Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Deuteronomy 23:3
An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD forever:
This law forbids only the naturalization of those against whom it is directed. It does not forbid their dwelling in the land; and seems to refer rather to the nations than to individuals. It was not understood at any rate to interdict marriage with a Moabitess; compare Rth 1:4; Rth 4:13. Ruth however, and her sister were doubtless proselytes.
Deu 23:4
Compare the marginal reference. The Moabites and the Ammonites are to be regarded as clans of the same stock rather than as two independent nations, and as acting together. Compare 2Ch 20:1.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Verse 3. An Ammonite or Moabite] These nations were subjected for their impiety and wickedness, (see De 23:4; De 23:5), to peculiar disgrace, and on this account were not permitted to hold any office among the Israelites. But this did not disqualify them from being proselytes: Ruth, who was a Moabitess, was married to Boaz, and she became one of the progenitors of our Lord.
Even to their tenth generation] That is, for ever, as the next clause explains; see Ne 13:1.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
This may be understood either,
1. Of the males only, or the children of such fathers, as interpreters commonly take it. Or rather,
2. Of females also, or of all that were born either of such fathers or mothers, as may be gathered from Ezr 10 Ne 13, where the children of strange wives were separated from Israel no less than the children of strange fathers. And it is an allowed maxim, that the birth follows the belly. And whereas the children of Rahab and Ruth are produced to the contrary, it may be said as it was before, that these were extraordinary instances, and that God when he pleased might exempt any particular person of them from this curse, though the Israelites might not do so.
For ever; so it seems to note the immutability and perpetuity of this law, that it should be inviolably observed in all succeeding ages, and not dispensed with for any merit in the persons, or any pretence whatsoever. But why then should this clause be added only here, seeing the foregoing laws are as inviolable as this? It seems therefore to extend the duration of this exclusion of them from the congregation of the Lord beyond what was said at first, and to be added by way of aggravation, even to their tenth generation shall they not enteryea, even for ever, i.e. they shall never enter, as it is expressed, without any mention of the tenth generation, Neh 13:1, that they shall not come into the congregation of God for ever.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
3. even to the their tenthgeneration shall they not enterMany eminent writers think thatthis law of exclusion was applicable only to males; at all eventsthat a definite is used for an indefinite number (Neh 13:1;Rth 4:10; 2Ki 10:2).Many of the Israelites being established on the east side of Jordanin the immediate neighborhood of those people, God raised thispartition wall between them to prevent the consequences of evilcommunications. More favor was to be shown to Edomites andEgyptiansto the former from their near relationship to Israel; andto the latter, from their early hospitalities to the family of Jacob,as well as the many acts of kindness rendered them by privateEgyptians at the Exodus (Ex 12:36).The grandchildren of Edomite or Egyptian proselytes were declaredadmissible to the full rights of citizenship as native Israelites;and by this remarkable provision, God taught His people a practicallesson of generosity and gratitude for special deeds of kindness, tothe forgetfulness of all the persecution and ill services sustainedfrom those two nations.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord,…. Or marry an Israelitish woman, as Jarchi, and so the Targum of Jonathan,
“the male Ammonites and Moabites are not fit to take a wife of the congregation of the Lord;”
for the Jews restrain this to men, because it is, as Aben Ezra observes, an Ammonite, not an Ammonitess, a Moabite, not a Moabitess; they allow that females of those nations might be married to Israelites, that is, provided they were proselytesses, as Ruth was m:
even to their tenth generation, shall they not enter into the congregation of the Lord for ever; that is, not only to the tenth generation, but for ever; and this law was understood as in force in Nehemiah’s time, which was more than ten generations from the making of it; though now, as these nations are no more a distinct people, they suppose it is no longer binding n.
m Misn. Yebamot, c. 8. sect. 3. n Misn. Yadaim, c. 4. sect. 4.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
3. An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter. As God has lately prohibited His people from all connection and alliance with the Canaanitish nations, so He now distinguishes between the aliens, and shews upon what conditions, and whom they might admit (into the Church. (305)) The Moabites and Ammonites He altogether rejects; because they not only refused the common rites of humanity to the people, but also took arms against them, and even hired Balaam to curse them. They were the descendants of Lot, and ought to have embraced the children of Abraham as brethren. It was, then, inexcusable barbarity in them to make a violent attack upon those who had voluntarily offered them peace; who had promised by their messengers that they would make their way without injury or wrong; and who finally had besought that a passage might be granted them, provided they honestly paid the price of bread and water; although doubtless God took vengeance rather on their impiety than their cruelty, since they had not only endeavored to make His goodness of none effect, but also to annihilate His faithfulness. Since, therefore, it was not their fault that the Church did not perish, and the effect of His promise fail, whereon the salvation of man was based, and this they had done knowingly and wilfully, no wonder that they were excluded from the Church.
(305) Added from Fr.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(3) An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter. According to Rashi, shall not marry an Israelitish woman. It must be remembered that the children, according to Jewish law, follow the father, not the mother. The case of Ruth would not, therefore, be touched by this precept.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
3-6. An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter Not as such. The case of Ruth shows they might on embracing Judaism. Knobel considers that the reason for the prohibition of the text was because Ammon and Moab were begotten in incest. Here Moses gives as reasons that they had failed to meet the Israelites with hospitality, and had hired Balaam to curse them.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
DISCOURSE: 214
BENEVOLENCE TOWARDS GODS ANCIENT PEOPLE
Deu 23:3-4. An Ammonite or a Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the Lord; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the Lord for ever; because they met you not with bread and with water, when ye came forth out of Egypt.
IN reading the history of Gods ancient people, we shall do well to notice even the most minute occurrences; since there will scarcely be found one which is not capable of spiritual improvement, or one from which the most important lessons may not be derived. The record before us would be passed over by the generality of readers, as pertaining only to that particular dispensation, and as affording but little instruction for us at this time: yet does it in reality contain as great practical information as can be found in any of the more signal events with which the inspired history abounds. A thousand years after this record was written, it was referred to, not by accident, as we call it, but by the special direction of Divine Providence: and was made the ground of the most self-denying command that could be given to men; and the ground, also, of the most prompt obedience to that command, that it was possible for fallen man to render. The Jews after their return from Babylon had formed connexions with the heathen that had occupied Judea in their absence: but Nehemiah, determining to rectify this great evil, read to all the people the very words which I have now read to you; and, by his clear and unquestionable inferences from them, prevailed on all the people of the land to separate themselves from the mixed multitude, and to act up to the spirit of the injunction there given [Note: Neh 13:1-3.]. Now it is to the practical improvement of them that I wish to direct your attention: and for that end I shall set before you,
I.
The duty of benevolence in general
It is a duty
[Love is the very essence of all practical religion. It is in a most peculiar manner inculcated under the Christian dispensation; and it is to be exercised towards every child of man. God, who is love itself, makes his sun to rise on the evil and on the good, and sends rain both on the just and unjust: and our duty is to resemble him, and to be perfect, even as our Father which is in heaven is perfect [Note: Mat 5:44-48.]. If we be doubtful how far this precept is to be obeyed, the parable of the good Samaritan gives us a clear and unerring direction [Note: Luk 10:37.]. No man under heaven can be so distant from us, but he is entitled to the offices of our love, so far as our opportunities and ability give scope for its exercise ]
It is absolutely indispensable to our acceptance with God
[Whatever else we may possess, yea, whatever we may either do or suffer for the Lords sake, if we have not an active principle of love in our hearts, we are only as sounding brass or a tinkling cymbal [Note: 1Co 13:1-3.]. St. John even appeals to us on this subject, and makes us judges in our own cause: Whoso hath this worlds goods, and seeth his brother have need, and shutteth up his bowels of compassion from him, how dwelleth the love of God in him [Note: 1Jn 3:17.]? In truth, the want of this principle, whatever else we may possess, will be adduced by our Judge, in the last day, as the ground of our eternal condemnation: Depart, accursed, into everlasting fire, prepared for the devil and his angels! for I was an hungred, and ye gave me no meat; I was thirsty, and ye gave me no drink; I was a stranger, and ye took me not in; naked, and ye clothed me not; sick, and in prison, and ye visited me not. Inasmuch as ye did it not to one of the least of these, ye did it not unto me [Note: Mat 25:41-45.].
Thus, then, as the Moabites and Ammonites are condemned for not administering to the necessities of Israel in the wilderness, so shall we, if we do not exercise benevolence towards our indigent fellow-creatures, to whatever sect or nation they belong, so far as it shall be in our power to afford them the relief which they stand in need of.]
Conceiving the general point established, that we should shew benevolence to all, I proceed to mark,
II.
Our special obligation to exercise it towards Gods ancient people
The Jews have, at all events, the same claim to our benevolence as any other people whatever. There is no exception made in Scripture with respect to them: and, consequently, if we should fail in establishing their peculiar claims, our main argument would remain in all its force. But they have claims superior to any other people upon earth
1.
We are more indebted to them than to any other people under heaven
[To whom are we indebted for all the instruction which we have received respecting the way of peace and salvation? We owe it all to Jews. We know nothing of God and of his Christ, but as it has been revealed to us by Jewish prophets and Apostles: yea, the very Saviour himself was of Jewish extraction: and, therefore, in that very fact we may well find a motive to exercise benevolence towards all who are related to him according to the flesh. Such infinite obligations as we owe to that people should surely be requited in acts of love towards their descendants; even as God himself often shewed mercy to rebellious Israel for Abrahams and for Davids sake; and as David for Jonathans sake spared Mephibosheth, who must otherwise, as a descendant of Saul, have been involved in the ruin of all his house [Note: 2Sa 21:7.].]
2.
The very blessings which we enjoy were taken from them, on purpose that they might be transferred to us
[The Jews were once the only people upon earth who possessed the blessings of salvation. But God, in righteous indignation, cast off them; and, in a way of sovereign grace and mercy, took us from a wild olive-tree, and grafted us in upon the stock from which they had been broken, and from which they had been broken on purpose that we might be grafted in [Note: Rom 11:19-20.]. The fact is, that every soul amongst us, that now derives sap and nourishment from Gods olive-tree, actually occupies, as it were, the place of a Jew, who has been dispossessed of his privileges, in order that we might enjoy them. Now, I would submit it to your own judgment: Suppose a person to have been disinherited by his father, on purpose that I, who had no relation to him, nor any more worthiness in myself than the disinherited offender, might he made his heir: suppose that disinherited son, in a state of extreme distress, should ask alms of you, whilst I was living in affluence close at hand; would you not refer him to me, as the person who might well be expected to attend to his case, and to relieve his necessities? And, if I dismissed him from my door as a worthless vagabond, in whose welfare I had no concern, would you not feel surprise and grief, yea, and a measure of indignation too? And if I professed to be a man of piety and benevolence, would you not spurn at my profession, as downright hypocrisy? Now, then, if under such circumstances you would condemn me, know that thou thyself art the man. For, all that thou hast of spiritual good was once the exclusive heritage of the Jew: and thou art possessing what has been taken from him; yea, thou art revelling in abundance, whilst he is perishing in utter want: and all the obligation which, by thine own confession, would attach to me in the case I have stated, is entailed on thee: and thou, in refusing to fulfil it, art sinning against God, and against thine own soul.]
3.
This very transfer of their blessings to us has been made for the express purpose that we might dispense them to that bereaved people in the hour of their necessity
[True, we are permitted to enjoy them ourselves, yea, and to enjoy them in the richest abundance: but we are particularly intrusted with them for the benefit of the Jews. Hear what God himself has declared on this subject: As ye in times past (ye Gentiles) have not believed God, but have now obtained mercy through their unbelief; even so have these also (these Jews) now not believed, that through your mercy they should be left to perish? No: but that through your mercy they also may obtain mercy [Note: Rom 11:30-31.]. Now, take again the case before stated: and suppose the man who had disinherited his son, and left me his estate, to have declared in his will, that he left me the estate on purpose that in the hour of his sons extremity I might shew kindness to him, and relieve his necessities; what would you say of me then, if I spurned him from my door, and left him to perish with hunger, when I was myself revelling in all manner of luxurious abundance? Well, Thou art the man: and what thou wouldest say of me, thou must say of thyself, as long as thou neglectest to promote the welfare of Gods ancient people: yes, out of thine own mouth shalt thou be judged, thou wicked servant. God has made thee a trustee for the Jew; and thou hast not only betrayed thy trust, but left him to perish, when thou hadst in possession all that his soul needs; and which thou couldest impart to him, to the full extent of his necessities, without feeling any sensible diminution of thy wealth; yea, when, strange to say! thou mightest increase thy wealth by relieving him. Tell me, then, in this view of the matter, whether thou hast not special obligations to shew benevolence to the Jew?]
But I must go further, and mark,
III.
The more particular obligations which we have to exercise benevolence towards them at this time
God, by his providence, called the Ammonites and Moabites to shew kindness to Israel; and their guilt was greatly aggravated by their manifesting such unwillingness to co-operate with him in his designs of love towards them: and on this account was so heavy a judgment denounced against them, even to their tenth generation. And is not God now calling us to concur with him in what he is doing for his ancient people? Yes; I think his call to us is clear and loud. Observe,
1.
The interest which is now felt in the Christian world for their restoration to God
[This interest is really unprecedented. There have been times when a few persons have laboured for their welfare: but now there is, throughout Europe and America, a very great and general increase of kindness towards them. They are no longer made the universal objects of hatred and persecution, as in former ages: even where there is no love towards them, there is a great diminution of hostility: and in many instances they have been treated with much liberality and candour by Christian governments, being raised by them to a measure of respect and honour that has not been accorded to them in former times. And for their conversion to Christianity, and their restoration to the divine favour, exertions are making to a considerable extent And is not this of the Lord? Methinks, such a victory over the prejudices of Christians is scarcely less a work of divine power, than was the deliverance of Israel from the hand of the Egyptians: and, as such, it is a call from God to concur with him in his labours of love towards them. See what is at this moment doing amongst the more religious part of the Christian community, in the circulation of the Scriptures, and especially of the New Testament; and what efforts are making by Christian missionaries for the conversion of the Jews! and I must say, that this is a call from God to us, and that it is no less our privilege, than it is our duty, to obey it.]
2.
The stir which prevails amongst the Jews themselves
[This also obtains to a degree unprecedented since the early ages of Christianity. Verily, there is a stir amongst the dry bones throughout the whole valley of vision [Note: Eze 37:7-8.]. Great numbers of Jews, upon the continent especially, and to a certain extent at home also, begin to think that Christianity may be true; and that that Jesus, whom their fathers crucified, may be the Messiah: and, if they did but know how, in the event of their embracing Christianity, they might support themselves and their families, great multitudes, I doubt not, would prosecute their inquiries, till they had attained the true knowledge of their Messiah and of his salvation. Let me then ask, Whence is this? Is not this the work of God? And is it not an encouragement to us to exert ourselves for their entire conversion? Methinks they are saying to us, Come over to Macedonia, and help us; and we ought, one and all of us, according to our ability, to obey the call.]
3.
The earnests which God has given us in the actual conversion of some to the faith of Christ
[If we cannot speak of Pentecostal days, we can declare, that God has accompanied his word with power to the hearts of some; and that one of a city and two of a tribe have already, as God has given us reason to expect [Note: Isa 17:6.], been brought to the saving knowledge of their Messiah. Of those who have embraced the truth as it is in Jesus, some have attained to a real eminence in the divine life, and are at this moment not inferior to the most exalted characters in the Christian world. This shews that God is about to rebuild his temple: and surely it does not become us to dwell in our ceiled houses at ease [Note: Hag 1:4.], when he is so plainly calling upon us to co-operate with him: we should rather strengthen the hands of those who are labouring in this good work, and, like Cyrus, afford every possible facility for the accomplishment of this vast and glorious undertaking [Note: Ezr 1:5-7.]. We should endeavour to improve this acceptable time [Note: Isa 49:8.]; removing to the utmost of our power all obstacles to their conversion [Note: Isa 62:10.]; and labouring, if by any means we may be Gods honoured instruments, to bring them home to him, and to present them as an offering in a clean vessel to the Lord [Note: Isa 66:19-20.].]
4.
The general voice of prophecy
[Prophecy begins to be better understood amongst us: and it is the united conviction of all who have studied the prophecies, that the time for the restoration and conversion of the Jews is nigh at hand. The twelve hundred and sixty years spoken of by Daniel, as the period fixed in the divine counsels for the establishment of the Redeemers kingdom among them, are, on any computation, nearly expired. Ought we not then, like Daniel, to put forth our prayers to God for the consummation of this great event, and by all possible means to help it forward?
I think, that, putting all these circumstances togetherthe concern of Christians, the stir among the Jews, the real converts from among them, and the unquestionable ground which is given us in prophecy to expect their speedy conversionwe may regard it all as a call from God, scarcely less powerful than that given to the Moabites and Ammonites of old, to come to the help of the Lord, and to labour with all our might for their salvation. In truth, if we do not act thus, we can expect nothing but the curse of God [Note: Jdg 5:23.], and the most lasting tokens of his displeasure.]
1.
You will say, perhaps, that You hare no connexion with the Jews, and therefore may well be excused from all concern about them
[But what had the Ammonites and Moabites to do with the Jews? They were descended, not from Abraham, but from Lot, and had never had any intercourse with them. But this was no excuse for their neglect: nor can any similar excuse avail for us.]
2.
You will reply, that it is Gods work, and that it should be left to him to accomplish it in his own time and way
[And might not the Ammonites and Moabites say the same? God not only could, but did, supply their wants by miracle: but this was no justification of those who refused to them the proper offices of love. Nor will this be any justification of our neglect.]
Permit me, in conclusion, to bring two things to your remembrance:
1.
That the Ammonites and Moabites had an excuse which you have not
[They might have said, These Israelites are going to extirpate the seven nations of Canaan: and we will not concur in such a work as this. But, in converting the Jews to Christ, we adopt the readiest and most certain way for the salvation of the whole world. If they, then, were excluded from the congregation of the Lord, even to the tenth generation, for their inhumanity, judge what tokens of Gods displeasure await you for yours.]
2.
That they were condemned for not coming forth, as volunteers, to meet Israel with bread and water
[What shall you then be, who are thus entreated and solicited to concur with Jehovah in this good work, if you still refuse your aid, or give it with such indifference, as to shew that your heart does not go forth with your hands in the service of the Lord? You remember, that when Nabal said, Shall I take my bread and my water, and give them to those whom I know not whence they be? it well nigh cost him his life; yea, it actually did cost him his life [Note: 1Sa 25:11; 1Sa 25:21-22; 1Sa 25:37-38.]. And I tremble to think what judgments await you, if ye resist our importunity, and refuse to co-operate with God in the work proposed. But I hope better things of you, my Brethren, though I thus speak; and I hope and trust that you will henceforth, each according to his ability, be workers together with God for the salvation of Gods ancient people, and through them for the salvation of the whole world. And let me not be misunderstood: I am far from intending to say that all who have neglected this sacred cause are equally obnoxious to Gods displeasure; for it is but lately that the attention of the Christian world has been called to it: but I think you will agree with me, that it is now high time to exert ourselves for God, and to redeem, as far as possible, the time we have lost. The cause well deserves our most assiduous efforts: and we may be sure, that God, who so indignantly resented the supineness of the Ammonites, will richly repay all that we can do for the furtherance of his gracious designs: for he has said, Blessed is he that blesseth thee; and cursed is he that curseth thee.]
Fuente: Charles Simeon’s Horae Homileticae (Old and New Testaments)
Deu 23:3 An Ammonite or Moabite shall not enter into the congregation of the LORD; even to their tenth generation shall they not enter into the congregation of the LORD for ever:
Ver. 3. For ever, ] i.e., This law is perpetual and indispensable; so highly displeasing are many mere omissions of duty. Omission of diet breeds diseases, brings death; so here.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Moabite. Hebrew, masculine. Therefore not excluding Ruth the Moabitess. Mat 1:5. Compare Rth 1:14-16.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Ammonite: These nations were subjected for their impiety, wickedness, and enmity to Israel – Deu 23:4, and Deu 23:5, to peculiar disgrace; and on this account were not permitted to hold any office among the Israelites. This did not, however, disqualify them from becoming proselytes; for Ruth, who was a Moabitess, was married to Boaz, and became one of the progenitors of our Lord. Rth 4:6, Rth 4:10-22, Neh 4:3, Neh 4:7, Neh 13:1, Neh 13:2, Neh 13:23, Isa 56:3
Reciprocal: Gen 19:37 – Moabites Gen 19:38 – children Deu 2:29 – As the children Deu 23:1 – shall not enter Deu 23:8 – third generation Jdg 11:25 – Balak Rth 1:4 – wives 1Sa 11:1 – Make 2Sa 10:2 – show kindness 1Ki 14:21 – Naamah 1Ch 19:2 – the children 2Ch 12:13 – an Ammonitess Ezr 9:1 – Ammonites Jer 49:1 – Ammonites Lam 1:10 – whom Amo 1:13 – and for
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Deu 23:3. An Ammonite or a Moabite The Jews will have it, that the women of these two nations were not concerned in this law. And that though an Israelitish woman might not marry an Ammonite or Moabite, yet a man of Israel might marry one of their women, after she professed the Jewish religion. For ever This seems to denote the perpetuity of this law, that it should be inviolably observed in all succeeding ages.