Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Leviticus 13:36
Then the priest shall look on him: and, behold, if the scurf be spread in the skin, the priest shall not seek for yellow hair; he [is] unclean.
He need not search for the hair, or any other sign, the spreading or running of it being a sure sign of leprosy, without any other evidence.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
Then the priest shall look on him,…. Again, and which is no less than the fourth time; for notwithstanding his being pronounced clean, he was still subject to the inspection of the priest, if any alteration appeared:
and, behold, if the scall be spread in the skin; which was a certain sign of a leprosy:
the priest shall not seek for yellow hair; or be solicitous about that, whether there is any or not, for either one or the other of these signs were sufficient to determine the case:
he [is] unclean; and so to be pronounced.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
36. Not seek for yellow hair The rapid spread is a sufficient token of the leprosy, without the other symptom.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Reciprocal: Lev 13:7 – General Lev 14:39 – General
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Lev 13:36. He shall not seek He need not search for the hair, or any other sign, the spreading of it being a sure sign of leprosy.
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
13:36 Then the priest shall look on him: and, behold, if the scall be spread in the skin, the priest shall not {k} seek for yellow hair; he [is] unclean.
(k) He shall not care whether the yellow hair is there or not.