Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Acts 8:2
And devout men carried Stephen [to his burial,] and made great lamentation over him.
2. And devout men carried Stephen to his burial ] On devout, see Act 2:5 note.
The verb often means “to prepare a dead body for burial,” but in Thuc. vi. 72 it is found exactly as used here.
The Jews paid great attention to funeral rites. Cp. Midrash Rabbah on Gen 47:29 (par. 96), “Deal kindly and truly with me,” literally, “Do with me kindness and truth.” Is there then a kindness of falsehood, that he says, kindness and truth? How is this? There is a common proverb which says, “Is the son of thy friend dead?” Put on the load (i.e. bear the burden with him). Is thy friend himself dead? Put off the load (his survivors will not requite you for your sympathy). Therefore he says to him, “If thou wilt do me a kindness after my death, that is a kindness of truth.” And in all Ashkenazic prayer-books it is said: “These are the works of which a man reaps the interest in this world, and the capital endures in the world to come; the honouring of father and mother, the doing of acts of mercy, the bearing forth the dead, the reconciliation of a man to his neighbour, but the study of the Torah is above them all.” Cp. Mishna Peah i. 1 for a part of this.
and made great lamentation over him ] The word expresses the beating on the breast which is one of the outward expressions of great sorrow. The Hebrew word for mourning (Gen 23:2; 2Sa 3:31, &c.) has the same sense. It must have needed no little courage at such a time to perform the funeral rites for one who had fallen as Stephen had, by the fury of the whole people.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
And devout men – Religious men. The word used here does not imply of necessity that they were Christians. There might have been Jews who did not approve of the popular tumult, and the murder of Stephen, who gave him a decent burial. Joseph of Arimathea, and Nicodemus, both Jews, thus gave to the Lord Jesus a decent burial, Joh 19:38-39.
Carried Stephen – The word translated carried means properly to collect, as fruits, etc. Then it is applied to all the preparations necessary for fitting a dead body for burial, as collecting, or confining it by bandages, with spices, etc.
And made great lamentation – This was usual among the Jews at a funeral. See the notes on Mat 9:23.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Act 8:2
And devout men carried Stephen to his burial.
The burial of Stephen
I. The devout men exemplified–
1. The constancy of Christian friendship. They did not need the sound of his voice and the echo of his steps to remind them of the duties they owed to him. The friendships induced by Christianity are the firmest and most enduring. Our friend may be no longer on earth, but he lives with Christ and so is still ours.
2. The heroism of Christian friendship. These men were in danger of sharing their friends fate. They might have said, What is the use of risking that now Stephen is dead? But the instinct of friendship was stronger than the fear of danger, and they went forth confessing that they were followers of Him in whose name Stephen had died. Christian friendship is not influenced by selfish considerations.
3. The practical kindness of Christian friendship. A saint who dies in the midst of saints is sure to have a loving burial. He may be poor, but his claims will not be unheeded.
II. The causes of their lamentation.
1. Their own personal loss. One dear to them had been taken away. Our religion does not chide the tears of the bereaved. Jesus wept, and manifested a tender feeling for the hearts of others when He said, Woman, why weepest thou?
2. The Churchs loss. Stephen seemed to be needed more than ever. Saul was becoming a terrible opponent, and there was no Stephen to answer him. A pillar strong with truth, and beautiful with love, was overturned when it was wanted to sustain the temple of God. A standard bearer had fallen when foes were gathering thickly about the camp. A shepherd was taken away when the flock was likely to be scattered.
3. The worlds loss. The world could not understand this. It was nothing to the soldier, the merchant, the priest; but it was a far greater calamity than if Caesar had fallen from his throne.
III. The alleviating circumstances. There was no need for the lamentation as far as Stephen was concerned.
1. A little before he died he had a vision of Christ.
2. He died in the calm assurance of a life to come.
3. He died in love and charity with all men. (J. Marratt.)
The burial of Stephen
The action of these devout men–
I. Expresses affectionate sorrow for their departed friend. The religion of Christ does not destroy our feelings as men. It makes the already gentle and loving heart more loving and gentle still, and fills the stern, the frozen breast, with warm and generous feeling. What a change it wrought in that young man, at whose feet Stephens murderers laid their clothes! The devout men were not yielding to unmanly or unchristian emotions. The religion of Jesus would moderate their grief, but it would not restrain their tears. Jesus Himself wept at the grave of a friend. And Stephen had been their friend.
II. Implies that their sorrow would be chastened by submission to the will of God. They knew who had said, The hour cometh, that whosoever killeth you, will think that he doeth God service. They also knew who had said, whilst Himself drinking a cup far more bitter than Stephens, O My Father, if this cup may not pass from Me, except I drink it, Thy will be done. And did they not know that that sufferer had left His disciples an example that they should tread in His steps? and that now He was Lord of all, and could dash His enemies in places, like a potters vessel? And therefore these devout men would in submission say, amid all their tears, It is the Lord, let Him do what seemeth Him good. The Lord gave–the Lord hath taken away: blessed be the name of the Lord.
III. Infers that they would be influenced by kindest sympathy towards Stephens surviving relations. What was their loss compared with the loss sustained by such? The loss of a friend is not so great as the loss of a son–the loss of a father–the loss of a husband. To such the loss would be irreparable, or could only be made up by Him who is better than ten thousand sons, and who has said, Leave thy fatherless children unto Me, I will provide, and let thy widows trust in Me. And would not these devout men sympathise with the widow and the orphan and the mother who had lost such a relative as Stephen? Pure religion and undefiled before God and the Father is this, to visit the fatherless and widows in their affliction.
IV. Leads us to suppose that they could not allow such an occasion to pass away without earnest prayer that this bereavement which the Church had sustained might be sanctified to the churchs interests. The burden of their prayer would probably be, Help, Lord, for the godly man ceaseth, etc. Who can tell what influence they had in the calling of Saul of Tarsus? Would they not also pray, Lord, teach us to cease from man whose breath is in his nostrils, and trust alone in Thee? And would not these prayers be blended with thanksgivings for the grace given to their departed brother?
V. Suggests the hope of a blessed reunion with their departed friend at the resurrection of the just. They sorrowed not as men without hope. They knew their brother had fallen asleep in Jesus; and surely they believed that them who sleep in Jesus will God bring with Him.
VI. Would there not be renewed consecration to the service of God? The storm of persecution raged, and they were scattered by its violence–but not as flock that has lost or left the shepherd. No; rather scattered as rays of light, to become the lights of the world, to be as flames of fire in the service of the Saviour (Act 8:4). And He that gave the word went with them, giving effect to the Word of His grace, so that the Word of the Lord had free course, and was glorified. So it ought ever to be. The work of the Lord must be done. It will be done, whether by us or not; but if not, we gain no reward. Work while it is called to-day–the night cometh in which no man can work. (P. C. Horton.)
Stephens funeral
I. A very select funeral.
1. Pre-eminently select. Devout men–not rich, learned, or titled, but good men; those who discharged thoroughly, from the purest motives, all the duties of life.
(1) Virtuous, or true to themselves.
(2) Philanthropic, or true to their fellow-men.
(3) Godly, or true to the Most High. Christians–men of the highest type.
2. Suitably select. The good burying the good. The pious should care for each other to the last.
3. Wholly select. Occasionally funerals are very mixed. Some attend because the dead man had been a good customer; some because they were neighbours; some because of a necessary family connection; some as an expression of readiness to put the deceased out of the way; some from a denominational bias. Stephens funeral was unmixed–composed of sincere and practical lovers of God and man. Perhaps heavens inhabitants streamed to the balconies of the celestial city and gazed with wonder at the novel sight.
II. A very sad funeral.
1. There have been many non-attendant burials, not an individual present to grieve.
2. There have been largely attended funerals, but the signs of regret were correspondingly small; more talk than tears.
3. Stephens funeral was attended by men of sense and sanctity, who rent the air with the cries of their broken hearts.
(1) Their sadness was an expression of homage to the excellencies of the departed.
(a) To great religious intelligence.
(b) To moral and religious character. The gospel lived in him, and he in it.
(c) To usefulness.
(2) An expression of sympathy with the sufferings of the departed. It was the loss of–
(1) A leading man.
(2) In a sudden manner.
(3) By cruel treatment.
(4) When he was most needed. (B. D. Johns.)
The lamentation at Stephens funeral
This was something more than a conventional funeral. The people among whom it occurred were given to burial rites of elaborate and studied ceremonial. Like all orientalists, their mourning was chiefly marked by a painstaking and intentional publicity. With them grief for the dead meant baring and beating the breast, sprinkling or sitting in ashes, songs of lamentation, and the employment of mourning women. And so, when the martyred Stephen is buried, the customs are not changed. True, he was not merely a flew, but a Christian; yet the infant Church still clung to the cherished ceremonies of the elder, and what was usual was followed here. It was indeed the hatred and vindictiveness of Judaism which had slain this godly man, yet, when he is dead, the manner of his burial is the usage of Judaism itself. To have changed it would have been to have surrendered his claim as a veritable and loyal Israelite; and doubtless, also, to have grieved and wounded his surviving relatives. All the more because his death had been so cruel and distressing, would they have his burial decent and reverent and painstaking; even as when the nation buries some honoured soldier she surrounds his funeral cortege with every element of pomp and state and ceremony, as though she would atone for the hardships of his bitter and lonely end upon the field of battle by utmost tenderness and reverence in dealing with his lifeless body. And thus it was with the bruised and mangled form of Stephen. The funeral order of his race was carefully observed. But there was this difference–and it comes out with a singular and touching significance in two Greek words, used here only in all the New Testament: the mourning at Stephens funeral was the mourning of unaffected feeling, and the attendants who followed him to his grave were not hired mutes nor paid mourners, but grief-stricken and godly men. This scene suggests the thought of the difference that there is in funerals. The Church has one common ritual for all her baptized dead. She does not attempt to discriminate either in her customs or her utterances. She is not a judge with such infallible insight that she can weigh character and prophesy of destiny. Most wisely, therefore, does she use one common office for all her dead, leaving scarce any discretion to her ministry, and uttering one uniform voice to her people. Her language is general, not specific. She writes as Inspiration has written before her, Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord, but she utters no verdict of application in connection with their use. She speaks words of Christian hope; but they are coupled with the Scriptural conditions of all Christian hope. In a word, her language is that of Christian faith and trust; and while it is utterly devoid of any specific application of its very general terms, we feel that its tone is only what the tone of anything save a heathen burial ought to be. And yet, when we come to use it, we recognise what a really tremendous difference there may be in even the Churchs funerals. As with Stephens burial by the elder Church, there are the same preliminaries, the same customs, the same words, and yet, as there, there may be the widest and most radical difference in what those words and customs express. Have we not all witnessed funerals where even the sublime ritual of the Church seemed powerless to touch the heart or lift the thoughts? With utmost charity, with every willingness to leave the vanished life in the hands of a Love at once deeper and wiser than ours, we cannot bind that life and the Churchs tones together. Somehow, they do not fit into, and form a part of, each other. Verily, Blessed are the dead who die in the Lord; for they rest from their labours. But if they have not lived in the Lord, nor laboured for Him–we may say these questions are useless; but we cannot help asking them. On the other hand, there are other funerals where we use precisely the same ritual; where there is no diversity in usage or custom from what is wonted, unless in the direction of greater simplicity; where merely the Churchs appointed words are said, and no others, and yet where the emotions of our own hearts and the very atmosphere of the whole occasion are utterly and wholly different. There is a deep and widespread sorrow, but it is a grief gilded with light. We listen to the words of inspired hope and promise, and, as we lift our eyes from the bier before us, lo! the clouds are parted, and we see how, to a Christian, the grave is only a low-brewed portal, through which, bending as he passes, he emerges into larger life and freer. (Bp. H. C. Potter.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 2. Devout men carried Stephen to his burial] The Greek word, , signifies not only to carry, or rather to gather up, but also to do every thing necessary for the interment of the dead. Among the Jews, and indeed among most nations of the earth, it was esteemed a work of piety, charity, and mercy, to bury the dead. The Jews did not bury those who were condemned by the Sanhedrin in the burying place of the fathers, as they would not bury the guilty with the innocent; and they had a separate place for those who were stoned, and for those that were burnt. According to the Tract Sanh. fol. 45, 46, the stone wherewith any one was stoned, the post on which he was hanged, the sword by which he was beheaded, and the cord by which he was strangled, were buried in the same place with the bodies of the executed persons. As these persons died under the curse of the law, the instruments by which they were put to death were considered as unclean and accursed, and therefore buried with their bodies. Among the ancients, whatever was grateful or useful to a person in life was ordinarily buried with him; thus the sword, spear, shield, c., of the soldier were put in the same grave the faithful dog of the hunter, c., c. And on this principle the wife of a Brahman burns with the body of her deceased husband.
Made great lamentation over him.] This was never done over any condemned by the Sanhedrin-they only bemoaned such privately this great lamentation over Stephen, if the same custom then prevailed as afterwards, is a proof that Stephen was not condemned by the Sanhedrin he probably fell a sacrifice to the fury of the bigoted incensed mob, the Sanhedrin not interfering to prevent the illegal execution.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
It was an argument that they were devout (religious) indeed, that they durst, amongst such a multitude of persecutors and furious zealots, own their esteem for St. Stephen. It was piacular amongst the Jews, to touch the dead corpse of such a one as was put to death for blasphemy; and these perform such funeral rites for him, as were used for such only as were of note and eminency.
Made great lamentation over him; as the Jews were wont to do at the funeral especially of eminent persons: thus it was done at Jacobs interment, Gen 50:10; and thus had been done more lately at Lazaruss funeral, Joh 11:1-44, even by our Saviour himself, Act 8:35; which lamentation was the greater, because of the churchs loss at such a time.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
2. and devout menpious Jews,probably, impressed with admiration for Stephen and secretly inclinedto Christianity, but not yet openly declared.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And devout men carried Stephen to his burial,…. These men were not Jewish proselytes, but members of the Christian church; who were eminent for their religion and piety, and who had courage enough, amidst this persecution, to show a respect to the dead body of this holy martyr; which they took from under the stones, washed it, and wound it up in linen clothes, and put it into a coffin, or on a bier: they did everything preparatory to the funeral, which, is chiefly designed by the word here used, rather than the carrying of him out to his grave; though this also they did, and buried him: and to bear a corpse and follow it to the grave, and bury it, were with the Jews x reckoned among acts of kindness, mercy, and piety, and which would not fail of a reward; they have a saying y, that
“he that mourns, they shall mourn for him; and he that buries, they shalt bury him and he that lifts up (his voice in weeping lamentation), they shall lift up for him; he that accompanies (a dead corpse), they shall accompany him; he that “carries”, they shall carry him;”
as these devout men did, who would not suffer Stephen to be buried in the common burying place of malefactors, but interred him elsewhere, in a more decent manner: but whether they had leave from the sanhedrim so to do, or whether they did this of themselves, is not certain; if the latter, which seems most likely, it is an instance of great boldness and resolution, and especially at this time; for
“they did not bury one that was stoned in the sepulchres of his fathers, but there were two burying places appointed by the sanhedrim, one for those that are stoned and burnt, and another for those that are slain with the sword and strangled z.”
So that, they acted contrary to the Jewish canon, as they also did in what follows:
and made great lamentation over him; though they did not sorrow as those without hope, yet they did not put on a stoical apathy; but as men sensible of the loss the church of Christ had sustained, by the death of a person so eminent for his gifts and grace, they mourned over him in a becoming manner: in this they went contrary to the Jewish rule, which forbids lamentation for those that died as malefactors, and runs thus a
“they do not mourn, but they grieve; for grief is only in the heart;”
their reason for this was, as the commentators say b, because they thought that
“their disgrace was an atonement for their sin:”
but these devout men knew that Stephen needed no such atonement, and that his sins were atoned for another way: otherwise the Jews looked upon mourning for the dead to be to the honour of him; hence they say c, that mourning
“is the glory of the dead–whoever is backward to the mourning of a wise man shall not prolong his days; and whoever is sluggish in mourning for a good man, ought to be buried alive; and whoever causes tears to descend for a good man, lo, his reward is reserved for him with the holy blessed God.”
x Maimon. & Bartenora in Misn. Peah, c. 1. sect. 1. y T. Bab. Cetubot, fol. 72. 1. & Moed Katon, fol. 28. 2. z Misn. Sanhedrin, c. 6. sect. 5. a Misn. Sanhedrin, sect. 6. b Jarchi & Bartenora in ib. c Maimon. Hilch. Ebel, c. 12. sect. 1, 2.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Devout (). Only four times in the N.T. (Luke 2:25; Acts 2:5; Acts 8:2; Acts 22:12). Possibly some non-Christian Jews helped. The burial took place before the Christians were chiefly scattered.
Buried (). Aorist active indicative of , old verb to bring together, to collect, to join with others in carrying, to bury (the whole funeral arrangements). Only here in the N.T.
Lamentation (). Late word from , to beat the breast, in LXX, Plutarch, etc., only here in the N.T.
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
Devout. See on Luk 2:25.
Carried to his burial [] . Only here in New Testament. Lit., to carry together; hence, either to assist in burying or, better, to bring the dead to the company [] of the other dead. The word is used of bringing in harvest.
Stephen [] . Meaning crown. He was the first who received the martyr’s crown.
Lamentation [] . Lit., beating (of the breast). Only here in New Testament.
Fuente: Vincent’s Word Studies in the New Testament
1) “And devout men carried Stephen to his burial,” (suekomisan de ton Stephanon andres eulabeis) “Then devout men recovered (the body of) Stephen,” from the place where he was stoned to death, outside the city, where they (the council) had “cast him out,” Act 7:58; As Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus prepared the body of Jesus for burial, so devout men prepared and buried the beaten and mangled body of Stephen, Mat 27:57-60; Luk 23:50-53.
2) “And made great lamentations over him,” (kai epoilsan kopeton megan ep’ auto) “And they made a great lamentation over him,” over his death. The (Gk. kopeton) means to beat the breast or head in expressing deep grief, sorrow, respect, and or regret for the deceased. It may be that both devout Jews and Christian Jews joined in the burial, without offending the Sanhedrin which had incited and given grounds for the murder, even as devout women wept at the burial of Lazarus, Joh 11:31-35.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
2. They dressed Stephen. Luke showeth, that even in the heat of persecution the godly were not discouraged, but being always zealous, they did those duties which did belong to godliness. Burial seemeth to be a matter of small importance; rather than they will foreslow [neglect] the same, they bring themselves in no small hazard of life. And as the circumstance of time doth declare, that they contemned death valiantly, so again, we gather thereby that they were careful to do this thing not without great and urgent cause. For this served greatly to exercise their faith, that the body of the holy martyr should not be left to the wild beasts, in whom Christ had triumphed nobly according to the glory of his gospel. Neither could they live to Christ, unless they were ready to be gathered unto Stephen into the society of death. Therefore the care they had to bury the martyr was unto them a meditation unto invincible constancy of professing the faith. Therefore they sought not in a superfluous matter, with an unadvised zeal, to provoke their adversaries. Although that general reason, which ought always and every where to be of force amongst the godly, was undoubtedly of great weight with them. For the rite of burying doth appertain unto the hope of the resurrection, as it was ordained by God since the beginning of the world to this end.
Wherefore, this was always counted cruel barbarism to suffer bodies to lie unburied willingly. Profane men did not know why they should account the rite of burial so holy; but we are not ignorant of the end thereof, to wit, that those which remain alive may know that the bodies are committed to the earth as to a prison, (499) until they be raised up thence. Whereby it appeareth that this duty is profitable rather for those which are alive than those which are dead. Although it is also a point of our humanity to give due honor to those bodies to which we know blessed immortality to be promised.
They made great lamentation. Luke doth also commend their profession of godliness and faith in their lamentation. For a doleful and unprosperous end causeth men, for the most part, to forsake those causes wherein they were delighted before. But, on the other side, these men declare by their mourning, that they are no whit terrified with the death of Stephen from standing stoutly in the approbation of their cause; considering therewithal what great loss God’s Church suffered by the death of one man. And we must reject that foolish philosophy which willeth all men to be altogether blockish that they may be wise. It must needs be that the Stoics were void of common sense who would have a man to be without all affection. Certain mad fellows would gladly bring in the same dotings into the Church at this day, and yet, notwithstanding, although they require an heart of iron of other men, there is nothing softer or more effeminate than they. They cannot abide that other men should shed one tear; if anything fall out otherwise than they would wish, they make no end of mourning. God doth thus punish their arrogancy jestingly, (that I may so term it,) seeing that he setteth them to be laughed at even by boys. But let us know that those affections which God hath given to man’s nature are, of themselves, no more corrupt than the author himself; but that they are first to be esteemed according to the cause; secondly, if they keep a mean and moderation. Surely that man which denieth that we ought to rejoice over the gifts of God is more like a block than a man; therefore, we may no less lawfully sorrow when they be taken away. And lest I pass the compass of this present place, Paul doth not altogether forbid men mourning, when any of their friends are taken away by death, but he would have a difference between them and the unbelievers; because hope ought to be to them a comfort and a remedy against impatience. For the beginning of death caused us to sorrow for good causes; but because we know that we have life restored to us in Christ, we have that which is sufficient to appease our sorrow. In like sort, when we are sorry that the Church is deprived of rare and excellent men, there is good cause of sorrow; only we must seek such comfort as may correct excess.
(499) “ Velut in custodiam,” as it were in custody.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
(2) And devout men carried Stephen to his burial.It has sometimes been asserted, as e.g. by Renan (Les Aptres, p. 145), that these were proselytes. St. Luke, however, always uses a different word to describe that class (comp. Act. 13:43; Act. 13:50; Act. 16:14; Act. 17:4; Act. 17:17), and the word used here is applied by him to Simeon (Luk. 2:25), to the multitude of Jews present on the day of Pentecost (Act. 2:5), to Ananias as devout according to the Law (Act. 22:12). This notion must accordingly be rejected as against evidence. On the other hand, had they been members of the Church they would naturally, though perhaps not necessarily, have been described as brethren or disciples. We are left therefore to the conclusion that they were Jews who had been kindled into admiration and half-conviction by the calm heroism of the martyr, and who, without committing themselves to more than that admiration, acted in his case as Nicodemus and Joseph of Arimatha had acted after the Crucifixion. They would show honour to the memory of the dead, though they had not had the courage to defend the preacher of the truth while he was yet with them. In the legend or tradition as to the death of Stephen, reported and accepted by Augustine (De Civ: Dei. xvii. 8; Serm. 318, 319; Tract. In Joann., 120), Gamaliel and Nicodemus are named as actually taking part in the entombment, and as afterwards laid in the same sepulchre, on which his name appeared in Aramaic characters as Chaliel (= garland), the equivalent in that language of the Greek Stephanos. The translation of the martyrs relics to Ancona, Minorca, and to Uzalis, and other towns in Africa, made a deep impression on Augustine, and gave occasion to some of his most eloquent sermons. Oratories were dedicated to his memory, and miraculous cures effected by prayers addressed to him. (See Butlers Lives of the Saints, Aug. 3rd.)
And made great lamentation over him.The act was every way significant. Commonly, one who had been stoned to death on the charge of blasphemy would have had no funereal honours. He would have been buried with the burial of an ass (Jer. 22:19). The public lamentation on the part of men conspicuous for their devout zeal for the Law, was therefore of the nature of a protest, probably on the part of the more moderate section of the Pharisees, such as Joseph, Nicodemus, and Gamaliel, against what would seem to them the unnatural coalition between the Sadducean priesthood and the ultra-zealot section of their own party.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
‘And devout men buried Stephen, and made great lamentation over him.’
Meanwhile some very brave and devout men obtained the body of Stephen for burial. For ‘devout men’ compare Act 2:5. They may have been supporters of Stephen, or of those pious Jews who like Joseph of Arimathea sought to disassociate themselves from the acts of their fellow Jews on such occasions (compare Luk 23:50-53), on a similar basis to that of the Jewish women who saw it as their duty to provide wine to executed criminals (Mar 15:23). To make great lamentation over a recognised heretic who had been stoned for blasphemy required great bravery. Public mourning for such was probably even at this time forbidden (as it certainly was later). Thus in ‘coming together to bury’ him they were taking both their reputations and their lives in their hands. But Luke wants us to recognise that Stephen was honoured in his death, and was deeply mourned. For these mourners, whether they knew it or not, were acting on behalf of the whole church. His body was not tossed onto the burning rubbish heap outside Jerusalem in the valley of Hinnom. It was given decent burial. And the man it represented was deeply mourned.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Act 8:2. And devout men Yet devout men. Some learned writers have been of opinion that these were proselytes; of which, however, there does not appear to be any proof. See on ch. Act 2:5. Such a token of respect, to one who had been publicly executed as a blasphemer, was an expression of zeal and piety which might justly entitle these men to the honourable character here given. Thus St. Luke calls Joseph of Arimathea, a good and just man, when he speaks of the generous and courageous regard that he shewed to the body of Jesus. See Luk 23:50.
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Act 8:2-3 . The connection of Act 8:1-3 depends on the double contrast, that in spite of the outbreak of persecution which took place on that day, the dead body of the martyr was nevertheless honoured by pious Jews; and that on the other hand, the persecuting zeal of Saul stood in stern opposition thereto. On that day arose a great persecution (Act 8:1 ). This, however, prevented not pious men from burying and lamenting Stephen (Act 8:2 ); but Saul laid waste , in that persecution which arose, the church (of Jerusalem, Act 8:3 ). The common opinion is accordingly erroneous, that there prevails here a lack of connection (Act 8:2 is a supplementary addition, according to de Wette), which is either (Olshausen, Bleek) to be explained by the insertion of extracts from different sources, or (Ziegler in Gabler’s Journ.f. theol. Lit. , I. p. 155) betokens that is an interpolation, or (Heinrichs, Kuinoel) at least makes it necessary to hold these words as transposed, so that they had originally stood after Act 8:2 . [218]
] to carry together , then, used of the dead who are carried to the other dead bodies at the burial-place, and generally: to bury . Soph. Aj. 1048; Plut. Sull. 38. According to the Scholiast on Soph. l.c. and Phavorinus, the expression is derived from gathering the fruits of harvest. Comp. Job 5:26 .
The are not (in opposition to Heinrichs and Ewald) Christians , but, as the connection requires, religious Jews who, in their pious conscientiousness (comp. Act 2:5 ), and with a secret inclination to Christianity (comp. Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus), had the courage to honour the innocence of him who had been stoned. Christians would probably have been prevented from doing so, and Luke would have designated them more distinctly.
: , Hesychius. See Gen 50:10 ; 1Ma 2:70 ; Nicarch. 30; Plut. Fab. 17; Heyne, Obss. in Tibull. p. 71.
] he laid waste , comp. Act 9:21 ; Gal 1:13 . The following sentence informs us how he proceeded in doing so; therefore a colon is to be placed after . .
. .] entering by houses (house by house, Mat 24:7 ; Winer, p. 374 [E. T. 500]).
] dragging . See Tittmann, Synon. N. T. p. 57 f., and Wetstein. Comp. Act 14:19 , Act 17:3 . Arrian. Epict. 1:29.
[218] According to Schwanbeck, p. 325, ver. 1 is to be regarded as an insertion from the biography of Peter.
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
2 And devout men carried Stephen to his burial , and made great lamentation over him.
Ver. 2. Carried Stephen ] , On their shoulders, lamenting, with knocking their breasts, &c., as the word imports: no whit afraid of those mad murderers. So the primitive Christians would not be kept from visiting the confessors in prison, Tamet si multis terroribus minis, et periculis interdictum erat, as Chrysostom witnesseth in his oration of the two martyrs. So certain good people took up and buried the bodies of Ursula and Mary, two noble virgins, burnt at Delden in Lower Germany, which the executioner could in no wise consume with fire, but left them lying on the ground. And the like is reported touching the hearts of Zuinglius and Cranmer.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
2. . ] Whether Jews or Christians is not certain. Ananias is so called, ch. Act 22:12 (not in rec), and he was a Christian. At all events, there is no contrast implied in the (as Mey.), ‘Yet, notwithstanding the persecution and dispersion, pious men were found who, &c.:’ the is merely the transitional particle, and, so far from its being any unusual thing to bury an executed person, it was commanded among the Jews. Olshausen thinks that, if they had been Christians, the term would have been used: but this does not seem by any means certain: we can hardly reason so minutely from the diction of one section in the narrative to that of another, especially in the case of a section so distinct and peculiar as this one. (Besides, in this sense does not occur till ch. Act 9:30 ; see reff. there.) Probably they were pious Jews, not yet converts, but hearers and admirers of Stephen.
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Act 8:2 . Spitta connects Act 8:2 with Act 11:19-21 , and all the intermediate section, Act 8:5 to Act 11:19 ; forms part of his source (so also Sorof, Clemen, who joins his H.H., Act 8:1 to Act 11:19 ; but on the other hand see Hilgenfeld, Zeitschrift fr wissenschaft. Theol. , p. 501 (1895), and Jngst, Apostelgeschichte , p. 79). According to Spitta the whole narrative of Philip’s ministry in 8 ought not to be connected so closely with the death of Stephen, but should fall after Act 9:31 . The only reason for its earlier insertion is the desire to connect the second deacon with the first (but Hilgenfeld, u. s. , pp. 413, 414 (1895), as against both Spitta and Clemen, regards the account of Philip and that of Stephen as inseparable). Spitta strongly maintains that Philip the Apostle, and not the deacon, is meant; and if this be so, he would no doubt help us to answer the objection that in Act 8:14-17 , and indeed in the whole section 9 24 we have an addition of the sub-Apostolic age inserted to show that the Apostles alone could bestow the Holy Spirit. But it cannot be said that Spitta’s attempt at the identification of Philip in 8 with the Apostle is in any way convincing, see, e.g. , Zckler, Apostelgeschichte , p. 212; Hilgenfeld, u. s. , p. 416 (note), and Jngst, u. s. , p. 81. Feine’s objection to Act 8:14-17 leads him, whilst he admits that the meeting with Simon Magus is historical, to regard the conversion of the sorcerer as doubtful, because the whole passage presupposes (Act 8:18-24 ) that the laying on of the Apostles’ hands bestowed the Spirit; so Clemen refers the whole representation in its present form of the communication of the Spirit, not through Baptism, but through the laying on of the Apostles’ hands, to his Redactor Antijudaicus ( cf. Act 19:6 ), and to the same hand he attributes the , Act 8:1 , and cf. Act 8:25 , introduced for the purpose of showing that the Apostles Peter and John sanctioned the Samaritan mission from the central home of the Christian Church. : in its primary sense the verb means to carry or bring together, of harvest; to gather in, to house it; so also in LXX, Job 5:26 ; in a secondary sense, to help in burying; so Soph., Ajax , 1048; Plut., Sull. , 38. The meaning is not “carried to his burial,” as in A.V., but rather as R.V., “buried,” for, although the Greek is properly “joined in carrying,” the word includes the whole ceremony of burial it is used only here in the N.T., and in LXX only in l. c. : only found in St. Luke in N.T., and used by him four times, once in Luk 2:25 , and in Act 2:5 ; Act 22:12 ( , T.R.). The primary thought underlying the word is that of one who handles carefully and cautiously, and so it bears the meaning of cautious, circumspect. Although and are both used in the sense of caution and reverence towards the gods in classical Greek, the adjective is never expressly so used. But Plato connects it closely with ( cf. Luk 2:25 ), Polit. 311 A and 311 [214] (so and are used together by Demosthenes). In the LXX all three words are found to express reverent fear of, or piety towards, God; , frequently, in Pro 28:14 , where in the second part of the verse seems to point to the religious character of the ., whilst is found in Mic 7:2 as a rendering of ( cf. Psalms of Solomon , p. 36, Ryle and James’ edition); cf. also Sir 11:17 (but see for both passages, Hatch and Redpath); in Lev 15:31 we find the word . , hi. The adverb is found once, 2Ma 6:11 . St. Luke uses the word chiefly at all events of O.T. piety. In Luk 2:45 it is used of Simeon, in Act 2:5 of the Jews who came up to worship at the feasts in Jerusalem, and in Act 22:12 , although Ananias was a Christian, yet the qualifying words . point again to a devout observance of the Jewish law. Trench, N. T. Synonyms , i., pp. 38, 198 ff.; Westcott, Hebrews , on Act 5:7 ; Grimm-Thayer, sub v ., and sub v . . .: much discussion has arisen as to whether they were Jews or Christians. They may have been Christians who like the Apostles themselves were still Jews, attending the temple services and hours of prayer, some of whom were doubtless left in the city. But these would have been described more probably as or (so Felten, Page, Hackett). Or they may have been devout Jews like Nicodemus, or Joseph of Arimathea, who would show their respect for Stephen, as Nicodemus and Joseph for Jesus (so Holtzmann, Zckler). Wetstein (so too Renan and Blass) explains of Gentile proselytes, men like Cornelius, who rendered the last offices to Stephen out of natural respect for the dead, and who stood outside the jurisdiction of the Sanhedrim, so that the funeral rites need not have been performed in secret. But St. Luke as a rule uses other words to denote Gentile proselytes, and the Sanhedrim would probably not have interfered with the burial, not only on account of the known Jewish care for the dead, but also because devout Jews would not have been obnoxious in their eyes to the charges brought against Stephen, Act 6:14 (so Nsgen). The word might therefore include both devout Jews and Jewish Christians who joined together in burying Stephen. , from , , cf. planctus from plango , to beat the breast or head in lamentation. Not used elsewhere in N.T., but frequent in LXX; cf., e.g. , Gen 1:10 , 1Ma 2:70 ; 1Ma 4:39 ; 1Ma 9:20 ; 1Ma 13:26 , for the same allocation as here, and for , Jer 6:26 , Mic 1:8 , and cf. also Zec 12:10 . In classical Greek is found, but see Plut., Fab. , 17, and Kennedy, Sources of N. T. Greek , p. 74, for reference to the comic poet Eupolis ( cf. also Blass), and Grimm-Thayer, sub v. For the Jewish customs of mourning cf. Mat 9:23 , Hamburger, Real-Encyclopdie des Judentums , i., 7, 996, “Trauer”; Edersheim, Jesus the Messiah , i., p. 616, and Sketches of Jewish Social Life , p. 172 ff. If the mourners included Jews as well as Jewish Christians, it may well have been that the lamentation was not only a token of sorrow and respect, but also in the nature of a protest on the part of the more moderate section of the Pharisees (see also Trench’s remarks, u. s. , p. 198). According to the tradition accepted by St. Augustine, it is said that both Gamaliel and Nicodemus took part in the burial of Stephen, and were afterwards laid in the same grave (Felten, Apostelgeschichte , p. 167, and Plumptre in loco ).
[214] Codex Vaticanus (sc. iv.), published in photographic facsimile in 1889 under the care of the Abbate Cozza-Luzi.
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
devout. Greek. eulabes. See note on Act 2:5.
carried . . . to his burial. Literally carried away together Greek. sunkomizo Only here.
lamentation. Greek. kopetos. Only here.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
2. . ] Whether Jews or Christians is not certain. Ananias is so called, ch. Act 22:12 (not in rec), and he was a Christian. At all events, there is no contrast implied in the (as Mey.), Yet, notwithstanding the persecution and dispersion, pious men were found who, &c.: the is merely the transitional particle,-and, so far from its being any unusual thing to bury an executed person, it was commanded among the Jews. Olshausen thinks that, if they had been Christians, the term would have been used: but this does not seem by any means certain: we can hardly reason so minutely from the diction of one section in the narrative to that of another, especially in the case of a section so distinct and peculiar as this one. (Besides, in this sense does not occur till ch. Act 9:30; see reff. there.) Probably they were pious Jews, not yet converts, but hearers and admirers of Stephen.
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Act 8:2. , attended to the burial of) A holy office. Comp. ch. Act 9:37 (Tabitha or Dorcas).-, devout) who feared GOD more than men, although those men were persecutors.
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
devout: Act 2:5, Act 10:2, Luk 2:25
made: Gen 23:2, Gen 50:10, Gen 50:11, Num 20:29, Deu 34:8, 1Sa 28:3, 2Sa 3:31, 2Ch 32:33, 2Ch 35:25, Isa 57:1, Isa 57:2, Jer 22:10, Jer 22:18, Joh 11:31-35
Reciprocal: Gen 50:9 – chariots Lev 10:4 – carry 1Sa 25:1 – lamented 1Ki 13:30 – mourned over 2Ki 2:12 – rent them 2Ki 13:20 – buried him Mat 14:12 – took Mar 6:29 – they came Act 6:5 – Stephen Act 9:39 – and all Act 17:17 – devout Act 22:12 – a devout 1Th 4:13 – ye sorrow
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
2
Act 8:2. The original for lamentation is defined by Thayer, “lamentation with beating of the breast,” and Robinson defines it in the same way. It was a formal demonstration of grief that such a righteous man should die as he did.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Act 8:2. And devout men. In spite of the terror caused by the execution of Stephen, and the persecution which immediately followed, some pious Jewsfor this is probably what is meant by the term devout men were found reverently to bury the martyrs disfigured body: these, though not professedly followers of Jesus, still as inquirers, had listened with admiration to the brave and eloquent deacon.
Made great lamentation over him. Chrysostom remarks that Stephens own dying words were his noblest funeral oration: Lord, lay not this sin to their charge. There is a curious legend repeated by Baronius, that Gamaliel, as a secret Christian, gave the body of the martyred Stephen sepulture in his own villa garden, and that subsequently he was buried in the same tomb.
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Observe here, 1. Though St. Stephen was stoned to death by his bloody persecutors, yet are they not so inhuman as to deny him burial; it is a mercy to have a grave, and a decent burial is a blessing: The body is the garment of the soul; we lay up this garment in the wardrobe of the grave, with assurance that we shall put it on again (when made spiritual and incorruptible) in the morning of the resurrection, and wear it to all eternity.
Observe, 2. The persons described who carried Stephen to the bed of the grave; devout men; That is, truly religious men, men of eminent piety and holy courage also; Devout men carried Stephen to his burial. A noble instance of a generous and Christian courage, that they durst, among such a multitude of persecutors and furious zealots, own their esteem of, and pay their last respects unto, the name and memory of the holy martyr.
Observe, 3. The doleful solemnity of his funeral, They made great lamentation over him; and reason enough there was for it, because of the church’s great loss at that time. When any of the ministers of God are snatched away by death, especially by a violent death, from the service of the church, there is just cause for great and solemn lamentation: Devout men carried Stephen to his burial, and made great lamentation over him.
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament
See notes on verse 1
Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)
8:2 {2} And devout men {a} carried Stephen [to his burial], and made great lamentation over him.
(2) The godly mourn for Steven after his death, and bury him, showing in this an example of singular faith and charity: but no man prays to him.
(a) Amongst all the duties of charity which the godly perform, there is no mention made of enshrining relics.
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
The "devout men" who buried Stephen were probably God-fearing Jews like Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus who buried Jesus (Luk 23:50-53). There were undoubtedly many Jews in Jerusalem who were still sympathetic with the Christians (cf. Act 6:7). Some of them evidently gave Stephen a burial suitable to his importance. The Mishnah considered open lamentation for someone who had suffered death by stoning as inappropriate. [Note: Mishnah Sanhedrin 6:6.] Luke’s notation that people made loud lamentation for Stephen may, therefore, be evidence that there were many Jews who regarded Stephen’s stoning as extremely unfortunate.