Miles de Libros Cristianos Gratis. Accede a nuestra Biblioteca Virtual

Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Joshua 2:12

Para un estudio avanzado de: “Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Joshua 2:12” utilice nuestra app.

Now therefore, I pray you, swear unto me by the LORD, since I have showed you kindness, that ye will also show kindness unto my father’s house, and give me a true token:

12. a true token ] “a verrey tokne,” Wyclif; i.e. a token of truth, a sign; comp. Exo 3:12, “And this shall be a token unto thee, that I have sent thee;” 1Sa 2:34; Isa 7:11; Luk 2:12.

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

A true token – literally, a sign or pledge of truth; something to bind them to keep their promise faithfully. The token was the oath which the spies take Jos 2:14.

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

Verse 12. Swear unto me by the Lord] This is a farther proof that this woman had received considerable instruction in the Jewish faith; she acknowledged the true God by his essential character Jehovah; and knew that an oath in his name was the deepest and most solemn obligation under which a Jew could possibly come. Does not this also refer to the command of God, Thou shalt fear the Lord, and shalt swear by his name? See Clarke on De 6:13.

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

By the Lord; by your God, who is the only true God: so she shows her conversion to God, and owns his worship, one eminent act whereof is swearing by his name.

My fathers house; my near kindred, which she particularly names, Jos 2:13. Husband and children it seems she had none. And for herself; it was needless to speak, it being a plain and undeniable duty to save their preserver.

A true token; either an assurance that you will preserve me and mine from the common ruin; or a token which I may produce as a witness of this-agreement, and a mean of my security.

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole

Now therefore, I pray you, swear unto me by the Lord,…. Which being a religious action, and done by men that feared the Lord, she knew it would be binding upon them: the Targum is,

“swear to me by the Word of the Lord:”

since I have showed you kindness; by receiving them with peace into her house, and hiding them when inquired for and demanded of her; in doing which she risked her own, life, had this treachery to her country, as it would have been deemed, been discovered;

that you will also show kindness unto my father’s house; she mentions not herself and household, for if this was granted that would be implied and included; and this she presses for by the law of retaliation and friendship, for since she had shown kindness to them, it was but reasonable it should be returned:

and give me a true token; that she and her father’s house would be saved by them when the city should be taken and the inhabitants destroyed; a token that would not deceive her, on which she might depend, and would be firm and sure.

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

12. Now, therefore, I pray you, swear, etc. It is another manifestation of faith that she places the sons of Abraham in sure possession of the land of Canaan, founding on no other argument than her having heard that it was divinely promised to them. For she did not suppose that God was favoring lawless intruders who were forcing their way into the territories of others with unjust violence and uncurbed licentiousness, but rather concluded that they were coming into the land of Canaan, because God had assigned them the dominion of it. It cannot be believed that when they sought a passage from the Edomites and others, they said nothing as to whither they were going. Nay, those nations were acquainted with the promise which was made to Abraham, and the memory of which had been again renewed by the rejection of Esau.

Moreover, in the language of Rahab, we behold that characteristic property of faith described by the author of the Epistle to the Hebrews, when he calls it a vision, or sight of things not appearing. (Heb 11:1) Rahab is dwelling with her people in a fortified city: and yet she commits her life to her terrified guests, just as if they had already gained possession of the land, and had full power to save or destroy as they pleased. This voluntary surrender was, in fact, the very same as embracing the promise of God, and casting herself on his protection. She, moreover, exacts an oath, because often, in the storming of cities, the heat and tumult of the struggle shook off the remembrance of duty. In the same way she mentions the kindness she had shown to them, that gratitude might stimulate them the more to perform their promise. For although the obligation of the oath ought of itself to have been effectual, it would have been doubly base and inhumane not to show gratitude to a hostess to whom they owed deliverance. Rahab shows the kindliness of her disposition, in her anxiety about her parents and kindred. This is, indeed, natural; but many are so devoted to themselves, that children hesitate not to ransom their own lives by the death of their parents, instead of exerting courage and zeal to save them.

Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary

12. Swear unto me She gives still stronger proof of her confidence in the success of the Israelites by wishing to enter into covenant with the spies for the salvation of herself and her father’s family. She feels that if they swear by Israel’s mighty God they will not dare prove false. Her faith assumes a practical character, and shows itself by works. It impels her to bargain for her deliverance from the destruction which she sees impending over the city.

Since I have showed you kindness Rahab here makes a good application of the Golden Rule.

Give me a true token Some visible, material proof of the oath; some object which she may keep and produce as evidence that such a solemn compact has been entered into by the parties. This token was a substitute for a written covenant bearing their signatures.

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

“ Now therefore, I pray you, swear to me by YHWH, since I have dealt faithfully with you, that you also will deal faithfully with my father’s house, and give me a true token, and that you will save alive my father, and my mother, and my brothers, and my sisters, and all that they have, and will deliver our lives from death.”

They were to swear by their own God, for then they would take it seriously. The word ‘faithfully’ is the word used for ‘covenant love’, containing ideas of kindness, loyalty and faithfulness. Kindness on its own is not strong enough as a translation. It involves commitment. She considered, quite reasonably, that her actions had committed them to her so that she could count on their assistance in return. With that in view she asked for a token of that commitment, which they gave her with an oath (Jos 2:14) and with a piece of scarlet thread which was probably itself a commitment token (Jos 2:18).

A piece of scarlet thread seems to have been a regularly recognised token (Gen 38:28; Gen 38:30; Son 4:3). Possibly it was a commitment token (sometimes a love token), worn round the neck (compare Gen 38:18).

“That you will save alive my father, and my mother, and my brothers, and my sisters, and all that they have, and will deliver our lives from death.” They would recognise that any commitment to her involved her family. She pleaded only for close family, blood relatives and their families, that they would be given their lives and allowed to retain their possessions. As she does not mention a husband she was clearly unmarried (or widowed).

Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett

EXPOSITION

THE OATH OF THE SPIES.

Jos 2:12

Kindness. The original is perhaps a little stronger, and involves usually the idea of mercy and pity. This, however, is not always the ease (see Gen 21:23; 2Sa 10:2). “It had been an ill nature in Rahab if she had been content to be saved alone: that her love might be a match to her faith, she covenants for all her family, and so returns life to those of whom she received it,” (Bp. Hall). A true token. Literally, a token of truth. The construction is that in which the latter noun often stands in Hebrew for an adjective. Here, however, it would seem to be a little more, a token of trutha pledge, that is, of sincerity. Rahab wanted some guarantee that her life and the lives of her kindred would be saved. The bare word of the spies would not suffice, for how could she and her kindred be identified in the confusion attending the sack of the city? But if the spies would agree upon some sign by which she could be recognised, it would at once be a pledge that they intended to keep their word, and a means of protection in the approaching downfall of the city.

Jos 2:14

Our life for yours. Literally, our souls (, answering to the Greek the principle of life in men and animals) in the place of you to die; i.e; may we die if you are not preserved safe and sound. A similar expression is used by Ignatius, ad Eph 1:1-23; ad Polyc. 2, 6, etc. If ye utter not, i.e; Rahab and her kindred (Rosenmuller). Many MSS; however, read “if thou utterest not.”

Jos 2:15

Then she let them down. The conversation which is related afterwards, no doubt occurred afterwards, as is proved by the use of the perfect in Jos 2:18. There is no reason to suppose the window by which she let them down. to have been so distant from the ground as to preclude a conversation, and it is quite possible that Rahab’s house may have been in a situation in which such a conversation could be carried on without interruption. There are continental cities now surrounded by walls, in which such a conversation would involve no difficulty whatever, especially if the house from which such a conversation was carried on happened to stand a little apart from other houses. And though the spies sent by Moses described the walls of the Phoenician cities in hyperbolical language, it is highly improbable that their fortifications were stronger than those of mediaeval times. The little town of Ahrweiler, in the valley of the Ahr, near Remagen, may serve as an instance in point. It would once have been called a strongly fortified town, but the walls are of no great height, and the houses are built upon them. The same may be seen at Bacharach and Oberwesel, and other well known places where the fortifications have not been modernised. With the escape of the spies we may compare the escape of St. Paul from Damascus, as recorded in Act 9:25, and 2Co 11:32, 2Co 11:33.

Jos 2:16

Get you to the mountains. No hint is given why the mountains were to be so safe a refuge. But a reference to the geography of the district will supply the reason. Any mountain district is usually less accessible and less thickly inhabited than the plains. But within five miles of Jericho lay the remarkable range called Quarantania, or Kuruntul, which is literally honeycombed with caves, so that a man might be concealed for months in the immediate neighbourhood of Jericho with a very slight risk of discovery. It is obvious how strongly this fact confirms the accuracy of the narrative. An inventor would have been certain in some way or other to draw attention to a statement intended to give an air of probability to his narrative. But there is nothing of the kind here, and yet the narrative displays a thorough acquaintance with the geographical features of the neighbourhood. Canon Tristram carefully explored the caverns. On one face of the rock, which is perpendicular, he found “some thirty or forty habitable caves,” and on the southern face, towards Jericho, he supposed there were a good many more than this. The scouts of the king of Jericho might be excused a very diligent search, for we are told that the “foot hold was hazardous and the height dizzy.” From the days of the spies till long after the Christian era, these caves have been in existence. They have been tenanted by Greek, Syrian, and even Abyssinian monks, and Canon Tristram found many Greek and Ethiopic inscriptions, as well as figures of our Lord and the saints. The Abyssinian Christians make a yearly pilgrimage there even now. The reason of the reverence in which the place is held, is the tradition (not, however, eight hundred years old, see Bitter, 3.37) that, as the name Quarantania implies, the forty days’ fast of our Lord took place there. As a specimen of the mystical interpretations in which the Fathers indulged, we find Origen expounding the advice, “Get you to the mountains,” as follows: “Humilia et dejecta refugite, quae excelsa sunt et sublimia, praedicate.”

Jos 2:17

We will be blameless. Perhaps “we would be blameless,” and therefore we make the conditions which follow. Something must be supplied to fill up the sense. The most ordinary rule would be to translate “we are blameless,” i.e; by making these conditions. But the former yields a better sense.

Jos 2:18

This line of scarlet thread. Rather, this rope, from to twist. It is described as made of sewing thread (), because no doubt it was formed of several such threads twisted into a rope. The scarlet (), or rather crimson, was produced from the dried bodies as well as the eggs of the cochineal insect, called in Arabic, kermes (whence our word crimson, and the German karmesin). This line of scarlet thread is regarded by the Fathers generally, and by our own divines, as Bishop Hall and Bishop Wordsworth, as symbolical of the blood of Christ,

Jos 2:19

His blood shall be upon his head (cf. Le Jos 20:9). “If we will wander out of the limits that God has set us, we cast ourselves out of His protection.” (Bp. Hall).

Jos 2:20

And if thou utter this our business. This was an obvious condition. Rahab’s betrayal of the spies could not save Jericho, but it would destroy them, or at least expose them to imminent danger. She would, therefore, by mentioning the matter, deprive herself of all title to protection.

Jos 2:21

And she bound the scarlet cord in the window.Not necessarily at once, but when the time for the precaution arrived.

Jos 2:23

And passed over. The sacred historian does not say how. But it is improbable (see Jos 2:7) that they forded the river. They probably swam across, as they were no doubt unarmed (cf. 1Ch 12:15). That befel them. Literally, “that found them.”

Jos 2:24

For even all the inhabitants of the country do faint because of us. “[For even” is literally “and also.” As Keil remarks, this information concerning the feelings of the Canaanites was the one great thing they had been sent out to discover.

HOMILIES BY E. DE PRESSENSE

Jos 2:9

Rahab and the spies.

The history of the escape of the Israelitish spies through the assistance of Rahab the harlot, and the reward given her for her services, in the sparing of her life when all her townsfolk perished, is one which presents many moral difficulties. To help the enemies of one’s country is an act severely and justly reprobated by all nations. That which is in itself evil cannot be transformed into good because it is done for a good cause; otherwise we ought to give plenary indulgence to the Society of Jesus. We must beware, then, of extolling the wrong thing which Rahab did. But at the same time we must recognise that she was prompted to it by a nobler motive than that of securing her own safety. Faith in the true God had taken rough possession of this ignorant soul. She had heard of the miracles by which Israel had been brought out of Egypt and led safely through the perils of the wilderness. She says, “We have heard how the Lord dried up the water of the Red Sea for you when ye came out of Egypt, and what ye did unto the two kings of the Amorites,” etc. It is clear, then, that the Canaanites knew enough to acknowledge with Rahab, that “the Lord the God of Israel was God in heaven above and in the earth beneath;” and therefore that they were sinning by still cleaving to their false gods, whose worship was an abomination to the only living and true God. It cannot be denied, therefore, that Rahab gave a proof of faith in the choice which she made between her own people and the people of God. It is this aspect of her conduct alone which is commended in the Epistle to the Hebrews (Jos 11:1-23 :31). We must be careful, moreover, not to exaggerate what she did. She did not betray the secret of her people, she simply preserved the lives of the representatives of the nation which she knows to be enrolled under the banner of the true God. This act of faith saved her, and even won for her the honour of a place in the genealogy of Messiah (Mat 1:5). We occupy a very different position from that of Rahab. No such conflict can arise in our case between duty to the earthly and to the heavenly fatherland, because the weapons of our warfare are not carnal but spiritual. Let it be ours to have the faith of Rahab in the victory of our Divine Head; and let us hold fast this confidence, especially in view of the great conflicts that are before us, between the Captain of our salvation and an unbelieving world. Have we not as much to rest our faith uponnay, far more than Rahab hadin the great victories of the past? We are the soldiers of a General who said, “Be of good cheer, I have overcome the world” (Joh 16:33). To be confident of victory is to have already conquered.E. DE P.

Jos 2:12 -25
EXPOSITION

THE OATH OF THE SPIES.

Jos 2:12

Jos 2:14

Jos 2:15

Jos 2:16

Jos 2:17

Jos 2:18

Jos 2:19

His blood shall be upon his head (cf. Le Jos 20:9). “If we will wander out of the limits that God has set us, we cast ourselves out of His protection.” (Bp. Hall).

Jos 2:20

Jos 2:21

And she bound the scarlet cord in the window.Not necessarily at once, but when the time for the precaution arrived.

Jos 2:23

Jos 2:24

HOMILETICS

Jos 2:12-24

The oath of the spies, and their return to Joshua.

This passage suggests considerations of various kinds, historical, practical, and allegorical.

I. THE TRUSTWORTHINESS OF THE SPIES. They had, no doubt, been specially selected by Joshua for this purpose, and they show themselves worthy of his choice.

(1) They are scrupulously honest. They enter into an engagement with Rahab, and that engagement is faithfully kept. They are anxious that the tenor of their engagement should be thoroughly understood on both sides, so that there may be no reproach cast upon them for not observing conditions which it would be impossible to fulfill. And they are also

(2) men of foresight. They do not give their word rashly, without having considered to what they are pledging themselves. They see beforehand how impossible it would be, in the confusion attending the sack of the city, to ensure the safety of those in whose welfare Rahab is interested. Thus they suggest the twofold precaution that Rahab’s relatives should be collected together in Rahab’s house, and that Rahab’s house should be plainly indicated by the scarlet cord. And

(3) they are grateful. They might have left matters as they were, and taken no trouble to point out to Rahab the risk she was running, in the absence of some definite agreement as to the way in which the promise should be carried out. They might have excused themselves afterwards by saying that it was not their business, but Rahab’s, to secure the identification of herself and her kindred. But they took every care and trouble possible to show their Sense of the obligation they were under to a stranger who had thus generously interested herself in their safety. Such are the men who ought to be singled out for special work in God’s Church, scrupulous, thoughtful, frank, generous, grateful men, who make it their first care to deal with others as they would desire to be dealt with themselves.

II. THE SCARLET CORD A TOKEN OF SALVATION THROUGH CHRIST. For scarlet, or rather crimson (see note), is the colour of blood. The scarlet cord had been the salvation of the messengers. It was now to be the means of salvation to her who had received from them the assurance of deliverance from the wrath to come. Like the blood upon the door post, it was to be the sign which the destroying messengers of God’s vengeance were to respect and pass by. That scarlet cord alone could ensure safety. And it could ensure the safety only of those who trusted in it alone. It must be taken, therefore, as the type of salvation through the blood of Christ alone.

III. EXTRA ECCLESIAM NULLA SALUS. Like St. Paul’s “Except these abide in the ship, ye cannot be saved” (Act 27:31), so the spies here declare that to abide in Rahab’s house is a necessary condition of safety. The house here is a type of the Church of Christ, not necessarily of external communion with any particular branch of it, but of actual internal membership in the mystical body of Christ, of which, ordinarily speaking, Baptism and the reception of the Sacrament of the Lord’s Supper are the outward tokens. “Holy Scripture,” says the 18th Article of the Church of England, “doth set out to us only the name of Christ, whereby men must be saved.” And we must unite ourselves with Him by faith and obedience. We must enter into the “House of God, which is the Church of the Living God, the pillar and ground of the truth” (1Ti 3:15). We must keep up a “continual remembrance of the sacrifice of the death of Christ.” Our scarlet cord must be bound prominently in the window. Those who wander recklessly from the fold, who are carried about to “erroneous and strange doctrines,” who follow their own wills instead of abiding by the covenant of salvation in Christ, cannot expect the deliverance which comes only to those who confess Christ openly before men, and declare plainly their union with those who fight under His banner.

IV. THE SPIES WHO FAITHFULLY DISCHARGE THEIR DUTY HAVE THEIR REWARD IN BRINGING GOOD TIDINGS. We have seen what the conduct of the spies has been. And now they return to reanimate their brethren. Their report is, that already their enemies are disheartened and dispirited at the thought of the Great Name under the protection of which the Israelites fight. So does the faithful soldier of Christ ever become a source of encouragement to his brethren. He who trusts in the Lord, and goes steadfastly about His work, never fails to find the enemies of the Lord “fainting because of” His soldiers. It is only the cowardly and distrustful who find the “children of Anak,” and “cities walled up to heaven”that is, insuperable difficulties and tasks beyond their powers. They who set themselves in earnest to combat the enemies of God, and will neither make a compact with them, nor be “afraid of their faces,” are sure of victory. Sometimes the walls of some fortress of sin will fall as if by miracle. Sometimes the enemy will only be discomfited after the prolonged and exhausting efforts of a battle of Beth-horon. But the servants of God on the eve of a new conflict with the powers of evil may safely address their fellow warriors in the words, “Truly the Lord hath delivered into our hands all the land.”

Fuente: The Complete Pulpit Commentary

Ver. 12. Now therefore, I pray you, swear unto me by the Lord In acknowledgment of the signal service which Rahab had done the two spies, she requests of them a favour, which is, that, at the taking of Jericho, not only herself and her parents, but all those also of her family who were found in her house, should be exempted from the general destruction. And she desires that it may be assured to her by an oath: this was the greatest security she could have; an oath is the most respectable and sacred tie of fidelity in all discourses and promises. All nations have so deemed it. All have believed, that the gods, avengers of sin, were particularly so of perjury; and, doubtless, the worshippers of the true God should be the most religious of all mortals in their observance of an oath. But how lively must the faith of this woman have been, that could excite her to act as she did! She speaks of Jericho, rather as a city already taken, than as barely threatened; and behaves as if she actually beheld the accomplishment of God’s aweful decree. Hence the precautions that she takes, and the oath which she requires, are so many proofs of the confidence wherewith she received the word of God, and of her perfect acquiescence in his will.

And give me a true token That is, a sign, which might serve her as a safeguard, and put her house in perfect security against the violence of the soldiery. Houbigant renders it, and that you will give me a true token.

Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke

Observe what views she had of Jehovah, that the grand security she desired was an oath of appeal to him! Where should she have learned this? Was not God her teacher? Isa 48:17 .

Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

Jos 2:12 Now therefore, I pray you, swear unto me by the LORD, since I have shewed you kindness, that ye will also shew kindness unto my father’s house, and give me a true token:

Ver. 12. And give me a true token. ] S , as Mar 14:44 . Signum consignans, de composito datum. As for the familiar conference that here passed betwixt these spies and Rahab, we need not question how they could so easily understand one another, being of two several nations. For, first, the language of the Canaanites, Phoenicians, Philistines, differed not much from the Hebrew, which Jerome a rightly calleth Omnium linguarum matricem, the mother tongue. See Plautus in “Paenulo,” act v. And then, it is not unlikely that these spies had learned the language of Canaan, by conversing with those conquered Amorites on this side Jordan.

a In cap. iii. Sophoniae.

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

and. Note the Figure of speech Polysyndeton (App-6) here and Jos 2:13, showing the earnestness of the appeal.

Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics

swear: Jos 9:15, Jos 9:18-20, 1Sa 20:14, 1Sa 20:15, 1Sa 20:17, 1Sa 30:15, 2Ch 36:13, Jer 12:16

that ye will: 1Sa 20:14-17, 1Sa 24:21, 1Sa 24:22, Est 8:6, 2Ti 1:16-18, Jam 2:13

my father’s: Jos 2:13, Gen 24:3, Gen 24:9, Rom 1:31, 1Ti 5:8

give me: Jos 2:18, Exo 12:13, Eze 9:4-6, Mar 14:44

Reciprocal: Gen 9:12 – General Gen 21:23 – swear Gen 40:14 – show Exo 20:7 – guiltless Deu 6:13 – shalt swear Jos 6:22 – as ye sware unto her Jdg 1:24 – we will 2Th 3:17 – the token

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

Jos 2:12-13. Swear unto me by the Lord Hebrew, by Jehovah, your God, who is the only true God: so she owns his worship, one eminent act whereof is, swearing by his name. My fathers house My near kindred, which she particularly names, (Jos 2:13,) husband and children, it seems, she had none. And for herself it was needless to speak, it being a plain and undeniable duty to save their preserver. True tokens Either an assurance that you will preserve me and mine from the common ruin, or a token which I may produce as a witness of this agreement, and a means of my security. This is all that she asks. But God did for her more than she could ask or think. She was afterward advanced to be a princess in Israel, the wife of Salmon, and one of the ancestors of Christ. All that they have That is, their children, as appears from Jos 6:23.

Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

Disfruta de miles de canciones cristianas en exclusiva sólo en Bibles