Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Samuel 31:8
And it came to pass on the morrow, when the Philistines came to strip the slain, that they found Saul and his three sons fallen in mount Gilboa.
1Sa 31:8
The Philistines came to strip the slain.
After the battle
Is there any sadder sight than a battlefield after the guns have stopped firing? A similar scene is described in our text. Before I get through today, I will show you that the same process is going on all the world over, and every day, and that when men have fallen, Satan and the world, so far from pitying them or helping them, go to work remorselessly to take what little there is left, thus stripping the slain. There are tens of thousands of young men every year coming from the country to our great cities. They come with brave hearts and grand expectations. But our young man has a fine position in a dry-goods store. The month is overse He gets his wages. He is not accustomed to have so much money belonging to himself. He is a little excited, and does not know exactly what to do with it, and he spends it in some places where he ought not. Soon there come up new companions and acquaintances from the barrooms and the saloons of the city. Soon that young man begins to waver in the battle of temptation, and soon his soul goes down. In a few months, or few years, he has fallen. He is morally dead. Why do the low fellows of the city now stick to him so closely? Is it to help him back to a moral and spiritual life? Oh, no! I will tell you why they stay; they are Philistines stripping the slain. The point I want to make is this: Sin is hard, cruel, and merciless. Instead of helping a man up, it helps him down; it will come and steal your sword and helmet and shield, leaving you to the jackal and the crow. But the world and Satan do not do all their work with the outcast and abandoned. A respectable impenitent man comes to die. He could not get up if the house was on fire. What does Satan do for such a man? Wily, he fetches up all the inapt, disagreeable and harrowing things in his life. He says: Do you remember those chances you had for heaven, and missed them? Do you remember all those lapses in conduct? And then he takes all the past and empties it on that death bed, as the mail bags are emptied on the post office floor. The man is sick. He cannot get away from them. Come, now, I will tear off from you the last rag of expectation. I will rend away from your soul the last hope. I will leave you bare for the beating of the storm. It is my business to strip the slain. Sin is a luxury now; it is exhilaration now; it is victory now. But after a while it is collision; it is defeat; it is extermination; it is jackalism; it is robbing the dead; it is stripping the slain. Give it up today–give it up! (T. De Witt Talmage, D. D.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 8. On the morrow] It is very likely that the battle and pursuit continued till the night, so that there was no time till the next day to strip and plunder the slain.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
8, 9. on the morrow, when thePhilistines came to strip the slain, that they found Saul and histhree sons fallenOn discovering the corpses of the slaughteredprinces on the battlefield, the enemy reserved them for specialindignities. They consecrated the armor of the king and his sons tothe temple of Ashtaroth fastened their bodies on the temple of Shen,while they fixed the royal heads ignominiously in the temple of Dagon(1Ch 10:10); thus dividing theglory among their several deities.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And it came to pass on the morrow,…. The day after the battle, which perhaps was fought till night came on:
when the Philistines came to strip the slain; of their clothes, and take from them whatever was valuable, as their booty:
that they found Saul and his sons fallen in Mount Gilboa; to which they had betaken themselves, when the battle went against them in the valley; of which see 1Sa 28:4.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
On the day following the battle, when the Philistines tripped the slain, they found Saul and his three sons lying upon Gilboa; and having cut off their heads and plundered their weapons, they went them (the heads and weapons) as trophies into the land of the Philistines, i.e., round about to the different towns and hamlets of their land, to announce the joyful news in their idol-temples (the writer of the Chronicles mentions the idols themselves) and to the people, and then deposited their weapons (the weapons of Saul and his sons) in the Astarte-houses. But the corpses they fastened to the town-wall of Beth-shean, i.e., Beisan, in the valley of the Jordan (see at Jos 17:11). Beth-azabbim and Beth-ashtaroth are composite words; the first part is indeclinable, and the plural form is expressed by the second word: idol-houses and Astarte-houses, like beth-aboth (father’s-houses: see at Exo 6:14). On the Astartes, see at Jdg 2:13. It is not expressly stated indeed in 1Sa 31:9, 1Sa 31:10, that the Philistines plundered the bodies of Saul’s sons as well, and mutilated them by cutting off their heads; but and , his (i.e., Saul’s) head and his weapons, alone are mentioned. At the same time, it is every evident from 1Sa 31:12, where the Jabeshites are said to have taken down from the wall of Beth-shean not Saul’s body only, but the bodies of his sons also, that the Philistines had treated the corpses of Saul’s sons in just the same manner as that of Saul himself. The writer speaks distinctly of the abuse of Saul’s body only, because it was his death that he had chiefly in mind at the time. To the word we must supply in thought the object and from the preceding clause. and (1Sa 31:10 and 1Sa 31:12) are the corpses without the heads. The fact that the Philistines nailed them to the town-wall of Beth-shean presupposes the capture of that city, from which it is evident that they had occupied the land as far as the Jordan. The definite word Beth-ashtaroth is changed by the writer of the Chronicles into Beth-elohim, temples of the gods; or rather he has interpreted it in this manner without altering the sense, as the Astartes are merely mentioned as the principal deities for the idols generally. The writer of the Chronicles has also omitted to mention the nailing of the corpses to the wall of Beth-shean, but he states instead that “they fastened his skull in the temple of Dagon,” a fact which is passed over in the account before us. From this we may see how both writers have restricted themselves to the principal points, or those which appeared to them of the greatest importance (vid., Bertheau on 1Ch 10:10).
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
| The Disposal of Saul’s Body. | B. C. 1055. |
8 And it came to pass on the morrow, when the Philistines came to strip the slain, that they found Saul and his three sons fallen in mount Gilboa. 9 And they cut off his head, and stripped off his armour, and sent into the land of the Philistines round about, to publish it in the house of their idols, and among the people. 10 And they put his armour in the house of Ashtaroth: and they fastened his body to the wall of Beth-shan. 11 And when the inhabitants of Jabesh-gilead heard of that which the Philistines had done to Saul; 12 All the valiant men arose, and went all night, and took the body of Saul and the bodies of his sons from the wall of Beth-shan, and came to Jabesh, and burnt them there. 13 And they took their bones, and buried them under a tree at Jabesh, and fasted seven days.
The scripture makes no mention of the souls of Saul and his sons, what became of them after they were dead (secret things belong not to us), but of their bodies only.
I. How they were basely abused by the Philistines. The day after the battle, when they had recovered their fatigue, they came to strip the slain, and, among the rest, found the bodies of Saul and his three sons, v. 8. Saul’s armour-bearer perhaps intended to honour his master by following the example of his self-murder, and to show thereby how well he loved him; but, if he had consulted his reason more than his passions, he would have spared that foolish compliment, not only in justice to his own life, but in kindness to his master, to whom, by the opportunity of survivorship, he might have done all the service that could be done him by any man after he was dead; for he might, in the night, have conveyed away his body, and those of his sons, and buried them decently. But such false and foolish notions these vain men have (though they would be wise) of giving and receiving honour. Nay, it should seem, Saul might have saved himself the fatal thrust and have made his escape: for the pursuers (in fear of whom he slew himself) came not to the place where he was till the next day. But whom God will destroy he infatuates and utterly consumes with his terrors. See Job xviii. 5, c. Finding Saul’s body (which now that it lay extended on the bloody turf was distinguishable from the rest by its length, as it was, while erect, by its height, when he proudly overlooked the surrounding crowd), they will, in that, triumph over Israel’s crown, and meanly gratify a barbarous and brutish revenge by insulting the deserted corpse, which, when alive, they had stood in awe of. 1. They cut off his head. Had they designed in this to revenge the cutting off of Goliath’s head they would rather have cut off the head of David, who did that execution, when he was in their country. They intended it, in general, for a reproach to Israel, who promised themselves that a crowned and an anointed head would save them from the Philistines, and a particular reproach to Saul, who was taller by the head than other men (which perhaps he was wont to boast of), but was now shorter by the head. 2. They stripped him of his armour (<i>v. 9), and sent that to be set up as a trophy of their victory, in the house of Ashtaroth their goddess (v. 10); and we are told, 1 Chron. x. 10 (though it is omitted here), that they fastened his head in the temple of Dagon. Thus did they ascribe the honour of their victory, not as they ought to have done to the real justice of the true God, but to the imaginary power of their false gods, and by this respect paid to pretended deities shame those who give not the praise of their achievements to the living God. Ashtaroth, the idol that Israel had many a time gone a whoring after, now triumphs over them. 3. They sent expresses throughout their country, and ordered public notice to be given in the houses of their gods of the victory they had obtained (v. 9), that public rejoicings might be made and thanks given to their gods. This David regretted sorely, 2 Sam. i. 20. Tell it not in Gath. 4. They fastened his body and the bodies of his sons (as appears, v. 12) to the wall of Beth-shan, a city that lay not far from Gilboa and very near to the river Jordan. Hither the dead bodies were dragged and here hung up in chains, to be devoured by the birds of prey. Saul slew himself to avoid being abused by the Philistines, and never was royal corpse so abused as his was, perhaps the more if they understood that he slew himself for that reason. He that thinks to save his honour by sin will certainly lose it. See to what a height of insolence the Philistines had arrived just before David was raised up, who perfectly subdued them. Now that they had slain Saul and his sons they thought the land of Israel was their own for ever, but they soon found themselves deceived. When God has accomplished his whole work by them he will accomplish it upon them. See Isa 10:6; Isa 10:7.
II. How they were bravely rescued by the men of Jabesh-Gilead. Little more than the river Jordan lay between Beth-shan and Jabesh-Gilead, and Jordan was in that place passable by its fords; a bold adventure was therefore made by the valiant men of that city, who in the night passed the river, took down the dead bodies, and gave them decent burial, 1Sa 31:11; 1Sa 31:13. This they did, 1. Out of a common concern for the honour of Israel, or the land of Israel, which ought not to be defiled by the exposing of any dead bodies, and especially of the crown of Israel, which was thus profaned by the uncircumcised. 2. Out of a particular sense of gratitude to Saul, for his zeal and forwardness to rescue them from the Ammonites when he first came to the throne, ch. xi. It is an evidence of a generous spirit and an encouragement to beneficence when the remembrance of kindnesses is thus retained, and they are thus returned in an extremity. The men of Jabesh-Gilead would have done Saul better service if they had sent their valiant men to him sooner, to strengthen him against the Philistines. But his day had come to fall, and now this is all the service they can do him, in honour to his memory. We find not that any general mourning was made for the death of Saul, as was for the death of Samuel (ch. xxv. 1), only those Gileadites of Jabesh did him honour at his death; for, (1.) They made a burning for the bodies, to perfume them. So some understand the burning of them. They burnt spices over them, v. 12. And that it was usual thus to do honour to their deceased friends, at least their princes, appears by the account of Asa’s funeral (2 Chron. xvi. 14), that they made a very great burning for him. Or (as some think) they burnt the flesh, because it began to putrefy. (2.) They buried the bodies, when, by burning over them, they had sweetened them (or, if they burnt them, they buried the bones and ashes), under a tree, which served for a grave-stone and monument. And, (3.) They fasted seven days, that is, each day of the seven they fasted till the evening; thus they lamented the death of Saul and the present distracted state of Israel, and perhaps joined prayers with their fasting for the re-establishment of their shattered state. Though, when the wicked perish there is shouting (that is, it is to be hoped a better state of things will ensue, which will be matter of joy), yet humanity obliges us to show a decent respect to dead bodies, especially those of princes.
This book began with the birth of Samuel, but now it ends with the burial of Saul, the comparing of which two together will teach us to prefer the honour that comes from God before any of the honours which this world pretends to have the disposal of.
Fuente: Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary
CRITICAL AND EXPOSITORY NOTES
1Sa. 31:9. And sent. Hebrew scholars here read sent them, i.e., the weapons and the head of Saul and probably those of his sons.
1Sa. 31:10. Ashtaroth. The plural form of Ashtoreth, the principal female divinity of the Phnicians, as Baal was the principal male divinity, identical with the Astarte of the Greeks and Romans, who was by many ancient writers identified with the goddess Venus, as well as also with the planet of that name. (See Smiths Bib. Diet.) Beth-shan. The present Beisan, in the Jordan valley, twelve miles south of the Sea of Galilee and four miles west of the Jordan. The royal heads, we learn from 1Ch. 10:10, were fixed in the temple of Dagon. Thus the trophies of their great victory were divided among their several deities. (Jamieson.)
1Sa. 31:11. Jabesh-Gilead. See on 1Sa. 11:1.
1Sa. 31:12. Went all night. Considering that Bethshan is about three hours distance, and by a narrow upland passage to the west of the Jordan, the whole being a journey of about twelve miles, they must have made all expedition to travel thither, to carry off the headless bodies and return to their own side of the Jordan in the course of a single night. (Jamieson.) Burnt them. This was not a Hebrew custom, and was either resorted to to prevent any further insult from the Philistines or, more likely, seeing that only the flesh was burned, because of the mangled and decomposed condition of the corpses.
1Sa. 31:13. A tree, rather the tamarisk, the article indicating that the site was well-known. David afterwards caused the bones to be removed to Sauls family burial place (2Sa. 21:11-14).
MAIN HOMILETICS OF THE PARAGRAPH.1Sa. 31:8-13
THE GRATITUDE OF THE MEN OF JABESH GILEAD
I. The courageous impulses of grateful hearts. Gratitude may be almost regarded as an instinct of human nature, for it springs up spontaneously in the breast of man in answer to benefits received. He who does not experience this emotion must be hardened below the brute, for even some of the lower animals will remember benefits conferred, and love him who has done them a service, But the strength and length of the gratitude will depend much on the disposition and character. All men are prone to forget benefits conferred long ago, and only true and loyal hearts keep their memory green, and are found willing to recognise them at their own risk. Many years had passed since Saul earned the gratitude of the men of Jabesh Gilead, and his later life had tended rather to efface than to perpetuate the recollection of that act of bravery. And very considerable must have been the danger which they now encountered in rendering. him this last servicethe only one which could now be rendered to one who had put himself beyond any other. But their gratitude and courage were equal to the occasion, and shed the only ray of light that brightens this dark picture.
II. The lasting influence of a good deed. The life that had begun in so much promise had ended in gloom, and it seems almost impossible to recognise in this fearful and despairing man the brave soldier-king by whom, at Jabesh, the Lord had wrought salvation in Israel (1Sa. 11:13). But in this day of his shame, and when he is justly reaping the reward of his evil deeds, this good one is not to be forgotten but receives its reward. Truly,
The evil that men do lives after them,
but so also, happily, does the good.
OUTLINES AND SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS
This book began with the birth of Samuel, but now it ends with the death of Saul, the comparing of which two together will teach us to prefer the honour that comes from God before any of the honours which this world pretends to have the disposal of.Henry.
In the greatness and the reverse of the house of Saul is the culmination and catastrophe of the tribe of Benjamin. The Christian fathers used to dwell on the old prediction which describes the character of that tribe, Benjamin shall ravin as a wolf: in the morning he shall devour the prey, and in the evening he shall devour the spoil. These words well sum up the strange union of fierceness and of gentleness, of sudden resolves for good or evil, which run, as hereditary qualities do often run, through the whole history of that frontier clan. Such were its wild adventures in the times of the Judges; such was Saul, its first king; such was Shemei, of the house of Saul, in his bitterness and his repentance; such was the divided allegiance of the tribe to the rival houses of Judah and Ephraim; such was the union of tenderness and vindictiveness in the character of Mordecai and Esther, if not actual descendants of Shemei and Kish, as they appear in the history of Saul, at least claiming to be of the same tribe, and reckoning among the list of their ancestors the same renowned names. And is it a mere fancy to trace with those same Christian writers the last faint likeness of this mixed history, when, after a lapse of many centuries, the tribe once more for a moment rises to our view; in the second Saul, also of the tribe of Benjamin? Saul of Tarsus, who, like the first, was at one time moved by a zeal bordering almost upon frenzy, and who, like the first, startled all his contemporaries by appearing among the Prophets the herald of the faith which once he destroyed; but, unlike the first, persevered in that faith to the end the likeness in the Christian Church, not of what Saul was, but of what he might have been.Stanley.
Fuente: The Preacher’s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell
(8) They found Saul and his three sons fallen in Mount Gilboa.It is expressly stated that the Philistines only found the royal corpses on the morrow of the great fight. So desperate had been the valour with which the King and his gallant sons had defended their last positions on the hill, that night had fallen ere the din of battle ceased. Nor were the enemy aware of the completeness of their success until the morning dawn revealed to the soldiers as they went over the scene, the great ones who were numbered among the slain. In the mean time the Amalekite had found and carried off the crown and royal bracelet. Only the bodies of Saul and the princes, and the armourbearer, are spoken of here. The crown royal, which would have formed so splendid a trophy, was already taken.
O Saul,
How ghastly didst thou look, on thine own sword
Expiring: in Gilboa, from that hour
Neer visited with rain from heaven, nor dew.
DANTE: Pura. 12
The curse of barrenness alluded to by the great Italian poet was called down on the hill where the first anointed of the Lord fell, and where the body was stripped and dismembered by the triumphant foe (2Sa. 1:21). Quickly the tidings were told, we learn, in the capital of Gath, and proclaimed through the streets of Askelon.
The historian with extreme brevity records the savage treatment of the royal remains, which, after all, was but a reprisal. The same generation had witnessed similar barbarous procedure in the case of Goliath, the great Philistine champion!
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
8. On the morrow They did not pause in the heat of battle or in the first flush of victory to gather up their trophies.
They found Saul and his three sons They probably knew that he had fallen, or at all events had not escaped with the fugitives of Israel, but until now they had not stopped their pursuit to search for his dead body.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Saul’s Body Is Humiliated And The Tidings Concerning Saul’s Death And Defeat Are Spread Among The Philistines ( 1Sa 31:8-10 ).
As Saul had anticipated, the Philistines sought to humiliate what remained of him. They cut off his head and sent it throughout the land of the Philistines in triumph, prior to setting it up in the temple of their god Dagon (1Ch 10:10). This was similar to the treatment meted out to the head of Goliath by David (1Sa 17:54). (There was no thought of honouring a fallen foe. It was intended as an indication of the respective triumph of their deities). They stripped off his armour and set it up in the house of their goddess Ashtaroth, probably in Bethshan. And they displayed his body on the walls of Bethshan. This was the only way of ensuring that all knew that he really was dead. Verse 12 informs us that they did the same with the bodies of his sons for a similar reason. But there was no doubt that there was also in it an intention to gloat over their dead enemies. It was a display of their triumph, and a warning to all who opposed them.
We should note how the writer actually refrains from mentioning what happened to Saul’s head, except indirectly. This suggests that he was writing within a time span when reverence for YHWH’s anointed as king of Israel prevented him from wishing to do so. The thought of it being hung in a Philistine temple filled him with repugnance (just as he also shortly gleefully describes how Saul’s body was saved from humiliation in 1Sa 31:11-13). The chronicler, who considered that Saul had shamed himself (1Ch 10:13), had no such inhibition hundreds of years later.
Analysis.
a And it came about on the next day, when the Philistines came to strip the slain, that they found Saul and his three sons fallen on mount Gilboa (1Sa 31:8).
b And they cut off his head, and stripped off his armour (1Sa 31:9 a).
c And they sent into the land of the Philistines round about, to carry the news to the house of their idols, and to the people (1Sa 31:9 b).
b And they put his armour in the house of the Ashtaroth (1Sa 31:10 a).
a And they fastened his body to the wall of Beth-shan (1Sa 31:10 b).
Note that in ‘a’ they discovered his body, and in the parallel they fastened it to the wall of Bethshan. In ‘b’ they stripped off his armour, and in the parallel they put it in the house of Ashtaroth. Centrally in ‘c’ they sent the tidings of the victory into all the land of the Philistines, informing both their idols and their people of it. This included sending Saul’s head with the messengers, (which was the purpose of cutting it off – compare 1Sa 17:54 where David took Goliath’s head to Judah’s sanctuary). 1Ch 10:10 tells us that it was placed in the temple of Dagon, which was where they had previously first placed the captured Ark in the time of Eli (1Sa 5:2). It was an act of worship to their god.
1Sa 31:8
‘ And it came about on the next day, when the Philistines came to strip the slain, that they found Saul and his three sons fallen on mount Gilboa.’
The day after the battle the Philistines returned to the battlefield to survey the dead and strip from them anything that might have value. This was the normal practise after a victorious encounter. And there, on Mount Gilboa, above the plain of Jezreel, they found the bodies of Saul and his three sons.
1Sa 31:9
‘ And they cut off his head, and stripped off his armour, and sent into the land of the Philistines round about, to carry the news to the house of their idols, and to the people.’
Their main activity was aimed at Saul. For many years he had proved a thorn in their sides, and had prevented them from encroaching far into Israelite territory. Saul ‘had slain his thousands’, and many of them had been Philistines. But now at last they had thoroughly routed his forces and had killed him. So they cut off his head and bore it into their land to hang it in the Temple of Dagon (1Ch 10:10), probably in Ashdod (1Sa 5:1-2), but some consider it to have been one of the two temples revealed archaeologically in Bethshan. There would be a number of temples of Dagon. They also stripped him of his armour and put it in the house of Ashtaroth (a Canaanite goddess represented by many images). And they sent the news of his death and of their victory over the Israelites to the house of their idols and to their people.
For the cutting off of the head compare 1Sa 17:51; 1Sa 17:54, and see also 1Sa 5:4. For the stripping of the armour compare 1Sa 17:54. These were clearly seen as the normal things to do to a prominent foe who had been defeated and slain. Many would have been appalled that this could happen to the ‘Anointed of YHWH’. But we are already in on the secret that he was no longer the Anointed of YHWH in God’s eyes, for he had been rejected and replaced by David. This was but the final proof of that fact.
1Sa 31:10
‘ And they put his armour in the house of the Ashtaroth, and they fastened his body to the wall of Beth-shan.’
1Ch 10:10 says that ‘they put his armour in the house of their gods’. This may have been in Bethshan which was a Canaanite city with Philistine connections by the Valley of Jezreel, but others see it as having in mind the great house of Ashtaroth in Ashkelon. The former view is seen as supported by the fact that the site of the temple is unnamed and by the parallelism:
“They put his armour in the house of Ashtaroth,
And they fastened his body to the walls of Bethshan.”
That Ashkelon is in mind might be seen as supported by the reference to Ashkelon in David’s lament (2Sa 1:20), and the fact that Ashkelon was in Philistia proper. That was not important to the writer, however. What he was concerned about was that Saul was being shamed and humiliated. Thus came to the end a reign which had begun gloriously and had descended into tragedy.
Ashtaroth is a plural word and may simply indicate the fact that the goddess Ashtoreth/Astarte had many images. Alternately it may be that we are to translate as ‘the houses of the Ashtaroth’ indicating that Saul’s weapons were widely distributed around different Philistine temples as tokens of victory, or borne triumphantly from one to the other.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
(8) And it came to pass on the morrow, when the Philistines came to strip the slain, that they found Saul and his three sons fallen in mount Gilboa. (9) And they cut off his head, and stripped off his armour, and sent into the land of the Philistines round about, to publish it in the house of their idols, and among the people. (10) And they put his armour in the house of Ashtaroth: and they fastened his body to the wall of Bethshan.
No doubt, so complete a victory, and so great a triumph inflamed the minds of the Philistines exceedingly. But had they seen the hand of the Lord in it, they would not have been tempted to ascribe the victory to their idols.
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
1Sa 31:8 And it came to pass on the morrow, when the Philistines came to strip the slain, that they found Saul and his three sons fallen in mount Gilboa.
Ver. 8. And it came to pass on the morrow. ] They made sure work of the victory before they fell upon the spoil: so did not Pirinninus. See Trapp on “ 1Sa 30:16 “
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
to strip: 1Ch 10:8, 2Ch 20:25
Reciprocal: 2Sa 1:19 – beauty
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
A TRAGIC END
Saul fallen in mount Gilboa.
1Sa 31:8
In Sauls ignominious end we see the righteous judgment of God upon his wilful hardness of heart. Still his memory was not to be left in utter disgrace, and it was vindicated by those whom he had delivered before he rejected God, who rightly and bravely protested against the unjustifiable and barbarous revenge of his enemies. What are some of the most obvious lessons from the terrible ending of a life so full of promise and of possibility as was Sauls?
I. Learn to estimate justly the value of natural virtues.Sauls good qualities must not be ignored. He was brave, affectionate, and open-hearted, so that David in his elegy lamented over both him and Jonathan, as being lovely and pleasant in their lives. But Saul would not recognise the claims of Godhe refused to acknowledge that he was viceroy, and that Jehovah was King; he would make no sacrifice of his own self-will; and our Lesson shows what came of it. Are there none such in our classes? popular, lovable, and genial, who refuse to acknowledge God as their Lord, neither hearkening to His word nor praying for His mercy and help?
II. Learn the insufficiency of circumstances to restrain from sin.God gave Saul a Samuel to teach him; a Jonathan to encourage him in right; a David to remind him of God by harp and song. Yet all these silken cords which might have held him to better things were snapped. Some young people now are restrained by school authority, by love of reputation, by Christian friends; but if they rely on these instead of relying on God, the spiritual downfall is sure to come.
III. Learn to use rightly the recurring crises of life.Saul had a fair trial.He was often warned. He had several distinct opportunities given him to turn to God. Yet he let all these opportunities slipand at last it was too late. The voices were silent which once pleaded with him. Gods Spirit had ceased to strive. To-day if ye will hear His voice, harden not your heart.
IV. Learn that though threatened retribution is delayed it comes certainly at last.Years passed away after Samuel told Saul that he had forfeited the kingdom. He may have begun to doubt it, but the threat was fulfilled. Not only in this world but in the world to come Gods hand can reach us, and unpardoned, unrepented sin will receive its just recompense of reward.
Illustrations
(1) There is no such test of the realities of life as noting what makes people remember a man gratefully after he is gone. Once Saul had been proud of his giant stature, but now no one said, What a pity that such a handsome, kingly fellow should have such indignities heaped upon him. His office, his victories, his wealth were all forgotten; but the one thing that left a fragrant memory was his unselfish succour of the men of Jabesh-Gilead from the Ammonites, at the very beginning of his reign. The real possessions of our lives are the helpful, kind, brave deeds in behalf of others that cost us something.
(2) The lesson, alike of Sauls melancholy end and of this one bright incident, is the same. Curses, like chickens, the old proverb says, come home to roost. An ill-sowing must have an ill-reaping. But so also do good deeds work out the peaceable fruits of righteousness. Nothing is lost. Here is the law under which we are now living. God will render to every man according to his deeds. Saul did only one conspicuously generous thing. It was the one flower that was planted on his grave.
(3) How terrible it is that sin must be visited on others. There is not in the whole Bible a more impressive verse than this, So Saul died and his three sons, and his armourbearer, and all his men, the same day together. For weighty compactness this verse stands almost alone. It is a law in moral government that is heard in three successive ands. No man sins to himself. Jonathan must die for Saul. The same thing is happening all about us now. The innocent are suffering for the guilty. Israel also illustrated the law at this time. These men who fell on Gilboa were few of them personally responsible for the choice of a king. Yet the defeat of this day, and the death of the monarch that their fathers would have, both recalled the word of God to Samuel, They have not rejected thee, but they have rejected Me, that I should not reign over them. Where is that mountain pass in which the stones lie poised so delicately on the sides of the hills that even a clattering warrior or a clarion blast will sometimes suffice to bring them thundering down? Let us tread carefully the path of life, or consequences may be started which shall fall with fatal force upon those who follow us.
(4) Saul was one of the kings chosen because they are higher than their fellows in inches, not because they are greater than their fellows in soul. To the last he was consistent to this low ideal of religion and of character. Draw thy sword, he said to his armourbearer, and thrust me through therewith, lest these uncircumcised come and abuse me. But what if his body had been at the mercy of a brutal foe? His heart, his life, his soul, these were of the first moment. Many of the martyrs were insulted after their death; what did it matter? True religion cares little what becomes of the body so long as the immortal nature is safe in the keeping of God. So Saul, fallen on Gilboa, reaped what he had sown. He sowed to the flesh; he reaped corruption. The wages of sin is always death.
(5) So closed the sad career of Saul, one of the most pitiful stories in all history. Few men have been more finely gifted than was this first king of ancient Israel. He was beautiful and strong, very brave, full of resource; he had genius for leadershiphe ruled and yet was loved; was a man of a simple nature, who lived the simple life, and at the outset at least was greatly humble. But there were baser elements in his naturethe makings of a moody, jealous, and suspicious temperand these (not crushed by trust in God and prayer) grew slowly into an awful dominance, until at last they put forth the deadly blossom of rebellion against the sweet constraints of heaven. It was that attitude which sealed the fate of Saul. It was that which blotted the blue out of the sky. With God, he would have been a king indeed. Without God, for all his gifts, he failed. Seek ye the Lord while He may be found, and call ye upon Him while He is near.