Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Judges 9:42
And it came to pass on the morrow, that the people went out into the field; and they told Abimelech.
42. the people went out ] Perhaps to lie in wait for passers by, if we connect this verse with Jdg 9:25.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
42 49. Abimelech destroys Shechem and Migdal-Shechem
After the Shechemites have suffered the severe defeat just described, and Abimelech has retired and dwelt at Arumah, it is incredible that, on the next morning, the people should come out of the city as if nothing had happened, and that Abimelech should be able to surprise them by the same device which had proved so successful the day before. All difficulties disappear if we regard these verses, not as the sequel to 34 41, but as a second account of Abimelech’s attack on Shechem, originally following 22 25. The Shechemites break out into open treason ( Jdg 9:25); A. takes instant (‘on the morrow’ Jdg 9:42) and severe revenge. Moore thinks that Jdg 9:22-25 are derived from E, Jdg 9:42-49 and Jdg 9:26-41 from J.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
After Gaals expulsion, the people went out into the field, either to complete the vintage, or for some other agricultural operation. They (Zebul and his party) sent word of this to Abimelech.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
The people went out into the field; either, first, To renew the fight, and avenge themselves for their last loss, the great God hardening their hearts to their destruction, and the accomplishment of his word delivered to them by Jotham. But here is not one word about the peoples arming, or resisting, or fighting, as there was before, Jdg 9:39, but only of their slaughter, Jdg 9:43,44. Or, secondly, To their usual and then proper employments about their lands; for though their vintage was past, the seed-time was now come, and other things were to be done in the fields. Or, thirdly, Upon some solemn occasion, not here expressed; possibly to make a solemn procession, or perform some other rites in the fields, to the honour of their god Baal-berith, as the manner of the heathen was, to make supplication to him for his help, and for better success; or only to go for that end to the house of their god Baal-berith, which is thought to have been in the fields, as may seem from Jdg 9:27,46, on a mountain upon the east side of the city.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
And it came to pass on the morrow,…. The day after the battle:
that the people went out into the field; some think to fight, and try the event of another battle, in order to be freed from Abimelech, but that seems not so likely: rather to finish their vintage, as Josephus l, or to till their ground, to plough and sow, which quickly came on after the vintage was ended; find this they might do the more securely, since Abimelech had withdrawn himself and his forces to his place of habitation, and so concluded he would not soon at least return to them; and the rather they might think he would be more easy, with then, since Gaal was thrust out from among them:
and they told Abimelech; or it was told Abimelech, that the people came out into the field, and so an opportunity offered to him to come and cut them off, as they were at their business unarmed.
l Antiqu. l. 5. c. 7. sect. 4.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
The next day the people of Shechem went into the field, apparently not to make war upon Abimelech, but to work in the field, possibly to continue the vintage. But when Abimelech was informed of it, he divided the people, i.e., his own men, into three companies, which he placed in ambush in the field, and then fell upon the Shechemites when they had come out of the city, and slew them.
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
(42) On the morrow.This is surprising. Possibly, however, there were important agricultural labours to be finished, and Abimelech had lulled them into security by ostentatiously withdrawing his forces.
Into the fieldThe wide corn-fields at the opening of the Valley of Shechem (Stanley).
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
(42) Set the hold on fire.The words of Jotham (Jdg. 9:20) had proved prophetic. (For a similar incident see 1Ki. 16:18Zimri burnt in the palace at Tirzah.)
Died.The Vulgate renders it, Were killed with the smoke and fire.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
42. On the morrow After the thrusting out of Gaal.
The people went out into the field Apparently to attend to their agricultural pursuits. They seem to have thought the war was over, and Abimelech had retreated to some place far away. “Notwithstanding their treasonable practices, they think the matter is now settled, and that Abimelech is content with the banishment of Gaal. They have forgotten, to their own hurt, what Jotham told them. The thorn-bush emits fire, and consumes those who despise it.”
Cassel.
They told Abimelech Probably Zebul again sent messengers to carry the information. Compare Jdg 9:31.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘ And so it happened on the next day, that the people went out into the field, and they told Abimelech.’
The next day some of the people who were with Abimelech went from Arumah into the countryside, probably to survey the situation, and returned to tell him of the expulsion of Gaal and his brothers, something they may have learned from a messenger sent by Zebul. This interpretation is supported by the re-mention of ‘the people’ in Jdg 9:43.
Alternately it may be that some of the people in the city, thinking that Abimelech had withdrawn, themselves went out to their fields to prepare them for the next stage of ploughing, before Abimelech could attack again. Whatever else happened the supply of food had to be maintained. (This may have been Abimelech’s hope when he withdrew). Then this news reached Abimelech, either from scouts or by means of a messenger from the city, from faithful Zebul.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
The destruction of Shechem, and burning of the Tower of Shechem. The siege of Thebez, and Abimelechs death
Jdg 9:42-57
42And it came to pass on the morrow, that the people went out into the field; and they told Abimelech. 43And he took the [i. e. his] people, and divided them into three companies, and laid wait in the field, and looked, and behold, the people were come [coming] forth out of the city; and he rose up against them, and smote them. 44And Abimelech, and the company [companies] that was [were] with him, rushed forward,22 and stood [placed themselves] in the entering [at the entrance] of the gate of the city: and the two other companies ran [advanced] upon all the people that were in the fields, and slew them. 45And Abimelech fought against the city all that day; and he took the city, and slew the people that was therein, and beat 46[tore] down the city, and sowed it with salt. And when all the men [lords] of the tower of Shechem heard that, they entered into an [the] hold23 of the house of the god Berith [house of El-Berith]. 47And it was told Abimelech, that all the men 48[lords] of the tower of Shechem were gathered together [there]. And Abimelech gat him up to Mount Zalmon, he and all the people that were with him; and Abimelech took an axe in his hand, and cut down a bough from the trees, and took it [lifted it up], and laid it on his shoulder, and said unto the people that were with him, What ye have seen me do, make haste, and do as I have done. 49And all the people likewise cut down [off] every man his bough, and followed Abimelech, and put them to the hold, and set the hold on fire upon24 them: so that [and] all the men of the tower of Shechem died also, about a thousand men and women. 50Then went Abimelech to Thebez, and encamped against [laid siege to] Thebez, and took it. 51But there was a strong tower within [in the midst of] the city, and thither fled all the men and women, and all they [the lords] of the city, and shut it to [after] them, and gat them up to the top [roof] of the tower. 52And Abimelech came unto the tower, and fought against it, and went hard [approached] unto the door of the tower to burn it with fire. 53And a certain woman cast a piece of a [cast an upper] mill-stone upon Abimelechs head, and all to [omit: all to]25 brake his skull26 [to pieces]. 54Then he called hastily unto the young man his armour-bearer, and said unto him, Draw thy sword, and slay me [put me to death], that men say not of me, A woman slew him. And his young man thrust him through, and he died. 55And when the men of Israel saw that Abimelech was dead, they departed every man unto his place. 56Thus God rendered [caused to return] the wickedness of Abimelech, which he did unto his father, in slaying his seventy brethren: 57And all the evil of the men of Shechem did God render [cause to return] upon their heads: and upon them came the curse of Jotham the son of Jerubbaal.
TEXTUAL AND GRAMMATICAL
[1 Jdg 9:44.: spread out, sc. in hostile array. The same word occurs Jdg 9:33; and in both places seems to contrast the expanded form of a body of men freely advancing, with its contraction when lying in ambush. The verse is somewhat difficult. Dr. Cassel renders it as follows: And Abimelech and the companies that were with him, spread themselves out. Part stood [took their stand] at the entrance of the gate of the city, and two companies threw themselves on all that were in the field, and slew them.Tr.]
[2 Jdg 9:46.. The meaning of this word is doubtful. Our author renders it Halle; De Wette, Veste, strong hold; Keil suggests Zwinger (cf. arx, from arceo), citadel, fortress; while according to Bertheau, Jdg 9:49 (where he would render: and they put the boughs on the , and infer thence that the place bearing this name was low), rather implies a cellar-like place, some sort of hollow. Cf. 1Sa 13:6, the only other passage where the word occurs, and where it is conjoined with caves and clefts of the rocks.Tr.]
[3 Jdg 9:49.: Cassel, with them, i. e. the boughs. But this rendering will scarcely find favor. De Wette: over them, i. e. the people in the .Tr.]
[4 Jdg 9:53.All to brake, is old English for entirely brake. Cf. Webster, Dict., under all, adv.Tr.]
[5 Jdg 9:53.., from , is undoubtedly to be read , which reading, according to Bertheau and Keil, is found in the edition of R. Norzi, Mantua, 174244.Tr.]
EXEGETICAL AND DOCTRINAL
Jdg 9:42-44. The people went out into the field. Sin is blind, and must be, for only repentance opens the eyes. The people of Shechem, notwithstanding their treasonable practices, actually think that the matter is now settled, and that Abimelech is content with the banishment of Gaal. It is a constant characteristic of the natural man, that he either does not hear his conscience, or seeks to silence it by persuading himself that the guilt to which he shuts his own eyes is also unseen by others. He thinks only of sin and its pleasure, not of its punishment. The Shechemites have forgotten, to their own hurt, what Jotham told them. The thorn-bush emits fire, and consumes those who despise it. Abimelech only tarries in his concealed height, until he has inspired the foolish Shechemites with confidence. With true Punic strategy, he allures them to the open fields, there to attend to their labor, as if all were peace, and nothing more were to be feared. Caught in the snare, their retreat is cut off. One of Abimelechs companies holds the gate, while others deal destruction to all in the fields. Similar strategies are told of Hamilcar, the Carthaginian, against Agrigentum, and of Hannibal against Saguntum (Frontinus, lib. iii. 10, 1).
Jdg 9:45. He destroyed the city and sowed it with salt. Notwithstanding Abimelechs sanguinary disposition, it would be difficult to account for his savage treatment of Shechem, if we did not remember that the city stood in the covenant of Baal-berith with him. The very money that assisted him to the throne, had been taken from the temple of this god. Now, among oriental nations, as among others, infidelity to covenant obligations was the greatest of crimes. The God of Israel, also, who made his divine covenant with the nation, says (Deu 4:23): Take heed unto yourselves, lest ye forget the covenant of Jehovah your God, which he made with you. For Jehovah your God is a consuming fire, a jealous God. He utters the threat (Lev 26:25): I will bring the sword upon you, that shall avenge the quarrel of my covenant. In the book of the prophet Ezekiel (Eze 17:15) we read: He hath broken the covenant, and shall he be delivered?
This covenant with Jehovah, Abimelech has desecrated in the most horrible manner. Does he fear no punishment for that transgression? But the natural man, who lightly breaks the covenant of his God, nevertheless claims the terrible right of punishing those who have failed in duty toward himself, with a severity greater than that threatened by God. The breach of a covenant born of blood and sin, is visited with vengeance like a consuming fire. Shechem is razed to the ground, and salt is strewn over its site. The usual explanation of this proceeding, of which no other instance occurs,27 is, that by it Abimelech intends to declare Shechem an unfruitful land, a land of salt, as it were (). But this explanation, although accepted by all recent expositors, does not appear to be satisfactory. For to make the land unfruitful, he neither intends, nor, if he did, were he able; for no one will think of such a salting as would actually bring about this result.28 He can only intend to say, that this city, being unfaithful to its covenants, and forgetful of its oaths, has ceased to exist, and is never more to be known as a city. When Joshua inflicted a similar destruction on Jericho, he swore that it should never be rebuilt (Jos 6:26). Abimelech makes the same declaration in the act of strewing salt; for salt is the symbol of an oath, just as among all nations, not excepting the dull tribes of Siberia, it was the symbol of covenants. The salt which he strewed over Shechem intimated both the cause and the perpetuity of the vengeance inflicted. A fate still worse, but less deserved, was suffered by the descendants of the Milesian Branchid who had betrayed the treasures of the temple of Apollo, at Didymi, into the hands of Xerxes, and had obtained through him a city in Persia. Alexander, coming upon this city, gave it up to the vengeance of the Milesians in his army. These destroyed it to its very foundations, killed all the inhabitants, so that not a trace of them remained, and tore up the groves by their roots, so that, as Curtius says (vii. 5, 34), vasta solitudo et sterilis humus linqueretur. Shechems destruction was not so bad as that: and it was afterwards rebuilt (1Ki 12:25).
Jdg 9:46-49. And the lords of the Tower of Shechem heard of it. Still more cowardly than that of the Shechemites, is the conduct of the men of the Tower of Shechem. They venture no resistance at all, but run for safety to the temple-asylum of El-Berith. The House of El, here mentioned, cannot well be the same with the House of Baal hitherto spoken of. The matter probably stands thus: Under the covenant entered into by Israel and the heathen, both parties served the Covenant-Deity, the Israelites in the temple of El-Berith, the heathen in that of Baal-Berith. Aside from this difference of locality, the worship was perhaps identical; and the covenant itself was already a sin. It would however be an error, to suppose that during such times of apostasy all distinction between Israel and the heathen ceased to exist. Abimelech still continued to be an Israelite; and the inhabitants of the Tower of Shechem probably expected to find greater security in the House of El-Berith than could be looked for in the asylum of a wholly heathen temple. The place to which they retired, is called , and is probably a hall of the temple29 (like , used to denote a special part of the temple at Jerusalem). The sanctuary privileges of temples were very great among all nations; and, as is well known with reference to the temple at Ephesus, were not seldom misused. In order to destroy Pausanias without violating the rights of sanctuary, the doors of the temple of Minerva, at Sparta, in which he had taken refuge, were built up, and the roof taken off that under the open sky he might more quickly perish (Corn. Nepos, Paus. Judges 5). Abimelech resorted to more terrible means. He ascended the neighboring wooded hill, Mount Zalmonso named from its forest-shades,and hewed off a multitude of boughs, himself being the first to swing the axe. (The plural, , stands for all the axes that were used.) These boughs were piled up about the building, and all its inmates perished in the flames. A like deed is related by Herodotus (iv. 164) of Arcesilaus: a number of Cyrenans having taken refuge in a tower, he heaped wood around it, and burned them to death. It is a species of violence which, especially among the northern nations, has been practiced oftener than once,as, for instance, by king Olaf (Tryggvesson), who burned in this manner all the warlocks of his land (Snorro, Heimgskringla, Saga vi. Judges 69).
In connection with these events, a number of topographical references to the region of Shechem, which prove that the narrator was an eye-witness, but which although alluding to permanent landmarks, as mountain, valley, and forest, are yet not easily traced. Migdal (Tower of) Shechem, however, may be confidently assumed to be the same as Beth (House of) Millo (Jdg 9:6; Jdg 9:20). Abimelechs wrath against it is thus readily understood; for its inhabitants had taken part in his election at the Monument-Oak, and had now doubtless made common cause with those of Lower Shechem. For it is perhaps safe to assume that the place were related to each other as Upper and Lower Shechem. Migdal Shechem, as the Acropolis, was a little city by itself, and might have ventured or further resistance; but its people preferred to pray for mercy, which Abimelech was not the man to exercise.
Jdg 9:50-53. And Abimelech went to Thebez. Since the course of the narrative leads to the inference that Abimelechs march upon this city formed part of his vengeance on Shechem, its location must be sought for at a very short distance from that place. The opinion of recent expositors and travellers (Robinson, Berggren, cf. Ritter, xv. 448 [Gages Transl. ii. 341]), who identify Thebez with the modern Tubs at the head of Wady el-Malih, does not therefore appear to be altogether certain. To me, Tubs has appeared more suitable for Tabbath (Jdg 7:22). Thebez must have been closely connected with Shechem. Since, in accordance with Jothams parable, the two miserable associates, Abimelech and Shechem, perish by each other, and since Abimelech finds his end at Thebez, the inhabitants of the latter must have been among those who at first patronized Abimelech. Thebez was built in circular form, like the Grecian Theb, for it had its Tower in the centre. Its inhabitants preferred desperate battle to mercy; but they were already on the verge of destruction, when Abimelech (inter confertissimos violentissime dimicans, fighting furiously in the thickest of the crowd, as Justin says of Pyrrhus) was struck on the head by a mill-stone, which crushed his skull. It appears that the inhabitants of Thebez were prepared for a lengthy siege, since along with provisions they had also brought a hand-mill into the tower. Such a mill consisted of a movable upper (, wagon, Eng. runner, Germ.Lufer), and of an immovable, nether stone ( ), on which the other turned. The duty of grinding generally devolved on women. Abimelech falls, as the Jewish expositors say, by a stone, as on a stone he had murdered his brothers. Other usurpers also have met with the same fate. When in 1190, impious men sought to destroy the poor Jews, who had taken refuge in the royal castle at York, one of the ringleaders of the mob fell, crushed by a stone (Milman, Hist. of the Jews, iii. 242).
Jdg 9:54. That men say not, A woman slew him. Poor Abimelech, in the moment of his fall, thinks of nothing save that his death will be ascribed to a woman; an end which has at all times been considered inglorious. To his latest breath, men were to be deceived by appearances. For though his attendant gave him the finishing stroke, it was nevertheless the woman that killed him. And, as 2Sa 11:21 shows, he was not able to avert the dreaded infamy. Still, this utterance also goes to show the warlike spirit of the fallen man. Energy, valor, and iron strength were inherited characteristics of the son, not unworthy of his heroic father. He towers, at all events, far above the cowardly Shechemites, the braggart Gaal, and the intriguing Zebul. If ambition and unrestrained fury had not stupefied his conscience; if, like Gideon, he had learned to serve and to suffer; had faithfully tarried the call of his God, and had not sought to found by the sword what only Gods Spirit can establish, it might have been said of him, as of the noblest: he judged delivered his people. As it was, he is never ever named by the title King which he arrogated to himself; and Jewish tradition exalts the heathen king Abimelech of Abrahams time, above the valiant son of Gideon.
Jdg 9:55-57. When the men of Israel saw that Abimelech was dead. In Abimelechs death, also, we may read the fate of tyrants. His attendant thrusts him through without hesitation, and the dead chieftain is forsaken by all. The interest created by his person and his wages, is gone. How much more beautiful is the otherwise so tragical death of Saul! His attendant, influenced by reverence, refuses to kill him, and finally follows him in voluntary death. The songs of David celebrate his memory: Abimelechs epitaph is his brother Jothams curse!
HOMILETICAL AND PRACTICAL
Compare on p. 147.
[Bp. Hall: O the just successions of the revenges of God! Gideons ephod is punished with the blood of his sons; the blood of his sons is shed by the procurement of the Shechemites; the blood of the Shechemites is shed by Abimelech; the blood of Abimelech is spilt by a woman. The retaliations of God are sure and just.The same: The pursued Shechemites fly to the house of their god Berith: now they are safe; that place is at once a fort and a sanctuary. Whither should we fly in our distress, but to our God? And now this refuge shall teach them what a god they have served.The same: Now, according to the prophecy of Jotham, a fire goes out of the bramble, and consumes these cedars, and their eternal flames begin in the house of their Berith. The confusion of wicked men rises out of the false deities which they have doted on.Henry What inventions men have to destroy one an other!The same: About 1,000 men and women perished in these flames, many of whom, probably, were no way concerned in the quarrel, nor meddled with either side; men of factious turbulent spirits, perish not alone in their iniquity, but involve many more, that follow them in their simplicity, in the same calamity with them.Wordsworth: Many powerful enemies of God and of his people, after victorious acts of oppression, have been overthrown at last by weak instruments, even by women: Sisera, by Deborah and Jael; Haman, by Esther; Holofernes, by Judith; and the Church, by the power of the Seed, overcomes the world.Bush: The end of Abimelech suggests the remark, 1. That they who thirst for blood, God will at last give them their own blood to drink. 2. The weak, in Gods hand, can confound the mighty; and those who walk in pride, He is able to abase. 3. They who in life consulted only their pride and ambition, will usually die as they lived, more solicitous that their honor should be preserved on earth, than that their souls be saved from hell. (4.) The methods proud men take to secure a great name, often only serve to perpetuate their infamy.Tr.]
Footnotes:
[22][Jdg 9:44.: spread out, sc. in hostile array. The same word occurs Jdg 9:33; and in both places seems to contrast the expanded form of a body of men freely advancing, with its contraction when lying in ambush. The verse is somewhat difficult. Dr. Cassel renders it as follows: And Abimelech and the companies that were with him, spread themselves out. Part stood [took their stand] at the entrance of the gate of the city, and two companies threw themselves on all that were in the field, and slew them.Tr.]
[23][Jdg 9:46.. The meaning of this word is doubtful. Our author renders it Halle; De Wette, Veste, strong hold; Keil suggests Zwinger (cf. arx, from arceo), citadel, fortress; while according to Bertheau, Jdg 9:49 (where he would render: and they put the boughs on the , and infer thence that the place bearing this name was low), rather implies a cellar-like place, some sort of hollow. Cf. 1Sa 13:6, the only other passage where the word occurs, and where it is conjoined with caves and clefts of the rocks.Tr.]
[24][Jdg 9:49.: Cassel, with them, i. e. the boughs. But this rendering will scarcely find favor. De Wette: over them, i. e. the people in the .Tr.]
[25][Jdg 9:53.All to brake, is old English for entirely brake. Cf. Webster, Dict., under all, adv.Tr.]
[26][Jdg 9:53.., from , is undoubtedly to be read , which reading, according to Bertheau and Keil, is found in the edition of R. Norzi, Mantua, 174244.Tr.]
[27][In Scripture, the author means, of course. The following instances in comparatively recent times, probably mere imitations of what from this passage is usually assumed to have been an ancient custom, are noted by Wordsworth: When Milan was taken in a. d. 1162, it was sown with salt (Sigonius); and the house of Admiral Coligny, murdered in the massacre of St. Bartholomew, a. d. 1572, was, by the command of Charles IX., king of France, sown with salt.Tr.]
[28][Wordsworth does however: Sowed it with salt, to destroy its fertility, and to make it barren for ever, like Sodom, comp. Pliny, xxxi. 7. But this idea is not at all necessary to the common explanation (as given by Bertheau, Keil, Bush) that the act was designed symbolically to turn the city into a salt-desert. Our authors explanation does not conflict with that of his predecessors, but rather completes it.Tr.]
[29]The extent of the temple building which this implies is not unparalleled. The temple of Diana in Samos was so large as to afford sanctuary to the 300 Corcyran boys whom Periander dispatched to Alyathes, king of Lydia, for eunuchs, and yet leave room for choirs of Samian youth to execute certain religious dances before them, ingeniously invented as a means of conveying food to them (Herod. iii. 48).
Fuente: A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures, Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical by Lange
Jdg 9:42 And it came to pass on the morrow, that the people went out into the field; and they told Abimelech.
Ver. 42. Went out into the field, ] viz., To renew the battle, and to rid the country of Abimelech; not to their grape gathering, or about their husbandry, as Josephus and Procopius say.
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Jdg 9:42-44. The people went out into the field To their usual employments about their land. He divided them into three companies Whereof he kept one with himself, (Jdg 9:44,) and put the rest under other commanders. Abimelech stood in the entering of the gate To prevent the retreat of the people into the city, and to give the other two companies opportunity to cut them off.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Jdg 9:42-49. Abimelech Destroys Shechem.These verses seem to contain a second, independent account of the attack on Shechem, the sequel to Jdg 9:22-25.
Jdg 9:43. Abimelech adopts the same tactics whereby his father routed the Midianites (Jdg 7:16).
Jdg 9:44. Read, with the LXX, the company that was with me.
Jdg 9:45. To sow a city with salt was to declare symbolically that it was henceforth to be as fruitless and desolate as a salt desert (Deu 9:23, Psa 107:34). But, in the case of Shechem, nature itself made that impossible.
Jdg 9:46. Read Migdal-Shechem, evidently a town in the neighbourhood. El-berith is another name for Baal-berith (Jdg 8:33), which the LXX has here. The translation hold is a guess; the word may mean an underground chamber. Mount Zalmon is unknown.
Jdg 9:49. Abimelech burns the town of Shechem; King Brambles fire devours the cedars as Jotham had predicted.