But afterward they turned, and caused the servants and the handmaids, whom they had let go free, to return, and brought them into subjection for servants and for handmaids.
Verse 11. But afterward they turned] They had agreed to manumit them at the end of the seventh year; but when the seventh year was ended, they recalled their engagement, and detained their servants. This, I believe, is what is here meant.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
Like a company of wretched hypocrites, they reformed this abuse only to serve a turn, which when it was served they returned again to their old oppression; and in this thing not the people alone, but the government, was to be blamed, for their judges in the courts of justice ought to have executed the law of the Lord, and to have restrained the covetous and oppressive humour of the people. The learned author of the English Annotations thinketh that that which altered their minds was a little alteration of their state, during the siege; for, Jer 37:5, we read that the Babylonians and Chaldeans hearing of an army coming out of Egypt, to relieve the city, left the siege for a time, and that the prophet, Jer 34:22 of this chapter, relates to that, when he prophesied that the king of Babylons army should return. But these wretched men, seeing the Babylonian army raised from the siege, concluded they were now out of Gods hands, and repented of their repentance in this particular, and would make all their servants return into their former servitude.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
11. During the interruption ofthe siege by Pharaoh-hophra (compare Jer 34:21;Jer 34:22; Jer 37:5-10),the Jews reduced their servants to bondage again.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
But afterwards they turned,…. From the law of God, and their own agreement, and returned to their former usage of their servants; they changed their minds and measures. This seems to be done, when the king of Babylon, hearing the king of Egypt was coming to break up the siege of Jerusalem, quitted it, and went forth to meet him, as appears from Jer 34:21; the Jews now finding themselves at liberty, and out of danger as they imagined, wickedly rebelled against the law of God; perfidiously broke their own covenant, repenting of what they had done, and returned to their former ways of oppression and cruelty; which shows they were not hearty and sincere in their covenant:
and caused the servants and the handmaids, whom they had let go free,
to return, and brought them into subjection for servants and for handmaids; which was done by force, contrary to the will of their servants and handmaids, and in violation of the law of God, and their own solemn oath and covenant.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
He then adds, And they afterwards turned, that is, after they had heard and obeyed. The turning refers to a change of purpose, for they immediately repented of what they had done. They had felt some fear of God, and then equity and kindness prevailed; but they soon turned or changed. The word is taken sometimes in a good, and sometimes in a bad sense. He says that they turned, or returned, because they receded or turned back after having commenced a right course. And they remanded; there is a correspondence between the verbs ישובו ishibu, they turned, and ישיבו ishibu, they remanded, or made to return the servants and maids whom they let go free, and brought them under as servants and maids There is no doubt but that the Jews alleged some excuse when they thus remanded their servants, and robbed them of the privilege of freedom: but God designed that they should act in sincerity and without disguise. Whatever, then, subtle men may contrive as an excuse for oppressing the miserable, and however they may disguise things before men, yet God, who requires integrity, does not allow such disguises, for he would have us to deal honestly with our neighbors, for all craftiness is condemned by him.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
11. But afterwards, etc. This reformation in the presence of impending danger, was no more genuine than deathbed repentances frequently are. So soon as the danger seemed over-past the wrong was resumed. The idiom in this verse is mistaken in the Authorized Version. Instead of turned, and caused to return, the true translation should be, they again caused them to return.
Jer 34:11 But afterward they turned, and caused the servants and the handmaids, whom they had let go free, to return, and brought them into subjection for servants and for handmaids.
Ver. 11. But afterwards they turned, and caused their servants. ] Stimulante avaritia. Covetousness prompting and pricking them on thereunto for that is the root of all evil. 1Ti 6:10 The Chaldeans had drawn off, to go, belike, to fight with the relief that was coming out of Egypt; Jer 37:7 ; Jer 37:11 and now these silly Jews thought themselves out of the reach of God’s rod perfidiously repealed their vows, re-embondaged their servants, and are therefore worthily threatened with a more cruel servitude to the Chaldeans for this their relapse and breach of covenant with God.
Jer 34:21, Jer 37:5, Exo 8:8, Exo 8:15, Exo 9:28, Exo 9:34, Exo 9:35, Exo 10:17-20, Exo 14:3-9, 1Sa 19:6-11, 1Sa 24:19, 1Sa 26:21, Psa 36:3, Psa 78:34-36, Psa 125:5, Pro 26:11, Ecc 8:11, Hos 6:4, Hos 7:16, Zep 1:6, Mat 12:43-45, Rom 2:4, Rom 2:5, 2Pe 2:20-22
Reciprocal: Jer 34:15 – in proclaiming Jer 34:16 – ye turned
Jer 34:11. The greed of mankind for property is great, as well as the desire to be dominant. The princes broke their word as well as the law and forced their servants to resume their burdens of servitude.
Shortly thereafter, the masters reneged on their promise, broke their covenant, and brought their servants back into subjection. It was a predictable response from people who had long ago and repeatedly demonstrated that they were covenant-breakers. Nebuchadnezzar’s withdrawal may have been the impetus for the peoples’ decision to break their promise to their servants. They may have thought that they were safe and that life would return to normal soon.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)