Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Corinthians 5:18

And all things [are] of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation;

18. all things are of God ] Whether natural or spiritual. He is the Creator of heaven and earth, Gen 1:1, as well as of the work of redemption and of the new heart of man. Cf. chap. 2Co 1:21, 2Co 5:5; 1Co 3:23 ; 1Co 15:28; also Joh 3:16; Rom 5:8; Rom 8:32. Christ came only to fulfil His Fathers Will (Joh 4:34; Joh 5:30; Joh 6:39-40). The Father and He were one in love to the human race as in everything else, Joh 17:21-23. “All the life of God is a flow of this Divine self-giving charity. Creation itself is sacrifice, the self-impartation of the Divine being.” Robertson.

who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ ] We have to observe here that not only was man estranged from God, but God from man. “We cannot imagine that God, Who is essentially just, should not abominate iniquity, yet there is no incongruity in this that a father should be offended with that son which he loveth, and at that time offended with him when he loveth him.” Bp Pearson. “God is angry with the wicked. For Christ was the representative of God under the name of Humanity. Now Christ was angry. That therefore which God feels” or rather the relation in which He stands towards sin “corresponds with that which in pure Humanity is the emotion of anger. No other word then will adequately represent God’s feeling” (or rather attitude). Robertson. But the reconciliation was God’s work of love, carried out by Jesus Christ, Who came to reveal His Nature and beneficial purposes to mankind, and to accomplish them by taking our mortal flesh, by His pure and stainless life, by His mysterious Death upon the Cross for our sakes, by His Resurrection from the dead, as well as by His sending His Spirit to work out His blessed Will in us. This is ‘reconciliation by Jesus Christ.’ The words reconcile, reconciliation, are deliberately preferred by the translators of the A. V. to the word atone, atonement, which is only to be found as an equivalent for the Greek word here used in Rom 5:11. Cf. Rom 5:10; Rom 11:15; 1Co 7:11, as well as a similar word occurring in Eph 2:16; Col 1:20-21. See also notes below.

the ministry of reconciliation ] Literally, the reconciliation, i.e. that which has just been mentioned. Cf. ch. 2Co 3:3, where St Paul describes the Corinthians as an Epistle of Christ ministered by him with the Spirit of the living God. The word ministry signifies service rendered freely, not of compulsion. It carries with it the idea of diligence, whatever derivation of the Greek word we take. It was the Apostles’ task, voluntarily undertaken by themselves, to proclaim the good tidings of reconciliation through Christ throughout the world, and thus to put it in men’s power to accept and act upon it. Tyndale, followed by Cranmer and the Geneva Version, render and hath given unto us the office to preach the atonement.

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

And all things are of God – This refers particularly to the things in question, the renewing of the heart, and the influences by which Paul had been brought to a state of willingness to forsake all, and to devote his life to the self-denying labors involved in the purpose of making the Saviour known. He makes the statement general, however, showing his belief that not only these things were produced by God, but that all things were under his direction, and subject to his control. Nothing that he had done was to be traced to his own agency or power, but God was to be acknowledged everywhere. This great truth Paul never forgot; and he never suffered himself to lose sight of it. It was in his view a cardinal and glorious truth; and he kept its influence always before his mind and his heart. In the important statement which follows, therefore, about the ministry of reconciliation, he deeply feels that the whole plan, and all the success which has attended the plan, was to be traced not to his zeal, or fidelity, or skill, but to the agency of God; see the note on 1Co 3:6-7.

Who hath reconciled us to himself – The word us here includes, doubtless, all who were Christians – whether Jews or Gentiles, or whatever was their rank. They had all been brought into a state of reconciliation, or agreement with God through the Lord Jesus Christ. Before they were opposed to God. They had violated His laws. They were his enemies. But by the means of the plan of salvation they had been brought into a state of agreement, or harmony, and were united in feeling and in aim with him. Two people who have been alienated by prejudice, by passion, or by interest, are reconciled when the cause of the alienation is removed, on whichever side it may have existed, or if on both sides, and when they lay aside their enmity and become friends. Thenceforward they are agreed, and live together without alienation, heart-burnings, jealousies, and strife. So between God and man. There was a variance; there was an alienation.

Man was alienated from God. He had no love for Him. He disliked His government and laws. He was unwilling to be restrained. He sought his own pleasure. He was proud, vain, self-confident. He was not pleased with the character of God, or with his claims, or his plans. And in like manner, God was displeased with the pride, the sensuality, the rebellion, the haughtiness of man. He was displeased that His Law had been violated, and that man had cast off his government. Now reconciliation could take place only when these causes of alienation should be laid aside, and when God and man should be brought to harmony; when man should lay aside his love of sin, and should be pardoned, and when, therefore, God could consistently treat him as a friend. The Greek word which is used here ( katallasso) means properly to change against anything; to exchange for anything, for money, or for any article – Robinson. In the New Testament it means to change one person toward another; that is, to reconcile to anyone; see the note on Rom 5:10.

It conveys the idea of producing a change so that one who is alienated should be brought to friendship. Of course, all the change which takes place must be on the part of man, for God will not change, and the purpose of the plan of reconciliation is to effect such a change in man as to make him in fact reconciled to God, and at agreement with him. There were indeed obstacles to reconciliation on the part of God, but they did not arise from any unwillingness to be reconciled; from any reluctance to treat his creature as his friend; but they arose from the fact that man had sinned, and that God was just; that such is the perfection of God that He cannot treat the good and evil alike; and that, therefore, if He should treat man as His friend, it was necessary that in some proper way He should maintain the honor of His Law, and show His hatred of sin, and should secure the conversion and future obedience of the offender.

All this God proposed to secure by the atonement made by the Redeemer, rendering it consistent for him to exercise the benevolence of his nature, and to pardon the offender. But God is not changed. The plan of reconciliation has made no change in his character. It has not made him a different being from what he was before. There is often a mistake on this subject; and people seem to suppose that God was originally stern, and unmerciful, and inexorable, and that he has been made mild and forgiving by the atonement. But it is not so. No change has been made in God; none needed to be made; none could be made. He was always mild, and merciful, and good; and the gift of a Saviour and the plan of reconciliation is just an expression of his original willingness to pardon. When a father sees a child struggling in the stream, and in danger of drowning, the peril and the cries of the child make no change in the character of the father, but such was his former love for the child that he would plunge into the stream at the hazard of his own life to save him. So it is with God. Such was his original love for man, and his disposition to show mercy, that he would submit to any sacrifice, except that of truth and justice, in order that he might save him. Hence, he sent his only Son to die – not to change his own character; not to make himself a different being from what he was, but in order to show his love and his readiness to forgive when it could be consistently done. God so loved the world that he sent his only begotten Son, Joh 3:16.

By Jesus Christ – By the agency, or medium of Jesus Christ. He was the mediator to interpose in the work of reconciliation. And he was abundantly qualified for this work, and was the only being that has lived in this world who was qualified for it. Because:

(1) He was endowed with a divine and human nature – the nature of both the parties at issue – God and man, and thus, in the language of Job, could lay his hand upon both, Job 9:33.

(2) He was intimately acquainted with both the parties, and knew what was needful to be done. He knew God the Father so well that he could say, No man knoweth the Father but the Son, Mat 11:27. And he knew man so well that it could be said of him, he needed not that any should testify of man, for he knew what was in man, Joh 2:25. No one can be a mediator who is not acquainted with the feelings, views, desires, claims, or prejudices of both the parties at issue.

(3) He was the friend of both the parties. He loved God. No man ever doubted this, or had any reason to call it in question, and he was always desirous of securing all that God claimed, and of vindicating him, and he never abandoned anything that God had a right to claim. And he loved man. He showed this in all his life. He sought his welfare in every way possible, and gave himself for him. Yet no one is qualified to act the mediators part who is not the common friend of both the parties at issue, and who will not seek the welfare, the right, or the honor of both.

(4) He was willing to suffer anything from either party in order to produce reconciliation. From the hand of God he was willing to endure all that he deemed to be necessary, in order to show his hatred of sin by his vicarious sufferings, and to make an atonement; and from the hand of man he was willing to endure all the reproach, and contumely, and scorn which could be possibly involved in the work of inducing man to be reconciled to God. And,

(5) He has removed all the obstacles which existed to a reconciliation. On the part of God, he has made it consistent for him to pardon. He has made an atonement, so that God can be just while he justifies the sinner. He has maintained His truth, and justice, and secured the stability of His moral government while He admits offenders to His favor. And on the part of man, He, by the agency of His Spirit, overcomes the unwillingness of the sinner to be reconciled, humbles his pride, shows him his sin, changes his heart, subdues his enmity against God, and secures in fact a harmony of feeling and purpose between God and man, so that they shall be reconciled forever.

And hath given to us – To us the apostles and our fellow-laborers.

The ministry of reconciliation – That is, of announcing to people the nature and the conditions of this plan of being reconciled. We have been appointed to make this known, and to press its acceptation on people; see 2Co 5:20.

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

2Co 5:18-21

And all things are of God who hath reconciled us to Himself by Jesus Christ.

High doctrine

Whatsoever the Christian can desire is to be found in the all things. But lest even that should not be comprehensive enough, our summary contains a still greater word, God. If we be thirsty, here are streams that never can be exhausted. If we be poor, here are riches inexhaustible.

I. The doctrine itself.

1. What is meant here by the term, all things? Do we call that man an infidel who should teach that some things of the old creation were of man? What name shall I give to him who will say that anything in the new creation of grace is of man? This is of God as to–

(1) Its first implanting. If thou hast but one good thought in thy heart it is of God; for all things are of God.

(2) Its subsequent outworking. Has the believer strength–it is of God. Is he preserved in the midst of temptation–his integrity is of God.

(3) Its privileges, pardon, justification, sanctification, adoption, communion. Who will dare to think of these things apart from the unspeakable grace of the Most High?

(4) Its actions. See yonder missionary venturing even unto death? Let us give him his raced of tribute; he hath done valiantly. But let us remember that everything in him that was good, was of God. Does the martyr burn at the stake? Is there a Christian, generous, thoughtful of the woes of others, mighty in prayer and diligent in service? All these things are of God. Set down no virtue to man. Good things are exotics in the human heart.

2. How and in what respect are all things of God?

(1) In the planning. Nay, in all the work of salvation God is the sole designer.

(2) In the purchase and procuring. One price hath bought His people.

(3) In the applying and bringing of it home to each individual conscience. God Will make moll willing in the day of His power.

(4) In the maintaining. Leave the Christian to himself to maintain the grade already begun, and he is gone.

(5) In the completing. The last steps shall be of God as much as the first.

3. Why is it that all things are of God? Because–

(1) There cannot be anything of man. What can a dead man do towards his own resurrection? Till the stone shall of itself fly upwards, till the sea shall beget fire, and until fire distil the shower, then and not till then shall depraved humanity breathe goodness within itself.

(2) It is expressly told us not that some good gifts, and some perfect gifts are from above, but every one. God were only in part the worlds benefactor, if there were other fountains out of which the world could draw.

(3) All the glory is Gods. Now if that be so the work must have been His; for where the work is, there must be the merit.

(4) You as Christians are compelled to feel Thou hast wrought all our works in us.

II. The excellent tendencies of this doctrine.

1. It compels men to think.

2. It rouses enthusiasm in the minds of those who believe it.

3. It humbles men.

4. It affords consolation for the troubled heart. If all things be of God, let not thy spirit be ruffled and affrighted by the tempest.

5. It encourages the sinner. You are naked; the robe in which you shall be dressed is of God. You are filthy; the washing is of God. You are unworthy; your worthiness must be of God. You are guilty; your pardon is of God. All you are bidden to do is simply to be a receiver. Come with your empty pitcher, and hold it now to the flowing fountain. (C. H. Spurgeon.)

God the new Creator

I. God is the original author of the new creature, and all things which belong thereunto. That will appear–

1. From the state of the person to be renewed. Can a stony heart of itself become tender? (Eze 36:26), or a dead heart quicken itself? (Eph 2:5.)

2. From the nature of this work. Creation is a work of omnipotency, and proper to God.

3. From its connection with reconciliation. We can no more convert ourselves than reconcile ourselves to God. Renewing and reconciling grace are often spoken of together, as in the text. There must be a supernatural work upon us, to cure our unholiness, as well as a supernatural work without us, to overcome our guiltiness,

4. From the effect of this renovation, which is the implantation of the graces of faith, hope, and love, which are our light, life, and power.

5. From the fact that all things belonging to the new creature the Scripture ascribeth to God (Php 2:13).

6. What is the true use to be made of this doctrine?

(1) To make us sensible that it is a hard task to get the change of the new creature.

(2) To check despair. He that can turn water into wine can also turn lions into Iambs.

(3) To keep us humble–All things are of God (1Co 4:7).

(4) To make us thankful Give God the praise of changing thy nature, if from a bad man thou art become good.

(5) To inflame our love to God in Christ.

(6) To encourage a cheerful and continual dependence upon God for that grace which is necessary. If we did keep the stock ourselves the throne of grace would be neglected.

II. God is the author of the new creature, as reconciled to us is Christ.

1. He would not give this benefit till justice be satisfied; not set up man with a new stock till there was satisfaction made for the breach of the old. All grace floweth from this, that God is become a God of peace to us (Heb 13:20; 1Th 5:23).

2. God is never actually reconciled to us, nor we to Him, till He give us the regenerating Spirit; that is receiving the atonement (Rom 5:11). Nothing but the new creature will evidence His special favour (Rom 5:5). Other things may be given us during His anger, but the regenerating Spirit is never given in anger.

3. Apply all this.

(1) Let us seek after this reconciliation with God by Christ; then we may comfortably look to obtain every good thing at His hands.

(2) It showeth us how much we are obliged to Christ, who by His death hath satisfied Gods justice and merited all the mercies promised.

(3) Let no breach fall out between God and you, lest it stop grace; the continual sanctification and perfection of man once regenerate dependeth upon this reconciliation, as well as the first renovation, Gods sanctifying power, and the abode of His Spirit, is still necessary to renew us more and more. (T. Manton, D. D.)

God the author of reconciliation

I. What reconciliation is.

1. It implies that there was a former friendship. There were once good terms between God and man.

2. It implies an enmity on one or both sides. On mans part this enmity is by sin; on the part of God–

(1) From the righteousness of His nature (Hab 1:13; Psa 5:5-6).

(2) From the righteousness of His law made against sin, whereby He cannot but according to His veracity punish it.

3. It implies that God is the prime Author of this reconciliation, yet no man is actually reconciled to God till he complies with those conditions whereupon God offers it. God was in Christ when He was reconciling the world; we must be in Christ if we be reconciled to God. We must distinguish between reconciliation designed by God, obtained by Christ, offered by the gospel, received by the soul.

4. This reconciliation is–

(1) Very congruous for the honour of God.

(a) For the honour of this wisdom. Had not a mediator been appointed, mankind had been destroyed at the beginning, and God had lost the glory of His present works.

(b) For the honour of His truth and justice.

(2) Necessary for us.

II. God the father must needs be, and is, the author of this reconciliation. If God be the first cause in all things, He is the first cause in the highest of His works. No creature could originate this work.

1. All human nature could not. Man was so depraved that he knew not how to desire it, and had no mind to cherish any thoughts of it (Rom 1:29-30; 1Co 1:21).

2. Nor the unblemished wisdom of angels (1Pe 1:12).

III. Wherein the agency of the Father in this affair doth appear. God was in Christ reconciling the world.

1. As choosing and appointing Christ (Isa 42:1; Isa 43:10; Heb 3:2).

(1) He was appointed by the Father to this end (Psa 40:6-7; Rom 3:25).

(2) God appointed Him to every office in order to this: as a priest, to offer sacrifices; a prophet, to declare His mercy; a king, to bring men to the terms of reconciliation.

(3) God chose Him to this work with a high delight, as one fully fit for the work, in whom He could confide.

2. God the Father solemnly called Him (Joh 10:36).

3. God gave Him a particular command concerning our reconciliation (Joh 10:18; Php 2:8; Rom 5:19).

4. The Father did fit Christ for this great undertaking.

(1) He is fitted with a body.

(a) This was necessary. Man, as constituted of soul and body, had violated the articles of the first covenant; therefore man, as constituted of soul and body, must answer the violations of it. It was also necessary that He might be nearly related to us in all things (sin excepted), and redeem us by His passion. Yet He was to have a whole body, free from any taint of moral imperfection, fit for the service He was devoted to, for which the least speck upon His humanity had rendered Him unfit.

(b) Therefore the Holy Ghost frames the body of Christ of this seed of the woman (Gen 3:15), and makes the union between the Divine and human nature (Luk 1:35).

(2). He is filled with His Spirit by the Father, i.e., with all the gifts and graces of the Spirit necessary to this work (Joh 3:34).

(a) Habitual holiness. This was necessary. It became Him and us, as our High Priest, to be undefiled (Heb 7:26).

(b) Wisdom and knowledge (Isa 11:2-4).

(c) Tenderness to man.

(d) Mighty power to go through this undertaking. He had a spirit of might (Act 10:38).

5. God commissioned Christ to this work of reconciliation. He gave Him a fulness of authority as well as a fulness of ability. He is therefore said to be sealed, as having His commission under the great seal of heaven (Joh 6:27). The end of this commission was the reconciliation and redemption of man.

(1) Satisfaction for our sins (Gal 1:4).

(2) Testification of the love of God (Isa 43:10-11).

(3) Final and perfect salvation (Gal 1:4) (S. Charnock, B. D.)

The ministry of reconciliation

I. Christs work–the reconciliation of God to Man. Reconciliation is identical with atonement. In Rom 5:11 the word atonement is the same word which is here translated reconciliation.

1. God needed a reconciliation.

(1) The Unitarian view is that God is reconciled already, that there is no wrath in God towards sinners. Nothing can be more unphilosophical and unscriptural. First of all, take Gal 4:9, which is decisive. St. Paul declares that the being recognised of God is more characteristic of the gospel state than recognising God. Know God: here is man reconciled to God. Are known of Him: here is God reconciled to man. Next, it is perilous to explain away those passages which speak of God as angry with sin. We feel that God is angry; and if that be but figurative, then it is only figurative to say that God is pleased. Then, again, Christ was the representative of God. Now Christ was angry. That, therefore, which God feels corresponds with that which in pure humanity is the emotion of anger. If we explain away such words, we lose the distinction between right and wrong; and you will end in believing there is no God at all, if you begin with explaining away His feelings.

(2) It is said that God needs no reconciliation, because He is immutable. But remember that, God remaining immutable, and the sinner changing, Gods relation to the sinner changes. God is love, but love to good is hatred to evil. If you are evil, then God is your enemy. Draw nigh to God, and He will draw nigh to you.

2. The way in which the text speaks of the reconciliation of God to us is, Not imputing their trespasses; for the atonement is made when God no longer reckons the sinner guilty. God is reconciled to humanity in Christ; then to us through Him; God was in Christ. It was a Divine humanity. To that humanity God is reconciled: there could be no enmity between God and Christ: I and My Father are one. To all those in whom Christs Spirit is God imputes the righteousness which is as yet only seminal, germinal–a spring, not a river; a righteousness in faith, not a righteousness in works.

II. The work of the Christian ministry–the reconciliation of man to God. Distinguish Christs position from ours. It was Christs work to reconcile God to man. That is done for ever; we cannot add anything to it. That is a priestly power; and it is at our peril that we claim such a power. Ours is ministerial. We can offer no sacrifice. By one offering He hath perfected for ever them that are sanctified. Therefore the whole work of the Christian ministry consists in declaring God as reconciled to man, and in beseeching, with every variety of illustration, and every degree of earnestness, men to become reconciled to God. All are Gods children by right; all are not Gods children in fact. All are sons of God; but all have not the Spirit of sons, whereby they cry, Abba, Father. All are redeemed, all are not yet sanctified. (F. W. Robertson, M. A.)

God was in Christ, reconciling the world unto Himself.—

Reconciliation

Christianity is eminently a remedial dispensation; it supposes disorder and confusion, and it seeks to introduce order and harmony. Now, it is this peculiar feature of the gospel as the religion of sinners that the apostle adverts to in this passage.

I. Consider the necessity of reconciliation. Sin has broken the friendship between God and man. When God created man at first, He created him holy and happy. Adam was the friend of God. Ever since the Fall man has vainly endeavoured to hide himself from God, and to widen the distance between him and his Maker. Hence the fear of death, the terrors of an accusing conscience, the various bloody sacrifices among heathen nations. And this breach of friendship is mutual. On the one hand, God is justly offended with the sinner; He hates all the workers of iniquity; His justice, His holiness, and His truth, are directed against the transgressors of His law. Your iniquities have separated between you and your God, and your sins have hid His face from you, that He will not hear. And, on the other hand, the sinner is filled with enmity against God–he is averse to the spirituality and strictness of the Divine law. It is very true that God is a God of infinite mercy, and that the sinner is the object of His compassion; but He cannot possibly be merciful at the expense of His justice. But, behold, there may be reconciliation; the offended Majesty of heaven is willing to be reconciled. He who is the offended and injured party is the first to make the overtures of reconciliation. From the depths of His mercy proceeds a plan by which His justice might be satisfied, and yet the sinner saved.

II. Consider the nature of the reconciliation. The great ground upon which the reconciliation rests is the atonement of the Lord Jesus Christ. God has reconciled us unto Himself by Jesus Christ; for He hath made Him to be sin for us who knew no sin, that we might be made the righteousness of God in Him. Christ is the Mediator of reconciliation; He comes in between the two parties; He is the Days-man betwixt us, who can lay His hand upon both. And it must ever be remembered that it is on the ground of His atonement that the reconciliation rests. The atonement of Christ has reconciled these opposing claims of justice and mercy. Here, in the words of the Psalmist, Mercy and truth have met together: righteousness and peace have kissed each other. The death of Christ has satisfied the claims of justice. The grand effect of the atonement of Christ is the non-imputation of sins to all who believe. God, says the apostle, is in Christ reconciling the world unto Himself, not imputing their trespasses unto them. This, of course, arises directly from the substitution of Christ; it is its immediate effect: we and He, as it were, change places; our sins are imputed unto Him, and His righteousness is imputed unto us. Further still, God hath given us the gospel as the word of reconciliation. He hath committed to us the word of reconciliation.

III. Consider the message of reconciliation. We are ambassadors for Christ. Christ is the chief ambassador; but we are the delegated messengers of this peace–we are in Christs stead. God might have sent angels as His ambassadors; they would be more worthy of so great a King and of so important a message. But, in condescension to human weakness, He has sent us weak and fallible men. He would rather allure us with love than terrify us by His greatness. Oh! how high and how responsible is our office! But what is the message? It is to treat with sinners on peace and reconciliation. The embassy is one of infinite grace. God promises that He is ready to receive sinners into His favour. And can it be that such a gracious message should be rejected? There are two motives which we would present before you–motives which the apostle uses in this very chapter: the one of fear, arising from a consideration of Christ on the throne of judgment; the other of love, arising from a consideration of love on the Cross of suffering. (P. J. Gloag, D. D.)

Reconciliation

I. Premise three things in general.

1. That to reconcile is to bring into favour and friendship after some breach made and offence taken (Luk 23:12; Mat 5:23-24)

2. That the reconciliation is mutual; God is reconciled to us, and we to God. The alienation was mutual, and therefore the reconciliation must be so. The Scripture speaketh not only of an enmity and hatred on mans part (Rom 5:10), but also of wrath on Gods part, not only against sin, but the sinner (Eph 2:3; Psa 7:11).

3. That reconciliation is sometimes ascribed to God, to Christ, and to believers.

(1) To God the Father, as in the text and verse 18, and Col 1:20.

(2) To Christ (Eph 2:16; Col 1:21).

(3) To believers (2Co 5:20).

II. More particularly note three things.

1. The foregoing breach.

(1) God and man were once near friends (Gen 1:26-27.)

(2) Man got out of Gods favour by conspiring with Gods grand enemy.

(3) Man fallen drew all his posterity along with him; for God dealt not with him as a single, but as a public person (Rom 5:13; 1Co 15:47).

(4) The condition of every man by nature is to be a stranger and an enemy to God (Col 1:21; Rom 8:7).

2. The nature of this reconciliation.

(1) As the enmity is mutual, so is the reconciliation; God is reconciled to us, and we to God. His justice is satisfied in Christ, and He is willing to forgive. Our wicked disposition, too, is done away, and our hearts are converted and turned to the Lord. God offereth pardon, and requireth repentance. When we accept the offer, and submit to the conditions, and give the hand to the Lord, to walk with Him in obedience, then are we reconciled.

(2) This reconciliation is as firm and strong as our estate in innocency, and in some considerations better (Isa 57:4). A bone well set is strongest where broken.

(3) This active reconciliation draweth many blessings along with it.

(a) Peace with God (Rom 5:1).

(b) Access to God with boldness and free trade into heaven (Rom 5:2; Eph 2:18). When peace is made between two warring nations, trade revives.

(c) Acceptance both of our persons and performances (Eph 1:6).

(d) All the graces of the Spirit.

(e) The sanctification of all outward blessings (1Co 3:23; Rom 8:28).

(f) A pledge of heaven (Rom 5:10).

3. How far Christ is concerned in it, and why.

(1) God was resolved to lose no honour by the fall of man, but to keep up a sense of–

(a) His justice.

(b) His holiness.

(c) His truth.

(2) Christ was a fit Mediator.

(a) Because of His mutual interest in God and us (Job 9:33). He is beloved of the Father, and hath a brotherly compassion to us.

(b) He is able to satisfy. (T. Manton, D. D.)

The word of reconciliation

We owe the word reconciliation and the conception of the gospel as a reconciliation to the Apostle Paul. Whether it was that the circumstances of his own conversion so coloured all his thought that henceforth there was nothing more wonderful in the gospel than the new relation it created between God and man, and between man and God, we cannot, perhaps, tell. In this chapter, for example, five times over he dwells on the word, as if it were some sweet memory from which he was loth to part. Nor is this conception of the gospel confined to the earlier period of St. Pauls ministry. In the two great Epistles written when he had reached the fullest revelation of the glory of Christ, the Epistles to the Ephesians and the Colossians, he still loves to dwell on the reconciling work of Christ. For He is our peace who made both one, and brake down the middle wall of partition, having abolished in His flesh the enmity, even the law of commandments contained in ordinances, that He might create in Himself of the twain one new man, so making peace.

I. The word of reconciliation. It has been maintained by some theologians that the word of reconciliation concerns only man in his relation to God, and has no meaning for God in His relation to man. The blew Testament–it is said–never once speaks of God as being reconciled to man, or as needing to be reconciled: it does speak of man being reconciled to God, and the reason is clear. On the side of God there was no enmity, no alienation: these were all on our side; we were enemies by reason of wicked works, and the word of reconciliation is therefore a message to man. On the other hand, it is said–and in this many of the profoundest Evangelical theologians are agreed–that this purely subjective view of reconciliation unduly narrows the message we have to bear; that the sin of man not only affected his relation to God, but necessarily altered Gods relation to man; that the death of Christ has a Divine significance as well as a human meaning; that it has made peace between God and man, as well as between man and God: God was in Christ reconciling the world unto Himself–And how? By that great objective reconciliation involved in the forgiveness of sins, not imputing their trespasses unto them. There are four great positions underlying the message in the word of reconciliation, on which all men who believe in the gospel of Christ will be agreed.

1. It is a word, first, concerning God. In the address delivered by Dr. Dale, at the opening of the International Council, he said, In Christ God is the Father of all men. This is the glorious discovery of the Christian gospel, and although he went on to warn us that the universal Fatherhood of God did not involve the universal sonship of man, he did not hesitate to say it was the very foundation of the order of the world and of human life. And to those words of Dr. Dale let me add one word more, that this eternal Fatherhood of God is not only the foundation of the order of the world and of human life, but it is the foundation of the gospel of Christ: the first word in the message of reconciliation we are sent to proclaim. The Fatherhood of God is a greater thing than even His sovereignty, for it contains in it all that sovereignty means. The Father must be a ruler, but the ruler need not be a father; and the eternal fatherhood is as awful in its justice as it is tender in its pity; as infinite in the wonder of its holiness as it is in the wonder of its love. And yet Love is its chief word, its all-embracing word. The Love of God for all men, even for the worst, is the first word in the message we have to proclaim. It is even before the Cross of Christ; for if there had been no love there would have been no Cross.

2. It is a word about Christ. And that word is contained in the chapter from which I take my text, He died for all.

3. The word of reconciliation is a word concerning the Holy Spirit. There is a gospel of the Spirit as well as of the Cross. Pentecost had a meaning for the world as well as for the Church.

4. It is a word concerning man: Be ye reconciled to God. And this word is as sad as the former words were glorious. His alienation from God, that alienation that is at once the result of sin and the punishment of sin, his guilty fear of God, his inward hostility to God–all are here, or men would not need to be reconciled to God. It is the human side of our message, the word of reconciliation so far as it concerns man; but I ask you to remember all the power of this appeal to man depends on our first uttering the word concerning God. One word about God has more power over the human heart than all the words one can speak concerning man. The tides which swept around the shores of this earth are all moved by attraction far up in the heavens, and the great tides of emotion which carry the soul back to God are all lifted by the Cross of Christ. I, if I be lifted up from the earth, will draw all men unto Me.

II. The greatness of the trust committed to us. All work that is the service of man is honourable work, and all true service of man is work for God. The artist who fixes on canvas the dream of beauty; the scientific man who spells out letter by letter the secrets of nature; the philosopher who discovers to us the mysteries of our own minds–nay, the humblest toiler at the bench or in the shop–all of them just so far as they make the will of God the law of their life are fellow-labourers with God; and all may share the honours of a Divine reward. But this is not all the truth. There are degrees of glory even in Divine work, there is some work that lies nearer the heart of God, that touches Christ more than any other work; and of all work done for God on this earth there is none so dear to God, none that confers such unspeakable honour on the servant who does it, none that will receive so glorious a reward at last as the work of saving men. And our responsibility is as great as the honour laid upon us.

1. We must be faithful to the word committed to us. We have a message from God to deliver, not a science of religion to discover.

2. And, finally, it is not enough for us to be ourselves faithful to the word of reconciliation; we are responsible also for speaking that word to others. (G. S. Barrett, B. A.)

The incarnation; Gods work in Christ

God is a great worker. He is the mainspring of all activity in the universe but that of sin. There are at least four organs through which he works: material laws, animal instincts, moral mind, and Jesus Christ. By the first He carries on the great revolutions of inanimate nature; by the second He preserves, guides, and controls all the sentient tribes that populate the earth, the air and sea; by the third, through the laws of reason and the dictates of conscience, He governs the vast empire of mind; and by the fourth, namely, Christ, He works out the redemption of sinners in our world. There is no more difficulty in regarding Him in the one person–Christ, for a certain work–than there is in regarding Him as being in material nature, animal instinct, or moral mind. The text leads us to two remarks concerning Gods work in Christ:–

I. It is a work of reconciling humanity to himself. He is reconciling the world unto Himself;

1. The work implies–

(1) Enmity on mans part; and the existence of this enmity is patent to all. The carnal mind, etc.

(2) A change of mind in one of the parties.

2. Paul speaks of the human world as being reconciled to God in contradistinction–

(1) To fallen angels. Hell hates God, but He does not work for its reconciliation.

(2) To any particular class of the human family. Some would limit the redeeming work to the few; but it is not so restricted. He is a propitiation, not for our sins only, etc.

II. It is a work involving the remission of sins. Not imputing their trespasses unto them. Three facts will throw light on this.

1. A state of enmity against God is a state of sin. There may be virtue in disliking some persons, but it is evermore a sin to dislike God; He is infinitely good.

2. A state of sin is a state exposed to punishment.

3. In reconciliation the enmity is removed, and therefore the punishment obviated. What is pardon? A remitting of just punishment–a separating of man from his sins and their consequences. This God does through Christ.

III. From this subject four things may be considered in regard to this work of God in Christ.

1. It is a work of unbounded mercy. Who ever heard of the offended party seeking the friendship of the offender, especially if the offender was sovereign and the other subject? But this is what the Infinite God is doing in Christ, and doing earnestly every hour.

2. It is a work essential to the well-being of humanity. It is impossible that the creature can be happy whose thoughts, feelings, and purposes are directly opposed to the being, purposes, and procedure of the Absolute.

3. It is a work exclusively of benign moral influence. No coercion on the one hand, no angry denunciations on the other, can produce reconciliation; it is the work of loving logic.

4. It is a work which must be gradual in its progress. You cannot force mind; it must have time to reflect, repent, and resolve. (G. S. Barrett, B. A.)

Not imputing their trespasses to them.—

The non-imputation of sin

The pardon or non-imputation of sin.

I. The nature and worth of the privilege–not imputing (Rom 4:8).

1. It is a metaphor taken from those who cast up their accounts; and so it implies–

(1) That sin is a debt (Mat 6:12).

(2) That God will one day call sinners to an account, and charge such and such debts upon them (Mat 25:19).

(3) That in this day of accounts God will not impute the trespasses of those who are reconciled to Him by Christ (Psa 32:2).

2. Now this is–

(1) An act of great grace and favour on Gods part, because–

(a) Every one is become guilty before God, and obnoxious to the process of His righteous judgment (Rom 3:19). There is sin enough to impute, and the reason of this non-imputation is not our innocency, but Gods mercy.

(b) He would not prosecute His right against us, calling us to a strict account, and punishing us according to our demerits, which would have been our utter undoing (Psa 130:3; Psa 143:1-12.).

(c) He found out the way how to recompense the wrong done by sin unto His Majesty, and sent His Son to make this recompense for us (verse 21; Psa 53:4; Rom 4:2).

(d) He did this out of His mere love, which set-a-work all the causes which concurred in the business of our redemption (Joh 3:16). And this love was not excited by any love on our parts (Rom 3:24).

3. This negative or non-imputation is heightened by the positive imputation of Christs merits.

(1) A matter of great privilege and blessedness to the creature. This will appear if we consider–

(a) The evil we are freed from; guilt is an obligation to punishment, and pardon is the dissolving this obligation.

(b) The good depending upon it in this life and the next.

II. The manner how this privilege is brought about and applied to us.

1. The first stone in this building was laid in Gods eternal decree and purpose to reconcile sinners to Himself by Christ, not imputing their trespasses to them.

2. The second step was when Christ was actually exhibited in the flesh, and paid our ransom for us (1Jn 3:5; Joh 1:29; Heb 10:14).

3. The next step was when Christ rose from the dead; for then we had a visible evidence of the sufficiency of the ransom, sacrifice, and satisfaction which He made for us (Rom 5:25; Rom 8:34).

4. We are actually justified, pardoned, and reconciled when we repent and believe.

5. We are sensibly pardoned, as well as actually, when the Lord giveth peace and joy in believing, and sheddeth abroad His love in our hearts by the Spirit.

6. The last step is when we have a complete and full absolution of sin–that is, at the day of judgment (Act 3:19).

III. It is a branch and fruit of our reconciliation with God.

1. Because when God releaseth us from the punishment of sin, it is a sign His anger is appeased and now over.

2. That which is the ground of reconciliation is the ground of pardon of sin (Eph 1:7).

3. That which is the fruit of reconciliation is obtained and promoted by pardon of sin, and that is fellowship with God and delightful communion with Him in a course of obedience and subjection to Him (Heb 10:22; 1Jn 1:7). (T. Manton, D. D.)

Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell

Verse 18. And all things are of God] As the thorough conversion of the soul is compared to a new creation, and creation is the proper work of an all-wise, almighty Being; then this total change of heart, soul, and life, which takes place under the preaching of the Gospel, is effected by the power and grace of God: this is salvation, and salvation must ever be of the Lord; and therefore men should apply to him, who alone can work this wondrous change.

Who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ] Having given Jesus Christ to die for sinners, they have through him access unto God; for his sake and on his account God can receive them; and it is only by the grace and Spirit of Christ that the proud, fierce, and diabolic nature of men can be changed and reconciled to God, and by and through this sacrifice God can be propitious to them. There is an enmity in the heart of man against sacred things; the grace of Christ alone can remove this enmity.

The ministry of reconciliation] The OFFICE or function of this reconciliation called, 2Co 5:19, the word; . the DOCTRINE of this reconciliation. , reconciliation, comes from , to change thoroughly; and the grand object of the Gospel is to make a complete change in men’s minds and manners; but the first object is the removal of enmity from the heart of man, that he may be disposed to accept of the salvation God has provided for him, on the terms which God has promised. The enmity in the heart of man is the grand hinderance to his salvation.

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

And all things are of God; this change, which is wrought in our hearts, is not of ourselves, but wrought in us by the great and mighty power of God: so Joh 1:13; Which were born, not of blood, nor of the will of the flesh, nor of the will of man, but of God; of God, as the principal efficient Cause.

Who hath reconciled its to himself by Jesus Christ; who, by the blood of his Son Jesus Christ, meritoriously, and by the Spirit of Christ, actually, hath reconciled us unto himself; of enemies hath made us friends.

And hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation; hath intrusted us with the preaching of the gospel. It is God that hath reconciled us; it is Christ by whom we are reconciled, his blood is the price of our reconciliation; but he committed to his apostles, and so to the successive ministers of the gospel,

the ministry of reconciliation, that is, the ministry of the gospel, by which this reconciliation is published to such as are yet enemies to God. They have but a ministration in it; God hath appointed them to publish and to declare it, and to entreat men to be reconciled unto him.

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole

18. allGreek, “THE.”

thingsall ourprivileges in this new creation (2Co 5:14;2Co 5:15).

reconciled usthat is,restored us (“the world,” 2Co5:19) to His favor by satisfying the claims of justiceagainst us. Our position judicially considered in the eye of the lawis altered, not as though the mediation of Christ had made a changein God’s character, nor as if the love of God was produced by themediation of Christ; nay, the mediation and sacrifice of Christ wasthe provision of God’s love, not its moving cause (Ro8:32). Christ’s blood was the price paid at the expense of GodHimself, and was required to reconcile the exercise of mercy withjustice, not as separate, but as the eternally harmonious attributesin the one and the same God (Rom 3:25;Rom 3:26). The Greek“reconcile” is reciprocally used as in the HebrewHithpahel conjugation, appease, obtain the favor of. Mt5:24, “Be reconciled to thy brother”; that is, takemeasures that he be reconciled to thee, as well as thou to him, asthe context proves. Diallagethi, however (Mt5:24), implying mutual reconciliation, is distinct fromKatallagethi here, the latter referring to the changeof status wrought in one of the two parties. The manner of Godreconciling the world to Himself is implied (2Co5:19), namely, by His “not imputing their trespasses tothem.” God not merely, as subsequently, reconciles the world byinducing them to lay aside their enmity, but in the first instance,does so by satisfying His own justice and righteous enmity againstsin (Ps 7:11). Compare 1Sa29:4, “Reconcile himself unto his master”; not removehis own anger against his master, but his master’s against him[ARCHBISHOP MAGEE,Atonement]. The reconciling of men to God by theirlaying aside their enmity is the consequence of God laying aside Hisjust enmity against their sin, and follows at 2Co5:20.

to usministers(2Co 5:19; 2Co 5:20).

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

And all things are of God,…. A man’s being brought into a Gospel church state is of God; the causing all old things to pass away, whether in the Jewish or Gentile world, is of God; the shaking of the heavens and the earth, and the removing of those things that are shaken, the abrogation of the ceremonial law, the putting an end to all the Mosaic rites and sacrifices, the ejection of Satan out of the Heathen temples, and the abolition of Gentilism, with every thing else that comes under the names of old, and new, are of God: it is he that causes old things to pass away, and makes all things new, see Re 21:1. Moreover, as all things in the old creation are from him, all creatures owe their beings to him, are supported in them by him, and all are made for his pleasure, and his glory so all things in the new creation are of him; the work of renovation itself is his; all the grace that is implanted in regeneration comes front him: nothing is of the creature, or to be ascribed to it. All things in redemption are of him; he drew the plan of it, called his Son to be the Redeemer, appointed and sent him as such; and particularly that branch of it, reconciliation, is of him:

who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ. The work of reconciliation, or making atonement for sin, is ascribed to the Father; not that he is the author of it, for it is properly Christ’s work; but because he took the first step towards it: he formed the scheme of it; he set forth his Son in his purposes and decrees to be the propitiary sacrifice; he assigned him this work in council and covenant, in promise and in prophecy, and sent him to effect it; therefore he is said to do it “by” him; that is, by his blood and sacrifice, by his sufferings and death, to which, and to which alone, the Scriptures ascribe our peace and reconciliation: and this is made to “himself”: as being the party offended, whose law was broken, against whom sin was committed, and whose justice required and demanded satisfaction:

and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation; which is the Gospel of peace, the word which preaches, publishes and declares, peace made by the blood of Christ; which is a gift to ministers, and a blessing to the people. The free grace of God greatly appears in this matter; God the Father sets this work of reconciliation on foot, Christ has brought it about, and the ministers of the Gospel publish it.

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

Who reconciled us to himself through Christ ( ). Here Paul uses one of his great doctrinal words, , old word for exchanging coins. , to change one’s mind, to reconcile, occurs in N.T. only in Mt 5:24 though in papyri (Deissmann, Light from the Ancient East, p. 187), and common in Attic. is old verb, but more frequent in later writers. We find in Ac 7:26 and in Col 1:20; Eph 2:16 and the substantive in Rom 5:11; Rom 11:15 as well as here. It is hard to discuss this great theme without apparent contradiction. God’s love (Joh 3:16) provided the means and basis for man’s reconciliation to God against whom he had sinned. It is all God’s plan because of his love, but God’s own sense of justice had to be satisfied (Ro 3:26) and so God gave his Son as a propitiation for our sins (Rom 3:25; Col 1:20; 1John 2:2; 1John 4:10). The point made by Paul here is that God needs no reconciliation, but is engaged in the great business of reconciling us to himself. This has to be done on God’s terms and is made possible through () Christ.

And gave unto us the ministry of reconciliation ( ). It is a ministry marked by reconciliation, that consists in reconciliation. God has made possible through Christ our reconciliation to him, but in each case it has to be made effective by the attitude of each individual. The task of winning the unreconciled to God is committed to us. It is a high and holy one, but supremely difficult, because the offending party (the guilty) is the hardest to win over. We must be loyal to God and yet win sinful men to him.

Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament

And [] . Better, Rev., but; as if anticipating a possible failure to discern the primary agency of God in this moral transformation. All things – all that are involved in this mighty change – are from God.

Reconciled. God is the prime – mover in the work of reconciliation. See on Rom 5:10, through Christ, as the medium.

Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament

1) “And all things are of God,” (ta de panta ek tou theou) “And all things are (now exist) of or from God,” all these new things are of God, 2Co 1:21; 2Co 4:6; 1Jn 4:10.

2) “Who hath reconciled us,” (tou katallaksantos hemas) “The one who reconciled us,” restored us, in God through Jesus Christ, Rom 5:10. The term “reconcile” means to reestablish friendly relations between two parties who are estranged no matter which party is offended, Mat 5:24; 1Sa 29:4.

3) “By Jesus Christ,” (heauto dia Christou) “to himself through Christ,” the embodiment of Godliness in redemption and reconciliation, 1Ti 3:16.

4). “And hath given to us,” (kai dontos hemin) “and hath doled out, meted out, or given into our trust,” the trust of the church (institutionally) and each congregation and her members in particular, Eph 3:21; Mar 16:15.

5) “The ministry of reconciliation,” (ten diakonian tes katallages) “The common ministry (deaconship) or fellowship of reconciliation;” Mat 28:18-20; Joh 20:21; Act 1:8; Rom 11:15; In the “cross-body” death of Christ the provision for reconciliation, of Jew & Gentile, and the whole world to God, was provided. Through the church body, which He too purchased with His own blood, the ministry, common labors of reconciliation, the story of reconciliation is told, Act 20:28; Eph 3:8-10.

Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary

18. All things are of God. He means, all things that belong to Christ’s kingdom. “If we would be Christ’s, we must be regenerated by God. Now that is no ordinary gift.” He does not, therefore, speak here of creation generally; but of the grace of regeneration, which God confers peculiarly upon his elect, and he affirms that it is of God — not on the ground of his being the Creator and Artificer of heaven and earth, but inasmuch as he is the new Creator of the Church, by fashioning his people anew, according to his own image. Thus all flesh is abased, and believers are admonished that they must now live to God, inasmuch as they are a new creature. (2Co 5:17.) This they cannot do, unless they forget the world, as they are also no longer of the world, (Joh 17:16,) because they are of God

Who hath reconciled us Here there are two leading points — the one relating to the reconciliation of men with God; and the other, to the way in which we may enjoy the benefit of this reconciliation. Now these things correspond admirably with what goes before, for as the Apostle had given the preference to a good conscience above every kind of distinction, (2Co 5:11,) he now shows that the whole of the gospel tends to this. He shows, however, at the same time, the dignity of the Apostolical office, that the Corinthians may be instructed as to what they ought to seek in him, whereas they could not distinguish between true and false ministers, for this reason, that nothing but show delighted them. Accordingly, by making mention of this, he stirs them up to make greater proficiency in the doctrine of the gospel. For an absurd admiration of profane persons, who serve their own ambition rather than Christ, originates in our not knowing, what the office of the preaching of the gospel includes, or imports.

I now return to those two leading points that are here touched upon. The first is — that God hath reconciled us to himself by Christ This is immediately followed by the declaration — Because God was in Christ, and has in his person accomplished reconciliation. The manner is subjoined — By not imputing unto men their trespasses Again, there is annexed a second declaration — Because Christ having been made a sin-offering for our sins, has procured righteousness for us. The second part of the statement is — that the grace of reconciliation is applied to us by the gospel, that we may become partakers of it. Here we have a remarkable passage, if there be any such in any part of Paul’s writings. Hence it is proper, that we should carefully examine the words one by one.

The ministry of reconciliation Here we have an illustrious designation of the gospel, as being an embassy for reconciling men to God. It is also a singular dignity of ministers — that they are sent to us by God with this commission, so as to be messengers, and in a manner sureties. (553) This, however, is not said so much for the purpose of commending ministers, as with a view to the consolation of the pious, that as often as they hear the gospel, they may know that God treats with them, and, as it were, stipulates with them as to a return to his grace. Than this blessing what could be more desirable? Let us therefore bear in mind, that this is the main design of the gospel — that whereas we are by nature children of wrath, (Eph 2:3,) we may, by the breaking up of the quarrel between God and us, be received by him into favor. Ministers are furnished with this commission, that they may bring us intelligence of so great a benefit, nay more, may assure us of God’s fatherly love towards us. Any other person, it is true, might also be a witness to us of the grace of God, but Paul teaches, that this office is specially intrusted to ministers. When, therefore, a duly ordained minister proclaims in the gospel, that God has been made propitious to us, he is to be listened to just as an ambassador of God, and sustaining, as they speak, a public character, and furnished with rightful authority for assuring us of this.

(553) “ Et comme pleges de sa bonne volonte enuers nous;” — “And as it were pledges of his good will toward us.”

Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary

Appleburys Comments

The Ministry of Reconciliation
Scripture

2Co. 5:18-21. But all things are of God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ, and gave unto us the ministry of reconciliation; 19 to wit, that God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself, not reckoning unto them their trespasses, and having committed unto us the word of reconciliation.

20 We are ambassadors therefore on behalf of Christ, as though God were entreating by us: we beseech you on behalf of Christ, be ye reconciled to God. 21 Him who knew no sin he made to be sin on our behalf; that we might become the righteousness of God in him.

Comments

But all things are of God.For Paul, the old things had passed away. He had suffered the loss of all things that he might gain Christ. See Php. 3:1-16. Once he had thought that he ought to do many things contrary to the name of Jesus of Nazareth. See Act. 26:9. He had actually tried to destroy the church of God. See Gal. 1:13. But God reconciled him unto Himself and gave him the ministry of reconciliation. He had become a new creature in Christ.

God was in Christ reconciling the world unto himself.This sentence should, in all probability be punctuated as follows: God was, in Christ, reconciling the world unto himself. It was through Christ that God created the world; it was through Him that God was reconciling the world unto Himself. Paul was the ambassador of Christ working together with God. This in no way contradicts the plain teaching of Scripture as to the deity of Jesus. His mission was to reveal the Father and save the lost. See Col. 2:9; Joh. 1:1-2; Joh. 1:14; Joh. 14:7-8. Paul said that Jesus existed in the form of God on an equality with God. See Php. 2:5-11. The Gospel of John was written to show how Christ revealed the Father. See Joh. 1:18. At the height of His ministry, Philip said to Jesus, Show us the Father, and it will suffice us. Jesus answered, Believest thou not that I am in the Father and the Father in me? The words that I say unto you I speak not of myself: but the Father abiding in me doeth his works. Believe me that I am in the Father, and the Father in me: or else believe me for my very works sake (Joh. 14:10-11). If they had only recognized Him, they would have known the Father. See Joh. 14:7. The ministry of Christ shows the Fathers effort to bring men into fellowship with Himself again. Sin which caused the separation is blotted out by the blood of Christ. Paul had accepted this profound truth and had gotten himself baptized by Ananias that his sins might be washed away.

not reckoning unto them their trespasses.See Pauls comment in Rom. 4:6-8. The blood of Christ covers the sin of the one who believes in Christ; for that reason, the Lord will not reckon his sin against him. As an apostle of Christ, Paul told sinners how to be saved that they might be reconciled to God.

we are ambassadors.This term refers to the apostles of Christ whom He equipped by the baptism in the Holy Spirit to speak for Him. See Joh. 16:8-14; 1Co. 2:6-16. The wisdom of God had been revealed to them through the Spirit of God. They were ambassadors on behalf of Christ, that is, they were acting on His authority when they revealed the terms on which sinners could be reconciled to God. Instead of reckoning their trespasses against them, God was urging sinners to accept His terms and be brought into fellowship with Him again.

Him who knew no sin.The sinlessness of Jesus is determined by the fact that He was tempted in all points like as we are yet without sin. See Heb. 4:15. God made Him represent sin when He died on the cross for our sakes. This made it possible for us to become representatives of the righteous standard of conduct which God approves. The words of Christ on the cross, My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me? show what it meant to represent sin. The cross shows what it means to be lost. The life of dedication to Christ shows what it means to become a representative of the kind of life God approves. Paul put it this way: I have been crucified with Christ; Christ lives in me. See Gal. 2:20. What was true of Paul is also true of those who belong to Christ, for they have crucified the flesh with the passions and lusts thereof. See Gal. 5:24.

The sin offering under the Old Covenant sheds light on the meaning of the cross. The sacrificial, animal had to be physically perfect. After the priest had confessed the sins of the people, the animal was slain to symbolize the fact that death is the penalty for sin. The perfection of the sacrifice symbolized the purity of the worshipper whose sins had been covered by the blood.

the righteousness of God in him.With his sins washed away in the blood of the Lamb, the believer becomes the representative of the kind of life God expects His people to live. Christ set the perfect example of this righteous conduct, for He did not sin. Peter, commenting on this, said, Christ also suffered for you, leaving you an example, that ye should follow in his steps: who did no sin (1Pe. 2:21-22).

Paul, speaking of the grace of God which reigns through righteousness unto eternal life through Jesus Christ, asks: What shall we say then? Shall we continue in sin, that grace may abound? God forbid. We who died to sin, how shall we any longer live therein? (Rom. 5:21; Rom. 6:1-2). To those who have been buried with Christ through baptism into death and have been raised together with Him to walk in the new life, Paul adds, Even so reckon yourselves to be dead unto sin, but alive unto God in Christ Jesus. Let not sin therefore reign in your mortal bodies that ye should obey the lusts thereof: neither present your members unto sin as instruments of unrighteousness; but present yourselves unto God, as alive from the dead, and your members as instruments of righteousness unto God! (Rom. 6:11-13).

Summary

Paul faced the future with undaunted courage because he knew that although his body was growing weak under the load he was carrying there was a home for him in heaven. His physical body was like a tent in which he was living temporarily, but the heavenly building would be a permanent dwelling place with the Lord.
Pain and hardship made Paul long for the time when he would be in that heavenly house not made with hands. He was not anticipating a condition without a body. Pagan philosophers thought such a state would be heavenly, because they would then be free from pain and suffering associated with the physical body. Paul looked to the time when the Lord would fashion anew this mortal body that it might conform to the body of His glory. We shall be like Him, for we shall see Him in His glorious body.
Paul was sure of this because of the guarantee God had given through the revelation from God by the Holy Spirit. We can read about it in the Bible. In this confidence, Paul longed for the time when he would be able to leave this earthly home and be at home with the Lord in that permanent, heavenly dwelling.
Therefore, Paul made it his aim to be well-pleasing to the Lord in this life and in the heavenly state. The verdict that will be rendered on the Judgment Day will depend on what we have done in the body in this life, whether it is good or evil.
Because of this solemn thought, Paul had committed himself to the ministry of reconciliation which he had received from God. He was endeavoring to persuade men to obey God and be prepared for the Judgment Day. He knew that this was evident to God and he hoped that the Corinthians were aware of it too. Their own response to this message of reconciliation would allow them to boast of the fact that they had received it from Gods apostle. This differs from the situation of those who were boasting in false hopes instead of the real hope that comes from obedience to the gospel.
Christs love for him was the compelling force that kept Paul on this true course. He knew that Christ had died for him, for He died for all sinners. Paul knew that he had died through his trespasses and sins; the greatest of these was his attempt to destroy the church of God. But Christ died for sinners so that they might no longer live for themselves but for Him who for their sakes died and rose again.
Since he had come to understand what the love of Christ had done for him, he no longer looked at any man as a mere human being but as one who could become a new creature through obedience to Christ. Once he had looked upon Messiahindeed, most Jews had done the same thingas a human Christ. But His death and resurrection changed all this for Paul. Old things had passed away, behold, they had become new!
Thus God had reconciled Paul to Himself through Christ and had given him the ministry of reconciliation. God was, in Christ, reconciling the world unto Himself. He was not entering their trespasses in the record against them, but through His ambassador He was pleading that they reconcile themselves to Him. This was possible because He made the sinless Christ to represent sin as He died on the cross that they might become the representatives of righteousness which God approves by their relation to Christ.

Questions

Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series

(18) And all things are of God.The presence of the article in the Greek indicates that he is speaking, not of the universe at large, but of the new things belonging to the new creation of which he had spoken in the previous verse. The line of thought on which he has now entered raises him for the time above all that is personal and temporary, and leads him to one of his fullest and noblest utterances as to Gods redeeming work.

Who hath reconciled us to himself. . . . and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation.It is worthy of note that this is the first occurrence, in order of time, in St. Pauls Epistles, of this word reconcile as describing Gods work in Christ, and that so applied it occurs only in this Epistle and in Rom. 5:10, written shortly afterwards. The idea involved is that man had been at enmity and was now atoned (at-oned) and brought into concord with God. It will be noted that the work is described as originating with the Father and accomplished by the mediation of the Son. It is obvious that the personal pronoun is used with a different extent in the two clauses: the first embracing, as the context shows, the whole race of mankind; the last limited to those who, like the Apostles, were preachers of the Word. More accurately, the verbs should run: who reconciled. . . . and gave. The word translated reconciliation is, it should be noted, the same as that rendered atonement in Rom. 5:11.

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

18. Of God See note, 2Co 5:5. Know, O ye late polytheistic Corinthians, that this whole system of Christian regeneration is firmly fastened to the throne of God.

Hath reconciled us Conditionally. For in 2Co 5:19 that reconciling is a process still in progress, and in 2Co 5:20, it depends upon the will of the transgressor whether he will be reconciled or not. It is the divine side, therefore, which St. Paul here designates; none the less implying the human side as condition to completion. And this reconciliation, when completed, is same with the renovation of 2Co 5:16-17, and fruit of the substitutional death of 2Co 5:14-15.

Ministry Same Greek word as applied to deaconship, Act 6:1, note. We are the ministers, and in 2Co 5:20 the ambassadors, of the reconciliation. The us, twice used in this verse, designates St. Paul himself, yet is inclusive of the apostles by implication. Yet no permanent limitation is implied, for the world is included as being reconciled. 2Co 5:19.

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

‘But all things are of God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ, and gave to us the ministry of reconciliation; to wit, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself, not reckoning to them their trespasses, and having committed to us the word of reconciliation.’

Having been tightly grasped by the love of Christ, and having experienced the powerful effect of the word of the cross, and having been made one with Him in His death and resurrection (2Co 5:14-15), we see both men and Jesus from different perspectives to what we had before (2Co 5:16), and we have become new creatures in Christ (2Co 5:17). And now he stresses that all this is of God.

‘All things are of God.’ Whether it be our salvation in Christ, the newness of our thoughts, or the new creatures that we have become. All that happens to us spiritually (‘all things’), is because God has taken the initiative and reconciled us to Himself through Christ Jesus.

Alternatively he may simply be making a general declaration that everything (‘all things’) that happens is of God, and especially His reconciling work.

Either way he is declaring that it was God and God alone who brought about the means of reconciliation and, as a result, our reconciliation to Him. It was God Who took the initiative, through Christ, as a result of which the consequences he has described followed. Paul probably has very much in mind the way that God arrested him on the Damascus road (Acts 9). His mad career was brought to a sudden halt by the sovereign power of God, Who reconciled him to Himself. Yet in the end it is true for all who come to Him. He chooses whom He will reconcile, and then brings about the reconciliation (indeed in one senses has already brought it about) through Christ (see Eph 2:13-18; Col 1:20-22). All we can do is respond to His initiative, as Paul did.

The need for ‘reconciliation’ suggests that there is enmity and hostility to be dealt with (Col 1:21). Once Paul had not thought of himself as hostile to God. He would have sworn that he was God’s true servant. That was why he had persecuted the Christians. But God had been forced to show him that his attitude to Christ demonstrated his enmity against God. He was rejecting what God really was. He was at enmity with God’s demands (compare Rom 8:7; Eph 2:15-16; Jas 4:4). The same is true for all men. They may have a general belief in God. But their hearts are not with Him. Their hearts too are at enmity with Him as is proved by their lives (Rom 1:18 following). All therefore need to be ‘reconciled’ if they are to know God (see Rom 5:10). And that does not just mean that they are willing to be reconciled, it means that somehow God has to become reconciled to them and what they are.

For God is ‘hostile’ to us because of what we are, because of our sinfulness and rebellion. It is not that He wishes enmity, it is that in us there is that which arouses His abhorrence, that which He cannot overlook, because it is contrary to His nature. So the result must be that God has a moral antipathy towards us because of our sin. That being the case provision has somehow to be found for the removal of sin, that sin which is abominable in God’s eyes, for while our sins are still reckoned to us God cannot be reconciled to us because He is holy and just. But through His death Christ has made it possible for our sins not to be reckoned to us, simply because once we believe in Him they are reckoned to Him. Thus can we be reconciled to God, and He to us, by believing in Him.

And having reconciled us to Himself God has now given to us the ministry of reconciliation. Are we now reconciled to Him? Then He wants the offer of reconciliation to be taken to others. It is not for us, and for us alone. There are more whom He would call. And what is the message? It is that ‘God was in Christ reconciling the world to himself, not reckoning to them their trespasses (misdeeds, that in which men fall short)’.

‘God was in (or ‘through’) Christ.’ This may mean that God was actually acting in Christ, that Christ was to be seen as God at work. But had the incarnation been specifically in mind we might perhaps have expected reference to ‘Jesus’. So if we translate ‘in’ the emphasis is more on God being in Christ in His pre-incarnation being (1Pe 1:20), predetermined to die from the foundation of the world (Act 2:23) as the One determined from the very beginning, although resulting in the incarnation and crucifixion. Alternatively we may better see it as meaning that God was Himself acting ‘through and in Christ’ in His work of redemption.

The offer now being made to ‘the world’ makes it clear that God has established a means of reconciliation which is open to the whole world. If man was to be reconciled to God, brought back into acceptability and friendly relations with Him, a means which made that reconciliation possible must be established. It was not just a matter of man laying down his arms. What he had done in the past, which had aroused God’s antipathy to sin, had somehow to be dealt with. And it was in Christ that God did all that was necessary for that reconciliation to be made possible, so that it could be offered to men and so that their sins might not, if they believed in Christ, be ‘reckoned against them’. He dealt with the cause of enmity, the law of commandments contained in ordinances (Eph 2:1; Rom 7:11) which pointed the finger at us and our sin, by bearing the punishment in His own Son. He Himself paid the price of sin (1Co 6:20; 1Pe 1:18-19; Tit 2:14). He made a way of atonement, of ‘at-one-ment’, a means by which what was contrary to Him could be removed (Rom 3:24-25; 1Jn 2:1-2), so that we could come to Him. And He accomplished it through the death of His Son.

It should be noted that elsewhere Scripture makes perfectly clear that all will not be reconciled. The point is not that all will be reconciled, but that what He has done is qualitatively sufficient for such reconciliation, yes, more than sufficient. If need be it would have been sufficient for a thousand universes. It is infinite compared with the finite. So if men refuse it they only have themselves to blame.

Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett

2Co 5:18. And all things, &c. Now, &c.

Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke

2Co 5:18 . On 2Co 5:18-21 , see appropriate remarks in Fritzsche, ad Rom. I. p. 279 f.

] leading on from the . to the supreme source of this change; hence, contextually, is nothing else than: the whole that has become new . Everything, in which the new state of the Christian consists, proceeds from God ; and now by is specified the mode in which God has set it into operation, namely, by His having reconciled us with Himself through Christ, and entrusted to the apostle and his fellow-labourers labourers the ministry of reconciliation. The reconciliation has taken place with reference to all humanity (hence , 2Co 5:19 ); but Paul uses in the person of believers , as those who have experienced the reconciliation of the world in its subjective realization. This in opposition to Leun, Ewald, Rckert, Hofmann, who refer it to the apostle and his fellow-workers, Hofmann, indeed, finding nothing else affirmed than the conversion , in so far as it was “a change of his relation , and not of his conduct , towards God.” And that does not apply to men in general (Olshausen), but to Paul and the rest of the apostolic teachers , is clear from , 2Co 5:19 , which is evidently (seeing that Paul has not written ) distinguished by a special reference from ; besides, the inference, 2Co 5:20 , ., manifestly presupposes the special reference of and in 2Co 5:18-19 . This also in opposition to Hfling. Kirchenverf . p. 225, Exo 3 .

. . .] who has reconciled us with Himself through Christ . For men were, by means of their uneffaced sin, burdened with God’s holy wrath, (Rom 5:10 ; Rom 11:28 ; Eph 2:16 ; comp. Col 1:20 f.), Deo invisi ; but through God’s causing Christ to die as , [237] He accomplished the effacing of their sins, and by this, therefore, God’s wrath ceased. The same thought is contained in Rom 5:10 , only expressed in a passive form. Tittmann’s distinction between . and . ( Synon . p. 102) is of no value; see on Rom 5:10 , and Fritzsche, ad Rom. I. p. 276 ff.

. .] the ministry, which is devoted to reconciliation , which is the means of reconciliation for men, inasmuch as through this ministry reconciliation is preached to them, and they are brought unto faith on the Jesus, which faith is the causa apprehendens of the reconciliation, Rom 3:25 ; comp. , 2Co 3:9 . The opposite: . , 2Co 3:9 .

[237] i.e. . Comp. ver. 21. Pelagius erroneously adds: “per Christi doctrinam pariter et exemplum .”

REMARK.

Rckert erroneously explains the reconciliation from the active enmity of men against God. God, according to his view, caused Christ to die for men, that He might, no doubt, on the one hand, be able to accomplish the of their sins; but through this manifest proof of His love He filled men with thankfulness, and gave them encouragement to accomplish the reconciliation on their side also, and so (as was Baur’s opinion also) to give up their enmity towards God. And thus strictly regarded, the death of Jesus, according to Paul, has not so much reconciled humanity with God, as it has removed the obstacles to the reconciliation, and given a stimulus to the heart to enter into the only right and friendly relation with God.

No, the death of Jesus operated as (Rom 3:25 ; Gal 3:13 ), consequently as effacing God’s holy enmity (Rom 11:28 ), the , so that He now did not impute to men their sins (2Co 5:19 ), and in this way, actu forensi , reconciled them with Himself (2Co 5:21 ), while simple faith is the subjective condition of appropriation on the part of men. Comp. on Col 1:21 . The thankfulness, the new courage, the holy life, etc., are only a consequence of the reconciliation appropriated in faith, not a part of it. Comp. Rom 5:1 ff; Rom 6:1 ff; Rom 8:3-4 , al. This, at the same time, in opposition to the doctrine of reconciliation set forth by Hofmann (see on Rom 3:25 ), who at our passage calls in question the view that . . . expresses an act of God, which takes place once for all in and with the history of Christ, and defines the notion of . (in which is held to apply to Paul, in whom God had wrought faith), as amounting to this, that God through Christ , “whom He Himself gives and ordains for the purpose, makes sin cease for Him to be the cause of wrath against the sinner .” Comp. on the clear and correct notion of reconciliation, according to our passage, Weiss, bibl. Theol. p. 325.

Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary

18 And all things are of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation;

Ver. 18. And all things are of God ] He is both author and finisher of our faith, the God of all grace, the Father of all lights, &c.

And hath given us the ministry ] He hath taken this office from the angels, those first preachers of peace, Luk 2:10 ; Luk 2:14 . The angel told Cornelius his prayers were heard in heaven; but for the doctrine of reconciliation he refers him to Peter, Act 10:36 .

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

18. ] And all things (in this new creation: he passes to a more general view of the effects of the death of Christ viz. our reconciliation to God ) are from God (as their source), who reconciled us ( all men , from next verse, where is parallel with it) to Himself by means of Christ (as an atonement, an expiatory sacrifice, 2Co 5:21 , for sin which made us , see Rom 5:10 ), and gave (committed) to us (Apostles, not mankind in general; for had it been so, in the next verse, which is parallel, , not , must have stood, after and just preceding) the ministration of the reconciliation (the duty of ministering in that office, whose peculiar work it is to proclaim this reconciliation: so , ch. 2Co 3:9 .

Observe, that the reconciliation spoken of in this and the next verse, is that of God to us , absolutely and objectively, through His Son: that whereby He can complacently behold and endure a sinful world, and receive all who come to Him by Christ. This, the subjective reconciliation, of men to God , follows as a matter of exhortation, 2Co 5:20 ),

Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament

2Co 5:18 . . . .: but all things, sc. , all these new things, are of God . See reff. St. Paul is especially anxious in this Epistle to trace up spiritual blessings to their true source; see chap. 2Co 1:21 , 2Co 4:6 , 2Co 5:5 , and cf. 1Co 3:23 , , . . . .: who reconciled (note the aorist) us, sc. , all mankind, to Himself through Christ . The words , should be studied (see reff.) in all the contexts where they occur. The verb signifies (i.) to exchange and (ii.) to reconcile, i.e. , to reestablish friendly relations between two parties who are estranged, no matter on which side the antagonism exists. Thus in Mat 5:24 it is the brother who has given offence (not he who has received it) that is spoken of as “being reconciled” to the other ( cf. also 1Sa 29:4 ). And so too St. Paul’s usage is to speak of man being reconciled to God, not of God being reconciled to man; but far too much has been made of this distinction. In fact, in 2 Macc. (see reff.) the usage is the other way, for God is there always spoken of as “being reconciled” to His servants. It is, no doubt, more reverent in such a matter to keep as close to the language of the N.T. as we can, and to speak nakedly of God “being reconciled” to man might readily suggest false and unworthy views as to the Supreme. But that St. Paul would have felt any difficulty in such a phrase is very unlikely. The important point to observe in the present passage is that it is God Himself who is the ultimate Author of this Reconciliation; cf. Rom 5:8 ; Rom 8:31-32 , and especially Joh 3:16 . That the Reconciliation is “through Christ” is the heart of the Gospel of the Atonement ( cf. Rom 3:24 , Col 1:20 , etc.). . . .: and gave to us, sc. , to me, Paul (he is not now thinking of others), the Ministry of Reconciliation; cf. chap. 2Co 3:9 , , the genitive in both cases being, of course, of the thing ministered.

Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson

all things. Greek. ta panta. Compare Act 17:26. Rom 11:36; 1Co 8:6.

hath. Omit.

reconciled. See Rom 6:10,

Jesus. Omit.

hath given = gave.

ministry. App-190.

reconciliation = the reconciliation, See 2Co 5:11.

Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics

18.] And all things (in this new creation: he passes to a more general view of the effects of the death of Christ-viz. our reconciliation to God) are from God (as their source), who reconciled us (all men, from next verse, where is parallel with it) to Himself by means of Christ (as an atonement, an expiatory sacrifice, 2Co 5:21, for sin which made us , see Rom 5:10), and gave (committed) to us (Apostles, not mankind in general; for had it been so,-in the next verse, which is parallel, , not , must have stood, after and just preceding) the ministration of the reconciliation (the duty of ministering in that office, whose peculiar work it is to proclaim this reconciliation: so , ch. 2Co 3:9.

Observe, that the reconciliation spoken of in this and the next verse, is that of God to us, absolutely and objectively, through His Son: that whereby He can complacently behold and endure a sinful world, and receive all who come to Him by Christ. This, the subjective reconciliation,-of men to God,-follows as a matter of exhortation, 2Co 5:20),

Fuente: The Greek Testament

2Co 5:18. , and all these things) which have been mentioned from 2Co 5:14. Paul infers from the death of Christ his obligation to God, 2Co 5:13.-, us) the world, and especially and expressly the apostles; comp. the following verse, where there is again subjoined [hath committed] unto us. That word us, especially comprehends the apostles; but not them alone; for at the beginning of 2Co 5:18, the discourse is already widely extended [so as to apply to all men]. Thus the subject varies [is changed] often in the same discourse, and yet subsequently the mark of the subject being distinct from what it had been, is not expressly added.-, to us) apostles.- , the ministry) the word [of reconciliation] in the following verse. The ministry dispenses the word.

Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament

2Co 5:18

2Co 5:18

But all things are of God,-All things in the new relation in Christ are from God. They have come through the love and grace of God.

who reconciled us to himself through Christ,-In Jesus Christ God reconciles the world unto himself. God is not mans enemy. He has no feelings of enmity against him. He has never harmed or wronged man in any way. God is love, and seeks mans greatest good both here and hereafter. The supreme good of the human race was his consideration in the creation of all things. When sin and death entered into the world, through mans transgression, God in grace and love provided through Christ the way of salvation. Hence, God is not the one to be reconciled. He is willing and able to save to the uttermost them that come unto him through Christ. (Heb 7:27). Man must turn from his sins, come to God through Christ, and in him, by a life of submission to his will, find, and complete a reconciliation with God.

and gave unto us the ministry of reconciliation;-God committed unto the apostles the ministry of reconciliation. He gave them the terms on which man could be reconciled to him, and sent them as ambassadors to make known the terms of reconciliation to man. The outpouring of the Holy Spirit on the day of Pentecost and all the miraculous gifts bestowed on the apostles that enabled them to work miracles were to confirm them as his apostles, and enable them to show to the world that they had the right and authority to proclaim the words of reconciliation. Had Jesus himself ministered the words of reconciliation after he had commanded the apostles: Go ye into all the world, and preach the gospel to the whole creation (Mar 16:15), he would have discredited them and their mission. Gods gifts and calling to a work once bestowed on persons, he does not take them from them (Rom 11:29). Once having given the work into the hands of the apostles to make known the terms of reconciliation, he did not take it into his own hands, but confirmed them in the work.

Inasmuch as the Lord desired to make Saul an apostle, to commission him as a co-ambassador with the other apostles, he must appear unto him for this purpose to enable him to be an apostle. Apostles must have seen the Lord after his resurrection (Act 1:22), and be sent by him. He had not delegated that power to others. Paul says: I thank him that enabled me, even Christ Jesus our Lord, for that he counted me faithful, appointing me to his service. (1Ti 1:12).

Whereunto I was appointed a preacher and an apostle, … a teacher of the Gentiles in faith and truth. (1Ti 2:7). And last of all, as to the child untimely born, he appeared to me also. For I am the least of the apostles, that am not meet to be called an apostle, because I persecuted the church of God. (1Co 15:8-9). The appearance to him after death was as to one untimely born to be an apostle. Jesus appeared to him to qualify him to be an apostle, but did not take upon himself the work that he had committed to the apostles and prophets. So when Saul had seen Jesus in his glory and learned who he was, Jesus sent him to Damascus to learn from his chosen disciple what he should do to be saved.

Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary

all: Joh 3:16, Joh 3:27, Rom 11:36, 1Co 1:30, 1Co 8:6, 1Co 12:6, Col 1:16, Col 1:17, Jam 1:17

who: Lev 6:30, Eze 45:15, Dan 9:24, Rom 5:1, Rom 5:10, Rom 5:11,*Gr: Eph 2:16, Col 1:20, Col 1:21, Heb 2:17, 1Jo 2:2, 1Jo 4:10

hath given: 2Co 5:19, 2Co 5:20, Isa 52:7, Isa 57:19, Mar 16:15, Mar 16:16, Luk 10:5, Luk 24:47, Act 10:36, Act 13:38, Act 13:39, Eph 2:17, Col 1:20

Reciprocal: Lev 8:15 – to make Deu 20:10 – then proclaim 2Ch 29:24 – reconciliation Job 25:2 – he maketh Psa 85:8 – for he Psa 102:18 – the people Son 4:3 – lips Zec 9:10 – he shall Mat 13:27 – the servants Luk 2:14 – and Luk 6:42 – cast Luk 14:17 – Come Joh 3:5 – cannot Joh 14:27 – Peace I leave Act 1:17 – this Act 10:22 – and to Act 26:16 – a minister Rom 10:15 – And how Rom 11:15 – the reconciling 2Co 3:6 – hath 2Co 4:1 – seeing 2Co 6:1 – workers Eph 4:12 – the work Eph 6:15 – the gospel Col 1:23 – whereof 1Ti 1:11 – which Heb 2:10 – for Heb 6:18 – who

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

2Co 5:18. God is the creator of all things, whether the material world is being considered or the spiritual one. Reconciled us is true of all Christians, but Paul is here considering especially the relation of himself and the other apostles to the great work of the new creation. In order for man in general to be reconciled or brought to God in the spiritual creation, it was necessary for some agency to be empowered for the work. Such a service or ministry was given to the apostles.

Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary

Comprehensive View of the Christian Ministry, 18-21.

2Co 5:18. Andto express in brief the whole Divine planall things (in this matter) are of God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ[1] Those who take this to mean induced us to give up our enmity to Him, go entirely against what the very next verse shews to be meantthat, by putting away the cause of His enmity to us, which lay in sin, He has brought about peace between Himself and us sinners. Meyer, whose testimony here is most valuable, refers to Rom 5:10-11, Eph 2:16, Col 1:20-21, where men are represented as Gods enemies, their uncancelled sin bringing upon them Gods holy wrath, only removed by Christs death as a propitiation. It is exactly that kind of reconciliation of which our Lord says, If thou art offering thy gift at the altar, and there rememberest that thy brother hath aught (any good ground of displeasure) against thee … go thy way, first be reconciled to thy brother (not, dismiss thy bad feeling towards him, but get him to put away his bad feeling towards thee) and then . . . offer thy gift (Mat 5:23-24),[2]

[1] The word Jesus before Christ here is an addition to the true text.

[2] Though the compound forms of the same word used in the two passages are different, Fritzsche (who will not be thought unduly biassed by orthodox leanings) has shewn by an elaborate collection of examples that there is no real distinction in the use of them by classical writers (Aa Rom. Epist. I. pp. 276 280).

and gave unto us the ministry of reconciliationthe office of proclaiming this great fact to the world;

Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament

That is, all those things forementioned belonging to this new spiritual creation, are of God, as the author and efficient cause of them.

Learn, That God is the original author of the new creature, and of all things belonging thereunto. This appears partly from the nature of the work, ’tis a new creation; and partly from the objects of the work, the persons wrought upon. They are averse from God, in enmity to him, and rebellion against him, dead in sin, under the dominion of Satan. Well therefore might the apostle say, All these things are of God.

Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament

Verse 18 This new man lives a life completely planned and revealed by God. He sent Christ to die that we might be made friends again with God.

Fuente: Gary Hampton Commentary on Selected Books

2Co 5:18-20. And all things, &c. These new things are all of God, the author of them, considered in this view as reconciling us to himself Removing our carnal mind, which was enmity against him, and taking us into his favour; by Jesus Christ Through whose sacrifice and intercession, merits and Spirit, these blessings are obtained. And hath given to us His ministers, and especially to his apostles; the ministry of reconciliation The gospel ministry, offering reconciliation and peace with God to all mankind, and ensuring these privileges to all the truly penitent that believe in Jesus. To wit The sum of which is; that God was in Christ United to him and manifesting himself by him; reconciling the world Which was before at enmity with God; to himself So taking away that enmity which could no otherwise be removed, than by the mediation and grace of the Son of God: not imputing their trespasses unto them Freely forgiving all their sins, Eph 1:7; and hath committed unto us As a trust of the highest importance; the word, the message, of reconciliation. We then are ambassadors for Christ Divinely commissioned and sent to treat with you in his name and stead, on a matter of infinite importance to you. As though God did beseech you by us By whom he speaks to you. We pray you in Christs stead , or, for Christs sake; be ye reconciled to God Who is now ready to be reconciled to you, on terms which, if you apply to him, he will enable you to comply with, and thankfully to accept that friendship and protection which he graciously vouchsafes to offer you. Herein the apostle might appear to some transported beyond himself: for in general he uses a more calm, sedate kind of exhortation, as in the beginning of the next chapter. What unparalleled condescension and divinely tender mercies are displayed in this verse! Did the judge ever beseech a condemned criminal to accept of pardon? Does the creditor ever beseech a ruined debtor to receive an acquittance in full? Yet our almighty Lord, and our eternal Judge, not only vouchsafes to offer these blessings, but invites us, entreats us, and with the most tender importunity solicits us not to reject them!

Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

But all things are of God, who reconciled us to himself through Christ, and gave unto us the ministry of reconciliation;

Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)

RECONCILIATION

18-20. All things are from God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ, and gave us the ministry of reconciliation.

19. As that God was in Christ, reconciling the world to Himself, not imputing their transgressions to them, and having placed in us the word of reconciliation. Christ is both God and man, hence perfectly qualified for the mediatorial office between the two. God is already fully reconciled to all the world through the vicarious atonement of Christ. So fully and completely is He reconciled that there is not the slightest legal necessity for the death of any sinner in all the world. Hence the work of the ministry is all on the human side, i. e., to get man reconciled to God.

20. Therefore we are ambassadors for Christ, as God entreating you through us: we pray you in behalf of Christ, be ye reconciled to God. Hence you see the Christian ministry are sent into all the world as ambassadors from Christ to prevail over the people to be reconciled to God. It is an old maxim, Facit qua per alium, quis facit per se What one does through another he does through himself. Hence we are sent into the world to do the very work of Christ Himself, i. e., to reconcile this wicked, lost world to God. It is a deplorable pity to see multiplied millions rushing into Hell, lost to all eternity as heir gratuity. This appalling reflection on themselves methinks will prove the hottest fire-brand with which infuriated devils will lash the lost soul through all eternity. I might as well have gone up to Heaven as down to Hell. God sent His only beloved Son to die in my place to keep me out of this awful doom. He prepared for me a sweet home in Heaven, but I would not have it. Verily, I die as the fool dieth, without a solitary reason to palliate my awful fate. All we have to do is to get the people to be reconciled to God, as He is already reconciled to them.

Fuente: William Godbey’s Commentary on the New Testament

Verse 18

All things are of God; the change, eat as it is, is wholly the work of god.–The ministry of reconciliation; the commission to offer reconciliation.

Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament

5:18 {12} And all things [are] of God, who hath reconciled us to himself by Jesus Christ, and hath given to us the ministry of reconciliation;

(12) He commends the excellency of the ministry of the Gospel, both by the authority of God himself, who is the author of that ministry, and also by the excellency of the doctrine of it. For it announces atonement with God by free forgiveness of our sins, and justification offered to us in Christ, and that so lovingly and freely, that God himself does in a way beseech men by the mouth of his ministers to have consideration of themselves, and not to despise so great a benefit. And when he says so, he plainly reprehends those who falsely attribute to themselves the name of “pastor”, as this calling can only come from God.

Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes

The ministry of reconciliation 5:18-21

This section and the first two verses of chapter 6 constitute the crux of Paul’s exposition of the apostolic office (2Co 2:14 to 2Co 7:4) and of the entire letter. [Note: Barnett, p. 300.]

Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)

The basis of this total change (new attitudes, 2Co 5:16, and new creation, 2Co 5:17) is God’s gracious provision of reconciliation in sending His Son to die for us. He has brought people to Himself by dealing with our sins in Christ. God is the reconciler, and He has reconciled everyone to Himself, the elect and the non-elect alike (cf. Rom 5:10-11; Col 1:20-22). [Note: See Gary L. Shultz Jr., "The Reconciliation of All Things in Christ," Bibliotheca Sacra 167:668 (October-December 2010):442-59.] He has brought everyone into a savable relation to Himself by sending His Son who paid the penalty for sin that separates people from God. The fact that God has reconciled everyone does not mean that everyone is justified, however. People still need to respond to the offer of salvation by believing the gospel to receive justification (2Co 5:20). Reconciliation removes a barrier to our salvation, but it does not by itself accomplish our salvation.

God has committed the message of this provision to those who have experienced reconciliation, and our ministry is to present it to all people (Mat 28:19-20). Paul was perhaps speaking primarily of his own ministry of bringing people back to God as well as the ministry of his fellow apostles. However all believers clearly share this ministry since God has reconciled us all. The word of reconciliation is the gospel message.

Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)

Chapter 16

RECONCILIATION.

2Co 5:18-21 (R.V)

“IF any man be in Christ,” Paul has said, “there is a new creation; he is another man and lives in another world. But the new creation has the same Author as the original one: it is all of God, who reconciled us to Himself by Jesus Christ, and gave to us the ministry of reconciliation.” It is plain from these last words that “us” does not mean Christians in general, but in the first instance Paul himself. He is a typical example of what it is to be in Christ; he understands what his own words mean-“the old things passed away; behold, they have become new”; he understands also how this stupendous change has been brought about. “It is due to God,” he says, “who reconciled us to Himself through Christ.”

The great interest of this passage is its bearing upon the Christian doctrine of reconciliation, and before we go further it is necessary to explain precisely what this word means. It presupposes a state of estrangement. Now, a state of estrangement may be of two kinds: the feeling of alienation and hostility may exist upon one side only, or it may exist upon both. What, then, is the character of that state of estrangement which subsists between God and man independently of the Gospel, and which the Gospel, as a ministry of reconciliation, is designed to overcome? Is it one-sided, or two-sided? Is there something to be put away in man only, or something to be put away in God as well, before reconciliation is effected?

These questions have been answered very confidently in different ways. Many, especially in modern times, assert with passionate eagerness that the estrangement is merely one-sided. Man is alienated from God by sin, fear, and unbelief, and God reconciles him to Himself when He prevails with him to lay aside these evil dispositions, and trust Him as his Father and his Friend. “All things are of God, who reconciled us to Himself through Christ,” would mean in this case, “All things are of God, who has won our friendship through His Son.” That this describes in part the effect of the Gospel, no one will deny. It is one of its blessed results that fear and distrust of God are taken away, and that we learn to trust and love Him. Nevertheless, this is not what the New Testament means by reconciliation, though it is one of its fruits.

To St. Paul the estrangement which the Christian reconciliation has to overcome is indubitably two-sided; there is something in God as well as something in man which has to be dealt with before there can be peace. Nay, the something on Gods side is so incomparably more serious that in comparison with it the something on mans side simply passes out of view. It is Gods earnest dealing with the obstacle on His own side to peace with man which prevails on man to believe in the seriousness of His love, and to lay aside distrust. It is Gods earnest dealing with the obstacle on His own side which constitutes the reconciliation; the story of it is “the word of reconciliation”; when men receive it they receive {Rom 5:10} the reconciliation. “Reconciliation” in the New Testament sense is not something which we accomplish when we lay aside our enmity with God; it is something which God accomplished when in the death of Christ He put away everything that on His side meant estrangement, so that He might come and preach peace. To deny this is to take St. Pauls Gospel away root and branch. He always conceives the Gospel as the revelation of Gods wisdom and love in view of a certain state of affairs as subsisting between God and man. Now, what is the really serious element in this situation? What is it that makes a Gospel necessary? What is it that the wisdom and love of God undertake to deal with, and do deal with, in. that marvelous way which constitutes the Gospel? Is it mans distrust of God? is it mans dislike, fear, antipathy, spiritual alienation? Not if we accept the Apostles teaching. The serious thing which makes the Gospel necessary, and the putting away of which constitutes the Gospel, is Gods condemnation of the world and its sin; it is Gods wrath, “revealed from heaven against all ungodliness and unrighteousness of men”. {Rom 1:16-18} The putting away of this is “reconciliation”: the preaching of this reconciliation is the preaching of the Gospel.

Much impatience has been shown in the criticism of this conception. Clever men have exhibited their talent and courage by calling it “heathenish”; and others have undertaken to apologize for St. Paul by describing this objection as “modern.” I cannot understand how any one should feel entitled either to flout the Apostle on this matter, or to take him under his patronage. If any one ever had the sense to distinguish between what is real and unreal in regard to God, between what is true and false spiritually, it was he; even with Ritschl on one side and Schmiedel on the other he is not dwarfed, and may be permitted to speak for himself. The wrath of God, the condemnation of God resting on the sinful world, are not, whatever speculative theologians may think, unreal things: neither do they belong only to ancient times. They are the most real things of which human nature has any knowledge till it receives the reconciliation. They are as real as a bad conscience; as real as misery, impotence, and despair. And it is the glory of the Gospel, as St. Paul understood it, that it deals with them as real. It does not tell men that they are illusions, and that only their own groundless fear and distrust have ever stood between them and God. It tells them that God has dealt seriously with these serious things for their removal, that awful as they are He has put them away by an awful demonstration of His love; it tells them that God has made peace at an infinite cost, and that the priceless peace is now freely offered to them.

When St. Paul says that God has given him the ministry of reconciliation, he means that he is a preacher of this peace. He ministers reconciliation to the world. His work has no doubt a hortatory side, as we shall see, but that side is secondary. It is not the main part of his vocation to tell men to make their peace with God, but to tell them that “God has made peace with the world.” At bottom, the Gospel is not good advice, but good news. All the good advice it gives is summed up in this-Receive the good news. But if the good news be taken away; if we cannot say, God has made peace, God has dealt seriously with His condemnation of sin, so that it no longer stands in the way of your return to Him; if we cannot say, Here is the reconciliation, receive it, -then for mans actual state we have no Gospel at all.

In the nineteenth verse {2Co 5:19} St. Paul explains more fully the way in which he is looking at the subject: “to wit, that God was in Christ reconciling the world to Himself, not reckoning unto them their trespasses, and having committed unto us the word of reconciliation.” The English Authorized Version puts a comma at Christ: “God was in Christ, reconciling the world to Himself.” It is safe to say that “God was in Christ” is a sentence which neither St. Paul nor any other New Testament writer could have conceived; the “was” and the “reconciling” must be taken together, and “in Christ” is practically equivalent to “through Christ” in the previous verse-God was by means of Christ reconciling the world to Himself. “Reconciling,” of course, must be taken in the sense already explained. The sentence does not mean that God was trying to convert men, or to prevail with them to lay aside their enmity, but that He was disposing of everything that on His part made peace impossible. When Christs work was done, the reconciliation of the world was accomplished. When men were called to receive it, they were called to a relation to God, not in which they would no more be against Him-though that is included-but in which they would no more have Him against them (Hofmann). There would be no condemnation thenceforth to those who were in Christ Jesus.

The connection of the words “not reckoning unto them their trespasses, and having committed unto us the word of reconciliation,” is rather difficult. The last clause certainly refers to something which took place after the work of reconciliation had been wrought: Paul was commissioned to tell the story of it. It seems most probable that the other is co-ordinate with this, so that both are in a sense the evidence for the main proposition. It is as if he had said: “God was by means of Christ establishing friendly relations between the world and Himself, as appears from this, that He does not reckon their trespasses unto them, and has made us preachers of His grace.” The very universality of the expression-reconciling a world to Himself-is consistent only with an objective reconciliation. It cannot mean that God was overcoming the worlds enmity (though that is the ulterior object); it means that God was putting away His own condemnation and wrath. When this was done, He could send, and did send, men to declare that it was done; and among these men, none had a profounder appreciation of what God had wrought, and what he himself had to declare as Gods glad tidings, than the Apostle Paul.

This is the point we reach in 2Co 5:20 : “We are ambassadors therefore on behalf of Christ, as though God were entreating you by us; we beseech you, oft behalf of Christ, be ye reconciled to God.” The Apostle has just told us that all is of God, but all is at the same time “in Christ,” or “through Christ.” Hence it is on Christs behalf he comes forward; it is the furtherance of Christs interests he has at heart. Nay, it is that same interest which is at the heart of the Father, who desires now to glorify the Son; so that when Paul appeals to men on Christs behalf it is as though God Himself entreated them. Most expositors notice the amazing contrast between (“we are ambassadors”) and (“we beseech you”). The ambassador, as a rule, stands upon his dignity; he maintains the greatness of the person whom he represents. But Paul in this lowly, passionate entreaty is not false to his Master; he is preaching the Gospel in the spirit of the Gospel; he shows that he has really learned of Christ; the very conception of the ambassador descending to entreaty is, as Calvin says, an incomparable commendation of the grace of Christ. One can imagine how Saul the Pharisee would have spoken on Gods behalf; with what rigor, what austerity, what unbending, uncompromising assurance. But old things have passed away; behold, they have become new. This simple verse illumines, as by a lightning flash, the new world into which the Gospel has translated Paul, the new man it has made of him. The fire that burned in Christs heart has caught hold in his; his soul is tremulous with passion; he is conscious of the grandeur of his calling, yet there is nothing that he would not do to win men for his message. It would go to his heart like a sword if he had to take up the old lament, “Who hath believed our report?” In his dignity as Christs ambassador and as the mouthpiece of God, in his humility, in his passionate earnestness, in the urgency and directness of his appeal, St. Paul is the supreme type and example of the Christian minister. In the passage before us he presents the appeal of the Gospel in its simplest form: wherever he stands before men on Christs behalf his prayer is, “Be ye reconciled unto God.” And once more we must insist on the apostolic import of these words. It is the misleading nuance of “reconcile” in English that makes so many take them as if they meant, “Lay aside your enmity to God; cease to regard Him with distrust, hatred, and fear”: in other words, “Show yourselves His friends.” In St. Pauls lips they cannot possibly mean anything but, “Accept His offered friendship: enter, into that peace which He has made for the world through the death of His Son; believe that He has at infinite cost put away all that on His part stood between you and peace; receive the reconciliation.”

The Received Text and the Authorized Version attach the twenty-first verse to this exhortation by (“for”): “For Him who knew no sin He made to be sin on our behalf.” The “for” is spurious, and though it is not inept the sentence gains greatly in impressiveness by its omission. The Apostle does not point out the connection for us: in simply declaring the manner in which God reconciled the world to Himself-the process by which, the cost at which, He made peace-he leaves us to feel how vast is the boon which is offered to us in the Gospel, how tremendous the responsibility of rejecting it. To refuse “the reconciliation” is to contemn the death in which the Sinless One was made sin on our behalf.

This wonderful sentence is the inspired commentary on the statement of 2Co 5:15 -“One died for all.” It takes us into the very heart of the Apostolic Gospel. Just because it does so, it has always been felt to be of critical importance, alike by those who welcome and by those who reject it; it condenses and concentrates in itself the attraction of Christ and the offence of Christ. It is a counsel of despair to evade it. It is not the puzzle of the New Testament, but the ultimate solution of all puzzles; it is not an irrational quantity that has to be eliminated or explained away, but the keystone of the whole system of apostolic thought. It is not a blank obscurity in revelation, a spot of impenetrable blackness; it is the focus in which the reconciling love of God burns with the purest and in-tensest flame; it is the fountain light of all day, the master light of all seeing, in the Christian revelation. Let us look at it more closely.

God, we must observe in the first place, is the subject. “All” is of Him in the work of reconciliation, and this above all, that He made the Sinless One to be sin. I have read a book on the Atonement which quoted this sentence three times, or rather misquoted it, never once recognizing that an action of God is involved.

But without this, there is no coherence in the Apostles thoughts at all. Without this, there would be no explanation of reconciliation as Gods work. God reconciled the world to Himself-made peace into which the world might enter-in making Christ sin on its behalf. What precisely this means we shall inquire further on; but it is essential to remember, whatever it mean, that God is the doer of it.

Observe next the description of Christ-“Him that knew no sin.” The Greek negative (), as Schmiedel remarks, implies that this is regarded as the verdict of some one else than the writer. It was Christs own verdict upon Himself. He whose words search our very hearts, and bring to light unsuspected seeds of badness, never Himself betrays the faintest consciousness of guilt. He challenges His enemies directly: “Which of you convinceth Me of sin?” It is the verdict of all sincere human souls, as uttered by the soldier who watched His cross-“Truly this was a righteous man.” It is the verdict even of the great enemy who assailed Him again and again, and found nothing in Him, and whose agents recognized Him as the Holy One of God. Above all, it is the verdict of God. He was the beloved Son, in whom the Father was well pleased. For three-and-thirty years, in daily contact with the world and its sins, Christ lived and yet knew no sin. To His will and conscience it was a foreign thing. What infinite worth that sinless life possessed in Gods sight! When He looked down to earth it was the one absolutely precious thing. Filled full of righteousness, absolutely well-pleasing in His eyes, it was worth more to God than all the world beside.

Now, God reconciled the world to Himself-He made a peace which could be proclaimed and offered to the world-when, all sinless as Christ was, He made Him to be sin on our behalf. What does this mean? Not, exactly, that He made Him a sin-offering on our behalf. The expression for a sin-offering is distinct ( ), and the parallelism with in the next clause forbids that reference here. The sin-offering of the Old Testament can at most have pointed towards and dimly suggested so tremendous an utterance as this; and the profoundest word of the New Testament cannot be adequately interpreted by anything in the Old. When St. Paul says, “Him that knew no sin God made sin,” he must mean that in Christ on His cross, by divine appointment, the extremest opposites met and became one-incarnate righteousness and the sin of the world. The sin is laid by God on the Sinless One; its doom is laid on Him; His death is the execution of the divine sentence upon it. When He dies, He has put away sin; it no longer stands, as it once stood, between God and the world. On the contrary, God has made peace by this great transaction; He has wrought out reconciliation; and its ministers can go everywhere with this awful appeal: “Receive the reconciliation; Him who knew no sin God hath made sin on our behalf, and there is henceforth no condemnation to them that are in Christ.”

No one who has felt the power of this appeal will be very anxious to defend the Apostolic Gospel from the charges which are sometimes made against it. When he is told that it is impossible for the doom of sin to fall on the Sinless One, and that even if it were conceivable it would be frightfully immoral, he is not disquieted. He recognizes in the moral contra dictions of this text the surest sign that the secret of the Atonement is revealed in it: he feels that Gods work of reconciliation necessarily involves such an identification of sinlessness and sin. He knows that there is an appalling side to sin, and he is ready to believe that there is an appalling side to redemption also-a side the most distant sight of which makes the proudest heart quail, and stops every mouth be fore God. He knows that the salvation which he needs must be one in which Gods mercy comes through, and not over, His judgment; and this is the redemption which is in Christ Jesus. But without becoming controversial on a subject on which more than on any other the tem per of controversy is unseemly, reference may be made to the commonest form of objection to the apostolic doctrine, in the sincere hope that some one who has stumbled at that doctrine may see it more truly. The objection I refer to discredits propitiation in the alleged interest of the love of God. “We do not need,” the objectors say, “to propitiate an angry God. This is a piece of heathenism, of which a Christian ought to be ashamed. It is a libel on the God and Father of our Lord Jesus Christ, whose name is love, and who waits to be gracious.” What are we to say to such words, which are uttered as boldly as if there were no possible reply, or rather as if the Apostles had never written, or had been narrow-minded unreceptive souls, who had not only failed to understand their Master, but had taught with amazing perversity the very opposite of what He taught on the most essential of all points-the nature of God and His relation to sinful men? We must say this. It is quite true that we have not to propitiate an offended God: the very fact upon which the Gospel proceeds is that we can not do any such thing. But it is not true that no propitiation is needed. As truly as guilt is a real thing, as truly as Gods condemnation of sin is a real thing, a propitiation is needed. And it is here, I think, that those who make the objection referred to part company, not only with St. Paul, but with all the Apostles. God is love, they say, and therefore He does not require a propitiation. God is love, say the Apostles, and therefore He provides a propitiation. Which of these doctrines appeals best to the conscience? Which of them gives reality, and contents, and substance, to the love of God? Is it not the apostolic doctrine? Does not the other cut out and cast away that very thing which made the soul of Gods love to Paul and John? “Herein is love, not that we loved God, but that He loved us, and sent His Son to be the propitiation for our sins.” “God commendeth His love toward us, in that, while we were yet sinners, Christ died for us, Him that knew no sin He made to be sin on our behalf.” That is how they spoke in the beginning of the Gospel, and so let us speak. Nobody has any right to borrow the words “God is love” from an apostle, and then to put them in circulation after carefully emptying them of their apostolic import. Still less has any one a right to use them as an argument against the very thing in which the Apostles placed their meaning. But this is what they do who appeal to love against propitiation. To take the condemnation out of the Cross is to take the nerve out of the Gospel; it will cease to hold mens hearts with its original power when the reconciliation which is preached through it contains the mercy, but not the judgment of God. Its whole virtue, its consistency with Gods character, its aptness to mans need, its real dimensions as a revelation of love, depend ultimately on this, that mercy comes to us in it through judgment.

In the last words of the passage the Apostle tells us the object of this great interposition of God: “He made Christ to be sin on our behalf, that we might become the righteousness of God in Him.” Our condemnation is made His; it is accepted, exhausted, annihilated, on His cross; and when we receive the reconciliation when we humble ourselves to be forgiven and restored at this infinite cost-there is no longer condemnation for us: we are justified by our faith, and have peace with God through our Lord Jesus Christ. This is what is meant by becoming the righteousness of God in Him. It is not, as the very next sentence suggests, all that is included in the Christian salvation, but it is all that the words themselves contain. “In Him” has all promise in it, as well as the present possession of reconciliation, with which the Christian life begins; but it is this present possession, and not the promise involved in it, which St. Paul describes as the righteousness of God. In Christ, that Christ who died for us, and in Him in virtue of that death which by exhausting condemnation put away sin, we are accepted in Gods sight.

Fuente: Expositors Bible Commentary