves phosphoresce, let joys flash from the swing of the sorrows of your souls. (H. W. Beecher.)
The benefit of light
The man who carries a lantern in a dark night can have friends all around him, walking safely by the help of its rays, and he not defrauded. So he who has the God-given light of hope in his breast can help on many others in this worlds darkness, not to his own loss, but to their precious gain. (H. W. Beecher.)
The value of light
A blacksmith can do nothing when his fire is out, and in this respect he is the type of a minister. If all the lights in the outside world are quenched, the lamp which burns in the sanctuary ought still to remain undimmed. For that fire no curfew must ever be rung.
Burning and shining lights
Paul, Peter, James, or John–Luke, Mark, Matthew, or Apollos–Andrew, Philip, Barnabas, or Stephen–each would be a burning and shining light: in one the lustre might dart from the pen, in another from the tongue; from one might flash the lightnings of eloquence, from another the more quiet beam of lucid exposition. St. Bernard may illuminate a court, or Thomas a Kempis a cloister; Wickliffe may lighten a rectory or a kingdom; Luther may blaze over an age; Brainerd and Elliott may spend their fiery light in rousing the latent emotions of Indian tribes; or Williams, in identifying Christianity to savages with the arts of life; Whitfield may be the voice of one crying in the wilderness, echoless as soon as uttered; Madame Chantal, the glorious Elizabeth of Hungary, or the lovely Florence Nightingale, may show how the Tabitha and Dorcas spirit is not confined to any age, to cottage, or to court. But the fact about Christianity is, that it turns all its possessors, all its sound-hearted professors, into burning and shining lights. (Paxton Hood.)
The self-consuming life
As a burning and shining light while illuminating others consumes itself, so Christian teachers should sacrifice themselves in the service of God for their fellow-men. (Zeisius.)
Ye were willing for a season to rejoice in His light.
Jesus compares the Jews to children who, instead of taking advantage of the precious moments during which the torch burns to accomplish an indispensable task, do nothing but dance and play the fool in its light till it goes out. It is impossible to characterize better the vain and childish satisfaction which the national pride has found for the moment in the appearance of this extraordinary man, and the absence of the serious fruits of repentance and faith which it was intended to produce. Instead of being yourselves led to faith by John, you made him an object of curiosity. You pleased yourselves with him. Comp. Luk 7:24, etc., which charges them with making it an amusing spectacle, and closes by comparing them to a group of children playing in the market-place. (F. Godet, D. D.)
Playing with the light
All you ever seriously contemplated was to leap, dance, make sport of, like gnats in the twilight, like flies round a lamp, like dancers at a wedding. The phrase marked not the progress of the Baptists career, but the short-lived character of their favourable mood towards him, or the celerity with which their satisfaction in the radiance emitted by him turned into disgust. (T. Whitelaw, D. D.)
Regeneration better than admiration
The Jews were pleased enough with the thrilling excitement of his ministry, and experienced the delight of a new and powerful sensation. But when John struck deep they forsook him, and never mourned when the martyr perished; as children sport with fire till they are burned, then they cast it aside. Thus the Athenians sought profane amusement in Pauls preaching (Act 17:19), Thus popular preachers are followed by thousands who will the next day be found at the gaming table, the racecourse, or the theatre. Not admiration, but regeneration is what a minister should seek for. (Van Doren.)
I have greater witness than that of John
The Greater Witness
Jesus was competent to bear witness to His own glory; so was the Father and the Holy Ghost. Each did, and they alone are competent witnesses. Besides the testimony of the Father through John there were
I. TWO OTHER FORMS IN WHICH THE FATHER BORE WITNESS.
1. By the works which He gave Jesus to finish (verse 36). Johns mission served its end by calling attention to them: the works themselves are now put in evidence.
(1) What were they? Not miracles merely, but all that required to be performed for mans salvation.
(2) In what sense were they given Him?
(a) In the everlasting covenant;
(b) When He was instituted in His mediatorial office;
(c) In token not only of the Fathers love for the elect, but for His Son.
(3) They were given Him to finish. Not to enter on and fail to accomplish. All heaven and earth were entitled to act on the assurance that there could be but one issue.
(4) Yet the works were His, done by His own inherent, personal, almighty power, and of His independent sovereign will.
(5) These works bore witness that the Father had sent Him. They were evidences not of an ordinary prophetic, but of an extraordinary Messianic mission.
2. The Father had directly borne witness to Him (verse 17): Here also was testimony greater than Johns.
(1) Christ doubtless referred to His baptism. Never had such a testimony been borne before. Unto which of the angels, etc. The Fathers voice was heard; the emblem cf the Spirit was seen; the image of the invisible God was revealed. Thus the triune Jehovah visited the East. It was a descent more glorious than on Sinai. Jesus now appealed to it.
(2) The Jews sought after a sign. Here was one. It had not been given in a corner. It bore testimony to the Only Begotten, but notwithstanding, the Jews remained in their unbelief.
3. This constituted their great sin which led ultimately to the cross. Unbelief is no less an evil in us. The evidence that Jesus is the Messiah is complete: who of us believes it unto salvation? What then if we be guilty of crucifying Christ afresh.
II. CHRISTS APPEAL TO THE JEWS ON THIS SUBJECT FOR THEIR CONVICTION consists of three charges. 1 (verse 37). The Saviour spoke here of all the ways in which the Father had testified of Him. The Fathers voice was uttered through Moses, the prophets, John, at Jordan and through the works. But to them it was as though it had never spoken. They enjoyed such opportunities as their fathers never enjoyed. Some of these, however, had heard and seen. Abraham, Jacob, Moses. 2 (verse 38). It was their national boast that they had the Scriptures, and a deep though superstitious regard for them. But they had not the word abiding in them. It was not so with all, however, e.g., Mary, Elizabeth, Simeon, Anna, Andrew, Philip, Nathanael. How common now the former case, how rare the latter, and the consequent acceptance or rejection of Christ. 3 (verses 39, 40).
(1) He praised them for the duty. But how much depends on the spirit and aim of the search. Theirs was fruitless through prejudice.
(2) They searched but did not come to the eternal life. Their discovery was an hallucination. How sad to read and hear about Christ and not find Him. (A. Beith, D. D.)
The Sons complaint against His own
I. A GRAVE INDICTMENT.
1. Nonacceptance of His Fathers ambassador (Joh 5:38).
2. Unwillingness to partake of His salvation (Joh 5:40).
3. Rejection of His gracious message (Joh 5:47).
II. A SUFFICIENT PROOF.
1. They entirely misconceived the nature and use of the Bible (Joh 5:39). That which had been given them so as to prepare them for Christ they had failed to understand. They beheld in it a sort of superior talisman that endowed them with eternal life. They never dreamed of searching it for light to lead them to the Son. It is possible for a Christian to make a Saviour of the Scriptures rather than of Christ.
2. They were devoid of true love to God. They made much profession of knowledge and zeal for Gods law, but had no sincere regard for the
Lawgiver. This was evinced by the fact that though they had the law it was not within them (Joh 5:38).
3. They were wholly out of sympathy with such a Saviour as Christ professed to be (Joh 5:43). Had He come as a temporal deliverer they would have rallied to His standard; but because He came in His Fathers name and with His Fathers love, and to do His Fathers work, they would have none of Him. What a melancholy tale for that day and for this.
4. They were completely absorbed in their own personal ambitions (Joh 5:44), and so were incapable of appreciating Christ.
5. They were thoroughly steeped in scepticism even in regard to Moses (Joh 5:46-47). Hence their unbelief in Him of whom Moses wrote, though not excusable, was not surprising.
III. A FEARFUL FATE.
1. To be accused to the Father (Joh 5:45), to be impeached before the high tribunal of heaven as those who had dishonoured the Fathers majesty in despising His Son.
2. To be prosecuted by Moses, the very law-giver in whom they had trusted.
3. To be deserted by the Son. Appalling retribution. Lessons:
1. A call to self-examination.
2. A note of warning. (T. Whitelaw, D. D.)
The works which the Father hath given Me.–The declaration of this relation of the Father and the Son is peculiar to St. John. The Father hath given
I. ALL THINGS INTO HIS HAND (Joh 3:35; Joh 13:3).
II. ALL JUDGMENT (Joh 5:22; Joh 5:27).
III. TO HAVE LIFE IN HIMSELF (Joh 5:26).
IV. A COMPANY OF FAITHFUL SERVANTS (Joh 6:39; cf Joh 6:65; Joh 7:2; Joh 7:6; Joh 7:9; Joh 7:12; Joh 7:24).
V. COMMANDMENT WHAT TO SAY (Joh 12:49) AND TO DO (Joh 14:31; Joh 17:4; cf. Joh 17:7, etc.).
VI. AUTHORITY OVER ALL FLESH (Joh 17:2).
VII. HIS NAME (Joh 17:11, etc.).
VIII. HIS GLORY (Joh 17:24, cf. Joh 17:22). (Canon Westcott.)
Search the Scriptures.–I rather construe it in the indicative sense, ye search, upon these reasons
1. Because of what is said in the verse itself, ye think ye have eternal life in them; in which words our Saviour intendeth not so much to show what they might have in the Scriptures, for then it had been proper to have said, In them ye have eternal life, as He meaneth to touch upon the erroneous conceit of the Jews, who thought they obtained eternal life by the study of the law ex opere operato.
2. Because of the context in the verse following, which lieth fairer in this sense, Ye study the Scriptures scrutinously, and they are they that testify of Me, and yet ye will not borne unto Me–than taken thus: Search ye the Scriptures, for they testify of Me, and ye will not come to Me.
Besides, consider
1. That Christ is speaking to the doctors of the Sanhedrim, the most acute, diligent, and curious searchers of the Scripture of all the nation. Men that made that their glory and employment; and howsoever it was their arrogancy that they thought their skill in Scripture more than indeed it was, yet was their diligence and scrutinousness in it real and constant even to admiration. It was exceedingly in fashion among the nation to be great Scripture men, but especially the great masters of the Sanhedrim were reputed as the very foundations of the law and pillars of instruction, as Maimony styles them in the treatise Mamrim, cap. 1. And therefore it cannot be proper to think that Christ in this clause sets them to the study of the Scripture, upon which they spent all their wits and time already, as confessing their studiousness, yet showeth them how unprofitably they did it and to little purpose.
2. They did exceeding copiously and accurately observe and take up the prophecies in Scripture that were of the Messias, and though they missed in expounding some particulars concerning Him, yet did they well enough know that the Scriptures did testify of Him abundantly.
3. The word that is used, , which betokeneth a narrow search, seemeth to be intended purposely to answer the word , which they themselves attribute to themselves in their unfolding of the Scriptures. (J. Lightfoot, D. D.)
Search the Scriptures
I. WHAT ARE WE TO UNDERSTAND BY THE SCRIPTURES?
1. Man had at first as perfect a knowledge of God as was necessary for him Ecc 7:29).
2. This knowledge was impaired by the fall, so that a Divine revelation became requisite for his instruction in duty and the way and means to happiness.
3. Here a God revealed His will to Adam (Gen 3:15).
4. This was handed down by tradition for 2,500 years, and the long lives of the patriarchs preserved it incorrupt. Methusaleh lived 243 years with Adam, and 98 with Shem, who lived 50 years with Isaac.
5. Mans life being shortened, God wrote His law by Moses (Psa 90:10).
6. For the clearing of it He inspired prophets continually (Heb 1:1; Num 27:21).
7. When Christ came He inspired others to record His works and doctrine Joh 14:26).
8. Hence the Scripture is contained in the books of the Old and New Testaments.
(1) The Old in number thirty-nine, which the Jews reduced to thirty-two, and they divide them in this manner:
(a) The Pentateuch.
(b) The Prophets.
(c) The Hagiographa.
(2) The New Testament consisting of
(a) Gospels,
(b) Acts,
(c) Epistles,
(d) Apocalypse.
9. These are all that make up the canon; and that the Apocrypha is no part thereof is plain (Heb 1:1; 2Pe 1:20-21; Eph 2:20).
(a) Malachi was the last prophet.
(b) From reason. They are neither of the Old nor New Testaments, in many places they contradict both, and they do not speak as from God.
(c) From the Fathers.
II. WHY ARE WE TO SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES?
1. Because they are the Word of God (2Ti 3:16; 1Pe 1:20-21).
(1) Probably
(a) From their antiquity.
(b) The simplicity of the penmen (Exo 32:1-35.; Num 11:11-14; Num 12:3).
(c) Their low quality (Amo 7:14; Mat 9:9; Act 4:13).
(d) Their high doctrine as Trinity, Creation, Fall, Incarnation, etc.
(e) Fulfilment of prophecy. Gen 3:15 was given 4,000 years before its fulfilment; Gen 12:3 almost 2,000; Gen 15:13-14, 400. So Dan 9:24; Gen 49:10.
(f) Their speaking with so much majesty and authority (1Co 1:17).
(g) Their efficacy and power to convert (Psa 19:7-8; Heb 4:12).
(h) The hatred of wicked men against them (Joh 15:19).
(2) Certainly
(a) If this be not Gods word there is none.
(b) God hath attested it by miracles.
(c) If they were not from God, then either from Satan or man. Not from Satan, for they destroy his kingdom (Jam 4:7). Not from men; good men would not cheat the world, bad men would not condemn themselves.
(3) The use. If the Scriptures are the Word of God, then
(a) Here is terror to the wicked (Isa 48:22).
(b) Comfort to the godly (Mat 5:2-4).
(c) Counsel to all. Wherefore: Reverence them; believe them; prize Psa 19:10; Pro 2:14-15); be thankful for them; conform your lives to them; delight in reading them Psa 1:2; Psa 19:10).
2. Because they contain all things necessary to be known and believed, explicitly or implicity; which appears
(1) from Scripture.
(a) God is their Author, and therefore they are like Himself–perfect (2Ti 3:16).
(b) They furnish the man of God unto all good works (2Ti 3:17; Psa 19:7).
(c) They contain the whole counsel of God (Deu 4:2, Rev 22:18-19; Gal 1:8-9).
(d) Christ and His apostles taught nothing but Scripture (Lu Act 17:2; Act 26:22).
(2) From reason. If all things necessary are not in Scripture, then there is something which I have no certainty of, and then the Scriptures would be in vain (Joh 20:21).
III. ARE ALL BOUND TO SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES? Yes.
1. God commands all (Deu 31:11-12; Col 3:16).
2. God commends it (Act 17:11; 2Co 1:13; 2Ti 3:15).
3. They were written to be read of all (Rom 15:4); and were, therefore, first written in the vulgar tongues.
4. The knowledge of the Scriptures keeps from error (Mat 22:29).
5. All are bound to mind their salvation.
IV. HOW MUST WE SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES?
1. With reverence and devotion.
2. With attention and understanding (Act 8:30).
3. With affection (Act 2:37).
4. With fear (2Ki 22:11-13).
5. With faith (Heb 4:2).
6. With delight (Psa 1:2; Psa 119:103).
7. To a right and good end.
8. Constantly (Psa 1:2).
V. USES.
1. Reproof to such as neglect to search the Scriptures.
2. The highest encouragement and motive thereunto.
(1) There is none so ignorant but this will make him wise (2Ti 3:15; Psa 19:7).
(2) There is no heart so sinful but this will cleanse it (Psa 19:7).
3. No soul so dejected, but here it may find comfort (Psa 94:19).
4. It is horrible ingratitude not to read what God hath written, and we shall have to answer for it. (Bp. Beveridge.)
Search the Scriptures
I. WHAT ARE THE SCRIPTURES?
1. The Word of God. In the sense in which the words of man are his, and reveal his thoughts, will, purposes, the Scriptures are the Word of God. He is their Author, and they rest on His authority. This is opposed
(1) To the Deistical.
(2) To the Rationalistic.
(3) To the Quaker views.
2. From this it follows that they are
(1) infallible;
(2) holy;
(3) powerful;
(4) consistent;
(5) the appointed means of salvation. We are enlightened, begotten, sanctified, and saved by the truth.
3. They are complete, containing all the extant revelation of God.
4. They are plain, so that every one can learn for himself what God says.
II. WE SHOULD KNOW WHAT WE SEEK WHEN WE SEARCH. We should search
1. For knowledge of God, Christ, truth, duty.
2. For consolation.
3. For holiness.
III. HOW ARE WE TO SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES?
1. Reverently and submissively, with fixed determination to believe every truth they affirm. Everything is right which they affirm, and wrong which they condemn. We are not to sit in judgment on Scripture.
2. With diligence.
(1) Studying them much.
(2) Consecutively.
(3) What they teach on particular subjects.
(4) Availing ourselves of every Aid; fixing right principles, and availing ourselves of All subsidiary means.
3. With dependence; convinced that without Divine guidance we shall obtain neither right speculative knowledge, nor right spiritual views.
4. Therefore with prayer previous and continued.
5. With self-application. (C. Hodge, D. D.)
Search the Scriptures
I. THE DIRECTION.
1. Not merely possess.
2. Nor survey.
3. But search as the woman for the lost piece of silver.
II. THE SUBJECT OF SEARCH. The Scriptures not merely theirs, but ours.
1. Between sixty and seventy writings, composed at intervals of hundreds of years, yet with one chain of truth, one message.
2. The original source of even the nineteenth centurys history, biography, and science.
3. The only guide for the soul of man.
III. THE OBJECT OF THE SEARCH
1. May we not search for scientific truth (Act 17:26).
2. For our own family records from Adam to John.
3. For the Divine message to our individual soul.
4. More especially for the life and the testimony here mentioned. In, through, and by the Scriptures, eternal life is to be had. Life is the joy of every living creature, therefore search for it in the Scriptures that reveal it by testifying of Him who is the Life.
IV. METHOD OF SEARCH.
1. Fairly, without foregone prepossession.
2. Prayerfully.
3. Regularly.
4. Comprehensively. (Pulpit Analyst.)
Search the Scriptures
I. WHY.
1. Because it is Divine in its origin.
(1) This it claims to be (Heb 1:1-2; 2Pe 1:21; 2Ti 4:16).
(2) This it can be proved to be from its fulfilled prophecies and its unique teaching.
2. Because it gives us correct ideas of our condition.
(1) Our sinfulness.
(2) The possibility and way of our salvation.
3. Because it makes us acquainted with our enemies and our dangers.
(1) It exposes the wiles of the devil.
(2) It furnishes us with weapons.
(3) It throws light on our dark and perilous way.
II. How?
1. With prayer. Prayer gives insight to the searcher, and opens up the depths.
2. With an upright intention of submitting to the will of God. Not going with the desire to nourish preoccupied fancies; nor as a controversialist for polemical weapons, but to know what God has said.
3. Regularly and diligently.
(1) By ourselves.
(2) With our families. (T. Snell.)
Search the Scriptures
1. Christs Scriptures were those of the Old Testament.
2. Of these Christ said, They contain eternal life. Hence
(1) If you admit the New you must accept the Old, for Christ endorses it.
(2) In the New it is the same truth and life as in the Old.
3. What a far better Bible is ours. Two witnesses to one Christ–first in figure, then in historical reality.
4. Remember what the Bible really is. God in His love desired to make Himself known to His creatures; so He gave His Son, the express image of His Person. How could we know the Son? Only by the Holy Ghost, who testifies of Him in the Scriptures. The Scriptures
I. MAKE KNOWN OURSELVES. With this end, St. James says they are a mirror. There we can see our real selves.
II. REVEAL SELFS ANTIDOTE. Christ in His saving mission as promised, and as come, and as coming again.
III. PROVIDE AN ORACLE TO RESOLVE DOUBTS; to check difficult questions; to show daily duty.
IV. REND THE VIEW OF FUTURITY. Conclusion: How many of you could pass an examination in the facts and truths of the Bible? Shall a soldier not know the articles of war? Shall a scholar not know his grammar? Search the Scriptures. (J. Vaughan, M. A.)
Childrens sermon
The Bible means the book, the book of books. Scriptures mean writings, the marks them out from all others. Search means hunt, dig. Why search? Because
I. THEY ARE THE WORD OF GOD. When you are absent from home you write to your parents, and although they do not see you they know from your handwriting, signature, and expressions that it is yours. God takes strange methods sometimes to convince men that the Bible comes from Him. A young man, an infidel, had to carry a large sum of money through a forest. He lost his way, and was benighted. He came to a cottage and obtained shelter. The owner was a rough-looking man, which made him afraid for his treasure. So he resolved to stay up all night and guard it. By and by the man reached down the Bible, upon which a load was taken from the travellers mind. He knew he was safe in the house of a Bible reader. This led him to be a Christian.
II. THEY MAKE KNOWN A SAVIOUR. A pious widow had a large family, all of whom became followers of the Saviour but one, a wild lad who went to sea. His mother gave him a Testament, and wrote his name and her own on the back. The ship was lost, and years passed by without any tidings. Eventually a sailor begged at the widows door, and gave an account of his life. He had been shipwrecked, and with another had been cast on a desert island. His companion read day after day in a little book his mother had given him. He wept a good deal over his sins, and gave himself up to the Saviour and soon afterwards died, and gave me the book. The book was produced, and it was the very one the widow had given to her boy.
III. THEY TEACH US HOW TO LIVE.
1. As ever in the sight of God. Thou God seest me.
2. To be obedient and useful.
IV. THEY SHOW US THE WAY TO HEAVEN. (E. Woods.)
The duty and advantage of searching the Scriptures
The supreme Authority in religion here sweeps away
(1) the dishonourable reflections of the infidel;
(2) the servile restraints of the superstitious;
(3) the wild fancies of the enthusiast. For how can Christianity be accused of conspiring to keep the world in ignorance when its injunction is, Read and investigate, making it therefore a duty to learn to read and to reason? How can it be charged with enslaving the mind by delivering it over to priestcraft, when its Author commanded a promiscuous audience to search for themselves? How can it be charged with fanaticism, when we are charged to bring all our sentiments and feelings to an inspired standard to be regulated? No! the most formidable foe to ignorance, and the most active stimulant to knowledge; that which best secures for the awakened mind the full enjoyment of its rights and the freedom of its inquiries, and the best safeguard against the perversion of our reason is the Bible.
I. To THE BIBLE Christ points while He says, Search, etc.
1. The Scriptures are a mine of wealth.
2. We should therefore search them as men digging for hid treasure.
(1) This suggests that its discoveries do not all lie on the surface to be obtained by a casual glance. Books partake of the qualities of their author. If the mind be profound, so will be the writing. What depths then may be expected in a volume inspired by God.
(2) Yet with all this depth there is the utmost simplicity. The Scriptures first instruct our childhood, and to the last engage the mature reflections of old age; before we can understand any other book we may read this to profit; and after we have exhausted all others, we still find something here to learn.
(3) But if searching implies difficulty, then careful and frequent perusal is required; and this should be accompanied with the comparison of one part of Scripture with another, and with the use of every available help and with prayer.
(4) This searching does not preclude hearing.
II. The Saviour here points TO OURSELVES and reminds us of our professed principles. In these Scriptures ye think ye have eternal life. He appeals
1. To the principle that in the Scriptures we have eternal life. How fondly we cling to life; yet we must soon part with it. We aspire, therefore, to a continuance after this present state, and nothing short of eternity can satisfy our cravings. What then will discover and guarantee this to us? Not the speculations of reason, but the revelation of God. This discloses to us the duration and blessedness of eternal life. What a motive then to search it to find this pearl of great price.
2. To persons, for you yourselves judge that you have eternal life in the Scriptures:
(1) to those who neglect it altogether;
(2) to those who keep it as a gilded toy;
(3) to those who only read it on Sundays;
(4) to those who pay no more honour to it than they do to their catechism, prayer book, or favourite author;
(5) to those who study it superficially or partially, or for the support of their own private views.
III. The Saviour here points TO HIMSELF as He says, These Scriptures testify of Me. Note
1. The fact that we have here the testimony of Jesus. This is declared to be the spirit of prophecy, or the soul of revelation. As the single principle of gravitation throws light on the whole system of the universe, so the discovery of Christ and His salvation explains the whole record of Scripture.
2. The argument which thence arises
(1) That the Scriptures by testifying of Christ afford us eternal life. He whom they reveal came not only to convince us of the fact and the grandeur of our immortality, I came that ye might have life, etc.
(2) That the Scriptures deserve to be diligently searched. What folly for a man who yearns for heaven to neglect the only means of getting there! (J. Bennett, D. D.)
The necessity of searching the Scriptures
Truth must be sought, and that with care and diligence, before we find it. Jewels do not use to lie upon the surface of the earth. Highways are seldom paved with gold. What is worth our finding calls for the greatest search. Prejudice is the wrong bias of the soul, that effectually keeps it from coming near the mark of truth; nay, sets it at the greatest distance from it. They are few in the world, that look after truth with their own eyes; most make use of spectacles of others making, which causes them so seldom to behold the proper lineaments in the face of truth; which the several tinctures from education, authority, custom, and predisposition do exceedingly hinder men from discerning (Joh 7:48; St. Luk 11:52). (Bp. Stillingfleet.)
Blank pages of the Bible
I dare say none of you ever saw a kind of ink used for secret writing. Common ink, you know, leaves a very plain mark on the paper; but this ink of which I am speaking fades away directly it is used, and the paper seems to be blank. But if that sheet of paper is held to the fire, the writing comes out, and can be read easily. Now to a great many people the pages of the Bible, especially of the Old Testament, seem all blank, without any beauty or interest.. But if you learn to read Gods word with care and intelligence, above all, if you pray to God to show you the true meaning, the pages which seemed blank before will be full of interest for you. (H. J. W. Buxton, M. A.)
Practical searching
Search the Scriptures, not as thou wouldst make a concordance, but an application; as thou wouldst search a wardrobe, not to make an inventory of it, but to find in it something fit for thy wearing. (J. Donne, D. D.)
Scriptural investigation
1. The Sadducees erred, not knowing the Scriptures, and this is the source of error all time through.
2. Christ made the Scriptures His constant rule and guide, and so, therefore, should we.
I. IT IS EVERY MANS DUTY TO SEARCH THE SCRIPTURES. Gods purpose in vouchsafing the Scriptures was in consequence of our fall, and the necessity of a new birth in Christ Jesus; and their characteristic feature is to lead men to a practical knowledge of these two great truths. If man had continued in a state of innocence he would not have needed an outward revelation, because Gods law was originally written on his heart; but since his fall, without such a revelation he could never have known how God could be reconciled. This revelation, then, is suited to his wants as a fallen creature, and that is sufficient evidence of its divinity. The infidel desires a sign, but no sign shall be given him but this, and if this is not enough, he would not believe though one rose from the dead.
II. SOME SUITABLE INSTRUCTION WHEREBY THE SCRIPTURES MAY BE STUDIED WITH PROFIT.
1. Have in view the one end for which they were written, to show the way of salvation through Christ. Always look for Christ; in Old Testament prophecies, etc., and in New Testament teaching.
2. Search with a humble disposition, for God hides its meaning from the wise in their own eyes, and reveals it to babes who desire the sincere milk of the word that they may grow thereby.
3. Search with a sincere intention to put in practice what you read. If any man will do His will, etc. But to those who read without a desire to keep the commandments, but only for amusement or cavil, God will never reveal Himself although they search to the end of time.
4. Make an application of everything you read, and this will make all Scripture profitable for reproof, etc.
5. Labour to obtain the influence of their Divine Author. It was for the want of this that the disciples fell into frequent and inexcusable mistakes. Therefore begin by praying that the Spirit who guides into all truth may assist you, and close by praying that He may engraft the truth on your heart.
6. Read diligently, thoroughly, daily. (H. J. Newbery, M. A.)
The inexhaustible treasures of Scripture
In the Dresden gallery of royal gems there is a silver egg: touch a spring, and it opens, disclosing a golden chicken; touch the chicken, and it opens, disclosing a crown studded with gems; touch the crown, and it opens, disclosing a magnificent diamond ring. So it is with the Bible; as we study it, we touch successive springs, disclosing exhaustless treasures. (G. D. Boardman.)
The importance of Scripture study
The Bible should be diligently studied because of
I. ITS ORIGIN. Divine (2Ti 3:10).
II. IT IS FOLLOWED BY THE QUICKENING SPIRIT OF GOD.
III. IT IS FITTED FOR ALL PEOPLE.
1. There is no nation wherever located or however educated for whom it has not just what they need.
2. It is adapted to all varieties of moral development.
IV. THERE IS NOTHING THAT CAN GIVE SO MUCH LIGHT TO THE WORLD.
1. It is like the sun; all other lights are like candles, oil, gas, or electricity.
2. Its effects, like those of the sun, are to kindle all other lights.
3. Like the sun it gives life, beauty, etc.
V. ITS AMPLITUDE REQUIRES CLOSE AND PERSEVERING ATTENTION. Who can study a picture-gallery or inspect a building to profit with one visit? The miner requires years before he can exhaust the mine. So the Bible.
VI. IT WILL ASSIST MORE THAN ANY OTHER BOOK IN FORMING A CLEAR, TERSE LITERARY STYLE. The greatest writers and speakers have been indebted to it.
VII. THE BIBLE IS A LIBRARY IN ITSELF. The fewness of the books is no objection. An old doctor uses few medicines.
VIII. THE STUDY OF THE BIBLE WILL INTRODUCE YOU TO GOOD SOCIETY. Enoch, Abraham, Moses, Elijah, our blessed Lord, etc.
IX. THE BIBLE IS IMMUTABLE.
1. In doctrine.
2. In language.
3. In influence.
Persecutors have destroyed it, and infidels argued it out of existence; but it still lives and they are gone.
X. IT IS INEXHAUSTIBLE. All physical growth has a law of limitation, but there is no limit to the growth of the soul. For the expanding needs of our spiritual nature the, Bible has an infinite supply. You can master every other book; the Bible never.
XI. IT TESTIFIES OF GOD.
XII. IT REVEALS ETERNAL LIFE. Sin is the germ of death; the Word plants the seed of never failing vitality. (H. M. Scudder, D. D.)
How we should study the Bible
I. PERSONALLY. Commentaries and lesson-helps are sometimes a hindrance. We must do our own thinking, evolving for ourselves what God has involved.
1. We must compare Scripture with Scripture, for the Bible is its own best commentator. The Gospels supplement each other; the Acts explain the Epistles; both covenants form one Divine unity.
2. Master the principles which be at the foundation of Hebrew poetry and prophecy, particularly the principle of parallelism; for while our rhyme is that of sound, the Hebrew is that of thought.
3. Learn the geography and natural history of the Bible. A true map is in a sense a part of the Bible.
4. We must put forth all our mental powers to perceive acutely, conceive accurately, reason closely, and express clearly. We must learn how to trace analogies, bring out real points, follow the outline of arguments, detect links, and observe general drifts.
5. We ought to summon the aid of imagination to realize actors and scenes.
6. But let us beware of the old sin of letter worship; that killeth, only the Spirit giveth life. Seek the essential under the incidental, the central under the superficial, the eternal under the transcient.
II. HUMBLY; with docility of spirit; stripping ourselves of preconceptions; searching not for the confirmation of our opinions but for the truth of God. Only the pure in heart, those of unmixed pellucid motives shall see God. The meek He will guide in judgment.
III. PRAYERFULLY. Scholarship is but a telescope, and telescopes are of no use to the blind or in the dark. The spirit must illuminate our understandings and guide into all the truth.
IV. EXECUTIVELY. Do the truth as well as study it; in fact, this is the only way of knowing and believing it. (G. D. Boardman, D. D.)
Bible study
The Bible should be studied
I. CRITICALLY. We are all possessed of judgment and reason, and God intends us to employ them. A large number of passages have come to be used in a conventional sense, which is not their real sense. It is the latter we ought to find. Make, then, the Greek Testament an object of study; or, if not, a good commentary.
II. CONSECUTIVELY. We do not do the Bible justice if we read a scrap here and a scrap there. The Epistle to the Romans, e.g., as all letters, should be read straight on. If you can only master a few verses keep to them, but do not let the chain be broken.
III. OCCASIONALLY. Carry a little Testament about with you to refresh you as you take a glass of water when you are thirsty between meals..
IV. TOPICALLY. Take the subject of justification and see what Paul says, and then James, and then John. Dont be afraid of controverted subjects. Work them out for yourself, not from treatises or sermons, but Gods Word.
V. EXPERIMENTALLY. When you read a passage ask yourself. With what lesson am I impressed? Dont be content with being interested, try and get something for edification.
VI. DEVOTIONALLY. If we want a real feast let us go down upon our knees, spread the Bible open before us, and realize that God is speaking to us. This is where the Jews failed in spite of all their critical care and reverence, Ye have not His word abiding in you. Many people use their Bibles as superstitiously as any Chinaman uses his praying machine. I have read my chapter this morning, and my conscience is satisfied. But how much good has it done you? Just as much as counting the beads of a rosary; i.e., none, unless you have found in it a living Saviour. (W. H. M. H. Aitken, M. A.)
The testimony of the Scriptures to Christ
I. As making atonement for sin, and thus providing THE GROUND OF LIFE.
II. As procuring the influences of the Spirit, and thus providing THE MEANS OF LIFE.
III. As exhibiting a perfect humanity, and thus providing THE MODEL OF LIFE.
IV. As overcoming death, and thus providing THE TRIUMPH OF LIFE. (W. H. Van Doren, D. D.)
How to study the Bible
To some the Bible is uninteresting and unprofitable because they read too fast. Among the insects which subsist on the sweet sap of flowers there are two very different classes. One is remarkable for its imposing plumage, which shows in the sunbeams like the dust of gems; and as you watch its jaunty gyrations over the fields, and its minuet dance from flower to flower, you cannot help admiring its graceful activity, for it is plainly getting over a good deal of ground. But in the same field there is another worker, whose brown vest and strong straightforward flight may not have arrested your eye. His fluttering neighbour darts down here and there, and sips elegantly wherever he can find a drop of ready nectar; but this dingy plodder makes a point of alighting everywhere, and wherever he alights he either finds honey or makes it. If the flower-cup be deep, he goes down to the bottom; if its dragon mouth be shut, he thrusts its lips asunder; and if the nectar be peculiar or recondite, he explores all about till he discovers it, and then, having ascertained the knack of it, joyful as one who has found great spoil, he sings his way down into its luscious recesses. His rival of the painted velvet wing has no patience for such dull and long-winded details. But what is the end? Why, the one died last October along with the flowers; the other is warm in his hive to-night amidst the fragrant stores which he gathered beneath the bright beams of summer. To which do you belong?–the butterflies or the bees? Do you search the Scriptures or only skim them? (J. Hamilton, D. D.)
The Bible to be studied often and lovingly
Lord Bacon tells us of a certain bishop who used to bathe regularly twice every day, and on being asked why he bathed thus often, replied, Because I cannot conveniently do it three times. If those who loved the Scriptures were asked why they read the Bible so often, they might honestly reply, Because we cannot find time to read them oftener. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
Superstition use of the Bible
The Bible is some- times used as a book of magic. Many open it at random, expecting to be guided by the first passage that they see, as Peter was told to open the mouth of the first fish that came up and he would find in it a piece of money. A missionary of high standing was cured of this superstition by consulting the Bible in an important matter of Christian duty, and the passage that met his gaze was, Hell from beneath is moved to meet thee at thy coming. (J. M.Buckley, D. D.)
The advantage of unfettered Bible study
It was a glorious hour in England when the Bible was unchained, when every man could hear and read in his own tongue, wherein he was born, the history it told of the doings of God with man. Freedom sprang to light whenever the book went, and at its touch imagination stirred and awoke to life. A fresh world of thought and feeling, the world of the Oriental heart, opened out its riches to the poet and the philosopher. New blood streamed through the veins of English literature. Not only intellectual, but political freedom deepened wherever its words were heard and its principles received. It gave new force to the struggle against tyranny. It gave fresh impulse to political progress. It made cruelty, injustice, the oppression of the weak, the corruption of the great and the small, more hateful and intolerable. It initiated reform; it was the standard of all noble revolution. Our civil freedom–accelerating as it goes–has always taken much of its impulse from the book of true liberty, true fraternity, true equality. And it is not only intellectual freedom or political freedom which have gained their living force from this book. Higher than the imagination of the poet, the intellect of the philosopher, and the patriotism of the citizen, is the immortal spirit which abides in man. The spiritual being of man lay crippled and unmoved in England, like the lame beggar of old at the beautiful gate of the temple. When the Bible was put into the hands of every man in the country, it came, like Peter and John of old, to the heart of England, and proclaimed the gospel of Christ Jesus. Straightway the soul of England received strength, and entered into the temple of spiritual freedom, walking, and leaping, and praising God. Far and wide the book penetrated into the homes of England, and the fetters which had been bound on the spirits of men mouldered into the dust from whence they came. Religious freedom was the Bibles child. (S. A. Brooke, M. A.)
The Bible interpreted by love
You have heard of the story of the blind girl who, when her fingers became callous, cut her finger-tips to make them more sensitive. This, however, only made them harder, and then she could not read her Bible at all. At last, after bitter weeping, she kissed her Bible a farewell. To her intense joy, that kiss revealed to her the fact that she could read the raised words with a touch of her lips. Ever after she kissed into her soul that precious Word. (H. M. Scudder, D. D.)
Christ in the Bible
I know that men sneer at the idea that Christ is traceable everywhere in the Scriptures. A wealthy man builds and furnishes a house for the reception of his much-loved bride. When she enters it she finds that all the rooms and all the furniture, from the least to the greatest, bear signs that she was thought of. Will she sit patiently under a sneer at her acknowledgment of the forethought of the bridegroom for her needs and tastes? Will she not point out the proofs, above and below, in common and peculiar things, and reassert that she sees the signs of his perfect knowledge and love everywhere? And shall we be frightened by a sneer from affirming that God, who built up all the books of the Bible, saw His end, and made reference to that end in every stage of revelation–that Christ is everywhere? Does not our Lord support the idea when He says to the Pharisees, Search the Scriptures, for these are they that testify of Me? And Ye will not come to Me that ye may have life is a mournful form in which He explains their utter misconception of the Scriptures. May that saying not be applicable to us! Let us read the Bible to find Christ. (D. G. Watt, M. A.)
Christ in the Bible
There was once a famous artist who made a wonderful shield, and worked his own name so cleverly into it, that it could not be removed without destroying the shield. The Bible is like that shield, and the name of Jesus is so worked into it that we find it everywhere. Have you ever seen a photographic artist take one of those sun-pictures which are now so common? Well, at first there was no picture, only a piece of glass with a kind of white cloud upon it. But presently, as the artist poured certain chemicals upon it, a picture began to come out of the mist; first one feature, then another, till you saw the likeness of a friend. The Old Testament Scriptures sometimes appear strange and uninteresting to you; there is a mist over them as it were. But as you study the words, or hear them explained, gradually new beauties, new features, come out, and you find a likeness. Whose likeness, my children? The likeness of Jesus Christ. Have you ever seen a kaleidoscope? When you hold it to your eye and turn it round, you see a number of pieces of coloured glass which form all kinds of beautiful patterns, such as stars, and crowns, and fountains, and flowers. The Bible is very like a kaleidoscope. When you look carefully into it, the more you turn over its pages and study them, the more beautiful things you find there; and remember that all these beautiful things will show you something about Jesus. Whether you are reading in the Old Testament or in the New, whether you study the law or the prophets, or read about the Judges or the Kings, you will find something about Jesus. He said, Search the Scriptures, for they are they which testify of Me. Whenever you read your Bible do so with one object–always read looking for Jesus. (H. J.Wilmot Buxton.)
Christ the interpreter of the Bible
In the vision of the apocalyptic book sealed with seven seals, one only out of all on earth or in heaven was able to break the seals and read the scroll: it was He who is alike the Lion of Judah and the Lamb of God. And He is still the only one who is able to interpret His own volume. We must consult Him, then, if we would understand His Word.
Search the Scriptures
It is said of some of the mines of Cornwall that the deeper they are sunk the richer they prove; and though some lodes have been followed a thousand and even fifteen hundred feet, they have not come to an end. Such is the Book of God. It is a mine of wealth which can never be exhausted. The deeper we sink into it, the richer it becomes. (Charles Graham.)
The Bible worth searching
There is gold in the rocks which fringe the Pass of the Splugen, gold even in the stones which mend the roads, but there is too little of it to be worth extracting. Alas! how like too many books and sermons! Not so the Scriptures; they are much fine gold; their very dust is precious.
Christ the gem of the Scriptures
What the pin is when the diamond has dropped from its setting, that is the Bible when its emotive truths have been taken away. What a babes clothes are when the babe has slipped out of them into death, and the mothers arms clasp only raiment, would be the Bible if the Babe of Bethlehem and the truths of deep-heartedness that clothed His life should slip out of it.
The Bible handy
Dear friends, fly to this comfort with speed in every time of trouble; get to be familiar with Gods Word, that you may do so. I have found it helpful to carry Clarkes Precious Promises in my pocket, so as to refer to it in the hour of trial. If you go into the market, and are likely to do a ready-money business, you always take a cheque-book with you; so carry precious promises with you, that you may plead the word which suits your case. I have turned to promises for the sick when I have been of that number, or to promises to the poor, the despondent, the weary, and such like, according to my own condition, and I have always found a Scripture fitted to my case. I do not want a promise made to the sick when I am perfectly well; I do not want balm for a broken heart when my soul is rejoicing in the Lord; but it is very handy to know where to lay your hand upon suitable words of cheer when necessity arises. Thus the external comfort of the Christian is the Word of God. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
The test of truth
A man offers you a note. You are not quite sure about it. You say to him, I dont know. Hold on; Ill let you know in half an hour; and away you run, round the corner. Your lawyer lives near by. You show him the note. Such a one offered me this. I thought Id just speak to you about it. What would you do? Better have nothing to do with it, says the lawyer, shaking his head. You run back, and say to the man, Ive concluded not to take that note. Then some transaction is urged upon you. You hesitate. You dont know exactly whether it will stand in law. Wait, you say, wait a minute–I cant decide yet; and away you go, round the corner. Oh, yes, says your lawyer, thats all perfectly right and safe; and back you run, and the matter is settled. He is the man of your counsel. Just in this way should you consult the Bible in regard to all the actions of your life.
The Scriptures without comment
There is a story told concerning John Bunyans Pilgrims Progress. Good Thomas Scott, the commentator, wrote notes to it: he thought the Pilgrims Progress a difficult book, and he would make it clear. A pious cottager in his parish had the book, and she was reading it when her minister called. He said to her, Oh, I see, you are reading Bunyans Pilgrims Progress. Do you understand it? She answered innocently enough, Oh, yes, sir, I understand Mr. Bunyan very well, and I hope that one day I shall be able to understand your explanations.
The wonders of Scripture
The boy holds his ball of twine in his hand, and thinks it is not much, he can clasp it so easily; but when he begins to unroll it, and his wind-borne kite mounts higher and higher, till at length that which on the ground was taller than he is now no bigger than his hand, he is astonished to see how long it is. So there are little texts which look small in your palm, but, when caught up upon some experience, they unfold themselves, and stretch out until there is no measuring their length. (H. W.Beecher.)
The Bible first
A business man sat at his fireside in the city. Near by him, playing on the floor, was his only child, a beautiful little boy. It was early in the morning. The days task was not begun, and while waiting for his breakfast the father took up the daily paper to read. The dear child came and climbed up on his fathers knee, and, laying his hand gently on the paper, looked lovingly up into his face and said, No, no, papa, Bible first, Bible first, papa. Very soon after this dear child was taken sick, and died. As that father stood by the coffin in which his dead darling lay, and when he laid him in the grave, he seemed to hear his gentle voice repeating those simple words, No, no, papa, Bible first. He never forgot those words. They were ringing in his ears all the time lie made them the rule of his life.
A search warrant
What warrant have you to read the Bible for yourself? was the demand of another priest of a new convert to the true faith. Och! was the answer, Ive a search warrant (Joh 5:39).
Diligent seeking will be rewarded by joyous finding
A friend of mine had been told that the Word of Life was contained in his Bible. He went quickly home, and he said, If it is there, I will find it. He began with Genesis, and read on further, until in due course of time he reached that good evangelical chapter, Isaiah lift. He read carefully until he came to the words, By His stripes we are healed. That is it, said he; I have it now; we are healed; I am healed. There is no hoping or wishing, or perhaps, or but, or if–we are healed. (Dr. Mackay.)
Heathen testimony to the excellence of the Scriptures
A Hindoo paper, published in Bengal, speaks as follows of the excellence of the Bible:–It is the best and most excellent of all English books, and there is not its like in the English language. As every joint of the sugarcane, from the root to the top, is full of sweetness, so every page of the Bible is fraught with the most precious instruction. A portion of this book would yield to you more of sound morality than a thousand other treatises on the same subject. In short, if anybody studies the English language with a view to gaining wisdom, there is not another book which is more worthy of being read than the Bible.
How to search the Scriptures
As the apes in the story, who, finding a glow-worm on a very cold night, took it for a spark of fire, and heaped up sticks upon it to warm themselves by, but all in vain, so do they lose their labour that, in the warrantable search of Divine truth, busy themselves about sounds of words and incoherent Scripture sentences; when, partly from depravedness of mind, partly frown ignorance, partly from instability, suddenness, and haste, they make a snatch, and run away with that which looks somewhat like the sense of Scripture, and so deceive their own souls, crying out, like the mathematician in Athens, I have found it, I have found it, when indeed they have found nothing to the purpose nor anything to the true information of themselves or others in the ways of God and goodness.
Bible facts
The learned Prince of Granada, heir to the Spanish throne, imprisoned by order of the Crown lest he should aspire to the sovereignty, was kept in solitary confinement in the old prison at the Place of Skulls, Madrid. After thirty-three years in this living tomb death came to his release, and the following remarkable researches marked with an old nail on the rough walls of his cell, told how the brain sought employment during those weary years:–In the Bible the word Lord is found 1,853 times; the word Jehovah 6,855 times, and the word reverend but once–in Psa 111:9. The 8th verse of Psa 117:1-2, is the middle verse of the Est 8:9 is the longest verse, and Joh 11:35 the shortest. In Psa 107:1-43, the 8th, 15th, 21st and 31st verses are alike. Each verse of Psa 136:1-26. ends alike. No words with more than six syllables are found in the Bible. Isa 37:1-38, and 2Ki 19:1-37 are alike. The word girl occurs only in Joe 3:3. There are found in both Testaments 3,586,483 letters, 773,693 words, 31,373 verses, 1,179 chapters, and 66 books. (W. Baxendale.)
Origin of the Bible Society
Mary Jones was the daughter of a poor weaver living in a humble dwelling at the foot of Cadet Idris. She was born in 1782, and early in life began to learn her fathers trade. She attended a Sunday-school, and was soon distinguished by her readiness to learn and repeat large portions of the Word of God. As yet, although there had been many editions of the Welsh Bible published, it was an exception to see a copy in a poor mans house in Wales. The nearest Bible was two miles distant from Mary Joness house. She had permission to read it as often as she chose. Meanwhile she carefully set aside all her pence, determined if possible to buy a Bible of her own. After years of saving she succeeded in making up the sum necessary to buy a copy of the Welsh Bible. She ascertained that Bale was the nearest town in which a copy might be got; and it was twenty-five miles away. But nothing daunted the girl set off, and walked all the way foot-bare, carrying her boots in a bag in order to put them on just before entering Bale. She arrived at Bale late in the evening–too late to see Mr. Charles, from whom the Bible was to be had. In themorning she went to Mr. Charles, and he was touched by her simple story. He said: I am sorry that you have come all the way to obtain a Bible, seeing I have no copy to give you. All the Bibles I received from London have been sold months since, excepting one or two which I have promised to keep for friends. Mary Jones wept bitterly. The disappointment was too much for her. But Mr. Charles could not withstand her tears, and he at last gave her one of the promised Bibles. Mary placed the Bible in her bag, and bade good-bye to the good Mr. Charles, feeling grateful to him for letting her have what she considered the greatest of treasures. Her visit to Mr. Charles left a lasting impression on both. Often afterwards did Mr. Charles refer to that touching incident to convince his English friends of the intense craving of the Welsh nation for the word of life. In December, 1802, Mr. Charles laid before the Committee of the Religious Tract Society the pressing needs of his country; and related the story of Mary Jones. The story awakened sympathy in every breast, and it was then resolved, not only to have a Bible Society for Wales, but a Bible Society for all nations.
This was the origin of the Bible Society. Who would have thought that little Mary Joness journey to Bala would have supplied the important link which, until then, had been wanting in the chain of events before the Bible Society could spring into being? Mary lived to an old age. The Bible she bought at Bala was by her bedside when she passed away. She no longer required to read it. She knew all its promises and consolations by heart. This Bible has recently been handed over to the British and Foreign Bible Society with the formation of which it has so sacred a connection. An open Bible is engraved on her tombstone with the words, The grass withereth, the flower fadeth, but the word of our God shall stand for ever. Then come these words:–Mary, widow of Thomas Lewis, weaver, Bryncrwg, who died December 28th, 1864. Aged 82. This tombstone was erected by contributions of the Calvinistic Methodists in the district, and other friends, in respect to her memory, as the Welsh girl, Mary Jones, who walked from Abergwynolwyn to Bala, in the year 1802, when sixteen years of age, to procure a Bible of the Rev. Thomas Charles, B.A. A circumstance which led to the establishment of the British and Foreign Bible Society. (Clerical Anecdotes.)
Dr. Johnsons dying counsel
Dr. Johnson said to a young gentleman who visited him on his deathbed, Young man, attend to the voice of one who has possessed a certain degree of fame in the world, and who is about to stand before his Maker. Read the Bible every day of your life. (W. Baxendale.)
Ye will not come unto Me, that ye might have life
Mans happiness dependent on his coming to Christ
You have read the lives of wise and good men, and yet without any conception that they were anything else, and that with all their excellences they had corresponding defects. Now, if Jesus Christ was a mere man you would have the same impression on reading His memoirs. But this is not the case. Who can read our text and feel that Christ was merely a wise and good man?
I. THE FINAL SALVATION OF MAN IS MADE DEPENDENT ON HIS COMING TO CHRIST.
1. Christ is a unique Being who exists in a condition unlike any other, not a condition of simple humanity or simple Divinity, but one who combines the attributes of both.
2. To sustain the character of Saviour it was necessary that He should suffer the just for the unjust, and that He should have the power to remit sin and confer eternal life.
3. To secure the benefits the sinner is required to come to Christ, not corporeally, speculatively, but by personal application of enlightened faith.
4. This Christ required in the days of His flesh, and He requires it now.
(1) There must be an acknowledgment cf His power to confer the blessing–just the same as when you apply for a favour to your friend. You insulthim if you disbelieve in his power.
(2) You must renounce your trust in everything else but your own need and His clemency. Does the pauper require a little wealth to qualify him for asking relief?
5. Coming in contact accidentally or designedly with others sometimes leads to unanticipated and important results. Chance meetings have been full of weal or woe. But no meeting was ever fraught with such effects as the meeting of a sinner with his Saviour. Take the case of the impotent man; that of any saved man.
(1) Internal: guilt removed, conscience allayed, passions quelled, apprehension destroyed, and instead peace, joy, hope, etc.
(2) External: the drunkard is made sober, etc.
6. Not only are the results extraordinary, they are satisfactory. The mind is at ease, and sometimes rises to transport; and there is not the slightest wish to have this occurrence undone.
II. Strange as it may appear MEN WILL NOT COME TO CHRIST THAT THEY MIGHT HAVE LIFE.
1. Why?
(1) Some are too proud to come. There is nothing more offensive to the pride of a man of intellect or social virtue to be told that he must come in the same way as the publicans and the harlots.
(2) Some say they cannot, and wait for Divine assistance. That is conveyed with the command. Come, and you will have power to come, as the withered hand was bestowed by stretching it forth.
2. This refusal is extraordinary.
(1) Man in all his stages–as child, youth, man–regards the temporal future with growing solicitude. Why not, then, the eternal?
(2) This eternal future is vastly more important, and is forfeited by not coming to Christ. Imagine a condemned criminal not accepting an offer like this!
3. This refusal is so extraordinary that it deserves to be recorded. Write down, then, solemnly–I will not come to Christ, etc. (T. East.)
Coming to Christ for life
Suppose a legislator, anxious to deter his subjects from crime, were to threaten confiscation of property. An individual offends and is punished. Suppose the children to tread in the steps of the father, and the legislator to have devised a method without encroaching on the principles of rectitude, by which the forfeited inheritance might be restored on easy terms, what would you think of the children if they despised the blessing and rejected the offer? And yet that was the case with the Jews, and is the case with the sinner. Perhaps you may conclude that you have obeyed this invitation because you are a professor of Christianity, but you have not unless you are a real Christian in heart and conduct.
I. THE CIRCUMSTANCES WHICH HINDER SOME FROM COMING TO CHRIST.
1. Disbelief in Christs Divine mission.
(1) But shall a man be condemned because he does not apply for salvation to one in whom he disbelieves? No, but fop disbelieving that God has commissioned that One to be a Saviour.
(2) But shall he be condemned because a certain impression is not produced upon him, and because the evidence is insufficient? Yes, if through his own culpability, which is the case where the gospel is preached in its purity and simplicity.
2. The Pharisees abstained because they were self-righteous–a reason which keeps many away still.
3. Others are deterred by the cares of the world. They have no time for it, and besides industry is a part of religion; they come to church, and what time can be spared should be spent in enjoyment.
4. Others come not because bound by the chains of criminal practice.
5. With some youth is the impediment. I will some day, but there is plenty of time.
6. With others age is the obstacle. It is now too late to change, and the meetness of declining years co-operates with mental repugnance.
II. IS WHAT MANNER. AND WITH WHAT DISPOSITIONS ARE WE TO COME.
1. With a sense of sin, its guilt and power.
2. With a conviction of our own impotence and deservedness of punishment.
3. With a desire to be saved.
4. With a faith in Christs power and willingness to save.
5. With a determination to be obedient to Christs commands.
III. PRACTICAL APPLICATION.
1. To sinners. Come at once.
2. To disciples. Show that you have come by fulfilling the duties you owe to Christ. (T. Gisborne, M. A.)
Coming to Christ the only means of salvation
I. WHAT IS MEANT HERE BY LIFE? As death is put for evil, so is life for all that is good (Deu 30:15). And seeing that the happiness which God hath prepared for His people consists in the full enjoyment of all that is good, it is called life; and eternal life, because it shall last for ever. Though it be perfected only in the other world it is begun in this. At our new birth, when we are made Gods children by adoption and grace the Holy Spirit is breathed into us and becomes the principle of eternal life in Joh 5:47; Joh 5:54; Joh 5:24; 1Jn 3:15).
II. THIS LIFE IS TO BE HAD IN CHRIST JESUS, AND IN HIM ONLY (Joh 17:2; Joh 14:6; Col 3:4; 1Jn 5:20). All things related to it are founded in Him. He purchased life for us, promised it to us, prepares it for us and us for it, and bestows it upon us. To make this clear
1. Man created in the image of God was immortal; but the first man in whom all the rest were contained by sinning made himself and his posterity obnoxious to the death God had threatened.
2. But Jesus Christ, the second Adam, having taken away the sin of the world, hath thereby abolished death, so that man by Him may have life again.
3. Christ being now by the right hand of God, exalted to be a Prince and a Saviour, confers upon the penitent believer this life.
III. THOSE WHO WOULD HAVE THIS LIFE MUST GO TO CHRIST FOR IT.
1. By coming to Him He means believing in Him as
(1) Our Prophet, assenting to all He has revealed to us.
(2) Our Lord and Master, obeying all that He commands.
(3) Our Priest, and trusting in His merits.
2. By thus coming to Him He gives us grace to repent, power to resist temptation, His Holy Spirit to guide us into all truth, to strengthen our faith, and to guide us to heaven.
IV. NEVERTHELESS MEN WILL NOT GO TO CHRIST FOR LIFE.
1. The truth of this proposition is proved by our Lords assertion, and is confirmed by experience.
2. The reasons.
(1) Because men are so stupid as not to care for it; they look no further than what just lies before them, and go on eating and drinking, and sleeping and playing, till death comes and carries them to a place they never thought of in their lives (Deu 32:28-29).
(2) But if they cannot with all their art keep their conscience quiet they flatter themselves with hopes that they will do well enough without troubling themselves about going to Christ, for they are moral.
(3) And of those who have some sense of their sins many think that their good works counter- balance them.
(4) But there are others who are poisoned with heretical opinions, denying Christs Divinity and Atonement.
(5) The greatest reason, however, is that they have things which they deem of greater moment (Luk 14:18-20; but Mat 16:26). (Bp. Beveridge.)
I. LIFE IS ONLY TO BE FOUND IN CHRIST (verse 39).
How to come to Christ, and the great hindrance
1. Not in the letter of the Word, but in the Living Word; not in an idea, but in a Person. Many are now satisfied with an imaginary Christ.
2. Why? Because they have never known the want of a real Christ. If they felt the pangs of hunger they could never be satisfied with wax fruit.
3. The real Christ differs from the ideal in that He is a living Christ, and can communicate the life that is in Himself.
4. Vain all your self- satisfaction, morality, prayers, etc., if you have not life from Him.
II. THE WAY TO OBTAIN THIS LIFE IS BY COMING TO CHRIST.
1. There are various steps in this process indicated by great Scripture words.
(1) Coming to the Cross.
(2) Looking away from everything to Christ.
(3) Believing that He died for us.
(4) Receiving Him in all His fulness.
(5) Embracing, grasping, or holding Him fast.
2. These are acts of faith, so you must
(1) Believe the record that He is the Lamb of God, etc.
(2) Believe that He has given you your discharge in full. You can only do this by committing all your sins to Him.
III. LIFELESS SINNERS DO NOT COME TO CHRIST BECAUSE THEY WILL NOT. (W. J.Chapman, M. A.)
The great refusal
I. WHY IS IT THAT WE WILL NOT COME TO CHRIST FOR LIFE?
1. Negatively. Not
(1) from any want of sufficiency in Christ to meet our need (Joh 5:21-29).
(2) From any want of evidence that He is the eternal life (verses 3139).
(3) From any want of consciousness of the need of life (Joh 5:39).
We all want something we have not, and few are so besotted as not to feel their need of heaven.
2. Positively. Prejudice and enmity against Himself, arising from self-righteousness and unbelief. He gives four reasons for this.
(1) Joh 5:41. The Lord Jesus is not fashionable in the world.
(2) Joh 5:42. If you only knew how God delights in Christ, and is honoured by Him, you would love and admire Christ too.
(3) Joh 5:44. The thing that keeps many back is the knowledge that he would be sneered at.
(4) Joh 5:46. We dont believe our Bibles, and therefore do not come to Christ for life.
II. CHRIST SETS BEFORE US THREE WEIGHTY MATTERS.
1. The great want of our souls is life. We think that reformation, good resolutions, a certain amount of sorrow, will do when Life is wanted; for the Bible is in nothing more emphatic than that man is dead in trespasses and sins. Consequently words, works, prayers, repentance, are all dead till we come to Christ. That is the begin- ning of religion.
2. The great duty and privilege of every sinner.
(1) We must come to Christ because
(a) God commands it;
(b) it is the end of Christs coming;
(c) the purpose of gospel preaching;
(d) the object of the mission of the Spirit.
(2) It is our privilege to come
(a)because life is to be had on the easiest terms;
(b) because all men, without exception, may receive it.
(3) But what is coming? Taking Him at His word and pleading His promise. You want no further warrant than your need and His invitation.
3. The great folly of infatuated sinners. Health proclaimed to diseased souls, life to dead souls; when the world, pleasure, evil calls, they go, but God calls in vain. What is this but folly?
Conclusion:
1. Christ says, Come unto Me: not to ministers, priests, ordinances: men readily go to them.
2. Not to go to Christ for life is to reject Him. (Marcus Rainsford.)
The lamentations of Jesus
I. Men, apart from the salvation of God, are in a state of DEATH.
1. In this plaint of the Saviours the true condition of sinners is seen in awful distinctness. He knew what was in man.
2. The estimate of mans state and prospects is of vital importance. To deny or neglect is
(1) to accuse Christ of coming into the world on a needless errand;
(2) to reject the only offer of deliver- ance.
II. In order to pass from death to life we must COME TO JESUS.
1. On our part it is not a word, but an act. A dead-letter knowledge destitute of moving power pervades and paralyzes the Church.
2. Beware lest you lose yourself in any mist which may gather round the expression, Come unto Me. In the experience of life we frequently pass over from one confidence to another, and we do this as really and potentially as we come in body from one place to another. It is not an incapacity to understand such a change, it is unwillingness to make it.
III. In order to live NOTHING MORE IS NEEDED than to come to Jesus.
1. No preliminary qualification is demanded. None are excluded for the presence of one quality or the absence of another.
2. To go conclusively off from self and all other confidences and cleave to the Son of God as all your salvation is all that is necessary.
3. The effects which the change produces have not produced the change.
4. It is not the coming to Christ and a better obedience that will bring life to the dead. Coming to Christ is itself alone this.
IV. Those who are spiritually dead are NOT WILLING to come to Christ for life.
1. This seems strange, and the Lord Himself wondered at their unbelief.
2. The human nature of the question is graphically represented in the history of Naaman. Most men would do difficult things willingly for the sake of what they call heaven; but they are unwilling to do the easy thing God requires.
3. The want lies in the will.
V. Jesus COMPLAINS that they will not come to Him for life.
1. Here the Saviour opens His heart that He may look in and see the love that fills it.
2. The upper side of religion is not a sentiment, hut a fact; such also must its under side be. The one is Christs coming into the world to die for us; the other is our coming to Christ to live in Him. Mercy let down from heaven must be grasped by the needy on earth while it is within their reach.
3. When you neglect this great salvation you mar the Saviours joy. (W. Arnot, D. D.)
Refusing life
I. THE UNWILLINGNESS OF MEN TO COME TO CHRIST. What is the cause of this reluctance?
1. It is not the Saviours fault. He not only invited but went, and does so to-day.
2. Scoffers say it arises from the visionary nature of the gift which Christ offers.
3. What too despondent friends of religion say amounts to the same thing, viz., that men are too gross and worldly to care for such a thing as immortality. But how then shall we account for the pilgrimages and endless mortifications of devotees.
4. No, the cause lies deeper, even in the sinfulness of the human heart. Just as darkness is opposed to light, so is sin to holiness.
II. WHAT IT IS THAT MEN GAIN BY COMING TO CHRIST.
1. It is inferred that life out of Christ is transient, unsubstantial, and must die. However fair and moral a mans outward life may be, if sin is busy in his heart he must perish.
2. But if you come to Christ in heart you shall obtain life,
(1) The life of holiness.
(2) Of Christ.
(3) Of heaven.
III. THE GREATNESS OF THIS GAIN OUGHT TO REMOVE ALL UNWILLINGNESS TO COME TO CHRIST. Those Who obtain life obtain
1. Perfect security, and all things work together for their good–loss, sickness, bereavement, death.
2. Constant progress in time and in eternity.
3. Happiness now and for ever. (G. Colborne, Ph. D.)
Unwillingness to come to Christ
I. THE PLAN OF SALVATION, coming to Christ. There must be personal contact between Christ and your spirit. Faith, like a hand, must spiritually grasp Him.
1. The text implies that we are to come to Jesus Christ for everything, for life includes all that is needful to salvation and salvation itself.
2. Christ gives us actual spiritual life and judicial life, so that we are saved from condemnation.
3. This way of coming to Christ is the only way, for there is none other name, etc.
4. It is a sure and open way. None have ever tried it and failed. The Fountain has never been closed.
II. YOUR POSITION IN REFERENCE TO THIS PLAN OF SALVATION.
1. I would have you get alone and say deliberately, I will not come, etc.
2. You will not because you have not.
(1) Some of you say softly, I cannot. This is the same as will not. If you had the will you would have the power.
(2) Others, I dare not. Turn that the other way, I dare not refuse to come.
3. Think of what you are spurning.
(1) Life eternal, and the day will come when you will think with anguish that you have despised it.
(2) Christ Himself, incarnate, dying, glorified.
(3) You refuse to come to Him. Not to Sinai, but to Calvary.
Salvation is worth Christ dying for, but not worth your thinking about.
4. Think of why you will not come.
(1) Do you hope to find salvation somewhere else? This is what the Jews did and failed: so will you.
(2) Is it some secret sin?
(3) Sheer frivolity perhaps. If you must play, play with something cheaper than the blood of Christ, something less precious than your souls.
III. WHAT WILL BE THE RESULT OF THIS? I suppose some of you think you will come to Jesus some day. Why not now? Every day adds to the chances that you never will come to Christ. And if not you must die eternally. What is that? Ask those who know–Dives.
IV. LET US HOPE THAT THERE WILL BE A CHANCE TO-NIGHT.
1. You may come. Christ invites; the Spirit and the Bride say,
Come!
2. Respond, I will come. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
Men by nature unwilling to come to Christ
I. MEN BY NATURE ARE FAR FROM CHRIST. In respect of
1. Knowledge.
2. Union.
3. Participation.
4. Converse.
II. SINNERS ARE UNWILLING TO COME TO CHRIST.
1. Many think they have already come.
2. Many do not fully apprehend their need of Christ. They think it enough to be sorry, reformed, mean well, etc.
3. Many are too busy, and so have no leisure for such a journey: pleasure, business, care, etc., prevent (Luk 14:1-35.).
4. Many will not part with that which keeps them at a distance from
Christ, viz., sin.
5. Many are possessed with prejudice against Christ as represented in the gospel.
III. THE USES.
1. Of information.
(1) Mans wretchedness.
(2) Mans helplessness to deliver himself.
(3) The sufficiency of Christ and His salvation.
2. For examination. Those who come to Christ
(1) Are sorry that they were so long ere they came to Him.
(2) Are acquainted with the way to Christ, having walked in it.
(3) Have a high esteem of Christ.
(4) Are in a new condition.
(5) Walk with Christ.
(6) Are at a greater distance from sin and the world.
(7) Have renounced their own righteousness.
3. Of exhortation. Consider
(1) The necessity of coming to Christ.
(a) You are under the power of Satan.
(b) You are under the guilt of sin.
(c) You are under Gods wrath.
(d) You are under the curse.
(e) The justice of God is engaged to destroy you.
(f) Your outward enjoyments and accommodations in the world are uncomfortable, unsanctified, accursed.
(2) The advantage of coming to Christ–freedom from all these disadvantages; and
(a) Union with Him, real, happy, everlasting.
(b) Communion with Him.
(c) Participation of Him in all He is and all He has: His obedience, miracles, prayers, resurrection, etc.
(3) The equity of coming to Christ.
(a) You lose nothing, but gain enough by it: health from sickness, liberty from captivity, beauty instead of deformity, sanity for madness.
(b) He waits till you come, condescendingly, industriously, patiently.
(4) The danger of not coming: the guilt of soul murder. If you will not come to Christ
(a) He will come against you either in a severer way to reclaim you or to destroy you.
(b) He will depart from you, and you know not how soon.
(c) You shall not come hereafter.
(d) Ye shall not have life.
IV. THE CONVERSE. Those that come to Christ will have life. What life? All that is opposite to the death Adam brought into the world. Those who come to Christ
1. Have another kind of temporal life.
(1) In respect of its tenure. The sinners title is common providence; the saints that of the covenant of grace.
(2) In respect of its blessing. Life is not a blessing special but in Christ.
(3) In respect of its comfort.
(4) In respect of its usefulness.
2. Spiritual life.
(1) The life of righteousness (Rom 5:18).
(2) The life of holiness in its principles, increase, acts, continuance.
3. Eternal life in respect to
(l) Its title
(2) Hope.
(3) Earnest.
(4) Possession.
Conclusion: Have you this life? If so, where there is life there is
1. Breath;
2. Motion;
3. Sense–seeing, hearing, feeling, tasting. (D. Clarkson, B. D.)
The reasons why men do not come to Christ
I. THEY PLACE NO VALUE ON THE BLESSINGS HE OFFERS. These blessings are
1. Remote.
2. Of a spiritual nature.
(1) Pardon of sin.
(2) Peace of conscience.
(3) A joyful hope of immortality.
(4) Holiness.
II. THEY HAVE NO CONFIDENCE IN THE POWER OF CHRIST TO GRANT THE BLESSINGS HE PROMISES.
III. THEY OBJECT TO THE TERMS UPON WHICH HE OFFERS SALVATION.
1. Self-denial and the taking up of the cross.
2. Repentance.
3. Faith.
4. Purity and spirituality. (J. Venn, M. A.)
Christs lamentation over those who will not come to Him
The discourse from which these words have been taken arose out of a conflict between our blessed Lord and the Pharisees respecting the observance of the Sabbath.
I. We have, in the words before us, CHRISTS EXPLANATION OF MANS INVETERATE SPIRITUAL MALADY.
1. Apart from Christ, men are spiritually dead. In forms, more or less repulsive, we find spiritual death wherever we look, in the world at large or in our own circle of friends. Intellectual life is not wanting. Never, perhaps, was there a period in the history of our race when intellectual life existed in a form more vigorous. Moral life is not wanting. One of the indirect results of the spread of the gospel is to enlighten the conscience even of those who do not receive it. But they have no spiritual life. God is not the object of their supreme affection. And, alas! this spiritual death is not confined to the world. Look for a moment at the Church.
2. Now, what is our Lords explanation of the solemn fact that spiritual death thus so generally obtains, notwithstanding that He has brought life within the reach of men and offered it to them in His gospel? He does not say that it is because they have never read the revelation of the Fathers love in Him, that they are as they are. But He says, Ye will not come to Me, that ye might have life.
3. But let us look at this solemn truth as it affects the anxious inquirer after salvation. It is only because men do not come to Christ for salvation, and therefore have no life, that the ordinances of the house of prayer are so often, and to so many, empty, fruitless exercises. Again: with how many questions does the inquirer after salvation often trouble and perplex his mind, from all of which he would be delivered, if he would only come for life simply and in faith to Christ. For instance, he sometimes perplexes himself as to the nature of conversion, and wonders, and asks himself whether it has taken place in his case. Regeneration takes place in the very act of receiving Christ as our life. Coming to Jesus for life and salvation is not the result, but the very means of the new birth.
II. We have in the words of our text, CHRISTS LAMENTATION OVER THE CAUSE OF THE CONTINUED SPIRITUAL DEATH OF MEN. Ye will not come to Me, that ye might have life. I cannot discern, my brethren-, in the utterance of these words by our blessed Lord, the tones of wrath. Oh, no! sadness must have covered His face with gloom as, looking over the reckless multitude, He said, Ye will not come to Me, that ye might have life. Christ might justly have spoken in anger. He would probably have done so had He been less holy and Divine than He was.
1. This complaint seems to open to us the very heart of Christ in its aspect towards men. It reveals to us the intensity of His love. The greatest joy He can possess is to impart Divine life to sinners, who are perishing because they have it not. The greatest grief which can oppress Him is to find His love, which would have given this life, despised and spurned. This has been so beautifully illustrated by a living writer, by a reference to one of the most familiar scenes of domestic life, that I must adopt his illustration, though not in his words. One of the deepest joys of a mothers heart is to nourish her babe from her own breast. It is a double grief! He grieves for the death of the dead, and the loss of His own life-giving! How deep and tender, therefore, the love of Jesus for perishing men!
2. In the second place, the complaint of Jesus suggests the solemn thought that the sinners death is the sinners fault! Possibly, you sometimes think that a portion of the fault, at least, may lie upon your minister. Possibly you sometimes blame the Church. There are so many frailties in those who compose it, that they are a stumbling block in you! The fault of your death is not to be found anywhere but in yourself! (E. J. Hartland.)
Hindrances to conversion
I. Some refuse Christ from IGNORANCE OF THEIR TRUE SPIRITUAL CONDITION. Content with lip-knowledge. Need to realize that respectability is not conversion.
II. Some are hindered by what they deem OPPOSING FORCES.
1. Pre-occupation.
2. Mistaken ideas of religion.
3. Inconsistency of professing Christians.
4. Fears–of God, of man, of self, of the danger of falling.
III. All these are SUMMED UP IN CHRISTS WORDS, Ye will not. How long is this to last? Why give everything to gain the world, and take no step to save your soul?
IV. YOUR LOSS IS LIFE. Christ came to rescue from death. Appreciate His love by appropriating His salvation. (John Edwards.)
Christ alone is rejected
When the dove was weary she recollected the ark, and flew into Noahs hand at once: there are weary souls who know the Ark, but will not fly to it. When an Israelite had slain, inadvertently, his fellow, he knew the city of refuge, he feared the avenger of blood, and he fled along the road to the place of safety; but multitudes know the refuge, and every Sabbath we set up the sign-posts along the road, but yet they come not to find salvation. The destitute waifs and strays of the streets of London find out the night refuge and ask for shelter: they cluster round our workhouse doors like sparrows under the eaves of a building on a rainy day; they piteously crave for lodging and a crust of bread; yet crowds of poor benighted spirits, when the house of mercy is lighted up, and the invitation is plainly written in bold letters, Whosoever will, let him turn in hither, will not come, but prove the truth of Wattss verse: Thousands make a wretched choice, And rather starve than come. Tis strange, tis passing strange, tis wonderful! (C. H. Spurgeon.)
Shall we refuse life?
Many years ago, when the great war was raging m America between the Northern and Southern States, no cotton came to supply the Lancashire mills, and hundreds of thousands of people were reduced to great poverty and suffering for want of food and clothing. Oh! how fervently they prayed that the war might soon be over, and that God would send them cotton. At last the war closed, and the sea was again white with the sails of cotton-bringing ships, and soon a railway train laden with the precious thing arrived at Preston, in Lancashire. The town was filled with joy, and when the first load of cotton was brought through the streets on a dray, the people went out by hundreds to welcome it. They marched on either side of it, and many of them kissed the bales of cotton as they moved along, and sang: Praise God from whom all blessings flow, for now there would be work, and food, and comfort. And when in the year 1871 the gates of the famine-stricken Paris were thrown open after the terrible siege, and a drove of fat cattle were driven along the streets to be killed for food, the women rushed from their doors and, throwing their arms around the necks of the sleek oxen, kissed them a welcome to their ruined city, for their coming was life to them and to their children. And is not Jesus Life to us? Is He not a thousand times more to us than cotton or cattle were to the people of Preston and Paris? And shall we refuse Him, or receive Him coldly? What think you? (R. Brewin.)
Sinners will not come to Christ
Since I have been watching the sea a wind has sprung up, and suddenly the ocean is dotted with ships. This little town has a harbour, and trading vessels of small tonnage evidently expect a storm, for here they come. Like sea-fowl borne on white wings they are flying for the harbour. Differing in their tacking, yet it is evident that they are all making for one spot. How beautiful it is to see them enter the haven, cast anchor, and rest! Oh, that our fellow-men were equally wise as to spiritual things! A thousand signs betoken the approaching tempest; they know there is a place of refuge, will they not hasten to it? They will suffer loss, nay, they will be wrecked totally, if they try to weather the last dread storm; the harbour is free, there is time to reach it, there is ample room within its shelter; why will they refuse the safety? Ah me! this is cause for tears. Are my fellow-creatures mad? Do they despise Jesus, the appointed haven of souls? Do they so despise Him as to perish to show their contempt? My God, help me to mourn for them, if I cannot persuade them, and do Thou give them understanding enough to accept their own lives. (C. H.Spurgeon.)
Sinners will not come to Christ
If there is any man here who says, I cannot come, I beg him to express himself properly, and speak out the sad fact as it ought to be spoken. Here is the style: Unhappy wretch, I cannot come to Christ! Millions in heaven have come, but I cannot come. My mother died in a good hope; but, Mother, I cannot come. My father has gone home to be with Jesus; but I cannot come. I thank God that this statement is not true; but if you say it, and believe it, you ought never to rest any more; for if you cannot come to Christ, you are the unhappiest person in the world. May I ask you to do another thing? If you still intend to say, I cannot come, will you speak the truth now? Will you alter a word, and get nearer the truth? Say, I will not come. I cannot come, is Greek, or double Dutch; but the plain English is, I will not come. I wish you would say that rather than the other, because the recoil of saying, I will not come: I will not believe in Jesus: I will not repent of sin: I will not turn from my wicked ways–the recoil, I say, from that might be blessed by God to you to make you see your desperate state. I wish you would then cry, I cannot sit down and make my own damnation sure by saying that I will not come to Christ. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
Christs desertions and complaints
Jesus, Mediator between God and man, suffers two desertions, and utters two complaints. On that side, God forsook Him; and on this side, man. The answer to the first desertion, My God, My God, why hast Thou forsaken Me? came in a strong cry from His dying lips; the answer to the second is written here, Ye will not come to Me that ye might have life. The desertion by the Father in the utmost agony of the Son was the greater–was inconceivably, infinitely great; but the lower and lesser–the desertion by sinners whom He seeks that He may save–pierces His heart more painfully, because the last desertion makes the first for that case of no avail. When we come to Him for life, He sees, He tastes of the travail of His soul and is satisfied; when we refuse, He complains that so far His soul has travailed in vain. The disciples were glad when they saw the Lord risen from the dead; the Lord is gladder when He sees disciples coming to Himself as doves to their windows. (W. Arnot, D. D.)
Will, the seat of inability
Nelson could not see the signal for suspending battle because he placed the glass to his blind eye, and man cannot see the truth as it is in Jesus because he has no mind to do so. Ungodly men are, as the country people say, like the hogs in a harvest field, who come not out for all their shouting; they cannot hear because they have no will to hear. Want of will causes paralysis of every faculty. In spiritual things man is utterly unable because resolvedly unwilling. (C. H.Spurgeon.)
Will–not violated by grace
When we see a casket wrenched open, the hinges torn away, or the clasp destroyed, we mark at once the hand of the spoiler; but when we observe another casket deftly opened with a master-key, and the sparkling contents revealed, we note the hand of the owner. Conversion is not, as some suppose, a violent opening of the heart by grace, in which will, reason, and judgment are all ignored or crushed. This is too barbarous a method for him who comes not as a plunderer to his prey, but as a possessor to his treasure. In conversion, the Lord who made the human heart deals with it according to its nature and constitution. His key insinuates itself into the wards; the will is not enslaved but enfranchised; the reason is not blinded but enlightened, and the whole man is made to act with a glorious liberty which it never knew till it fell under the restraints of grace. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 31. If I bear witness] If I had no proof to bring of my being the Messiah, and equal to God, common sense would direct you to reject my testimony; but the mighty power of God, by which I work my miracles, sufficiently attests that my pretensions are well founded.
Bishop Pearce gives a different turn to this verse, by translating it interrogatively, thus: “If I only bear witness of myself, is not my witness true? i.e. is it, on that account, not true? In Joh 8:14, he says, Though I bear record of myself, yet my record is true. And in Joh 8:18, he says, I am one that bear witness of myself.”
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
This seemeth to contradict what he saith, Joh 8:14, Though I bear record of myself, yet my record is true: but our Saviour here speaketh according to the common opinion of the Jews, or indeed of men, who are ready to suspect any ones testimony who testifieth of himself. He tells them, he could grant them this, though his record of himself was true, yet he could allow them their common received opinion and saying, Joh 8:13, that the testimony of one testifying of himself is suspicious; for it is certain that a man may testify truth of himself, only such a testimony is suspicious: he tells them, he did not only testify of himself, his reputation did not stand upon his own single word.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
31. If I . . . witness ofmyselfstanding alone, and setting up any separate interest.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
If I bear witness of myself,…. Which was not allowed any man to do; nor indeed is it proper that a man should be a witness in his own cause: and, according to the Jewish canons, a man might not be a witness for his wife, because she was reckoned as himself.
“An husband is not to be believed in bearing witness for his wife, that had been carried captive, that she is not defiled, , “for no man witness of himself” k.”
So likewise they say l,
“a city that is subdued by an army, all the priestesses (or priests’ daughters) that are found in it are rejected (from the priesthood, as defiled); but if they have witnesses, whether a servant, or an handmaid, lo, they are to be believed; but no man is to be believed for himself: says R. Zechariah ben Hakatzah, by this habitation (swearing by the temple) her hand was not removed from my hand, from the time the Gentiles entered Jerusalem, till they went out: they replied to him, “no man bears witness of himself”.”
Christ reasons here upon their own principles, and according to their sense of things, that should he bear witness of himself; then, says he,
my witness is not true, , not to be believed, or admitted as an authentic testimony: and so the Ethiopic version renders it, “is not credible”; not valid in law, or in such a court of judicature in which Christ now was; for, as according to the Jewish law, no man was admitted a witness for himself, so neither was anything established by a single testimony, but by the mouth of two or three witnesses, De 19:15. Christ’s meaning is, that his testimony alone, his single witness, how true soever it was, would stand for nothing in their court; and therefore he would not insist upon it, but drop it; for “true” here, is not opposed to that which is “false”, but to that which is not valid in law. Christ’s testimony was true in itself; nor could it be any other, it coming from him, who is truth itself, the “Amen”, and faithful witness; but being considered as an human testimony, and in his own cause, was not to be admitted as sufficient; and this he allows. From arguments, proving his equality with the Father, he passes to testimonies; and without ranking use of his own, he had enough to produce, and which were valid and authentic, and are as follow.
k Maimon. Issure Bia, c. 18. sect. 19. l Misn. Cetubot, c. 2. sect. 9. T. Bab. Cetubot, fol. 27. 2. Juchasin, fol. 56. 1.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
| Christ Proves His Divine Mission; Infidelity of the Jews Reproved. |
| |
31 If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true. 32 There is another that beareth witness of me; and I know that the witness which he witnesseth of me is true. 33 Ye sent unto John, and he bare witness unto the truth. 34 But I receive not testimony from man: but these things I say, that ye might be saved. 35 He was a burning and a shining light: and ye were willing for a season to rejoice in his light. 36 But I have greater witness than that of John: for the works which the Father hath given me to finish, the same works that I do, bear witness of me, that the Father hath sent me. 37 And the Father himself, which hath sent me, hath borne witness of me. Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape. 38 And ye have not his word abiding in you: for whom he hath sent, him ye believe not. 39 Search the scriptures; for in them ye think ye have eternal life: and they are they which testify of me. 40 And ye will not come to me, that ye might have life. 41 I receive not honour from men. 42 But I know you, that ye have not the love of God in you. 43 I am come in my Father’s name, and ye receive me not: if another shall come in his own name, him ye will receive. 44 How can ye believe, which receive honour one of another, and seek not the honour that cometh from God only? 45 Do not think that I will accuse you to the Father: there is one that accuseth you, even Moses, in whom ye trust. 46 For had ye believed Moses, ye would have believed me: for he wrote of me. 47 But if ye believe not his writings, how shall ye believe my words?
In these verses our Lord Jesus proves and confirms the commission he had produced, and makes it out that he was sent of God to be the Messiah.
I. He sets aside his own testimony of himself (v. 31): “If I bear witness of myself, though it is infallibly true (ch. viii. 14), yet, according to the common rule of judgment among men, you will not admit it as legal proof, nor allow it to be given in evidence.” Now, 1. This reflects reproach upon the sons of men, and their veracity and integrity. Surely we may say deliberately, what David said in haste, All men are liars, else it would never have been such a received maxim that a man’s testimony of himself is suspicious, and not to be relied on; it is a sign that self-love is stronger than the love of truth. And yet, 2. It reflects honour on the Son of God, and bespeaks his wonderful condescension, that, though he is the faithful witness, the truth itself, who may challenge to be credited upon his honour, and his own single testimony, yet he is pleased to waive his privilege, and, for the confirmation of our faith, refers himself to his vouchers, that we may have full satisfaction.
II. He produces other witnesses that bear testimony to him that he was sent of God.
1. The Father himself bore testimony to him (v. 32): There is another that beareth witness. I take this to be meant of God the Father, for Christ mentions his testimony with his own (ch. viii. 18): I bear witness of myself, and the Father beareth witness of me. Observe,
(1.) The seal which the Father put to his commission: He beareth witness of me, not only has done so by a voice from heaven, but still does so by the tokens of his presence with me. See who they are to whom God will bear witness. [1.] Those whom he sends and employs; where he gives commissions he give credentials. [2.] Those who bear witness to him; so Christ did. God will own and honour those that own and honour him. [3.] Those who decline bearing witness of themselves; so Christ did. God will take care that those who humble and abase themselves, and seek not their own glory, shall not lose by it.
(2.) The satisfaction Christ had in this testimony: “I know that the witness which he witnesseth of me is true. I am very well assured that I have a divine mission, and do not in the least hesitate concerning it; thus he had the witness in himself.” The devil tempted him to question his being the Son of God, but he never yielded.
2. John Baptist witnessed to Christ, v. 33, c. John came to bear witness of the light (<i>ch. i. 7); his business was to prepare his way, and direct people to him: Behold the Lamb of God.
(1.) Now the testimony of John was, [1.] A solemn and public testimony: “You sent an embassy of priests and Levites to John, which gave him an opportunity of publishing what he had to say; it was not a popular, but a judicial testimony.” [2.] It was a true testimony: He bore witness to the truth, as a witness ought to do, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth. Christ does not say, He bore witness to me (though every one knew he did), but, like an honest man, He bore witness to the truth. Now John was confessedly such a holy, good man, so mortified to the world, and so conversant with divine things, that it could not be imagined he should be guilty of such a forgery and imposture as to say what he did concerning Christ if it had not been so, and if he had not been sure of it.
(2.) Two things are added concerning John’s testimony:–
[1.] That it was a testimony ex abundanti—more than he needed to vouch (v. 34): I receive not testimony from man. Though Christ saw fit to quote John’s testimony, it was with a protestation that it shall not be deemed or construed so as to prejudice the prerogative of his self-sufficiency. Christ needs no letters or commendation, no testimonials or certificates, but what his own worth and excellency bring with him; why then did Christ here urge the testimony of John? Why, these things I say, that you may be saved. This he aimed at in all this discourse, to save not his own life, but the souls of others; he produced John’s testimony because, being one of themselves, it was to be hoped that they would hearken to it. Note, First, Christ desires and designs the salvation even of his enemies and persecutors. Secondly, The word of Christ is the ordinary means of salvation. Thirdly, Christ in his word considers our infirmities and condescends to our capacities, consulting not so much what it befits so great a prince to say as what we can bear, and what will be most likely to do us good.
[2.] That it was a testimony ad hominem—to the man, because John Baptist was one whom they had a respect for (v. 35): He was a light among you.
First, The character of John Baptist: He was a burning and a shining light. Christ often spoke honourably of John; he was now in prison under a cloud, yet Christ gives him his due praise, which we must be ready to do to all that faithfully serve God. 1. He was a light, not phos—lux, light (so Christ was the light), but lyknos—lucerna, a luminary, a derived subordinate light. His office was to enlighten a dark world with notices of the Messiah’s approach, to whom he was as the morning star. 2. He was a burning light, which denotes sincerity; painted fire may be made to shine, but that which burns is true fire. It denotes also his activity, zeal, and fervency, burning in love to God and the souls of men; fire is always working on itself or something else, so is a good minister. 3. He was a shining light, which denotes either his exemplary conversation, in which our light should shine (Matt. v. 16), or an eminent diffusive influence. He was illustrious in the sight of others; though he affected obscurity and retirement, and was in the deserts, yet such were his doctrine, his baptism, his life, that he became very remarkable, and attracted the eyes of the nation.
Secondly, The affections of the people to him: you were willing for a season to rejoice in his light. 1. It was a transport that they were in, upon the appearing of John: “You were willing— ethelesate, you delighted to rejoice in his light; you were very proud that you had such a man among you, who was the honour of your country; you were willing agalliasthenai–willing to dance, and make a noise about this light, as boys about a bonfire.” 2. It was but transient, and soon over: “You were fond of him, pros horan—for an hour, for a season, as little children are fond of a new thing, you were pleased with John awhile, but soon grew weary of him and his ministry, and said that he had a devil, and now you have him in prison.” Note, Many, that seem to be affected and pleased with the gospel at first, afterwards despise and reject it; it is common for forward and noisy professors to cool and fall off. These here rejoiced in John’s light, but never walked in it, and therefore did not keep to it; they were like the stony ground. While Herod was a friend to John Baptist, the people caressed him; but when he fell under Herod’s frowns he lost their favours: “You were willing to countenance John, pros horan that is, for temporal ends” (so some take it); “you were glad of him, in hopes to make a tool of him, by his interest and under the shelter of his name to have shaken off the Roman yoke, and recovered the civil liberty and honour of your country.” Now, (1.) Christ mentions their respect to John, to condemn them for their present opposition to himself, to whom John bore witness. If they had continued their veneration for John, as they ought to have done, they would have embraced Christ. (2.) He mentions the passing away of their respect, to justify God in depriving them, as he had now done, of John’s ministry, and putting that light under a bushel.
3. Christ’s own works witnessed to him (v. 36): I have a testimony greater than that of John; for if we believe the witness of men sent of God, as John was, the witness of God immediately, and not by the ministry of men, is greater, 1 John v. 9. Observe, Though the witness of John was a less cogent and less considerable witness, yet our Lord was pleased to make use of it. We must be glad of all the supports that offer themselves for the confirmation of our faith, though they may not amount to a demonstration, and we must not invalidate any, under pretence that there are others more conclusive; we have occasion for them all. Now this greater testimony was that of the works which his Father had given him to finish. That is, (1.) In general the whole course of his life and ministry–his revealing God and his will to us, setting up his kingdom among men, reforming the world, destroying Satan’s kingdom, restoring fallen man to his primitive purity and felicity, and shedding abroad in men’s hearts the love of God and of one another–all that work of which he said when he died, It is finished, it was all, from first to last, opus Deo dignum–a work worthy of God; all he said and did was holy and heavenly, and a divine purity, power, and grace shone in it, proving abundantly that he was sent of God. (2.) In particular. The miracles he wrought for the proof of his divine mission witnessed of him. Now it is here said, [1.] That these works were given him by the Father, that is, he was both appointed and empowered to work them; for, as Mediator, he derived both commission and strength from his Father. [2.] They were given to him to finish; he must do all those works of wonder which the counsel and foreknowledge of God had before determined to be done; and his finishing them proves a divine power; for as for God his work is perfect. [3.] These works did bear witness of him, did prove that he was sent of God, and that what he said concerning himself was true; see Heb 2:4; Act 2:22. That the Father had sent him as a Father, not as a master sends his servant on an errand, but as a father sends his son to take possession for himself; if God had not sent him, he would not have seconded him, would not have sealed him, as he did by the works he gave him to do; for the world’s Creator will never be its deceiver.
4. He produces, more fully than before, his Father’s testimony concerning him (v. 37): The Father that sent me hath borne witness of me. The prince is not accustomed to follow his ambassador himself, to confirm his commission viva voce–by speaking; but God was pleased to bear witness of his Son himself by a voice from heaven at his baptism (Matt. iii. 17): This is my ambassador, This is my beloved Son. The Jews reckoned Bath-kol;–the daughter of a voice, a voice from heaven, one of the ways by which God made known his mind; and in that way he had owned Christ publicly and solemnly, and repeated it, Matt. xvii. 5. Note, (1.) Those whom God sends he will bear witness of; where he gives a commission, he will not fail to seal it; he that never left himself without witness (Acts xiv. 17) will never leave any of his servants so, who go upon his errand. (2.) Where God demands belief, he will not fail to give sufficient evidence, as he has done concerning Christ. That which was to be witnessed concerning Christ was chiefly this, that the God we had offended was willing to accept of him as a Mediator. Now concerning this he has himself given us full satisfaction (and he was fittest to do it), declaring himself well-pleased in him; if we be so, the work is done. Now, it might be suggested, if God himself thus bore witness of Christ, how came it to pass that he was not universally received by the Jewish nation and their rulers? To this Christ here answers that it was not to be thought strange, nor could their infidelity weaken his credibility, for two reasons:– [1.] Because they were not acquainted with such extraordinary revelations of God and his will: You have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his shape, or appearance. They showed themselves to be as ignorant of God, though they professed relation to him, as we are of a man we never either saw or heard. “But why do I talk to you of God’s bearing witness of me? He is one you know nothing of, nor have any acquaintance or communion with.” Note, Ignorance of God is the true reason of men’s rejecting the record he has given concerning his Son. A right understanding of natural religion would discover to us such admirable congruities in the Christian religion as would greatly dispose our minds to the entertainment of it. Some give this sense of it: “The Father bore witness of me by a voice, and the descent of a dove, which is such an extraordinary thing that you never saw or heard the like; and yet for my sake there was such a voice and appearance; yea, and you might have heard that voice, you might have seen that appearance, as others did, if you had closely attended the ministry of John, but by slighting it you missed of that testimony.” [2.] Because they were not affected, no, not with the ordinary ways by which God had revealed himself to them: You have not his word abiding in you, v. 38. They had the scriptures of the Old Testament; might they not by them be disposed to receive Christ? Yes, if they had had their due influence upon them. But, First, The word of God was not in them; it was among them, in their country, in their hands, but not in them, in their hearts; not ruling in their souls, but only shining in their eyes and sounding in their ears. What did it avail them that they had the oracles of God committed to them (Rom. iii. 2), when they had not these oracles commanding in them? If they had, they would readily have embraced Christ. Secondly, It did not abide. Many have the word of God coming into them, and making some impressions for awhile, but it does not abide with them; it is not constantly in them, as a man at home, but only now and then, as a wayfaring man. If the word abide in us, if we converse with it by frequent meditation, consult with it upon every occasion, and conform to it in our conversation, we shall then readily receive the witness of the Father concerning Christ; see ch. vii. 17. But how did it appear that they had not the word of God abiding in them? It appeared by this, Whom he hath sent, him ye believe not. There was so much said in the Old Testament concerning Christ, to direct people when and where to look for him, and so to facilitate the discovery of him, that, if they had duly considered these things, they could not have avoided the conviction of Christ’s being sent of God; so that their not believing in Christ was a certain sign that the word of God did not abide in them. Note, The in-dwelling of the word, and Spirit, and grace of God in us, is best tried by its effects, particularly by our receiving what he sends, the commands, the messengers, the providences he sends, especially Christ whom he hath sent.
5. The last witness he calls is the Old Testament, which witnessed of him, and to it he appeals (v. 39, c.): Search the scriptures, ereunate.
(1.) This may be read, either, [1.] “You search the scriptures, and you do well to do so you read them daily in your synagogues, you have rabbies, and doctors, and scribes, that make it their business to study them, and criticize upon them.” The Jews boasted of the flourishing of scripture-learning in the days of Hillel, who died about twelve years after Christ’s birth, and reckoned some of those who were then members of the sanhedrim the beauties of their wisdom and the glories of their law; and Christ owns that they did indeed search the scriptures, but it was in search of their own glory: “You search the scriptures, and therefore, if you were not wilfully blind, you would believe in me.” Note, It is possible for men to be very studious in the letter of the scripture, and yet to be strangers to the power and influence of it. Or, [2.] As we read it: Search the scriptures; and so, First, It was spoken to them in the nature of an appeal: “You profess to receive and believe the scripture; here I will join issue with you, let this be the judge, provided you will not rest in the letter” (hrere in cortice), “but will search into it.” Note, when appeals are made to the scriptures, they must be searched. Search the whole book of scripture throughout, compare one passage with another, and explain one by another. We must likewise search particular passages to the bottom, and see not what they seem to say prima facie–at the first appearance, but what they say indeed. Secondly, It is spoken to us in the nature of an advice, or a command to all Christians to search the scriptures. Note, All those who would find Christ must search the scriptures; not only read them, and hear them, but search them, which denotes, 1. Diligence in seeking, labour, and study, and close application of mind. 2. Desire and design of finding. We must aim at some spiritual benefit and advantage in reading and studying the scripture, and often ask, “What am I now searching for?” We must search as for hidden treasures (Prov. ii. 4), as those that sink for gold or silver, or that dive for pearl, Job xxviii. 1-11. This ennobled the Bereans, Acts xvii. 11.
(2.) Now there are two things which we are here directed to have in our eye, in our searching the scripture: heaven our end, and Christ our way. [1.] We must search the scriptures for heaven as our great end: For in them you think you have eternal life. The scripture assures us of an eternal state set before us, and offers to us an eternal life in that state: it contains the chart that describes it, the charter that conveys it, the direction in the way that leads to it, and the foundation upon which the hope of it is built; and this is worth searching for where we are sure to find it. But to the Jews Christ saith only, You think you have eternal life in the scriptures, because, though they did retain the belief and hope of eternal life, and grounded their expectations of it upon the scriptures, yet herein they missed it, that they looked for it by the bare reading and studying of the scripture. It was a common but corrupt saying among them, He that has the words of the law has eternal life; they thought they were sure of heaven if they could say by heart, or rather by rote, such and such passages of scripture as they were directed to by the tradition of the elders; as they thought all the vulgar cursed because they did not thus know the law (ch. vii. 49), so they concluded all the learned undoubtedly blessed. [2.] We must search the scriptures for Christ, as the new and living way that leads to this end. These are they, the great and principal witnesses, that testify of me. Note, First, The scriptures, even those of the Old Testament, testify of Christ, and by them God bears witness to him. The Spirit of Christ in the prophets testified beforehand of him (1 Pet. i. 11), the purposes and promises of God concerning him, and the previous notices of him. The Jews knew very well that the Old Testament testified of the Messiah, and were critical in their remarks upon the passages that looked that way; and yet were careless, and wretchedly overseen, in the application of them. Secondly, Therefore we must search the scriptures, and may hope to find eternal life in that search, because they testify of Christ; for this is life eternal, to know him; see 1 John v. 11. Christ is the treasure hid in the field of the scriptures, the water in those wells, the milk in those breasts.
(3.) To this testimony he annexes a reproof of their infidelity and wickedness in four instances; particularly,
[1.] Their neglect of him and his doctrine: “You will not come tome, that you might have life, v. 40. You search the scriptures, you believe the prophets, who you cannot but see testify of me; and yet you will not come to me, to whom they direct you.” Their estrangement from Christ was the fault not so much of their understandings as of their wills. This is expressed as a complaint; Christ offered life, and it was not accepted. Note, First, There is life to be had with Jesus Christ for poor souls; we may have life, the life of pardon and grace, and comfort and glory: life is the perfection of our being, and inclusive of all happiness; and Christ is our life. Secondly, Those that would have this life must come to Jesus Christ for it; we may have it for the coming for. It supposes an assent of the understanding to the doctrine of Christ and the record given concerning him; it lies in the consent of the will to his government and grace, and it produces an answerable compliance in the affections and actions. Thirdly, The only reason why sinners die is because they will not come to Christ for life and happiness; it is not because they cannot, but because they will not. They will neither accept the life offered, because spiritual and divine, nor will they agree to the terms on which it is offered, nor apply themselves to the use of the appointed means: they will not be cured, for they will not observe the methods of cure. Fourthly, The wilfulness and obstinacy of sinners in rejecting the tenders of grace are a great grief to the Lord Jesus, and what he complains of. Those words (v. 41), I receive not honour from men, come in a parenthesis, to obviate an objection against him, as if he sought his own glory, and made himself the head of a party, in obliging all to come to him, and applaud him. Note, 1. He did not covet nor court the applause of men, did not in the least affect that worldly pomp and splendour in which the carnal Jews expected their Messiah to appear. He charged those whom he cured not to make him known, and withdrew from those that would have made him king. 2. He had not the applause of men. Instead of receiving honour from men, he received a great deal of dishonour and disgrace from men, for he made himself of no reputation. 3. He needed not the applause of men; it was no addition to his glory whom all the angels of God worship, nor was he any otherwise pleased with it than as it was according to his Father’s will, and for the happiness of those who, in giving honour to him, received much greater honour from him.
[2.] Their want of the love of God (v. 42): “I know you very well, that you have not the love of God in you. Why should I wonder that you do not come to me, when you want even the first principle of natural religion, which is the love of God?” Note, The reason why people slight Christ is because they do not love God; for, if we did indeed love God, we should love him who is his express image, and hasten to him by whom only we may be restored to the favour of God. He charged them (v. 37) with ignorance of God, and here with want of love to him; therefore men have not the love of God because they desire not the knowledge of him. Observe, First, The crime charged upon them: You have not the love of God in you. They pretended a great love to God, and thought they proved it by their zeal for the law, the temple, and the sabbath; and yet they were really without the love of God. Note, There are many who make a great profession of religion who yet show they want the love of God by their neglect of Christ and their contempt of his commandments; they hate his holiness and undervalue his goodness. Observe, It is the love of God in us, that love seated in the heart, a living active principle there, that God will accept; the love shed abroad there, Rom. v. 5. Secondly, The proof of this charge, by the personal knowledge of Christ, who searches the heart (Rev. ii. 23) and knows what is in man: I know you. Christ sees through all our disguises, and can say to each of us, I know thee. 1. Christ knows men better than their neighbours know them. The people thought that the scribes and Pharisees were very devout and good men, but Christ knew that they had not the love of God in them. 2. Christ knows men better than they know themselves. These Jews had a very good opinion of themselves, but Christ knew how corrupt their inside was, notwithstanding the speciousness of their outside; we may deceive ourselves, but we cannot deceive him. 3. Christ knows men who do not, and will not, know him; he looks on those who industriously look off from him, and calls by their own name, their true name, those who have not known him.
[3.] Another crime charged upon them is their readiness to entertain false Christs and false prophets, while they obstinately opposed him who was the true Messias (v. 43): I am come in my Father’s name, and you receive me not. If another shall come in his own name, him you will receive. Be astonished, O heavens, at this (Jer 2:12; Jer 2:13); for my people have committed two evils, great evils indeed. First, They have forsaken the fountain of living waters, for they would not receive Christ, who came in his Father’s name, had his commission from his Father, and did all for his glory. Secondly, They have hewn out broken cisterns, they hearken to every one that will set up in his own name. They forsake their own mercies, which is bad enough; and it is for lying vanities, which is worse. Observe here, 1. Those are false prophets who come in their own name, who run without being sent, and set up for themselves only. 2. It is just with God to suffer those to be deceived with false prophets who receive not the truth in the love of it. 2Th 2:10; 2Th 2:11. The errors of antichrist are the just punishment of those who obey not the doctrine of Christ. They that shut their eyes against the true light are by the judgment of God given up to wander endlessly after false lights, and to be led aside after every ignis fatuus. 3. It is the gross folly of many that, while they nauseate ancient truths, they are fond of upstart errors; they loathe manna, and at the same time feed upon ashes. After the Jews had rejected Christ and his gospel, they were continually haunted with spectres, with false Christs and false prophets (Matt. xxiv. 24), and their proneness to follow such occasioned those distractions and seditions that hastened their ruin.
[4.] They are here charged with pride and vain-glory, and unbelief, the effect of them, v. 44. Having sharply reproved their unbelief, like a wise physician, he here searches into the cause, lays the axe to the root. They therefore slighted and undervalued Christ because they admired and overvalued themselves. Here is,
First, Their ambition of worldly honour. Christ despised it, v. 41. They set their hearts upon it: You receive honour one of another; that is, “You look for a Messiah in outward pomp, and promise yourselves worldly honour by him.” You receive honour:— 1. “You desire to receive it, and aim at this in all you do.” 2. “You give honour to others, and applaud them, only that they may return it, and may applaud you.” Petimus dabimusque vicissim–We ask and we bestow. It is the proud man’s art to throw honour upon others only that it may rebound upon himself. 3. “You are very careful to keep all the honours to yourselves, and confine them to your own party, as if you had the monopoly of that which is honourable.” 4. “What respect is shown to you you receive yourselves, and do not transmit to God, as Herod.” Idolizing men and their sentiments, and affecting to be idolized by them and their applauses, are pieces of idolatry as directly contrary to Christianity as any other.
Secondly, Their neglect of spiritual honour, called here the honour that comes from God only; this they sought not, nor minded. Note, 1. True honour is that which comes from God only, that is real and lasting honour; those are honourable indeed whom he takes into covenant and communion with himself. 2. This honour have all the saints. All that believe in Christ, through him receive the honour that comes from God. He is not partial, but will give glory wherever he gives grace. 3. This honour that comes from God we must seek, must aim at it, and act for it, and take up with nothing short of it (Rom. ii. 29); we must account it our reward, as the Pharisees accounted the praise of men. 4. Those that will not come to Christ, and those that are ambitious of worldly honour, make it appear that they seek not the honour that comes from God, and it is their folly and ruin.
Thirdly, The influence this had upon their infidelity. How can you believe who are thus affected? Observe here, 1. The difficulty of believing arises from ourselves and our own corruption; we make our work hard to ourselves, and then complain it is impracticable. 2. The ambition and affectation of worldly honour are a great hindrance to faith in Christ. How can they believe who make the praise and applause of men their idol? When the profession and practice of serious godliness are unfashionable, are every where spoken against,–when Christ and his followers are men wondered at, and to be a Christian is to be like a speckled bird (and this is the common case),–how can they believe the summit of whose ambition is to make a fair show in the flesh?
6. The last witness here called is Moses, v. 45, c. The Jews had a great veneration for Moses, and valued themselves upon their being the disciples of Moses, and pretended to adhere to Moses, in their opposition to Christ but Christ here shows them,
(1.) That Moses was a witness against the unbelieving Jews, and accused them to the Father: There is one that accuses you, even Moses. This may be understood either, [1.] As showing the difference between the law and the gospel. Moses, that is, the law, accuses you, for by the law is the knowledge of sin; it condemns you, it is to those that trust to it a ministration of death and condemnation. But it is not the design of Christ’s gospel to accuse us: Think not that I will accuse you. Christ did not come into the world as a Momus, to find fault and pick quarrels with every body, or as a spy upon the actions of men, or a promoter, to fish for crimes; no, he came to be an advocate, not an accuser; to reconcile God and man, and not to set them more at variance. What fools were they then that adhered to Moses against Christ, and desired to be under the law! Gal. iv. 21. Or, [2.] As showing the manifest unreasonableness of their infidelity: “Think not that I will appeal from your bar to God’s and challenge you to answer there for what you do against me, as injured innocency usually does; no, I do not need; you are already accused, and cast, in the court of heaven; Moses himself says enough to convict you of, and condemn you for, your unbelief.” Let them not mistake concerning Christ; though he was a prophet, he did not improve his interest in heaven against those that persecuted him, did not, as Elias, make intercession against Israel (Rom. vi. 2), nor as Jeremiah desire to see God’s vengeance on them. Nor let them mistake concerning Moses, as if he would stand by them in rejecting Christ; no, There is one that accuses you, even Moses in whom you trust. Note, First, External privileges and advantages are commonly the vain confidence of those who reject Christ and his grace. The Jews trusted in Moses, and thought their having his laws and ordinances would save them. Secondly, Those that confide in their privileges, and do not improve them, will find not only that their confidence is disappointed, but that those very privileges will be witnesses against them.
(2.) That Moses was a witness for Christ and to his doctrine (Joh 5:46; Joh 5:47): He wrote of me. Moses did particularly prophesy of Christ, as the Seed of the woman, the Seed of Abraham, the Shiloh, the great Prophet; the ceremonies of the law of Moses were figures of him that was to come. The Jews made Moses the patron of their opposition to Christ; but Christ here shows them their error, that Moses was so far from writing against Christ that he wrote for him, and of him. But, [1.] Christ here charges it on the Jews that they did not believe Moses. He had said (v. 45) that they trusted in Moses, and yet here he undertakes to make out that they did not believe Moses; they trusted to his name, but they did not receive his doctrine in its true sense and meaning; they did not rightly understand, nor give credit to, what there was in the writings of Moses concerning the Messiah. [2.] He proves this charge from their disbelief of him: Had you believed Moses, you would have believed me. Note, First, The surest trial of faith is by the effects it produces. Many say that they believe whose actions give their words the lie; for had they believed the scriptures they would have done otherwise than they did. Secondly, Those who rightly believe one part of scripture will receive every part. The prophecies of the old Testament were so fully accomplished in Christ that those who rejected Christ did in effect deny those prophecies, and set them aside. [3.] From their disbelief of Moses he infers that it was not strange that they rejected him: If you believe not his writings, how shall you believe my words? How can it be thought that you should? First, “If you do not believe sacred writings, those oracles which are in black and white, which is the most certain way of conveyance, how shall you believe my words, words being usually less regarded?” Secondly, “If you do not believe Moses, for whom you have such a profound veneration, how is it likely that you should believe me, whom you look upon with so much contempt?” See Exod. vi. 12. Thirdly, “If you believe not what Moses spoke and wrote of me, which is a strong and cogent testimony for me, how shall you believe me and my mission?” If we admit not the premises, how shall we admit the conclusion? The truth of the Christian religion, it being a matter purely of divine revelation, depends upon the divine authority of the scripture; if therefore we believe not the divine inspiration of those writings, how shall be receive the doctrine of Christ?
Fuente: Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary
If I bear witness of myself ( ). Condition of third class, undetermined with prospect of determination ( and present active subjunctive of ). The emphasis is on (I alone with no other witness).
Is not true ( ). In law the testimony of a witness is not received in his own case (Jewish, Greek, Roman law). See De 19:15 and the allusion to it by Jesus in Mt 18:16. See also 2Cor 13:1; 1Tim 5:19. And yet in 8:12-19 Jesus claims that his witness concerning himself is true because the Father gives confirmation of his message. The Father and the Son are the two witnesses (8:17). It is a paradox and yet true. But here Jesus yields to the rabbinical demand for proof outside of himself. He has the witness of another (the Father, John 5:32; John 5:37), the witness of the Baptist (5:33), the witness of the works of Jesus (5:36), the witness of the Scriptures (5:39), the witness of Moses in particular (5:45).
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
If I [ ] . The I expressed for emphasis : I alone.
True [] . As distinguished from false. See on 1 9.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “If I bear witness of myself,” (ean ego marturo peri heautou) “If I testify concerning myself,” regarding a charge of wrong against me, brought by another, if I do it alone, unsustained by another or any other witness, Joh 8:14-16; Joh 17:4-5; It would not be accepted of you all as true, being skeptics, as you are, Rev 3:14.
2) “My witness is not true.” (he marturia mou ouk estin alethes) “My testimony (alone) is not true,” or held to be true, except it be verified by one or two others, according to your law and logic, which premise I am willing to accept, if you are, as expressed in Num 35:30, Deu 17:6; Joh 8:4-6; Pro 27:2.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
31. If I testify concerning myself. He does not here take any thing away from the credit due to his testimony, which he elsewhere asserts in strong terms, but he speaks by way of concession; for Christ, having been in other respects most abundantly supported, consents that they should not believe his word. “If my testimony concerning myself,” says he, “is suspected by you according to the ordinary custom of men, let it go for nothing.” Now we know that what any man asserts about himself is not reckoned to be true and authentic, although in other respects he speak truth, because no man is a competent witness in his own cause. Though it would be unjust to reduce the Son of God to this rank, yet he prefers to surrender his right, that he may convince his enemies by the authority of God.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(31) If I bear witness of myself.This verse is the link between the thoughts of Christs person (Joh. 5:17-30) and the witness to Him (Joh. 5:32-40). He can do nothing of Himself (Joh. 5:30), and does not even bear witness of Himself. If He did, it would be on technical grounds not to be credited. He meets the objection then doubtless in their minds, and soon expressed in their words. (Comp. Notes on Joh. 8:13-18.)
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
II. The threefold witness to the Sonship of Christ, Joh 5:31-47.
As in the first part of this defence Jesus (17-30) unfolds the truth of his Sonship, so now he adduces the testimonies to that Sonship, of all which the real Author is truly God, (Joh 5:32😉 but, instrumentally, there are: 1. John the Baptist, 31-35. 2. His works, 36. And, 3. The Scripture, 37-40. Our Lord’s mention of each witness is closed with an allusion to the Jews’ rejection of it. See Joh 5:35; Joh 5:38; Joh 5:40.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
1 . The witness of the Father, through John, Joh 5:31-35.
31. My witness is not true It was the province of the Son to be authenticated by another, whom he will adduce in the following verse. HE by whom the Son was sent furnishes all the credentials of his genuineness. If Jesus is without His testimony, his own claims, and all his self-witnessing, are false. The universal maxim applies to him, that no man’s evidence, uncorroborated, is valid in his own case.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
“If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true.”
Clearly Jesus did not literally mean that His witness was not true simply because it was His own. He was rather acknowledging that self-testimony was seen as worthless by the Jews from a judicial point of view. This was the strongly held Jewish viewpoint based on the Scriptures. He is therefore stressing that He does not expect them to rely on such self-testimony. Rather there are others who testify of Him. This does not therefore contradict Joh 8:14, rather it indicates what the response of men will be. Men will say that ‘truth’ judicially can only be established by more than one witness. In contrast Joh 8:14 is saying that essential truth can be established by Him in that He is the One Who truly knows because He is in a position to know, and because of where He comes from, even though it might not be judicially acceptable on earth. The idea there is that by its very nature as heavenly, heavenly truth is more acceptable than earthly truth and requires no further witness.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Witnesses to the Genuineness of His Authority ( Joh 5:31-40 ).
Jesus now goes on to describe the witnesses which support Him:
He is the One to Whom the Father has borne witness (Joh 5:37)
His very works bear witness to Him as the One sent by the Father (Joh 5:36).
The Scriptures themselves bear witness to Him (Joh 5:39).
And He closes by emphasising the fact that He has come in His Father’s Name in contrast with those who come in their own name. The reference to those who come in their own name (Joh 5:43) probably has in mind Messianic pretenders.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
The Witness of John, of the Father, and of Scriptures. A reference to John:
v. 31. If I bear witness of Myself, My witness is not true.
v. 32. There is another that beareth witness of Me; and I know that the witness which He witnesseth of Me is true.
v. 33. Ye sent unto John, and he bare witness unto the truth.
v. 34. But I receive not testimony from man; but these things I say that ye might be saved.
v. 35. He was a burning and a shining light, and ye were willing for a season to rejoice in his light. The Jews might have raised the objection at this point that Jesus was speaking and testifying of Himself, but that His own testimony had no value. See Deu 19:15. Jesus concedes in advance that from their standpoint He stands alone, and that therefore His words will not stand without corroboration from other witnesses. He was trying to place Himself entirely on their level, in order that the points which He wanted to make would be all the stronger. At the same time it remains true that all His words are eternal truth and need no confirmation. But for the sake of the blind, hostile Jews He is perfectly willing to argue from their standpoint. And He refers to another Witness, one that is unimpeachable, whose testimony He is about to refer to and of which He knows and they must admit that there can be no question as to its certainty. Note: It is not the least of the evils attending unbelief that it acts not only in opposition to God, but acts also inconsistently with itself. In many cases it professes to receive Scriptures in bulk, even conceding them to have come through divine inspiration; and yet believes no part separately. Before going into detail concerning the testimony of the Father, Jesus refers them to a witness whom many of the Jews there present had seen and heard. They had sent a delegation to Joh 3:25-36, to get definite information about the new Teacher, and John had repeated his former testimony concerning the divinity of Christ and carried it out at length. He had borne witness to the truth. He had stated the facts in his testimony concerning Jesus. Now Jesus was not in need of testimony from any man, but John’s testimony; concerning Him redounded to their salvation. If they had accepted that, it would have been to their own temporal and eternal advantage. They would have been saved by relying upon that message. They have a full chance at salvation now, if they will but heed His reference to that Gospel-message. Jesus sought no honor for Himself, His object was the salvation of men. John himself, during his lifetime, was a burning and a shining light. His testimony concerning Christ was plain, clear, unmistakable. If they had heeded it, they would have been shown the way to salvation. Note: Every minister of the Gospel should be a light, to shed forth not his own luster, but that of the Redeemer; not consuming, either others by a zeal without knowledge or himself by a foolish manner of working, but burning in holy love for the Savior and His Gospel; and shining, finding his greatest joy” in leading the way to Jesus. The Jews of that time were willing enough for a season to rejoice greatly in the light of John. It was like the brief play of the moths about the arc lamp, a regular Revival-type of religion, with much emotional Revelation ling, but no sound basis of faith. Just so many people in our days may be struck for a while by some aspect of religious work and become most enthusiastic. But when the enthusiasm has burned out, the work palls on them, to their own damnation.
Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann
Joh 5:31. If I bear witness of myself, &c. These certainly were very grand assertions, which our Lord made of his own dignity. But he did not require his hearers to believe them merely on the authority of his own testimony; a circumstance by which the Lord Jesus Christ, the only Son of God, isdistinguished from Mahomet and every other impostor. He told them, that he had the testimony of John given him in the hearing of their own deputies; but at the same time he observed, that the truth of his divine mission did not depend merely on human testimony, though it was given by one who was a burning and shining Light, and in whom they greatly rejoiced, because the prophetic spirit which had so long ceased seemed to be again revived in him. See Joh 5:35.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Joh 5:31 . Justification of His witness to Himself from Joh 5:19 ff., intermingled with denunciation of Jewish unbelief (Joh 5:31-40 ), which Jesus continues down to Joh 5:47 .
The connection is not that Jesus now passes on to the which is due to Him (Joh 5:23 ), and demands faith as its true form (Luthardt), for the conception of does not again become prominent; but , , Euthymius Zigabenus. Comp. Chrysostom. Thus at the same time is solved the seeming contradiction with Joh 8:14 .
] emphatic: if a personal witness concerning myself only, and therefore not an attestation from another quarter. Comp. , Joh 5:32 .
.] i.e. formally speaking, according to the ordinary rule of law (Chetub. f. 23. 2 : “testibus de se ipsis non credunt,” and see Wetstein). In reality, the relation is different in Christ’s case, see Joh 8:13-16 ; but He does not insist upon this here, and we must not therefore understand His words, with Baeumlein, as if He said: . Chap. Joh 8:54-55 also, and 1Co 4:15 ; 1Co 13:1 , Gal 1:8 , are not conceived of in this way.
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
31 If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true.
Ver. 31. My witness is not true ] That is, fit, firm, valid, foro humano, Concessio rhetorica. Beza.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
31. ] This assertion is not to be trifled away by an accommodation, or supposed to be introduced by ‘ Ye will say to Me: ’ see by all means ch. Joh 8:12-14 and notes. The words are said in all earnestness, and are strictly true . If such a separation, and independent testimony, as is here supposed, could take place , it would be a falsification of the very conditions of the Truth of God as manifested by the Son, Who being the , speaks, not of himself, but of the Father. And in this sense ch. Joh 8:14 is eminently true also, the being the .
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Joh 5:31 . . Jesus anticipates the objection, that these great claims were made solely on His own authority [ , Euthym.]. The Jewish law is given by Wetstein, “Testibus de se ipsis non credunt,” or “Homo non est fide dignus de se ipso,” and cf. Deu 19:15 . The same law prevailed among the Greeks, (Demosth., De Cor. , 2), and among the Romans, “more majorum comparatum est, ut in minimis rebus homines amplissimi testimonium de sua re non dicerent” (Cicero, pro Roscio , 36, Wetstein). Grotius says: “Romani dicunt neminem idoneum testem esse in re sua”. But how can Jesus say that if His witness stands alone it is not true? Chrysostom says He speaks not absolutely but with reference to their suspicion [ ]. And on occasion He can maintain that His testimony of Himself is true, chap. Joh 8:13 , where He says “Though I witness of myself my witness is true,” and demands that He be considered one of the two witnesses required. Here the point of view is different, and He means: Were I standing alone, unauthenticated by the Father, my claims would not be worthy of credit. But (on the definite predicate with indefinite subject vide Winer, p. 136). “It is another that beareth witness of me,” namely, the Father [ , Cyril, Melanchthon, and the best modern interpreters, Holtzmann, Weiss, Westcott]. Grotius, following Chrysostom and Euthymius, says “facillimum est ut de Johanne sumamus, quia de eo sunt quae proxime sequuntur”. Against this is (1) the disclaimer of John’s testimony, Joh 5:34 ; (2) and especially the accentuated opposition of , Joh 5:33 , and , Joh 5:34 . For other reasons, see Lcke. Of this witness Jesus says . Why this addition? Is it an overflow of satisfaction in the unassailable position this testimony gives Him? Rather it is the offset to the supposition made in Joh 5:31 , “my witness is not true”. [Cyril’s interpretation is inexact, but suggestive: , , , , , .]
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Joh 5:31-47
31If I alone testify about Myself, My testimony is not true. 32There is another who testifies of Me, and I know that the testimony which He gives about Me is true. 33You have sent to John, and he has testified to the truth. 34But the testimony which I receive is not from man, but I say these things so that you may be saved. 35He was the lamp that was burning and was shining and you were willing to rejoice for a while in his light. 36But the testimony which I have is greater than the testimony of John; for the works which the Father has given Me to accomplish-the very works that I do-testify about Me, that the Father has sent Me. 37And the Father who sent Me, He has testified of Me. You have neither heard His voice at any time nor seen His form. 38You do not have His word abiding in you, for you do not believe Him whom He sent. 39You search the Scriptures because you think that in them you have eternal life; it is these that testify about Me; 40and you are unwilling to come to Me so that you may have life. 41I do not receive glory from men; 42but I know you, that you do not have the love of God in yourselves. 43I have come in My Father’s name, and you do not receive Me; if another comes in his own name, you will receive him. 44How can you believe, when you receive glory from one another and you do not seek the glory that is from the one and only God? 45Do not think that I will accuse you before the Father; the one who accuses you is Moses, in whom you have set your hope. 46For if you believed Moses, you would believe Me, for he wrote about Me. 47But if you do not believe his writings, how will you believe My words?
Joh 5:31 In the Old Testament there was a need for two witnesses to confirm a matter (cf. Num 35:30; Deu 19:15). In this context Jesus gives five witnesses to Himself.
1. the Father (Joh 5:32; Joh 5:37)
2. John the Baptist (Joh 5:33, cf. Joh 1:19-51)
3. Jesus’ own works (cf. Joh 5:36)
4. Scripture (cf. Joh 5:39)
5. Moses (cf. Joh 5:46) which reflects Deu 18:15-22
See Special Topic at Joh 1:8.
“If” This is a third class conditional sentence which speaks of potential action.
“My testimony is not true” This seems to contradict Joh 8:14. Context shows that these statements are made in different settings. Here Jesus shows how many other witnesses there are, but in Joh 8:14 He asserts that only His is necessary!
For “true” see Special Topic: Truth in John at Joh 6:55.
Joh 5:32 “There is another who testifies of Me” This refers to God the Father (cf. 1Jn 5:9) because of the use of the term allos, which means “another of the same kind” in contradistinction to heteros, which means “one of a different kind,” although this distinction was fading in Koine Greek. See SPECIAL TOPIC: WITNESSES TO JESUS at Joh 1:8.
Joh 5:33 “You have sent to John” This refers to John the Baptist (cf. Joh 1:19).
Joh 5:34 “I say these things so that you may be saved” This is an aorist passive subjunctive. The passive voice implies the agency of God or the Spirit (cf. Joh 6:44; Joh 6:65). Remember the Gospels are evangelistic proclamations (i.e., tracts), not historical biographies. There is an evangelistic purpose in all that was recorded (cf. Joh 20:30-31).
Joh 5:35 “he was the lamp” This is another emphasis on light, here John’s preparatory message(cf. Joh 1:6-8).
Joh 5:36 “the very works that I do-testify about Me” Jesus’ actions were fulfillments of OT prophecies about the Messiah. The Jews of His day should have recognized these miraculous signs-healing the blind, feeding the poor, restoring the lame (cf. Isa 29:18; Isa 32:3-4; Isa 35:5-6; Isa 42:7). The power of Jesus’ teachings, lifestyle righteousness, compassion, and mighty miracles (cf. Joh 2:23; Joh 10:25; Joh 10:38; Joh 14:11; Joh 15:24) bore a clear witness to who He was, where He came from, and Who sent Him.
Joh 5:37 “He has borne witness of Me” The “He” refers to the Father. In context this phrase seems to refer to OT Scripture (cf. Heb 1:1-3). This would involve all the Messianic references in the OT (cf. Joh 5:39).
“You have neither heard His voice at any time nor seen His form” Jesus was asserting that although the Jews should have known God through the Scriptures and personal experiences in worship, they did not really know Him at all (cf. Joh 8:43; Isa 1:1-15; Isa 6:9-10; Isa 29:13; Jer 5:21).
In the OT, seeing Deity was thought to bring death. The only person who spoke to YHWH face to face was Moses and even then the encounter was through the veil of the Cloud. Many have thought that Exo 33:23 contradicts Joh 1:18. However, the Hebrew terms in Exodus means “after glory,” not physical form.
Joh 5:38 “His word abiding in you” These are two powerful metaphors in John’s writings. God’s word (logos) must be received, once received (cf. Joh 1:12) it must remain (abide, cf. Joh 8:31; Joh 15:4-7; Joh 15:10; 1Jn 2:6; 1Jn 2:10; 1Jn 2:14; 1Jn 2:17; 1Jn 2:24; 1Jn 2:27-28; 1Jn 3:6; 1Jn 3:14-15; 1Jn 3:24). Jesus is God’s full revelation (cf. Joh 1:1-18; Php 2:6-11; Col 1:15-17; Heb 1:1-3). Salvation is confirmed by a continuing relationship (Hebrew sense of “know” cf. Gen 4:1; Jer 1:5) and the affirmation of gospel truths (Greek sense of “know” cf. 2Jn 1:9).
This term “abiding” is used in the sense of intimate, personal relationship with perseverance. Abiding is a condition of true salvation (cf. chapter 15) It is used in several senses in John.
1. the Son in the Father (cf. Joh 10:38; Joh 14:10-11; Joh 14:20-21; Joh 17:21)
2. the Father in the Son (cf. Joh 10:38; Joh 14:10-11; Joh 14:21; Joh 17:21; Joh 17:23)
3. believers in the Son (cf. Joh 14:20-21; Joh 15:5; Joh 17:21)
4. believers in the Son and the Father (cf. Joh 14:23)
5. believers in the word (cf. Joh 5:38; Joh 8:31; Joh 15:7; 1Jn 2:14).
See Special Topic at 1Jn 2:10.
Joh 5:39 “You search the Scriptures” This can be a present active indicative or a present active imperative. Since it is in a list of witnesses that the Jews had rejected it is probably an indicative.
Here is the tragedy of the Jewish leaders: they had the Scriptures, read them, studied them, memorized them, and yet missed the person to whom they point! Without the Spirit, even the Scriptures are ineffective! True life comes only through a personal, obedient faith relationship (i.e., Deu 4:1; Deu 8:13; Deu 30:15-20; Deu 32:46-47).
“these that testify about Me” This refers to the OT Scriptures, which Jesus fulfills (i.e., Joh 1:45; Joh 2:22; Joh 5:46; Joh 12:16; Joh 12:41; Joh 19:28; Joh 20:9). Most of the early sermons of Peter (cf. Act 3:18; Act 10:43) and Paul (cf. Act 13:27; Act 17:2-3; Act 26:22-23; Act 26:27) in Acts use fulfilled prophecy as an evidence of Jesus’ Messiahship. All but one passage (1Pe 3:15-16), which affirms the authority of Scripture found in the NT (cf. 1Co 2:9-13; 1Th 2:13; 2Ti 3:16; 1Pe 1:23-25; 2Pe 1:20-21), refer to the OT. Jesus clearly saw Himself as the fulfillment and goal (and proper interpreter, cf. Mat 5:17-48) of the OT.
SPECIAL TOPIC: THE KERYGMA OF THE EARLY CHURCH
Joh 5:41-44 These verses seem to reflect the fact that the Jewish religious leaders enjoyed the applause from their peers. They gloried in quoting rabbis from the past, but because of spiritual blindness they missed the greatest of all teachers, who was in their midst. This is one of Jesus’ strong denunciations of first-century rabbinical Judaism (also note the parable in Mat 21:33-46; Mar 12:1-12; Luk 20:9-19).
Joh 5:41
NASB, NRSV”I do not receive glory from men”
NKJV”I do not receive honor from men”
TEV”I am not looking for human praise”
NJB”Human glory means nothing to me”
The term “glory,” doxa, is difficult to translate consistently (see Special Topic at Joh 1:14). It reflects the Hebrew, “glory,” kabodh, which was used as a way to express God’s radiant, brilliant presence (cf. Exo 16:10; Exo 24:17; Exo 40:34; Act 7:2) and to praise and honor God for His character and acts. A good verse that combines these connotations is 2Pe 1:17.
This brilliant aspect of God’s very presence and character is related to
1. angels (cf. Luk 2:9; 2Pe 2:10)
2. supremacy to Jesus (cf. Joh 1:14; Joh 8:54; Joh 12:28; Joh 13:31; Joh 17:1-5; Joh 17:22; Joh 17:24; 1Co 2:8; Php 4:21)
3. derivatively to believers (cf. Rom 8:18; Rom 8:21; 1Co 2:7; 1Co 15:43; 2Co 4:17; Col 3:4; 1Th 2:12; 2Th 2:14; Heb 2:10; 1Pe 5:1; 1Pe 5:4)
It is also interesting to note that John refers to Jesus’ crucifixion as His being glorified (cf. Joh 7:39; Joh 12:16; Joh 12:23; Joh 13:31). However, it can also be translated as “honor” or “thanksgiving” (cf. Luk 17:18; Act 12:23; Rom 4:20; 1Co 10:31; 2Co 4:15; Php 1:11; Php 2:11; Rev 11:13; Rev 14:7; Rev 16:9; Rev 19:7). This is how it is used in this context.
Joh 5:43 “you do not receive Me” Throughout the Gospel of John, the focus of believing in Jesus is not a prescribed theological creed but a personal encounter with Him (i.e., Joh 5:39-40). Belief begins with a decision to trust Him. This starts a growing personal relationship of discipleship that culminates in doctrinal maturity and Christlike living.
“if another shall come in his own name” This is a third class conditional sentence.
“you shall receive him” This is a play on the rabbis’ study methods of comparing teachers from differing rabbinical schools from the Talmud.
Michael Magill, New Testament TransLine, has a good quote:
“The Jewish leaders will receive a human teacher or rabbi who does not claim to be sent by God. With a human teacher, they are in a reciprocal relationship of peers, exchanging glory on an equal basis. With a prophet sent from God, they must be in a subordinate position, hearing and obeying. This has always been at the root of why God’s prophets were rejected” (p. 318).
Joh 5:44 See note at Joh 17:3.
Joh 5:45-47 Jesus is asserting that the writings of Moses revealed Him. This is probably a reference to Deu 18:15-22. In Joh 5:45 Scripture is personified as an accuser. It was meant to be a guide (cf. Luk 16:31). The guide rejected, becomes an adversary (cf. Gal 3:8-14; Gal 3:23-29).
Joh 5:46-47 “if. . .if” Joh 5:46 is a second class conditional sentence called “contrary to fact,” which asserts that Jewish leaders did not truly believe even in Moses’ writings and that Jesus (the eschatological Moses [i.e., the Prophet of Deu 18:15-19]) would be their judge on the last day. The “if” of Joh 5:47 introduces a first class conditional sentence which is assumed to be true (NIV has “since”).
Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley
If. Assuming the condition, where experience will decide. App-118.
I. Emphatic = I alone.
bear witness. See note on Joh 1:7.
of = concerning. Greek. peri. App-104. The emphasis being on “Myself”. Greek. emautou.
witness. See note on Joh 1:7.
true. App-175. Referring to Deu 19:15. Compare Joh 8:14. See p. 1511.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
31.] This assertion is not to be trifled away by an accommodation, or supposed to be introduced by Ye will say to Me:-see by all means ch. Joh 8:12-14 and notes. The words are said in all earnestness, and are strictly true. If such a separation, and independent testimony, as is here supposed, could take place, it would be a falsification of the very conditions of the Truth of God as manifested by the Son, Who being the , speaks, not of himself, but of the Father. And in this sense ch. Joh 8:14 is eminently true also, the being the .
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Joh 5:31. ) if I alone. A condition impossible to occur; comp. ch. Joh 8:16, Yet if I judge, My judgment is true; for I am not alone, but I and the Father that sent Me, with Joh 5:13, The Pharisees said, Thou bearest record of Thyself; Thy record is not true.-) true witness, i.e. sure, incontrovertible.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
Joh 5:31
Joh 5:31
If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not true.-If he alone bears witness of himself, the witness is not to be accepted as true. This was also the law of Moses. Every charge was to be established in the mouth of two or three witnesses. (Num 35:30; Deu 19:15). That it does not mean the testimony is false is seen by a comparison with 8:14.
Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary
witness
Cf. Joh 8:14. In Joh 5:31 our Lord, defending His Messianic claims before Jews who denied those claims, accepts the biblical rule of evidence, which required “two witnesses”; Joh 8:17; Num 35:30; Deu 17:6. A paraphrase of verse Joh 5:31 would be: “If I bear witness of myself ye will say my witness is not true.” Cf. Joh 8:14.
Fuente: Scofield Reference Bible Notes
Joh 8:13, Joh 8:14, Joh 8:54, Pro 27:2, Rev 3:14
Reciprocal: Joh 3:11 – ye Joh 8:18 – and Joh 10:37 – General 1Jo 5:9 – we
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Son of God and God the Son
Joh 5:31-35
INTRODUCTORY WORDS
The greatest of all questions is the one suggested in the twenty-second chapter of Matthew: “What think ye of Christ? whose Son is He?” On a parallel with that question stands the one in Mat 16:1-28 : “Whom do men say that I the Son of Man am?” With those questions fully before us, let us remember a third question which was asked by Pilate: “What shall I do then with Jesus which is called Christ?”
It is the purpose to bring before you five outstanding witnesses to Jesus Christ. We want you to imagine yourself in a jury room, and then we wish to present our witnesses. If our witnesses prove to a conclusion that Jesus is the Christ, the Son of the Living God, that He is all that He claimed to be, then surely every honest and sincere heart will accept our witnesses, and bring in their verdict, accepting Jesus Christ as Son of God, and God the Son, their Saviour.
We remember very well how the multitude left Jesus as He told them that He was the Bread of Life; that His body was meat indeed, and His blood was drink indeed. After many of the people turned from Him and refused to follow further, the Lord addressed the twelve disciples, saying, “Will ye also go?” They immediately replied: “To whom shall we go? Thou hast the Words of eternal life.”
In each of the following five divisions we will bring before you one of these five witnesses. We trust that, if the witnesses prove that Christ is God, and that being God, He is the Saviour, that then each one will give Him the affiance of their heart, and the service of their life.
The one who knows that Christ is Divine, and yet refuses to follow Him; the one that acknowledges that Jesus is the Saviour, and yet refuses to trust Him, must, indeed, love darkness rather than light. Such an one must be classed among those of whom Jesus said, “Ye will not come to Me, that ye might have life.” “Ye have not the love of God in you.” “Ye believe not.” “Ye receive Me not.”
I. THE WITNESS OF JESUS CHRIST TO HIMSELF (Joh 5:31)
It is customary, before a jury, for the person on the witness stand to speak for himself. Nevertheless one’s own testimony would not be received unless it was backed by the testimony of other witnesses. Therefore, in bringing before you the witness of Jesus Christ, we know that it is a true witness; nevertheless, we ask you to consider the testimony of our other witnesses, before you give your verdict. Let us permit Jesus Christ to speak for Himself, step by step.
1. Christ’s assertion that He was God. The Lord Jesus said, in Joh 5:17, “My Father worketh hitherto, and I work. Therefore the Jews sought the more to kill Him, because He * * said also that God was His Father making Himself equal with God.”
When we heard a man saying that Jesus was the greatest man that ever lived, but that He was not God, we wondered wherein His greatness lay.
Was He great as a philanthropist? Did He endow colleges, or build hospitals, or do anything else in a marked way for His country or His fellow men? Was He great as a financier? Did He heap up money? Was He a successful business man? Did He rule in the realm of commerce? Was He great as a politician? Did He dominate senates and dictate policies to the children of men? Did every man who sought office, first secure His O. K.? Was He great as a painter, or a musician? Did He write His Name on the pinnacles of fame, as a Michael Angelo on the one hand, or a Beethoven on the other hand? Was Jesus great in the world as a writer? Did He write books? Did He startle the world with His poetry, or His rhythmic rhetoric?
Where was Jesus Christ great? He was great because He was God. Great in holiness. Great in majesty. Great in Deity. If you rob Him of His Deity, you leave Him despised and rejected of men. You leave Him nailed between two malefactors. You have Him with but a few hundred disciples as the result of His earthly life.
2. Christ’s assertion that He was One with the Father. The Lord Jesus Christ, in Joh 5:19, says: “The Son can do nothing of Himself, but what He seeth the Father do: for what things soever He doeth, these also doeth the Son likewise.” Jesus Christ, therefore, claimed to be one with the Father. He was so perfectly one, that He did only what the Father did. He spoke only what the Father spoke. His will was only the Father’s will. Surely this was a remarkable claim, and yet this is what Christ always taught. He said to the disciples, “Have I been so long time with you, and yet hast thou not known Me?” “He that hath seen Me hath seen the Father.”
The Word of God bears testimony that Jesus Christ was the declaration, or, the interpretation, of the Father. It says, “The * * Son, which is in the bosom of the Father, He hath declared Him.”
3. Christ’s assertion that He raised the dead, even as the Father raised them. He claimed not only to be the manifestation of the Father’s character, but also to do all the works which the Father did. He taught that the hour was coming when all that were in the graves would hear His voice and would come forth. He claimed that He was the Resurrection, and the Life. This is in line with the Word of God, which says that, Christ “shall descend from Heaven with a shout, * * and the dead in Christ shall rise first.”
4. Christ’s assertion that He should receive honor along with the Father. Joh 5:23 reads, “That all men should honour the Son, even as they honour the Father.” He even said, “He that honoureth not the Son honoureth not the Father.”
We desire to enter upon no tirade against any organization, and yet the organization which will eliminate the Son, must of necessity eliminate the Father. There is no man who can come unto the Father, apart from Christ; and there is no man that can honor or magnify the Father, apart from Christ.
5. Christ’s assertion that He had inherent life along with the Father. Here are His words, “As the Father hath life in Himself; so hath He given to the Son to have life in Himself.” All of us have life which is begotten. We have life which had a beginning”. Not so with Christ. He had life within Himself; He was the Author of life. He even said, “I am * * the Life.”
6. Christ’s assertion that all judgment was given unto Him. Here are His exact words, “And hath given Him authority to execute judgment also, because He is the Son of Man.”
The wicked in the day of tribulation will cry unto the rocks and mountains to fall upon them and hide them from the wrath of the Lamb, for the “great day of His wrath” will have come.
Is it not a striking fact, that the One who so tenderly said, “Come unto Me,” also said, “Depart from Me, ye cursed”? that the One who said, “I am * * the Life,” also said, “judgment is Mine”?
Thus we have laid before you, in brief, the witness of Jesus Christ to Himself. Our conclusion, as this witness leaves the stand, is that no man in the history of the wide, wide world ever made claims such as He made. No one ever said, “I am the Way.” None other ever said, “Whoso eateth My flesh, and drinketh My Blood, hath eternal life.” None other ever said, “Come unto Me, all ye * * and I will give you rest.” None other ever said, ” I am the Resurrection, and the Life.”
It is useless to cavil. Jesus Christ was either all that He claimed to be, or else He was the greatest religious impostor that ever lived on earth. For our part we accept His testimony. We bend the knee. We crown Him Lord of all.
II. THE WITNESS OF MAN (Joh 5:33)
We now bring before you the witness of one man, even John. We take him as a sample witness representing a large crowd. Representing, indeed, multiplied millions of men who have lived down through the ages, and have borne a like witness. Shall we let John speak for himself?
We will take his testimony from the first chapter of John.
1. John proclaimed a witness of the Light. Joh 5:6-7 and Joh 5:8 read, “There was a man sent from God, whose name was John. The same came for a witness, to bear witness of the Light, that all men through Him might believe. He was not that Light, but was sent to bear witness of that Light.” Jesus Christ was the “true Light, which lighteth every man that cometh into the world.” We wonder if John was ashamed to give testimony to the Lord Jesus? Let us look at our witness for a moment. He was a man of the wilderness. He came, preaching, near the Jordan. He did not go into the crowded thoroughfares of the city. He began to cry out, and men went to him. They came from all over Judaea. The great men, and the mighty men came. The plebians, the common people came. Herod, the tetrarch, came along with the rabble, to hear the testimony of John.
2. John’s witness of Christ-he proclaimed Christ’s eternity. Joh 5:15 says, “John bare witness of Him, and cried, saying, This was He of whom I spake, He that cometh after me is preferred before me: for He was before me.” We all know that, in actuality, as far as years are concerned, Jesus was not before John. John was six months the senior of Christ, as far as birth was concerned. What then is the meaning of John’s testimony, that Christ was before him? John was acclaiming Jesus Christ as the eternal Son. Jesus was before John, because He was before all men. Christ could say, “Before Abraham was, I am.” Yea, and He could say, “Before the day was, I am.” John knew this, and he spoke of Christ as the eternal One.
3. John proclaims himself the forerunner of Christ. As we think of this marvelous man, we should remember that Christ said of him, “Among those * * born of women there is not a greater Prophet than John the Baptist.” Yet, we take the word of John, when a delegation came down from Jerusalem to ask him, “Art thou Elias? And he saith, I am not. Art thou that Prophet? And he answered. No. Then said they unto him, Who art thou? * * What sayest thou of thyself?” This greatest of men said, and denied not, “I am the voice of one crying in the wilderness, Make straight the way of the Lord.”
“And they asked him, and said unto him, Why baptizest thou then, if them be not that Christ, nor Elias, neither that Prophet? John answered them, saying, I baptize with water: but there standeth One among you, whom ye know not; He it is, who coming after me is preferred before me, whose shoe’s latchet I am not worthy to unloose.” What a marvelous witness is John! The greatest born of woman confessed freely that he was not even worthy to unloose the latchet of the sandals of the Son of God.
4. John Proclaims Jesus Christ as the Lamb of God. In Joh 5:29 we read that when John saw Jesus, he said, “Behold the Lamb of God, which taketh away the sin of the world.” This is the testimony which John gave to Christ. He believed that the sacrificial Lamb had come. He believed that the One prophesied for 1500 years, in the shedding of the blood of the passover lamb, was now before them. But he went even farther than this. He said, when he saw the Holy Spirit descending, and remaining on Christ, that that Christ was the Son of God. Hear his own words, “And I saw, and bare record that this is the Son of God.” In other words, the Lamb of God, was, the Son of God.
III. THE WITNESS OF CHRIST’S WORKS (Joh 5:36)
Jesus Christ said that He had a greater witness than John. “For the works which the Father hath given Me to finish, the same works that I do, bear witness of Me, that the Father hath sent Me.”
We remember how Christ, when but a twelve-year-old lad, said unto His mother, who had sought Him sorrowing, “Wist ye not that I must be about My Father’s business?” We have already suggested in this study that Jesus did no mighty works along the lines of human accomplishment. We have shown that He was not great in the realm where other men count greatness. Yet, He wrought as no other man ever wrought, because He wrought where no man had ever wrought. He worked in the realm of the creative. Man works in the realm of the things that are made.
We know that all things were made by Christ. “AH things were made by Him; and without Him was not any thing made that was made.” Jesus Christ said of old, “Let there be light: and there was light.” He had said, “Let the earth bring forth,” and it brought forth. Jesus Christ, on earth, by His word turned water into wine. He stood by the dead daughter of Jairus, and speaking the word, she was restored to life. He stood by the bier of the son of the widow of Nain, and, likewise, quickened him. He stood by the grave of Lazarus, who had been four days dead, and said, “Lazarus, come forth.” Then Lazarus “came forth.”
Jesus Christ lay asleep in a ship. The disciples, who for the most part had been accustomed to the storms of Galilee, were filled with fear for the ship was about to sink. Peter went to the Lord, and, waking Him said; “Master, we perish.” With what quiet, unperturbed majesty did the Son of God step forth, saying, “Why are ye so fearful, O ye of little faith?” Then, lifting His hands, He said, “Peace, be still, * * and there was a great calm.” The disciples cried, “What manner of Man is this, that even the wind and the sea obey Him?”
When John the Baptist, from his prison, sent disciples to ask Christ if He was the Messiah, Christ said, “The blind receive their sight, and the lame walk, the lepers are cleansed, and the deaf hear, the dead are raised up, and the poor have the Gospel preached to them. And blessed is he, whosoever shall not be offended in Me.” Beloved, as we see the works of Christ’s earthly life, do they not bear witness of Him that He is the Son of God? His supreme work was the work of Calvary. It was there that He met principalities and powers and vanquished them, “making a show of them openly.” His supreme subsequent work, however, was that of the resurrection and ascension. His works have declared Him the Son of God.
IV. THE WITNESS OF THE FATHER (Joh 5:37)
We now come to our fourth witness, as God, Himself, clothed with majesty and power, steps upon the scene.
We have heard the testimony of Christ to Himself; we have heard the testimony of John, and the testimony of the works of the Lord. Now, the Father will add His voice.
1. The testimony at Christ’s birth. As the shepherds were watching their flocks by night, an angel from God bore witness, saying, “Behold * * unto you is born this day * * a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord.” The words spoken by angels are true and steadfast.
The angels not only gave testimony at Christ’s birth, but they gave testimony at His resurrection, as they sat upon the stone which they had rolled from the tomb. Again, the angels spoke at the ascension of Christ as they bore witness to the fact: “This same Jesus, * * shall so come in like manner as ye have seen Him go into Heaven.”
2. The testimony at Christ’s baptism. At first John would have hindered Jesus, but Christ said, “Suffer it to be so now.” Then John baptized Jesus, and as the Lord came forth from the waters, the heavens were opened, and the voice of God spoke saying, “This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.”
This witness of the Father was retrospective. It looked back over the thirty years which Christ had already lived among men, and endorsed Him.
This witness of the Father was perspective. It anticipated Christ’s march toward the Cross,-His death, burial, and resurrection, which Christ’s baptism prefigured, and endorsed it.
3. The testimony at Christ’s transfiguration. As Christ was on the mountain with Peter, and James, and John, Moses and Elias appeared with Him in glory, talking with Him of His decease which He should accomplish at Jerusalem.
It was then that the Father spoke from Heaven. Peter had suggested the building of three tabernacles, giving honor to Moses, to Elias, and to Christ. Then the Father said, “This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased; hear ye Him.”
The Father would not, for one moment, allow any equality of honor or of worship between Christ and earth’s greatest seers.
4. The testimony at the visit of the Greeks. The Greeks came saying, “Sir, we would see Jesus.” They came at the moment that Christ faced immediate crucifixion and rejection. Christ said, “What shall I say? Father, save Me from this hour: but for this cause came I unto this hour. Father, glorify Thy Name.”
Thus Jesus spoke, and then there came a voice from Heaven, saying, “I have both glorified it, and will glorify it again.”
Space will not permit further words, but we know that the Father gave indisputable testimony and witness to Christ.
V. THE WITNESS OF THE SCRIPTURES (Joh 5:39)
When Jesus walked along the road to Emmaus He began with Moses, and through all the Prophets He opened up unto two disciples, with whom He walked, all those things concerning Himself.
It would be a task far too great for this hour to give the testimony of the Word of God to the Son of God. We will only quote one passage of Scripture. It is found in the last chapter of the First Epistle of John, verse twenty.
“And we know that the Son of God is come, and hath given us an understanding, that we may know Him that is true, and we are in Him that is true, even in His Son Jesus Christ. This is the true God, and eternal life.”
AN ILLUSTRATION
Here is a testimony to Jesus Christ: “To the artist He is the Chief Cornerstone.
To the astronomer He is the Sun of Righteousness.
To the biologist He is the Life.
To the builder He is the Sure Foundation.
To the carpenter He is the Door.
To the doctor He is the Great Physician.
To the farmer He is the Sower and the Lord of the Harvest.
To the geologist He is the Rock of Ages.
To the horticulturist He is the True Vine.
To the judge He is the Righteous Judge, the Judge of all men.
To the newspaper man He is the Good Tidings of Great Joy.
To the philanthropist He is the Unspeakable Gift.
To the sculptor He is the Living Stone.
To the preacher He is the Word of God.”
-The Toronto Globe.
Now let us take the testimony of many saints:
TESTIMONY OF WITNESSES
“Who do men say that I * * am?”
“Pharisees, with what have ye to reproach Jesus?” “He eateth with publicans and sinners.” “And you, Caiaphas, what have you to say of Him?” “He is a blasphemer, because He said, Hereafter shall ye see the Son of Man sitting on the right hand of power, and coming in the clouds of heaven.” “Pilate, what is your opinion?” “I find no fault in this Man.” “And you, Judas, who have sold your Master for silver-have you some fearful charge to hurl against Him?” “I have sinned in that I have betrayed the innocent blood.” “And you, centurion and soldiers, who led Him to the cross, what have you to say against Him?” “Truly this was the Son of God.” “And you, demons?” “He is the Son of God.” “John Baptist, what think you of Christ?” “Behold the Lamb of God.” “And you, John the Apostle?” “He is the Bright and Morning Star.” “Peter, what say you of your Master?” “Thou art the Christ, the Son of the Living God.” “And you, Thomas?” “My Lord and my God.” “Paul. you have persecuted Him: what testify you against Him?” “I count all things but loss for the excellency of the knowledge of Christ Jesus my Lord.” “Angels of Heaven, what think ye of Jesus?” “Unto you is born * * a Saviour, which is Christ the Lord.” “And, Thou, Father in Heaven, who knowest all things!” “This is My beloved Son, in whom I am well pleased.”
-Evangelistic Messenger.
Fuente: Neighbour’s Wells of Living Water
1
Bear witness of myself. This means if His testimony is by itself, and not in harmony with that of his Father. That is why Jesus always worked in harmony with God, so that their united efforts would verify each other.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Joh 5:31. If I bear witness concerning myself, my witness is not true. The word I is emphatic,if it is I that bear witness. The words plainly mean I and I alone, for no one is discredited because he testifies to himself, although he is not credited if no other witness appears on his behalf. The Jews may have understood Jesus to mean: If I have no other witness to testify concerning me, my testimony cannot claim to be received. But there is more in His words. In the consciousness of oneness with the Father, He would say that if it were possible that His own witness should stand alone, unaccompanied by that of the Father, it would be self-convicted, would not be true: He, in making the assertion, would be false, for He is one with the Father, and His statement, as that of one who was false, would be false also. He must therefore show that the witness He bore to Himself was really borne to Him by the Father: the Fathers witness even the Jews will acknowledge to be true. To this, therefore, He proceeds.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Our blessed Saviour having produced these five foregoing arguments, to prove his unity in essence, and his equality in power, with the Father, comes now at the end of the chapter, to produce several testimonies for the proof of it: and the first of them is, the testimony of God his Father: There is another that beareth witness of me whose witness is true. Now the Father had lately, at Christ’s baptism, by a voice from heaven, declared him to be his beloved Son, in whom he was well pleased; which illustrious testimony, given to Christ, they had not regarded.
Learn hence, That as Christ came into the world in obedience to his Father, and to bear witness of him, and his testimony concerning his Son is undoubtedly true, and to be depended and rested upon: for we make the Father a liar, if we do not depend upon the record which he hath given of his Son.
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament
Joh 5:31-35. If I bear witness of myself my witness is not true Heylin and Wesley read, is not valid; Doddridge, is not [to be admitted as] true; and Campbell, is not to be regarded; observing, In every country, where there are standing laws, and a regular constitution, there is what is called a forensic, or judicial use of certain words, which differs considerably from familiar use. Thus the word , rendered a just person, (Mat 27:24,) seems to mean no more than, not guilty of the crime charged. The like holds of the word , (here rendered true,) which, when used in reference to the procedure in judicatories, denotes, not what is in itself true, but what is proved, or what is accounted legal proof. Thus it is said, that a mans testimony of himself is not true. A man may certainly give a true testimony of himself; but, in law, it is not evidence; and is therefore held as untrue. This sense of the word often occurs in this gospel. As if he had said, I have certainly entered a very high claim, and asserted my dignity in very strong terms, but I do not require any man to believe me merely on the authority of my own testimony. There is another that beareth witness of me A person of undoubted reputation and veracity. He refers to the testimony of John, given him in the hearing of their own deputies. But at the same time he observed, that the truth of his mission did not depend on human testimony, though it was given by one who was a burning and shining light, and in whom they greatly rejoiced, because the prophetic spirit, which had so long ceased, seemed to be again revived in him. For he proceeds; But I receive not Or, I have no need to receive; testimony from man: but these things Concerning John, whom ye yourselves reverence; I say, that ye may be saved Namely, from that destruction which John foretold would be the portion of those who should reject me. So really and seriously did Christ will their salvation. Yet they were not saved. Most, if not all of them, died in their sins. He was a burning and a shining light Inwardly burning with love and zeal; outwardly shining with all holiness. Some infer from this expression that the Baptist was now dead; yet he does not seem to have been killed till a little before the third passover. The reason is, the miracle of the loaves, performed in the desert of Bethsaida immediately after word was brought of Johns death, is said to have happened a little before that feast, Joh 6:4. If so, our Lords meaning is, that John was a burning and a shining light, not while he lay in prison, but while his ministry lasted; for during his imprisonment his light may be said to have been extinguished. Accordingly it is added, And ye were willing for a season , for an hour; to rejoice in his light Ye hearkened to him with great pleasure, till his credit was impaired in your estimation by his imprisonment. Or the meaning may be, that they did not continue long to manifest that regard for his preaching, which, at his first appearance, they seemed to promise; because his doctrine was too strict and severe to be approved of, or endured long by so carnal and worldly-minded a people.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
II. The testimony of the Father, in support of that which the Son renders to Himself: Joh 5:31-40.
Jesus had just ascribed to Himself marvelous works. Such declarations might provoke an objection among His hearers: All that which thou affirmest of thyself has no other guaranty than thine own word. Jesus acknowledges that His testimony has need of a divine sanction (Joh 5:31-35); and He presents it to His adversaries in a double testimony of the Father: 1. That of His miracles (Joh 5:36); 2. And that which is found from old time in the Scriptures (Joh 5:37-40).
ADDITIONAL NOTES BY THE AMERICAN EDITOR.
XXIX.
Vv. 31-40.
1. The presentation of the testimony on which He rests His claims is opened by Jesus with the words of Joh 5:31. These words must be interpreted in connection with Joh 8:14, and must therefore be understood as conveying the idea, that, if the only witness which He has to offer is His own, He is content to be judged by the ordinary rule. Such, however, is not the fact. He is supported by the testimony of another, and that other even God Himself. Being thus able to appeal to this highest of all testimony, He is also able to say (Joh 8:14) that, though in a given case He actually bears witness of Himself, the witness is nevertheless true.
2. That the of Joh 5:32 is God, and not John the Baptist, is indicated by the reference to THE testimony in Joh 5:36, which clearly points back to this verse, and by the evident parenthetical and subordinate character of the reference to John. This reference to John, however, is quite significant, especially in connection with the prominence given to John’s testimony in all the earlier part of this Gospel. The witness of John would have led these Jews to the truth, if they had suffered themselves to be influenced by it. It was a divinely-appointed testimonypreparatory and at the foundation. But it was not that on which Jesus rests and that which proves the truth. This latter is the testimony which comes from God only.
3. The testimony which comes from the Father is manifestly declared, in the first place, to be that of the miraculous works. Whether there are two other forms of testimony referred to, or only one, it is somewhat difficult to determine. That which is given in the Old Testament Scriptures is distinctly set forth; and this may, not improbably, be all that is intended by the words of Joh 5:37-40. It may be, however, that in Joh 5:37 there is a reference to something elsewhich, as it would seem, can be only the voice of God in the soul. The latter is favored by the fact that the direct mention of the Scriptures does not occur until Joh 5:39, and even an indirect allusion to them is not apparent until Joh 5:38. The words, Ye have neither heard his voice at any time, nor seen his form, may be regarded as pointing in the same direction. On the other hand, had this reference to the Divine voice in the human soul been intended, it would seem natural that it should have been brought out with greater fullness and clearness. On the whole, the reference to the testimony in the Scriptures may be regarded as covering all that is said in Joh 5:37 ff., and the words of Joh 5:37 b may be taken in a semi-figurative sense, as implying that they had not really recognized God in His true teaching and the pointing of His revelation towards the Messiah and the Messianic kingdom, when they read and searched the Old Testament writings.
4. The verb is, in all probability, an indicative. The development of the thought does not suggest a demand or exhortation, but a statement of their failure, through unwillingness, to appreciate the testimony of the book which they themselves were always looking into and the study of which they demanded.
5. The two testimonies which are here set forththe works and the Scripturesbear witness, the first as, in the strict sense, a which made known the power of God as possessed by Jesus; the second, as showing that the indications of the Old Testament all looked towards such a person and teaching and work as they now saw before them. To announce the coming of this Messianic era and the Messiah Himself, John the Baptist had appeared and given his witness to them. He had aroused their attention and interested their minds for the time. He had thus, as it were, opened the door for them to appreciate the new testimony presented in the works, and to understand fully the old testimony contained in the Scriptures. That they did not yield to the force of the testimony, either old or new, was indisputable proof that they had not the word of God abiding in themthat they had really never seen or known Him in His revelationsthat their will was not to receive the witness which was given.
Fuente: Godet Commentary (Luke, John, Romans and 1 Corinthians)
Verse 31
If I, &c.; meaning that such an objection might be advanced by his enemies.
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
5:31 If I bear witness of myself, my witness is not {p} true.
(p) Faithful, that is, worthy to be credited; see Joh 8:14 .
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
Jesus had said that the Son can do nothing independently of the Father (Joh 5:19; Joh 5:30). That includes even bearing witness. Jesus did not mean that if He said anything about Himself it must be false, though apparently some of the Jews thought He meant that (cf. Joh 8:13). He meant that the truthfulness of His claims about Himself did not rest on His own testimony exclusively. Jesus had said that He only said and did what the Father said and did. Therefore Jesus’ witness about Himself must reflect the Father’s witness about Him. The "another" that bore witness about Jesus was the Father. Jesus was not speaking of the Father’s witness as essentially different from His own witness. He viewed His own witness as simply an extension of the Father’s witness since He always faithfully represented the Father’s will. [Note: See Tenney, "Topics from . . .," pp. 229-41, "The Meaning of ’Witness’ in John."]
Some students of John’s Gospel have thought that Jesus contradicted what He said here in Joh 8:14, but there He was speaking about His personal knowledge as the basis for His testimony about Himself. Here He was speaking about the Father’s witness to His identity.
"The witness of the Father may not be acceptable to the Jews; it may not even be recognized by them. But it is enough for Jesus. He knows that this witness is ’true.’ . . . It is the witness of the Father and nothing else that brings conviction to him." [Note: Morris, p. 288.]