Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Acts 5:15

Insomuch that they brought forth the sick into the streets, and laid [them] on beds and couches, that at the least the shadow of Peter passing by might overshadow some of them.

15. Insomuch that they brought forth the sick into the streets ] Instead of the preposition into, the best authorities read even into, “they even brought forth,” &c.

These words are a description of one way in which the new believers gave evidence of their faith. To bring a sick person on a couch to the presence of Jesus was accepted by Him (Mar 2:5) as a sign of true faith, and for the sake of the faith shewn by those who brought him the paralytic was made whole. So here, though we are not told of any cures wrought by the shadow of Peter, we may conclude that to the like faith God would give a like blessing.

and laid them on beds and couches ] The warm climate making it possible for the sick to be exposed in the open air.

that at the least the shadow of Peter passing by might overshadow some of them ] The order in the original is, that, as Peter came by, at the least his shadow might, &c. Peter is alone mentioned here because he was the most prominent figure, but we are not to conclude that no mighty works were done by the rest. These men who gave such an exhibition of faith have been described ( Act 5:14) as believers in the Lord. There can therefore be no question as to what they regarded as the power which was to heal their sick. They did not believe on Peter, though they magnified him as the Lord’s instrument; they did not ascribe healing power to Peter’s shadow, though it might please God to make that a sacrament of healing, as to Israel in old times He had made the brazen serpent. They had seen health bestowed through the Apostle by the name of Christ, and to demonstrate their faith in that name, they bring their afflicted friends into the way of salvation.

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

Insomuch – So that. This should be connected with Act 5:12. Many miracles were performed by the apostles, insomuch, etc.

They brought forth – The people, or the friends of the sick, brought them forth.

Beds – klinon. This word denotes usually the soft and valuable beds on which the rich commonly lay. And it means that the rich, as well as the poor, were laid in the path of Peter and the other apostles.

Couches – krabaton. The coarse and hard couches on which the poor used to lie, Mar 2:4, Mar 2:9,Mar 2:11-12; Mar 6:55; Joh 5:8-12; Act 9:33.

The shadow of Peter – That is, they were laid in the path so that the shadow of Peter, as he walked, might pass over them. Perhaps the sun was near setting, and the lengthened shadow of Peter might be thrown afar across the way. They were not able to approach him on account of the crowd, and they imagined that if they could anyhow come under his influence they might be healed. The sacred writer does not say, however, that any were healed in this way, nor that they were commanded to do this. He simply states the impression which was on the minds of the people that it might be. Whether they were healed by this, it is left for us merely to conjecture. An instance somewhat similar is recorded in Act 19:12, where it is expressly said, however, that the sick were healed by contact with handkerchiefs and aprons that were brought from the body of Paul. Compare also Mat 9:21-22, where the woman said respecting Jesus If I may but touch his garment I shall be whole.

Might overshadow – That his shadow might pass over them. Though there is no certain evidence that any were healed in this way, yet it shows the full belief of the people that Peter had the power of working miracles. Peter was supposed by them to be eminently endowed with this power, because it was by him that the lame man in the temple had been healed Act 3:4-6, and because he had been most prominent in his addresses to the people. The persons who are specified in this verse were those who dwelt at Jerusalem.

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

Act 5:15

Inasmuch that they brought forth the sick.

., that at least the shadow of Peter passing by might overshadow them.

The shadow of Peter

The miracles of Christ and His apostles were mainly miracles of healing–a fact to be well noted. The power to work these has been withdrawn; but the same object is still accomplished by the prayerful use of natural means. Still the heart of the believer is alive to the tender offices of compassion; still, in the shadow of the Christian, the sorrows of the unfortunate obtain relief. Charity may be not unaptly denominated the Christians shadow. A shadow is the reflection of a substance: charity is a habit of conduct, reflected from a Christian disposition. A shadow represents, in some degree, the form and aspect of the substance; charity pourtrays, in outline, the figure of the child of God. A shadow moves with the substance it represents, attends and imitates it in every step and posture: charity accommodates itself, in equal vigour, to every change of capacity and circumstance;–in prosperity, is liberal; in adversity, considerate; humble in joy, cheerful in affliction. But a shadow can only be reflected by a stronger light than that in which the substance stands or moves. And what is that light?

I. Shall we find that ray within? In the tenderness and fervency of our own affections? Many are the deeds of kindness prompted by instinctive feeling: but are not deeds of very different hue as often prompted by the same emotions? Are not evil thoughts, adulteries, etc., things which defile a man, the offspring also of the heart? And shall we think to derive our light from such a source? Shall we follow, in security, a guide so blind and treacherous? Nay, we are assured that the heart, with all its flexibility of control, is deceitful above all things, and desperately wicked. So far from directing our judgment, it must itself be brought perpetually to justice; instead of holding a light unto our path, it ever needs a lantern to its own.

II. Shall we look around us for that ray? And shall we find it in the selfishness and ambition of the world, the blandishments of mans admiration? It has become a practice somewhat too prevalent to urge the contributions of the wealthy, without regard to rectitude of principle or motive, on the pretext that, so long as charitable institutions are upheld, no matter with what design of their supporters, the object of such application is substantially realised. But there is a case of the giver to be taken into consideration; and the effect on his mind is decidedly injurious. He is taught to repose a merit upon actions which, under existing circumstances, assume a character entirely the reverse of meritorious. He is taught to attach an undue value to wealth, as a vital source, and not an accidental garb, of beneficence: to allow to charity its plenary importance in the rank of virtues, but to limit the scope of charity to the bare performance of alms-giving. And lastly, he is taught to look to man, and not to God, for his reward. Why else are we reminded of the generosity of those who have thought to make their peace with heaven fur the defects of an unprofitable life by bequeathing their possessions to the poor, when the near approach of death withdraws the further prospect of gratifications which have constituted the chief endearment of their lives? The poor enjoy their pittance, it is true; but at whose and at what expense? to those who give, the probability of that mortifying reproof hereafter, Who hath required this at thy hand? To those who urged the gift, the sure and certain recompense of the ceremonious Pharisee, who preached sacrifice and not mercy, and put other burdens on the souls of men than the covenant of their Lord and Master.

III. If we find it neither within us, nor around us, it remains only that we lift our eyes above us, even to that Sun of Righteousness, who rose, the offering for our redemption, and the example of our duty, with healing in His wings. From Him have we this commandment, that he who loveth God, should love his brother also. The love of Christ constraineth us. It is only under the influence of this prevailing motive that our principles and habits can be warmed into a generous concern for the whole household of Christ; it is only under the brightness of His presence that the Christians shadow can be reflected. The frame of mind required for such an exercise of benevolence is the repose inspired by a firm and humble trust in the providence of the Almighty, and the efficacy of His Sons atonement; a calm and holy peace, which leaves the mind at liberty to toil, for righteousness sake, amid the sneers and censures of the ungodly, and, like the pattern of its daily practice, to go about doing good. And what other influence can be named, capable of producing this blessedness of tone and spirit, but the constraint of the love of God? Will you say that inducements, at least of equal weight, are given us, in the dread of future punishment. But fear is, after all, but a flickering and inconstant meteor, totally incapable of reflecting that steady shadow we are now employed in contemplating. Think not I would deny the efficacy of an arrangement which converts even the fears and apprehensions of the sinner into occasions and instruments of good, and thus not seldom penetrates his soul through the only avenue unchoked by the brambles of worldly-windedness. I merely argue that the sensations of fear and terror are incompetent of themselves to generate that steadiness of principle and habit, that abandonment of selfish and carnal interests, that devotion of the heart and life to the will and purposes of the Creator, which manifests itself in a regard and concern for all the creatures of His hands. I say that an intermediate process must take place; that the inner man must be purified as well as roused; must first learn to love God, and then, and not till then, will love his brother also. There is not a star that twinkles in the firmament on high but has its appointed sphere of service and occupation: but from the sun alone we behold our fair proportions represented. There is not a motive, a feeling, in the constitution of a human being but may be made conducive, by Gods blessing, towards the great end of his probation; but it is only beneath the love of God that the Christians shadow lies unfolded. (P. Hall, M. A.)

Casting shadows

We all cast shadows, i.e., exert unconscious influences. Some men are always, without seeming effort or thought, making other people happy. But there are others whose presence depresses and saddens us. This is so in the secular sphere; but our unconscious influence spreads into wider areas. God works out His grandest purposes by undemonstrative agents. The earthquake and lightning are as nothing compared with attraction and heat. And so with human influences.

1. Because our voluntary efforts are only occasional and interrupted, while our unconscious energy is everywhere operative and constant.

2. Our constant and silent energy is most expressive of our real character. Consider a few practical applications.

I. It should impress us with a sense of the importance of human life.

II. We are responsible for our unconscious influence. We may think to evade this on the ground that the evil we do is unintentional. But apply this to physical evil; to the case of Solomons lunatic who said, I am in sport; or to the man who, exerting no positive influence, lets a blind man fall over a precipice. Just to do nothing is to do terrible evil; but in such a world no man can do nothing. Our whole mortal life is embodied force.

III. Death does not destroy this unconscious influence. The Greeks used to term the disembodied spirit a shadow, an invisible presence, haunting the scenes of its former life, and though not in this sense yet, as abiding influences, the dead are still with us. On the one hand, Lord Byron, Bonaparte, Voltaire, etc., yet stalk the earth and gibber their influence; on the other, Calvin, Luther, Wesley, Chalmers, still live. This truth is a warning to all workers of iniquity, but an encouragement to every true child of God. (C. Wadsworth, D. D.)

Casting shadows in life

Our text shows–

I. The power there may be in comparative trifles. As a metaphor few figures are more frequently used in the Scriptures than that of the shadow. Sometimes it is suggestive of blessing, as the shadow of a great rock in a weary land, or the shadow of the Almighty; sometimes the opposite, as the shadow of death. A shadow! What is more insignificant? Intangible and unsubstantial, is it not the veriest trifle? Yet how solemnly impressive it is.

1. The most irresistible forces of the world in nature are those that we can neither see nor hear. The earthquakes tread makes us tremble, and so does the roar of the hurricane. How appalling the thunder and lightning; but how far inferior are they in either benign or blasting influence to the quieter, subtler force of electricity, gravitation, heat, or light.

2. In science and civilisation the quieter forces have counted most. The grandest discoveries have usually emerged from some by-way of accident. The most thrilling pages of history are but chronicles of events that have nearly all turned on the pivot of some trivial circumstance. Mohammedanism was the product of a spiders web woven behind the fleeing prophet and deceiving his pursuers. The battle of Waterloo was suspended upon the co-operation of Blucher, whose life escaped the enemys sword by the simple circumstance of wearing the cap of a common soldier, and for the reason that the clasp of his own helmet had broken.

3. Just so it is in religion. Are we not astonished often to find that the little things we say and do tell more radically and widely than some of our most demonstrative actions? Then, too, the very constancy of those trifles tells. Repeated blows of a little hammer may be more effective than the single downfall of the ponderous sledge. The clock strikes at intervals, the ticking is momentary; we hear the one, we do not notice the other; yet the hour stroke comes not if the ticking fails.

II. As no shadow can be cast without light, our text illustrates the essential place Christ holds in all true religion, in the world and in the soul. If the sun be clouded, or the atmosphere hazy, no distinct shadows can be east. The sun must shine out to make shadows. So the distinctness of shadows of grace indicate the strong or feeble shining of the Sun of Righteousness.

1. Nationalities like Italy and Russia and South America tell us of the cloudy and dark day. England and America, on the other hand, bourgeoned with beauty, tell of the sun shining warmly and clearly from a gospel sky.

2. As in the world, so in the soul. Saul of Tarsus, breathing out threatenings and slaughter, stands in striking contrast with Paul, the singing pilgrim in the dungeon of Philippi, and the same man near martyrdom exclaiming, I am now ready to be offered up, etc. Whence came the difference? Ah! Christ commenced shining upon him near that Damascene gate, and the light grew brighter and sweeter and clearer every day, so that he shouted, I live, yet not I, but Christ liveth in me. Peter and James and Jn exclaimed on a glory-lit summit, It is good to be here! because Jesus in the midst was the centre of the glory. Shadows of noble action and happy feeling can come from those only who are wont to bask in the light of One above the brightness of the sun.

III. Every one exerts an influence, quiet but real, unconscious but a fact. Every one casts a shadow. The ghost of Banquo no more persistently refuses to down at the bidding of Macbeth than the ghostly shadow of the person or thing on which the sun is falling refuses to disappear. A man may simply stand still in a thoroughfare, he will soon find all eyes upon him, and all excitement about him. Every act, word, look, attitude, is a moral dynamic upon those around us. They are forces with which we are building or destroying. A whisper has often been clothed with the attribute of thunder. Unconsciousness of it is no argument against the fact. Peter was not thinking of the shadow he threw; much less how eagerly the sick sought it. So lasting is the influence that it lingers behind when the living have passed away. He being dead yet speaketh. No man liveth to himself, and no man dieth to himself. How startling the warning to the worker of wickedness, while the good may take its lessons of perpetual encouragement. The evil that men do, and the good, too, lives after them. This is true of great lives; it is equally true of the humblest. The intoning of Niagara can be heard farther away, but the rippling of the rill is just as real and sweeter. Mont Blanc witnesses to Divine power, but not more effectually than the violet tells us of the Divine skill and goodness by its beauty and fragrance. The eagle may soar higher, but the little canary has a sweeter song. As I mark the trivial act of the poor widow dropping her two mites, unconscious that any eye was watching, and then remember what a sermon that lowly act has been preaching to the world from that day to this; then am I ready to express the deep conviction that a shadow of influence beyond conception clings to the most obscure person; and often the humblest act. How this fact shows the dignity and importance of human life, and with what tremendous responsibility it invests it!

IV. The sombre and empty character of some kinds of religion; only a shadow. The shadow is dark and intangible; alas if our religion be only that and nothing more! Pity that any should get but a gloomy, and so a false, impression of religion from the representation we give them. It has been said that every one lives for a funeral; but can we not wait for the funeral till life is over? Must we see it every day? We meet such people, says a writer, every day, and they have always some new distress for us. Their sweetest smile is suggestive of the neuralgia, and their most cordial greeting depresses like an east wind. They go home at night like an undertaker to a funeral, and children cease singing, and wives refrain from smiles. They go abroad in the morning like a Scotch mist from the Highlands, to drizzle discontent in the street and market-place. They enter the house of God to render its songs of praise requiems, and its oil of joy ice water; and their religious light shines before men as heavens sunshine through stained glass, and the priest at the shrine looks like a variegated ghost, and the reverend worshippers like brindled hobgoblins. A croaking raven is the device on their shields–a coffin with cross-bones the blazon on their banner. Surely such a religious spirit and demeanour argue a wrong idea altogether of God and of truth. Peevish, morose, severe, fault-finding and censorious Christians are guilty, though they may not mean it, of dishonouring their Lord arid defaming the Church by the cheat of a shadow. True religion is sweet as the light, joyous as childhood, and benevolent as love. So the Scriptures represent it, and true hearts have ever felt it.

V. The real benevolence and cheer there is, or ought to be, in genuine religion. Peters shadow was eagerly sought by the sick ones or their friends, not because it was a shadow, but because to them it was the symbol of healing and cheer. So on whatever threshold the shadow of a Christian falls, in whatever company he moves, his coming should start a smile of pleasure; a manifest benison should beam in his face. Good-will to men was the cradle song over the Saviour, and it should be perpetuated as an echo in the life of every child of God. Heaven, as represented to us, is all joy, and earth should resemble heaven as far as sin and suffering will allow, by the prevalence of an atmosphere of cheerfulness over it. There are those whose presence is like the ripple of water by the wayside, or the shadow of groves on a hot day like an oasis in a vast sandy desert, or the singing of the nightingale in the darkness. (J. M. McNulty, D. D.)

The healing shadow

Who ever heard of the shadow of a person acting the part of a physician? They had no right to suppose that any good would come of such an extraordinary plan, And they had certainly no right to make Peter cure their friends in their own way, by a device of their own, without consulting him first as to whether it would be agreeable or not. Now the remarkable thing is, though these people were thus ignorant and superstitious, neither God nor Peter found fault with them. They used Peters shadow as a charm, and God made it to them what they wished it to be. Now, why was this? Because of the simplicity of their belief. And does not God often throw His power into the means which we ourselves devise, if we have only childlike faith? Little children come to church with their parents, and they are not always able to understand the meaning of the service. But their attendance is not useless on that account. If they place themselves in their simple faith under the shadow of Gods house, the blessing will assuredly not be wanting. It is not an intellectual knowledge of deep mysteries that God values, but a simple faith in Himself. The shadow of a tree or rock is a very delightful and refreshing thing on a burning summer day. It cools the heated frame, and imparts vigour and strength to the languid body. And if an inanimate thing can do so much good by its shadow, you would expect that the shadow of a human being would be more effectual still. I do not know that the shadow of our bodies would help much to keep off the too hot sun from a friend, but most certainly the shadow or influence of a good character can help others a great deal. We read in the fairy tale of a Peter Schlemihl, the man without a shadow, who frightened everybody else, and was miserable himself. But in real life there is no such thing as a person without a shadow. We have all a shadow to our natures as we have a shadow to our bodies. They say that it was from the shadow thrown by the figure of a girl on a wall, on a sunny day, that the art of drawing a picture was first found out. And so from the shadows which people cast as they pass by on the way of life, we can draw their portraits in our own mind; and these portraits are wonderfully like–much more true to life than the old silhouettes that used to be cut out of black paper. If peoples tempers should cast shadows, what would they be? said a little boy once, as he walked beside a companion, and saw his shadow on the road. Jns shadow would be a fist doubled up, for he is always quarrelling; and Andrews would be that of a dove, for he is always amiable and pleasant; and Janes would be that of a letter X, for she is as cross as two sticks; and my own shadow, what would it be? He stopped short. He was afraid of what kind of shadow his own temper would cast. Now supposing you follow out the little boys idea, and believe what is actually true, that you are throwing off impressions of what you really are all around you, and in fact can no more help doing so than you can prevent your bodies from casting real shadows on the road as you walk along; and each of you should ask himself or herself, What kind of shadow is my temper casting? It might perhaps surprise you to see yourselves as others see you. (H. Macmillan, LL. D.)

Healing and hurting shadows

This record is the indication of a belief that stirred some human souls in old times, and ought to stir them still–a belief that there is something in a shadow cast from one over another, of a deep and potent power; a deed done sometimes the hand has no part in; a word said the tongue never utters; a virtue going out of me, or a vice, apart from my determination; a shadow of my spirit and life cast for good or evil, as certain and inseparable as my shadow on the wall. For instance, there is some mysterious force by which men, the first time we meet them, cast a shadow of light or darkness we cannot account for, and cannot overcome. What these subtle influences are no man has ever told us.

I do not like thee, Dr. Fell;

The reason why I cannot tell;

But–I do not like thee, Dr. Fell,

is the inner and instinctive verdict we pass on some men; probably, also, that some men pass on us. Their shadows hurt us: our shadows hurt them. Foremost of all shadows is the shadow of the home; where, four times in a century, God makes a new earth, and out of which he peoples a new heaven. I have sat bareheaded in the noblest Gothic cathedral on the earth. And for years I sat, in my youth, in a simple country church, joining in the old liturgies that, in one form or another, had been said or sung ever since the Saxon embraced the Christian faith. And once, I remember, I rose in the grey light, and stood alone by Niagara, while the sound of its mighty thunder rose up fresh and pure, unbroken as yet and undefiled by the clamour of those many changers who deserve a whip of not very small cords for profaning that place in which, of all places, the soul longs to be alone with her God. These were sacred places. But the holiest of all, the place whose shadow stretches over forty-five hundred miles of earth and sea, and forty years of time, and is still a shadow of healing, is a little place built of gray stone. There, bending over the picture in the great Bible, or listening to psalm or song or story, the child lived in the shadow of that home; and it became to him as the very gate of heaven, so dear and good, that no great cathedral, no grand scene in nature, no place for worship anywhere, can be what that grey-stone cottage was. I wonder whether we have any deep consciousness of the shadows we are weaving about our children in the home; whether we ever ask ourselves if, in the far future, when we are dead and gone, the shadow our home casts now will stretch over them for bane or blessing. It is possible we are full of anxiety to do our best, and to make our homes sacred to the children. We want them to come up right, to turn out good men and women, to be an honour and praise to the home out of which they sprang. But this is the pity and the danger, that while we may not come short in any real duty of father and mother, we may yet cast no healing and sacramental shadow over the child. I look back with wonder on that old time, and ask myself how it is that most of the things I suppose my father and mother built on especially to mould me to a right manhood are forgotten and lost out of my life. But the tender, unspoken love; the sacrifices made, and never thought of, it was so natural to make them; ten thousand little things, so simple as to attract no notice, and yet so sublime as I look back at them–they fill my heart still and always with tenderness when I remember them, and my eyes with tears. All these things, and all that belong to them, still come over me, and cast the shadow that forty years, many of them lived in a new world, cannot destroy. To make this question clear, if we can, let me open to you a glimpse of some shadows that are being cast in some homes every day, not over children alone, but over men and women also.

1. Here is a man who has been down town all day, in the full tide of care, that from morning till night floods the markets, offices, and streets of all our great cities. Tired, nervous, irritable, possibly a little disheartened, he starts for his home. If it is winter, when he enters there is a bit of bright fire, that makes a bad temper seem like a sin in the contrast; a noise of children that is not dissonant; and an evident care for his comfort, telling, plainer than any words, how constantly he has been in the mind of the house-mother, while breasting the stress and strife of the day; while a low, sweet voice, that excellent thing in woman, greets him with words that ripple over the fevered spirit like cool water. And the man who can nurse a bad temper after that deserves to smart for it. There is no place on the earth, into which a man can go with such perfect assurance that he will feel the shadow of healing, as into such a home as that. It is the very gate of heaven.

2. But I will open another door. Here is a home into which the man goes with the same burden on him. When he enters querulous questions meet him as to whether he has forgotten what he ought never to have been required to remember. Plaintive bewailings are made to him of the sad seventy-seventh disobedience of the children, or the radical depravity of the servants; and a whole platoon-fire of little things is shot at him, so sharp and ill-timed, that they touch the nerve like so many small needles. It is in such things as these that the shadows are cast, that hurt, but never heal: that drive thousands of men out of their homes into any place that will offer a prospect of comfort and peace, even for an hour.

3. But let me not be unfair. The evil shadow may just as certainly come from the man. Here is another man in the mood I have tried to touch. All day long he has fretted at the bit; but society has held him in. He goes home too, but it is to spume out his temper. The very sound of his foot casts a shadow that can hurt, but can never heal. If his wife is silent, he calls her sulky: if she speaks, he snaps her. If his children tome to him with innocent teasings he would give a year of his life some day to bring back again, they are pushed aside, or sent out of the room, or even–God forgive him–are smitten. He eats a moody dinner: takes a cigar; bitter, I hope, and serves him right; takes a book, too–not Charles Lamb or Charles Dickens, I warrant you–and, in one evening, that man has cast a shadow he may pray, some day, in a great agony, may be removed, and not be heard.

4. Then again, what shadows of healing fall, in their turn, from the children! No affliction that can ever come through children ever equals that which comes with their utter absence; while the heaviest affliction to most, the death of the little one, often casts a shadow of healing that could come in no other way. I went one day to see a poor German woman, whose children had all been down with scarlet fever. Four were getting well again; one was dead. And it was very touching to see how the shadow of that dead child had come over the mother, and sent its blessing of healing through all the springs of her life. These are beautiful children, I said.

Oh, yes! but I should have seen the one that died. While he was with her, he was like the rest. But now, when he was gone, he cast the shadow. The little shroud was turned into a white robe, that glistened and shone in the sun of Paradise, so that she was blinded; the broken prattle had filled out into an angel-song; the face shone as the face of an angel; and, all unknown to herself, God had laid her where the shadow of the little one up in heaven could touch her with its healing. And no shadow is so full of healing as that shadow of the child that is always a child in heaven. The most gentle and patient will sometimes feel a touch of irritation at the waywardness of the one that is with us; but no father or mother in this world ever did bring back any sense of such a feeling toward the one Chat is gone. The shadow of healing destroys it for ever. (R. Collyer, D. D.)

Unconscious influence

All things are engaged in writing their history. The plant, the pebble, goes attended by its shadow. The rolling rock leaves its scratches on the mountain; the river, its channel in the soil; the animal, its bones in the stratum; the fern and leaf, their model epitaph in the coal. The falling drop makes its sculpture in the sand or stone. Not a foot steps into the snow or along the ground but prints, in characters more or less lasting, a map of its march. Every act of man inscribes itself on the memory of his fellows, and in his own manners and face. The air is full of sounds, the sky of tokens; the ground is all memoranda and signatures, and every object covered with hints which speak to the intelligent.

Unconscious influence

Here was the apostle who had gone forth purposed to heal men; and one by one as they were brought up he commanded them to stand; and they stood whole. Thus he exerted a conscious and voluntary power. But as he passed along the streets, his shadow fell upon many, and they sprang up behind him, he knowing little or nothing of it; so that his shadow or unconscious influence, also, was working at the same time. Now, all of us have both kinds of influence or power–that which we understand and mean, and that which falls like a shadow, the existence of which we do not understand or recognise.

I. Unconscious influence in a bad sphere. Men may act unconsciously in the production of trouble, far more than they themselves suspect; for their unconscious influence works according to the quality of that which is in them. When men pursue voluntary courses, they often hide the reality, and put forth that which is not real but simulated. Thus, perhaps, one makes himself friendly to a person whom he does not like, for purposes of business. Sometimes men suppress anger because good-nature will carry their purposes better. So that a mans overt and open conduct may not be in the line of nature. But there is an influence derived from that which you actually are.

1. A proud man may carry himself intentionally in such a way that every one he meets is made to feel his inferiority. But a man may tarry himself in such a way that without the slightest intention he shall insult his fellow-men, and make a perpetual aggression upon them. Your pride does not always exert itself according to your will. It has a magnetism of its own. A man may carry in his hand, if he please, a mignonette, and he may carry it because it is sweet. He may also put fetid odours in his clothes. He may hide them, not wishing that others shall know that they are there. But they will make themselves known, whether he wants them to or not. So a man may carry himself in the strong qualities of his nature, wishing well; but if those qualities are harmful in their tendency he will produce mischief in spite of his good intentions.

2. A mans selfishness may act as good conductors of heat do. If you put your hand upon wood it seems relatively warm; and if you put it on iron it seems excessively cold. They are of the same temperature, as measured by the thermometer, only the iron, being a good conductor, has the power of drawing heat rapidly from your hand, while the wood, being a poor conductor, draws it but sparingly. So it is with men. Some men exhaust you, they suck you dry, and you know not what is the matter. A man may have a nature such that when you are in his presence you are perpetually conscious that your sympathy is drawn upon and exhausted. He is a good conductor. His effect upon you is to chill you. And he does not intend any harm. Unconscious selfishness always works in that way. A man may be consciously selfish and not half so offensive as a man whose selfishness is never positively aggressive, but who carries an inward nature that all the while and everywhere draws upon men, making the whole room and house uncomfortable.

3. So combativeness may take on forms which will detract from the happiness of every one. The more obvious forms, bad as they are, probably, if measured by the mischief which they work, would not be found to produce one-half the discomfort of society which arises from the latent forms–what we call ill-nature. It hovers in the air. It is in silence as much as in the short, sharp reply. So men oftentimes fill the circles in which they live with malign influences. They poison the air with suspicion, with envy, with jealousy. A look, a hint, a shrug, may convey the wretched insinuation; or the unconscious atmosphere of jealousy make itself felt.

4. I may mention, also the unconscious wrong which sorrow commits upon those who are about it. Sorrow is not a thing to be controlled altogether; and yet we must exhort men to beware of the extremely selfish tendencies and qualities of sorrow. You have a right, as far as you can, to lean on sympathising friends, and so relieve your sorrow: and men should help the sorrowful; but, after all one has no right to distribute his sorrow. This is true, too, in the matter of ill-health. Invalids are privileged persons; but they should not privilege themselves. Because one is sick he has no right to set aside all laws of love, and disinterestedness, and honour.

5. Mens good qualities even may act unfavourably upon other men. For example, a man may be perfectly upright, and yet carry his conscience in such a way that it is perpetually condemning men. There is a kind of arrogance of goodness. Deliver me from a person who never does wrong–and knows it; from one whose tongue never makes any mistakes–and keeps account of that fact. If there be anything that is provoking to a poor sinner–and most of us are poor sinners–it is one of these perfect people who move about without much temptation–a perpetual rebuke to us all the time–a kind of stinging censure to our infelicities and inferiorities.

II. Unconscious influence in a good sphere. If the predominant faculties are sweet and gracious, then you will carry with you a sweet and gracious atmosphere, so that while you are doing good on purpose, you will be doing more good without purpose. There be men whom we might almost wish to have walk up and down in the street, in order to shed abroad their disposition–unconscious to themselves. There is goodness that means to be good; and there is a great deal of goodness which is better, that comes out from the eye, from the lips, or from the pores–I had almost said from the skin–and that is not conscious of being good. And when one dwells in such a royal bounty of kindness and goodness in himself that his very shadow, falling on men, makes them happy, that unconscious kindness and goodness is wealth indeed. When the train is stopped, the engineer springs from the locomotive and oils the machinery at every point, so that the oil runs in at all the joints. We look at him and at the engine, and admire them. But we never say a word to the oil, or about it. And yet the engine, and what it does, are largely dependant upon the lubrication which the oil brings. Now there are lubricators among men who keep the machinery of society oiled, so as to prevent its joints from wearing, and its journals from heating.

1. Such a man is one who is thoroughly good-natured. Men are as much perceived that carry good-nature in society as spicewood is that carries sweet odours. There is no danger of there being too many men who are not easily irritated, who look on the bright side of things, and who tend to solace–men that you can cushion on, and not touch the hard angles of an exacting, conscientious spirit. It is a great comfort just to look at a man who is good-natured. I remember once riding on a cold night. I was so cold that I almost feared that I should freeze. After awhile I came across a blacksmiths shop. I saw a bright light on the forge. I wanted to get off and warm myself, but I was afraid that I should be so numb that I could not get on again. So I sat and looked at the fire a moment; and then I said: Well, I feel better just for looking at you, and rode on. I have seen persons whose very presence, when the night was dark, and the way was difficult, and all things were freezing, filled you with comfort. There are thousands of times when men want to be thawed out. Men have power enough, but it is frozen; they need sympathy. And there are men who are supplying this element without knowing what they are doing. Many men are shot along the way of encouragement, and made to triumph, by some man who never dreams that he is doing anything for them. It is a good investment to have good-nature, and so much of it that you exhale it, as flowers do their odours; for you do not know who will take the comfort of it.

2. So, too, there is great inspiration in humour and in wit. Among the gifts which have been made to humanity, none in the lower sphere of virtues should call forth our thankfulness more than these. They civilise life. They carry with them a perpetual Blessing.

3. Still more are trust, devotion, humility. We think more of what Christ was, than of what He said or did. He always seems as one with a shining face. None go near Him without feeling the sanctity of His presence. None go near Him without feeling inspired toward good.

4. And so while we do and teach, our best work is that which we perform without knowing it. Silence under provocation is better than doctrine to many and many a man. Fortitude under trouble is a testimony to religion which is far better than a thousand proof-texts. In your boyhood, as you will very well remember, you used to write with invisible ink; and there was nothing for the recipient to do but to take the paper and hold it to the fire, and straightway out came the message. You are writing with invisible letters on thousands of childrens hearts; on the hearts of passers-by; on the hearts of those whom you meet in every circle where you move. (H. W. Beecher.)

Personal influence

I. We all exert some kind of influence. The law of influence every atom has to obey. A bird can neither scatter its songful notes in the air, nor soar in the heavens, without setting in motion pulsations which vibrate through all space. So man is so closely united to his fellows by various ties that he cannot live unto himself. In our social gatherings we meet with some persons around whom there is a kind of atmosphere charged with enkindling and attractive elements; and we meet with others who have a something about them which is dampening and rapelling. As leaven influences the meal, so we in some way affect those with whom we come into contact. Now this influence is–

1. Voluntary. Our Lord declared that the apostles should heal all manner of diseases. In this chapter we have a fulfilment of this prediction. The apostles voluntarily touched the sick and healed them. So, whenever we do anything with an aim, we exert voluntary and conscious influence.

2. Involuntary. The shadow which Peter cast upon the diseased restored them. Unintentionally and unconsciously a curative virtue went out from him. It is this influence which we all possess, an influence which flows from us, and floats about us insensibly

(1) Like our shadow, this involuntary influence is noiseless in its working as the darkness of night, or as the moonbeams which transfigure the sea. But we do not imagine that its power is less because it operates so quietly. The shadow of Peter was heard not, yet it cured the suffering ones by the wayside. Time and sunshine are ever soundless, but are there any forces more omnipotent?

(2) As our shadow is the similitude of our form, so our involuntary influence is the type of our actual self. Good words and deeds do not always spring from a good disposition. Young, in his Night Thoughts, writes scornfully of worldly glory, and yet no man sought for it more eagerly than he did. Voluntary influence does not always indicate what a man really is, but involuntary influence does. How many there are who try to pass for what they are not. But in spite of their mask we feel when in contact with them that they are playing a false part. Our involuntary influence is as much the outcome of our real nature as the scent is the outcome of the plant,s life. It is a something which we cannot imprison–a something that will out. Our unintended influence, then, is the key to the quality of our being.

(3) Our involuntary influence, like our shadow, is ever with us. It is not a mere appendage–a robe of which we can divest ourselves. Voluntary influence is necessarily intermittent, but involuntary influence is incessant. It is co-extensive with our existence. As a pebble when flung into a lake causes ripples to extend over its surface, so as soon as we enter the world we influence it in some degree.

II. The secret of beneficial influence. Christian character. A man may have but little of this worlds goods, and may occupy a lowly sphere; but if he has the Christ-like disposition, his influence, as was the shadow of Peter, will be rife with benediction. On the other hand, a man may possess extensive knowledge, immense wealth, and may move in the highest circles; but unless he has the Christ-like spirit, his treasures and status may fill him with pride; he may use them as instruments in the service of the god of this world, and render his influence as deadly as a pestilence. Or, prompted by some selfish motives, he may devote them very largely to benevolent purposes; but, lacking the true spirit, he produces in our minds a feeling of his hollowness and insincerity. If such an one would really benefit his fellows his heart must be renewed. Spirituality of character alone will give weight and value to riches, learning and position, when used in the service of Christ. If our voluntary influence is to be good, our involuntary influence must be good, and if our involuntary influence is to be good we must be right at the core. We must be quickened ere we can quicken. We must be recipients of the Divine ere we can be its distributors. Lord Peter-borough said of Fenelon: He is a delicious creature; I was forced to get away from him as fast as I could, else he would have made me pious. Thus our influence will be a wondrous force for good in proportion to the holiness of our life.

III. A few reasons which should urge us to exert a beneficial influence.

1. Because of our responsibility. We are as responsible for the influence which our character pours out apart from our own will, as we are for the influence of the words we intentionally utter, and the deeds we intentionally perform. Surely, then, it should be our supreme effort to model our character according to the Divine plans. We should see to it that our foundation and materials are such as shall endure the fire-tests of the Judgment.

2. Because we owe so much to such influence. The good that men do is not interred with their bones. What would have been the character of our laws, literature, art, commerce, and morals, apart from the influence of those whose footfalls are no longer heard on earth! Do not sceptics and infidels owe their best privileges to the influence of those who were animated by the faith which they reject!

3. Because it will be a source of infinite joy. It will cause joy to well up in the heart now–a joy which springs from the sense of duty done, from a quiet conscience, from making others happy and noble. But who can depict the joy to which it will give rise in the future?

4. Because it is the will of Christ. Let your light so shine, etc. (E. H. Palmer.)

The mysterious power of a man filled with the Holy Ghost

1. He repels the wicked (verse 13), and attracts the good.

2. He is the torment of unclean spirits (verse 16), but gives rest to the weary and heavy-laden (verse 18).

3. To the enemies of truth He is as the savour of death unto death–Ananias and Sapphira; the priests and elders–and to souls desiring salvation, a savour of life unto life–the sick, and those who were added to the Church. (K. Gerok.)

Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell

Verse 15. Insomuch that they brought forth the sick] This verse is a continuation of the subject begun in the 12th. Ac 5:12 The following is the order in which all these verses should be read, from the 11th to the 15th. Ac 5:11-15

Verse 11. And great fear came upon all the Church, and upon as many as heard these things.

Verse 13. And of the rest durst no man join himself to them; but the people magnified them:

Verse 14. And believers were the more added to the Lord, both men and women.

Verse 12. (last clause.) And they were all with one accord in Solomon’s porch.

Verse 12. (first clause.) And by the hands of the apostles were many signs and wonders wrought among the people;

Verse 15. Insomuch that they brought forth the sick into the streets, and laid them on beds and couches, c., c.

How these different verses and clauses of verses, got so intermingled and confounded as they are now in our common text, I cannot tell but the above will appear at once to be the natural order in which they should be placed.

That – the shadow of Peter passing by] I cannot see all the miraculous influence here that others profess to see. The people who had seen the miracles wrought by the apostles pressed with their sick to share the healing benefit: as there must have been many diseased people, it is not likely that the apostles, who generally addressed such persons, prayed and used imposition of hands, could reach all those that were brought to them, as fast as the solicitude of their friends could wish. As, therefore, they could not get Peter or the other apostles, personally, to all their sick, they thought if they placed them on that side of the way where the shadow was projected, (the sun probably now declining, and consequently the shadow lengthening,) they should be healed by the shadow of the man passing over them, in whose person such miraculous powers were lodged. But it does not appear that the persons who thus thought and acted were of the number of those converts already made to the faith of Christ nor does it appear that any person was healed in this way. The sacred penman simply relates the impression made on the people’s minds; and how they acted in consequence of this impression. A popish writer, assuming that the shadow of Peter actually cured all on which it was projected, argues from this precarious principle in favour of the wonderful efficacy of relics! For, says he, “if the shadow of a saint can do so much, how much more may his bones, or any thing that was in contact with his person, perform!” Now, before this conclusion can be valid, it must be proved:

1. That the shadow of Peter did actually cure the sick;

2. That this was a virtue common to all the apostles;

3. That all eminent saints possess the same virtue;

4. That the bones, c., of the dead, possess the same virtue with the shadow of the living

5. That those whom they term saints were actually such;

6. That miracles of healing have been wrought by their relics;

7. That touching these relics as necessarily produces the miraculous healing as they suppose the shadow of Peter to have done.

I think there is not sufficient evidence here that Peter’s shadow healed any one, though the people thought it could; but, allowing that it did, no evidence can be drawn from this that any virtue is resident in the relics of reputed or real saints, by which miraculous influence may be conveyed. It was only in rare cases that God enabled even an apostle to work a miracle.

After the words, might overshadow some of them, the Vulgate adds, et liberarentur ab infirmitatibus suis; a Greek MS. (E) has nearly the same words, , and that they might be freed from all the infirmities which they had: a few other MSS. agree in the main with this reading.

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

Into the streets; into every street generally taken, it being a common practice where they came, and not in one street only. These weak and unlikely means did more show the power to be of God, and was the greater confirmation to the truth of the gospel; and this was fulfilled what our Saviour had promised to the apostles, and such as should believe in him, Joh 14:12, that they should do greater works than he did.

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole

15. into the streets“inevery street.”

on beds and couchesThewords denote the softer couches of the rich and the meaner cribs ofthe poor [BENGEL].

shadow of Peter . . . mightovershadow some of themCompare Act 19:12;Luk 8:46. So Elisha. Now thepredicted greatness of Peter (Mt16:18), as the directing spirit of the early Church, was at itsheight.

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

Insomuch that they brought forth the sick into the streets,…. These words are to be read in connection with the former part of the twelfth verse. Such miraculous cures being wrought by the apostles, the people who had sick persons in their houses, hearing of it brought them out; either “into the streets”, as we render it, and as the Alexandrian copy reads; or “in every street” in Jerusalem, waiting for the apostles as they came, to receive a cure from them:

and laid them on beds and couches; for the better conveniency of carrying them to the apostles, or for their lying upon them until they came by that way:

that at the least, the shadow of Peter passing by, might overshadow some of them. The Vulgate Latin version adds, “and be delivered from their infirmities”; but this is not supported by any copy, nor is it in any other version. Peter is only mentioned because he was most known, he being the chief speaker and actor. Who these were that fancied there was such a virtue in Peter’s shadow, and whether any were cured by it, is not certain. However, it is a vain thing in the Papists to conclude from hence the primacy of Peter, the worshipping of images, and that the Pope is Peter’s shadow, and has his power.

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

Insomuch that (). With the present infinitive and , regular Greek idiom for result.

Into the streets ( ). Supply (ways), into the broad ways.

On beds and couches ( ). Little beds ( diminutive of ) and camp beds or pallets (see on Mark 2:4; Mark 2:9; Mark 2:11).

As Peter came by ( ). Genitive absolute with present middle participle.

At the least his shadow might overshadow ( ). Future active indicative with (common with in ancient Greek) and (crasis for =even if), even if only the shadow. The word for shadow (, like our “sky”) is repeated in the verb and preserved in our “overshadow.” There was, of course, no virtue or power in Peter’s shadow. That was faith with superstition, of course, just as similar cases in the Gospels occur (Matt 9:20; Mark 6:56; John 9:5) and the use of Paul’s handkerchief (Ac 19:12). God honours even superstitious faith if it is real faith in him. Few people are wholly devoid of superstition.

Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament

Couches [] . See on Mr 2:4.

The shadow of Peter passing by. But the proper rendering is, as Peter passed by, his shadow might, etc. 13

Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament

1) “Insomuch that,” (hoste kai) “So that even,” to the extent that even or also – – This returns to the parenthetical interruption of Act 5:12, where the report of apostolic signs and wonders was being given, and is now, here continued.

2) “They brought forth the sick into the streets,” (eis tas plateias ekpherein tous astheneis) “They went into the streets, (into every street) to bring out the ailing, sick, or afflicted,” the “they” refers to the masses of people of the city of Jerusalem, for the empowered church was obeying God in being witness to Jesus first “in Jerusalem,” Luk 24:49; Act 1:8.

3) “And laid them on beds and couches,” (kai tithenak epi klinarion kai krabaton) “Even to put (them) upon pallets and mattresses,” much as the lame man at the gate beautiful was brought and laid helplessly thereto ask alms the day Peter and John were used to heal him, Act 3:1-11; And as the palsied was brought to Jesus, Mar 2:1-12.

4) “That at least the shadow of Peter passing by,” (hina erchomenou Petrou kan skia) “in order that even the shadow of Peter passing by,” or influence of his power as he passed by. There is no evidence that such were healed, but at least it indicates that Peter was God’s healing instrument of the moment, Mat 14:36.

5) “Might overshadow,” (episkiase) “Might overshadow or pass over,” to touch, contact or make them whole in some supernatural manner, much as the unclean woman was made whole, when by faith she touched Jesus, Mat 14:35-36; Mar 5:25-34.

6) “Some of them,” (tini auton) “Some of them,” hospital-type patients, the afflicted of many orders, types of diseases, even as Jesus had done, Mat 4:23-24; Mar 1:32-34.

Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary

15. The shadow of Peter, as he came. The Papists abuse this text, [as a pretexts] not only to the end they may commend reigned miracles, which they say are done at the graves of martyrs, but also that they may boast of their relics. Why (say they) shall not the grave, or garment, the touching of the bones of Peter, have power to heal, as well as his shadow had this power? I answer, we must not by and by think that that is right which Luke saith was done by ignorant men, and those which knew not the pure faith. Yet we have a more certain answer in readiness than this. For the apostles were endued with such power for this cause, because they were ministers of the gospel. Therefore they used this gift, inasmuch as it served to further the credit of the gospel; yea, God did no less show forth his power in their shadow than in their mouth. Those miracles whereof the Papists babble are so unlike to these, that they are rather altogether contrary. For this is the end of their miracles, to lead away the world from Christ unto saints.

Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary

(15) Insomuch that they brought forth the sick . . .The tense implies habitual action. For some days or weeks the sick were laid all along the streetsthe broad open streets, as distinct from the lanes and alleys (see Note on Mat. 6:5)by which the Apostle went to and fro between his home and the Temple.

That at the least the shadow of Peter . . . .It is implied in the next verse that the hope was not disappointed. Assuming that miracles are possible, and that the narratives of the Gospels indicate generally the laws that govern them, there is nothing in the present narrative that is not in harmony with those laws. Christ healed sometimes directly by a word, without contact of any kind (Mat. 8:13; Joh. 4:52); sometimes through material mediathe fringe of His garment (Mat. 9:20), or the clay smeared over the blind mans eyes (Joh. 9:5) becoming channels through which the healing virtue passed. All that was wanted was the expectation of an intense faith, as the subjective condition on the one side, the presence of an objective supernatural power on the other, and any medium upon which the imagination might happen to fix itself as a help to faith. So afterwards the hand, kerchiefs and aprons from St. Pauls skin do what the shadow of St. Peter does here (Act. 19:12). In the use of oil, as in Mar. 6:13, Jas. 5:14, we find a medium employed which had in itself a healing power, with which the prayer of faith was to co-operate.

On the beds and couches, see Note on Mar. 2:4. The couches were the more portable pallets or mattresses of the poor.

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

15. Insomuch that What is now stated, the bringing vast numbers to be healed, was the consequence of all that is narrated in the last three verses; namely, the miraculous deeds, the awe and love of the people, and the increased number of believers.

Beds and couches Beds and pallets or mats.

Shadow Mentioned as showing the enthusiastic, perhaps superstitious, faith of the people, not as affirming that miracles resulted from Peter’s shadow. But see note Act 8:24.

Upon this passage, Act 5:11-16, a variety of interpretations have been given; but without discussing them we give our own, which differs slightly, especially in Act 5:13, from all others. Dr. Clarke thinks the order of the verses deranged and gives a rearrangement. So great a liberty with the text is inadmissible, and, so far as we can see, wholly unnecessary.

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

Act 5:15. That at least the shadow, &c. The efficacy of St. Peter’s shadow in curing distempers, is so far from being natural, or likely to enter into the minds of any, that nothing but the force of truth could have rendered it credible; and it must have been experience which first gave the idea of it. For the sick being exposed in the streets where the apostles passed, that they might receive from them a cure by their prayers and the imposition of hands, they found that the shadow of Peter had the sacred power; and this unlooked-for experiment became afterwards a means of their faith and expectation.

Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke

15 Insomuch that they brought forth the sick into the streets, and laid them on beds and couches, that at the least the shadow of Peter passing by might overshadow some of them.

Ver. 15. The shadow of Peter passing by ] Upon these stupendous miracles, as upon so many eagles’ (or rather angels’) wings, was the gospel carried abroad the world then. And the establishing of the Reformation begun lately by Luther, &c., to be done by so weak and simple means, yea, by casual and cross means, against the force of so potent and political an adversary as the pope, is that miracle which we are in these times to look for.

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)

15. ] now takes up afresh the main subject of Act 5:12-13 , the glorification of the apostolic office, insomuch, that . It is connected not only with . . , but also with Act 5:12 .

. ] down the streets , i.e. in the line of the streets , see Winer, edn. 6, 49, d.

. . .] Kuinoel’s distinction, that the latter is a poor and humble bed, the former a couch of richer character, appears to be unfounded. (So also Bengel.)

] As the greatest, in pre-eminence and spiritual energizing, of the Apostles. Now especially was fulfilled to him the promise of Mat 16:18 (see note there): and even the shadow of the Rock (Isa 32:2 , Heb., and E.V., spoken primarily of His divine Master) was sought for. We need find no stumbling-block in the fact of Peter’s shadow having been believed to be the medium (or, as is surely implied, having been the medium) of working miracles. Cannot the ‘Creator Spirit’ work with any instruments, or with none, as pleases Him? And what is a hand or a voice, more than a shadow, except that the analogy of the ordinary instrument is a greater help to faith in the recipient? Where faith, as apparently here, did not need this help, the less likely medium was adopted.

See, on the whole, ch. Act 19:12 , and note: and remark that only in the case of our Lord (Luk 8:46 [39] ) and His two great Apostles in the N. T., and of Elisha in the O. T., have we instances of this healing virtue in the mere contact with or accessories of the person . But what a fertile harvest of superstition and imposture has been made to spring out of these scanty examples!

[39] When, in the Gospels, and in the Evangelic statement, 1Co 11:23-25 , the sign () occurs in a reference, it is signified that the word occurs in the parallel place in the other Gospels, which will always be found indicated at the head of the note on the paragraph. When the sign () is qualified , thus, ‘ Mk.,’ or ‘ Mt. Mk.,’ &c., it is signified that the word occurs in the parallel place in that Gospel or Gospels, but not in the other or others .

Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament

Act 5:15 . , “insomuch that they even,” R.V. , T.R., so Alford, Meyer, “all down the streets,” as if the streets were entirely beset with sick folk (see Holtzmann, in loco ). , feminine of the adjective , sc. , , a broad way, so here, the open streets, in classical Greek, and frequently in LXX, chiefly for Hebrew, , Tob 13:17 , Jdt 1:14 ; Jdt 7:14 ; Jdt 7:22 , 1Ma 1:55 ; Mal 2:9Mal 2:9 , 3Ma 1:18 , used by St. Luke three times in his Gospel, Act 10:10 , Act 13:26 , Act 14:21 , but only here in Acts, see below on Act 9:11 . For read , which is found only here in N.T., not at all in LXX, and very rarely in other Greek authors, Aristoph., Frag. , 33, d, and Arrian, Epict. Diss. , iii., 5, 13, where it is used for the couch of a sick person; Artem., Oneir. , ii., 57. As Dr. Hobart points out, St. Luke employs no less than four different words for the beds of the sick, two in common with the other Evangelists, viz. , (not in John), and (not in Matthew). But two are peculiar to him, viz. , (Luk 5:19 ; Luk 5:24 ), and only here. Neither word is found in the LXX, but , although rare elsewhere, is used in Artem., also in Plutarch, and Dion. Hal. ( Antiq. Rom. , vii. 68), for a litter for carrying the sick, Hobart, Medical Language , etc., pp. 116, 117. Dr. Kennedy sees in an instance of rare words used by the comic poets, especially Aristophanes, found also in the N.T., and almost nowhere else, and hence a proof of the “colloquial” language of the N.T. writers ( Sources of N. T. Greek , pp. 76 79). But the fact remains that the word in question is found only in St. Luke, and that both it and were employed for the couch of a sick person. , genitive absolute, “as Peter came by,” R.V. (very frequent in Luke), it does not mean, as Felten admits, that none of the other Apostles possessed such powers. = even if it were only his shadow, “at the least his shadow,” R.V., cf. Mar 5:28 ; Mar 6:56 , 2Co 11:16 ; the usage is not unclassical, Soph., Elect. , 1483; Simcox, Language of the N. T. , p. 170; Viteau, Le Grec du N. T. , p. 118 (1893). with dative, Luk 1:35 , Mar 9:7 ; [171] so W.H [172] , future indicative , a construction common with in classical Greek (Page); for other examples of the future indicative with see Viteau, Le Grec du N. T. , p. 81 (1893), of which several are found in the N.T., although not in classical Greek; cf. Luk 14:10 ; Luk 20:10 , 1Co 9:18 , 1Pe 3:1 , Act 21:24 , W.H [173] ; Joh 7:3 , Gal 2:4 , etc.; Burton, u. s. , p. 86. Undoubtedly this action of the people showed the lively power of their faith (Chrys., Theod., Aug [174] ), but the further question arises in spite of the severe strictures of Zeller, Overbeck, Holtzmann, as to how far the narrative indicates that the shadow of Peter actually produced the healing effects. Act 5:16 shows that the sick folk were all healed, but Zckler maintains that there is nothing to show that St. Luke endorses the enthusiastic superstition of the people (so J. Lightfoot, Nsgen, Lechler, Rendall). On the other hand we may compare Mat 9:20 , Mar 6:56 , Joh 9:5 , Act 19:12 ; and Baumgarten’s comment should be considered that, although it is not actually said that a miraculous power went forth from Peter’s shadow, it is a question why, if no such power is implied, the words should be introduced at all into a narrative which evidently purports to note the extraordinary powers of the Apostles. The parallels just instanced from the Gospels could, of course, have no weight with critics who can only see in such comparisons a proof that the Acts cannot rise above the superstitious level of the Gospels, or who start like Renan with “an absolute rule of criticism,” viz. , the denial of a place in history to all miraculous narratives. [175] adds . . .: but even here, as Blass says, Luke does not distinctly assert that cures were wrought by the shadow of Peter, although there is no reason to deny that the Evangelist had this in mind, since he does not hesitate to refer the same miraculous powers to St. Paul. Hilgenfeld refers Act 5:14-16 to his “author to Theophilus,” and sees in the expressions used in Act 5:16 a reminiscence of Luk 6:17 .

[171] Codex Vaticanus (sc. iv.), published in photographic facsimile in 1889 under the care of the Abbate Cozza-Luzi.

[172] Westcott and Hort’s The New Testament in Greek: Critical Text and Notes.

[173] Westcott and Hort’s The New Testament in Greek: Critical Text and Notes.

[174] Augustine.

[175] R(omana), in Blass, a first rough copy of St. Luke.

Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson

Insomuch that = So that. This depends upon the first clause of Act 5:1, Act 5:2, all that intervenes being in a parenthesis.

sick. See note on Joh 11:1.

into = along.

on = upon. App-104.

couches. Greek. krabbatos. See note on Mar 2:4.

that = in order that. Greek. hina.

at the least = even if (it might be).

overshadow. Greek. episkiazo. See note on Luk 9:34.

some = some one. App-123.

Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics

15.] now takes up afresh the main subject of Act 5:12-13, the glorification of the apostolic office, insomuch, that. It is connected not only with . ., but also with Act 5:12.

.] down the streets, i.e. in the line of the streets,-see Winer, edn. 6, 49, d.

. . .] Kuinoels distinction, that the latter is a poor and humble bed, the former a couch of richer character, appears to be unfounded. (So also Bengel.)

] As the greatest, in pre-eminence and spiritual energizing, of the Apostles. Now especially was fulfilled to him the promise of Mat 16:18 (see note there):-and even the shadow of the Rock (Isa 32:2, Heb., and E.V., spoken primarily of His divine Master) was sought for. We need find no stumbling-block in the fact of Peters shadow having been believed to be the medium (or, as is surely implied, having been the medium) of working miracles. Cannot the Creator Spirit work with any instruments, or with none, as pleases Him? And what is a hand or a voice, more than a shadow, except that the analogy of the ordinary instrument is a greater help to faith in the recipient? Where faith, as apparently here, did not need this help, the less likely medium was adopted.

See, on the whole, ch. Act 19:12, and note: and remark that only in the case of our Lord (Luk 8:46 [39]) and His two great Apostles in the N. T.,-and of Elisha in the O. T., have we instances of this healing virtue in the mere contact with or accessories of the person. But what a fertile harvest of superstition and imposture has been made to spring out of these scanty examples!

[39] When, in the Gospels, and in the Evangelic statement, 1Co 11:23-25, the sign () occurs in a reference, it is signified that the word occurs in the parallel place in the other Gospels, which will always be found indicated at the head of the note on the paragraph. When the sign () is qualified, thus, Mk., or Mt. Mk., &c., it is signified that the word occurs in the parallel place in that Gospel or Gospels, but not in the other or others.

Fuente: The Greek Testament

Act 5:15. , insomuch that) This depends on Act 5:12, at the beginning [And they were all-women, in Act 5:14, being a parenthesis].- , into, or along the streets) [secundum plateas]. The preposition has a distributive sense without the article, Act 5:42, , house by house: not with the article, ch. Act 8:3, Entering into the houses, .- ) A couch, , is more costly: a pallet, , more humble.-, of Peter) He, who had denied Jesus, was now the more on that account conspicuous in faith.-, of them) See the App. Crit., Ed ii., on this passage, as to the addition, and they were delivered from their infirmity.[41] The force of this clause is virtually contained in verses 12 and 16.

[41] Ee add . D has : d somewhat similar. Lucif. 201 has et liberabantur ab infirmitate su: and so the oldest MS. of Vulg., viz. Amiat., also others, inserting omnes.-E. and T.

[16. , round about) The success of the Gospel cause advances continually to greater distances and more widely.-V. g.]-, all) There was now no , failure, no abortive attempt to work miracles, as before: Mat 17:16, The man having the lunatic son, I brought him to Thy disciples, and they could not cure him.

Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament

they brought: Act 19:11, Act 19:12, Mat 9:21, Mat 14:36, Joh 14:12

into the streets: or, in every street

Reciprocal: 2Ki 13:21 – touched Ecc 3:3 – a time to heal Mat 4:23 – healing Mat 8:16 – they brought Mat 9:20 – touched Mat 15:30 – great Mar 3:10 – pressed Mar 5:27 – touched Mar 6:56 – they laid Mar 16:18 – they shall lay Luk 4:40 – and he Luk 6:19 – sought Luk 8:44 – touched Luk 9:6 – General Act 2:43 – many Act 4:30 – and that Act 28:9 – others 1Co 12:9 – the gifts

Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge

5

Act 5:15. Insomuch should be connected with the statement in verse 12, about the “signs and wonders” that were performed by the apostles. Those wonders had produced so much interest among the people that they began to bring their sick folks into the vicinity. They had so much faith in the work of the apostles that even the presence of Peter was thought by them to be sufficient to heal them. Such an act was like those performed by the woman. in Mar 5:27, and the men in Mat 14:36.

Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary

Act 5:15. Into the streets. Those between the apostles house and the Temple. The whole scene of growing admiration and respect for the persons of these brave and earnest teachers, who enforced their burning words with such mighty loving acts, reminds us of a still greater enthusiasm excited by the Master of Peter and his companions (see Mar 2:1-2; Mar 6:55-56).

The shadow of Peter. Peter especially is mentioned as the greatest and foremost of the apostles in all work and preaching in those early days. At this period there is certainly no doubt but that this apostle, both in reality and also in the popular estimation, was the acknowledged chief of the community of believers in Jesus.

On the much-disputed question respecting the efficacy of the shadow of Peter falling upon the sick, two points must not be lost sight of(1) the reality of the miracles wrought at this juncture of the Churchs history; (2) the great number of the miraculous cures which were just then worked; for we read how from the city the sick were brought from their houses and laid on beds and couches: and from the cities round about Jerusalem a multitude came, bringing sick folks; and they were healed, every one. Occurring as it does in the midst of this matter-of-fact relation of a number of cures performed on the persons of the sick of the city and the neighbouring towns, the statement respecting the effect of the shadow of Peter must not be watered down by an attempt to explain it as an accident existing only in the opinion of the people, or by a suggestion that the author of the Acts makes no assertion whatever respecting the effect of the shadow falling on the sick. (See Meyer, Lange, and Gloag.) The writers plain statement is, that some at least of these miraculous cures were effected by Peters shadow falling upon them as, fervently trusting to be healed, they lay waiting his passing by. Instances of this special form of miracle, where the healing virtue appears to exist in the person, independent of all instruments, are very rare; in the Old Testament, the case of the prophet Elisha stands by itself. In the New Testament, our Lord (Luk 8:46), St. Peter in this passage, St. Paul (Act 19:12), where the miracles in question are designated as , the rarest or special alone seem to have exercised this peculiar power. Dean Alford has an admirable note here: In this and similar narratives (Act 19:12), Christian faith finds no difficulty whatever. All miraculous working is an exertion of the direct power of the All-powerfula suspension by Him of His ordinary laws; and whether He will use any instrument in doing this, or what instrument, must depend altogether on His own purpose in the miraclethe effect to be produced on the recipients, beholders, or hearers. Without His special selection and enabling, all instruments were vain; with them, all are capable. What is a hand or a voice more than a shadow, except that the analogy of the ordinary instrument is a greater help to faith in the recipient? When faith, as apparently here, did not need this help, the less likely medium was adopted. In this case at Jerusalem, as later with St. Paul at Ephesus, it was His purpose to exalt His apostle as the herald of His Gospel, and to lay in Jerusalem the strong foundation of His Church; and He therefore endues him with this extraordinary power.

Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament

Act 5:15-16. Insomuch, or so that, they brought the sick into the streets, &c. The contents of this and the following verse are evidently connected with the former part of Act 5:12; the intermediate paragraph being intended to be read in a parenthesis. They brought the sick into the streets, because, as is probable, the priests would not suffer them to bring them into the temple to Solomons porch; and the apostles had not leisure to come to the houses of them all. And they laid them on beds and couches Because they were so weak that they could neither walk nor stand, and in order that, if they could neither have access to Peter, nor he come to them, at least the shadow of him passing by might overshadow some of them Though it could not reach them all, and they had faith to believe this would be the means of healing them. And it is probable that they were not disappointed, but that some, at least, were thus healed, as the woman mentioned in the gospel was, by touching Christs garment. According to their faith it was done unto them. And in this, among other things, the promise of Christ, (Joh 14:12,) The works that I do, shall ye also do, and greater works than these, &c., was eminently fulfilled. And if such miracles were wrought by Peters shadow, we have reason to think some were wrought in some such way by the other apostles; as by the handkerchiefs from Pauls body, Act 19:12. And there came a multitude out of the cities In proportion as the fame of these wonderful works was spread abroad; bringing sick folks That were afflicted in body; and those vexed with unclean spirits Who were troubled in mind; and they were healed every one Distempered bodies and distempered minds were both cured. Thus opportunity was given to the apostles, both of convincing peoples judgments, by those miracles, of the heavenly origin of the doctrine they preached, and also of engaging peoples affections both to them and it, by giving them specimens of its manifest beneficial tendency.

Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments

15, 16. The connection of Luke’s next statement, introduced by the adverb so that, is somewhat obscure: but I presume he intends to state a result of all the facts just mentioned. Signs and wonders were done by the apostles; the people magnified them, and believers were the more added to the Lord. (15) “So that they brought forth the sick into the streets, and laid them on beds and couches, that at least the shadow of Peter passing by might overshadow some of them. (16) There came also a multitude out of the cities round about to Jerusalem, bringing the sick and those vexed by unclean spirits, who were all healed.”

Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)

DIVINE HEALING

15, 16. While the revival tide is inundating Jerusalem and rolling into the surrounding country like an ever-widening sea, we see as in all ages a corresponding prominence given to divine healing and a multitude of the cities around Jerusalem came together, bringing their sick and those tormented by unclean spirits, who all continued to get healed. Bodily healing is the legitimate overflow and outgrowth of the spiritual life.

He that raised up Christ Jesus from the dead will also quicken your mortal bodies by his Spirit dwelling in you (Rom 8:11).

Divine healing is normally for those who are filled with the Holy Ghost, who is always ready to repair any dilapidation of His own house, that it may be competent to answer the purposes of His occupancy, becoming His efficient instrument in His labors of love through our mortal instrumentality. Though we are very diligent to repair the houses in which we live, perpetuating their adaptations to the enterprises of our Occupancy, yet the time comes when it is no longer expedient to repair the breaches in the old house. In that case we desist from any further repairs, take it down and build a new one. Divine healing only reaches the body in this life in an earnest of the glory that awaits us when this mortal shall put on immortality in the transfiguration, received either by translation, as Enoch and Elijah, and all of the saints at the rapture, or in the resurrection, as final and complete bodily healing must eliminate mortality, which is the very element of physical ailment and death. The doctrine of divine healing, so prominent in the New Testament and practical in the Apostolic ministry, is especially valuable as a tributary to the spiritual life, furnishing a powerful incentive to all to be filled with the Holy Ghost, and to keep filled, receiving perpetually an increasing enduement of the blessed indwelling Comforter, who, pursuant to our perfect submission, obedience and humble faith, will keep His own tenement in good repair, adapted to the work He has given us to do, pouring on us a thousand blessings through our surviving physical infirmities, preparing us for translation when our Lord descends.

Fuente: William Godbey’s Commentary on the New Testament

Peter’s powerful influence reminds us of Jesus’ influence during the early days of His Galilean ministry when all Capernaum gathered at His door (Mar 1:32-34). Elsewhere Luke described the power of God’s presence overshadowing someone (cf. Luk 1:35; Luk 9:34). The text does not say that Peter’s shadow healed people. It says that people wanted to get close to Peter because he was so powerful. [Note: See Barrett, pp. 276-77.] Even today some people superstitiously believe that a person’s shadow carries his power. Some parents have pulled their children away from the shadow of a wicked person and thrust them into the shadow of an honored individual. The action of these first century Near Easterners shows their respect for Peter who had the power to heal. These signs and wonders authenticated the apostles as Jesus and God’s representatives (cf. Act 19:11-12; Mat 10:8).

"I have often told how my oldest son at one time had an eclipse of faith until one day several of us were invited to spend an afternoon with William Jennings Bryan in his Florida home, and I was asked to bring my son. During that visit, for two or three hours we discussed the Word of God and exchanged thoughts on precious portions of Scripture. The young man sat apart and said very little, but as we left that place he turned to me and exclaimed, ’Father, I have been a fool! I thought I couldn’t believe the Bible, but if a man like that with his education and intelligence can believe, I am making a fool of myself to pretend I cannot accept it.’ So much for the shadow ministry of William Jennings Bryan." [Note: Ironside, Lectures on . . ., p. 136.]

Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)