Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 1 Thessalonians 4:14
For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.
14. For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again ] The faith of a Christian man in its briefest and simplest form. So in Rom 10:9 the Apostle declares the faith that “saves” to be the belief of the heart that “God raised Jesus from the dead.” This involves everything else; it carries with it the conviction that Christ is Divine (Rom 1:4), and that His death brings “justification of life” for men (Rom 4:25). Such faith St Paul assumes, for himself and his readers, as a fundamental fact. He speaks of “Jesus,” thinking of Him in His human Person and in the analogy of His experience to our own. He is “Firstborn of many brethren, Firstborn out of the dead” (Rom 8:29; Col 1:18); and what we believe of Jesus, we may expect to see fulfilled in His brethren.
even so them also which sleep in Jesus ] Rather, which fell asleep. The verb is past (historical) in tense. The Apostle is looking back with his readers to the sorrowful event of their friends’ decease, that he may give them comfort; comp. 1Th 4:15.
in Jesus is in the Greek through Jesus, or more strictly, that fell asleep (possibly, were laid to sleep) through the Jesus just spoken of, Him “Who died and rose again.” For the force of the preposition, comp. 1Th 4:2 and note. The departed Thessalonian Christians had “fallen asleep;” for them Death was robbed of his terrors and transformed to Sleep. “Through Jesus” this came to pass the Jesus of their faith, the dying, risen Saviour! Trusting in His Name, remembering and realising what it meant, they had met the last enemy, and conquering their fears they “laid them down and slept.” Such is the power of this Name in the last conflict:
“Jesus! my only hope Thou art,
Strength of my failing flesh and heart!”
(Chas. Wesley’s Dying Hymn.)
them that fell asleep through Jesus, God will bring with Him. God (expressed with emphasis) is the Agent in their restoration, as in ch. 1Th 1:10 in the “raising” of “His Son from the dead.” He “Who raised up the Lord Jesus, will raise up us also with Jesus” (2Co 4:14; comp. Eph 1:19-20). But the Apostle does not say here “will raise them with Jesus,” it is not the resurrection of the dead that is in question, but their relation to the Parousia, their place in Christ’s approaching kingdom. Therefore he says: “God will bring them with Him,” they will not be forgotten or left behind when Jesus comes in triumph.
The argument of this verse is condensed and somewhat subtle. When the Apostle begins, “If we believe” &c., we expect him to continue, “so we believe that those who died will, by the power of Christ’s resurrection, be raised to life, and will return to share His glory.” But in the eagerness of his inference St Paul passes from the certainty of conviction in the first member of the sentence (“If we believe ”) to the certainty of the fact itself (“ God will bring them”) in the second. In the same eagerness of anticipation he blends the final with the intermediate stage of restoration, making the resurrection of Jesus the pledge not of the believer’s resurrection simply (as in 2Co 4:14), but of his participation in Christ’s glorious advent, of which His resurrection is the prelude (comp. ch. 1Th 1:10, “to wait for His Son from the heavens, Whom He raised from the dead,” and note). The union between Christ and the Christian, as St Paul conceives it, is such that in whatever Christ the Head does or experiences, He carries the members of His body with Him. The Christian dead are “the dead in Christ ” (1Th 4:16); they will therefore be in due course the risen and the glorified in Christ (2Th 1:12); comp. 2Ti 2:11, “If we died with Him, we shall also live with Him.” The point of the Apostle’s reasoning lies in the connection of the words “ died and rose again.” Jesus has made a pathway through the grave, and by this passage His faithful, fallen asleep, still one with the dying, risen Jesus, will be conducted, to appear with Him at His return.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again – That is, if we believe this, we ought also to believe that those who have died in. the faith of Jesus will be raised from the dead. The meaning is not that the fact of the resurrection depends on our believing that Jesus rose, but that the death and resurrection of the Saviour were connected with the resurrection of the saints; that the one followed from the other, and that the one was as certain as the other. The doctrine of the resurrection of the saints so certainly follows from that of the resurrection of Christ, that, if the one is believed, the other ought to be also; see the notes on 1Co 15:12-14.
Which sleep in Jesus – A most beautiful expression. It is not merely that they have calm repose – like a gentle slumber – in the hope of awaking again, but that this is in Jesus – or through ( dia) him; that is, his death and resurrection are the cause of their quiet and calm repose. They do not sleep in paganism, or in infidelity, or in the gloom of atheism – but in the blessed hope which Jesus has imparted. They lie, as he did, in the tomb – free from pain and sorrow, and with the certainty of being raised up again.
They sleep in Jesus, and are blessd,
How kind their slumbers are;
From sufferings and from sin released,
And freed from every snare.
When, therefore, we think of the death of saints, let us think of what Jesus was in the tomb of Joseph of Arimathea. Such is the sleep of our pious friends now in the grave; such will be our own when we die.
Will God bring with him – This does not mean that God will bring them with him from heaven when the Saviour comes – though it will be true that their spirits will descend with the Saviour; but it means that he will bring them from their graves, and will conduct them with him to glory, to be with him; compare notes, Joh 14:3. The declaration, as it seems to me, is designed to teach the general truth that the redeemed are so united with Christ that they shall share the same destiny as he does. As the head was raised, so will all the members be. As God brought Christ from the grave, so will he bring them; that is, his resurrection made it certain that they would rise. It is a great and universal truth that God will bring all from their graves who sleep in Jesus; or that they shall all rise. The apostle does not, therefore, refer so much to the time when this would occur – meaning that it would happen when the Lord Jesus should return – as to the fact that there was an established connection between him and his people, which made it certain that if they died united with him by faith, they would be as certainly brought from the grave as he was.
If, however, it means, as Prof. Bush (Anastasis, pp. 266, 267) supposes, that they will be brought with him from heaven, or will accompany him down, it does not prove that there must have been a previous resurrection, for the full force of the language would be met by the supposition that their spirits had ascended to heaven, and would be brought with him to be united to their bodies when raised. If this be the correct interpretation, then there is probably an allusion to such passages as the following, representing the coming of the Lord accompanied by his saints. The Lord my God shall come, and all the saints with thee. Zec 14:5. And Enoch, the seventh from Adam, prophesied of these, saying, Behold, the Lord cometh, with thousand of his saints; Jud 1:14. Who, says President Dwight (Serm. 164), are those whom God will bring with Him at this time? Certainly not the bodies of his saints … The only answer is, he will bring with him the spirits of just men made perfect.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
1Th 4:14
For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with Him
Christs resurrection and ours
I.
The event predicted. Will God bring with Him.
1. This is affirmed to meet the fear that God could not do so. The ground of their sorrow was that their departed friends would be deprived of the glories of Christs advent, which was thought to be near. Paul now assures them that the dead will share it as powerfully as the living.
2. The Thessalonians thus believed in Christs second coming. This was a subject often on our Lords lips, and is a prominent feature in this Epistle. It is kept in the background by many Christians to their disadvantage. Frequent thought about it is requisite to spirituality of mind. Paul says, Our conversation is in heaven, and his reason is from whence also we look for the Saviour. Heavenly mindedness is the drawing of self to Christ.
3. If God brings departed saints with Him, they are with Him now, otherwise He could not bring them. They are the general assembly of the first born; Spirits of just men made perfect; Absent from the body, present with the Lord. The New Testament again and again asserts that the saints after death go direct into Gods presence.
4. When departed spirits are brought by God they will know one another. It is amazing to suppose that we should know each other on earth and not in heaven; that we should have a less amount of perception as to each others character and identity there than here. If this be admitted the passage which was intended to comfort is a mockery. How could the Thessalonians be comforted by the coming of their deceased friends if they were not to know them? Read 1Th 2:19-20. How could Pauls converts be his crown of rejoicing if he was not to know them? The same doctrine is proved from the parable of the rich man and Lazarus and from the appearance of Moses and Elias at the Transfiguration.
II. Its certainty.
1. If we believe that Christ died and rose again it follows as a necessary consequence that those who sleep in Him He will bring with Him. Observe how everything is based on the death and resurrection of Christ; and in view of that it is no wonder that the first preachers were selected because they were witnesses of the resurrection.
(1) The object of Christs death was to redeem unto Himself a peculiar people. When God speaks of the results of that death as to its primary purpose, He says, He shall see His seed; He shall see of the travail of His soul and be satisfied.
(2) The object of the resurrection was to be the guarantee that the work of redemption was accomplished, and to be the first fruits of its accomplishment; to be followed by its proper results, a harvest. So that if we believe these two facts, i.e., that Christ finished the whole work that the Father gave Him to do, we must believe that the Father will fulfil His covenant part of the transaction and give to Christ the seed, and that the seed shall be perfected and glorified. To this it is necessary that He should bring the spirits of the saints to meet their bodies, which is the assertion of Paul here.
2. It follows, also, that the Church being thus perfected in herself must also be perfected in her circumstances. Father I will also that those whom Thou gavest Me be with Me, etc. (1Th 2:17).
III. Its object and purpose. The reunion of the saints–
1. With their bodies.
2. With their friends.
3. With Christ, body and soul.
Conclusion: The passage is full of comfort, but there is a tremendous limitation in it. It refers exclusively to those who sleep in Christ and those who are living in Him when He comes. Are you in Christ? (C. Molyneux, M. A.)
Christs resurrection the pledge of ours
At our birth our bodies became a battleground between life and death. During the first ten years death makes many conquests. At ten years death begins to fall back. At twenty, life is triumphant. At thirty, life foresees the future. At forty, the battle is hot. At fifty, death inflicts some wounds, and life begins an orderly retreat. At sixty, life feels her strength failing. At seventy, the retreat becomes a rout. At eighty, death waves the black flag and cries, No quarter! This is no fancy picture; it is no preachers dream; it is a fact undeniable, inevitable, universal! Indifference cannot affect its certainty, and scepticism cannot refute its truth. There is only one other fact with which we can confront this fact of death, and that is the resurrection of Jesus. Here fact meets fact. That is what we demand. We want a fact, a case, an instance, one single instance of resurrection. Once a sea captain found his crew on shore apparently dead. The surgeon took one of the men and applied remedies, and the poisoned man stood on his feet. The captain shouted with joy, for in that one risen man he saw the possibility to save them all. So Christ brings life and immortality to light. His resurrection is not metaphysics, but history. Not speculation for the future, but a fact of the past. Not a problem to be solved, but the solution of all problems. (R. S. Barrett.)
The certainty and blessedness of the resurrection of true Christians
I. What is meant by those that sleep in Jesus.
1. Sleep is a metaphor used by sacred and profane writers. The ancient Christians called their place of burial Koimetrion sleeping place. The figure is applied to the death of the wicked, but more frequently to that of the righteous (Isa 57:2). Fitly is death so called as signifying rest (Rev 14:13), and as preparatory to waking.
2. Death is called a sleeping in Jesus in conformity with 1Co 15:18; 1Co 15:23; 1Th 4:16; Heb 11:13. To sleep in Christ, to be Christs, to die in Christ, to die in the faith, all mean the same; to die in the state of true Christians as to be in Christ (Joh 15:4; Rom 13:1), means to be a Christian. And it is observable that we share all Christs acts–die, rise, ascend, etc. with Him.
3. Some think that this is the sleep of the soul, but, on the contrary, Scripture applies the figure invariably to the body (Dan 12:2; Mat 27:52; Act 13:36); and it is inconsistent with those passages which clearly affirm the soul to be awake (Luk 16:22-23; Luk 23:43; Php 1:23; 2Co 5:6).
II. What is meant by Gods bringing with Him them that sleep in Jesus.
1. The death and resurrection of Christ are an argument and proof of ours. Christs death is mentioned as part of the argument because the truth of the miracle of the resurrection depends upon it. If Christ did not die He could not have risen. The resurrection is shown in 1Co 15:20 to be the pledge and first fruits of ours. And that Christ intended to lay great stress upon this argument, appears in that He foretold it so often as the great sign He would give to the Jews to confute their infidelity (Joh 2:18-19; Mat 12:39-40). Christs resurrection gives us satisfaction in general of immortality, and then of His power to raise us because He raised Himself. And then it assures us of His truth and fidelity that He will perform what He promised. He could not have promised anything more improbable than His own resurrection; and, therefore, since He kept His word in this, there is no reason to distrust Him in anything else that He has promised (Rev 1:18; Rev 3:14).
2. Wherein the blessedness of the just shall consist.
(1) In the mighty change which shall be made in our bodies and the glorious qualities with which they shall be invested.
(a) Equal to the angels in immortal duration, and children of God in the perfect possession of His happiness (Luk 20:35-36).
(b) Fashioned like unto the glorious body of Christ (Php 4:20).
(c) 1Co 15:35, etc.).
(2) In the consequent happiness of the whole man, the body purified from frailty and corruption, and the soul from sin, and both admitted to the sight and enjoyment of the ever-blessed God (Rev 21:2-4; Rev 21:27; Rev 22:3-4). (Abp. Tillotson.)
The dead Christ and sleeping Christians
I. Jesus died that we might sleep. The thought is that He, though sinless, died like a sinner. He took the place of a sinner; was treated as a sinner as far as possible without sinning. He became what we sinners are, that we, the sinners, as far as possible, might become what He, the Righteous, is. Jesus died, then; His disciples sleep. Jesus spake of Lazarus sleeping, but never referred to His own death as sleep: that was not sleep, but death in its utter awfulness. The sting of death, He felt it; the victory of death, He yielded to it; the curse of death, He bore it; the desolation of death, He endured it; the darkness of death, He dreaded it. O death! where is thy sting? O grave! where is thy victory? were not words of our blessed Saviour, though they may be of the blessed dead.
II. If we believe that Jesus rose from the dead, we may also believe that those who sleep in Jesus, God will bring with Him. So far as we loved them, we may love them as ever, as we shall yet behold them perfect in Jesus, without a semblance of sin, pure as He is pure. When He died, His sorrows were over, His work was done. And observe a remarkable fact–the body of the Redeemer was preserved from every indignity after the spirit had departed. Up to the moment of His death, He was subjected to every outrage. He was like the sinner; He was acting for the sinner; He was suffering for the sinner; and, while He was a consenting party, every indignity was heaped upon Him. But from the moment His spirit left His body, every honour was done to Him. His body, after His resurrection, was very unlike His body previously–it was a spiritual body, invisible, and passing when and where it would and doing what it would. That body will be the model of our bodies; and the prime thought of St. Paul is–He will bring our friends to us again, and we shall know them, and be with them forever with the Lord. (A. Lind, D. D.)
Resting on Gods Word
A pastor in visiting a member of his church found her very sick, apparently dying. He said to her: Mrs. M., you seem to be very sick. Yes, said she, I am dying. And are you ready to die? She lifted her eyes upon him with a solemn and fixed gaze, and, speaking with great difficulty, she replied: Sir, God knows–I have taken Him–at His word–and–I am not afraid to die. It was a new definition of faith. I have taken Him at His word, What a triumph of faith! What else could she have said that would have expressed so much in so few words?
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 14. For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again] . Seeing that we believe; knowing that the resurrection of Christ is as fully authenticated as his death.
Even so them] It necessarily follows that them who sleep-die, in him-in the faith of the Gospel, will God bring with him-he will raise them up as Jesus was raised from the dead, in the same manner, i.e. by his own eternal power and energy; and he will bring them with him-with Christ, for he is the head of the Church, which is his body.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
As in the former verse the apostle made use of the hope of the resurrection, as an argument against immoderate sorrow, so here he proves the resurrection by Christs rising again, &c.
For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again; he supposeth they did believe that Christ died and rose again; it was that which he had taught them, and which they had received, as being the two first and fundamental points of the Christian faith, without which they could not have been a church of Christ.
Question. But how doth Christs resurrection prove the resurrection of the saints? He being the eternal Son of God, might have a privilege above all.
Answer. This first shows the thing is possible, God hath already done it in Christ.
2. Christ rose for our justification, Rom 4:25; and in justification sin is pardoned which brought in death, and which alone by its guilt can keep under the dominion of death.
3. Christ rose not as a private person, but as the Head of the body, his church, Eph 1:4,20, &c., and so loosed the bands of death, and conquered the grave, for his people.
4. As the first-fruits, 1Co 15:20, which was a pledge and assurance of the whole harvest to follow.
5. God hath predestinated the elect, whom he foreknew, to be conformed to the image of his Son, Rom 8:29.
6. He is not complete without them, Eph 1:23.
Lastly: They sleep in Jesus, as the text speaks; not only live but die in him, Rev 14:13, their union remains with Christ even in death.
Even so them also which sleep in Jesus; by which words also the apostle distinguisheth believers from all others; it is only they shall have the privilege of this blessed resurrection who sleep in Jesus. And perseverance in Christ to the end is here also intimated.
Will God bring with him; and though their resurrection is not expressed in the text, yet it is implied in this saying. By God is meant, as some understand here, the Son of God, who is to come from heaven, 1Th 1:10, and who will bring the spirits of just men, made perfect in heaven, with him, and unite them to their bodies, which cannot be done without their resurrection: whereby the apostle gives another argument against excessive sorrow for the saints departed, they shall return from heaven again with Christ at his coming. Others understand it of God the Father, who will raise the dead, and then bring them to his Son, and bring them with him to heaven. Those that read the text, those that sleep, or die, for Jesus, and so confine it only to martyrs, restrain it to too narrow a sense.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
14. For ifconfirmation of hisstatement, 1Th 4:13, that theremoval of ignorance as to the sleeping believers would removeundue grief respecting them. See 1Th4:13, “hope.” Hence it appears our hope rests onour faith (“if we believe”). “As surely as weall believe that Christ died and rose again (the very doctrinespecified as taught at Thessalonica, Ac17:3), so also will God bring those laid to sleep byJesus with Him (Jesus).” (So the order and balance of themembers of the Greek sentence require us to translate).Believers are laid in sleep by Jesus, and so will be brought backfrom sleep with Jesus in His train when He comes. The disembodiedsouls are not here spoken of; the reference is to the sleepingbodies. The facts of Christ’s experience are repeated in thebeliever’s. He died and then rose: so believers shall die and thenrise with Him. But in His case death is the term used, 1Co 15:3;1Co 15:6, c. in theirs, sleep;because His death has taken for them the sting from death. The sameHand that shall raise them is that which laid them to sleep.“Laid to sleep by Jesus,” answers to “dead in Christ”(1Th 4:16).
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
For if we believe that Jesus died, and rose again,…. As every Christian does, for both the death and resurrection of Christ are fundamental articles of faith; nothing is more certain or more comfortable, and more firmly to be believed, than that Christ died for the sins of his people, and rose again for their justification; on these depend the present peace, joy, and comfort of the saints, and their everlasting salvation and happiness: and no less certain and comfortable, and as surely to be believed, is what follows,
even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him. The saints that are dead are not only represented as asleep, as before, but as “asleep in Jesus”; to distinguish them from the other dead, the wicked; for the phrase of sleeping in death is promiscuously used of good and bad, though most commonly applied to good men: and so say the Jews c,
“we used to speak of just men, not as dead, but as sleeping; saying, afterwards such an one fell asleep, signifying that the death of the righteous is nothing else than a sleep.”
To represent death as a sleep makes it very easy and familiar; but it is more so, when it is considered as sleeping in Jesus, in the arms of Jesus; and such as are asleep in him must needs be at rest, and in safety: some join the phrase “in”, or “by Jesus”, with the word bring, and read the passage thus, “them that are asleep, by Jesus will God bring with him”; intimating, that God will raise up the dead bodies of the saints by Christ, as God-man and Mediator; and through him will bring them to eternal glory, and save them by him, as he has determined: others render the words, “them which sleep through”, or “by Jesus”; or die for his sake, and so restrain them to the martyrs; who they suppose only will have part in the first resurrection, and whom God will bring with Jesus at his second coming; but the coming of Christ will be “with all his saints”; see 1Th 3:13 wherefore they are best rendered, “them that sleep in Jesus”; that is, “in the faith of Jesus”, as the Arabic version renders it: not in the lively exercise of faith on Christ, for this is not the case of all the saints at death; some of them are in the dark, and go from hence under a cloud, and yet go safe, and may be said to die, or sleep, in Jesus, and will be brought with him; but who have the principle, and hold the doctrine of faith, are, and live and die, true believers; who die interested in Christ, in union with him, being chosen and blessed, and preserved in him from everlasting, and effectually called by his grace in time, and brought to believe in him; these, both their souls and bodies, are united to Christ, and are his care and charge; and which union remains in death, and by virtue of it the bodies of the saints will be raised at the last day: so that there may be the strongest assurance, that such will God bring with him; either God the Father will bring them with his Son, or Jehovah the Son will bring them with himself; he will raise them from the dead, and unite them to their souls, or spirits, he will bring with him; the consideration of which may serve greatly to mitigate and abate sorrow for deceased friends.
c Shebet Juda, p. 294. Ed. Gent.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
For if we believe ( ). Condition of first class, assuming the death and resurrection of Jesus to be true.
In Jesus ( ). Literally, through or by means of Jesus. It is amphibolous in position and can be taken either with (that are fallen asleep in or through Jesus) like in 1Co 15:18 and probably correct or with (through Jesus with God).
With him ( ). Together with Jesus. Jesus is the connecting link () for those that sleep ( first aorist passive, but with middle sense) and their resurrection.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
Them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him [ ] .
(1) Which sleep should be, which have been laid asleep or have fallen asleep, giving the force of the passive.
(2) Dia tou Ihsou can by no possibility be rendered in Jesus, which would be ejn Ihsou : see 1Co 14:18; 1Th 4:16. It must mean through or by means of Jesus.
(3) The attempt to construe dia tou Ihsou with touv koimhqentav those who have fallen asleep by means of Jesus, gives an awkward and forced interpretation. It has been explained by supposing a reference to martyrs who have died by Jesus; because of their faith in him. In that case we should expect the accusative, dia ton Ihsoun on account of or for the sake of Jesus. Moreover Paul is not accentuating that idea. Koimhqentav would be universally understood by the church as referring to the death of Christians, so that by Jesus would be superfluous.
(4) Dia tou Ihsou should be construed with axei will bring. Rend. the whole : them also that are fallen asleep will God through Jesus bring with him. Jesus is thus represented as the agent of the resurrection. See 1Co 14:21; Joh 5:28; Joh 6:39, 44, 54. Bring [] is used instead of ejgeirei shall raise up, because the thought of separation was prominent in the minds of the Thessalonians.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “For if we believe” lei gar pisteuomen) “For if we believe or trust,” Unlike some Corinth members, the Thessalonian brethren did not doubt the second coming of Christ, 1Co 15:17-18; 1Th 1:10; 1Co 15:16-21.
2) “That Jesus died and rose again” (hoti lesous apethemen kai aneste) “That Jesus died and rose (up) again”; This is an essential element of the gospel, belief, in which is necessary to ones receiving salvation, 1Co 15:1-4; Act 2:24; Act 4:10; Act 10:40.
3) “Even so them also which sleep in Jesus” (houtos kai tous koimethentas dia tou lesou) “Even so those having slept through Jesus or those having come to the sleep of death in Jesus”; It is the bodies of saints that sleep in death, not the soul that sleeps. The souls of redeemed saints will Jesus bring with him to their own resurrection bodies, Mat 27:51; 1Co 15:38; 1Co 15:52; 1Co 15:57.
4) “Will God bring with him,” (ho theos aksei sun auto) “The God will bring with him”; 1Co 15:20-23; Rom 8:11; 2Th 1:10 indicate that Jesus will come “to be glorified in his saints”, referring to the glorified saints, in their resurrection bodies, and in the Church, his special church saints, the Bride, 2Co 11:1-2; Eph 3:21; Rev 19:7-9; Mat 25:6-13.
While the first resurrection had its beginning, (1) when Jesus was raised from the dead, (2) was continued when others (saints) came forth from the graves, and walked in the streets of Jerusalem, and (3) those bodies of saints still in the grave at His coming shall be raised, and (4) we (of the church) who are alive shall be caught up with them, yet 5) the last ones raised shall be just before the Millennial begins, 1Co 15:23; Mat 27:52-53; 1Th 4:16; 1Th 4:17; 1Th 2:14; Rev 20:4-5.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
14 For if we believe. He assumes this axiom of our faith, that Christ was raised up from the dead, that we might be partakers of the same resurrection: from this he infers, that we shall live with him eternally. This doctrine, however, as has been stated in 1Co 15:13, depends on another principle — that it was not for himself, but for us that Christ died and rose again. Hence those who have doubts as to the resurrection, do great injury to Christ: nay more, they do in a manner draw him down from heaven, as is said in Rom 10:6
To sleep in Christ, is to retain in death the connection that we have with Christ, for those that are by faith ingrafted into Christ, have death in common with him, that they may be partakers with him of life. It is asked, however, whether unbelievers will not also rise again, for Paul does not affirm that there will be a resurrection, except in the case of Christ’s members. I answer, that Paul does not here touch upon anything but what suited his present design. For he did not design to terrify the wicked, but to correct (578) the immoderate grief of the pious, and to cure it, as he does, by the medicine of consolation.
(578) “ Mais seulement de corriger ou reprimer;” — “But merely to correct or repress.”
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
Text (1Th. 4:14)
14 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also that are fallen asleep in Jesus will God bring with him.
Translation and Paraphrase
14.
For since we believe that Jesus died and rose (again from the dead, we have the assurance that) in the same manner (as God raised up Jesus) God will also through Jesus (and the salvation Jesus provides) bring those who have fallen asleep (into eternal life and glory) with him (that is, with Jesus).
Notes (1Th. 4:14)
1.
Although Paul begins this verse by saying, If we believe that Jesus died and rose again, we must not think for a moment that Paul doubted that Jesus died and rose again. While our version uses the word, If, to begin the sentence, the Greek construction (ei. w. indic.) is one which is used when one wished to assume that what he said was true.
2.
The evidence that Jesus did rise from the dead is overpowering. He was seen alive after his death and resurrection on at least ten occasions, over a period of fifty days, by as many as five hundred people at once. We must believe that Jesus arose, if we expect to be saved. Rom. 10:9. See also Rom. 4:25.
3.
The phrase, sleep in Jesus, is literally translated those who have fallen asleep through Jesus.
This phrase, through Jesus, should probably not be connected with asleep but with God bringing them.
We say this because the Devil has the power of death. Heb. 2:14. And it is therefore not likely that Paul meant to say that Christians fall asleep through the work of Jesus. Rather, Paul surely meant that through Jesus (and the salvation He provides) God will bring those who have fallen asleep back from the dead with Jesus.
The Revised Standard Version renders this clearly: For since we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so, through Jesus, God will bring with him those who have fallen asleep.
4.
1Co. 15:12If Christ be preached that he rose from the dead, how say some of you that there is no resurrection of the dead? The fact that Jesus arose never to die again is a proof that we also can rise from the dead. The fact that Jesus promised that He would resurrect the dead, combined with the power He exhibited when He arose Himself, makes us absolutely confident that there will be a resurrection of the dead, both of the just and unjust, Act. 24:15; Joh. 5:28-29.
5.
The word sleep in this verse is an aorist (a kind of past tense) passive participle, and is probably best rendered those who have fallen asleep, rather than as them which sleep, Concerning the use of the word sleep to describe death, see notes on 1Th. 4:13, par. 4.
Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series
(14) For if . . .A reason for thinking that if the Thessalonians knew and believed the truth, they ought not to be so miserable. The if implies no doubt: if we believe (as we do), then, &c.merely clearing the ground for a logical deduction. The writer does not care to prove so well-known a fact as the resurrection of Christ; he only argues from the clear faith of the Thessalonians with regard to it.
Jesus died and rose again.Notice the human name; for though it is true that as God He raised Himself (Joh. 10:18), as man He was no less dependent upon the Father than we are (Act. 17:31): therefore His resurrection is a real argument for ours. And the two verbs are put together because of their contrarietyreally died a human death, and yet rose again.
Even so.The structure of the clauses is not quite regular. We should have expected either the omission of we believe that in the first, or the insertion of it in the second: it makes the statement of the second, however, more direct or authoritative.
Which sleep in Jesus.Rather, which were laid to sleep through Jesus. The meaning of the preposition, however, is not widely different from in. The simpler words in Rev. 14:13 mean dying in full communion still with Him. Our present phrase makes Him, as it were, the way, or door, by which they journeyed to death: He surrounded them as they sank to rest (Comp. Joh. 10:9.) Additional sweetness is imparted to the phrase by the use of the metaphor of sleep; but it is, perhaps, too much to say, as Dean Alford does, that falling asleep is here contrasted with dying, in this sense:Who through the power of Jesus fell asleep instead of dyingfor the word is even used of a judicial punishment of death in 1Co. 11:30.
Will God bring with himi.e., with Jesus. In the Greek the word God stands in an unemphatic positionEven so will God bring, implying that it was God also who had raised Jesus from the dead. But St. Paul is not content with saying, Even so will God raise those who passed through Christ to death. The thought of the Advent is so supreme with him that he passes at once to a moment beyond resurrection. If the question be asked from whence God will bring the dead along with Christ, it must be answered, from Paradise, and the persons brought must be the disembodied spirits; for in 1Th. 4:16 this coming of the Lord with the saints is the signal for the deadi.e., the bodiesto rise. It must be owned, however, that this manner of speaking is unusual. Jesus is no longer in Paradise, for the spirits to be brought thence with Him; and one would have expected something more like bringing up (Heb. 13:20), as it is always considered a descent into hell or Paradise. Because of this difficulty (which however is more in form than reality), some take the words to mean, God will lead them by the same path with Christi.e., will make their whole career (including resurrection) conform with His, comparing the same verb in Rom. 8:14; Heb. 2:10.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
14. Jesus died Both here and in 1Co 15:3, Paul says died of Christ; but sleep of the saints. An indication that in accordance with the spirit of Christianity he sees in sleep a thought of the waking. Even with hopeful pagans this emblem was used. A Greek epitaph says, “He sleeps; say not the good can die.” Our Lord in Joh 11:11, and other places, naturalized this language in Christianity. The Catacombs, those cities of the dead saints of the first centuries, cut beneath the surface of the earth in the soft rock, are made morally luminous by the spirit of purity and hopefulness pervading the epitaphs. The image of hopeful sleep is predominant. “Zoticus hic ad dormiendum Zoticus here laid to sleep; Dormitio Elpidis The sleeping place of Elpis; Dormivit et Requiescit He has slept and is at rest.” Catacombs, p. 430. The true life and glory of the spirit above, as contrasted with the corpse and sepulchre, are thus indicated: “She departed, desiring to ascend to the ethereal light of heaven.” “Here sleeps in the sleep of peace the sweet and innocent Severianus, whose spirit is received into the light of the Lord.” “Here rests in the sleep of peace Mala. Received into the presence of God.” Catacombs, pp. 427, 8. These passages record the testimony of the early Church. 1. To the essential distinction of body and soul; the duality of man’s constituted nature: 2. To the supernal existence of the soul above, while the body lies in the tomb below; a denial of the sleep of the soul: 3.
To the resurrection of the same body; as the body that wakes is the same body that sleeps.
Sleep in Or rather, through Jesus. But how can the saints be said to be dead through Christ. Most commentators seem to think it to be too refined to make Paul say that their death is made to be a sleep through Jesus. They, therefore, connect through with bring, and read, God will, through Jesus, bring them with him; bring them, that is, from the grave into resurrection. But Alford argues, that inasmuch as sleep is spoken of Christian death alone, Paul truly means that so blessed a distinction is through Christ. Wordsworth plausibly renders it, “those who have been laid asleep, sommo compositos, through Jesus.”
Will bring That is, from their graves, back to us, which are alive.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so those also who are fallen asleep through Jesus will God bring with Him.’
Paul’s solution is simple. Jesus died and rose again. He defeated death (1Co 15:52-55). He has therefore the power to give life to the dead (Joh 5:25-29). Thus the dead in Christ will rise prior to His royal visit and will come with Him (see 1Th 3:13).
The ‘if’ does not express doubt about their faith, it distinguishes between them and the unbelievers among whom they live. It is the equivalent of ‘because’ while also stirring up their faith within them.
Note that Jesus did not ‘sleep’, He ‘died’. It is because Jesus died that the saints only sleep. It was through His death that resurrection was made possible. Jesus’ death when spoken of directly is always described as death.
‘Those who are fallen asleep through Jesus will God bring with Him.’ Or more literally, ‘even so God the fallen asleep ones through Jesus will bring with Him’. To fall asleep in Christ is to be ‘safe in the arms of Jesus’. Because they are in Him they will rise again. And when He comes again God will bring them with Him. The use of the name Jesus without the accompanying Lord makes it possible to see ‘God’ as signifying the Godhead. All the Godhead were involved in the first coming of Jesus, and will be involved with this coming of the resurrected saints (people of God).
‘Through Jesus.’ This may be attached to ‘those who are fallen asleep’ or to ‘God’. In the first case it may be confirming the fact that it is through Jesus’ work on the cross that their death is only sleep. In the second it is signifying that the resurrected people of God can accompany Jesus at His coming because God was able to bring it about through what Jesus had done on the cross and by His resurrection. The former seems more probable because of the construction of the sentence, and because it is necessary to distinguish which sleeping ones are meant, but both are true.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
1Th 4:14. Which sleep in Jesus The state of the bodies of the pious dead in their graves is not only here, but in many other passages of scripture, described as a short sleep, compared with that eternal life into which they shall awake in the morning of the resurrection. This 14th verse ought to be read in a parenthesis, it being a repetition of what the Apostle had more fully instructed them in before. The resurrection of Christ was the grand fact upon which the whole Christian religiondepended; and with it, the resurrection of mankind in general, but more especially of the just, was joined in the closest connection. This is what the Apostle elsewhere shews at large; here he only reminds the Thessalonians of it in a short parenthesis, and passes on to the further discovery mentioned in the preceding note.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
1Th 4:14 . Reason not of , but of . The Thessalonians were not to mourn, for Christ has risen from the dead; but if this fact be certain, then it follows that they also who are fallen asleep, about whom the Thessalonians were so troubled, will be raised. There lies at the foundation of this proof, which Paul uses as a supposition, the idea that Christ and believers form together an organism of indissoluble unity, of which Christ is the Head and Christians are the members; consequently what happens to the Head must likewise happen to the members; where that is, there these must also be. Comp. already Pelagius: Qui caput suscitavit, etiam caetera membra suscitaturum se promittit. From the nature of this argument it is evident (1) that those who are asleep, about whom the Thessalonians grieved, must already have been Christians; (2) that their complete exclusion from the blessed fellowship with Christ was dreaded. [54]
] for if we believe . is not so much as “ quum , since, because” (Flatt), also not equivalent to quodsi : “for as we believe” (Baumgarten-Crusius), but is here, as always, hypothetical. But since Paul from the hypothetical protasis, without further demonstrating it, immediately draws the inference in question, it is clear that he supposes the fact of the death and resurrection of Christ as an absolute recognised truth, as, indeed, among the early Christians generally no doubt was raised concerning the reality of this fact. For even in reference to the Corinthian church, among whom doubts prevailed concerning the resurrection of the dead, Paul, in combating this view, could appeal to the resurrection of Christ as an actual recognised truth; comp. 1Co 15:12-23 .
The apodosis, 1Th 4:14 , does not exactly correspond with the protasis. Instead of . . . we should expect , , or .
] is not pleonastic as the mere sign of the apodosis (Schott, Olshausen); also not, with Flatt, to be referred to , and then to be translated “in such a condition, i.e. raised, revived;” or to be interpreted as “then under these circumstances, i.e. in case we have faith” (Koch, Hofmann), but denotes “ even so ,” and, strengthened by the following , is designed to bring forward the agreement of the fate of Christians with Christ; comp. Winer, p. 478 [E. T. 679].
] is (by Chry sostom, Ambrosiaster, Calvin, Hemming, Zanchius, Estius, Balduin, Vorstius, Cornelius a Lapide, Beza, Grotius, Calixt, Calov, Wolf, Whitby, Benson, Bengel, Macknight, Koppe, Jowett, Hilgenfeld ( Zeitschr. f. wissenschaftl. Theolog. , Halle 1862, p. 239), Riggenbach, and others) connected with , and then the sense is given: “those who have fallen asleep, in Christ.” [55] But this would be expressed by , as would at most contain a designation of those whom Christ had brought to death, consequently of the Christian martyrs . Salmeron, Hammond, Joseph Mede, Opp. p. 519, and Thiersch ( die Kirche im apostol. Zeitalter , Frankf. u. Erlang. 1852, p. 138) actually interpret the words in this sense. Yet how contrary to the apostle’s design such a mention of the martyrs would be is evident, as according to it the resurrection and participation in the glory of the returning Christ would be most inappropriately limited to a very small portion of Christians; not to mention that, first, the indications in both Epistles do not afford the slightest justification of the idea of persecutions, which ended in bloody death ; and, secondly, the formula would be much too weak to express the idea of martyrdom. Also in the fact that Paul does not speak of the dead in general, but specially of the Christian dead, there is no reason to unite with ; for the extent of the idea of in our passage is understood from the relation of the apodosis, 1Th 4:14 , to the protasis . . . We are accordingly constrained to unite with .
Christ is elsewhere by Paul and in the New Testament generally considered as the instrument by which the almighty act of God, the resurrection of the dead, is effected; comp. 1Co 15:21 ; Joh 5:28 ; Joh 6:39 ; Joh 6:44 ; Joh 6:54 .
] will bring with Him , is a pregnant expression, whilst, instead of the act of resuscitation , that which follows the act in time is given. And, indeed, the further clause , i.e. (incorrectly Zacharius and Koppe = ), is united in a pregnant form with . God will through Christ bring with Him those who are asleep, that is, so that they are then united with Christ, and have a complete share in the benefits of His appearance. Hofmann arbitrarily transforms the words into the thought: “that Jesus will not appear, God will not introduce Him again into the world, without their deceased brethren coming with Him.” For the words instruct us not concerning Jesus, but concerning the ; it is not expressed in what manner the return of Christ will take place, but what will be the final fate of those who have fallen asleep. The apostle selects this pregnant form of expression instead of the simple , because the thought of a separation of deceased Christians from Christ was that which so greatly troubled the Thessalonians, and therefore it was his endeavour to remove this anxiety, this doubting uncertainty, as soon as possible. [56]
[54] Hofmann’s views are very distorted and perverted. He will not acknowledge that from the fact of the resurrection of Christ, the resurrection of those fallen asleep in Thessalonica is deduced; and against which the of the apodosis should have guarded him he deduces the aimless platitude, that “the apostle with the words: , gives an assurance which avails us in the case of our death, if we believe on the death and resurrection of Jesus.” As Hofmann misinterprets the words, so also does Luthardt, supra , p. 140 f.
[55] Also Alford connects with ; but then arbitrarily (comp. , ver. 16) pressing the expression ( are distinguished from the merely . What makes this distinction? Why are they asleep and not dead? By whom have they been thus privileged? Certainly ), and inappropriately regarding the constructions , Rom 1:8 ; , Rom 5:1 , , Rom 5:11 , as analogous expressions, he brings out the following grammatically impossible meaning: If we believe that Jesus died and rose again, then even thus also those, of whom we say that they sleep just because of Jesus , will God, etc.
[56] The idea of “a general ascension of all Christians,” which Schrader finds in this verse, and in which he perceives a mark of un-Pauline composition, because Paul thought “only on a kingdom of God on earth,” is, according to the above, introduced by him into the passage.
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
14 For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in Jesus will God bring with him.
Ver. 14. Sleep in Jesus ] Dead in Christ. The union then is not dissolved by death. But as by sleep the body is refreshed, so by death it is refined. Let our care be to cleave close to Christ in the instant of death; so shall he be to us, both in life and death, advantage.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
14 .] Substantiation ( ) of that implied in last verse, that further knowledge will remove this their grief : and that knowledge, grounded on the resurrection of our Lord.
] not ‘ seeing that :’ but hypothetical: ‘ posito , that we, &c.’
. . go together, forming the same process through which are passing. “The Apostle here, as always, uses the direct term in reference to our Lord, to obviate all possible misconception: in reference to the faithful he appropriately uses the consolatory term : see Thdrt. in loc.” Ellicott.
] The two clauses do not accurately correspond. We should expect , or the like. Still the betokens identity of lot for the two parties concerned, viz., death, and resurrection. In this they resemble: but in the expressed particulars here, they differ. Christ’s was simply : theirs shall be a resurrection through Him, at His coming.
. ] I feel compelled to differ from the majority of modern scholars (not Ellicott), in adhering to the old connexion of these words with . . I am quite aware of the grammatical difficulty: but as I hope to shew, it is not insuperable. But if we join . . with , we obtain a clause which I am persuaded the Apostle could never have written, flat and dragging in the extreme referring to already mentioned in the same clause. Whereas, on the other connexion, we have and set over against one another, the very article, and the unemphatic position of the words, shewing the reference back, and we have naturally and forcibly referring back to and , in the preceding clauses. In other words, the logical construction of the sentence seems to me so plainly to require the connexion of with , that it must be a grammatical impossibility only, which can break that connexion. But let us see whether there be such an impossibility present. are confessedly the Christian dead, and none else. They are distinguished by the Apostle’s use of and adhesion to the word, from the merely . What makes this distinction? Why are they asleep, and not dead? By whom have they been thus privileged? Certainly, . We are said ( Act 3:16 ), ( Rom 1:8 ), (ib. Rom 5:1 ), (ib. Rom 1:11 ), ( 2Co 1:5 ), &c. &c.: why not also ? And when Lnem. objects, that the extent of the idea is understood from the former part of the sentence, . . ., this very reason seems to me the most natural one for the specification If we believe that Jesus died and rose again, then even thus also those, of whom we say that they sleep , just because of Jesus, will God , &c.: the emphasis being on the . Jowett keeps this connexion, merely saying however, “nor will the order of the words allow us to connect them with ;” a reason surely insufficient for it. He is certainly in error when he continues, “The only remaining mode is to take for (?), ‘those that are asleep in Christ.’ ”
] will bring (back to us) with Him (Jesus): i.e. when Jesus shall appear, they also shall appear with Him, being (as below) raised at His coming. Of their disembodied souls there is here no mention: nor is the meaning, as often understood, that God will bring them (their disembodied souls, to be joined to their raised bodies) with Him: but the bringing them with Jesus = their being raised when Jesus appears.
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
1Th 4:14 . Unlike some of the Corinthians (1Co 15:17-18 ), the Thessalonians did not doubt the fact of Christ’s resurrection ( of course implies no uncertainty). Paul assumes their faith in it and argues from it. Their vivid and nave belief in Christ’s advent within their own lifetime was the very source of their distress. Paul still shares that belief (17). is an unusual expression which might, so far as grammar is concerned, go either with . . (so. e.g. , Ellic., Alford, Kabisch, Lightfoot, Findlay, Milligan) or . The latter is the preferable construction (so most editors). The phrase is not needed ( cf. 15) to limit . . to Christians (so Chrys., Calvin), for the unbelieving dead are not before the writer’s mind, and, even so, would have been the natural preposition ( cf. 16), nor does it mean martyrdom. In the light of 1Th 5:9 ( cf. Rom 5:9 ; 1Co 15:21 ), it seems to connect less awkwardly with , though not = “at the intercession of Jesus” (Rutherford). Jesus is God’s agent in the final act, commissioned to raise and muster the dead ( cf. Sthelin, Jahrb. f. deut. Theol. , 1874, 189 f., and Schettler, Die paul. Formel, “Durch Christus,” 1997, 57 f.). The divine mission of the Christ, which is to form the climax of things, involves the resurrection of the dead who are His (1Th 5:10 ). Any general resurrection is out of the question (so Did., xvi. 6: , , ).
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
1 Thessalonians
SLEEPING THROUGH JESUS
1Th 4:14 .
That expression is not unusual, in various forms, in the Apostle’s writings. It suggests a very tender and wonderful thought of closeness and union between our Lord and the living dead, so close as that He is, as it were, the atmosphere in which they move, or the house in which they dwell. But, tender and wonderful as the thought is, it is not exactly the Apostle’s idea here. For, accurately rendered–and accuracy in regard to Scripture language is not pedantry–the words run, ‘Them which sleep through Jesus.’
Now, that is a strange phrase, and, I suppose, its strangeness is the reason why our translators have softened it down to the more familiar and obvious ‘in Jesus.’ We can understand living through Christ, on being sacred through Christ, but what can sleeping through Christ mean? I shall hope to answer the question presently, but, in the meantime, I only wish to point out what the Apostle does say, and to plead for letting him say it, strange though it sounds. For the strange and the difficult phrases of Scripture are like the hard quartz reefs in which gold is, and if we slur them over we are likely to loose the treasure. Let us try if we can find what the gold here may be.
Now, there are only two thoughts that I wish to dwell upon as suggested by these words. One is the softened aspect of death, and of the state of the Christian dead; and the other is the ground or cause of that softened aspect.
I. First, then, the softened aspect of death, and of the state of the Christian dead.
It is to Jesus primarily that the New Testament writers owe their use of this gracious emblem of sleep. For, as you remember, the word was twice upon our Lord’s lips; once when, over the twelve-years-old maid from whom life had barely ebbed away, He said, ‘She is not dead, but sleepeth’; and once when in regard of the man Lazarus, from whom life had removed further, He said, ‘Our friend sleepeth, but I go that I may awake him out of sleep.’ But Jesus was not the originator of the expression. You find it in the Old Testament, where the prophet Daniel, speaking of the end of the days and the bodily Resurrection, designates those who share in it as ‘them that sleep in the dust of the earth.’ And the Old Testament was not the sole origin of the phrase. For it is too natural, too much in accordance with the visibilities of death, not to have suggested itself to many hearts, and been shrined in many languages. Many an inscription of Greek and Roman date speaks of death under this figure; but almost always it is with the added, deepened note of despair, that it is a sleep which knows no waking, but lasts through eternal night.
Now, the Christian thought associated with this emblem is the precise opposite of the pagan one. The pagan heart shrank from naming the ugly thing because it was so ugly. So dark and deep a dread coiled round the man, as he contemplated it, that he sought to drape the dreadfulness in some kind of thin, transparent veil, and to put the buffer of a word between him and its hideousness. But the Christian’s motive for the use of the word is the precise opposite. He uses the gentler expression because the thing has become gentler.
It is profoundly significant that throughout the whole of the New Testament the plain, naked word ‘death’ is usually applied, not to the physical fact which we ordinarily designate by the name, but to the grim thing of which that physical fact is only the emblem and the parable, viz., the true death which lies in the separation of the soul from God; whilst predominately the New Testament usage calls the physical fact by some other gentler form of expression, because, as I say, the gentleness has enfolded the thing to be designated.
For instance, you find one class of representations which speak of death as being a departing and a being with Christ; or which call it, as one of the apostles does, an ‘exodus,’ where it is softened down to be merely a change of environment, a change of locality. Then another class of representations speak of it as ‘putting off this my tabernacle,’ or, the dissolution of the ‘earthly house’–where there is a broad, firm line of demarcation drawn between the inhabitant and the habitation, and the thing is softened down to be a mere change of dwelling. Again, another class of expressions speak of it as being an ‘offering,’ where the main idea is that of a voluntary surrender, a sacrifice or libation of myself, and my life poured out upon the altar of God. But sweetest, deepest, most appealing to all our hearts, is that emblem of my text, ‘them that sleep.’ It is used, if I count rightly, some fourteen times in the New Testament, and it carries with it large and plain lessons, on which I touch but for a moment. What, then, does this metaphor say to us?
Well, it speaks first of rest. That is not altogether an attractive conception to some of us. If it be taken exclusively it is by no means wholesome. I suppose that the young, and the strong, and the eager, and the ambitious, and the prosperous rather shrink from the notion of their activities being stiffened into slumber. But, dear friends, there are some of us like tired children in a fair, who would fain have done with the weariness, who have made experience of the distractions and bewildering changes, whose backs are stiffened with toil, whose hearts are heavy with loss. And to all of us, in some moods, the prospect of shuffling off this weary coil of responsibilities and duties and tasks and sorrows, and of passing into indisturbance and repose, appeals. I believe, for my part, that, after all, the deepest longing of men–though they search for it through toil and effort–is for repose. As the poet has taught us, ‘there is no joy but calm.’ Every heart is weary enough, and heavy laden, and labouring enough, to feel the sweetness of a promise of rest:–
‘Sleep, full of rest from head to foot, Lie still, dry dust, secure of change.’
Yes! but the rest of which our emblem speaks is, as I believe, only applicable to the bodily frame. The word ‘sleep’ is a transcript of what sense enlightened by faith sees in that still form, with the folded hands and the quiet face and the closed eyes. But let us remember that this repose, deep and blessed as it is, is not, as some would say, the repose of unconsciousness. I do not believe, and I would have you not believe, that this emblem refers to the vigorous, spiritual life, or that the passage from out of the toil and moil of earth into the calm of the darkness beyond has any power in limiting or suspending the vital force of the man.
Why, the very metaphor itself tells us that the sleeper is not unconscious. He is parted from the outer world, he is unaware of externals. When Stephen knelt below the old wall, and was surrounded by howling fanatics that slew him, one moment he was gashed with stones and tortured, and the next ‘he fell on sleep.’ They might howl, and the stones fly as they would, and he was all unaware of it. Like Jonah sleeping in the hold, what mattered the roaring of the storm to him? But separation from externals does not mean suspense of life or of consciousness, and the slumberer often dreams, and is aware of himself persistently throughout his slumber. Nay! some of his faculties are set at liberty to work more energetically, because his connection with the outer world is for the time suspended.
And so I say that what on the hither side is sleep, on the further side is awaking, and that the complex whole of the condition of the sainted dead may be described with equal truth by either metaphor; ‘they sleep in Jesus’; or, ‘when I awake I shall be satisfied with Thy likeness.’
Scripture, as it seems to me, distinctly carries this limitation of the emblem. For what does it mean when the Apostle says that to depart and to be with Christ is far better? Surely he who thus spoke conceived that these two things were contemporaneous, the departing and the being with Him. And surely he who thus spoke could not have conceived that a millennium-long parenthesis of slumberous unconsciousness was to intervene between the moment of his decease and the moment of his fellowship with Jesus. How could a man prefer that dormant state to the state here, of working for and living with the Lord? Surely, being with Him must mean that we know where we are, and who is our companion.
And what does that text mean: ‘Ye are come unto the spirits of just men made perfect,’ unless it means that of these two classes of persons who are thus regarded as brought into living fellowship, each is aware of the other? Does perfecting of the spirit mean the smiting of the spirit into unconsciousness? Surely not, and surely in view of such words as these, we must recognise the fact that, however limited and imperfect may be the present connection of the disembodied dead, who sleep in Christ, with external things, they know themselves, they know their home and their companion, and they know the blessedness in which they are lapped.
But another thought which is suggested by this emblem is, as I have already said, most certainly the idea of awaking. The pagans said, as indeed one of their poets has it, ‘Suns can sink and return, but for us, when our brief light sinks, there is but one perpetual night of slumber.’ The Christian idea of death is, that it is transitory as a sleep in the morning, and sure to end. As St. Augustine says somewhere, ‘Wherefore are they called sleepers, but because in the day of the Lord they will be reawakened?’
And so these are the thoughts, very imperfectly spoken, I know, which spring like flowers from this gracious metaphor ‘them that sleep’–rest and awaking; rest and consciousness.
II. Note the ground of this softened aspect.
They ‘sleep through Him.’ It is by reason of Christ and His work, and by reason of that alone, that death’s darkness is made beautiful, and death’s grimness is softened down to this. Now, in order to grasp the full meaning of such words as these of the Apostle, we must draw a broad distinction between the physical fact of the ending of corporeal life and the mental condition which is associated with it by us. What we call death, if I may so say, is a complex thing–a bodily phenomenon plus conscience, the sense of sin, the certainty of retribution in the dim beyond. And you have to take these elements apart. The former remains, but if the others are removed, the whole has changed its character and is become another thing, and a very little thing.
The mere physical fact is a trifle. Look at it as you see it in the animals; look at it as you see it in men when they actually come to it. In ninety-nine cases out of a hundred it is painless and easy, and men sink into slumber. Strange, is it not, that so small a reality should have power to cast over human life so immense and obscuring a shadow! Why? Because, as the Apostle says, ‘the sting of death is sin,’ and if you can take the sting out of it, then there is very little to fear, and it comes down to be an insignificant and transient element in our experience.
Now, the death of Jesus Christ takes away, if I may so say, the nimbus of apprehension and dread arising from conscience and sin, and the forecast of retribution. There is nothing left for us to face except the physical fact, and any rough soldier, with a coarse, red coat upon him, will face that for eighteenpence a day, and think himself well paid. Jesus Christ has abolished death, leaving the mere shell, but taking all the substance out of it. It has become a different thing to men, because in that death of His He has exhausted the bitterness, and has made it possible that we should pass into the shadow, and not fear either conscience or sin or judgment.
In this connection I cannot but notice with what a profound meaning the Apostle, in this very verse, uses the bare, naked word in reference to Him, and the softened one in reference to us. ‘If we believe that Jesus Christ died and rose again, even so them also which sleep.’ Ah! yes! He died indeed, bearing all that terror with which men’s consciences have invested death. He died indeed, bearing on Himself the sins of the world. He died that no man henceforward need ever die in that same fashion. His death makes our deaths sleep, and His Resurrection makes our sleep calmly certain of a waking.
So, dear ‘brethren, I would not have you ignorant concerning them which are asleep, that ye sorrow not even as others which have no hope.’ And I would have you to remember that, whilst Christ by His work has made it possible that the terror may pass away, and death may be softened and minimised into slumber, it will not be so with you–unless you are joined to Him, and by trust in the power of His death and the overflowing might of His Resurrection, have made sure that what He has passed through, you will pass through, and where He is, and what He is, you will be also.
Two men die by one railway accident, sitting side by side upon one seat, smashed in one collision. But though the outward fact is the same about each, the reality of their deaths is infinitely different. The one falls asleep through Jesus, in Jesus; the other dies indeed, and the death of his body is only a feeble shadow of the death of his spirit. Do you knit yourself to the Life, which is Christ, and then ‘he that believeth on Me shall never die.’
Fuente: Expositions Of Holy Scripture by Alexander MacLaren
For. Greek. gar.
if. App-118.
believe. App-150.
rose again. App-178.
even so them also. Read “so (we believe) also that them”.
sleep = are fallen asleep.
in Jesus = through (App-104. 1Th 4:1) Jesus. This stands in the Greek between the words “sleep” and “bring”. To which does it belong? “Sleep in Jesus” is an expression not found elsewhere. In 1Th 4:16 the “dead in Christ” are spoken of, with which may be compared 1Co 15:18. And the proper meaning of dia with the Genitive is “through”, though it is wrongly translated “in” Mat 26:61. Mar 14:58. 1Ti 2:15. Heb 7:9; Heb 13:22, and “among” 2Ti 2:2. The context will show that “through” is the meaning, as the Revised Version renders it in margin. “Through” the Lord Jesus Christ we have peace, reconciliation, sonship, the Holy Spirit’s gifts, victory, and many other blessings; Rom 5:1, Rom 5:10; Rom 8:37. 1Co 15:57. 2Co 5:18. Eph 1:5. Col 1:20. Tit 3:6. Death is not a blessing, but an enemy. Inflicted by the Lord (Rev 2:23; Rev 19:21), and permitted by Him, it is the work of the devil (Heb 2:14. Rev 2:10), whose works He came to destroy. It is better, therefore, to take the words “through Jesus” with “bring”, and read, “God will through Jesus bring with Him”, in harmony with Joh 5:25; Joh 11:25. Php 1:3, Php 1:21.
with. App-104.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
14.] Substantiation () of that implied in last verse, that further knowledge will remove this their grief: and that knowledge, grounded on the resurrection of our Lord.
] not seeing that: but hypothetical: posito, that we, &c.
. . go together,-forming the same process through which are passing. The Apostle here, as always, uses the direct term in reference to our Lord, to obviate all possible misconception: in reference to the faithful he appropriately uses the consolatory term : see Thdrt. in loc. Ellicott.
] The two clauses do not accurately correspond. We should expect , or the like. Still the betokens identity of lot for the two parties concerned, viz., death, and resurrection. In this they resemble: but in the expressed particulars here, they differ. Christs was simply : theirs shall be a resurrection through Him, at His coming.
. ] I feel compelled to differ from the majority of modern scholars (not Ellicott), in adhering to the old connexion of these words with . . I am quite aware of the grammatical difficulty: but as I hope to shew, it is not insuperable. But if we join . . with , we obtain a clause which I am persuaded the Apostle could never have written,-flat and dragging in the extreme- – referring to already mentioned in the same clause. Whereas, on the other connexion, we have and set over against one another, the very article, and the unemphatic position of the words, shewing the reference back,-and we have naturally and forcibly referring back to and , in the preceding clauses. In other words, the logical construction of the sentence seems to me so plainly to require the connexion of with , that it must be a grammatical impossibility only, which can break that connexion. But let us see whether there be such an impossibility present. are confessedly the Christian dead, and none else. They are distinguished by the Apostles use of and adhesion to the word, from the merely . What makes this distinction? Why are they asleep, and not dead? By whom have they been thus privileged? Certainly, . We are said (Act 3:16),- (Rom 1:8), (ib. Rom 5:1), (ib. Rom 1:11), (2Co 1:5), &c. &c.: why not also ? And when Lnem. objects, that the extent of the idea is understood from the former part of the sentence, …,-this very reason seems to me the most natural one for the specification-If we believe that Jesus died and rose again, then even thus also those, of whom we say that they sleep, just because of Jesus, will God, &c.: the emphasis being on the . Jowett keeps this connexion, merely saying however, nor will the order of the words allow us to connect them with ; a reason surely insufficient for it. He is certainly in error when he continues, The only remaining mode is to take for (?), those that are asleep in Christ.
] will bring (back to us) with Him (Jesus): i.e. when Jesus shall appear, they also shall appear with Him, being (as below) raised at His coming. Of their disembodied souls there is here no mention: nor is the meaning, as often understood, that God will bring them (their disembodied souls, to be joined to their raised bodies) with Him: but the bringing them with Jesus = their being raised when Jesus appears.
Fuente: The Greek Testament
1Th 4:14. , for) The Scripture, from among so many topics of consolation in regard to death, generally brings forward this one concerning the resurrection, as principal and pre-eminent.-, died) This word is usually applied to Christ; whereas to fall asleep is applied to believers, 1Co 15:3; 1Co 15:6; 1Co 15:18; 1Co 15:20; 1Co 15:51.-) in like manner, as Jesus Himself rose, so we believe that we shall be conducted alive by the path of death.- , in Jesus) This is construed with ,[19] who have fallen asleep. For the verb, will lead [bring], which follows, has accordingly the with Him standing in apposition, and answering to the words, , in Jesus.
[19] Lit. Those lulled to sleep by Jesus.-ED.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
1Th 4:14
For if we believe-The foundation truth of the gospel was, and is, that all Christians believe that Jesus died and rose again.
that Jesus-[The personal name is appropriate here, as it reminded them that the Deliverer for whom they looked, and who had himself undergone death, which they dreaded, was himself man, and that his manhood was unimpaired by his death. It was Jesus who died and the same Jesus who rose again. (Act 1:11; Act 2:32; Act 2:36; Act 9:5; 1Ti 2:5; 2Ti 2:8.) Death had not been final in his case, neither would it be in theirs.]
died-The first cardinal point of the gospel of God concerning his Son is that he died-who was delivered up for our trespasses (Rom 4:25); and gave himself up (Eph 5:25); suffered (1Pe 3:18). This fact is always stated in direct terms. The term as used in the Scriptures refers to two things: (1) The separation of the soul from the body and the cessation of the functions of the body and its return to “dust. (Gen 3:19.) In this sense Adams body at the age of nine hundred thirty years died. (Gen 5:5.) In this sense death awaits every human being. (Heb 9:27.) (2) The separation of man from God. For the mind of the flesh is death. (Rom 8:6.) Adam died in this sense the day he disobeyed God. (Gen 2:17.) The descendants of Adam are born in the same state of separation from God. In this sense death describes the condition of all unregenerated men. (Joh 5:24-25; Rom 5:12-21; Eph 2:15; Eph 4:18; 1Jn 3:14.) Death is the opposite of life. It is definitely stated that God created man, called him into existence (Gen 1:27); but the Scriptures nowhere state that he will ever cease to exist. The term “life when used of man, as distinguished from the body-“the earthly house of our tabernacle (2Co 5:1)-may be defined as conscious existence in communion with God. But when death is used of man, and not merely of the body, it is properly defined as conscious existence in separation from God. All out of Christ are dead, all in Christ have life. But all, whether living or dead, equally exist and are equally conscious of existence. (Luk 16:19-31.) If death were no existence, the declaration that Jesus died would convey a thought contradictory to the plain teaching of the Scriptures and would obviously be untrue. Therefore, in whichever sense it is used, it is in the Scripture viewed as the penal consequence of sin, and sinners alone are subject to death; it was as the bearer of sin that the Lord Jesus submitted to death on the cross. (Rom 5:12; 1Pe 2:24.) And while the physical death of the Lord Jesus was of the essence of his sacrifice, it was not the whole. It is said: Now from the sixth hour there was darkness over all the land until the ninth hour. And about the ninth hour Jesus cried with a loud voice, saying, . . . My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? (Mat 27:45-46.) The darkness symbolized and his cry expressed the fact that he was left alone in the universe; he was forsaken. Hence, it is that the word of consolation, “sleep, was not used of him in his death. Here, however, since not expiation of sin, but the resurrection of the saints is in view, attention is concentrated on the simple historical fact of the physical death of the Lord Jesus. (Joh 19:30.)
and rose again,-That it was not possible that his Son should be held by death is the second cardinal point in the gospel of God concerning his Son. (Act 2:24; Rom 1:4; 1Co 15:4.) When he had made purification of sins, sat down on the right hand of the Majesty on high. (Heb 1:3.) [This is the only place in which Paul speaks of the resurrection of the Lord Jesus as his own act. Ordinarily, he speaks of it as the act of God. (1:10.) ]
even so them also that are fallen asleep in Jesus will God bring with him.-Jesus was the first fruits from the dead, and the first fruits were the promise of the coming harvest when all in Christ should come forth from the grave. [The same gospel that carried the assurance of the death and resurrection of the Lord carried also the assurance of the resurrection of all who believe on him.]
Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary
if we: Isa 26:19, Rom 8:11, 1Co 15:12-23, 2Co 4:13, 2Co 4:14, Rev 1:18
sleep: 1Th 4:13, 1Th 3:13, 1Co 15:18, Rev 14:13
God: 1Th 4:17, Gen 49:19, Zec 14:15, Mat 24:31, 1Co 15:23, Phi 3:20, Phi 3:21, 2Th 2:1, Jud 1:14, Jud 1:15
Reciprocal: 2Sa 7:12 – sleep Job 14:12 – awake Job 14:14 – shall he live Psa 4:8 – I will Psa 16:9 – my flesh Pro 3:24 – and Son 6:2 – and to Son 7:9 – those that are asleep Jer 31:16 – Refrain Dan 12:2 – many Hos 13:14 – O death Mat 27:52 – slept Mar 5:39 – not dead Mar 13:27 – shall gather Joh 5:19 – and Joh 5:28 – for Joh 11:11 – sleepeth Joh 11:25 – I am Act 4:2 – preached Act 7:60 – he fell Act 24:15 – that Rom 6:8 – we believe Rom 14:8 – we live therefore 1Co 6:14 – God 1Co 11:30 – sleep 1Co 15:13 – General 1Co 15:51 – We shall not Phi 3:10 – and the power Heb 6:2 – resurrection Heb 9:28 – he appear
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
REUNION IN ETERNITY
If we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also that are fallen asleep in Jesus will God bring with Him.
1Th 4:14
The text discloses to us two blessed and consolatory truths, each containing in regard of those that die in Christ the holiest and deepest consolation.
I. Those who have loved the Lord, and have departed hence in His faith and fear, pass into a union with Him that becomes ever closer and closer, and in special cases may even be crowned with that first Resurrection of which, in one well-known passage in the last book of Holy Scripture, there is such precise and definite mention. To those who have loved the Lord on earth and have loved Him to the last, this text plainly tells us we may confidently believe there will be this closer unionthe degree of closeness depending on the depth and reality of the love. And this, let it be remembered, is no isolated text; this is by no means the only passage in which we have the same great consolatory truth, that by the Lords Resurrection death has verily been swallowed up in victory, and is to the believer no longer the curse, but the blessed mode of entry into a truer union with the Lord.
II. But the deeper heart-question still remains: Can there be, will there be, reunion hereafter with those we have loved here on earth? Yea, verily, who can doubt it, for those that die in Christ. If the text tells us that to the faithful death bears with it a closer union with Christ, and that to die is gain, it assuredly also tells us that there will be a true, real, and blessed reunion hereafter with all that we have loved on earth, and who have died in the faith of the Lord. When Christ returns, God Himselfsuch are the plain words of the textwill bring with the Redeemer, all in one blessed and united company, the redeemed; and, as another passage still more precisely declares, will HimselfHimself, the God of the spirits of all fleshwipe away every tear in the limitless joy of that last and indissoluble reunion. In Him everything that ministers to the fulness of holy joy will be vouchsafed to us, every pure sympathy will be responded to, every longing of holy love will be tenderly satisfied. If we are truly His, that communion of saints which, in the Apostles Creed, we profess as one of the fundamental articles of our faith, will attain its fullest perfection and development.
III. Could communion be perfect if souls that had been united by the closest bond here on earth were to lose all consciousness of that bond in the world beyond, and all that constituted personality were to be forgotten or obliterated? No, though it be right for us to say, with the Apostle, that it is not yet made manifest what we shall be, and that many things connected with personal identity here may, by the very assumption of the glorified body, become modified hereafter, still of this we may feel the most abiding assurance that whatever has constituted the truest communion of souls on this side the grave will continue when at last all are unitedand continue not only unimpaired but enhanced. Yea, verily, if personal recognition and knowledge be an inseparable element of the truest communion here on earth, so must it be for ever. If God, who is love, brings again all who have been laid to sleep in Jesus, will He withhold from them that knowledge and recognition without which personal love could never be complete and perfected?
Bishop Ellicott.
Illustration
The inability to be comforted, the unresigned state of soul that cannot wipe away its tears of bitterness, will ever be found a certain index that true faith in the fact of the Lords Resurrection has not yet been vouchsafed to the soul. Of this there are often very sad illustrations. In many of the public comments that are made on the death of public men, there is a distinct pagan element in thought, epithet, and expression that reveal the utterly imperfect recognition of the truth and reality of the Resurrection of the Lord Jesus Christ which, I fear, is now very unmistakably to be traced in current literature of the day. The Lords Resurrection is not exactly denied except by the professed opponents of Christianity; but it is left as something which lies outside the sphere of historical investigation, and can never be soberly regarded as ministering any real consolation on the bitterness of human sorrows and bereavement. In a word, the power of the Resurrection in its holiest application to the individual soul is deemed to be nothing more than an innocent illusion; and a distinct statement is put aside as belonging only to the poetry of religion.
Fuente: Church Pulpit Commentary
1Th 4:14. If we believe, etc., means that it is as reasonable to believe one part of this verse as the other. The resurrection of Christ is a fact, hence the same God who brought his Son from the dead and up to Heaven, is able to bring others from death into Heaven. The same thought is expressed in other words in Heb 2:10, where it is said that God will be “bringing many sons unto glory.” It should not be overlooked that it is only those who sleep in Jesus who are being given such a prospect. All the dead will be resurrected at the last day (Joh 5:28-29; Act 24:15), but the resurrection of the unsaved is not being considered at all in this chapter.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
1Th 4:14. For if we believe. Paul goes on to explain the reason of the hope which should be entertained regarding departed Christians. It is founded on the universal and fundamental Christian belief that Jesus died but rose again. The argument is more fully drawn out in 1 Corinthians 15, in which passage, as here, Paul proceeds upon the fact of Christs resurrection, and from it infers the certainty of that of His people. In this argument is involved the important principle that Jesus Christ is the Head and Representative of His people, in such a sense that in His human history we see the history and experience of each Christian acted out in all its essential parts. The members cannot be separated from the Head in any important part of His destiny. In His triumphant return they must share.
Who sleep through Jesus, i.e. they who by the intervention of Christ are now peacefully awaiting resurrection. It will be observed that while Paul uses the consolatory word sleep when he speaks of believers, he uses the word died when speaking of Christ. He does so because between the death of Christ and that of His people there was an essential difference; the one being an endurance of the curse, the other being exempt from this sting. Christ tasted death for every man and by the infallible chemistry of His love drew out of each mans cup the poison, so that it became a sleeping draught.
Will God bring with him, i.e. with Jesus.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
St. Paul having, in the foregoing verse, dissuaded from immoderate grief and sorrow for the death of relations, comes now to lay down several considerations or consolatory arguments in order to it.
The first word of comfort is this, that our relations over whom we mourn, are but fallen asleep; the grave is a bed, in which the saint is laid to rest, his body rests in a bed of dust, as in a safe and consecrated dormitory, till the morning of the resurrection: and, if the night be long, the morning will be the more joyous.
The second comfort is, they sleep in Jesus, that is, in union with Jesus, as members of his body; in the faith of Jesus, that is, in such a belief of the doctrine of Christ, as is accompanied with a holy obedience to the commands of Christ.
The third consolatory word is this, God will come, that is, to judgment, and when he cometh, will bring his sleeping saints with him, that is, he will bring their souls from heaven, their bodies from the grave. Body and soul united he shall take up to himself into the clouds, and then carry all his saints back with him into heaven.
A fourth, is this, our relations are not alone in death; Jesus died; the Captain of our salvation marched before us through the black regions of death and the grave, and has perfumed the bed of the grave, by his own lying in it.
Note here, the apostle says Jesus died, the saints sleep; a believer’s death is called a sleep. I do not find that Christ’s death is called a sleep; no, his death was death indeed, death with a curse in it: but the believers’ death is turned by Christ into a sweet and silent sleep.
Again, Jesus died and rose again, that is a comforting consideration, he was laid, but not lost in the grave: he rose by his own power, he rose as our Head and representative, and accordingly, all his saints are risen in him, and shall rise after him. Because I live, says Christ, you shall live also.
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament
Christ’s Resurrection Is Proof God Can Raise the Dead
Kelcy suggests that the doctrine of the resurrection must have been especially difficult for Greeks to accept ( Act 17:32 ). The Christian, who believes in Christ’s resurrection, will believe in the resurrection of all the saints. This is true because God has shown His power over death by raising His Son. Clearly, Paul taught that those who are God’s sons in the church, or family of God (compare 1Ti 3:15 ), will also be raised by the One who has power over death. In fact, the apostle was delivering the words of the Lord when he said living saints will not go before dead saints to meet the Lord ( 1Th 4:14-15 ).
Fuente: Gary Hampton Commentary on Selected Books
1Th 4:14. For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again Namely, 1st, In attestation of the truth of his doctrine, in which he taught expressly the immortality of the soul, Mat 10:28; Luk 23:43; and the resurrection of the body, Joh 5:28-29. 2d, For the expiation of sin, and the procuring of justification and peace with God for the penitent that should believe in him, however guilty they had before been, Heb 9:26; Rom 4:24-25. 3d, That he might procure and receive for us the Holy Spirit, to work that repentance and faith in us, assure us of our justification and of our title to that future felicity, and to prepare us for it by inward holiness; and, 4th, That he might ascend, take possession of it in our name, receive our departing souls, and raise from the dust our fallen and corrupted bodies, and so exalt us to that immortal, glorious, and blessed state; even so them also which sleep in Jesus Who die in the Lord, (Rev 14:13,) in union with him, and possessed of an interest in him; will God bring with him They will be found in the train of his magnificent retinue at his final appearance, when he comes to judge the world, and reward his faithful servants.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also that are fallen asleep in Jesus will God bring with him. [Paul here founds an affirmation on the intimate relation which exists between Christ and his people; a relation which he elsewhere likens to the union between the head and the body (Eph 4:15-16); the argument being that if the head enjoys a resurrection, the body must likewise share in it. “With him” does not here mean that Jesus will bring the disembodied spirits from heaven to the resurrection, but that God, who brought Jesus from the grave, will also bring from the grave, in conjunction with Jesus, all those who entered it with their lives spiritually united with Jesus. But the bringing from heaven is taught at 1Th 3:13]
Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)
4:14 {12} For if we believe that Jesus died and rose again, even so them also which sleep in {d} Jesus will God {e} bring with him.
(12) A reason for the confirmation, for seeing that the head is risen, the members also will rise, and that by the power of God.
(d) The dead in Christ, who continue in faith by which they are ingrafted into Christ, even to the last breath.
(e) Will call their bodies out of their graves, and join their souls to them again.
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
We could translate "If" "Since." This word introduces a first class condition in the Greek text, which in this case is a condition true to reality. The death and resurrection of Christ are among the best attested facts of history. [Note: See Frank Morison, Who Moved the Stone?] Furthermore the Scriptures predicted these events before they occurred. Therefore we can be equally certain that the events of the Rapture, which Paul predicted here, will also happen. Paul told his readers that God would bring the spirits of Christians who had died back with Jesus when He returned for the saints still living on earth. It is only those who have died "in Jesus" (saints "in Christ," i.e., Christians as contrasted with all the saved of all ages) who will accompany our Lord. The terms "in Christ" and "in Jesus" when used of believers consistently describe believers who are members of the body of Christ, the church.
Pretribulationists identify this return of Christ with the Rapture that, we believe, will occur before the Tribulation. Posttribulationists contend that this return of Christ (the Rapture) will occur at the end of the Tribulation just before the second coming of Christ.