Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Genesis 37:26

And Judah said unto his brethren, What profit [is it] if we slay our brother, and conceal his blood?

26. conceal his blood ] Referring to the superstition that blood, which was not covered, would cry for vengeance: see note on Gen 4:10. Cf. Job 16:18; Isa 26:21; Eze 24:7.

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

If we suffer him to perish in the pit, when we may sell him with advantage,

and conceal his blood, i.e. his death, as the word blood is often used. See Deu 17:8; 2Sa 1:16; 3:28.

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole

26-28. Judah said, . . . What profitis it if we slay our brother?The sight of these travellingmerchants gave a sudden turn to the views of the conspirators; forhaving no wish to commit a greater degree of crime than was necessaryfor the accomplishment of their end, they readily approved of Judah’ssuggestion to dispose of their obnoxious brother as a slave. Theproposal, of course, was founded on their knowledge that the Arabianmerchants trafficked in slaves; and there is the clearest evidencefurnished by the monuments of Egypt that the traders who were in thehabit of bringing slaves from the countries through which theypassed, found a ready market in the cities of the Nile.

they . . . lifted up Josephout of the pit, and sold himActing impulsively on Judah’sadvice, they had their poor victim ready by the time the merchantsreached them; and money being no part of their object, they sold himfor

twenty pieces of silverThemoney was probably in rings or pieces (shekels), and silver is alwaysmentioned in the records of that early age before gold, on account ofits rarity. The whole sum, if in shekel weight, did not exceed 3.

they brought Joseph intoEgyptThere were two routes to Egypt: the one was overland byHebron, where Jacob dwelt, and by taking which, the fate of hishapless son would likely have reached the paternal ears; the otherwas directly westward across the country from Dothan to the maritimecoast, and in this, the safest and most expeditious way, themerchants carried Joseph to Egypt. Thus did an overruling Providencelead this murderous conclave of brothers, as well as the slavemerchants both following their own free coursesto be parties in anact by which He was to work out, in a marvellous manner, the greatpurposes of His wisdom and goodness towards His ancient Church andpeople.

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

And Judah said unto his brethren,…. In sight of the Ishmaelites, a thought came into his mind to get Joseph sold to them;

what profit [is it] if we slay our brother, and conceal his blood? it could be no advantage to them even if they could have concealed his blood from men; and if it was discovered, as it would, in all likelihood, by come means or another, then they must be answerable for it; and if not, God would take vengeance on them, from whom they could never conceal it; and therefore it would be most profitable and advantageous to them to sell him, and not destroy him, or take away his life; and to suffer him to lie in the pit and die was the same thing.

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

‘And Judah said to his brothers, “What profit do we gain if we kill our brother and conceal his blood? Come and let us sell him to the Ishmaelites, and let not our hand be upon him for he is our brother, our flesh.” And his brothers listened to him.’

There is still disagreement about what is to be done to Joseph. The more belligerent (Simeon and Leah especially? – compare on Genesis 34. They were bloodthirsty enough) still want to kill him while others, like Judah, are probably siding with Reuben’s idea. But the sight of the caravan combines the two parties. They can not only get rid of Joseph for good without killing him, but also make a profit out of it as well by selling him to the traders.

“Conceal his blood.” That is, conceal his violent death. But they are all aware that spilled blood, especially of a brother, ‘cries from the ground’ (Gen 4:10).

“Let not our hand be upon him for he is our brother, our flesh.” Judah does not like the idea of killing a person of his own flesh and blood. It would be looked on by all decent people as a heinous crime. Instead they will sell him.

Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett

EXPOSITION

Gen 37:26, Gen 37:27

And Judah (apparently shrinking from the idea of murder) said unto his brethren, What profit is it if (literally, what of advantage that) we slay our brother, and conceal his blood? (i.e. and hide the fact of his murder). Come, and let us sell him to the Ishmaelites, and let not our hand be upon him (literally, and our hand, let it not be upon him, i.e. to slay him); for he is our brother and our fleshor, more expressly, our brother and our flesh he (cf. Gen 29:14). And his brethren were contentliterally, hearkened, viz; to the proposal.

Gen 37:28

Then there passed by Midianites merchantmen;literally, and passed by the men, Midianites (by country), merchants (by profession). On the different appellations given to the traders vide infra, Gen 37:36and theynot the Midianites (Davidson), but Joseph’s brethrendrew and lifted up Joseph out of the pit, and sold Joseph to the Ishmaelites for twenty pieces of silverliterally, for twenty (sc. shekels) of silverL2 10s.; the price afterwards fixed for a boy between five and twenty (Le Gen 27:5), the average price of a slave being thirty shekels (Eze 21:32), and Joseph only bringing twenty because he was a lad (Kurtz), because the Midianites desired to make money by the transaction (Keil), perhaps because-his brethren wished to avoid the reproach of having acted from love of gain (Gerlach), but most probably because Joseph’s brethren cared little what they had for him, if so be they were rid of him (Lawson). On the term keseph vide Gen 20:16. And they brought Joseph into Egyptwhere they in turn disposed of their purchase, doubtless at a profit (verse 36).

Gen 37:29, Gen 37:30

And Reuben (in whose absence apparently the scheme of sale had been concocted and carried through) returned to the pit (obviously with a view to deliver Joseph); and, behold, Joseph was not in the pit; and he rent his clothesa token of his mingled grief and horror at the discovery (of. Gen 37:34; Gen 44:13; 2Sa 13:31; 2Ki 18:37; Job 1:20). And he returned unto his brethren, and said, The child (or young man, as in Gen 4:23, where in the one hemistich is equivalent to in the other) is not; and I, whither shall I goi.e. however shall I account for his disappearance?

Gen 37:31, Gen 37:32

And theyi.e. Joseph’s Brethren, including Reuben, to whom manifestly the matter had been explained, and who wanted the courage either to expose their wickedness or to dissent from their device for deceiving Jacobtook Joseph’s coat, and killed a kid of the goats,more correctly, a he-goat of the goats, since the name of goat seems to have belonged in a wider sense to other animals also (Gesenius); usually understood to mean the somewhat older he-goat which was used as a sin offeringLe Gen 16:9; Gen 23:19; Num 7:16; Num 15:24 (Furst)and dipped the coat in the blood; and they sent the coat of many colors (vide on Num 15:3), and they brought it (or caused it to be brought by the hands of a servant) to their father, and said (of course by the lips of the messenger), This have we found: know now whether it be thy son’s coat or no. Either Jacob’s sons had not the fortitude to witness the first outburst of his grief, or they had not the effrontery requisite to carry through their scheme in their own persons, and were accordingly obliged to employ another, probably a slave, to carry home the bloody coat to Jacob in Hebron.

Gen 37:33

And he knew it, and said, It is my son’s coat; an evil beast (vide Gen 37:20) hath devoured him (this was precisely what his sons meant him to infer); Joseph is without doubt rent in pieces , the inf. abs. Kal with the Pual expressing undoubted certainty.

Gen 37:34

And Jacob rent his clothes, and put sackcloth upon his loins, (cf. , el, frog, saccus), the usual dress of mourners (2Sa 3:31; Neh 9:1; Est 4:1), was a coarse, thick haircloth, of which corn sacks were also made (Gen 42:25), and which in cases of extreme mental distress was worn next the skin (1Ki 21:27)and mourned for his son many days. Though twenty-two years elapsed before Jacob again beheld his son, and though doubtless the old man’s grief for the premature and, violent death, as he imagined, of Rachel’s child was little abated by the lapse, of time, yet the expression “many days” may only be employed to mark the intensity of Jacob’s sorrow, which continued longer than the customary mournings of the period.

Gen 37:35

And all his sonsthe criminals become comforters (Lange)- and all his daughterseither Jacob had other daughters besides Dinah (Kalisch, Gerlach, ‘Speaker’s Commentary’), or these included his daughters-in-law, the word being employed as in Rth 1:11, Rth 1:12 (Willet, Bush, Murphy), or the term is used freely without being designed to indicate whether he had one or more girls in his familyrose up to comfort him (this implies the return of Jacob’s brethren to Hebron); but he refused to be comforted; and he said (here the thought must be supplied: It is vain to ask me-to be comforted), For I will go down into the grave unto my son mourningor, retaining the order of the Hebrew words, which is almost always more expressive than those adopted by our translators, I will go down to my son mourning to, or towards, in the direction of, Sheol. The term more fully , an inf. absol, for a noun, either

(1) from = , to go down, to sink (Gesenius, Ftirst), signifying the hollow place; or,

(2) according to the older lexicographers and etymologists, from , to ask, and meaning either the region which inexorably summons all men into its shade, the realm that is always craving because never satisfied (Keil, Murphy, Lange), or the land that excites questioning and wonder in the human heart, “the undiscovered country from whose bourne no traveler returns” (T. Lewis)is not the grave, since Jacob’s son had no grave, but the place of departed spirits, the unseen world (, LXX.) into which the dead disappear, and where they consciously exist (2Sa 12:23). Thus (literally, and) his father (not Isaac) wept for him.

Gen 37:36

And the Midianitesor Medanites, descendants of Medan, a brother of Midian, both of whom were sons of Abraham by Keturah (Gen 25:2). That the Arabian merchants are called Ishmaelites (Gen 37:27), Midianites (Gen 37:28), and Medanites (Gen 37:36), is explained as an evidence of varying legends (Tuch, Bleek, Davidson, Colenso), but is better accounted for as indicating that the traders were composed of men of various nations (Clericus); that the Midianites, Ishmaelites, and Medanites were often confounded from their common parentage and closely similar habits (Keil); that the narrator did not intend to lay stress upon the nationality, but upon the occupation, of the travelers (Havernick); that the proprietors of the caravan were Ishmaelites, and the company attending it Midianites or Medanites (Lange); that the Ishmaelites were the genus, and the Midianites and Medanites the species, of the same nation (Rosenmller, Quarry); that the Midianites or Medanites were the actual purchasers of Joseph, while the caravan took its name from the Ishmaelites, who formed the larger portion of it (Murphy)sold him into Egypt (i.e. having brought him into Egypt, perhaps, as Luther conjectures, passing through Hebron on the way, sold him) unto Potiphar,the name is abbreviated from Poti-Phera (Gen 41:50), i.e. he who belongs to the sun (Gesenius, sub voce). The LXX. render or an officer, from , an unused root signifying to pull up by the roots, originally means a eunuch (Isa 56:3, Isa 56:4), such as Oriental monarchs were accustomed to set over their harems (Est 2:3, Est 2:14, Est 2:15; Est 4:5), but is here employed to denote an officer or courtier generally, without any reference to the primary signification, since Potiphar was marriedof Pharaoh’s (vide Gen 12:15), and captain of the guardliterally, captain of the slaughterers, i.e. chief officer of the executioners, the nature of whoso duties may be understood from the fact that he was keeper of the State prison, “where the king’s prisoners were bound” (Gen 39:20).

HOMILETICS

Gen 37:26-36

Joseph carried by Midianites to Egypt.

I. THE INFAMOUS SALE.

1. The wicked proposal. “Come, and let us sell him. By whatever motives Judah was actuated, the notion that either he or his brethren had a right thus to dispose of Joseph’s life was not simply an open violation of the Divine law which constituted all men with equal fights, and in particular made every man his brother’s keeper, not his brother’s destroyer or proprietor, but a hideous discovery of the utter perversion of moral nature which had taken place in the case of Joseph’s brethren. So low had they now sunk, that they were become not alone without humanity, but without natural affection as well.

2. The double reason.

(1) The advantageous character of the proposed transaction is exhibited by Judah, who doubtless understood the sort of arguments that would weigh most powerfully with his brethren. Simply to assassinate the hated stripling and conceal his blood might indeed gratify their feelings of revenge, but would not do much to enrich them. Might it not be possible to dispose of him more profitably than by the coarse way of killing him? Then

(2) the humane aspect of the proposed transaction is pathetically dwelt upon by Judah,”he is our brother and our flesh,”in which perhaps may also be detected Judah’s subtle knowledge of human nature, in reasoning that men who cared nothing for the claims of humanity and brotherhood in themselves might be induced to do a little cheap philanthropy by sparing Joseph, after they had first been made to see that it would likewise be profitable. Judah’s last remark was a master-stroke which overbore every vestige of opposition: “his brethren were content.”

3. The favorable opportunity. Many wicked schemes are happily never carried through because the opportunity is wantingthanks to Divine providence! But, on the other hand, thousands of nefarious crimes are born of the opportunitythanks to the sinful ingenuity of the fallen heart I The scheme of Judah was clearly suggested by the providential circumstance that at the moment an Ishmaelitish caravan was passing by on its way with gums and spicery to Egypt. That caravan was God’s chariot sent to convey Joseph to the throne of Egypt. Judah asked his brethren to see in it a prison van to take their brother into slavery in Egypt. Wicked men and God may often seem to play at cross purposes with one another, but God always triumphs. Man proposes; God disposes.

4. The accomplished transaction. “They drew and lifted Joseph up out of the pit, and sold him to the Midianites for thirty pieces of silver.” The first recorded specimen of a transaction which has frequently been repeated in the history of mankind. Slave markets have often imitated, but seldom surpassed, the wickedness of which Joseph’s brethren were guilty. It was not simply a fellow-creature that they sold, but a brother; and they had not even the poor apology of getting a good bargain, as they sold him for twenty shekelslittle over forty shillings!

5. The unforeseen result. Joseph’s purchasers conveyed him into Egypt, and sold him, as probably his brethren expected; it is scarcely likely they anticipated he would find his way into so honorable service as that of a high officer of state. But God was taking Joseph thereby a step nearer to his predicted elevation.

II. THE DOLEFUL TIDINGS.

1. The ominous symbol. The coat of ends, the token of a father’s love for his darling son, the insensate ruffians, after dipping it in blood, caused to be conveyed into their father’s presence by the hands of a swift-footed messenger. This was rather a proof of their cowardice than of their consideration for Jacob’s feelings.

2. The pretended discovery. The bearer of the blood-stained tunic was directed to say that the brethren had found the robe, and to ask, with expressions of their deep concern, whether or not it was the coat of his beloved son. Their intention we cannot think was to stab their father’s heart, but to mislead his judgment.

3. The expected inference. As they designed, the old man concluded that his son was devoured: “Joseph is without doubt rent in pieces.” Seldom do villains’ plots succeed so well.

III. THE SORROWING PARENT.

1. The bitter grief. The depth and tenderness of Jacob’s mourning for his lost son was

(1) visibly expressed: “he rent his clothes, and put sackcloth on his loins;”

(2) long continued: “he mourned for his son many days;” and, if we accept a proposed reading of the last clause of Gen 37:35,

(3) lovingly shared: “his father,” the blind Isaac, who still survived, “wept for him”for Rachel’s dead child and Jacob’s lost son.

2. The ineffectual consolation. “All his sons and all his daughters rose up to comfort him; but he refused to be comforted.” For this Jacob was

(1) to be excused, since his comforters were mostly hypocrites, whose proffered consolations must have sounded strangely hollow in his ears; but also

(2) to be blamed, since although God in his providence had taken away Joseph, that was no reason why he should give way to despairing grief. Not so did Abraham when he thought of losing Isaac.

HOMILIES BY F. HASTINGS

Gen 37:28

Drawn from the pit.

“And they drew and lifted up Joseph out of the pit.” As a compromise Joseph had been thrown into a pit. His brothers at first intended to murder him. Their intention was almost as bad as a murder. The Scriptures tell us that “he that hateth his brother is a murderer.” And one writer says, “Many a man who has not taken a brother’s life, by indulgence of malevolence, is in the sight of God a more sinful man than many who have expiated their guilt on a scaffold.” Joseph only was the gainer in that life was spared. To the brothers deep guilt appertained. They threw him into a pit to perish, thinking possibly to lessen guilt by avoiding the actual shedding of blood.

I. WE MUST EXPECT TO FIND PITFALLS IN LIFE. To Joseph the snare came suddenly. He was forced in. He had acted as he believed rightly in revealing the wicked deeds of his brethren, and he suffers for it. His brothers seize the first opportunity of bringing reprisals upon him for what they considered his officiousness. When alone they seized him. They were ten men to one stripling. Coward brothers! “In with him,” they say. In the pit’s depth is security, in its dryness speedy death. The pitfalls into which many stumble or into which they are drawn are such as these: circumstances being altogether unfavorable in life; or severe and overpowering temptations to some special sin, as intemperance, passion, or lust; or greed, or ambition, or spiritual pride. Debt, loss of character, and despondency are also deep pitfalls. If we come to love evil for itself, that is a very deep pit, and it adjoins that state which is hopeless. Many are drawn into these pits by carelessness, indifference, and neglect, while others are so entangled by circumstances and conditions of birth that the wonder is that they ever escape.

II. THERE IS OFTEN DELIVERANCE FROM THE DEEPEST PITFALLS. To Joseph it came at the right moment. It came in response to earnest desire. The brothers thought to make a profit by his deliverance, but God was saving him through their avarice and timidity. Joseph was helpless. His brothers had to lift him out. We must feel our helplessness, and then Christ is sure to deliver us from the pit of sin and despair. The brothers of Joseph had low and mercenary aims in lifting up their brother; Jesus is all love and self-sacrifice in the effort to save us. Nothing but the long line of his finished work and fervent love could reach souls. When brought up from the pit we shall not be inclined to praise ourselves. We shall ascribe all the glory to him who “brought us up out of the deep pit and fairy clay, and placed our feet upon a rock, and established our goings.”H.

Fuente: The Complete Pulpit Commentary

Gen 37:26 And Judah said unto his brethren, What profit [is it] if we slay our brother, and conceal his blood?

Ver. 26. What profit is it? &c. ] Cui bono said that old judge in Rome. a This is a song that most men will listen to. As the Jassians in Strabo, delighted with the music of an excellent harper, ran all away, when once they heard the market bell ring, save a deaf old man, that could take little delight in the harper’s ditties. But it were to be wished, that whenever we are tempted to sin, we would ask ourselves this question, What profit is it? &c.

a Cic., Orat. pro. C. Rabir.

Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)