Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Romans 7:12
Wherefore the law [is] holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.
12. Wherefore, &c.] This is not a direct inference from the preceding passage. The holiness of the Law is rather assumed as an axiom than proved. But the fault of Sin has been so brought out as to leave the faultlessness of the Law vividly in view.
the law the commandment ] The general and the particular. Here “Thou shalt not lust” is the specimen-commandment. Observe the emphasis on the goodness of the commandment; it is not merely “holy” but “holy, and just, and good:” q. d., “not only is the Law in the abstract a sacred thing, but its most definite and restraining precepts are so also, in the fullest sense.” See Mat 5:19; (also ch. Rom 12:2.)
This verse is sometimes arranged as the close of a sub-paragraph. It seems better to take it as equally connected with the past and coming contexts; introducing now the fuller and deeper statement of the case.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Wherefore – So that. The conclusion to which we come is, that the Law is not to be blamed, though these are its effects under existing circumstances. The source of all this is not the Law, but the corrupt nature of man. The Law is good; and yet the position of the apostle is true, that it is not adapted to purify the heart of fallen man. Its tendency is to excite increased guilt, conflict, alarm, and despair. This verse contains an answer to the question in Rom 7:7, Is the law sin?
Is holy – Is not sin; compare Rom 7:7. It is pure in its nature.
And the commandment – The word commandment is here synonymous with the Law. It properly means what is enjoined.
Holy – Pure.
Just – Righteous in its claims and penalties. It is not unequal in its exactions.
Good – In itself good; and in its own nature tending to produce happiness. The sin and condemnation of the guilty is not the fault of the Law. If obeyed, it would produce happiness everywhere. See a most beautiful description of the law of God in Psa 19:7-11.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Rom 7:12
Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy: and Just, and good.
The law
I. Its nature. It is–
1. Universal in its extent. It is binding at all times, in all places, and upon all.
2. Perpetual in its obligation: it can allow of no change. Other laws, the ceremonial laws, e.g., may be abrogated or altered, but the moral law, being founded upon the Divine nature, knows no change. Heaven and earth shall pass away, etc.
3. Perfect in its character. Being the expression and emanation of the perfect nature and will of God, the law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul.
4. Spiritual (Rom 7:14). It comes from God who is Spirit; and it demands of man spiritual obedience.
5. Holy; free from all spot and blemish.
6. Just, founded upon the eternal principles of right.
7. Good, benevolent in its design, tending to promote happiness, and promising life to those that observe it.
II. Its excellence and importance. This is implied in its nature; but it will further appear if we consider–
1. It was originally implanted in the constitution of mans nature. A written law was not necessary, for the love of God, the essential principle of this law, was bound up in the constitution of Adam (Gen 1:27; Rom 2:15). And it is the purpose of God to replace the law in the position which it originally occupied; to rewrite it upon mans heart.
2. In the giving of this law at Sinai we see another illustration of its excellence.
(1) The law contained in the ten commandments was given directly by word of mouth from God. All the other commandments were given through Moses.
(2) It was written twice by the finger of God upon both sides of the tables, perhaps covered the whole of them to show that there was to be no addition or alteration.
(3) It was written not upon parchment, but upon stone, to show its perpetual obligation.
3. Our Lord
(1) Ever recognised it, vindicated its authority, expounded its import, and enforced it by His own sanction and teaching.
(2) Not only taught the law, but practised it, rendering it a perfect and sinless obedience.
(3) Honoured it by undergoing the penalty which it threatens against all that break its enactments.
III. Its use.
1. To mankind at large–
(1) It exhibits, magnifies, and explains the character of God.
(2) It teaches men the principles of right and wrong, and how they are bound to act with reference to God, their neighbour, and themselves. The gospel has in no sense superseded or abrogated the law. It comes in as a supplemental system, saving man from the penalty which the law threatens, and placing man in a position whereby he may render obedience to that law.
2. But whilst saying this a considerable difficulty suggests itself as to the relation of the believer to the law. We find a class of passages which appear to teach its eternal obligation upon all men (Mat 5:1-48; Rom 3:31; Rom 13:10; Jam 1:25; Jam 2:8). But we find other passages which appear to teach that the Christian is not under the law (1Ti 1:9; Rom 6:14; Rom 7:6). How are we to understand this? The true believer is not under the law–
(1) As a ground of condemnation or as a ground of justification. Inasmuch as Christ has perfectly obeyed the law, and atoned for the Jaws breach, that work is imputed and made over to him that believes, so that he is delivered from the condemnation of the law (Rom 8:1-39). So far therefore as his judicial standing before God is concerned, he and the law are altogether separated.
(2) In regard to sanctification. When a man believes truly in Christ, he has not only imputed to him the merits of Christ, but he has imparted to him the power of Christs new life. He is born again of the Spirit. And where that Holy Spirit is, every desire which He inspires, every principle which He suggests, is holy. The man is no longer under the law as a handwriting against him, for he has its principle implanted in his heart, and he can say, Oh, how I love Thy law; it is my meditation all the day.
3. Of what use then is the law to a believer? I answer that if the work of grace were perfected within us, that if we acted in perfect harmony with the instincts and quickenings of the Spirit of God, it would be of no use. But inasmuch as the work of grace is not perfected within us, inasmuch as there is a tendency oftentimes towards evil, the law of God is necessary for him who is not under the law, but under grace.
(1) In keeping us under grace. The law not only leads him as to a schoolmaster first of all to Christ, but keeps him trusting in the Saviour.
(2) In restraining the believer from sin. There are those who think there is but one motive which ought to influence a Christians heart–love, and no doubt perfect love would be enough. But we are not perfect, and therefore, though we are delivered from the fear of bondage and the fear of terror, yet the fear of reverence ought ever to influence the Christian.
4. As regards the unconverted, the law is of great importance.
(1) As a restraining principle to keep them back from open and notorious sin.
(2) As a convincing principle (Rom 7:9).
(3) As a principle of conversion. The law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul. Use it honestly, prayerfully, perseveringly, and you will find you can have no rest, until it has shut you up into the faith, until it has been the means of driving you to that refuge which is open for the sinner in Christ. (E. Bayley, B. D.)
The law holy and just and good
Observe–
I. The doctrine laid down in my text.
1. The law has different meanings. At one time it stands for the whole religion of Moses; as when the Jews are said to make their boast of the law. In another place it means the ceremonies which formed a prominent part of that religion; in which sense the law had a shadow of good things to come. But, very frequently the ten commandments are meant, as here.
(1) By quoting the tenth commandment in Rom 7:7, Paul shows that the whole argument relates to the moral law.
(2) This allusion also explains the repetition in the text. The whole law, but particularly that commandment to which I have alluded, is holy, just, and good.
(3) The selection of this particular command shows that Paul viewed it as a spiritual law; extending, not to actions only, but to desires. He never knew what the law was till this tenth commandment came with power to his conscience; e.g., the sixth, he thought, forbad only actual murder; the seventh, actual adultery; the eighth, actual stealing. But when at length it was said, Thou shalt not covet, he then perceived that even the desire of things forbidden was sinful.
2. What, then, is the doctrine laid down by St. Paul concerning this heart-searching law?
(1) It is holy.
(a) The things which it forbids are evil; the dispositions which it requires are excellent.
(b) By what standard shall we estimate holiness and unholiness?
There is none other but the will and character of God. Those actions and dispositions which are agreeable to His nature, and which resemble His inimitable perfections, are holy; those of a contrary kind are unholy. Gods law is the very copy of His own Holy character; were it perfectly obeyed man would be holy, as God is holy.
(2) It is just.
(a) God could require nothing short of this. Anything less than entire purity of heart is not only different from Gods nature, but directly opposed to it. We may, without offence, be less wise or powerful; but it is impossible to admit the thought of His consenting that we shall be less holy. God made man in His own image, and after His own likeness; God made man upright. Was it unreasonable to require that man should preserve this holy likeness?
(b) But you may object that we have now lost our original likeness to God; and that it is therefore no longer just to demand from us perfect obedience. But Gods rights cannot be diminished by any change in our condition. A bankrupt has lost the power of paying his debts; yet it is still just in the creditor to demand them, especially when, as is the case with men, the bankruptcy is the result of wickedness.
(3) It is good. The whole of it tends to our welfare. If we had never broken it, there would have been no such thing as sorrow; and, if men would govern their hearts and lives by it, the worlds miseries would soon have an end. For what is the sum and substance of its requirements? Love to God above all, love to our neighbour as to ourselves. Now we know that love is happiness. The joys of heaven will consist of perfect love to God, and the mutual love of each other.
II. Its practical uses. Learn–
1. A lesson of the deepest self-abasement. The law, when first given to man, only made known to him his duty; but ever since the fall it has taught the knowledge of sin. The law is holy; but what are we? Moreover, the doctrine shuts out all excuse. We cannot complain of the law, for it is just and good. Yet have we all our lives acted contrary to it.
2. A lesson of despair. Whatever it may have been to man in a state of innocence, it is now the ministration of condemnation. It pronounces a curse on every transgressor; it worketh wrath; it has shut us up like prisoners, under a charge of sin so fully proved that it cannot be evaded. From all this let us learn that by the deeds of the law no flesh can be saved. Perfect obedience is necessary if we are to be justified by it. Can you, then, stand up and claim a full acquittal? If once you have sinned your soul is lost. Learn this and you will then be prepared to hear of a Saviour, who hath redeemed us from the curse of the law, being made a curse for us, and despair will prove the parent of hope and joy.
3. How you ought to walk and please God. The law is what it ever was, holy, and just, and good. And therefore, though it cannot justify us as a covenant, it must still instruct us as a guide. (J. Jowett, M. A.)
The law holy and just and good
I. Holy.
1. In principle.
2. In requirement.
3. In operation.
4. In tendency.
As a whole and in each commandment it bears the character and expresses the mind and will of Him who is infinitely holy, and requires only what is holy and pure (Mic 6:8).
II. Just. It demands what is just and right and nothing more, and requires only what man was made capable of rendering. It tends to promote justice and righteousness everywhere; and secures to each his due–God, our neighbour, ourselves.
III. Good–useful, beneficial, tending to the happiness of man. The commandment broken was Paradise lost; the commandment observed will be Paradise restored. (T. Robinson, D. D.)
The law holy and just and good
Some think these high characters are given to the law as being holy, in teaching us our duty towards God; just in prescribing our duty towards our neighbour, and good in regard to ourselves. Others thus, the law is holy respecting the matter of it, because it prescribeth holy things; just in propounding rewards and punishments, and good in respect to the end, leading to holiness and happiness. But I think we ought to carry the point much further: all these titles are given to the law, both in relation to the Author, the matter, and the end of the law. The Author of the law is holy, just and good; so is the doctrine or matter contained in the law; and so is the end proposed by the law. (J. Stafford.)
The excellence of the law
Holy in its origin, just in its requirements, good in its purpose. (Archdn. Farrar.)
The holy law
Holy in its nature, just in its form, good in its end. (T. Robinson, D. D.)
Perfection of the law
Gods justice is seen in the law given to man as the universal law of his existence. To give law to rational creatures is the prerogative of their Creator, and His law is, by an inevitable consequence, holy, just and good; it neither prohibits nor enjoins anything that is not in the most perfect accordance with the infinite perfections of God and the true and best interests of man. It represents Him as the Righteous Governor of the universe, whose laws are in perfect consistency with the principles of equity, and whose character is in accordance with His laws. Referring to these principles of morality which are engraven on the heart of man, it declares that they were engraven by the finger of God, and that conscience is His vicegerent, speaking to us in His name, and making known to us the principles of His moral administration. And it unfolds a more copious code of morality, in which the same principles are revealed, for our better information and surer guidance–principles which, being engraven in the book of nature, and revealed in the written Word, are infallibly certain, and ought to be regarded as a true manifestation of the righteous character of Him who is the Author alike of nature and of revelation. (J. Buchanan.)
The law and the gospel
I. Their difference.
1. In time and mode of original relation. The law is coeval with creation; the gospel was made known after the fall. The law is discoverable by the light of nature, the gospel is a hidden mystery.
2. The law addresses man as a creature, the gospel as a sinner.
3. Command, the characteristic of the law; promise of the gospel is the promise of life in Christ. Contrast between the covenant of Sinai and the covenant of grace.
4. The law condemns, the gospel justifies. Law only acquits or condemns, mercy is revealed in the gospel.
5. The law requires, the gospel enables. No enabling power in a command; motive and power supplied by the gospel.
II. Their harmony.
1. There is no real antagonism.
(1) The law prepares the way for the gospel.
(2) The gospel fulfils, and so establishes the law. There are two ways of dealing with law, repeal and relaxation. Neither mode supposable in Divine government. How can man be saved and yet the law upheld? Perfect obedience the one condition of life. Christ undertakes for man. Fulfilment in mans own person. Faith lays hold of precepts as well as promises. The law is a rule of life, written on the heart. The gospel secures its fulfilment for man and in man.
(a) Assigns its just place and value to the Law in the Christian scheme.
(b) Assigns its just place and value to the gospel.
Conclusion;
1. How sure a foundation laid for the believers hope.
2. How sure a provision made for the believers holiness. (E. Bayley, B. D.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 12. Wherefore the law is holy] As if he had said, to soothe his countrymen, to whom he had been showing the absolute insufficiency of the law either to justify or save from sin: I do not intimate that there is any thing improper or imperfect in the law as a rule of life: it prescribes what is holy, just, and good; for it comes from a holy, just, and good God. The LAW, which is to regulate the whole of the outward conduct, is holy; and the COMMANDMENT, Thou shalt not covet, which is to regulate the heart, is not less so. All is excellent and pure; but it neither pardons sin nor purifies the heart; and it is because it is holy, just, and good, that it condemns transgressors to death.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Wherefore the law is holy; and so the objection, Rom 7:7, was a groundless objection: for though the law were the occasion of sin, or were made advantage of by sin, as Rom 7:8, yet it was not the cause of it; that, on all hands, is acknowledged to be holy, &c.
The law; the law in all the branches of it.
The commandment; particularly the preceptire part of the law, and every particular precept.
Holy, and just, and good: the three epithets here given the law of God may be thus distinguished; it is holy in respect of the ceremonial part, it is just in respect of the judicial part, and good in respect of the moral part of it. Or else the law is holy, as it teacheth us our duty unto God; just, as it showeth us our duty to our neighbour; good, in regard of the effect and end, as it works goodness in the observer thereof, and is conducive to his temporal and eternal good.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
12, 13. Wherefore“Sothat.”
the law is“isindeed”
good, and thecommandmentthat one so often referred to, which forbids alllusting.
holy, and just, and good.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Therefore the law is holy,…. This is a conclusion or inference drawn from the preceding discourse, in commendation of the law; that standing clear of any charge or imputation of sin, as being the cause of it. This epithet the apostle gives to the law is what the Jews frequently give it; worthy are the Israelites, say they h,
“to whom is given “the holy law”; in which they study day and night.”
By “the law” is meant the whole body of the precepts of it in general; and by
the commandment, either the same, or everyone of the commandments in particular, and especially that which is cited, “thou shall not covet”. Some have thought that the three properties of it design the threefold division of the law; and suppose that by that which is “holy” is meant the ceremonial law, which sanctified to the purifying of the flesh; by that which is “just”, the judicial law, which pointed out to the Jewish commonwealth what was right and wrong; and by that which is “good”, the moral law in all its precepts: but nothing is more certain, than that the moral law is only spoken of in this context, which may be said to be
holy, because of its author, the holy God, from whom nothing can come but what is holy; and because of the matter of it, it is a transcript of the holy nature of God, a declaration of his holy will; it requires holiness both of heart and life; it forbids whatever is unholy, and commands nothing but what is holy; it teaches men to live holy, sober, righteous, and godly lives. It may be truly called
just, or righteous, as it demands perfect obedience to all its precepts, or it will not admit of it as a righteousness; as it pronounces guilty, curses and condemns for every disobedience of it; as it deals impartially with persons the transgressors of it; and as it acquits believers upon the foot of the righteousness of Christ, the fulfilling end of it. It is rightly called
good, from the author of it, God, from whom every good thing comes, and nothing else; from the matter of it, and from the use of it both to saints and sinners.
h Zohar in Gen. fol. 48. 4.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Holy, and righteous, and good ( ). This is the conclusion (wherefore, ) to the query in verse 7. The commandment is God’s and so holy like Him, just in its requirements and designed for our good. The modern revolt against law needs these words.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
Holy, just, good. Holy as God ‘s revelation of Himself; just (Rev., righteous) in its requirements, which correspond to God ‘s holiness; good, salutary, because of its end.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “Wherefore the law is holy “ (hoste ho men nomos hagios) “So the law is (exists as) holy;” this conclusion is the one with which Paul’s premise or argument began, Rom 7:7. It is holy because it reveals to man what he is by nature and the exceeding sinfulness of his deeds, Deu 4:8; Deu 10:13.
2) “And the commandment holy” (Kai he entole hagia) “and the commandment (is) holy,” referring specifically to the tenth commandment, the one regarding lust of the old covetous nature, the will to do as one wills or pleases in general, and all the commandments it undergirds, as the bottom one. Joh 7:7; Psa 19:7-11; Psa 119:160; Rom 3:19.
3) “And just and good,” (kai dikaia kai hagiathe) “And (the law is) just and good;” reflecting the attributes and character of the giver of the Law, Exo 20:1; 1Ti 1:18. The specific intent or purpose of the law was to show how bad sin is, before the holiness of God, and why and how man may find pardon and deliverance from the consequence of his guilt of sin, and find strength and help to live usefully as a child of God, while still in the sinful body.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
12. So then the law is indeed holy, etc. Some think that the words law and commandment is a repetition of the same thing; with whom I agree; (216) and I consider that there is a peculiar force in the words, when he says, that the law itself and whatever is commanded in the law, is holy, and therefore to be regarded with the highest reverence, — that it is just, and cannot therefore be charged with anything wrong, — that it is good, and hence pure and free from everything that can do harm. He thus defends the law against every charge of blame, that no one should ascribe to it what is contrary to goodness, justice, and holiness.
(216) This is doubtless true, and it is an example of what the Apostle’s manner of writing is, it being that of the ancient prophets. How various are the words used in the Psa 119:0 to designate the law or the revealed will of God? and two different words are often used in the same verse.
Having spoken of the law in connection with sin, the Apostle may be supposed to have had the character of sin in view in characterizing the law. Sin works depraved desires and lusts; the law is holy: sin deceives and acts the traitor, the law is plain-dealing and just: sin leads to death and misery; the law is good and leads to happiness. The last contrast is evident from what follows in the next verse, “Was that which is good made death unto me?” — Ed.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(12) Wherefore.This word introduces a conclusion, not from the verse immediately preceding, but from the whole of the last five verses. The Apostle glances back for a moment over the course of his argument.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
12. Wherefore The conclusion is that the law stands vindicated in its divine perfection.
Law The eternal law universally taken.
Commandment The law manifested in some special requirement, as to Adam, in the ten commandments, and in the details of the Mosaic requirements.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘So that the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and righteous, and good.’
Thus he had recognised that ‘the Law was holy, and that the commandment was holy and just, and good’. They were from God and were instruments of God set apart for His holy purpose, and they were both righteous and good. It was not the Law that was to blame for man’s sins. The Law had simply revealed them for what they were.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Rom 7:12. Wherefore the law is holy In Rom 7:7 the Apostle laid down this position, “that the law was not sin.” In Rom 7:8-11 he proves it, by shewing that the law was very strict in forbidding of sin, so far as to reach the very mind, and the internal acts of concupiscence; and that it was sin remaining under the law (which annexed death to every transgression) that brought death on the Israelites.He here infers, that the law was not sinful, but righteous, just, and good; just such as by the eternal rule of right it ought to be.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Rom 7:12 . ] The result of Rom 7:7-11 .
] The contrast for which prepares the way was intended to be: “but sin has to me redounded unto death through the law, which in itself is good.” This follows in Rom 7:13 as regards substance , but not as regards form . See on Rom 7:13 .
The predicates
( holy , as God’s revelation of Himself, Rom 7:14 ; 2Ma 6:23 ; 2Ma 6:28 ), which is assigned to the Mosaic law generally, and , ( just , in respect to its requirements, which are only such as accord with the holiness), and ( excellent , on account of its salutary object), which are justly (comp. Act 7:38 ) attributed to the exhaust the contents of the opposite of in Rom 7:7 . They are accumulated on , because the latter had just been specially described in Rom 7:7 ff. as that which occasioned the activity of the sin-principle.
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
12 Wherefore the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and just, and good.
Ver. 12. The commandment ] Vis legis in mandando et praecipiendo. The word ( ) properly signifieth an affirmative precept.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
12. ] So that (seeing it was not the law in general, nor this particular commandment, that wrought coveting in me, but the sinful principle in me taking advantage of these , which themselves were given and not ) the law (indeed) is holy ( , as understanding a to fellow ‘but it was sin,’ &c.: which does follow in an expanded form, in Rom 7:13 ), and the commandment ( , Rom 7:8 ) holy and just and good (Theodoret thus accounts for the epithets: , , . See also 1Ti 1:8 ).
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Rom 7:12 . The conclusion is that the law is holy (this is the answer to the question with which the discussion started in Rom 7:7 : ;), and the commandment, which is the law in operation, holy and just and good. means that it belongs to God and has a character corresponding; that its requirements are those which answer to the relations in which man stands to God and his fellow-creatures; that in its nature and aim it is, beneficent; man’s weal, not his woe, is its natural end. There is no formal contrast to , such as was perhaps in the Apostle’s mind when he began the sentence, and might have been introduced by ; but a real contrast is given in Rom 7:13 .
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
the law = the law indeed (Greek. men. Omitted by Authorized Version and Revised Version.)
just = righteous. App-191.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
12.] So that (seeing it was not the law in general, nor this particular commandment, that wrought coveting in me, but the sinful principle in me taking advantage of these, which themselves were given and not ) the law (indeed) is holy (, as understanding a to fellow-but it was sin, &c.: which does follow in an expanded form, in Rom 7:13), and the commandment ( , Rom 7:8) holy and just and good (Theodoret thus accounts for the epithets: , , . See also 1Ti 1:8).
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Rom 7:12. , holy) supply from what follows, and just and good; although it was necessary to accumulate these synonymous terms chiefly in defence of the commandment, with its stinging power [rather than of the law]: holy, just, good, in relation respectively to its efficient cause, its form, and its end; (as we find in the MS. notes of Dorscheus) or holy in respect of my duties to God; just, in respect of my neighbour; good in respect of my own nature;[71] with which whatever is commanded is in harmony, for life is promised, Rom 7:10. The third of these three epithets is taken up with very great propriety in the following verse.
[71] Th. , is that which is precisely what it should be, without regard to the question whether good or evil flow from it, just, right. But , what is profitable and of benefit to men. The commandment is , for it teaches nothing but what is just; , for it regards the happiness of those, to whom it is given. It is also , not because it makes holy, but because it is holy in itself, sacred to God, and therefore to be held inviolate.-See Tittmann Syn. Gr. Text.-ED.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
Rom 7:12
Rom 7:12
So that-[The conclusion from the foregoing representation of the effect of the law is that it is not to be blamed for the evil which it incidentally produces.]
the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and righteous, and good.-The law God gave Moses is the divine standard of holiness, righteousness, and goodness. [The law is that which says, and the commandment is that which is said. The law is the abstract, the commandment the concrete.]
Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary
the law: Rom 7:14, Rom 3:31, Rom 12:2, Deu 4:8, Deu 10:12, Neh 9:13, Psa 19:7-12, Psa 119:38, Psa 119:86, Psa 119:127, Psa 119:137, Psa 119:140, Psa 119:172, 1Ti 1:8
the commandment: Rom 7:7
Reciprocal: 2Ki 18:3 – right in the sight Job 33:27 – right Psa 19:8 – is pure Psa 33:4 – the word Psa 111:8 – are done Psa 119:47 – which Psa 119:62 – thy Psa 119:128 – I esteem Pro 30:5 – word Isa 42:21 – he will Hos 8:12 – written Hos 14:9 – for Rom 7:16 – I consent 2Co 3:7 – was Eph 6:1 – for Jam 1:25 – the perfect Jam 4:11 – speaketh evil of the law 2Pe 2:21 – holy 1Jo 5:3 – and
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
:12
Rom 7:12. See the comments on verse 10.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Rom 7:12. So that. The result of the whole discussion (Rom 7:7-11) is not to cast doubt upon the law, but to maintain its character as worthy of God who gave it. The original suggests a second member of the sentence, which is indicated in Rom 7:13.
The law if holy. This positive character of the law Paul does not stop to prove; for the only suspicion against its holy character came from the sinful results already spoken of. But there the law was constantly condemning, which condemnation betokened that it was holy.
And the commandment. What is true of the law as a whole, is also true of its single commandments.
Holy and just and good, Holy, because it comes from a holy God; just, because of its form; good, because of its end (so Bengel). As the specific commandment had in each case been used by sin to deceive and slay him, the Apostle gives this full declaration of the character of the commandment.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Observe here, What care and holy caution the apostle uses to vindicate and clear the holy law of God from all fault and blame, charging his guilt, not upon the commandment, but upon the corruption of his own heart, which took occasion to be stirring in him, and by the commandment slew him; affirming nevertheless, that the law of God in itself, and in its own nature, is holy, just, and good.
Here note, that the apostle adorns the law with the most excellent eulogy and commendation.
‘Tis holy, 1. As it enjoins all acts of piety towards God; namely, adoration of his majesty, imitation of his purity, resignation to his providence, obedience to his commands.
2. ‘Tis just, as it directs us in our duty to others in every capacity and relative wherein we stand, and obliges us to walk by that rule of equity, to do to others as we would they should do unto us.
3. ‘Tis good to the man that keeps it, commanding nothing but what is influential upon his well-being both here and hereafter.
Could we set aside the authority of the Lawgiver, yet all the precepts of the law, for their moral goodness, deserve our esteem, and choice, and entire observation; nothing being required of us but what is our duty and interest as men, and which tends to the perfecting and ennobling of our natures: Well then might our apostle determine, that the law is holy, the commandment holy, and just, and good.
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament
Rom 7:12-13. Wherefore Since then, by what has been said, it appears that the law is not the cause of sin or death, except indirectly and by accident, it must be acquitted from this charge, and acknowledged to be holy; and the commandment The preceptive part of the moral law, and every particular precept of it; is holy, just, and good It springs from and partakes of the holy nature of God; tends only to promote holiness and a conformity to God, and prescribes our duty to God in his worship and service. It is every way just and right in itself, and commands nothing but what is agreeable to those common apprehensions of right and equity which are imprinted in our natures: it is designed wholly for the good of man, 1Ti 1:8, and is really profitable and conducive to our good, both temporal and eternal, and subservient to the common interest of mankind. Was then that which is good made the cause of evil to me? Yea, of death, which is the greatest of evils? Was it made the proper and direct cause of death? Not so: But it was sin, which was made death to me, inasmuch as it wrought death in me, even by that which is good. Here the apostle clearly distinguishes between a proper cause and an occasion, or cause by accident. The law is the occasion of death to sinners; but sin is the proper or efficient cause of that evil. That it might appear sin Might appear superlatively vile; working death in me by that which is good By the good law: that sin by the commandment Manifesting and forbidding it, and thereby awakening and irritating it; might become exceeding sinful That, being quickened and excited by so innocent and holy a thing as the commandment, it might thereby show its horrid and vile nature; the guilt of it being hereby greatly aggravated. Our translators suppose that [rendered sinful] is put here for the adjective. But, as Beza observes, it is used as a substantive, and signifies a sinner. For the apostle carries on the personification of sin, begun chap. Rom 6:6, by showing its exceeding sinfulness in this respect, that it makes the law, which was intended for life, the occasion of mens death. Macknight.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Vv. 12, 13. So that the law assuredly is holy, and the commandment holy, just, and good. Did then that which is good become death unto me? Let it not be so! But sin, that it might appear sin, wrought death in me by that which is good; that sin by the commandment might become exceeding sinful.
The result formulated in these two verses is this: The holier the law is, the more does sin, which has used it to produce evil, appear thereby in the blackness of its nature.
The apostle begins, in view of the result indicated, by removing from the law all suspicion of blame. The , undoubtedly, has no corresponding , but. So far as the sense goes, the is found in Rom 7:13 b This is intended to guard beforehand the unassailable character of the law. Whatever may be said afterward, nothing shall invalidate the character of holiness belonging to the law. The law, , here denotes the Mosaic system in its entirety, and the commandment , each article of the code in particular. The term , holy, is the word which in Scripture denotes the perfect love of good; when it is applied to God, it is the identity of His will with goodness; when it is applied to the creature, it is his voluntary consecration to God, the one Being essentially good. The law is holy, precisely because it demands this consecration, and the commandment also, because each commandment only demands this consecration in a particular relation. The two characteristics just and good flow from and are included in that of holiness. The commandment is just (), because it regulates in a normal way the relations between different beings. It is good (), in the sense of beneficent; this epithet is explained by the preceding words: fitted to give life (Rom 7:10).
Fuente: Godet Commentary (Luke, John, Romans and 1 Corinthians)
So that the law is holy, and the commandment holy, and righteous, and good. [In the days of his youth (and perhaps also even in his young manhood– Phi 3:6), Paul had that free, untroubled conscience which is enjoyed by the innocent, and felt that he lived, and was entitled to live, before God; but later, as to its fullest extent he grasped the meaning of the law, he found how vain was his confidence; and that he was really a condemned man in the sight of God, having no true life in him (Rom 6:21-23), being dead in trespasses and sin. Thus the law which was ordained to give life, and had the promise of life attached to it (Rom 10:5; Lev 18:5), he found, to his amazed surprise, to be to him, because of his sinfulness, only a means of death: for sin, finding in the law a golden opportunity to accomplish his ruin, deceived him into breaking the law, and, by thus drawing down upon him the curse of the violated law, slew him. It has been observed that sin, as here personified, occupies the place filled by Satan in literal life (Gen 3:14; 2Co 11:3). Again we should note how Satan, operating on the sinful nature of Paul, beguiled and deceived him into supposing that he could obtain righteousness and life by keeping the Mosaic law (Phi 3:4-7), and also into thinking that in persecuting Christians he was doing God service (Act 26:9), while in reality he was making himself the chief of sinners (1Ti 1:15). So, clearing the law of this doubt which his own argument had raised, the apostle declares in conclusion that it is worthy of all the unquestioned respect and confidence which it had so long enjoyed as a holy, righteous and good institution of God.]
Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)
12. So the law indeed is holy, just and good. That is certainly true, because the law is the very radiation of the divine purity and glory, yet when antagonized becomes the swift vehicle of condemnation, infinitely augmenting eternal responsibility.
Fuente: William Godbey’s Commentary on the New Testament
Verse 12
Wherefore; that is, since the aggravation of human guilt, resulting from the exhibition of the law, is to be charged to sin, that is, to the sinfulness of the heart, and not to the law.
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
7:12 {6} Wherefore the law [is] holy, and the {t} commandment holy, and just, and good.
(6) The conclusion: that the law is holy in itself, and that all the fault is in us, the ones who abuse the law.
(t) Concerning the commandment, not to covet.
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
Here is a concluding reaffirmation of the answer to Paul’s question in Rom 7:7. Far from being sinful, the Law is holy. It comes from a holy God and searches out sin. It is righteous because it lays just requirements on people and because it forbids and condemns sin. It is good because its purpose is to produce blessing and life (Rom 7:10). [Note: See Adeyemi, pp. 55-57.]