Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Acts 5:2
And kept back [part] of the price, his wife also being privy [to it,] and brought a certain part, and laid [it] at the apostles’ feet.
2. and kept back part of the price ] i.e. while at the same time they professed to be bringing the whole sum into the common fund. The portion which was kept back was probably not large, for otherwise the general sense of the value of the land would have made it conspicuous. The word translated “kept back” is the same which is rendered Tit 2:10 purloining, and in classical Greek it has frequently the meaning to rob.
his wife also being privy to it ] This is mentioned to shew that the offence was an aggravated one, and had not been committed without deliberation and set purpose. She was a willing accomplice in the intended fraud.
and brought a certain part, and laid it at the apostles’ feet ] Thus professing equal devotion with all the others who were making sacrifices for the cause of the faith. We are not told what they hoped to gain by their act, whether in reputation among the people (Act 2:47), or, by giving what was supposed to be their whole estate (which may be implied in the vague word possession), to procure for themselves in perpetuity a maintenance from the common funds. The former ambition was most probably what led to their offence. They thought more of the display made at the Apostles’ feet than of the offence before God’s eyes. And we know from St Peter’s Epistle (2Pe 2:3) that it was soon foretold that men would arise in the Christian community, who “through covetousness would with feigned words make merchandise of” the society, and at a later date (Judges 11), these men are described as those who run “greedily after the error of Balaam for reward.” We may therefore be convinced that in the example of Ananias we have a typical instance of the kind of offence into which at this time the Christian community was in danger of being tempted.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
And kept back – The word used here means properly to separate, to part: and then it means to separate surreptitiously or clandestinely for our own use a part of public property, as taxes, etc. It is used but three times in the New Testament, Act 5:3, and in Tit 2:10, where it is rendered purloining. Here it means that they secretly kept back a part, while professedly devoting all to God.
His wife also being privy to it – His wife knowing it, and evidently concurring in it.
And laid it at the apostles feet – This was evidently an act professedly of devoting all to God. Compare Act 4:37; also Act 5:8-9. That this was his profession, or pretence, is further implied in the fact that Peter charges him with having lied unto God, Act 5:3-4.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Act 5:2
And kept back part of the price.
The sin of pretence and its punishment
They desired to have all the credit the Church would give them for acting as generously as Barnabas did, and yet, while getting credit for unselfish and unstinting liberality, to be able to enjoy in private somewhat of that which they were believed to have surrendered. And their calculations were terribly disappointed. They tried to play the hypocrites part on most dangerous ground, just when the Divine spirit of purity, sincerity, and truth had been abundantly poured out, and when the spirit of deceit and hypocrisy was therefore at once recognised. It was with the apostles and their spiritual natures then as it is with ourselves and our physical natures still. When we are living in a crowded city we notice not strange scents and ill odours and foul gases; our senses are dulled, and our perceptive powers are rendered obtuse because the whole atmosphere is a tainted one. But when we dwell in the pure air of the country, and the glorious breezes from mountain and moor blow round us fresh and free, then we detect at once, and at a long distance, the slightest ill odour or the least trace of offensive gas. The outpoured presence of the Spirit, and the abounding love which was produced thereby, quickened the perception of St. Peter. He recognised the hypocrisy, characterised the sin of Ananias as a lie against the Holy Ghost; and then the Spirit and Giver of life, seconding and supporting the words of St. Peter, withdrew His support from the human frame of the sinner, and Ananias ceased to live, just as Sapphira, his partner in deceit, ceased to live a few hours later. It may well have been that this incident was inserted in this typical Church history to correct a false idea which would otherwise have grown up. The apostles and their followers were now realising their freedom in the spirit; and some were inclined to run into licentiousness as the result of that freedom. They were realising, too, their relationship to God as one of pure filial love, and they were in great danger of forgetting that God was a God of justice and judgment as well, till this stern dispensation recalled them to a sense of the fact that eternal love is also eternal purity and eternal truth, and will by no means clear the guilty. (G. T. Stokes, D. D.)
The nature of the sin
That it was simply the sin of lying, is impossible to believe. He who calmly told them of their instant fate had himself lied most foully, and been forgiven. It is more plausible to maintain that their sin was something far worse than mere falsehood–that it was hypocrisy of the lowest type–that they could not endure to lack the praise of the noblest Christian conduct, or to make the necessary sacrifices–that they schemed to be considered the best, whilst they were, and knew that they were, very far below the best. All this is true and terrible, but does not satisfy us as an explanation of their awful end. I venture to suggest that Ananias and Sapphira suffered the extreme penalty, not as sinners, but as criminals; not in revenge for a flagrant insult offered to the Almighty, but as the due reward for a frightful wrong inflicted upon their fellowmen; not to accentuate the hideousness of a sin (for which purpose it had been unneeded and ineffective), but to mark the enormity of a crime which blasted the fairest prospect ever opened before the sons of men. It seems to me that they suffered death just as the dynamitards ought to suffer death, because in the recklessness of political hatred they destroy the lives of innocent people. Their crime was beyond all possible reach of human justice, therefore God Himself intervened to mark for once and all how great a crime, how vast a wrong they had committed in the sight of Heaven. Of what, then, were they guilty? What did they do? Before the deceit of Ananias and Sapphira communism was the rule within the Christian fold. It was practised freely as a natural, nay, a necessary part of a whole-hearted following after Christ. After the deceit of Ananias and Sapphira communism ceased to be the rule–apparently it ceased to exist. In the very next chapter we find, not communism, but charity, with all its paltry greeds and grudges. Why was this? What became of the communism? I say that Ananias and his wife killed it. Such a state of things depends essentially upon mutual confidence, and they killed that confidence. The fatal blow had been given: and what had been an actual working system, perfect in its principle, and boundless in its promise, faded at once into a beautiful dream Co-operation in the labours of life does very well for beavers, for they do not deceive one another, nor does one desire to grow fat at his neighbours expense, neither does another wish to take credit for having done what he has not really done. Why cannot Christian men he as true to one another, and to the society of which they form a part, as beavers? Ask Ananias and Sapphira. Before they began, there were no suspicions, no grudgings, no wealth, and no poverty, neither was there any among them that lacked. When they had ended there were rich and poor, there was a murmuring of one class against another, there was the foretaste of those monstrous evils which we deplore to-day. They only told a lie, but that lie gave a mortal blow to the mutual confidence on which any system of communism has to rest. If it is only to-day that we are beginning to face the social problems of advanced civilisation in their naked ugliness, if it is only to-day that we are in a position to estimate the results of unlimited competition, and the reign of universal greed; if it is only to-day that we are becoming thoroughly frightened at the hideous contrast between the professed principles and the existing facts of Christian society; it is for this very reason only to-day that we are able to appreciate the true moral of that tremendous and unexampled judgment. The socialism of the first believers was the fairest work of the Holy Ghost–it was the truest following after Christ–it was the loftiest faith and the broadest charity translated into that simple language of everyday life, which must be read and loved of all men. The Magnificat is the inspired hymn of gospel communism, it is the Marseillaise of the Christian socialist. Striking at once to the heart of the matter, rising at once to the principle of the new order, forestalling (like all inspired strains) the end from the beginning, it pronounces without mitigation, it exults without qualification, that He hath put down the mighty, etc. (R. Winterbotham, M. A.)
Making gain out of a pretence of godliness
When Nineveh was burned under Sardanapalus, great quantities of treasure were known to bare fallen into the fiery ruins. Belesis, governor of Babylon, had been one of the conspirators against the dead king, and was aware of all the circumstances of the sack of the city. He told the other generals that in the midst of the fight he had at one time despaired of success, and then he had solemnly sworn to the immortal gods that, if victory were vouchsafed him, he would convey bodily all the ashes of the conflagration to Babylon, and deposit them in a vast temple which he would erect to receive them in honour of the propitious deities: he added that his tender conscience would not permit him to delay the fulfilment of his vow. No one could object to so pious a proposal; so Belesis set the whole army at work to gather up the remains of the fire. When the valuable mass reached Babylon he smelted the heaps in great furnaces, and enriched himself to a fabulous amount with the gold and silver that came forth. This he had understood all along; but he was neither the first nor the last man who has put forward his conscience to make gain out of godliness with a villainous deceit. (C. S. Robinson, D. D.)
Keeping back the price
We read in French history that Louis XI. once proffered the entire department of Bologne to the Blessed Virgin Mary. He drew up a deed, signed, sealed; he delivered it to the proper ecclesiastics of the Church. But with a peculiar perversity he kept all the revenues and taxes, appointing every year new collectors who might secure the income rigidly for himself without any peril of being tampered with by the priests. (C. S. Robinson, D. D.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 2. Kept back part of the price] Ananias and Sapphira were evidently persons who professed faith in Christ with the rest of the disciples. While all were making sacrifices for the present necessity, they came forward among the rest, pretending to bring all the money they had got for a possession, , (of what kind we know not,) which they had sold. A part of this price, however, they kept back, not being willing to trust entirely to the bounty of Providence, as the others did; thinking probably, that, as the whole was their own, they had a right to do with it as they pleased. And so they had: they were under no necessity to sell their possession; but the act of selling it for the ostensible purpose of bringing it into the common stock, left them no farther control over it, nor property in it; and their pretense, that the money which they brought was the whole produce of the sale, was a direct lie in itself, and an attempt to deceive the Holy Spirit, under whose influence they pretended to act. This constituted the iniquity of their sin.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Kept back part of the price, when they had vowed the whole to God and his service, which made it a robbing of God, whatsoever pretence they might possibly have of detaining some part for their own necessities in old age, or time of sickness; arguing a great distrust in that God, whom, when they had made their vow, they pretended to give themselves and their substance unto.
His wife also being privy to it; her subjection to her husband not excusing her partaking in his sin and punishment.
Brought a certain part; their ambition carried them thus far, they would seem devout, charitable, &c., and their covetousness hindered them from going farther.
Laid it at the apostles feet: see Act 4:35.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
2. kept back part of the price, hiswife also being privy to itThe coolness with which theyplanned the deception aggravated the guilt of this couple.
brought a certainpartpretending it to be the whole proceeds of the sale.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And kept back part of the price,…. At which the possession was sold; he reserved it for his own use, after he had given out that he sold it for the service of the church:
his wife also being privy to it; to this private reserve:
and brought a certain part; whether the greater part, or an equal part, half of it, or a lesser part; some little part of it, so the phrase seems to signify, is not certain:
and laid it at the apostles’ feet; as the rest did, thereby to make a show of charity, and cover the deceit.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Kept back (). First aorist middle indicative of , old verb from , afar, apart, and so to set apart, to separate for oneself, but only here, verse Acts 5:3; Titus 2:10 in the N.T.
His wife also being privy to it ( ). Genitive absolute with second perfect participle of , to know together with one, “his wife also knowing it together with him.”
Brought a certain part ( ). Aorist active participle of , for a definite act. The praise of Joseph was too much for Ananias, but he was not willing to turn over all. He wanted praise for giving all and yet he took care of himself by keeping some. Thus he started the Ananias Club that gave a new meaning to his lovely name (God is gracious).
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
Kept back [] . Only here, ver. 3, and Tit 2:10, where it is rendered purloining. From nosfi, aloof, apart. The verb means to set apart for one’s self; hence to appropriate wrongfully.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “And kept back part of the price,” (Kai enosphisato apo tes times) “And appropriated (held back) from the price,” purloining or stealing for covetous satisfaction or momentary pleasure, much like Achan did, with similar consequences, Jos 7:19-26; condemned of the Lord, Tit 2:10. He hid or concealed a part of the income from men, but not from the Lord.
2) “His wife also being privy to it,” (suneiduies kai tes gunaikos) “His wife also party to (the) collusion,” a deliberate calculated act to deceive in a religious matter. It was an act of selfish hypocrisy, excelled by none, lest it were that of the Pharisees, Mat 22:14; Mat 22:33.
3) “And brought a certain part,” (kai enegkas meros ti) “And bringing a certain part,” ostentatiously, with public display, to gain a reputation as a liberal giver, a philanthropist; The Lord beholds “how” men cast into the treasury, of the financial need of His church, even today Mar 12:41; Heb 7:8; “The eyes of the Lord (as judge) are still in every place beholding the evil and the good,” Pro 15:3.
4) “And laid it at the apostles’ feet,” (para tous posas ton apostolon etheken) “Placed it at the feet (disposal) of the apostles,” in public display, to rival what Barnabas had done, yet the strong contrast of the motives and integrity of the two parties are set forth clearly, Act 5:35; Act 5:37. Ananias presented his “part,” pretending that it was all of his part, at the apostles’ feet, solely for their distribution for the common good of all the needy.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
(2) And kept back part of the price.The mere act of keeping back would not in itself have been sinful. The money was his own, to give the whole or part (Act. 5:4). But the formal act, apparently reproducing that of Barnabas, was an acted lie. The part was offered as if it were the whole. The word for kept back is rendered purloining in Tit. 2:10, and always carried with it the idea of stealthy and dishonest appropriation. It is used in the LXX. of Jos. 7:1, as describing the sin of Achan.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
2. Brought It would seem that the money was brought and presented to the apostles in the meeting-room (note Act 2:2) of the church. Yet the three hours of Act 5:7 presuppose a lengthened stay at the place.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
2 And kept back part of the price, his wife also being privy to it , and brought a certain part, and laid it at the apostles’ feet.
Ver. 2. And kept back part ] Interverted, , purloined, nimmed it away. Here was a concurrence of hypocrisy, sacrilege, diffidence, and ambition; for he would be thought as good as the best, and therefore laid that he brought at the apostles’ feet, &c. Hypocrites shall be uncased; no goat in a sheepskin shall steal on Christ’s right hand at the last day.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Act 5:2 . : may merely mean from its derivation, to set apart . But both in LXX and N.T. it is used in a bad sense of appropriating for one’s own benefit, purloining, Jos 7:1 , of Achan, 2Ma 4:32 , so here and in Act 5:3 , and Tit 2:10 , cf. also a similar use of the word in Jos., Ant. , iv., 8, 29 (so in Greek authors, Xen., Polyb., Plut.). : the same combination in Jos 7:1 ( cf. Act 2:17 above, , cf. Hebrew . See Bengel’s note, in loco , on the sin of Achan and Ananias). : it was thus a deliberate and aggravated offence. On the irregular form, instead of – , cf. the LXX, Exo 8:21 ; Exo 8:24 , 1Sa 25:20 ; and see also Winer-Schmiedel, p. 81, note, and Blass on instances from the papyri, in loco . : a further aggravation (Act 4:35 ), since the money was brought ostentatiously to gain a reputation for the donors. Blass well comments: “in conventu ecclesi hoc liberalitatis documentum editum”; cf. Calvin, who in marking the ambition of Ananias to gain a reputation for liberality adds: “ita fit ut pedes Apostolorum magis honoret quam Dei oculos”.
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
kept back. Greek. noaphizomai. Only here, Act 5:3. Tit 9:10.
of = from. App-104.
being privy to = being conscious of. Greek. suneidon. Only here, Act 12:12; Act 14:6. 1Co 4:4.
at. App-104.
apostles’. App-189.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Act 5:2. , he fraudulently kept back) The sin of Achan and that of Ananias were in many respects similar, at the beginning of the churches of the Old and New Testament respectively; and the same verb, , fraudulently appropriated or kept, is used of Achan, in Jos 7:1. The former, however, in the Old Testament, according to the direction of God, was killed by the hand of men; the latter, in the New Testament, by the Divine hand, at the word of the apostle. The sin of Judas also was similar to that of Ananias.- , of the price) These two seem not to have believed that Christianity would last long.-, being conscious of it) They sinned the more grievously, since they might have mutually dissuaded one another from the sin.- , having brought a certain part) just as if it were the whole. Ananias however had wished to seem to have brought the whole: therefore he had not kept back much.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
kept: Jos 7:11, Jos 7:12, 2Ki 5:21-25, Mal 1:14, Mal 3:8, Mal 3:9, Joh 12:6, 1Ti 6:10, 2Pe 2:14, 2Pe 2:15
his: Act 5:9
laid: Act 4:34, Act 4:35, Act 4:37, Mat 6:2, Mat 6:3, Mat 23:5, Phi 2:3
Reciprocal: 2Ki 5:20 – my master Mat 22:12 – how Act 2:45 – sold Act 20:20 – I kept Tit 2:10 – purloining
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
2
Act 5:2. Kept back part of the price. There was no wrong in this for the whole system was voluntary to begin with. This item will be noticed again in a later verse. Being privy to it. This phrase is from SUNEIDON which Thayer defines, “To see (have seen) together with others.” The Englishman’s Greek New Testament renders it, “being aware of it.” The husband doubtless took the lead in the transaction, but the wife’s knowledge of what was being done made her a full partaker in the deed. The whole family of Achan was stoned because the goods was stored in the tent, so that they had knowledge of it (Jos 7:21). If a person has knowledge of an evil deed and does not object to it, he is thereby made as guilty as the actual perpetrator. However, the wife of Ananias went further than guilty knowledge as we shall soon learn.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
See notes on verse 1
Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)
Verse 2
Brought a certain part; pretending that it was the whole.
Fuente: Abbott’s Illustrated New Testament
5:2 And {a} kept back [part] of the price, his wife also being privy [to it], and brought a certain part, and laid [it] at the apostles’ feet.
(a) Craftily took away.