Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Peter 2:16
But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man’s voice forbade the madness of the prophet.
16. but was rebuked for his iniquity ] Literally, had a rebuke for his transgression of the law.
the dumb ass speaking with man’s voice ] The Greek word for “ass” is literally beast of burden. It is used, as here, in Mat 21:5. The term for “madness” is not found elsewhere in the New Testament, but the corresponding verb is used by St Paul (2Co 11:23). For “forbade” it would be better, perhaps, to read checked, the actual rebuke having come from the angel, and taking the form of a permission rather than a prohibition. It is obvious that St Peter assumes the truth of the narrative of Numbers 22 (22 33) as beyond question, nor is there indeed any ground for thinking that it was at that time questioned by any reader, as it has been since. It does not fall within the scope of this Commentary to discuss either the objections which have been urged against that narrative, or the explanations that have been offered as toning down or minimising the supernatural element in it.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
But was rebuked for his iniquity – The object of Peter in this seems to be to show that God employed the very extraordinary means of causing the ass on which he rode to speak, because his iniquity was so monstrous. The guilt of thus debasing his high office, and going forth to curse the people of God – a people who had done him no wrong, and given no occasion for his malediction – was so extraordinary, that means as extraordinary were proper to express it. If God employed means so extraordinary to rebuke his depravity, it was to be expected that in some appropriate way he would express his sense of the wickedness of those who resembled him.
The dumb ass, speaking with mans voice – Num 22:28. God seems to have designed that both Balsam and Balak should be convinced that the children of Israel were his people; and so important was it that this conviction should rest fully on the minds of the rations through whom they passed, that he would not suffer even a pretended prophet to make use of his influence to curse them. He designed that all that influence should be in favor of the cause of truth, thus furnishing a striking instance of the use which he often makes of wicked men. To convince Balaam of the error of his course, and to make him sensible that God was an observer of his conduct, and to induce him to utter only what he should direct, nothing would be better suited than this miracle. The very animal upon which he rode, mute and naturally stupid, was made to utter a reproof; a reproof as directly from heaven as though the stones had cried out beneath his feet, or the trees of the wood had uttered the language of remonstrance. As to the nature of the miracle here referred to, it may be remarked:
(1)That it was as easy for God to perform this miracle as any other; and,
(2)That it was a miracle that would be as likely to be effectual, and to answer the purpose, as any other.
No one can show that it could not have occurred; and the occasion was one in which some decided rebuke, in language beyond that of conscience, was necessary.
Forbade the madness of the prophet – That is, the mad or perverse design of the prophet. The word here rendered madness means, properly, being aside from a right mind. It is not found elsewhere in the New Testament. It is used here to denote that Balaam was engaged in an enterprise which indicated a headstrong disposition; an acting contrary to reason and sober sense. He was so under the influence of avarice and ambition that his sober sense was blinded, and he acted like a madman. He knew indeed what was right, and had professed a purpose to do what was right, but he did not allow that to control him; but, for the sake of gain, went against his own sober conviction, and against what he knew to be the will of God. He was so mad or infatuated that he allowed neither reason, nor conscience, nor the will of God, to control him!
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Verse 16. The dumb ass, speaking with man’s voice] See Clarke on Nu 22:28.
The madness of the prophet.] Is not this a reference to the speech of the ass, as represented in the Targums of Jonathan ben Uzziel and Jerusalem? “Wo to thee, Balaam, thou sinner, thou madman: there is no wisdom found in thee.” These words contain nearly the same expressions as those in St. Peter.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
But was rebuked; not only by the angels speaking to him, but by the asss, as follows.
The dumb ass speaking with mans voice, forbade; not in express words, that we read of, but the asss speaking with human voice, discerning the angel before Balaam did, and going back, when he, carried out by the power of his covetousness, would needs go forward, were so prodigious things as might sufficiently convince him of his sin, in going to Balak contrary to Gods command at first given; and it was no small dishonour put upon him, that he who would not hearken to God, should have an ass for his teacher.
The madness; in going against Gods command, and to curse those who, God had told him, were blessed.
Objection. Balaam had leave given him to go with Balaks messengers, Num 22:20, and refused Balaks offers, 2Pe 2:18.
Answer.
1. Balaam did not contemn the gifts offered, but had a desire after them, as appears by his inquiring of God the second time, 2Pe 2:19, though God had fully revealed his will to him before, 2Pe 2:12.
2. God bade him go that he might bless the people, 2Pe 2:12, compared with 2Pe 2:20, whereas he went not out of a respect to Gods answer, but out of a covetous mind, and a desire to curse Israel, as appears by Jos 24:9,10, and by the cursed counsel he gave, Num 25:1, compared with Num 31:16, and Rev 2:14.
Of the prophet: Balaam is called a prophet here, either:
1. Because he pretended to be so: thus the false prophets are sometimes called absolutely prophets, Jer 6:13; 26:7,8,11. Or:
2. Because he really was a prophet, though a wicked and covetous one; for he inquired of God, and had answers from him, Num 6:22; 8:9,10,18,19; and Moses says expressly, that the Lord put a word in Balaams mouth, Num 23:5,16; and that prophecy concerning the Messiah, Num 24:17, could not but be of God, yet it is probable that Balaam, out of covetousness, might sometimes use divination, nay, it is plain in some cases he did, Num 24:1.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
16. was rebukedGreek,“had a rebuke,” or conviction; an exposure ofhis specious wickedness on his being tested (the root verb ofthe Greek noun means to “convict on testing”).
hisGreek, “hisown”: his own beast convicted him of his own iniquity.
assliterally, “beastof burden”; the ass was the ordinary animal used in riding inPalestine.
dumbGreek,“voiceless-speaking in man’s voice“; markingthe marvellous nature of the miracle.
forbadeliterally,”hindered.” It was not the words of the ass (for itmerely deprecated his beating it), but the miraculous fact of itsspeaking at all, which withstood Balaam’s perversity indesiring to go after God had forbidden him in the first instance.Thus indirectly the ass, and directly the angel, rebuked hisworse than asinine obstinacy; the ass turned aside at thesight of the angel, but Balaam, after God had plainly said, Thoushalt not go, persevered in wishing to go for gain; thus the ass, inact, forbade his madness. How awful a contrasta dumb beastforbidding an inspired prophet!
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
But was rebuked for his iniquity,…. Which was not merely going along with the messengers of Balak, for he had leave from the Lord so to do, Nu 22:20; but going along with them with a desire to curse Israel, when it was the will of God he should go and bless them, in order to get Balak’s money; so that his governing iniquity was covetousness, which led him to other sins; and for this he was rebuked by the angel, Nu 22:32, as well as reproved by his ass, Nu 22:28: for
the dumb ass, as it was naturally so, the ass on which he rode,
speaking with man’s voice; which was supernatural and miraculous, for it was God that opened the mouth of the ass: the mouth of that ass is said, by the Jews m, to be one of the ten things created between the two evenings on the sixth day of the creation; that is, as the gloss on it says, concerning which it was decreed, that its mouth should be opened to speak what this ass said; and the occasion of it may be seen in Nu 22:22. Lactantius n observes, that there are two stars in the constellation of Cancer, which the Greeks call the “asses”; and which, the poets feign, are those that carried Liberus over a river, when he could not pass it; to one of which he gave this for a reward, “ut humana voce loqueretur”, “that it should speak with man’s voice”; a fable, no doubt, hatched from the sacred history, and said in imitation of this ass. Which
forbad the madness of the prophet: and so Balaam, though a diviner and soothsayer, is called by the Jewish writers o; who, they say, was first a prophet, and then a soothsayer, from whom Jerom p seems to have received the tradition; who says, that he was first a holy man, and a prophet of God, and afterwards, through disobedience, and a desire of gifts, was called a diviner; for his eyes were opened, and he saw the vision of the Almighty; and the Spirit of God came upon him, and he prophesied many things concerning Israel, and the Messiah, and others, Nu 24:4. His madness lay in going with the messengers of Balak, Nu 22:21, in order to curse Israel, contrary to the will of God, Nu 22:12; and it is madness in any to oppose God in his counsels, purposes, providences, and precepts; and every sin, which is an act of hostility against God, has madness in it; and this of Balaam’s was forbid by his ass, and he was convinced of it. Very appropriately is mention made of this dumb ass, when the persons here spoken of were as natural brute beasts, and worse than them, 2Pe 2:12.
m Pirke Abot, c. 5. sect. 6. & Jarchi in ib. Sepher Cosri, par. 2. p. 254. n De falsa Religione, l. 1. c. 21. o Pesikta, Ilmedenu & Gerundensis apud Drus in loc. T. Bab Sanhedrin fol. 106. 1. Aben Ezra in Numb. xxxii. 28. p Tradition. Heb. in Genes. fol. 69. D.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
But he was rebuked ( ). “But he had rebuke.” Second aorist active indicative of and accusative of (late word from , a periphrasis for , here only in N.T.
For his own transgression ( ). Objective genitive of , old word (from lawbreaker), here only in N.T.
A dumb ass ( ). Dumb is without voice, old word for idols and beasts. The adjective ( ) “being under a yoke,” is applied to the ass as the common beast of burden (papyri, Deissmann, Bible Studies, p. 160), in N.T. only here and Mt 21:5.
Spake (). First aorist middle participle of , old verb, to utter a sound, in N.T. only here, verse 2Pet 2:18; Acts 4:18.
Stayed (). First aorist active indicative of , to hinder.
Madness (). Only known example of this word instead of the usual or . It is being beside one’s wits.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
Was rebuked [ ] . Lit., had a rebuke. The word for rebuke only here in New Testament.
For his iniquity [ ] . Rev., his own transgression. His own, see on ch. 2Pe 1:3. Transgression, from para, contrary to, and nomov, law. Only here in New Testament. Compare the kindred verb paranomew, also occurring but once, Act 23:3, where see note on contrary to the law.
The dumb ass. Inserting an article not in the text, and omitted by Rev. Ass [] . Lit., beast of burden. An animal subjected to the yoke. From uJpo, beneath, and zugon, a yoke. See on Mt 21:5. Speaking [] . The verb is found in Peter only, here and ver. 18, and in Act 4:18, a Petrine narrative. It is well chosen, however. The verb denotes the utterance of a sound or voice, not only by man, but by any animal having lungs. Hence, not only of men’s articulate cries, such as a battle – shout, but of the neigh of the horse, the scream of the eagle, the croak of a raven. It is also applied to sounds made by inanimate things, such as thunder, a trumpet, a lyre, the ring of an earthen vessel, showing whether it is cracked or not. Schmidt (” Synonymik “) says that it does not indicate any physical capability on the part of the man, but describes the sound only from the hearer’s stand – point. In view of this general sense of the verb, the propriety is apparent of the defining phrase, with man’s voice.
Forbad [] . Rather, hindered, or, as Rev., stayed. Compare Act 8:36; Rom 1:13, Rev.
Madness [] . Only here in New Testament. But compare the kindred verb parafronew (2Co 11:23), in the phrase, “I speak as a fool.” From para, beside, and frhn, the mind; and so equivalent to the phrase, beside one’s self.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “But was rebuked for his iniquity.” (Greek de elegksin) “Moreover he was reproved or reprimanded” (eschen) “he had” (rebuke) (Greek idias pranomias) of his own transgression, trespassing, or paranoia” toward God. His sin was deliberate, presumptuous, premeditated.
2) “The dumb ass speaking with man’s voice.” (hupozugion) “an ass” (Greek aponon) “dumb” (en phone anthropou phthegksamenon) “Speaking with or in (the) voice of a man.” Num 22:28-30. That man should curse a donkey is no miracle, but that a donkey should chide a man, reprimand his stubborn donkey-like master is a miracle, and no less. Vain men often act as a stubborn ass toward his master, Job 11:12.
3) “Forbad the madness of the prophet.” (Greek ekolusen) “restrained or held back” the (paraphronian) “extreme, inflamed, red-faced madness or anger” of the prophet. For a price Balaam was riding into the Baal -peor-worship with the princes of Balak, King of Moab, leading the way. His sin of ecumenism-compromise resulted in the slaughter of 24,000 Israelites, Num 25:8-9, in spite of the angels that stood in the way and sought to inform and guard Balaam from going on up to lead Israel into compromise and apostasy Heb 1:14.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
It may be here asked, by what right Balaam had the name of a prophet, when it appears that he was addicted to many wicked superstitions. To this I reply, that the gift of prophecy was so special, that though he did not worship the true God, and had not true religion, he might yet have been endued with it. Besides, God has sometimes caused prophecy to exist in the midst of idolatry, in order that men might have less excuse.
Now, if any one considers the chief things which Peter says, he will see that his warning is equally suitable to the present age; for it is an evil which prevails everywhere, that men use scurrilous raillery for the purpose of deriding God and the Savior; nay, they ridicule all religion under the cloak of wit; and when addicted, like beasts, to their own lusts, they will mingle with the faithful; they prattle something about the gospel, and yet they prostitute their tongue to the service of the devil, that they may bring the whole world, as far as they can, to eternal perdition. They are in this respect worse than Balaam himself, because they gratuitously pour forth their maledictions, when he, induced by reward, attempted to curse.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(16) But was rebuked for his iniquity.Literally, But had a conviction of his own transgressioni.e., was convicted of it, or rebuked for it. His transgression was that, although as a prophet he knew the blessedness of Israel, and although God gave him leave to go only on condition of his blessing Israel, he went still cherishing a hope of being able to curse, and so winning Balaks promised reward.
The dumb ass.Literally, a dumb beast of burden. The same word is rendered ass in Mat. 21:5, in the phrase foal of an ass. In Palestine the ass was the most common beast of burden, horses being rare, so that in most cases beast of burden would necessarily mean ass.
Forbad the madness.Strictly, hindered the madness; and thus the trivial discrepancy which some would urge as existing between this passage and Numbers 22 disappears. It has been objected that not the ass but the angel forbad Balaam from proceeding. But it was the ass which hindered the infatuation of Balaam from hurrying him to his own destruction (Num. 22:33). The word for madness is probably chosen for the sake of alliteration with prophetprophtou paraphronian. It is a very rare formation, perhaps coined by the writer himself.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
‘But he was rebuked for his own transgression. A dumb ass spoke with man’s voice and stayed the madness of the prophet.’
But let them remember that Balaam was rebuked because of his transgression, and that by a dumb ass. Even a dumb ass was wiser than he was. And the result was that he stopped in his headlong race to disaster. He recovered from his madness. By this Peter is offering a way of escape to these ‘madmen’. If only they will listen, they also may recover. But he wants his readers to know what they are. Madmen who are not even as wise as a dumb ass.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
2Pe 2:16. The dumb ass speaking, &c. When Balaam laid aside his reason, and acted like a brute, then the brute animal, the ass on which he rode, , though naturally dumb, was, by the miraculous power of God, endued with a voice, like that of a man, to rebuke the madness of his master. The madness of the prophet, signifies, his mad attempt to oppose the divine will. The Jerusalem Targum and Ben Uzziel, on Num 22:30 introduce the ass saying to Balaam, “Woe unto thee, Balaam! thou art mad!” His madness was voluntary, and consequently criminal; and all wickedness will in the end, according to the degree and aggravation of it, appear to be madness; for in every act of wickedness, men so far oppose the will of God. See on Num 22:28.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
16 But was rebuked for his iniquity: the dumb ass speaking with man’s voice forbad the madness of the prophet.
Ver. 16. The dumb ass speaking ] The angel (some think) spake in the ass, as the devil had done in the serpent. Who now can complain of his own inability and rudeness to reply in a good cause, when the dumb ass is enabled by God to convince his master? There is no mouth into which God cannot put words; and how often doth he choose the weak and unwise to confound the learned and mighty! (Dr Hall’s Contempl.) Benedictus the Sorbonist affirmeth, that the ass in Balaam’s history signifieth their Church, An quia Pontifex Balaam est qui ei insidet? saith Dr Reynolds. Meaneth the man that the pope is that Balaam that rideth on the ass?
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
16 .] but had a rebuke for his own iniquity (what sort of a reproof, is shewn below. If any force can be given to , it will be found in the fact that the reproof came from an animal which was part of his own substance: he himself furnished the conviction of his own iniquity, from the animal on which he rode): a (or, “ the :” we are never sure of our ground with anarthrous substantives in these later Epistles) dumb beast of burden ( is apparently used as synonymous with in ref. Matt. If so, the universal practice of riding on the ass in Palestine must be regarded as the reason) speaking (aor. part. contemporary with aor. verb following) in man’s voice (not, “by speaking in man’s voice:” the participial clause brings into notice the miraculous character of the incident) hindered (not in matter of fact, for Balaam went on his way: but subjectively, more as the imperfect is often used: “ withstood ,” or as E. V. “ forbade ”) the madness of the prophet (a discrepancy has been discovered between this and the Mosaic account, seeing that it was the angel, and not the ass, from whom the rebuke came, the ass having merely deprecated ill-treatment at Balaam’s hands. But the Apostle evidently regards not so much the words of rebuke uttered, as the miraculous fact, as being the hindrance. It was enough to have prevented his going onward, when the dumb animal on which he rode was gifted with speech to shew him his madness).
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
2Pe 2:16 . , a periphrasis for the passive of , = “was rebuked”. , emphatic, “his own transgression”. Two interpretations of are possible. (1) The . is a characteristic trait in Balaam (Keil. Weiss). (2) As prophet, Belaam was expected to do and teach God’s law. He whose duty it is to rebuke others is himself rebuked for his own transgression” (Hundhausen, Wiesinger). = “a particular transgression” as distinct from = “disobedience in general”, , “infatuation”. Balaam is proceeding against what he knows to be the Divine will.
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
was rebuked = had rebuke (Greek. elenxis. Only here).
his = his own.
iniquity. App-128. Only here.
dumb. See Act 8:32.
ass. Greek. hupozugion. Only here and Mat 21:5.
speaking. See Act 4:18.
man’s. App-123.
forbad = hindered.
madness. Greek. paraphronia. Only here. Compare 2Co 11:23.
prophet. App-189. Balaam delivered Jehovah’s messages (Num 23:5, Num 23:16; Num 24:4, Num 24:13), however unwillingly. He afterwards became a minister of Satan, in the counsel he gave Balak (Num 31:8, Num 31:16).
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
16.] but had a rebuke for his own iniquity (what sort of a reproof, is shewn below. If any force can be given to , it will be found in the fact that the reproof came from an animal which was part of his own substance: he himself furnished the conviction of his own iniquity, from the animal on which he rode): a (or, the: we are never sure of our ground with anarthrous substantives in these later Epistles) dumb beast of burden ( is apparently used as synonymous with in ref. Matt. If so, the universal practice of riding on the ass in Palestine must be regarded as the reason) speaking (aor. part. contemporary with aor. verb following) in mans voice (not, by speaking in mans voice: the participial clause brings into notice the miraculous character of the incident) hindered (not in matter of fact, for Balaam went on his way: but subjectively, more as the imperfect is often used: withstood, or as E. V. forbade) the madness of the prophet (a discrepancy has been discovered between this and the Mosaic account, seeing that it was the angel, and not the ass, from whom the rebuke came, the ass having merely deprecated ill-treatment at Balaams hands. But the Apostle evidently regards not so much the words of rebuke uttered, as the miraculous fact, as being the hindrance. It was enough to have prevented his going onward, when the dumb animal on which he rode was gifted with speech to shew him his madness).
Fuente: The Greek Testament
2Pe 2:16. , a dumb beast: of the prophet) A fine antithesis. So great was the madness of Balaam, that an ass must speak, rather than it should pass unreproved.-) without a voice of man.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
the dumb: Num 22:22-33
the madness: Ecc 7:25, Ecc 9:3, Hos 9:7, Luk 16:11, Act 26:11, Act 26:24, Act 26:25
Reciprocal: Num 22:5 – sent Num 22:23 – the ass saw Num 22:28 – the Lord opened Num 22:30 – the ass said Jdg 18:20 – heart 1Ki 13:11 – an old prophet Isa 56:11 – all look Act 1:18 – with 1Ti 6:9 – they
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
2Pe 2:16. This verse continues the case begun in the preceding one, and the record is included in the chapters in Numbers cited. The point is that the false prophet was rebuked even though no other was at hand through whom God could speak. Yet since He was able to give speech to the dumb brute to chastise the prophet, it is made sure that the Lord will be able to give wicked men their proper punishment when the time comes for the judgement of evildoers.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
2Pe 2:16. but he was rebuked for his transgression. The phrase means literally, but he had a rebuke for his transgression. The word used here for his may mean his own, and hence some suppose that it is emphatic here, the point being that he who was a prophet to others had himself to be rebuked for a trespass of his own. It is precarious, however, to assert such force for the word in the N. T. The transgression referred to is Balaams yielding to curse Israel for the sake of gain, under the proviso that Gods permission should not be withheld.
the dumb ass, speaking with mans voice, stayed the madness of the prophet. The ass is designated here, and again in Mat 21:5, by a general term which means simply a beast that bears the yoke, or a beast of burden. The madness charged against Balaam is expressed by a term which is found only here, although the cognate verb appears in the as a fool of 2Co 11:23. The forbade of the A. V. does not fairly represent the sense of the original. The meaning is prevented, checked, or, as the R. V. very happily gives it, stayed. The offence was interdicted, but not left uncommitted. It has been held by not a few that Peter gives an incorrect report of the O. T. narrative, in so far as the latter represents the angel, and not the ass, as uttering the rebuke. Peter, however, does not affirm that the rebuke was spoken by the ass. What he states is simply -that the prophet was rebuked, and that the dumb ass, speaking with mans voice, stayed his madness. And that the O. T. narrative represents the beast as bringing the prophet first to a stand is clear. The difficult questions about the credibility and interpretation of the story of Balaam belong, however, to the criticism and exegesis of the Old Testament. It is referred to by the writer of this Epistle as a story well known and accepted in his time, and furnishing a parallel, which all might understand and feel, to the terrible picture which he has been sketching.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
2Pe 2:16. But was rebuked for his iniquity In a very extraordinary manner; the dumb ass On which he rode; speaking with mans voice That is, in mans language; forbade the madness of the prophet Namely, his endeavour to contradict the will of God, which might well be called madness, because it could have no effect but to bring the curse of God upon himself. The apostle does not mean that the ass forbade Balaam, in so many words, to go with the princes of Moab; but that her unwillingness to proceed in the journey, her falling down under him rather than go on, her complaint in mans language of his smiting her three times for not going on, and her saying, Was I ever wont to do so to thee, were things, so extraordinary, especially her speaking, that Balaam, from that miracle at least, ought to have understood that the whole was a rebuke from God of his foolish project. Though Balaam is termed a soothsayer, (Jos 13:22,) and is said to have used enchantments, (Num 24:1,) Peter justly calls him a prophet, on account of Gods speaking to him, and giving him a very remarkable prophecy, recorded Num 24:15. However, being a very bad man, he may often have feigned communications with the Deity to draw money from the multitude. Perhaps the only communications he ever had with God were on this occasion; and they may have been granted to him, that by uttering them in the hearing of Balak, and of the princes of Moab and Midian, the coming of one out of Jacob, who was to have dominion, might be known to the nations of the East.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Verse 16
The dumb ass–forbade, &c. A strong antithesis is intended here. A senseless ass had to rebuke the senselessness of a prophet.
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
Whenever a person rejects God’s Word and will, he or she begins to act irrationally because God’s Word reveals true reality. Finally right becomes wrong, and wrong becomes right for him or her. That is what happened to Balaam. He became so insensitive that God had to use a dumb animal to rebuke him. The ancients regarded animals as mute (dumb) because they did not speak human language. [Note: Bauckham, p. 268.] That donkey, a proverbially obstinate animal, was wiser than Balaam (cf. Judges 11).
"It is sufficient to say to one who believes at all in miracles, that it was no more difficult for God to utter thought through the mouth of the ass in the words of men, than to stop men, as he once did, from talking in a given language and cause them to talk in another." [Note: Nathaniel M. Williams, "Commentary on the Epistles of Peter," in An American Commentary on the New Testament, p. 102.]