Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Joshua 5:3

And Joshua made him sharp knives, and circumcised the children of Israel at the hill of the foreskins.

3. the hill of the foreskins ] or “ Gibeah-haaraloth,” probably so named from this transaction. Comp. Col 2:11-13; Col 3:1-6.

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

The hill of the foreskins – i. e. the hill where the foreskins, the emblem of all worldly and carnal affections, were buried. (Compare Col 2:11-13; Col 3:1-6.)

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

i.e. He caused this to be done; and because it was to be done speedily, the passover approaching, it was necessary to use many hands in it, either priests and Levites, or other circumcised persons, who, at least in those circumstances, were permitted to do it.

The children of Israel, i.e. such of them as were uncircumcised. And though it be not mentioned, it is more than probable, that the Israelites beyond Jordan were circumcised at the same time.

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole

3. at the hillprobably one ofthe argillaceous hills that form the highest terrace of the Jordan,on a rising ground at the palm forest.

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

And Joshua made him sharp knives, and circumcised the children of Israel,…. Not that Joshua circumcised them himself, any more than he made the knives himself, but he ordered both to be done, and took care that they were done. And as any that had skill might make the knives, so might any circumcise; circumcision was not restrained to any order of men, not to the priests and Levites, but any might perform it; so that though the number to be circumcised was great, it might soon be finished: and this was done

at the hill of the foreskins; as the place was afterward called from hence; these being heaped up one upon another, made a hill of them, as the Jews say y, being covered with dust. This circumcision performed by Joshua, or his orders, was typical of the spiritual circumcision without hands, which those that believe in Jesus, the antitype of Joshua, partake of.

y Pirke Eliezer, ut supra. (c. 29.) Jarchi in loc.

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

3. Hill of the foreskins The hill on which this rite occurred, one of the many argillaceous hills on the terrace of the valley, receives its name from the prepuces buried in it, and not, as the Rabbins say, from the quantity piled up there.

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

‘ And Joshua made for himself flint knives, and circumcised the children of Israel at the hill of the foreskins.’

The action is depicted as Joshua’s but he would no doubt be assisted by able and worthy men. The flint knives had to be fashioned and then all the uncircumcised males circumcised. During this period they would have been vulnerable (see Gen 34:25). But YHWH had put such fear in the hearts of the Canaanites that they had nothing to fear.

“At the hill of the foreskins.” Literally ‘Gibeath-ha-araloth’. A name given to a hill where the practise was then carried out. It was possibly where the remnants were buried.

Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett

Ver. 3. And Joshuacircumcised the children of Israel He caused the commands of God to be performed by all the people, whether on this or on the other side of Jordan, and, as it appears, by all on the same day, that every Israelite might be enabled to celebrate the passover. The matter was no way difficult, as it did not signify by what hand it was effected. Father, mother, relations, friends, might all perform the operation, as well as the priests and Levites. The hill of the foreskin is, in the Hebrew, Gibeath-haaraloth, which some take to be the name of a place, as it probably was, but a place deriving its name from that ceremony.

Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke

Jos 5:3 And Joshua made him sharp knives, and circumcised the children of Israel at the hill of the foreskins.

Ver. 3. And Joshua circumcised.] That is, he caused them to be circumcised, viz., by the priests, whose office it was properly: or, by those others, that being under twenty years of age at their coming out of Egypt, had been circumcised before. The Jews at this day count it the most meritorious thing that can be, to be a good circumciser. a

At the hill of the foreskins. ] Heb., Gibeah haaraloth, where they cast away and buried their foreskins; whereby was signified that that which was begotten by that, part deserved in like sort to be cut off, and thrown away as execrable and accursed.

a Leo Modena.

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

Joshua: Gen 17:23-27, Mat 16:24

the hill of the foreskins: or, Gibeah haaraloth

Reciprocal: Gen 17:11 – the flesh Exo 4:25 – a sharp stone 1Sa 18:25 – foreskins

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

Jos 5:3. Joshua circumcised the children of Israel That is, he caused them to be circumcised, namely, such of them as were uncircumcised. And because it was to be done speedily, the passover approaching, it was necessary to use many hands in the business. Nor was it difficult to find them, as it did not signify by what hand the operation was performed. Fathers, mothers, relations, friends, might any of them perform, as well as the priests or Levites. Although it be not mentioned, it is more than probable that the Israelites beyond Jordan were circumcised at the same time, that they also might keep the passover.

Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

5:3 And Joshua made him sharp knives, and circumcised the children of Israel at {c} the hill of the foreskins.

(c) Gilgal was so called, because they were there circumcised.

Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes