Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Acts 10:3
He saw in a vision evidently about the ninth hour of the day an angel of God coming in to him, and saying unto him, Cornelius.
3. He saw in a vision evidently [ openly ] i.e. he was not in a trance, as we read afterwards concerning Peter, but was employed in prayer when the angel appeared. See below, Act 10:30.
about the ninth hour of the day ] This was the hour for evening prayer see Act 3:1. So we can see that Cornelius had adopted the Jewish hours of prayer.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
He saw in a vision – See the notes on Act 9:10.
Evidently – Openly; manifestly.
About the ninth hour – About 3 oclock p. m. This was the usual hour of evening worship among the Jews.
An angel of God – See the notes on Mat 1:20. Compare Heb 1:14. This angel was sent to signify to Cornelius that his alms were accepted by God as an evidence of his piety, and to direct him to send for Peter to instruct him in the way of salvation. The importance of the occasion – the introduction of the gospel to a Gentile, and hence, to the entire Gentile world – was probably the chief reason why an angel was commissioned to visit the Roman centurion. Compare Act 16:9-10.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Verse 3. He saw in a vision evidently] The text is as plain as it can be, that an angel of God did appear to Cornelius. This was in a vision, i.e. a supernatural representation; and it was , manifestly, evidently made; and at such a time too as precluded the possibility of his being asleep; for it was about the ninth hour of the day, answering to our three o’clock in the afternoon, (See Clarke on Ac 3:1,) the time of public prayer, according to the custom of the Jews, and while Peter was engaged in that sacred duty. The angelic appearance to Cornelius was something similar to that made to Daniel, Da 9:20-23, and that especially to Zachariah, the father of John Baptist, Lu 1:11, &c.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
In a vision; not in a dream or rapture, but sensibly and plainly.
About the ninth hour; their ninth hour was with us about three oclock in the afternoon; being the ordinary time for the evening sacrifice; and, by consequence, their time of prayer, Act 3:1. And this devout man doth not seek Gods face in vain; Cornelius had been faithful in a little, and God would give him much; rather than he should want further instruction, who had improved what he had already, God here sends an angel, and soon after an apostle unto him.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
3-6. saw . . .evidently“distinctly.”
the ninth hour of thedaythree o’clock, the hour of the evening sacrifice. But hehad been “fasting until that hour” (Ac10:30), perhaps from the sixth hour (Ac10:9).
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
He saw in a vision evidently,…. He was not in a dream, or in a trance, but he was thoroughly awake, and his eyes open, and was himself; it was not in the night, but in clear day:
about the ninth hour of the day; or three o’clock in the afternoon, which was the hour of prayer, Ac 3:1 in which exercise he was now engaged, Ac 10:30 at this time he saw
an angel of God coming to him; into the room where he was at prayer:
and saying unto him, Cornelius; he called him by his name, to let him know that he knew him, as angels are very knowing spirits; and to express his affection and friendship to him, and that he was a messenger, not of bad, but of good news to him; as well as to engage his attention to him; for he might be so intent at his devotion, that had he not called him by name, he would not have minded him.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Coming in (). Ingressive second aorist active participle, not present. So punctiliar, “saw come,” not “saw coming.” So also “say” or “speak,” not “saying.” Luke repeats the account of this vision to Cornelius twice (Acts 10:30; Acts 11:13) and also the story of the vision to Peter (Acts 10:1-16; Acts 10:28; Acts 11:5).
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
A vision. See on ch. Act 8:31.
Evidently [] . Better, clearly or distinctly, as opposed to a fancy.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “He saw a vision evidently,” (eilen en horamati phaneros) “He saw (perceived) clearly in a vision,” he recognized, an open manifestation, not an illusion, not in a trance as Peter did in Act 10:10, or as Paul did, Act 22:17.
2) “About the ninth hour of the day,” (hosei peri horan neaten ten hemeras) “As it was around the ninth hour of the day,” or about three o’clock in the afternoon. It appears that as a proselyte to Judaism, Cornelius, though a Gentile, observed the Jewish hours of prayer and at this hour he had this vision regarding his salvation, Act 11:14.
3) “An angel of God coming in to him,” (angelon tou theou eiselthonta pros auton) “An angel of and from God entering in unto (toward) or approaching him,” Heb 1:14. Tho angels are spirits they are given power to appear in visible form resembling men, Psa 104:4; Heb 1:7.
4) “And saying unto him, Cornelius,” (kai eiponta auto Kornelie) “And saying to him, Cornelius,” (he knew who Cornelius was, and he called his name!) God cares for all men, sends His word and Spirit to call all men to salvation and obedient service, Pro 1:22-30; Joh 16:7-11; Heb 3:7; Heb 4:7; Rev 22:17. And it appears that the still small voice or thunderous tone in which He speaks thru His Spirit to the souls and conscience of men may come thru the mouth of unseen angels, even today. When I hear His voice I must “Harden not my heart” or stiffen my neck in refusing to bow to His call either in salvation or service, Pro 29:1.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
3. He saw in a vision. Luke putteth vision for a kind of oracle coming from God, that we may know that Cornelius was brought unto the faith of Christ after an heavenly manner. And because men are oftentimes deceived with juggling, Luke setteth down the time to avoid all suspicion, when he mentioneth the ninth hour. And at that time they were wont to divide the day into twelve hours; from the rising of the sun until the going down thereof. Whereupon it followeth that it was fair daylight when the angel appeared, that the vision might be more evident. Although there were always seals added unto visions, that they might free the servants of God from fear of illusions, because when he appeared in dreams, yet were there such marks of certainty imparted in their minds as would not suffer them to doubt.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(3) In a vision evidently.The adverb seems added to distinguish the manifestation from that of a dream like Josephs in Mat. 1:20; Mat. 2:13, or of a trance like St. Peters (Act. 10:10) or St. Pauls (Act. 22:17).
About the ninth hour of the day.This was, as in Act. 3:1, one of the three hours of prayer, the hour when the evening sacrifice was offered in the Temple. Cornelius had therefore so far accepted the Jewish rules of devotion, and for him also the Law was a schoolmaster bringing him to Christ.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
3. In a vision evidently ninth hour The word vision, or, more literally, sight, indicates that it was no dream, but that he was awake; the ninth hour, three o’clock in the afternoon, declares that it was open day not night.
An angel His radiant attire (Act 10:30) showed him to be superhuman.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘He saw in a vision openly, as it were about the ninth hour of the day, an angel of God coming in to him, and saying to him, “Cornelius.” ’
Cornelius was in his own home when he saw a vision. Cornelius was a common Roman name. And this man was praying at the regular time of prayer (the ninth hour), which we may presume was his custom. He was a God-fearer. At that time he saw in a vision an angel of God, who came to him and spoke with him, addressing him by name. Three in the afternoon (fifteen hundred hours) was not a time for dreaming.
‘An angel of God.’ This indicates a more direct and more physical messenger than the Spirit, which was necessary because Cornelius was not yet a man of the Spirit. The coming of an angel of God speaking a person’s name takes us right back to Luk 1:11; Luk 1:28. It is indicative in Luke of something that is to happen which is vital for the future. See also Act 5:19; Act 8:26; Act 12:7, where however he is an ‘angel of the Lord’, for there it was in respect of believers.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Act 10:3. About the ninth hour of the day That is, about three o’clock in the afternoon, at the time of theevening sacrifice. See Dan 9:21; Dan 9:27. Perhaps Cornelius might be praying for the coming of the kingdom of the Messiah, when the Gentiles were to be accepted as the people of God; for there was then a general expectation that this kingdom would appear. In Act 10:31 his particular prayer, which he was offering up at that time, is said to have been heard.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Act 10:3 . is the verb belonging to ., Act 10:1 , and . is in apposition to .
The intimation made to Cornelius is a vision in a waking condition, caused by God (during the hour of prayer, which was sacred to the centurion on account of his high respect for Judaism), i.e. a manifestation of God made so as to be clearly perceptible to the inner sense of the pious man, conveyed by the medium of a clear ( ) angelic appearance in vision, which Cornelius himself, Act 10:30 , describes more precisely in its distinctly seen form, just as it at once on its occurrence made the corresponding impression upon him; hence Act 10:4 : . and , . Comp. Luk 24:5 . Eichhorn rationalized the narrative to the effect that Cornelius, full of longing to become acquainted with the distinguished Peter now so near him, learned the place of his abode from a citizen of Joppa at Caesarea, and then during prayer felt a peculiar elevation of mind, by which, as if by an angel, his purpose of making Peter’s acquaintance was confirmed. This is opposed to the whole representation; with which also Ewald’s similar view fails to accord, that Cornelius, uncertain whether or not he should wish a closer acquaintance with Peter, had, “as if irradiated by a heavenly certainty and directed by an angelic voice,” firmly resolved to invite the apostle at once to visit him
. . (see the critical remarks): as it were about the ninth hour . Circumstantiality of expression. See Bornemann in loc.
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
3 He saw in a vision evidently about the ninth hour of the day an angel of God coming in to him, and saying unto him, Cornelius.
Ver. 3. About the ninth hour ] Which was the time of the evening sacrifice, when the joint prayers of the Church were ascending as incense.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
3. . ] not in a trance , as Act 10:10 , and ch. Act 22:17 , but with his bodily eyes : thus asserting the objective truth of the appearance.
. . ] It here appears that C. observed the Jewish hours of prayer.
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Act 10:3 . : there is no ground for explaining away the force of the words by assuming that Cornelius had formerly a longing to see Peter. : “openly,” R.V.; manifeste , Vulgate. The words plainly are meant to exclude any illusion of the senses, not in a trance as in Act 10:10 , cf. Act 22:17 ; only here in Luke’s writings, cf. 2Ma 3:28 . ( ): the , as Blass points out, intimates the same as the dative which is read here by Chrysostom (omit ) is sometimes confused with the accusative in the sense of duration of time, see Blass on Act 10:30 , and Act 8:11 (for the accusative see Joh 4:52 , Rev 3:3 ), and Gram. , p. 93. Cornelius observed without doubt the Jewish hours of prayer, and the vision is represented as following upon, or whilst he was engaged in, prayer, and in answer to it.
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
saw. Greek. eidon. App-133.
vision. Greek. horama, as in Act 7:31.
evidently = clearly, i.e. objectively. Greek. phaneros.
about = as if.
the ninth hour = 3pm App-165.
unto = to.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
3. . ] not in a trance, as Act 10:10, and ch. Act 22:17,-but with his bodily eyes: thus asserting the objective truth of the appearance.
. .] It here appears that C. observed the Jewish hours of prayer.
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Act 10:3. , in a vision) not in an ecstasy, as Peter.-, manifestly) So that it could not be a deception of the senses which was disturbing Cornelius, who was not accustomed to such things.-, the ninth) This is about our third hour (three oclock) in the afternoon: a time in which the senses are wont to be fresh and lively.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
angel
(See Scofield “Heb 1:4”).
Fuente: Scofield Reference Bible Notes
saw: Job 4:15, Job 4:16, Dan 9:20, Dan 9:21
about: Act 10:30, Act 3:1, Mat 27:46, Luk 23:44-46
an: Act 5:19, Act 11:13, Act 12:7-11, Act 27:23, Luk 1:11, Luk 2:10, Luk 2:11, Luk 2:13, Heb 1:4, Heb 1:14
Cornelius: Act 9:4, Exo 33:17, Isa 45:4
Reciprocal: Gen 46:2 – in the visions Exo 3:4 – Moses Psa 55:17 – Evening Eze 1:1 – I saw Dan 10:12 – and I Mat 18:10 – their Mat 20:5 – sixth Mar 15:34 – at Luk 15:10 – there Luk 24:5 – they Joh 20:16 – Mary Act 1:10 – two Act 9:10 – and to Act 12:9 – wist not Act 16:9 – a vision
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
3
Act 10:3. He saw evidently denoted it was so plain that it could not leave any doubt as to what he saw. God was about to put an end to the Patriarchial Dispensation, and selected one of the best men in that system for the occasion. That was significant and showed that the change was not made just because the system was an absolute failure. The angel was not to tell Cornelius what to do to be saved, but to direct him to a man who would tell him. (See the comments at chapter 8:26.)
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Vision of Cornelius at CaesareaMessengers sent to St. Peter at Joppa, 3-8.
Act 10:3. He saw in a vision evidently. The language seems carefully chosen so as to assert the certainty and absolute distinctness of the vision. This was not a dream or a trance. What Cornelius saw was addressed to his waking senses. His own language afterwards (Act 10:30) is that a man stood before him and spoke; and Peter, at a later period still (Act 11:13), remembering the account given to him by Cornelius, told the apostles and elders that he saw an angel standing and speaking to him. It should be noted, too, that in each of these passages, where the event is subsequently related, the words in the house occur.
About the ninth hour of the day. This is the first place where the question necessarily arises, whether Cornelius was at this time a proselyte to Judaism or not. The ninth hour (i.e. three in the afternoon) was one of the stated Jewish hours of prayer. It was at this time of the day, specially named as an hour of prayer, that we have seen Peter and John going to the Temple (Act 3:1). Other hours of prayer were the third (Act 2:15) and the sixth (Act 10:9). Moreover, though nothing is said about prayer in the verse before us, Cornelius distinctly says afterwards (Act 10:30) that he was at that time (and he names the hour) engaged in prayer. Thus it is evident that Cornelius, besides having formed the habit of prayer, had adopted some of the customary Jewish regulations affecting prayer. The whole tone of the narrative, however, and its place in the history convey the impression that Cornelius was by no means a proselyte in the sense of having been circumcised. There were various degrees of approximation to strict Judaism among those Gentiles who, at the period of the Roman Empire, were in contact with the Jews; and Cornelius seems simply to have been drawn into sympathy with the religion of the Hebrews on its moral and spiritual side. Thus it is correct to say (and it is an important way of stating the matter) that he was the first Pagan baptized by an apostle.
An angel. This fact would weigh forcibly with the apostles and elders at Jerusalem, when these occurrences were brought before them. Thus Peter in his apologetic account (Act 11:13) lays stress upon it. The messengers (Act 10:22) use the phrase holy angel. The description given by Cornelius himself (Act 10:30) is, that what he saw was a man in bright clothing, which is strictly in analogy with the account of angels in the Gospels (Joh 20:12; see Act 1:10).
Coming in. This is part of the description which helps to give definiteness and certainty to the vision (see below, when the angel departed, Act 10:7). Cornelius distinctly saw his heavenly visitant come and go.
Saying unto him, Cornelius. This addressing of the person by name is, again, according to the analogy of the visions recorded in the Bible, as in the cases of Samuel in the Old Testament, and St. Paul at his conversion. A distinct appeal was made at Csarea to the hearing, as well as the seeing, of Cornelius. Stier says: This was the answer to his entreaties; it was as if the holy messenger had said to him in the name of the Lord, I know thee by name, and thou hast also found grace in my sight.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Observe here, 1. The extraordinary favour afforded to Cornelius; namely, the vision of an holy angel. This devout man did not seek the face of God in vain; God sends him first an angel to comfort him, then an apostle, to instruct him: He saw in a vision an angel of God.
Observe, 2. The effect which the sight of the angel had upon Cornelius; He was afraid.
Learn hence, That whilst our soul’s inhabit these mortal and sinful bodies, the appearance of angels is terrible and affrighting to them, and cannot be otherwise; partly upon a a natural, and partly upon a moral account: Upon a natural account, because the dread of spirits strikes our natural spirits, they shrink and tremble at the approach of spirits; both the spirits of men and beasts quail at it; witness the ass, Num 22:23 that Balaam rode upon: And also upon a moral account, because of our consciousness of guilt: wherever there is guilt, there will be a fear upon an extraordinary appearance of God to us, though it be but mediately by an angel.
Observe, 3. The joyful message which the angel brings to Cornelius; that his prayers and his alms were come up for a memorial before God.
Where note, That as God records all the prayers of his people, so he books all the acts of mercy which any of them at any time do exercise and shew unto his members: he takes notice of the person, of the action, of the time when, of the manner how, of the measure and degree, how much: if it be but a cup of cold water, given in love to Christ in his members, it shall not be forgotten, but recorded and rewarded.
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament
Act 10:3-6. He saw At a time, it seems, when engaged in secret devotion; in a vision Not in a trance, like Peter; evidently , manifestly and plainly, so as to leave him, though not accustomed to things of this kind, no room to suspect any imposition; about the ninth hour That is, about three in the afternoon, which, being the hour of evening sacrifice, was chosen by him as a proper season for his devotion; an angel of God Known to be such by the brightness of his countenance and the manner of his coming in to him: and saying, Cornelius Calling him by his name, to intimate the particular notice God took of him. And when he looked on him , having fixed his eyes on him; he was afraid And no wonder, for the wisest and best of men have been struck with fear upon the appearance of any extraordinary messenger from heaven; and said, What is it, Lord? As if he had said, What can this mean? for the words seem to be a sudden exclamation, and prayer to God to preserve him, and let him know what was the design of so astonishing an appearance. And he (the angel) said, Thy prayers, and thine alms With which they have been attended; have come up for a memorial before God Far more pleasing to him than the most fragrant incense. And dare any man say, then, that these were only splendid sins? or that they were an abomination before God? And yet it is certain, in the Christian sense, Cornelius was then an unbeliever. He had not then faith in Christ. So certain it is, that every one who seeks faith in Christ, should seek it in prayer and doing good to all men. And now Adds the angel, since God is about to give thee a very singular proof of his love, by discovering things to thee which it is of the highest importance thou shouldst know; send, therefore, to Joppa, and call for one Simon, &c.; he shall tell thee what thou oughtest to do Two things here are remarkable, and worthy of particular attention: 1st, Cornelius is influenced continually by the fear of God; from that principle he prays and gives alms; is religious himself, and maintains religion in his family. And all this he does in such a manner as to be accepted of God therein. Nevertheless, it is now necessary he should do something further; he must embrace the Christian religion, God having now established it among men. Not, he might do this if he pleased, and it would be an improvement of his religion; but, he must do it, his doing it is indispensably necessary to his acceptance with God for the future. He that had believed the promise of the Messiah, must now believe the performance of that promise. Now God having given a further record concerning his Son than what had been given in the Old Testament prophecies, he requires men to receive that record when it is brought to them; and unless they do so, neither their prayers nor their alms can any longer come up for a memorial before him. Prayers and alms are indeed still accepted from those that believe in God and fear him, if they have not an opportunity of knowing more. But with those to whom the gospel is preached, it is necessary, in order to the acceptance of their persons, prayers, and alms, that they should believe that Jesus is the Christ, and should confide in him alone for acceptance. 2d, Though Cornelius has now an angel from heaven talking to him, yet he must not receive the gospel of Christ from this angel, nor be told by him what he ought to do, but must send for Peter to inform him. As the former observation puts a remarkable honour upon the gospel, so doth this upon the gospel ministry. It was not to angels, but to saints, persons compassed about with infirmity, that this grace was given, to preach among the Gentiles the unsearchable riches of Christ, that the excellence of the power might be of God, and the dignity of Christs institution supported. And as it was an honour to the apostle, that he must preach that which an angel might not, so it was a further honour, that an angel was despatched from heaven on purpose to order him to be sent for. Observe, reader, to bring a faithful minister and a willing people together, is a work worthy of an angel, and what, therefore, the greatest of men should be glad to be employed in.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
3-6. This defect in his religious character was not a fault; it was only a misfortune. He was doing the best he knew how; and, if we may infer what he prayed for, from what he obtained in answer to his prayers, he was praying for additional knowledge, and perhaps for an interest in the salvation offered through Christ. Such a prayer, offered by such a man, is always acceptable to God. On a certain day he had fasted till in the afternoon, and at three o’clock was praying within his house, when, (3) “He saw distinctly in a vision, about the ninth hour of the day, an angel of God coming in to him and saying to him, Cornelius. (4) He looked intently upon him, and was full of fear, and said, What is it, Lord? He said to him, Thy prayers and thine alms have come up for a memorial before God. (5) And now, send men to Joppa, and call for one Simon who is surnamed Peter. (6) He is lodging with a certain Simon, a tanner, whose house is by the sea-shore. He will tell you what you ought to do.”
Here is an unconverted man praying, and his prayer is answered. But the circumstances of the man, the nature of the prayer, and the answer given, are all essentially different from those of unconverted men who are taught to pray by the Protestant sects of the present day. The man was not instructed in a knowledge of the Redeemer, and the way of salvation, and of his own interest in the same, but neglecting his duty, as in the case with the modern sinner. Neither was he praying for pardon, while postponing obedience to the gospel, as in these cases; but his prayer was for a knowledge of his duty, and he had no one by to instruct him. The answer to his prayer was given, not, as is now so often pretended, by sending forth the Spirit into his heart to speak his sins forgiven, but by sending an angel to tell him where he can find a man who will guide him in the way of salvation.
In the case of the eunuch, an angel appeared to the preacher and sent him to the inquirer. In this case, the angel appears to the inquirer, and tells him to send for the preacher. In both cases, the only work of the angel was to bring the two men together, face to face. Thus, again, we seen an insuperable necessity, in case of a scriptural conversion, for the presence and co-operation of a human agent, showing that the divine influences, whatever, and however numerous they may be, reach the heart through the word of truth. The prayer of Cornelius was answered, like that of Saul, by referring him to inspired authorities within the Church. This shows how vain, at the present day, must be every prayer for direct answers from heaven, in reference to the pardon of sins. If a verbal answer to such prayers could be obtained, we are bound to conclude, from these precedents, that it would still be, “Go to Damascus and it shall be told you,” or “Send men to Joppa for Simon whose surname is Peter, and he will tell you what you ought to do.” Peter and Ananias are before us now, with the same instruction which they gave then, and it is useless for us to offer for what we have in hand, prayers which Saul and Cornelius offered for what had not yet been granted. The directions given by the two teachers, in these cases, and by other inspired men, is all that God granted to sinners then, and it is certainly all that we have a right to ask for now.
The necessity for the spoken word in order to the conversion of men is not only exhibited in these mission of angels, but it also explains the occurrence, in the two cases of Cornelius and the eunuch, of an agency not discernible in other cases. If no heavenly messenger had been sent to Philip, he could not have known that there was an Ethiopian on the road to Gaza, reading his Bible, and ready to hear the gospel. And if no angel had appeared to Cornelius, he could not have known that he had any interest in the blood of Jesus, or any right to send for Peter. No human being could have informed him, because all others, including Peter, were as ignorant of it as himself. An interposition from heaven is necessary; but when it occurs, it provides only for just such demands of the case as could not be supplied without it. The multitude on Pentecost needed no such angelic aid, for the preacher was before them, and each party was conscious of the right to speak, on the one hand, and the right to obey, on the other. So with us. When we wish any information, or the enjoyment of any religious privilege, we have the apostles before us, face to face. Their words are in our hands, and may be in our minds and hearts. We have no need for heavenly apparitions or illuminations; and if we expect them, we will be disappointed, or deluded. If a man in ignorance prays for a knowledge of salvation, this incident in the case of Cornelius, instead of encouraging him to pray on, actually answers his prayer, by telling him to send for some man who understands the gospel, and will guide him as Peter did Cornelius.
Before proceeding further in this case of conversion, we wish the reader to observe that enough has occurred already to secure Cornelius’ recognition as a genuine convert, by the prevailing Protestant parties of this day. Let any man come before the Church with such an experience as his, saying, “I have been for many years a devout man, worshiping God as well as I knew how, giving alms to the poor, praying continually, and teaching all my family the fear of God. Yesterday afternoon, at three o’clock, I was praying, according to my custom, when suddenly a holy angel stood before me, and said, Thy prayers and thine alms have come up for a memorial before God.” Who would doubt that he was “powerfully converted,” or dare to insinuate that there was anything else necessary in this case? He would receive the right-hand of fellowship at once. Yet, so different was the apostolic procedure, that the man was now only prepared to hear words by which he might be saved. How long will religious men allow their inventions and traditions to nullify the word of God?
Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)
Verse 3
Evidently; distinctly.–Ninth hour; about the middle of the afternoon.
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
The ninth hour (3:00 p.m.) was the Jewish hour of prayer (cf. Act 3:1), so Cornelius may have been praying. Again God prepared two people to get together by giving each of them a vision (cf. Saul and Ananias). Cornelius saw an angel, not Jesus (Act 10:7; Act 10:22; Act 10:30; Act 11:13; cf. Act 1:20). "Lord" here is a respectful address such as "Sir," but the centurion undoubtedly felt great awe when he saw this supernatural visitor (cf. Act 10:30). Cornelius was not calling the angel his Savior or his Sovereign. God had noted Cornelius’ piety (his prayers Godward, proseuchai, and his alms manward, cf. Act 10:2) and was now going to give him more revelation.
"Luke is suggesting that the prayers and the alms of this Gentile were accepted by God in lieu of the sacrifices which he was not allowed to enter the Temple to offer himself. In other words, God had acted to break down barriers between Jew and Gentile by treating the prayers and alms of a Gentile as equivalent to the sacrifice of a Jew." [Note: P. F. Esler, Community and Gospel in Luke-Acts: The Social and Political Motivations of Lucan Theology, p. 162.]
Modern missionaries have told stories of similar seekers after God. After they penetrated some remote tribe and preached the gospel, the natives explained how they had previously worshiped the God the missionary preached and had prayed for more light. Rom 3:11 means that no one seeks God unless God draws him or her to Himself, which is what God did with Cornelius.