Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Ecclesiastes 3:7
A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak;
7. A time to rent, and a time to sew ] The words are commonly connected with the practice of rending the garments as a sign of sorrow (Gen 37:29; Gen 37:34; Gen 44:13; Job 1:20; 2Sa 1:2) and sewing them up again when the season of mourning is past and men return again to the routine of their daily life. It is, however, somewhat against this view that it makes this generalisation practically identical with that of Ecc 3:4. The symbolic use of “rending a garment” to represent the division of a kingdom, as in the prophecy of Ahijah the Shilonite (1Ki 11:30) and therefore of “sewing” for the restoration of unity (so the “seamless garment” of Joh 19:23 has always been regarded as a type of the unity of Christ’s Church) seems to suggest a more satisfying sense. There are seasons when it is wise to risk or even to cause discord and division in families (Mat 10:34-35) or schism in Church or State, other seasons when men should strive to restore unity and to be healers of the breach (Isa 58:12). In the parable of the New Patch upon the old Garment we have an instance of an inopportune sewing which does but make the rent worse (Mat 9:16).
a time to keep silence, and a time to speak ] Here again the range of thought has been needlessly limited by interpreters to the silence which belongs to deep sorrow, of which we have an example in the conduct of the friends of Job (Job 2:12-13), of the want of which in the sons of the prophets Elisha complained bitterly (2Ki 2:3; 2Ki 2:5). This is, of course, not excluded, but the range of the law is wider, and takes in on the one hand, the unseasonable talk of the “prating fool” of Pro 10:8, and on the other the “word spoken in due season” (Pro 15:23), to one that is weary (Isa 50:4), the right word at the right time, in the utterance of which we rightly see a genius akin to inspiration. If it is true at times that speech is silvern and silence golden, there are times when the converse also is true, when the word in season is like “apples of gold (= perhaps, oranges) in a basket of silver” (Pro 25:11).
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Rend – i. e., Tear garments in sign of mourning or anger. See 2Sa 1:2, 2Sa 1:11 ff.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Ecc 3:7
A time to keep silence.
Silence
There is a proverb which says, Speech is silvern, silence is golden. Like all proverbs, this admits of qualification. There is a silence that means cowardice, sulkiness, and stupidity; and there is a speech that is more precious than any gold, triumphant over error and wrong, quickening and beneficent as the sunbeam. Notice two or three kinds of silences.
I. There is the silence of emotional fulness. It is a physiological fact that great emotions choke the utterance.
1. Great painful emotions do this (Mat 22:12). Will not all the wicked who stand at the bar of their Maker at the last day be struck with this silence? Emotions of surprise, remorse, despair, will rush with such tumultuousness upon them as to paralyze all articulating power.
2. Great joyous emotions do this. When the father embraced his prodigal son, his heart was so full of joyous feelings that he could not speak. It has been said that superficial emotions chatter, deep emotions are mute: there are joys that are unutterable.
II. There is the silence of Pious resignation. It is said that Aaron held his peace, and the psalmist said, I was dumb and opened not my mouth because Thou didst it. This indeed is a golden silence: it implies unbounded confidence in the character and procedure of our Heavenly Father. It is a loving, loyal acquiescence in the will of Him who is all-loving, all-wise, and all-good. This silence reveals–
1. The highest reason. Is there a sublimer philosophy than this?
2. The highest faith. Faith in the immutable realities of love and right.
III. There is the silence of holy self-respect. This was the silence which Christ displayed before His judges. He seemed to feel that to speak to such virulently prejudiced creatures would be a degradation. The man who can stand and listen to the language of stolid ignorance, venomous bigotry, and personal insult addressed to him in an offensive spirit, and offer no reply, exerts a far greater power upon the minds of his assailants than he could by words, however forceful. His silence reflects a moral majesty, before which the heart of his assailants will scarcely fail to cower. (Homilist.)
A time of war, and a time of peace.—
The Christian view of war
There are those, among the most conscientious of men, who maintain that war is never permissible, that it has always the nature of sin. Among Englishmen the Quakers have clung to the doctrine of non-resistance as one of their most distinctive tenets; among modern thinkers Count Tolstoi has restated it with considerable force. They have based their argument not so much upon the general tenor of Christs teaching as upon misinterpretations of isolated texts–e.g. Resist not evil, All they that take the sword shall perish with the sword. It is to their honour that they have been consistent in their interpretation of such passages, often to their own loss, and have applied them both to individual and to national conduct. Yet it is strange that they have not seen how far their argument carries them, and how by exaggerating one counsel of the Gospel they have made other of its precepts of none effect. Toleration of personal injury, to the point of self-effacement, is indeed enjoined upon Christians, but only so far as it does not conflict with other laws of justice and the like. Non-resistance, tolerance of evil and injustice from an individual, may often be most dangerous to society, as an encouragement to crime; and to let an offender go free may be to do him no kindness, but the cruelest of injuries. As with individuals, so with nations. National injustice, greed, insolence, is to be resisted as a danger to humanity. And those who make their appeal to isolated passages of Holy Scripture may be answered by other considerations. To take one only, it may justly be argued that if it were unlawful to wage war, as they assert, it would be unlawful for the Christian to bear arms, and that the soldiers calling would be reprobated in the New Testament. But the exact opposite is the case. The soldiers calling is treated as of equal honour with others, a vocation in which God may be well and truly served. The Christian life is itself compared to a warfare, in which the soldier of Christ is exhorted to fidelity by the example of the Roman soldier. The soldiers who inquire their duty of St. John the Baptist are not told to forsake their calling, but to exercise it with justice and mercy. And from Cornelius, the devout man whose prayers and alms were accepted of God, to St. Martin and General Gordon, a long line of soldier-saints bears eloquent witness to the fact that the grace of God may be looked for, and will bear fruit, in that vocation as in others. We may even go further, and say that war and the military vocation undoubtedly develop in nations and in individuals certain of the simpler virtues. It is often through war, as Mr. Ruskin has told us, that truth of word and strength of thought are learnt by nations. Peace and the vices of civil life only flourish together. We talk of peace and learning, and of peace and plenty, and of peace and civilization; but I found that these were not the words which the muse of history coupled together: and that on her lips the words were–peace, and sensuality–peace, and selfishness–peace, and death. No less marked are its bracing effects upon the individual. On the whole, the habit of living lightly hearted in daily presence of death, always has had, and always must have, power both in the making and testing of honest men. Many a man by losing himself has found himself, and through the stern discipline of the soldiers life has gained the self-control which otherwise he would have lost. In war men have the opportunity of rising to higher levels of virtue than they would have thought possible of attainment. From Sir Philip Sidney, dying in agony on the field of Zutphen, and refusing the water which another seemed to need more, to the trooper in Matabeleland who gave his horse–and with it his life–for a wounded comrade, there are countless instances of noble unselfishness developed under the stress of sudden decision, sometimes in the most unexpected characters. Nor, if we be wise, shall we complain that the cost is too great. We cannot know that those who have died nobly would have lived nobly. And so we cannot refuse the conclusion that warfare is not necessarily wrong in itself; that it is lawful for Christian men, at the command of the magistrate, to wear weapons and to serve in the wars: that war is even in some cases a gain in that it tends to the development of national and individual virtues. But of course when this is conceded we are still very far from admitting that it is ever to be undertaken with a light heart, as the French declared war upon Prussia. The amount of direct and indirect suffering which it causes, immeasurable as that is, is not the greatest of the evils which war brings inevitably in its train. The racial hatreds which it engenders often linger on for scores of years, smouldering fires which a chance gust of passion may easily fan again into flame. Nor can we regard it in any sense as an appeal to the Divine justice, as our forefathers regarded it. War is infinitely the most wasteful, crudest, and least just way of settling international quarrels. And above all, for all its indirect gains, it is to be avoided by Christian nations to the very limits of forbearance, because it hinders the progress of mankind towards the ideals of peace and brotherhood which the Incarnation revealed. War, however just, is an acknowledgment that Christian methods and Christian love have so far failed to be effective. We inquire, lastly, on what conditions warfare may be pronounced justifiable. St. Thomas Aquinas defines the conditions as three in number–the command of the prince, a just cause, and a good intention. The Christian will not hesitate to justify wars morally safeguarded by regard to these conditions. And yet for all that may be said in justification of warfare, war will ever remain a thing grievous to the Christian, ranking with the famine and the pestilence as scourges of God. Upon all Christians there is laid the supreme duty of striving continually for peace, and in these days of democracy no one is without his share of responsibility for national acts. Christians will not shrink from just wars; at the same time they will denounce wars of aggression for material gain. They will endeavour to emphasize the overwhelming responsibility of those in whose power it is t,o declare war, and of those who may influence their decision. They will lose no opportunity of dissociating themselves from those who wantonly disturb the peace of nations, by fostering race-hatreds, magnifying disagreements, offering petty insults, whether in the columns of an intemperate Press, or in any other way. They will promote the principles of arbitration; for though the arbitrators between nations are not backed by force, and cannot compel submission to their decisions, and though long centuries may pass before arbitration can supersede war, yet there is among nations a growing desire to settle differences by that method–an increasing disposition to submit to arbitration, because the justice of the principle is acknowledged. Above all, they will not be ashamed to assert their belief in the efficacy of prayer to the Lord mighty in battle, who is also the Prince of peace, that He would direct aright the counsels of the nations, and would give peace in our time. Who can doubt that wars, in Christendom at least, would soon become rare if all Christians were continually to pray from their inmost heart that God would give to all nations unity, peace, and concord? (E. H. Day, M. A.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 7. A time to rend, – sew, – keep silence, – speak]
_______________ “Intestine broils
And factions rend a state: at length the breach
Is heal’d, and rest ensues. Wisdom restrains
The tongue, when words are vain: but now,
‘Tis time to speak, and silence would be criminal.”
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
A time to rend; when men shall rend their garments, as they did in great and sudden griefs, as Gen 37:29; Joe 2:13.
A time to keep silence; wherein men will or shall be silent, either through grief, as Job 2:12,13, or by sickness or weakness, or because God denies a man ability to utter his mind.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
7. rendgarments, in mourning(Joe 2:13); figuratively,nations, as Israel from Judah, already foretold, in Solomon’s time(1Ki 11:30; 1Ki 11:31),to be “sewed” together hereafter (Eze 37:15;Eze 37:22).
silence (Am5:13), in a national calamity, or that of a friend (Job2:13); also not to murmur under God’s visitation (Lev 10:3;Psa 39:1; Psa 39:2;Psa 39:9).
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
A time to rend, and a time to sew,…. To rend garments, in case of blasphemy, and in times of mourning and fasting, and then to sew them up when they are over; see Isa 37:1; This the Jews apply to the rending of the ten tribes from Rehoboam, signified by the rending of Jeroboam’s garment, 1Ki 11:30; the sewing up or uniting of which is foretold, Eze 37:22. Some interpret it of the rending of the Jewish church state, signified by the rending of the vail, at the death of Christ; and of the constituting the Gospel church state among the Gentiles;
a time to keep silence, and a time to speak k; when it is an evil time, a time of calamity in a nation, it is not a time to be loquacious and talkative, especially in a vain and ludicrous way, Am 5:13; or when a particular friend or relation is in distress, as in the case of Job and his friends, Job 2:13; or when in the presence of wicked men, who make a jest of everything serious and religious, Ps 39:1; and so when under afflictive dispensations of Providence, it is a time to be still and dumb, and not open the mouth in a murmuring and complaining way, Le 10:3. And, on the other hand, there is a time to speak, either publicly, of the truths of the Gospel, in the ministry of it, and in vindication of them; or privately, of Christian experience: there is a time when an open profession should be made of Christ, his word and ordinances, and when believers should speak to God in prayer and praise; which, should they not, the stones in the wall would cry out.
k , , Homer. Odyss. 11. v. 378.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
7 a. “To rend has its time, and to sew has its time.” When evil tidings come, when the tidings of death come, then is the time for rending the garments (2Sa 13:31), whether as a spontaneous outbreak of sorrow, or merely as a traditionary custom. – The tempest of the affections, however, passes by, and that which was torn is again sewed together.
Perhaps it is the recollection of great calamities which leads to the following contrasts: –
7 b. “To keep silence has its time, and to speak has its time.” Severe strokes of adversity turn the mind in quietness back upon itself; and the demeanour most befitting such adversity is silent resignation (cf. 2Ki 2:3, 2Ki 2:5). This mediation of the thought is so much the more probable, as in all these contrasts it is not so much the spontaneity of man that comes into view, as the pre-determination and providence of God.
The following contrasts proceed on the view that God has placed us in relations in which it is permitted to us to love, or in which our hatred is stirred up: –
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
7. To rend to sew keep silence speak The rending of garments and sitting down in silence is token of great sorrow; the repairing of them and the recommencing of conversation is evidence of the relief of sorrow. These are thus properly grouped in one verse.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Ecc 3:7 A time to rend, and a time to sew; a time to keep silence, and a time to speak;
Ver. 7. A time to rend, and a time to sew. ] As in making a new or translating an old garment. Turks wonder at the English for pinking or cutting their clothes, and making holes in whole cloth, which time of itself would tear too soon. a It was a custom among the Jews to rend their clothes in the case of sad occurrences. The prophet Ahijah rent Jeroboam’s new garment in twelve pieces, to show that God would rend the kingdom out of the hand of Solomon. 1Ki 11:31 Schismatics rend the Church, heretics the Scriptures. God will stitch up all in his own time, and heal the breaches thereof. Psa 60:2
A time to keep silence, and a time to speak.
a Fuller.
b Pythagorica. – Cuspin. de Caesarib., 475.
c H .
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
to rend. 1Sa 15:27, 1Sa 15:28; 1Ki 11:11, 1Ki 11:31; 1Ki 12:31; 1Ki 14:8. Joe 2:13. Joh 19:24.
to sew = to join together, adjust. Spoken of kingdom, as “rending” is: Eze 37:15, Eze 37:22, and references there. Compare Ezr 4:12, margin.
to keep silence. Lev 10:3. Psa 32:2. Amo 5:13. 1Ti 2:11, 1Ti 2:12; 1Pe 2:15. Compare Deu t. Ecc 3:26. Luk 1:22; Luk 4:41.
to speak. Exo 7:2. Num 22:8. 2Sa 7:17. Psa 2:5; Psa 145:6, Psa 145:11, Psa 145:21. Eze 2:7. Luk 1:19, Luk 1:20. Joh 16:13.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
time to rend: Gen 37:29, Gen 37:34, 2Sa 1:11, 2Sa 3:31, 1Ki 21:27, 2Ki 5:7, 2Ki 6:30, Jer 36:24, Joe 2:13, Act 9:39
time to keep: Job 2:13, Psa 39:2, Isa 36:21, Jer 8:14, Lam 3:28, Amo 5:13, Amo 8:3, Mic 7:5
and a time to speak: Gen 44:18, Gen 44:34, 1Sa 19:4, 1Sa 19:5, 1Sa 25:24-44, Est 4:13, Est 4:14, Est 7:4, Job 32:4 – Job 37:24, Pro 24:11, Pro 24:12, Pro 31:8, Pro 31:9, Luk 19:37-40, Act 4:20
Reciprocal: Gen 2:7 – dust 2Ki 2:5 – I know it Neh 2:12 – neither Luk 9:36 – And they Joh 8:6 – as though