Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of 2 Peter 3:8
But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day [is] with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
8. But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing ] Literally, the construction being the same as in 2Pe 3:5, let not this one thing be hidden from you.
that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years ] The latter clause has its origin in the words of the Psalmist, “A thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday” (Psa 90:4); but while the Psalmist dwells only on the littleness of our greatest time-measures, the Apostle completes the thought by joining with it the possible greatness of that which to our sight is almost infinitely little. “A day” (probably with special reference to the day of judgment) may be pregnant with results for the spiritual history of mankind or of an individual soul as great as those of a millennium. The delay of a millennium may be but as a day in the evolution of the great purposes of God. The words have the additional interest of having impressed themselves as a “faithful saying” or axiom of religious thought on the minds of the apostolic age, and are quoted as such in the Epistle that bears the name of Barnabas (chap. 15). This forms the second answer of the Apostle to the sneering question of the mockers.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years – This 2Pe 3:8-9 is the second consideration by which the apostle meets the objection of scoffers against the doctrine of the second coming of the Saviour. The objection was, that much time, and perhaps the time which had been supposed to be set for his coming, had passed away, and still all things remained as they were. The reply of the apostle is, that no argument could be drawn from this, for that which may seem to be a long time to us is a brief period with God. In the infinity of his own duration there is abundant time to accomplish his designs, and it can make no difference with him whether they are accomplished in one day or extended to one thousand years. Man has but a short time to live, and if he does not accomplish his purposes in a very brief period, he never will. But it is not so with God. He always lives; and we cannot therefore infer, because the execution of His purposes seems to be delayed, that they are abandoned. With Him who always lives it will be as easy to accomplish them at a far distant period as now. If it is His pleasure to accomplish them in a single day, He can do it; if He chooses that the execution shall be deferred to one thousand years, or that one thousand years shall be consumed in executing them, He has power to carry them onward through what seems, to us, to be so vast a duration. The wicked, therefore, cannot infer that they will escape because their punishment is delayed; nor should the righteous fear that the divine promises will fail because ages pass away before they are accomplished. The expression here used, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, etc., is common in the Rabbinical writings. See Wetstein in loc. A similar thought occurs in Psa 90:4; For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Verse 8. Be not ignorant] Though they are wilfully ignorant, neglect not ye the means of instruction.
One day is with the Lord as a thousand years] That is: All time is as nothing before him, because in the presence as in the nature of God all is eternity; therefore nothing is long, nothing short, before him; no lapse of ages impairs his purposes, nor need he wait to find convenience to execute those purposes. And when the longest period of time has passed by, it is but as a moment or indivisible point in comparison of eternity. This thought is well expressed by PLUTARCH, Consol. ad Apoll.: “If we compare the time of life with eternity, we shall find no difference between long and short. , , , for a thousand or ten thousand years are but a certain indefinite point, or rather the smallest part of a point.” The words of the apostle seem to be a quotation from Ps 90:4.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Be not ignorant of this one thing; i.e. be sure of it: the same word is here used as 2Pe 3:5; and so he cautions them against the ignorance of scoffers, and to prevent it, would have them certainly know this one thing, which is extant in the Scripture, which foretells Christs coming.
That one day is with the Lord; the Lord Jesus Christ, of whose coming he speaks.
As a thousand years; by a synecdoche, a thousand years is put for any, even the longest revolution of time; and the sense is, that though there be great difference of time, long and short, with us, who are subject to time, and are measured by it; yet with Him who is eternal, without succession, to whom nothing is past, nothing future, but all things present, there is no difference of time, none long, none short, but a thousand years, nay, all the time that hath run out since the creation of the world, is but as a day; and we are not to judge of the Lords delay in coming by our own sense, but by Gods eternity.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
8. be not ignorantas thosescoffers are (2Pe 3:5). Besidesthe refutation of them (2Pe3:5-7) drawn from the history of the deluge, here he adds another(addressed more to believers than to the mockers): God’s delay infulfilling His promise is not, like men’s delays, owing to inabilityor fickleness in keeping His word, but through “long-suffering.”
this one thingas theconsideration of chief importance (Lu10:42).
one day . . . thousand years(Ps 90:4): Moses there says,Thy eternity, knowing no distinction between a thousandyears and a day, is the refuge of us creatures of a day. Peterviews God’s eternity in relation to the last day: that day seems tous, short-lived beings, long in coming, but with the Lord theinterval is irrespective of the idea of long or short. His eternityexceeds all measures of time: to His divine knowledge all futurethings are present: His power requires not long delays for theperformance of His work: His long-suffering excludes all impatientexpectation and eager haste, such as we men feel. He is equallyblessed in one day and in a thousand years. He can do the work of athousand years in one day: so in 2Pe3:9 it is said, “He is not slack,” that is, “slow”:He has always the power to fulfil His “promise.”
thousand years as one dayNodelay which occurs is long to God: as to a man of countless riches, athousand guineas are as a single penny. God’s oeligonologe(eternal-ages measurer) differs wholly from man’s horologe(hour-glass). His gnomon (dial-pointer) shows all the hours atonce in the greatest activity and in perfect repose. To Him the hourspass away, neither more slowly, nor more quickly, than befits Hiseconomy. There is nothing to make Him need either to hasten or delaythe end. The words, “with the Lord” (Ps90:4, “In Thy sight”), silence all man’s objections onthe ground of his incapability of understanding this [BENGEL].
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing,…. Here the apostle addresses the saints he writes unto, and for whom he had a tender affection and regard, and for whose welfare he was concerned, lest they should be stumbled at the length of time since the promise of the coming of Christ was given, and which these scoffers object; and therefore he would have them know, observe, and consider this one thing, which might be of great use to them to make their minds easy, and keep up their faith and expectation of the coming of Christ:
that one day [is], with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day; referring either to Ps 90:4; or to a common saying among the Jews, founded on the same passage, ”
, “the day of the holy blessed God is a thousand years” z; suggesting, that though between thirty and forty years had elapsed since the promise was given out that Christ would come again, and should even a thousand, or two thousand years more, run off, before the coming of Christ, yet this should be no objection to the accomplishment of the promise; for though such a number of years is very considerable among men, ye not “with God”, as the Arabic and Ethiopic versions read, with whom a thousand years, and even eternity itself, is but as a day, Isa 43:13. Unless this phrase should be thought to refer, as it is by some, to the day of judgment, and be expressive of the duration of that: it is certain that the Jews interpreted days of millenniums, and reckoned millenniums by days, and used this phrase in confirmation of it. Thus they say a,
“in the time to come, which is in the last days, on the sixth day, which is the sixth millennium, when the Messiah comes, for the day of the holy blessed God is a thousand years.”
And a little after,
“”the Lord hath created a new thing in the earth, a woman shall compass a man”. This is in the time of the Messiah which is in the sixth day.”
And elsewhere b,
“the sixth degree is called the sixth day, the day of the holy blessed God is a thousand years. And in that day the King Messiah shall come, and it shall be called the feast of gathering, for the holy blessed God will gather in it the captivity of his people.”
So they call the sabbath, or seventh day, the seventh millennium, and interpret c
“”the song for the sabbath day”, Ps 92:1 title, for the seventh millennium, for one day of the holy blessed God is a thousand years.”
To which agrees the tradition of Elias, which runs thus d;
“it is the tradition of the house of Elias, that the world shall be six thousand years, two thousand years void (of the law), two thousand years the law, and two thousand years the days of the Messiah;”
for they suppose that the six days of the creation were expressive of the six thousand years in which the world will stand; and that the seventh day prefigures the last millennium, in which will be the day of judgment, and the world to come; for
“the six days of the creation (they say e) is a sign or intimation of these things: on the sixth day man was created; and on the seventh his work was finished; so the kings of the nations of the world (continue) five millenniums, answering to the five days, in which were created the fowls, and the creeping things of the waters, and other things; and the enjoyment of their kingdom is a little in the sixth, answerable to the creation of the beasts, and living creatures created at this time in the beginning of it; and the kingdom of the house of David is in the sixth millennium, answerable to the creation of man, who knew his Creator, and ruled over them all; and in the end of that millennium will be the day of judgment, answerable to man, who was judged in the end of it; and the seventh is the sabbath, and it is the beginning of the world to come.”
z Bereshit Rabba, sect. 8. fol. 7. 3. Vajikra Rabba, sect. 19. fol. 160. 2. Bemidbar Rabba, sect. 14. fol. 216. 1. Shirhashirim Rabba, fol. 20. 1. Zohar in Exod. fol. 60. 1. Tzeror Hammor, fol. 157. 1. & Nishmet Chayim Orat. 1. c. 5. fol. 12. 1. a Zohar in Gen. fol. 13. 4. b Ib. fol. 16. 1. c Bartenora in Misn. Tamid, c. 7. sect. 4. d T. Bab. Sanhedrin, fol. 97. 1. & Avoda Zara, fol. 9. 1. e Ceseph Misna in Maimon. Hilchot Teshuva, c. 9. sect. 2.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Conception of Eternity. | A. D. 67. |
8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
The apostle comes in these words to instruct and establish Christians in the truth of the coming of the Lord, where we may clearly discern the tenderness and affection wherewith he speaks to them, calling them beloved; he had a compassionate concern and a love of good-will for the ungodly wretches who refused to believe divine revelation, but he has a peculiar respect for the true believers, and the remaining ignorance and weakness that the apprehends to be in them make him jealous, and put him on giving them a caution. Here we may observe,
I. The truth which the apostle asserts–that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years are as one day. Though, in the account of men, there is a great deal of difference between a day and a year, and a vast deal more between one day and a thousand years, yet in the account of God, who inhabits eternity, in which there is no succession, there is no difference; for all things past, present, and future, are ever before him, and the delay of a thousand years cannot be so much to him as the deferring of any thing for a day or an hour is to us.
II. The importance of this truth: This is the one thing the apostle would not have us ignorant of; a holy awe and reverential fear of God are necessary in order to our worshiping and glorifying him, and a belief of the inconceivable distance between him and us is very proper to beget and maintain that religious fear of the Lord which is the beginning of wisdom. This is a truth that belongs to our peace, and therefore he endeavours that it may not be hidden from our eyes; as it is in the original, Let not this one thing be hidden from you. If men have no knowledge or belief of the eternal God, they will be very apt to think him such a one as themselves. Yet how hard is it to conceive of eternity! It is therefore not very easy to attain such a knowledge of God as is absolutely necessary.
Fuente: Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary
Forget not this one thing ( ). Rather, “let not this one thing escape you.” For (present active imperative of ) see verse 5. The “one thing” () is explained by the (that) clause following. Peter applies the language of Ps 90:4 about the eternity of God and shortness of human life to “the impatience of human expectations” (Bigg) about the second coming of Christ. “The day of judgment is at hand (1Pe 4:7). It may come tomorrow; but what is tomorrow? What does God mean by a day? It may be a thousand years” (Bigg). Precisely the same argument applies to those who argue for a literal interpretation of the thousand years in Re 20:4-6. It may be a day or a day may be a thousand years. God’s clock ( , beside the Lord) does not run by our timepieces. The scoffers scoff ignorantly.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
1) “But, beloved,” (Greek de agapetoi) “But beloved ones” — the unnamed church to which this church letter was addressed.
2) “Be not ignorant of this one thing,” (Greek hen touto) “in this one thing or matter” — the matter of pending, awaiting, or held in abeyance judgment (Greek me lanthaneto humas) “let us not be deceived, or be concealed from it.”
3) “That one day is with the Lord.” (hoti mia hemera) “that one day” (para kurio “with (the) Lord” (is or exists).
4) “As a thousand years.” (hos chilia) as a thousand” (heta) “years.”
5) “And a thousand years as one day.” (kai chilia hete) and a thousand years.” (hos hemera mia) “as day one.” Peter simply affirms that the Lord in His divinity, being infinite, unlimited, exists without being restricted by time measurements like, watches, calendars, clocks, or hour glasses, Psa 90:2; Psa 90:4.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
8. But be not ignorant of this one thing. He now turns to speak to the godly; and he reminds them that when the coming of Christ is the subject, they were to raise upwards their eyes, for by so doing, they would not limit, by their unreasonable wishes, the time appointed by the Lord. For waiting seems very long on this account, because we have our eyes fixed on the shortness of the present life, and we also increase weariness by computing days, hours, and minutes. But when the eternity of God’s kingdom comes to our minds, many ages vanish away like so many moments.
This then is what the Apostle calls our attention to, so that we may know that the day of resurrection does not depend on the present flow of time, but on the hidden purpose of God, as though he had said, “Men wish to anticipate God for this reason, because they measure time according to the judgment of their own flesh; and they are by nature inclined to impatience, so that celerity is even delay to them: do ye then ascend in your minds to heaven, and thus time will be to you neither long nor short.”
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
CRITICAL AND EXEGETICAL NOTES
2Pe. 3:8. One day, etc.The time-element gave opportunity to the scoffers. The time-measures of God must not be thought of as like those of men. It is to misrepresent this verse, to regard it as fixing Gods measure for a day as being a thousand years. To do so would make Gods judgment-day a thousand years long, and the day of Christs coming also a thousand years long. The Millennium is a day, if the last sentence of this verse be taken literally.
2Pe. 3:9. Not slack.The apparent delay is arranged in Divine wisdom, and with due consideration of the saints. God is long-suffering, because He is eternal (Augustine). To us-ward.Toward you.
2Pe. 3:10. Great noise.Rushing noise. Elements.Or heavenly bodies. Macknight says, The electrical matter, the sulphurous vapours, the clouds, and whatsoever floats in the air, with the air itself.
2Pe. 3:11. Shall be dissolved.Lit. are being dissolved. All holy conversation, and godliness.Both words are in the plural. All forms of holy living.
2Pe. 3:12. Hasting.(Omit unto). Hasting the coming by holy lives. Wherein.Or on account of which.
2Pe. 3:13. New heavens, etc.See Isa. 65:17; Isa. 66:22; Rev. 21:1. The idea is fully expanded in the book of Enoch.
MAIN HOMILETICS OF THE PARAGRAPH.2Pe. 3:8-13
Long-suffering is not Indifference.
I. The Divine time-measures.2Pe. 3:8 contains the second answer to the sceptical argument. Time is the condition of mans thought and action, but not of Gods. His thoughts are not as our thoughts, nor His ways as our ways; what seems delay to us is none to Him. The figurative expression of this text has been much misrepresented and misused. It is when it is treated as a precise statement, and made the basis of minute calculations. The whole conception of a Millennium rests on a figurative expression. When it is said that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day, it is simply meant to assert that Gods prophecies and promises must never be tested by human time-measures. If He says a thing will happen to-day we must always keep in mind that it is His to-day, not ours; and that His to-day may cover even what we should call a thousand years. As an argument against the scoffer this is effective enough. The force of his scoff is broken when he is compelled to reckon the fulfilment of promises by Gods time-measures.
II. The patience of Divine delay.It needs to be clearly seen that, since God must always keep moral ends in view, He can never make an unconditional promise. The promise is a moral force. If that promise fulfils its end the promise can be made good at once. If that force is in any way hindered, the fulfilment must be left over until the moral force has duly affected its mission. And the Divine patience is seen in being willing even to be misunderstood and misrepresented, rather than to cease exerting the graciously redeeming moral force. There is no sublimer revelation of God than that which comes to us in the Divine delayings. He can wait and bear, in view of the ends of His infinite love for man. He is not slack concerning His promise. We never may think that He is indifferentthat He has forgotten to be gracious. That never can explain the Divine action. We may always find long-suffering patience. He is not willing that any should perish. He stretches opportunity of repentance to its utmost limit. He gives warning after warning, until the utter hopelessness of any further warning is made quite plain, and the cup of self-willedness and iniquity is quite full.
III. The certain ending of times of Divine delay.But the day of the Lord will come. If judgment be threatened as a flood, the flood will come, unless men repent. A hundred and twenty years may pass, and men may grow bold in their impious self-security; they may laugh away all fears as they enjoy their sunny days; but the flood will come. The Flood came. Gods word never returns to Him void. It will certainly be the same in regard to the promise of Christs coming, whether that be viewed as the vindication of the saints, or as judgment on their persecutors. Divine delay in no sense indicates that the Divine purpose is abandoned. Let nobody for one moment think that. Christ will come. The day of the Lord will come. And if the scoffer persists in scoffing, let him remember that the sun was risen upon the earth when Lot entered Zoar; there was every prospect of another splendid summer day; but that day the fire of God fell. Certain as death is judgmentis Christs coming to judgment.
IV. The certainty of Divine judgment is present blessing.It is a constant and a gracious persuasion to virtue. This is its proper influence upon us. It makes us say, What manner of persons ought we to be in all holy conversation and godliness. By the earnestness of our endeavours in cultivating the godly life, and growing in grace, we should be looking for, and hasting unto the coming of the day of God. Not looking for in any sense of idly watching at a window; but looking for, as Christ taught us the good servant looks for the return of his Master, by all devoted obediences, all earnest activities, all careful preparations. Christ is coming; then let us be diligent, that we may be found of Him in peace.
SUGGESTIVE NOTES AND SERMON SKETCHES
2Pe. 3:8. A Thousand Years as a Day.The latter half of this saying is quite original, and has no equivalent in Psa. 90:4. The second half is only partially parallel to a thousand years in Thy sight are but as yesterday, when it is past. Consequently we cannot be sure that the apostle had this passage from the psalms in his mind, though it is probable enough that he had. That God can punish in one day the sins of a thousand years is a thought which is neither in the text nor in the context. What is insisted on is simply this: that distinctions of long and short time are nothing in the sight of God; delay is a purely human conception. Justin Martyr (about A. D. 145) gives the day of the Lord is as a thousand years as a quotation, and in this form it is closer to this verse than to Psa. 90:4. As another possible reference to our epistle follows in the next chapter, it may be regarded as not improbable that Justin knew the epistle. But the saying may have been a favourite one, especially with those who held Millenarian views. In the epistle of Barnabas (15:4) we read, For a day means with Him a thousand years, and He Himself witnesseth, saying, Behold, to-day shall be as a thousand years, where for to-day the Codex Sinaiticus reads the day of the Lord. Irenseus has, The day of the Lord is as a thousand years twice. Hippolytus has it once, Methodius once. In no case, however, is the context at all similar to the verses before us.A. Plummer, M.A.
The Brevity of Gods Delays.No delay which occurs is long to God; as to a man of countless riches, a thousand guineas are as a single penny. Gods nologe (eternal-ages measurer) differs wholly from mans horologe (hour-glass). His gnomon (dial-pointer) shows all the hours at once in the greatest activity and in perfect repose. To Him the hours pass away, neither more slowly, nor more quickly, than befits His economy. There is nothing to make Him need either to hasten or delay the end.Fausset.
2Pe. 3:11. What is a Holy Conversation?The Revised Version reads holy living, but the word conversation may be taken as altogether more suggestive. It is a very searching thing to require a holy tone and character upon all the turning about, in and out, here and there, to and fro, with this man and that, in all the everyday and commonplace associations of life. And that is what is meant by the holy conversation of the text. It may seem at first sight as if godliness were very much the same thing as holy conversation, but we may distinguish between the actual conduct of life and the inspiring motive of it. The inspiring motive should be godliness. Godliness is the realisation of Gods abiding presence, the fruits of which are reverence and trust. But the argument by which a holy conversation is urged upon us by the apostle is certainly somewhat peculiar. Because all present material things are to be dissolved; because the heavens shall pass away with a great noise; because the elements shall melt with fervent heat; because the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up;therefore, we ought to be supremely concerned about our holy conversation and godliness. If this stood alone it would be perplexing; but when St. Peter adds Nevertheless we, according to His promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness, we begin to understand him. A great testing time awaits Gods people; what it was to be could only be conceived under the forms of an overwhelming commotion of material things. In that time of testing nothing could possibly stand but steadfast goodness, an established holy conversation and godliness. Out of that time of testing will come a condition of confirmed holiness; there will be a new heaven and a new earth, whose supreme characteristic should be that in it dwelleth, abideth, righteousness. Only they who maintain the holy conversation and godliness can have any place in that new earth; but he who has persistently kept righteous during the testing time shall then be righteous still. That, then, is our work as the disciples of the Lord Jesus Christ. We are to earnestly maintain our holy conversation and godliness, as our true preparation for every time of strain that may be coming, and as providing the only sure defence from the evil influences which that time may bring. And we are to maintain it because only those who are holding it fast can have any entrance ministered unto them into the everlasting kingdom of righteousness. It is very significant that the apostles, while anxious about right opinion, are so much more anxious about right conduct and right character. The two may go together, and always should, but conduct and character must come first, and be esteemed as of supreme importance. Only let your conversation be such as becometh the gospel of Christ. We do well, then, to try and understand what a holy conversation is; or, to put the same thing in other words, what actual and practical ordering and shaping of our human life and relationships is involved in our making a Christian profession. What manner of persons ought we to be?
I. A holy conversation is a daily life ordered by principle.One Scripture writer earnestly counsels us not to let our life drift. But it is precisely that we are tempted to do. To let things go. To live on, day by day, simply responsive to the accidents of the day, and fitting our wisdom and skill, as well as we can, to the duties and emergencies of the day. It is but a butterfly kind of life, flitting lazily from flower to flower, and sipping what nectar we can. A holy conversation was never attained in that way. It is easy enough to drift into a low, careless kind of life, but no man ever yet put a stamp of character upon his conduct until he gained a clear meaning and purpose for his life. It is the greatest work of education to inspire the boy with a great resolve. He is not educated unless he has come to see a meaning in his life, to set before himself a noble purpose, and to recognise the law or principle by which all his efforts to attain are to be ruled. To start in life without a fixed principle is like starting a voyage on the unknown and wind-driven seas, without a guiding and controlling helm. Sometimes the principle chosen for the ordering of a life is not a good principle, but even then it has its power as a principle, and in the sway of it the man reaches altogether grander things than the man possibly can who drifts through life, anyhow and anywhere, without any guiding principle at all. But there is no reason against our choosing such a principle as will secure for us a holy conversation. We can resolve that life shall be ordered on the principle of always and simply doing what we know to be the will of God. For us that will is in part declared in the teachings of the Lord Jesus Christ, and in part witnessed every day afresh, in adaptation to the circumstances of life, by the indwelling Holy Spirit. And what we call conversion is precisely this: the dethroning of the old principle of seeking the interests of Self, and enthroning the principle of service to the holy will of God. Just in the measure in which a mans life is ordered and toned by that principle will his daily life and association be described as a holy conversation. That is the first thing, and there is nothing more absolutely essential to right living. We can attain nothing unless we are purposed to attain it. We can attain no high thing unless our purpose be based on a principle, and that principle be the noblest that can give character to a life. It is but putting this in figurative form for the apostle to say, I beseech you, therefore, by the mercies of God, that ye present your bodies a living sacrifice which is your reasonable service.
II. A holy conversation is a daily life shaped to a pattern.We want help in finding befitting expression for our principle in the actual details of our daily association and duty and influence. We see this want very clearly in the case of the Christians connected with the early Gentile Churches. It was most difficult and perplexing work to get the new Christian principle, altering, re-moulding, and re-toning all the common, every-day thoughts, feelings, and relations of life; and we know how, in all the epistles, practical counsels for guidance were given, and how, in the epistles to the Corinthians, the more special cases of perplexity were carefully dealt with. Was this principle, which we have commended as the right, the highest, the most sanctifying principle that can order a human life, ever so worked out into the details of any one human career that such a mans life-story can be taken as an absolutely satisfactory pattern? We can take any and every good man as an example of something; but then each ordinary good man is almost as much a warning as an example. Was there ever a case in which the pattern of the life-principle, worked into all details, was perfect? A case in which the life contains nothing whatever which we must be warned not to copy? That supremely important question has never yet received more than one answer. It never will receive more than one. That one is entirely satisfactory. The Man, Christ Jesus is the model life of details, in which the power of the controlling principle is seen; and whosoever takes that human life for his pattern increasingly finds himself satisfied with it, and inspired by it so as to attain a holy conversation. But we shall misuse that pattern if we merely slavishly imitate it; if we inconsiderately say, Jesus did and said such and such things, and we must say and do exactly the same. That is childish imitation, not intelligently using our pattern. What we require is to see that Christs pattern is simply but precisely this: the varying suggestion of ways in which the great life-principle finds befitting expression in the details of human conduct. What we have to ask, if we would follow the example of Christ aright, is this: How would Christ have expressed the great principle if He had been placed in just these particular circumstances in which I am placed? And we can get practical help from observing how Christ did act in circumstances that were similar. To follow His steps is to express principle as He did. Is it not quite plain that shaping life after the pattern which Christ has set will ensure a holy conversation? It did. No other terms are befitting as the description of the life of the Lord Jesus. Take what meanings you may please to attach to the term holy, they are all satisfied in the blessed life of Him who did no sin, neither was guile found in His mouth; who was holy, harmless, undefiled, and separate from sinners. And a holy conversation is possible to us in the measure in which we answer to the pattern, have the mind that was in Christ Jesus, and are made like unto Him in all thingschanged into His image.
III. A holy conversation is a life sustained by consecrated energy.It is necessary to dwell upon this, because Christs holy life may seem to us a far easier thing than we shall ever find a holy life to be; and we may readily get disheartened when we are impressed with the contrast between our Lords easy attainment and our ever difficult and doubtful struggle. It really should not be felt a surprising thing that we can but, at the best, come a long way behind Christa very long way indeed it will be unless we put consecrated energy into our endeavour. Such energy is demanded because the life-principle we have chosen is never so established and confirmed in us as to be beyond peril; and even more than that, it has a way of fading down in us and becoming ineffective if we do not perseveringly and persistently keep it well to the front, and make it have its say about everything. A true life-principle in a man must be everything or nothing, everywhere or nowhere. There is therefore constant demand for the consecrated energy which will keep power and vigour in the principle which makes a holy conversation. The holy life is a life in earnest, and it can be nothing else. The hair and fur of animals reveals at once lowered vitality. Keep up the energy of the souls life, and all the signs will be right; there will surely be the holy conversation. And the consecrated energy is further needed because the practical outworking of our life-principle in the details of conduct is never easy for us, if it was always easy for Christ. Our Lord expressed a truth which was applicable to more than the entrance into the kingdom when He said, Strive (agonise) to enter in. It is quite true that the effort for us will grow easier as years unfold, and will become easier in particular things, but it will never cease to make demands upon watchfulness, self-mastery, and consecrated energy. If we would attain the holy conversation, we must be prepared to endure hardness as good soldiers of Jesus Christ, and we must be constantly lifting ourselves afresh up to the holy enduring. What is wanted, always wanted, is earnestness put into the endeavour to live the holy life. We must mean it, and strive for it.
IV. A holy conversation is life toned by righteousness.There are so many things in life that would be beautiful if they were polished. Things never do become lovely until they get their bloom. What marvellous improvements have been made in the paper of our books and magazines! Now it has its polish on and shines. It may be of first importance that a Christians conversation should be rightthat it should be of sterling worth; the ring of it must be sound and true. But it does not answer to the description holy conversation until it gets its polish, until upon it lies the bloom. It must be beautiful and gracious. The fruits of the Spirit, love, joy, peace, long-suffering, gentleness, make up the bloom, and no man has gained the holy conversation until he is strong, true, and beautiful in Christ. Yes, in Christ. For there is a marvel about our Pattern. The Pattern proves to be a Person, a living Person, with whom we can have so real a fellowship that the glow of Him shall be reflected from us. Like Moses, when he saw God, the shine will be on our faces, the Christ-tone will be on all our intercourse. The Christ-bloom creeps all over us if we really come into soul-nearness to Him. Surely the question with which we started has been fully answered. What is a holy conversation? It is a human life ordered by the principle that ruled the human life of Christ. It is a human life in all its details shaped after the pattern of the Man, Christ Jesus. It is a human life into which is put the energy of a vigorous life and a consecrated purpose. It is a human life that is kept within the radiance of Christ, and shines out His light upon men. Seeing that the great strain-time, taking one form or another, must come to us all; and seeing that through the strain-time we may hope to come to the world where all is righteous;what manner of persons ought we to be in all holy conversation and godliness?
2Pe. 3:13. Heaven: its Nature and Character.There is great confusion, both in the language and the opinions of men, in regard to the final dwelling-place which is promised in Scripture to the righteous. We speak of heaven continually, yet have but a vague and unconnected notion of what it positively is. There is no perspicuous and definite idea impressed upon the mind: we are wandering in the regions of generality, or probability. It may be this, or it may be that. It is a speculation rather than an article of faith. With our very limited faculty of intelligence, and with our many imperfections and impurities clinging on all sides around us, we shall never be able entirely to penetrate those sacred mysteries of futurity which God has but partially disclosed. To be wise beyond the Scriptures would be the height of impiety; but, nevertheless, there is no reason why we should not strive to be wise up to the Scriptures.
I. Heaven is a place, a tangible, material locality.Heaven, as a word, is used with various significations.
1. The region of air or atmosphere immediately surrounding the earth.
2. The firmament, or vast expanse of space which is beyond or above the atmosphere, wherein the stars appear.
3. As the place of Gods residence, and the dwelling of angels. Many persons have taken up the idea that heaven is nothing more than a sort of indefinite ethereal abode; that the grossness of materialism cannot enter there; that it is filled with nothing but certain mental and spiritual essences of glory and love, unallied to anything that savours of body or of matter; and so they attenuate and dwindle away all notion of it, till it disappears in nothing; and when pressed home, they find that their minds have been dwelling upon that which is purely imaginative, and has no foundation. The source of this is not difficult to detect. By our present connection with the world in which we dwell, our notion of materialism is inseparably connected with a notion of imperfection and sin; and by the exalted pictures which Scripture gives us of the joys of heaven, we are loth to admit, as within its comprehension, anything that appertains to our present state. The contemplative mind cannot think of heaven as constituted of any such material elements as here he sees around him. But there is a fallacy in such reasoning, and the fallacy is this: we look upon the material things of nature as they are now, and not as God made them originally; we look upon the human body as it is now, in sin, and not as the Almighty originally constituted itin glory and holiness. Man was a sinless creature; there was naught for him but loveliness and beauty; there was no such thing as sorrow, no such thing as pain. The paradise in which Adam and Eve dwelt, we must consider to have been a perfect and blissful abode; and yet it was a local abode. It was not till Adam fell that materialism ceased to be holy. It was not till sin entered into the world that there was any drawback in the works of nature, as now looked upon by us. Then, indeed, the whole of the works of God were changed from their original destination. But who would say that, because this material state, in which we now are, cannot form such a place as heaven, that no material state shall? Then Scripture asserts the resurrection of the body, and the reunion of the body and soul, before entering the future abode of eternity. Christ, in His human nature, as a body, is in heaven, at Gods right hand. We cannot conceive this at all, unless we conceive of Gods right hand as a place. In all the descriptions of the blessedness of the righteous, that which describes their happiness infers that happiness as depending on organs of sensation, as seeing, conversing with, and listening to, other beings who shall there be associated with us. If there is material vision, material hearing, material recognition, there must be a material abode, and material objects on which they are to be exercised. The promised abode of righteous men, we may confidently say, is of a local and material character. It is materialism, purged indeed from sin, and cleansed of all those imperfections which attach to it herebut still materialism.
II. There is a certain character attached to the place without which character no man can attain unto its glories.Wherein dwelleth righteousness. As some have theorised away the notion of heaven, by lifting it up beyond the cognisance of our senses altogether, so others, men of sensual and earthly affections, have so debased their notion of it as to represent it as a mere place of such corporeal pleasures as prevail in this world. But such an absurditylet alone its profanenessas that picture of Paradise which the Koran describes, can never for a moment be entertained by one who reads the Bible. The most perfect and hallowed goodness must of necessity belong to the saints in light. Harmony of views, identity of interests, unison of affectionsin short, universal goodshall fill every bosom, and stimulate every heart. What must the character of the soul of man be, before he can become the fit inhabitant of such a heaven? Clearly, we human beings must be changed; we must be spiritualised; we must be lifted up to God, for God cannot be brought down to us. And when may this change be effected? Certainly not after death. If we attain not to holiness and spirituality of character while on this earth, we shall not attain unto the spirituality of the character which belongs to the new earth. What you are here, you will be hereafter. Heaven cannot but be a place of holiness. He therefore that is unholy can have no place therein. It appears, then, that as one part of heaven, the material part, cannot be commenced here, but must wait for the final restitution of all things, so, in proportion, the other part of heaven, the spiritual part, must be commenced here, otherwise the fruition of eternal joy never can be ours. The spiritual heaven, the temper of mind, the patience, the meekness, the purity, the love of heaventhat, unless we have a foretaste of it now, we shall not be in a capacity for enjoying hereafter.William J. E. Bennett, M.A.
New Heavens and New Earth.What is our conception of the new heaven and the new earth that we desire? Is it a mere absence of annoyances? Is it an egotism, expanded to infinitude? Is it a sensual Mohammedan paradise? Is it a selfish palace of art? Is it a city paved with gold, or a pagoda of jewels, like the Jerusalem of St. John, in its merely external aspect? Childish must we be indeed if we have not get beyond these symbols, if we do not know that man is, in his essence, a spiritual being, and that for a spiritual being there can be no felicity save in spiritual conditionsin communion with God, in serenity of mind, in purity of heart. We, according to His promise, look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein dwelleth righteousness. Shall we ever enjoy that heaven hereafter? Yea, if we truly seek it now.Dean Farrar.
Attainableness of Righteousness.Is righteousness attainable by man? If it be, then the essence of Gods kingdom is not beyond mans reach. If righteousness be attainable here and now, then here and now we may at least enter into the kingdom of heaven. Is our conception of happiness identified with righteousness? Is that the thing which we desire? Is that our ideal? Is that the one goal to which we are stretching forward in the heavenly race? If so, then for us, even here and now, the path to heaven lies through heaven, and all the way to heaven is heaven. What sort of a condition answers to the heaven of which you dream, for which you sigh? Is it a state of things which you vaguely call glory? Is it a starry crownthe symbol of supreme self-aggrandisement? Is it a golden throne, the summit of individual exaltation? Is it the rest of an untroubled indolence? If so, our heaven may prove to be indeed a chimera, both now and hereafter. Such notions of heaven betray the unsuspected fact that, after all, our high spiritual hopes resolve themselves into mere earthliness, into an ill-concealed amalgam of vanity and selfishness. The true conception of heaven is holiness.Dean Farrar.
ILLUSTRATIONS TO CHAPTER 3
2Pe. 3:12. Ready for the Voyage.The Christian, at his death, should not be like the child, who is forced by the rod to quit his play; but like one who is wearied of it, and willing to go to bed. Neither ought he to be like the mariner whose vessel is drifted by the violence of the tempest from the shore, tossed to and fro upon the ocean, and at last suffers wreck and destruction; but like one who is ready for the voyage, and, the moment the wind is favourable, cheerfully weighs anchor, and, full of hope and, joy, launches forth into the deep.Gottholds Emblems.
Influence of Fire upon the Earth.What has fire done upon the earth? Fire has only re-constructed and destroyed. Nothing has found an origin in fire. Fire itself is an effect, and not a cause it is in the atmosphere, it is in the flint in the earth, it is in the water; in each it is a thing by itself, unseen or unfelt; certain conditions bring it into active existence, but it cannot be traced in either element as a matter of course; yet it is here, there, and everywhere: it has built up Cotopaxi to the height of 18,000 feet; Teneriffe has been shot up by its labours from an unknown depth beneath the sea to 12,000 feet above it; Etna is heaped up with lava, ashes, and scori some 11,000 feet; Iceland has grown into a great island under its influence; and Vesuvius has grown to a height of 3,751 feet, from a reconstruction of earthy matter by force.Malet.
Fuente: The Preacher’s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell
2Pe. 3:8-9 But forget not this one thing, beloved, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some count slackness; but is longsuffering to you-ward, not wishing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
Expanded Translation
But, loved ones, instead of being like those around you (who wilfully forget, 2Pe. 3:5), you must not ignore, let go unnoticed, or forget this one thing: that one day is as a thousand years as far as the Lord is concerned, and a thousand years is as one day (therefore, the elapse of time does not hinder his purposes). The Lord is not slow or delaying concerning (the fulfillment of) his promise (to destroy the world by fire) in the manner that some men think of slowness or delay, but rather is long-suffering and patient, (withholding His wrath) toward you, not purposing, determining, or wishing that any person perish and be lost, but rather that all should come to repentance (a radical change of mind for the better, which influences the whole life).
_______________________
But forget not this one thing beloved
The word forget (lanthano) occurs in 2Pe. 3:5 (where see definition). The idea here is, These false teachers wilfully let the true facts of religion, especially concerning the worlds destruction, go unnoticed. You Christians must not let this of which I am now about to speak escape your memories . . .
that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day
That is, time means nothing to God, particularly here as it concerns the fulfillment of his promises and purposes (see 2Pe. 3:4). As far as God is concerned, he might just as well have decreed the end of the world a couple of days ago! The lapse of time between His decree and its fulfillment is no weighty argument against the certainty and truthfulness of the prophecy.
This statement again refutes the mockers idea that the Lord had not appeared as yet, and all things continue unchanged from the beginning . . . (2Pe. 3:4). In 2Pe. 3:6 the apostle shows that things have not continued unchanged. And here he points out that the passing of centuries means nothing to God. Yet such a delay may seem long to man.
Thus two basic arguments stand out against those who made light of the coming destruction of the world.
1.
True history (2Pe. 3:5-7).
2.
Gods view of time (2Pe. 3:8-9).
the Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some count slackness
That is, the Lord is not slow or behindhand in fulfilling His promise, though some men may think so who do not understand His timeless nature. The verb slack (braduno) and the noun slackness (bradutes) may be simply defined slow and slowness respectively, or tardy and tardiness. As most men reckon time, God is certainly slack, But that is mans idea of slackness, not Gods.
but is longsuffering to you-ward
He is patient, forbearing, and slow in avenging wrongs, for so makrothumia signifies. The word generally describes the self-restraint which does not hastily retaliate a wrong (Thayer), and stands opposed to the quick or impulsive manifestation of wrath or revenge, (God has this trait, and we are to be holy as he is holy1Pe. 1:16.)
It is because of this characteristic of God that he may appear slack concerning his promise. When he decreed that the ancient world would be destroyed, His longsuffering caused him to spare that world for a hundred and twenty years (Gen. 6:3). How much longer will his patience hold out with the present world? With crime, lust, war, and rebellion everywhere, it is surely difficult to believe that the awful event described in these verses is very far distant.
not wishing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance
Giving a reason for his longsuffering. God has nothing but the good of his creatures at heart! He would have all men to be saved, and come to the knowledge of the truth (1Ti. 2:4).[76] It is not a few or some that he desires to be saved, but all! And he that is athirst, let him come: he that will, let him take of the water of life freely (Rev. 22:17 b).
[76] In 1Ti. 2:4 the verb would have is thelo, while the verb wishing (boulomai) is used here. The distinction between these words is not always clear-cut, but Abbot-Smith expresses the consensus when he says boulomai implies more strongly than thelo the deliberate exercise of volition. Thus it is neither Gods purpose or intention nor his wish or desire that any person be lost. When a man opposes the desire and purpose of God to save him, God, being both merciful and righteous, must exercise justice, But let no man blame God for being in a state of condemnation! See further notes on thelo (willfully), 2Pe. 3:5.
(See notes on the word perish (apollumi) under 2Pe. 3:6, Concerning the foreknowledge of God as it pertains to salvation, see notes under 1Pe. 1:2.)
Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series
(8) Second Answer to the sceptical argument: Time is the condition of mans thought and action, but not of Gods. His thoughts are not as our thoughts, nor His ways as our ways; what seems delay to us is none to Him.
But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing.Although these scoffers are willingly ignorant of what refutes their error, do not you be ignorant of what will lead you to the truth.
One day is with the Lord as a thousand years.This half of the saying is quite original, and has no equivalent in Psa. 90:4. The second half is only partially parallel to a thousand years in Thy sight are but as yesterday, when it is past. Consequently, we cannot be sure that the Apostle had this passage from the Psalms in his mind, though it is probable enough that he had. That God Can punish in one day the sins of a thousand years is a thought which is neither in the text nor in the context. What is insisted on is simply thisthat distinctions of long and short time are nothing in the sight of God; delay is a purely human conception. Justin Martyr, about A.D. 145 (Trypho, lxxxi.), gives the day of the Lord is as a thousand years as a quotation, and in this form it is closer to 2Pe. 3:8 than to Psa. 90:4. As another possible reference to our Epistle follows in the next chapter, it may be regarded as not improbable that Justin knew the Epistle. (See above, second Note on 2Pe. 2:1.) But the saying may have been a favourite one, especially with those who held Millenarian views. In the Epistle of Barnabas (xv. 4) we read, For a day means with Him a thousand years, and He Himself witnesseth, saying, Behold, to-day shall be as a thousand years, where for to-day the Codex Sinaiticus reads the day of the Lord. Irenus has The day of the Lord is as a thousand years twice(V. xxiii. 2; xxviii. 3); Hippolytus has it once (Comm. on Daniel, Lagarde, p. 153); Methodius once (in Photius Bibliotheca, cod. 235). In no case, however, is the context at all similar to the verses before us.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
8. Our apostle now returns to the all-important caution in regard to time. It is on this point that the sceptical scoffers will fix. Remember that God’s hours are ages. Note on Act 1:7.
One day a thousand years In the prophetic predictions of the second advent the Spirit speaks by the arithmetic of God, in which the terms soon, quickly, humanly indicating a few days, divinely allow a few ages. Psalms 90.
And now the question may well arise, Why has inspiration thus used phrases of such nearness to designate an event which was to be, as near two thousand years’ experience has proved, so distant? Or, to express the thought in higher terms, Why has a divine arithmetic been thus used to express such a distance to human minds? Our reply would be this: The Spirit’s purpose is, to preserve in our minds an impressive conception of its nearness in spite of its distance. The divine intention is, to prevent our banishing it from our thoughts on account of its far futurity. In its momentousness to us it is nigh at hand, and time is no rightful factor in our calculations. Nay, the very greatness of its distance, far millenniums, perhaps, hence, demands that thought and language should bring it near. Sensible time is very relative. To us in the intervening spirit-world millenniums may pass with inconceivable rapidity. There ever is to us but a step, as it were, to the judgment-day. Note on Mat 25:6. Hence, Scripture uniformly points us, with warning, not to the day of death, but to the resurrection and the judgment-seat of Christ.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘But forget not this one thing, beloved, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.’
Note again the use of ‘beloved’. His heart yearns for these saints of God who are resisting the false teachers. And he calls on them not to forget that with the Lord one day is as a thousand years, and a thousand years is as one day. In other words with God there is no limit to His thinking as regards time. A ‘day’ and ‘a thousand years’ are both the same to Him. Time is almost irrelevant, because both a thousand years and one day are to Him simply brief periods of time in a much vaster time-scale, that of eternity.
But there is no justification for applying this principle mechanically (an error later made in the Epistle of Barnabas and by Irenaeus). This use here does not mean that we can take other places where prophetic days are mentioned and make them each mean a thousand years. It does, however, suggest that we would be justified in using the principle of boundlessness if we were specifically dealing with ‘days of God’. Some would argue that this is the case in Genesis 1. It is particularly appropriate there as the days are clearly not ordinary days (the lengths of days are not fixed until day 4).
In fact in Scripture generally ‘a thousand years’ is simply indicative of a long period of time. The nearest example to its use here is found in Psa 90:4, ‘For a thousand years in your sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night’. There also the idea is that a thousand years is to God as but the passing of a brief period of time, the third of a night (the night was split into three watches). But such a use of ‘a thousand’ in Scripture to indicate ‘a great many’ is common.
Thus we have the following:
‘The Lord, the God of your fathers make you a thousand times so many more as you are, and bless you, as He has promised you!’ (Deu 1:11). Here it is simply the equivalent of our saying, ‘I have a thousand things to do.’ It simply means, ‘many times’.
‘And the man said to Joab, ‘Though I should receive a thousand shekels of silver in my hand, yet would I not put forth mine hand against the king’s son: for in our hearing the king charged you and Abishai and Ittai, saying, Beware that none touch the young man Absalom’ (2Sa 18:12). This is similar to the first case and simply means a large round number.
‘For every beast of the forest is Mine, and the cattle on a thousand hills’ (Psa 50:10). We can assume that no one asks who the cattle on the other hills belong to.
‘Your neck is like the tower of David built for an armoury, on which there hang a thousand bucklers, all shields of mighty men’ (Son 4:4). Again the significance is of a large number.
‘And it shall come about in that day, that every place, where there were a thousand vines at a thousand silverlings, shall even be for briars and thorns (Isa 7:23). Again the significance is a large number.
‘Belshazzar the king made a great feast to a thousand of his lords, and drank wine before the thousand’ (Dan 5:1). It is doubtful if this is intended to indicate an actual number. It rather means a large number of lords.
2). More significant in this context are the examples where ‘a thousand’ is used with a time word indicating the passage of time:
‘Know therefore that the Lord your God, He is God, the faithful God, Who keeps covenant and mercy with those who love Him and keep His commandments to a thousand generations’ (Deu 7:9). We suspect here that no one would suggest here that God’s mercy would fail once the thousand generations were past, nor that it bound God specifically to a thousand generations. It simply means a great many generations.
‘For a day in Your courts is better than a thousand. I had rather be a doorkeeper in the house of My God, than to dwell in the tents of wickedness’ (Psa 84:10). Again the significance of ‘a thousand’ is ‘many’, and once more in a time context.
‘For a thousand years in your sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night’ (Psa 90:4). Here the idea is of a large number, (he could have used any large round number). It is important here because it refers both to how God sees time, and to a time context.
‘He has remembered His covenant for ever, the word which He commanded to a thousand generations’ (Psa 105:8). Here again we have a reference to God’s view of time and it is related specifically to the passing of time and to a time word, ‘generations’. No one would suggest that here the idea is that after a thousand generation He would forget His covenant, nor that He is indicating that a thousand generations will actually be achieved.
‘Yes, though he live a thousand years twice told, yet has he seen no good. Do not all go to one place?’ (Ecc 6:6). Here ‘a thousand years’ signifies a long time, and interestingly it can without difficulty be seen as two thousand.
‘And he laid hold on the monster, the old Serpent who is the Devil, and bound him for a thousand years, and cast him into the Abyss, — that he should deceive the nations no more until the thousand years be finished’ (Rev 20:5). There are no Scriptures anywhere else that suggest any other than that this is simply referring to a long period of time.
‘And they lived and reigned with Christ a thousand years. The rest of the dead lived not again until the thousand years should be finished — they shall be priests of God and of Christ, and shall reign with Him a thousand years’ (Rev 20:4-6). Again there are no Scriptures anywhere else that suggest that the thousand here is to be taken literally.
All this would seem to stress the fact that when God says ‘a thousand years’ it simply means a long extent of time, although not a long time to God. And this is especially so as his statement is not just that a day can be seen as a thousand years, but that a thousand years is also to God the equivalent of one day. A thousand years is but a blink of His eye.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
The Reason For Delay And The Final Fulfilment ( 2Pe 3:8-13 ).
The Certainty of the Second Coming In 2Pe 3:8-10 the apostle Peter reaffirms the Second Coming of Christ Jesus.
2Pe 3:8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
2Pe 3:8 Psa 90:4, “For a thousand years in thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past, and as a watch in the night.”
2Pe 3:9 The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
2Pe 3:9 The promise refers to Jesus’ Second Coming. The next verse will call this event the “Day of the Lord.” In 2Pe 3:12 he will refer to it again as the “Day of God.”
2Pe 3:9 “but is longsuffering to us-ward” – Comments – Why is God waiting patiently?
Isa 30:18, “And therefore will the LORD wait, that he may be gracious unto you , and therefore will he be exalted, that he may have mercy upon you: for the LORD is a God of judgment: blessed are all they that wait for him.”
2Pe 3:9 Comments – If Jesus returned while I was lost in sin, I would have spent eternity in hell. Praise the Lord that He did not come before my conversion. The delay of His Return allows many the opportunity to repent and believe and be saved.
2Pe 3:10 But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.
2Pe 3:10 Mat 24:36 2Pe 3:10 “in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat” – Word Study on “noise” Strong says the Greek word “noise” ( ) (G4500) means, “whizzingly, i.e. with a crash.” BDAG says it means, “with a hissing or crackling sound, with a roar, with great suddenness.”
Word Study on “melt” Strong says the Greek word “melt” ( ) (G3089) means, “break (up), destroy, dissolve, (un)loose, melt, put off.” BDAG says this word describes “the parts of the universe, as it is broken up and destroyed in the final conflagration.”
Word Study on “with fervent heat” Strong says the Greek word “with fervent heat” ( ) (G2741) means, “to set on fire.” BDAG says it is used passively to mean, “be consumed by heat, burn up.”
2Pe 3:10 Comments – 2Pe 3:10 refers to the Day of the Lord. This passage of Scripture raises the question of whether God will absolutely destroy the existing heavens and earth in the Day of the Lord, or will He simply remodel them, and restore them to their original glory. Some suggest that God will remodel this old earth that has been subjected to vanity and decay. The description in this passage looks very much like God will melt and dissolve all physical elements into vapor and re-create a new heavens and a new earth.
Scripture References There are a number of Scriptures that refer to Jesus Christ coming as a thief in the night (Mat 24:43-44, 1Th 5:2, 2Pe 3:10, Rev 3:3; Rev 16:15).
Mat 24:43-44, “But know this, that if the goodman of the house had known in what watch the thief would come, he would have watched, and would not have suffered his house to be broken up. Therefore be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man cometh.”
1Th 5:2, “For yourselves know perfectly that the day of the Lord so cometh as a thief in the night.”
2Pe 3:10, “But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.”
Rev 3:3, “Remember therefore how thou hast received and heard, and hold fast, and repent. If therefore thou shalt not watch, I will come on thee as a thief, and thou shalt not know what hour I will come upon thee.”
Rev 16:15, “Behold, I come as a thief. Blessed is he that watcheth, and keepeth his garments, lest he walk naked, and they see his shame.”
2Pe 3:8. One day is with the Lord, &c. “I have taken notice, that the scoffers are voluntarily ignorant of, or inattentive to these things. But as to the distance of time, with which they insult you, be not you ignorant of, or inattentive to this one thing; namely, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.It makes no differencewith God, whether the thing which he has engaged to do is to be performed now, or a thousand years hence: he will as certainly and punctuallyaccomplish it; and time makes no alteration, as to his wisdom, goodness, power, or veracity.” This was a proverbial expression among the Jews, (see Psa 90:4. Sir 18:9, &c.) and was plainly intended to signify, that no finite duration bears any proportion to the eternity of God. Plutarch has a passage exactly parallel to it, in his discourse “On the Slowness of the divine vengeance.” It may be proper just to observe further, that if St. Peter had been speaking here, as some suppose, of the destruction of Jerusalem, which happened within three years, it is not likely that he would have talked of a thousand years. The most natural answer to the scoffers, if they had inquired about that event, would have been, “It is just at hand; the Jewish war is broke out; and by many of the signs and forerunners of it, you may be sure that the desolation thereof draweth near.”
2Pe 3:8 refers to the reason given in , 2Pe 3:4 , on which the scoffers based their assertion; it points out that the delay, also, of the Parousia is no proof that it will not take place.
] “ this one thing ,” as a specially important point.
] “ let it not be hid from you ;” said with reference to 2Pe 3:5 .
. . .] a thought that echoes Psa 90:4 . The words lay stress on the difference between the divine and the human reckoning of time. It does not designate God as being absolutely without limitations of time (cui nihil est praeteritum, nihil futurum, sed omnia praesentia; Aretius), for it is not the nature of God that is here in question, but God’s reckoning of time which He created along with the world, and the words only bring out that it is different from that of man. [95] For this purpose the words of the Psalms were not sufficient: ; and therefore on the basis of them the author constructs a verse consisting of two members.
] “ with God,” i.e. in God’s way of looking at things. Since, then, time has a different value in God’s eyes from that which it has in the eyes of men, the tarrying hitherto of the judgment, although it had been predicted as at hand , is no proof that the judgment will not actually come. [96]
[95] Hofmann is consequently equally incorrect when he says that the passage in the Psalm asserts that “for God time is no time,” but here that “for Him it is neither short nor long.”
[96] The following thoughts are not expressed here, although they may he inferred from what is said: “In one single day of judgment God can punish the sin of centuries, and can adjust that great inequality which, by so long a duration, has been introduced into eternity” (Dietlein); and “in one day a mighty step onwards may be taken, such as in a thousand years could hardly have been expected; and then again, if retarded by the will of God, the march of development will, for a thousand years hardly move faster than otherwise it would have done in a single day” (Thiersch, p. 107).
DISCOURSE: 2427 2Pe 3:8-9. Beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is long-suffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.
THE compassion of Almighty God has in all ages been abused by ungodly men, and made an occasion of impenitence and persevering wickedness. In the minds of many it has been made a source of triumph against God, as though he were not able or willing to vindicate the honour of his law. Just as our blessed Lords condescension in noticing an abandoned, but penitent, woman was made by his enemies a reason for doubting whether he was a prophetsince, if he had been really inspired of God, he must have known how unworthy she was of such an honour; so the forbearance of God with an ungodly world has given occasion to scoffers to say, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. But such persons forget, that, however long God may have borne with the wickedness of men, he has given at the deluge a very awful testimony of his determination to punish it. And, though he now bears with sinners, he reserves the earth for a similar display of his vengeance by fire; and will surely, in due season, execute his threatenings against sin and sinners. In the mean time, however, he waits to be gracious to returning penitents, and will gladly lay aside his anger the very instant that they come to him in his appointed way. I.
In what light Gods delay of his final judgment should be viewed
God forbears to punish sinners, because he desires to save them He desires to save every child of man Having seen the long-suffering of God towards this sinful world, let us consider,
II.
What improvement we should make of it
From a sense of it, we should be led,
1.
To acknowledge our obligations to him
[Who amongst us has not reason to acknowledge the long-suffering of God towards him? Who is not a sinner before God? Who has not merited his wrathful indignation? Who might not, on ten thousand occasions, have justly been cut off, and made a monument of Gods righteous displeasure? Let us not, then, impute his forbearance to any indifference in him respecting us, but to its true source, his tender compassion, and unbounded mercy ]
2.
To humble ourselves before him
[Because judgment against an evil work is not executed speedily, therefore the hearts of too many are fully set in them to do evil [Note: Ecc 8:11.]. But let it not be so with us. St. Paul tells us, that the true intent of Gods patience and long-suffering is, to lead us to repentance [Note: Rom 2:4.]. Let it operate upon us in this manner; and let us humble ourselves before him in dust and ashes.]
3.
To justify him in his judgments
[Whatever men may urge against the denunciations of Gods wrath, we are sure he will be justified in every sentence which he shall pass, and be just in every judgment which he shall inflict [Note: Psa 51:4.]. The man who had not on the wedding-garment was speechless, when called to an account for his neglect. He might have said, Lord, I was called suddenly, and compelled to come in, and had not time to procure the requisite apparel. But there was no room for any such excuse. The Master of the feast would have provided him with the garment; but he would not deign to ask for it. Therefore, when cast into outer darkness, he had not a word to say in vindication of himself, or to criminate his Lord. And so, when sentence shall be past on those who despise the forbearance of their God, the whole host of heaven will cry, Righteous and true are thy ways, thou King of saints.]
4.
To improve the time that may be yet allotted to us
[God is now giving us space to repent. But how soon his patience may come to an end, we know not. We see persons taken away at every period of life [Note: If this be a Funeral Sermon, any particulars may be mentioned here.] Let not another day pass unimproved; but to-day, whilst it is called to-day, turn unto the Lord, and seek him with your whole hearts.]
“But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. (9) The Lord is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness; but is longsuffering to us-ward, not willing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance. (10) But the day of the Lord will come as a thief in the night; in the which the heavens shall pass away with a great noise, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat, the earth also and the works that are therein shall be burned up.”
How sweetly the Apostle turns from scoffers, in answering them, in order to comfort the faithful. And what a blessed plan hath he adopted in doing it. The comparative statement of a thousand years, and of a day, is chosen by way of manifesting, that in relation to His Being, and existence, who inhabiteth eternity, all calculations of time lose their very meaning. I AM, which is the Lord’s distinguishing name, renders past, present, and future to Him, but as one eternal Now. And it should not be forgotten by his people, that it is the eternity of his nature, and the unchangeableness of his purpose, counsel, will, and pleasure, which gives being and accomplishment to all his promises in Christ. The people or God, therefore, have an everlasting bottom to rest upon, in the assurance both of Christ’s coming, and his coming to perform all his gracious intentions to his Church. And so sudden, as well as sure, will be his coming, that that great day, or night, will be to all the earth as unlooked for, and unexpected, as when the midnight thief breaks into the house while men sleep. Alarm will rouse up the whole of the unregenerate world, and those awful events will take place with them all, which in various scriptures are so described. Mat 24:27 to the end.
8 But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
Ver. 8. One day is with the Lord, &c. ] Nullum tempus occurrit regi; how much less to the Ancient of days! In God there is no motion or flux; therefore a thousand years to him are but as one day.
8 10 .] Second contradiction to the scoffers: we are not to judge God , in the case of delay, as we do men , seeing that His thoughts are not as our thoughts.
8 .] But let this one thing not escape you, beloved ( , as especially important: , in allusion to 2Pe 3:5 ), that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day (the saying is the completion of that in Psa 90 (reff.), setting forth also in a wonderful way, that one day may be in God’s sight as productive of events as a millennium: in other words, when both clauses are considered, placing Him far above all human limits of time. “Summa: Dei onologium (sic appellare liceat) differt ab horologio mortalium. Illius gnomon omnes horas simul indicat in summa actione et in summa quiete. Ei nec tardius nec celerius labuntur tempora, quam Ipsi et conomi ejus aptum sit. Nulla causa est cur finem rerum aut protelare aut accelerare necessum habeat. Qui hoc comprehendemus? Si comprehendere possemus, non opus foret a Mose et Petro addi, apud Dominum .” Bengel).
2Pe 3:8-10 . A further argument to explain the apparent delay . “One thing beloved, you must not forget. The sense of the duration of time in the Divine Mind is not the same as in the human. One day is the same to God as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. God must not be judged as slack by human standards, in the fulfilment of His promise. He is better than the promise. He is long-suffering to usward, not willing that some should perish, but that all should come to repentance. We know not when His long-suffering will be exhausted. The day of the Lord will come as a thief. Then the heavens will pass away with hurtling noise, and the elements being burned, shall pass away, and the earth and the works of men contained in it, will be made manifest.”
2Pe 3:8 . , . . . Cf. Psa 40:4 . The literal application of this statement to the story of creation, employed by patristic writers, in which one day is interpreted as 1000 years, and therefore the creation in six days really means 6000 years, is of course absurd. On the other hand, it can scarcely be said that the writer of 2 Peter has attained to the conception that the category of time does not exist for the Divine Mind. Rather the meaning is that infinite compassion overrides in the Divine Mind all finite reckoning. Cf. Barnabas, 15, Justin, Dialogue , 81.
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: 2Pe 3:8-10
8But do not let this one fact escape your notice, beloved, that with the Lord one day is like a thousand years, and a thousand years like one day. 9The Lord is not slow about His promise, as some count slowness, but is patient toward you, not wishing for any to perish but for all to come to repentance. 10But the day of the Lord will come like a thief, in which the heavens will pass away with a roar and the elements will be destroyed with intense heat, and the earth and its works will be burned up.
2Pe 3:8
NASB”do not let this one fact escape your notice”
NKJV”do not forget this one thing”
NRSV”do not ignore this one fact”
TEV”do not forget one thing”
NJB”there is one thing. . .you must never forget”
This is a present imperative with a negative particle, which usually implies “stop an act in process.” Because of the persecution (cf. 1 Pet.) and the false teachers (cf. 2 Pet.) believers were beginning to question the trustworthiness of the biblical eschatological events.
“one day is like a thousand years” This is an allusion to Psa 90:4. It asserts the truth that time is not a factor with an eternal God. Only His creatures experience past, present, and future. We are time-bound, time-conscious. Believers must hold on to the truth that what God promises, God will do (cf. 1Ki 8:24; 1Ki 8:26; 1Ki 8:56). We trust in His character, His promises, His word, and His Son! Time is irrelevant although God uses time for His unfolding purposes.
The first generation of believers expected Jesus to return quickly (cf. Mar 13:30). This is one reason why they did not write down Jesus’ words and deeds (the Gospels) for many years. But with the continuing delay
1. the eyewitnesses began to die
2. false teachers began factions
3. some began to wonder why
Both Paul (cf. 2 Thessalonians 2) and Peter (cf. 2 Peter 3) address this subject of the delayed Second Coming. Even in the teachings of Jesus there is a tension between the imminent return (cf. Mat 10:23; Mat 24:27; Mat 24:34; Mat 24:44; Mar 9:1; Mar 13:30) and “some events must occur first”
1. return world-wide evangelization, cf. Mat 24:15; Mar 13:10
2. the revelation of the “man of sin,” cf. Mat 24:15; 2 Thessalonians 2; Revelation 13
3. the great persecution, cf. Mat 24:21; Mat 24:24; Revelation 13
Peter uniquely links the delay with God’s compassion for the lost! God is delaying Christ’s return so that more may repent and turn to Him through Christ. Believers’ godly lives are to point the unbelievers toward God!
2Pe 3:9 “the Lord is not slow” This use of “the Lord” must refer to YHWH. God’s unfolding plan (cf. Hab 2:3) of creation and redemption seems so slow to humans. The time element allows us to exercise trust within time. This period of our lives is the only time believers live by faith, which pleases God. Our patience and godly living are expressions and evidence of our faith/trust commitment to Him.
“but is patient toward you” One of the characteristics of God is His long-suffering patience toward both sinners and saints. However, His patience is taken advantage of by both groups. His patience has a purpose, the restoring of the image lost in the Fall.
“not wishing for any to perish” This is a Present middle (deponent) participle. God wants all humans to be saved (cf. Eze 18:23; Eze 18:32; Eze 33:11; Joh 3:16; Joh 4:42; Act 17:30; Rom 11:32; 1Ti 2:4; 1Ti 2:6; 1Ti 4:10; Tit 2:11; Heb 2:9; 1Jn 2:2). Because all humans are made in His image for personal fellowship, He sent His Son to die so that all may respond to Him (cf. Rom 5:12-21). This is an important balance to theological systems which major on God’s place in salvation, but minimize mankind’s needed covenantal response. I have included my notes from 1Ti 2:4 (Vol. 9, p. 25) regarding this topic.
Notes from my commentary on 1Ti 2:4
2Pe 2:4 “who desires all men to be saved” Believers are to pray for all people because God wants all people saved. This was a shocking statement to the exclusivistic false teachers, whether Gnostic or Jewish or, more probably in the pastoral letters, a combination. This is the great truth about God’s love for all mankind (cf. 1Ti 4:10; Eze 18:23; Eze 18:32; Eze 33:11; Joh 3:16; Act 17:30; Rom 11:22; 1Ti 2:4; 1Ti 2:6; 1Ti 4:10; Tit 2:11; Heb 2:9; 2Pe 3:9; 1Jn 2:2). This verse shows the imbalance of dogmatic, super-lapsarian, double-edged predestination which emphasizes God’s sovereignty to the exclusion of any needed human response. The stated truths of “five point” Calvinism, especially “irresistible grace” and “limited atonement” violate the covenant aspect of biblical faith. It is improper to reduce God to a puppet of human free will, as it is also improper to reduce mankind to a puppet of divine will. God in His sovereignty has chosen to deal with fallen mankind by means of covenant. He always initiates and structures the covenant (cf. Joh 6:44; Joh 6:65), but He has mandated that humans must respond and continue to respond in repentance and faith (cf. Mar 1:15; Act 3:16; Act 3:19; Act 20:21), as well as obedience and perseverance!
Often the theological discussion of God’s sovereignty (predestination) and human free will deteriorates into a proof-texting contest. The Bible clearly reveals the sovereignty of YHWH. However, it also reveals that His highest creation, mankind, made in His image, had been given the awesome personal quality of moral decision making. Humans must co-operate with God in every area of life.
The term “many” has been used to assert that God has chosen some (the elect) but not all; that Jesus died for some, not all. A careful reading of the following texts shows that these are used in a parallel sense!
Isaiah 53Romans 5
1. “all” (Isa 53:6) 2. “many” (Isa 53:11-12)1. “all” (Rom 5:18) 2. “many” (Rom 5:19)
SPECIAL TOPIC: YHWH’s ETERNAL REDEMPTIVE PLAN
“for all to come to repentance” Notice the emphasis on “all,” not just “some” (i.e., elect). Everyone is potentially elect in Christ. See SPECIAL TOPIC: REPENTANCE IN THE OLD TESTAMENT at Mar 1:4.
2Pe 3:10 “the day of the Lord will come like a thief” This phrase “the day of the Lord” is an OT phrase for the end of time. Thieves are often used as a metaphor for an unexpected visitation (cf. Mat 24:43-44; Luk 12:39; 1Th 5:2; Rev 3:3; Rev 16:15) from God (i.e., Judgment Day/Second Coming/Resurrection Day).
“the heavens will pass away” This is a recurring theme (i.e., physical creation will cease, but not God’s word, cf. Mar 13:31; Mat 5:18; Mat 24:35) describing the temporality and finitude of physical creation (cf. Rev 21:1).
NASB, NJB”with a roar”
NKJV”with a great noise”
NRSV”with a loud noise”
TEV”with a shrill noise”
This word has the connotation of a whizzing sound of something moving rapidly through the air. The consummation and cleansing of the new age will come with a sound and flame much like the inauguration of the new age at Pentecost (cf. Act 2:2-3).
“the elements” Most words develop from a literal, physical sense to a metaphorical extension. This term (stoicheia) originally referred to something in a row, a series. It developed into several connotations:
1. The basic physical building blocks of the world (air, water, earth, and fire, cf. 2Pe 3:10; 2Pe 3:12).
2. The basic teachings of a subject (cf. Heb 5:12; Heb 6:1 for Judaism).
3. The angelic powers behind the heavenly bodies (cf. I Enoch 52:8-9; the early church fathers; Col 2:8; Col 2:20; 1Co 15:24) or the angelic ranks (aeons) of the Gnostic false teachers (cf. Col 2:10; Col 2:15; Eph 3:10).
4. Angels hostile to mankind who tried to stop the giving of the Law to Moses (cf. Act 7:38; Heb 2:2).
5. Possibly the impersonal structures of our fallen world that allow fallen mankind to appear independent from God (education, government, medicine, religion, etc., cf. Gal 4:3; Gal 4:8-9 and Hendrik Berkhof’s Christ and the Powers by Herald Press, p. 32).
“with intense heat” This is a present passive participle implying God as an unnamed agent. This was a medical term to denote high fever.
NASB”the earth and its works will be burned up”
NKJV”the earth and the works that are in it will be burned up”
NRSV”the earth and everything that is done on it will be disclosed”
TEV”the earth with everything in it will vanish”
NJB”the earth and all it contains will be burned up”
There are many Greek manuscript variants in this phrase.
1. “will be discovered” (cf. MSS , B, K, P)
2. “will be found destroyed” (cf. MS P72)
3. “will be burned up” (cf. MS A)
4. “will be hidden” (cf. MS C)
There is no certainly of the original Greek text, or even probability, in the translation of this phrase.
be not, &c. Literally let not this one thing be hidden (as 2Pe 3:6) from you.
with. App-104.
LORD. App-98.
8-10.] Second contradiction to the scoffers: we are not to judge God, in the case of delay, as we do men, seeing that His thoughts are not as our thoughts.
2Pe 3:8. ) but this one thing; namely, that which pertains to this subject. This one thing only pertains to teaching in this epistle; which (epistle) in other respects admonishes, but does not teach.- ) do not suffer it to escape your notice.-, you) Antithetical to them, 2Pe 3:5. He does not so fully reply to the mockers, as he instructs the faithful.- , , one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day, Psa 90:4, Septuagint, , , , . for a thousand years, O Lord, are in Thy sight as yesterday, which is gone, and as a watch in the night. The preceding words convey this meaning: Thou art our refuge, Eternal God; and not we ourselves, frail weak men. The reason is added: for a thousand years, etc. Moses describes the eternity of God much more absolutely: Peter describes it in the relation which it bears to the last day, and to men looking for that day; so that His eternity may itself be perceived, by which in essence and in operation, He wonderfully exceeds all measure of time; and that His divine knowledge may also be included in the idea, that knowledge to which all future things are present: and His Power (may be recognised), which does not require long delays for the performance of its work; and His Long-suffering, from which all impatient expectation is absent and all eager haste. With the Lord one day is as a thousand years (Peter adds this to the saying of Moses): that is, He is equally blessed in one day, or in one moment, and in a thousand years and a whole age: He is able to perform the work of a thousand years in one day. Wherefore in the following verse it is added: He is not slow: It is always in His power to fulfil His promise. And a thousand years are as one day (thus Peter, while in this clause he re-echoes the former one, and accommodates both to the subject in hand, appropriately varies the words of Moses): that is, no delay happens which is long to God. As to a man of excessive wealth, a thousand guineas are as a single penny; so to the Eternal God a thousand years are as one day: wherefore in the next verse it is added: but is long-suffering: He gives us space for repentance without any annoyance to Himself. Comp. Sir 18:10-11. The sum of Peters words is, the age-measurer (so to speak) of God differs from the hour-reckoner of mortals. His gnomon[20] shows at once all hours in the greatest activity and in the greatest repose. To Him the times pass away neither more slowly nor more quickly than is befitting to Him and to His economy. There is no reason why He should consider it needful either to delay or to hasten the end. How shall we understand this? If we were able to understand it, there would be no occasion for Moses and Peter to add, with the Lord.
[20] Gnomon properly denotes the pin of a sun-dial.-T.
Part I
The Evidence That The Church Of God Is About To Close Its Earthly History
Even in apostolic days the near return of the Lord Jesus was ever kept before the souls of believers as a present hope; yet there are many scriptures that in a hidden way (as we can now realize) intimated a certain series of events, or succession of conditions, which would run their course ere the blessed hope was fulfilled. In the wisdom of God these prophetic forecasts of the Churchs history were couched in terms of such a nature as not to hinder Christians of any period in their continued expectancy of the Lords coming, which was designed to be a great sheet-anchor to their souls, keeping them from drifting into worldliness and kindred folly.
But now that nearly twenty centuries (two of Gods great days-2Pe 3:8) have elapsed, we can look back over the long course of the Churchs pilgrimage and see how all her varied states and experiences were foreknown and foretold, and the heart thrills with joyful expectancy as we look ahead. For the next great miraculous event must be the shining forth of the Morning Star, the coming of the Lord Jesus, and our gathering together unto Him.
I purpose to trace this out from several different standpoints. In our introduction we have noticed briefly how the Lord Himself intimated what has been mentioned in the parable of the ten virgins. It was a veiled picture of the whole course of Christendom, and plainly divides the Church dispensation into three distinct stages, or epochs: First, the period of eager expectation. Second, the era of lethargic indifference to the blessed hope. Third, the season of awakening which was the almost immediate precursor of the coming of the Bridegroom. We are living in this last solemn time, and it is well to be trimming our lamps and waiting in holy fear for the summons which may come at any moment to enter in with Him to the Marriage Supper of the Lamb.
The parable of the Ten Virgins was not given, it is true, to teach Church truth, but it presents in a graphic way the responsibility of saints to wait for the return of the Lord.
There are other passages corroborative of this interpretation, and to them let us now turn.
In the two epistles to Timothy we have two distinct conditions predicted as characterizing what the Holy Spirit designates the latter times and the last days. In 1Ti 4:1-5 He speaks of the first of these periods; in 2Ti 3:1-9, of the second. A careful reading of both passages ought, I think, to convince any reader that they show the progress of evil.
At any rate, the conditions of the latter times were the first to develop, and out of these grew the anarchic state of the last days.
I quote the first scripture in full: Now the Spirit speaketh expressly, that in the latter times some shall depart from the faith, giving heed to seducing spirits, and doctrines of demons; speaking lies in hypocrisy; having their conscience seared (Gk., cauterized); forbidding to marry, and commanding to abstain from foods, which God hath created to be received with thanksgiving of those who believe and know the truth. For every creature of God is good, and nothing to be refused, if it be received with thanksgiving; for it is sanctified by the word of God and prayer (1911 Version).
Now while the various things here credited to demoniacal influence are found in many modern systems, such as Christian Science, Seventh-day Adventism, and others, it is very evident that it was in connection with the Romish apostasy they were first introduced. The latter times were the times of Papal domination. Their evil teachings are still to be found on many sides, but the point I want to make is that the latter times have long since been passed, and we are further down the course of time than many have supposed.
Note well how Rome has fulfilled these predictions to the letter. Departing from the faith of Gods word, she has been misled by evil spirits seducing her devotees to believe that the church cannot err, and that her voice is the voice of inspiration. Thus has Satan foisted doctrines of demons on the blinded nations. Rome, the very citadel of untruth, has spoken lies in hypocrisy, her leaders having cauterized consciences which seemed immune to all Scriptural appeals. This the Reformation proved, when God gave her space to repentand she repented not (Rev 2:21).
But one might say: All this is mere assumption. You tell us Rome is demon-led. You tell us her hierarchy teach lies in hypocrisy. But this is the very point to be proven. What outward evidence have you that she is the guilty one?
In reply we turn to verse 3, where God has given us two great marks which none can successfully deny fit Rome, as they fully describe no other large communion. It was Rome who forbade to marry-enjoining an unnatural celibacy upon her vast clergy and her hosts of monks and nuns, thus setting herself up to be wiser than God (who says: Marriage is honorable in all, Heb 13:4), be-littling His holy ordinance of matrimony, declaring the celibate nun far holier than the married mother, and the unwedded priest in a higher state of grace than the godly husband and father.
And what of the second mark? Who has so assiduously cultivated the dogma that piety is manifested in abstention from certain foods, as Rome? God created all to be received with thanksgiving. Rome would damn the one who ate flesh on Fridays and gave God thanks therefor! Her numberless rules on such subjects declare all too plainly that she it is who is marked out in 1Ti 4:1-5. Others have been deluded by the same demons, but it was in the Roman apostasy that the latter times came in.
Now let us turn to the second epistle: This know also, that in the last days perilous times shall come. For men shall be self-lovers, money-lovers, boasters, proud, blasphemers, disobedient to parents, unthankful, unholy, without natural affection, unforgiving, false accusers, incontinent, savage, haters of good, traitors, heady, high-minded, lovers of pleasures rather than lovers of God; having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof; from such turn away. For of this sort are they who creep into houses, and lead captive silly women laden with sins, led away with manifold desires, ever learning and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth. Now as Jannes and Jambres withstood Moses, so do these also resist the truth: men of corrupt minds, reprobate concerning the faith. But they shall proceed no further: for their folly shall be manifest unto all, as theirs also was (1911 Version).
These are the great outstanding features of the last days-closing the Church dispensation, and to be immediately followed by the coming of the Lord. Can any believer in Holy Writ doubt our being now in the very midst of them?
But it may be here objected: When have men in general been other than as here depicted? Is not this but a repetition, of what Paul has already said in describing the heathen world in his day? (Rom 1:29-32). In what special sense are they any more characteristic now than then? To these very natural queries I reply: Such things, indeed, ever described the heathen; but in 2 Tim. 3 the Holy Spirit is describing conditions in the professing Church in the last days! It is not the openly wicked and godless who are being depicted here. It is those who have a form of godliness, while denying its power. This is what makes the passage so intensely solemn and gives it such tremendous weight in the present day. There are twenty-one outstanding features in this depicting of Church conditions in the last days, and that each may have its due weight with my reader I touch briefly on them in order.
1. Men shall be self-lovers. It is men self-occupied, as contrasted with the godly of all ages who found their joy and delight in looking away from self to God as seen in Christ. This is the age of the egotist in matters spiritual as well as carnal. They find their God within them, we are told, and not without. They make no secret of it. When they profess to love God it is themselves they love.
2. Money-lovers. Is it necessary to speak of this? Colossal fortunes heaped together by men who profess to believe the Bible and its testimony! What a spectacle for angels and demons! There was one Simon Magus of old. He has myriads of successors in the professing church to-day, and the command not to eat with a covetous man or an extortioner is in most places a dead letter indeed.
3. Boasters. Read the so-called Christian papers; attend Christendoms great conventions of young people, or old. Listen to the great pulpiteers of the day. What is their theme? Rich and increased with goods and have need of nothing! Great swelling words are rapturously applauded by people dwelling in a fools paradise, even when uttered by men who are tearing the Bible to shreds, and who deny practically every truth that it contains.
4. Proud. So proud as to glory in their shame-congratulating themselves on the very things the Word of God so unsparingly condemns. Proud of their fancied superiority; proud of their eloquence; proud of their miscalled culture; proud of their very impiety, which is hailed as the evidence of broad-mindedness and a cultivated intellect! How nauseating it must all be to Him who said, Take My yoke upon you and learn of Me, for I am meek and lowly in heart.
5. Blasphemers! Yes, there it is-that big, ugly word that one hesitates to use, but which is chosen by the Holy Spirit Himself to describe the men drawing salaries as ministers of Christ who use their office to impiously deny His name! Blasphemers! Aye, the whole host of the new theologians, miscalled higher critics, and all their ilk-all who deny the deity of the Son, His virgin-birth, His holy humanity- blasphemers, every one, and as such to be judged unsparingly in the harvest of wrath so near at hand! And think of the disloyalty to Christ of Christians- real Christians, I mean-who can sit and listen to such men week after week, and are too timid to protest, or too indifferent to obey the word, From such turn away!
6. Disobedient to parents. It is one of the crowning sins of the age, and indicates the soon breaking-up of the whole social fabric as at pres- ent constituted. Opposition to authority is undoubtedly one of the characteristic features of the times. Children will not brook restraint, and parents have largely lost the sense of their responsibility toward the rising generation. Does this seem unduly pessimistic? Nevertheless, a little thoughtful consideration will, I am sure, convince any reasonable person of its truth. And it may be laid down as an axiom, that children not trained in obedience to parents will not readily be obedient to God. We have been sowing the wind in this respect for years, as nations and as families. The reaping of the whirlwind is certain to follow.
7. Unthankful. It is the denial of divine Providence-utterly forgetting the Source of all blessings, both temporal and spiritual. Straws indicate the turn of the wind, and even in so small a matter, as some may call it, as the giving-up of the good old-fashioned and eminently scriptural custom of thanksgiving at the table, we may see how prevalent is the sin of unthankfulness among professed Christians. Go into the restaurants or other eating-houses; how often can you tell the believer from the unbeliever?
8. Unholy. The godly separation from the world according to the Bible is sneered at as bigotry and Puritanism. In its place has come a jolly, rollicking worldliness that ill comports with the Christian profession. Piety-that characteristic Christian virtue-how little seen now! It is not necessary to be outwardly vile to be unholy. Giving up the line of separation between the believer and the unbeliever is un-holiness.
9. Without natural affection. The foundations of family life are being destroyed. Un-scriptural divorces and all their kindred evils cast their dark shadows over the professing church, as well as over the body politic.
Of the next unholy octave I need not write particularly. To enumerate them is enough to stir the heart and appal the soul when it is remembered how they are tolerated and spreading through the great professing body. 10-unforgiving; 11-false accusers (let us beware lest we be found almost unwittingly in this Satanic company!); 12 -incontinent; 13 -savage; 14-haters of good; 15-traitors; 16 -heady; 17-high-minded. This last accounts largely for the daring things proudly uttered by learned doctors against the Scriptures and the great fundamentals of the faith, and complacently accepted by unregenerate hearers. Surely, the time has come when they will not bear sound teaching, but according to their own desire shall heap to themselves teachers, having itching ears (2Ti 4:3, 1911 Version).
18. Lovers of pleasures rather than lovers of God. Would you not almost think the words were written by some fiery-souled exhorter of the present day? How aptly they characterize in one brief clause the greatest outstanding feature of the religious world. The Church of God has gone into the entertainment business! People must be amused, and as the Church needs the peoples money, the Church must, perforce, supply the demand and meet the craving! How else are godless hypocrites to be held together? How otherwise can the throngs of unconverted youths and maidens be attracted to the services? So the picture-show and the entertainment, in the form of musicale (sacred, perhaps!) and minstrel-show, take the place of the gospel address and the solemn worship of God. And thus Christless souls are lulled to sleep and made to feel religious while gratifying every carnal desire under the sanction of the sham called the Church!-And the end? What an awakening!
19. Having a form of godliness, but denying the power thereof. Men must have some form of religious expression, and so the outward thing is sustained after the life is gone out of it. Thus formality prevails where regeneration, conversion to God, the Spirits sanctification, and everything really vital has long since been virtually denied. The bulk of so-called church-members do not even profess to have been saved, or to be Spirit-indwelt. All this is foreign to their mode of thought or speech. The gospel, which alone is the power of God unto salvation, is seldom preached, and, by the mass, never missed! Could declension and apostasy go much further? Yet there are still lower depths to be sounded!
20. Feminism. No, you wont find the word-but read verse 6 again, slowly and thoughtfully. Does it not indicate a great feminist movement in these last dark days? Silly women, laden with manifold desires-craving what God in His in- finite wisdom has forbidden them: authority, publicity, masculinity, and what not? Thus they leave their own estate and make a new religion to suit themselves. Is it a matter of no import that just such emotional, insubject women were the tools used by Satan for the starting and propagating of so many modern fads? Need one mention Mesdames Blavatsky, Besant and Tingley of Theosophy; the Fox sisters relation to modern Spiritism; Mrs. Mary Baker Glover Eddy and her host of female practitioners in the womans religion miscalled Christian Science; the neurotic Ellen G. White and her visionary system of Seventh-day Adventism; Ella Wheeler Wilcox and her associates in the spreading of what they have been pleased to denominate the New Thought, which is only the devils old lie, Ye shall be as gods, in a modern garb; and the women-expounders of the Silent Unity, or Home of Truth delusions? All these are outside the orthodox fold; -but when we look within, what a large place has the modern feminist movement secured in the affections of women who profess to believe the Bible, but who unblushingly denounce Paul as an old batchelor with narrow, contracted ideas, little realizing that they are thereby rejecting the testimony of the Holy Spirit. It is one of the signs of the times, and clearly shows towards what the professing body is so rapidly drifting!
21. Ever learning, and never able to come to the knowledge of the truth-and that by their own confession. They are truth-seekers. Ask them if it be not so. They confess it without a blush, and consider it humility thus to speak. According to these apostates, the Church which began as the pillar and ground of the truth, is, in this twentieth century of its existence, seeking the truth, thereby acknowledging they never yet have found it! Truth-seekers! Yet the Lord Jesus said, I am the Way, the TRUTH, and the Life. Why then seek further? Because they have drifted away from Him and His Word, so they go on, ever learning, ever seeking, and ever missing the glorious revelation of the TRUTH as it is in Jesus.
Well-this is the end. Declension can go no further than to deny the Lord that bought them, until He Himself shall remove His own to the Fathers house. Then the apostate body remaining will declare, We have found the truth at last! and they will worship the Antichrist, believing the devils lie and calling it the truth. And how comes such delusion? And for this cause God shall send them strong delusion, that they should believe the lie; that they all might be judged who believed not the truth but had pleasure in unrighteousness (2Th 2:11, 12-1911 Version).
Predictions of two directly opposite conditions are made in the word of God in regard to events to be consummated immediately before the Lords return to establish His kingdom and close up the Times of the Gentiles. If therefore we see these predictions within a small degree of being already fulfilled prior to the rapture of the Church, we may be certain that the coming of the Saviour to the air is very near at hand.
The predictions referred to were made-one directly by the Lord Himself; the other by the Holy Spirit through the apostle Paul. To the question of the disciples, What shall be the sign of Thy coming and of the end of the age? the Lord gave a lengthy answer recorded in Matthew, chaps. 24 and 25; but the prediction I refer to now is that of the 14th verse of chap. 24: This gospel of the kingdom shall be preached in all the world for a witness unto all the nations; and then shall the end come. Now I recognize, in common with others, a distinction in aspect between the gospel of the kingdom and the gospel of the grace of God, but I regard it as a mistake to say that the gospel of the kingdom is not, or should not be, preached now. Each are but different aspects of the one gospel; and Paul preached both.
In Act 20:24, 25 we find the two aspects intimately connected in the ministry of the apostle Paul: None of these things move me, neither count I my life dear unto myself, so that I might finish my course with joy, and the ministry which I have received of the Lord Jesus, to testify the gospel of the grace of God. And now, behold, I know that ye all, among whom I have gone preaching the kingdom of God, shall see my face no more. See also Act 14:22. When he wrote, If thou shalt confess with thy mouth the Lord Jesus, it involved the present phase of the gospel of the kingdom; when he added, And believe in thy heart that God hath raised Him from the dead thou shalt be saved, it was the gospel of the grace of God. Christ Jesus is Lord. He is also Redeemer. Men are called on to own Him in both characters. In the Jewish age, and in the coming tribulation period, the gospel of the kingdom is the emphatic phase. Now, where there is intelligence, it is the grace of God that the gospel preacher will lay special stress upon.
Now it is the individual believer who owns the sovereignty of the Lord Jesus Christ. In the Tribulation era, when Mat 24:14 will be completely carried out, the whole world will be called on to own the sway of Him who is about to appear as King of kings and Lord of lords to reign over His world-kingdom.
But why this effort to show that the gospel of the kingdom is now being preached? Because, my reader, the end comes when it has been carried into all the world, for a witness! And even now it has gone to the uttermost parts of the earth, so that it can confidently be said that with the possible exception of a few wild tribes of Indians in South America, or negroes in Africa, , there is probably no nation to whom the witness has not already been given. The nineteenth was the greatest missionary century since the days of the apostles. In one hundred years, the gospel was practically carried to the whole world after a millennium of lethargy and indifference to the claims of the heathen. This great missionary awakening is like the trumpet-blasts that herald the Kings approach. In this twentieth century the work of carrying the gospel to the pagan world has gone on more extensively than ever. None can say when the last tribe or nation will get the witness message, but when they do, then shall the end come. And, mark it well, it is not before the rapture, but after it, that the final call is to be given. It will be Jewish saints, and not Christian missionaries, who will complete the work of world-wide evangelization; therefore the coming of the Lord as predicted in 1 Thess. 4 must be very near!
But now we turn to consider the other prediction to which I referred in the beginning. That day, writes the apostle, shall not come except there come the apostasy first (literal rendering of 2Th 2:3). This is startling surely-the gospel going into all the world, the apostasy sweeping all before it, and both just before the end, or the day of the Lord, shall come! How strange a paradox, and yet how exactly are both scriptures being fulfilled! Never before such wide-spread missionary activity! Never before such far-reaching apostasy! Earnest workers guided by the Holy Spirit are hazarding their lives to carry the good news of Christs incarnation, atonement, resurrection and coming again to the heathen world. Equally earnest, but Satan-inspired, men at home are tearing the Bible in pieces and railing at these very truths once for all delivered to the saints, and, alas! their unholy rationalizing is fast finding its way into the fields of missionary endeavor, where education is taking the place of the gospel; and culture, charac- ter-building, and various accomplishments are put in place of the Son of God, the Saviour of sinners!
Theological seminaries, in many instances, are hot-beds of infidelity. Schools and colleges are busy, as Harold Bolce graphically expressed it, in blasting at the Rock of Ages. The rising generation in so-called Christian lands bids fair to be a generation of Bible-rejectors. The prophets prophesy falsely, and the priests bear rule by their means, and My people love to have it so, and what will ye do in the end thereof? That end is almost upon us, and When the Son of Man cometh shall He find the faith on the earth? It is fast being supplanted by human speculations and oppositions of science falsely so-called.
The leaven of man-worship is rapidly leavening the whole lump and preparing the way for Antichrist who shall, if it were possible, deceive the very elect. Thank God, it is not possible; but it behooves every regenerated soul to hold fast to the revealed Word of God and utterly refuse the lying systems of the enemy. To sit in churches and listen to preachers of the apostasy, or to support such in any way, is treason against Christ! He that biddeth him [the false teacher] God speed is partaker of his evil deeds.
It would be a great mercy if every converted person would refuse positively to listen twice to a minister who denies the inspiration of the Bible, or to give a penny to a church or a missionary society that gave the right hand of fellowship to men of this type. To stay the on-rushing apos- tasy is impossible. To protest against it and to have no fellowship with the unfruitful works of darkess is a positive duty.
Reader, let me press my point again.-The world-wide gospel proclamation and world-wide apostasy at the same time are clear proofs that the end is close upon us! It is too late to trifle. Let us be in earnest for the few remaining hours!
Another line of evidence is presented in the seven prophetic letters of Rev. 2 and 3. For that they are prophetic, and not merely moral-dispensational, and not simply local in their application-is a fact now familiar to many earnest students of the Scriptures. The proof of this is found in their exact correspondence with the seven stages of the history of the Church on earth. This is incontrovertible, however self-styled optimists may object to it-the objection being chiefly based on the fact that Laodicea closes the septenary series, thus precluding all thought of a triumphant Church and a converted world at the end of the dispensation. Yet the Church shall be triumphant; of that there should be no question. For our Lord Jesus has solemnly declared, Upon this Rock (Christ as Son of the living God) I will build my Church; and the gates of hell shall not prevail against it. But between the Church of Christs building and the vast complex church of mans devising there is a great difference. The real Church will be triumphantly raptured to glory ere the judgments fall on the great apostate mass of Laodicea.
I do not therefore attempt to prove by argu- ment that the seven letters give us an outline of the Churchs course from apostolic days to the closing up of the present age. This has been so well done by others that it would be on my part a work of supererogation to try to make it any more convincing.1 I only desire in these necessarily brief pages to refresh the memory of my reader by pointing out how aptly those letters fit the history.
Ephesus then, from this view-point, presents the Church in apostolic days-an unworldly, called-out company who labored earnestly and well in making known the riches of grace, and who walked apart from iniquity; unable to bear those who were evil, as indeed these in turn could not endure the company of Gods redeemed, for we read elsewhere, Of the rest durst no man join himself to them. In those days of primitive simplicity men were tried by the testimony they brought, and if they spoke not according to the doctrine of Christ were rejected as liars-a short and ugly word that aptly designates many profane hucksterers of the Word of God to-day.
But the picture has its shadows too, for even during the very lifetime of the apostolic band declension began: the Church left her first love, and a somewhat mysterious form of evil, the deeds of the Nicolaitanes, came in, though largely against the desire of the mass, for Ephesus is commended because of hatred to this unholy thing. Leaving their first love was losing the sense of Christs presence: occupation with work, with service, took the place of heart-occupation with Himself. No sect of the Nicolaitanes is known, though some have tried to link the name with the reputed followers of an apostate Nicholas, traditionally held to be one of the seven of the 6th of Acts, who were set apart to serve tables. He is supposed to have taught his disciples that the indulgence of licentious practices was not inconsistent with the grace of God. This, however, is very uncertain and largely conjectural. They seem to be right who consider NicolaitanQs to be an untranslated Greek word, properly rendered rulers of the people. In that case Diotrephes of 3 John would be a typical Nicolaitane, who has had many successors. It would be the divine condemnation of the clerical sytem. Not yet had this system become an accepted doctrine, but the deeds manifested the spirit behind it. Crystallization into an accredited dogma came later (Rev 2:15).
The second period followed apace, as set forth in the letter to Smyrna. It depicts, as by a few master-strokes, the tragedy of the Pagan persecutions in their efforts to crush Christianity beneath the iron heel of the Roman emperors, from Domitian to Diocletian. Neros persecution was local rather than general, but the monster who succeeded him set in motion a world-wide effort to destroy the Church of Christ. Historians count ten general persecutions, which are connected with ten main edicts of the emperors. The last under Diocletian went on for ten years, ceasing only with the death of the incapacitated tyrant. Ye shall have tribulation ten days seems to hint at this. But a suffering Church is more likely to be rich in faith than a Church fawned upon by the world; though in deepest poverty the Church in the Smyrna age was rich, and prospered, for as Augustine later said, The blood of the martyrs is the seed of the Church. Those dark days were days of Christian devotion and heroism unparalleled save in similar times of suffering and danger. And yet the picture is not altogether bright, for the clear gospel of grace was largely obscured by the legal teaching of those who said they were Jews and were not. Such are a synagogue of Satan. Judaism was a divine institution, Christianity is a divine revelation. But the strange mixture of Judaism with Christianity is of Satan. It is a corruption and a counterfeit; and the corruption of the best thing is the worst of corruptions.
Pergamos followed this, and gives us the period of the Churchs relief from persecution and her subsequent union with the world. It is the era of Constantine the Great and his successors, when the Church became the pet of the emperors (save for a brief period under Julian the Apostate), and Church and State were linked in an unholy alliance. Thus the Church sat at ease where Satan had his throne, clung to this for centuries, until the world itself wearied of her, and wrenched her from her place of power. He who is familiar with Church history can scarcely read the Perga- mos letter without the vast pageant of the fourth century passing before the eye of his mind. The death of Diocletian; the temporary triumph of Maxentius; the Gallic legions hastening eastward led by Constantine; the famous vision of the fiery cross; the in hoc signo vinces portent; the Christians coming forth into the glare of publicity from the dens, caves and catacombs which had been their hiding places for so long; the bishops summoned to the generals august presence; his endorsement of the new doctrine and intellectual conversion; the cross-led army driving all before it; the overthrow of Maxentius; Constantine hailed as Emperor of the world; proclaimed head of the church and pontifex maximus (the title of the head of the heathen hierarchy) ; the bishops seated among princes; the Churchs mourning over, her eyes dazzled by the unaccustomed luxury and splendor, basking in the imperial favor! Then the Arian controversy; Christs true deity denied, but maintained at the council of Nicea where despite tremendous pressure the Church held fast His Name, refusing to deny His faith. Of Antipas personally we know nothing, but we see in his very name (which means against all) the trumpet-note of Athanasius who, when a later Arian emperor sought to persuade him to endorse the hated Unitarian heresy by crying, All the world is against you, in holy dignity exclaimed, Then I am against all the world.
The Balaam doctrine too was openly advocated by many in those days, and since-urging the mingling of clean and unclean, the unequal yoke of the Church and world, a spiritual marriage, which Pergamos seems to imply; while Nicolai-tanism, or clerisy, had now become a full-blown doctrine, and the distinction between clergy and laity was at last complete. The Pergamos letter is a synoptic description of the conditions prevailing from the fourth to the seventh centuries.
And Thyatira followed as the natural result. Things were going down-hill with fearful rapidity. Yet the church of the middle ages was rich in works of mercy and abounded in charity. Her monasteries and hostelries dotted the lands and kept open house for the sick and distressed. But doctrinally she had deteriorated tremendously, and the Papal system was fully organized, becoming a church within the Church, to which all had to bow. It was the woman Jezebel teaching and leading the servants of God astray. As the heathen princess of old foisted her idolatry on Israel, so this false paganistic thing crowded out the Christianity of Christ and superseded it by a system unspeakably evil and inherently corrupt.
At the Reformation of the sixteenth century she was given space to repent, but she repented not, as the decrees of the Council of Trent bear witness. She spurned the light shining from the newly-recovered Scriptures and continued in her idolatrous course. For her children there is naught but death, though grace ever has discerned even in Rome a remnant having not known the depths of Satan, whom a gracious Lord owns as His and commands to cling to what they have till He shall come. It is the first intimation that declension has gone so far that His return is now the only hope.
For Sardis, though it speak of Protestantism and its great State churches, is not a true recovery. They had received a deposit of truth at the Reformation, which became crystallized into creeds and confessions but did not quicken the mass. So of the great Protestant bodies it can be said, Thou hast a name that thou livest and art dead, for churchmanship has largely been substituted for new birth, and orthodoxy for conversion to God. Yet there are a few with garments undefiled who know the Lord and love His truth, and who are exhorted to watch for His coming again!
Philadelphia speaks of the great revival period of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, assuming different forms in different places, but in all characterized by reality, by brotherly love, by clinging to Christs Word and honoring His Name who is the Holy and the True. They who take such ground will never be popular with the world or the worlds churches, but they will be content to know that God approves, and that the Lord Himself has opened for them a door of service which none on earth or anywhere else can shut. They wait in patience for the Morning Star-the Bridegrooms symbolic title.
Laodicea closes the series. It is the solemn arraignment of latitudinarian Christianity with its pride and folly, marked by impudent self-conceit and utter indifference to Christ. It glories in its breadth and culture, its refinements of thought, and its refusal of ancient formulas. It congratulates itself on its wealth and following, while, in His sight who stands knocking outside, it is poor and wretched and blind and naked. All the church machinery can go on without His presence, and without any sense of His absence.
And this is the last state of the professing body on earth. When things are in this condition, the Lord Himself will come, and will spew out of His mouth that which is so distasteful and disgusting to Him. After this, says John, I looked, and behold, a door was opened in heaven. As he is caught up through that open door he beholds surrounding the throne in glory the true Church seated in triumph, as symbolized in the twenty-four elders.
Laodicea is the closing period of the Churchs history, and who can doubt that we have now reached the very time depicted? It behooves us to act as men who wait for their Lord, knowing that His coming cannot be much longer delayed.
We have thus glanced at various scriptures having to do with the evidences in the professing church of the Lords near return. We must now look at some movements among the nations which point unquestionably to the same thing.
1 The inquiring reader is referred to The Prophetic History of the Church, by F. W. Grant, 35 cts. Same publishers.
be not: Rom 11:25, 1Co 10:1, 1Co 12:1
that one: Psa 90:4
Reciprocal: Gen 15:16 – Amorites Deu 32:35 – the things Job 10:5 – General Job 24:1 – seeing Job 36:26 – neither Psa 9:7 – But Psa 39:5 – as nothing Psa 94:15 – But Psa 102:13 – the set Ecc 3:17 – for Isa 54:7 – a small Isa 60:22 – I the Lord Eze 39:8 – this Luk 18:8 – he will Luk 18:22 – one Act 3:19 – when Act 7:17 – when Rom 4:17 – calleth Rom 9:22 – endured 1Co 7:29 – the time Phi 3:13 – one Phi 4:5 – The 1Th 4:13 – I would Heb 10:37 – General Rev 1:1 – which must Rev 1:3 – for Rev 12:12 – because Rev 20:3 – the thousand Rev 22:6 – which
2Pe 3:8. Having made his exposure of the scoffers and their wilful ignorance, the apostle devotes the rest of the epistle to the good brethren. They have been advised against being misled by the false statements of the scoffers, yet they doubtless wished sincerely to have information concerning the seeming delay of the second coming of Christ. Peter will take up that matter and explain it for the sake of them and other readers of the epistle. One day is with the Lord as a thousand years. It should be noted the apostle does not say a day is as long as a thousand years with us for that would not be true. When the earth revolves once man has been given a day. It must make such a revolution 365 times to give him one year and that must be multiplied a thousand times to amount to the period of the italicized statement. But with the Lord no such measurements are necessary for He inhabits eternity (or time, which is the same), and as there is no limit or end to it, He can prolong the earth’s existence through hundreds of such revolutions as easily as through one. To man it seems like a drawn-out delay and hence the apostle gives the explanation herein.
2Pe 3:8. But let not this one thing escape you, beloved; the mode of expression which has been already used in reference to the mockers in 2Pe 3:5. The writer passes now from the idea of the supposed constancy of the order of things to that of the apparent delay in the realization of the promise. He calls the attention of his readers first to a single fact, the difference between the Divine measure of duration and the human, which would be sufficient refutation of the scornful incredulity of such scoffers.
that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. As the writer seems to make use of the words of the 90th Psalm here, the designation the Lord, both in this verse and in the next, should be taken in its Old Testament sense, and, therefore, not as = Christ, but as = God or Jehovah, without reference to the personal distinctions which belong to the Christian doctrine of the Trinity. While the Psalmist (Psa 90:4), however, speaks simply of a thousand years as being in Jehovahs sight as yesterday when it is past, Peter throws the statement into a form which presents also the converse truth that one day is as a thousand years, if a thousand years are as one day. His object is not to exhibit the brevity of human life over against the eternity of God, as is the case with the Psalmist, but to express how inapplicable to God are all those ideas of time, those estimates of long and short, of hasting and delay, by which man measures things. The O. T. view of the eternity of God, however, is not merely this comparatively abstract idea of everlasting duration, which seems to be on the surface of the Psalmists words, but the deeper idea of changelessness of being which makes God the object of His peoples fearless trust. Whilst God as Jehovah is the eternal, Gods eternity is defined as the unchangeableness of His being, persisting throughout every change of time, and thus it becomes the basis of human confidence. Therefore Moses, in the midst of the dying away of his people, addresses God as the Eternal One, Psa 90:1; therefore, Deu 32:40, the idea that God is eternal forms the transition to the announcement that He will again save his rejected people; therefore Israel, when sighing in misery, is comforted, Isa 40:28 : knowest thou not, and hast thou not heard, that Jehovah is an eternal God? (Oehler). Hence, while Peter meets the scorner by asserting God to be superior in all His modes of action to human reckonings of time, he also exhibits the ground of His peoples continued faith in Himself and His promise through postponements of their hope.
Our apostle here answers the cavil and objection of the fore-mentioned scoffers, namely, That if Christ intends to come to judgment, why does he so long defer his coming?
To this our apostle replies,
1. By assuring them that this delay ought not to be judged according to our sense and apprehension of things, for God does not measure time as we do, but a thousand years, which seem so long to us, are but a day, yea, but a moment to him who is eternal, and inhabiteth eternity. To the eternity of God no finite duration bears any proportion; to eternity all time is equally short; God does not measure time by our pole, nor cast up years by our arithmetic.
2. He assures them farther, that God’s delay of judgment did not proceed from slackness, but from divine patience and goodness. He delays his coming, on purpose to give men time to repent, and by repenting, on purpose to give men time to repent, and by repentance to prevent their own eternal ruin.
Learn hence, 1. That God’s delay of judgment is no ground for sinners to conclude that he will not come to judgment, for our Saviour has now here fixed and determined the time of it. We can neither be sure when our Lord will come, nor certain when he will not come.
Learn, 2. That the true reason why God defers judgment is, to give sinners opportunity for repentance, if this be not complied with, he reserves those who are incorrigibly bad to a more remarkable ruin, condemning them that will not be saved, but obstinately destroy themselves.
2Pe 3:8. Be not ye ignorant Whatever they are; of this one thing Which casts much light on the point in hand; that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day This is an allusion to Psa 90:4, where Moses had said, A thousand years in thy sight are as one day, which words St. Peter applies with regard to the period intervening between the time when he wrote, and the last day; denoting thereby, 1st, Gods eternity, whereby he exceeds all measure of time in his essence and in his operation: 2d, His knowledge, to which all things past, or to come, are present every moment: 3d, His power, which needs no long delay in order to bring his work to perfection: and, 4th, His long-suffering, which excludes all impatience of expectation and desire of making haste. But it must be observed, that neither the apostle nor the psalmist meant that God does not perceive any difference between the duration of a day and that of a thousand years; but that these differences do not affect either his designs, or actions, or felicity, as they do those of finite creatures. So that what he brings to pass on the day he declares his purpose, is not more certain than what he will bring to pass a thousand years after such declaration. In like manner, what is to be brought to pass a long time after his declaration, is not less certain than if it had been done when declared. See Abernethys Sermons, vol. 1. p. 218. The apostles meaning is in substance, that in one day, yea, in one moment, he could do the work of a thousand years; therefore he is not slow, he is always equally able, equally ready to fulfil his promise; and a thousand years, yea, the longest time, is no more delay to the eternal God than one day is to us: therefore he is longsuffering; he gives us space for repentance without any inconvenience to himself. In a word, with God time passes neither slower nor swifter than is suitable to him and his economy. Nor can there be any reason why it should be necessary for him either to delay or hasten the end of all things. How can we comprehend this? If we could have comprehended it, St. Peter needed not to have added, with the Lord.
2Pe 3:8-13. Moreover the Lord is not really slow to fulfil His promise; He does not reckon time as men reckon. His seeming slowness is not the manifestation of His impotence, but of His long-suffering love (cf. 2Pe 3:15). His purpose is that time for repentance should be given to all; when the end comes it will be sudden, and there will be no time for repentance then. The fact that all material things will pass away constitutes a call to holy living (we can see here, per contra, the connexion between the libertinism of the false teachers and their disbelief in the Parousia), especially since we look for new heavens and a new earth, wherein righteousness dwelleth (cf. Isa 65:17, Enoch 91:16).
2Pe 3:12. earnestly desiring the coming: render, hastening (mg.) the coming, i.e. by repentance; for the belief that mens repentance was the essential condition of the Parousia cf. Act 3:19 f., Repent, therefore . . . that he may send the Christ.
Verse 8
One day is with the Lord, &c., an expression suggested, perhaps, to the apostle’s mind by Psalms 90:4.
3:8 {7} But, beloved, be not ignorant of this one thing, that one day [is] with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.
(7) The taking away of an objection: in that he seems to desire this judgment for a long time, in respect of us it is true, but not before God, which whom there is no time either long or short.
Again Peter reminded his readers to remember what they had learned previously (2Pe 3:1) and not to forget, as the scoffers did (2Pe 3:5). As far as God’s faithfulness to His promises, it does not matter if He gave His promise yesterday or a thousand years ago. He will still remain faithful and will fulfill every promise (cf. Psa 90:4). The passage of a thousand years should not lead us to conclude that God will not fulfill what He has promised. The passing of time does not cause God to forget His promises. Peter was not saying that the "day of judgment" will last 1,000 years since a day is as 1,000 years with the Lord. This would contribute nothing to Peter’s argument against the scoffers.
This verse does not mean that God operates in a timeless state. Time is simply the way He and we measure the relationship of events to one another. The idea of a timeless existence is Platonic, not biblical. God’s relationship to time is different from ours since He is eternal, but this does not mean that eternity will be timeless. Eternity is endless time.
"Peter did not say that to God ’one day is a thousand years, and a thousand years are one day.’ The point is not that time has no meaning for God but rather that His use of time is such that we cannot confine Him to our time schedules. His use of time is extensive, so that He may use a thousand years to do what we might feel should be done in a day, as well as intensive, doing in a day what we might feel could only be done in a thousand years." [Note: Hiebert, Second Peter . . ., p. 153. See also Bauckham, p. 310. See Zane C. Hodges, The Epistles of John, pp. 106-7, for a good explanation of how Einstein’s special theory of relativity has introduced a new perspective on time that harmonizes with this verse.]
This statement does not negate the hope of the imminent return of the Lord either. Peter, as the other New Testament writers, spoke as though his readers would be alive at His return (2Pe 1:19; 2Pe 3:14). This was an indisputable hope of the early Christians. [Note: Fornberg, p. 68; Bauckham, p. 310.]
Chapter 28
THE LORD IS NOT SLACK
2Pe 3:8-9
“ALL things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation,” said the mockers. It was foolish, therefore, to believe in, or to think of a judgment to come. In the words before us the Apostle not only supplies an answer to the scorners, but gives a precious lesson to Christians for all time on the nature of God and His government of the world. It is but a single thought, but when the mind of the believer has grasped its significance, he will look out upon the world untroubled. No mockery will disturb his faith.
“But forget not this one thing, beloved, that one day is with the Lord as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day.” Here the Apostle quotes some words from that psalm (Psa 90:1-17) which is entitled “A Prayer of Moses, the Man of God.” In it the Psalmist is contrasting Gods eternity with the frailty of man and the shortness of human life. “A thousand years in Thy sight are but as yesterday when it is past.” But St. Peter not only adopts, but adapts, the words for his own purpose. He wants to teach the Christians in their trials that, while what is long in mans estimation may in Gods providence be counted but little, yet through Gods decree what to man appears little may be big with mightiest consequences. He therefore first inverts the words of the Psalmist. One day is with the Lord as a thousand years, while a thousand years may be as one day. One day of His deluge swept a whole generation out of the world, while His day of Pentecost remains potent in the history of His grace for all the ages which are yet to come. Through a mistaken literalness, men have sometimes expounded the lesson as if Jehovahs dealings were a question of arithmetic. Nothing could be farther from the Apostles thought, who would have us know that of great and little Gods work makes no account. With Him there is no short or long in time. What he does is not to be measured by the petty standards of humanity. Men must take note of time, for they feel its lapse, and its loss. They are ever conscious that a period is coming after which what is undone must continue undone. Again, the length of time is known to them by the recurrence of the various acts of life, and by the weariness which comes of continued labor, and by the grief of protracted waiting. These things force them to speak of short and long, but with God it is not so. For Him all time is one. He knows nothing of toil. Whatsoever He pleaseth, that doeth He in heaven and in earth, in the sea, and in all deep places. {Psa 135:6} The Psalmist had attained a true conception. The whole world and all worlds were in His control, and their order the working of His eternal will. He needs no rest; He slumbereth not, nor sleepeth. To Him there is no waiting, no weariness. Hence the past, the present, and the future are for Him one unbroken now.
This is the one thing which the Apostle offers to the Christian brethren for their support and consolation against the scoffers. And the knowledge is mighty for those who grasp it. It helps them to cast themselves securely upon the almighty arms, convinced that Gods working is not to be estimated according to mans days and years, but is certain in its effect. One generation passeth away, and another cometh; but death, they learn, does not take men out of the knowledge or the hand of God, be it for mercy they are reserved, or for judgment. God does not defer His action because He lacks power to perform, neither does He tarry because He is unmindful of His servants or insensible to what they endure.
Such thoughts can minister to the faithful abundant consolation, and this was the desire of the Apostle. But they raise for all time large questions which can find no answer here, questions concerning the lot of those who pass from this brief day of life into the eternal world and have not known Gods will, that they might do it; questions concerning a discipline which may yet be reserved for some who have not bent themselves to it here, perhaps from want of light; questions of how far hope may extend itself beyond the veil which divides this world from the next. Such questions rise within many earnest souls, often rather for the sake of others than themselves; but God has vouchsafed us no answer, lest men should wax presumptuous.
“The Lord is not slack concerning His promise, as some count slackness.” Many things conspire to make the doings of men to tarry. At one time pledges are given beyond what foresight would warrant; and when the day of performance arrives, they are forced to plead that events have falsified their expectation, and they cannot do the things that they would. Again, men, with the most earnest zeal, attempt a work beyond their powers, and of necessity have to delay the fulfillment of their promises; while some are taken away untimely from the midst of their fellows, ere life has enabled them to achieve what they counted on once as certain. Want of knowledge, of time, and of power is the heritage of the sons of men; and therewith conspires not seldom a change of mind and consequent want of will. But He with whom is no variableness, the omnipotent, omniscient, eternal Lord of all, is subject to no hindrance. Whether events appear to men to linger or to be sudden, all move under the control of the same unchanging will. He is not slack, as men are slack, either to rescue the righteous or to punish the ungodly. Of this the son of Sirach spake: “The Lord will not be slack, neither will the Almighty be patienttill He have taken away the multitude of the proud and broken the scepter of the unrighteoustill He have judged the cause of His people and made them to rejoice in His mercy” (Sir 35:18). Here is a medicine for fainting souls, of whom there must have been many among these Asian Christians. And it is a solace furnished, too, by the teachings of prophecy. “The vision,” says one, “is yet for an appointed.” {Hab 2:3} Gods Will has ordered when and how it shall be accomplished; all moves by His decree. “At the end it shall speak, and not lie.” There is no disappointment to those who wait upon the purposes of God. “Though it tarry, wait for it,” even though the waiting may last beyond this life, “because it will surely come; it will not tarry. The just shall live by his faith.”
T ( ) and the unwonted construction of the verb, of which no other example is forthcoming, have suggested to some to render thus: “The Lord of the promise is not slack.” Even so the words give a powerful sense. God, who makes the promise to men, is supreme over all on which its faithfulness depends, supreme both as Maker and Fulfiller of His word. He sees and controls the end from the beginning. Blessed are all they that put their trust in Him.
“But is long-suffering to you-ward.” The Authorized Version reads “to usward.” And some have thought it more in accord with the Apostles manner and humility to include himself with the brethren. The other reading is better supported, and none will doubt on that account St. Peters sense of Gods long-suffering towards himself. The term which he here employs to describe the Divine character implies the holding back of wrath. God might justly punish, but He stays His blow. Men have sinned, and still sin; but His love prevails above His anger. The word is formed by the LXX translators to render one expression in that passage {Exo 34:6} where God proclaims unto Moses the attributes by which He would be known unto men. Through all the list mercy is the dominant feature.
Term upon term seems devised to magnify the tenderness of Jehovah towards His people, though at last, if the continual offers of mercy are despised, He “will by no means clear the guilty.” No other language furnishes such a word, for no other people had such a knowledge of the God of all grace.
“Not wishing that any should perish, but that all should come to repentance.” We are wont to connect statements like this with the gracious messages of the New Testament. Yet some saints of earlier time felt all that St. Peter here teaches. The writer of Ecclesiasticus has some striking words. He is connecting Gods mercy with the shortness of mans life, and his language anticipates in the main this teaching of the Apostle: “The number of a mans days at the most are a hundred years. As a drop of water unto the sea, so are a thousand years to the days of eternity. Therefore is God patient with them, and poureth forth His mercy upon them. The mercy of man is toward his neighbor, but the mercy of God is upon all flesh; He reproveth, and nurtureth, and teacheth, and bringeth again as a shepherd his flock” (Sir 18:9-14). In such wise had some who waited for the consolation of Israel grasped Gods promises by anticipation, seeing them afar off, and being persuaded of them. Such men owned themselves, equally with the Apostle, to be strangers and pilgrims, and sought for that inheritance which Christ sent him to preach.
The word “wishing” () implies deliberate consent. This God does not give to the death of any sinner. If any perish it is not because God so desired or designed. But some will ask, “Why, then, should any perish?” St. Peter in this sentence, full of grace, supplies the answer. They continue in sin, and repent not. Even offers of mercy are of no avail. But why does not the Almighty Father drive them to repentance by His judgments? Because He has made His children free, and asks from them a willing service. They are to come to repentance. The invitation is full and free. Christ says, “Come unto Me, all ye that labor.” Nay, God makes at times a less demand: “Look unto Me and be ye saved, all ye ends of the earth.” Could words breathe more of mercy? To come, to look-that is the sole demand. God bestows all besides. Let men but manifest a desire, and His grace is poured forth. He wisheth not that any should perish.
And Christ, too, when He speaks of the gifts of the Holy Spirit, has the same lesson. The Father, the Son, and the Holy Ghost all conspire to further the work of mans salvation. “All things,” said our Lord, “whatsoever the Father hath, are Mine. Therefore said I, He shall take of Mine, and shall show” (R.V. declare) “it unto you.” But the eye to see what He shows, the ear to hear His declarations-these He asks from men. He willeth that they should come to repentance, and through that gate should come to Him.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Fuente: Everett’s Study Notes on the Holy Scriptures
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
GODS FORBEARANCE
The words which I have now read will naturally lead me to shew,
[Scoffers, indeed, impute it to weakness or indifference; and take occasion from it to cast reflections on God himself, as either not seeing, or not regarding, the wickedness of men: since, if he did see it, and did regard it as he professes to do, it would not be possible for him to pass it over from year to year in the way he does. But such persons forget, that time, which to us appears long, has, in fact, no existence before God. All things past, present, and future, are alike present with him, and form in his mind but a single point: One day is with him as a thousand years, and a thousand years as one day. Men are afraid to suspend the exercise of their displeasure for a number of years, lest they should be considered as acting from policy, or a sense of weakness and fear. But with God there is no scope for any such views or feelings. He is able to punish whensoever he will: nor is it possible for any to escape from his hands. He, however, is averse to proceed to extremities, till he has used every possible method to reclaim sinners, and to open a way for the exercise of his mercy towards them. He is not slack concerning his promise, as some men count slackness. He is kept back, not by any conscious weakness, or by indifference, or by fear, or by any other motive which may be supposed to influence us: he is restrained by long-suffering alone, and by a desire to spare those who have deserved punishment.]
[He is not willing that any should perish: no; he would not that so much as one should ever become a monument of his indignation. This he affirms in the strongest manner; yea, and confirms his assertion with an oath: As I live, saith the Lord God, I have no pleasure in the death of a sinner, but rather that he should turn from his wickedness and live [Note: Eze 33:11.]. It is surprising, that any, after such a declaration as this, should maintain the doctrine of absolute reprobation. Were that, or any other doctrine, clearly revealed in the Holy Scriptures, I should feel it my duty to receive it with the simplicity of a little child: but to receive it merely as a deduction of human reason, an inference drawn by weak and fallible man from the doctrine of election, when the whole Scriptures uniformly declare the very reverse, is, to say the least, very dangerous, and exceeding sinful. I know it is said of ungodly men, by St. Jude, that they were of old ordained to this condemnation [Note: Jude, ver. 4.]. I know, also, that St. Peter says of many, that they stumbled at the word, being disobedient, whereunto also they were appointed [Note: 1Pe 2:8.]. But it is not of individuals that these Apostles speak, but of characters. God has ordained, that they who will not receive the truth with humility shall stumble at it; and that they who will resist the faith which he has delivered to his saints, shall be left to turn the grace of God into lasciviousness, and to deny the only Lord God, and our Lord Jesus Christ. And this is a wise and righteous appointment. But it is a far different thing from creating any with a fixed determination to consign them over to perdition, purely of his own arbitrary will, without any fault of theirs. Such an idea as this is directly contradicted by the assertion in my text: and by the oath which I have before mentioned; and by numberless other portions of Scripture, which can admit of no doubt. Our blessed Lord said to his hearers, Ye will not come to me, that ye may have life [Note: Joh 5:40.]: and to the Jews, even after they were given up to the judgments they had merited, he said, O that thou hadst known, even thou, at least in this thy day, the things that belong unto thy peace! but now they are hid from thine eyes [Note: Luk 19:42.]. And again: How often would I have gathered you, even as a hen gathereth her chickens under her wings, but ye would not [Note: Mat 23:37.]. The whole Scripture attests, that God would rather that all should come to repentance and live. He commands all men everywhere to repent [Note: Act 17:30.]. He exhorts them to it also; saying, Turn ye, turn ye from your evil ways; for why will ye die, O house of Israel [Note: Eze 33:11.]? and he declares to all, without exception, Him that cometh unto me, I will in no wise cast out [Note: Joh 6:37.]. Now shall we, in deference to human systems, set aside all these passages of holy writ? God forbid: we dare not do so: and if we cannot mark out the precise boundaries where truths of an opposite aspect meet, we are contented to say, What I know not now, I shall know hereafter. If we choose to speculate on divine truths, we may soon get out of our depth: but if we will practically apply them to our own souls, we shall find them as clear as we can wish. Where is the man who has not experienced more or less the strivings of Gods Spirit in his soul [Note: Gen 6:3.]? Who amongst us has not a consciousness that he has resisted those strivings [Note: Act 7:51.]; and that, if he had made a due improvement of them, God would have given him more grace [Note: Jam 4:6.]? The truth, then, is plain: if God forbear to execute upon the world the judgments we deserve, it is not because he is indifferent about our proceedings, but because he is long-suffering towards us, and desirous, if we would improve the opportunity, to save us all. This is the true reason why he endures, with such astonishing forbearance, the vessels of wrath who are fitted for destruction [Note: Rom 9:22.].]
Fuente: Charles Simeon’s Horae Homileticae (Old and New Testaments)
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
Fuente: Commentaries on the New Testament and Prophets
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Fuente: Peake’s Commentary on the Bible
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)
Fuente: Expositors Bible Commentary