Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Corinthians 8:11
And through thy knowledge shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died?
11. shall the weak brother perish ] Some read, the weak brother is perishing. Cf. Rom 14:15.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
And through thy knowledge – Because you knew that an idol was nothing, and that there could be really no danger of falling into idolatry from partaking of these entertainments. You will thus be the means of deceiving and destroying him. The argument of the apostle here is, that if This was to be the result, the duty of those who had this knowledge was plain.
Shall the weak brother – The uninformed and ignorant Christian. That it means real Christian there can be no doubt. Because:
(1) It is the usual term by which Christians are designated – the endearing name of brother; and,
(2) The scope of the passage requires it so to be understood; see the note at Rom 14:20.
Perish – Be destroyed; ruined; lost; see the note at Joh 10:28. So the word apoleitai properly and usually signifies. The sense is, that the tendency of this course would be to lead the weak brother into sin, to apostasy, and to ruin. But this does not prove that any who were truly converted should apostatize and be lost; for:
(1) There may be a tendency to a thing, and yet that thing may never happen. It may be arrested, and the event not occur.
(2) The warning designed to prevent it may be effectual, and be the means of saving. A man in a canoe floating down the Niagara river may have a tendency to go over the falls; but he may be hailed from the shore, and the hailing may be effectual, and he may be saved. The call to him was designed to save him, and actually had that effect. So it may be in the warnings to Christians.
(3) The apostle does not say that any true Christian would be lost. He puts a question; and affirms that if one thing was done, another might follow. But this is not affirming that anyone would be lost. So I might say that if the man continued to float on toward the falls of Niagara, he would be destroyed. If one thing was done, the other would be a consequence. But this would be very different from a statement that a man had actually gone over the falls, and been lost.
(4) It is elsewhere abundantly proved that no one who has been truly converted will apostatize and be destroyed; see the notes at Joh 10:28; compare the note at Rom 8:29-30.
For whom Christ died – This is urged as an argument why we should not do anything that would tend to destroy the souls of people. And no stronger argument could be used. The argument is, that we should not do anything that would tend to frustrate the work of Christ, that would render the shedding of his blood vain. The possibility of doing this is urged; and that bare possibility should deter us from a course of conduct that might have this tendency. It is an appeal drawn from the deep and tender love, the sufferings, and the dying groans of the Son of God. If He endured so much to save the soul, assuredly we should not pursue a course that would tend to destroy it. If he denied himself so much to redeem, we should not, assuredly, be so fond of self-gratification as to be unwilling to abandon anything that would tend to destroy.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
1Co 8:11-13
And through thy knowledge shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died?
Suffering, the measure of worth
I. The weak brother is not of much value in himself; but he is made valuable by the fact that Christ died for him.
1. How much of themselves men will give for one another, measures the worth in which that other is held. I love you, may mean only you are my plaything, or I love myself; but true love will give up for anothers sake time and convenience. It will employ all the resources of its being for the sake of that friend. And when, in some great exigency, all this will not avail, then love, in the glory of its power, goes to death as to the consummation of itself, and leaves a witness to itself which all mankind recognises (Joh 15:13).
2. Even when this is the fruit of instinct, it is impressive. The bear that dies defending its cubs, the hound that pines and dies on its masters grave, the little sparrow that fights the hawk and owl, not for itself, but its nest–one must be heartless indeed to feel no admiration for these fidelities of love.
3. But how much more when ones love and suffering spring from a perception of excellence in an object loved? The greater the nature that suffers, the higher is the estimate which his example gives of that for which he suffers. And by this analogue, the suffering and sacrifice of a Divine Being carries out the witness to its utmost conceivable extent.
4. We see at once a new element in the hands of the apostles after this testimony of the Master. No sooner was He gone up than they began to preach that man was valuable on account of what Christ suffered for him. A man for whom Christ died became a very different creature from a man before Christ had died for him. The fact that Christ died for a man made him worth protecting if he was weak.
5. This suffering was not founded upon mans character. It would be a testimony to the value of good character if Christ had come to die for it; but that was the very point of conflict between Him and the Pharisees. They held that Christ ought to suffer and identify Himself with them; but He most scornfully rejected that, and said, I came not to call the righteous, but sinners. I came to give My life for the lowest and worst men. He more sharply than any other discriminated between good and bad character; yet there was something behind character to which Christ was bearing witness, viz., the abstract original value which inheres in human life. The death of Christ is a testimony to the value of man in his very substance, if I may so say; so that the least and the lowest have the essence of value in them.
II. The effect which this fact has of determining mans place, his rights, and his worth.
1. Consider what the worlds way of estimation has been in judging men. Earliest, men measured physical power. Now the habit of society is to classify men into relative ranks of value by the effects which they are able to produce; by what they are worth to society. Therefore, when a great man dies men say, The world has met with a great loss. If a poor man dies, men say, The world has one less incumbrance. The dog that hunts well is better than a pauper that does not do anything, in the estimation of men. If a race are not able to hold their own against aggressive peoples men say, There is no help for it; they must go. They judge men by the standard of political economy. There is no such contempt on the globe for anything as man has for man. We need therefore to go back to this testimony of our Masters example, who came by His suffering and death to bear a testimony of that element in human nature which every man has like every other.
2. This view interprets the future. A man in the lowest condition here is not the man that he is to be; and when you have measured and weighed him, you have not estimated what he is worth in the kingdom to come. He has before him another world; and we are told most solemnly by our Saviour that the men who are the most regarded here will be worth the least there. The first shall be last, the last first. Many of the plants of our northern summer come up quickly, and do exceedingly well; but they are coarse and rank at that. And there are many seeds that I plant by the side of them every spring, which in the first summer only grow a few leaves high. There is not sun enough to make them do what it is in them to do. But if I put them in some sheltered hot-house, and give them the continuous growth of autumn and winter, and then, the next summer, put them out once more, they gather strength by this second planting, and lift up their arms and spread out the abundance of their blossoms. The plants that grew quickest the year before, are now called weeds by their side. And I doubt not that there is many a man who rushes up to a rank growth in the soil of this world, and of whom men seeing him, say, That is a great man, but there are many poor, feeble creatures in this world who will be carried safely on and up, and rooted in a better clime; and then, lifting up their whole nature, they will come out into that glorious summer of fervent love in heaven, where they will be more majestic, more fruitful, than those who so far surpass them here.
III. The effects which this doctrine will have upon our feelings and conduct to our fellow-men.
1. Let us suppose that we are in full possession of the Christian feeling–Christ died for that man. It will be a powerful restraint upon lawless liberty, and will bring us into such sympathy with all our fellow men, that, at the sacrifice of our own convenience and rights, it will be a privilege and a pleasure for us to serve them. Some men go through life, saying, I will take care of myself, and you must take care of yourself; and they feel that they have a right to go through life thus. Now no one who has drunk deeply of the spirit of the Master will refuse to accept the injunction, We that are strong ought to bear the infirmities of the weak. It is as if a strong swimmer should turn back and lend a helping hand to buoy up and lift across the flood one that was weaker or less able to swim than himself. We have no right to disregard, much less to hinder, the welfare of any human being. Have I a right to go tramp, tramp, tramp, according to the law of my physical strength, among little children? If I have had better privileges than others, and have come to conclusions which they cannot understand, have I a right to scatter sceptical notions through society? A man is bound to hold his knowledge, his conscience, his pleasures, &c., subject to this great law: Christ died for men, and I must live for men, and restrain my power, and forego my rights, even for their sake. We have a right to employ men, of course; but there is a habit which prevails in society of thinking that a man has a right to just so much of his fellow-men as he is able to extract from them. A man may fleece a hundred men during the week, and take the communion on Sunday, and nobody thinks that there is any violation of good-fellowship or of orthodoxy. But that great law of fellowship which knits every man to every other man on the globe says not only Thou art his brother, but, Thou art responsible for his weal as well as thine own. Thou shalt not in any wise harm him.
2. This is one of the most precious of doctrines to those that look and long for a better period of the world. It was almost the only thing we could urge when slavery rent our land. The single strand that held against the storms of avarice and the fire of lurid lusts was the single argument, For these Christ died. And that held; and the most wonderful change toward regeneration that the world ever saw has taken place by the simple operation of that great law. And what have we now for the weak races? Men of a hard heart and an iron-shod foot are preparing to tread these people down and deny them their rights. And I take my stand by the side of every weak creature, whatever his nationality may be, and I say, For him Christ died. Give men at the bottom a chance to come up. God, the highest, bowed down His head and came upon the earth and suffered for the weakest and the worst.
3. Christian brethren, we must arm ourselves betimes. The seeds of a better public sentiment must be sown. Then let no man be discouraged because he is labouring with a very much neglected class. There is no material in this world which is un-promising. No man is beyond salvation since Christ died for him. (H. W. Beecher.)
But when ye sin so against the brethren, and wound their weak conscience, ye sin against Christ.—
Sin against Christ
It is a proof of the intimate character of the relation between Christ and His people that it should be the very climax of reproach against Christians because of any course they followed, to charge them with sin against Christ. Language like this could be used of no merely human teacher and leader. To act without due charity is a sin against Christ because it is–
I. To offend against Christs commandment, viz., to love one another. This was to be the test of Christian discipleship.
II. To contradict Christs example. What Christ enjoined He exemplified in His whole life, and at last in His death.
III. To injure Christ in the person of one of His little ones. Christ so identified Himself with His disciples as to regard what was done to them as done to Himself. Whosoever is indifferent to the welfare of the Lords servants, sins against the Lord Himself, and shall not be held guiltless. (Prof. J. R. Thomson.)
Wounding a weak conscience
I. What a weak conscience is.
1. Such a conscience is improperly called tender; for tenderness imports quickness and exactness of sense, which is the perfection of this faculty, whose duty it is to be a spiritual watch to give us warning of whatsoever concerns us. It is opposed to a hard or seared conscience; but a weak conscience is opposed to a strong, which very strength consists in the tenderness or quickness of its discerning power.
2. The weakness of conscience here spoken of is opposed to faith (Rom 14:2), by which is not meant that act by which a man is justified, but signifies the same with knowledge (1Co 8:7; 1Co 8:10). The clear discernment of what is unlawful, and what is only indifferent, together with a firm persuasion of the lawful use of such indifferent things, all circumstances being duly observed in the using of them. And therefore, on the other side, the weak conscience is such a one as judges otherwise of the nature of things than indeed it is, supposing that to be unlawful in itself which really is not so.
3. From whence it follows that weakness of conscience implies–
(1) An ignorance of the lawfulness of some certain thing or action. That ignorance must be such a one as is not willing.
(a) Because it must be such a one as renders it in some degree excusable; but so far as any defect is resolved into the will, it is in that degree inexcusable.
(b) Because it must be such an ignorance as renders the person having it the object of compassion.
But no man pities another for any evil lying upon him, which he would not help, but which he could not. And consequently it must be resolved into the natural weakness of the understanding faculty, or else the want of opportunities or means of knowledge. Either of which makes ignorance necessary, as it is impossible for him to see who wants eyes, and equally impossible for him who wants light.
(2) A suspicion of the unlawfulness of any thing or action.
(3) A religious abstinence from the use of that thing of the lawfulness whereof it is thus ignorant or suspicious. It brings a man to that condition in Col 2:21.
II. What it is to wound or sin against it.
1. To afflict or discompose it; i.e., to rob it of its peace. For there is that concernment for Gods honour dwelling in every truly pious heart which makes it troubled at the sight of any action by which it supposes God to be dishonoured. And as piety commands us not to offend God, so charity enjoins us not to grieve our neighbour.
2. To encourage or embolden it to act against its present judgment or persuasion: which is, in other terms, to offend, or cast a stumbling-block before it: i.e., to do something which may administer to it an occasion of falling or bringing itself under the guilt of sin. So that as the former was a breach upon the peace, this is properly a wound upon the purity of the conscience.
3. The conscience may be induced to act counter to its present persuasion.
(1) By example; which is the case here expressly mentioned, and principally intended.
(2) By command; as when a person in power enjoins the doing something, of the lawfulness of which a man is not persuaded. (R. South, D. D.)
Dissuasives against an undue use of Christian liberty
1. A weak conscience is easily wounded.
2. The infliction of such a wound is a violation of the law of love.
3. It is a sin against Christ Himself. (J. Lyth, D. D.)
Wherefore, if meat make my brother to offend, I will eat no flesh while the world standeth.—
The great argument for abstinence
I. Arguments for abstinence are often grounded on.
1. Danger to ourselves.
(1) We may be led to excess.
(2) We may injure ourselves, physically or morally.
2. Wastefulness.
3. Intrinsical wrongness.
II. Such arguments frequently lack cogency.
1. The third will have no application to a large class of things indifferent in themselves, and it is generally in respect of such that the war is waged.
2. The others are open to question. Conflicting facts will be adduced, and where knowledge is imperfect the contest is likely to continue. And the argument often acts as a temptation, for when human nature is warned of peril it often delights to show how brave and steadfast it can be.
III. The apostolic argument. St. Paul–
1. Enlarges the view so that others are included as well as ourselves. Abstinence is sometimes not for ourselves at all, but only for our fellows (Php 2:4). We are units, but united units. We cannot legislate for that little area which we ourselves occupy.
2. Recognises the influence of example. Our words are a spiders web; our acts are a cable. Men do what we show them, not what we tell them. And we cannot persuade men that we are strong and they weak.
3. Asserts the obligation of self-sacrifice for the welfare of others. That which is indifferent becomes anything but that if our indulgence is injurious to others. Our sacrifice is small indeed compared with their possible loss. This argument has special force for Christians.
(1) They have the example of self-sacrifice in their Master (verse 12). They have a more impressive view of the issues involved in the fall of a fellow-creature.
(2) Their non-abstinence may be a sin against a fellow-Christian (verse 11). The fall may be, not of an unbeliever, but of a brother associated in Christian fellowship and service, and thus be–
(3) A sin against the brethren (verse 12), i.e., the Church, bringing scandal and disgrace through a brothers fall. And also–
(4) A sin against Christ (verse 12). For Christ and Christians are one–He the Head and they the members.
(5) They have in their ears such utterances of their Masters as Mat 18:6; Mat 25:40. (W. E. Hurndall, M. A.)
Personal sacrifice is
I. Necessary.
1. Not only in meats and drinks, but in many other things.
2. To avoid offence.
II. Is obligatory–
1. On Christians.
2. By the law of love, and–
3. The example of Christ.
III. Is magnanimous. It is–
1. A conquest of self.
2. An act of benevolence.
3. A feature of renewed nature.
IV. Will be abundantly compensated.
1. By the approval of conscience.
2. The benefit of others.
3. The approbation of God.
4. Final reward. (J. Lyth, D. D.)
Abstaining for the good of others
Do you not think, dear friends, that though it may be quite proper for you to take a glass of wine or a glass of beer, and there is no sin in the thing at all, your example may be injurious to somebody to whom it would be a sin to take it? Perhaps some persons cannot take a glass without taking two, three, four, five, or six glasses. You can stop, you know; but if your example leads them to start, and they cannot stop, is it right to set them going? Though you have a clear head, and can stand in a dangerous place, I would not recommend you to go there if somebody else would thus be placed in danger. If I were walking by the cliffs of Dover, and I happened to have a very fine cool head, yet, if I had my sons with me, and I knew that they had ordinary kinds of heads, I should not like to go and stand just on a jutting piece of crag so as to induce them to try the same position. No; I should feel, Though I can stand here, you cannot; and if I stand here, perhaps you will attempt it, and fall, and I shall be guilty of your blood. Let us treat men as we would treat our sons; and let us be weak to their weakness, and deny ourselves for their sakes. Is not that good and proper reasoning? It seems to me that it is. If it is not good reasoning, it is safe. I never have asked God to forgive me for my sin in going without strong drink. I have never seen any commandment in Scripture showing that I am bound to take it. I feel free to do as I like about abstaining; but especially free when for the good of others I prefer to abstain altogether. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
Christian consideration for others
Now you may say to me if you please as a man, Mr. Gough, I am a moderate drinker; I use these things in moderation, and therefore I set you a good example. I say at once, Sir, you do not. Well, if I drink one glass and there stop, is not that an example for others? No, sir; no, sir; no more than if there was a bridge built over a gulf, to fall into which was utter ruin, and that bridge will bear 150 lbs., and you weigh 1501bs., and you say to that young man (and he weighs 200 lbs.), Follow my example.–I dont like the look of that bridge. Dont be a fool, I have walked it forty years; proved it perfectly safe; never cracked with me; never sprung with me; perfectly safe.–But I dont like it. Dont be foolish; you can do that which I can do; now I am setting you a good example; follow me step by step. That young man attempts to follow it; he sets his foot on the centre; crash! crash! down he goes, with a shriek, into destruction. Now, did you set a good example? No, because you didnt take into consideration the difference of weight. Before you can say to a young man, I set you a good example, you must take into consideration the difference between his temperament and yours, his susceptibility and yours. (J. B. Gough.)
.
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 11. Shall the weak brother perish] Being first taught by thy conduct that there was no harm in thus eating, he grieves the Spirit of God; becomes again darkened and hardened; and, sliding back into idolatry, dies in it, and so finally perishes.
For whom Christ died?] So we learn that a man may perish for whom Christ died: this admits of no quibble. If a man for whom Christ died, apostatizing from Christianity, (for he is called a brother though weak,) return again to and die in idolatry, cannot go to heaven; then a man for whom Christ died may perish everlastingly. And if it were possible for a believer, whether strong or weak, to retrace his steps back to idolatry and die in it, surely it is possible for a man, who had escaped the pollutions that are in the world, to return to it, live and die in its spirit, and perish everlastingly also. Let him that readeth understand.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Through thy knowledge, in this place, is, by occasion of thy knowledge. God hath not given people knowledge that they thereby should be a means to harm and to destroy, but to do good, and to save others; it is a most absurd thing for any to use their knowledge, therefore, to the destruction of others.
Shall the weak brother perish? By perish is here meant, be led into sin, by acting contrary to the judgment of his own conscience; for, (as the apostle saith, Rom 14:23): He that doubteth is damned if he eat, for whatsoever is not of faith, that is, done out of a firm persuasion in the party doing that it is lawful, is sin.
For whom Christ died; though he be weak, yet if he be a true believer, Christ died for him, and there can be nothing more contrary to the duty of a charitable Christian, than to be a means to damn him whom Christ came down from heaven and died for, that he might save him.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
11. shall . . . perishTheoldest manuscripts read “perisheth.” A single act seeminglyunimportant may produce everlasting consequences. The weak brotherloses his faith, and if he do not recover it, his salvation [BENGEL](Ro 14:23).
for whom Christ diedandfor whose sake we too ought to be willing to die (1Jo3:16). And yet professing Christians at Corinth virtually temptedtheir brethren to their damnation, so far were they from sacrificingaught for their salvation. Note here, that it is no argument againstthe dogma that Christ died for all, even for those who perish,to say that thus He would have died in vain for many.Scripture is our rule, not our suppositions as to consequences. Moreis involved in redemption than the salvation of man: the characterof God as at once just and loving is vindicated even in the caseof the lost for they might have been saved, and so even in their caseChrist has not died in vain. So the mercies of God’s providence arenot in vain, though many abuse them. Even the condemned shallmanifest God’s love in the great day, in that they too had the offerof God’s mercy. It shall be the most awful ingredient in their cupthat they might have been saved but would not: Christ died to redeemeven them.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And through thy knowledge,…. These words contain an aggravation of the sin such persons are guilty of, who are the means, by their example, of ensnaring weak minds, and causing them to stumble and fall, even in some sense so as to perish:
shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died? every word almost carries in it an exaggeration of this matter; it is not some slight injury that is done to the person, but even causing him to “perish”; and this is not said of any person, but a “brother”, to whom the strongest affection, and strictest regard, should be shown; and a “weak” brother, of whom the greater care should be taken; and therefore it is an instance of cruelty to do damage to such an one, and that not ignorantly, which cannot be pretended, but “through thy knowledge”; not through the true use, but abuse of it: those that have knowledge should know better, and improve it to the edification, and not the destruction of fellow Christians; and all this done in a case of indifference, that might as well be let alone, of which there was no necessity for the doing of it: but what aggravates most of all is, that this affects a person for “whom Christ died”; that he had such a value for as to purchase and redeem with the price of his own blood; and yet these men made so little account of, as by so trifling a thing to risk their good and welfare. Some would from hence conclude the doctrine of universal redemption, that Christ died for all men, even for them that perish; but it should be observed, that the words are put by way of interrogation, and prove no matter of fact, even supposing they could be understood of eternal ruin and destruction; and at most only imply the danger and possibility thereof through offences given, were they not preserved by the power and grace of God through Christ, who died for them, and so will not suffer them to perish; though this is no thanks to them who lay stumblingblocks in their way, and, as much as in them lies, cause them to perish, in this sense: besides, the “perishing” of this weak brother is to be understood of his peace and comfort, and is explained by “defiling” his conscience, 1Co 8:7 by wounding it, 1Co 8:12 and making him to offend, 1Co 8:13 through an imprudent use of Christian liberty in those who had the greater knowledge, and by a participation of things offered unto idols, in an idol’s temple, and not of his eternal damnation in hell; which could never enter into the apostle’s thought, as to be brought about hereby, as appears from 1Co 8:8 and so is no proof of Christ’s dying for such as perish eternally: for those for whom Christ has died, he has by his death procured such blessings for them, as a justifying righteousness, pardon of sin, peace with God, reconciliation unto him, and eternal salvation, which will for ever secure them from perishing in such sense.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Through thy knowledge ( ). Literally, in thy knowledge. Surely a poor use to put one’s superior knowledge.
Perisheth (). Present middle indicative of the common verb , to destroy. Ruin follows in the wake of such daredevil knowledge.
For whose sake Christ died (‘ ). Just as much as for the enlightened brother with his selfish pride. The accusative () with ‘ gives the reason, not the agent as with the genitive in 8:6 (‘ ). The appeal to the death (, second aorist active indicative of ) of Christ is the central fact that clinches Paul’s argument.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
Shall the weak brother perish [ ] . Not a question, as A. V. The participle “he that is being weak” indicates a continuance of the weakness, and the present tense, is perishing, implies that the process of moral undermining is in progress through the habitual indulgence of the better informed Christian. Rev., he that is weak perisheth.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) And through thy knowledge. (en te se gnosei) in or by thy knowledge – Though you know to eat the meat sacrificed to the idol will neither help nor hurt you – can you afford to do it?
2) Shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died? (apollutai gar ho asthenon ho adelphos di on christos apethanen) Shall the one being weak as a brother, perish or be destroyed in his testimony, on behalf of whom Jesus died? This rhetoric question is designed to assert that no child of God has a right to do anything that would cause another to stumble, even if the matter in question would not hurt him, personally – such as to dance, attend a theater, or go to a pool hall, etc.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
11. And thy brother perish Mark how serious an evil it is, that mankind commonly think so little of — that of venturing upon anything with a doubtful or opposing conscience. For the object to which our whole life ought to be directed, is the will of the Lord. This, therefore, is the one thing that vitiates all our actions, when we disregard it. (474) This we do, not merely by an outward action, but even by a thought of the mind, when we allow ourselves in anything in opposition to conscience, even though the thing be not evil in itself. Let us bear in mind, therefore, that whenever we take a step in opposition to conscience, we are on the high road to ruin.
I read, however, the sentence interrogatively, thus: Shall he perish through thy knowledge ? as though he had said: “Is it reasonable that thy knowledge should give occasion of ruin to thy brother? Is it for this reason that thou knowest what is right, that thou mayest cause another’s ruin!” He makes use of the term brother, in order to expose their pride as unfeeling, in this way: “It is true that the person whom you despise is weak, but still he is your brother, for God has adopted him. You act a cruel part, therefore, in having no concern for your brother.” There is, however, still greater force in what follows — that even those that are ignorant or weak have been redeemed with the blood of Christ; for nothing were more unseemly than this, that while Christ did not hesitate to die, in order that the weak might not perish, we, on the other hand, reckon as nothing the salvation of those who have been redeemed with so great a price. A memorable saying, by which we are taught how precious the salvation of our brethren ought to be in our esteem, and not merely that of all, but of each individual in particular, inasmuch as the blood of Christ was poured out for each individual!
(474) “ Quand nous entreprenons quelque chose center ceste saincte volonte;” — “When we attempt anything in opposition to that holy will.”
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(11) And through thy knowledge shall . . .Better, and by means of thy knowledge the weak one perishesthe brother for whom Christ died. It is not, as in the English version, a question, but it is the expansion and interpretation of the previous statement. There is a great variety of readings in the MSS., but the weight of evidence is in favour of this reading. Christ died for him. The sarcasm passes away in words of solemn and pathetic reproof. You wont give up your liberty for him. You will indulge yourself, and so prevent Christs death being his redemption. A sacrifice of conscience destroys spiritual life.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
11. And The Greek is for. This particle in Greek often refers to some omitted phrase, easily understood by the context. The true rendering, with the omitted phrase supplied, with the verb perish brought into its true present tense, and the spurious interrogation point removed, is this: [ Alas that it should be so, ] for the weak brother perishes by thy knowledge. See note on Rom 14:15.
Christ died A pathetic and forcible argument, drawn from the depths of Christian truth and Christian feeling, and possible for a Christian solely to adduce. Will you not suffer a privation in behalf of the soul for which Christ died?
1Co 8:11 . (“terrificum verbum,” Clarius) unfolds the meaning of the antiphrastic element of the preceding ., the introducing the answer (Hartung, I. p. 477; Klotz, a [1363] Devar. p. 240; Baeumlein, Part. p. 72), in which the apostle’s irony loses itself in the deep earnestness which underlies it: he is in truth utterly ruined , etc.
is meant here, as in Rom 14:15 , of destruction , the eternal to which a man becomes liable when he falls from the life of faith into that of sin through violation of his conscience. see on Rom 14:15 . Billroth, indeed, holds the here to be quite inexplicable, unless we take . simply in the sense of is led astray (but see the critical remarks); while Rckert declares the utterly useless. Nevertheless, . . [1364] makes it clear and unmistakeable how the case stands with the preceding ., so that is logically correct.
] belongs to .: by means of thy knowledge , so that it, through the use thou hast made of it, has occasioned this destruction. (see the critical remarks) would be: upon thy knowledge, so that it was the ground of what took place.
. . .] a weighty twofold motive for not bringing about such a result. Comp Rom 14:15 . The . . is frustrated by the .! Comp 1Co 8:12 . Bengel says well in reference to : “ut doceamur, quid nos fratrum causa debeamus.” Respecting , comp Rom 4:25 .
[1363] d refers to the note of the commentator or editor named on the particular passage.
[1364] . . . .
11 And through thy knowledge shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died?
Ver. 11. Thy weak brother perish ] Revolt to paganism, or at least pollute his conscience with mortal sin, which shall be set upon thy score? And hast thou not sins enough of thine own to answer for?
11. ] and (thus) the weak perishes (hereafter: see the parallel, ref. Rom. and note) in (as the element in which, he entering into it as his own, which it is not) thy knowledge, the brother, in whose behalf Christ died ? See again Rom. as above.
1Co 8:11 . “For the weak man [whom you talk of building up!] is being destroyed through thy knowledge the brother, on whose account Christ died!” (Rom 14:15 ). This affirms, with terrible emphasis, the issue implied by 1Co 8:10 : “est dificatio ruinosa” (Cv [1267] ). means (more than ) the man in a continued state of weakness. , “on the ground ( or in the sphere) of thy knowledge”; in this atmosphere the weak faith of the other cannot live ( cf. in 1Co 2:4 ; Eph 4:16 , ). His “knowledge” leaves the tempter inexcusable. “Notice the threefold darkness of the picture: there perishes, thy brother, for whom Christ died” (Bt [1268] ). Paul appeals to the strongest feelings of a Christian brotherly love and loyalty to Christ. For the prospective , cf. Rom 4:25 ; Christ’s death is thus frustrated of its dear object ( cf. Gal 2:21 ) by thy heartless folly!
[1267] Calvin’s In Nov. Testamentum Commentarii .
[1268] J. A. Beet’s St. Paul’s Epp. to the Corinthians (1882).
through = upon. App-104. The texts read “in”, Greek. en.
perish. Greek. apollumi. See 1Co 1:18.
for = on account of. App-104. 1Co 8:2.
Christ. App-98. This sentence is not a question.
11.] and (thus) the weak perishes (hereafter: see the parallel, ref. Rom. and note) in (as the element in which,-he entering into it as his own, which it is not) thy knowledge,-the brother, in whose behalf Christ died? See again Rom. as above.
1Co 8:11. , shall perish) He will lose his faith, and, if he do not recover it, his salvation, Rom 14:23. [See, what important results a single action may produce, although externally considered it seemed to be of little consequence.-V. g.]- , for [on account of] whom) For rather than instead of suits the passage before us; that we may be taught, what we ought to do for the sake of our brethren.-, died) prompted by the love, which thou so very little imitatest.
1Co 8:11
1Co 8:11
For through thy knowledge he that is weak perisheth, the brother for whose sake Christ died.-Through their knowledge that they might eat the flesh offered to an idol the weak brother perisheth. This shows that a thing not a sin in itself becomes sin when so done as to lead the weak ones into sin. We are held accountable for leading others into that which, in their ignorance and weakness, will prove their ruin.
Speaking more fully on this same subject, Paul says: If one of them that believe not biddeth you to a feast, and ye are disposed to go; whatsoever is set before you, eat, asking no question for conscience sake. But if any man say unto you, This hath been offered in sacrifice, eat not, for his sake that showed it, and for conscience sake: conscience, I say, not thine own, but the others; for why is my liberty judged by another conscience? If I partake with thankfulness, why am I evil spoken of for that for which I give thanks? Whether therefore ye eat, or drink, or whatsoever ye do, do all to the glory of God. Give no occasion of stumbling, either to Jews, or to Greeks, or to the church of God: even as I also please all men in all things, not seeking mine own profit, but the profit of the many, that they may be saved. (1Co 10:27-33). We are to do nothing that will lead others into sin; we are to do nothing that will defile the conscience of others; we are not to assert our rights when to do so will injure others; and we must deny ourselves things that would please us, to profit and save others. This is an important principle, far-reaching in its results, and embodies the essential principle of the Christian religion.
shall: 1Co 8:13, 1Co 10:33, 1Co 11:1, Rom 14:15, Rom 14:20, Rom 14:21, Rom 15:1-3
Reciprocal: Num 32:15 – ye shall Neh 5:8 – shall they Psa 73:15 – offend Eze 13:19 – to slay Mat 18:14 – one Luk 17:2 – one Joh 21:15 – lambs Rom 14:3 – despise Rom 14:5 – Let 1Co 1:5 – and in 1Co 5:11 – called Gal 2:18 – General
1Co 8:11. But as soon as he had done that, he would have that “guilty feeling” which defiled his conscience. He would perish; be in danger of condemnation for defiling his conscience, and it would be through the example of the stronger brother who had no conscientious objections to the meat.
1Co 8:11. for through thy knowledge he that is weak perisheth, the brother[1] for whose sake Christ died. It might seem that for here is inappropriate; but the thought is this:The wrong you thus do, through your uncalled-for exercise of liberty, is far greater than you think; for whoever is thus the means of leading a Christian brother to violate his conscience is helping so far to destroy his soul. Well might Olshausen say, in view of so affecting a statement, The worth of even the poorest, weakest brother could not be more emphatically expressed.
[1] Such is the correct reading here.
For through thy knowledge he that is weak perisheth, the brother for whose sake Christ died. [Paul here presents a new appeal, of unapproachable pathos and power. The world had never before heard any such reason why mercy should be shown to the weak.]
11. For he who is weak is destroyed by thy knowledge, the brother for whom Christ died.
1Co 8:11-12. Terrible and possible result of this edification, given as a dissuasive; and then expounded.
Perishes: see 1Co 1:18. A natural tendency, Paul represents as actual fact. For tendencies are sure to realize themselves sooner or later in facts. And this gives them their significance.
Through thy knowledge: melancholy result. If the strong man had not known that idols do not exist at all, the weak brother would not have been overcome by his example (an example the stronger because of his well-known knowledge) and led to eat that which he believed to be wrong, and thus made still weaker till he fell from Christ and fell into eternal death. Notice the three-fold darkness of this picture; there perishes, a brother, for whom Christ died. Same argument, Rom 14:15. This argument, 1Co 8:12 further expounds.
Thus: as expounded in 1Co 8:10-11.
Sin against: Mat 18:21.
The brothers; reproduces the argument lying in brother, 1Co 8:11.
Smiting their conscience: By leading them to do what their conscience disapproves, we create in them unintentionally a consciousness of having done wrong; and thus inflict upon them a blow in the inmost and most vital part of their being.
It being weak: and, therefore, liable to receive injury. A reason for caution on the part of the strong.
Against Christ: for by doing so we frustrate the purpose of His death. Cp. Mat 25:45; Mat 18:5.
8:11 {7} And through thy knowledge shall the weak brother perish, for whom Christ died?
(7) An amplification of the argument taken both of comparison and opposites: “You wretched man”, he says, “pleasing yourself with your knowledge which indeed is not knowledge, for if you had true knowledge, you would not sit down to eat food in an idol’s temple. Will you destroy your brother, hardening his weak conscience by this example to do evil, for whose salvation Christ himself has died?”
Paul explained what had taken place in such a situation. The knowledgeable Christian had by his knowledge of what he considered legitimate, and by acting on the basis of that knowledge alone, destroyed his brother’s relationship with God. "Ruined" seems strong, but Paul evidently anticipated the weaker brother returning to idolatry, the next step after participating in a feast in an idol temple. The apostle stressed the value of the weaker brother by referring to the fact that Christ died for him. Therefore the stronger brother dare not view him and his scruples as insignificant or unimportant.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)
Fuente: William Godbey’s Commentary on the New Testament
Fuente: Beet’s Commentary on Selected Books of the New Testament
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)