Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Corinthians 15:47

The first man [is] of the earth, earthy: the second man [is] the Lord from heaven.

47. The first man is of the earth, earthy ] See Gen 2:7. The word earthy ( from dust) is an allusion to the ‘dust of the ground’ in that passage, in the Septuagint .

the second man is the Lord from heaven ] The Vulgate reads, is from heaven, heavenly, Tyndale follows the Vulgate, and also Wiclif, who translates however, the secunde man of heuene is heueneli. Alford reads the second man is from heaven, with the majority of MSS. and versions. The law of progress, above referred to, is illustrated by the creation of the second man. The first man was ‘dust of the ground,’ and God breathed a breath of life into his soul. But the second man is not created anew altogether, but takes the first man as the starting-point of the new life. By the agency of the Holy Spirit Jesus Christ took our flesh in the womb of the Blessed Virgin, being a new creation, but not directly from heaven. See note on 1Co 15:21. This passage bears a strong resemblance to St Joh 3:31; and in the reading we have mentioned the resemblance is even stronger than in the authorized version. The margin of St Joh 3:3 may also be compared.

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

The first man – Adam.

Is of the earth – Was made of the dust; see Gen 2:7.

Earthy – Partaking of the earth; he was a mass of animated clay, and could be appropriately called dust; Gen 3:19. Of course, he must partake of a nature that was low, mean, mortal, and corruptible.

The second man – Christ; see the note on 1Co 15:45. He is called the second man, as being the second who sustained a relation to people that was materially to affect their conduct and destiny; the second and the last 1Co 15:45, who should sustain a special headship to the race.

The Lord from heaven – Called in 1Co 2:8, the Lord of glory; see note on that place. This expression refers to the fact that the Lord Jesus had a heavenly origin, in contradistinction from Adam, who was formed from the earth. The Latin Vulgate renders this, the second man from heaven is heavenly; and this idea seems to accord with the meaning in the former member of the verse. The sense is, evidently, that as the first man had an earthly origin, and was, therefore, earthy, so the second man being from heaven, as his proper home, would have a body adapted to that abode; unlike that which was earthy, and which would be suited to his exalted nature, and to the world where he would dwell. And while, therefore, the phrase from heaven refers to his heavenly origin, the essential idea is, that he would have a body that was adapted to such an origin and such a world – a body unlike that which was earthy. That is, Christ had a glorified body to which the bodies of the saints must yet be made like.

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

1Co 15:47-49

The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.

The first and second man

I. The first–is of the earth, earthy–consequently–

1. Confined to earth.

2. Perishes with the earth.

II. The second–from heaven, heavenly.

1. Rules the earth.

2. Opens heaven.

3. Lives for ever. (J. Lyth, D.D.)

Of the earth, earthy

properly means clayey, but is here used to express mans terrestrial nature. Because he is of the earth in his origin–i.e., as to his body, there is a terrestrial side to his nature and sphere of action. From this we may infer–

I. That man in his sinless state had a body capable of dying. If he had continued sinless, his body would have been rendered immortal by a Divine act, and we gather from Gen 3:22 that the tree of life was the appointed sacrament of immortality. This is consistent with Rom 5:12. In the case of man sin brought death, not mortality, into the world. The correctness of this hypothesis is confirmed by the side light it throws upon the voluntariness of Christs death. As Christ was sinless, death was not a necessity to Him, though He had a mortal body; and as He was Divine as well as sinless, death was impossible to Him without a voluntary act of laying down His life.

II. That the divine image in adam consisted, negatively, in sinlessness and, positively, in a potential and rudimentary goodness; by no means in the full perfection of human nature. Christ does infinitely more than restore our original state (cf. Wis 8:1)

. (Principal Edwards.)

The second man

In what sense is our Lord the second man? There were so many millions intervening between Him and Adam. The answer is that all the others were mere copies of the first; whereas Christ introduced a new kind of man, and became the head of a new family.

I. The differences between Adam and Christ. There is a difference.

1. Of origin.

(1) The first man is of the earth, earthy.

(a) Whatever may be said of Adams Divine parentage, according to his physical nature, he and his belong essentially to this earth; they are part of its fauna, and stand at the head of long lines of animal life, which, commencing with the lowest of sensitive creatures, find their highest term in man. All the materials of his physical life and being belong to the planet of which he is the chief inhabitant, of whose vital forces he is simply the highest outcome, the most elaborated product.

(b) There are many who tell us that man is of the earth, earthy, in the sense of being descended from the lower forms of animal life through the process of natural selection; but this can only be received as an hypothesis; yet there is nothing in it contrary to Scripture. If true it gives a new and most marvellous aspect to the Incarnation. Of course, if our ancestors were marine ascidians, so were His; and thus we see Him in an unexpected sense, gathering together in one, and summing up in Himself all created life (Eph 1:10), and reuniting it unto God. I do not know why a Christian should be staggered at the thought of one unbroken continuity of life; for the great gap in the cycle of life, which seemed to be eternally impassable, was above man, not below him, and yet we know that this gulf which separated the highest creature by an infinite distance from the Creator was bridged by the condescension of the Son.

(2) For the second man was the Lord from heaven. His origin was as distinctly Divine and heavenly as Adams origin was earthy.

2. Of nature. This difference was not in wealth, happiness, beauty, nor in any of those things which ordinarily make one man superior to another, for in all these things Christ voluntarily placed Himself at a disadvantage; but it was in holiness.

(1) Adam was a rebel, a sinner; and after him all we are the same. No doctrine of the Scripture is more confirmed by constant experience, or more in accordance with modern science than that of hereditary sin. For not only does every child afford a fresh example of the tendency to do wrong, but as the instinct by which the young bird feeds itself is the transmitted experience of its remote ancestors, so the mortal evil which began in Adam has become an inseparable characteristic of his race.

(2) But Christ was not sinful. Coming into the world by a miraculous and immaculate conception, it was said to Mary, That holy thing which shall be born of thee shall be called the Son of God; and this holiness, which belonged to Him by virtue of His origin, He kept spotless amidst all the temptations of His earthly life. And what was the consequence of this holiness? This–that He was by right immortal and incorruptible, even as man; death and the grave could have no claim on One who had no sin. But did He not die? Yes, truly; but it was by His own permission. Being holy, although He was capable of death, it was not possible that He should be holden of it. I have seen some large insect fly into a spiders web, and the hungry spider has come forth with haste, thinking he has caught a finer prize than has fallen into his clutches for many a long day. But the prisoner is stronger than any for which the web was made; he gathers up his might, he throws himself hither and thither, he shakes the web violently, he rends it from top to bottom–he is gone, and has left the broken net and the baffled spider behind him. Even so death had spread his snares for the sons of men, and had caught them all one by one, and had held them fast; at last came the Son of Man, and He, too, died like men, and death and hell rejoiced together over their notable captive. But they did not rejoice long; their toils were not made for Him. The bands of death were to Him as the green withes were to Samson. As the flush of morning comes back upon the earth, as the tints of spring return upon the trees, and we cannot say at what moment it begins, so did Christ rise, we know not when; it needed no effort nor preparation; it was as natural and proper to Him to live, to be abroad in the freedom of unfettered life, as it is for the dew to rise when the sun is warm.

II. Christ is called the second adam because–

1. He introduced into the world a new type, a new order of humanity–a child of man, indeed, but such a child of man as had never been seen before. He was the beau ideal of the human race; all that is noble and lovely in other human beings was united in Him, and all that is noble and lovely in our dreams and fancies about what human beings might be was realised in Him. You have heard of those tropical plants which are said to blossom but once in a hundred years, then, having thrown up a single spike of exquisite white blossom, to die. This (however exaggerated in fact) may serve to illustrate the relation of Christ to the human race: once, and once only, humanity blossomed up and put forth one exquisite faultless flower, in which its entire life culminated, in which all its possibilities were exhausted; that flower was Christ, the Son of Man, par excellence, the second man.

2. But Adam not only set a type, but he began a race, a series like himself, and thus he became the fountain-head of a guilty and perishing humanity. In like manner Christ began a new race, and became the fountain.head of a new regenerate human life, cleansing itself from sin, rising victorious over death. (R. Winterbotham, M.A.)

The believers pedigree

1. On the one side traced to Adam who is of the earth–on the other to Christ who is the Lord from heaven.

2. On the one side he derives an earthly nature, on the other a heavenly.

3. On the one side he is stamped with the features of the earthy, on the other with those of the heavenly.

4. On the one side he can claim no inheritance in the kingdom of God, on the other becomes heir of all things. (J. Lyth, D.D.)

As is the earthy, such are they also that are earthy.—

The earthy and the heavenly

I. The earthy–frail, sensual, dying–can only produce his like.

II. The heavenly–pure, spiritual, immortal–communicates His own nature by a new birth, to be consummated in the resurrection. (J. Lyth, D.D.)

As is the heavenly, such are they also that are heavenly.—

The assimilation of Christians to the Redeemer

I. The redeemer of the world is the heavenly.

1. The Scriptures represent Him as the express character of Gods person, the brightness of His glory. The perfections of the Divine nature indeed shine forth in all the works of creation; but there is a clearer and more glorious display of them all in God manifest in the flesh.

2. His life and character demonstrate Him to be the Heavenly.

II. The points of similarity between the heavenly and those with whom he stands connected.

1. That we may be humble, contemplate the dissimilarity. There is in Him the complete perfection of those various graces and virtues of which, in the saints, there is only an extremely remote resemblance.

2. But although the dissimilarity be great, there is an obvious similarity.

(1) In heavenliness of mind. A carnal Christian is a contradiction in terms.

(2) In faith. Like Christ, they put their trust in their heavenly Father.

(3) In being of a devotional spirit.

(4) In humility.

(5) In their conversation.

(6) In active goodness. (T. Swan.)

On heavenly-mindedness

A soul chained down to earth is as little suited for the occupations of heaven as is a body framed of the dust for becoming the eternal tenement of a spirit that liveth for ever. Temper, in its widest acceptation, is the uniform frame of the mind; the disposition, which it partly derives from nature and partly from circumstance; but to which, in its better condition, it is principally reduced by Divine grace and by religious cultivation. Thought is a sudden conception or a process of the intellect, and the fitful spring of action. Passion is a desultory violence of the soul when roused by external impressions. Both thought and passion are subject to variations in the same breast, and both may have intervals of cessation. But disposition is the inward light–the permanent hue of the heart, which tinctures the moral complexion, and blends with the whole course of thought, action, passion and existence. What, then, is that spirit, that disposition, which prevails among the blessed above, and by imitating which we may humbly aspire to be joined to their high and holy association?

1. In its reference to God it implies a spirit of devotion. To acquire the habit of contemplating, under all circumstances, the bond which connects earth with heaven, and of acknowledging the impulse which all the affairs of life are constantly receiving from an unseen arm: to discover providence where ignorance sees but chance, or where pride confesses only the power of man; to hear the voice of God in the accents of instruction; to trace His workmanship in the magnificence of Nature; to admire His beneficence throughout the varied year, whether crowned with blossoms or laden with sheaves–this is to imbibe the spirit of the heavenly; for the works and the wonders of Providence, we may rest assured, for ever occupy the meditations, the converse, and the praises, of the blessed, in the courts of light.

2. The temper and spirit of heaven may be considered, secondly, as it relates to our neighbour. Charity is the bond of union among the blessed above; all is there harmonious as the silent chime of the spheres.

3. It now remains to consider heavenly-mindedness in its immediate relation to ourselves. Humility is the pre-eminent virtue of the heavens. Another feature in the disposition which looks towards a heavenly prototype, and a feature relating to ourselves, is purity. The enjoyments of heaven, and the affections of its inhabitants, we may be sure, are unstained by the cloud or shadow of a thought that may suffuse the mind with the tinge of shame. But the crowning quality of temper, which at once unites and assimilates probationary mortals unto the multitude–the Sabaoth of heaven–is serenity. To this entire composure it cannot be expected that creatures such as we, in a state like that which we inherit, can attain. But here, too, though all may not be achieved or hoped, the task is not to be wholly relinquished. Some self-discipline is practicable; and what is practicable is what God expects. We have the treasury of grace for our feebleness–we have devotion as the key which unlocks it. (J. Grant, M.A.)

As we have borne the image of the earthy, we shall also bear the image of the heavenly.

The image of the earthy and of the heavenly

I. The image of the earthy.

1. Sin.

2. Sorrow.

3. Death.

II. The image of the heavenly.

1. Holiness.

2. Happiness.

3. Life. (F. A. Cox, LL.D.)

The attainment of the image of the heavenly

The great hindrance to our reception of the full power of these words lies in the difficulty of realising them as a present experience. We fancy that death is the great magician. Paul contemplated the change as actually begun. We were once merely natural men, and knew nothing of the higher spiritual world. Then quickened by the grace of God in Christ we became spiritual. Thus because the quickening Spirit of Christ is forming His image in us now, the earthly shall perish, and we shall wear the image of the heavenly. Just as the flowers which open beneath the summer sunshine are folded in the dark buds which are beaten and tossed in the winter winds; just as the strength of will, the fire of feeling, etc., of a man are hidden in the child, so the heavenly life is within us now, and because it is there it is possible for us to reach the full formed image of the heavenly.

I. The great aim of Christian aspiration–to bear the image, etc. This is one of the deepest longings of the soul. We yearn for rest, for service, for happiness; but there is a deeper longing; we want to be holier, heavenlier men. This is also the all-embracing Christian aim. Every prayer for light, blessedness, strength, is gathered up and centred in the aim to be like Christ. Observe His image has three great features.

1. Divine vision–the spiritual insight that realises the presence of God and the unseen world. It is true that we cannot see God and the radiance of eternity with the bodily eye; but were we like Christ, we should apprehend them through the sympathies of the soul.

2. Divine love. We admit the feebleness of our love to God, yet in many ways we aspire after a deeper love. What means our perpetual unrest, our constant effort after the unattained, etc., but the yearning after that love of God which alone can fill us, our longing after the image of Christ who realised it fully.

3. Divine power.

II. The hindrance to its attainment. The image of the earthy, i.e., the body of corruption whose tendency is–

1. To limit aspiration to the earthy.

2. To become an aid to the sin of the soul.

Conclusion:

1. Our aspirations must be earnest and real. What we sincerely aspire to be we may become.

2. Our endeavour must be practical. Meditation alone will do but little.

3. God will aid us by the discipline of life. Many strokes may be needed; but as the form of immortal loveliness lies concealed in the block of stone, and is being moulded stroke by stroke by the sculptors genius, so the heavenly form in man is being developed by the Eternal Sculptor, who by His discipline is unveiling in us the image of His Son. (E. L. Hull, B.A.)

Perfection in heaven

I. Wherein consists the image of the earthy.

1. In innocent infirmities; hunger, thirst, weariness, etc., and the like. How unlike are we in this respect to the blessed who hunger no more, and thirst no more, and rest not day nor night.

2. In sinful imperfections, commonly expressed by the want of original righteousness, and the corruption of nature.

3. In the consequences.

(1) The miseries of this life.

(2) Death.

(3) A liableness to suffer under the wrath and curse of God for ever.

II. The respects in which true believers shall bear the image of the heavenly.

1. In the glorious spirituality of the body. How vastly will it differ from what it now is (verses 42-44).

2. In the perfect holiness of the soul.

3. In complete happiness.

4. In immortality. (D. Whittey.)

The believers assimilation to Christ

I. The characters here placed in contrast.

1. The earthy.

2. The heavenly.

II. The fact assumed–that we have all borne, etc.

1. The first man is emphatically styled earthy (verse 47).

(1) On account of his origin.

(2) Because of his tendency.

(3) Because of his apostasy.

2. But Christ is the heavenly One, because of–

(1) His pre-existence.

(2) The moral beauty and glory displayed by Him while on earth.

3. Therefore it is said that we have borne the image of the earthy.

4. And not only because of this, but also because the first mans moral image has become characteristic of us.

III. The promise in reference to believers. A perfect moral resemblance to Christ will be attained at the last day. (J. Scott.)

Mans present and future

I. Confirm the lamentable fact that, by nature, we all bear the image of the earthly. So says my text; so says my experience, the melancholy experience of all ages and nations; so witness our own feelings in the endurance of those ills to which mortality is subject. Behold it–

1. In our bodies, which are earthly, frail, and tending to dissolution. What is that in the cold corpse which shocks the feelings of humanity, and harrows up the soul? It is the image of the earthly Adam! And ere long you shall bear it too.

2. We all bear this image in our souls.

(1) Our souls are defiled with sin.

(2) Our souls are exposed to Divine wrath, and thus bear the image of the earthly.

II. Rejoice in the glorious truth that, as believers, we shall also bear the image of the Lord from heaven.

1. It is first impressed upon us at the time of our regeneration. Effectual grace then gives a new bias to the mind, and the Father of the spirits of all flesh then makes us new creatures in Christ Jesus. The Saviour imparted to us the principle of grace; He made us, who before lived only for folly and sin, to pant after holiness as our noblest pursuit; to grasp after purity as our noblest attainment.

2. This image shall visibly discover itself through the whole course of the Christians life, producing a happy effect upon his temper, his passions, his pursuits; it shall make him to speak, to look, to live, like the children of God.

3. This image shall be rendered more striking and glorious on the resurrection morning. (T. Spencer.)

Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell

Verse 47. The first man is of the earth] That is: Adam’s body was made out of the dust of the earth; and hence the apostle says he was , of the dust; for the body was made aphar min ha-adamah, dust from the ground; Ge 2:7.

The second man is – from heaven.] Heavenly, , as several good MSS. and versions read. The resurrection body shall be of a heavenly nature, and not subject to decay or death. What is formed of earth must live after an earthly manner; must be nourished and supported by the earth: what is from heaven is of a spiritual nature; and shall have no farther connection with, nor dependence upon, earth. I conceive both these clauses to relate to man; and to point out the difference between the animal body and the spiritual body, or between the bodies which we now have and the bodies which we shall have in the resurrection. But can this be the meaning of the clause, the second man is the Lord from heaven? In the quotation I have omitted , the Lord, on the following authorities: MANUSCRIPTS – BCD*EFG, and two others. VERSIONS – Coptic, AEthiopic, Armenian in the margin, Vulgate, and Itala. FATHERS – Origen, who quotes it once and omits it once; Athanasius, Basil, the two Gregories, Nyssen and Nazianzen; Isidore, Cyril, Tertullian, Cyprian, Hilary, Zeno, Ambrose, Augustine, Jerome, Ambrosiaster, Philaster, Leo, Pacianus, Primasius, Sedulius, Bede, and others. See these authorities more at large in Wetstein. Some of the most eminent of modern critics leave out the word, and Tertullian says that it was put in by the heretic Marcion. I do think that the word is not legitimate in this place. The verse is read by the MSS., versions, and fathers referred to, thus: The first man is of the earth, earthy; the second man is of heaven, heavenly; being omitted and added. The first man and the second man of this verse are the same as the first Adam and the second Adam of 1Co 15:45, and it is not clear that Christ is meant in either place. Some suppose that there is a reference here to what Eve said when she brought forth Cain: I have gotten a man from the Lord, kanithi ish eth Yehovah, I have possessed or obtained a man, the Lord; that is, as Dr. Lightfoot explains it, that the Lord himself should become man: and he thinks that Eve had respect to the promise of Christ when she named her son; as Adam had when he named his wife. If Eve had this in view, we can only say she was sadly mistaken: indeed the conjecture is too refined.

The terms first man of the earth, and second man from heaven, are frequent among the Jews: the superior Adam; and Adam the inferior; that is, the earthly and the heavenly Adam: Adam before the resurrection, and Adam after it.

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

Adam, who was the first man, was of the earth, Gen 2:7, and was of an earthy constitution, like unto the earth out of which he was formed; but Christ had another original: for though his body was formed in the womb of the virgin, and he was flesh of her flesh, yet she conceived by the Holy Ghost overshadowing her, and Christ had an eternal generation (as to his Divine nature) from his Father.

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole

47. of the earthinasmuch asbeing sprung from the earth, he is “earthy” (Gen 2:7;Gen 3:19, “dust thou art”);that is, not merely earthly or born upon the earth, butterrene, or of earth; literally, “of heapedearth” or clay. “Adam” means red earth.

the Lordomitted in theoldest manuscripts and versions.

from heaven (Joh 3:13;Joh 3:31). Humanity in Christ isgeneric. In Him man is impersonated in his true ideal as Godoriginally designed him. Christ is the representative man, thefederal head of redeemed man.

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

The first man is of the earth, earthy,…. He was formed out of the earth, Ge 2:7 and the word there used signifies red earth. Josephus c observes, that the first man was called Adam, which in the Hebrew tongue signifies red, because he was made out of red earth; for such, adds he, is the true and virgin earth: Pausanias d makes mention of a clay, which is not the colour of earth, but like the sand of brooks and rivers; and gives a smell very near to that of the skin, or body of men; and which is said to be the remains of that clay, out of which all mankind was made: but be that as it will, Adam was certainly made out of the earth, and had his habitation and abode assigned him in the garden of Eden, and was made to cultivate and till it; his lordship and dominion, at most and best, only extended to the terraqueous globe, and the creatures in it; and having sinned, he was not only thrust out of the garden to till the ground out of which he was taken, but doomed to return to the dust from whence he came; and whose sin and fall had such an influence on him and his posterity, as to make their souls sensual and earthly, to mind, affect, and cleave unto earthly things:

the second man is the Lord from heaven; as Adam was the first man, Christ is the second man; and these two are spoken of, as it they were the only two men in the world; because as the former was the head and representative of all his natural posterity, so the latter is the head and representative of all his spiritual offspring: and he is “the Lord from heaven”; in distinction from the first man, who was of the earth, and whose lordship reached only to the earth; whereas Christ is Lord of all, not only Lord of lords below, but Lord of angels and saints above; the whole family in heaven and in earth is named of him; and he has all power in heaven and in earth, and a name above every name in this world, and that to come, and is indeed higher than the heavens: this is not to be understood of his human nature, or of his human body, as if that came down from heaven, and passed through the virgin, as some heretics of old said, as water through a pipe; for though it was conceived and formed in a miraculous manner, under the overshadowing of the Holy Ghost from on high, yet was formed out of the matter and substance of the virgin, and so was of the earth; and was indeed an earthly body, supported by earthly means, and at last returned to the earth, and was interred in it: but it is to be understood either of Christ as a divine person, as the Son of God, as Lord of all, coming down from heaven at his incarnation; not by local motion, or change of place, but by assumption of the human nature into union with him, the Lord from heaven; or rather of him as he shall descend from heaven, as the Lord and Judge of all at the last day, when he will come in his glorious, spiritual, and heavenly body; and raise the righteous dead, and fashion their bodies like his own; when what follows will have its full accomplishment. The Cabalistic doctors among the Jews often speak e of , “the superior man”, and , “the inferior man”; and in their Cabalistic table f, in the sixth “sephirah”, or number, they place the man from above, the heavenly Adam; and, in one of their writings g, have these remarkable words,

“anynt Mdaw hale Mda Nam, “who is the supreme man and the second man”, but of whom it is said, Pr 30:4 “what is his name, and what is his son’s name?” what is his name? this is the supreme man; what is his son’s name? this is the inferior man; and both of them are intimated in that Scripture, Ex 3:13 “and they shall say unto me, what is his name? what shall I say?””

Some copies, and the Vulgate Latin and Ethiopic versions; leave out the word “Lord”, and add the word “heavenly”, reading the clause thus, “the second man from heaven, heavenly”.

c Antiqu. l. 1. c. 1. sect. 2. d Phocica, sive l. 10. p. 615. e Raziel, fol. 26. 1. & 31. 1. & 33. 1. Tzeror Hammor, fol. 1. 4. f In Cabala Denudata, par. 2. p. 9. g Zohar in Gen. fol. 39. 2.

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

Earthly (). Late rare word, from , dust.

The second man from heaven ( ). Christ had a human () body, of course, but Paul makes the contrast between the first man in his natural body and the Second Man in his risen body. Paul saw Jesus after his resurrection and he appeared to him “from heaven.” He will come again from heaven.

Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament

Earthy [] . Only in this chapter. The kindred noun couv dust appears Mr 6:11; Rev 18:19. From cew to pour; hence of earth thrown down or heaped up : loose earth. Compare Gen 2:7, Sept., where the word is used.

From heaven [ ] . Ex out of, marking the origin, as ejk ghv out of the earth. Meyer acutely remarks that “no predicate in this second clause corresponds to the earthy of the first half of the verse, because the material of the glorified body of Christ transcends alike conception and expression.” The phrase includes both the divine origin and the heavenly nature; and its reference, determined by the line of the whole argument, is to the glorified body of Christ – the Lord who shall descend from heaven in His glorified body. See Phi 3:20, 21. 13 4

Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament

1) “The first man is of the earth, earthy:” (ho protos anthropos ek ges choikos) “The first man was out of earth (earth bodies), earthy.” This was Adam and involved are all his offspring in the consequence of his transgression, Rom 5:10-20. This term “earthy” refers to elemental body structure as to origin and substance.

2) “The second man is the Lord from Heaven.” (ho deuteros anthropos eks ouranois) “The second man was out of heaven.” Eph 4:8-10. His resurrection body possessed life and attributes of spiritual nature. He came down from heaven and bodily returned to heaven in resurrection glory, a revelation glow of what awaits the redeemed in the resurrection, Act 1:8-11.

Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary

47. The first Adam was from the earth. The animal life comes first, because the earthy man is first. (119) The spiritual life will come afterwards, as Christ, the heavenly man, came after Adam. Now the Manichees perverted this passage, with the view of proving that Christ brought a body from heaven into the womb of the Virgin. They mistakingly imagined, however, that Paul speaks here of the substance of the body, while he is discoursing rather as to its condition, or quality. Hence, although the first man had an immortal soul, and that too, not taken from the earth, yet he, nevertheless, savoured of the earth, from which his body had sprung, and on which he had been appointed to live. Christ, on the other hand, brought us from heaven a life-giving Spirit, that he might regenerate us into a better life, and elevated above the earth. (120) In fine, we have it from Adam — that we live in this world, as branches from the root: Christ, on the other hand, is the beginning and author of the heavenly life.

But some one will say in reply, Adam is said to be from the earth — Christ from heaven; the nature of the comparison (121) requires this much, that Christ have his body from heaven, as the body of Adam was formed from the earth; or, at least, that the origin of man’s soul should be from the earth, but that Christ’s soul had come forth from heaven. I answer, that Paul had not contrasted the two departments of the subject with such refinement and minuteness, (for this was not necessary;) but when treating of the nature of Christ and Adam, he made a passing allusion to the creation of Adam, that he had been formed from the earth,, and at the same time, for the purpose of commending Christ’s excellence, he states, that he is the Son of God, who came down to us from heaven, and brings with him, therefore, a heavenly nature and influence. This is the simple meaning, while the refinement of the Manichees is a mere calumny.

We must, however, reply to another objection still. For Christ, so long as he lived in the world, lived a life similar to ours, and therefore earthly: hence it is not a proper contrast. The solution of this question will serve farther to refute the contrivance (122) of the Manichees. For we know, that the body of Christ was liable to death, and that it was exempted from corruption, not by its essential property, (as they speak,) (123) but solely by the providence of God. Hence Christ was not merely earthy as to the essence of his body, but was also for a time in an earthly condition; for before Christ’s power could show itself in conferring the heavenly life, it was necessary that he should die in the weakness of the flesh, (2Co 13:4.) Now this heavenly life appeared first in the resurrection, that he might quicken us also.

(119) “ La vie sensuelle, ou animale, c’est a dire, que nous auons par le moyen de l’ame, precede;” — “The sensual or animal life, that is to say, what we have by means of the soul, comes first.”

(120) “ Plus haute et excellente que la terre;” — “Higher and more excellent than the earth.”

(121) “ La nature de l’antithese et comparison;” — “The nature of the contrast and comparison.”

(122) “ La meschante imagination; ” — “ The wicked fancy.”

(123) “ Afin que Fuse du terme commun;” — “To use the common phrase.”

Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary

(47) The second man is the Lord from heaven.Better, the second man is from heaven. The words the Lord, which occur in the English version, are not in the best Greek MSS. The word which is twice rendered of in this verse has the force of from, originating from, in the Greek. The first representative man was from the earth, the second representative man was from heaven; and as was the first earthly Adam, so are we in our merely physical condition; and as is the second heavenly Adam, so shall we be in our heavenly state.

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

47. Of Rather, from the earth, as the second man is from heaven. In Gen 2:7, the same Greek words occur, from the earth.

The Lord This phrase is rejected as spurious by the best scholars; the true reading is the second man is the Lord from heaven. By this antithesis, as by the former, (1Co 15:45; 1Co 15:49,) Adam is viewed at his creation, and Christ at his second advent, producing our resurrection.

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

‘The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is of heaven.’

For the first man, the source of the life of all men, is earthy, and is of the earth, as are they. But the second man is of Heaven. Paul has now come to the point where he feels that he can speak of what is heavenly without it simply being connected with sun, moon and stars, but rather being seen as that which is greater than the stars. Again Genesis 2 is in mind. Man was made of the earth, and as such returned to the earth. But the second man was not only made of earth, He was of Heaven. That is central to what He is.

By sin man had lost that heavenly part of himself, and had shut himself up ever to be earthy. But the second man was of Heaven. He had not lost that heavenly part of Himself. It was central to what He was. And although He had come as earthy, although He was made flesh and dwelt among us (Joh 1:14), it was in order to be the source of that new heavenly life for men.

So they must see that life in Christ has changed everything. Those who have that life are no longer just living souls, they have received life from above, heavenly life, coming from the Life-giver Himself Who while on earth could say that He was the man from Heaven (Joh 3:13) and could claim ‘I am the life’ (Joh 14:6; Joh 11:35). They can thus not only be described as citizens of Heaven (Php 3:20), but are in their bodies imbued with heavenly life which will come to its full fruition in the resurrection. Even while on earth they dwell in Christ in the spiritual realm, in heavenly places (Eph 2:6).

Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett

1Co 15:47. The first man is of the earth, “The first man was from the earth, and so earthly: he was created out of the dust of the earth, and his body was only a mass of animated clay; in reference to which it was said, ‘Dust thou art.’ The second man of whom we speak, is the Lord from heaven: and whatever of earth there was in the composition of the body which he condescended to wear, it is now completely purified and refined into the most glorious form.”

Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke

1Co 15:47 , by the concrete phenomena of the two heads of the race of mankind, Adam and Christ.

The principal emphasis is upon and , so that the former corresponds to the , and the latter to the of 1Co 15:46 ; hence, too, is not used here again. “The first man (not the second) is of earthly origin, earthy (consisting of earth-material); the second man (not the first) is of heavenly origin.”

] Origin and material nature. Comp. Gen 2:7 , ; Ecc 3:20 ; Ecc 12:7 ; 1Ma 2:63 . That the article (Joh 3:31 ) was not required with (in opposition to van Hengel, who, on account of the lacking article, explains it, terrenus sc. terram sapiens ; and then ; humilia spirans ) is clear not only in general (see Winer, p. 114 [E. T. 149]), but also from passages such as Wis 15:8 ; Wis 17:1 ; Sir 36:10 ; Sir 40:11 . It may be added, that since, by the words , Adam’s body is characterized as , as in 1Co 15:45 , and the psychical corporeity, again, taken purely in itself (without the intervention of a modifying relation), includes mortality (1Co 15:44 ), it is clear that Paul regards Adam as created mortal , but so that he would have become immortal, and would have continued free from death, if he had not sinned. The protoplasts are accordingly in his eyes such as under an assumed condition potuerunt non mori , which, however, through the non-fulfilment of this condition, i.e. through the Fall, came to nothing; so that now death , and that as a penalty , came to be a reality, a view which agrees alike with his own doctrinal statement, Rom 5:12 , [85] and also with Genesis. For had the protoplasts not sinned, they would, according to Genesis, have remained in Paradise, and would have become immortal (Gen 3:22 ) through the enjoyment of the tree of life (Gen 2:9 ), which God had not forbidden to them (Gen 2:16-17 ). But they were driven out of Paradise, before they had yet eaten of this tree (Gen 3:22 ); and so, certainly, according to Genesis also, through sin came death into the world as the penalty appointed for them by God (Gen 2:17 ). Comp. Augustin, De pecc. meritis et remiss . i. 5 : “ipsum mortale non est factum mortuum nisi propter peccatum;” see, too, Ernesti, l.c. p. 248 f.; Ewald, Jahrb. II. p. 153 f.

] of heavenly derivation . This applies to the glorification of the body of Christ, [86] originating from heaven, i.e. wrought by God (comp. 2Co 5:2 ), in which glorified body He is in heaven, and will appear at His Parousia (comp. Phi 3:20 ). Comp. on 1Co 15:45 . According to de Wette (comp. also Beyschlag in the Stud. u. Krit. 1860, p. 437 f., and Christol . pp. 228, 242), it applies to the whole personality of Jesus, “which, through its preponderating spirituality, has also a spiritual body,” or to the heavenly origin characterizing the nature of the whole person (Beyschlag). But the above-given definite reference is the only one which corresponds, in accordance with the text, to the contrast of , which applies to the formation of Adam’s body , as well as to the whole point of the development ( ). Van Hengel is wrong in seeking to conclude from the absence of the article here also, that the heavenly dignity of Jesus is meant. Comp. 2Co 5:2 ; Gal 1:8 . Paul has the article before or , after or , only in 1Th 1:10 .

No predicate in the second clause corresponds to the of the first half of the verse, [87] because the material of the glorified body of Christ transcends alike conception and expression.

[85] In connection with this, no difficulty whatever is occasioned by the , Rom 5:12 , according to its correct interpretation, which does not make it refer to the individual sins of the posterity; see on Rom. l. c . The Pelagian view, that Adam, even if he had not sinned, would have died, is decidedly against the Pauline doctrinal conception. This in opposition to Schleiermacher, Neander, and others; especially, also, against Mau, v. Tode, d. Solde der Snde , 1841.

[86] Hence Gess ( v. d. Person Chr . p. 75) very irrelevantly objects to the reference to the body of Christ, that that body was not from heaven , but from the seed of David . Delitzsch ( Psychol . p. 334 ff.), by referring back to the incarnation, which is contrary to the context, mixes up things that differ. Beyschlag (comp. also his Christol . p. 226) finds in our text a heavenly humanity of Christ (human pre-existence); but the connection and the contrast lead us only to the heaven-derived body of the risen and exalted One. Comp., too, Hofmann and J. Mller, v. d. Snde , p. 412, Exo 5 ; Weiss, bibl. Theol . p. 315 f.

[87] Delitzsch, Psychol . p. 336, prefers the Marcionitic reading: . ., i.e. the second is Lord from heaven . According to the critical evidence, this reading deserves no consideration. Offence was taken at .

Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary

47 The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is the Lord from heaven.

Ver. 47. Of the earth, earthy ] Gr. dusty, slimy, ex terra friabili. Let this pull down proud flesh. Let us throw this proud Jezebel out of the windows of our hearts, and lay her honour in the dust, by remembering that we are but earth and dust. Adam of Adamah, red earth; homo ab humo. Humility comes from the same root, because it lays a man flat on the ground; and because, like the earth, it is the most weighty of all virtues.

The Lord from heaven ] Not for the matter of his body, for he was “made of a woman;” but for the original and dignity of his person, whereof see a lively and lofty description,Heb 1:2-3Heb 1:2-3 .

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

47 .] So exactly in Gen 2:7 . God made man . Meyer has some excellent remarks here, with which I entirely agree: “Since the body of Adam is thus characterized as a , as 1Co 15:45 , and psychical organism involves mortality ( 1Co 15:44 ), it is clear that Paul treats of Adam not as created exempt from death : in strict accordance with Gen 2:7 ; Gen 3:19 . Nor does this militate against his teaching that death came into the world through sin . Rom 5:12 . For had our first parents not sinned, they would have remained in Paradise, and would, by the use of the Tree of Life , which God had not forbidden them ( Gen 2:16-17 ), have become immortal ( Gen 3:22 ). But they were driven out of Paradise, ere yet they had tasted of this tree ( Gen 3:22 ), and so, according to the record in Genesis also, Death came into the world by sin.” See also some striking remarks on the verse in Genesis in Stier, ‘Andeutungen fr glabiges Schriftver-stndniss,’ pp. 202, 3.

] either, in this glorified Body , at his coming, as Meyer: or, in his whole Personality (De W.) as the God-man: this latter seems more probable from Joh 3:13 , where is designated as .

Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament

1Co 15:47-49 draw another contrast between the two “men,” types of the two eras of humanity, which is suggested by the words (‘ aphr minha’adamh ) of Gen 2:7 . The first is , ( terrenus , Vg [2556] ; more literally, pulvereus , Bz [2557] ); the second is (om. ). The former epithets, and by antithesis the latter, point to bodily origin and substance ( cf. 40, also 2Co 4:7 , ), but connote the whole quality of the life thus determined. The expression ( e clo , Bz [2558] ; not de clo , Vg [2559] ) has led to the identifying of the . with the incarnate Christ (see Ed [2560] ), to the confusion of Paul’s argument ( cf. note on 1Co 15:45 ). This phrase is suggested by the antithetical : the form of existence in which the risen Jesus appeared was super-terrestrial and pneumatic (cf. 2Co 5:2 ); it possessed a life and attributes imparted “from heaven” by an immediate and sovereign act of God (Rom 1:4 ; Rom 6:4 , 2Co 13:4 , Eph 1:19 f., Peter 1Co 1:21 , etc.). This transformation of the body of Jesus was foreshadowed by His Transfiguration, and consummated in His Ascension; P. realised it with the most powerful effect in the revelation to himself of the risen Christ “from heaven”. The glorious change attested , indeed, the origin of Christ’s personality, but it should not be confused with that origin (Rom 1:4 ; cf. Mat 17:5 ). From His resurrection onwards, Christ became to human faith the (Rom 6:9 f., Rev 1:17 ff.), who was taken previously for a and like other men. Baur, Pfleiderer, Beyschlag ( N.T. Theology ), Sm [2561] , and others, see in the the pre-existent Christ , whom they identify with Philo’s ideal or “heavenly man” of Gen 1:26 (see note on 1Co 15:45 above); on this interpretation an entire Christology is based the theory that Christ in his pre-in-carnate state was simply the Urmensch , the prototype of humanity, existing thus, either in fact or in the Divine idea, with God from eternity, and being in this sense the Eternal Son. Doubtless the “second man” is ideally first and reveals the true end and type of humanity, and this conception is, so far, a just inference from Paul’s teaching. But what P. actually sets forth is the historical relation of the two Adams in the development of mankind, Christ succeeding and displacing our first father (1Co 15:46 , see note; 49), whereas the Baurian Urmensch is antecedent to the earthly Adam.

[2556] Latin Vulgate Translation.

[2557] Beza’s Nov. Testamentum: Interpretatio et Annotationes (Cantab., 1642).

[2558] Beza’s Nov. Testamentum: Interpretatio et Annotationes (Cantab., 1642).

[2559] Latin Vulgate Translation.

[2560] T. C. Edwards’ Commentary on the First Ep. to the Corinthians . 2

[2561] P. Schmiedel, in Handcommentar zum N.T. (1893).

The above and have severally their copies in and (1Co 15:48 ). Is this a purely physical distinction, between pre- and post-resurrection states of the same men ( cf. 1Co 15:44 )? or is there a moral connotation implied, as Hf [2562] and Ed [2563] suggest? The latter seems likely, esp. on comparison of Phi 3:18 ff., Col 3:1-4 , Rom 6:4 , and in transition to the exhortation of 1Co 15:49 . Those who are to be “heavenly” in body hereafter already “sit in heavenly places” (Eph 2:6 ), while those are “earthy” in every sense “whose flesh hath soul to suit,” . Admitting the larger scope of 1Co 15:48 , we accept the strongly attested hortatory of 1Co 15:49 : “Let us wear also the image of the Heavenly One”. The embraces the entire “man” not the body alone, the and (Phi 2:7 , 2Co 4:7 , 1Th 4:4 ) in Adam and Christ respectively ( cf. 1Co 11:7 , 2Co 3:18 , Rom 8:29 , Col 1:15 ; Col 3:10 ); and we are exhorted to “put on Christ” (Rom 13:14 , Gal 3:27 ), realising that to wear His moral likeness here carries with it the wearing of His bodily likeness hereafter: see 1Co 15:20-23 , Rom 8:11 ; 1Jn 3:2 f.

[2562] J. C. K. von Hofmann’s Die heilige Schrift N.T. untersucht , ii. 2 (2te Auflage, 1874).

[2563] T. C. Edwards’ Commentary on the First Ep. to the Corinthians . 2

Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson

earth. App-129.

earthy. Greek. choikos. Only here and in verses: 1Co 15:48-49. The noun chous, dust, is found in the Septuagint Gen 2:7. Psa 22:15; Psa 104:29. Ecc 3:20.

the Lord. All the texts omit.

from. App-104. Same as “of”, previous line.

heaven. Singular. See Mat 6:10.

Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics

47.] So exactly in Gen 2:7. God made man . Meyer has some excellent remarks here, with which I entirely agree:-Since the body of Adam is thus characterized as a , as 1Co 15:45, and psychical organism involves mortality (1Co 15:44), it is clear that Paul treats of Adam not as created exempt from death: in strict accordance with Gen 2:7; Gen 3:19. Nor does this militate against his teaching that death came into the world through sin. Rom 5:12. For had our first parents not sinned, they would have remained in Paradise, and would, by the use of the Tree of Life, which God had not forbidden them (Gen 2:16-17), have become immortal (Gen 3:22). But they were driven out of Paradise, ere yet they had tasted of this tree (Gen 3:22), and so, according to the record in Genesis also, Death came into the world by sin. See also some striking remarks on the verse in Genesis in Stier, Andeutungen fr glabiges Schriftver-stndniss, pp. 202, 3.

] either, in this glorified Body, at his coming,-as Meyer: or, in his whole Personality (De W.) as the God-man: this latter seems more probable from Joh 3:13, where is designated as .

Fuente: The Greek Testament

1Co 15:47. , , , , the first man is of the earth, earthy; the second man is the Lord from heaven) We have here an exact antithesis. The first man, , viz. , since he is of the earth, is , earthy, affected in the same way as a heap of earth () , accumulated, and then scattered: the reason of this is, because he is sprung from the earth. This is the protasis; the apodosis follows, in which it would not have been appropriate to say, the second man, from [of] heaven, heavenly; for man owes to the earth his obligations for this, that he is earthy; but the Lord does not owe His glory to heaven, inasmuch as it was He Himself who made heaven what it is, and by descending from heaven, presented Himself to us as the Lord. Therefore the order of the words is now changed, the Lord, from heaven [Lord coming before from heaven; whereas earthy, the antithesis to Lord, comes after of earth]. The word Lord signifies the same thing in the concrete, as glory does in the abstract (Germ. Herr, Herrlichkeit, Lord, Lordship), whence it is properly opposed to earthy, 1Co 15:43; Php 3:20, etc.: and from this glory is derived the incorruptibility of Christs flesh, Act 2:24; Act 2:31. In this way the received reading is defended, and the various readings, although ancient, which are mentioned in the Apparatus, are withdrawn.[144]

[144] BCD corr. later, G Vulg. g (these last three add ) f omit . Rec. Text retains the words, with A (according to Tisch., but Lachm. quotes A against the words), Marcion (according to Tertullian) both Syr. Versions. Origen, 2,559d supports them. But in 4,302d he rejects them.-ED.

Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament

1Co 15:47

1Co 15:47

The first man is of the earth, earthy:-Our first body, or the man in his first body, is of the earth; like Adam, earthly.

the second man is of heaven.-The second, or resurrection body, will be spiritual like the body of Christ after his resurrection.

Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary

first: 1Co 15:45, Gen 2:7, Gen 3:19, Joh 3:13, Joh 3:31, 2Co 5:1

the Lord: Isa 9:6, Jer 23:6, Mat 1:23, Luk 1:16, Luk 1:17, Luk 2:11, Joh 3:12, Joh 3:13, Joh 3:31, Joh 6:33, Act 10:36, Eph 4:9-11, 1Ti 3:16

Reciprocal: Gen 18:27 – dust Gen 32:24 – man Psa 10:18 – the man Luk 3:38 – of God Joh 1:14 – the Word Joh 3:6 – born of the flesh Joh 4:1 – the Lord Joh 6:42 – Is not Joh 8:23 – Ye are from Joh 16:27 – and have Joh 21:7 – It is Act 9:17 – the Lord Act 17:26 – hath made Rom 10:12 – Lord 2Co 4:5 – Christ 2Co 8:9 – though Phi 2:11 – is Lord

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

1Co 15:47. This is virtually the same as the preceding verse.

Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary

1Co 15:47. The first man is of the earth. The word signifies rubbish, loose earth, dust (as in Gen 2:7; Ecc 12:7 in LXX.),the second man is of heaven.[1] The reference here is not to the properties of Christs flesh, as received from the Virgin, but to the properties of His resurrection or spiritual body, as is plain from what follows.

[1] The Lord, in the received text of this verse, is plainly an addition to the true text; and the remarks above will shew, we think, that it is not wanted.

Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament

1Co 15:47-49. The first man is [was] of the earth, earthy Being from earth, and having forfeited his immortality by sin, he became subject to corruption and dissolution, like the earth from which he came. The second man is the Lord from heaven St. Paul could not well say, is of, or from heaven, heavenly: because though man owes it to the earth that he is earthy, yet the Lord does not owe it to heaven that he is glorious. He himself made the heavens, and by descending from them, showed himself to us as the Lord. Christ is called the second Adam in this respect, that as Adam was a public person who acted in the stead of all mankind, so was Christ; and as Adam was the first general representative of men, Christ was the second and the last: and what they severally did, terminated not in themselves, but affected all whom they represented. As is the earthy

The first Adam after his fall; such are they also that are earthy Who continue without any higher principle; they are sinful, mortal, corruptible creatures: such a body as Adam had, have all his posterity while they remain on earth. And as is the heavenly Man, Christ, at present; such are Or rather, shall be; they that are heavenly Who are united to Christ by the quickening and regenerating influences of his Spirit. That they may live with him in heaven, they shall at last have glorious bodies like his. And as we have borne the image of the earthy As assuredly as we are now sinful, afflicted, and mortal men, like the first Adam; we shall also bear the image of the heavenly So surely shall we be brought to resemble Christ in holiness, glory, and immortality.

Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

Vv. 47. The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is from heaven.

Here is the sovereign application of the general law enunciated in the previous verse. To the psychical state, which must come first, there corresponds the earthly body of the first man; as to the spiritual state, which comes second, there corresponds the heavenly body of the second Adam. This double correlation is natural; for the organ, the body, should be adapted to the mode of life of which it is the agent. And each of the two periods consecrated to these two modes of living was inaugurated by a typical individual who represented it in its entirety.

The epithet second is here intentionally substituted for last (1Co 15:45), because the point in question is no longer the final destination of man, but the relation of succession to the preceding phase. The , second, answers, as Meyer says, to the , afterwards, of 1Co 15:46. The qualifications: of the earth and earthy, belong both to the predicate: The first man is of the earth, earthy. The second term, , is added to show that it is in respect of the body that Paul thus speaks. The word or denotes the fine dust which lends itself most easily to become organic matter. This term, which is found nowhere else in the New Testament except in Mar 6:11 and Rev 18:19, is borrowed from the LXX.; Gen 2:7 : God formed man of the dust of the earth ( ). Because of the contrast, the second man will also be characterized in respect of the body.

The term , the Lord, which is added by the T. R. with some documents, after , has nothing corresponding in the former member; and in this context it naturally excites surprise. As it is wanting in the majority of the documents, it should be rejected from the text. The qualifying phrase from heaven corresponds at once to the two predicates of the foregoing sentence. In our ignorance as to what a heavenly body is, Paul could add no precise qualification regarding its nature to contrast with the expression: earthy.

The important question is to what time we should refer the regimen: from heaven. Does it refer to the fact of the incarnation, the coming of the heavenly Christ to the earth to complete the work of redemption? So Athanasius, Baur, Beyschlag, Edwards. Or should we apply this , from heaven, to the Advent, when the Lord will descend again in His glorified body to glorify the faithful? It is from the first interpretation that the Tbingen school have deduced their theory, according to which the pre-existing Christ was, in Paul’s view, a celestial man, the prototype of terrestrial humanity, possessing a luminous (spiritual) body. And thus this school has succeeded in finding an intermediate being between the purely human Christ of the synoptics and the wholly Divine Christ of St. John. But if such was Paul’s view, he must have changed his conception between our Epistles to the Corinthians and those of the Roman captivity (Colossians, Philippians), for in these he distinctly affirms the Divine state of the pre-existing Christ; he must even have changed it between our Epistle and the very near date when he composed the Epistle to the Romans, in which he ascribes to Jesus a body entirely similar to our sinful body (1Co 8:3), and therefore by no means celestial and luminous, but made of dust like ours. He must even have changed his view in the course of our Epistle, for in chap. 1Co 8:6 he ascribes to the pre-existing Christ the work of creation, and in 1Co 10:4 he identifies Him with the Lord guiding Israel in the cloud; declarations which it is impossible to harmonize with the conception of a Christ pre-existing as a celestial man. But above all, to refer these words to the fact of the incarnation, is to wrench them absolutely from the context. Gess rightly reminds us that everything here tends to the solution of the question: With what body do they come? a question which must of course be solved by the relation of the resurrection body, not to the body of the pre-existing, but to that of the risen Christ. As to the , from heaven, Gess justly quotes as parallels: 1Th 4:16 ( ) and 2Th 1:7 ( . . ), two passages which point to the Advent. But the parallel Php 3:20-21, is that which above all appears to me decisive in favour of this application in our passage. There, as here, the apostle is comparing our Lord’s glorified body as well as that of risen believers made like His, with our present body, which he calls the body of our humiliation; then he says expressly: Our citizenship is in heaven, whence we look for the Saviour, the Lord ( …); exactly our . Similarly the , the heavenly, 1Co 15:48, can only be Christ risen and glorified. For it is to Him we shall be made like, and not to the pre-existing Christ. The title , given in the same verse to glorified believers, would be enough to prove this. Finally, would it not be strange if Paul, after laying down the principle: first the inferior, then the better, should cite as an illustration of the rule an example which would prove exactly the contrary? For, according to this Christological theory, the heavenly Christ would be first and the earthly Christ second. Thus falls the one solitary ground which the Tbingen school has attempted to find in the whole of the New Testament in favour of the alleged Pauline conception of Christ as a pre-existing celestial man. A similar idea has been put forth as developed by Philo. In commenting on the double account of man’s creation, in Genesis, this philosopher lays down a distinction between man celestial and man terrestrial. Only, according to him the celestial is first and the terrestrial second, and that very naturally, because the former is a pure ideal belonging to the world of conceptions. It is thus obvious how far we are from the idea ascribed to Paul. As to the Rabbinical passages, which present similar expressions, they are probably much later than the first age of Christianity. Besides, did not the Old Testament lead men to compare the Messiah with Adam by way of contrast, even as with Moses by analogy?

After showing the law of 1Co 15:46 realized in the two heads, Paul applies it to the two humanities which proceed from them, and he thus reaches the conclusion relative to the resurrection-body of believers.

Fuente: Godet Commentary (Luke, John, Romans and 1 Corinthians)

The first man is of the earth, earthy: the second man is of heaven.

Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)

MORTAL, BUT DESIGNED FOR IMMORTALITY

47. The first man is from earth earthy, the second man is from Heaven.

48. As is the earthy, such also are they which are earthy; as is the Heavenly, such also are they who are Heavenly:

49. As we have borne the image of the earthy, so also we must bear the image of the Heavenly. These Scriptures clearly involve the conclusion that man was created out of earthly elements and mortal. However, the conclusion does not follow that he would have died if he had never sinned, because God had created the tree of life, the normal effect of whose fruit was to confer immortality. Hence, if they had never sinned, when they had been duly tried and tested and stood their earthly probation, guided by instinct or Providence, they would have had access to the tree of life, of whose fruit they were never forbidden to take. The effect of this fruit would have conferred immortality, i. e., ripened them for translation, which would have enabled them to fly away from this probationary world like Enoch and Elijah, and range ad libitum through the fenceless fields of glory, winging their flight from world to world. If sin had never entered, the race would have multiplied with great rapidity on the earth, pursuant to the mandate already given to multiply and replenish the earth; instead of getting old and dying, their families, well cognizant that their beloved parents we are ripening for glory, would have kept their eyes on them, like Elisha pursuing and watching Elijah, that he might see the last of him. Thus translation at the expiration of probation, which probably would have been a thousand and more years, was evidently the original economy. This conclusion is clearly involved from the fact that, as we live in these houses of clay bearing the image of the earthy, so are we to live in a glorified spiritual body, thus bearing the image of the Heavenly; in our case death supervened as a sanctified auxiliary under the redemptive scheme, which never would have been known if the original twain had sustained their probation. Still, however, having been created in the earthly image, they also would have passed by translation into the Heavenly.

Fuente: William Godbey’s Commentary on the New Testament

15:47 The first man [is] of the earth, {z} earthy: the second man [is] the Lord from {a} heaven.

(z) Wallowing in dirt, and wholly given to an earthly nature.

(a) As Adam was the first man, Christ is the second man; and these two are spoken of, as if they were the only two men in the world; because as the former was the head and representative of all his natural posterity, so the latter is the head and representative of all the spiritual offspring: and that he is “the Lord from heaven”; in distinction from the first man. (Ed.)

Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes

God formed Adam out of dust to live on this planet (Gen 2:7). Jesus Christ had a heavenly origin. However, Paul seems to have meant more than this since he compared two human beings, "the first Adam" and "the last Adam." His emphasis seems to have been that the first Adam was fitted for life in this age with natural life whereas the last Adam was fitted for life in the age to come with spiritual life. God equipped both to live in the realm that they would occupy. Similarly the bodies we inherit from Adam are for earthly existence. The bodies we will receive from Christ at our resurrection will be for living in the spiritual realm. Paul was not speaking of heavenly existence as distinct from life in hell but as spiritual in contrast with earthly.

"Each race has the attributes of its Head. As a consequence of this law . . . we who once wore the likeness of the earthly Adam shall hereafter wear that of the glorified Christ. What Adam was, made of dust to be dissolved into dust again, such are all who share his life; and what Christ is, risen and eternally glorified, such will be all those who share His life." [Note: Robertson and Plummer, p. 374.]

Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)