Biblia

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Numbers 10:31

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Numbers 10:31

And he said, Leave us not, I pray thee; forasmuch as thou knowest how we are to encamp in the wilderness, and thou mayest be to us instead of eyes.

31. instead of eyes ] his presence would obviate the necessity of searching for halting places.

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

Thou mayest be to us instead of eyes – A proverbial expression still in use in the East. Hobab would indicate the spots where water, fuel, and pasture might be found, or warn them of the dangers from hurricanes, and point out localities infested by robbers.

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

Verse 31. Thou mayest be to us instead of eyes.] But what need had they of Hobab, when they had the pillar and fire continually to point out their way? Answer: The cloud directed their general journeys, but not their particular excursions. Parties took several journeys while the grand army lay still. (See chap. xiii., xx., xxxi., xxxii., c.) They therefore needed such a person as Hobab, who was well acquainted with the desert, to direct these particular excursions to point them out watering places, and places where they might meet with fuel, c., c. What man cannot, under the direction of God’s providence, do for himself, God will do in the way of especial mercy. He could have directed them to the fountains and to the places of fuel, but Hobab can do this, therefore let Hobab be employed and let Hobab know for his encouragement that, while he is serving others in the way of God’s providence, he is securing his own best interests. On these grounds Hobab should be invited, and for this reason Hobab should go. Man cannot do God’s work and God will not do the work which he has qualified and commanded man to perform. Thus then the Lord is ever seen, even while he is helping man by man. See some valuable observations on this subject in Harmer, vol. ii., 286. Instead of, And thou mayest be to us instead of eyes, the Septuagint translate the passage thus: , And thou shalt be an elder among us. But Moses probably refers to Hobab’s accurate knowledge of the wilderness, and to the assistance he could give them as a guide.

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

To direct and guide us; for though the cloud determined them to a general place, yet many particulars might be uncertain and unknown to Moses, wherein Hobab, having long lived in those parts, might be able to advise him, as concerning the conveniences of water for their cattle, concerning the safety or danger of the several parts by reason of serpents or wild beasts, or enemies, in the parts adjoining to them, that so they might guard themselves better against them. Or this to be understood of his directing them not so much in their way, as about great and difficult matters, wherein the counsel he had from God did not exclude the advice of men, as we see in Hobabs father Jethro, Exo 18. And it is probable this was the wise son of a wise father.

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole

31. Leave us not, I pray thee . . .and thou mayest be to us instead of eyesThe earnestimportunity of Moses to secure the attendance of this man, when heenjoyed the benefit of the directing cloud, has surprised many. Butit should be recollected that the guidance of the cloud, though itshowed the general route to be taken through the trackless desert,would not be so special and minute as to point out the places wherepasture, shade, and water were to be obtained and which were oftenhid in obscure spots by the shifting sands. Besides, severaldetachments were sent off from the main body; the services of Hobab,not as a single Arab, but as a prince of a powerful clan, would havebeen exceedingly useful.

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

And he said,…. That is, Moses, he replied to Hobab, unwilling to take him at his word and go without him:

leave us not, I pray thee; or “not now”; as the Targums of Onkelos and Jonathan; at this present time, under our present difficulties, while we are in the wilderness; though Jarchi says the particle signifies beseeching or supplication:

forasmuch as thou knowest how we are to encamp in the wilderness; that this will be our case, that we shall be obliged, before we get to the promised land, to pitch our tents in the wilderness, in our passage through it; and thou knowest which are the best and most convenient places for that purpose, and therefore must entreat thee to go with us:

and thou mayest be to us instead of eyes; not to show the way, as Aben Ezra notes, or guide and direct them in the road through the wilderness; for the cloud by day and the fire by night were of that use to them, as well as when it rested, it directed them when and where to pitch their tents; rather to assist with his advice in difficult matters, when they should be in pressing circumstances: the Targum of Jonathan is,

“thou hast been dear unto us, as the apple of our eyes, and therefore we cannot part with thee.”

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

31. And he said, Leave us not, I pray thee. Moses perseveres and urges what he had just said, that Hobab should be a sharer in the prosperity which God had given his people reason to expect. “To this end” (he says) “thou hast known all our stations in the desert,” which words commentators do not appear to have observed or understood; for they translate them simply, “for thou hast known,” as if Moses desired to retain Hobab to be of use to himself, whereas there is more than one causal particle here; (10) and thus it is literally, “Since, for this cause, thou hast known all our resting-places,” etc. Its meaning, then, is as follows, that Hobab was ill-advised for his own interest; for he had borne many inconveniences, for this reason, that he might at sonic time or other receive his recompense; as if it were said, Wherefore hast thou hitherto endured so many inconveniences whilst directing our course, unless that thou mightest enjoy with us the blessings of our repose? In a word, Moses signifies that the labors of Hobab would be vain and fruitless, unless he should endure them a little while longer, until, together with the children of Israel, he should enjoy the promised inheritance. What is here said, then, does not relate to the future, as if Moses had said, Be to us instead of eyes, as thou hast been heretofore; but by reminding him that the reward of his labors was at hand, he urges and encourages him to proceed.

(10) כי על-כן. Translated in A. V., Gen 18:5, for therefore; Jud 6:22, for because; Jer 38:4, for thus; and here, forasmuch as.

Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary

(31) How we are to encamp . . . It is clear from these words, as well as from many indications of the same nature, that notwithstanding the direct guidance which was vouchsafed from heaven, and the miraculous interpositions of Providence which the Israelites experienced throughout their journeys, Moses did not neglect to take advantage of all the ordinary precautions of which it was incumbent upon him as the leader of his people to avail himself. The line of march and the places of encampment were clearly marked out by the cloud, but many difficulties would arise in the course of the journeys, and at the places of encampment, which Hobabs familiarity with the desert would enable him to meet.

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

31. Leave us not Even a decided refusal may be overcome by earnest persuasion. For we infer from Jdg 1:16; Jdg 4:11 ; 1Sa 15:6, where the descendants of Hobab, called Kenites, are abiding with Israel, even down to the time of Saul, that the entreaty of Moses prevailed, and that Hobab, after a visit to his own land, returned and accompanied the Hebrews into Canaan. “It is always pleasant to read the indications of a return to the way of life on the part of those who have at one time seemed resolved to forsake it. We hail with delight every instance where the man who at first refuses to enter the vineyard afterward repents and goes.” Bush.

Thou mayest be to us instead of eyes Though Jehovah had promised to lead Israel in the desert, yet no promise of divine guidance is designed to supersede the use of the best natural means within their reach. God usually helps men in the manner best adapted to the development of their own self-reliance. In this case “the cloud directed their general journeys, but not their particular excursions. Parties took several journeys while the grand army lay still.” A. Clarke. The best camping grounds might not always be near to springs of water and pasturage. An experienced guide would be necessary to point out these. Similar service would be required in the commercial intercourse of Israel with the nomad tribes which lay along their path. Hence the Septuagint rendering is, “Thou shall be among us a presbutes ” an ambassador, legate, or negotiator. Says Bruce, in speaking of guides in the desert: “They are men of great consideration, knowing perfectly the situation and properties of all kinds of water to be met on the route, the distance of the wells, whether occupied by enemies or not, and, if so, the way to avoid them with the least inconvenience.” From their connexion with powerful tribes they are able to conciliate their favour. “As no further refusal is mentioned on the part of Hobab, and the departure of Israel is related immediately afterward, he probably consented.” Knobel.

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

Gracious souls cannot give over pleading. See the holy importunity of Angels on this point. Gen_19:17; Gen_19:22 .

Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

Num 10:31 And he said, Leave us not, I pray thee; forasmuch as thou knowest how we are to encamp in the wilderness, and thou mayest be to us instead of eyes.

Ver. 31. Instead of eyes. ] To descry unto us the commodities and discommodities of the country, which is well known to thee. Herein thou mayest be of singular use unto us, though we have God going visibly before us. The Jews had a kind of officers at their feasts, called , the eyes of the feast, et praefecti morum. a

a Gaudentius. Casaubon.

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

thou mayest

But see Exo 13:21; Exo 13:22 What need had Moses of Hobab’s eyes? Cf. Jer 17:5.

Fuente: Scofield Reference Bible Notes

forasmuch: As the Israelites were under the immediate direction of God himself, and were guided by the pillar of cloud and fire, it might be supposed that they had no need of Hobab. But it should be remembered, that the cloud directed only their general journeys, not their particular excursions. Parties took several journeys while the grand army lay still – Num 13:1, Num 20:1, Num 31:1, Num 32:1.

instead of eyes: Job 29:15, Psa 32:8, 1Co 12:14-21, Gal 6:2

Reciprocal: 1Co 12:21 – General

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

GUIDESHUMAN AND DIVINE

Be to us instead of eyes. The ark went before them.

Num 10:31-33

I. Moses lack of faith.When they were about to leave Sinai, Moses begged his father-in-law (or brother-in-law), Hobab, to accompany them. Moses did not like parting with him. Hobabs help and counsel had been of invaluable service to him, and he feared to face the future without the assistance of Hobabs wise advice. Now all this indicates a certain weakness in Moses character. For what need had he or the Israelites of Hobab to tell them when they should encamp when they had God Himself for guide? The Bible is never afraid of revealing the faults and weaknesses of its great men; it paints them as Oliver Cromwell desired to be painted, warts and all. And so it paints Moses to us here as lacking in faith, clinging to the creature rather than the Creator, afraid to venture forward without Hobab, although God had promised to be always with him. Moses fault is our fault too. We rely too much upon earthly helpers. When Hobabthe earthly helperleaves us, or is taken away from us, we are apt to fall into something like panic and despair. But our safety does not depend upon the presence with us of this Hobab or that; our safety is assured by the fact that we have the everlasting God for our Guardian and our Guide, and though every Hobab be removed, though every earthly friend and helper be taken away, we need not be afraid, for with the old Puritan we can say, the best of all is God is with us. Let us have faith in God!

II. Moses appeal to Hobab.While this incident indicates a certain lack of faith on Moses part, it throws a beautiful light upon the essential nobility of Hobabs character. According to the story Moses made a twofold appeal to Hobab.

(1) He appealed to him on the ground of self-interest. Moses assured Hobab that by throwing in his lot with Israel, he would share in Israels blessing. Now this was a very fine thing for Moses to be able to say. It is a fine thing for any man to be able to say. Can we say it? Can we say that it is to a persons interest to keep company with us?

How was it Moses was so certain that it was to Hobabs interest to company with the Israelites? The answer is given in the first words of Moses appeal. We are journeying unto the place of which the Lord said, I will give it to you. Moses knew that he and his people were travelling in a God-appointed way and towards a God-appointed goal. Whoever has that same confidence can afford to say, Come with us, and we will do thee good. Are we travelling in Gods way and towards the God-appointed goal? If we are travelling the broad way, then we and those who company with us are in danger of destruction.

(2) Hobab, however, did not respond to this appeal addressed to his self-interest. He was not moved by the advantages Moses held forth. I will not go, he said, but I will depart to mine own land and to my kindred. And then Moses shifted his ground, and based his second appeal upon Hobabs power to render service. And Hobab, who was not touched at all by the first appeal to his interests, responded at once to this nobler appeal to him on the ground of the service he could render. He threw in his lot with Moses and the Israelites, and the services he rendered were ever kept in grateful remembrance.

The most effective appeal we can address to men is the appeal to what is heroic and sacrificial in them. When Moses talked of what he would get, Hobab remained stolid and indifferent. But when he talked to him of what he could give and do, Hobabs soul fired up in instantaneous response. Christs call to us addresses itself to what is highest and best in us. Take up the Cross, He says, deny yourself daily, and follow Me, and following Him means, not a life of self-indulgence, but a life of self-forgetful service. The appeal is not made in vain; young men in their hundreds make a joyful sacrifice of interests, and go forth to India and China and Africa and the islands of the seas to toil in poverty and obscurity all their days in order that they may serve their fellows and glorify their Lord. Christ wants us to follow Him, not simply for what we can get, but for what we can do and give. He appeals to us to lay life down in loving and consecrated toil. Come and save, He cries. Shall He appeal in vain?

III. The true Guide.So Hobab accompanied Moses and the Israelites, and put all his Bedouin skill at their disposal. But the very next verse reminds us that there was some one else on the look-out for suitable resting places for the pilgrims. The ark of the Lord went before them three days journey to seek out a resting place for them. Hobab was no doubt a wise and good man, and it was a comfort to know that he was in the host; but the real security of the Israelites consisted in this, that the Ark went before them, and that God Himself from time to time prepared them rest. Does the Ark go before us?

Illustration

(1) A traveller, following his guide amid the Alpine heights, reached a place where the path was narrowed by a jutting rock on one side and a terrible precipice on the other. The guide, holding on to the rock with one hand, extended his other hand over the precipice for the traveller to step upon and pass around the jutting rock. He hesitated, but the guide said, That hand has never lost a man. He stepped upon the hand, and passed on safely. So the Hand that guides us is an unfailing Hand, that has never let a trusting one slip from its clasp.

(2) There is a mountain path in Switzerland, over which the traveller is led blindfold. He might lose his footing if he caught but one bewildering glimpse of the chasm below.

(3) General Nicholson, who fell before Delhi in the Mutiny, sent a last message to his friend, Sir Henry Edwards. Tell him, he said, I was always a better man for any time, however short, spent in his company. Is that the effect of our companionship? Do our friends grow better men, better women, for the time they spend in our company?

Fuente: Church Pulpit Commentary

Num 10:31. Thou mayest be to us instead of eyes A very significant expression, importing that he should be to them as a guide to the blind. Several ancient versions, however, give a different turn to these words, probably in order to reconcile them with the promise of the divine conduct. The Chaldaic Paraphrase explains it thus: Thou knowest how we have encamped in the wilderness, and thine eyes have seen the miracles which have been wrought for us. The Samaritan thus: Thou knowest our encampments, and hast been to us instead of eyes. But this cannot be a just interpretation, for Hobab had not yet followed their camp. The Syriac thus: Thou shalt be dear to us as our eyes. The LXX., , Thou shalt be a senator among us; the counsellors of princes being sometimes called their eyes. But our translation seems most exactly to express the sense of the Hebrew, and certainly implies nothing inconsistent with the promise of the divine guidance; for though the cloud determined them to a general place, yet many particulars might be unknown to Moses, wherein Hobab, having long lived in those parts, might be able to advise him; as concerning the conveniences of water for their cattle; concerning the safety or danger of the several parts, by reason of serpents, or wild beasts, or enemies, in the parts adjoining to them, that so they might guard themselves better against them. Or, this is to be understood of his directing them not so much in their way, as about great and difficult matters, wherein the counsel Moses had from God did not exclude the advice of men, as we see in Hobabs father, Jethro, Exodus 18. And it is probable this was the wise son of a wise father.

Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments