Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Leviticus 8:7
And he put upon him the coat, and girded him with the girdle, and clothed him with the robe, and put the ephod upon him, and he girded him with the curious girdle of the ephod, and bound [it] unto him therewith.
7 9. ( b) vesting; cp. Exo 29:5-6. The garments are mentioned in a different order in Exo 28:4, and some of them are there described more fully in Lev 8:6 ff. The reader may refer to the notes in Driver’s commentary. The ‘linen breeches’ (Exo 28:42) are not mentioned here.
the coat ] the tunic, Heb. kuttoneth or kthoneth. A long tunic with sleeves, secured by a girdle, or sash, somewhat like a dressing gown. It was the principal garment of ordinary life, and made of cotton, linen, or wool. The high priest’s coat, or tunic, was made of fine linen ( shsh) and ornamented with a pattern. Cp. Exo 28:4, where it is described as ‘a coat of chequer work’ ( a broidered coat, A.V.), and in Exo 28:39 as woven ‘in chequer work of fine linen’; the exact meaning of the Heb. is uncertain, but it not improbably denotes something of the nature of a check.
the girdle ] sash, the work of the embroiderer (Exo 28:39), made in the same way as the screen ( hanging A.V.) for the entrance to the Tent (Exo 26:36) and to the Court (Lev 27:16). It was of considerable length (according to the Talmud about 48 ft.) and was passed round the body several times (Jos. Ant. iii. 7. 2). It seems to have been accidentally omitted in Exo 29:5. It must be distinguished from the ‘cunningly woven band of the ephod’ (cp. Exo 28:8, etc.), translated in A.V. ‘curious girdle.’
the robe ] called ‘the robe of the ephod,’ Exo 28:31; Exo 29:5; Exo 39:22 f. A garment all blue with a hole for the head, and a binding of woven work round the whole to prevent its being rent. The Heb. word m‘ l is applied to the robe (A.V. coat) made by Hannah for her son Samuel (1Sa 2:19), and to the robe (A.V. mantle) of Samuel which was rent by Saul (1Sa 15:27). The clothing of the High Priest, though of costly material, is so far like that of other people, and similar to that worn by the Arabs of the present day; an under garment bound with a sash, and an outer robe reaching nearly to the ground, but this outer garment is now worn open in front. According to Josephus ( Ant. iii. 7. 4, B.J. 8:5. 7) the robe of the ephod reached to the feet, but some writers describe it as shorter than the tunic. Its fringe of pomegranates and bells is described Exo 28:33-35; Exo 39:24-26 note the addition of ‘pure’ to ‘gold’ in the second passage), but being a part of the robe is not mentioned here or in Exodus 29.
the ephod ] This garment (described Exo 28:6 ff; Exo 39:2-5) was made of fine twined linen with blue purple and scarlet threads, and fine gold wire. Its exact shape cannot be determined. There were two shoulder straps, on each of which was an engraved onyx stone, and a band made of the same material as the ephod and woven with it in one piece, which served to gird the ephod over the other garments. This band is called ‘the cunningly woven band’ ( the curious girdle A.V.) of the ephod; the Heb. shb denotes textile work of the highest grade, employed only for the curtains of the Dwelling, the veil, the ephod, and the pouch for the Urim and Thummim. See note on Exo 26:1, where terms used for the different kinds of woven work are distinguished. The words ‘cunning,’ ‘cunningly’ were in Old English used to denote what is now termed ‘skilful,’ ‘skilfully.’ If the ephod consisted of front and back pieces, then the whole garment with its band would form a kind of waistcoat; if it consisted of a front piece only, it would resemble an apron. See Driver on Exo 28:5-12 and p. 312.
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
See the notes at Exo. 28.
Lev 8:9
The holy crown – The golden plate of the mitre was so called as the distinctive badge of the high priests consecration. See Lev 21:12.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
The linen breeches prescribed Exo 28:42 are not here mentioned, because they were not to be put on at his consecration, but afterwards in the execution of his office.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
7-9. he put upon him the coat, andgirded him with the girdleThe splendor of the officialvestments, together with the gorgeous tiara of the high priest, wasintended, doubtless, in the first instance, to produce in the mindsof the people a high respect for the ministers of religion; and inthe next, from the predominant use of linen, to inculcate upon Aaronand his sons the duty of maintaining unspotted righteousness in theircharacters and lives.
Fuente: Jamieson, Fausset and Brown’s Commentary Critical and Explanatory on the Whole Bible
And he put upon him the coat,…. The embroidered coat of fine linen, which was next to his flesh; Ex 28:39 and all the garments were put on just in the order they are here declared; no mention is made indeed of the linen breeches, since it is highly probable these were put on by Aaron himself in some apartment in the tabernacle, or before came thither; it not being so decent to put on, or have these put on, in the sight of the whole congregation:
and girded him with the girdle; the girdle of needlework with which the linen coat was girt to him, and was distinct from the curious girdle of the ephod after mentioned, Ex 28:39
and clothed him with the robe: the robe of the ephod, which had at the hem of it golden bells and pomegranates, Ex 28:31
and put the ephod upon him; made of gold, blue, purple, scarlet, and fine twined linen, which had two shoulder pieces, and on them two onyx stones, on which were engraved the names of the twelve tribes,
Ex 28:6
and he girded him with the curious girdle of the ephod, and bound [it] unto him therewith; which was made of the same with the ephod, and by which it was girt close unto him; of the mystical meaning of these garments, [See comments on Ex 28:39] [See comments on Ex 28:31] [See comments on Ex 28:32] [See comments on Ex 28:33] [See comments on Ex 28:34] [See comments on Ex 28:35] [See comments on Ex 28:6] [See comments on Ex 28:7] [See comments on Ex 28:8] [See comments on Ex 28:9] [See comments on Ex 28:10] [See comments on Ex 28:11] [See comments on Ex 28:12].
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
(7) And he put upon him the coat.Better, and he put upon him the tunic. For this garment see Lev. 6:10, and Exo. 28:39. It will be seen that the first article of dressviz., the drawersdistinctly mentioned in Exo. 28:42, is here omitted. This arises from the fact that, being nearest to the skin, Aaron put them on himself behind the curtain, immediately after his ablution.
And girded him with the girdle.Not the band of the ephod, which is mentioned further on by the name of curious girdle, but the one made of needlework, with which the tunic was girded about the loins. (See Lev. 6:10, and Exo. 28:39.)
The robe.Called in Exo. 28:31-35, the robe of the ephod, which was woven without seam, and was wholly blue. (See Lev. 6:10.)
And put the ephod upon him.The ephod, which was the distinctive vestment of the high priest, was a sleeveless garment, and was worn over the shoulders. It was made of blue, purple, scarlet, and fine-twined linen, interwoven with golden threads. (See Exo. 28:6-7.)
And he girded him with the curious girdle.Better, and girded him with the band. This band was not only made of the same costly materials as the ephod, but was woven out of the same piece on either side of the garment, so that the ephod had as it were two hands, which constituted the band. (See Exo. 28:8.) It will be seen that this is entirely different from the girdle which was tied around the tunic, mentioned in the former part of this verse.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
7. The coat This is the cethoneth, corresponding to the Greek , a closely-fitting garment in form and use like our shirt, by which term it should be translated. A person wearing this alone was described as naked.
1Sa 19:24; Isa 20:2; Joh 21:7.
The girdle The abhnet was an ornamental belt or sash, worn only by priests and state officers. Aaron’s was of fine twilled linen, tricoloured, blue, purple, and scarlet, embroidered with flowers of needlework. Exo 39:29. It was tied in a knot, so that the ends hung down in front nearly to the feet, and were thrown over the left shoulder in time of sacrifice. The length, according to Maimonides, was thirty-two cubits, and it was wrapped several times round the body, just below the armpits; its breadth was three fingers.
The robe The me’il. This was a cloak worn over the cethoneth, and under the girdle, reaching down to the feet.
The ephod The term is transferred from the Hebrew. This sacred vestment was originally for the high priest, but it was afterwards worn by ordinary priests, (1Sa 22:18,) and deemed characteristic of the office. Hos 3:4. It was divided below the armpits into two parts, one covering the front, to which the breastplate was attached, and the other the back, the two parts being united on the shoulders by clasps of gold or precious stones. It reached down to the middle of the thighs, and was worn over the robe. Much gold was used in making it. Exo 39:2-21. To make a new style of ephod implied the introduction of a new system of worship.
The curious girdle of the ephod “Curious” is an adjective not found in the original. What is meant is, the band for the two parts of the ephod, which was of the same material and of one piece with it. Exo 28:8.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Reader, when you have read this verse turn to Rev 1:12-18 , and behold him whom Aaron represented. In order to strengthen the assurance of this precious doctrine, if you consult Dan 10:5-6 , you will find that the prophet was blessed with a similar representation to the beloved apostle John.
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
the girdle. Not the band of the ephod called the “curious girdle”, but the one of needlework, Ch. Lev 16:4 and Exo 28:39.
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
he put: Exo 28:4, Exo 29:5, Exo 39:1-7, Isa 61:3, Isa 61:10, Rom 3:22, Rom 13:14, Gal 3:27
the ephod: The ephod seems to have been a garment worn by persons of distinction of various characters (2Sa 6:4); the description of which in the book of Exodus (Exo 28:6, etc.) relates only to its materials. As to its shape, the LXX calls it , which signifies that it was worn on the shoulders. So also Josephus, who says it was a cubit long. St. Jerome compares it with the Roman caracalla, which was a sort of short cloak, only that it had a head or hood, which the ephod had not.
Reciprocal: Exo 28:2 – holy garments Exo 28:8 – curious Exo 28:31 – General Exo 29:29 – anointed Exo 31:10 – General Exo 39:2 – General Exo 39:5 – curious Lev 16:4 – therefore Lev 16:24 – his garments Lev 21:10 – consecrated 1Sa 2:18 – a linen ephod 1Sa 2:28 – And did I Psa 105:26 – Aaron Eze 42:14 – they not go Hos 3:4 – ephod Rev 1:13 – and girt
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
THE INVESTITURE
Lev 8:7-9
“And he put upon him the coat, and girded him with the girdle, and clothed him with the robe, and put the ephod upon him, and he girded him with the cunningly woven band of the ephod, and bound it unto him therewith. And he placed the breastplate upon him: and in the breastplate he put the Urim and the Thummim. And he set the mitre upon his head: and upon the mitre, in front, did he set the golden plate, the holy crown; as the Lord commanded Moses.”
The next ceremony of the consecration was the Investiture of Aaron with his official high priestly robes, as they had been appointed of God to be made. {Exo 28:1-43} The investiture of the sons of Aaron significantly takes place only after the anointing of the tabernacle, and of Aaron as high priest. Of the investiture of Aaron we read in Lev 8:7-9, above.
As these garments were official, we must needs regard them as symbolical; a thought which is the more emphasised by the very minute and special directions given by the Lord for making them. Nothing was left to the fancy of man; all was prescribed by the Lord. The official robes of the high priest consisted of eight pieces, four of which, the coat, the girdle, the turban (or “mitre”), and the breeches, were, with the exception of the turban, of white linen, and identical in every respect with the official dress of the ordinary priests.
Four pieces more were peculiar to himself, the special insignia of his office, and unlike the dress of the ordinary priest, were richly made in gold and various colours, “garments for glory and for beauty.” These were: the robe of the ephod, made all of blue, with a border of pendant pomegranates and golden bells in alternation; the ephod itself consisting of two pieces, broidered in gold and blue, purple, scarlet, and fine white linen, the one hanging in front, the other behind, over the robe of the ephod, and joined on the shoulders with two onyx stones, on which were graven the names of the twelve tribes, six on the one shoulder and six on the other; it was girt about him with a girdle of the same material and colours. The third was the breastplate, which was a double square of the same material and colours as the ephod, within the fold of which, as it hung from his shoulders by golden chains, was placed the Urim and the Thummim, whatever these may have been, and upon the front of which were set twelve precious stones, on which, severally, were engraved the names of the twelve tribes of the children of Israel. And the fourth and last article of his attire was “the golden plate, the holy crown”; a band of gold bound about his forehead over the turban, with blue lace, on which were engraven the words, “Holiness to Jehovah.”
This dress of the high priest represented him, in the first place, as the appointed minister of the tabernacle. The number of pieces, twice four, like the four of the common priests attire, answered to the four which was represented in the ground plan of the tabernacle, quadrangular both in its form as a whole and in its several parts, the Holy of Holies being a perfect cube; four being in Scripture constantly the number which symbolises the universe, as created by God and bearing witness to Him. So also the garments of the high priest marked him as the minister of the tabernacle by their colours, also four in number, and the same as those of the latter, namely, blue, purple, scarlet, and white.
But the official robes of the high priest marked him, in the second place, as the servant of the God of the tabernacle, whose livery he wore. For these colours, various modifications of light, all thus had a symbolic reference to the God of light, who made the universe of which the Mosaic tabernacle was a type. Of these, the blue, the colour of the overarching heaven, has been in many lands and religions naturally regarded as the colour symbolising God, as the God of the heaven, bowing to the earth in condescending love and self-revelation. In like manner, we find it repeatedly recurring in the symbolic manifestations of Jehovah in the Holy Scriptures, where it always brings God before us with special reference to His condescending love as entering into covenant with man, and revealing for their good His holy law. The purple, as will occur to everyone, is everywhere recognised as the colour of royalty, and therefore symbolised the kingly exaltation and majesty of God, as the Ruler of heaven and earth. The scarlet reminds us at once of the colour of blood, which stands in the very foreground of the Mosaic symbolism as the symbol of life, and thus points us to the conception of God, as the essentially Living One, who is Himself the sole primal source of all life, whether physical or spiritual, in the creature. No one can mistake, again, the symbolic meaning of the white, which, not only in the Scripture, but among all nations, has ever been the symbol of purity and holiness, and thus represented the high priest as the minister of God, as the Most Holy One. By this investiture, therefore, Aaron was symbolically constituted the minister of the tabernacle, on the one hand, and of God, on the other; and, in particular, of God as the God of revelation, in covenant with Israel; of God as the Most High, the King of Israel; of God as the God of life, the Giver of life in the redemption of Israel; and, finally, of God as the Most Holy, the God “who is light,” and “with whom is no darkness at all.”
The “robe of the ephod” was woven in one piece, and all of blue. In that it was thus without seam, was symbolised the wholeness and absolute integrity necessary to him who should bear the high priestly office. In that it was made all of blue, the colour which symbolised the God of heaven as manifesting Himself to Israel in condescending love, in the holy law and covenant, this robe of the ephod specially marked the high priest as the minister of Jehovah and of His revealed law.
The ephod, which depended from the shoulders before and behind, according to the usage of Scripture, was the garment specially significant of rule and authority; a thought which reached full expression in the breastplate which was fastened to it, which contained the Urim and Thummim, by which Gods will was made known to Israel in times of perplexity, and was called “the breastplate of judgment.”
The ornamentation of these garments had also a symbolic meaning, though it may not be in each instance equally clear. In that the high priest, as thus robed, bore upon the ephod and the breastplate of judgment, graven on precious stones, the names of the twelve tribes of Israel, he was marked as one who in all his high priestly work before and with God, presented and represented Israel. In that the names were engraven upon precious stones was signified the exceeding preciousness of Israel in Gods sight, as His “peculiar treasure.” In that, again, they were worn upon his shoulders, Aaron was represented to Israel as upholding and bearing them before God in the strength of his office; in that he wore their names upon his breast, he was represented as also bearing them upon. his heart in love and affection.
The symbolic meaning of the pomegranates and golden bells, which formed the border of the robe of the ephod, is not quite so clear. But we may probably find a hint as to their significance in the Divine direction as to the border of blue which every Israelite was to wear upon the bottom of his garment. {Num 15:39} The purpose of this is said to be that it might be for a continual reminder of the law: “It shall be unto you for a fringe, that ye may look upon it, and remember all the commandments of the Lord, and do them.” If then this border in the garment of each individual member of the priestly nation was designed symbolically to mark them as the keepers of the law of the God of heaven, we may safely infer an analogous meaning in the similar border to the official garment of the high priest. And if so, then we shall perhaps not be far out of the way if in this case we follow Jewish tradition in regarding the pomegranate, a fruit distinguished by being filled to the full with seeds, as the symbol, par excellence, of the law of commandments, the words of the living God, as “incorruptible seed,” endowed by Him with vital energy and power.
As for the bells, we naturally think at once of the common use of the bell to give a signal, and announce what one may be concerned to know. So we read of these golden bells, {Exo 28:35} “the sound thereof shall be heard when he goeth in unto the holy place before the Lord that he die not.”
These golden bells in the border of his garment, between each pair of pomegranates, thus announced him as officially appearing before God as the fulfiller of the law of commandments, and as, for this reason, acceptable to God in the execution of his high priestly functions.
As to the Urim and Thummim, “Light and Perfection,” which were apparently placed within the fold of the breastplate of judgment, as the tables of the law within the ark of the covenant, there has been in all ages much debate; but what they were cannot be said to have been certainly determined. Most probable appears the opinion that they were two sacred lots which on solemn occasions were used by the high priest for determining the will of God. So much, in any case, is clear from the Scripture, that in some way through them the will of God as the King of Israel was made known to the high priest, for the direction of the nation in doubtful matters. Most fitly, therefore, they were placed within the breastplate of judgment, which, indeed, may have received this name from this circumstance. The high priest, therefore, as the bearer of the Urim and Thummim, was set forth, in accordance with the meaning of these words, as one who in virtue of his office received perfect enlightenment from God as to His will, in all that concerned Israels action.
The plate of graven gold, called the “holy crown” was bound by Moses with a lace of blue upon the mitre of Aaron in front. The precious metal here, as elsewhere in the official garments of the high priest, and in the tabernacle, was symbolic of the boundless riches of the glory of the God of Israel, whose minister the high priest was. The special significance, however, of this holy crown, is found in the words which appeared upon it, “Holiness to Jehovah.” This was a continual visible mark and reminder of the fact that the high priest, in all that he was, and in all that he did, was a person in the highest possible sense consecrated to Jehovah, the heavenly King of Israel, whose livery he wore. And in that this golden plate with this inscription is called his “crown,” it is further suggested that in this last-named fact is found the crowning glory and dignity of the high priests office. He is the minister of the God of Israel, Jehovah, whose own supreme glory is just this, that He is holy. In the directions given for this crown in Exo 28:36-38 it is said that in virtue of his wearing this, or, rather in virtue of the fact thus set forth, “Aaron shall bear the iniquity of the holy things which the children of Israel shall hallow in all their holy gifts; and it shall always be upon his forehead, that they may be accepted before the Lord.” That is, even Israels consecrated things, their holiest gifts, are yet defiled by the ever abiding sinfulness of those who offer them; but they are nevertheless graciously accepted, as being offered by Aaron, himself “holy to the Lord.”
Such then appears to have been the symbolic meaning of these “garments for glory and for beauty,” with which Moses now robed Aaron, in token of his investiture with the manifold dignities of the exalted office to which God had called him. But we must not forget that we are not, in all this, dealing merely with matters of antiquarian or archaeological interest. Nothing is plainer than the teaching of the New Testament, that Aaron, as the high priest, not by accident, but by Divine intention, prefigured Christ. In all the directions given concerning his investiture with his office, and the work which, as high priest, he had to do, the Holy Ghost intended to prefigure, directly or indirectly, something concerning the person, office, and work of Jesus Christ, as our heavenly High Priest, the Fulfiller of all these types. As Aaron appears in his fourfold high priestly garments of four colours, which represented him as the minister, on the one hand, of the tabernacle, and, on the other, of the God of Israel, the Inhabitant of the tabernacle, so are we reminded how Christ is appointed as the “Minister of the greater and more perfect tabernacle, not made with hands,” {Heb 9:11} the earth, the heaven, and the heaven of heavens, to reconcile, by the offering of His blood, “both the things which are on earth and those which are in the heavens”. {Col 1:20} We look upon the blue robe of the ephod, and remember how Christ is made a minister of “a better covenant, enacted upon better promises,” {Heb 8:6} representing, as that old covenant did not, the fulness of the revelation of Gods condescending love and saving mercy. So also the inwoven scarlet reminds us how Christ, again, as the great High Priest, is the minister of the God of life, and is also Himself life and the Giver of life to all His people. We look upon the high priests purple and gold, and are reminded again that Christ, the High Priest, is also invested with regal power and dominion, all authority being given unto Him in heaven and on earth. {Mat 28:18}
Again, we look on the ephod of fine linen, inwoven with blue, and scarlet, and purple, and gold, with its girdle, symbolising service, and its pendant breastplate of judgment, and are reminded how Christ in all the relations thus pertaining to Him as High Priest, is the Ruler and the Judge of His people, who, as the bearer of the true Urim and Thummim, is not only Priest, and King, and Judge, but also, and in order to the salvation of His people, their Prophet, continually revealing unto those who seek Him, the will of God for their direction and guidance in every emergency of life. The girdle, the symbol of service, brings to mind, again, how in all this He is the Servant of the Lord, serving the Father in Saving us.
The symbolism of the pomegranates and the golden bells reminds us, for the strengthening of our faith, how our exalted High Priest, who appears before God in our behalf in the Holiest, appears there as the great Preserver and Fulfiller of the Divine law, supremely qualified, no less by His supreme merit than by Divine appointment, to urge our needs with prevalence before God, His very presence in the heavenly sanctuary vocal with sweet music. Did Aaron bear the names of the twelve tribes of Israel on his shoulders and on his breast before God continually? Even so, does his great Antitype bear continually all His people before God, as He executes His high priestly office; and this, too, not merely in a vague and general way, but tribe by tribe, community by community, each with its peculiar case and special need; nay, we may say even more; each individual, as such, is thus borne continually on the shoulders and the breast of the heavenly Priest; on His shoulders He bears them, to support them by His power; on His heart, in tenderest love and sympathy. And so often as we are distressed and discouraged by the consciousness of defilement still pertaining even to the holiest of our holy things, consecration ever imperfect at the best, we may bethink ourselves of the golden crown which Aaron wore, and its inscription, and remember how the Lord Jesus is in fullest reality “holy to the Lord”; so that we may take heart of grace as, with full reason and right, we apply to Him what is said of this crown of holiness on Aarons brow: “The crown of holiness is ever on His forehead, and He shall bear the iniquity of the holy things which we shall hallow in all our holy gifts; it is always on His forehead, that our works may be accepted before the Lord.” And so we are taught by this symbolism ever to look away from all conscious defilement and sin to the infinite holiness of the person of the Lord Jesus, as He continually appears before God as High Priest in our behalf, the all-sufficient Surety for the acceptance of our persons and of our imperfect works, for His own sake.
The investiture, as also the anointing, of the sons of Aaron, followed the robing and anointing of Aaron. We read (Lev 8:13): “Moses brought Aarons sons, and clothed them with coats, and girded them with girdles, and bound head-tires upon them; as the Lord commanded Moses.”
To the three articles of their attire here mentioned, must he added the “linen breeches”; {Exo 28:42} so that they also, in the several parts of their official vestments, bore the number four, the signature of the creaturely, as represented in the tabernacle. All was of pure white linen, signifying the holiness and righteousness of those who should act as priests before God. So once and again in the Apocalypse, the same symbol is used to denote the spotless holiness and righteousness of the blood-bought saints, who are made “a kingdom and priests” unto God: as, for instance, it is said of that same holy body, symbolised as the bride of the Lamb, that “it was given unto her that she should array herself in fine linen, bright and pure: for the fine linen is the righteous acts of the saints”. {Rev 19:8}