Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Acts 4:33
And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all.
33. And with great power gave the apostles witness ] [Better, their witness.] The Greek verb implies a great deal more than our English gave. It is the word so constantly used for paying a debt (Mat 18:25; Luk 7:42), or rendering an account (Mat 12:36; Heb 13:17). So that there is implied in it the sense of obligation under which the Apostles felt themselves to lie of declaring “the things which they saw and heard” ( Act 4:20).
and great grace was upon them all ] i.e. like their Master, while experiencing the favour of God, they were also finding favour with men. Cp. Act 5:13.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
And with great power – See Act 1:8. The word power here denotes efficacy, and means that they had ability given them to bear witness of the resurrection of the Saviour. it refers, therefore, I rather to their preaching than to their miracles.
Gave the apostles witness – The apostles bore testimony to.
The resurrection of the Lord Jesus – This was the main point to be established. If it proved that the Lord Jesus came to life again after having been put to death, it established all that he taught, and was a demonstration that he was sent from God. They exerted, therefore, all their powers to prove this, and their success was such as might have been expected. Multitudes were converted to the Christian faith.
And great grace … – The word grace means favor. See the notes on Joh 1:16. The expression here may mean either that the favor of God was remarkably shown to them, or that they had great favor in the sight of the people. It does not refer, as the expression now does commonly, to the internal blessings of religion on a mans own soul, to their personal advancement in the Christian graces, but to the favor or success that attended their preaching. The meaning probably is, that the favor of the people toward them was great, or that great success attended their ministry among them. Thus, the same word grace (Greek) is used in Act 2:47. If this is its meaning, then here is an instance of the power of the testimony of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus to impress the minds of people. But this is not all, nor probably is it the main idea. It is that their union, their benevolence their liberality in supplying the needs of the needy, was a means of opening the hearts of the people, and of winning them to the Saviour. If we wish to incline others to our opinions, nothing is better adapted to it than to show them kindness, and even to minister to their temporal needs.
Benevolence toward them softens the heart, and inclines them to listen to us. It disarms their prejudices, and disposes them to the exercise of the mild and amiable feelings of religion. Hence, our Saviour was engaged in healing the diseases and supplying the needs of the people. He drew around him the poor, the needy, and the diseased, and supplied their necessities, and thus prepared them to receive his message of truth. Thus, God is love, and is constantly doing good, that his goodness may lead people to repentance, Rom 2:4. And hence, no persons have better opportunities to spread the true sentiments of religion, or are clothed with higher responsibilites, than those who have it in their power to do good, or than those who are habitually engaged in bestowing favors. Thus, physicians have access to the hearts of people which other persons have not. Thus, parents have an easy access to the minds of children. for they are constantly doing them good. And thus Sunday-school teachers, whose whole work is a work of benevolence, have direct and most efficient access to the hearts of the children committed to their care.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Act 4:33
With great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus.
The power of the Apostolic testimony to the resurrection
In what did this great power consist?
I. In the great number of witnesses. Here were more than were necessary for the fabrication of a cheat, and too many to keep it long a secret (1Co 15:5-6).
II. In the well-known character of the apostles. They were poor, timid and friendless; and, therefore, unlikely to devise, and unable to execute, a scheme for imposing a falsehood of this nature upon the world. Above all, they were proverbial for integrity in principle and conduct. Such qualities would render any evidence respectable. Will it be said that their simplicity exposed them to delusion? There were among them Peter, sufficiently acute, and Thomas sufficiently scrupulous. Will it be said that, as followers of Christ; they were interested in the success of this story. Alas! in what way could the story advance the interest of any of them, if Jesus was not risen? It would have been much more natural, as well as reasonable, for them, as indeed they did after the crucifixion, to have shrunk from the public view.
III. In that there was among them consistence, boldness, and correspondent behaviour.
1. They were perfectly consistent. Numerous as were the testifiers, there were no divisions, contradictions, or separate interests: and if there were some little variations in their narratives, respecting minute matters, these are reconcilable, and tend rather to confirm their accounts, by evidencing that there had been no combination.
2. They were undaunted. Though before, mortified with disappointment, and shaking with terror, they shunned even the light, they now openly and eagerly proclaimed that He who had been crucified, was risen from the dead.
3. There was also correspondent behaviour. They exhibited that life which the resurrection necessarily enforced. They were animated with that joy which it was calculated to inspire. They manifested that anxiety and diligence to maintain and propagate the religion of their Lord which it could not fail to produce.
IV. In that they brought to their support the types and prophecies of the word of God. The argument was of wonderful power with those Jews who had cherished the revelations which the Most High had vouchsafed to them; and it is of astonishing import, of irresistible force to every man, who considers soberly the wonderful, the supernatural, the connected, the singularly significant nature, of the Jewish economy.
V. In that it left His adversaries destitute of any satisfactory or reasonable replication. Much it behoved the rulers of the Jews to prove to the people, who were many of them struck with the miracles of Christ, that they had not crucified the Lord of Glory. In their care to secure the sepulchre, they betrayed their anxiety to do so. And, blessed Lord, could they have produced Thy sacred body after the third day, with what triumph would it have been exhibited! But there was no such refutation of the resurrection.
VI. In that it was accompanied with the confirmation and blessing of God, and produced great and extensive conviction. The establishment and rapid progress of a religion, whose Author was crucified, and its propagators twelve of the most despised men; of a religion so opposed to the strongest propensities of nature, so different from anything to which man had been accustomed, and so destructive to ancient, venerated, and congenial systems; and this, too, by means so simple, and seemingly inadequate to the object, is of itself a demonstration of the wisdom and power with which its witnesses unto the people spake. (Bp. Dehon.)
Preaching the resurrection of Jesus
Notice–
I. The great fact to which they gave testimony.
1. This fact was of essential importance in the Christian scheme. All the great events of our Lords history are of vast importance, both in themselves or in their relation to each other. What would the death of Christ have availed if He had not also risen?
2. The apostles were witnesses of it. Hence they were prepared everywhere to vindicate the doctrine of the Resurrection.
II. The character of their testimony. Power may refer to–
1. The miracle they wrought.
2. The unction, the energy, the extraordinary influence of their ministry.
3. Their marvellous success.
III. The abundant grace with which they were endowed. Great grace. Application:
1. Let us learn to give great prominence to the fundamental doctrines and facts of Christianity.
2. Let us remember that the success of our labours depends not only on what is preached, but very greatly on how it is preached.
3. Let us all, and always, mind to have great grace–the grace of humility, of patience, of charity, of faith–if we would have great success. (W. Antliff, D. D.)
The resurrection of Christ historic
1. The resurrection of Christ is the most important event in all history. It expresses in itself the whole gospel of God to man. When a new apostle was elected it was that he might be a witness to it.
(1) This fact is the demonstration of all the other vital things in the gospel that went before it. By it Jesus was declared to be the Son of God with power. By it God publicly owned Him in the face of earth and heaven, and testified to all things vital in His life and mission, to the sinlessness of His character, to the Divine truth of His teaching, and to the sufficiency of His atonement.
(2) It is also the pledge and promise of all that is yet to come. It opens the gate of a future life; it is the pattern and the assurance of our own resurrection; the Church arose again in Christ, and each individual member of it has power and privilege to say, Because He lives, I shall live also!
2. With truth therefore, this fact is put in the Scriptures, and in derived systems of theological thought, as the key-stone of the arch of Christianity. Take it away, and the whole system crumbles to pieces. Our preaching is vain; your faith is vain; we are yet in our sins; we have no more hope in Christ for this life, or for any other.
3. Such a fact, from its very importance, requires the very strongest confirmation, and, being a fact of history, confirmation of a strictly historical kind.
I. The fact itself.
1. It is a fact quite capable of proof. There is no difficulty in imagining it to have occurred. There are no invincible laws against it. There are no natural principles or instincts of the human mind which reject it. All that can be averred is that it is not in the line of our experiences.
2. What is sufficient evidence? All human laws assume that the testimony of two witnesses, when that testimony is unchallenged and when it is confirmed by collateral evidence, is enough. This is not to say that any two men would be believed in anything they might choose to say. They must be honest men worthy of belief, and must be able to show that they had adequate opportunity for ascertaining or observing the thing to which they give testimony, and that they were the dupes of no illusion, and that they were in full possession of their faculties. Then, the human mind is so constituted that it must receive their testimony. If it were not so; human society would be no longer possible; no important ease could be decided in any court of law; in fact, no law could be administered at all.
II. The witnesses.
1. How many are they? The first to see the risen Lord was Mary; then her companions, the other women, shared the privilege with her. Then John and Peter saw Him. Later in the day He met the two disciples on the way to Emmaus. In the evening He appeared to the brethren as they sat at meat; and again, a week later, to them in presence of Thomas. He came to the apostolic company by the lake; on the mountain more than five hundred brethren at once saw Him. It is probable that six or seven hundred people, at least, saw Christ after He was risen. True, we have not a separate testimony in writing from every one who saw Him. Writing in those days was not an easy matter. We have the testimony of the four Evangelists and of James, Peter, and Paul–to what? Not only to what they themselves saw and heard, but to the fact that a great many others saw and heard with them; and there is no denial from any of these. Here, e.g., is a letter which Paul writes to the Corinthians, which he must have known would not be kept a secret; and he asserts in it that Christ was seen after His resurrection by more than five hundred men, most of whom, he says, were then alive; and yet there is no contradiction. Corinth was full of objectors, and some of them would have been nothing loth to undermine his authority. The casual observation, Some have fallen asleep, indicates that he knew many of the persons referred to, and that, had it been necessary, he could have given further details respecting them.
2. Are they honest men? Let any one read the Gospels and see. True, and honest, and simple-hearted are they, if ever such men were in the world.
3. As to their soundness of mind. Where is there any sign of weakness or of hallucination in these Gospels, or in the Epistles, from first to last? They seem almost too calm. It is impossible to conceive evidence more perfectly given. They were the subjects of profound emotion; but they knew that the world could have no interest in the state of their feelings, and that what they had to do was to tell faithfully and truly the great facts which had excited such feelings.
4. As to their opportunities for ascertaining the truth. They saw their risen Lord many times and in many places. They heard Him speak; they talked with Him; they touched Him; they saw Him eat; they felt His breath; they saw Him ascend to heaven.
5. But had they not something to gain by this history? Yes; they gained disrepute, persecution, spoiling of goods, as the price of their faithfulness. They gained bonds and martyrdom. If they did not believe it, their course of action makes them the greatest madmen the world has ever seen.
6. Their testimony was received undoubtingly by men of their own generation. It has been said that eighteen centuries is a long time across which to verify important historic truth. But it was grasped and held by those to whom it was near, who could judge of its truth as we judge of the occurrences of our own time, and who could not be deceived. Remember the wonderful effects this belief produced then; and now Christendom, with all the light and love and tenderness it contains, is the fruit of the faith that there is a risen Christ. Conclusion: Eighty years before the resurrection Caesar landed on the coast of Kent. Who thinks of doubting that? I suppose, if eternal salvation depended on believing it, there is not a sane Englishman alive who would fail of heaven; and yet the actual historic proof of this is far less complete, cogent, convincing, than the proof that Christ died and rose and revived, that He might be Lord both of the dead and of the living. Men believe without any doubt or difficulty in the Sabine farm of Horace, where his friends quaffed the Falernian wine. We believe that Virgil died on a journey, and that he lies buried, at his own request, at the second milestone from Naples on the Puteolan way. We believe in the plough of Cincinnatus, and in the poison-cup of Socrates; but all kinds of conscientious scruples and honest doubts, which must be treated with great tenderness and delicacy, arise in some minds when they are asked to believe in the resurrection and ascension of the Lord Jesus Christ. We feel inclined to say of such, everything in its own place. We would not break any bruised reed, or quench any smoking flax; but if any one will not take the trouble to examine the evidence for the resurrection, and yet will complain that he is unable to believe it, sympathy with such a person may be unfaithfulness to truth, and a slight even upon rationality, because he asks for comfort while rejecting light. Let men be honest and earnest in this great matter. (A. Raleigh, D. D.)
The gospel of the resurrection
Let us consider some of the reasons why the apostles attached such importance to the resurrection. It proved:
I. That Christ was still living and had returned to His Church. His death had struck them with confusion and dismay, and their first feeling was one of profound loss. The resurrection was the return of their beloved Master. So we do not worship a dead Christ. He is not a memory but a presence.
II. That Christ had not failed in His work. This was once their impression (Luk 24:21). But after the resurrection all was changed. Here was–
1. Triumph over death.
2. The proof that God had accepted the great sacrifice.
3. The evidence that what seemed a hindrance was the very means by which the Saviour effected His work of redemption.
III. That Christ was more than man. It was a triumphant refutation of Jewish error. They had mocked at His claims (Luk 23:35). Here was the vindication of them. Accordingly the apostles pressed this fact with great persistency (Act 3:15). He could be no mere man that could break the bars of the grave.
IV. The supernatural character of Christianity. If this is granted it is vain to cavil at lesser miracles. Admit this, and all anti-Christian objection crumbles to dust.
V. That it is possible for man to be raised from the dead (1Co 15:20). (W. F. Adeney, M. A.)
Great grace was upon them all.—
Manifestations of Divine grace
Grace sometimes denotes the full and undeserved compassion which our Heavenly Father manifests to a lost world. At other times, the term is employed to describe the subduing and sanctifying effects of this marvellous love. In the text it is to be understood as referring to both. Great grace was manifest–
I. In their earnest and united prayers. They held frequent communion with the God of all grace. This practice was habitual (Act 1:14). On any unusual occasion of trial, prayer was their first and last resort (Act 4:31; Act 12:5; Act 21:5). If great grace is to rest upon believers in our time, it will be when they realise the cheering promise of their Lord (Mat 18:20). No matter how small, or how great the number, nor from what quarter, nor the place of assembly, He–the Prophet, Priest, and King of His Church–will be present to bless.
II. In their steadfast devotion to scripture doctrine. Indifference to Divine truth is always the sign that the spark of grace in the heart is near extinction. The first-fruits of the day of Pentecost, instead of dividing themselves up into rival factions, to suit their individual caprice, continued steadfast in the apostles doctrine (Act 2:42).
III. In their love one to another (verse 32). When a company of Christians in Numidia had been taken prisoners by barbarians, and the churches to which (hey belonged were unable to pay their ransom, they sent to the Church in Carthage. Bishop Cyprian no sooner heard of this than he set himself at work, and never relaxed his efforts until he had collected the necessary sum. This substantial token of brotherly kindness was not more gratifying than the letter of Christian sympathy and tenderness which accompanied it. In cases like these, wrote the bishop, who would not feel sorrow, and who would not look upon a brothers sufferings as his own? As the apostle says, When one member suffers, all the members suffer with it (1Co 12:26). Therefore, we must consider the captivity of our brethren as our own captivity. We must see Christ in our captive brethren, and redeem Him from captivity who redeemed us from death.
IV. In the holy joy and peace in believing with which they triumphed in every place.
V. In the spirit and deportment with which they recommended their religion to the world (Act 2:47). A Christian young man was asked what had led him to turn aside from his wild and thoughtless career to become a follower of Jesus. Was it a sermon or a book that had improved him? He answered very emphatically, No. Had any one spoken to him specially on the subject of religion? No. It was a Christian man, who boarded at the same house with me. Did he ever talk to you about your soul? No, never, till I sought an interview with him; but there was a sweetness in his disposition, a heavenly-mindedness about him, that made me feel that he had a source of comfort and peace, to which I was a stranger. His whole life was a sermon. I sought an interview with him. He pointed me to Jesus Christ, prayed with me and counselled me. In this, and in all such cases, religion is preached most eloquently to the world. About twenty years ago, a Christian woman of London was asked to take charge of a Bible-class of three young women. Although the work was a very humble one, she shrank from its responsibilities, and, with many misgivings, consented to the trial. The first months experience was so encouraging that she consented to go on with the work, and the class constantly increased in numbers. From fifty, it soon grew to eighty, and a larger room was provided. In the course of a few years the Bible-class became five hundred strong; and now, at the age of sixty-nine, the faithful teacher (Mrs. Bartlett) has fallen asleep in Jesus. She was not a woman of marked ability, but simply one who gave up her whole self to the service of the Lord. This was the secret of her success. She knew the members of her large class, and called them by their names. She visited them at their homes, and wrote letters to the absent ones. For each, and for all of them, she prayed unceasingly. Her pupils are scattered over the whole earth, and many of them are telling to others the good tidings she brought to them. (J. N. Norton, D. D.)
Happy state of the primitive Church
We shall now seek an illustration of the text, by inquiring wherein such eminent grace appeared in these primitive believers.
1. Great grace appeared in their earnest and united supplications.
2. If appeared in their steadfast adherence to the apostles doctrine.
3. In a constant adherence to the worship and service of God.
4. In their great love to one another.
5. These primitive Christians were full of holy joy and peace in believing, and they triumphed in every place.
6. Their spirit and deportment were such as recommended their religion to the word (Act 2:47).
They abounded in those Christian graces which are lovely even in the eyes of men in general. (Theological Sketch-Book.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 33. With great power gave the apostles witness] This power they received from the Holy Spirit, who enabled them, , with striking miracles, to give proof of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus; for this is the point that was particularly to be proved: that he was slain and buried, all knew; that he rose again from the dead, many knew; but it was necessary to give such proofs as should convince and confound all. This preaching and these miracles demonstrated this Divine truth: Jesus died for your sins-he rose again for your justification; behold what God works in confirmation of these glorious truths; believe therefore in the Lord Jesus, and ye shall not perish, but have everlasting life.
Great grace was upon them all.] They all received much of the favour or grace of God; and they had much favour with all who feared God. In both these ways this clause may be understood; for means favour, whether that be evidenced by benevolence or beneficence, or by both. The favour of God is the benevolence of God; but his benevolence is never exerted without the exertions of his beneficence. Hence the grace or favour of God always implies a blessing or gift from the hand of his mercy and power. The favour or benevolence of men may exist without beneficence, because it may not be in their power to communicate any gift or benefit, though they are disposed to do it; or, 2dly. the persons who enjoy their favour may not stand in need of any of their kind acts; but it is not so with God: his good will is ever accompanied by his good work; and every soul that is an object of his benevolence stands in the utmost need of the acts of his beneficence. Hence, as he loved the world, he gave his Son a ransom for all. All needed his help; and, because they all needed it, therefore all had it. And truly we may say of the whole human race, for whom the Son of God tasted death, that great grace was upon all; for ALL have been purchased by his sacrificial death. This by the way.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
With great power; by sundry miracles which they wrought, as also by their boldness with which they spake; it being no small wonder to see and hear such illiterate men testifying the truths of the gospel amidst so many learned rabbins.
The resurrection was the greatest point in controversy, which being granted, all things concerning Christ and the gospel could not be denied; and therefore here it is especially mentioned.
Great grace; favour and acceptation; men could not but think well of their doctrine and ways, whom they saw so innocent and holy, meek and good; especially Gods grace was manifest in their words and actions.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
33. with great powereffect onmen’s minds.
great grace was upon themallThe grace of God copiously rested on the whole community.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And with great power,…. Either in a very powerful way, with great fervency of spirit, and ardour of mind, and uncommon zeal; or with great efficacy on the souls of men; or with many miracles, and powerful operations in healing the sick, casting out devils, c.
gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus which they were chosen to be witnesses, and were eyewitnesses of; and which is a fundamental article of the Gospel, and was what the Sadducees were particularly disturbed at, and on account of which they forbade them to preach any more in Christ’s name.
And great grace was upon them all; not only upon the apostles and ministers, but upon the whole church: and which may be understood either of the large gifts of the Spirit of God, which were poured out upon them, and plentifully bestowed on them; or of the gracious protection of God over them, preserving them from the rage and malice of men; or of that grace and favour which they had among thee people in common; or of that charity, liberality and beneficence, which were among them, which sense is confirmed by what follows; though it may be all these senses may be taken in.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Gave their witness ( ). Imperfect active of , old verb to give back, to pay back a debt (Lu 7:42), but a late omega form instead of the usual . They kept on giving their witness with power after the answer to their prayer (verse 31).
Of the resurrection ( ). It was on this issue that the Sadducees had arrested them (4:1-3).
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
Gave [] . Lit., gave back [] ; as something which they were in duty bound to give.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1)“And with great power,” (kai dunamei megale) “And with great dynamics,” above mere human power, with convincing, persuading power of Holy Spirit help, as Divinely directed, Luk 24:49; Act 1:8; Act 1:22.
2) “Gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: (apedidoun to marturion hoi apostoloi tou kuriou tes anastaseos) “The apostles gave forth the testimony of resurrection of the Lord Jesus,” Act 2:24; Act 2:31-32; Act 3:15; Act 4:2; Act 4:10.
3) “And great grace was upon them all,” (charis te megale en epi pantas autous) “And there was great grace upon them all,” Divine favor and blessing was upon and with them all, 1Ti 1:14. All who witness in spirit, in truth, and in love for the Lord find “ever-present help” and good reward, Mat 5:11-12; 1Ti 3:12; 1Co 10:13.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
33. And with great power. This third member appertaineth to doctrine. For Luke doth signify that the zeal which the apostles had to preach the gospel was so far from being diminished, that they were rather endowed with new power. Whereas he doth only name the resurrection of Christ, it is synecdoche; for this part is put for the whole gospel. But Luke maketh mention of the resurrection alone, because it is, as it were, the furnishing or fulfilling of the gospel; and, secondly, because they had endured a sore combat for the same, and the Sadducees were sore grieved at it, who aid then bear the chief swinge, [sway.]
And great grace was He signifieth that this served not a little to the spreading abroad of doctrine, in that, by helping the poor so bountifully, they found favor at the hands of strangers. For he saith that they were beloved, because they were beneficial. (232) Therefore, there is a showing of a reason in these words, No man amongst them did lack. Although we need not doubt of this, but that their honesty, and temperance, and modesty, and patience, and other virtues, did provoke many to bear them good-will. He declareth (233) afterward, after what sort they had their goods common, which he had touched before, to wit, that the rich men sold their lands and houses, that they might relieve the poverty of the poor,
(232) “ Benefici,” beneficient.
(233) “ Latius exponit,” expoundeth more at large.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(33) With great power gave the apostles witness.The Greek verb implies the idea of paying or rendering what was due, as in Mat. 22:11. They were doing that which they were bound to do.
Great grace was upon them.The words may stand parallel with Luk. 2:40 as meaning that the grace of God was bestowed upon the disciples in full measure, or with Act. 2:47 as stating that the favour of the people towards them still continued. There are no sufficient data for deciding the question, and it must be left open. The English versions all give grace, as if accepting the highest meaning, as do most commentators.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
33. With great power Natural and bestowed by the Spirit.
Resurrection They had seen the risen Jesus, and they had mighty power in testifying to that fact as the fundamental point in the history of the Lord.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘And with great power gave the apostles their witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus, and great grace was on them all.’
Meanwhile the testimony also went on through the Apostles. They witnessed everywhere with great power, testifying to the resurrection of ‘the Lord, Jesus’, the One Who had been raised from the dead and enthroned as ‘’Lord’ over all (Act 2:36). And the whole church as a whole greatly experienced the gracious favour of God. It was a period of continual blessing and rejoicing.
‘With great power.’ While this may include the power which enabled the performing of the miracles it is not to be limited to that. The Apostles revealed power in all that they did and said. Their word was the word of the cross which is the power of God to those who are being saved (1Co 1:18). It was the word of the Gospel which is the power of God unto salvation for those who believe (Rom 1:16). It was the power of the word of the resurrection.
‘And great grace was on them all.’ All who are His know the greatness of the grace of God, of God’s unmerited love and favour, of His kindness and compassion. Without it none of us would be His. But this was something more. God was present among them in an unusual way. His unmerited love and favour moved them to be the same. They were filled with kindness and compassion. They walked constantly in His light. God was revealing His special favours. They were enjoying superabundance of blessing. They were fully conscious of ‘living in heavenly places’. (See Eph 1:4; Eph 2:6). It is in the light of such an exalted atmosphere that we must judge the sin of Ananias and Sapphira.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Act 4:33. And with great power gave the apostles, &c. The word , rendered gave, signifies the restoring of something which is given as a charge, or intrusted to another. If it be taken in that sense here, it may serve to illustrate what is said, Act 4:20. Several commentators understand the last clause of this verse, of the grace or favour which they had among the people, on account of their love, charity, zeal, and good conduct. See the note on ch. Act 2:47. Diodati explains the word , “by the blessing of God, and the good will of the people.”
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Act 4:33 . And with this unity of love in the bosom of the church, how effective was the testimony of the apostles , and the divine grace , which was imparted to all the members of the church!
. . . ] This was continually the foundation of the whole apostolic preaching; comp. on Act 1:22 . They bore their witness to the resurrection of Christ, as a thing to which they were in duty bound. Hence the compound verb , which (see Wyttenbach, Bibl. crit. III. 2, p. 56 ff.) , Oecumenius. Comp. 4Ma 6:32 ; Dem. 234. 5. Observe, moreover, that here, where from Act 4:32 onwards the internal condition of the church is described, the apostolic preaching within the church is denoted.
The is usually understood (according to Act 2:47 ) of the favour of the people . Incorrectly, as . . ., Act 4:34 , would contain no logical assignation of a reason for this. It is the divine grace , which showed itself in them in a remarkable degree (1Co 15:10 ). So, correctly, Beza, Wetstein, de Wette, Baumgarten, Hackett.
. .] upon them all : of the direction in which the presence of grace was active. Comp. Luk 2:40 .
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
33 And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus: and great grace was upon them all.
Ver. 33. Great grace was upon them all ] Dropped down, as it were, upon them from heaven. God it is that fashioneth men’s opinions, and maketh them think well of us. He gave Solomon honour as well as wisdom. And of him it was, that whatsoever David did, pleased the people. Paul goes to God for acceptance of his service, which yet was the bringing of alms. And such are usually very welcome.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
33 .] The Apostles were the specially appointed witnesses of the Resurrection, ch. Act 1:22 ; and this their testimony they gave with power , i.e. with a special gift of the Holy Spirit to enforce and illustrate, to persuade and dispute on, those facts of which their own experience (see Act 4:20 ) informed them. That the Spirit did not inspire them with unbroken uniformity in matters of fact , our present Gospels, the remnants to us of this very testimony, sufficiently witness. Nor was this necessary: each man reported what he had heard and seen; and it was in the manner of delivering this report that the great power of the Spirit was shewn. See, on the whole subject, Prolegg. Vol. I. i. iii. 5 ff.
, better grace , i.e. from God, than favour , i.e. from the people, which would hardly be so absolutely designated.
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Act 4:33 . , “gave the Apostles their witness,” R.V. See Act 4:12 . ., prop., “res qu testimonio est,” but sometimes in N.T. pro (Blass). ., however, implies paying or rendering what is due; it suggests that there is a claim in response to which something is given (Westcott on Heb 13:11 ); cf. Mat 12:36 , Luk 12:59 ; Luk 16:2 ; Luk 20:25 , Rom 13:7 , 1Co 7:3 , etc. This was its first and strict significance in classical Greek, cf. also its use in LXX, frequently. The Apostles therefore bear their witness as a duty to which they were pledged, cf. Act 1:8 ; Act 1:22 , Act 4:20 ; , Oecum. : the words may include miraculous powers, as well as stedfast witness. But the must not, as Weiss maintains, be so taken as to indicate that was the result, as in Act 2:47 . For if we regard as referring to the favour of the people (as in the former narrative in ii.), the in Act 4:34 seems to point to the love and liberality of the Christians as its cause. But many commentators prefer to take as in Act 6:8 (and as in Luk 2:40 , Hilgenfeld), of the grace of God, since here as there it is used absolutely, and Act 4:34 would thus be a proof of the efficacy of this grace, cf. 2Co 9:14 , as Bengel maintains, may include grace, favour with God and man, as in our Lord Himself, Gratia Dei et favor populi .
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
gave = were giving forth.
apostles. App-189.
witness = the testimony. Greek. marturion. First occurance Mat 8:4.
grace. App-184.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
33.] The Apostles were the specially appointed witnesses of the Resurrection, ch. Act 1:22; and this their testimony they gave with power, i.e. with a special gift of the Holy Spirit to enforce and illustrate, to persuade and dispute on, those facts of which their own experience (see Act 4:20) informed them. That the Spirit did not inspire them with unbroken uniformity in matters of fact, our present Gospels, the remnants to us of this very testimony, sufficiently witness. Nor was this necessary: each man reported what he had heard and seen;-and it was in the manner of delivering this report that the great power of the Spirit was shewn. See, on the whole subject, Prolegg. Vol. I. i. iii. 5 ff.
, better grace, i.e. from God, than favour, i.e. from the people, which would hardly be so absolutely designated.
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Act 4:33. , the apostles gave or rendered[37]) Being assured of the truth themselves, they tried to assure others of it.- , the apostles) The giving testimony was peculiarly their province; for they had seen the facts. To them also was given an extraordinary measure of the Spirit: ch. Act 5:12.-, grace) The grace of GOD and the favour of the people.
[37] The implies, that they gave testimony as a thing that was due, as of a thing which, having received themselves, they gave in turn to others.-E. and T.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
with: Act 4:30, Act 1:8, Act 1:22, Act 2:32, Act 2:33, Act 3:15, Act 3:16, Act 5:12-16, Mar 16:20, Luk 24:48, Luk 24:49, Rom 15:18, Rom 15:19, 1Th 1:5, Heb 2:4
grace: Act 2:47, Luk 2:52, Joh 1:16
Reciprocal: Isa 35:2 – the excellency Luk 2:40 – the grace Joh 14:12 – the Joh 15:27 – ye also Act 2:43 – many Rom 12:8 – giveth 1Co 15:15 – we have
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
3
Act 4:33. The great power came in answer to the prayer of the other disciples in verse 30, and it consisted in the miraculous deeds that they performed upon the people. The question might be asked, what would the miraculous performances of the apostles have to do with the resurrection of Jesus. It confirmed the testimony they were giving that they had seen Jesus alive after his death on the cross. Had they been false witnesses of that claim, they never could have performed the miracles, for God would not work with them in their activities. All of this proved that when they affirmed that Jesus had appeared to them after his resurrection, they were telling the truth.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Act 4:33. And with great power gave the apostles witness of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus. These words speak of the relations of the Church with the outer world; the powerful and effective eloquence of the apostolic preaching was not, as some have suggested, merely working within the comparatively narrow pale of the believers: the writer of these brief early memoirs would hardly dwell on the power of the preaching within the Church. It was doubtless the solemn answer to the congregations solemn (and, we believe, often repeated) prayer (see Act 4:29); and we may think of these devoted men, day after day in the thronged Temple courts, the popular favour supporting them, speaking their blessed message for a time unhindered. The resurrection of the Lord Jesus is again and again mentioned as the groundwork of the apostolic teaching; it was the column upon which their strong patient faith rested; they knew they had seen their Master after He had risen; they told it out to others that men might grasp the mighty issues which this victory of Jesus over death involved for every man and woman.
And great grace was upon them all. Expositors have differed respecting the meaning of the great grace here alluded to. Is it (a) the grace of God? does it mean that the Divine favour was abundantly shown to the apostles? Or (b) does it signify that these devoted teachers found favour among the people? (b) seems decidedly the better interpretation; for, first, the word grace distinctly bears this meaning in chap. Act 2:4; and second, it is obvious that the grace of God was upon the apostles and brethren: they were filled, we read, with the Holy Ghost (Act 4:31). Act 4:33 speaks of the great power of the apostolic preaching. There was scarcely any need for the writer of the Acts specially to mention, further, how Gods favour was resting upon them; but the fact of their standing high in popular estimation was an important one: it showed under whose protection and by whose favour their public preaching and work went on after the threats of the supreme council (see Act 4:18; Act 4:21; Act 4:29; comp. also chap. Act 5:12-14).
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
See notes on verse 32
Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)
BARNABAS
33-37. Here we have another allusion to the community of goods, practiced by the Apostolic church, necessitated by the suddenness and improvidence of the Pentecostal revival, and inspired by the hostility of their environments and the vivid anticipation of the Lords speedy return. Barnabas, which is but a cognomen, a Syriac word, meaning son of consolation, while his real name was Joseph, though a Levite, was a farmer off in the beautiful isle of Cyprus, in the Mediterranean Sea. He was a bright young man of liberal education, a friend and acquaintance of Saul, the celebrated Tarsian, doubtless having been his school-mate in the Greek colleges in the city of Tarsus, the Capital of Cilicia, a border-land of Asia, near his home in Cyprus. This bright and promising young Levite is an honored delegate of a Cyprian synagogue, sent to represent them in the great annual camp-meeting at Jerusalem, denominated Pentecost, without the vaguest dream of the heavenly cyclone destined to catch him in its inextricable whorls. Now that he is wonderfully converted to the Christhood of Jesus, I trow, having formerly known the God of Israel, he is a most joyful recipient of the Pentecostal baptism. Therefore he sells out his Cyprian farm, with all its appurtenances, brings the money and tumbles down every penny at the apostles feet, simultaneously importuning, Will you not take Barnabas also? Behold the contrast between primitive Christianity and the present age! I am constantly accosted by brothers and sisters in the kingdom of God, testifying to a call to preach and a burning enthusiasm to start at once if they only had the money. Behold the contrast! In the Apostolic age, the first thing they did after receiving a call was to sell out all they had and turn over every cent to the church, giving themselves, too. The monetary difficulties arise from the misapprehension that they actually need it in their humble efforts to glorify God in the salvation of souls. The apostles and their evangelistic comrades all walked everywhere they went, trusting the Lord to feed them like He feeds the birds. Therefore they needed no money except such as the Lord would supply in their peregrinations, as they had no fares to pay. Consequently, in order to disencumber themselves of all temporal care, that they might be perfectly free to go preaching, like Barnabas, they sold out everything they had, turning the proceeds over to the apostles. We would enjoy much better health, live longer and be more useful if we would let the railroads alone and all walk, as in the Apostolic age. We need multiplied thousands of walking itinerants, full of faith and the Holy Ghost, to preach the gospel from house to house, pursuant to the primitive economy.
Fuente: William Godbey’s Commentary on the New Testament
The power in the witness of the believers was their love for one another (cf. Joh 13:35), not just their rhetorical (homiletical) and miraculous power. Notice the central place the resurrection of Jesus occupied in their witness. His resurrection fulfilled prophecy and identified Jesus as the Messiah (cf. Act 2:29-32). The abundant grace that rested upon these Christians was the divine enablement that God granted them to speak and to live as they did. This grace was on the young church as it had been on the young Jesus (cf. Luk 2:40).