Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Exodus 35:20
And all the congregation of the children of Israel departed from the presence of Moses.
20 29. How the people responded to Moses’ summons: ordinary men, women, and ‘rulers,’ all brought willingly whatever their means, or their ability, enabled them to provide. An ideal picture of a community ready and eager to contribute liberally to the sanctuary and service of its God. Cf. on Exo 25:1.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
20 29. Presentation of the offerings.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
20, 21. all the congregation ofIsrael departed from the presence of MosesNo excitingharangues were made, nor had the people Bibles at home in which theycould compare the requirements of their leader and see if thesethings were so. But they had no doubt as to his bearing to them thewill of God, and they were impressed with so strong a sense of itsbeing their duty, that they made a spontaneous offer of the best andmost valuable treasures they possessed.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And all the congregation of the children of Israel departed from the presence of Moses. After they had heard what Moses was ordered to propose unto them, they immediately went to their tents, and fetched what they had with them, or were willing to part with, and brought it directly as a freewill offering to the Lord; as
Ex 35:21 shows: from hence, Aben Ezra observes, we may learn, that the whole congregation of Israel came to the tabernacle, company after company.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
| The Contributions for the Tabernacle. | B. C. 1491. |
20 And all the congregation of the children of Israel departed from the presence of Moses. 21 And they came, every one whose heart stirred him up, and every one whom his spirit made willing, and they brought the LORD‘s offering to the work of the tabernacle of the congregation, and for all his service, and for the holy garments. 22 And they came, both men and women, as many as were willing hearted, and brought bracelets, and earrings, and rings, and tablets, all jewels of gold: and every man that offered offered an offering of gold unto the LORD. 23 And every man, with whom was found blue, and purple, and scarlet, and fine linen, and goats’ hair, and red skins of rams, and badgers’ skins, brought them. 24 Every one that did offer an offering of silver and brass brought the LORD‘s offering: and every man, with whom was found shittim wood for any work of the service, brought it. 25 And all the women that were wise hearted did spin with their hands, and brought that which they had spun, both of blue, and of purple, and of scarlet, and of fine linen. 26 And all the women whose heart stirred them up in wisdom spun goats’ hair. 27 And the rulers brought onyx stones, and stones to be set, for the ephod, and for the breastplate; 28 And spice, and oil for the light, and for the anointing oil, and for the sweet incense. 29 The children of Israel brought a willing offering unto the LORD, every man and woman, whose heart made them willing to bring for all manner of work, which the LORD had commanded to be made by the hand of Moses.
Moses having made known to them the will of God, they went home and immediately put in practice what they had heard, v. 20. O that every congregation would thus depart from the hearing of the word of God, with a full resolution to be doers of the same! Observe here,
I. The offerings that were brought for the service of the tabernacle (v. 21, c.), concerning which many things may be noted. 1. It is intimated that they brought their offerings immediately they departed to their tents immediately to fetch their offering, and did not desire time to consider of it, lest their zeal should be cooled by delays. What duty God convinces us of, and calls us to, we should set about speedily. No season will be more convenient than the present season. 2. It is said that their spirits made them willing (v. 21), and their hearts, v. 29. What they did they did cheerfully, and from a good principle. They were willing, and it was not any external inducement that made them so, but their spirits. It was from a principle of love to God and his service, a desire of his presence with them in his ordinances, gratitude for the great things he had done for them, faith in his promise of what he would further do (or, at least, from the present consideration of these things), that they were willing to offer. What we give and do for God is then acceptable when it comes from a good principle in the heart and spirit. 3. When it is said that as many as were willing-hearted brought their offerings (v. 22), it should seem as if there were some who were not, who loved their gold better than their God, and would not part with it, no, not for the service of the tabernacle. Such there are, who will be called Israelites, and yet will not be moved by the equity of the thing, God’s expectations from them, and the good examples of those about them, to part with any thing for the interests of God’s kingdom: they are for the true religion, provided it be cheap and will cost them nothing. 4. The offerings were of divers kinds, according as they had; those that had gold and precious stones brought them, not thinking any thing too good and too rich to part with for the honour of God. Those that had not precious stones to bring brought goats’ hair, and rams’ skins. If we cannot do as much as others for God, we must not therefore sit still and do nothing: if the meaner offerings which are according to our ability gain us not such a reputation among men, yet they shall not fail of acceptance with God, who requires according to what a man hath, and not according to what he hath not,2Co 8:12; 2Ki 5:23. Two mites from a pauper were more pleasing than so many talents from a Dives. God has an eye to the heart of the giver more than to the value of the gift. 5. Many of the things they offered were their ornaments, bracelets and rings, and tablets or lockets (v. 22); and even the women parted with these. Can a maid forget her ornaments? Thus far they forgot them that they preferred the beautifying of the sanctuary before their own adorning. Let this teach us, in general, to part with that for God, when he calls for it, which is very dear to us, which we value, and value ourselves by; and particularly to lay aside our ornaments, and deny ourselves in them, when either they occasion offence to others or feed our own pride. If we think those gospel rules concerning our clothing too strict (1Ti 2:9; 1Ti 2:10; 1Pe 3:3; 1Pe 3:4), I fear we should scarcely have done as these Israelites did. If they thought their ornaments well bestowed upon the tabernacle, shall not we think the want of ornaments well made up by the graces of the Spirit? Prov. i. 9. 6. These rich things that they offered, we may suppose, were mostly the spoils of the Egyptians; for the Israelites in Egypt were kept poor, till they borrowed at parting. And we may suppose the rulers had better things (v. 27), because, having more influence among the Egyptians, they borrowed larger sums. Who would have thought that ever the wealth of Egypt should have been so well employed? but thus God has often made the earth to help the woman, Rev. xii. 16. It was by a special providence and promise of God that the Israelites got all that spoil, and therefore it was highly fit that they should devote a part of it to the service of that God to whom they owed it all. Let every man give according as God hath prospered him, 1 Cor. xvi. 2. Extraordinary successes should be acknowledged by extraordinary offerings. Apply it to human learning, arts and sciences, which are borrowed, as it were, from the Egyptians. Those that are enriched with these must devote them to the service of God and his tabernacle: they may be used as helps to understand the scriptures, as ornaments or handmaids to divinity. But then great care must be taken that Egypt’s gods mingle not with Egypt’s gold. Moses, though learned in all the learning of the Egyptians, did not therefore pretend, in the least instance, to correct the pattern shown him in the mount. The furnishing of the tabernacle with the riches of Egypt was perhaps a good omen to the Gentiles, who, in the fulness of time, should be brought into the gospel tabernacle, and their silver and their gold with them (Isa. lx. 9), and it should be said, Blessed be Egypt my people, Isa. xix. 25. 7. We may suppose that the remembrance of the offerings made for the golden calf made them the more forward in these offerings. Those that had then parted with their ear-rings would not testify their repentance by giving the rest of their jewels to the service of God: godly sorrow worketh such a revenge, 2 Cor. vii. 11. And those that had kept themselves pure from that idolatry yet argued with themselves, “Were they so forward in contributing to an idol, and shall we be backward or sneaking in our offerings to the Lord?” Thus some good was brought even out of that evil.
II. The work that was done for the service of the tabernacle (v. 25): The women did spin with their hands. Some spun fine work, of blue and purple; others coarse work, of goats’ hair, and yet theirs also is said to be done in wisdom, v. 26. As it is not only rich gifts, so it is not only fine work that God accepts. Notice is here taken of the good women’s work for God, as well as of Bezaleel’s and Aholiab’s. The meanest hand for the honour of God, shall have an honourable recompence. Mary’s anointing of Christ’s head shall be told for a memorial (Matt. xxvi. 13); and a record is kept of the women that laboured in the gospel tabernacle (Phil. iv. 3), and were helpers to Paul in Christ Jesus, Rom. xvi. 3. It is part of the character of the virtuous woman that she layeth her hands to the spindle, Prov. xxxi. 19. This employment was here turned to a pious use, as it may be still (though we have no hangings to make for the tabernacle) by the imitation of the charity of Dorcas, who made coats and garments for poor widows, Acts ix. 39. Even those that are not in a capacity to give in charity may yet work in charity; and thus the poor may relieve the poor, and those that have nothing but their limbs and senses may be very charitable in the labour of love.
Fuente: Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary
Verses 20-29:
The people returned to their tents, and began to gather materials for the tabernacle, as Moses instructed.
The work of building and furnishing the tabernacle was completely voluntary. And it was not undertaken as Moses’ project, or in honor of the people. It was “the Lord’s offerings,” 2Co 8:12.
This illustrates the manner of giving to sacred ministry today: it is the Lord’s work. One who gives either of money, materials, time, or talent, is to give as “unto the Lord,” not to the church, or to the missionary, or to any specific project.
All classes of people were involved. Both men and women gave of their jewelry. The men gave of the materials they had at hand. The women gave of their skills to weave the fabric for the tabernacle. The wealthy (rulers) gave of their gem-stones for the sacred garments, and the expensive spices and oils for the incense and anointing ointment. ,
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
20. And all the congregation of the children of Israel. There is no reason why any one should be surprised that the order of the narrative is changed, since it plainly appears from many passages that the order of time is not always observed by Moses. Thus he appears here to connect the fall of the people with the foregoing injunctions, both with respect to the building of the tabernacle, and the rest of the religious service of God. But I have shewn (292) upon good grounds that the tabernacle was built before the people fell into idolatry. Therefore Moses now supplies what had been before omitted, though I have followed the thread of the narrative in order to render it less difficult.
The sum of this relation is, that whatever was necessary for the building of the tabernacle was liberally contributed. It must be observed that they had departed from the presence of Moses: for we gather from this circumstance that, having severally retired to their tents, they had considered apart by themselves what they should give. Hence their liberality is deserving of greater praise, because it was premeditated; for it often happens that when a person has been bountiful from sudden impulse, he afterwards repents of it. When it is added that “they came, every one,” it is a question whether he means that the minds of the whole people were prompt and cheerful in giving, or whether he indirectly rebukes the stinginess and sordidness of those who meanly neglected their duty. In whichever way we choose to take it, Moses repeats what we have seen before, that the offerings were not extorted by force or necessity, but that they proceeded from voluntary and cordial feelings. I thus construe the words, “They came, every one, as his heart stirred each of them up,” as if he had said that they were not compelled by any law imposed upon them, but that every one was his own lawgiver, of his own good-will. This passage is absurdly twisted by the Papists in proof of free-will; as if men were incited by themselves to act rightly and well; for Moses, even while praising their spontaneous feelings, does not mean to exclude the grace of the Spirit, whereby alone our hearts are inclined to holy affections; but this stirring up is contrasted with the unwillingness by which ungodly men are withheld and restrained. Those, therefore, whom the Spirit rules, He does not drag unwillingly by a violent and extrinsic impulse, as it is called, but He so works within them upon their will, that believers stir up themselves, and they voluntarily follow His leadings. So that when it is added, “whose spirit was liberal in himself,” (293) the commencement of well-doing is not ascribed to men, nor is even their concurrence praised, as if they co-operated apart from God, but only the internal impulse of their minds, and the sincerity of their desires·
(292) See vol. 2, p. 143, and note.
(293) “Every one, whom his spirit made willing.” — A. V.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
MAIN HOMILETICS OF THE PARAGRAPH.Exo. 35:20-29
HINTS FOR BUILDING COMMITTEES
The wishes of God were made known in the previous section, and the people forth with resolved themselves into a committee of ways and means for carrying those wishes out. The action of the committee was
I. Immediate, Exo. 35:20-21. They did not hold a meeting to take into consideration the recommendations, and adopt the report. Nor did they elect a chairman, secretary, and working committee, to advise when, where, and how measures were to be carried out, but went away at once and commenced the work, before their ardour evaporated in idleness and their determination in talk. Had they met but once and debated the question, the probabilities are, like their Christian successors, the work might never have been done.
II. Spontaneous and earnest, Exo. 35:21. They had but one public meeting, and that a very short one, and that without resolutions or amendment or exciting appeals. The cause itself was all the eloquence they wanted. God had graciously forgiven them, and had condescended to dwell amongst them, and wanted a house for that purpose. That was enough for them. Their gratitude to, and love of God, did all the rest. Should Christian people want other incentives than these? and should their contributions to building funds, &c., be less prompt, less free, less generous? Must Christian contributions, for Gods cause, be prompted by dinners, soirees, harangues, bazaars, when Jewish contributions were given because the peoples heart was stirred up, and their spirit made willing by the grandeur of the cause? (2Co. 8:9-12).
III. According to individual ability. From gold and silver, down to brass and badgers skins. Nothing was too good or rich, nothing too poor. They did what they could. The poor did not draw back because of their poverty. The rich did not plead the many demands upon their wealth. God required then, as now, according to what a man had, not according to what he had not. God looks at quality as well as quantity, and has scales of His own in which to weigh the widows mites. The wisdom of this encouragement to poor as well as rich is obvious. Let the poor man feel that, because it has been raised partly by his exertions, the building belongs as much to him as to the rich man, and that he does not occupy its benches on sufferance or through charity.
IV. Self-denying. Many of these gifts for the sanctuary were the ornaments, luxuries, and comforts, and even the necessities of life. They felt that the work was worth the sacrifice. And what work? Let the Christian remember that the Tabernacle was mainly for domestic worship, not for teaching the will of God to the foreigner and idolater outside. When we consider, then, the work of Christian Churches, how that they are not merely or mainly for the comfort and edification of believers, but for the preaching of the Gospel for the lost and the depraved, how much more should we be willing to dispense with the superfluities of life, that the Word of God may have free course and be glorified!
V. Laborious. Their gifts did not supersede their individual exertion, Exo. 35:29. And those who could present no material gift gave their time and skill.
1. Let those who can work as well as give, do both. This applies particularly to women who, indeed, are specifically mentioned. The Church has wisely followed this example, and utilised this source of profit in Working-meetings, &c. Let them never go out of date. Not merely for the pecuniary profit, although that is by no means to be overlooked, but for the good feeling and sympathy that are established, and because of the interest in the Lords work that it develops.
2. Let those who cant give, work. Many a little country chapel has been built by the exertions of its congregation in their overtime. Work is money, and work done for God is perhaps more prolific in blessing, and more acceptable to God. This applies to the children. Let them have a share in the work; and let them be able in after years to look back with satisfaction and gratitude that they were early in life instructed and encouraged to work for God.
VI. In conclusionour text implies that some were unwilling, and did not embark on this glorious enterprise.
1. Some were selfish. They loved their property more than they loved their God.
2. Some may have argued, Amongst such a vast congregation, one contribution will not be missed, as many Christians do to-day.
3. Some may have argued, We are poor, and our mite will be really nothing in aid of the undertaking.
4. But all who failed to do what they could in this matter, necessarily failed to receive that special blessing which God has for, the cheerful giver.
J. W. Burn.
ILLUSTRATIONS
BY
REV. WILLIAM ADAMSON
Moral Law! Exo. 35:1-35.
(1.) The ceremonial law was like a scaffolding around a building which is being slowly and gradually raised. When the building is completed, the scaffolding is taken away. But the moral law is like the rafters, deep sunk in the building itself. These cannot be taken away without the ruin of the whole structure of revelation.
(2.) The ceremonial law is like the bright petals of a blossom, which drop off to make room for the fruit. But the moral law is like the stem, which upholds both blossom and fruit. For God is holyGod is good; and therefore the law of holiness and goodness must, like God, endure for ever.
Thy God is good, His mercy nigh,
His love sustains thy tottering feet;
Trust Him, for His grace is sure,
Ever doth His Truth endure.
Zehn.
Gift-Generosity! Exo. 35:21.
(1.) Dr. Fowler remarks that the servants of God should be as hearty as the servants of Satan have been. They gave their ornaments for the golden calf; now they give them to God. Let grace succeed sin, as Paul passed from a self-sacrificing persecutor to a self-denying and laborious preacher. God invites but does not compel. Every one is to do what he can. Christs kingdom rests on the affections. Its motive is love, its object is the perfection of love.
(2.) Spurgeon relates of a woman who was known to be very poor, that she offered at a missionary meeting to subscribe one penny a week to the mission field. When remonstrated with, that surely she could not afford such a sum in her great poverty, she replied, I spin so many hanks of yarn a week for my living, and Ill spin one hank more, which will be a penny a week for the Society.
To pass, when life her light withdraws,
Not void of righteous self-applause,
Nor in a merely selfish cause.
Church Gifts! Exo. 35:21-22. Bickersteth says the urgent needs of the Church Missionary Society were set before his flock on November 25th; and, although his congregation was by no means a wealthy one, 100 was collected. A printed note was circulated during the week following, in which he asked for a great effort to be made to raise the sum of 300 in this emergency of Foreign Missions. On Sunday 300 were cast into the Lords treasury, including a cheque for 100a roll of bank notes to the amount of 75, the proceeds of the sale of a silver bowl, and a little boys silver cup. There were also two small gold rings put in the plates, and two more silver mugs were since sent for sale. So that he had 400, or more than he asked for, to send to the Society for missions to the heathen.
But what or who are we, alas!
That we in giving are so free!
Thine own before our offering was,
And all we have we have from Thee.
Wicher.
Almsgiving, &c.! Exo. 35:21-22. Two women were one day discussing what constituted the true beauty of the hand. Differing in opinion, they selected a gentleman at umpire. It was a delicate matter. He thought of Paris and the three goddesses. Glancing from one to the other of the hands presented for examination, he replied at last, Ask the poor, and they will tell you that there is a more beautiful hand than these. Astonished at this reply, they inquired, What hand? To which he responded that the poor considered that the most beautiful hand in the world which was devoted to deeds of loving service and almsgiving. There is one hand more beautiful stillthe hand that with a humble, grateful heart, brings gifts for the worship and service of God.
At least not rotting like a weed,
But, having sown some generous seed,
Fruitful of further good indeed.
Necklaces and Jewels! Exo. 35:22. Hengstenberg tells us that in Egypt costly and elegant ornaments abounded in proportion as the clothing was simple and scarce. Girdles, necklaces, armlets, rings and earrings of various kinds, suspended from the neck, are found represented in the paintings, and in fact still exist among the mummiesthe excellence of the Egyptians in some of the nicer and more elaborate and useful branches of art. They imitated, with a skill not certainly surpassed by moderns, the amethyst, the emerald, and other precious stores; and they formed necklaces of all the hues of the rainbow. From these, it is plainas a matter of historythat the Israelites received instructions in the art of making, as well as engraving, precious stones.
The jasper, streaked with many a tender dye,
The sapphire, of celestial blue serene,
The agate, once Chalcedons peerless boast,
The melibean hyacinth, and last
The lucid violet of amethyst.
Bickersteth.
Permanent Offerings! Exo. 35:22. Dr. Judson tells of a Karen woman who offered herself for baptism. After the usual examination, he inquired whether she could give up her ornaments for Christ. It was an unexpected blow. He explained the spirit of the Gospel, and appealed to her own consciousness of vanity. He then read to her the apostles prohibition in 1Ti. 2:9. She looked again and again at her handsome necklace; and then, with an air of modest decision, she took it off, saying, I love Christ more than this.
No love but Thine, but Thine can me relieve;
No light but Thine, but Thine will I receive;
No light, no love but THINE.
Bonar.
Fine Linen! Exo. 35:25. In the tombs of Beni Hassan, there are pictures of the method of preparing and twisting the thread for the manufacture of the fine liner or byssus of which the priests garments were composed. The yarn was beaten with clubs, and the thread boiled in water, so as to soften it. Arsinoe, Pelusium, and Alexandria were celebrated for their weaving, which was principally done by men, and not by women. In agreement with this last fact, the preparation of the cloth for the sanctuary, and of the robes of the priests, was entrusted throughout to the care of men. The women did the spinning, and they bought of the people which they had spun.
To toil in tasks, however mean,
For all we know of right and true,
In this alone our worth is seen;
Tis this we were ordained to do.
Sterling.
Spindle and Spinning! Exo. 35:25. In ancient times, and even in periods not long ago in our own country, the distaff and spindle formed as commonly the occupation in the higher ranks of society, as do the more elegant accomplishments of the present day. Even in the Augustan age of Rome, the Emperor usually wore no other garments than what were made at home by his wife, sister, or daughter. Irby and Mangles in their Travels say, that in Arabia, while the girls guard the flocks they have a bundle of wool at their backs for spinning. The spindle was probably the most ancient form of spinning apparatus. In India and other parts of the East, the art of spinning, so says the author of Rays from the East, is still of the most primitive kind. The Hindoo mother, placing her infant on the ground, will sit by the hour turning the simply-formed machine with her hand; at her wheel
Spinning amain, as if to overtake
The never-halting time; or, in her turn,
Teaching some novice in the Eastern home
Her skill in this, or other household work.
Tribute-Offerings! Exo. 35:29.
(1.) Gratitude! A slave in the Southern plantations was aided by a Canadian to escape from the horrible oppression of a slave-driver. He was enabled to procure employment in Canada, and, being a skilled mechanician by natural talent, he was able to command a liberal income. Every half-year a mysterious gift reached the home of the Canadian liberatorGratitudes tribute for my freedom. Freed from the bondage of Egyptian taskmasters, Israel had ample occasion to testify their gratitude to the Divine deliverer.
(2.) Gladness! Frequently, an announcement may be seen in the daily papers that the Queen has been graciously pleased to accept some subjects gift, a book, or something else. The donor is glad to have his gift accepted by so great a personage as his sovereign. It becomes a red-letter day on which the donation was acknowledged. What gladness the Israelite donors ought to have felt in their hearts that the Kingthe Divine King in their midst, and heavens dread Sovereign-consented to receive their voluntary offerings!
Pitying Lord, wilt Thou despise
This my sacrifice?
Tell me, Saviour, do I bring Anything?
Kimball.
Sacred Self-denial! Exo. 35:29.
(1.) In a happy rural parsonage were two children. The parish was a poor one, often visited with distress and disease. The elder girl delighted in deeds of loving service amongst the aged and needy the younger found pleasure in self-gratification. On one occasion came an urgent demand upon the charity of the charitable, and the love of the loving. The elder was desirous of helping in time of need, and gave up her trinkets and presents, with the consent of her another, to be appropriated to supplying the necessity. But the younger hugged her presents, and grudged to give her necklaces and ornaments. On the following Sunday, as they walked to the house of God, they presented a singular contrast, the one plainly attired, with no ornament of any kind, the other arrayed in all her prettiness of jewel and adornmentwhich was the happier! Churchgoers, who saw outwardly, may have thought the one in all her bravery; but her mother and her God knew otherwise.
(2.) So Moses and Jehovah saw that the hearts of those Israelites, who had cheerfully given up their armlets and amulets of gold and silver, their jewels and necklaces of precious stones, were happier far than those who still retained them. They may have derided their plainly-robed fellows for their over-devotion to God; but they could not have the inward sense of joy and satisfaction which springs from unselfish self-sacrifice for God. And when the givers and non-givers stood before the completed tabernacle, on whom would the Divine benediction rest. Thus will it be when the Church of Christ is perfect in the last day.
Their earthly ministry approved, Hell enroll
Their names among the citizens of heaven,
And freemen of His sinless universe.
Fuente: The Preacher’s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell
The People Bring Gifts In Abundance ( Exo 35:20-29 ).
Exo 35:20-22
‘And all the congregation of the children of Israel departed from the presence of Moses. And they came, every one whose heart stirred him up, and every one whom his spirit made willing, and brought Yahweh’s offering, for the work of the Tent of Meeting, and for all its service, and for the holy garments. And they came, both men and women, as many as were willing-hearted, and brought brooches, and earrings, and signet-rings, and armlets, all jewels of gold; even every man that offered an offering of gold to Yahweh.’
When they heard Moses’ words the people went away, and stirred in heart and spirit, as many as were made willing brought their offerings to Yahweh of jewellery, and ornaments and gold. Note that it included men and women. They gladly sacrificed their ornaments and jewellery. Many of them, of course, they had earlier abandoned at Yahweh’s command (Exo 33:5-6). But none of the people were left out and we may be sure that Yahweh noticed each contribution as He did the contribution of the widow woman in the Temple in the time of Jesus (Mar 12:42-43).
Exo 35:23-26
‘And every man, with whom was found bluey-violet, and purpley-red, and scarlet, and fine linen, and goats’ hair, and rams’ skins dyed red, and dolphin skins, brought them. Every one who offered an offering of silver and bonze brought Yahweh’s offering; and every man, with whom was found acacia wood for any work of the service, brought it. And all the women that were skilled (‘wise-hearted’) span with their hands, and brought what they had spun, the bluey-violet, and the purpley-red, the scarlet, and the fine linen. And all the women whose heart stirred them up in skilfulness spun the goats’ hair.’
Both men and women brought what they could, the men providing dyed cloth, fine linen, and so on, including acacia wood that they were keeping by for another purpose. And the enthusiastic women did the skilled work of spinning in their tents at home and then brought it to Moses’ workers. Clearly goats’ hair was seen as requiring special expertise.
Exo 35:27-28
‘And the rulers brought the onyx stones, and the stones to be set, for the ephod, and for the breastplate; and the spice, and the oil; for the light, and for the anointing oil, and for the sweet incense.’
The wealthier leaders brought the more valuable jewels, especially those which were required for the ephod and the breastpouch, and spice and oil. The latter being for the lamp, for the anointing oil and for the incense.
Exo 35:29
‘The children of Israel brought a freewill-offering to Yahweh; every man and woman, whose heart made them willing to bring, for all the work which Yahweh had commanded to be made through Moses.’
So all who were willing brought their gifts freely so as to complete the work which Yahweh had shown Moses as requiring to be done.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
The Willing Offerings
v. 20. And all the congregation of the children of Israel departed from the presence of Moses. v. 21. And they came, everyone whose heart stirred him up, v. 22. And they came, both men and women, v. 23. And every man with whom was found blue, and purple, and scarlet, and fine linen, and goats’ hair, and red skins of rams, and badgers’ skins v. 24. Every one that did offer an offering of silver and brass brought the Lord’s offering, v. 25. And all the women that were wise hearted, v. 26. And all the women whose heart stirred them up in wisdom spun goats’ hair v. 27. And the rulers brought onyx stones, and stones to be set, for the ephod and for the breastplate; v. 28. and spice, and oil for the light, and for the anointing oil, and for the sweet incense.
v. 29. The children of Israel brought a willing offering unto the Lord, every man and woman whose heart made them willing, urged them on, to bring for all manner of work which the Lord had commanded to be made by the hand of Moses.
Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann
What is here said of the departure of the congregation, means, that they went away with hearts disposed to the service. Deu 5:28 .
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Free Gifts for the Tabernacle
Exo 35:20-29
The people departed to think over their response to Moses appeal, and then returned. How long had elapsed? Did Moses speak in the morning, and did they return in the cool of the evening? And what a rich profusion of gifts did they contribute! Here one of the princes brought a priceless jewel; here again were crowds of ordinary people bringing precious amulets, ear-rings, nose-rings and other jewelry, in which Orientals take great delight. Large numbers of women brought their metal mirrors, and out of them the laver was afterward constructed. These things were piled in heaps, and we are told that the Spirit drove the people to give till the artificers exclaimed that they had more than enough.
But what would the gifts have availed apart from the divinely designated artists! We, too, are called to build the Temple of God. Ask the Spirit of God to show you your place and equip you for it. Some sphere will be probably indicated by your natural aptitude; but be sure that you are filled with the Spirit of God.
Fuente: F.B. Meyer’s Through the Bible Commentary
Reciprocal: 2Ch 31:5 – as soon Pro 3:9 – General