Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Lamentations 4:6

For the punishment of the iniquity of the daughter of my people is greater than the punishment of the sin of Sodom, that was overthrown as in a moment, and no hands stayed on her.

6. the iniquity the sin ] rather than as mg. and A.V. the punishment of the iniquity the punishment of the sin. There is no assertion in this part of the v. as to the comparative amount of punishment, but from the admitted fact that the sufferings of Jerusalem exceeded those of Sodom, it is inferred that the sin must have been in like proportion. Sodom perished in a moment, there were no prolonged sufferings, such as are brought about or directly administered by the hand of man.

were laid upon her ] The words are susceptible of various interpretations: no hands raged (whirled) about her (Ewald), too swiftly, even for men to wring their hands (Lhr). The verb is used of a tempest in Jer 23:19; Jer 30:23. The mg. here suggests fell, comparing 2Sa 3:29.

Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges

Rather, For the iniquity of the daughter of my people was greater than the sin of Sodom. The prophet deduces this conclusion from the greatness of Judahs misery (compare Jer 30:11; see also Luk 13:1-5).

No hands stayed on her – Or, no hands were round about her. Sodoms sufferings in dying were brief: there were no starving children, no mothers cooking their offspring for food.

Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible

Verse 6. For the punishment] He thinks the punishment of Jerusalem far greater than that of Sodom. That was destroyed in a moment, while all her inhabitants were in health and strength; Jerusalem fell by the most lingering calamities; her men partly destroyed by the sword, and partly by the famine.

Instead of no hands stayed on her, Blayney translates, “Nor were hands weakened in her.” Perhaps the meaning is, “Sodom was destroyed in a moment without any human labour.” It was a judgment from God himself: so the sacred text: “The LORD rained down fire and brimstone from the Lord out of heaven.” See Ge 19:24.

Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible

The word translated

punishment signifies also iniquity, as was said in the notes on Lam 3:39. The sins of the Jews are compared to the sins of Sodom, Isa 3:9; Eze 16:46,48,49; hence their rulers are called rulers of Sodom, Isa 1:10; either their sins were specifically the same (as they were) as to many sins, Eze 16:49, or they were of an equal magnitude and provocative nature. The prophet here complains that they were punished like Sodom, Amo 4:11; yea, and their punishment was greater, because more lingering and gradual, whereas Sodom was overthrown in a moment, and that by no human hands that abode upon her, causing her a continued torment, as there did upon the Jews. David said, It is better to fall into the immediate hand of God than into the hands of men.

Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole

6. greater than . . . Sodom(Mt 11:23). No prophets hadbeen sent to Sodom, as there had been to Judea; therefore thepunishment of the latter was heavier than that of the former.

overthrown . . . in amomentwhereas the Jews had to endure the protracted andmanifold hardships of a siege.

no hands stayed on herNohostile force, as the Chaldeans in the case of Jerusalem,continually pressed on her before her overthrow. Jeremiah thusshows the greater severity of Jerusalem’s punishment than that ofSodom.

Zain.

Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible

For the punishment of the iniquity of the daughter of my people,…. In the long siege of their city, and the evils that attended it, especially the sore famine:

is greater than the punishment of the sin of Sodom; which was destroyed at once by fire from heaven: or it may be rendered, “the iniquity of the daughter of my people is greater than the sin of Sodom” p; though the men of Sodom were great sinners, the Jews were greater, their sins being more aggravated; to this agrees the Targum, which renders the word “sin”, and paraphrases the words following thus,

“and there dwelt not in her prophets to prophesy unto her, and turn her by repentance;”

as the Jews had, and therefore their sin was the greater; both senses are true, and the one is the foundation of the other; but the first seems best to agree with what follows:

that was overthrown as in a moment; by a shower of fire from heaven, which consumed it at once; whereas the destruction of Jerusalem was a lingering one, through a long and tedious siege; the inhabitants were gradually wasted and consumed by famine, pestilence, and sword, and so their punishment greater than Sodom’s:

and no hand stayed on her; that is, on Sodom; the hand of God was immediately upon her, and dispatched her at once, but not the hands of men; as the hands of the Chaldeans were upon the Jews, afflicting and distressing them a long time, which made their ease the worse.

p —-Nwe ldgyw “et ingens fuit iniquitas–prae peccato”, Montanus; “et major extitit pravitas–prae peccato”, Cocceius. So V. L.

Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible

The Prophet says first,, that the punishment of his people was heavier than that of Sodom. If any one prefers the other version, I will not contend, for it is not unsuitable; and hence also a most useful doctrine may be drawn, that we are to judge of the grievousness of our sins by the greatness of our punishment for God never exceeds what is just when he takes vengeance on the sins of men. Then his severity shews how grievously men have sinned. Thus, Jeremiah may have reasoned from the effect to the cause, and declared that the people had been more wicked than the Sodomitites. Nor is this unreasonable; for if the Jews had not fallen into that great wickedness of which the Sodomites were guilty, yet the Prophets everywhere charged them as men who not only equaled but also surpassed the Sodomites, especially Ezekiel, (Eze 16:46.) Isaiah also called them the people of Gomorrha, and the king’s counselors and judges, the princes of Sodom, (Isa 1:9.) This mode of speaking is then common in the Prophets, and the meaning is not unsuitable.

But as he dwells only on the grievousness of their punishment, the other explanation seems more simple; for I regard not what is plausible, but accept the true meaning. Let us then repeat the Prophet’s words: greater is the punishment of my people, etc. The word עון, oun, means punishment as well as iniquity; this is certain, beyond dispute. Now חטאת, chethat, means also both sin and punishment. It is hence applied to expiations; the sacrifice for sin is called חטאת, chethat. As to the words, then, they designate punishment as well as sin, the cause of it. But the reason which follows leads me to consider punishment as intended, for he says that Sodom was overthrown as in a moment. Here, doubtless, we see that the sins of the Jews are not compared to the sins of the Sodomites, but their destruction only: God had overthrown Sodom, as afterwards he overthrew Jerusalem; but the ruin of Sodom was milder, for it perished in a moment — for when God had dreadfully thundered, the Sodomites and their neighboring citizens were immediately destroyed; and we know that the shorter the punishment, the more tolerable it is. As the Prophet here compares the momentary destruction of Sodom with the prolonged ruin of the city and slaughter of the people, we see that what is spoken of is not sin, but on the contrary God’s judgment.

There is yet no doubt but that the Prophet summoned the Jews to God’s tribunal, that they might know that they deserved such a vengeance, and that they might perceive that they were worse than the Sodomites. For it was not the Prophet’s object to expostulate with God, or to charge him with having been too rigid in destroying the city of Jerusalem. As, then, the Prophet does not charge God either with injustice or with cruelty, it is certain that punishment is what is here set forth, in order that the people might know what they deserved. (212)

But the words declare nothing more than that God’s vengeance had been severer towards the Jews than towards the Sodomites. How so? it is evident from this reason, because Sodom was consumed as in a moment; and then it is added, and strokes remained not on her. The word יד, id, as it is well known, means hand, a place, but sometimes, metaphorically, a stroke. Interpreters vary here, but I shall not recite the opinions of all, nor is it needful. Those who seem to come nearest to the words of the Prophet, render them thus, “and hands (or forces) have not encamped against her.” But this is a forced and far-fetched meaning. It would run better, “have not remained.” The verb חול chul, means sometimes to encamp and sometimes to remain, to settle. Then the most appropriate meaning would be, that strokes settled not on the Sodomites, while the Jews pined away in their manifold evils. (213) For they did not immediately perish like the Sodomitites; but when God saw them so obstinate in their wickedness, he destroyed some by famine, some by pestilence, and some by the sword; and then the city was not immediately demolished altogether, as it often happens when enemies make a slaughter and kill men, women, and children; but this people were not so destroyed. Many of them were driven into exile, and some of the common people were left to inhabit the ruined cities, for there was dreadful desolation. The king himself, as it has before appeared, was removed to Babylon, but his eyes had previously been pulled out, and his children slain in his presence.

We hence see that the destruction of the city was like a slow consumption: and that thus strokes remained there as it were fixed, which did not happen to Sodom; for Sodom suddenly perished when God thundered against it; but the hand of God did not depart from the Jews, and the strokes or smitings, as I have said, were fixed on them and continued. It follows, —

(212) The early versions and the Targ. render the words “iniquity,” and “sin;” but modern critics agree with Calvin. Penalty and punishment might be suitably adopted. — Ed.

(213) The clause might be rendered, —

And not wearied against (or, over) her were hands.

This is substantially the Sept. and the Syr. Grotius says that the meaning is, that Sodom was destroyed not by human means, that is, not by a siege, as Jerusalem had been. — Ed.

Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary

(6) The punishment of the iniquity.Better, The iniquity of the daughter of my people was greater than the sin of Sodom. The words in both cases point to guilt rather than its penalty, though, as the context shows, the greatness of the former is inferred from that of the latter. The point of comparison was that Sodom was not doomed to a protracted misery, like that which had been the lot of Jerusalem.

No hands stayed on her . . .Literally, no hands went round about her: i.e., her destruction was the direct work of God, and not of human agents, with their more merciless tortures. (Comp. 2Sa. 24:14.) The main thought may be noticed as reproduced in Mat. 10:15; Mat. 11:24.

Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)

6. The punishment The margin, iniquity, is to be preferred. The sin of the daughter of my people is greater than the sin of Sodom. The contrast in favour of Sodom’s punishment consisted, 1) In the suddenness of her overthrow, as in a moment; 2) In that its overthrow came direct from God without the intervention of human agency.

No hands stayed on her More literally, no hands went round in her.

Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments