Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Samuel 9:18
Then Saul drew near to Samuel in the gate, and said, Tell me, I pray thee, where the seer’s house [is].
18. in the gate ] Heb. “ In the midst of the gate,” i.e. the gateway, where they would naturally halt to inquire for the Seer’s house.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
1Sa 9:18
The people will not eat until he come, because he doth bless the sacrifice.
Religious ordinances
There is a striking resemblance between the outlines of the Mosaic, and of the Christian Church. Each arose upon a Divine basis. Each had its form of imitation and symbolic rites. Each had its three orders of ministers in the sanctuary. And each boasts of a Divine Being at its head. As in the one, so in the other, the covenant is in the hands of a Mediator, and its principles and laws are deposited in a sacred code. There is, indeed, in the Christian Church, a higher degree of spirituality than is found under any other dispensation. Here, the daily sacrifice and oblation cease, absorbed, in their significance, in that great sacrifice, of which, to the eye of faith, they all were figures. But in the constitution of this Church, our blessed Lord did not overlook the ancient pattern of heavenly things, nor forget the nature of man.
1. The first point to which I would call your attention, is the fitness and utility of Religious Ordinances. There are in truth, no such obvious, simple, and universal means of preserving communities distinct, and manifesting their members to the world and to each other, as characteristic rights and peculiar badges. Nature prompts to the use of them; for the savage of the woods has the song and the ceremonies of his ancestors, and by the gashings and daubings with which he disfigures his form, denotes his tribe. Reason and policy have discovered their utility; for the armies of the ambitious have their uniforms and their standards; and almost every nation has its mode of naturalising subjects, its oaths of allegiance, and its arms. Indeed so fit and necessary are they, that few communities continue long without them, or survive the loss of them; and they who denounce all rites as useless, are obliged to recur to peculiarity of dress, of phrase, or of gesture, when they would be known to each other, and distinguished from the world. Hitherto our observations have been of a general nature applicable go any community. What, then, shall we say of the propriety and importance of rites and ordinances, in the service of religion? To the Jews, God appointed a system of ceremonies, to connect them together, and shadow forth the sublime subjects of faith to their understandings. And our adorable Redeemer instituted for His followers a baptism, which should represent their death unto sin, and new birth unto righteousness; and a supper, in which they should commemorate the foundation of all their hopes and joys, His offering Himself in the body once for all. Religious ordinances are of unspeakable advantage, in uniting members of the same body, and attaching them affectionately to each other. They form a kind of visible chain connoting men together; the first and last links of which are connected with God. Community of interest begets confidence; and while we are pursuing the same objects, under consciousness of the saint infirmities, but with reliance upon the same hopes, we are filled, involuntarily, with affection for each other. This strikingly illustrated in the natural tendency, and no doubt was strong in our Redeemers view at the gracious institution, of the Lords Supper.
2. There arises from the nature of the Christian ordinances, a peculiar necessity for an authorised ministry. These sacraments are of high and holy import. Like the ark of the covenant, they are not to be carried by unhallowed hands. They are seals of an engagement between God and men. They are compacts between the Almighty Father and His repentant children, in which He pledges Himself, upon condition of their faith and obedience, to give them the pardon of their sins, the blessings of His Spirit, and the enjoyment of eternal life. And who can sign the covenant of such mercies unto men, but they who act in Gods behalf? And who can act in Gods behalf, but they who act by Gods authority? Not, that in those to whom this ministry is committed, there is any elevation above the ordinary qualities of their fellow beings. We have this treasure, says St. Paul, speaking of the great Christian behests entrusted to the ministry, we have this treasure in earthen vessels, that the excellency of the power may be of God, and not of us.
3. Here we are brought to notice the obligations, which the truths we have been considering devolve upon ministers and people. The first and most obvious inference is, that it is incumbent upon us all to respect and observe the institutions of the Gospel. But the truths we have been considering, press upon our observation the holiness, and importance, and duties of the ministry. They are the keepers of the fountain, which is set open for mankind to wash in from sin and from uncleanness, and they are the dispensers of the word, by which we are instructed in righteousness, and begotten again to the blessed hope of everlasting life. Under the Christian dispensation, much more than under the Jewish economy, should there be written upon the foreheads of the priesthood, and upon all their sacred vestments, Holiness unto the Lord. But, finally, we must remark, that there arises from what has been said, an obligation upon the people to abide by, and cooperate with those, who are regularly appointed to minister in holy things. In vain will God have instituted ordinances in the Church, in vain will He have established in it pastors and teachers, if the body of Christians neglect, or profane, these sacred institutions, or with Gallios temper, care for none of these things. (Bishop Dehon.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
In the gate; the gate, either, first, Of Samuels house. But he was come out thence before, 1Sa 9:14. Or rather, secondly, Of the city; for the word gate being put by itself, according to reason and common use, must be understood of the most eminent in its kind, which the gate of the city is. And through this gate Samuel seems now to have been passing to go to the high place, which probably was without the city; and there he makes a stand, to hear what these persons now approaching to him were about to speak.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
18-20. Tell me, I pray thee, wherethe seer’s house isSatisfying the stranger’s inquiry, Samuelinvited him to the feast, as well as to sojourn till the morrow; and,in order to reconcile him to the delay, he assured him that thestrayed asses had been recovered.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Then Saul drew near to Samuel in the gate,…. Either at the door of his own house, just as he was coming out of it, or within the gate of the city as Saul entered that, Samuel came to it, in order to go through it to the high place, which it is probable was without the city; wherefore it is very properly said that Samuel came out to meet them, 1Sa 9:14
and said, tell me, I pray thee, where the seer’s house is; one knows not which to wonder at most, the simplicity and humility of Samuel to be in so plain an habit, unattended by servants, and yet going to a public festival, so that he seemed to be no other than a common man, to be inquired of whereabout his house was; or the ignorance of Saul, who had lived so long in the world, and so near Samuel, and yet had never seen and knew not the chief magistrate in the nation, so famous both for his civil and religious character.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
The thread of the narrative, which was broken off in 1Sa 9:15, is resumed in 1Sa 9:18. Saul drew near to Samuel in the gate, and asked him for the seer’s house. The expression is used to define more precisely the general phrase in 1Sa 9:14, ; and there is no necessity to alter in 1Sa 9:14 into , as Thenius proposes, for does not mean to go (or be) in the middle of the town, as he imagines, but to go into, or enter, the town; and the entrance to the town was through the gate.
1Sa 9:19-21 Samuel replied, “ I am the seer: go up before me to the high place, and eat with me to-day; and to-morrow I will send thee away, and make known to thee all that is in thy heart.” Letting a person go in front was a sign of great esteem. The change from the singular to the plural may be explained on the ground that, whilst Samuel only spoke to Saul, he intended expressly to invite his servant to the meal as well as himself. “ All that is in thine heart ” does not mean “all that thou hast upon thy heart,” i.e., all that troubles thee, for Samuel relieved him of all anxiety about the asses at once by telling him that they were found; but simply the thoughts of thy heart generally. Samuel would make these known to him, to prove to him that he was a prophet. He then first of all satisfied him respecting the asses (1Sa 9:20): “ As for the asses that were lost to thee to-day three days (three days ago), do not set thy heart upon them (i.e., do not trouble thyself about them), for they are found.” After this quieting announcement, by which he had convinced Saul of his seer’s gift, Samuel directed Saul’s thoughts to that higher thing which Jehovah had appointed for him: “ And to whom does all that is worth desiring of Israel belong? Is it not to thee, and to all thy father’s house? ” “The desire of Israel” ( optima quaeque Israel , Vulg.; “the best in Israel,” Luther) is not all that Israel desires, but all that Israel possesses of what is precious or worth desiring (see Hag 2:7). “The antithesis here is between the asses and every desirable thing” (Seb. Schmidt). Notwithstanding the indefinite character of the words, they held up such glorious things as in prospect for Saul, that he replied in amazement (1Sa 9:21), “ Am not I a Benjaminite, of the smallest of the tribes of Israel? and my family is the least of all the families of the tribe of Benjamin ( is unquestionably a copyist’s error for ); and how speakest thou such a word to me? ” Samuel made no reply to this, as he simply wanted first of all to awaken the expectation in Saul’s mind of things that he had never dreamt of before.
1Sa 9:22 When they arrived at the high place, he conducted Saul and his servant into the cell (the apartment prepared for the sacrificial meal), and gave them (the servant as well as Saul, according to the simple customs of antiquity, as being also his guest) a place at the upper end among those who had been invited. There were about thirty persons present, no doubt the most distinguished men of the city, whilst the rest of the people probably encamped in the open air.
1Sa 9:23-24 He then ordered the cook to bring the piece which he had directed him to set aside, and to place it before Saul, namely the leg and (the article in the place of the relative; see Ewald, 331, b.); i.e., not what was over it, viz., the broth poured upon it (Dathe and Maurer), but what was attached to it (Luther). The reference, however, is not to the kidney as the choicest portion (Thenius), for the kidneys were burned upon the altar in the case of all the slain sacrifices (Lev 3:4), and only the flesh of the animals offered in sacrifice was applied to the sacrificial meal. What was attached to the leg, therefore, can only have been such of the fat upon the flesh as was not intended for the altar. Whether the right or left leg, is not stated: the earlier commentators decide in favour of the left, because the right leg fell to the share of the priests (Lev 7:32.). But as Samuel conducted the whole of the sacrificial ceremony, he may also have offered the sacrifice itself by virtue of his prophetic calling, so that the right leg would fall to his share, and he might have it reserved for his guest. In any case, however, the leg, as the largest and best portion, was to be a piece of honour for Saul (see Gen 43:34). There is no reason to seek for any further symbolical meaning in it. The fact that it was Samuel’s intention to distinguish and honour Saul above all his other guests, is evident enough from what he said to Saul when the cook had brought the leg: “ Behold, that which is reserved is set before thee ( is the passive participle, as in Num 24:21); for unto this time hath it been kept for thee, as I said I have invited the people.” is either “ to the appointed time of thy coming,” or possibly, “ for the (this) meeting together.” Samuel mentions this to give Saul his guest to understand that he had foreseen his coming in a supernatural way. , saying, i.e., as I said (to the cook).
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
| Saul Entertained by Samuel. | B. C. 1070. |
18 Then Saul drew near to Samuel in the gate, and said, Tell me, I pray thee, where the seer’s house is. 19 And Samuel answered Saul, and said, I am the seer: go up before me unto the high place; for ye shall eat with me to day, and to morrow I will let thee go, and will tell thee all that is in thine heart. 20 And as for thine asses that were lost three days ago, set not thy mind on them; for they are found. And on whom is all the desire of Israel? Is it not on thee, and on all thy father’s house? 21 And Saul answered and said, Am not I a Benjamite, of the smallest of the tribes of Israel? and my family the least of all the families of the tribe of Benjamin? wherefore then speakest thou so to me? 22 And Samuel took Saul and his servant, and brought them into the parlour, and made them sit in the chiefest place among them that were bidden, which were about thirty persons. 23 And Samuel said unto the cook, Bring the portion which I gave thee, of which I said unto thee, Set it by thee. 24 And the cook took up the shoulder, and that which was upon it, and set it before Saul. And Samuel said, Behold that which is left! set it before thee, and eat: for unto this time hath it been kept for thee since I said, I have invited the people. So Saul did eat with Samuel that day. 25 And when they were come down from the high place into the city, Samuel communed with Saul upon the top of the house. 26 And they arose early: and it came to pass about the spring of the day, that Samuel called Saul to the top of the house, saying, Up, that I may send thee away. And Saul arose, and they went out both of them, he and Samuel, abroad. 27 And as they were going down to the end of the city, Samuel said to Saul, Bid the servant pass on before us, (and he passed on,) but stand thou still a while, that I may shew thee the word of God.
Providence having at length brought Samuel and Saul together, we have here an account of what passed between them in the gate, at the feast, and in private.
I. In the gate of the city; passing through that, Saul found him (v. 18), and, little thinking that he was Samuel himself, asked him the way to Samuel’s house: Tell me where the seer’s house is; for there he expected to find him. See how mean a figure Samuel made, though so great a man: he took not any state, had no attendants, no ensigns of honour carried before him, nor any distinguishing habit, no, not when he went to church, but appeared, in all respects, so much a common person that Saul, though he was told he should meet him, never suspected that it was he, but, as if he looked more like a porter than a prophet, asked him the way to the seer’s house. Thus is great worth oftentimes hidden under a very despicable appearance. Samuel knew that it was not the house, but the man, that he wanted, and therefore answered him, “I am the seer, the person you enquire for,” v. 19. Samuel knew him before he knew Samuel; thus, though all that are called to the kingdom of glory are brought to know God, yet first they were known of him, Gal. iv. 9. Now, 1. Samuel obliges him to stay with him till the next day. The greatest part of this day had been spent in sacrificing, and the rest of it was to be spent in holy feasting, and therefore, “To-morrow I will let thee go, and not sooner; now go up before me to the high place; let us pray together, and then we will talk together.” Saul had nothing in his mind but to find his asses, but Samuel would take him off from that care, and dispose him to the exercises of piety; and therefore bids him go to the high place, and go before him, because, it may be, some business obliged Samuel to call by the way. 2. He satisfies him about his asses (v. 20): Set not thy mind on them, be not in further care about them; they are found. By this Saul might perceive that he was a prophet, that he could give him an answer to the enquiry which he had not yet made, and tell him what he thought; and thence he might infer, if a man of God can do this, much more doth God himself understand our thoughts afar off. 3. He surprises him with an intimation of preferment before him: “On whom is all the desire of Israel? Is it not a king that they are set upon, and there is never a man in Israel that will suit them as thou wilt.” It does not appear that the country had as yet any eye upon him for the government, because they had left it wholly to God to choose for them; but such a one as he they wished for, and his advancement would be the advancement of his family and relations, as Abner, and others. 4. To this strange intimation Saul returns a very modest answer, v. 21. Samuel, he thought, did but banter him, because he was a tall man, but a very unlikely man to be a king; for, though the historian says (v. 1) his father was a mighty man of power, yet he himself speaks diminishingly of his tribe and family. “Benjamin, the youngest of Jacob’s sons, when grown up to be a man, was called a little one (Gen. xliv. 20); that tribe was diminished by the war of Gibeah; and I am a Benjamite, my family the least,” probably a younger house, not in any place of honour or trust, no, not in their own tribe. Gideon had expressed himself thus, Judg. vi. 15. A humble disposition is a good presage of preferment.
II. At the public feast; thither Samuel took him and his servant. Though the advancement of Saul would be the deposing of Samuel, yet that good prophet was so far from envying him, or bearing him any ill-will for it, that he was the first and forwardest man to do him honour, in compliance with the will of God. If this be the man whom God has chosen, though he be none of Samuel’s particular friends or confidants, yet he is heartily welcome to his table, nay, to his bosom. We may suppose it was no unseasonable kindness to Saul to give him a meal’s meat, for it seems, by what he said (v. 7), that all their meat and money were spent. But this was not all. Samuel treats him not as a common person, but a person of quality and distinction, to prepare both him and the people for what was to follow. Two marks of honour he put upon him:– 1. He set him in the best place, as more honourable than any other of the guests, to whom he said, Give this man place, Luke xiv. 9. Though we may suppose the magistrates were there, who in their own city would claim precedency, yet the master of the feast made Saul and his servant too (who, if Saul was a king, must be respected as his prime minister of state) sit in the chief place, v. 22. Note, Civil respects must be paid to those who in civil things have the precedency given them by the divine providence. 2. He presented him with the best dish, which, having had notice from heaven the day before of his coming (v. 16), he had designed for him, and ordered the cook to secure for him, when he gave orders for inviting the guests and making preparation for them. And what should this precious dish be, which was so very carefully reserved for the king-elect? One would expect it should be something very nice and delicate. No, it was a plain shoulder of mutton (1Sa 9:23; 1Sa 9:24). The right shoulder of the peace-offerings was to be given to the priests, who were God’s receivers (Lev. vii. 32); the next in honour to that was the left shoulder, which probably was always allotted to those that sat at the upper end of the table, and was wont to be Samuel’s mess at other times; so that his giving it to Saul now was an implicit resignation of his place to him. Some observe a significancy in this dish. The shoulder denotes strength, and the breast, which some think went with it, denotes affection: he that was king had the government upon his shoulder, for he must bear the weight of it; and the people in his bosom, for they must be dear to him.
III. What passed between them in private. Both that evening and early the next morning Samuel communed with Saul upon the flat roof of the house, 1Sa 9:25; 1Sa 9:26. We may suppose Samuel now told him the whole story of the people’s desire of a king, the grounds of their desire, and God’s grant of it, to all which Saul, living very privately, was perhaps a stranger; he satisfied him that he was the person God had pitched upon for the government; and whereas Saul would object that Samuel was in possession, and he would not for all the world take it out of his hands, Samuel, we may suppose, gave him all the assurance he could desire of his willingness to resign. Early in the morning he sent him towards home, brought him part of the way, bade him send his servant before, that they might be private (v. 27), and there, as we find in the beginning of the next chapter, he anointed him, and therein showed him the word of the Lord, that is, gave him full satisfaction that he was the person chosen to be king, for he would not jest with that sacred rite. It is by the unction of the Holy Ghost that Christ, the great prophet, shows us the word of the Lord. 1 John ii. 27, the same anointing teacheth you of all things.
Fuente: Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary
(18) In the gate.The LXX. (Greek Version) here reads, in the midst of the city. It is not improbable that this is the original reading, it being very possible for a scribe to write the Hebrew word gate for city.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
18. The seer’s house The house where he abides while in the city; the place he temporarily makes his home.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
To His Surprise Saul Is Treated As The Guest Of Honour At The Festival That Is Taking Place ( 1Sa 9:18-24 ).
1Sa 9:18
‘ Then Saul drew near to Samuel in the gate, and said, “Tell me, I pray you, where the seer’s house is.” ’
Meanwhile Saul, unconscious of all this, approaches the unknown man (whom we know as Samuel) in the gateway and asks him where the seer’s house is.
1Sa 9:19
‘ And Samuel answered Saul, and said, “I am the seer. Go up before me to the high place, for you shall eat with me today, and in the morning I will let you go, and will tell you all that is in your heart.” ’
To his pleasant surprise the unknown man reveals himself as Samuel, and he declares that he is the seer and that they must both precede him to the high place, where they will both eat with him that very day. This was possibly because it would be an act of courtesy to Samuel for them to arrive before him, something expected by all the other guests, or it may have been with the aim of emphasising Saul’s importance (something that Samuel will certainly do at the feast). Then in the morning he will let Saul go, once he has revealed to him what is in his (Saul’s) heart. It is not unlikely that such a powerful young man, son of a well known warrior, would have been dreaming about what he could do against the Philistines if only he got the chance. And it is that which Samuel wishes to speak to him about.
1Sa 9:20
“ And as for your asses which were lost three days ago, do not concern yourself about them for they have been found. And for whom is all that is desirable in Israel? Is it not for you, and for all your father’s house?”
Samuel then relieves his mind about his father’s asses, informing him that they have been found, thereby revealing to him Samuel’s own supernatural knowledge. And then he informs him that ‘all that is desirable in Israel’ is for Saul and for his father’s house. In other words because of the position that he will shortly hold he will no longer in the future have to worry about a few asses, because everything that is desirable in Israel will be his. He will be able to have his choice of anything. We are not, of course, expected to apply this too literally. Clearly he would be expected to choose sensibly and reveal discretion. It is rather a description of the superabundance that will now be available to him as compared with a few asses.
1Sa 9:21
‘ And Saul answered and said, “Am I not a Benjaminite, of the smallest of the tribes of Israel? And my family the least of all the families of the sub-tribes of Benjamin? Why then do you speak to me in this way?”
Saul is understandably confused. ‘Why are you saying these things to me?’ he asks. ‘I come from the smallest tribe in Israel, and my family is the least of all the tribes in Benjamin.’ In the chiasmus this is in parallel to the fact that he was the tallest man in Israel. So this is to be seen as typical Near Eastern modesty. In those days it was polite to deprecate yourself and your background. No one was expected to believe it. It is, of course, true that Benjamin was probably the smallest tribe in Israel after the battering that they had received in Judges 20-21, but they were fierce and experienced warriors. Saul’s words, however, are not intended to be taken literally. We can compare them with what Gideon said of himself in Jdg 6:15, and in his case his father was a leading elder in the town. What he was modestly saying was that he was not really deserving of what Samuel is suggesting. He felt completely at a loss to understand what Samuel was getting at. And we can appreciate why he might be doubtful about the acceptance by the large tribes of a Benjaminite as war leader. (However, Ephraim would not have accepted a permanent war-leader from Judah, nor would Judah have accepted one from Ephraim. So actually a Benjaminite was a good choice. All recognised the warlike potential of Benjaminites. None were jealous of them).
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
(18) Then Saul drew near to Samuel in the gate, and said, Tell me, I pray thee, where the seer’s house is.
Now the Lord in his providence had brought Saul to Samuel, and all the great events those two persons had to transact together, as the sequel of their history shows, began in this way. I would have the Reader remark with me, that though Saul was so handsome in his person, yet the great prophet Samuel was so poor and plain that Saul had no consciousness who it was when he accosted him. Such, depend upon it, are God’s people in a thousand and ten thousand instances as to any outward attraction. Like their great head, there is no beauty in external appearances, that we should desire them.
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
1Sa 9:18 Then Saul drew near to Samuel in the gate, and said, Tell me, I pray thee, where the seer’s house [is].
Ver. 18. In the gate. ] Heb., In the midst of the gate; Sept., In the midst of the city; Chaldee, Within the gate.
Tell me, I pray thee, where the seer’s house is.] It seemeth, then, that Samuel bore no great import in his outside. Saul knew him not, though judge of Israel, by his clothes, or by his attendants.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
in the gate. Hebrew “in the midst of the gate”: i.e. the open place near the gate where judgment was given.