Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Acts 22:7
And I fell unto the ground, and heard a voice saying unto me, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?
7. and heard a voice ] As in chap. Act 9:4; Act 9:7, so here, and below in Act 22:9, the case of the noun is varied, so as to mark that the hearing in St Paul’s case was different from the hearing of his companions. The verb can be connected with either a genitive or accusative case. In both the narratives a variation is made, and it was not without its significance (see notes on chap. 9). St Paul heard intelligible words, the others heard a sound, but it was not speech to them. Cp. the narrative in Dan 10:6-9.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Saul, Saul; as men that call another earnestly repeat his name; as when the angel of the Lord called Abraham, Abraham, Gen 22:11.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
And I fell unto the ground,…. And so did those that were with him, Ac 26:14.
And heard a voice, saying unto me, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me? [See comments on Ac 9:4].
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
I fell (). Second aorist active indicative with – rather than , the usual form of .
Unto the ground ( ). Old word, here alone in N.T. So the verb , is in Lu 19:44 alone in the N.T.
A voice saying ( ). Genitive after , though in 26:14 the accusative is used after , as in 22:14 after , either being allowable. See on 9:7 for discussion of the difference in case. Saul’s name repeated each time (Acts 9:4; Acts 22:7; Acts 26:14). Same question also in each report: “Why persecuted thou me?” ( ?). These piercing words stuck in Paul’s mind.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
1) “And I fell unto the ground,”(epesa te eis to edaphos) “Then (in an instant) I fell to the ground,” because of the voice and the supernatural light, Act 9:4.
2) “And heard a voice saying unto me, Saul, Saul,” (kai ekousa legouses moi Saoul, Saoul) He recognized the voice as one of intelligible address, or understood what the voice said. Whereas his companions “heard not the voice” of Him that spoke, or did not hear in the sense of understanding what was said, Act 22:9; Act 9:7.
3) “Why persecutest thou me?” (ti me diokeis) “Why do you persecute me?” my people and my work? Act 9:4; Act 26:14.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
(7) Saul, Saul . . .We have again, as in Act. 9:4, the Hebrew form of the name.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
“And I fell to the ground, and heard a voice saying to me, ‘Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?’.”
And the result was that he had fallen to the ground and had heard a voice saying, ‘Saul, Saul, why do you persecute me?’ In Paul’s day much was made of the ‘bath qol’, the whisper of a voice from heaven. But he had heard the voice loud and clear. And the voice had asked him why he was persecuting ‘the Lord’. His very repetition of this was a strong hint to his listeners to consider whether they too, by their actions against Paul, were persecuting the Lord.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
7 And I fell unto the ground, and heard a voice saying unto me, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou me?
Ver. 7. See Trapp on “ Act 9:4 “
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Act 22:7 . : on the form W.H [366] see Kennedy, Sources of N.T. Greek , p. 159, Winer-Schmiedel, p. 111. : only here in N.T. (in LXX, 1Ki 6:15 , Wis 11:5 , etc., and in 4Ma 6:7 , .), but the verb is found in Luk 19:44 , and there only in N.T. , see on Act 9:4 ; Act 9:7 , cf. Dan 10:6-9 . , , as in Act 9:4 , see note on Act 26:14 (and cf. reading in [367] text).
[366] Westcott and Hort’s The New Testament in Greek: Critical Text and Notes.
[367] R(omana), in Blass, a first rough copy of St. Luke.
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
ground. Greek. edaphos. Only here.
heard. See note on Act 9:4.
Saul, Saul. See note on Act 9:4.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Saul: Gen 3:9, Gen 16:8, Gen 22:1, Gen 22:11, Exo 3:4, 1Sa 3:10
why: Isa 43:22-26, Jer 2:5, Jer 2:9, Mat 25:45, Mat 27:23, 1Ti 1:13
Reciprocal: Mat 17:6 – General Act 9:4 – why Act 23:9 – if Act 26:14 – Saul Rom 1:1 – Paul
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
THE CONVERSION OF ST. PAUL
Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou Me?
Act 22:7
The inquiry upon which I ask you to enter is this. What drew Saul of Tarsus to Jesus Christ? And what bound St. Paul throughout his whole life as the devoted slave of our Lord?
I. In order to understand this, we must consider the man, his origin and his training.He was a Jew, not a Jew of Palestine, but a Jew, as it was called, of the Dispersion. Though Palestine was the land of the Jews, and Jerusalem their sacred centre, yet there were more Jews outside the Holy Land than in it; they were dispersed over Asia Minor and Greece, and the other shores of the Mediterranean. They had settlements and synagogues almost everywhere throughout the Roman Empire, and even at Rome itself; they attained to firm positions of honour and prosperity, and gained in some cases the Roman franchise, which enabled a man to say I am a Roman citizen and enjoy special privileges. Paul could say that he was free born, for his father was a Roman citizen. He lived at Tarsus, a city in Ciliciaa Greek city of which he was proud; and so, though he was a Jew, he had a complete command of the Greek language. His father belonged to the strict school of Judaism, and therefore his son was sent to be educated under the most famous Jewish teacher of the dayRabbi Gamaliel.
About this time strange things had been happening elsewhere. A young prophet had appeared in Galilee who had aroused a vast enthusiasm among the populace, whom the Pharisees were accustomed to count their own special sphere of influence. He had been caught, hurriedly tried, and sentenced to a horrible form of execution by crucifixion.
II. His hesitancy.When Saul returned to Jerusalem he found that the matter was by no means at an end. Certain people declared that the young Prophet was alive again. Attempts were made by the priestly party to crush the new sect, especially because they proclaimed the resurrection of the dead, which was a doctrine rejected by the Sadducees, to whom the great priestly families mainly belonged. Gamaliel suggested that persecution of this sect was unwise; they might even find that they were fighting against God. We must not lose sight of this very instructive point in the story. Gamaliel was Sauls teacher, and Gamaliel had not made up his mind. The little brotherhood were very devoted attendants at the Temple worship; they had a great following among the people; it was clearly a new religious movement within Judaism which should be watched and, if possible, guidednot crushed. We may reasonably think of Saul at this moment as noting and sharing the uncertainty of his master, wondering not with the old mans wisdom, but with the young mans eager anxiety, for here was a new situation from which he could not escape. His own future as a religious teacher must be influenced by these new facts as to which he at any rate must make up his mind. He had not very long to wait. Among those who had joined the new society was a man of exceptional force and ability, who, like Saul, was not a Palestinian, but a Greek-speaking Jew, with a Greek nameStephen. We do not know exactly what Stephen said, we only know what his enemies said that he said, but clearly it was enough to raise a storm; he was accused of speaking against the law of Moses and against the sacredness of Jerusalem itself. At last the Pharisaic party were thoroughly aroused. We observe that those who argued with Stephen were not Palestinian Jews, but Jews of the Dispersion. They, who lived at a distance from the home country, were peculiarly anxious to show their patriotism toward the mother city. Some of those that disputed with Stephen were from Cilicia and Asia, and we may be sure that among them was young Saul of Tarsus. Stephens teaching was to them the deadliest heresy. So Stephen was hurried to his death. Those who bore witness against him were, by the Jewish law, bound to cast the first stone at him, and so we read: the witnesses laid down their clothes at a young mans feet whose name was Saul.
III. Saul the persecutor.Saul was consenting unto his death. It was a sudden, a terrible transformation; the brilliant, attractive, tender-hearted, religious young student had in a moment become Saul the persecutor. He sprang to the front as a champion of religion, he would be thorough; and so having dispersed the sect in Jerusalem, he got a letter from the high priest and went to hunt out certain remnants of it in distant Damascus. What a journey it must have been! What thoughts came to him in his long rides: Gamaliels attitude of sympathetic hesitancy, Stephens face bright with the light of another world, Stephens vision of the Lord Jesus, Stephens dying prayerall these would haunt him. O God, he must have cried in the night watches under the Syrian stars, O God, show me what is right, unravel the mystery, let me not be carried away, keep me true to Thee. But no answer came: and day followed night and night day; till at last the walls of Damascus came in sight and the journey was all but closed.
IV. The momentous question.It was midday, when suddenly there was a blinding flash brighter than the sunlight, and Saul fell to the ground, and he heard a voice calling him by name, Saul, Saul, why persecutest thou Me? Yes, why indeed? What a flash of light there was in that question! It was more wonderful than any outward miracle. You might explain away an outward phenomenon and say that Saul was overborne by the strain and fatigue of the journey and the heat of the midday sun, and swooned and fell from his horse. But you cannot explain away that question. It was not a question he could have asked himself. No doubt he did ask again and again, Why am I persecuting these few feeble folk far away from home? But to Saul Jesus was dead, he could not persecute Him; and yet here was Jesus of Nazareth saying, Why persecutest Me? Yes, why? If Jesus was risen from the dead, if He was indeed living again with His followers and feeling their sufferings as His own, what was Saul doing, why was he persecuting at all? The power of that question is clear. Think also of its tenderness: He does not smite the persecutor, He does not even upbraid him, but only asks this question. Of another young man we read that, Jesus beholding him, loved him, and, so it is herethe same irresistible tenderness which we find so often in the Gospel story is at work still. What wilt thou have me to do? is the only possible reply. Go into the city and it shall be told thee what thou shalt do. The conquest was complete. The King of men had claimed another subject. It was one of the decisive victories of the world, and we thank God still for the conversion of His blessed Apostle St. Paul.
V. The answer to the inquiry.So, then, we have begun to find an answer to the inquiry, What was it that drew Saul of Tarsus to Jesus Christ, and bound St. Paul the Apostle for his life as His devoted slave? It was a personal contact with the love of the living Christ. I drew them with the cords of a man, with bands of love.
VI. Have you come into personal contact with the love of the living Christ?If not, why not? You must not wait for a special interposition, for a wonderful vision such as was granted to Saul of Tarsus; that was necessary for him; he could get no nearer without it: there were no Gospels written then for him to read about Jesus, and he was hopelessly prejudiced against all living Christian witnesses; he was certain that Jesus was dead; nothing but the voice of the living Christ could possibly reach him. But with you it is different. You have the Gospels, you have the living witnesses who plead in Christs Name. Why have you not felt His power? Will you ask yourselves the question? I will not put it in the form in which Christ put it to SaulWhy persecutest thou Me? though He Himself has said: He that is not with Me is against Me, and so in some sense it might be applicable; but I will rather assume that you want to do right, as Saul wanted to do right, that you want to consecrate your life to the highest purposes, and yet you have not won your way to Christ, and so I ask, Why not? Why have you not come into contact with Jesus Christ? Why are you not in His service? It is the same question, only shaped to suit your case; and the tender, loving Holy Spirit which Christ sends to plead on His behalf shall press you for the reply.
Dean Armitage Robinson.
Fuente: Church Pulpit Commentary
7
Act 22:7. The account here and that in chapter 9:4 mentions simply that Paul fell to the ground, while chapter 26:14 says they all fell dawn. Both accounts are true, but Paul was the only one who heard the question from the voice.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Act 22:7. Saul, Saul. Here, and again in Pauls own account before Agrippa and Bernice at Csarea, the language Hebrew is specially noticed (chap. Act 26:14); and also in the narrative of chap. 9, the Aramaic (Hebrew) form of Saul, Saoul, is found. The voice from heaven had so imprinted itself on the memory of Paul that he reproduces the call to him as he first heard it.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
See notes on verse 3