Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Acts 17:25
Neither is worshiped with men’s hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;
25. neither is worshipped with ( served by) men’s hands ] The verb implies the sort of service yielded by a steward to his master, or a minister to his King, a service in which the superior is not independent of his inferior, and could not well do without him. This is seen in the next clause. God is not like earthly masters and kings. He gives all, and men can only offer to Him themselves in return. Cp. Psalms 50, 51 for like teaching.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Neither is worshipped with mens hands – The word here rendered worshipped ( therapeuetai) denotes to serve; to wait upon; and then to render religious service or homage. There is reference here, undoubtedly, to a notion prevalent among the pagan, that the gods were fed or nourished by the offerings made to them. The idea is prevalent among the Hindus that the sacrifices which are made, and which are offered in the temples, are consumed by the gods themselves. Perhaps, also, Paul had reference to the fact that so many persons were employed in their temples in serving them with their hands; that is, in preparing sacrifices and feasts in their honor. Paul affirms that the great Creator of all things cannot be thus dependent on his creatures for happiness, and consequently, that that mode of worship must be highly absurd. The same idea occurs in Psa 50:10-12;
For every beast of the forest is mine;
And the cattle upon a thousand hills.
I know all the fowls of the mountain;
And the wild beasts of the field are mine.
If I were hungry, I would not tell thee;
For the world is mine, and the fulness thereof.
Seeing he giveth – Greek: he having given to all, etc.
Life – He is the source of life, and therefore he cannot be dependent on that life which he has himself imparted.
And breath – The power of breathing, by which life is sustained. He not only originally gave life, but he gives it at each moment; he gives the power of drawing each breath by which life is supported. It is possible that the phrase life and breath may be the figure hendyades, by which one thing is expressed by two words. It is highly probable that Paul here had reference to Gen 2:7; And the Lord God breathed into his nostrils the breath of life. The same idea occurs in Job 12:10;
In whose hand is the life (margin) of every living thing;
And the breath of all mankind.
And all things – All things necessary to sustain life. We may see here how dependent man is on God. There can be no more absolute dependence than that for every breath. How easy it would be for God to suspend our breathing! How incessant the care, how unceasing the providence, by which, whether we sleep or wake – whether we remember or forget him, he heaves our chest, fills our lungs, restores the vitality of our blood, and infuses vigor into our frame! Compare the notes on Rom 11:36.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Act 17:25
Neither is worshipped with mens hands.
Contrast between God and idols
Idols certainly require the care of human hands. There are still shops in the cities of India and China, with this inscription on their sign boards, Here old gods are repaired and renovated. (Leonhard.)
As though He needed anything.
God has no needs
The idol was supposed to be a needy, dependent being, fed by the hands of man. God not so (Psa 50:1-23). Notice the main points of comparison.
I. Idols are dead; God lives of Himself and by Himself. He gives–
1. Life. What a gift is life! And what a giver the Author of life!
2. Breath.
3. All things necessary for the sustentation and continuance of both. It is not matter that lives, but God in matter. This living God is the Being with whom we have to do; there is a living eye on thee, a judge taking account now.
II. God is the builder of His own temple. The idol is made, then a temple is built, and the idol is put there and chained, that he might not be stolen. God too has a temple; but He is the architect of His own temple, erected it not for Himself but for us; worship is for the benefit of man. It is getting, not giving; receiving, not imparting. Worship may be regarded–
1. As the highest exercise of mans nature. Man can never be greater than when he stands before God; a creature can never perform a nobler office than when thus holding communion with God.
2. As the purest influence of mans nature. Sin is put down by this. We must look up, not down; the glance of the eye on the infinite is worth all the talking and troubling our minds about non-essentials in religion. But we must get the principles from the habit of looking up.
3. As the truest happiness. Have you ever felt happiness corresponding to the high demands of your nature? When your soul has been with God, how little did this world appear then!
III. God is the proprietor of His own sacrifice. All dead matter, silver and gold, our body, soul, intellect, affections, hopes, fears, are Gods. When we worship we are teaching ourselves a great truth, instructing ourselves in our own dependence on God.
IV. God is the father of His own worshippers.
1. Paul shows the nature of man. We are also His offspring. The tree, the elephant, birds, stars, etc., are not like God. They are far from Him, they are matter; He is mind. They are dead; He is living. But we are like God. We have power to think as He thinks, to love as He loves, to be felicitous as He is felicitous.
2. We have the destiny of this nature. Seek the Lord, if haply they might find Him. Seek Him, so as to feel Him touch the soul. Are you in search after God? Whatever pursuit fails, this will not. It is the only study worthy the soul of man. (Caleb Morris.)
God has no needs
I. This declaration sheds considerable light on God Himself, who is underived, unconditioned, everlasting, and the source of all other life throughout the universe. We have to do with a living God; therefore let us have no dead souls or dead services.
II. How may this truth apply to the scheme of redemption? God is all fulness of being, excellency, and blessing; yet He has condescended to propose reconciliation to men. The advantage here is altogether on the side of men. And what an advantage it is f It is the fulness, the power, of the rich God spreading Himself out through the entire nature of man; so that he feels he is invested with every attribute God possesses. When man is thus brought into union with the rich God, he receives two things which constitute his spiritual life.
1. A consciousness of his relationship to God. A living consciousness that we are His offspring, in whom we live and move and have our being. That feeling is worth the universe. Man is a child of God, whether he feels it or not; he has not lost his relationship to God. What has he lost by sin?
(1) The filial character. All likeness to Gods character.
(2) Sympathy to the Father. He does not love what God loves, nor hate what God hates.
(3) The knowledge of God to a great extent. Not altogether. He is far from God, as an isolated being. Man has not the slightest formal knowledge of Him as his Father.
(4) Every disposition to return to God.
2. But when the poor sinner comes to the rich God what takes place?
(1) There is a quickening sense of his relationship. He says, I am not worthy to be called Thy son. Then he says, Talk to me about my Father. The soul sympathises with God till it has impressed on it Gods character.
(2) There is a right in all the privileges involved in the relationship (Rom 8:17). Think how Christ is the heir of God; think of His position, offices, glory; then imagine yourselves to be in a state of approximation to Him; and then feel what it is to be enriched with the riches of God.
III. God has no needs. Then He is more than adequate to finish the work of redemption. If He has all power, He is able to work out mens salvation. Man has not a fixed purpose. God has a clear, definite conception of the Divine scheme of salvation. God is so in love with His purpose of saving man there is no fear of His giving it up. Men often fail in their purposes in consequence of impediments. God, who is the Creator of heaven and earth, has dominion over all things.
IV. God has no needs. Then He could have no motives in redemption but generosity. (Caleb Morris.)
Seeing that He giveth to all life.—
Gods bounty
He giveth–
I. Life, and none but He, the Living One. It is a rill from the Fountain of Life. Growth and other qualities belong to plants, such as circulation of sap and respiration by their leaves; but life characterises man–with its voluntary and involuntary functions, its enjoyments and capabilities, its appetites and instincts, its operations on the world without it, and its conscious possession of its powers within it. Pleasure, glory, and usefulness are bound up with its prolongation. So sweet is it that few choose to part with it, and the cessation of it was regarded by the apostles hearers as the direst of calamities. He who is our life confers and supports it in His ineffable goodness–for man liveth not by bread alone.
II. Breath, Which, as the condition and means of life, is, therefore, singled out. Even then the atmosphere was popularly valued as the first of necessary gifts, and, when scientifically examined, its preciousness is not only confirmed, but it becomes a powerful proof of Divine unceasing goodness. For the air we breathe is endowed with many qualities, the loss or disturbance of which must be fatal to life. If it lose its gravity, or if its elasticity be changed or become changeable; if it thicken, and darken, and cease to be an invisible medium; if it be deprived of its compressibility, or if any amount of cold could condense it; if the gases composing it were to vary in their proportions: or if it were not universally present, and what is vitiated by respiration purified and restored–animal existence would be extinguished on the face of the earth.
III. And His bounty is immense, for He giveth all things. Whatever we have He has given us–the food on our table, and the raiment on our persons, with ability to win them and health to enjoy them. Nor let any man boast of being the architect of his own fortune; for the materials out of which he builds it, the skill with which he constructs it, and the propitious season which enables him to rear it without pause or discomfiture–are each of them the gift of the one sovereign Benefactor. Discovery, invention, science, art, adventure, commercial shrewdness, literary power, mechanical skill, and political success; the sharp eye that is first to perceive the tide in the affairs of men; and the wary enterprise that launches the vessel upon it–are not self-originated. Every good gift and every perfect gift is from above, and cometh down from the Father of Lights. (Prof. Eadie.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 25. Neither is worshiped with men’s hands] This is an indirect stroke against making of images, and offering of sacrifices: he is not worshipped with human hands, as if he needed any thing, or required to be represented under a particular form or attitude; nor has he required victims for his support; for it is impossible that he should need any thing who himself gives being, form, and life, to all creatures.
Giveth-life, and breath, and all things] These words are elegantly introduced by St. Paul: God gives life, because he is the fountain of it: he gives breath, the faculty of breathing or respiration, by which this life is preserved; and though breathing or respiration, be the act of the animal, yet the , the faculty of breathing, and extracting from the atmosphere what serves as a pabulum of life, is given by the influence of God, and the continued power thus to respire, and extract that pure oxygen gas which is so evident a support of animal life, is as much the continued gift of God as life itself is. But, as much more is necessary to keep the animal machine in a state of repair, God gives the , all the other things which are requisite for this great and important purpose, that the end for which life was given may be fully answered. St. Paul also teaches that Divine worship is not enacted and established for GOD, but for the use of his creatures: he needs nothing that man can give him; for man has nothing but what he has received from the hand of his Maker.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
As though he needed any thing; God is not worshipped or served by holy men, because he wants their service, or any thing that can be offered unto him by them; but because it is their duty and advantage to be employed in his service and worship, Psa 50:10,11.
Life, and breath; the breath of life, Gen 2:7. And in this respect God is called the God of the spirits of all flesh, Num 16:22; as the cause of life and breath in all creatures, but especially in man; which made that charge so great against Belshazzar, Dan 5:23, that his breath was in Gods hand, and yet he had not glorified him.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
25. Neither is worshippedwithministered unto, served by
men’s hands, as though heneeded anythingNo less familiar as this thought also is to us,even from the earliest times of the Old Testament (Job 35:6;Job 35:8; Psa 16:2;Psa 16:3; Psa 50:12-14;Isa 40:14-18), it wouldpour a flood of light upon any candid heathen mind that heard it.
seeing heHe Himself.
giveth to all life, andbreath, and all thingsThe Giver of all cannot surely bedependent for aught upon the receivers of all (1Ch29:14). This is the culminating point of a pure Theism.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Neither is worshipped with men’s hands,…. Or “served” with them; or “ministered unto” by them, as the Syriac version renders it: and the sense is, that men by worshipping God do not give anything to him, that can be of any use or service to him; he, being God all sufficient, stands in need of nothing; for external worship is not here intended by worshipping with men’s hands, in distinction from, and opposition to, internal worship, or to the worship of God with the heart; but that whether it be with the one or with the other, or both, nothing is given to God, as adding any thing to his essential glory and happiness:
as though he needed anything; for he does not, he is “El Shaddai”, God all sufficient; nor can anything be given to him, he has not; or otherwise all perfection would not be in him: but that he cannot be indigent of anything, appears from hence,
seeing he giveth to all life and breath; or “the breath of life”, as the Ethiopic version renders it; this God breathed into man at first, and he became a living soul; and every animate creature, everyone that has life and breath, have them from God; he gives them to them, and continues them:
and all things; that are enjoyed by them, and are necessary for their subsistence, and for the comfort of life, and for both their use and profit, and for their delight and pleasure; wherefore he that gives them all things, cannot want anything himself, nor receive anything at their hands. This clause is left out in the Syriac, Arabic, and Ethiopic versions.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
As though he needed anything ( ). Present middle participle of , to want besides, old verb, but here only in the N.T. This was strange doctrine for the people thought that the gods needed their offerings for full happiness. This self-sufficiency of God was taught by Philo and Lucretius, but Paul shows that the Epicurean missed it by putting God, if existing at all, outside the universe.
Seeing he himself giveth to all ( ). This Supreme Personal God is the source of life, breath, and everything. Paul here rises above all Greek philosophers.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
Is worshipped [] . Incorrect. Rendel; as Rev., served. Luke often uses the word in the sense of to heal or cure; but this is its primary sense. See on Luke verse 15. It refers to the clothing of the images of the gods in splendid garments, and bringing them costly gifts and offerings of food and drink.
As though he needed [] . Properly, “needed anything in addition [] to what he already has.”
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “Neither is worshipped with men’s hands,” (oude hupo cheiron anthropinon therapeuetai) “Nor is he worshipped, served by the hands of men,” that is ritual forms and ceremonies do not constitute worship, but perhaps, fellowship, and service rendered in the Spirit does, Joh 4:23; Col 3:17.
2) “As though he needed any thing,” (prosdeomenos tinos) “Having or holding a need for anything, “from men; If he were hungry, he would not tell man, Psa 50:12; Job 41:11.
3) “Seeing he giveth to all,” (autos didous pasin) “For he is the God continually giving to all,” doling out to men, sustaining all, La 3:22, 23; Jas 1:17.
4) “Life, and breath, and all things;” (zoen kai pnoen kai ta panta) “Life and breath and all things,” that one has or receives, Job 12:10; Dan 5:23; Isa 42:5.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
−
25. Neither is he worshipped with man’s hands. The same question which was answered of late concerning the temple, may now be objected touching ceremonies. For it seemeth that that may be translated unto the worshippings of the law of Moses, which Paul condemneth in the ceremonies of the Gentiles. But we may readily answer, that the faithful did never properly place the worship of God in ceremonies; but they did only count them helps wherewith they might exercise themselves according to their infirmity. When they did slay beasts, offered bread and drink offerings, light torches and other lights, they knew that godliness was not placed in these things, but being holpen by these, − (296) they did always look unto the spiritual worship of God, and they made account of it alone. And God himself saith plainly in many places, that he doth not pass for any external or visible thing, that ceremonies are of themselves of no importance, and that he is worshipped no otherwise but by faith, a pure conscience, by prayer and thankfulness. What did the Gentiles then? to wit, when they erected images, they offered incense, they set forth plays, and laid their cushions before their idols, they thought they had fulfilled the offices of godliness excellent well. Not only the philosophers, but also the poets, do sometimes deride the folly of the common people, because they did disorderly place the worship of God in the pomp and gorgeousness of ceremonies. That I may omit infinite testimonies, that of Persius is well known: −
“
Tell me, ye priests to sacred rites, what profit gold doth bring? The same which Venus’ puppets fine, certes no other thing. Why give not we to gods that which the blear-eyed issue could of great Messiah never give from out their dish of gold? Right justly deem’d a conscience clear, and heavenly thoughts of mind, A breast with mildness such adorn’d, as virtue hath assign’d, Let me in temples offer these, Then sacrifice the gods shall please.” −
And, undoubtedly, the Lord caused profane men to utter such speeches, that they might take away all color of ignorance. But it doth plainly appear, that those who spake thus did straightway slide back again unto common madness; yea, that they did never thoroughly understand what this meant. For though those who pass the common people in wit be enforced to confess that bare ceremonies are in no estimation, yet it is impossible to pull from them this persuasion, but that they will think that they be a part of the divine worship. Therefore, the more diligently they give themselves to such vanities, they do not doubt but that they do the duties of godliness well. Therefore, because all mortal men, from the highest to the lowest, do think that God is pacified with external things, and they will, with their own works, fulfill their duty towards him, that doth Paul refute. There is also a reason added, because, seeing he is Lord of heaven and earth, he needeth nothing, because, seeing that he giveth bread and life to men, he can receive nothing of them again. For what can they bring of their own, who, being destitute of all good things, have nothing but of his free goodness, yea, who are nothing but by his mere grace, who shall forthwith be brought to nought, if he withdraw the Spirit whereby they live? Whereupon it followeth, that they are not only dull, but too proud, if they thrust in themselves to worship God with the works of their own hands. −
For whereas he saith, that alms and the duties of love are sweet-smelling sacrifices, that must be distinguished from the matter which we have now in hand, where Paul doth only intreat of the ceremonies which the unbelievers put in place of the spiritual worship of God. By life and breath is mean the life which men live so long as the soul and body are joined together. Touching the end of the sentence, though some Greek books − (297) agree in this reading, [ κατα παντα ], “through all things;” yet that seemeth to me more agreeable which the old interpreter hath, [ κατα παντα ], “and all things,” because it is both plainer, and doth also contain a more perfect and full doctrine. For thence we do better gather that men have nothing of their own; and also certain Greek copies agree thereto.
(296) −
“
Talibus rudimentis,” by such rudiments.
(297) −
“
Codices,” manuscripts.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(25) Neither is worshipped with mens hands, as though he needed any thing.Literally, as needing anything in addition. The previous words had struck at a false theory of temples, this strikes at a false theory of worship. Men have to think of God as the supreme Giver, not as requiring anything at their hands but justice, mercy, and truth. Both Jewish and heathen writers had borne their witness of the same truth: David had said, Thou desirest not sacrifice; else would I give it (Psa. 51:16), and the Latin Epicurean poet had written of the Divine nature, that it was
Ipsa suis pollens opibus, nihil indiga nostri,
Nec bene promeritis capitur, nec tangitur ira.
[Strong in itself, it needeth nought of ours,
Is neither won by gifts, nor moved by wrath.]
Lucret. ii. 649-50.
The passage is found also in some editions in i. 61, 62.
Life and breath.If we can draw a distinction between the two words, the first may be held to mean the higher element of mans life, the latter that which he shares, by virtue of his organization, with other animals. Stoics and Epicureans would, probably, both of them, so far, accept a teaching which echoed much that was taught in their own schools.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
25. As though he needed any thing A fatal blow at the whole system of pagan rituals, which assumed that its sacrifices and incense gratified the appetites and senses of the human-like deities.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Act 17:25. Neither is worshipped with men’s hands, Neither is served . This refers to the foolish notion among the heathens, that the gods fed on the fumes of sacrifices. Their votaries also clothed their images with splendid garments, and waited upon them in other services, ill becoming the majesty and purity essential to the Divine Nature.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
25 Neither is worshipped with men’s hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things;
Ver. 25. Neither is worshipped ] Colitur vel delinitur, collogued with, or complimented. Colendi verbum , dictum volant eo quod plerunque Dei hominumque cultus cum adulatione et hypocrisi est coniunctus. Sic a , Gallicum flatter. Some derive the word here used, , of the Hebrew Taraph or Teraphim, idols or images,Gen 31:30Gen 31:30 ; Jdg 17:5 . God is not so worshipped. (Stuchius de Sacrif. Gentil.; Avenarius; Ainsworth.)
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
25. ] , is (really and truly) served .
So , Gal 6:7 .
. ] , . Ulpian (in Wetst.).
As the assertion of Creation contradicted the Epicurean error , so this laid hold of that portion of truth, which, however disguised, that school had apprehended: ‘Omnis enim per se divm natura necesse est | Immortali vo summa cum pace fruatur. |. | Ipsa suis pollens opibus, nihil indiga nostri ,’ Lucret. i. 57. There is a verse in 2Ma 14:35 , remarkable, as compared with the thoughts and words of Paul here: , , , .
] neuter, as referring to the temples and statues offered by the Athenians.
. ] He is the Preserver , as well as the Creator, of all; and all things come to us from Him . Compare, on , David’s words, 1Ch 29:14 , , .
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Act 17:25 . : used in LXX and in classical Greek of the service of the Gods, significantly twice in Epist. Jer [313] , 17:27, 39, of the worshippers and priests of the idols overlaid with silver and gold, which are contrasted with the true God in that they can save no man from death, or show mercy to the widow and the fatherless, before which the worshippers set offerings and meat as before dead men. “Non qurit ministros Deus. Quidni? ipse humano generi ministrat,” Seneca, Epist. , 95, and instances in Wetstein; but St. Chrysostom’s comment must also be noted, , . . , . : only here in N.T., to need in addition, as if necessary to perfection, “qui habet quidem aliquid, sed non satis, qui insuper eget,” Wetstein, so “cum nullius boni desideret accessionem ,” Erasmus; a close parallel is found in 2Ma 14:35 ( 3MMal 2:9 ); in both passages the word is used of God, and in the former reference is made to the fact that God was pleased that the temple of His habitation should be amongst the Jews, cf. also Ecclus. 52:21. Blass and Wetstein both quote a striking Pythagorean saying from Hierocles, see in loco , and to this of the divine nature both the Jewish philosopher Philo and the Roman Epicurean Lucretius from their varying standpoints bore witness, see the instances in Wetstein ( cf. Psa 51:9 ). Luther takes as masculine, which as Wendt admits corresponds well to the preceding and also to the following , but it seems best to take it as neuter, of the service which men render, cf. Clem., Cor [314] , lii., 1, , , , , and Epist. ad Diognetum , iii., 5. : “seeing he himself giveth,” R.V., so Vulgate ipse , but although is so emphatic it was unfortunately ignored in Wycl., Genevan and A.V. The best commentary on the words is in David’s words, 1Ch 29:14 , cf. the striking passage in Epist. ad Diognetum , iii., 4. : taken as neuter or masculine, but perhaps with Bengel “omnibus viventibus et spirantibus, summe indigentibus . De homine speciatim, v. seq.” , cf. Gen 2:7 , not a mere hendiadys, vitam animalem, or spiritum vitalem, but the first word = life in itself, existence; and the second the continuance of life, “per spiritum (halitum) continuatur vita,” Bengel: on the paronomasia, see Winer-Moulton, lxviii., 1. For LXX, Psa 150:6 , Job 27:3 , Isa 42:5 , Ecclus. 30:29 ( Sir 33:20 ), 2Ma 3:31 ; 2Ma 7:9 , etc. : omnia qucumque , Rom 8:32 , the expression need not be limited with Bethge to all things necessary for the preservation of life and breath.
[313] Jerome, Hieronymus.
[314] Corinth, Corinthian or Corinthians.
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
worshipped. Greek. therapeuo. App-137.
with = by. Greek. hupo. App-104.
men’s. Greek. anthropos. App-123.
as though He needed = as needing. Greek. prosdeomai. Only here.
any thing = something. Greek. tis, as verses: Act 17:4, Act 17:5.
seeing He giveth = Him-self giving.
life. Greek. zoe. App-170.
breath. Greek. pnoe. See note on Act 2:2.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
25.] , is (really and truly) served.
So , Gal 6:7.
.] , . Ulpian (in Wetst.).
As the assertion of Creation contradicted the Epicurean error, so this laid hold of that portion of truth, which, however disguised, that school had apprehended: Omnis enim per se divm natura necesse est | Immortali vo summa cum pace fruatur. |. | Ipsa suis pollens opibus, nihil indiga nostri, Lucret. i. 57. There is a verse in 2Ma 14:35, remarkable, as compared with the thoughts and words of Paul here: , , , .
] neuter, as referring to the temples and statues offered by the Athenians.
. ] He is the Preserver, as well as the Creator, of all; and all things come to us from Him. Compare, on , Davids words, 1Ch 29:14, , .
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Act 17:25. , neither) The negation belongs to . He is said , who has something, but accompanied with some degree of need (of it): 2Ma 14:35, , , , , …-) Middle.-) There is a double antithesis to this, and . The masculine is included in the signification of the neuter .-) He hath given and gives.-) to all who live and breathe, who are in the highest degree , in need. As to man specially, see the foll. ver.-, life) To this refer we live, Act 17:28.-, breath) spirit. To this refer we move, Act 17:28. It is by the spirit, or breath, that the life is continued. This moment I breathe, the very next moment that follows is not in my power.- , all that they have) To this refer we have our being, Act 17:28.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
is: Job 22:2, Job 35:6, Job 35:7, Psa 16:2, Psa 50:8-13, Jer 7:20-23, Amo 5:21-23, Mat 9:13
seeing: Act 17:28, Act 14:17, Gen 2:7, Num 16:22, Num 27:16, Job 12:10, Job 27:3, Job 33:4, Job 34:14, Psa 104:27-30, Isa 42:5, Isa 57:16, Zec 12:1, Mat 5:45, Rom 11:35, 1Ti 6:17
Reciprocal: Gen 1:20 – Let the waters Gen 1:29 – I have Exo 6:2 – I am the Lord Deu 30:20 – thy life Job 10:12 – life and favour Psa 50:9 – General Psa 104:29 – thou takest Psa 145:9 – good Psa 145:15 – The eyes Dan 5:23 – in whose Dan 6:26 – for Mal 2:10 – hath Mat 21:3 – The Lord Mar 11:3 – that Joh 5:26 – hath life Act 7:48 – dwelleth Rom 11:36 – of him 1Ti 6:13 – who quickeneth Heb 9:11 – not made
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
5
Act 17:25. The Athenians offered their worship to God in connection with a supposed case of healing, hence Paul selected a word from their vocabulary that pertains to the art of medicine and healing. Worship in this passage is from THERAPEUO which Thayer defines, “to heal, cure, restore to health.” The word also means “to serve,” but Paul used it in the first sense because the Athenians were worshiping God (unknowingly) in connection with their experience in the healing of the epidemic. Since God is the source of all the creatures of life and health, it would be foolish for such to think they could grant healing to Him through the works of their hands.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Act 17:25. Neither is he worshipped with mens hands, as though he needed anything. The men of the heathen world loved to spend their wealth on the adornment of the temples of the gods, to whom also they brought costly offerings of food and drink, as though these imaginary eternal beings needed such things. Iliad, i. 37, 38 (Popes Version), may be quoted as expressive of the true heathen feeling in this respect:
If eer with wreaths I hung thy sacred fane,
Or fed the flames with fat of oxen slain.
Pauls words were the outcome of a mind steeped in the often-repeated reminders and reproaches of the prophets, that the God of Israel was not to be worshipped with sacrifice and incense, but with a pure, noble life. The words of the Psalmist were evidently in his mind: I will take no bullock out of thy house, nor he-goats out of thy folds: For every beast of the forest is mine, and the cattle on a thousand hills. … If I were hungry, I would not tell thee: for the world is mine. . . . Thinkest thou that I will eat bulls flesh and drink the blood of goats? (Ps. 1. 9-13). The higher minds among the Epicurean teachers, rising above the popular notion of worship, grasped this lofty conception, which the old Hebrew prophets so nobly set forth, of Deity being above the loves and passions of mortals, dwelling in a sphere far removed from earth and earthly needs. But while the Hebrew teachers used this sublime truth to show the infinite love which, needing nothing from men, could yet stoop to watch over them with a fathers care, and to guide erring feet through the mazes of this life to a higher existence, the Epicurean only seems to have grasped it to show the deserted helplessness of mortals, and the serene selfishness of Divinity. See the lines of the Epicurean Lucretius:
Omnis enim perse Divdm natura necesse est,
Immortal! aevo summi cum pace fruatur.
Life and breath. The GodPaul was preaching to themnot merely was the All-Creator but also the All-Preserver. Their very breath, by means of which from minute to minute each mortal lived, was His gift.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
See notes on verse 22
Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)
Verse 25
As though he needed any thing. In his sacrifices to the gods, the heathen worshipper imagined that he was supplying their wants.
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
The true God also sustains all things; He does not need people to sustain Him. In other words, He is imminent as well as transcendent. He participates in human existence. This contradicted the Epicureans’ belief that God took no interest in human affairs as well as the Stoics’ self-sufficiency.