Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Acts 1:25
That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.
25. that he may take part ] The best MSS. read that he may take the place, &c. The Rec. Text has the same words here and in Act 1:17, as is represented in the A. V. A scribe remembering the former would easily assimilate the two places, and as the Greek word in Act 1:17 signifies lot, he might perceive a fitness in its use in this part of the narrative.
from which Judas by transgression fell ] Better, from which Judas fell away. The Gk. has only a verb which literally = transgressed.
that he might go to his own place ] He had been chosen into one place by Jesus, but had made another choice for himself, which had ended in destruction. That “his own place” when thus used was, to the Jewish mind, an equivalent for Gehenna = the place of torment, may be seen from the Baal Haturim on Num 24:25, where it is said “Balaam went to his own place, i.e. to Gehenna.” A like expression is found concerning Job’s friends, Midrash Rabbah on Ecc 7:1.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
That he may take part of this ministry – The word rendered part – kleron – is the same which in the next verse is rendered lots. It properly means a lot or portion the portion divided to a man, or assigned to him by casting lots; and also the instrument or means by which the lot is determined. The former is its meaning here; the office, or portion of apostolic work, which would fall to him by taking the place of Judas.
Ministry and apostleship – This is an instance of the figure of speech hendiadys, when two words are used to express one thing. It means the apostolic ministry. See instances in Gen 1:14, Let them be for signs and for seasons, that is, signs of seasons; Act 23:6, Hope and resurrection of the dead, that is, hope of the resurrection of the dead.
From which Judas by transgression fell – Literally, went aside – parebe – as opposed to the idea of adhering faithfully to the character and service which his apostleship required of him (Prof. Hackett). The transgression referred to was his treason and suicide.
That he might go to his own place – These words by different interpreters have been referred both to Matthias and Judas. Those who refer them to Matthias say that they mean that Judas fell that Matthias might go to his own place, that is, to a place for which he was suited, or well qualified. But to this there are many objections:
1. The apostolic office could with no propriety be called, in reference to Matthias, his own place, until it was actually conferred upon him.
2. There is no instance in which the expression to go to his own place is applied to a successor in office.
3. It is not true that the design or reason why Judas fell was to make way for another. He fell by his crimes; his avarice, his voluntary and enormous wickedness.
4. The former part of the sentence contains this sentiment: Another must be appointed to this office which the death of Judas has made vacant. If this expression, that he might go, etc., refers to the successor of Judas, it expresses the same sentiment, but more obscurely.
5. The obvious and natural meaning of the phrase is to refer it to Judas. But those who suppose that it refers to Judas differ greatly about its meaning. Some suppose that it refers to his own house, and that the meaning is, that he left the apostolic office to return to his own house; and they appeal to Num 24:25. But it is not true that Judas did this; nor is there the least proof that it was his design. Others refer it to the grave, as the place of man, where all must lie; and particularly as an ignominious place where it was proper that a traitor like Judas should lie. But there is no example where the word place is used in this sense, nor is there an instance where a man, by being buried, is said to return to his own or proper place. Others have supposed that the manner of his death by hanging is referred to as his own or his proper place. But this interpretation is evidently an unnatural and forced one. The word place cannot be applied to an act of self-murder. It denotes habitation, abode, situation in which to remain; not an act. These are the only interpretations of the passage which can be suggested, except the common one of referring it to the abode of Judas in the world of woe. This might be said to be his own, as he had prepared himself for it, and as it was proper that he who betrayed his Lord should dwell there. This interpretation may be defended by the following considerations:
1. It is the obvious and natural meaning of the words. It commends itself by its simplicity and its evident connection with the context. It has in all ages been the common interpretation; nor has any other been adopted, except in cases where there was a theory to be defended about future punishment. Unless people had previously made up their minds not to believe in future punishment, no one would ever have thought of any other interpretation. This fact alone throws strong light on the meaning of the passage.
2. It accords with the crimes of Judas, and with all that we know of him. What the future doom of Judas would be was not unknown to the apostles. Jesus Christ had expressly declared this – it had been good for that man if he had not been born; a declaration which could not be true if, after any limited period of suffering, he was at last admitted to eternal happiness. See Mat 26:24, and the notes on that place. This declaration was made in the presence of the eleven apostles, at the institution of the Lords Supper, and at a time when their attention was absorbed with deep interest in what Christ said; and it was therefore a declaration which they would not be likely to forget. As they knew the fate of Judas beforehand, nothing was more natural for them than to speak of it familiarly as a thing which had actually occurred when he betrayed his Lord and hung himself.
3. The expression to go to his own place is one which is used by the ancient writers to denote going to an eternal destiny. Thus, the Jewish Tract, Baal Turim, on Num 24:25, says, Balaam went to his own place, that is, to Gehenna, to hell. Thus, the Targum, or Chaldee Paraphrase on Ecc 6:6, says, Although the days of a man’s life were two thousand years, and he did not study the Law, and do justice, in the day of his death his soul shall descend to hell, to the one place where all sinners go. Thus, Ignatius in the Epistle to the Magnesians says, Because all things have an end, the two things death and life shall lie down together, and each one shall go to his own place. The phrase his own place means the place or abode which was suited for him, which was his appropriate home.
Judas was not in a place which befitted his character when he was an apostle; he was not in such a place in the church; he would not be in heaven. Hell was the only place which was suited to the man of avarice and of treason. And if this be the true interpretation of this passage, then it follows:
1. That there will be such a thing as future, eternal punishment. There is certainly one man in hell, and ever will be. If there is one there, for the same reason there may be others. All objections to the doctrine are removed by this single fact; and it cannot be true that all people will be saved.
2. Each individual in eternity will find his own proper place. The punishment of hell is not an arbitrary appointment. Every man will go to the place for which his character is suited. The hypocrite is not suited for heaven. The man of pride, and avarice, and pollution, and falsehood, is not suited for heaven. The place adapted to such people is hell; and the design of the judgment will be to assign to each individual his proper abode in the eternal world. It would not be fit that the holy and pure should dwell forever in the same place with the unholy and impure; and the Lord Jesus will come to assign to each his appropriate eternal habitation.
3. The sinner will have no cause of complaint. If he is assigned to his proper place, he cannot complain. If he is unfit for heaven, he cannot complain that he is excluded. And if his character and feelings are such as make it proper that he should find his eternal abode among the enemies of God, then he must expect that a God of justice and equity will assign him such a doom. But,
4. This will not alleviate his pain; it will deepen his woe. He will have the eternal consciousness that that, and that only, is his place – the abode for which he is suited. The prison is no less dreadful because a man is conscious that he deserves it. The gallows is not the less terrible because the man knows that he deserves to die. And the consciousness of the sinner that he is unfit for heaven; that there is not a solitary soul there with whom he could have sympathy or friendship; that he is fit for hell, and hell only, will be an ingredient of eternal bitterness in the cup of woe that awaits him. Let not the sinner then hope to escape; for God will assuredly appoint his residence in that world to which his character here is adapted.
The character and end of Judas is one of the most important and instructive things in history. It teaches us:
1. That Christ may employ wicked men for important purposes in his kingdom. See the notes on Act 1:17. He does no violence to their freedom; he permits them to act as they please, but brings important ends out of their conduct. One of the most conclusive arguments for the pure character of Jesus Christ is drawn from the silent testimony of Judas.
2. The character of Judas was eminently base and wicked. He was influenced by one of the worst human passions; and yet he concealed it from all the apostles. It was remarkable that any man should have thought of making money in such a band of men; but avarice will show itself everywhere.
3. We see the effects of covetousness in the church. It led to the betraying of Jesus Christ, and to his death; and it has often betrayed the cause of pure religion since. There is no single human passion that has done so much evil in the church of God as this. It may be consistent with external decency and order, and in accordance with the principles on which the world acts, and which it approves, and it may therefore be indulged without disgrace, while open and acknowledged vices would expose their possessors to shame and ruin. And yet it paralyses and betrays religion probably more than any single propensity of man.
4. The character of an avaricious man in the church will be developed. Opportunities will occur when it will be seen and known by what principle he is influenced. So it was with Achan Jos 7:21; so it was with Judas; and so it will be with all. Occasions will occur which will test the character, and show what manner of spirit a man is of. Every appeal to a mans benevolence, every call upon his charity, shows what spirit influences him – whether he is actuated by the love of gold, or by the love of Christ and his cause.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Verse 25. That he may take part of this ministry, c.] Instead of , the lot, which we translate part, , the place, is the reading of ABC*, Coptic, Vulgate, and the Itala in the Codex Bezae, and from them the verse may be read thus, That he may take the place of this ministry and apostleship, (from which Judas fell) and go to his own place but instead of , own, the Codex Alexandrinus, and one of Matthai’s MSS., read , just-that he might go to his just or proper place.
This verse has been variously expounded:
1. Some suppose that the words, that he might go to his own place, are spoken of Judas, and his punishment in hell, which they say must be the own place of such a person as Judas.
2. Others refer them to the purchase of the field, made by the thirty pieces of silver for which he had sold our Lord. So he abandoned the ministry and apostolate, that he might go to his own place, viz. that which he had purchased.
3. Others, with more seeming propriety, state that his own place means his own house, or former occupation; he left this ministry and apostleship that he might resume his former employment in conjunction with his family, c. This is primarily the meaning of it in Nu 24:25: And Balaam returned to HIS OWN PLACE, i.e. to his own country, friends, and employment.
4. Others think it simply means the state of the dead in general, independently of either rewards or punishments as is probably meant by Ec 3:20: All go unto ONE PLACE: all are of the dust, and all turn to dust again.
But, 5. Some of the best critics assert that the words (as before hinted) belong to Matthias-his own place being the office to which he was about to be elected. Should any object, this could not be called his own place, because he was not yet appointed to it, but hell might be properly called Judas’s own place, because, by treason and covetousness, he was fully prepared for that place of torment, it may be answered, that the own or proper place of a man is that for which he is eligible from being qualified for it, though he may not yet possess such a place: so St. Paul, Every man shall receive HIS OWN reward, , called there his own, not from his having it already in possession, for that was not to take place until the resurrection of the just; but from his being qualified in this life for the state of glory in the other. See the observations at the end of the chapter. See Clarke on Ac 1:26.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Ministry and apostleship, klhron, or every ones station in the world, is ordered by the providence of God, and their part or portion is assigned to them; and so the apostleship was unto the apostles.
His own place; hell, or destruction, not intended by Judas, but righteously by God appointed for him: whilst he was in the world (especially after his betraying of our Saviour) he was a usurper in it; and as bad as the world was, it was too good for him. That these words should be understood of Matthiass succeeding to the apostleship of Judas as into his own place, is the less probable, because as yet he was not chosen into it.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
25. that he might go to his ownplaceA euphemistic or softened expression of the awful futureof the traitor, implying not only destined habitation but congenialelement.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship,…. Of the ministry of the apostles, or of the apostolical ministration; which lay in preaching the Gospel, administering ordinances, planting churches, and working miracles; and which part, lot, or inheritance, Judas had; see Ac 1:17.
And from which Judas by transgression fell; by betraying his Lord, whose apostle he was, he was turned out of his office, and had no longer part in the apostolical ministry:
that he might go to his own place; which may be understood of Judas, and of his going to hell, as the just punishment of his sin; which is commonly so called by the Jews, who often explain this phrase, “his place”, by hell; as when it is said of Laban, Ge 31:55 that he “returned to his place”, it intimates, say they d, that he returned to his place, which was prepared for him in hell; and so likewise when it is said of Balaam, Nu 24:25 that he “returned to his place”, they observe e, that
“he did not return from his evil way, but returned to his place; and so intimates by saying, to his place, that which was prepared for him in hell, as the Rabbins of blessed memory say f; “they came everyone from his own place”, Job 2:11 a man from his house, a man from his country it is not written, but a man from his place, which was prepared for him in hell; and because they came to show mercy to Job, they were delivered from hell, and became worthy of the world to come; and so here, and “he returned to his place”, , “which was prepared for him in hell”.”
And another of their writers g, on the same passage, has this remark, and he returned to his place, and he does not say,
“he went on his way, for he was driven out of his way, and went down to hell.”
And agreeably to what is said of Job’s friends, the Targumist on Job 2:11 paraphrases the words thus;
“and there came a man, or everyone from his place, and by this merit they were delivered from the place, prepared for them in hell.”
And which place the same Targumist on Job 8:4 calls , “the place of their rebellion”; that is, procured by it: and so Judas’s own place was what he had merited by his sin, and was righteously appointed for him; and though it was not peculiar to him, but common to all impenitent sinners, yet very proper for him, as a betrayer; for it is a settled point with the Jews h, that
“he that betrays an Israelite into the hands of the Gentiles (so Judas betrayed his master), whether in his body, or in his substance, has no part in the world to come.”
This clause is by some understood not of Judas, but of Matthias, or of him that was to come in the room of Judas; and by “his own place” it is thought is meant, the “part of the ministry and apostleship”, in the former clause, and which the Alexandrian copy reads, “the place of this ministry”, he was to take; and now Judas by his iniquity falling from it, made way for another, for Matthias to go to his own place, which God had in his counsel and purposes designed for him; or “into his place”, as the Syriac and Arabic versions render it; that is, into the place of Judas, to take his place among the apostles, in his room and stead: the Alexandrian copy reads, “into that righteous place”.
d Tzeror Hammor, fol. 43. 2. e Ib. fol. 127. 1. f Vid. Midrash Kohelet, fol. 74. 3. g Baal Hatturim in Numb. xxiv. 25. h Maimon. Hilchot Chobel, &c. c. 8. sect. 9.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Apostleship (). Jesus had called the twelve apostles. An old word for sending away, then for a release, then the office and dignity of an apostle (Acts 1:25; Rom 1:5; 1Cor 9:2; Gal 2:8).
To his own place ( ). A bold and picturesque description of the destiny of Judas worthy of Dante’s Inferno. There is no doubt in Peter’s mind of the destiny of Judas nor of his own guilt. He made ready his own berth and went to it.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
That he may take part [ ] . Lit., to take the lot. But the best texts read ton topon, the place. Rev., to take the place. By transgression fell [] . See on trespasses, Mt 6:14. The rendering of the A. V. is explanatory. Rev., better, fell away.
His own place. Compare “the place in this ministry.” Ton idion, his own, is stronger than the simple possessive pronoun. It is the place which was peculiarly his, as befitting his awful sin – Gehenna.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship,” (labein ton topon tes diakonias tautes kai apostoles) “To take the place of this common ministry, even an apostleship,” a position of appointed oversight in spiritual matters of council, teaching, and preaching appointed for the twelve Apostles, by our Lord, Mat 10:1-42.
2) “From which Judas by transgression fell,” (aph’ es parebe loudas) “From which (lofty office) Judas (the Iscariot) fell,” Act 1:16-20. He had held the bag (the money) received by the Lord and other apostles in their itinerary work. His greed, stealing, and avarice grew worse and worse until he finally betrayed the Lord for the thirty pieces of silver, Joh 12:6; Joh 13:29; Mat 27:3-10.
3) “That he might go to his own place,” (pore uthena i eis ton topon ton idion) “To go on to the place of his own,” of his own choosing, of his own accord, of his own chosen destination, to eternal destruction, without excuse; a guilty conscience must eventually find either hell or pardon, Pr 291; Ro 21; Joh 17:12.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
25. (75) Of the ministry and apostleship. Because the word ministry was base, he addeth apostleship, wherein there is greater dignity; although the sense shall be more plain if you expound it, “the ministry of the apostleship.” For the figure hypallage is common in the Scriptures. Assuredly Luke meant to join with the burden the excellency of the office, that it might have the greater reverence and authority; and yet this was his intent also, to declare that the apostles are called unto a painful function.
(75) There is here a transposition in the translation. The 26 verse precedes the 25.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(25) That he may take part of this ministry.Better, the portion, or the lot, so as to give the word (cleros, as in Act. 1:17) the same prominence in English as it has in the Greek.
From which Judas by transgression fell.The last three words are as a paraphrase of the one Greek verb. Better, fell away.
That he might go to his own place.Literally, as the verb is in the infinitive, to go to his own place. The construction is not free from ambiguity, and some interpreters have referred the words to the disciple about to be chosen, to go to his own place in the company of the Twelve. If we connect them, as seems most natural, with Judas, we find in them the kind of reserve natural in one that could neither bring himself to cherish hope nor venture to pronounce the condemnation which belonged to the Searcher of hearts. All that had been revealed to him was, that it had been good for that man if he had not been born (Mar. 14:21).
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
25. Part The best readings would substitute place for part here. And then we seem to have a sort of antithesis. The new apostle elect must take place in the apostleship that Judas may go to his own place.
His own place Of the different interpretations of this phrase (which may be found in Clarke on the passage) but one possesses the slightest probability. Judas had fallen from what was not his place to go to the place which belongs to final apostates, hell. Kuinoel abundantly proves this by examples from Jewish classic and apostolic authors. Thus, upon Num 24:25, one Jewish writer thus comments: “Balaam went to his own place, that is, Gehenna,” [hell.] The Targum on Ecc 6:6, says, “On the day of his death his soul descended into Gehenna, into the single place, where all sinners go.” St. Ignatius, in his Epistle to the Magnesians, says, “When things have come to an end, there occur two ways, death and life, and each one will go to his own place.” Clement, Bishop of Rome, says of Peter, “Having suffered many labours, and so suffered martyrdom, he went to the due place of glory.” Thus every person in this world of probation has his own place in the world of retribution; a place made his own by his own conduct and character.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Act 1:25. That he might go to his own place. That is, to the place and state of lost souls. It was a maxim among the Jews, “He who betrayeth an Israelite, shall have no part in the world to come.” The term his own place, or his due or appointed place, was very frequently used by the primitive Christians, who meant thereby to express a man’s going presently after death into his proper place and state of happiness or misery. In the epistle ascribed to Barnabas, it is said, that good men go to the place appointed for them; and Clemens Romanus observes, that St. Peter suffered martyrdom, and went into the place of glory which was due to him, that is, his own, through the Blood of Christ. Ignatius says, “all things have an end; death and life are set before us, and every one must go unto his own place.” Compare with this, what our Lord himself had said of Judas, Mat 26:24. Joh 6:70-71; Joh 17:12. The word rendered part is , which signifies a lot, and may refer to the lots mentioned in the next verse.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
25 That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression fell, that he might go to his own place.
Ver. 25. Go to his own place ] A place of his own providing; and that he had purchased with that wages of wickedness, Act 1:18 . Bellarmine tells us of a desperate advocate in the court of Rome, who being exhorted on his death bed to make his peace with God, made this speech to him; Lord, I have a word to say to thee, not for myself, but for my wife and children, Ego enim propero ad inferos, neque est ut aliquid pro me agas; for I am hasting to hell, neither is there anything that I would beg of thee in my own behalf. And this he spake, saith Bellarmine (who was by the while), as boldly and without fear, as if he had been but to take his journey only to some near neighbouring village.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
25. ] is from internal evidence, as well us manuscript authority, the preferable reading. It has been altered to to suit Act 1:17 .
, implying the active duties; , the official dignity of the office: no figure of .
] With the reading before, I think these words may be interpreted two ways: 1. that Judas deserted this our , our office and ministry, to go to his own , that part which he had chosen for himself, viz. the office and character of a traitor and enemy of God; 2. regarding the former word as being selected to correspond to the more proper and dreadful use of the word here , that Judas deserted his , his appointed place, here among us, that he might go to his own appointed elsewhere , viz. among the dead in the place of torment . Of these two interpretations, I very much prefer the second, on all accounts; as being more according to the likely usage of the word, and as more befitting the solemnity of such a prayer. At the same time, no absolute sentence is pronounced on the traitor, but that dark surmise expressed by the euphemism . ., which none can help feeling with regard to him. To refer the words . . . . ., to the successor of Judas (Knatchbull, Hammond, al.), ‘ ut occupet locum ipsi a Deo destinatum ,’ (1) is contrary to the form of the sentence, which would require ; (2) is inconsistent with the words . . . ., which are unexampled in this sense; (3) would divest a sentence, evidently solemn and pregnant, of all point and meaning, and reduce it to a mere tautology. It appears to have been very early understood as above; for Clement of Rome says of Peter (1Co 5 ), , an expression evidently borrowed from our text. Lightf., Hor. Hebr. in loc., quotes from the Rabbinical work Baal turim on Num 24:25 , ‘Balaam ivit in locum suum, i.e. in Gehennam.’
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Act 1:25 . : R.V. marking the antithesis between the place in the Apostleship and “his own place” to which Judas had gone, Vulg. locum . : as above we have not only the word used but also , Act 5:17 ; Act 5:20 , so here too we have not only but also , although no doubt there is a sense in which we may truly say with Dr. Hort ( Ecclesia , p. 204) that Apostleship is the highest form of ministration. On the word see Act 13:2-3 ; the term was undoubtedly used in N.T. to include others besides the Twelve, although there is no reason to suppose that the qualification of having “seen the Lord” was in any case invalidated ( cf. Gwatkin, “Apostle,” Hastings’ B.D., p. 126). The whole narrative before us which relates the solemn appeal of the Church to her Ascended Lord, and the choice determined upon in immediate sequence to that appeal, is clearly at variance with any conception of Apostleship as other than a divine commission received directly from Christ Himself (Moberly, Ministerial Priesthood , p. 130). , “fell away,” R.V. cf. LXX Exo 32:8 , , so Deu 9:12 ; Deu 17:20 , ( cf. Act 28:14 , A.), so the Heb. followed by . A.V. following Tyndall renders “by transgression fell,” which lays too much stress upon “fell,” which is not the prominent notion of the Greek verb, elsewhere “transgressed” (Humphry on Revised Version , p. 188 on ). in the sense of social position, dignity, see Sir 12:12 , and also Deissmann, Neue Bibelstudien , p. 95, of succeeding to the vacant place caused by death in a religious community. Here the phrase is usually explained as the place of punishment, Gehenna, cf. Baal Turim on Num 24:25 (and Gen 31:55 ) “Balaam ivit in locum suum,” i.e. , Gehenna, Lightfoot, Hor. Heb. , while on the other hand Schttgen sees no need to explain the expression in this way. In each of the passages in the O.T. the word does not occur in the LXX, although in the still more fanciful comment of the Rabbis on Job 2:11 , we have . That the phrase may be used in a good or bad sense is plain from Ignat., Magn. , v., in a passage which is naturally referred to the verse before us, where a man’s “own place” denotes the place of reward, or that of punishment, cf., e.g. , , Polycarp, Phil. , ix., where the words refer to the martyrs who were with the Lord, and . said of St. Peter, Clem. Rom., Cor [112] v. Nsgen argues, Apostelgeschichte , pp. 88, 89, that we are not justified in concluding from a few Rabbinical passages which contain such fanciful interpretations of simple words ( cf. the comment on Job 2:11 , quoted by Wetstein) that St. Peter must have meant “Gehenna”. In his wilful fall from the place chosen for him by God, Judas had chosen in self-will , and this wilful and deliberate choice St. Peter would emphasise in contrast to the about to be bestowed, Act 1:25 (see also Rendall, Acts , p. 174). But however this may be, the words may well indicate a reserve on the part of St. Peter in speaking of the fate and destiny of Judas, characteristic of his reference to him cf. note on Act 1:16 . None of the other explanations offered can be deemed satisfactory, as, e.g. , that the word . . . refers to the successor of Judas; that Matthias should undertake the Apostolic circuit assigned to Judas (so Oecumenius, and amongst English commentators, Hammond); or, that the words refer to the house or home of Judas, or to his association with the Pharisees, or to his suicide and dishonoured burial, or to the mentioned above. Spitta, amongst recent commentators, stands almost alone in referring the words back to Act 1:16 , and holds that they refer to the position of Judas as the guide to those who took Jesus. The sense of the passage is expressed in the reading of A instead of .
[112] Corinth, Corinthian or Corinthians.
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
take part = receive the lot. Greek. kleros.
this ministry, &c. = this apostolic ministry. Figure of speech Hendiadys. App-6.
apostleship. Greek. apostole. Only here, Rom 1:5. 1Co 9:2. Gal 1:2, Gal 1:8.
from. App-104. but texts read apo.
by transgression fell = transgressed. App-128.
that he might = to.
his own. Same word as “proper”, Act 1:19.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
25.] is from internal evidence, as well us manuscript authority, the preferable reading. It has been altered to to suit Act 1:17.
, implying the active duties; , the official dignity of the office:-no figure of .
] With the reading before, I think these words may be interpreted two ways: 1. that Judas deserted this our , our office and ministry, to go to his own , that part which he had chosen for himself, viz. the office and character of a traitor and enemy of God; 2. regarding the former word as being selected to correspond to the more proper and dreadful use of the word here, that Judas deserted his , his appointed place, here among us, that he might go to his own appointed elsewhere, viz. among the dead in the place of torment. Of these two interpretations, I very much prefer the second, on all accounts; as being more according to the likely usage of the word, and as more befitting the solemnity of such a prayer. At the same time, no absolute sentence is pronounced on the traitor, but that dark surmise expressed by the euphemism . ., which none can help feeling with regard to him. To refer the words . . . . ., to the successor of Judas (Knatchbull, Hammond, al.), ut occupet locum ipsi a Deo destinatum, (1) is contrary to the form of the sentence, which would require ; (2) is inconsistent with the words . …, which are unexampled in this sense; (3) would divest a sentence, evidently solemn and pregnant, of all point and meaning, and reduce it to a mere tautology. It appears to have been very early understood as above; for Clement of Rome says of Peter (1 Corinthians 5), , an expression evidently borrowed from our text. Lightf., Hor. Hebr. in loc., quotes from the Rabbinical work Baal turim on Num 24:25,-Balaam ivit in locum suum, i.e. in Gehennam.
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Act 1:25. , to his own place) to the place altogether peculiar to him, and distinct from that of the other apostles, [or even distinct from the rest of those who perish.-V. g.] He had sought , a something peculiarly his own property: Act 1:18, the field: he obtained his own place, which escapes [falls not under] the eyes of survivors, viz. a place in the region of death.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
transgression
Sin. (See Scofield “Rom 3:23”).
Fuente: Scofield Reference Bible Notes
he may: Act 1:17, Act 1:20
from: Act 1:16-21, Psa 109:7, Mat 27:3-5
by: 1Ch 10:13, 1Ch 10:14, 2Pe 2:3-6, Jud 1:6, Jud 1:7
go: Mat 25:41, Mat 25:46, Mat 26:24, Joh 6:70, Joh 6:71, Joh 13:27, Joh 17:12
Reciprocal: Job 20:11 – which shall lie Job 36:20 – cut Job 40:12 – in Psa 55:15 – them Psa 63:9 – go Psa 101:7 – He that worketh Psa 109:18 – so let Pro 29:1 – General Ecc 3:21 – knoweth Mat 10:4 – and Mar 3:14 – he ordained Mar 14:21 – but Luk 6:16 – Judas Iscariot Luk 9:25 – what Luk 22:28 – General Act 26:16 – a minister Rom 1:5 – apostleship 1Co 1:1 – an 1Co 9:27 – a castaway 2Co 2:11 – General Eph 4:12 – the work Col 1:23 – whereof 1Th 5:9 – not Rev 12:8 – their
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
5
Ministry is from DIAKONIA, and its general meaning is “service.” The word will apply to anyone and to any activity that is of service to the Cause of Christ. The apostleship was a specific service to be administered only by those qualified and authorized to do it. Judas fell from his position as apostle by transgression, hence was responsible for his actions. His own place meant perdition according to Joh 17:12.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Act 1:25. That he may take part of this ministry and apostleship. The word (clerus), translated part, better perhaps the place, signifies(1) a lot, (2) anything assigned by lot; for instance, an allotment of land, or an official position. So Israel is termed the inheritance, the lot, or the portion of the Lord out of the tribes of the earth (Deu 9:29, LXX.). Jerome tells us that out of the whole body of Christians, Gods ministers were called Clerici, either because they are the lot and portion of the Lord, or because the Lord is their lotthat is, their inheritance. The early history and associations which cluster round the well-known terms clergy, clergyman, clerk, clerical, most be looked for, in the first instance, in the various uses and meanings of this word.
That he might go to his own place. These strange words which close the traitors gloomy story can convey no other possible sense than that Judas had gone to a place of condemnation. The phrase, to go to ones own place, was a known and received phrase in the Apostolic Age, and signified a mans going presently after death into his proper placea state either of happiness or misery, according to the life he had before lived while on earth (see Bishop Bulls Works, vol. i. Sermon ii.). Polycarp (Ep. ad Phil.) speaks of apostles and martyrs of that age being with their Lord in their due place. Clement of Rome writes of St. Peter, Having suffered martyrdom, he went to his due place of glory. Ignatius (Ep. ad Magnes.) tells us how two things are together set before uslife and death, and every one shall go to his own place. A rabbinical work (Baal Turim on Num 24:25) interprets with the same mournful interpretation an expression used of one who, like Judas, had been placed in a position which connected him in a peculiar manner with God. Balaam went to his placethat is, to Gehenna
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
See notes on verse 23
Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)
25. To receive a place of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas departed to go into his own place. So long as Judas was true to the ministry and apostleship of our Lord, he enjoyed a place in the kingdom of God. Unfortunately, Satan pulls and pulls incessantly on the mighty Archimedian lever of money-love, till he finally maneuvers to tilt him away from the safe anchorage of our Lords ministry and apostleship, the divine image evanescing from his heart and the Heavenly Dove retreating away. Then Satan comes in and pollutes his spirit through and through, obliterating every trace of heavenly congeniality and fitting him only for hell. Just as Holiness gravitates all its possessors into heaven, their own place, where they meet none but congenial spirits; even so doth sin gravitate its victim hellwardly, till, like a millstone round his neck, it drags him into the bottomless pit, his own place, where everything and all the inmates are alike polluted with sin, and where alone in all the realms of eternal worlds, the sinner can find congeniality. The sinner has his own hell in him and carries it with him into hell. If he were to go to heaven he would carry his hell in him into the city of God. With hell in him, though in heaven, he would doubtless be, if possible, more miserable than in hell; so that even in heaven he would be irreconcilably dissatisfied and wretched so that he would long to get away, and, like the fallen apostle, go to his own place.
Fuente: William Godbey’s Commentary on the New Testament
1:25 That he may take {y} part of this ministry and apostleship, from which Judas by transgression {z} fell, that he might go to his own place.
(y) That he may be a member and partaker of this ministry.
(z) Departed from, or fallen from: and it is a metaphor taken from the word “way”: for callings are signified by the name of “ways” with the Hebrews.