Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Job 34:37
For he addeth rebellion unto his sin, he clappeth [his hands] among us, and multiplieth his words against God.
37. Job’s sin is that of his former life, for which he has been cast into afflictions; his rebellion is his unsubmissive, defiant demeanour against God in his speeches. This “rebellion” is further described as clapping of the hands, a gesture of open mockery and contempt. The next clause, “multiplieth his words against God”, that is, his rebellious speeches, indicates that it is against God that Job “claps his hands,” not against his friends and counsellors he shews his defiant scorn of God among them.
The passage is decisive as to the position taken by Elihu towards Job. His judgment of Job extends far beyond the mere bearing of the latter under his afflictions; it embraces Job’s former life. And the language exceeds in harshness almost anything that the three friends had said.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
For he addeth rebellion unto his sin – To the sin which he has formerly committed and which bas brought these trials upon him, he now adds the sin of complaining and rebellion against God. Of Job, this was certainly not true to the extent which Elihu intended, but it is a very common case in afflictions. A man is visited with calamity as a chastisement for his sins. Instead of searching out the cause why he is afflicted, or bowing with resignation to the superior wisdom of God when he cannot see any cause, he regards himself as unjustly dealt with; complains of the government of God as severe, and gives occasion for a severer calamity in some other form. The result is often that he is visited with severe affliction, and is made to see both his original offence and the accumulated guilt which has made a new form of punishment necessary.
He clappeth his hands amongst us – To clap the hands is either a signal of applause or triumph, or a mark of indignation, Num 24:10, or of derision, Job 27:23. It seems to be used in some such sense here, as expressing contempt or derision for the sentiments of his friends. The meaning is, that instead of treating the subject under discussion with a calm spirit and a disposition to learn the truth and profit by it, he had manifested in relation to the whole matter great disrespect, and had conductcd like one who attempts to silence others, or who shows his contempt for them by clapping his hands at them. It is scarcely necessary to say, that, notwithstanding all the professed candor and impartiality of Elihu, this is a most unfair representation of the general spirit of Job. That he had sometimes given vent to improper feelings there can be no doubt, but nothing had occurred to justify this statement.
And multiplieth his words against God – That is, his arguments are against the justice of his government and dealings. In the special phrase used here – he multiplieth words, Elihu means, probably, to say, that there was more of words than of argument in what Job had said, and that he was not content even with expressing his improper feelings once, but that he piled words on words, and epithet on epithet, that he might more fully give utterance to his reproachful feelings against his Maker.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Verse 37. He addeth rebellion unto his sin] An ill-natured, cruel, and unfounded assertion, borne out by nothing which Job had ever said or intended; and indeed, more severe than the most inveterate of his friends (so called) had ever spoken.
Mr. Good makes this virulent conclusion still more virulent and uncharitable, by translating thus: –
“For he would add to his transgressions apostasy;
He would clap his hands in the midst of us:
Yea, he would tempest his words up to God.”
There was no need of adding a caustic here; the words in the tamest translation are tart enough. Though Elihu began well and tolerantly, he soon got into the spirit, and under the mistake, of those who had preceded him in this “tempest of words.”
ON Job 34:30 I have referred to the case of Hegiage, governor of the Babylonian Irak, under the caliph Abdul Malec. When Hegiage was informed that the people were in a state of mutiny because of his oppressive government, before they broke out into open acts of hostility, he mounted on an eminence, and thus harangued them: –
“God has given me dominion over you; if I exercise it with severity, think not that by putting me to death your condition will be mended. From the manner in which you live you must be always ill-treated, for God has many executors of his justice; and when I am dead he will send you another, who will probably execute his orders against you with more rigour. Do you wish your prince to be moderate and merciful? Then exercise righteousness, and be obedient to the laws. Consider that your own conduct is the cause of the good or evil treatment which you receive from him. A prince may be compared to a mirror; all that you see in him is the reflection of the objects which you present before him.”
The people immediately dropped their weapons, and quietly returned to their respective avocations. This man was one of the most valiant, eloquent, and cruel rulers of his time; he lived towards the close of the 7th century of the Christian era. He is said to have put to death 120,000 people; and to have had 50,000 in his prisons at the time of his decease.
Yet this man was capable of generous actions. The following anecdote is given by the celebrated Persian poet Jami, in his Baharistan: –
Hegiage, having been separated from his attendants one day in the chase, came to a place where he found an Arab feeding his camels. The camels starting at his sudden approach, the Arab lifted up his head, and seeing a man splendidly arrayed, became incensed, and said, Who is this who with his fine clothes comes into the desert to frighten my camels? The curse of Good light upon him! The governor, approaching the Arab, saluted him very civilly, with the salaam, Peace be unto thee! The Arab, far from returning the salutation, said, I wish thee neither peace, nor any other blessing of God. Hegiage, without seeming to heed what he had said, asked him very civilly “to give him a little water to drink.” The Arab in a surly tone, answered, If thou desirest to drink, take the pains to alight, and draw for thyself; for I am neither thy companion nor thy slave. The governor accordingly alighted, and having drank, asked the Arab, “Whom dost thou think the greatest and most excellent of men?” The prophet sent by God, said the Arab, and thou mayest burst with spleen. “And what thinkest thou of Aaly?” returned Hegiage. No tongue can declare his excellence, said the Arab. “What,” asked Hegiage, “is thy opinion of the caliph Abdul Malec?” I believe him to be a very bad prince, replied the Arab. “For what reason?” said Hegiage. Because, said the Arab, he hath sent us for governor the most execrable wretch under heaven. Hegiage, finding himself thus characterized, was silent; but his attendants coming up, he rejoined them, and ordered them to bring the Arab with them.
The next day Hegiage ordered him to be set at table with himself, and bade him “eat freely.” The Arab, ere he tasted, said his usual grace, “God grant that the end of this repast may be no worse than the beginning!” While at meat the governor asked him, “Dost thou recollect the discourse we had together yesterday?” The Arab replied, God prosper thee in all things! but as to the secret of yesterday, take heed that thou disclose it not to-day. “I will not,” said Hegiage; “but thou must choose one of these two things; either acknowledge me for thy master, and I will retain thee about my person; or else I will send thee to Abdul Malec, and tell him what thou hast said of him.” There is a third course, replied the Arab, preferable to those two. “Well, what is that?” said the governor. Why, send me back to the desert, and pray God that we may never see each other’s face again. Cruel and vindictive as Hegiage was, he could not help being pleased with the frankness and courage of the man; and not only forgave him the preceding insults but ordered him 10,000 pieces of silver, and sent him back to the desert, according to his wish.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
He sinned before, as other ways, so by impatience under his afflictions, which may be ascribed to human infirmity; but now he is grown obstinate and incorrigible, and instead of repenting and humbling himself for his sins, he excuseth them, and justifieth himself, and accuseth the blessed God. Or thus,
For otherwise, unless he be thoroughly tried and rebuked, he will add rebellion unto his sin; he will break forth into open rebellion against God, and (as it follows) he will clap, &c. For the Hebrew words are of the future tense, although such are oft rendered by the past tense.
He clappeth his hands, in token of joy and victory, as this phrase is used, Psa 47:1; 98:8; insulting and triumphing, not only over us, as if none of us were able to answer him, but in a sort over God himself, inasmuch as he hath again and again desired leave of God to debate his cause with or before him, and in that case did not doubt to maintain it, but could not obtain the favour or justice of a fair hearing.
Multiplieth his words against God: whereas the reverence which he oweth to God, and his infinite distance from him, should teach him to be very modest and sparing in his speeches of God, Job on the contrary poureth forth whole floods of bold and presumptuous expostulations with God, and reflections upon Gods proceedings with him.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
37. clappeth . . . handsinscorn (Job 27:23; Eze 21:17).
multiplieth . . . words(Job 11:2; Job 35:16).To his original “sin” to correct which trials have beensent, “he adds rebellion,” that is, words arraigningGod’s justice.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
For he addeth rebellion unto his sin,…. Or he “may” or “will” add u, if he is suffered to go on at this rate, and is not stopped; as yet he has only committed, it may be charitably hoped, some sins through ignorance, error, and mistake, but if he is let alone he will proceed from evil to evil, to more ungodliness; to be guilty of presumptuous sins, of open treason and rebellion against God;
he clappeth [his hands] amongst us, or “he will clap”; he will either clap his hands together as expressive of extreme grief and sorrow, of the agonies of his mind; showing extravagant impatience, and pouring out his complaints in the most bitter manner, see Eze 21:14; or rather by way of joy and triumph, as having got the victory over us, see
Ps 47:1;
and multiplieth his words against God, or “will multiply”; he has said too many things already against God, his justice in his dealings with him, Job 34:5; he will say more if he is not restrained. These are the reasons Elihu gives for a thorough trial and strict examination of Job; and they are taken partly from a concern for the good of Job, and partly on their account, that they might not be triumphed over, and chiefly for the glory of God.
u “addet”; Montanus, Mercerus, Drusius, Cocceius, so in the next clauses.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
(37) He clappeth his hands among us.As though he were confident of victory in argument.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
37. For he addeth rebellion The root idea of “rebellion,” is, “break from,” “sever.” The more Job murmurs, the more he becomes alienated from God. The danger is that he will completely apostatize from God. That Job may, if possible, be saved, it is desirable that he be tried to the utmost, or “till eternity,” (Furst,) if need be.
Clappeth An expression of contempt, same as in Job 27:23.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
REFLECTIONS
READER, let not this interesting discourse of Elihu pass away from us without leaving behind it upon our minds the many precious instructions it is so eminently calculated to impart; nor, in the view of the suitableness of it to Job, overlook the interest we ourselves have in it. Every perfection of JEHOVAH preacheth to us the same blessed truths as Elihu here contends for; namely, that GOD’S sovereignty, and GOD’S justice, independent of his covenant love and wisdom, have unanswerable claims upon all his creatures, for the most extensive and unqualified submission to his holy will in all things. That conclusion of Eli is, or ought to be, the conclusion of every one: It is the LORD , let him do what seemeth him good. But when we add to this view of GOD’S power and authority, the sense also of his wisdom and his love, while the former demands our dutiful submission, as to the LORD’S right, this latter adds another claim to this becoming frame of mind, because we know these glorious perfections are both engaged, and always in exercise, to arrange and order all things, as shall best and ultimately promote the happiness of his redeemed people, whatever outward events may be appointed for the accomplishment. And the consciousness of this brings the mind into the sweetest of all frames, when the heart is once fully established in the firm faith and assurance of it. For the soul of the faithful will then arrive at this happy conclusion, Wherefore should I be anxious at any one circumstance that occurs, when my GOD’S power and sovereignty, and my GOD’S wisdom and love, are all in exercise to do that for me which may best promote my GOD’S glory, and my welfare? No, saith the believer, let my GOD, my JESUS, my wise and loving LORD, choose everything for me; for sure I am it will then not only be the wisest and best chosen, but that which ought to be, for his glory and my good. Reader, I pray GOD that both you and I may find grace thus to act, and thus to refer everything into his hands that concerns our present and everlasting welfare, from a perfect conviction of that unerring truth, All things work together for good to them that love GOD , to them that are the called according to his purpose.
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Job 34:37 For he addeth rebellion unto his sin, he clappeth [his hands] among us, and multiplieth his words against God.
Ver. 37. For he addeth rebellion unto his sin ] Or, he will add, viz. unless he be exercised and subdued by more and longer load of afflictions; there will else be no hoe with him, no ground will hold him. The cross is of singular use to tame that rebel flesh; and is theretbre prayed for by Jeremiah for himself, Jer 10:24 , and here by Elihu for Job, who had before advisedly chosen affliction rather than sin, and reckoned it as a mercy to be visited every morning, and tried every moment, Job 7:18 .
He clappeth his hands among us
And multiplieth his words against God
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
rebellion. Hebrew. pasha’. App-44.
sin. Hebrew. chata’. App-44.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
rebellion: 1Sa 15:23, Isa 1:19, Isa 1:20
he clappeth: Job 27:23
multiplieth: Job 8:2, Job 8:3, Job 11:2, Job 11:3, Job 35:2, Job 35:3, Job 35:16, Job 42:7
Reciprocal: Psa 78:19 – Yea Ecc 10:14 – is full of words Eze 25:6 – thou hast Eze 35:13 – have multiplied
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Job 34:37. He addeth rebellion unto his sin He sinned before by impatience under his afflictions, but now he is grown obstinate, and, instead of humbling himself for his sins, he justifies himself, and accuses the blessed God. He clappeth his hands among us In token of victory, insulting and triumphing; and multiplieth his words against God In effect, though not directly.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
34:37 For he {e} addeth rebellion unto his sin, he clappeth [his hands] among us, and multiplieth his words against God.
(e) He stands stubbornly to the maintenance of his cause.