Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Isaiah 44:17
And the residue thereof he maketh a god, [even] his graven image: he falleth down unto it, and worshipeth [it], and prayeth unto it, and saith, Deliver me; for thou [art] my god.
Isa 44:17
And the residue thereof he maketh a god
Residual religion
The scene is one which we may describe as very childish indeed.
It belongs to the very earliest stage one might imagine of the thought of worship, The man who evidently lives under conditions by no means of the highest civilisation feels himself exposed to the natural inclemency of the weather, and to the pangs of hunger. He selects a tree, and because he needs food he breaks up the tree and kindles a fire and prepares his food. He then rejoices in the warmth of the fire that he has kindled, and he has satisfied two of the simple wants of nature. He has been hungry, and he has provided himself food. He is cold, and he has provided himself with warmth. But there is yet another instinct in his nature which demands satisfaction. He is conscious that he is a weak creature in the midst of a strange and wonderful world. Mysterious powers that he cannot fathom seem to float about his life, and to interpose their forces often to the derangement of his plans. And therefore, when he has satisfied those two simple physical wants, he takes the residue of the tree that he has cut down, and he makes it into a god. Thus it is that he satisfies three imperious desires and needs of his nature. Is it wholly untrue to say that there are many men who live after this fashion, that when they have supplied their own wants, when their body has been amply fed, when the conditions of their life have been cared for so that they are well provided with the warming comforts of life, then, out of the residue of their time, out of the residue of their money, out of the residue of their thought, they will, perchance, consecrate something to God? (Bp. W. B. Carpenter, D. D.)
Materials and principles of life:
There is one very common delusion which, if we will watch ourselves, we shall find that we are all of us more or less liable to. We confuse the materials of life with the principles which ought to govern life. The materials of life in this poor mans case were very simple indeed. He is a man who can cut down a tree of the forest to make himself a habitation, and from the wood all round about him gathers what may be called the material of life, whether for the house or for the cooking of food, and these materials of life are such that you and I, looking back upon them from our refined and elevated position, say that they are very simple and very crude indeed; but he manipulates these materials after a certain principle. Given that we have different materials to deal with, and that ours is not the life of the forest and the dependence upon the forest, but that ours is the life of modern civilisation, with our railways and our telegraphs and our newspapers daily, with our opportunities of enjoyment in abundance, and with means of information in the multiplied books which are issued daily from the press. With all these things which constitute the material of our life, and with our occupations governed and guided by the principles of modern civilisation, it is possible that we may say–and we shall say truly–that the materials of life which we possess are far superior to the rude materials which belonged to that poor mans life. But is the difference between one man and another to be judged by the materials which a man uses, or by the principles which he applies in the use of those materials? (Bp. W. B. Carpenter, D. D.)
Religion the all-comprising principle of life:
Is religion to be looked upon as a thing that you can separate? Or are you going to regard religion as a principle which is applicable to life, and applicable at every hour and in every place, and all through life? Was that old rhyme right that told us that the twenty-four hours of the day should be divided into eight hours for work, and eight for rest, and eight which are given to God; or was not that correction right of the man who said, eight for toil, and eight for rest, and all for God? Gounod had painted on his piano the head of the Christ, as if he would say, Wherever I look before I compose, I look upon the head of the crucified Lord, and I know that the spirit of that Lord passes into me; and when I begin to compose my melodies, the music of His life penetrates my soul, and gives me the respiration. We should look into the face of God, understand the character of God, understand that He claims every human being as His son, and understand, therefore, that there is no bondage here, but that there is the freedom of the son, and the love of the sons heart, and the desire of the sons heart to advance the kingdom and the family of God. (Bp. B. W. Carpenter, D. D.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 17. He falleth down unto it] There were four forms of adoration used among the Hebrews:
1. HISHTACHAVAH, The prostration of the whole body.
2. KADAD, The bowing of the head.
3. CARA, The bending of the upper part of the body down to the knees.
4. BARACH, Bowing the knee, or kneeling. See on Isa 49:23.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
And the residue thereof he maketh a god, even his graven image,…. What remains of the tree, that is not consumed by making a fire to warm with, by heating the oven to bake bread with, and by using it in the kitchen to roast meat with, this is made an image of, and being graved and carved, is called a god, and worshipped; though it is of the same matter, and of the same nature, with that which was used for warming, baking, and roasting:
he falleth down unto it, and worshippeth it, and prayeth unto it, and saith, deliver me, for thou art my god; he bows unto it, falls down on his knees, and spreads out his hands, and lifts them up, and uses all the gestures of adoration; yea, makes a formal address in prayer and supplication, and particularly requests that he would deliver him from present danger and distresses, of whatsoever kind he was attended with; declaring at the same time he was his god, in whom he trusted, and from whom he expected relief and help. Monstrous stupidity!
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Isa 44:17 And the residue thereof he maketh a god, [even] his graven image: he falleth down unto it, and worshippeth [it], and prayeth unto it, and saith, Deliver me; for thou [art] my god.
Ver. 17. He falleth down unto it, and worshippeth it. ] Do not Papists even the same, whatever they pretend in defence of their idolatry? See Rev 9:20 . See Trapp on “ Rev 9:20 “ So loath they are to have their asses’ ears to be seen.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
maketh a = maketh into a.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Deliver me: Isa 36:19, Isa 36:20, Isa 37:38, Dan 3:17, Dan 3:29, Dan 6:16, Dan 6:20-22, Dan 6:27
Reciprocal: Deu 27:15 – maketh 1Sa 5:3 – set him 1Ki 18:26 – no voice 2Ki 22:17 – the works Isa 37:19 – no gods Isa 42:17 – say to Isa 45:20 – they Isa 46:2 – they could Isa 46:6 – they fall Dan 3:6 – falleth Hos 13:2 – according Jon 1:5 – cried Hab 2:19 – that
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
The leftover piece becomes the idol. How can what is the result of human effort and care, an idol, put forth any effort and care for its builder? Worshipping and praying to a graven image is absurd (cf. Mat 6:7-8).
"Diagoras of Melos, a pupil of Democritus, once threw a wooden standing figure of Hercules into the fire, and said jocularly, ’Come now, Hercules, perform thy thirteenth labor, and help me to cook the turnips.’" [Note: Delitzsch, 2:211.]
"John Knox, in decrying the idolatry of the Mass, parodied this passage with devastating effect: ’With part of the flour you make bread to eat, with the residue you fashion a god to fall down before’." [Note: Archer, p. 640.]
Isaiah concluded his exposé of paganism by highlighting the blindness of idol worshippers.