Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Timothy 2:9
Wherein I suffer trouble, as an evil doer, [even] unto bonds; but the word of God is not bound.
9. wherein I suffer trouble, as an evil doer ] Hardship rather than ‘trouble,’ the same word as in 2Ti 2:3; malefactor rather than ‘evil doer,’ the same word as of the thieves on the cross, Luk 23:32, these being the only N.T. occurrences.
even unto bonds ] ‘Even’ need not have been italicised in A.V., much less omitted by R.V.; for the force of the preposition is more fully given with than without it. In the similar passage, Php 2:8, the ‘obedient unto death’ of A.V. has actually been altered by R.V. into ‘obedient even unto death.’ Vulg. ‘usque ad.’
‘Over the blackened ruins of the city (the firing of which had been falsely set down to the Christians) amid the squalid misery of its inhabitants, perhaps with many a fierce scowl turned on “the malefactor” he passed to his gloomy dungeon. There as the gate clanged upon him, he sat down, chained night and day, without further hope, a doomed man. His case was far more miserable than it had been in his first imprisonment, two or three years earlier. He was no longer permitted to reside “in his own hired room.” He was in the custody, not as before of an honourable soldier like Burrus, but of the foul Tigellinus, whose hands were still dripping with Christian blood.’ Farrar, Messages of the Books, p. 388.
but the word of God is not bound ] Not his own preaching power, but the power of the Gospel at large. The Church is more than the individual, however eminent. The perfect passive tense here represents the state, ‘is not in a bound state,’ is not ‘cribbed, cabin’d and confined’; according to the proper force of the perfect, as in 1Ti 6:17, nor have their hope set on,’ 2Ti 4:8, ‘who have their love set on his appearing.’
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Wherein I suffer trouble, as an evil-doer – as if I were a violator of the laws. That is, I am treated as if I were a criminal.
Even unto bonds – As if I were one of the words kind of malefactors; see the notes at Eph 6:20. During the apostles first imprisonment at Rome, he was permitted to dwell in his own hired house, though guarded by a soldier, and probably chained to him; see the notes at Act 28:16, Act 28:30. What was his condition in his second imprisonment, during which this Epistle was written, we have no means of knowing with certainty. It is probable, however, that he was subjected to much more rigid treatment than he had been in the first instance. The tradition is, that he and Peter were together in the Mamertine prison at Rome; and the place is still shown in which it is said that they were confined. The Mamertine prisons are of great antiquity. According to Livy, they were constructed by Ancus Martius, and enlarged by Servius Tullius. The lower prison is supposed to have been once a quarry, and to have been at one time occupied as a granary. These prisons are on the descent of the Capitoline Mount, toward the Forum. They consist of two apartments, one over the other, built with large, uncemented stones. There is no entrance to either, except by a small aperture in the roof, and by a small hole in the upper floor, leading to the cell below, without any staircase to either. The upper prison is twenty-seven feet long, by twenty wide; the lower one is elliptical, and measures twenty feet by ten. In the lower one is a small spring, which is said at Rome to have arisen at the command of Peter, to enable him to baptize his keepers, Processus and Martianus, with 47 companions, whom he converted. No certain reliance can be placed on any part of this tradition, though in itself there is no improbability in supposing that these prisons may have been used for confining Christians, and the apostle Paul among others. Dr. Burton says that a more horrible place for the confinement of a human being can scarcely be conceived.
But the word of God is not bound – This is one of Pauls happy turns of thought; compare the notes at Act 26:29. The meaning is plain. The gospel was prospered. that could not be lettered and imprisoned. It circulated with freedom. even when he who was appointed to preach it was in chains; see Phi 1:13-14. As this was the great matter, his own imprisonment was of comparatively little consequence. What may befall us is of secondary importance. The grand thing is the triumph of truth on the earth; and well may we bear privations and sorrows, if the gospel moves on in triumph.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
2Ti 2:9
Wherein I suffer trouble, as an evil doer, even unto bonds; but the Word of God is not bound.
The Word of God is not bound
The apostle is imprisoned, but his tongue and his companions pen are free. He can still teach those who come to him; can still dictate letters for others to Luke and the faithful few who visit him. He has been able to influence those whom, but for his imprisonment, he would never have had an opportunity of reaching–Roman soldiers, and warders, and officials, and all who have to take cognisance of his trial before the imperial tribunal. The Word of God is not bound. While he is in prison Timothy and Titus and scores of other evangelists and preachers are free, Those who are left at large ought to labour all the more energetically and enthusiastically in order to supply whatever is lost by the apostles want of freedom, and in order to convince the world that this is no contest with a human organisation, or with human opinion, but with a Divine word and a Divine Person. The Word of God is not bound, because His Word is the truth, and it is the truth that makes men free. How can that of which the very essence is freedom, and of which the attribute is that it confers freedom, be itself kept in bondage? (A. Plummer, D. D.)
Gods Word free
He perhaps changes the expression from my gospel to the Word of God in order to indicate why it is that, although the preacher is in prison, yet his gospel is free, because the Word which he preaches is not his own, but Gods. (A. Plummer, D. D.)
Suffering furthers the gospel
The sufferings of the witnesses for Christ was, and is at all times, one of the most powerful agencies for the furtherance of the gospel (comp. Php 1:12-14; Col 1:24; 2Co 1:5-7). (Van Oosterzee.)
.
Suffering for the gospel
I. The gospel may occasion trouble.
1. For it bruiseth Satans head, discovereth his plots, overturneth his kingdoms.
2. Besides, it pulleth down the pride of man, provoketh to repentance, presseth him to deny himself, put confidence in Christ, and its worth is not known in the world.
II. The enemies of the church afflict the godly under a pretence of law.
1. For the conversation of the godly is holy, honest, harmless; that without such pretences they could have no seeming cause to afflict them.
2. The wicked, in their generation, are wise; therefore, to cover and cloak their mischiefs they must have some pretence of law.
III. Godly preachers may have great persecutions.
1. Because not many wise, mighty, or noble men are called neither to embrace the gospel nor preach it.
2. And godly preachers speak with power, curb mens raging corruptions, wound their rebellious spirits, and never prophesy of peace unto them.
IV. The liberty of Gods word is greatly to be regarded.
1. For it is the instrumental cause of mans conversion.
2. It increaseth grace, supports in trouble, and directeth to heaven.
3. And by the Word are not our adversaries foiled?
V. The persecution of preachers doth not always infringe the liberty of the Word.
1. Because then the Lord hath a special care to His own cause.
2. The example of some will embolden others. (J. Barlow, D. D.)
The Word of God not bound
1. The first idea suggested by the words in their original connection is, that Pauls incarceration did not hinder his own personal exertions as a preacher of the gospel. The practical lesson taught by Pauls example, in this view of it, is obvious. It is a reproof of our disposition to regard external disadvantages, restraints, and disabilities as either affording an immunity from blame if we neglect to use the power still left us, or discouraging the hope of any good effect from using it.
2. It was still true, however, that Pauls bonds diminished his efficiency. While he avoided the extreme of abandoning all hope, he equally avoided that of foolishly imagining that he could personally do as much for the diffusion of the gospel in his own hired house at Rome, as in the wide sweep of his itinerant apostleship. His work, though not yet at an end, was interrupted, and how should his lack of service be supplied? The answer is a plain one: By the labours of others. This was a large ingredient in the cup of the apostles consolation. He rejoiced not only in the labours of others during his comparative inaction, but in that inaction as the occasion, the exciting cause, of other mens exertions. Nay, he could even go so far as to consent to be wronged and dishonoured, if by that means his ruling passion might be gratified (see Php 1:12-21). What is the principle involved in this sublime profession of heroic devotion to the cause of Christ? Plainly this, that while Paul was ever ready to magnify his office as apostle to the Gentiles, and correctly appreciated both the honour and the difficulty of the work assigned to him, he never dreamed that it was meant to be entirely dependent upon his individual activity. It was not at himself, but at the word that he continually looked. Here, too, the lesson to ourselves is obvious. The apostles example ought to shame us out of all undue reliance upon certain human agencies and influences. Especially ought this to be the case in relation to our own share of the work to be performed for the honour of God and the salvation of the world.
3. One of the most important lessons, couched in this significant expression or deducible from it, would be lost upon us if we went no further. I refer to the doctrine that the truth of God is independent, not only of particular human agents, but of all human systems of opinion, organisations, and methods of procedure. The Word of God is not bound or restricted, in its salutary virtue, to the formal and appreciable power exerted upon Churches and Christian communities, or through the ordinary modes and channels of religious influence, however great this power may be, however indispensable to the completion of the work which God is working in our days. We may even admit that it is relatively almost all, but it is still not quite all; and the residuary power may be greater, vastly greater, than it seems to us before attentively considering the other less direct, less formal, less appreciable ways, in which the Word of God, the truth revealed in Scripture, is at this moment operating on the condition of society, apart from its constant and direct communication through the pulpit, the school, and the religious press. These are the agencies, indeed, by which sound doctrine is maintained in your Churches and impressed upon your youth; and this, in its perfection, is the highest end that can be wrought by the diffusion of the truth. But let us not forget that much may be effected even when this highest end is not attained. In many a heresy, for instance, how much truth maybe mingled, saving it from absolute corruption, and perhaps the souls of those who hold it, from perdition. Infidelity, in all its forms, affects to treat religion with contempt, as the offspring of ignorance; but its own discoveries are mere mutilations of the truths which it has stolen from its despised enemy. The attempt of infidelity to do away with the great doctrines of religion is the prowess of a dwarf mounting on a giants shoulders to put out his eyes. The same thing is true as to those slighter and more trivial, but for that very reason more effective, forms of unbelief, which are propagated, not in philosophical abstractions, but in poetry, romance, and other current literature. The novelist or journalist who, with a scorn of Christianity only to be equalled by his ignorance of what it teaches, undertakes to Show his readers a more excellent way, often brings them at last to some elementary truth, already wrought into the mind and stamped upon the memory of every child who reads the Bible. What a tribute is this to the pervading, penetrating force of truth, that it can find its way even into such dark places, and at least serve to make the darkness visible! Look, too, at the schemes of civil government and social order framed by irreligious men, or unbelievers in the Scriptures, and observe these two facts easily established: that every departure from the lessons of Gods Word is a demonstrable evil or defect in relation even to the lower object aimed at; and that everything conducive to a good end in the system is an adaptation of some Christian doctrine to a special purpose. It would be easy to pursue the same inquiry through every field of science and every walk of art, and to show that even there the Word of God has first been followed as a guide, and then expelled as an intruder; that its light has first been used to kindle others, and then vain attempts made to extinguish it for ever; in a word, that its enemies have first resorted to it in their time of need, and then ungratefully forgotten or unblushingly denied the obligation. If this be a correct view of the influence exerted even indirectly by the Word of God; if over and above its certain and complete results, it shines through the interstices of unknown caverns, and mitigates the darkness of unfathomed depths; if in fertilising one spot it sheds even a few scattered but refreshing drops upon a multitude of others; if in doing all for some, it incidentally does some for all, let me ask, in conclusion, What should be the practical effect of this belief?
1. We need not tremble for the truth itself.
2. There is some hope for the world itself, and even for those parts of it, and those things in it, which otherwise might seem to be confined to hopeless, irrecoverable ruin.
3. It may teach us a valuable lesson as to the true spirit of philanthropy, as being not a formal, rigid, mathematical attempt to save mens souls by certain rules, and in the use of certain ceremonial forms; but a generous, impulsive, and expansive zeal for the glory of God in the salvation of the lost. And as the surest way of gaining this end, let us flood the world with the pure and unadulterated Word of God. (J. A. Alexander, D. D.)
Not bound yet
I. In what sense is it true, that the Word of God is not bound?
1. It is not bound so that it cannot be preached. Paul could preach it even when in bonds, and he did preach it, so that the gospel was made known throughout Caesars palace, and there were saints in the imperial household. Nineteen centuries after Paul we have still an open Bible and a free pulpit. When Hamilton was burned in Scotland, there was such an impetus given to the gospel through his burning that the adversaries of the gospel were wont to say, Let us burn no more martyrs in public, for the smoke of Hamiltons burning has made many eyes to smart until they were opened. So, no doubt, it always was. Persecution is a red hand which scatters the white wheat far and wide.
2. The Word of God is not bound so as to be no longer a living, working power among men. Sometimes the enemies of truth have thought that they had silenced the last witness, and then there has been an unexpected outburst, and the old faith has been to the front again. The enemies of the gospel have attempted also to bind it by the burning of books. I have in my possession an early copy of Luthers sermons, and I was told how very rare it was, because at first the circulation was forbidden, and afterwards they were bought up and burned as soon as ever they were met with. And what did they do? They only put fire into Luther when they burned his sermons; they drove him to be more outspoken than he otherwise might have been, and so they helped the cause they thought to destroy. As the sun is not blown out by the tempest, nor the moon quenched by the night-damps, so is not the gospel destroyed by the sophistries of perverse minds.
3. The Word of God is not bound so that it cannel reach the heart. God has ways of reaching the hardest hearts and melting them, and He can do it at moments when such a work is least expected. Sometimes it happens to those whom we love that they are removed from the means of grace, but even then the Word of God is not bound. Had we not, a little while ago, an instance of one whom we were praying for at a prayer-meeting, and that night, while we were praying, it was a moonlight night, and as he was walking the deck of the ship, the Lord met with him? When no tongue was able to reach him, the memory of what he had heard at home came over his soul, and he was humbled before God. I was telling, just a little while ago, at our prayer-meeting, a very singular instance of how, just lately, three or four sermons on Sunday evenings have been made most useful to a young friend. He was going away to Australia unconverted, and without God. He went on board to depart, and when the vessel steamed out of dock, it ran into another ship, and he was obliged to wait and spend almost a month here, whilst the vessel was being repaired. The Lord met with him on those Sunday nights, and he has gone now, leaving in his mothers heart the sweet persuasion that he has found his mothers God. But sometimes we are apt to think a case is more hopeless still, when, in addition to natural depravity, and the absence of the means of grace, there springs up a scepticism, perhaps a downright derision of the Word of God, and of things sacred. I knew a man who had lived a life of carelessness and indifference, with occasional outbursts of drunkenness and other vices. This man happened one day, on Peckham Rye, to hear a preacher say that if any man would ask anything of God, He would give it to him. The assertion was much too broad, arid might have done harm; but this man accepted it as a test, and resolved that he would ask, and thus would see if there was a God. On the Saturday morning of that week, when he was going early to his work, the thought came upon him, Perhaps there is a God after all. He was ready to swoon as the possibility struck him, and there and then he offered the test petition, concerning a matter which concerned himself and his fellow-workmen. His prayer was granted in a remarkable manner, and he came then to be a believer in God. He is more than that now, and has found his way to be a believer in all that God has spoken, and has found peace through believing in Jesus Christ.
4. It is not bound as to its power to comfort the soul.
5. The Word of God is not bound in the sense that it cannot be fulfilled. I now allude principally to the promises and prophecies of Gods Word.
6. The Word of God is not bound so that it cannot endure and prevail unto the end.
II. What are the reasons why the word of God is not bound?
1. It is not bound, because it is the voice of the Almighty. If the gospel be indeed the gospel of God, and these truths be a revelation of God, omnipotence is in them.
2. Moreover, the Holy Ghost puts forth His power in connection with the Word of God, and as He is Divine He is unconquerable.
3. If you wanted another reason less strong than these two, I should say, How can it be bound while it is so needful to men? There are certain things which if men want they will have. I have heard say that in the old Bread Riots, when men were actually starving for bread, no word had such a terribly threatening and alarming power about it as the word Bread! when shouted by a starving crowd. I have read a description by one who once heard this cry: he said he had been startled at night by a cry of Fire! but when he beard the cry of Bread! Bread! from those that were hungry, it seemed to cut him like a sword. Whatever bread had been in his possession he must at once have handed it out. So it is with the gospel: when men are once aware of their need of it, there is no monopolising it. None can make a ring or a corner over the precious commodity of heavenly truth.
4. The Word of God is not bound, because, when once it gets into mens hearts, it works such an enthusiasm in them that you cannot bind it. There is Master Bunyan; they have put him in prison, and his family is nearly starving, and they bring him up, and they say, You shall go out of prison, John, if you wont preach. Go home, and tag your laces, that is what you have to do, and leave the gospel alone; what have you got to do with that? But honest John answers, I cannot help it. If you let me out of prison to-day, I will preach again to-morrow, by the help of God. I will lie here till the moss grows on my eyelids, but I will never promise to cease preaching the gospel.
III. One or two other facts run parallel to the text. Paul is bound, but the Word of God is not bound. Read it thus: the preacher has had a bad week, he is full of aches and pains, he feels ill: but the Word of God is not ill. What will become of the congregation when a certain minister dies? Well, he will be dead, but the Word of God is not dead. Oh, but the worker is so feeble! The Word of God is net feeble. But the worker feels so stupid. But the Word of God is not stupid. But the worker is so unfit. But the Word of God is not unfit. But you bitterly and truthfully lament that Christian men are nowadays very devoid of zeal. All hearts are cold in every place; the old fire burns low. But the Word of God is not cold, nor lukewarm, nor in any way losing its old fire. Yes, says one, but I am disgusted with the cases I have lately met with of false brethren. Yes, but the Word of God is not false. But they walk so inconsistently. I know they do, but the Word of God is not inconsistent. But they say they have disproved the faith. Yes, they have disproved their own faith, but they have not disproved the Word of God for all that. Oh, but, says one, it is an awful thing to think of the spiritual ruin of so many that are round about us, who bear the gospel, and yet after all wilfully refuse it, and die in their sins. Truly this is a grievous fact: they appear to be bound by their sins like beasts for the slaughter, but the Word of God is not bound or injured. It was said of old that it would be a sweet savour unto God in them that are saved, and in them that perish–in the one a savour of life unto life, and in the other a savour of death unto death. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
The Word of God not bound
Liberal Christianity may be defined, not as any belief, nor as any system of opinions, but as something going deeper. It is a habit of mind; a way of considering all opinions as of secondary importance; all outward statements, methods, operations, administrations, as not belonging to the essence of religion. Liberal Christianity comes from that spiritual insight which penetrates the shell and finds the kernel; sees what is the one thing needful, and discovers it to be not the form, but the substance; not the letter, but the spirit; not the body, but the soul; not the outward action, but the inward motive; net the profession, but the life. Liberal Christianity began when the first struggle began between the spirit and the letter, and that was the great battle which emancipated Christianity from Judaism. It was thought, at first, that the Word of God was bound to Judaism, and that no man could be a Christian unless he were also a Jew. Paul rooted that weed out of Christianity, and won for the whole Ethnic world–Greeks, Romans, Egyptians, Persians, Hindoos, Germans–the right of becoming Christians at once, just as they were, without first having to become Jews. But intolerance is the natural growth of strong soils. Out in the West, when the primeval forest is felled, there comes up in regular order, a whole succession of weeds, which are killed out, one after another, by culture. So it has been in the progress of Christian civilisation. This progress has killed off, one afar another, a similar series of weeds which came up in the Christian Church. The Jewish intolerance was the first weed. Paul weeded the Church of that so thoroughly that it never came up again. The next weed was the Church intolerance, which said, No man can be a Christian who is not a member of the Holy Roman Catholic Church, and partakes of its sacraments, and submits to its authority. Martin Luther weeded Christianity of this form of intolerance, and made it possible for man to be a Christian without being a Roman Catholic. But not being as liberal a Christian as Paul, he left another weed growing in its place–the weed of dogmatic intolerance. The dogmatists said, The Word of God is not bound to the Roman Catholic Church; but it is bound to certain essential doctrines–the Trinity, total depravity, the atonement, everlasting punishment. This weed has also been nearly eradicated in our time. The principle of liberal Christianity has pervaded all denominations. It has taken the shells and husks and outward coverings from the Word of God, and these are now seen to be like those envelopes which God puts around the fruits of the earth, until they are ripe, but which then are taken off and thrown away. Nothing abides, nothing is permanent in Christianity, says Paul, but faith, hope, and love. The Word of God is not bound to any Church or to any creed; it goes outside of all Churches and all creeds. The same cool breeze which fans the hot cheeks of the labourers on the plains of Hindostan, sweeps on across the Indian Ocean, gathering moisture as it goes, and pours it down in rain on the parched regions of Central Africa. So God sends His prophets and teachers of truth to every race, to help them according to their separate needs; sends some knowledge of Himself, some intuitions of duty, some hopes of immortality, to all the children of men. The Word of God is not bound to the Bible. It is not the prophecies of the Bible which are essential–for whether there be prophecies, they shall fail. It is not its verbal inspiration which gives to it its supreme importance–for whether there be tongues, they shall cease. Nor is its vitality even in the doctrinal truth it teaches–for whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away. But it is the faith, the hope, the love which are in the Bible which will abide, and will cause the Bible to remain always a permanent blessing to mankind. Nor is the Word of God bound to any belief we may have about the outward history of Jesus–His miraculous birth, His own miracles, or any particular outward facts of His life. The essential thing, even in His resurrection, is not the outward part of it, but the inward part; not the particular way in which He arose, as that He did go up to a higher life; that He is now alive, and that death has no dominion over Him. Faith in Christ is not believing this or that fact about Him, but it is faith in Himself, faith in the truth and love, which are incarnate in Him, and which were breathed forth in all He said and did and was. Deny His miracles, if you please; you cannot deny the great miracle of His influence on mankind. Such a vast effect must have its cause. If we have faith in the spirit of Jesus, in the Divine piety which made Him the well-beloved Son, dwelling always in the bosom of the Father; in the Divine charity which made Him the Friend and the Helper of the humblest of Gods children; if we have faith in these as the true life to lead here and as salvation hereafter, then we have the real Word of God in our hearts, and believe in the real Christ. Finally, the Word of God is not bound to any particular religions experience. Men come to God in all sorts of ways–the important thing is to come to Him. Some are converted suddenly; others grow up, by an insensible process, into the love of God. God has a great many means of making men good. If a man find that formal and regular prayers help him, let him pray that way. If he finds that he comes nearer to God by endeavouring to live a pure and honest life, and leaning on Gods help to do it, let him pray that way. He who loves truly prays well. Here is a poor woman who is obliged to be away from her children all day, working hard for their support. When she comes home at night she finds that her oldest boy has been sawing the wood and bringing the water, and that the oldest girl has been taking care of the little children all the time she has been gone. That pleases her more than all the affectionate words they could say to her. That is the best proof of their love. If we take care of Gods poor, and His sick and His sorrowful children, that will be counted to us, I think, for faith and prayer and conversion and piety. (J. Freeman Clarke.)
The Word of God not bound
I. By any restrictions imposed by god. God may permit certain circumstances, but He has not imposed any restrictions. The Old Testament and New Testament, the voice of the prophets, and of Him who is greater than prophets, alike concur (Psa 67:5; Psa 98:3; Isa 49:6; Mar 16:5). The character of God, the end of the gospel, the state of man, confirm this.
II. By any artificial or conventional restraints imposed by man. Look at the history and progress of Christianity (Act 4:18; Act 5:28; Act 6:6; Act 12:24; Act 19:20); history of early Church–Reformation–of missionary labours.
III. By any degree of human guilt or depravity. Look again at first days of gospel (Luk 15:2; Luk 19:1-11; Luk 23:39-44; 1Co 6:9-12. St. Paul himself a witness (1Ti 1:12-17). But if the Word of God is not bound, why do not all men receive it, and live by it? Not because the gospel is bound, but because the natural heart is bound. (E. A. Eardley-Wilmot, M. A.)
The invincibility of the Divine Word
As a word expresses a thought, and so places one in a definite relation to another, so the Word of God is that by means of which He places Himself in a definite or thinkable relation to us. It is an expression of the purpose of God; that purpose in accordance with which He seeks to place Himself in a relation of abiding concord with the children of men, on the basis of which all men may be brought into the perfect knowledge and love of God. By the declaration that the Word of God is not bound, I understand the apostle to assert that this word, as a revelation of the purpose of God to bless and save men, must infallibly succeed in making that purpose known, and must also, from the very nature of the case, effect in some sense and way the realisation of the purpose itself. In so far as the Word of God is concerned, there is nothing to prevent the salvation and everlasting blessedness of every human being.
1. The Word of God is not bound by either of the two conditions of all created existence: the conditions of time and space. The Word of God is not bound as regards time, because it is the revelation of a purpose that runs through all time, originating in eternity and reaching unto eternity. It is true that the revelation is made in time. It moves in the line, works on the plane, and manifests itself through the sphere of the natural World; still its distinctive feature is this, that it is a revelation of that which exists in the supernatural: and, therefore, while existing in time, it also transcends time, and cannot, in the whole extent of its existence, be limited by time. And yet there are people who practically believe that the Word of God is bound as regards time. What is the error of all traditionalism, if it be not this, that nothing is good for us in the matter of religion, but that which has been handed down to us as a finished result from the past; and that, therefore, a new truth is necessarily not a truth at all, having no right to call itself a truth, except on the explicit understanding of its being the merest echo of an idea uttered long ago. Space, again, is that in which we have the notion of the comprehension of existence. It is that in which all things exist, and are held together, each in its own place. Space itself has no outline, but everything, as existing therein, has a Given outline, within which it exists. But the Word of God is not bound as regards space. And yet there are those who would confine the Word of God not merely to this earth, which is but a speck in the boundlessness of space, but would limit it still further to some particular spot of the earth. The people who believe in consecrated places, and make pilgrimages to them, in the hope of getting spiritual benefit thereby, are the unhappy dupes of the delusion that the Word of God is bound–bound as to place.
2. The Word of God is not bound by either of the two highest forms of supernatural existence, viz., Christ and the Church, It is in the person of Jesus Christ that God has placed Himself in a definite relation to us. Hence Christ is spoken of as the living or incarnate Word, God manifest in the flesh. Is not the Word of God, then, it may be said, as thus embodied in the person of Christ, in some sense limited or bound? It exists under the conditions of human nature; appears in a particular country; is spoken in a particular language; submits to the restrictions of a somewhat limited sphere, experience, and term of life; and have we not in all this that which fulfils, in the most complete sense, the notion of the conditioned or bound? In a word, is not the Incarnation at best a mere anthropomorphism, under which we have only a partial view of God? To this objection it may be answered in a general way that the supernatural is not necessarily bound when it moves in the line, works on the plane, and manifests its power through the sphere of the natural world, any more than a father is bound, when he freely stoops to take the hand of his child, and keeps pace, for a time, with the shorter step of the little one, in order that the child may ultimately be brought up, as nearly as possible, to the level of the father; and no more is God, as the self-existent One, bound when He reveals Himself under the forms of nature, or comes as Christ into a more definite relation to us, in order that we may be able thereby to think ourselves up to the ideas of God. At the same time, it must be admitted that if the supernatural came down into any form of permanent subordination to the natural, it would undoubtedly to that extent be bound. Accordingly, up to the time of the first advent, or prior to the ascension of our Saviour, to the right hand of God in heaven, there was a sense in which the supernatural was bound, to some extent, in its relation to the natural. That partial and temporary dispensation has given place to the dispensation of the Spirit, under which those former limitations and restrictions have passed away. If, then, the Word of God is no longer bound, even as it was by the circumstances of our Saviours life upon the earth, how can it be bound by any other individual, such as an infallible Head of the Church upon the earth, by an historical succession of apostles, or priestly caste of any kind, in whose hands alone that Word is supposed to reside, and by whom alone saving grace can be communicated to their fellow-men? The exaltation of Christ to the right hand of God in heaven and to the absolute supremacy of the whole world, puts an end for ever to all such pre tensions. But the objection may still be pursued under the form of the Church. We require to lay hold of some clear idea of the Church in its relation to the Word of God. Undoubtedly it is the Divinely-appointed expounder of that Word; but so long as the Church is broken up into so many little sects, and so long as spiritual matters are disposed of by the merest majority, it may be even of a sect, it is difficult to see how the whole truth of the Divine word ever can be brought out before the world, the only organ through which the Holy Spirit speaks in fullest form being a truly Catholic Church. In the existence, then, of such a body there is no restraint put upon the Word of God, because the creed of that Church would be the ever-growing and ever-brightening expression of the mind of God as contained in the sacred Scriptures.
3. The Word of God is not bound by either of the two essential qualities of personal being; viz., thought and speech. If every idea is the identity of a thinking subject and an object thought, the one absolute law of thought is the law of identification. No doubt thought in its course reveals a number of opposites or contradictories, but its last function is to unite the whole. There cannot be legitimately different schools or types of thought, any more than there can be different laws of thought in different individuals, or different principles of understanding and reason in different parts of the world. Therefore, we deem it a fallacy to say that men cannot attain to unanimity of sentiment in regard to the highest of all subjects; because they have only to be true to the deepest principles of their own intellectual being in order to come to the most perfect harmony in respect of all these important matters. If so, the Word of God is not bound when it comes under the conditions of human thought, seeing that, in its essential principles, it is one with the very laws of thought themselves. But it may still be objected–and this is the last point with which we have to deal–that if the Word is not bound by the limits and laws of thought, it is so by the limits and laws of speech. As regards the Bible there need not be much difficulty. It is simply a record of spiritual facts. It merely notes the different points in the historical development of the Divine purpose. It professes, indeed, to be a veritable history of the supernatural, as a phenomenon working itself out, in, and through the natural. And it is altogether to be tested from the point of what it claims to be. The letter of the Bible is no more a fetter on the living purpose of God than any word or letter is to the thought of which it is the free and adequate expression. It is not so evident, however, that the Word of God is not bound, when we come to the written creed of the Church; and on that account some sections of the Church dispense altogether with a written creed. It becomes, therefore, a question as to what the creed of the Church is, and what the relation of the Church to her creed. And the whole question seems to resolve itself into this–that on a basis of perfectly clear and immovable conviction, about which no one can have any real difficulty, who believes in God at all, and without which the Church, as a whole, can have no existence, every one ought to be free to carry out in detail, to the minutest and remotest ramifications of thought, those subordinate shades of spiritual life and conviction that belong to the experience of one individual as compared with another. In such a case the creed would only be an arrangement, in their simple and natural order, of the leading conceptions of Divine revelation; and thus the whole mind of the Church would be left perfectly free to explore the depths, to bring out the riches, and to reveal the glory of the Divine Word. (F. Ferguson.)
Gods Word not bound
Under the Church of Santa Maria via Lata, on the Corse, in Rome, is an ancient house which is said to have been St. Pauls hired house, where be dwelt daring the two years of his abode in the Imperial City; and where, as tradition says, he converted his keeper, a soldier named Marcellus. In this house is to be seen an antique marble pillar and a rusty chain, hundreds of years old, riveted into it, bearing the inscription: Sed verbum Dei non est alligatum–The Word of God is not bound. Our Divine Master Himself was bound to the accursed tree, but His gracious words are heard throughout the world. St. Pauls bonds turned out to the furtherance of the gospel; and Gods Word is set free by the endurance and sufferings of its preachers. The apostles manacled hand still pointed to the cross of his Divine Lord. When Admiral Ver Huce, a Protestant of whom Buonaparte entertained the highest opinion, went over to London, a few years after the battle of Waterloo, to represent the Bible Society of France, at the annual meeting of the British and Foreign Bible Society, he and Admiral Gambler met on the platform. The last time they had met was in deadly combat on the ocean; met as enemies, amidst the roar of cannon and all the accompaniments of a bloody conflict. Now they met, not simply as friends, but as brethren in the faith of a common Saviour, to advocate and help forward His glorious reign of righteousness and peace. As the two brave old men rushed into each others arms, and wept aloud, the immense assembly arose with one accord, profoundly moved by a spectacle so unlooked for and so touching. Although the Bible is the best book in the world, it has always had enemies who have tried to do away with its teachings, if they could not succeed in destroying it. For three hundred years after our Saviour lived upon earth, the emperors of Rome did their utmost to hinder the advance of the gospel, by shutting up its ministers in prison, or by putting them to death. They stirred up dreadful persecutions against Christians, some of which lasted ten years; and during one of these, more than a hundred and fifty thousand followers of Jesus were slain. Diocletian was so confident that he had accomplished his purpose that he caused a medal to be struck, bearing this inscription: The Christian religion is destroyed; and the worship of the gods restored. After the overthrow of the Roman empire, and the rise of the Papacy, stringent measures were inaugurated against the circulation of the Holy Scriptures. Fulgentio once preached in Venice from the text, Have ye not read? If Christ were now to ask you this question, said the bold friar, all the answer you could make would be, No, Lord, we are not suffered to do so. On another occasion, when preaching on Pilates question, What is truth? he told his hearers that he had been long searching for it, and had at last found it. Holding up the New Testament, he said, Here it is in my hand! Then, returning it to his pocket, he observed, with an arch look, The Book is prohibited! He was a little too venturesome in his zeal for the truth, and was burned alive. In 1553, when Pope Julius
III. asked some of his counsellors as to the best mode of strengthening the Church, several bishops gave him this advice–the original document being still in existence–We advise that as little as possible of the gospel be read in the countries subject to your jurisdiction. The little which is usually read at Mass is sufficient, and beyond that no one whatever must be permitted to read. While men were contented with that little, your interests prospered; but when they read more, they began to decay. A company of bigoted priests once met in Earl Street, Blackfriars, London, to consult together concerning an edition of the Bible which Wyclif had just published in the English tongue. As might be expected, they not only condemned this excellent clergyman as a bad man, but they passed this resolution: The Bible is a dangerous book. It shall not be circulated. These instances of the efforts made to suppress the Holy Scriptures might be indefinitely multiplied; but, instead of dwelling on so painful a subject, let us rather ask, how have such attempts succeeded? It is certainly a wonderful ordering of Providence, that on the very spot where those misguided priests met to destroy the Bible, the building erected for The British and Foreign Bible Society now rears its head. Aye, more than this, millions of copies of the Word of God are scattered abroad, every year, in all the languages of the earth. In Rome herself, where the Bible was so long a sealed book, it is now openly sold and distributed by colporteurs; and within a stones throw of the place where St. Paul was imprisoned, a large apartment has been fitted up, where multitudes of soldiers gather every night to listen to the reading of the Bible, and to learn to read it for themselves. These men come from every part of Italy, and are generally from the better classes of the peasantry. After staying in Rome for three years, they will be removed to other parts of the kingdom, or go back to their homes, carrying the Bible with them. M. Guizot, the famous French scholar and historian, on taking his seat as president of The French Bible Society, in Paris, truthfully and forcibly remarked, The more the Bible is contested, the greater the number of devoted defenders who arise to affirm it and to send it forth. The Bible renews itself through trials, and its battles lead only to new conquests. The Word of God is not bound to any person who preaches it. The weak and the unlearned often confound the wise and the mighty. In 1821, some wretched slaves were crowded into a Portuguese ship, on the coast of Guinea, and among them a boy of eleven, who, when the slaver was captured by a British cruiser, was carried to England. The boy manifested such excellent qualities of mind and heart that he was placed at school, where he occupied a high position in his class, and became a tutor, and then a clergyman. He returned as a missionary to his native land, and one of the first who heard the glad tidings of the gospel from his lips was his widowed mother. Converts multiplied, and a bishop was needed to govern and instruct this new community of Christians. All eyes were turned on Samuel Crowther; and on St. Peters day, 1864, in the grand old cathedral of Canterbury, the slave-boy was consecrated to the high office which St. Paul himself had filled.
2. The Word of God is not bound to any form in which it is preached.
3. The Word of God is not bound to any time, place, or circumstance. (J. N. Norton.)
The Word of God not bound
When I was cast into prison all knew that I was locked up because I had read the Gospel, said Ratushny, a Russian Christian. When I was locked up for the second time people wondered again, and began to search after the gospel with greater zeal, and to read it. That is how our doctrines have spread, and not, as some people think, through my having propagated it. (Sunday at Home.)
Fame through opposition
In 1834, there was a little book published by the Abbe de la Manuals, entitled, The Words of a Believer, which began to make some noise because of its Republican sentiments. The reigning Pope, however, went out of his way to condemn it in an Encyclical letter, which gave it an additional popularity, caused it to be widely read, and translated into the principal European languages. (H. O. Mackey.)
Useful though in prison
The Earl of Derbys accusation in the Parliament house against Mr. Bradford was that he did more hurt (so he called good evil) by letters and conferences in prison than ever he did when he was abroad by preaching. (J. Trapp.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 9. Wherein I suffer trouble, as an evil doer] This verse contains one of the proofs that this epistle was written while St. Paul was a prisoner the second time at Rome. See the preface, where this is particularly considered.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Wherein I suffer trouble, as an evil-doer, even unto bonds; that is, for which I suffer affliction, as if I were an evil-doer, to that degree that I am put in chains.
But the word of God is not bound; but yet I preach the gospel, or the gospel is preached; though they have restrained me, they are not able to restrain that.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
9. Whereinin proclaimingwhich Gospel.
suffer troubleliterally,”evil.” I am a sufferer of evil as though I were a doer ofevil.
bonds (2Ti1:16).
word . . . not boundThoughmy person is bound, my tongue and my pen are not (2Ti 4:17;Act 28:31). Or he alludes notmerely to his own proclamation of the Gospel, though inchains, but to the freedom of its circulation by others, eventhough his power of circulating it is now prescribed (Php1:18). He also hints to Timothy that he being free ought to bethe more earnest in the service of it.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Wherein I suffer trouble as an evildoer,…. As a malefactor, as if guilty of some capital crime; an enemy to the law of Moses, a pestilent fellow, a mover of sedition everywhere, and a ringleader of the sect of the Nazarenes, Ac 24:5. The Ethiopic version renders it, “as a thief”. The “trouble” he suffered were reproaches, persecutions, whipping, beating, stoning, imprisonment: for he adds,
even unto bonds; for he was now a prisoner, and in chains; nor was it the first time, he was in prisons frequent; and all this for the sake of the Gospel, which he preached, concerning the incarnation, death, and resurrection of Christ:
but the word of God is not bound; for the apostle, while a prisoner at Rome, had the liberty of dwelling by himself, in his own hired house, though held in chains, and guarded by a soldier, and of receiving his friends, and of preaching the Gospel to as many as would come to hear him, Ac 28:16 as well as of sending letters to the churches; for several of his epistles were written by him when a prisoner, as those to the Ephesians, Philippians, and Colossians; and this to Timothy, and also that to Philemon: so that the Gospel was not restrained, or the apostle restrained from publishing it, both by word of mouth, and by writing; which was a great support to him under his troubles. Moreover, the Gospel was the more spread through the bonds of the apostle, and met with great success; it became known in Caesar’s palace, and was the means of the conversion of some of his household; and many of the brethren, through his bonds, became bolder to preach the Gospel of Christ; so that it had a free course, and was glorified: and sometimes so it is, that persecution is a means of the greater spread of the Gospel; which was an effect that followed upon the persecution raised against the church at Jerusalem, upon the death of Stephen, Ac 8:1. And indeed, when God opens an effectual door, none can shut it, though there be many adversaries; and when he gives the word a commission, there is no stopping it; when it comes in power, it bears down all before it; it cannot be fettered and bound by men, though men may be fettered and bound for the sake of it.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Wherein ( ). In my gospel.
I suffer hardship (). “I suffer evil.” Old compound (, ), elsewhere in N.T., 2Tim 4:5; Jas 5:13.
Unto bonds ( ). “Up to bonds.” A common experience with Paul (2Cor 11:23; Phil 1:7; Phil 1:13; Phil 1:14; Col 4:18).
As a malefactor ( ), old compound (, , doer of evil), in N.T. only here and Lu 23:32ff. (of the robbers). One of the charges made against Paul.
Is not bound ( ). Perfect passive indicative of , to bind. Old verb. See 1Cor 7:27; 1Cor 7:39; Rom 7:2. I am bound with a chain, but no fetters are on the word of God (Pauline phrase; 1Thess 2:13; 1Cor 14:36; 2Cor 2:17; Phil 1:14; Titus 2:5).
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
Wherein I suffer trouble [ ] . Wherein refers to the gospel. Kakopaqein only here, chapter 2Ti 4:5, and Jas 5:13. LXX, Joh 4:10.
As an evildoer [ ] . Only here and in Luke. Better, malefactor. The meaning is technical. Comp. Luk 23:32, 33, 39. Unto bonds [ ] . Comp. Phi 2:8, mecri qanatou unto death : Heb 12:4, mecriv aimatov unto blood. Const. with I suffer trouble But the word of God is not bound [ ] . Nevertheless, although I am in bonds, the gospel which I preach will prevail in spite of all human efforts to hinder it. Word of God often in Paul. In Pastorals, 1Ti 4:5; Tit 2:5. Bound, in Paul metaphorically, as here, Rom 7:2; 1Co 7:27, 39.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “Wherein I suffer trouble” (en ho kakopatha) “In which I suffer ill.” In which sphere of action, for declaring the resurrection gospel, Paul suffered, Act 24:12-21; 1Co 15:29-30.
2) “As an evil doer, even unto bonds” (mechri desmon hos kakourgos) “Unto bonds, like a doer of evil.” For such he was persecuted, hounded on every continent he visited, 2Co 11:24-32; Eph 6:20.
3) “But the word of God is not bound” (alla ho logos tou theou ou dedetai) “But the Word of God has not been bound.” Heb 4:12; Isa 55:10-11; Psa 126:5-6. It is alive, does not return void to God’s glory and the reward of the sower, Ecc 11:1-6; Php_1:12; Php_1:14.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
9 In which I am a sufferer This is an anticipation, for his imprisonment lessened the credit due to his gospel in the eyes of ignorant people. He, therefore, acknowledges that, as to outward appearance, he was imprisoned like a criminal; but adds, that his imprisonment did not hinder the gospel from having free course; and not only so, but that what he suffers is advantageous to the elect, because it tends to confirm them. Such is the unshaken courage of the martyrs of Christ, when the consciousness of being engaged in a good cause lifts them up above the world; so that, from a lofty position, they look down with contempt, not only on bodily pains and agonies, but on every kind of disgrace.
Moreover, all godly persons ought to strengthen themselves with this consideration, when they see the ministers of the gospel attacked and outraged by adversaries, that they may not, on that account, cherish less reverence for doctrine, but may give glory to God, by whose power they see it burst through all the hindrances of the world. And, indeed, if we were not excessively devoted to the flesh, this consolation alone must have been sufficient for us in the midst of persecutions, that, if we are oppressed by the cruelty of the wicked, the gospel is nevertheless extended and more widely diffused; for, whatever they may attempt, so far are they from obscuring or extinguishing the light of the gospel, that it burns the more brightly. Let us therefore bear cheerfully, or at least patiently, to have both our body and our reputation shut up in prison, provided that the truth of God breaks through those fetters, and is spread far and wide.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(9) Wherein I suffer trouble.Here St. Paul bids Timothy take courage, by thinking of the brave, patient example he was setting him in his Roman prison, undaunted and full of hope. Wherein I suffer: in which, that is, discharging my office as a preacher of the gospel, I suffer trouble.
As an evil doer.Better rendered, as a malefactor: the same word used in St. Lukes Gospel for the two thieves crucified with Jesus Christ (Luk. 23:32-33; Luk. 23:39).
Even unto bonds; but the word of God is not bound.A prisoner in chains and, as he tells us further on in the Epistle, expecting death, and yet he still could write and pray and speak from his narrow prison. Surely his disciple, still free, ought to work on with undiminished spirit and zeal. Though St. Paul was in bonds, his sufferings and imprisonment had in no way weakened the power of the gospel.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
9. Suffer trouble Fair justification for calling it my gospel.
Word That same gospel.
Not bound The apparent defeat of the preacher prevents not the triumph of his gospel.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘In which (or ‘in whom’) I suffer hardship unto bonds, as a criminal, but the word of God is not bound.’
And it is because of this Gospel (in which), or because he is in Christ Jesus (in Whom), and for no other reason that he is at present suffering hardship, that is, roughing it, in his manacles as though he was an evildoer. At his previous trial he had made known to the judges the full message of the Gospel and that time he had been released. And he was now here because he had insisted on proclaiming the same message and serving the same Christ Jesus. But the fact that he is suffering ‘as a criminal’ suggests that the charge against him was not that he was a Christian. Possibly he was being blamed for pubic affrays that had arisen as a result of his preaching, or for incendiarism with regard to the fire in Rome which was blamed by Nero on the Christians because most people thought that he himself was responsible, or it may simply have been because he was the leader of an unauthorised society (all societies were strictly regulated lest they ferment rebellion).
‘But the word of God is not bound (manacled).’ In spite of the fact that he is bound, he wants Timothy to know that the word of God was not bound. It was going freely to the Roman soldiers who were manacled to him. It was going to all who visited him. It was going out in his letters, so that, although he was manacled, his words were not. It was going out through all the hundreds of thousands of Christians who were still freely proclaiming the Gospel throughout the Empire and beyond. Nothing could bind the word of God. Rome would attempt it by political means, Rome would then try it again by ecclesiastical means, but both times it failed. And whoever tries to bind it anywhere at any time they will also fail.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
2Ti 2:9. Wherein For which. Heylin and Whitby.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
2Ti 2:9 . In this verse Paul again, as before, points to his own example, in order to encourage Timothy to the , 2Ti 1:8 , 2Ti 2:3 .
] according to Paul’s manner, refers to immediately preceding, and not to the more distant . The preposition is not equivalent to , Col 4:3 (Heydenreich). Matthies presses the original signification too far when he gives the interpretation: “the gospel is, as it were, the ground and soil in which his present lot is rooted.” Beza rightly gives the meaning thus: cujus annuntiandi munere defungens; de Wette says: “in preaching which.” Comp. Php 4:3 ; 1Th 3:2 . Hofmann incorrectly explains by “in consequence of,” which never does mean, not even in 1Ti 1:18 .
] is an allusion to 2Ti 2:3 .
] comp. Phi 2:8 : .
directs attention to the criminal aspect of Paul’s bonds, and thereby strengthens the [27] . The word occurs only here and in Luke’s gospel; it is synonymous with , 1Pe 4:14 .
] Chrysostom explains it: , ; comp. Phi 1:12 . The meaning according to this would be: “the bonds do not, however, hinder me from freely preaching the gospel.” But this limitation is not contained in the words themselves; they have rather the more general meaning: “though I (to whom the gospel is entrusted) am bound, the gospel itself is not thereby fettered, but goes freely forth, into the world and works unfettered” (2Th 3:1 : ). This is the very reason of the apostle’s joy in his bonds, that Christ is preached; comp. Phi 1:18 . This connection of ideas does not, however, compel us to take with these words (Hofmann). If so connected, would rather appear to be a modification added loosely; besides, Paul never places it at the end of a sentence.
Some have wrongly understood by . . . here, the divine promises, and have taken to mean that these do not remain unfulfilled.
[27] Otto, opposed to Wieseler, rightly remarks that these words do not justify any inference as to an increase in the severity of his imprisonment.
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
9 Wherein I suffer trouble, as an evil doer, even unto bonds; but the word of God is not bound.
Ver. 9. But the word of God is not bound ] It runs and is glorified, 2Th 3:1 , being free and not fettered. I preach, though a prisoner, saith Paul; so did Bradford and other martyrs. Within a few days of Queen Mary’s reign, almost all the prisons in England were become right Christian schools and churches (saith Mr Fox), so that there was no greater comfort for Christian hearts than to come to the prisons to behold their virtuous conversation, and to hear their prayers, preachings, &c. The Earl of Derby’s accusation in the Parliament house against Mr Bradford was, that he did more hurt (so he called good evil) by letters and conferences in prison, than ever he did when he was abroad by preaching.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
2Ti 2:9 . : in which sphere of action , cf. Rom 1:9 , 2Co 10:14 , Phi 4:2 . The connexion seems to be that St. Paul is now indicating that he himself, in his degree, is an imitator of Jesus Christ.
(see reff.): malefactor (R.V.). Evil doer (A.V.) does not so vividly express the notion of criminality implied in the word. Ramsay notes that the use of this word here marks “exactly the tone of the Neronian period, and refers expressly to the flagitia , for which the Christians were condemned under Nero, and for which they were no longer condemned in A.D. 112” ( Church in the Roman Empire , p. 249). Compare 1Pe 4:15 .
: We have the same contrast between the apostle’s own restricted liberty and the unconfinable range of the Gospel in Phi 1:12 ; Phi 1:14 , and 2Ti 4:17 . There is no reference, as Chrys. supposes, to the liberty permitted to St. Paul to preach the kingdom of God in his prison, as during the first imprisonment (Act 28:30-31 ). The clause here is a natural reflective parenthetical remark.
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
Wherein = In (Greek. en) which.
suffer trouble. Greek. kakopatheo, no in 2Ti 2:3.
evil doer. Greek. kakourgos. Only here and Luk 23:32, Luk 23:33, Luk 23:39 (of the malefactors crucified with the Lord). For the other word for evil doer, kopoios, see Joh 18:30.
unto = as for as. Greek. mechri.
word. App-121.
God. App-98.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
2Ti 2:9. , in which) viz. in the Gospel.-, I suffer [trouble]) , an evil-doer, is the conjugate. The evil of suffering [is my portion], as if the evil of doing had preceded it [on my part].-, bonds) , is not bound, is the conjugate.- , as an evil-doer) attended with danger of life and with disgrace.- ) is not bound, i.e. makes progress without hindrance.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
2Ti 2:9
wherein I suffer hardship unto bonds, as a malefactor;-In and for the gospel he suffered trouble, arrest, imprisonment, and affliction as though he had been an evildoer. Had he been a thief, a murderer, or a disturber of the peace, he would have suffered the same punishment that he did suffer.
but the word of God is not bound.-He was imprisoned, deprived of his freedom, bound, but rejoiced that the word of God was not bound and could not be. No chain or prison wall can bind the word of God. [The words have a wide range of meaning. His hands were manacled, but his tongue was free, and with it he could speak the word of God. Apart from any action of his own that word was working actively outside his prison walls. There was no ground for fear that its course was over.]
Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary
I suffer: 2Ti 1:8, 2Ti 1:12, 2Ti 1:16, Act 9:16
as: Eph 6:20, 1Pe 2:12, 1Pe 2:14, 1Pe 3:16, 1Pe 4:15
even: Act 28:31, Eph 6:19, Eph 6:20, Phi 1:12-14, 2Th 3:1
but: Eph 3:1, Phi 1:7, Col 4:3, Col 4:18
Reciprocal: Gen 39:20 – into the prison Ezr 1:11 – five thousand Pro 27:17 – so Jer 33:1 – he Jer 36:5 – General Jer 37:21 – Thus Jer 39:15 – while Jer 43:8 – General Mat 27:2 – bound Joh 7:13 – spake Act 4:4 – many Act 6:7 – the word Act 16:23 – they cast Act 21:11 – So shall Act 28:20 – this chain 2Co 6:5 – imprisonments 2Co 11:23 – in prisons Col 1:24 – fill 1Ti 4:10 – therefore Heb 10:34 – in my Heb 11:36 – bonds
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
THE BIBLE
The word of God is not bound.
2Ti 2:9
It is a notable allegation, and we take occasion to direct your thoughts to certain considerations flowing from this statement.
I. The Bible is the Word of God.What do we mean by this tremendous assertion? What should the phrase the Word of God convey?
(a) Views of inspiration were prevalent once, which we of to-day decline to accept; and our rejection of them leaves, as we are persuaded, the Bible a more wonderful production in our esteem than before.
(b) Another consideration is offered. The shifting of the front of attack is singular. Years ago it was contended by destructive criticism that Moses could not possibly have had sufficient learning to write the Pentateuch. Now modern discoveries have conclusively proved that he would have been behind his contemporaries had he not.
II. The Bible being written by men whose thoughts were not fettered, but free, is intended for readers whose thoughts are free. Uphold me, prays the Psalmist, with Thy free Spirit. Where the Spirit of the Lord is, there is liberty, writes St. Paul. We confess to little sympathy with that timid credulity (we cannot call it faith) which fears the disintegrating influence of modern criticism. It is so intensely illogical. If the Bible can be pulled to pieces, the sooner this process is accomplished the better for a hitherto deluded Christendom. But can it? Like its Lord, the Incarnate Word of God, it is on its trial.
Like its Lord, once more we say, This Book is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel, and for a sign that shall be spoken against.
Bishop Alfred Pearson.
Illustration
St. Paul here registers his confidence in the power of the Word of God to dispense with his personal support and defence. It does not suffer from his enforced withdrawal from active service. It is not restrained in its effectual activities because for the time he is. It has within itself the secret of its own vitality and of its own spiritual successes. And this will be vindicated in the eyes of the world, while he is hidden away from observation in the Roman barrack. Said a manand a young onefrom a platform once: I am here to-day to defend the Bible. Perhaps his words were less modest than their meaning. Probably older people present smiled, conscious that the Bible did not need his defence or any one elses; that a book which had survived more attacks than all other books in the world put together would survive that very young man and all the foes against which he had the purpose of defending it.
Fuente: Church Pulpit Commentary
2Ti 2:9. Wherein means for which cause Paul was in trouble, being falsely accused as an evildoer. Even unto bonds is literal, for he was fastened to a real chain as a prisoner held for execution. Word of God is not bound. The exact date set for the slaying of Paul is not stated, and we do not know whether he was informed of it. However, he was still able to tell the story of Jesus to those who came within the sound of his voice, and to write it as he is doing in this epistle, which is the reason he said the word was not bound. That is not the only sense in which the word of the Lord cannot be bound. Others who received it, and especially those who learned that Paul was being persecuted because of his devotion to it, would be thereby roused to speak out boldly on its behalf (Php 1:12-14).
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
2Ti 2:9. Wherein I suffer trouble. The same emphatic word as the endure hardness of 2Ti 2:3, the be partaker of afflictions in 2Ti 1:8. The way in which St. Paul dwells upon the actual chains that were the outward marks of what men thought shame is eminently characteristic. So, at the outset, he is for the hope of Israel bound with this chain (Act 28:20), so at a later stage he is an ambassador in bonds (Eph 6:20).
The word of God is not bound. The words have a wide range of meaning. His hands are manacled, but his tongue is free, and with it he can still speak the word of God. Apart even from any action of his own, that word was working actively outside his prison walls. There was no ground for fear that its course was over.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Verse 9
Wherein; in preaching which.
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
Vs. 9 “Wherein I suffer trouble, as an evil doer, [even] unto bonds; but the word of God is not bound.”
Not that Paul had done evil but that he was imprisoned as one that had.
The important piece of information is that though the messenger is bound the message most certainly is not.
Mankind may think it will slow the spread of the gospel but in reality they cannot. Believers may, by their inaction, cause God to revise His delivery system but even then the gospel will not be slowed.
Just a little side trail – how arrogant and foolish for man or mankind to think they can ever overcome the All Mighty God! Can you feature the one that might suggest such nonsense? Yet many have over the ages – including most of the isms of the world. Indeed, our own society is treading heavily into this concept in America.
One of the joys of contemplating death is to realize that what we hold to be the dearest truth is one of the few things that will not be swayed by our death. At death our thoughts cease, at death our dreams cease, at death our intentions cease, at death our everything ceases in this life EXCEPT that one great driving force that has been the highlight of our life the Gospel will continue unabated. We will be gone as we relate to this life, but our driving force the Gospel will not falter.
Verse nine may hold a truth for us that by application might encourage us in time of trouble.
As we suffer indignity at the tongue of another, that abuses the truth about us, can we not have Paul’s attitude of ignoring the wrong and looking on the great truth that God will not be hindered in His great Plan and purpose?
When the tongues wag, focus on what God is doing and the fact that HE WILL DO IT! not on the ill gotten gains of a gossiping tongue.
Fuente: Mr. D’s Notes on Selected New Testament Books by Stanley Derickson
2:9 {7} Wherein I suffer trouble, as an evil doer, [even] unto bonds; but the word of God is not bound.
(7) The taking away of an objection: it is true that he is kept in prison as an evildoer, yet there is no reason why some should therefore go about to take away credit from his Gospel. And this is because God has blessed his ministry; indeed, the example of this his captivity and patience, did rather in different ways strengthen and encourage his Church in the hope of a better life.
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
Paul, too, was willing to suffer hardship for the gospel. He had done so all his Christian life and was presently in prison because of it. The Greek word translated "criminal" (kakourger) is a strong one and occurs only in Luk 23:32-33; Luk 23:39 elsewhere in the New Testament. There it describes the criminals crucified with Jesus. Under Nero’s persecution non-Christians viewed Christians as serious criminals. Timothy needed to remember that the Word of God was just as powerful to change lives as ever. Its power was as great as it ever was even though its champion defender was in chains. So Timothy should continue to proclaim it.