Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Lamentations 3:55
I called upon thy name, O LORD, out of the low dungeon.
A prayer for deliverance and for vengeance upon his enemies.
Lam 3:55
Out of the low dungeon – The lowest pit of Psa 88:6. Some consider that Ps. 69 was composed by Jeremiah, and is the prayer referred to here (Jer 38:6 note).
Lam 3:56
Thou hast heard – In sending Ebedmelech to deliver me. The next clause signifies Hide not thine ear to my relief to my cry, i. e. to my cry for relief.
Lam 3:58
God now appears as the prophets next of kin, pleading the lawsuits of his soul, i. e. the controversies which concern his salvation. and rescuing his life, in jeopardy through the malice of his enemies.
Lam 3:59
Wrong – Done to him by the perversion of justice.
Lam 3:60, Lam 3:61
Imaginations – Or, devices.
Lam 3:63
Their sitting down, and their rising up – i. e. all the ordinary actions of their life.
Musick – Or, song, the subject of it.
Lam 3:64-66
The versions render the verbs in these verses as futures, Thou shalt render unto them a recompence, etc.
Lam 3:65
Give them sorrow of heart – Or, Thou wilt give them blindness of heart.
Lam 3:66
Persecute … – Or, pursue them in anger and destroy them, etc.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
That is, out of my deepest affliction, as Jonah out of the
belly of hell, Jon 2:2. I cried unto God, and called upon him for mercy.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
55-57. I called out of dungeonThusthe spirit resists the flesh, and faith spurns the temptation[CALVIN], (Psa 130:1;Jon 2:2).
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
I called upon thy name, O Lord,…. As in times past, so in the present distress; when all hope was gone, and all help failed, still there was a God to go to, and call upon:
out of the low dungeon; or “dungeon of lownesses” r; the lowest dungeon, the deepest distress, a man or people could be in; yet then and there it is not too late to call upon the Lord; and there may be hope of deliverance out of such an estate by him.
r “e cisterna infimitatum”, Piscator.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Prayer for deliverance, and confident trust in its realization. Lam 3:55. “Out of the lowest pit I call, O Lord, on Thy name;” cf. Psa 88:7, Psa 88:14; Psa 130:1. The perfect is not a preterite,
(Note: The perfects are so viewed by Ngelsbach, who also thinks that the speaker, in Lam 3:55-58, thanks the Lord for deliverance from the pit, and in Lam 3:55 reminds the Lord of the prayer he has addressed to Him out of the pit. But could he possibly think that the Lord had forgotten this? What, we should like to know, would be the use of this reminder, even if ‘ , Lam 3:56, could be taken as the words of address to the Lord? For we can discover no thanksgiving in Lam 3:55-58. This whole mode of viewing the passage breaks down before Lam 3:59: “Thou hast seen mine oppression; judge me!” For, if the perfects in Lam 3:55-58 are preterites, then also , Lam 3:59, can only be a preterite; and the prophet can only be speaking of injustice that has been done him previously: hence he cannot add thereto the request, “Judge me,” inasmuch as the Lord (according to Ngelsbach) has already judged him by delivering him from the pit. Moreover, it is quite arbitrary to understand the perfects in Lam 3:59 and Lam 3:62 as referring to what has been done and is still being done to the speaker by his enemies, if it be agreed that the perfects in Lam 3:55-58 refer only to past events.)
but expresses what has already happened, and still happens. This is evident from the fact that the corresponding perfect, , Lam 3:56, is continued by the optative . is taken from Psa 88:7: “pit of the lower regions of the earth,”-the , Psa 63:10; Eze 32:18, Eze 32:24, i.e., Sheol, essentially the same with , Lam 3:6, which is thereby connected with Psa 88:7, – the dark regions of the depth, whose open mouth is the grave for every one (see Delitzsch on Psalms, l.c.), hence the symbol of mortal danger.
Lam 3:56-66 “Thou hast heard my voice” expresses the full assurance of faith from which the request comes: “Cover not Thine ear from my sighing.” , “breathing out again;” in Eze 8:11, mitigation of oppression, yet not here respiratio, relaxatio (C. B. Michaelis, Rosenmller, etc.), – since the asyndetic does not accord with such an interpretation, – but a relieving of oneself by means of deeply-drawn sighs, as in Job 32:20; hence “sighing,” as Luther has already rendered it, following the Vulgate: ne avertas aurem tuum a singultu meo (Thenius, Gerlach, etc.). – In Lam 3:57 and Lam 3:58, the writer still more fully expresses his confidence that the Lord will accept him. “Thou art near on the day when I call on Thee” is a sentence found in Psa 145:18, and uttered as the experience of all believers. “Thou sayest, Fear not,” i.e., Thou assurest me of Thine assistance; cf. Jer 1:8, Jer 1:17, etc. “Thou dost conduct the causes (Ger. Streitsachen) of my soul” ( ), i.e., not merely “my lawsuits,” but causas quae vitam et salutem meam concernunt (C. B. Michaelis). This is shown by the parallel member, “Thou redeemest my life,” sc. from the destruction which threatens it; cf. Lam 3:53., Psa 103:4. With this is connected the request in Lam 3:59, “Thou dost certainly see my oppression” ( from , to bend, oppress), the oppression which I suffer; “judge my cause,” i.e., help me in my cause, cf. Jer 5:28. The suppliant bases this request, Lam 3:60-62, on the recollection that God, as the Omniscient One, knows the plans and intentions of his opponents. “Thou seest all their plans for revenge.” is not here the outcome of revenge, but the thought of revenge cherished in the heart; it does not, however, mean desire of revenge, or revengeful disposition, but simply the thinking and meditating on revenge, which certainly has the spirit of revenge for its basis, but is not identical with this. Their thoughts are the plans of vengeance. , dat. incomm ., “to my hurt;” the reading of some codices is simply a correction after Lam 3:61. This revenge they express in reproaches and invectives. , “lips,” for utterances of the lips; and as in Psa 18:40, Psa 18:49 = , Psa 4:3, etc. corresponds to , and to , Lam 3:61; and the whole of Lam 3:62 still depends on “Thou hearest,” without any need for supplying , as Rosenmller does. Thenius and Ngelsbach would combine Lam 3:62 with 63, and make the former dependent on ; but this is unsuitable, nor do they consider that utterances or words are not seen ( ), but heard ( ). With this proposed combination there falls to the ground the further remark of Thenius, that “by lips, devising, sitting, rising up, are meant the conversation and consultation of the enemies one with another.” Sitting and rising up have nothing in common with speaking about any subject, but merely form a circumlocution for action generally: cf. Psa 139:2; Deu 6:7; Deu 11:19; Isa 37:28. The form for occurs nowhere else: Ewald considers it a form that has been lengthened for the purpose of designating a mocking song – “Sing-song.” This supposition has at least more to recommend it than the ingenious but worthless idea of Bttcher, that is contracted from , “what a stringed instrument am I to them;” but it also is improbable. is the subject of the , as words formed with often express merely the subject of the idea contained in a noun or verb; cf. Ewald, 160, b, 3. After this statement of the hostile treatment which the speaker has to suffer, there follows the renewed and further extended request that God may reward the foes according to their deeds. , “Thou shalt return,” is a confident expression of the request that God would do this; hence the optative follows in Lam 3:65. In Lam 3:64 is condensed the substance of what is contained in Psa 28:4. , covering (veil) of the heart, – an expression analogous to the , 2Co 3:15, – is not obduration, or hardening, but blinding of the heart, which casts into destruction; but it can scarcely signify “madness” (Delitzsch, Bibl. Psychology, Clark’s translation), since the Arabic majannat , insania , furor, has probably received this meaning from jinn, genius, daemon ; cf. Gesenius, Thes. s. v., and Rosenmller, ad h. l. “Thy curse to them!” is not to be viewed as dependent on “give,” but to be explained in accordance with Ps. 3:9, “Thy blessing [be] upon Thy people!” – thus, “May Thy curse be their portion!” The curse of God is followed by destruction. “Destroy them from under Jahveh’s heaven!” i.e., not merely ut non sint amplius sub caelis (C. B. Michaelis), because is not considered in this latter rendering. The heaven of Jahveh is the whole world, over which Jahveh’s authority extends; the meaning therefore is, “Exterminate them wholly from the sphere of Thy dominion in the world,” or, Thy kingdom.
Fuente: Keil & Delitzsch Commentary on the Old Testament
| God’s Goodness Acknowledged; An Appeal to God. | B. C. 588. |
55 I called upon thy name, O LORD, out of the low dungeon. 56 Thou hast heard my voice: hide not thine ear at my breathing, at my cry. 57 Thou drewest near in the day that I called upon thee: thou saidst, Fear not. 58 O Lord, thou hast pleaded the causes of my soul; thou hast redeemed my life. 59 O LORD, thou hast seen my wrong: judge thou my cause. 60 Thou hast seen all their vengeance and all their imaginations against me. 61 Thou hast heard their reproach, O LORD, and all their imaginations against me; 62 The lips of those that rose up against me, and their device against me all the day. 63 Behold their sitting down, and their rising up; I am their music. 64 Render unto them a recompence, O LORD, according to the work of their hands. 65 Give them sorrow of heart, thy curse unto them. 66 Persecute and destroy them in anger from under the heavens of the LORD.
We may observe throughout this chapter a struggle in the prophet’s breast between sense and faith, fear and hope; he complains and then comforts himself, yet drops his comforts and returns again to his complaints, as Ps. xlii. But, as there, so here, faith gets the last word and comes off a conqueror; for in these verses he concludes with some comfort. And here are two things with which he comforts himself:–
I. His experience of God’s goodness even in his affliction. This may refer to the prophet’s personal experience, with which he encourages himself in reference to the public troubles. He that has seasonably succoured particular saints will not fail the church in general. Or it may include the remnant of good people that were among the Jews, who had found that it was not in vain to wait upon God. In three things the prophet and his pious friends had found God good to them:– 1. He had heard their prayers; though they had been ready to fear that the cloud of wrath was such as their prayers could not pass through (v. 44), yet upon second thoughts, or at least upon further trial, they find it otherwise, and that God had not said unto them, Seek you me in vain. When they were in the low dungeon, as free among the dead, they called upon God’s name (v. 55); their weeping did not hinder praying. Note, Though we are cast into ever so low a dungeon, we may thence find a way of access to God in the highest heavens. Out of the depths have I cried unto thee (Ps. cxxx. 1), as Jonah out of the whale’s belly. And could God hear them out of the low dungeon, and would he? Yes, he did: Thou hast heard my voice; and some read the following words as carrying on the same thankful acknowledgment: Thou didst not hide thy ear at my breathing, at my cry; and the original will bear that reading. We read it as a petition for further audience: Hide not thy ear. God’s having heard our voice when we cried to him, even out of the low dungeon, is an encouragement for us to hope that he will not at any time hide his ear. Observe how he calls prayer his breathing; for in prayer we breathe towards God, we breathe after him. Though we be but weak in prayer, cannot cry aloud, but only breathe in groanings that cannot be uttered, yet we shall not be neglected if we be sincere. Prayer is the breath of the new man, sucking in the air of mercy in petitions and returning it in praises; it is both the evidence and the maintenance of the spiritual life. Some read it, at my gasping. “When I lay gasping for life, and ready to expire, and thought i was breathing my last, then thou tookest cognizance of my distressed case.” 2. He had silenced their fears and quieted their spirits (v. 57): “Thou drewest near in the day that I called upon thee; thou didst graciously assure me of thy presence with me, and give me to see thee nigh unto me, whereas I had thought thee to be at a distance from me.” Note, When we draw nigh to God in a way of duty we may by faith see him drawing nigh to us in a way of mercy. But this was not all: Thou saidst, Fear not. This was the language of God’s prophets preaching to them not to fear (Isa 41:10; Isa 41:13; Isa 41:14), of his providence preventing those things which they were afraid of, and of his grace quieting their minds, and making them easy, by the witness of his Spirit with their spirits that they were his people still, though in distress, and therefore ought not to fear. 3. He had already begun to appear for them (v. 58): “O Lord! thou hast pleaded the causes of my soul” (that is, as it follows), “thou hast redeemed my life, hast rescued that out of the hands of those who would have taken it away, hast saved that when it was ready to be swallowed up, hast given me that for a prey.” And this is an encouragement to them to hope that he would yet further appear for them: “Thou hast delivered my soul from death, and therefore wilt deliver my feet from falling; thou hast pleaded the causes of my life, and therefore wilt plead my other causes.”
II. He comforts himself with an appeal to God’s justice, and (in order to the sentence of that) to his omniscience.
1. He appeals to God’s knowledge of the matter of fact, how very spiteful and malicious his enemies were (v. 59): “O Lord! thou hast seen my wrong, that I have done no wrong at all, but suffer a great deal.” He that knows all things knew, (1.) The malice they had against him: “Thou hast seen all their vengeance, how they desire to do me a mischief, as if it were by way of reprisal for some great injury I had done them.” Note, We should consider, to our terror and caution, that God knows all the revengeful thoughts we have in our minds against others, and therefore we should not allow of those thoughts nor harbour them, and that he knows all the revengeful thoughts others have causelessly in their minds against us, and therefore we should not be afraid of them, but leave it to him to protect us from them. (2.) The designs and projects they had laid to do him a mischief: Thou hast seen all their imaginations against me (v. 60), and again, “Thou hast heard all their imaginations against me (v. 61), both the desire and the device they have to ruin me; whether it show itself in word or deed, it is known to thee; nay, though the products of it are not to be seen nor heard, yet their device against me all the day is perceived and understood by him to whom all things are naked and open.” Note, The most secret contrivances of the church’s enemies are perfectly known to the church’s God, from whom they can hide nothing. (3.) The contempt and calumny wherewith they loaded him, all that they spoke slightly of him, and all that they spoke reproachfully: “Thou hast heard their reproach (v. 61), all the bad characters they give me, laying to my charge things that I know not, all the methods they use to make me odious and contemptible, even the lips of those that rose up against me (v. 62), the contumelious language they use whenever they speak of me, and that at their sitting down and rising up, when they lie down at night and get up in the morning, when they sit down to their meat and with their company, and when they rise from both, still I am their music; they make themselves and one another merry with my miseries, as the Philistines made sport with Samson.” Jerusalem was the tabret they played upon. Perhaps they had some tune or play, some opera or interlude, that was called the destruction of Jerusalem, which, though in the nature of a tragedy, was very entertaining to those who wished ill to the holy city. Note, God will one day call sinners to account for all the hard speeches which they have spoken against him and his people, Jude 15.
2. He appeals to God’s judgment upon this fact: “Lord, thou hast seen my wrong; there is no need of any evidence to prove it, nor any prosecutor to enforce and aggravate it; thou seest it in its true colours; and now I leave it with thee. Judge thou my cause, v. 59. Let them be dealt with,” (1.) “As they deserve (v. 64): Render to them a recompence according to the work of their hands. Let them be dealt with as they have dealt with us; let thy hand be against them as their hand has been against us. They have created us a great deal of vexation; now, Lord, give them sorrow of heart (v. 65), perplexity of heart” (so some read it); “let them be surrounded with threatening mischiefs on all sides, and not be able to see their way out. Give them despondence of heart” (so others read it); “let them be driven to despair, and give themselves up for gone.” God can entangle the head that thinks itself clearest, and sink the heart that thinks itself stoutest. (2.) “Let them be dealt with according to the threatenings: Thy curse unto them; that is, let thy curse come upon them, all the evils that are pronounced in thy word against the enemies of thy people, v. 65. They have loaded us with curses; as they loved cursing, so let it come unto them, thy curse which will make them truly miserable. Theirs is causeless, and therefore fruitless, it shall not come; but thine is just, and shall take effect. Those whom thou cursest are cursed indeed. Let the curse be executed, v. 66. Persecute and destroy them in anger, as they persecute and destroy us in their anger. Destroy them from under the heavens of the Lord; let them have no benefit of the light and influence of the heavens. Destroy them in such a manner that all who see it may say, It is a destruction from the Almighty, who sits in the heavens and laughs at them (Ps. ii. 4), and may own that the heavens do rule,” Dan. iv. 26. What is said of the idols is here said of their worshippers (who in this also shall be like unto them), They shall perish from under these heavens, Jer. x. 11. They shall be not only excluded from the happiness of the invisible heavens, but cut off from the comfort even of these visible ones, which are the heavens of the Lord (Ps. cxv. 16) and which those therefore are unworthy to be taken under the protection of who rebel against him.
Fuente: Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary
Vs. 55-66: COMFORT AND A CRY FOR VENGEANCE
1. From the remotest depths of misery Judah calls on the name of the Jehovah, the God who, in her wantonness she has forsaken, (vs. 55); because she is now deeply grieved by a consciousness of her sin, her plea for mercy and forgiveness is heard, (vs. 56; comp. Psa 40:1-3; Psa 116:1-5).
2. Having cast herself upon God’s tender mercies, the sinner (Judah) finds that God is very “present help In trouble”; as both Advocate and Redeemer (1Jn 2:1; Isa 54:8), He speaks words of comfort and assurance, (vs. 57; Isa 41:10; Isa 41:14).
3. Judah’s “kinsman-redeemer” (“Goel”, Lev 25:25; Lev 25:47-54; Rth 4:1-2). who ransomed her fathers from bondage in Egypt, is once more envisioned as redeeming the life of the nation, (vs. 58; Psa 34:22; Psa 71:22-23).
a. The redemption of the believing sinner has been purchased by the blood of Christ – the kinsman Who took our very humanity upon Himself that He might freely bear the weight of our sin! (1Pe 1:18; Tit 3:5).
b. While the provision He made is for ALL MEN (Joh 3:16; 2Co 5:15; 1Ti 2:5-7; 1Ti 4:10), it is only as INDIVIDUAL souls renounce their sin and trust in Jesus Christ as their personal Sin-bearer and Saviour that His sacrifice actually AVAILS to our deliverance and cleansing, (Act 20:21; Luk 13:3; Act 16:30-31; Joh 5:24; Joh 3:17-18; Joh 3:36).
4. Though conscious that she suffers because of her own sin, Judah still feels that she has suffered some thing UNJUSTLY, (vs. 59).
a. Knowing what the blessedness of her covenant relationship to Jehovah has once been, Judah is very sensitive to any injury received from her enemies, and His; thus, she calls for vindication, (comp. Jer 18:19-20; Psa 35:24-26; Psa 137:9).
b. Though she has long fallen short of her covenant obligations, God has not changed! and He has promised to punish her oppressors! (Isa 10:12; Jer 50:6-10).
c. Submitting her case to the judge of all the earth, she can expect a ruling that is equitable and just! (comp. Psa 43:1-2; Jer 11:20).
5. The Lord is reminded of what He has seen and heard – relative to Judah’s treatment at the hands of her enemies, (vs. 60-62; comp. Exo 2:24).
a. He has observed the vengeance that they devised against her, (vs. 60; comp. Psa 10:4).
b. And He has heard the reproaches that they have hurled against her, (Psa 74:18; Psa 89:50; Zep 2:8-11); with mischievous delight they have made her the theme of their taunt-songs! (vs. 61-62, 63b).
1) Mocking songs were anciently used to express contempt for an enemy:
2) Israel had sung them concerning her enemies, (Num 21:27-30).
3) And the prophets employed them, (Isa 47:1-15; Hab 2:6-19).
6. Thus, Jeremiah and Judah express confidence that the Lord will eventually bring vengeance upon their adversaries – recompensing them according to their deeds (Psa 28:4-5; Jer 51:6; Jer 51:24; Jer 51:56), and destroying them from under His heaven! (vs. 64-66; comp. Exo 14:28; Psa 11:4-7; Mat 5:34-35).
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
We certainly see that the Prophet had an inward conflict, which also all the faithful experience, for the spirit fights against the flesh, as Paul teaches us. (Gal 5:17.) Though, then, he on the one hand apprehended death, he yet ceased not to flee to God; for faith strengthened his mind so that he did not succumb, but on the contrary he firmly rejected the temptation presented to him. Though, then, he was, according to the flesh, persuaded as to his own ruin, he on the other hand, called on the name of God; for the faithful do not measure the power and grace of God by their own thoughts, but give glory to God by recumbing on him even in the greatest extremities.
And this passage ought to be carefully noticed; for when Satan cannot in any other way turn us aside from prayer, he alleges our weakness; “What meanest thou, miserable being? will God hear thee? for what canst thou do? thou tremblest, thou art anxious, nay, thou despairest; and yet thou thinkest that God will be propitious to thee.” Whenever, therefore, Satan tries to shut the door against us so as to prevent us to pray, let this example of the Prophet come to our minds; for he, though he thought himself lost, did not yet cast aside the confidence he entertained as to God’s help and aid. For whence arose his perseverance, except that he in a manner rebuked himself when he found himself so overwhelmed, and as it were dead. These two states of mind are seen in this short prayer of David,
“
My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?” (Psa 22:1.)
For when he addressed God, and called him his God, we see his rare and extraordinary faith; and when he complains that he was forsaken, we see how, through the infirmity of the flesh, he thought that it was all over with him as to his salvation. Such a conflict, then, is described here; but faith overcame and gained the victory, for the Prophet ceased not to cry to God, even from the pit of depths — from the pit, that is, from death itself.
And this also ought to be carefully observed; for when God bears us on his wings, or when he carries us in his bosom, it is easy to pray; but when we seem to be cast into the deepest gulfs, if we thence cry to him, it is a real and certain proof of faith and hope. As such passages often occur in the Psalms, they may be compared together; but I touch but slightly on the subject, for it is not my object to heap together all the quotations which are appropriate; it is enough to present the real meaning of the Prophet. It follows, —
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
V. HIS PRAYER FOR DELIVERANCE Lam. 3:55-66
TRANSLATION
(55) I called on Your name, O LORD, from the depths of the pit. (56) You have heard my voice! Do not close Your ear to my sighing, to my cry for help! (57) You have drawn near in the day I called upon You. You said; Do not be afraid. (58) You have pleaded the causes of my soul, O Lord; You have redeemed my life. (59) You have seen, O LORD, the wrong done unto me. Judge my cause. (60) You have seen all of their vengeance, all of their plots against me, (62) the lips of those who rise up against me and their murmuring against me all the day. (63) Observe their sitting down and rising up. I am their song. (64) Repay them, O LORD, according to the deeds of their hands. (65) Give them blindness of heart! Let Your curse be on them! (66) Pursue them in anger and destroy them from under the heavens of the LORD.
COMMENTS
The closing section of chapter 3 is a prayer for deliverance which is filled with expressions of confidence that the prayer will be answered. As the prophet recalls the cistern experience and how God delivered him from that certain death his faith begins to grow. Just as God heard his cry from the dark dungeon of death (Lam. 3:55) so he asks God not to ignore his present pleas for help (Lam. 3:56). In the past God had answered his prayers by drawing near and whispering Be not afraid! (Lam. 3:57). God had intervened on behalf of His servant, had taken up his cause, and had redeemed his very life (Lam. 3:58). On the basis of Gods past response to his petition Jeremiah again calls upon God to hear and answer his prayer.
In Lam. 3:59-66 the actual petition is presented before the Lord. The prophet here prays in the first person singular. But the me of these verses is in reality us. Jeremiah is praying as an intercessor. He is praying for his nation and as part of his nation. The enemies for whose destruction he prays must then be the Chaldean conquerors of Jerusalem. The petitioner realizes that God already knows the desperate plight of Judah, the wrongs which have been suffered (Lam. 3:59), the vicious and vengeful plots (Lam. 3:60), the taunting and ridicule of the enemy (Lam. 3:61-62). All day long the Jews are the subject of Chaldean taunt-songs (Lam. 3:63), Therefore, Jeremiah calls upon the Lord to judge his cause i.e., judge those who have committed wrongs against the Jews (Lam. 3:59). He asks God to repay these enemies in accordance with the deeds they have done (Lam. 3:64). He prays that these opponents might experience blindness of heart i.e., intellectual confusion, and that Gods curse might rest upon them (Lam. 3:65). He asks God to destroy these enemies from off the face of the earth (Lam. 3:66). Lam. 3:64-66 reflect that imprecatory mood which is so difficult for Christians to comprehend. However, these verses are best regarded not as a prayer for vengeance, but as a plea for justice. If a holy and just God rules this world then wrong must be punished and inequities must be eliminated. The petitioner was confident that God was just and therefore did not hesitate to call for God to act in accordance with His justice. There is no personal animosity in these words. The prophet prays as a representative of his people. In praying for the destruction of the Babylonians he prays that God will fulfill the threats already made against the conquerors of Jerusalem (Jer. 25:12; Jer. 29:10; chaps. 5051).
Fuente: College Press Bible Study Textbook Series
(55) Out of the low dungeon.Here, again, we have to choose between a literal reference to Jeremiahs sufferings or a figurative interpretation. The phrase is the same as that of Psa. 88:6.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
55. Low dungeon, etc. Here is evidently a reminiscence of the 88th psalm, in the sixth verse of which the same original words are rendered lowest pit. The meaning is not sheol, but the deep places.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Prayer for Deliverance
v. 55. I called upon Thy name, O Lord, v. 56. Thou hast heard my voice, v. 57. Thou drewest near in the day that I called upon Thee. Thou saidst, Fear not, v. 58. O Lord, Thou hast pleaded the causes of my soul, v. 59. O Lord, Thou hast seen my wrong, v. 60. Thou hast seen all their vengeance and all their imaginations against me, v. 61. Thou hast heard their reproach, O Lord, and all their imaginations against me, v. 62. the lips of those that rose up against me, v. 63. Behold their sitting down and their rising up, v. 64. Render unto them a recompense, O Lord, according to the work of their hands, v. 65. Give them sorrow of heart, v. 66. Persecute and destroy them in anger from under the heavens of the Lord,
Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann
“Handfuls of Purpose”
For All Gleaners
“I called upon thy name, O Lord, out of the low dungeon. Thou hast heard my voice: hide not thine ear at my breathing, at my cry.” Lam 3:55 , Lam 3:56 .
This is a testimony which cannot be set aside by mere criticism, but is personal and direct, and is endorsed not for official purposes, but with the extremest and happiest consciousness of which the soul is susceptible. There are great hours in life which men cannot forget. Answers have come to us that have written themselves upon the very tablets of the heart, and we cannot consent to have them erased merely to endorse or sanction some frivolous or speculative theory of life. Testimonies of this kind acquire still greater force and value from the fact that the witnesses are not ashamed to testify that many prayers have remained unanswered, and many cries have awakened nothing but mocking echoes. For example, this very prophet has already said, “Also when I cry and shout, he shutteth out my prayer. He hath enclosed my ways with hewn stone, he hath made my paths crooked.” Never do the Biblical saints hesitate to acknowledge that their prayers have remained without answers. Thus Job: “I cry unto thee, and thou dost not hear me: I stand up, and thou regardest me not.” And thus the Psalmist: “O my God, I cry in the daytime, but thou hearest not; and in the night season, and am not silent.” Whilst, therefore, we speak about unanswered prayer, as if there could be no doubt concerning the reality of the witnesses, we are bound by our own reasoning to accept those witnesses when they testify that they have cried unto the living God, and have received direct and sufficient replies. In this chapter Jeremiah is full of gratitude because of his communion with God; he says: “Thou drewest near in the day that I called upon thee: thou saidst, Fear not. O Lord, thou hast pleaded the causes of my soul; thou hast redeemed my life.” What variety of experience we have in all these chapters! Sometimes the prophet is on the mountain, and he waves the banner of victory; and sometimes he is down in the valley, putting on a shroud as a garment, and making ready to lie down with those that are slain. This image of God drawing nigh has been taken up by the Apostle James “Draw nigh to God, and he will draw nigh to you.” This image of pleading is familiar in the Old Testament: “Plead my cause, O Lord, with them that strive with me”; “Therefore thus saith the Lord, Behold, I will plead thy cause.” We must not take the light as expressing the sum-total of religious experience; nor must we regard the darkness as the only aspect of the divine government of men: we must think of the night and of the morning, of the winter and of the summer: in other words, we must not judge God by special aspects or particular incidents, we must take in great breadths of time, large areas of observation and experience, and ground our inferences upon them. So judged, Christianity has nothing to fear from the most bitter and persistent of its enemies. The older men become, the richer should be their store of Christian evidence: there is a learning of experience as well as of letters; there is a genius of spiritual enjoyment as well as of intellectual penetration: here the simplest may assist: the greatest, and the men who have seen the most of affliction can throw light upon many problems which puzzle the most intellectual minds. Letters can belong but to a few. Genius is the badge of individualism. The common experience of mankind is the fund on which we must draw both for argument and illustration in many attempts to elucidate the divine government of man.
Fuente: The People’s Bible by Joseph Parker
Lam 3:55 I called upon thy name, O LORD, out of the low dungeon.
Ver. 55. I called upon thy name, O Lord, out of the low dungeon. ] See 1Jn 2:11Jn 2:11Jn 2:11Jn 2:1 . See Trapp on “ Psa 130:1 “ See Trapp “ Jon 2:1 “
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Thy name = Thee, or Thy attributes. See note on Psa 20:1.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
2Ch 33:11, 2Ch 33:12, Psa 18:5, Psa 18:6, Psa 40:1, Psa 40:2, Psa 69:13-18, Psa 116:3, Psa 116:4, Psa 130:1, Psa 130:2, Psa 142:3-7, Jer 38:6, Jon 2:2-4, Act 16:24-28
Reciprocal: Psa 31:22 – I am Psa 64:1 – Hear Psa 66:19 – General Psa 69:14 – Deliver Psa 86:7 – General Jer 37:16 – into the dungeon Act 5:23 – The prison 1Ti 2:8 – pray Jam 5:13 – any among
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Lam 3:55. The prophet was personally cared for by the Lord because he was a righteous man. And the nation was also promised relief after suffering for a while.
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Jeremiah prayed to the Lord out of his desperate condition (cf. Psa 88:7; Psa 88:14; Psa 130:1; Jon 2:1-3). He believed the Lord had heard his prayer, and he begged that the Lord would pay attention to his petition and grant him deliverance.
Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)
DE PROFUNDIS
Lam 3:55-66
As this third elegy-the richest and the most elaborate of the five that constitute the Book of Lamentations-draws to a close it retains its curious character of variability, not aiming at any climax, but simply winding on till its threefold acrostics are completed by the limits of the Hebrew alphabet, like a river that is monotonous in the very succession of its changes, now flowing through a dark gorge, then rippling in clear sunlight, and again plunging into gloomy caverns. The beauty and brightness of this very variegated poem are found at its centre. Sadder thoughts follow. But these are not so wholly complaining as the opening passages had been. There is one thread of continuity that may be traced right through the series of changes which occupy the latter part of the poem. The poet having once turned to the refuge of prayer never altogether forsakes it. The meditations as much as the petitions that here occur are all directed to God.
A peculiarity of the last portion of the elegy that claims special attention is the interesting reminiscence with which the poet finds encouragement for his present prayers. He is recalling the scenes of that most distressing period of his life, the time when he had been cast into a flooded dungeon. If ever he had come near to death it must have been then: though his life was spared the misery of his condition had been extreme. While in this most wretched situation the persecuted patriot cried to God for help, and as he now recollects for his present encouragement, he received a distinct and unmistakable answer. The scene is most impressive. As it shapes itself to his memory, the victim of tyranny is in the lowest dungeon. This phrase suggests the thought of the awful Hebrew Sheol. So dark was his experience and so near was the sufferer to death, it seems to him as though he had, been indeed plunged down into the very abode of the dead. Yet here he found utterance for prayer. It was the prayer of utter extremity, almost the last wild cry of a despairing soul, yet not quite, for that is no prayer at all, all prayer requiring some real faith, if only as a grain of mustard seed. Moreover, the poet states that he called upon the name of God.
Now in the Bible the name always stands for the attributes which it connotes. To call on Gods name is to make mention of some of His known and revealed characteristics. The man who will do this is more than one “feeling after God”; he has a definite conception of the nature and disposition of the Being to whom he is addressing himself. Thus it happens that old, familiar ideas of God, as He had been known in the days of light and joy, rise up in the heart of the miserable man, and awaken a longing desire to seek the help of One so great and good and merciful. Just in proportion to the fulness of the meaning of the name of God as it is conceived by us, will our prayers win definiteness of aim and strength of wing. The altar to “an unknown god” can excite but the feeblest and vaguest devotion. Inasmuch as our Lord has greatly enriched the contents of the name of God by His full revelation of the Divine Father, to us Christians there has come a more definite direction and a more powerful impulse for prayer. Even though this is a prayer de profundis it is an enlightened prayer. We may believe that, like a star seen from the depths of a well which excludes the glare of day, the significance of the sacred Name shone out to the sufferer with a beauty never before perceived when he looked up to heaven from the darkness of his pit of misery.
It has been suggested that in this passage the elegist is following the sixty-ninth psalm, and that perhaps that psalm is his own composition and the expression of the very prayer to which he is here referring. At all events, the psalm exactly fits the situation; and therefore it may be taken as a perfect illustration of the kind of prayer alluded to. The psalmist is “in deep mire, where there is no standing”; he has “come into deep waters, where the floods overthrow” him; he is persecuted by enemies who hate him “without a cause”; he has been weeping till his eyes have failed. Meanwhile he has been waiting for God, in prayers mingled with confessions. It is his zeal for Gods house that has brought him so near to death. He beseeches God that the flood may not be allowed to overwhelm him, nor “the pit shut her mouth upon him.” He concludes with an invocation of curses upon the heads of his enemies. All these as well as some minor points agree very closely with our poets picture of his persecutions and the prayer he here records.
Read in the light of the elegists experience, such a prayer as that of the psalm cannot be taken as a model for daily devotion. It is a pity that our habitual use of the Psalter should encourage this application of it. The result is mischievous in several ways. It tends to make our worship unreal, because the experience of the psalmist, even when read metaphorically, as it was probably intended to be read, is by no means a type of the normal condition of human life. Besides, in so far as we bring ourselves to sympathise with this piteous outcry of a distressed soul, we reduce our worship to a melancholy plaint, when it should be a joyous anthem of praise. At the same time, we unconsciously temper the language we quote with the less painful feelings of our own experience, so that its force is lost upon us.
Yet the psalm is of value as a revelation of a souls agony relieved by prayer; and there are occasions when its very words can be repeated by men and women who are indeed overwhelmed by trouble. If we do not spoil the occasional by attempting to make it habitual it is wonderful to see how rich the Bible is in utterances to suit all cases and all conditions. Such an outpouring of a distressed heart as the elegist hints at and the psalmist illustrates, is itself full of profound significance. The stirring of a soul to its depths is a revelation of its depths. This revelation prevents us from taking petty views of human nature. No one can contemplate the Titanic struggle of Laocoon or the immeasurable grief of Niobe without a sense of the tragic greatness of which human life is capable. We live so much on the surface that we are in danger of forgetting that life is not always a superficial thing. But when a volcano bursts out of the quiet plain of everyday existence, we are startled into the perception that there must be hidden fires which we may not have suspected before. And, further, when the soul in its extremity is seen to be turning for refuge to God, the revelation of its Gethsemane gives a new meaning to the very idea of prayer. Here is prayer indeed, and at the sight of such a profound reality we are shamed into doubting whether we have ever begun to pray at all, so stiff and chill do our utterances to the Unseen now appear to be in comparison with this Jacob-like wrestling.
Immediately after mentioning the fact of his prayer the elegist adds that this was heard by God. His cry rose up from “the lowest dungeon” and reached the heights of heaven. And yet we cannot credit this to the inherent vigour of prayer. If a petition can thus wing its way to heaven, that is because it is of heavenly origin. There is no difficulty in making air to rise above water; the difficulty is to sink it; and if any could be taken to the bottom of the sea, the greater the depth descended the swifter would it shoot up. Since all true prayer is an inspiration it cannot spend itself until it has, so to speak, restored the equilibrium by returning to its natural sphere. But the elegist puts the case another way. In His great condescension God stoops to the very lowest depths to find one of His distressed children. It is not hard to make the prayer of the dungeon reach the ear of God, because God is in the dungeon. He is most near when He is most needed.
The prayer was more than heard; it was answered there was a Divine voice in response to this cry to God, a voice that reached the ear of the desolate prisoner in the silence of his dungeon. It consisted of but two words, but those two words were clear and unmistakable, and quite sufficient to satisfy the listener. The voice said, “Fear not.” {Lam 3:57} That was enough.
Shall we doubt the reality of the remarkable experience that the elegist here records? Or can we explain it away by reference to the morbid condition of the mind of a prisoner enduring the punishment of solitary confinement? It is said that this unnatural punishment tends to develop insanity in its miserable victims. But the poet is now reviewing the occurrence, which made so deep an impression on his mind at the time, in the calm of later reflection; and evidently he has no doubt of its reality. It has nothing in it of the wild fancy of a disordered brain. Lunacy raves; this simple message is calm. And it is just such a message as God might be expected to give if He spoke at all-just like Him, we may say. To this remark some doubting critic may reply, “Exactly; and therefore the more likely to have been imagined by the expectant worshipper.” But such an inference is not psychologically correct. The reply is not in harmony with the tone of the prayer, but directly opposed to it. Agony and terror cannot generate an assurance of peace and safety. The poison does not secrete its own antidote. Here is an indication of the presence of another voice, because the words breathe another spirit. Besides, this is not an unparalleled experience.
Most frequently, no doubt, the answer to prayer is not vocal, and yet the reality of it may not be any the less certain to the seeking soul. It may be most definite, although it comes in a deed rather than in a word. Then the grateful recipient can exclaim with the psalmist-
“This poor man cried, and the Lord heard him,
And saved him out of all his troubles.”. {Psa 34:6}
Here is an answer, but not a spoken one, only an action, in saving from trouble. In other cases, however, the reply approaches nearer the form of a message from heaven. When we remember that God is our Father the wonder is not that at rare intervals these voices have been heard, but rather that they are so infrequent. It is so easy to become the victim of delusions that some caution is requisite to assure ourselves of the existence of Divine utterances. The very idea of the occurrence of such phenomena is discredited by the fact that those persons who profess most eagerly to have heard supernatural voices are commonly the subjects of hysteria; and when the voices become frequent this fact is taken by physicians as a symptom of approaching insanity. Among semi-civilised people madness is supposed to be closely allied to inspiration. The mantis is not far from the mad man. Such a man is not the better off for the march of civilisation. The ancients would have honoured him as a prophet; we shut him up in a lunatic asylum. But these discouraging considerations do not exhaust the question. Delusions are not in themselves disproofs of the existence of the occurrences they emulate. Each case must be taken on its own merits; and when, as in that which is now under our consideration, the character of the incident points to a conviction of its solid reality, it is only a mark of narrowness of thought to refuse to lift it out of the category of idle fancies.
But, quite apart from the question of the sounding of Divine voices in the bodily ear, the more important truth to be considered is that in some way, if only by spiritual impression, God does most really speak to His children, and that He speaks now as surely as He spoke in the days of Israel. We have no new prophets and apostles who can give us fresh revelations in the form of additions to our Bible. But that is not what is meant. The elegist did not receive a statement of doctrine in answer to his prayer, nor, on this occasion, even help for the writing of his inspired poetry. The voice to which he here alludes was of quite a different character.
This was in the olden times; but if then, why not also now? Evidently the elegist regarded it as a rare and wonderful occurrence-a single experience to which he looked back in after years with the interest one feels in a vivid recollection which rises like a mountain, clean cut against the sky, above the mists that so quickly gather on the low plains of the uneventful past. Perhaps it is only in one of the crises of life that such an indubitable message is sent-when the soul is in the lowest dungeon, in extremis, crying out of the darkness, helpless if not yet hopeless, overwhelmed, almost extinguished. But if we listened for it, who can tell but that the voice might not be so rare? We do not believe in it; therefore we do not hear it. Or the noise of the worlds great loom and the busy thoughts of our own hearts drown the music that still floats down from heaven to ears that are tuned to catch its notes; for it does not come in thunder, and we must ourselves be still if we would hear the still small voice, inwardly still, still in soul, stifling the chatter of self, stopping our ears to the din of the world. There are those today who tell us with calm assurance, not at all in the visionarys falsetto notes, that they have known just what is here described by the poet-in the silence of a mountain valley, in the quiet of a sick chamber, even in the noisy crowd at a railway station.
When this is granted it is still well for us to remember that we are not dependent for Divine consolation on voices which to many must ever be as dubious as they are rare. This short message of two words is in effect the essence of teachings that can be gathered as freely from almost every page of the Bible as flowers from a meadow in May. We have the “more sure word of prophecy,” and the burden of it is the same as the message of the voice that comforted the poet in his dungeon.
That message is wholly reassuring-“Fear not.” So said God to the patriarch: “Fear not, Abram; I am thy shield, and thy exceeding great reward”; {Gen 15:1} and to His people through the prophet of the restoration: “Fear not, thou worm Jacob”; {Isa 41:14} and Jesus to His disciples in the storm: “Be of good cheer: it is I: be not afraid”; {Mar 6:50} and our Lord again in His parting address: “Let not your heart be troubled, neither let it be fearful”; {Joh 14:27} and the glorified Christ to His terrified friend John, when He laid His right hand on him with the words: “Fear not; I am the first and the last; and the Living One; and I was dead, and behold, I am alive forever more, and I have the keys of death and of Hades.” {Rev 1:17-18} This is the word that God is continually speaking to His faint-hearted children. When “the burthen of the mystery,” and
“the heavy and the weary weight
Of all this unintelligible world”
oppress, when the greater sorrows threaten to crush outright, listening for the voice of God, we may hear the message of love from a Fathers heart as though spoken afresh to each of us; for we have but to acquaint ourselves with Him to be at peace.
The elegist does not recall this scene from his past life merely in order to indulge in the pleasures of memory-generally rather melancholy pleasures, and even mocking if they are in sharp contrast to the present. His object is to find encouragement for renewed hope in the efficacy of prayer. In the complaint that he has put into the mouth of His people He has just been depicting the failure of prayer. But now he feels that if for a time God has wrapped Himself in a mantle of wrath this cannot be forever, for He who was so gracious to the cry of His servant on that ever memorable occasion will surely attend again to the appeal of distress. This is always the greatest encouragement for seeking help from God. It is difficult to find much satisfaction in what is called with an awkward inconsequence of diction the “philosophy of prayer”; the spirit of philosophy is so wholly different from the spirit of prayer. The great justification for prayer is the experience of prayer. It is only the prayerless man who is wholly sceptical on this subject. The man of prayer cannot but believe in prayer; and the more he prays and the oftener he turns to this refuge in all times of need the fuller is his assurance that God hears and answers him.
Considering how God acted as his advocate when he was in danger in the earlier crisis, and then redeemed his life, the poet points to this fact as a plea in his new necessity. {Lam 3:58} God will not desert the cause He has adopted. Men feel a peculiar interest in those whom they have already helped, an interest that is stronger than the sense of gratitude, for we are more attracted to our dependants than to our benefactors. If God shares this feeling, how strongly must He be drawn to us by His many former favours. The language of the elegist gains a great enrichment of meaning when read in the light of the Christian Gospel. In a deep sense, of which he could have had but the least glimmering of apprehension, we can appeal to God as the Redeemer of our life, for we can take the Cross of Christ as our plea. St. Paul makes use of this strongest of all arguments when He urges that if God gave His Son, and if Christ died for us, all other needful blessings, since they cannot involve so great a sacrifice, will surely follow. Accordingly, we can pray in the language of the “Dies Irae”-
“Wearily for me Thou soughtest,
On the Cross my life Thou boughtest.
Lose not all for which Thou wroughtest.”
Rising from the image of the advocate to that of the magistrate the distressed man begs God to judge his cause. {Lam 3:59} He would have God look at his enemies-how they wrong him, insult him, make him the theme of their jesting songs. {Lam 3:60-63}
It would have been more to our taste if the poem had ended here, if there had been no remaining letters in the Hebrew alphabet to permit the extension of the acrostics beyond the point we have now reached. We cannot but feel that its tone is lowered at the close. The writer here proceeds to heap imprecations on the heads of his enemies. It is vain for some commentators to plead the weak excuse that the language is “prophetic.” This is certainly more than the utterance of a prediction. No unprejudiced reader can deny that it reveals a desire that the oppressors may be blighted and blasted with rum, and even if the words were only a foretelling of a divinely-decreed fate they would imply a keen sense of satisfaction in the prospect, which they describe as something to be gloated over. We cannot expect this Jewish patriot to anticipate our Lords intercession and excuse for His enemies. Even St. Paul so far forgot himself as to treat the High Priest in a very different manner from his Masters behaviour. But we may see here one of the worst effects of tyranny-the dark passion of revenge that it rouses in its victims. The provocation was maddening, and not only of a private nature. Think of the situation-the beloved city sacked and destroyed, the sacred temple a heap of smouldering ruins, village homesteads all over the hills of Judah wrecked and deserted; slaughter, outrage, unspeakable wrongs endured by wives and maidens, little children starved to death. Is it wonderful that the patriots temper was not the sweetest when he thought of the authors of such atrocities? There is no possibility of denying the fact-the fierce fires of Hebrew hatred for the oppressors of the much-suffering race here burst into a flame, and towards the end of this finest of elegies we read the dark imprecation, “Thy curse upon them!” {Lam 3:65}