Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Deuteronomy 17:12
And the man that will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest that standeth to minister there before the LORD thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die: and thou shalt put away the evil from Israel.
12. presumptuously ] See on Deu 1:43 and cp. Deu 18:20.
unto the priest or unto the judge ] Again no information is given as to how the cases are to be divided between the two. D’s sole interest is to accommodate the procedure of law to the fact of the One Altar.
that standeth to minister, etc.] See on Deu 10:8.
put away the evil ] See on Deu 13:5 (6).
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Verse 12. The man that will do presumptuously] The man who refused to abide by this final determination forfeited his life, as being then in a state of rebellion against the highest authority, and consequently the public could have no pledge for his conduct.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
That will do presumptuously, i.e. that will proudly and obstinately oppose the sentence given against him. This is opposite to ignorance and error, Exo 21:13,14.
The evil; either,
1. The evil thing, that scandal, that pernicious example. Or,
2. That evil, refractory, pernicious person, whose practice herein tends to the dissolution of all government, and the ruin of the common-wealth of Israel.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
Ver. 12 And the man that will do presumptuously,…. The judge of the country court that makes his application to that at Jerusalem for information and direction; if, after all, he is conceited in his own opinion, and rejects theirs, and is obstinate, and will not be guided and directed, but will take his own way, and pursue his own sense of things, and act according to that:
and will not hearken to the priest that standeth to minister there before the Lord thy God; the priests of the tribe of Levi, of whom the court generally consisted, De 17:9, priest for priests; though some think the high priest is meant, to whom the character very well agrees; but he was not always at the head of the sanhedrim, nor indeed a member of it, unless he had the proper qualifications; see De 18:18
or unto the judge; or judges; [See comments on De 17:9]. L’Empereur g thinks, that the supreme senate, or grand sanhedrim, was twofold, according to the diversity of ecclesiastic and political matters; since where it treats of the supreme senators, or chief persons in the court, the priest is manifestly distinguished from the judge (i.e. priests or judges); now the man that has asked advice of them, and will not be directed by it, but takes his own way, this being so great a contempt of, and insult upon, the great senate of the nation:
even that man shall die; and this was by strangling, for so the rebellious older, as such an one is called, was to die according to the Misnah h; and it is said i, that the death spoken of in the law absolutely (without specifying what kind of death) is strangling:
and thou shall put away the evil from Israel; the evil man that is rebellious against the supreme legislature of the nation, and the evil of contumacy he is guilty of, deterring others from it by his death.
g In Misn. Middoth, c. 5. sect. 3. h Sanhedrin, c. 10. sect. 2. i Maimon. Issure Biah, c. 1. sect. 6.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
He pronounces a similar punishment on those who shall have contumaciously rejected the judgment of the priests. We have already seen that the prophetical office was united with the priesthood; since, according to Mal 2:4, the covenant of God was with Levi, that his descendants might be the guardians of His knowledge, and the interpreters of His law: yet God often punished the laxity of the priests, by setting other teachers over his people. At any rate, both were ambassadors for Him. Since, therefore, the authority of the prophets had been sanctioned above, the same rights are now conferred upon the priests; nor is this surprising, for it was no trifling crime to despise God, the appointer of this order. Yet we must remember what I have elsewhere stated, that the priests were not armed with tyrannical authority, so that it was sinful to reject whatever they might have decreed according to their own fancy. For neither did God dethrone Himself when He appointed them, nor did He bind men’s consciences to obey their ordinances without distinction, but only would put reins on the audacity of those who have no scruple in undervaluing the government of the Church. For this must be considered, that foul and horrible would be the disorder, if men were promiscuously permitted to reject whatever the rulers of the Church may have appointed; and it would be ridiculous that persons should be called to govern, to whom no dignity should be accorded; and, therefore, natural reason itself shews and dictates, that the reverence, which is here demanded, is due to all lawful commands. God was the author of the priesthood: He, too, ordained judges. What could be more absurd than that they should be despised and laughed at with impunity, who presided in the name and by the command of God? But He has never exalted a mortal man so high as to abdicate His own rights; nay, it was often necessary boldly to reject what the priests had commanded. Urijah the priest built a profane altar in the fashion of that at Damascus, which Ahaz had sent, and offered a sacrifice thereon, (55) (2Kg 16:12,) was it necessary that Isaiah should acquiesce in this? Nay, detestable was the adulation of all who assented to the decree of a wicked and perfidious priest. Moreover, we see that the prophets were very often so far from agreeing with the priests, that they waged open war with them. But the whole of this matter is decided by the words of Moses, for he does not unreservedly condemn all who should not obey, but restricts his law by the addition of a special mark, viz., if the contempt should arise from presumption or arrogance. Therefore it was not else a capital crime to disobey the priest or the judge, unless any one should insolently and proudly oppose himself to the ordinance established by God. Otherwise this exception would have been interposed without reason. In fine, the priests of old were to be obeyed, as far as it concerned the public peace that the pastors ordained by God should be reverently honored; yet so as that there should be no departure from God Himself, the one Head and Prince of all pastors. We have elsewhere seen how foolishly the Papists take this to themselves (56)
(55) “ Ce vilein traistre Urie y offroit;” that vile traitor Urijah offered on it. — Fr.
(56) “ Combien les Papistes sont sots et badins, voulant faire leur profit de ce passage;” how silly and trifling the Papists are, in seeking to make their profit of this passage. — Fr.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
12. The man that will do presumptuously Apparently defying the judge and the law.
And will not hearken unto the priest The Jews understood this to apply to such elders or judges as had, in accordance with the preceding requirement, referred an important matter to the highest authority, and then refused to abide by its decision.
Even that man shall die Such resistance was to be considered as rebellion against constituted authority. It was defiance of God’s law it was at that time to be looked upon as treason against the state.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Ver. 12. The man thatwill not hearken unto the priest, &c. By priest in this place is thought to be meant the high-priest; or it may be put for priests, the enallage of numbers being frequent in the sacred book; and so it means the same as the priests the Levites in the 9th verse. But, however the word be interpreted, the crime here mentioned was contumacy, in not submitting to the sentence of the highest authority, whereby the government was in danger of being broken; and therefore God orders such a person to be put to death. St. Augustin, cited by Grotius, observes, that, in the church, excommunication has succeeded to the punishment of death denounced by this law. See Cyprian in Epist. ad Pomponium, de Virgin. Ephesians 4.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
will do: Deu 13:5, Deu 13:11, Num 15:30, Ezr 10:8, Psa 19:13, Hos 4:4, Mat 10:14, Heb 10:26-29
and will not hearken: Heb. not to hearken, Jer 25:3-14
the priest: Deu 10:8, Deu 18:5, Deu 18:7, Luk 10:16, Joh 12:48, Joh 20:23, 1Th 4:2, 1Th 4:8
that man: Heb 10:28
thou shalt: Deu 17:7, Deu 13:5, Pro 21:11, 1Ti 5:20
Reciprocal: Exo 21:14 – presumptuously Deu 16:18 – Judges Jos 1:18 – that doth rebel Jdg 20:13 – put away Rom 13:1 – every Tit 3:1 – to be subject Heb 2:2 – every 2Pe 2:10 – despise
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
17:12 And the man that will do presumptuously, and will not hearken unto the priest that standeth to {h} minister there before the LORD thy God, or unto the judge, even that man shall die: and thou shalt put away the evil from Israel.
(h) So long as he is the true minister of God, and pronounces according to his word.