Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Acts 13:12
Then the deputy, when he saw what was done, believed, being astonished at the doctrine of the Lord.
12. Then the deputy [ proconsul ], when he saw what was done, believed ] He was convinced by the miracle and by the words with which it was accompanied, that the Apostles were teachers of the way of the Lord after which he had been seeking in vain from Elymas. We are not told that Sergius was baptized, but we have other instances of the like omission of notice (see Act 13:48), yet as baptism was the appointed door into Christ’s Church, such omission of the mention thereof should not be thought to warrant us in believing that the sacrament was neglected on any occasion.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Then the deputy …believed – Was convinced that Elymas was an impostor, and that the doctrine of Paul was true. There seems no reason to doubt that his faith was what is connected with eternal life; and if so, it is an evidence that the gospel was not always confined to the poor, and to those in obscure ranks of life.
At the doctrine of the Lord – The word doctrine here seems to denote, not the teaching or instruction, but the wonderful effects which were connected with the doctrine. It was particularly the miracle with which he was astonished; but he might have been also deeply impressed and amazed at the purity and sublimity of the truths which were now expanded to his view. We learn nothing further respecting him in the New Testament.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Act 13:12
Then the deputy, when he saw what was done, believed.
Two Pauls and a blinded sorcerer
Note–
I. Opposition to the faith.
1. Elymas withstood them, seeking to turn away the deputy from the faith. This is true the world over. The greater the opportunity the greater the opposition. The devil is ever on the lookout to defeat the servants of God and hinder the effect of truth.
2. But opposition is overruled for good. The intense opposition of Elymas only served to draw the attention of the deputy more intently to the doctrine of Gods Word. But more than this: when Saul pronounced upon him the solemn judgment of God, the proconsul saw that it was in very deed the Word of God. The blinded sorcerer, seeking someone to lead him by the hand, was a visible witness for the truth against which he had fought. So that the overthrow of the opposition made the victory of truth the more conspicuous. And this is always so.
II. Aids to faith. I have not called miracles causes of faith, for they do not cause it, although they may lead up to it. What Sergius Paulus saw did not make him believe, but it helped him to believe. What did he see, then?
1. The great courage of Paul. In another case boldness struck a blow at unbelief, for when the rulers saw the boldness of Peter and John, and perceived that they were unlearned and ignorant men, they marvelled. In this case the effect would be the same. Saul fixed his eyes on Elymas as though he were perfectly master of the situation–as indeed he was, and without hesitation or apology addressed him, O full of all subtlety, etc. Intense conviction in the mind of Paul led him to speak thus plainly and sternly, but it was not the heat of his own spirit, for he was filled with the Holy Ghost. Let every teacher of Christ be thus filled, and then let him speak boldly, as he ought to speak. Come not forward with your ifs and buts and peradventures to prove Gods Word. Tell out the message God hath told thee, as from Him, and not as thine own opinion!
2. Gods judgments. If Sergius Paul was deeply impressed with Pauls boldness, he was still more deeply moved when he saw Elymas stricken with blindness.
3. Gods wonders of mercy. Conversions are the standing miracles of the gospel, the best attesting seals the truth can have. I knew a man who was of a fierce temper, a troubler to his own household; I have seen that man since his conversion, and the lion has become a lamb. We have seen persons revelling in licentiousness, but they have heard the gospel and become chaste. What has wrought this? What teaching must that be which accomplishes such marvels?
III. The source of faith. It is doctrine, or faithful teaching, which brings men to Christ. Let those who despise doctrine beware, for the doctrine of the Cross is only foolishness to them who perish. Under the influence of the Holy Ghost the plain teaching of the Word of the Lord leads men to believe in Jesus. I do not think it is any great good for a preacher to cry, Believe, if he never tells you what is to be believed. There is plenty of this kind of preaching about, and the result is sadly transient and superficial. If we do not preach the great doctrine of the atoning sacrifice, we have not put before men the basis on which their faith is to be built. Justification by faith and regeneration by the Spirit must be taught continually. The proconsul was, no doubt, astonished to see Elymas blinded, but he was a great deal more astonished at the doctrine which Paul preached when he began to tell him that salvation was not by the works of the law, but by faith in Jesus Christ; that the way to be accepted of God was not by presenting to the Lord anything performed by us or felt within us, but by laying hold upon the righteousness which Jesus Christ has wrought out and brought in. When he heard this good news he might well be astonished, and yield his heart to Jesus. The most astonishing thing in the world is the gospel. Come, then, and candidly study what is to be believed. If you desire to know God you shall know Him. The great Father is not far from any one of you. There is the light! It is not dim, nor far away. The fault is in your eyes if you do not see. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
The conversion of Sergius Paulus
I. He saw. Probably no special stress is laid upon the seeing, yet the fact that opportunity was given him to see is worthy of emphasis. Had the Church of Antioch loved their own better than the things of Christ, the missionaries had been kept at home. If we turn over the opportunity of Sergius and examine its obverse side, we shall find written thereon a duty and a privilege. Paul, who felt it and obeyed it thus early in his career, later states it (Rom 10:13-15). The great salvation is provided for all; let it be carried to all. No violence is done human thought or the spirit of the gospel by discerning, in the proconsuls opportunity to see, the Churchs opportunity to send. Paul came and preached, therefore Paulus saw and heard.
II. He was astonished. The transition from sight to faith is explained in the astonishment produced by the matter and manner of the doctrine of the Lord. Two teachers, each professing to possess the oracles of the Highest, had confronted each other with contradictory doctrine. The mind of the heathen deputy, unrestful and discontented with the fables of Roman mythology, must have been perplexed with these rival claimants for his faith and devotion. But the purer doctrine had the prevailing power, and Paulus wondered at the doctrine of the Lord, and admired it. Then came the proof that the story of Divine love was no bright fiction nor sweet poem, but a genuine fact and power in the world among men by the method of the teaching–persuasively to him who was ready to hear–judicially to him who was determined to resist. It could sue or subdue.
III. He believed. The simplicity and freshness of youth adorned and invigorated the gospel of that early day. The deputys mind was not perplexed by half a dozen kinds of faith, each with a technical name requiring special instruction to understand. The story of the living, personal Christ, what He had said and done, and what He wanted and waited to do, was the simple and unformulated theology of that earliest day. Sergius Paulus, in believing, was conscious of no such abstract process as that of accepting a theory or adopting a system. This might come afterwards; but when he believed he simply trusted himself into the care of God, he took Him at His word. The Roman proconsul became the Christian disciple; faith gave him a higher rank and a sublimer title. He had before represented the emperor of the world. He then represented the One seated on the right hand of God. The name Roman proconsul pales before the title Heir of God. (J. R. Danforth.)
Pauls first convert from heathenism
When Napoleon landed on his return from Elba, and one man came and presented himself as willing to serve the Emperor, Here, said Napoleon, is one recruit at least. So may we say when we have converts, Here is one recruit, and thank God for one; for the same attractive influence which draws one will draw multitudes more. We have got the right medicine, we have got the right power, and therefore let us hope that there is a harvest to be reaped now. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
The conversion of one soul
The conversion of one soul by the gospel should be to you a hopeful sign that God intends to convert others. For see, the cholera is raging in certain towns, say, on the continent, and a physician has been studying the disease. He has administered a variety of drugs, but in every case without success. He has prescribed different methods of treatment, but in no case has he succeeded in effecting a cure. At last he has hit upon the right drug, and, administering it, he sees his patient rallying, strength evidently given by the medicine; the struggle ends favourably, and the patient rises to life and health. Now, says the physician, I know that I shall have a harvest of men who will be preserved from this disease, because the same medicine which heals one will heal two, will heal twenty, will heal a thousand, or even twenty thousand; it only has to be administered; that one person has been healed by this compound, and it is clear that as many more may be healed as are willing to receive it. Brethren, we do not lack this sign with regard to the gospel. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
Opposition helpful to the gospel
In all probability the opposition of Bar-Jesus may have called the attention of Sergius Paul more intently to the doctrine of the Word of God. When a certain doctrine is neglected and half forgotten by the Church of God there rises up a bold heretic who rails at the truth most bitterly, and then Christian people remember it, defend it, and propagate it. A Colenso attacks the story of the Exodus, and all eyes are fixed upon Moses and the tribes of Israel. Some critic or other attacks the Book of Deuteronomy, and straightway we get a host of books about Deuteronomy; all the scholars of the Christian Church begin to study it, and as a part of the Word it is valued exceedingly. This Elymas finds fault with the gospel, and Saul and Barnabas are thus called upon to clear up the points at issue, and by refuting the magicians malicious errors they make the truth the more apparent to the mind of the proconsul. So far so good. (C. H. Spurgeon.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 12. The deputy – believed] This was a proof that the doctrine was true; and that the power of God, from which nothing could be concealed, and which nothing could resist, was with these preachers.
Being astonished] , Being struck with astonishment, as Elymas was struck with blindness. Thus the word of God is a two-edged sword: it smites the sinner with judgment or compunction; and the sincere inquirer after truth, with conviction of its own worth and excellence.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
The gospel which Paul preached; finding in it (though a wise man) depths beyond his fathoming; and all accompanied with such a power in doing of miracles, and changing of hearts and lives, as might well amaze so prudent and considering a man.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
12. Then the deputy, when he sawwhat was done, believed, being astonished at the doctrine of theLordso marvellously attested; compare Mr1:27. What fruit, if any, followed this remarkable conversion, orhow long after it the missionaries remained at Paphos, we know not.
Ac13:13-52. AT PERGAJOHN MARKFORSAKES THEMATANTIOCH IN PISIDIA,PAUL PREACHESWITH GLORIOUSEFFECTTHEJEWS, ENRAGED,EXPEL THEMOUT OF THEMCOASTS.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
Then the deputy, when he saw what was done,…. That Elymas was struck with blindness immediately, and that the hand of God was manifestly in it, and there was no juggle nor magic art in the case; it was a plain fact, which was certain and visible:
he believed; in the Lord Jesus Christ, whom the apostle preached:
being astonished at the doctrine of the Lord: both at what was contained in it: for there are many astonishing things in the doctrine of faith; as the birth of Christ of a virgin; the union of the two natures, divine and human, in his person; salvation through his crucifixion and death, and the resurrection of the dead, with others: and also at the miracles which attended this doctrine, and confirmed it; though the Alexandrian copy reads the words thus, “being astonished, he believed in the doctrine of the Lord”; which affords a very easy and natural sense, as that being filled with admiration at the striking of Elymas with blindness, he was induced to believe the doctrine of Christ, preached by Paul and Barnabas, and so the Ethiopic version renders it, “he wondered, and believed in our Lord”: and Beza’s ancient copy, and others read, “he wondered and believed in God”. This deputy we hear no more of afterwards; there is no reason to believe that he quitted his government of this island; though some pretend to say that he did, and followed the Apostle Paul, and went with him into Spain; and that he was left by him at Narbonne in Languedoc in France, and became bishop of that place; which office he held till his death. And though we read of no more converted at this time in Paphos, yet it is highly probable there were others, and that a foundation of a Gospel church state was laid in this place, even though Heathenism still continued. The temple of Venus remained in this place in the “second” century; and in the “fourth” century Venus was worshipped here; yet in the beginning of the “fourth” century, in the council of Nice, Cyril, bishop of Paphos, was present; and in the “fifth” century, a bishop of this place was at the synod of Chalcedon: and in the “eighth” century, Michael, bishop of Taphos, was in the Nycene synod w. Jerom x makes mention of Hilarion, an eminent servant of Christ, who was for some time at Paphos, in the fourth century, and of the many miraculous cures he wrought here; but of the church here, or of any number of believers in Christ, he takes no notice, only of one Hesychius, a disciple; though it is certain there must be a church at this time, as before observed.
w Magdeburg. Hist. Eccles. cent. 2. c. 15. p. 193. cent. 4. c. 2. p. 5. c. 15. p. 865. cent. 5. c. 2. p. 6. cent. 8. c. 2. p. 6. x Vita Hilarion. fol. 86. C.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Believed (). Ingressive aorist active indicative. Renan considers it impossible that a Roman proconsul could be converted by a miracle. But it was the teaching about the Lord ( , objective genitive) by which he was astonished (, present passive participle of , see on Mt 7:28) or struck out as well as by the miracle. The blindness came “immediately” () upon the judgment pronounced by Paul. It is possible that Sergius Paulus was converted to Christ without openly identifying himself with the Christians as his baptism is not mentioned as in the case of Cornelius. But, even if he was baptized, he need not have been deposed from his proconsulship as Furneaux and Rackham argue because his office called for “official patronage of idolatrous worship.” But that could have been merely perfunctory as it probably was already. He had been a disciple of the Jewish magician, Elymas Barjesus, without losing his position. Imperial persecution against Christianity had not yet begun. Furneaux even suggests that the conversion of a proconsul to Christianity at this stage would have called for mention by the Roman and Greek historians. There is the name Sergia Paullina in a Christian cemetery in Rome which shows that one of his family was a Christian later. One will believe what he wills about Sergius Paulus, but I do not see that Luke leaves him in the category of Simon Magus who “believed” (8:13) for revenue only.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
Astonished [] . See on Mt 7:28.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “Then the deputy, when he saw what was done,” (tote idon ho anthupatos to gegonos) “Right then the proconsul observing what occurred,” to Elymas, the fraudulent sorcerer, false prophet, and opposer of God, right before his own eyes. The blindness that came upon Elymas helped open the eyes of the governor, 2Co 4:3-4.
2) “Believed,” (episteusen) “Believed,” trusted, or openly committed himself to the Lord, in the sense that he became a convert, 1Jn 5:1; 1Jn 5:10-11; Joh 3:18; Joh 5:24.
3) “Being astonished at the doctrine of the Lord.” (ekplessomenos epi te didache tou kuriou) “Being astonished at the teaching (or doctrine) of the Lord,” as presented in the faith, by Paul and Barnabas. He was astonished at the manifestation of their testimony, accompanied by this miraculous act of Divine Judgement inflicted by Paul upon Elymas the obstinate, opposing, obstructing sorcerer, deceiver, and false prophet. This miraculous deed confirmed the testimony of Barnabas and Paul as messengers of God, even as the miracles of Jesus confirmed to Nicodemus and the Sanhedrin that Jesus had come from God, Joh 3:1-2; Heb 2:4.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
12. Then when the deputy saw This is that which I said, that the snares were broken wherein Elymas kept him entangled, for he was brought by the miracle unto faith, because the reverence of doctrine is the beginning of faith, and the preparation. Therefore, forasmuch as he saw an evident token of the power of God, he knew that Paul was sent of God, and so he began to reverence his doctrine, whereof he did doubt before. If God do now miraculously strengthen in the minds of many the faith of the gospel, which is shaken with so many and such strong engines; if he bring to pass, after an incredible manner, that the course of faith doth pass through a thousand lets, being content with this his grace, let us not murmur against him, or reason the matter with him, as if our condition were worse, if he do not daily show such miracles as we would desire.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(12) Being astonished at the doctrine of the Lord.The genitive is, probably, that of the object, the teaching which had the Lord, i.e., the Lord Jesus, as its main theme.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
12. Done, believed The penal miracle performed upon the magus overthrew the divinity of his claims; performed by the apostle, it established his. So the superiority of the miracles of Moses over and in penalty upon the sorcerers of Egypt, and of Paul over and upon those of Ephesus, are specimens of the divine method of defeating the preternaturalisms and demonisms of paganism by the supernaturalisms and miracles of Jehovah and Jesus.
Astonished Thrilled, electrified. The miracle wrought belief; the doctrine wrought salvation.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘Then the proconsul, when he saw what was done, believed, being astonished at the teaching of the Lord.’
Amazed at what he saw the Lord could do, as he might well have been, the pro-consul believed. In lieu of Luke’s usual usage this must signify that Luke sees him as becoming a Christian. He would no doubt have had good reason for believing it as a result of what happened in the future. Luke wrote many years afterwards and would have known whether his faith survived. There is some later evidence that his daughter and other relatives were possibly Christians. (It should be noted that Luke does not tend to overstate the response of people. Compare how he quite openly admits that Felix only sends to hear Paul because he hopes to obtain a bribe from him (Act 24:26)).
It will be seen here that while the Jew, Bar-jesus, rejects Paul’s message, the Gentile, Sergius Paulus, receives it gladly. This is to be the pattern for the future. It will also be noted by glancing at the analysis at the beginning of this chapter that this appearance before the pro-consul parallels Paul’s later appearance before the pro-consul Gallio in Achaia (Act 18:12-17), the twofold point being established in each case being, firstly that, like the Apostles (Mat 10:18; Mar 13:9; Luk 21:12), Paul testifies before rulers (Act 9:15), and secondly that the authorities of Rome did not condemn Paul for his teaching.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Act 13:12 . . ] For he rightly saw, both in that announcement of punishment by Paul, and in the fate of his sorcerer, something which had a connection with the doctrine of the Lord (that is, with the doctrine which Christ caused to be proclaimed by His apostles; see on Act 8:25 ). Its announcer had shown such a marvellous familiarity with the counsel of God, and its opponent had suddenly experienced such a severe punishment, that he was astonished at the doctrine , with which so evident a divine judgment was connected. Comp. on the connection of the judgment concerning the doctrine with the miracle beheld, Mar 1:27 . The obviously supposes the reception of baptism; comp. Act 4:4 , Act 11:21 , Act 19:18 .
Whether the sorcerer afterwards became a believer the text does not, indeed, inform us; but the presumption of a future conversion is contained in , Act 13:11 , and therefore the question is to be answered in the affirmative; for Paul spoke that : , Oecumenius. The Tbingen criticism has indeed condemned the miraculous element in this story, and the story itself as an invented and exaggerated counterpart of the encounter of Peter with Simon Magus, chap. 8 a judgment in which the denial of miracles in general, and the assumption of dogmatic motives on the part of the author, are the controlling presuppositions (see Baur and Zeller; comp. also Schneckenburger, p. 53).
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
12 Then the deputy, when he saw what was done, believed, being astonished at the doctrine of the Lord.
Ver. 12. Being astonished, &c. ] The word worketh not kindly till it be received with admiration.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
12. . . . ] Hesitating as he had been before between the teaching of the sorcerer and that of the Apostle, he is amazed at the divine power accompanying the latter, and gives himself up to it. It is not said that he was baptized : but the supposition is not thereby excluded: see Act 13:48 ; ch. Act 17:12 ; Act 17:34 ; Act 18:8 , first part.
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Act 13:12 . : “the blindness of Elymas opened the eyes of the proconsul” (Felten). If the verb is understood in its full sense, viz. , that Sergius Paulus became a convert to the faith, Act 13:48 , Act 2:44 , Act 4:4 , Act 11:21 , baptism would be implied, Act 8:12 . ., Mat 7:28 , Mar 1:22 ; Mar 11:18 , Luk 4:32 ; Luk 9:43 , etc., so in classical Greek with . The verb is also found in Ecc 7:17 (16), Wis 13:4 , 2Ma 7:12 , 4Ma 8:4 ; 4Ma 17:16 . Bengel’s comment is suggestive, “miraculo acuebatur attentio ad doctrinam”: the conversion is not represented as the result of the miracle alone. The conversion of a Roman proconsul is regarded as absolutely incredible by Renan (so more recent critics). But if the narrative had been a mere fiction to magnify Paul’s powers in converting such an important personage in his first encounter with the powers of heathenism, the forger would not have contented himself with the brief . of Act 13:9 ; see Zckler’s Apostelgeschichte , p. 245, second edition, on this and other objections against the narrative. See Introd. for the favourable light in which St. Luke describes the relations between the Roman government and Christianity.
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
saw. Greek. eidon. App-133.
believed. App-150.
astonished. Greek. ekplesso. Compare Mat 7:28; Mat 22:33. Luk 4:32.
at. Greek. epi. App-104.
doctrine = teaching.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
12. . . .] Hesitating as he had been before between the teaching of the sorcerer and that of the Apostle, he is amazed at the divine power accompanying the latter, and gives himself up to it. It is not said that he was baptized: but the supposition is not thereby excluded: see Act 13:48; ch. Act 17:12; Act 17:34; Act 18:8, first part.
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Act 13:12. , what had happened) Often the obstacles which have stood in the way of the truth, when overcome, are subservient to it.-, the doctrine) By the miracle his attention was sharpened in relation to the doctrine.[71]
[71] Bengel, J. A. (1860). Vol. 2: Gnomon of the New Testament (M. E. Bengel & J. C. F. Steudel, Ed.) (A. R. Fausset, Trans.) (610-621). Edinburgh: T&T Clark.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
the deputy: Act 13:7, Act 28:7
when: Act 19:7, Mat 27:54, Luk 7:16
being: Act 6:10, Mat 7:28, Mat 7:29, Luk 4:22, Joh 7:46, 2Co 10:4, 2Co 10:5
Reciprocal: Ezr 5:14 – governor Act 9:18 – and was Act 18:12 – the deputy Act 19:17 – and fear Rom 12:8 – ruleth 1Co 1:26 – not many mighty
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
2
Act 13:12. The deputy believed when he saw the miracle. That was according to the Lord’s purpose for miracles, stated in Joh 20:30-31.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Act 13:12. Believed. That Sergius Paulus was baptized is the natural inference. Believed is the ordinary expression used in the early Christian records for turning to the Lord and joining the Church (so Act 4:4; Act 11:21; Act 19:18). The proconsul of Cyprus is another instance of men of high rank joining the Christian brotherhood in very early times (see note on Act 13:1 of this chapter).
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Act 13:12. Then the deputy Or proconsul; when he saw what was done What a wonderful miracle was performed, yielding to such convincing evidence; believed the gospel; being astonished , being struck with astonishment; at the doctrine of the Lord At the confirmation thus given to it, and probably also at the internal evidence which he soon discovered in it, and which broke in with increasing lustre on his mind. The reader will observe, that at this period of the history, Luke has changed Sauls name, calling him Paul, without assigning any reason for so doing. Some learned men have supposed that this change was made by Saul himself, in honour of the proconsul, who they think was, perhaps, Sauls first convert from among the idolatrous Gentiles, or the first person of high rank of that character who was converted. For it was customary among the Romans to assume the name of a benefactor whom they highly esteemed. Thus the Jewish historian, Josephus, took the name of Flavius, in compliment to Vespasian, with whom he was in high favour. But it is more probable, that, coming now among the Romans and Greeks, they adapted his name to their own language, and so called him Paul instead of Saul; as one whose Hebrew name was Jochanan, would be called by the Greeks and Latins, Johannes; by the French, Jean; by the Dutch, Hans; and by the English, John. Perhaps, however, the family of the proconsul might be the first who addressed, or spoke to him, by this name. But in whatever manner it happened, it is certain that ever after this he was known only by this name; and, being the apostle of the Gentiles, he himself used it as a name most familiar to them. From this time forth, likewise, Paul is generally mentioned by the historian before Barnabas: because, by his success in preaching at Paphos, and by the greatness of his miracles, he was now shown to be the principal person; although, formerly, he was mentioned after Barnabas, because he was a younger disciple, and because his apostolical authority was not fully understood.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
See notes one verse 8
Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)
This show of superior power convinced Sergius Paulus of the truth of Paul’s gospel, and he believed it. Notice again that belief is all that was necessary for his salvation (cf. Act 14:1; Act 17:34; Act 19:18). It was Paul’s teaching concerning the Lord that Sergius Paulus believed. There is some extrabiblical evidence that Sergius Paulus’ daughter and other descendants also became Christians. [Note: See William M. Ramsay, The Bearing of Recent Discovery on the Trustworthiness of the New Testament, pp. 150-72.]
"This blinding of the false prophet opened the eyes of Sergius Paulus." [Note: W. J. Conybeare and J. S. Howson, The Life and Epistles of St. Paul, p. 120.]
The blinding of Elymas shows that Paul possessed the power of binding that God had also given to Peter (cf. Mat 16:19). God validated Paul’s message by granting a miracle. This was especially helpful in evangelism before the completion of the New Testament. Here a Roman Gentile responded to the gospel whereas a Jew did not.
This incident is significant in the unfolding of Luke’s purpose because at Paphos Paul assumed the leadership among the missionaries (cf. Act 13:13). The mission of the church also became more Gentile oriented. Jewish response continued to be rejection, symbolized by Elymas’ blindness (cf. Act 28:26-27). Furthermore, this was the first appearance of Christianity before Roman aristocracy and high authority, a new benchmark for the advance of the mission. Paul’s conflict with Elymas is also reminiscent of others in the Old Testament in which prophets with rival messages made presentations to kings and people (cf. 1 Kings 22; Jeremiah 28-29).
"The conversion of Sergius Paulus was, in fact, a turning point in Paul’s whole ministry and inaugurated a new policy in the mission to Gentiles-viz., the legitimacy of a direct approach to and full acceptance of Gentiles apart from any distinctive Jewish stance. This is what Luke clearly sets forth as the great innovative development of this first missionary journey (Act 14:27; Act 15:3). Earlier Cornelius had been converted apart from any prior commitment to Judaism, and the Jerusalem church had accepted his conversion to Christ. But the Jerusalem church never took Cornelius’s conversion as a precedent for the Christian mission and apparently preferred not to dwell on its ramifications. However, Paul, whose mandate was to Gentiles, saw in the conversion of Sergius Paulus further aspects of what a mission to Gentiles involved and was prepared to take this conversion as a precedent fraught with far-reaching implications for his ministry. It is significant that from this point on Luke always calls the apostle by his Greek name Paul and, except for Act 14:14; Act 15:12; and Act 15:25 (situations where Barnabas was more prominent), always emphasizes his leadership by listing him first when naming the missioners. For after this, it was Paul’s insight that set the tone for the church’s outreach to the Gentile world." [Note: Longenecker, pp. 420-21.]