Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Numbers 23:25
And Balak said unto Balaam, Neither curse them at all, nor bless them at all.
25, 26. Balak in his anger refuses to allow Balaam to make any further utterances about Israel, either to curse or to bless. Balaam reminds him of his reiterated statement that he could only say what Jehovah commanded him (Num 22:38, Num 23:3; Num 23:12). Balaam’s relations with Balak, therefore, as recorded in E , are now at an end. The sequel ( Num 23:27-30 ; Num 23:24) is not really a sequel, but a parallel account from J .
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
And Balak said unto Balaam, neither curse them at all, nor bless them at all. Signifying that it would be as well or better to do nothing at all, than to do what he did; but the sense is not, that he would not have him curse them, that he could never say, since he had pressed it both before and after this; wherefore the words should be rendered, as they are by some p, “if in cursing thou dost not curse”, or will not curse, “neither in blessing bless”, or, however, do not bless: if he could not or would not curse Israel, he would not have him bless them on any account; if he could do him and his people no good in ridding them of their enemies, yet he desires him by no means to do them any harm by discouraging them and encouraging Israel.
p So Fagius, Vatablus; with which agree the Arabic version, and Noldius, p. 221. No. 1024.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Balaam’s Last Words. – Num 23:25-30. Balak was not deterred, however, from making another attempt. At first, indeed, he exclaimed in indignation at these second sayings of Balaam: “ Thou shalt neither curse it, nor even bless.” The double with signifies “neither – nor;” and the rendering, “if thou do not curse it, thou shalt not bless it,” must be rejected as untenable. In his vexation at the second failure, he did not want to hear anything more from Balaam. But when he replied again, that he had told him at the very outset that he could do nothing but what God should say to him (cf. Num 22:38), he altered his mind, and resolved to conduct Balaam to another place with this hope: “ peradventure it will please God that thou mayest curse me them from thence.” Clericus observes upon this passage, “It was the opinion of the heathen, that what was not obtained through the first, second, or third victim, might nevertheless be secured through a fourth;” and he adduces proofs from Suetonius, Curtius, Gellius, and others.
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
Verses 25, 26:
When Balak protested to Balaam that he should not bless Israel, Balaam reminded him that he could do only what he was permitted to do.
It is significant that in the entire affair, Balaam never advanced beyond the pagan point of view. It was his job as a professional soothsayer to know the facts about those with whom he dealt. But he was evidently lacking in true spiritual understanding. Yet he knew enough to admit that he was powerless to go beyond the limits Jehovah prescribed for him.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
25. And Balak said unto Balaam. Here we may behold as in a mirror how wretchedly unbelievers are driven to and fro, so as to alternate between vain hopes and fears, though by their changes of purpose they are still brought back to the same errors, as if their blind passion led them through a labyrinth. When Balak sees that he is deceived in his opinion, he seeks at least that the hireling prophet should neither profit nor injure. This, however, is exactly as if he would have God to lie idle; but presently he recovers his spirits, and endeavors to repurchase the curse, which in his penitence he had abandoned. For this cause he drags Balaam to another place, although he had already discovered that this was in vain. But thus pertinaciously do unbelievers prosecute their wicked efforts: whilst, at the same time, the disquietude which agitates them with doubts is the just reward of their temerity.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
F. THE THIRD BLESSING vv. 2530
TEXT
Num. 23:25. And Balak said unto Balaam, Neither curse them at all, nor bless them at all. 26. But Balaam answered and said unto Balak, Told not I thee, saying, All that the Lord speaketh, that I must do?
And Balak said unto Balaam, Come, I pray thee, I will bring thee unto another place; peradventure it will please God that thou mayest curse me them from thence. 28. And Balak brought Balaam unto the top of Peor, that looketh toward Jeshimon. 29. And Balaam said unto Balak, Build me here seven altars, and prepare me here seven bullocks and seven rams. 30. And Balak did as Balaam had said, and offered a bullock and a ram on every altar.
PARAPHRASE
Num. 23:25. And Balak said to Balaam, Neither curse them nor bless them at all! 26. But Balaam replied, Did I not tell you, All that the Lord says, I must do?
27. And Balak said to Balaam, Come now; I will take you to another place. Perhaps it will please God for you to curse them for me there. 28. So Balak took Balaam to the top of Peor, which overlooks the desert. 29. And Balaam said to Balak, Build seven altars here for me, and provide me with seven bulls and seven rams. 30. And Balak did as Balaam had asked, and offered a bull and a ram on each altar.
COMMENTARY
Substantially, Balaks first reaction to the previous words of Balaam are, If you cant say something bad about these people, dont say anything at all! He has had no grounds for reassurance from anything yet spoken, and we can only be amazed that he should want to try again to gain a favorable word from Balaam unless he had some reason to believe that the prophet was still susceptible to bribery, or that yet another change of location would bring a change of message, If this is true, Balaam may have given some slight hint, ever so subtle or even subconscious, which Balak detected.
Although the exact peak indicated here cannot be positively identified, it is in the Abarim range, which includes Pisgah, Nearby was the village of Beth-Peor, in which vicinity Moses would later be buried (Deu. 34:6). The area was across the Jordan from Jericho. From the site Balaam could see the entire camp of Israel spread out before him (Num. 24:2). Jeshimon, the waste, is primarily the plains area at the east and northeast section of the Dead Seaa barren, rarely-inhabited region which extended to the southern end of the Jordan valley.
QUESTIONS AND RESEARCH ITEMS
439.
How could Balak possibly hope now that Balaam would say anything different from what he had prophesied previously?
440.
Do you believe Balaam was sincere and honest when he said he could not say anything other than what God revealed for him? Defend your answer.
441.
Locate and describe the place to which Balaam was led for the third round of sacrifices and prophecies.
442.
Identify Jeshimon, and describe the terrain.
Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series
25. Neither curse nor bless This issue of Balak’s machinations against the people of God is only a single instance of the inspired declaration, “The wrath of man shall praise thee,” which has been fulfilled all along the ages. The efforts of infidelity to destroy Christ have all resulted in his exaltation. The stone, the watch, and the seal, intended to keep the crucified Jesus in the tomb, have become strong proofs of the resurrection of our Lord. The assaults of rationalism, by arousing Christian apologists to deeper researches, have contributed to lay bare the immutable foundations of the Gospel of Jesus Christ.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
G.THE THIRD BLESSING
Num 23:25 to Num 24:9
25And Balak said unto Balaam, Neither curse them at all, nor bless them at all. 26But Balaam answered and said unto Balak, Told not I thee, saying, All that the Lord speaketh, that I must do?
27And Balak said unto Balaam, Come, I pray thee, I will bring thee unto another place; peradventure it will please God that thou mayest curse me them from thence. 28And Balak brought Balaam unto the top of Peor, that looketh toward Jeshimon. 29And Balaam said unto Balak, Build me here seven altars, and prepare me here seven bullocks and seven rams. 30And Balak did as Balaam had said, and offered a bullock and a ram on every altar.
Num 24:1.And when Balaam saw that it pleased the Lord to bless Israel, he went not, as at other times, to seek for1 enchantments, but he set his face toward the wilderness. 2And Balaam lifted up his eyes, and he saw Israel abiding in his tents according to their tribes; and the Spirit of God came upon him.
3And he took up his parable, and said,
Balaam the son of Beor hath said,
And the man whose eyes are2 open hath said:
4He hath said, which heard the words of God,
Which saw the vision of the Almighty,
Falling into a trance, but having his eyes open:
5How goodly are thy tents, O Jacob!
And thy tabernacles, O Israel!
6As the valleys are they spread forth,
As gardens by the rivers side,
As the trees of lign-aloes which the Lord hath planted,
And as cedar trees beside the waters.
7He shall pour the water out of his buckets,
And his seed shall be in many waters,
And his king shall be higher than Agag,
And his kingdom shall be exalted.
8God brought him forth out of Egypt;
He hath as it were the strength of an unicorn:
He shall eat up the nations his enemies,
And shall break their bones,
And pierce them through with his arrows.
9He couched, he lay down as a lion,
And as a great lion: who shall stir him up?
Blessed is he that blesseth thee,
And cursed is he that curseth thee.
TEXTUAL AND GRAMMATICAL
[Num 24:1. Heb. as time after time.A. G.].
[Num 24:3. a divine saying used ordinarily with Jehovah, found only here and Pro 30:1; 2Sa 23:1, with the genitive of the human bearer of the saying.A. G.].
[Num 24:3. Rather closed like to close, the being later softened into or . See Hengst., pp. 136139, and the authorities quoted.A. G.].
[Num 24:4. Falling downhaving his eyes open, i. e., the inward eye. The words are different from those in Num 24:3.A. G.].
[Num 24:7. The dual form: personifying the nation as a man carrying two pails overflowing with water.A. G.]
[Num 24:8. . Those who beset him round.A. G.].
[Num 24:8. The suffix in refers to Israel, and the verb is without an expressed object. Hirsch meets the difficulty by making the singular suffix refer to God, as His arrows, the arrows of God, Israel wounds.A. G.].
EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL
Balak is betrayed into the greatest confusion, utters things which are self-contradictorya usual result of such cunningly-laid schemes. At first he says: Thou shalt neither curse them nor bless them, i. e. keep silence with respect to them. But immediately another superstitious idea occurs to him. He had erred perhaps in only letting the curser see the extreme limits of the Israelitish camp. Possibly the result might be entirely different if he should overlook the whole camp at one time and in one view. Then perchance his alarm at the sight of this great swarming host would overwhelm him, and so lead him to pronounce the curse. He leads him therefore at once to the top of Mount Peor. This mountain lay nearest the camp of Israel, one of the peaks of the Abarim range and overlooking the whole plain. It was probably not far from the city Beth-Peor. [It was north from Pisgah, and nearly opposite Jericho, six Roman miles higher than Libbias. The locality is important in connection with the prophetic utterances which follow, See Smiths Bib. Dict., Art. Balaam, Stanleys Hist. of Jewish Church, p. 213217. Behind him lay the vast expanse of desert extending to the shores of his native Assyrian river. On his left were the red mountains of Edom and Seir; opposite were the dwelling-places of the Kenite, in the rocky fastnesses of Engedi; further still was the dim outline of the Arabian wilderness, where ruled the then powerful tribe of Amalek; immediately below him lay the vast encampment of Israel, amongst the Acacia groves of Abel-Shittimlike the water-courses of the mountainslike the hanging gardens beside his own river Euphrates with their aromatic shrubs and their wide-spreading cedars. Beyond them, on the western side of Jordan, rose the hills of Palestine, with glimpses through their valleys of ancient cities towering on their crested heights. And beyond all, though he could not see it with his bodily vision, he knew well that there rolled the deep waters of the great sea, with the Isles of Greece, the Isle of Chittima world of which the first beginnings of life were just stirring, of which the very name here first breaks upon our ears.A. G.] The same costly sacrifice must be offered again. It could only have been in an ironical temper that Balaam, after his previous utterances, could start upon this new attempt or make these requisitions for it.
He knows now definitely the will of Jehovah, and does not go as before to meet or seek auguries, but turns his back directly towards the wilderness, and surveys the whole people of Israel encamped there. Then the Spirit of God came upon him in a new and higher way. The words are no longer put into his mouth, and uttered under constraint and legal fear; he speaks out now in his ecstatic condition winged words, although we cannot say that they came from the heart. [He no longer attempted by any magic art to control the purpose of God, but became the organ which God used in the communication of His will. He spake now in the spirit of prophecy Hirsch. It was not the mere sight of the ordered camp which formed the subjective preparation for receiving the Spirit of God, but the sight in connection with the previous living conviction that Israel was the blessed people of God. Hengstenberg.A. G.]
Num 24:3-4. He begins with a description of his new higher and more exalted state. From his very opening words Balaam himself is conscious for the time of prophetic powers. From Balaam the son of Beor he has become the man who has his inward prophetic eyes opened, since he has passed now into prophetic ecstacy. He first heard the words of (the mighty) Godas hearing usually precedes vision in the miraculous revelationand then saw the vision (face) of the Almighty, but was so overpowered that he fell down (as Saul, 1Sa 19:24; Daniel, Dan 10:9; the Seer in the Apocalypse, Revelation 1; and as generally the prophets were prostrated in their calling); but with the fall, his spiritual eyes were unveiled, so that he can now make known the divine sayings. [Keil: He calls his prediction a divine saying, a , for the purpose of designating it as a divine revelation received from the Spirit of God. The falling to the ground was not necessarily or even generally an attendant upon the prophetic state and calling. There seems to be an intimation in the phrase, is Saul also among the prophets? that this condition was common. But that is a slight basis upon which to build a theory of the prophetic state. It is only in cases like Balaam and Saul, when the Spirit finds an alien condition of will and heart, that His coming is attended by these marks of violence, as if they were overcome and thrown down by a hostile power. As Hengstenberg well says, we are not justified in inferring from these cases that this was the condition with all the prophets. We could scarcely conceive it to have occurred with Samuel, as with Saul. To those whose ordinary states are pervaded by the Spirit He comes as to His own. The falling with David, Ezekiel, John, are not parallel; for in their case it was the splendor and glory of the manifestation which led them to prostrate themselves in reverence and fear. Whose eyes are open, not with the margin: who had his eyes shut, but now open, referring in both cases to his inward eye, but with most modern commentators, as now shut or closed. It is descriptive of his present ecstatic state. His bodily eyes and senses are closed to the external world, while his inner eye is open to the visions which the Spirit gave. The contrast between the third and fourth verses in the original favors this interpretation. It does not follow, however, that every prophet in his prophetic condition, had his bodily eyes closed, or the senses, as it were, suspended, so far as self-conscious reflection is concerned. With men like Balaam, whose inner eye was darkened by lusts and passions, it seems necessary; but with those who were spiritually-minded, who were not sunken in the world of the senses and of self, it was not necessary, and probably did not occur.A. G.] But here again the blessing is richer in its pathetic form than in its contents. The figures used are massed, and sometimes obscure. We meet again not only the image of the swift-rushing buffalo, but of the lion in a modified form. He describes the goodly and splendid appearance of the tent-city, which may be regarded as an unconscious type of the theocracy or the church (Num 24:5-6). In the next place he describes the glorious development of this people (Num 24:7). Then thirdly he celebrates its powerand indeed its destructive power over the heathen (Num 24:8-9). Only a faint glimmer of hope for the nations shines through the closing words: Blessed is he that blesseth thee, and cursed is he that curseth thee.
Num 24:5. How goodly are thy tents, etc.The word is typically significant, not only in reference to the theocracy, but to the Christian Church. [It is Israel which comes before his mental visionthe people in its higher nature, in its relation to God, and therefore all who are Israel, down to the most distant ages.A. G.]
Num 24:6. From the dwellings to the land. Well-watered valleys spread themselves out in beautiful pictures, and to these the still more beautiful gardens by the river side. The conception of the aloe-groves breathing out their fragrance, and the cedar trees standing in their strength by the water courses, leads us away from the ordinary beauties of nature, to a higher paradisaic nature and culture. As an unconscious typical word, it foretells the Canaan to come, and the wider and succeeding glorification of the earth. [Bible Com. The aloe imported from China and the far distant east furnished to the ancients one of the most fragrant and precious of spices. Comp. Ps. 45:48. All thy garments smell of myrrh, aloes and cassia, Psa 7:17. The images of the prophecy seem to have a basis or ground partly in the scene which lay before his natural eyes before the trancethe camp with its wide surroundings, and partly in those with which he was familiar along the banks of his own Euphrates.A. G.]
Num 24:7. The people are presented under the image of a water carrier, whose two buckets (the dual form) which he carries, are overflowing with water. [He shall pour the water.He shall not only prosper, have abundance of water, as water was so essential to all fertility, but he shall pour from his overflowing buckets, he shall distribute to others out of his fullness of blessings. In thee shall all families of the earth be blessed, Gen 12:3.A. G.] His seed, i. e., his progeny (not his sowing corn, as Bunsen), shall be in many waters, i. e., shall spread itself abroad, be cheered with great and varied blessing. His king shall be higher than Agag, i. e., the kings of his ancient enemies, the Amalekites, who were called Agag (the fiery). [Agag seems to have been the common name of the kings of the Amalekites, as Pharaoh of the kings of Egypt, and Abimelech of the kings of the Philistines. And Hengstenberg has shown clearly, from the immediate context, in which Balaam speaks only in general terms of the good which should come to Israel, and from the relation which this third saying has to those which precede it, and that which follows, forming as it were a middle member in the whole prophetic utterance, a transition from the general and ideal, to the particular or individual, that we cannot suppose a reference to any individual king as the Agag overthrown by Saul, 1Sa 15:8. It is only in the fourth saying, and even then in a general way, that he passes on to an individual application of the predictions to particular hostile nations. This is still further confirmed by the fact that his king is not any particular king, as Saul or David, nor even the Messiah exclusively, but his king generally, i.e., the king whom Israel should receive. His king here is equivalent to the kingdom which should be exaltedin and through which the power of Israel should be fully developed and established over all enemies. There is too an historical reason why the Amalekite kingdom should appear here as the representative of the enmity of the world to the kingdom of God (see Exo 17:8). And they were still probably among the most mighty of Israels foes, which was not the case at the time of Saul. There is no valid ground therefore for the supposition that this passage indicates a later origin of the book of Numbers. On the contrary, it may be fairly urged as showing how deeply the idea of the kingdom lies imbedded in all conceptions of the people of God as a power in the world, as showing that it is not an idea of late growth, but one with which the people of God, and even Balaam was familiar.A. G.] His kingdom shall be exalted, i. e., raise itself by its activity, vigor and growth. In the words his king he indicates the establishment of a royal dynasty in Israel, but that the kings of the Amalekites (and not Edom, Assyria, Babylon) are chosen as the type of heathen enmity proves the antiquity of the narrative. The singular greatness of the people corresponds to the singular greatness of the king. There is no verbal and conscious prophecy of the Messiah here (Keil: The king was neither the Messiah exclusively, nor the earthly kingdom without the Messiah); for with the conception of the ideal Messiah, which unfolds itself later, out of the natural and generic Messiah, the conception of salvation as extending to all assumes a definite form. The words, however, in a typical sense have an unmistakable significance: the great people of God with its great king overcoming and towering above all heathen kingdoms and kings. [Hengstenberg: for as Israel only attains the complete realization of its idea in the erection of the kingdom, so the kingdom reaches completely its destination only, with the appearance of the Messiah. In Him first the king of Israel is truly higher than Agag, the representative of the hostile world-power.A. G.]
Num 24:8. The repeated reference to Egypt and the Exodus appears to be designed to bring out more vividly the contrast between this poor race of liberated slaves, and its destruction of the heathen nations as its enemies. We explain the latter and difficult clauses thus: he will crush (not gnaw) the bones of his enemies, and then break his own arrows, because the instruments of warfare have become useless. (See Isa 2:4.) It is a strange order surely to say that he will first gnaw the bones of his enemies, and then pierce them with his arrows. We would rather account for the change from the plural to the singular thus: as he will crush the hostile nations, so he will break his (the enemies) arrows. [Keil renders: he shall dash them in pieces with his arrows, making the enemies the object of the verb. The violent alterations in the text suggested by J. D. Michaelis and Knobel are unnecessary. The order may be, from the crushing defeat of Israels enemies, to the instruments by which it is secured, arrows standing for the weapons of war. Hirsch: And as the arrows of God, Israel wounds, i.e., Israel is the weapon in the hand of God in His warfare with His malignant foes, the enemies of the dominion of His moral law upon the earth, and it is only as the arrow of God that Israel has victorious power over the nations.A. G.]
The figure of the lion has a deeper significance than in Num 23:22. There the lion goes in search of his prey; he has not yet lain down; here he appears as a triumphant lion, who has lain down in his majesty, and will injure no more. As to the typical meaning underlying this prediction of the kingdom of Israel conquering and destroying all heathen power, see Psalms 2, 110; Isaiah 9, 11; Dan 2:34-35.
Num 24:9. Comp. Gen 12:3; Gen 27:29; Gen 49:9; Mat 10:40-42.
The last words must lead to a rupture between Balak and Balaam, for their application to themselves, and their opposite purposes, was apparent. Balaam as the blesser felt himself blessed; and since Balak still wished to curse Israel, he was pursued already by the curse. [The future history will scarcely justify the supposition that Balaam felt himself blessed. He was conscious that he did not bless with the heart; it was not a blessing he desired which he utters, and hence he could not feel that he himself was heir to the blessing.A. G.]
Footnotes:
[1]Marg. To the meeting of enchantments.
[2]Marg. who had his eyes shut but now opened.
Fuente: A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures, Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical by Lange
Nothing can be more evident, I think, from the perusal of the whole conference between Balak and Balaam, than that Balak was satisfied of Balaam’s wish to oblige him with cursing Israel, had he dared to have done it. And nothing can be more evident, than that the impious prophet endeavored by all the arts of enchantment, to do the reverse of what the LORD constrained him to do. Reader! pause over such views, and ask your own heart, what greater testimony can be needed, in proof of the divine government watching over his people, and accomplishing the destruction of his enemies! See two striking instances of this, 2Ki 19:32-37 ; Isa 10:24-25Isa 10:24-25 .
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Num 23:25 And Balak said unto Balaam, Neither curse them at all, nor bless them at all.
Ver. 25. Nor bless them at all. ] But they are blessed, and they shall be blessed, the one cursing the malice of earth and of hell.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Psa 2:1-3
Reciprocal: 1Ch 9:28 – the charge
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Num 23:25 to Num 24:2. Balaks Sacrifices preliminary to Balaams third Oracle.The scene of these was Peor, some mountain overlooking the desert bordering the Dead Sea on the W. The inconsistency between Balaks indignant dismissal of Balaam in Num 23:25 and his renewed attempt in Num 23:27 f. to gain what he wanted has suggested that with Num 23:25 one account of the episode ends, and that what follows comes from another, with editorial links. The allusion in Num 24:1 to the use of enchantments (better, divinations or omens) on previous occasions certainly does not correspond to the accounts in Num 23:3 f., or Num 23:15 f., so that the conclusion that here the editor has used another source of which a portion has been omitted, seems justified. Probably E has been mainly employed in Numbers 23, and J in Numbers 24.