Exegetical and Hermeneutical Commentary of Luke 2:21
And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.
21. The Circumcision
21. for the circumcising of the child ] Gen 17:12. Doubtless the rite was performed by Joseph. “Jesus Christ was a minister of the circumcision” (i. e. went to the Jew first) “for the truth of God to confirm the promises made unto the fathers,” Rom 15:8. Thus it became him ‘to be made like unto His brethren, and to fulfil all righteousness,’ Mat 3:15. Christ suffered pain thus early for our sake to teach us that, though He ordained for us the painless rite of baptism, we must practise the spiritual circumcision the circumcision of the heart. He came “not to destroy the Law but to fulfil,” Mat 5:17
“He, who with all heaven’s heraldry whilere
Entered the world, now bleeds to give us ease.
Alas, how soon our sin
Sore doth begin
His infancy to seize!”
Milton, The Circumcision.
his name was called JESUS ] See on Luk 1:31. The name of the child was bestowed at circumcision, as with us at baptism. Among Greeks and Romans also the genethlia and nominalia were on the eighth or ninth day. Observe the brief notice of Christ’s circumcision compared with the fuller and more elaborate account of John’s. “In the person of John the rite of circumcision solemnised its last glories.”
Fuente: The Cambridge Bible for Schools and Colleges
Eight days … – This was the regular time for performing the rite of circumcision, Gen 17:12.
Called Jesus – See the notes at Mat 1:21.
Fuente: Albert Barnes’ Notes on the Bible
Luk 2:21
For the circumcising of the Child
Circumcision and baptism
The teaching of Jewish circumcision resembles the teaching of Christian baptism.
Both exhibit the putting away of the filth of the flesh; the first by a wounding of the body (which aptly recalls the severity of the elder dispensation); the second by an outward washing. This, which may be called the practical bearing of the present festival (Circumcision of Christ, 1st January), is brought out in the collect for the day, wherein we beseech God to grant us the true circumcision of the spirit. And it is worth observing that this was seen, from the very first, to be the mystical teaching of the rite. Thus Moses, in the book of Deuteronomy (which abounds in the loftier class of doctrine), speaks plainly (Deu 10:16; Deu 30:6) of circumcising the heart; and the prophets (Jer 4:4) use the same expression. St. Stephenslanguage, when he addressed his countrymen for the last time (Ye stiff-necked and uncircumcised in heart and ears, Act 7:51), seems to show that this continued throughout the whole history of the Jewish people to be the well-understood meaning of the rite; while St. Pauls witness on the point (Rom 2:28-29) is express. It is interesting to observe how closely this observance was connected with holy baptism, besides being typical of the Christian sacrament, and, indeed, a kind of anticipation of it: a rite performed in infancy, and made the occasion of bestowing a new name. (Dean Burgon.)
Spiritual nature of circumcision
Circumcision was the seal of the gospel covenant made by God with Abraham (Gen 17:2; Gen 17:4; Gen 17:9); which the law, added–as the apostle teaches (Gal 3:17)–four hundred and thirty years after, could not disannul. This was a covenant of faith, quite distinct from the covenant of works (Exo 24:8) made through Moses; it was an evangelical, not a legal, covenant. And it foreshadowed what was to be in the latter days, though the people knew it not, would not know it. They relied on being naturally descended from Abraham, and gave no heed to our Saviours declaration that, if they were
indeed Abrahams children, they would do the works of Abraham (Joh 8:39); in other words, that Gods promise to the patriarchs seed was a spiritual promise, fulfilled to as many as showed the like faith with himself Gal 3:7; Gal 3:29). While, therefore, our Saviours submission to be circumcised–whereby, in one respect, He fulfilled all righteousness–conveys an obvious lesson of obedience, and conformity to the laws of the Church, to which we belong; the gospel fulfilment which Christ gave to that sacred rite, and to the covenant with Abraham of which it was the seal and pledge, brings to mind the high spiritual teaching of all His other ancient laws, the design of which was to guide mans heart to the future Messiah. Gods ancient law was spiritual throughout; no dead letter, but a living reality, trying the very heart and reins. (Dean Burgon.)
The circumcision of our Lord
There is no part of our Saviours life uninteresting, or that will not yield instruction. We ask, then, why did He submit to circumcision?
1. Christ was circumcised in order to fulfil the law. By His perfect obedience to all its precepts, He abolished its force and condemning power over every transgression. For us He was circumcised and baptized; for us He exhibited entire legal obedience, that He might bring us under the tender, merciful, encouraging covenant of the gospel, by fulfilling all righteousness.
2. Christs circumcision was necessary to obtain for Him a hearing among His own people. The Jews looked upon every uncircumcised person as unclean. Christ could have had no access to them without submitting to this ceremony. To manifest Himself of the seed of Abraham, to satisfy in this respect the requisitions of His nation, to substantiate His pretentions to be their Messiah, and deprive them of what would have been an unanswerable plea for rejecting Him, He graciously condescended to endure this painful rite. What an example has He set us of the excellency of submitting to privations and pains in advancing the happiness of our fellow-beings! Did Jesus bear the marks of an humbling rite in His own precious body, that His own people, when He came to them, might not be offended in Him; and shall not we yield to all innocent compliances with the habits and feelings of others, which may facilitate our usefulness to them, and bear with contentment the labours and crosses, self-denials, expenses, and cares, which may be necessary in promoting their salvation or happiness?
3. The institution of this ceremony, and Christs compliance with it, suggests to us the propriety and efficacy of visible rites and sacraments. Here was a seal of a covenant established by God. It was to be a token for distinguishing the faithful, a sign of cleansing from pollution, and an assurance of blessing from Jehovah. Without some visible rite it is hardly conceivable how this or any Church could be preserved distinct. Some sacrament is necessary, and, if necessary, obligatory upon every one who would support the Church, for which it is hallowed, and enjoy all its privileges. Accordingly, all systems of religion have had their rites, mysteries, symbols. What circumcision was to the Jews, baptism is to Christians. Both of Divine appointment, significant of incorporation into the Church of God, requiring faith, representing purification from the defilements of sin, and implying consequent self-denial, holiness, obedience.
4. In the circumcision of Christ we are strikingly taught the propriety of submitting to all the precepts and institutions of the revelation under which we live. Christ was made under the law, consequently the law had authority over Him. With singular truth, He might have asked, Can I be benefited by this rite, and by these simple ceremonies? With peculiar force He might have inquired, What connection can there be between these outward forms and My spirit; what efficacy can they have upon My heart? With more propriety than any mortal He might have said, I can be safe and perfect without all these. But he did not stop to scruple their utility; He did not find fault with their nature. They were ordained by the Being who established the law under which He lived. This was sufficient for Him. And so throughout His life. He kept the passover; He observed the Sabbath; He went up to the feasts; He neglected no precept of the revelation which He knew came from God, and was authoritative till superseded by His new and better dispensation. In this conduct of His life our Saviour has set an example, excellent in itself, and fit for His disciples to revere. It points to us the necessity of obeying every precept, and observing every rite to which the gospel gives the seal of Divine authority. To neglect baptism or holy communion because, as men think, they may be as good and as safe without them, or because they cannot see their efficacy, is taking a ground which the all-perfect Son of God was too modest to assume. Whether men may be saved without these means, how they effect what is attributed to them, whether they are the best which might have been selected, are points with which we have nothing to do. The questions which concern us are, Whether Christ instituted baptism and the eucharist; and, if He did, whether His injunctions are binding upon us or not? On this plain ground every man may easily form a just determination concerning the propriety of observing all the precepts and institutions of the revelation under which he lives. His observance of them should be a simple act of faith and obedience, by which he should testify both to God and men. (Bishop Dehon.)
Early suffering
Thus early did Jesus suffer pain for our sakes, to teach us the spiritual circumcision, the circumcision of all our bodily senses. As the east catches at sunset the colours of the west, so Bethlehem is a prelude to Calvary, and even the Infants cradle is tinged with a crimson reflection from the Redeemers cross. (Archdeacon Farrar.)
The circumcision of Christ
(First Sunday after Christmas.)
I. THE RITE OF CIRCUMCISION WHICH, AS ON THIS DAY, WAS ADMINISTERED TO THE INFANT JESUS HAD A TWOFOLD SIGNIFICANCE.
1. Its existence was a testimony that mankind is fallen and needs purification.
2. Circumcision was not only an act of humility, it was also an act of obedience to the law of God.
II. THE CIRCUMCISION OF JESUS THUS REVEALS TO US THE FOUNDATIONS ON WHICH HIS HUMAN LIFE WAS BUILT, VIZ., HUMILITY AND OBEDIENCE. Can there be truer foundations for any human life than these? Is it not the very ideal of Christian childhood? Humility, which is the expression of our own insufficiency; obedience, which is the recognition of our dependence upon God.
III. It has been well pointed out by many devout Christian thinkers that THE HUMAN LIFE WHICH THE SON OF GOD LIVED IN THE FLESH IS THE VERY SAME AS THE LIFE WHICH HE LIVES IN US; it is produced in the same manner, and progresses according to the same law. After His spiritual birth in us comes our spiritual circumcision (Col 2:11). As this life grows within us, we shall find that it has also its epiphany, its baptism, its temptation, its active ministry, its passion, its cross, its resurrection. Enough for us to-day to consider its circumcision. Not without reason do we pray in the Litany, By Thy holy nativity and circumcision, good Lord deliver us.
IV. The circumcision was distinguished from all other acts of our Lords humiliation IN THAT IT WAS WITHOUT ANY COMPENSATING GLORY, and was accepted by Him without any protest from God or man, declaring that He needed it not for His own sake. Yet there was even in His circumcision a glory bestowed upon Him which men could not at the time recognize, but which has proved to be the greatest of all the honours of His incarnate life. IT WAS THEN THAT THERE WAS BESTOWED UPON HIM THE NAME OF JESUS, God our Saviour. The name thus given Him in His humiliation has become the name in which He has triumphed over His enemies, the name which has been blessed by millions of penitent sinners, and adored in rapture by ten thousands of His saints.
V. Trembling, anxiously, WE ARE LOOKING FORWARD INTO THE UNCERTAINTY OF A NEW YEAR. If we begin the year in the spirit of Him who began His earthly life in humility and obedience, we may know that, however galling to our natural unrenewed will may be the humility which alone becomes us, however difficult may be the obedience which God demands from us, there is yet to be manifested a glory that exalteth, in comparison with which the trials of this present life are but as nothing. (Canon V. Hutton, M. A.)
The year begins with Thee,
And Thou beginnst with woe,
To let the world of sinners see
That blood for sin must flow.
Thine Infant cries, O Lord,
Thy tears upon the breast,
Are not enough–the legal sword
Must do its stern behest.
Like sacrificial wine
Poured on a victims head
Are these few precious drops of Thin,,
Now first to offering led.
They are the pledge and seal
Of Christs unswerving faith
Given to His Sire, our souls to heal,
Although it costs His death.
Jesus, the watchword
I. FOR THE CHURCH AND FOR THE HOME.
II. FOR JOY AND FOR SORROW.
III. FOR LIFE AND FOR DEATH. (Dr. Gerok.)
The circumcision and naming of the Child
Boys were circumcised eight days after their birth. Tradition said that this day was chosen because the mother ceased to be unclean on the seventh day if she had borne a boy. He who circumcised the child used the following words: Blessed be the Lord our God, who has sanctified as by His precepts, and given us circumcision. The father of the child continued: Who has sanctified us by His precepts, and has granted us to introduce our child into the covenant of Abraham our father. The child was named the same day, because it was said that God changed the names of Abraham and Sarah when He gave the covenant of circumcision. (E. Stapler, D. D.)
The circumcision of Christ
1. It signifies purification. Christ committed no sin, but stood for sinful man.
2. It signified obedience (Gen 17:12). He was made under the law Gal 4:4).
3. It signified consecration. This ordinance was part of the covenant between God and the Jewish nation, whereby they were to be counted a peculiar treasure unto God above all people (Exo 19:5). (D. Hughes, M. A.)
New Years Day
I. CIRCUMCISION WAS A RITE WHICH TOLD OF A MISIMPROVED PAST. The first account of it occurs in the history of Abraham, in whose case Paul says it was given as a sign and seal of the righteousness which is obtained by faith (Rom 4:11). The state of uncircumcision was thus a state of unrighteousness. Paul also tells the Colossians, that they had been dead in their sins and the uncircumcision of their flesh (Col 2:13). Circumcision, therefore, carried with it the remembrance and acknowledgment of a bad and unsatisfactory past. It told of alienation from God, and of faithlessnesses and infidelities. It carried with it a retrospect of failure and sin. Even the circumcision of the holy child Jesus, was an acknowledgment of the fallen condition of the race, with which he identified Himself, in its humiliation, that He might become its perfect Saviour.
II. CIRCUMCISION WAS A SIGN OF THE CUTTING OFF AND CASTING AWAY OF SIN. The fleshly incision was a token of a spiritual one, which consisted in separation from moral impurity and evil (Rom 2:29).
III. BUT CIRCUMCISION SET APART TO OBEDIENCE, AS WELL AS SEVERED FROM IMPURITY. It was the ceremony of initiation into the covenant, and pledged the subject to obey it. It was part of the redemption-work of Christ to obey the law.
IV. CIRCUMCISION CONFERRED AND FIXED ON CHRIST HIS TRUE DESCRIPTIVE NAME.
V. But, for the encouragement of those who feel their deficiencies and miseries, there is still one other particular connected with the text. HE WHOM GOD HATH APPOINTED TO BE OUR JUDGE, TOOK THE NAME OF JESUS. He is a Saviour, and a great one. Hopefully His circumcision day so proclaims Him to us. Yea, saith the apostle, He is able also to save them to the uttermost that come unto God by Him (Heb 7:25). (J. A.Seiss, D. D.)
Fuente: Biblical Illustrator Edited by Joseph S. Exell
Verse 21. When eight days were accomplished] The law had appointed that every male should be circumcised at eight days old, or on the eighth day after its birth, Ge 17:12; and our blessed Lord received circumcision in token of his subjection to the law, Ga 4:4; Ga 5:3.
His name was called JESUS] See Clarke on Mt 1:21 and See Clarke on Joh 1:29.
Fuente: Adam Clarke’s Commentary and Critical Notes on the Bible
The time prescribed by the Divine law for circumcision was the eighth day. Gen 17:12; Lev 12:3. He was indeed the lawgiver, and as such not tied to the observance of the law. But he was also made of a woman, made under the law, Gal 4:4; and the law was, Lev 12:2, that if a woman had conceived seed, and borne a man child, in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin should be circumcised. He was to make himself appear the Son of Abraham; and so this was Gods covenant, Gen 17:10, with Abraham and his seed after him; Every man child among you shall be circumcised. This law Christ was bound to fulfil, and by the fulfilling of it in this point he showed himself a debtor to do the whole law, Gal 5:3, and by his observance of it he was to teach us our duty. He was to be a minister of the circumcision, Rom 15:8, and to the circumcision, which they would never have allowed him to be, had not he himself been circumcised; upon which account Paul took Timothy, and circumcised him, Act 16:3. By his circumcision also we were to be circumcised with the circumcision made without hands, in putting off the body of the sins of the flesh, Col 2:11. It was therefore reasonable and necessary that Christ should be circumcised the eighth day.
His name was called Jesus; it was in circumcision before witnesses publicly declared to be so, for God by his angel had given him his name, Mat 1:21. We read of four under the Old Testament, to whom God gave names before they were born; Isaac, Gen 17:19, Josiah, 1Ki 13:2, Ishmael, Gen 16:11, Cyrus, Isa 44:28; and in the New Testament to John the Baptist, and to Jesus Christ. Which lets us know the certainty to God of future contingencies; for though the parents of Ishmael, and Isaac, John the Baptist, and Christ, imposed those names in obedience to the command of God, and there was but a small time betwixt the giving of these four their names and their birth, yet the case was otherwise as to Josiah and Cyrus.
Fuente: English Annotations on the Holy Bible by Matthew Poole
And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child,…. According to the original institution of circumcision, Ge 17:12 and which was strictly observed by religious persons, as by the parents of our Lord here, and by those of John the Baptist, Lu 1:59 Hence the Apostle Paul reckons this among his privileges, that he could have boasted of as well as other Jews, [See comments on Php 3:5]. But it may be asked, why was Christ circumcised, since he had no impurity of nature, which circumcision supposed; nor needed any circumcision of the heart, which that was a symbol of? To which it may be replied, though he needed it not himself, it was the duty of his parents to do it, since all the male seed of Abraham were obliged it, and that law, or ordinance, was now in force; and besides, it was necessary that he might appear in the likeness of sinful flesh, who was to bear, and atone for the sins of his people; as also, that it might be manifest that he assumed true and real flesh, and was a partaker of the same flesh and blood with us; and that he was a son of Abraham, and of his seed, as it promised he should; and that he was made under the law, and came to fulfil it, and was obliged to it, as every one that is circumcised is; as well as to show a regard to all divine, positive institutions that are in being, and to set an example, that we should tread in his steps; and likewise to cut off all excuse from the Jews, that they might not have this to say, that he was an uncircumcised person, and so not a son of Abraham, nor the Messiah.
His name was called Jesus, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb, Lu 1:31 It appears from hence, and from the instance of John the Baptist, that at circumcision it was usual to give names to children; [See comments on Lu 1:57]. The Jews observe u that
“six persons were called by their names before they were born: and these are Isaac, Ishmael, Moses, Solomon, Josiah, and the King Messiah:”
the latter they prove from Ps 72:17 which they render, “before the sun his name was Yinnon”, or the son: that is, the Son of God.
u Pirke Eliezer, c. 32.
Fuente: John Gill’s Exposition of the Entire Bible
Christ Presented in the Temple. |
|
21 And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb. 22 And when the days of her purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought him to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord; 23 (As it is written in the law of the Lord, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord;) 24 And to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons.
Our Lord Jesus, being made of a woman, was made under the law, Gal. iv. 4. He was not only, as the son of a daughter of Adam, made under the law of nature, but as the son of a daughter of Abraham was made under the law of Moses; he put his neck under that yoke, though it was a heavy yoke, and a shadow of good things to come. Though its institutions were beggarly elements, and rudiments of this world, as the apostle calls them, Christ submitted to it, that he might with the better grace cancel it, and set it aside for us.
Now here we have two instances of his being made under that law, and submitting to it.
I. He was circumcised on the very day that the law appointed (v. 21): When eight days were accomplished, that day seven-night that he was born, they circumcised him. 1. Though it was a painful operation (Surely a bloody husband thou has been, said Zipporah to Moses, because of the circumcision, Exod. iv. 25), yet Christ would undergo it for us; nay, therefore he submitted to it, to give an instance of his early obedience, his obedience unto blood. Then he shed his blood by drops, which afterwards he poured out in purple streams. 2. Though it supposed him a stranger, that was by that ceremony to be admitted into covenant with God, whereas he had always been his beloved Son; nay, though it supposed him a sinner, that needed to have his filthiness taken away, whereas he had no impurity or superfluity of naughtiness to be cut off, yet he submitted to it; nay, therefore he submitted to it, because he would be made in the likeness, not only of flesh, but of sinful flesh, Rom. viii. 3. 3. Though thereby he made himself a debtor to the whole law (Gal. v. 3), yet he submitted to it; nay, therefore he submitted to it, because he would take upon him the form of a servant, though he was free-born. Christ was circumcised, (1.) That he might own himself of the seed of Abraham, and of that nation of whom, as concerning the flesh, Christ came, and who was to take on him the seed of Abraham, Heb. ii. 16. (2.) That he might own himself a surety for our sins, and an undertaker for our safety. Circumcision (saith Dr. Goodwin) was our bond, whereby we acknowledged ourselves debtors to the law; and Christ, by being circumcised, did as it were set his hand to it, being made sin for us. The ceremonial law consisted much in sacrifices; Christ hereby obliged himself to offer, not the blood of bulls or goats, but his own blood, which none that ever were circumcised before could oblige themselves to. (3.) That he might justify, and put an honour upon, the dedication of the infant seed of the church to God, by that ordinance which is the instituted seal of the covenant, and of the righteousness which is by faith, as circumcision was (Rom. iv. 11), and baptism is. And certainly his being circumcised at eight days old doth make much more for the dedicating of the seed of the faithful by baptism in their infancy than his being baptized at thirty years old doth for the deferring of it till they are grown up. The change of the ceremony alters not the substance.
At his circumcision, according to the custom, he had his name given him; he was called Jesus or Joshua, for he was so named of the angel to his mother Mary before he was conceived in the womb (Luke i. 31), and to his supposed father Joseph after, Matt. i. 21. [1.] It was a common name among the Jews, as John was (Col. iv. 11), and in this he would be made like unto his brethren. [2.] It was the name of two eminent types of him in the Old Testament, Joshua, the success or of Moses, who was commander of Israel, and conqueror of Canaan; and Joshua, the high priest, who was therefore purposely crowned, that he might prefigure Christ as a priest upon his throne,Zec 6:11; Zec 6:13. [3.] It was very significant of his undertaking. Jesus signifies a Saviour. He would be denominated, not from the glories of his divine nature, but from his gracious designs as Mediator; he brings salvation.
II. He was presented in the temple. This was done with an eye to the law, and at the time appointed by the law, when he was forty days old, when the days of her purification were accomplished, v. 22. Many copies, and authentic ones, read auton for autes, the days of their purification, the purification both of the mother and of the child, for so it was intended to be by the law; and our Lord Jesus, though he had no impurity to be cleansed from, yet submitted to it, as he did to circumcision, because he was made sin for us; and that, as by the circumcision of Christ we might be circumcised, in the virtue of our union and communion with him, with a spiritual circumcision made without hands (Col. ii. 11), so in the purification of Christ we might be spiritually purified from the filthiness and corruption which we brought into the world with us. Now, according to the law,
1. The child Jesus, being a first-born son, was presented to the Lord, in one of the courts of the temple. The law is here recited (v. 23): Every male that opens the womb shall be called holy to the Lord, because by a special writ of protection the first-born of the Egyptians were slain by the destroying angel; so that Christ, as first-born, was a priest by a title surer than that of Aaron’s house. Christ was the first-born among many brethren, and was called holy to the Lord, so as never any other was; yet he was presented to the Lord as other first-born were, and no otherwise. Though he was newly come out of the bosom of the Father, yet he was presented to him by the hands of a priest, as if he had been a stranger, that needed one to introduce him. His being presented to the Lord now signified his presenting himself to the Lord as Mediator, when he was caused to draw near and approach unto him, Jer. xxx. 21. But, according to the law, he was redeemed, Num. xviii. 15. The first-born of many shalt thou redeem, and five shekels was the value, Lev 27:6; Num 18:16. But probably in case of poverty the priest was allowed to take less, or perhaps nothing; for no mention is made of it here. Christ was presented to the Lord, not to be brought back, for his ear was bored to God’s door-post to serve him for ever; and though he is not left in the temple as Samuel was, to minister there, yet like him he is given to the Lord as long as he lives, and ministers to him in the true temple not made with hands.
2. The mother brought her offering, v. 24. When she had presented that son of hers unto the Lord who was to be the great sacrifice, she might have been excused from offering any other; but so it is said in the law of the Lord, that law which was yet in force, and therefore so it must be done, she must offer a pair of turtle-doves, or two young pigeons; had she been of ability, she must have brought a lamb for a burnt-offering, and a dove for a sin-offering; but, being poor, and not able to reach the price of a lamb, she brings two doves, one for a burnt-offering and the other for a sin-offering (see Lev 12:6; Lev 12:8), to teach us in every address to God, and particularly in those upon special occasions, both to give thanks to God for his mercies to us and to acknowledge with sorrow and shame our sins against him; in both we must give glory to him, nor do we ever want matter for both. Christ was not conceived and born in sin, as others are, so that there was not that occasion in his case which there is in others; yet, because he was made under the law, he complied with it. Thus it became him to fulfil all righteousness. Much more doth it become the best of men to join in confessions of sin; for who can say, I have made my heart clean?
Fuente: Matthew Henry’s Whole Bible Commentary
His name was called Jesus ( ). The is left untranslated or has the sense of “then” in the apodosis. The naming was a part of the ceremony of circumcision as is shown also in the case of John the Baptist (Lu 1:59-66).
Fuente: Robertson’s Word Pictures in the New Testament
CIRCUMCISION OF JESUS V. 21-24
1) “And when eight days were accomplished,” (kai hote eplesthesan hemerai okto) “And when eight days were completed,” or when Jesus was eight days old, in the flesh, the age of circumcising male children, Lev 12:3.
2) “For the circumcision of the child,” (tou peritemein auton) “Of the time to circumcise him,” in compliance with Moses’ law, which he came to fulfill, Gen 17:12. It is believed that Joseph performed the rite of circumcision. His circumcision was that He might fulfill the whole law, Gal 5:3; Mat 5:17-18.
3) “His name was called JESUS,” (kai eklethe to onoma autou lesous) “And his name was (that day) called (to him) Jesus,” or the name Jesus was given to Him on that day, as formerly directed by the angel, to Joseph and Mary, Mat 1:21; Luk 1:31.
4) “Which was so named of the angel,” (to plethen hupo tou angelou) “Which name was called by the angel,” or first given by the angel Gabriel, as cited above, to Joseph, Mat 1:21, and to Mary, Luk 1:26; Luk 1:31.
5) “Before he was conceived in the womb.” (pro tou sullemphthenai auton en te koilia) Before he came to be conceived in the womb,” Luk 1:26-35, then after conception it was given to Joseph, Mat 1:19-21; Mat 1:25.
Fuente: Garner-Howes Baptist Commentary
21. That the child might be circumcised As to circumcision in general, the reader may consult the Book of Genesis, (Gen 17:10.) At present, it will be sufficient to state briefly what applies to the person of Christ. God appointed that his Son should be circumcised, in order to subject him to the law; for circumcision was a solemn rite, by which the Jews
were initiated into the observance of the law. (171) Paul explains the design, (172) when he says, that Christ was
“
made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law,” (Gal 4:4.)
By undergoing circumcision, Christ acknowledged himself to be the slave (173) of the law, that he might procure our freedom. And in this way not only was the bondage (174) of the law abolished by him, but the shadow of the ceremony was applied to his own body, that it might shortly afterwards come to an end. For though the abrogation of it depends on the death and resurrection of Christ, yet it was a sort of prelude to it, that the Son of God submitted to be circumcised.
His name was called JESUS. This passage shows, that it was a general custom among the Jews to give names to their children on the day that they were circumcised, just as we now do at baptism. Two things are here mentioned by the Evangelist. First, the name Jesus was not given to the Son of God accidentally, or by the will of men, but was the name which the angel had brought from heaven. Secondly, Joseph and Mary obeyed the command of God. The agreement between our faith and the word of God lies in this, that he speaks first, and we follow, so that our faith answers to his promises. Above all, the order of preaching the word is held up by Luke for our commendation. Salvation through the grace of Christ, he tells us, had been promised by God through the angel, and was proclaimed by the voice of men.
(171) “ Par lequel les Juifs protestoyent de se soumettre a l’observation de la Loy;” — “by which the Jews solemnly declared that they would submit to the observance of the Law.”
(172) “ Finem.” — “ La fin ou le but de ceste soumission de Jesus Christ;” —”the end or design of this submission of Jesus Christ.”
(173) “ Servum.”—This might have been supposed to be equivalent to ministrum , servant, had not the latter clause of the sentence expressly contrasted freedom with the condition of a slave. But Calvin settles the point by rendering it serf, slave; by which he evidently means “complete and degrading subjection.” Paul frequently speaks of the state of the Church under the law as bondage, (Gal 4:3,) and a yoke of bondage, (Gal 5:1.) — Ed.
(174) See passages referred to in the preceding note, in which the term bondage is applied by an inspired writer to the ceremonial law — Ed.
Fuente: Calvin’s Complete Commentary
CRITICAL NOTES
Luk. 2:21. The child.The best MSS. read Him.
Luk. 2:22. Her purification.The true reading is, their purification (R.V.). The mother was ceremonially unclean by child-birth, the others of the household by daily contact. The law of purification is given in Leviticus 12. At the conclusion of forty days a lamb was to be offered as a burnt-offering, and a turtle-dove or young pigeon as a sin-offering. In case of poverty two turtle-doves or young pigeons were to be offered instead, one as a burnt-offering and the other as a sin-offering. To present Him.As a first-born male. The first-born male of every species was sacred to the Lord, in memory of the delivery of the first-born of the Israelites in Egypt (Exo. 12:29-30; Exo. 13:2). But the first-born male child was to be redeemed for money (Exo. 13:11-15; Num. 18:15-16), and the whole tribe of Levi was regarded as having been substituted for the first-born (Num. 3:12-13) (Speakers Commentary).
Luk. 2:23. That openeth the womb.Figurative for first-born.
Luk. 2:24. A pair of turtle-doves, etc.As no mention is made of the lamb, it has been reasonably inferred that the holy family were poor.
Luk. 2:25. Simeon.According to some the son of the famous Rabbi Hillel and the father of Gamaliel. This is scarcely possible, as the Simeon of the text seems to have been in extreme old age (Luk. 2:26-29), while the other was president of the Sanhedrim some seventeen or eighteen years later. The name was at this time very common among the Jews. Just and devout.Cf. Luk. 1:6. The one epithet describes external conduct, the other the inward, spiritual character. The consolation of Israel.A beautiful title of Christ or description of the blessings expected from His coming. Cf. Mar. 15:43.
Luk. 2:26. The Lords Christ.I.e. the Anointed of Jehovah. Cf. Psa. 2:2.
Luk. 2:27. By the Spirit.I.e. under the influence of the Spirit.
Luk. 2:29. Now lettest Thou.Death seemed near and sure since he had seen the Lords Christ.
Luk. 2:31. All people.Rather, all peoples (R.V.), divided in Luk. 2:32 into Gentiles (sitting in darkness, to whom Christ was to be a light) and Jews (whose glory He was to be).
Luk. 2:32. To lighten the Gentiles.Rather, for revelation to the Gentiles (R.V.).
Luk. 2:34. Is set.Lit. lies: perhaps the figure is akin to that of the stone lying on the path, which is to some a stone of stumbling, to others a stone of support. The fall and rising again.Rather, the fall and rising up (R.V.), i.e. for the fall of many who now stand, and for the rising of many who now lie prostrate, that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed. The child was to be a touch-stone of character, of faith, and of love. Gods true but hidden servants would embrace Him; the hypocrites would reject Him (Speakers Commentary). The prediction finds fulfilment in the fall of Pharisees and scribes, and the rising of publicans and sinners. A sign, etc.That His life and teaching would provoke violent oppositiona prophecy only too abundantly fulfilled.
Luk. 2:35. Yea, a sword.Reference having been made to opposition excited by the life and teaching of Christ, it is natural to see here an allusion to the grief this would excite in the heart of His mother; the sword would pierce deepest at the cross. This idea pervades the Stabat Mater dolorosa. Any reference to Marys anguish for sin, or doubts concerning the Messiahship of her Son, seems out of place.
Luk. 2:36. Anna.The same name as Hannah. A prophetess.Known as such previous to this time. Cf. cases of Miriam, Deborah, and Huldah in the Old Testament, the daughters of Philip in the New (Act. 21:9). Aser.I.e. Asher. It is interesting to note the presence of one belonging to the ten tribes in the Holy Land at this epoch. Had lived, etc.I.e. bad been married for seven years, and was now a widow of fourscore and four years of age.
Luk. 2:37. Departed not.Probably denotes assiduous attendance (cf. Act. 2:46): it may mean that her home was in the Temple, that as prophetess she lived in one of the chambers of the holy building. Fastings.Only one fast appointed in the law, that on the great Day of Atonement. The Pharisees were in the habit of fasting twice in the week (Luk. 18:12), on Mondays and Thursdays.
Luk. 2:38. Looked for.I.e. expected. The readings of the last clause in the verse vary: the R.V. gives it, looking for the redemption of Jerusalem. Jerusalem regarded as the place where redemption would begin. The expectations of these devout souls would be checked by the flight into Egypt, the withdrawal to Nazareth, and the long years of silence before the prophecies concerning Christ began to find fulfilment in His public ministry.
MAIN HOMILETICS OF THE PARAGRAPH.Luk. 2:21-39
The Holy Spirit testifies to Christ.The veil which concealed the glory of Christ had for a moment been drawn aside by the angels, and the shepherds had seen in Him their Lord and Saviour. But after this revelation the veil falls again, and He takes His place among men without anything to distinguish Him from them. He is treated as ordinary Jewish children were; He is circumcised on the eighth day, presented in the Temple on the fortieth day; the Virgin offers sacrifice for her purification, and makes the offering by which He, like other first-born children not of the tribe of Levi, was redeemed from service in the Temple. The only remarkable circumstance is that the name (not in itself an uncommon one) was that appointed by the angel before His conception. But when He appears in the Temple, the veil that conceals His glory is again drawn aside: at the very moment when He is subject to the ordinances of the law, witnesses are raised up and inspired by God to declare that He is the Desired One for whose coming Israel had long waited, and who was to be the Light of the world. Special interest attaches to those who on this occasion were the organs of the Holy Spirit to make this announcement to men. We notice:
I. Both Simeon and Anna were persons of holy character.They had that purity of heart which enables us to see Godto have understanding of Divine things.
II. Their faith and hope were strong.They waited for the consolation of Israel as those who expected to see it, and God rewarded the confidence they placed in His promises.
III. They were not of official rank, yet they received revelations which were denied to priests and doctors of the law. This is in accordance with the Divine procedure in the case of many who were called to be prophets. The majority of the prophets were laymen, whose words had weight from the fact of their being immediately inspired of God, and not because the speakers had a claim to be heard apart from that which their message gave them. Nor can it be without significance that the one of these witnesses was a man and the other a woman, since under the new covenant inaugurated by Christ both sexes are on an equality before God which was before but imperfectly indicated.
SUGGESTIVE COMMENTS ON Luk. 2:21-39
Luk. 2:21. The circumcising of the child.By circumcision Jesus entered into the covenant relationship with God in which the Jewish nation stood, and of which that rite was the seal. Henceforth there rested on Him the obligation to keep the law and commandments laid upon the children of Israel. The purification from sin which circumcision symbolised was an element in the rite which had no personal significance for Him. Yet His submission to circumcision, as afterwards to baptism, was necessary to His becoming like His brethren. Wherefore in all things it behoved Him to be made like unto His brethren, that He might be a merciful and faithful high priest in things pertaining to God, to make reconciliation for the sins of the people (Heb. 2:17). When the fulness of the time was come, God sent forth His Son, made [born, R.V.] of a woman, made [born, R.V.] under the law (Gal. 4:4). God, sending His own Son in the likeness of sinful flesh, and for sin, condemned sin in the flesh (Rom. 8:3).
Was called Jesus.Less stress is laid upon the fact of Jesus receiving circumcision than upon that of the significant name bestowed upon Him at the time. His Divine character and His freedom from taint of sin are implied in the title of Saviour: the name given Him by the special appointment of God distinguishes Him from all others born of woman, as One who would save the sinful, and therefore of necessity be Himself free from sin.
Before He was conceived.The unique glory of Christ as one in whom the Father was well pleased is delicately implied in the name bestowed upon Him before He was conceived in the womb of the Virgin.
When eight days were accomplished.Our celebration of December 25th as the day of Christs nativity makes the first day of the new year to correspond with the date of His circumcision and of His receiving the name Jesus. The putting away of the sinful nature, and the acceptance of obligation to obey the law of God, which are implied in circumcision, suggest appropriate thoughts for the beginning of the new year; and along with them the name of Jesus should suggest the absolution of our past offences, and the gift of spiritual strength for the time that is to come.
The Circumcision of our Lord.As man our Lord underwent in infancy the rite which was enjoined by the Jewish law. As God He willed to undergo it. He might have ordered things otherwise. But He freely submitted to this, as to all the humiliations of His earthly life, and to death itself. Notice, in this submission
I. Our Lord gave emphatic sanction to the principle that a feature of heathen practice or religion might be occasionally consecrated to serve the purpose of religious truth.It is certain that from early times some heathen nations did practise circumcision. Abraham would not regard it as a new rite; for it was common, if not universal, in Egypt. With him, therefore, it was an old rite with a new meaning. The Holy Spirit lays under contribution for His high purposes various words, thoughts, arguments, customs, symbols, rites, associated before with false religions or with none; He invests them with a new and higher meaning, and thus enlists them in a holier service.
II. Our Lord became obedient to the whole Mosaic law.Made under the law. This was the meaning of circumcision, so far as man was concerned; it was an undertaking to be true to everything in the covenant with God, of which it was the initial rite. Our lord voluntarily submitted to ordinances which He Himself had instituted, but to ordinances which had no purpose or meaning except as referring to Himself. He could not have done more had He been consciously ignorant or criminal. He could not have done less if He was to represent us, in His life of perfect obedience, as well as on His cross of shame. Thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness. What a lesson of obedience! When do many get into trouble with God? When they make their estimate of their wants, and not Gods declared will, the rule of conduct. Our Lord submitted, because the Father so ordered, and because we needed the bright example and moral strength of His submission.
III. Our Lord submitted to this rite in order to persuade us of the necessity of that spiritual circumcision which was prefigured by it.Even the Old Testament teaches a moral and spiritual as well as a literal circumcision. Heart, lips, ears, must be circumcised. For us the literal rite is of no value: the real rite is spiritual. Its essence is the mortification of earthly desire. Desire no longer centres in God, but is mainly lavished upon objects of sense. Thus the soul is degraded; it becomes animalised. Hence the necessity for spiritual circumcision. The mortification of degraded desire is the most serious business of a true Christian life. If thy right hand offend thee, etc. Our Lord meant by these searching words the mortification of desire which no longer centres in God.Liddon.
The Name of Jesus.
I. Why should this importance be attached to a name, even although it be the name of our Lord?We think lightly of names. We contrast names with realities, words with things. Not so in the Bible. Names there are significant. The name of God is treated as if it were a living thing. Is this merely an orientalism? No. Is it not better to feel one language, as the Hebrews felt theirs, than to use the words of two or three as mere counters. A name is a power. Some names invigorate and illuminate; others darken and depress by reason of their associations. The choice of a childs name is not to be left to chance. Every child possesses in his surname a social and moral inheritance; it is decided for him before his birth: but what of his Christian name, which you are to fix on him indelibly? Our Lord entering the world as a Jew, His human name was constructed on the Hebrew type. It belongs to a large class of personal titles in which the sacred name of GodJehovahis connected with some one of His works or attributes.
II. We might have expected that our Lord would have chosen a unique name, unshared by any of the sons of men.But He willed it otherwise. In His name He had many forerunners, the greatest of whom is Joshua, the saviour of Israel, a man of blood and iron. This greater Joshua is a Saviour in a higher sense. Is He not the Author of all the self-restraint, the truthfulness, the courage, the purity, the disinterestedness, the sacrifice, which save society? Joshua (or Hoshea) was a name borne of old by intellectual deliverers. Jesus Christ it is who has saved the human race from ignorance of the truths which it most concerns man to know. Another Joshua was the high priest of the Restoration, an earthly anticipation of of our ascended King and Priest upon His throne. He is a Saviour who delivers us from sins guilt by His sufferings, and from sins power by His grace.Ibid.
Luk. 2:22. The Consecration of the Family to God.The law of Moses prescribed
(1) the purification of the mother, and
(2) the presentation of the first-born son to the Lord. So close were the ties by which God and His people were bound together, every mother in the time of her newfound happiness was called to appear before God, to receive purification from the taints inseparably connected with the transmission of a sinful nature, and each first-born son was acknowledged as so specially His that he could only be redeemed from service in the Temple by payment of a fine in money. This consecration of the family to God was one of the noblest features of Judaism.
Luk. 2:24. The Sacrifice of Purification.Humble circumstances, but not abject poverty, are implied in the offering presented by Mary for the sacrifice of purification; for in the Mosaic law provision was made for those who might be too poor to afford the offering specified in the text. The considerate spirit in which that law was drawn up is manifested, not only in the scale of sacrifices to suit persons in different conditions of life, but also in the alternative of a pair of turtledoves or two young pigeons. The turtle-doves being migratory birds might not be procurable at the time when they were needed in any particular place, and it might be difficult to catch old pigeons, so it was allowable to bring young pigeons taken from the nest.
An Appropriate Offering.There is something in the birds themselvesthe dovescharacteristic of the love, purity, and meekness of Christ, anointed above His fellows with the gifts of the Divine Dove.Wordsworth.
The Lamb of God brought into the Temple.Mary cannot bring a lamb for an offering; she brings something better, even the true Lamb of God, into the Temple.Van Oosterzee.
Luk. 2:25-26. A man, whose name was Simeon.His character is described in a few pregnant words. As regards his relation to the spirit of the law, he was just. In relation to God, he possessed that careful reverential spirit which is ever cautious not to offend. His heart was not wanting in that attitude of sweet expectation, that flower-like unfolding to the dews of promise, characteristic of true holiness under the older dispensation; he waited in hushed expectancy for the consolation of Israel. And that consolation implies a Consoler. Such influence of the Spirit was upon him as was yet vouchsafed under the first covenant. To this man Gods will stood revealed in a way which Luke describes with a sweet and subtle antithesis: It was revealed unto him that he should not see death before he had seen the Anointed of the Lord. Just as the Virgin and Child were coming up, Simeon came in the Spirit into the Temple courts. God directs the path of His faithful servants, that good may meet them on the way. We go here and there, and at times seem to ourselves as if we were floating half at random. But there is a guiding purpose. Then the Evangelist tells us with simple emphasis, And he himself also received Him into his arms. Now he feels that he may and must soon go home. So arises his sentinel-song.Alexander.
A man in Jerusalem, etc.The description given of Simeon may be resolved into seven distinct statements, proceeding from the general to the particularseven concentric circles:
1. A manhis dignity consisting not merely in official standing, wealth, notoriety, or gifts, but in his manhood.
2. In Jerusalemin the possession of special privileges as a Jew.
3. Justupright in his outward life.
4. Devoutin spirit, as one who loved and obeyed God.
5. Animated by religious hopeslooking for the consolation of Israel.
6. An organ of the Holy Ghostthe Holy Ghost was upon him.
7. One who had received a special revelation and promise (Luk. 2:26).
Waiting for the consolation of Israel, or rather looking for it as something which was now close at hand, as he was assured by the infallible testimony of the Spirit that it was.
It was revealed unto him.Not to the priests, or to a priest, for they as a class were at this time corrupt and unspiritual, as we see from their unsympathetic and even hostile attitude towards Christ during His public ministry. God therefore passes them by, and chooses unofficial persons, such as Simeon and Anna, to be the organs of the Holy Spirit.
Luk. 2:25-32. Hope Realised.The outward circumstances of the presentation in the Temple are devoid of anything to arrest attention or to appeal to a love of the marvellous. No miracles dazzle the senses of beholders. Nothing is seen but two parents of humble rank of life presenting their child to God and offering the sacrifice of the poor. Simeon, who greets them, is no official of high rank; his only claim to distinction is the beauty and elevation of his characterjust and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel. It is this last-named circumstance which gives significance to his action and words. He is a type of those who under the old covenant had waited for and longed for the coming of the Saviour. We see in him the Church of the patriarchs and prophets, which takes the newborn Christ into its failing arms and presents Him to the Church of the future, and says, As for me, my task is accomplished; here He is whom I have so ardently desired to behold; here He is who is Saviour and King.
Simeons Hope and Faith.
1. The first remarkable feature in the character of Simeon was the firmness of his hope. He looked forward to the future in the firm conviction inspired by the Holy Spirit that before he saw death he would see the Lords Christ. The attitude he maintained was not peculiar to him, though the special prophecy in which he trusted was given to him aloneit was that of the devout in Israel in all ages of their history. Their golden age was in the future, and not in the past. And we as Christians look forward to a brighter and happier time than the present, when the kingdom of Christ shall have fully come. Our Master is absent, and we look for His return.
2. The second remarkable feature is the greatness of his faith. What was it that his bodily eyes beheld? A child a few weeks oldthe child of poor and obscure parents. What appeared to the eye of his spirit? The Saviour of the world, who was to raise up the fallen nation of Israel to more than its former glory, and give light and hope to the heathen world. And can our faith languish and die when we have before us Christ, not as a helpless child, but as the Redeemer who has made atonement for sin and has ascended to the right hand of Godwhen we have before us His Divine teaching and holy life, and all the influence which He has exercise 1 upon human society? His hopes realised, his faith assured, he has but one emotionthat of joy; his soul enters into a holy peace. Nothing now can move him to desire to linger longer upon earth; it only remains for him to leave the post he has occupied for so many years, from which he has eagerly looked for the rising of this star, and to enter into his rest.
Luk. 2:27. Came by the Spirit into the Temple.It might seem accidental, but was not so. A secret impulse urged him to go into the sacred precincts at that particular moment; it was one of the great crises of his life, when all depended upon obeying the Divine intimation pointing out his course, but not compelling him to take it. Do not many of our failures and disappointments in life result from ignoring or disobeying what we believe to be good impulses?
A True Priest.The parents brought in the child Jesus, and Simeon received Him into his arms, as a true priest appointed of God, though not anointed of man.
Luk. 2:28. Then took he Him up in his arms.The aged and righteous Simeonthe good old man of the lawreceived into his arms the child Jesus presented in the Temple, and signified his desire to depart; and thus represents to us the law, now worn out with age, ready to embrace the gospel, and so to depart in peace.Wordsworth.
Luk. 2:29-32. Hope fulfilled.As the swan is said to sing just before its death, so does this aged saint break forth into a psalm of thanksgiving as he beholds the Saviour, whom it had been predicted he should see before he should taste of death. With devout gratitude he takes farewell of life, now that he has received the object of his hopes. The anticipation of seeing the Lords Christ had made him cling to life; but now that the Holy Child is within his arms, he has nothing more to wish for, and is ready to depart. Now let me die, since I have seen Thy face.
The SentinelSimeon represents himself under the figure of a sentinel whom his master has stationed upon an elevated place to watch for the appearance of a certain star and to give notice to the world of its arrival. He sees the wished-for star, and announces that it has risen, and asks to be set free from the post he has occupied so long. It is thus that, in the opening of the Agamemnon of schylus, the sentinel stationed to watch for the signal-fire that would tell that Troy had fallen when he at last beholds the long-expected blaze, celebrates in verse both the victory of Greece and his own release.Godet.
A Rebuke to our Unbelief.The faith in a Saviour who had just appeared which sustained Simeon in the near prospect of death is a rebuke to our unbelief and fears in view of that great change. We know Jesus as the conqueror of death and sin.
Luk. 2:29. Nunc Dimittis.In this apparently unremarkable little group there is something really remarkable in each of these four living souls. We recognise in the words spoken the Nunc Dimittis of eighteen centuries of the Churchs worship. What is there in these pathetic and beautiful words, suggestive of thoughts which should be our life?
I. The speaker is an Old Testament saint.Just and devout, yet waiting for the consolation of Israel by the actual coming of the Coming One. He had a revelation common to him with his nation; he had also a private revelation of his own.
II. The message.
1. The thought comes to usBlessed is the man who has the Lord for his God, the man whose life was in the hands of an Owner. Very real and very dear to the heart of Simeon was the relationship of servant and master. It was the chosen title of the apostles; it was the secret of their success, the rest and stay of their anxious and homeless life. Later saints have felt the same thing, and expressed it in the same way.
2. Simeon has still to see the Lords Christ. It is a parable for all time. There are many who say, Be just, and it shall be counted to you for righteousness. There are many who say, Be just and devout, fear God and pray to Him alway, and assuredly you shall lack nothing of the fitness for glory. Simeon had both these graces, and yet he must not die till he had seen Jesus. There are many who have all elseevery grace of uprightness and devoutness, every characteristic of seriousness and earnestness, of piety and charity; only Christ they have not yet realised. It does not come home to them why Believe in God should not suffice for them without the added clause, Believe also in Me. We must not idly wait for that peradventure of illumination which Simeons case suggests. Upon us the true Light has already shined; it is ours to see it, and to walk-in it. We cannot say the Nunc Dimittis till we can say with it, Mine eyes have seen Thy salvation.
III. Another thought remains.The Divine office of dismissing. Thou art letting Thy servant depart. What would these partings be, how sad, how hopeless, without a gospelwithout the knowledge, such as we can only get from Jesus Christ, of a life out of sight, in which present and absent are oneof a real heaven, opened and set open to all who are travelling lifes journey in the faith of a Father, and Saviour, and Comforter who has us all in His holy keeping! With this gospel in our hearts, we can hear of each others deaths with no disconsolate sorrow, because in Him, living or dying, we are one. The dismissal Simeon spoke of was dismissal by death. He was ready for it now. He spoke of it as a release, a setting free, a desired change, a transition, all for good. When the great departing comes for each of us, we shall need all Simeons hope, and all the support of his dismissal. We know not any of us what that departure is. It is no lack of courage to confess that it is formidable in the prospect. Let us think of it now, earnestly endeavouring so to live that there may be no spectres and no voices to terrify the act of dying.Vaughan.
Simeons View of Death.It is not the removal of a reluctant, unwilling man from the scene of all his joys and all his interests; it is the releasing of a weary man at evening from the toil and heat of a long, fatiguing day; it is the desirable and peaceful dismissal of one who has done his work to a rest which toil has earned and which promise has sweetened. It is worth while so to live as that the Nunc Dimittis may express our own true thought when we die.Ibid.
Luk. 2:29-30. Christ and Old Age.One of our Lords epiphanies; His epiphany to old age. A subject of pointed application to the young, for the young expect to be old. The present sowing of youth is for the reaping of age. What is a good old age? All old age is not good. There is an old age which mars as well as an old age which makes reputations.
I. Few men in the abstract desire old age.Few men in their experience find it desirable. It needs practising for. A good old age comes to no man by accident. Rare, probably unexampled, is that natural and durable sweetness which could make the trials of protracted age light or enjoyable. It is bitter to feel yourself in the way, and to see no help for it; to be beyond the age of activity, of independence, of importance, of admiration; to be reminded daily that you are the survivor of a past generation; to know that the only prospect is a narrowing of action and interest, to make room for new energies and young self-sufficiencies: this is a severe trial, on the acceptance of which, for good or evil, will depend the real character and complexion of the individual old age. Well-principled and self-controlled patience is one condition of a good old age.
II. A foremost condition of a good old age is the preservation of a thorough harmony and unity with the young.Old age is naturally impatient of the new. But still the old may succeed in being young in feeling; and where this is so they attract the young. The young delight in their experience, their mellowness, their sympathy. This special characteristic cannot be put on; it must be cultivated and lived into. Let each age be in harmony with the age below. Let the continuity never be broken. Lead by going before, help by feeling with, and old age will but complete and crown the work of the manhood and the activity.
III. There are, however, besides trials and risks, incomparable privileges in old age.These should be faithfully treasured and occupied. An intelligent old age is a storehouse of precious memories, which no chronicles can rival nor libraries supersede. An old man should use his opportunities of testifying to a younger generation the living sights and sounds of his own. It is a debt due to history; it is a debt scarcely less to the verities of Christianity and Christ. And, besides, the influences of old age are incalculable. Let a man give himself to this work, and he may mould the young almost to his will. Let the old make the young feel that they are worth helping, listening to, answering. By a generous, manly interest in the coming generation who are what he was, by deep, true, noble sympathy with their difficulties, struggles, unavoidable ignorances, the old man may write himself unconsciously upon the young, and keep up the continuity of that work of God on earth which consists in the amelioration, emancipation, and transfiguration of His creatures. But such a work needs for its accomplishment the epiphany of our Lord Jesus Christ to old age. Natural gifts and graces do not suffice for this apostleship of the aged. O miserable spectacle a Christless old age! Pity, yet despise not, the old man whose testimony, rightly read, is all on the side of materialism and infidelity. How different the evidence of him whose old age has been brightened with the epiphany of Jesus Christ! He, the Ancient of Days, is still, as ever, young with a perpetual youth: herein lies the virtue of His epiphany to the old. He tells of a world where they reckon not by years, where past and future are not, where the weakness of old age is made strong in the first sight of the Immortal. He draws nigh to the solitude, He comforts the isolation, He calms the irritation, He inspires the languor, He fills the void of old age. He makes its age venerable, its weakness dignified, its deathbed beautiful, its last departure blessed, and its funeral a door opened in heaven.Ibid.
Luk. 2:29-35. Nunc Dimittis.Simeon is the reverend type of Old Testament piety, waiting for the consolation of Israel. His inspired words
(1) express the perfect homage of his individual soul;
(2) expand into a glowing prophecy of the gospel future;
(3) through a side glance of benediction on Mary utter the first disguised prediction of the Redeemers darker, as well as of His brighter, destiny as the Saviour and Judge of mankind.Pope.
The Nunc Dimittis a pre-Christian Hymn.Our Church uses the song of the blessed Virgin and the song of Simeon as daily psalms, and applies them to Christ. But those who had seen the incarnate Lord, and who had beheld Him risen and ascending, would have spoken far more strongly. Their songs would have been more like Rock of Ages, or When I survey the wondrous cross. They would not have been echoes of the harp of David, so much as of the harps of heaven. Thou wast slain, and hast redeemed us to God by Thy blood. Such silence as to the details of redemption could only belong to the thin border-line of a period which was neither quite Jewish nor quite Christian. A little less, and these songs would be purely Jewish; a little more, and they would be purely Christian.Alexander.
Luk. 2:29-30. Simeon.
I. Simeon himself.
1. His character. He was just and devout, upright in his relations to men, pious towards God. And he lived in faith, waiting for the consolation of Israel. Doubtless the blessed prophecies of Isaiah, Comfort ye, comfort ye, My people, saith your God, were dear to the old mans heart. He was one of those who were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem. He lived in the faith of the Messiah who was to come, who was to bear our griefs and carry our sorrows, who was to make intercession for the transgressors, to justify many, who should see of the travail of His soul and should be satisfied.
2. His privileges.
(1) The promise. The Holy Ghost was upon him. That gracious Presence which is vouchsafed in a greater or less measure to all true believers rested on the faithful Simeon. Special revelations were granted to him: he was not to see death till he had seen the Lords Christ; he was to see in this earthly life the Messiah of whom the prophets had spoken, the Lords Anointed, who was to be, in the highest sense of the words, the Prophet, Priest, and King of His peoplethe Prophet like unto Moses, but greater far than Moses (Heb. 3:3), of whom Moses spake; the great High Priest, who is able to save to the uttermost all who come unto God by Him, seeing He ever liveth to make intercession for them; the King of kings and Lord of lords, whose kingdom shall have no end.
(2) The fulfilment of the promise. The time was come: the Spirit led the holy man to the Temple of the Lord; he came by the Spirit into the Temple. So we should now come to the church by the guidance of the Spirit, led thither by the Spirit, that there we may find the Lord, and worship Him in spirit and in truth, praying in the Holy Ghost (Jud. 1:20). They who thus come in faith and prayer ever find the Lord. Simeon found Him now. It was not perhaps what he had looked for; it was but a little Babe lying in His mothers arms. But Simeon doubted not; the Spirit taught him that that little Babe was indeed the Christ of God, who was come into this world to save sinners, to conquer back the world from the dominion of the wicked one. He took Him up in his arms; he blessed God, and poured forth his thankfulness in the words so familiar to us all.
II. The utterance of Simeon.
1. His view of life. It is not a prayer. We may well pray for a happy, holy death; it is the greatest of earthly blessings, the crown of a holy life. But these words are not words of prayer: it is an utterance of recognition and assent. He says (to translate the words literally), Master, now Thou art releasing Thy slave. He recognises the fulfilment of the Divine promise: he has seen the Lords Christ. That sight means that the end is close at hand: he is about to die. He recognises the intimation of the Divine will; he receives the solemn announcement with cheerful acquiescencehe is ready to depart. Master, he says, now Thou art releasing Thy servant. Life, he means, is a time of service, work to be done for God. He calls God his Master; he speaks of himself as the slave of God. Indeed, Almighty God has permitted us to address Him by another name: He bids us call Him Father, our Father in heaven. We are not worthy to be called His children, but He is our Father still. He gave His blessed Son to die for us, that through His atoning blood we might be restored to the privileges of sonship; He gives us His Holy Spirit. He hath sent the Spirit of His Son into our hearts, whereby we cry, Abba, Father. But while we thank Him for His gracious condescension, and claim His holy promises, we must not forget that He is our Master too. The word here translated Lord means properly Mastera Master in relation to slaves. God is our Master; we are the slaves of God. We are not our own; we are bought with a price (1Co. 6:19-20); our souls and bodies are Gods, not our own. We are His by creation: He made us. We are also His by redemption: He bought us to be His own, not with corruptible things such as silver and gold, but with the precious blood of Christ (1Pe. 1:18). And because we are His, we have work to do for Him. He teaches us that solemn lesson in the awful parable of the talents. He giveth to all men liberally (Jas. 1:5); He worketh in us both to will and to do; therefore we must work out our own salvation with fear and trembling. All that we have comes from Himlife, health, worldly means, intellectual gifts. All these are talents intrusted to our keeping for a while. But spiritual gifts must be chiefly signified by the talents distributed among the servants; for spiritual gifts are the only coin current in the kingdom of heaven. Without the grace of the Spirit we are helpless, we can do nothing good; we cannot become approved money-changers (a saying attributed to our Lord by several of the Fathers), unless we have from God a portion of the heavenly treasure. All the servants in the household of the great Master receive their portion from Him; they have to use it to His glory and their own good, to work out their own salvation, to beware lest they receive the grace of God in vain (2Co. 6:1). Two servants were faithful. Outwardly there was a great difference between them. One was far more highly gifted than the other; his gains were far greater; he was a man of great energy, great resourceslike St. Paul, who laboured more abundantly than all the rest (1Co. 15:10). But the second servant also did his best, his very best according to his power; his gains were much less than those of his fellow-servant, but they were in the same proportion to his endowments; and he received the same reward. The Lord judgeth not according to the outward appearance; he looketh on the heart. He regards not the outward work, not the amount of work done, but the inward temper of heart and mindthe faithfulness, the love with which the work is done. He saith, Well done, good and faithful servant, to the humblest Christian who in faith and self-denial has done his little best. The slothful servant had done nothing for his Lord; he may have worked hard for himself, but he let his Lords money lie unused and uncared for; he neglected the precious means of grace; he lived as if he had no Masteras if he was his own master, as if his time was his own, to waste it or to use it as he pleased; therefore he was cast into the great outer darkness, where is weeping and gnashing of teeth. Simeon had been a good and faithful servant; he was just and devout; the Holy Ghost was upon him. Now his life-work was over; the Master was releasing him from his labours; he was ready, cheerful, and happy. We may well long to be like him, to share his faithfulness and his peace.
2. Simeons view of death. It was not to be dreaded: it was to be welcomed; it was a release from the labours of life. Simeons life, we may be sure, had not been miserable. Doubtless he had had his troubles, perhaps great troubles, for Gods holiest servants are sometimes most severely tried. But the Holy Ghost was upon him; and the fruit of the Spirit is love, joy, peace. The faithful servant has an inner source of joy even amid tears; he is, like St. Paul, sorrowing, yet always rejoicing. Nevertheless, death was a release. Sometimes death is very thoughtlessly described as a happy release: people think only of the cessation of bodily pain; they do not think of what comes after death. Simeon looked forward to the rest that remaineth for the people of God. To the faithful servant, who has striven to work out his own salvation with fear and trembling, death is a release; for life is full of work, bodily, intellectual, spiritual work, sometimes very hard and exhausting. And that spiritual work which is of all work the most momentously important is sometimes full of fear and trembling: our past sins affright the conscience, the old temptations which once seemed overcome reassert their power, Satan is strong, we are weak, we seem to have no strength, we are tempted to fear, sometimes in very agony of soul, lest we ourselves may be castaways at the last. Therefore, to the faithful, death is a true release: it sets them free from anxiety and fear, from toil and labour. Blessed are the dead which die in the Lord. Yea, saith the Spirit, for they rest from their labours, and their works do follow them.
III. The ground of Simeons confidence.
1. The promise. He was to depart, according to Gods word, in peace. He is faithful that promised. He that hath begun the good work in His people will perform it until the day of Jesus Christ (Php. 1:6). We might well despair if we were left to ourselves; but we have the blessed promises, and we must trust. He that spared not His own Son, but delivered Him up for us all, how shall He not with Him also freely give us all things? We must trust, and not be afraid.
2. The earnest, the pledge of fulfilment. Mine eyes have seen Thy salvation. Simeon had seen the Lords Christ, the Saviour Jesus, whose blessed name means the salvation of Jehovah. That was his hope; and that is the hope of the faithful Christian now. We see not the Holy Babe with our outward eyes; but we may see Him still with the eye of faith, we may embrace Him with the embrace of faith, and cling to Him with our whole heart as our only Saviour and Redeemer. We have His blessed promise: The world seeth Me no more, but ye see Me; I am with you all the days, even to the end of the world. We must pray, Lord, increase our faith; we must pray for a strong, living, earnest faith, that seeing Christ now by faith, and living in spiritual communion with Him, we may at last, through His grace and the power of His atoning blood, depart in peace, and rest with Him for ever.Caffin.
Luk. 2:30. Salvation.To see Christ is to see salvationto see Him, as Simeon saw Him, with the eye of faith. If Simeon had not seen Him thus, he would not have seen in Him Gods salvation; for everything to the outward eye was against His being so. Every one, our Lord says, who seeth the Son, and believeth on Him hath everlasting life. We who have not seen may yet believe. Is this our idea of salvationChrist Himself? If it be, are we looking for Him? When we can see Christ by faith, then we shall be fit to die.Vaughan.
Assurance of Salvation.This is one chord of Simeons swan-song. Does it not remind us that
I. The great aim of Jesus Christ is to bring salvation?Not simply mental light, or national renewal, or even spiritual comfort, but salvation from sin as a ruling principle, as a terrific power, and as entailing an awful penalty.
II. This salvation can be clearly realised?Not dreamed of, talked about, expected, hoped for only, but seen: its purpose, method, and result seen.
III. This salvation should be realised in its personal relation?
1. As saving the individualmine eyes.
2. As wrought by GodThy salvation.
IV. This clear consciousness prepares for death?He who can make these words his own can sing Nunc Dimittis.Thomas.
Preparation for Death.No one is ready to die in peace until he has seen Christ; but when he has seen Him, he needs no further preparation for dying. He may not have carried out one of his own ambitious plans in life, nor have achieved anything great or beautiful; but no matter, the one essential achievement in life is to see Jesus.Miller.
Luk. 2:29-35. Simeons Twofold Prophecy.Simeon is not expressly said to have been an old man; but he probably was so. How striking is the picture of the aged, worn face bending over the unconscious Child, whom he clasped in his withered arms! His two short prophetic songs are singularly contrasted in tonethe one all sunny and hopeful, the other charged with sad forebodings.
I. The one tells what Christ is sent to be.The joyful welcome of the new by the expiring old. Simeon lives in the forward-looking attitude proper to Old Testament saints. Is not the ideal for us the same? We too have to base our morality on religion, and to nourish both by hope, which burns the clearer the nearer we come to the end of earthly life. When he actually touched the long-promised Hope of Israel, an infant of six weeks old, no wonder be broke into praise. But the course of his thoughts is noteworthy. His first thoughtand it is a glad thought to himis, Here is the order for my release. Is there not a tone of relief and of hailing a long-wished blessing in the nowas if he had said, At last, after weary waiting, it has come? He speaks as a servant getting escape from toil. The words are not a prayer, though this is the application often made of them. He teaches us what death may be to us if we hold Christ in our hearts. It may be the crowning act of obedience. Death is to Simeon the sweet rest after the day of toil, and the satisfied close of long expectancy. Life can give nothing more than the sight of the Christ. The latter part of the song tells us what the eyes of faith see in the Child in whom the eyes of sense see only weakness. This feeble suckling is the God-appointed means of salvation for all the world. The precedence given to Messiahs work among the Gentiles is very remarkable. Simeon rejoices over a salvation prepared for all peoples. No shadows darken the glad picture. The Divine ideal and purpose are painted in unshaded colours.
II. What mens sin will make of Gods salvation.Can it be that the salvation prepared by God is a salvation not accepted by men? Who could suppose that in the very Israel of which Messiah was meant to be the glory there would be found tongues to speak against Him and hearts to reject Him? But the wonder is true, and that Child is charged with the terrible power of being ruin as well as blessing. There is no more mournful nor mysterious thought than that of mans power to turn the means of life into the occasion of death, and that power is never so strangely and mournfully displayed as in mens relations to this Child. Christ may be either of two things. One or other of them He must be to all who come in contact with Him. They can never be quite the same as before. How do we fall by contact with Christ? By the increase of self-conscious opposition, by the hardening following rejection, by the deeper condemnation which necessarily dogs the greater light with its blacker shadow. How do we rise by Christ? In all ways and to all heights to which humanity can soar. From the depth of sin and condemnation to the height of likeness to Himself, and finally to the glory of participation in His throne. He is life to those who take Him for their all, and death to those who turn from Him. Simeon further forecasts the fate of the Child as a sign that shall be spoken against. A sign from heaven, yet spoken against, is a paradox which only too accurately forebodes the history of the gospel in all ages. How strange to the virgin mother, in all the wonder and joy of those blissful early days, must that prediction of the sorrows that were to pierce her heart have sounded! Marys grief at her Sons rejection culminated when she stood by Calvarys cross. Her heart was to be pierced, the thoughts of many hearts to be laid open. A mans attitude to Jesus Christ is the revelation of his deepest self. It is the outcome of his inmost nature, and betrays his whole character. Christ is the test of what we are, and our reception or rejection of Him determines what we shall be.Maclaren.
Luk. 2:32. A light to lighten the Gentiles.The Gentiles are represented as enveloped in darkness, the Jews as abased and down-trodden. Christ, therefore, appears in two aspects corresponding to the conditions in which the two great divisions of the human race are placed:
1. He gives light to those in darkness.
2. He gives the promised glory to the chosen people; they derive from Him an imperishable renown, for the great claim of the Jew to honour among men is that Christ was one of His blood.
The Gentiles Israel.There seems to be some significance in the Gentiles being named before the Jews, as though Simeon had some prophetic intimation of the fact that the Jews as a nation would reject Christ. His words might be taken to imply that the conversion of the Gentiles would precede and bring about that of Gods ancient people to faith in Jesus. This seems to be the tenor of the teaching in some parts of Scripture, e.g. in Rom. 11:25-26.
Luk. 2:33. Marvelled.Doubtless the surprise was due to testimony thus coming from all quarters to the greatness of the destiny in store for the Holy Child: the angels, the shepherds, Elisabeth, and Zacharias had all hailed His advent; and now in the Temple aged saints of prophetic rank bear witness to Him. Already the wise men from the East are on their way, as representatives of the Gentile world, to do Him honour.
Luk. 2:34. And Simeon blessed them.It is noticeable that Simeon pronounces a benediction on Joseph and Mary, as distinguished from Jesus, of whom he proceeds to speak. On the principle that the less is blessed of the better (Heb. 7:7), he would naturally abstain from even the appearance of superiority to the Child whom he held in his arms. He addresses Mary with special emphasis, as though acquainted with the fact of the miraculous conception.
Sign which shall be spoken against.The allusion is evidently to Isa. 8:14-15, where the Messiah is represented as a rock on which the believing find a refuge, but against which the rebellious dash themselves. In many parts of the Gospels we read of violent opposition excited by the teaching and actions of Christ, and He Himself frequently speaks of divisions and conflicts arising in consequence of the proclamation of the truthe.g. Luk. 12:49-53. He is appointed to try mens hearts and tempers, whether they will humbly and carefully examine the truth, and receive it with joy, and bring forth its fruits in their lives; and according to the result of this moral probation, He will be for their weal or woe (Joh. 3:19; 2Co. 2:16). As Greg. Nyssen says, the fall will be to those who are scandalised by the lowliness of His humanity; the rising will be to those who acknowledge the truth of Gods promises in Him, and adore the glory of His divinity. Other passages in which this testing of human character is described are: 1Co. 1:18 et seq., Luk. 2:14; Joh. 9:39; 1Pe. 2:7-8; Heb. 4:12; Joh. 12:48.
Luk. 2:34. The Blessedness of the Virgin is proclaimed over and over again in the early chapter of this Gospel. The angel Gabriel salutes her as blessed among women; Elisabeth repeats the phrase; she says of herself, All generations shall call me blessed; and here the aged Simon bestows his benediction on her and on Joseph. Yet it is instructive to notice that this blessedness did not imply a life of unmixed happiness. Here, indeed, her future sorrows are spoken of in no uncertain manner: Yea, a sword shall pierce through thine own soul also. The prophecy was not long in finding fulfilment. The jealousy and malice of Herod expose the life of her Son to great danger, and she is obliged to find safety for Him in flight. The fatigues and anxieties of a journey into Egypt have to be encountered by her. Then some years after she undergoes the agony of losing Him for three days at the Passover feast in Jerusalem. Nor were her sorrows at an end when He reached the years of manhood. She had the grief of seeing that He was despised and rejected of men, hated even by His own townsmen, and in risk of being murdered by them. She saw Him weary with labours for the good of others, and yet treated with ingratitude, contempt, and contumely. And finally she was witness of His death at the hands of His enemies, after an unjust and shameful trial; she saw Him expire upon the cross after hours of pain and suffering. Scarcely any griefs could be more poignant than hers, and the name by which she is frequently describedMater dolorosacommemorates her pre-eminence in sorrow. One great lesson we may learn from her history is that immunity from suffering is not necessarily enjoyed by those who are truly blessed of God; and the thought is one that should console us in times of trial and suffering. Outward troubles may not be a sign of Gods displeasure with us: they may be a form of discipline to which in His wisdom and love He subjects us.
Luk. 2:35. Yea, a sword shall pierce.Undue elation on the part of the parents, and especially of the virgin mother, must have been repressed by the ominous tone of Simeons words, and still more by the special reference to the sorrow which was to pierce her heart like a sword. The full meaning of this latter prophecy she must have realised as she stood beside the cross. No lamentation of hers is recorded as having been uttered in the hour of her greatest grief; but her silence is that of ineffable anguish, and not of insensibility.
The thoughts revealed.In and by Christs sufferings it was shown what the temper and thoughts of men were. Then Judas despairs, Peter repents, Joseph of Arimatha becomes courageous, Nicodemus comes by day, the centurion confesses, one thief blasphemes, the other prays; men faint, and women become strong.
Luk. 2:36-38. Anna the Prophetess.Gods book is a book for all. The aged are not forgotten. They need support and comfort. This history of Anna, with many a word besides, is proof that they are not passed over by God. In the life of Anna we have
I. The grace of God sustaining a believer in the midst of affliction.She had met with trialswidowed in her youth; but she had learned to look beyond the blow to the Hand that had inflicted it. She had found in Him the widows stay through long years of sad memories; her heart renewed many a time all its grief, but she ever found fresh comfort in God. So may every aged Christian in like trying experiences. Bereavements will come, even though long delayed. The effect of trial to Anna was doubtless most blessed. One great affliction at the beginning of life may bless the sufferer to the close of it.
II. The grace of God supporting a believer in privation.Anna had to face the worlds struggles all alone. We know not if she had relatives to advise or aid, or outward means of sustenance to depend on. If so, Gods grace was as much manifested in providing and continuing these as it would have been in maintaining her without them. It is not only those who are ever on the verge of want who illustrate Gods care. So do those who have what is called a competency. They are as surely dependent on God. They are exhorted to trust not in uncertain riches, but in the living God. In this humble trust rich and poor meet together. Anna had been thus divinely helped. So is every aged Christian. Each is a living monument of Gods faithfulness, of Gods perpetual providence. A life of fourscore years bears manifold inscriptions of the grace of God. At this advanced age He writes on her briefly told history Jehovah-Jireh, Let thy widows trust in Me.
III. The grace of God strengthening a believer in duty.Anna served God night and day. A long course, but not dreary or monotonous. The spectator sees only the outward form of service, not the inward life and love that animate it. The freshness and constancy of aged Christians in the performance of duty is one of the most delightful proofs of the unfailing power of gospel truth, and of the faithfulness of the renewing Spirit. Their activity, though it differ from that of youth, will continue. They shall still bring forth fruit in old age. None of Gods children becomes sated with prayer or praise, with the exercise of trust and hope. In a higher sense than that of Moses their eye is not dim nor their natural force abated.
IV. The grace of God consoling a believer in the decline of life.There is much externally to make the last years of life cheerless and comfortless. The bodily powers decline. The old familiar faces disappear. The sense of solitude deepens. Still the setting sun has more glorious hues than at his dawning, and autumn has a beauty which spring knows nothing of. So Gods saints may have their brightest hours at the close of life, and the day of death be better than the day of birth. So it was with Abraham, Jacob, Moses, Paul, and John. As the world faded their eyes saw the King in His beauty.
V. The grace of God sealing a believers parting testimony.This aged saint gives thanks for herself, and speaks of Christ to others. God makes her useful to the latest close, and dismisses her bearing testimony to His faithfulness and mercy in the gift of His Son. It is a happy thing to be willing to serve God to the end. Aged sufferers serve by waiting. Thus, certainly, they also do His will. To bear, to submit meekly, to praise God in fainting and decaythis is the prerogative of earth. Let none think the time of trial too long, when the time of triumph shall be eternal. The aged Christian should be concerned to make his closing days a testimony for his Lord.Ker.
Luk. 2:37. A widow.Perhaps it was in allusion to her that St. Paul depicted the manner of life of one who was a widow indeed, and desolateshe trusteth in God, and continueth in supplications and prayers night and day (1Ti. 5:5).
Asceticism commended.It is impossible to overlook the fact that the Evangelist speaks with emphatic approval of the ascetic mode of life followed by Annaher abstinence from second marriage, her residence in the Temple, and her fastings and prayers night and day. Perhaps our recoil from the abuses of a monastic life has carried us too far in the opposite direction, and blinded us to the beauty and worth of a type of piety which may have its home in a cloister. It aims at a complete and single-hearted service of God, and it is lacking in the important element of religion which concerns service of man. In our philanthropical forms of religion we are specially in danger of losing sight of the service of God in serving our fellow-men.
Luk. 2:38. A Small Congregation.But one old man and one old woman recognised the Lord when He came to His Temple. Priests and wise men and the world knew Him not. They two alone witnessed the fulfilment of Malachis prophecy (Luk. 3:1); so it may be with other prophecies yet to be fulfilled.
Luk. 2:39. Returned into Galilee.The evangelists constantly speak of Galilee as a different country from Juda. The fact that there were considerable differences between the two needs to be kept in mind, if we would understand many parts of the gospel history. The inhabitants of Galilee were despised by those of Juda as rude, illiterate, lax in religious practices, and almost semi-heathen. The people of Juda were more cultured, strict in religious observances, under the rule of custom, and priestridden. The ministry of Jesus was more successful in Galilee than in Juda, and it is plainly indicated that the enthusiasm manifested on the day of His triumphal entrance into Jerusalem was largely owing to the pride of Galilan pilgrims in the greatness of their fellow-countryman. Of the twelve apostles, eleven evidently were from Galilee, and only oneJudas Iscariotfrom Juda.
Respect for the Law.It is significant that St. Luke, who in so many parts of his Gospel reflects the Pauline teaching, gives no indication of any contempt for the ceremonial laws of Judaism. It is only after his parents had performed all things according to the law of the Lord that they returned to Nazareth. The antagonism between adherents of the Old Testament economy and those of the New belongs to a later generation, and finds no justification in the inspired documents on which Christianity is based.
Fuente: The Preacher’s Complete Homiletical Commentary Edited by Joseph S. Exell
(21) When eight days were accomplished . . .Hence the Feast of the Circumcision in the Church Calendar comes on January 1st, and so, not without design, perhaps, came to coincide with the beginning of the civil year. The contrast between this and the narrative of Johns circumcision is striking. Here there are no friends and neighbours. Mary and Joseph were but poor strangers, in a city far from their own home. On the name of Jesus, see Note on Mat. 1:21. In St. Pauls words, made of a woman, made under the law (Gal. 4:4), we may, perhaps, see a reference to a narrative with which his friendship with St. Luke must almost of necessity have made him familiar.
Fuente: Ellicott’s Commentary for English Readers (Old and New Testaments)
11. CIRCUMCISION OF JESUS, Luk 2:21 ; Mat 1:25 .
21. Eight days According to the Jewish laws, Gen 17:12, Lev 12:1-6.
Fuente: Whedon’s Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
‘And when eight days were fulfilled for circumcising him, his name was called JESUS, which was so called by the angel before he was conceived in the womb.’
On the eighth day after His birth Jesus was circumcised, a ritual which had to be undergone by all Jews who did not wish to be cut off from Israel. It was considered so important that it could even be carried out on the Sabbath day. This removal of the foreskin was a sign that the recipient was being brought within the covenant with Abraham (Gen 17:12). The seven day wait was probably in order to cater for the ‘removal by waiting’ of the uncleanness of childbirth, due partly to the contact with the blood and afterbirth involved. The naming of Jesus here would appear to confirm that this ‘naming’ at the time of circumcision had become the custom (compare Luk 1:59). It is this naming, (which is drawn attention to by the comment), that is important to Luke. Jesus was here named with the name given by the angel before He was born, indicating His separation to God from before His birth.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
Jesus Is Circumcised and Presented at the Temple and Is Blessed By Simon Who Prophesies Over Him (2:21-35).
The purification of Mary and Jesus from the ritual defilement of child birth was necessary due to the requirements of Jewish Law, something that would take forty days, and offerings and sacrifices would then be made once the period was over. The fact that the birth had made Mary ‘unclean’ is clear evidence of the genuineness of the birth and of the fact that the one born was true man. It was right that Jesus also should partake in all this, for He was ‘born under the Law’ for our sakes (Gal 4:4), and for our sakes went through all that He had to face. He was sent in the likeness of sinful flesh and for sin (Rom 8:3), in all things becoming like His brethren (Heb 2:17) so that on their behalf He might die for their sin. Thus what He went through He went through, not for His own sin (for He was without sin – 2Co 5:21; 1Pe 2:22), but for us as representative man.
Here in this passage Simeon is placed in parallel with Elisabeth in Luk 1:41-45 (see opening chiasmus). Both prophesy by the Holy Spirit over Jesus, the one before His birth and the other after His birth. Mankind and womankind together combine to acknowledge His coming.
It will be noted how all the people who have been involved in proclaiming Jesus are ‘ordinary people’. They are godly, but ordinary (although in a sense that is a contradiction). Not a chief priest, or Scribe, or elder among them. It is not to the world’s great that He comes, but to those who will receive Him.
This passage can be analysed as follows:
a And when eight days were fulfilled for circumcising him, his name was called JESUS, which was so called by the angel before he was conceived in the womb (Luk 2:21).
b And when the days of their purification according to the law of Moses were fulfilled, they brought him up to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord, as it is written in the law of the Lord, “Every male which opens the womb shall be called holy to the Lord”, and to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, “A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons” (Luk 2:22-24).
c And behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon, and this man was righteous and devout, looking for the consolation of Israel, and the Holy Spirit was on him. And it had been revealed to him by the Holy Spirit, that he would not see death, before he had seen the Lord’s Messiah, and he came in the Spirit into the temple, and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, that they might do concerning him after the custom of the law, then he received him into his arms, and blessed God (Luk 2:25-28).
d And he said,
“Now let your servant depart, Lord,
According to your word, in peace,
For my eyes have seen your salvation,
Which you have prepared before the face of all peoples,
A light for revelation to the Gentiles,
And the glory of your people Israel” (Luk 2:29-32).
e And his father and his mother were marvelling at the things which were spoken concerning him, and Simeon blessed them
d And said to Mary his mother,’
“Behold, this child is set for the falling and the rising of many in Israel,
And for a sign which is spoken against.
(Yes, and a sword will pierce through your own soul),
That thoughts out of many hearts may be revealed.”
c And there was one Anna, a prophetess, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Asher (she was of a great age, having lived with a husband seven years from her virginity, and she had been a widow even to fourscore and four years), who departed not from the temple, worshipping with fastings and supplications night and day, and coming up at that very hour she gave thanks to God, and spoke of him to all those who were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem (Luk 2:36-38).
b And when they had accomplished all things that were according to the law of the Lord, they returned into Galilee, to their own city Nazareth (Luk 2:39).
a And the child grew, and waxed strong, filled with wisdom, and the grace of God was on him (Luk 2:40).
In ‘a’ the baby Jesus is circumcised and named Jesus as God had commanded, and in the parallel he becomes strong and the grace of God is on Him. In ‘b’ the customs of the Jews are carried out and in the parallel the parents, having fulfilled those customs, return home to Nazareth with Him. In ‘c’ there is a man in whom is the Holy Spirit in Jerusalem, who blesses Jesus, and in the parallel there is a woman who is a prophetess who does the same. These together are the two witnesses necessary to testify to what is true. Both give blessings to the baby Jesus. In ‘d’ we have in parallel the two prophetic statements of Simeon. And central in ‘e’ we find the perplexed parents, and Simeon blessing them. The real central point of this chiasmus are the two prophetic statements which come to a perplexed world.
Fuente: Commentary Series on the Bible by Peter Pett
The Witnesses in the Temple at His Dedication Luk 2:21-40 contains the story of Jesus being named and later taken to the Temple for his presentation and circumcision, at which time Mary receives the prophecies of Simeon and Anna in the Temple, as they testified of Jesus’ divine birth and ministry in the redemption of mankind. This passage concludes with Jesus awaiting His manifestation to Israel while growing up in Nazareth (Luk 2:39-40).
Luk 2:39-40, “And when they had performed all things according to the law of the Lord, they returned into Galilee, to their own city Nazareth. And the child grew, and waxed strong in spirit, filled with wisdom: and the grace of God was upon him.”
Outline: Here is a proposed outline:
1. The Naming of the Child Jesus Luk 2:21
2. The Presentation of Jesus in the Temple Luk 2:22-24
3. The Witness of Simeon Luk 2:25-35
4. The Witness of Anna Luk 2:36-38
5. Jesus Returns to Nazareth Luk 2:39-40
Luk 2:21 The Naming of the Child Jesus Luk 2:21 records the dedication and naming of the child Jesus.
Luk 2:21 And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.
Luk 2:21
Lev 12:3, “And in the eighth day the flesh of his foreskin shall be circumcised.”
“his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb” – Comments Joseph named the child Jesus in obedience to the command of the angel recorded in Luk 1:31, “And, behold, thou shalt conceive in thy womb, and bring forth a son, and shalt call his name JESUS.”
Luk 2:22-24 The Presentation of Jesus in the Temple In Luk 2:21-24 we have the story of Jesus being presented in the Temple. Notice how Joseph and Mary bring the baby Jesus to the Temple according to the Mosaic Law (See Lev 12:1-8). They gave the offering that poor people were allowed to give.
Luk 2:22 And when the days of her purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought him to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord;
Luk 2:22
Lev 12:4, “And she shall then continue in the blood of her purifying three and thirty days; she shall touch no hallowed thing, nor come into the sanctuary, until the days of her purifying be fulfilled.”
Luk 2:23 (As it is written in the law of the Lord, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord;)
Luk 2:23
Exo 13:2, “Sanctify unto me all the firstborn, whatsoever openeth the womb among the children of Israel, both of man and of beast: it is mine.”
Exo 13:12, “That thou shalt set apart unto the LORD all that openeth the matrix, and every firstling that cometh of a beast which thou hast; the males shall be the LORD’S.”
Exo 13:15, “And it came to pass, when Pharaoh would hardly let us go, that the LORD slew all the firstborn in the land of Egypt, both the firstborn of man, and the firstborn of beast: therefore I sacrifice to the LORD all that openeth the matrix, being males; but all the firstborn of my children I redeem.”
Luk 2:24 And to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons.
Luk 2:24
Lev 12:8, “And if she be not able to bring a lamb, then she shall bring two turtles, or two young pigeons ; the one for the burnt offering, and the other for a sin offering: and the priest shall make an atonement for her, and she shall be clean.”
Luk 2:25-35 The Witness of Simeon Both Simeon and Anna recognized the Christ-child. It pleased God to record their two prophecies. In Luk 2:25-35 we have the testimony of Simeon by a word of prophecy confirming the divinity of the Lord Jesus Christ.
Luk 2:25 And, behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon; and the same man was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel: and the Holy Ghost was upon him.
Luk 2:25
Luk 2:33 Comments Note that the Gospel of Luke does not call Joseph, “his father.”
Luk 2:34 And Simeon blessed them, and said unto Mary his mother, Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken against;
Luk 2:34
Jas 1:9-10, “Let the brother of low degree rejoice in that he is exalted: But the rich, in that he is made low: because as the flower of the grass he shall pass away.”
This is prophesied in Isa 40:3-5 and fulfilled in Luk 3:4-6. The proud will be made low and the humble will be exalted.
Luk 3:5, “Every valley shall be filled, and every mountain and hill shall be brought low; and the crooked shall be made straight, and the rough ways shall be made smooth;”
Luk 2:35 (Yea, a sword shall pierce through thy own soul also,) that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed.
Luk 2:35
Joh 19:25-26, “Now there stood by the cross of Jesus his mother , and his mother’s sister, Mary the wife of Cleophas, and Mary Magdalene. When Jesus therefore saw his mother, and the disciple standing by, whom he loved, he saith unto his mother, Woman, behold thy son!”
God always prepares us for difficulties that will take place in the future by giving us words to strengthen us and to prepare us for that time and season. Thus, God gave Mary words that would one day serve to strengthen her during the most difficult moment in her life, which was the crucifixion of her beloved Son on Calvary. In the same way, Jesus gave Peter a prophecy about his future suffering and death in order to strengthen him.
Joh 21:18-19, “Verily, verily, I say unto thee, When thou wast young, thou girdedst thyself, and walkedst whither thou wouldest: but when thou shalt be old, thou shalt stretch forth thy hands, and another shall gird thee, and carry thee whither thou wouldest not. This spake he, signifying by what death he should glorify God. And when he had spoken this, he saith unto him, Follow me.”
Luk 2:36-38 The Testimony of Anna the Prophetess Both Simeon and Anna recognized the Christ-child. It pleased God to record their two prophecies. We have the testimony of Anna the prophetess in Luk 2:36-39.
The Person of Anna the Prophetess – The Scriptures tell us quite a bit about Anna in a few verses.
1. She was of the tribe of Asher. (Luk 2:36)
2. She stood in the office of a prophetess. (Luk 2:36)
3. She was married only seven years before becoming a widow. (Luk 2:36)
4. She was a widow indeed because she never remarried. (Luk 2:37) (1Ti 5:5)
5. She served God day and night through prayer and fasting. (Luk 2:37) (1Ti 5:5)
6. She recognized the Christ and spoke of Him to all (Luk 2:38)
Luk 2:36 And there was one Anna, a prophetess, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Aser: she was of a great age, and had lived with an husband seven years from her virginity;
Luk 2:36
[161] John Gill, Luke, in John Gill’s Expositor, in e-Sword, v. 7.7.7 [CD-ROM] (Franklin, Tennessee: e-Sword, 2000-2005), comments on Luke 2:36.
Luk 2:36 “a prophetess” Comments – We have a number of Scriptures that support the fact that God used women in the office of a prophetess throughout history.
Exo 15:20, “And Miriam the prophetess , the sister of Aaron, took a timbrel in her hand; and all the women went out after her with timbrels and with dances.”
Jdg 4:4, “And Deborah, a prophetess , the wife of Lapidoth, she judged Israel at that time.”
2Ki 22:14, “So Hilkiah the priest, and Ahikam, and Achbor, and Shaphan, and Asahiah, went unto Huldah the prophetess , the wife of Shallum the son of Tikvah, the son of Harhas, keeper of the wardrobe; (now she dwelt in Jerusalem in the college;) and they communed with her.”
2Ch 34:22, “And Hilkiah, and they that the king had appointed, went to Huldah the prophetess , the wife of Shallum the son of Tikvath, the son of Hasrah, keeper of the wardrobe; (now she dwelt in Jerusalem in the college:) and they spake to her to that effect.”
Neh 6:14, “My God, think thou upon Tobiah and Sanballat according to these their works, and on the prophetess Noadiah , and the rest of the prophets, that would have put me in fear.”
Isa 8:3, “And I went unto the prophetess ; and she conceived, and bare a son. Then said the LORD to me, Call his name Mahershalalhashbaz.”
Luk 2:36, “And there was one Anna, a prophetess , the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Aser: she was of a great age, and had lived with an husband seven years from her virginity;”
Act 2:17, “And it shall come to pass in the last days, saith God, I will pour out of my Spirit upon all flesh: and your sons and your daughters shall prophesy , and your young men shall see visions, and your old men shall dream dreams:”
Act 21:9, “And the same man had four daughters, virgins, which did prophesy .”
1Co 11:5, “But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.”
Rev 2:20, “Notwithstanding I have a few things against thee, because thou sufferest that woman Jezebel, which calleth herself a prophetess , to teach and to seduce my servants to commit fornication, and to eat things sacrificed unto idols.”
Luk 2:36 “the daughter of Phanuel”- Comments – The Greek name (G5323) (Phanuel) is the Greek transliteration of the Hebrew name (H6439), translated in the KJV as “Penuel” 8 times or “Peniel” 1 time. The LXX uses the name “Phanuel” in 1Ch 4:4, just as is used in Luk 2:36. The name means, “face of God” ( Strong). This Greek word occurs once in the New Testament, in Luk 2:36.
Luk 2:36 “of the tribe of Aser” Comments – Genealogies were very important to the Israelites in order to trace their Jewish roots. The fact that Matthew and Luke were able to trace Jesus’ genealogy back to Abraham testifies to the fact that the Jews kept ancient records of their ancestry. This is confirmed when Paul declares himself to be of the tribe of Benjamin (Rom 11:1, Php 3:5). Josephus tells us that there were indeed public tablets of Jewish ancestry. Josephus also tells us of the painstaking care that the Jews have taken to keep records as old as two thousand years of their ancestry. All Jews of the Diaspora kept accurate records, which were sent to Jerusalem for safekeeping ( Against Apion 1.7). Thus, for Luke to refer to Anna’s genealogy as a descendent of the tribe of Asher when recording her testimony shows that many Jews knew their own personal ancestry.
Luk 2:36 “she was of a great age, and had lived with an husband seven years from her virginity” – Comments – Anna was eighty-four (84) years old. She was married only seven years before her husband died. Matthew Henry notes the fact that she never married again is mentioned to her praise, as it testifies to her sincere devotion to God.
Luk 2:37 And she was a widow of about fourscore and four years, which departed not from the temple, but served God with fastings and prayers night and day.
Luk 2:37
Luk 2:37 “which departed not from the temple” – Comments – The temple is God’s house. Also, we are the temple of God. See 1Co 7:16-17.
1Co 3:16-17, “Know ye not that ye are the temple of God, and that the Spirit of God dwelleth in you? If any man defile the temple of God, him shall God destroy; for the temple of God is holy, which temple ye are.”
Luk 2:37 “but served God with fastings and prayers night and day’ – Comments – Anna’s great age prevented her from performing many ministerial duties. However, she could serve the Lord with prayer and fasting night and day. In fact this was a duty of widows in the New Testament church. In the early Church Paul ordained and established the office and ministry of the widows indeed to give themselves to prayers night and day (1Ti 5:3-16). This practice seems to have already been established in the Jewish culture regarding Temple service.
1Ti 5:5, “Now she that is a widow indeed, and desolate, trusteth in God, and continueth in supplications and prayers night and day.”
Cindy Jacobs says that she once asked the Lord why we have to pray night and day, and why can we not just pray in the daytime and sleep at night. The Lord said to her, “because the devil never rests.” She said that God made the night and called it good, but the devil has taken over the night. [162] That is when the drug deals happen, when the prostitutes come out and all kinds of evils take place. God originally made the night a good thing. For example, one good thing about the night is that it is a time of quietness and prayer and meditation on the activities of the day.
[162] Cindy Jacobs, with Benny Hinn, This is Your Day (Benny Hinn Ministries, Grapevine, Texas), television program.
Luk 2:37 Comments – There were many people in the Temple that day Joseph and Mary brought in baby Jesus. There were probably a number of babies there also, perhaps some to be dedicated. However, it was Anna’s life of prayer and fasting that put her in a position to hear from God and to recognize the presence of Israel’s Redeemer.
Luk 2:38 And she coming in that instant gave thanks likewise unto the Lord, and spake of him to all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem.
Luk 2:38
Luk 2:38 “gave thanks likewise unto the Lord” Comments – We read in Luk 2:28, “Then took he him up in his arms, and blessed God,” Thus, Anna’s thanksgiving was like in comparison to Simeon’s praise unto God.
Luk 2:38 “and spake of him to all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem” Comments – The Greek verb “spake” is in the imperfect, which is easily translated “she began to speak from that time forth.” In other words, she began to testify of Simeon’s prophecy and of baby Jesus for the rest of her life to all of those whose hearts were yearning to hear about the Messiah. She had been in God’s Word. Because it had filled her heart, she naturally spoke His Word to others.
Jos 1:8, “This book of the law shall not depart out of thy mouth; but thou shalt meditate therein day and night, that thou mayest observe to do according to all that is written therein: for then thou shalt make thy way prosperous, and then thou shalt have good success.”
Luk 2:39-40 Jesus Returns with His Family to Nazareth Luk 2:39-40 tells us how Jesus and His family returned to Nazareth after His birth. However, we must be able to reconcile this account with that of Mat 2:13-15, which describes Joseph’s flight to Egypt until the death of King Herod before returning to Nazareth. Apparently, the family did not go immediately to Nazareth, but first fled to Egypt and later made their way to Nazareth. We know from Luk 2:22 that His parents stayed in the area of Bethlehem at least one month, during which time they dedicated baby Jesus in the Temple. We do not know precisely the time of the visit of the wise men from the East, but it was within the first two years of Jesus’ birth. A popular way to harmonize the Gospel narratives on Jesus’ childhood is give the following order of events: Jesus’ birth (Luk 2:1-7), the visit by the shepherds (Luk 2:8-20), Jesus’ dedication in the Temple (Luk 2:22-38), the visit by the wise men (Mat 2:1-12), His flight to Egypt and the killing of the children in Bethlehem (Mat 2:13-18), Jesus’ return to Nazareth (Mat 2:19-23, Luk 2:39), His childhood in Nazareth (Luk 2:40). [163]
[163] A. T. Robertson, A Harmony of the Gospels for Students of the Life of Christ Based on the Broadus Harmony of the Revised Version (New York: George H. Doran Company, 1922), xiv.
Luk 2:39 And when they had performed all things according to the law of the Lord, they returned into Galilee, to their own city Nazareth.
The Circumcision and Presentation of Christ. Luk 2:21-40
The circumcision:
v. 21. And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcision of the Child, His name was called Jesus, which was so named of the angel before He was conceived in the womb.
By His ancestry and birth, Jesus was a member of the Jewish race and of the Jewish Church. And Mary and Joseph observed all the rites and ceremonies of the Jewish law. On the eighth day of the Child’s life, therefore, the sacrament of circumcision was administered to Him, whereby He was formally declared to be a member of the Jewish Church. Incidentally, according to the custom of the Jews, He was given a name by which He should be distinguished in the congregation of God’s people. And in this instance there was no difference of opinion. As the angel had told Mary at the time of the annunciation, as he had told Joseph in a dream, Mat 1:21, so it was now done. The child’s name was Jesus. In Him there is salvation for all men. Note: Jesus here, in submitting to the ordinance of circumcision, was made under the Law, Gal 4:4-5. It was the beginning of His active obedience in behalf of all men. But it was the beginning also of His passive obedience, of His suffering. For here He paid the first drop of blood as the price of our souls, the full payment being completed when He committed His soul into the hands of His heavenly Father on the cross.
The presentation:
v. 22 And when the days of her purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought Him to Jerusalem to present Him to the Lord,
v. 23. (as it is written in the Law of the Lord, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord,)
v. 24. and to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the Law of the Lord, a pair of turtledoves or two young pigeons.
Luke finds it necessary to explain the rites connected with the purification for the sake of his readers that were not familiar with Jewish laws. The mother was unclean, according to the ordinances of Moses, for seven days after the birth of a son, and must then remain separate for a matter of another thirty-three days. These forty days altogether denoted the days of the Levitical cleansing, or purification, Lev 12:1-8. At the close of this period the parents went up to Jerusalem with the Child to present Him to the Lord, for the firstborn of man and beast belonged to the Lord, Exo 13:2, and had to be redeemed with a sacrifice. Since Mary and Joseph were poor, they could not afford to bring a lamb. Mary therefore brought the less expensive sacrifice, Lev 12:6-8. The manner in which Mary brought her sacrifice, the sin-offering and the offering of thanksgiving, is the following. She entered the Temple through the “gate of the firstborn,” waited at the gate of Nicanor while the offering of incense was being made in the Holy Place. She then proceeded to the highest step of the stairway which led from the Court of the Women to the Court of Israel. Here a priest took the sacrifice from her hand and made the offering. She was then sprinkled with the blood to indicate the cleansing. Finally she paid five pieces of silver into the Temple treasury, placing the money (about 85 cents) into one of the trumpet-shaped treasure-boxes which stood in the Court of the Women. Note: The law really concerned only such women as became mothers after the visual course of nature. The Virgin and her Child might fitly have claimed exemption. But Christ humbled Himself so completely for the sake of us sinners, so completely did He want to become flesh of our flesh, that He submitted even to this humiliating rite of purification in the Temple.
Luk 2:21. When eight days were accomplished Among the Jews it was reckoned dishonourableto keep company with persons uncircumcised: Act 11:3 wherefore, to render Jesus acceptable to the Jews, to fit him for conversing familiarly with them, and to qualify him for discharging the other duties of his ministry, it was in some sense necessary that he should be circumcised. Besides, as the Messiah was to be the descendant of Abraham, whose posterity was distinguished from the rest of mankind by this rite, he received the seal of circumcision, to shew that he was rightly descended from that patriarch. And further it was necessary that Jesus should be circumcised, because thereby he was subjected to the law of Moses, and put into a condition to fulfil all righteousness.
Luk 2:21 . ] The genitive, not as at Luk 2:22 ; Luk 1:57 ; Luk 2:6 , but as genitive of the aim: in order to circumcise Him , that He might be circumcised. Comp. Buttmann, neut. Gr. p. 230 [E. T. 267].
] was also named , indicating the naming as superadded to the rite of circumcision. See Ngelsbach, z. Ilias , Exo 3 , p. 164. And the Son of God had to become circumcised , as , , Gal 4:4 . This was the divine arrangement for His appearing as the God-man in necessary association with the people of God (Rom 9:5 ). There is much importation of the dogmatic element here among the older commentators. [53]
. . .] See Luk 1:31 . Comp. Mat 1:21 , where, however, the legend quite differently refers the giving of the name to the angel.
[53] Calovius says that Christ allowed Himself to be circumcised “tum ob demonstrandam naturae humanae veritatem tum ad probandam e semine Abrahae originem tum imprimis ob meriti et redemptions Christi certificationem .”
THIRD SECTION Luk 2:21-52
A. The Eighth Day; or, Submission to the Law. Luk 2:21
(The Gospel for New Years Day)
21And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child [for circumcising Him],20 his name was called JESUS, which was so named of [by] the angel before he was conceived in the womb.
EXEGETICAL AND CRITICAL
Luk 2:21. The circumcising.See the Exegetical Notes on Luk 1:59.
[Alford:The Lord was made like unto His brethren (Heb 2:17; Heb 4:15) in all weakness and bodily infirmity, from which legal uncleannesses arose. The body which He took on Him, though not a body of sin, was mortal, subject to the consequence of sin,in the likeness of sinful flesh; but incorruptible by the indwelling of the Godhead (1Pe 3:18). In the fulfilment therefore of His great work of redemption He became subject to legal rites and purificationsnot that they were absolutely necessary for Him, but were included in those things which were for Him in His humiliation and making perfect: and in His lifting up of that human nature, for which all these things were absolutely necessary (Gen 17:14), into the Godhead.Bengel remarks on , antequam: Exquisite hic denotatur beneplacitum Patris in Christo, atque innuitur simul, nunc infantem circumcisione per se non eguisse. Conf. Gal 1:15.P. S.]
Jesus, .Hebr. , or contracted, ,Jehovah auxilium. It appears from Col 4:11, and Mat 27:16-17, where the correct reading is Jesus Barabbas, that the name was not an usual one at this time. For mystical derivations of the name see Wolf and others.
Which (name) was so named (or: the name given by the angel).The naming of our Lord was not less an act of faith in obedience to the divine command, than the naming of the Baptist (Luk 1:63). In this instance, the direction was not given to Joseph alone (Mat 1:21), but also to Mary (Luk 1:31).
DOCTRINAL AND ETHICAL
1. It is remarkable that Luke relates the circumcision of the Baptist in a far more detailed and circumstantial manner than that of the Messiah. This is surely no proof that the two narratives were derived from entirely different sources (Schleiermacher); while this very brevity and simplicity offer a fresh token of the truth of the history. A mere inventor would never have omitted enhancing the occurrences of the eighth and fortieth days, by appearances of angels. The detailed account of the circumcision of John, contrasted with the brevity with which that of Jesus is narrated, is the more striking, when we consider that the first stands entirely upon Old Testament ground; while the Mosaic law, and the rite of circumcision itself, were about to be done away with by the second (Lange.) 3. He who was , came also at the appointed time by circumcision. His reception of this rite is an incident in the history of the self-humiliation of Him who, being originally in the form () of God, took upon Him the form of a servant. By it He became symbolically bound to perform that will of the Father, for whose fulfilment He had come into the world. Olshausen well remarks, that the harmony of the divine plan of salvation required His submission to even this form of human development, according to which He was received as a member of the theocracy of the Old Testament, by means of the same sacred treatment which brought all His brethren within the bonds of the covenant, in order that He might, after attaining to the perfectly developed consciousness of His higher existence, elevate to the higher degrees of His own life, that community to which He was united by so many various ties.
4. Now that Christ is circumcised, the law is in this respect also both fulfilled and repealed. Baptism takes the place of circumcision (Col 2:10-12), as the form of admission into the new covenant; and Paul rightly opposes the judaizing zeal for the re-introduction of circumcision, as a virtual denial of Christian principle.
5. The most important fact of the eighth day, is, after all, the naming of the Saviour. What name was ever given which promised more, and which less disappointed the expectations excited, than this? Comp. Act 4:12.
HOMILETICAL AND PRACTICAL
Jesus made under the law, that He might redeem us from the law.Jesus both humbled and exalted, on the eighth day.The circumcision of the flesh, and the circumcision of the heart, Rom 2:28-29.Circumcision and baptism.The first fruits of the blood of Christ, a sacrifice of obedience.The name Jesus Isaiah , 1. a name given by God; 2. a name whereby we must be saved; 3. the only name under heaven given for this purpose.The solemn manner in which circumcision was instituted (Genesis 17.), contrasted with the silent and almost imperceptible manner in which it disappeared, Heb 8:13.The harmony between the name and work of Jesus.The name Jesus: 1. The dignity with which the Lord is invested; 2. the work which He performs; 3. the homage He receives, as bearing this name.Joseph and Mary, patterns of the unquestioning obedience of faith.The name of Jesus, and our name.New Years day, the Lords name-day: 1. The knowledge of the name of Jesus, the best New Years blessing; 2. the faithful confession of this name, the chief New Years duty.The New Year considered in the light of the name of Jesus, the name of Jesus in the light of the New Year.Our earthly destination also, is appointed by God before our birth.
Starke:Christ was esteemed unclean, according to the law, that, by His satisfaction, He might take away our uncleanness.
Palmer:The name of Jesus in the mouth of His believing people who are in the world: 1. All that we believe and confess in the world is summed up in this one name; 2. what we do for the world, we do in the name of Jesus; 3. what we shall take out of the world is this name alone; (or, more shortly, the name of Jesus, with respect to the faith, the works, and the hope of the Christian).
Rautenberg:The name of Jesus, our light in the darkness of the New Years morning: 1. The light of grace for the darkness of our conscience; 2. the light of power for the darkness of our life.This name on New Years day, 1. throws the right light on our reminiscences; 2. gives the right weight to our resolutions; 3. and provides the anchor of true confidence for our hopes.
Spritzler:We must begin with Jesus Christ, the true beginning.Through Him we have, 1. new life; 2. new hopes; 3. new righteousness; 4. new peace.
V. Gerlach:The New Year, a year of salvation.
Stier:The right way of beginning the New Year: 1. Not in our own name; 2. not only in the name of God alone, but in the name of the Lord Jesus.
Heubner:The Christian resolution to lead a new life in the New Year: 1. What this resolution requirescircumcision of the heart and fulfilment of duties; 2. what gives it strengththe name of Jesus; 3. what promises its accomplishmentthe protection of Providence (Luk 2:21).
Footnotes:
[20]Luk 2:21.The Received Text reads to , the child, to mark the chief person; but this word is unnecessary in the connection and not sustained by the best authorities and critical editions which read . So also Cod. Sinait. The second before is simply redundant, and hence properly omitted in the E. V.P. S.]
DISCOURSE: 1474 Luk 2:21. And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.
THE naming of children has often been used, not merely for distinctions sake, but also to express some expectation or wish which the parent entertained respecting his child. Of course, the name must frequently have ill-suited the character of the person that bore it. This was remarkably the case with the two first children that were born into the world. Adam named the first Cain, (which signifies getting,) supposing that he had gotten that Promised Seed who was to repair the ruins of the fall: and his second son he named Abel (vanity), having already had abundant evidence of the sinful dispositions of Cain. But in both he was mistaken; for the former proved a murderer; and the latter a distinguished saint.
But God has on several occasions condescended to give names to children previous to their conception in the womb: and the names so given have always designated the real character of the persons themselves. We are particularly informed, that God required the child which he gave to Zacharias and Elizabeth to be called John, which means grace or favour; because, whilst he was a favour bestowed on them, he was to be an object of Gods peculiar favour, and an occasion of much good to others [Note: Luk 1:13-14.].
The name of Jesus also was given by the angel to the Virgins Child, before he was conceived in her womb. And how significant this was, it is scarcely needful to mention. It was the same name with Joshua, and meant Divine Saviour: and was therefore most fitly given to Him, who was Emmanuel, God with us, and who was destined to save his people from their sins [Note: For a fuller explanation of this, see Disc, on Mat 1:21-23.]. The time of imposing the name on a child was generally that of his circumcision. It was thus in the case of John [Note: Luk 1:59-63.], as also in that of Jesus: the solemnity of that rite giving an additional weight to the name imposed.
But it is to the rite itself, that is, to circumcision, that we shall confine our attention at this time: for, in point of importance, it seems to have been the first and greatest of all the ordinances among the Jews. We propose to shew,
I.
The nature and intent of circumcision
It was originally given to Abraham as a seal of the covenant of grace
[God made a covenant with Abraham, to give him a numerous posterity, with the land of Canaan for their inheritance; and at last one particular Seed, in whom all the nations of the earth should be blessed. This promise Abraham believed; and he looked forward to that peculiar Seed as the true and only source of blessings to himself. In consequence of this faith, he was accepted of God; who engaged to treat him as a righteous person, through the righteousness of the Saviour imputed to him [Note: Rom 4:3; Rom 4:18-25.]. And in token that he would execute every part of this gracious covenant, he appointed him and all his posterity to be circumcised. This is the account which St. Paul himself gives of this ordinance: he calls it a sign, and a seal: a sign to Abraham and his seed, that they were the Lords peculiar people; and a seal to them, that God would be his and their God, provided they walked in the faith, and in the steps of their father Abraham [Note: Rom 4:11-12.]. As a sign, it shewed them their engagements to God; and as a seal, Gods engagements to them.]
But, as continued to the Jews, in and after the days of Moses, it was a seal of the covenant of works This view of the rite will throw light upon,
II.
The reasons of our Lords submitting to it
These were chiefly two;
1.
That he might appear to be the Promised Seed
[The Person in whom all the nations of the earth were to be blessed, was marked out by God as one particular individual, who should in due time arise, and in whom the covenant made with Abraham should be confirmed. St. Paul infers this from the very term used on that occasion being in the singular number: and though we should not have conceded to him that inference, as a critic, we doubt not but that the truth he affirms, was intended, by the Holy Ghost, to be marked in that very expression on which he founds his remark [Note: Gal 3:16.]. At all events, the Messiah was to be of the posterity of Abraham; all of whom were circumcised: therefore, if Jesus were not circumcised, he could have no claim, no allowable claim, to this distinction: whatever he might be, he could not be acknowledged to be a child of Abraham. It is true, this mark could not distinguish him as the Messiah, because it was common to all the Jews: but the want of it would have been an infallible proof that he was not the Messiah; and therefore he submitted to receive it.]
2.
That he might be fully under the obligations of the Mosaic law
[Mankind at large were subject only to the moral law; and therefore for their redemption it would have been sufficient for the Son of God to assume our nature: but the house of Israel, for whose salvation he was sent in the first instance, were under the ceremonial law; and therefore for their redemption he must be made under that also. This is particularly noticed by St. Paul, who says, that in the fulness of time God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, that he might redeem them that were under the law [Note: Gal 4:4-5.]. Now it was by circumcision that the children of the Jews were initiated into the Mosaic covenant, and brought fully into subjection to the law. Hence therefore Christ submitted to circumcision, and acknowledged at all times his obligation to obey that law in every thing. He says himself, I am not come to destroy the law and the prophets, but to fulfil them. There is one very remarkable instance of his obedience to the law, which reflects considerable light on the subject before us. Baptism was not any part of the original law: but it had been introduced as an additional rite for the admission of proselytes into the Jewish religion: and the introduction of it had been so far sanctioned by God himself, that John, the forerunner of our Lord, was expressly commissioned to baptize all who desired an admission into the kingdom of the Messiah. Hence Jesus Christ himself went to be baptized of him: and upon Johns declining it as unsuitable to the dignity of our Lord, Jesus said to him, Suffer it to be so now; for thus it becometh us to fulfil all righteousness [Note: Mat 3:15.]. The same strict adherence to the law was observable in him at all times, except when the execution of his high office, and the establishment of his Divine authority, required a temporary deviation from it. Indeed, he not only fulfilled the law, but was himself the completion of it; every part of it being accomplished in him as its great prototype. In a word, if he would redeem mankind, he must do it by obeying that law which we had broken, and enduring those penalties which we had incurred. This therefore he undertook to do, that, by his atoning sufferings and perfect obedience, he might restore us to our forfeited inheritance. Of this work his circumcision was the commencement: it was the commencement of those sufferings which constitute his atoning sacrifice, and of that obedience which constitutes our justifying righteousness. It was the commencement of that work which God had given him to do, and which terminated at last in what the Apostle fitly calls, his obedience unto death.]
Let us now turn our attention to,
III.
The lessons, which his submission to it may teach us
It may well teach us,
1.
To observe the instituted ordinances of our religion
[Circumcision, with respect to us, is done away, and is superseded by the milder rite of baptism. But baptism is as necessary for us, as circumcision was to the Jews; and it is to be administered to the very same persons. Be it so; children are not capable of all the ends of baptism. But was Christ capable of all the ends of circumcision? was not one end of it to put away (emblematically then, and really afterwards) the lusts of the flesh? But had he any lusts to put away? Yet he was circumcised: and consequently, children may now be baptized, though they be not capable of all the ends of baptism.
Once more: Are not children capable of receiving the blessings of the covenant? for our Lord says, Suffer little children to come unto me, and forbid them not; for of such is the kingdom of God. And if they are capable of the blessings of the covenant, are they not also of the seal; when that seal is nothing more than a token from God that the blessings shall be theirs?
We have said thus much, not for the sake of stirring up controversy, but of confirming you in the principles, which, as members of the Church of England, you profess. 2.
To seek that purity of which circumcision was an emblem
[What the true circumcision was, we are abundantly informed both by Moses and the prophets [Note: Deu 10:16. Jer 4:4.]. Even at that time circumcision, if not accompanied with a suitable course of life, was accounted for uncircumcision: and much more, under our dispensation, must those only be accounted Christians, who are such in deed and in truth [Note: Rom 2:25; Rom 2:28-29.]. We will call upon you all then, not to rest in your baptism, as though that made you Christians, but to seek the baptism of the Holy Ghost, and the answer of a good conscience towards God [Note: 1Pe 3:21.]. It is remarkable that St. Paul represents this very purification as the thing intended to be produced by the circumcision of Christ. We are (federally) circumcised in him: but (personally) we are to put away the body of the sins of the flesh [Note: Col 2:10-11.]. And the very promise which God has given us, is, that he will circumcise our hearts, to love the Lord our God with all our heart, and with all our soul [Note: Deu 30:6.]. Look ye to it then, my brethren, that this seal of our covenant be found in you. Put off the old man, which is corrupt according to the deceitful lusts, and put on the new man, which after God is renewed in righteousness and true holiness. It may be painful thus to mortify the flesh; but it must be done, if you would have any well-founded hope towards God: for, notwithstanding salvation is bestowed by grace through faith, yet it is an unalterable truth, that they who are Christs, have crucified the flesh with the affections and lusts.]
(21) And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb. (22) And when the days of her purification, according to the law of Moses, were accomplished, they brought him to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord; (23) (As it is written in the law of the Lord, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord;) (24) And to offer a sacrifice, according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, A pair of turtle doves, or two young pigeons.
It is blessed, yea, very blessed, to behold Christ being put into our law-room and place, thus entering upon his work in redeeming his people. As such, circumcision was the first rite in the Church, for admission into the covenant. See Gen 17:10-14 . Christ therefore, by virtue of this rite, became a debtor to the whole law to fulfil it. This proved him to be under the law, and a son of Abraham, according to the flesh. And his presentation in the temple, became a further testimony. And with Christ the rite ceased forever. For as Christ, by virtue of it, became a debtor to the whole law, and fulfilled it in his own person, so he virtually freed his Church from the rite forever. Hence the Apostle saith, Behold I Paul, say unto you, that if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing. For I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law. Gal 5:1-6 . See Lev 12:3-6 ; Exo 13:2 ; Num 3:13 .
VIII
BEGINNINGS OF MATTHEW AND LUKE (CONTINUED)
Harmony pages 8-10 and Luk 2:21-38 THE CIRCUMCISION OF JESUS Luk 2:21
On this point the answers to two questions will be sufficient: Why was our Lord subject to this ordinance? and to what did it obligate him? Paul answers both questions: “He was born under the law that he might redeem them that were under the law” (Gal 4:4-5 ). Circumcision made him “a debtor to do the whole law” (Gal 5:2 ). To accomplish his ultimate mission of mercy to the Gentile world he must approach them through the Jews “For I say that Christ hath been made a minister of the circumcision for the truth of God that he might confirm the promises given unto the fathers and that the Gentiles might glorify God for his mercy” (Rom 15:8-9 ).
So that his circumcision had a twofold purpose to reach the Jews and through the Jews to reach the Gentiles. Being, through his mother, a lineal descendant of Abraham, it became him to magnify and make honorable the law in every minute respect. He himself said: “Think not that I came to destroy the law or the prophets: I came not to destroy but to fulfill. . . . Till heaven and earth pass away, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass away from the law till all things be accomplished” (Mat 5:17-18 ).
THE PRESENTATION IN THE TEMPLE Luk 2:22-38
This was the second step in the line of keeping the law. Circumcision was a family rite on the eighth day this a Temple rite on the fortieth day. In this account we must distinguish what applied to Jesus from what applied to his mother. Two laws applied to his mother: (1) The forty days of purification required after bearing a first-born son (Lev 12:1-4 ). (2) The bringing to the sanctuary a lamb for a burnt offering and a turtle-dove or a pigeon for a sin offering. But in mercy the law provided: “If her means suffice not for a lamb, then she shall take two turtle-doves or two young pigeons the one for a burnt offering and the other for a sin offering: and the priest shall make atonement for her, and she shall be clean” (Lev 12:6-8 ). What a comment, then, on the family poverty when our text says she offered “a pair of turtle-doves, or two young pigeons!”
The laws applying to her Son were: (1) He belonged, as first-born, to Jehovah and must be presented to him. The historical ground of Jehovah’s title to the first-born of man or beast was the salvation of Israel’s first-born through the blood of the passover lamb on the night that Egypt’s first-born perished (Exo 13:2 ; Exo 13:11-16 ). This obligated the first-born son to a consecrated service in the sanctuary.
(2) But when Jehovah selected the tribe of Levi for sanctuary service in lieu of the first-born males of all the tribes, then the first-born of the other tribes were exempted from sanctuary service on payment of a redemption price of five shekels, which constituted a part of the means for supporting the tribe of Levi (Num 8:16 ; Num 18:15-16 ).
So when Jesus was seven days old he was circumcised; and when forty days old was carried from Bethlehem to Jerusalem for presentation in the Temple, that the laws cited bearing on him and his mother might be fulfilled. The habit-blinded Temple officers saw nothing unusual in this observance of ordinary ritual. To them only a poor Jewish mother and her child had entered the gorgeous Temple of Herod. Like the unseeing man pilloried by Wordsworth: A primrose by a river’s brim A yellow primrose was to him, And it was nothing more.
But this first appearance of our Lord in the Temple, as many subsequent ones, was to be signalized by mighty events. To one man and to one woman were given the seeing eye. One righteous and devout old man was looking for the coming Messiah, here called, according to prophecy, the Consolation of Israel. He had not only noted that the converging lines of type and prophecy had focused, but the Holy Spirit had revealed to him that his old eyes should not close in death until they had seen the Lord’s Christ. It was like -the revelation to Enoch that his son Methuselah should live to the end of the antediluvian world, and like the revelation to Lamech that his son Noah should give rest from the flood and start a new race in the postdiluvian world. The Spirit, all the time resting on Simeon, gave him special prompting to go to the Temple at a certain hour, and there enabled him to recognize the Lord just entering in, borne by his mother. He took the child in his arms, blessing God and Joseph and Mary. Under immediate inspiration he spoke of three things:
(1) Salvation, (a) It was a salvation prepared before the face of all nations. This preparation had been going on for 4,000 years. In some way the preparation had conspicuously touched every nation under heaven. The Old Testament records the story of the contact. The great world empires, Egypt, Assyria, Babylon, Persia, Greece, and Rome, were no more than smaller nations and tribes. The loom of God’s moral government of the world was ever weaving its web. The nations, as colored threads, constituted the warp. His providence, like a shuttle, ever flying to and fro, supplied the woof. And now, at last, after 4,000 years of weaving the pattern of the web exhibits the Lord Jesus Christ as the central figure of all history.
(b) It was a salvation, not only “to the glory of Israel,” but as a revelation to the Gentiles.
(c) After his eyes had seen the coming of this salvation earth had nothing more of honor to wait for he was permitted to depart in peace. Happy old man! What a glorious consummation of a long and faithful life! What a brilliant sunset of life, unflecked by a cloud I Well might a disobedient prophet say, Let me die the death of the righteous, And let my last end be like his.
Contrast the hideous old age and exit of Herod with the old age and beatific departure of Simeon.
(2) Concerning the Saviour, (a) “Behold, this child is set for the falling and rising up of many in Israel.” Christ is the touchstone revealing the secret of every heart. Those who accept him rise. Those who reject him fall. He is a savor of life unto life, or of death unto death.
(b) He is set for a sign which is spoken against. This again depends on how he is presented or regarded. As a mere good man none spoke against him. But as God-man on the cross, expiating, as a substitute the sins of the world, voices from every class blaspheme his name and mission.
(3) Concerning his mother. “Yea, and a sword shall pierce through thine own soul.” Your attention has been called to a book entitled The Sorrows of Mary, based on this passage. The honor put on Mary was the highest privilege ever conferred on woman. When she thought of the honor, well might she sing: “My soul doth magnify the Lord, and my spirit hath rejoiced in God, my Saviour. . . . For he that is mighty hath done to me great things.”
But with this honor come many sorrows. She must see her Son pass beyond all earthly relations to become absorbed in the higher spiritual relations. She must witness his rejection, betrayal, and crucifixion. Her sympathetic maternal heart must lead her into a baptism of suffering on his account.
Anna, the prophetess. Simeon, the aged man, is not alone as a witness. Here is a woman more than 100 years old. She had lived as a wife seven years, and had now been a widow eighty-four years. If she married at fourteen she would be 105 years old. She reminds us of Paul’s direction concerning one “who is a widow indeed” (1Ti 5:5-10 ). After the death of her husband she devoted herself exclusively to the service of God in the Temple. Great joy comes to her old age. She, like Simeon, beholds the coming of the long-expected Saviour. Under the inspiration of the Spirit she testifies of the Christ to other waiting souls expecting the redemption.
In the most degenerate days of impiety and public corruption God never leaves himself without witnesses.
They are not in the high places, nor conspicuous in the congregations. They quietly wait and pray and serve. There are always more of them than men think. Elijah thought himself alone against the world. But God, even then, had reserved to himself seven thousand who had not bowed the knees to Baal. And so, says Paul, there is always “a remnant according to the election of grace.” It is this remnant that constitutes the seed and nucleus of future revivals. In the dark days of Malachi, there were some faithful ones: “Then they that feared Jehovah spake one with another; and Jehovah hearkened, and heard, and a book of remembrance was written before him’, for them that feared Jehovah, and that thought upon his name. And they shall be mine, saith Jehovah of hosts, even mine own possession, in the day that I make; and I will spare them, as a man spareth his own son that serveth him. Then shall ye return and discern between the righteous and the wicked, between him that serveth God and him that serveth him not.” And this “book of remembrance” will be among the “books opened at the judgment” (Rev 20:12 ).
THE VISIT OF THE MAGI Mat 2:1-12 On this notable event we submit the following observations: (1) The meaning of Magi. Nebuchadnezzar summoned all his “wise men” (Dan 2:12 ) to reveal to him the dream he had forgotten and ‘then to interpret it. In this case our word “magi” is made to include “magicians, enchanters, sorcerers, and Chaldeans” (Dan 2:2 ). The Chaldeans only of this list answer to the character of the Magi of our paragraph. They were astronomers, devoting much attention to the study of the heavenly bodies, and believing, not only that they were appointed for signs to the earth, as taught in Gen 1:14 , but had much influence for good and evil on earth’s affairs, hence the question of the Almighty to Job: Canst thou bind the cluster of the Pleiades, Or loose the bands of Orion? Canst thou lead forth the Mazzaroth in their season, Or canst thou guide the Bear with her train? Knowest thou the ordinances of the heavens? Canst thou establish the dominion thereof in the earth?
Job 38:31-33
To like effect is the passage in Jdg 5:20 From heaven fought the stars, From their courses they fought against Sisera,
So the sun and the moon, at the bidding of Joshua, paused in their respective courses that the enemies of Israel might be utterly discomfited (Jos 10:12-14 ).
From astronomy, a great and proper science with the ancient Egyptians and Chaldeans, there was developed later the superstition of astrology, with its casting of horoscopes, which darkened medieval Europe.
Later than Daniel’s time we have another Old Testament use of the word “magi”: “Then the king said to the wise men, who knew the times (for so was the king’s manner toward all that knew law and judgment; and the next unto him were Carshena, Shethar, Admatha, Tarshish, Meres, Marsena, and Memucan, the seven princes of Persia and Media, who saw the king’s face, and sat first in the kingdom)” (Est 1:13-14 ). The Magi here are both princes and counselors to Ahasuerus (Xerxes the Great).
It is evident from a comparison of our paragraph with the two instances quoted from the Septuagint, that Magi might be very wise and honorable men engaged in the lawful study of astronomy, and that if Jehovah made a revelation to them, it would be adapted to their line of study.
(2) How would these Wise Men in the Far East be prepared to recognize a heavenly phenomenon as a sign of a coming Jewish king? Very much to the point is a prophecy under the compulsion of unwelcome inspiration, by an unworthy magian from the Far East, many centuries before the birth of our Lord. Balaam three times prophesies of a coming king of Israel who shall rule the nations. In his last prophecy concerning this king, he says,
I see him but not now; I behold him but not nigh: There shall come forth a star out of Jacob And a sceptre shall rise out of Israel . . . And out of Jacob shall one have dominion.
Num 24:17-19
Then, in the captivity under Nebuchadnezzar this book, centuries later, was carried to the home of the Magi Ezra on his return bringing back a copy (Ezr 7:6 ; Ezr 7:10 ; Neh 8:2 ) and then the book of Isaiah was also shown to Cyrus, in which the prophecy, “Jehovah will arise upon thee, and his glory shall be seen upon thee. And nations shall come to thy light, and kings to the bright-ness of thy rising. . . . They shall bring gold and frankincense, and shall proclaim the praises of Jehovah” (Isa 60:2-6 ). Moreover, all these holy books were kept in circulation in the land of the Magi, by resident Jews, until Christ was born.
I say, then, in view of the prophecy of a magian concerning the star and the King, and of Isaiah’s prophecy of Gentiles coming to his rising, naming the very gifts they would bring, and of the circulation of these books in their very midst by resident Jews up to Christ’s birth, of which it was impossible for these Magi to be ignorant, it is easy to understand how these stargazers would connect the appearance of a new and brilliant luminary with the birth of the long foretold King of the Jews who would rule the world.
(3) Was the star they saw the conjunction of heavenly bodies, appearing naturally at this time) or was it a miracle? You will find in Dr. Robertson’s note, appendix to Broadus Harmony, a brief summary of the argument in favor of a natural phenomenon. I do not quote it, because such an explanation could not be made to fit Matthew’s account, particularly, 2:9. It must be considered a miraculous appearance.
(4) How many of these Wise Men, what were their names, were they kings, and what became of them? The record is silent. We had better follow the record. Of course, if you desire to follow traditional fancies, utterly worthless, you may learn from Gen. Lew Wallace’s romance, Ben Hur , that they were three in number, and royal personages, and their names and countries, and how, contrary to Matthew’s account, they lingered long and conspicuously, instead of returning quietly to their distant homes.
Moreover, if you are given to the worship of lying relics, the next time you visit the famous cathedral at Cologne, the janitor, for a fee, will show you their bones in the shrine behind the high altar. Then will be justified the proverb: “A fool and his money are soon parted.” The first time I visited New Orleans, an auctioneer of curios told me they were still selling to credulous visitors the cannon ball that killed Sir Edward Packingham in his great battle with Andrew Jackson.
And I have heard that an auctioneer once tried to sell the sword with which Balaam killed his ass. When a bystander informed him that Balaam did not kill his ass, but only wished for a sword that he might kill him, the auctioneer was nothing daunted: “This,” said he, “is the sword be wished for,” and he sold is as an antique relic.
(5) These Wise Men, quite naturally, went to Jerusalem with their question: “Where is he that is born king of the Jews, for we have seen his star in the East, and are come to do homage to him?” But it was not good tidings to Herod and Jerusalem. Both were greatly troubled Herod, because he feared the downfall of his proposed dynasty; Jerusalem, because it dreaded political convulsions followed by bloodshed and destruction of their city. Herod summons the obsequious Sanhedrin and learns that Bethlehem, according to prophecy, was to be his birthplace. The cunning old tyrant, having gathered from the Wise Men the time of the appearance of the star, sent them to Bethlehem, with the charge to let him know if they found the child, that he also might come and worship him.
(6) It seems that the Magi saw the star only twice: first, at its appearance in the East, and second, after they left Jerusalem on their way to Bethlehem, where the star led them, and then stood still over the house where Joseph and Mary lodged.
(7) Observe that the first gift laid at the feet of Jesus was gold. On a great occasion, before our Texas convention, when the foreign mission cause was greatly suffering, I preached a sermon on the gold, frankincense and myrrh, the first gifts to Jesus, and as myrrh was used for both the holy ointment in the anointing of kings and prophets, and also for embalming, I made the gifts represent contribution, prayer, and unction, and that they should never be separated: We must contribute, we must pray, we must have the unction of the Spirit. A great collection followed for foreign missions.
These Wise Men, having done homage to the new-born King, and warned of God in a dream not to return to Herod, went away into their own country. How dramatic their coming and their going!
(8) Evidently they may be counted as the firstfruits of the Gentiles.
QUESTIONS
1. Why should Jesus be circumcised, and what was its twofold purpose in his case?
2. In the presentation of our Lord in the Temple, distinguish the laws as applied to him from those applied to his mother.
3. What two mighty events signalized this first appearance of our Lord in the Temple?
4. Is Luk 2:29 a prayer for an affirmation?
5. In the prophecy of Simeon, he speaks three things concerning salvation. What are they?
6. He speaks two things concerning the Saviour: What are they?
7. He speaks one thing concerning Mary: What is it?
8. Does “that thoughts out of many hearts be revealed,” in v. 35, refer to what Simeon said to Mary, or to what he said of her Son?
9. What do you learn concerning Anna the prophetess?
10. Cite the Old Testament uses of the word “Magi,” and what is its meaning?
11. What is the difference between astronomy and astrology?
12. How were these Wise Men prepared to recognize a heavenly phenomenon as a sign of the coming Jewish King?
13. Was the star they saw a junction of heavenly bodies appearing naturally, or was it a miracle?
14. How many of these Wise Men, what were their names, were they kings, what became of them?
15. What traditions concerning them are given in Gen. Lew Wallace’s Ben Hur!
16. What have you to say about their bones now lying in the cathe dral at Cologne?
17. Why were Herod and Jerusalem troubled at the account of the Wise Men?
18. What wag the first gift ever laid at the feet of our Lord, and what providential use was made of it?
19. Tell concerning the sermon on “gold, frankincense and myrrh.”
21 And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.
Ver. 21. For the circumcising of the child ] Christ would be circumcised, and so become bound to fulfil the law, that he might free us that were under the law,Gal 4:5Gal 4:5 . He shed his blood for us when he was but eight days old; he took us into his family by baptism when we hung on our mother’s breasts. Should we not then serve him betimes, remember him from our infancy?
21. ] HIS CIRCUMCISION. The second must not be rendered ‘ also .’ It is simply redundant, as in reff. The Lord was made like unto His brethren (Heb 2:17 ; Heb 4:15 ) in all weakness and bodily infirmity, from which legal uncleanness arose. The body which He took on Him, though not a body of sin, was mortal, subject to the consequence of sin, in the likeness of sinful flesh: but incorruptible by the indwelling of the Godhead ( 1Pe 3:18 ). In the fulfilment therefore of His great work of redemption He became subject to legal rites and purifications not that they were absolutely necessary for Him , but were included in those things which were for Him in His humiliation and ‘making perfect:’ and in His lifting up of that human nature, for which all these things were absolutely necessary ( Gen 17:14 ), into the Godhead.
Luk 2:21-24 . Circumcision and presentation in the temple .
Luk 2:21 . , as in Luk 1:57 , Luk 2:6 , and again in Luk 2:22 ; in the first two places the reference is to the course of nature, in the second two to the course prescribed by the law. , the genitive not so much of purpose (Meyer, J. Weiss), but of more exact definition (Schanz; vide Burton, M. and T. , 400, on the use of with infinitive to limit nouns). : the may be taken as “also” = He was circumcised (understood), and at the same time His name was called Jesus, or as introducing the apodosis: and = then (so Godet and Hahn). It might have been dispensed with ( superfluit . Grotius).
NASB (UPDATED) TEXT: Luk 2:21
21And when eight days had passed, before His circumcision, His name was then called Jesus, the name given by the angel before He was conceived in the womb.
Luk 2:21 “eight days old” This was the Jewish time for circumcision (cf. Gen 17:12; Lev 12:3). It was considered so important that it was even performed on the Sabbath. All of the people in the Mediterranean area were circumcised (except the Philistines). The Romans performed this rite on the ninth day, the Greeks on the seventh or tenth day, and the Arabs on the thirteenth birthday (cf. Gen 17:23-26). For the Jews it was a sign of YHWH’s Covenant with Abraham. Jesus was born under the Law. See Contextual Insights, A.
“His name was then called Jesus” The parents usually named their children, but this child’s name had been revealed by Gabriel (cf. Luk 1:31; Mat 1:21).
Jesus (Greek) and Joshua or Yeshua (Hebrew) are the same Hebrew names. They are a combination of the covenant name for God, YHWH, and the noun “help” or “deliver.” The exact way to combine these two nouns is uncertain, a verb must be supplied. Here are some options.
1. “YHWH saves”
2. “salvation is of YHWH”
3. “YHWH delivers”
4. “YHWH is the deliverer”
eight days, &c.: i.e. on the last and great day of the Feast of Tabernacles (Joh 7:37).
accomplished = fulfilled. See Lev 12:3.
name. Supply the logical Ellipsis thus: “[Then they circumcised Him] and called His Name”, &c. Only four named before birth: Ishmael, Isaac, John, and the Lord.
JESUS. See note on Mat 1:21. App-98. X
of = by. Greek. hupo, as in Luk 2:13.
before. Greek. pro. App-104.
21.] HIS CIRCUMCISION. The second must not be rendered also. It is simply redundant, as in reff. The Lord was made like unto His brethren (Heb 2:17; Heb 4:15) in all weakness and bodily infirmity, from which legal uncleanness arose. The body which He took on Him, though not a body of sin, was mortal, subject to the consequence of sin,-in the likeness of sinful flesh: but incorruptible by the indwelling of the Godhead (1Pe 3:18). In the fulfilment therefore of His great work of redemption He became subject to legal rites and purifications-not that they were absolutely necessary for Him, but were included in those things which were for Him in His humiliation and making perfect: and in His lifting up of that human nature, for which all these things were absolutely necessary (Gen 17:14), into the Godhead.
Luk 2:21. And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called Jesus, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.
Although the old law ends with Christ, it is very instructive to notice that he came under the law, and conformed to all its appointments. Jesus, therefore, had to be circumcised. In him the law was fulfilled in every point, even to the jots and tittles; nothing was omitted. Behold, how perfect is the righteousness which he wrought out for his people!
Luk 2:22. And when the days of her purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought him to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord;
Everything was done that was required by the Jewish law, you see. When the fullness of the time was come, God sent forth his Son, made of a woman, made under the law, to redeem them that were under the law, that we might receive the adoption of sons. Being found in fashion as a man, and a man under the Jewish law, Jesus and his parents were obedient to all its requirements.
Luk 2:23-24. (As it is written in the law of the Lord, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord;) and to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, A pair of turtle-doves, or two young pigeons.
This proves the poverty of our Lords parents. If they had been able to bring a costlier sacrifice, they should have done so. The law required the offering of a lamb for a burnt offering; but there was a gracious provision in the case of the poor mother: If she be not able to bring a lamb, then she shall bring two turtles, or two young pigeons; the one for the burnt offering, and the other for a sin offering: and the priest shall make an atonement for her, and she shall be clean. Even in the case of a working-woman, the birth of her first-born son required from her a sacrifice; but it might be of the smallest kind: A pair of turtle-doves, or two young pigeons. Think of your Lord himself redeemed by a sacrifice, a pair of doves offered in his stead! What a wonderful coming down to our condition and position was this!
Luk 2:25. And, behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon; and the same man was just and devout,
He blended in his character his duty to man and his duty to God, he was just and devout.
Luk 2:25. Waiting for the consolation of Israel:
His devotion was not that of a blind devotee. He had eyes of expectation, he was expecting the Messiah to come, who is the consolation of Israel.
Luk 2:25-26. And the Holy Ghost was upon him. And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lords Christ.
That which the Holy Ghost reveals will assuredly come to pass, as it did in the experience of old Simeon.
Luk 2:27. And he came by the Spirit into the temple:
Men who have the Spirit will be led by the Spirit. Simeon came into the temple at the right moment. Just when a young man was entering, with his wife and new-born child, He came by the Spirit into the temple.
Luk 2:27-28. And when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him after the custom of the law, then took he him up in his arms,
He came in, I say, at the right time. Did ever anybody, who was not led by the Spirit, find Christ? Somebody has come in here tonight, and he does not know why he has come; but he has been led here by the Spirit that he may see Jesus, and may have such a sight of him as shall be his salvation. God grant that it may be proved that many an aged Simeon has traveled here this Sabbath night, led by the Spirit for this purpose, to find the Saviour in his own house!
Luk 2:28; Luk 2:32. And blessed God, and said, Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word: for mine eyes have seen thy salvation, which thou hast prepared before the face of all people; a light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel.
Simeon had studied the ancient prophecies to good purpose, and he perceived from them that the Lords Christ would be a light to lighten the Gentiles as well as the glory of Gods ancient people, Israel.
Luk 2:33. And Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of him.
We may be very near to Christ, and yet know very little about him. Joseph and the virgin mother did not understand those things which were spoken of him. One wonders it was so after all that had been revealed to them; we marvel that they marvelled.
Luk 2:34. And Simeon blessed them, and said unto Mary his mother, Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel;
Do you understand that? Whenever Christ comes to a man, there is a fall first, and a rising again afterwards. You never knew the Lord aright if he did not give you a fall first. He pulls us down from our pride and self-sufficiency, and then he lifts us up to a position of eternal safety. He is set for this purpose; this is the great design of Christs coming: This child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel.
Luk 2:34. And for a sign which shall be spoken against;
Christ and his gospel will always be spoken against. If you know a gospel which is approved by the age, and patronized by the learned, that gospel is a lie. You may be sure of that; but if it be spoken against, if it be slandered, if it be called absurd, unscientific, and I know not what, all that is in its favor.
Luk 2:35. (Yea, a sword shall pierce through thy own soul also,)
This favored woman had the greatest smart to go with her great honour. She saw the suffering and anguish of her son; and the nearer you are to Christ, the more of sorrow it will cost you, sorrow which you may be well content to bear. You know how it is put in that hymn of which many of us are very fond,
If I find him, if I follow,
What his guerdon here?
Many a labour, many a sorrow,
Many a tear.
Yet, I say again, you may be well content to bear it all for his sake; for you remember what the next verse of the hymn is,
If I still hold closely to him,
What hath be at last?
Borrow vanquished, labour ended,
Jordan past.
Luk 2:35. That the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed.
Christ and his cross are the revealers of the thoughts of mens hearts. Mens hearts can conceal their thoughts until Christs cross comes near; then the old enmity rises up, the heart rebels, and we see what is really in mens hearts.
Luk 2:36-37. And there was one Anna, a prophetess, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Aser: she was of a great age, and had lived with an husband seven years from her virginity; and she was a widow of about fourscore and four years, which departed not from the temple, but served God with fastings and prayers night and day. It would have been a pity for Christ to have been received in the temple only by a man. There must be a woman there, too, to join in Simeons swan song, and to unite her testimony with his.
Luk 2:38. And she coming in that instant
God knows how to time what we call our accidental walks: She coming in that instant
Luk 2:38. Gave thanks likewise unto the Lord, and spake of him to all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem.
So that the song of Simeon was sweetened by the voice of Anna, and they both rejoiced in God their Saviour; and their joy was shared by all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem. May many of us have a share in that same joy as, by faith, we lovingly gaze upon the Lords Christ.
Luk 2:21. , that they should circumcise: He was called) The circumcision is not recorded in so direct terms as the naming of Him, inasmuch as the latter was divinely ordered by express command.-[ , by the angel) ch. Luk 1:26; Luk 1:31.-V. g.]- , before that) There is hereby exquisitely expressed the good pleasure of the Father in Christ. [And it is implied at the same time, that this infant of (in) Himself did not need circumcision.-V. g.] Comp. Gal 1:15.- , in the womb) viz. of His mother. So is used absolutely, Jer 1:5, .
Luk 2:21-40
6. THE CIRCUMCISION AND PRESENTATION OF JESUS
Luk 2:21-40
21 And when eight days were fulfilled-The law required that the first-born male be dedicated to Jehovah. (Lev 12:1-8.) This was to be done on the eighth day, or when the child was eight days old; these days were required for the preparation of the ceremony of circumcision at this time the child officially received its name. The angel at the annunciation had told Mary that she should call “his name Jesus.”
22-24 And when the days of their purification-The mother of a child was unclean for forty days after the birth of a son, and for eighty days after the birth of a daughter; the time for a son was forty days from his birth, or thirty-three days after the circumcision. When the days were fulfilled for the purification, “they brought him up to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord.” Women on errands commonly rode to the temple on oxen; they did this because the body of an ox was so large that it increased the space between the woman and the ground to prevent any chance of further defilement from passing over any unclean thing on the road.
as it is written in the law of the Lord,-The word “law” occurs in this chapter five times;this is more times than in all the rest of the Gospel of Luke. Luke emphasizes the fact that Jesus was “born of a woman, born under the law” (Gal 4:4), and accordingly he elaborates the details of the fulfillment of the law by the parents of both John and Jesus. There are different expressions for the law of Moses; it is called “law of Moses,” “the law of the Lord,” and “the law.” (Neh 8:1; Neh 8:3; Neh 8:7-8; Neh 8:14; Neh 8:18; Mar 7:10.) From the day when the first born of Egypt had been smitten by the destroying angel, the first born of Israel among the male were consecrated to the Lord. (Num 3:13.) However, God ordained and accepted, as a substitute for the first born, the tribe of Levi, which was set apart for his special service. (Num 3:12.) But as the number of the first born exceeded that of the tribe, a redemption price of five shekels was to be paid to the priests (Num 3:46-47), which was ordained to be paid for all the first born (Num 18:15-16). This is why the first born was called “holy.”
to offer a sacrifice according to that which-This verse is joined to verse 22, but separated by a parenthetical statement in verse 23. The law prescribed the sacrifice to be a lamb one year old for a burnt offering, and a young pigeon or turtledove for a sin offering; but in case the poverty of the mother forbade the offering of a lamb, two turtledoves or young pigeons were permitted as a substitute; one of these was for a burnt offering and the other for a sin offering. (Lev 12:6-8.) The fact that Mary offered “a pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons” shows that she was poor, for she would not have made the offering of the poor, if she had not been poor. This fact also denies the legend that she was a rich heiress. God had made provision for the poor; his service has always been reasonable. While the lamb for this offering would probably cost about two dollars, the doves would cost about sixteen cents.
25, 26 And behold, there was a man in Jerusalem,-This man’s name was Simeon;some have thought that Simeon was the celebrated rabbi of that name, and the father of Gamaliel; there is no evidence that this supposition is true. It was not the design of Luke to refer to the worldly standing of Simeon, but only his religious attainments. Luke describes Simeon as being “righteous and devout.” The Greek for “devout” is used only by Luke; it means circumspect or cautious; hence Simeon was a person who took hold of things carefully; he was cautious and careful to observe all the ordinances of the law; he was righteous in that he kept the commandments of the law. Simeon was one who was “looking for the consolation of Israel.” “Consolation of Israel” is the same as “hope of Israel.” (Act 28:20.) He was looking for the Messiah. There was a common form of adjuration among the Jews which said, “so may I see the consolation.” Simeon was filled with the Holy Spirit whether he was filled just at this time or at some previous time, we are not told.
And it had been revealed unto him-The original bears the interpretation that it was having been revealed; that is, it “stood” revealed while he waited for the fulfillment of the revelation. We are not informed as to what manner it was revealed to him. Some have inferred that it was revealed to him in a dream as it was to Joseph and to the wise men (Mat 1:20; Mat 2:12-13; Mat 2:19); but the distinct reference made twice to the Holy Spirit would lead one to suppose that it was made to him in a vision while he was in a state of prophetic ecstasy. It was revealed to him “that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord’s Christ.” In Mat 16:28 we have the statement, “shall in no wise taste of death, till they see the Son of man coming in his kingdom.” Taste and sight are often put figuratively for the actual experience of a thing. Simeon was promised that he should not die before he saw “the Lord’s Christ”; this means the Christ, the anointed of the Lord. (Psa 2:2.) There is a beautiful and striking antithesis between the words “see death” and “see the Lord’s Christ.”
27-32 And he came in the Spirit into the temple:-The Holy Spirit prompted Simeon to go to the temple at this time; the Holy Spirit moved Simeon to come to the temple at the opportune moment when Joseph and Mary brought the child Jesus, just as the Holy Spirit brought Philip and the eunuch together on the road to Gaza. (Act 8:26-31.) Simeon was brought into the court of the women of the temple; women were not permitted to enter the temple proper; hence we are to understand that they went into the court where women were permitted. Here Joseph and Mary are spoken of as “the parents” of “the child Jesus.” Luke has made his record clear that Joseph was not one of “the parents” of Jesus; he is spoken of as a “parent” of him, because he was the husband of Mary, who was the mother of Jesus. They brought Jesus to the temple “that they might do concerning him after the custom of the law.” “After the custom” means “according to that which was usually done”; “custom” or “to be accustomed” are used more frequently by Luke than any other writer; they are words which are common in medical writings; hence Luke, who was a physician (Col 4:14), uses frequently medical terms. Reference is here made to the payment of the redemption price.
then he received him into his arms,-Simeon required no information in regard to the incidents attending the conception and birth of the child; it had been revealed to him that before his death he should see the long-expected Messiah; he had gone to the temple by the direction of the Holy Spirit, and when Mary entered with the babe, he recognized her child as the promised Messiah. He then took the child and “blessed God.” His act first was one of thanksgiving; then his aged eyes were permitted to rest on the long-expected and hope-for Messiah; he prayed for a speedy and peaceful departure from the toils and sorrows of life. He said: “Now lettest thou thy servant depart, Lord, according to thy word, in peace.” Simeon regarded the sight of the promised Messiah as the consummation of his earthly life, and hence it was to him an assurance that his earthly labors were now about to end.
For mine eyes have seen thy salvation,-This was the ground of his assurance; he had been permitted to see the Messiah, which was equivalent to seeing the salvation of Jehovah, for “salvation” is to be interpreted as “Saviour”; this salvation in the vision of Simeon had been prepared “before the face of all peoples.” “All people” primarily include the Jews which had been scattered all over the world, and in a comprehensive sense it embraces all people of the earth. For this Savior was to be “a light for revelation to the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel.” “A light” is put here with the meaning of “a lamp.” The Messiah was to be the Savior of the world; he was to be the moral light of the Gentiles, revealing to them the ways of God, and the true and only method of salvation through his atoning blood. The blessings of the Messiah’s reign are promised here conjointly to the Jews and the Gentiles, and although Simeon spoke this under the inspiration of the Holy Spirit, there can be no doubt of the belief of such pious Israelites as Simeon and others who had studied carefully the Messianic prophecies that the Gentiles were to participate in some degree in the same blessings. There was much doubt and mystery with respect to the nature and extent of his kingdom, and it cost much effort on the part of our Lord to teach his disciples the true conception of his mission to earth. Light is promised here to the Gentiles and glory is promised to Israel; the Gentiles were regarded as in darkness and ignorance, and the Messiah would attain the true and highest glory of Israel.
33-35 And his father and his mother-Again we have Joseph spoken of as “his father”; this is done only in the sense that he was regarded legally as his father, since Joseph was the legal husband of Mary. God was the father of the Christ. Joseph and Mary marveled “at the things which were spoken concerning” Jesus by Simon. Although they had been prepared by the previous wonderful manifestations for the remarkable destiny of the child, yet they were doubtless very far from having attained to a full and just conception of the glorious reality; they can hardly realize that the child so helpless and dependent is the manifested Messiah; hence when reminded of this by the words of the shepherds and of Simeon, they wonder at the marvelous event almost as though they had then heard of it for the first time.
Simeon blessed them,-While the plural is used here, the blessing seems to be directed to Mary; some think that the “them” includes Joseph, Mary, and the babe Jesus. In speaking to Mary, Simeon said; “Behold, this child is set for the falling and the rising of many in Israel.” He was the “falling” of some because he would be a stumbling block to many. (Isa 8:14; Mat 21:42; Mat 21:44; Act 4:11; Rom 9:33; 1 Cor. 1 23.) He was the “rising” of many because many would be raised up through him to life and glory. (Rom 6:4; Rom 6:9; Eph 2:6.) He was also to be “a sign which is spoken against.” This expression does not voice a prophecy, but describes an inherent characteristic of the sign, a sign of which is the character to experience contradiction from the world. In the beginning as a babe Jesus was endangered at the hands of Herod, and all through his earthly ministry and even on the cross, he suffered many things and was spoken against by all who refused to believe him.
yea and a sword shall pierce through thine own soul;- Strictly speaking, this means a large broad sword; the original is used in the Septuagint of the sword of Goliath. (1Sa 17:51.) This is a strong figure of Mary’s pang when Jesus her son was nailed to the cross, and while she stood at a distance and witnessed the dying agonies of her son. All the manifestations of Jesus before men would have the result of revealing many hearts; hence Simeon said “that thoughts out of many hearts may be revealed.” When Jesus stood in the presence of men he could look into their hearts and see what was in them; his presence became a searching test of real character. When Jesus came among men some hailed him with joy as one who brought the light of God from heaven to their needy, longing souls; but others hated this light, repelled it because it rebuked their evil deeds; those who refused to accept Jesus hardened their hearts and deepened their own damnation.
36-38 and there was one Anna,-Anna is another one of those who were prayerfully waiting with hopeful, longing expectation for the coming of the Messiah she was guided on the present occasion by the same spirit and came at the same time that Simeon came to the temple to behold the Messiah. She was well advanced in years; she was a prophetess, “the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Asher.” The particularity with which her parentage and lineage is given shows that she was a person whose family as well as personal history was well known to the public. She had married in her young maidenhood, and had lived with her husband seven years; after her husband’s death she lived eighty-four years, making in all ninety-one years since her marriage; on the supposition that she was twenty years old when she married, she was at this time one hundred eleven years old. She was regular in her worship, for she “departed not from the temple, worshipping with fastings and supplications night and day.”
And coming up at that very hour she gave thanks-Like Simeon she gave thanks to God that her aged eyes had been spared to see the infant Messiah; she knew by the Holy Spirit that the child Jesus was the long-expected Messiah; she “spake of him to all them that were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem.” Anna not only gave thanks to God, but she spoke to all others who in their hearts were waiting for the Messiah; it is not to be understood that she gave public utterance, but that she spoke to the pious ones who were with her in the temple waiting for the Messiah. “Looking for the redemption of Jerusalem” is equivalent to “looking for the consolation of Israel.” (Verse 25.) “Jerusalem” here stands for the race or nation of the Jews. Anna is to be classed with Simeon, Zacharias, and the shepherds. All of these were in a state of prayerful expectation of the Messiah.
39 And when they had accomplished all things-After the presentation of the child in the temple, Joseph and Mary returned “into Galilee, to their own city Nazareth.” According to the record given by Matthew (Mat 2:1-12), it seems that they returned to Bethlehem, where they were visited by the Magi, and afterwards took their flight into Egypt (Mat 2:13-23). The portion of Luke’s record is parallel to Mat 2:22-23, and serves to explain what is there left out of sight, that Joseph and Mary with the babe returned to Nazareth, because it was “their own city.” Matthew refers to this only to show that Jesus was brought up in that despised city; Luke, whose plan led him to speak of the previous dwelling place and condition of Joseph and Mary, refers to Nazareth as their place of abode before and after the birth of Jesus.
40 And the child grew, and waxed strong,-This shows that Jesus had a human body and that he was capable of increasing in wisdom and knowledge. The childhood life of Jesus followed the normal law of the race, growth of both body and mind; the facts were peculair to him and he had the great grace of God upon him and his wisdom was noticeable. The Jews marked the stages of a child’s development by seven different terms; the newborn babe (Isa 9:6);the suckling (Isa 11:8) the suckling beginning to ask for food (Lam 4:4); the weaned child (Isa 28:9);the child clinging to its mother (Jer 40:7);the child becoming firm and strong (Isa 7:14); the youth becoming free and independent (Isa 31:8). Jesus passed through all of these stages in his human development.
The Presentation In The Temple — Luk 2:21-38
And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the Child, His name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before He was conceived in the womb. And when the days of her purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought Him to Jerusalem, to present Him to the Lord; (as it is written in the law of the Lord, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord;) and to offer a sacrifice according to that which is said in the law of the Lord, A pair of turtle doves, or two young pigeons. And, behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon: and the same man was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel: and the Holy Ghost was upon him. And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lords Christ. And he came by the Spirit into the temple: and when the parents brought in the Child Jesus, to do for Him after the custom of the law, then took he Him up in his arms, and blessed God, and said, Lord, now lettest Thou Thy servant depart in peace, according to Thy word: for mine eyes have seen Thy salvation, which Thou hast prepared before the face of all people; a light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of Thy people Israel. And Jeseph, and His mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of Him. And Simeon blessed them and said unto Mary, His mother, Behold, this Child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken against: (yea, a sword shall pierce through thy own soul also;) that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed. And there was one Anna, a prophetess, the daughter of Phanuel, of the tribe of Aser: she was of a great age, and had lived with an husband seven years from her virginity; and she was a widow of about fourscore and four years, which departed not from the temple, but served God with fastings and prayers night and day. And she coming in that instant gave thanks likewise unto die Lord, and spake of Him to all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem- Luk 2:21-38.
There are really five parts in this section. First, we have the actual presentation of the Lord in the temple, to do for Him according to the law. As a Jewish child the ordinance of circumcision had been performed upon Him when He was eight days old. At that time His name was definitely called Jesus, as the angel declared should be the case before His birth. It is important to remember that this very name signifies not only His Saviourhood, but also His Deity, for it actually means Jehovah the Saviour. That was the name given to Him before He was born, and confirmed to Mary before He was presented in the Temple. How blessed to know Him as that! God Himself came down in grace, linked His Deity with our humanity, in order to perfect our redemption. We have something that is rather pathetic and deeply interesting to me, in the offering that Mary and Joseph brought. According to the law, after a child was born and a certain number of days had elapsed, a sacrifice was to be brought in recognition of the Lords goodness to the parents, and also in recognition of the fact that even little children, as sweet and comparatively innocent as they are, come of a sinful race and need a Saviour. According to the law, that sacrifice might be of various animals. It might be a lamb out of the flock, or a kid of the goats, or, the Word says, if they were not able to bring a lamb or a kid, they might bring two turtledoves or two young pigeons. Here we have a most significant thing. When Mary and Joseph came to offer this sacrifice in connection with the presentation of our blessed Lord Jesus, their wonderful adorable Babe, we read that they brought a pair of turtledoves. They could not bring the higher-priced offerings. They were numbered among the poor of Israel. That gives us some conception of the place our Saviour took in grace-He who was higher than the highest. He who created all things came into this world and took His place in a family so poor that they were not able to bring a lamb out of the flock, but they brought the offering of the very needy-two turtledoves.
Next we have the recognition of the Saviour by Simeon and the prophecy concerning Him. We are told that, There was a man in Jerusalem whose name was Simeon, and the same man was just and devout, awaiting the consolation of Israel. There were, doubtless, many of the Jews at this time who recognized the fact that the great time-prophecy of Daniel 9 had almost run out and that very soon the promised Messiah, the King and Saviour of Israel, must appear in accordance with the Word of God; and so they waited for Him. I wonder how many of us are waiting for His second coming. The years have gone since He went away. He said, If I go to prepare a place for you I will come again, and receive you unto Myself. The Thessalonian believers turned to God from idols to serve the living and true God and to wait for His Son from heaven. Are we numbered among those who are waiting for the Lord Jesus-waiting for Him to return again; waiting for Him to call His Church to be with Himself, and then to be manifested in glory for the full blessing of Israel and the nations? Just as this little remnant in Israel was waiting for Him to come the first time, so we should be waiting for Him to appear the second time, apart from the sin question, unto our complete and final salvation.
This man, Simeon, an aged man, was waiting for the consolation of the coming of the Messiah, and it was revealed to him by the Holy Spirit that he should not taste of death until he had seen the Lords Christ; that is, until he had seen the Messiah that Jehovah had promised. As Mary and Joseph came into the Temple bringing the little child in their arms, Simeon entered also, and when the parents presented the Child Jesus, Simeon saw Him immediately and said, That is the One, and without a moments hesitation he went to Mary and took the child in his own arms and blessed God and said, Now, Lord, let Thy servant depart in peace according to Thy Word, for mine eyes hath seen Thy salvation. That for which he was waiting had now actually been fufilled. The Spirit made it clear to him, and he said, This is what I have waited for. This is what I wanted, and I now have that for which I longed, and I am ready to go home. Let me now depart in peace, for mine eyes have seen Thy salvation. Notice the last expression- Gods salvation is bound up in a Person. When he saw Christ he said, I have seen Thy salvation. If you would ever see Gods salvation you must see the Lord Jesus Christ. If, when you look by faith upon Him, when you behold Him as the One who was sent by the Father, who came to this world in grace, and gave Himself a ransom for our souls-when you can see Him you are beholding Gods salvation. So, if you would know Gods salvation you must receive Christ.
Then Simeon goes on to prophesy. He says, Mine eyes have seen Thy salvation, which Thou hast prepared before the face of all people, a light to lighten the Gentiles and the glory of Thy people, Israel. You might have expected Simeon to reverse that expression, for it was prophesied in the Old Testament that the Messiah was coming first to bring blessing to Israel and then, through Israel, to the Gentile world. Simeon realizes and recognizes that there is a break in Gods way in dealing with men; so he puts the Gentiles first, and then Israel. The Spirit of God knew that when our Lord Jesus Christ came that first time in lowly grace, His own people would refuse Him. They would turn away from Him. They would not receive Him as their Messiah. So their hour of blessing was to be deferred. But he said, He shall be a light to lighten the Gentiles, and that explains why it is that, though Israel refuses to own our Lord Jesus Christ as their Saviour, He has been manifested to untold millions of Gentiles who have recognized and trusted in Him. Has God lost His interest in Israel? No; for the present time blindness, in part, has happened to Israel until the fulness of the Gentiles comes in. When the work among the Gentiles is completed, then He is going to take up Israel again in a marvelous way. So Simeon says, He is a light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of Thy people, Israel. What a day it will be when Israel returns to the Lord, and when they shall recognize in Him the One whom their fathers rejected-the Saviour that God had promised, whose finished work on the cross alone redeems!
Then notice in the third place, the special word for Mary, the mother of our blessed Lord. Simeon said unto her, Behold, this Child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken against. How this must have confirmed to the blessed mother of our Lord the words spoken by the angel before His birth. It was all so strange and mysterious, but when this aged Spirit-controlled servant of God definitely said to her, This child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel, it would confirm what had already been revealed to her. What does he mean by the fall and rising again? You will remember, Jesus said He was the stone of salvation, but He said, Whosoever shall fall upon this stone shall be broken. Israel stumbled over the lowly Jesus. He was a stumbling-stone and a rock of offence to both the houses of Israel; so He was set for the fall of many in Israel; but, on the other hand, down through the centuries thousands upon thousands have turned to Him, as many did in the days immediately following His resurrection-three thousand at Pentecost, thousands more afterward, untold myriads down through the centuries since. Vast numbers from Israel have turned to God and found in the Lord Jesus their Saviour, and by-and-by the nation as a whole will be converted. So, this Child was set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel, and for a sign that should be spoken against. Oh, the bitter things, the blasphemous things that have been said concerning the Lord Jesus Christ! When people reject the Lord Jesus Christ there is no saying to what length they will go to bolster up their false beliefs.
Then Simeon turned directly to Mary and said to her, Yea, a sword shall pierce through thine own soul also, that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed. I wonder if these words did not come back to Mary as she stood by the cross and saw her blessed Son nailed to the tree, as she looked upon the thorn-crowned head, as she saw blood spurting from every wound, as she saw the hands that had been pressed upon her brow so many times nailed upon that cross, and those feet that had gone about, carrying their blessed Owner on errands of love and mercy, spiked to that tree. Her sorrows must have been deep indeed, and yet she knew that all was foreknown of God, and that it was her appointed destiny to bring into the world the Saviour who was thus to give His life a ransom for all.
The next thing we notice is that in Luk 2:36, God gives further confirmation. This time an aged woman appears on the scene, a prophetess, named Anna, the daughter of Phanuel. She had lived with an husband seven years from her virginity, we are told, and was a widow of about eighty-four years, so she must have been above a hundred years of age. She was one of the remnant in Israel, waiting for the coming of the Messiah. She departed not from the Temple, but served God with fastings and prayer night and day. She, coming in that instant, suddenly recognized the Babe as the Saviour, and she gave thanks likewise unto the Lord, and she spake of Him to all them that looked for redemption in Jerusalem. This aged woman, becomes one of the first evangelists of the new age, saying, I have seen the Saviour. He has come-the One who is to bring redemption.
The closing part of our passage has to do with the Childhood of our blessed Lord. When they had performed all things according to the law of the Lord they returned into Galilee, into their own city, Nazareth, and the Child grew and waxed strong in spirit. It is a lovely picture of this Child growing up in the seclusion of the home and glorifying God, His Father, in all things. There was nothing abnormal about Him. He was not doing wonderful and remarkable things. If you want signs and wonders the Apocryphal Gospels will give you all kinds of things attributed to our blessed Lord. It is told how, when He was a little boy, He went to school and the teacher started to teach Him the alphabet. The teacher said, Say Aleph and He repeated it. Then the teacher told Him to say Beth. He replied, No, I will not say Beth until you tell me what Aleph means. The teacher lifted up his hand to strike Him and his hand became paralyzed. That is the kind of Jesus the Apocryphal Gospels tell us of.
There is nothing like that in Gods Holy Word. This is a beautiful, perfectly normal Child growing up in a lowly home where God is revered, and feeding upon the Word of God until the hour when He was to go forth on His great mission to redeem the world. Those hidden years were the suitable preparation for His future ministry.
Chapter 14
According To The Law
Everything our Saviour did as a man he did according to the law. When the Lord Jesus Christ came into the world to save his people from their sins, he willingly put himself under the law and became voluntarily subject to the law in all things as a man. He did so because God cannot justify the guilty except upon the grounds of strict justice. Righteousness must be maintained and justice must be satisfied in the exercise of mercy, love and grace. He who is our God and Saviour is a just God and a Saviour (Isa 45:20). By mercy and truth iniquity is purged (Pro 16:6). Our blessed Saviour magnified the law and made it honourable as our Substitute, that we might receive the adoption of sons in the sweet experience of his saving grace (Isa 42:21; Gal 4:4-5).
Though the yoke of the law was a heavy yoke, and only a shadow of good things to come, if we would have those good things, Christ must bear the laws heavy yoke for us. And he did it as our willing Substitute and Surety. Though the carnal ordinances of the law were what the Holy Spirit calls weak and beggarly elements (Gal 4:9), and but the rudiments of the world (Col 2:8; Col 2:20), our Lord Jesus Christ submitted to all the ordinances and institutions of the law as a man, that he might fulfil the law for us and bring it to an honourable end. He fulfilled all the law for us, from the beginning to the end of his manhood, that he might by his obedience unto death bring in everlasting righteousness for us and put away our sins forever, and that he might do so in a way that honours God.
Here in Luk 2:21-24 the Spirit of God shows us how the Lord Jesus, as our Saviour, Mediator, Surety and Substitute, from the very beginning of his holy manhood, fulfilled the law of God in the room and stead of his people.
Circumcised Surety
When he was just a baby, eight days old, the Lord Jesus Christ was circumcised as our covenant Surety. Circumcision was instituted under the law as a symbol of the new birth. The cutting away the filth of the flesh showed the necessity of Gods elect being purified by his grace (Tit 3:5-6). But Christ had no sin. Why was he circumcised? The answer is obvious. He was circumcised as our Surety.
Circumcision identified him as one with Abrahams seed whom he came to save (Heb 2:16-17). Circumcision required the shedding of blood. Here he shed a few drops of blood, by a painful act done to him, by order of Gods law, as a foreshadowing of the pouring out of his lifes blood unto death, by the order of Gods law, in the most painful, ignominious manner possible. By submitting to this ordinance of the law, our blessed Saviour voluntarily made himself a debtor to do the whole law for us (Gal 5:3).
Circumcision was the legally required pledge of every Israelite, that he was a debtor to keep the whole law. Our Lord Jesus Christ, by being circumcised, wrote Thomas Goodwin, did as it were set his hand to it, being made sin for us. The ceremonial law consisted much in sacrifices. Christ hereby obliged himself to offer, not the blood of bulls and goats, but his own blood as our Substitute.
It is a blessed thing to see the Christ of God standing before the law in our place, at the very beginning of his humanity, as he entered this world to redeem and save his people, making himself a debtor to the law, that we might never be debtors to the law (Rom 6:14-15; Rom 7:4; Rom 8:1-4; Rom 10:4).
Named Saviour
When he was circumcised, the incarnate God was named as our Saviour. His name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb. This name, JESUS, or Joshua, was given to our Lord by the express command of God by the angel, both to Joseph and to Mary, before he was conceived in the womb (Mat 1:21; Luk 1:31).
Jesus was a common name in ancient times (Col 4:11); and many are called Jesus who are not Saviours at all. Our Lord was given this name because it was the name of two very eminent types of him in the Old Testament: Joshua who led Israel into the land of promised rest, and Joshua the priest upon his throne, who represented the removal of sin by Christ (Zec 3:1-5), and also represented our Lord Jesus Christ upon his throne as our Intercessor King (Zec 6:11-13). Our Lord Jesus Christ was named Jesus because he was sent into this world to save his people from their sins (Mat 1:21); and save them he shall. His name shall endure for ever: his name shall be continued as long as the sun: and men shall be blessed in him: all nations shall call him blessed (Psa 72:17).
How sweet the name of Jesus sounds
In a believers ear!
It soothes his sorrows, heals his wounds,
And drives away his fear.
It makes the wounded spirit whole,
And calms the troubled breast,
Tis manna to the hungry soul,
And to the weary, rest.
Dear name! The rock on which I build,
My shield and hiding place:
My never failing treasury filled,
With boundless stores of grace!
John Newton
The Firstborn
Our Lord Jesus Christ was presented in the temple at Jerusalem as the Firstborn, according to the law.
And when the days of her purification according to the law of Moses were accomplished, they brought him to Jerusalem, to present him to the Lord; (As it is written in the law of the Lord, Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord) (Luk 2:22-23).
Mary came to the temple to offer her sacrifices for ceremonial purification forty days after the Lord Jesus was born, according to the law (Lev 12:4-6). Certainly, we have before us a reminder of the fact that there is no cleansing from uncleanness of any kind, except by the blood of a sacrifice. If we would be clean before God, it must be by blood.
The Lord Jesus came into his temple to fulfil the prophecy given by Malachi (Mal 3:1). And our Saviour, the God-man, came into the temple, according to the law of God, as the firstborn, as Gods firstborn, that one who is sanctified and holy before God (Exo 13:2; Num 3:13).
Christ is the Firstborn among many brethren (Rom 8:29), the Firstborn of every creature (Col 1:15), and the Firstborn from the dead (Col 1:18). Throughout the Old Testament, the preeminence of our Lord Jesus Christ as our Saviour was typified as the first, firstborn, firstfruits and the firstlings of the flock and of the herd. Indeed, everything recorded in the Old Testament foreshadows him who is the Alpha and the Omega, the First and the Last, and the Sum and the Substance of all things in the salvation of his people (Luk 24:25-27; Luk 24:44). There is nothing in the Book of God that does not speak of our all-glorious Christ, nothing that does not, in one way or another, set forth his supremacy, excellence and glory as God our Saviour. Nowhere is this fact more evident than in those passages dealing with the firstborn.
The firstborn symbolized a fathers might and strength, the excellency of dignity and the excellency of power (Gen 49:3). In that awesome night, when the Lord God slew the firstborn of both man and beast among the Egyptians (Exo 12:29), he claimed the firstborn of both man and beast in Israel as his own, requiring that they be sanctified unto him (Exo 13:2).
It was God himself, and God alone, who put a difference between the firstborn in Egypt and the firstborn in Israel on that night. We are expressly taught by the Spirit of God that everything on that passover night was typical of Christ, who as our Passover was sacrificed for us (1Co 5:7). The sprinkling of the blood of the lamb of the first year, without blemish, and without spot, on the houses of the Israelites, was the one thing that put a difference between the firstborn of Israel and the firstborn of Egypt. The blood of the lamb alone saved them from destruction. This we are plainly told in Exo 11:7.
As it was on that great night of judgment and mercy, so the year of Christs redeemed is both the day of vengeance and the day of salvation (Isa 63:3-5). When the Son of God died as our Substitute upon the cursed tree, he both bore all the vengeance of Gods holy wrath for us, to the full satisfaction of divine justice; and obtained eternal redemption and salvation for us (Heb 9:12). At the same time, he declares, the day of vengeance is in my heart. Yes, there is a day appointed and fixed by him, when our God will execute judgment in the firstlings of his enemies, as well as of mercy in the firstlings of his people.
The birthright of the firstborn among the children of Israel gave him primacy in the family. To him belonged the right of priesthood (Num 3:12-13; Num 3:40-45; Num 8:15-18). The firstborn was given a double portion among his brethren (Deu 21:17). And to the firstborn it was promised, thou art he whom thy brethren shall praise: thy hand shall be in the neck of thine enemies; thy fathers children shall bow down before thee (Gen 49:8). All these Old Testament declarations were intended to show forth the majesty of Christ as the firstborn among many brethren. All the offering required of God for every male that opened the womb pointed to our Lord Jesus (Exo 13:2; Exo 34:19-20; Lev 12:6; Luk 2:21-24).
Robert Hawker suggested that the scriptures, when speaking of the firstborn that openeth the womb, must have been prophetic of the virgin birth of our Saviour. He wrote, For strictly and properly speaking, none but the Lord Jesus ever did open the womb In every other instance, from the creation of the world, as anatomists well know, it is accomplished at the time of conception. Our blessed Saviour, the firstborn, was conceived in Marys virgin womb by the overshadowing power of God the Holy Spirit. He opened Marys virgin womb when he came forth from it to accomplish our redemption. Thus, throughout the Levitical dispensation, the firstborn of man and beast directed the eye of faith to him whom the triune God appointed to have everlasting preeminence as the firstborn. In all things it is, was and forever shall be the will of the eternal God, that Christ have preeminence in all things as the God-man, our Mediator and Redeemer.
Poorest Of Men
Though he is God the Son, when he came into this world to redeem and save his elect, our blessed Lord Jesus, the Firstborn, became the poorest of men, that he might bring us into the unsearchable riches of his grace and his kingdom. We see this in Marys sacrifice (Luk 2:24). The law required worshippers to bring a lamb of the first year for a burnt offering and a young pigeon or turtledove for a sin offering, except if they were very poor. If they were very poor, they were allowed to bring two young pigeons or two turtledoves (Lev 12:6-8), the one for a burnt offering and the other for a sin offering. Mary was a poor woman.
Mary offered, A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons. For ye know the grace of our Lord Jesus Christ, that, though he was rich, yet for your sakes he became poor, that ye through his poverty might be rich (2Co 8:9).
And, behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon; and the same man was just and devout, waiting for the consolation of Israel: and the Holy Ghost was upon him. And it was revealed unto him by the Holy Ghost, that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lords Christ. And he came by the Spirit into the temple: and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, to do for him after the custom of the law, Then took he him up in his arms, and blessed God, and said, Lord, now lettest thou thy servant depart in peace, according to thy word: For mine eyes have seen thy salvation, Which thou hast prepared before the face of all people; A light to lighten the Gentiles, and the glory of thy people Israel. And Joseph and his mother marvelled at those things which were spoken of him. And Simeon blessed them, and said unto Mary his mother, Behold, this child is set for the fall and rising again of many in Israel; and for a sign which shall be spoken against; (Yea, a sword shall pierce through thy own soul also,) that the thoughts of many hearts may be revealed
eight: Luk 1:59, Gen 17:12, Lev 12:3, Mat 3:15, Gal 4:4, Gal 4:5, Phi 2:8
his name was: Luk 1:31, Mat 1:21, Mat 1:25
Reciprocal: Gen 21:4 – General Mal 3:1 – and Luk 1:13 – thou Luk 2:39 – performed Phi 3:5 – Circumcised Col 2:11 – by
THE NAME ABOVE EVERY NAME
And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the Child, His name was called Jesus.
Luk 2:21
The passage narrates how our Lord was circumcised and received His name.
I. The name and the rite.Circumcision (Gen 17:12-13) the sign of the covenant. The covenant introduced Abraham and his descendants into a nearer and more intimate relation with God, The new name a mark and reminder of this relation. In Abrahams case it was the introduction of an aspirate, a breathing, into his old name. He became father of a multitude through the inspiration, in-breathing, of God. So with our Lord, a reminder of promises and responsibilities; a sign of sacrifice, but of sacrifice which should ensure rejoicing. Our baptismal names have the same suggestive significance. They remind us of Gods promises, and of the duties to be fulfilled if we would gain them. Tokens of self-surrender, through which we may be enabled to receive the blessing.
II. What the name implies.The name Jesus given by Gods direction; but why this name rather than another?
(a) The name was not uncommon. It was already honourable through association with those by whom it had been previously borne; e.g. the son of Nun, the great captain of Israel; the son of Josedech, high priest, friend of Haggai and Zechariah; the son of Sirach, and his grandfather, whose works he edited (cf. Ecclesiasticus). As now given it might intimate that the bearer should be greater as a captain than the first, as a priest than the second; whilst He was also that Divine wisdom after which the son of Sirach hungered.
(b) It was appropriate to the character of the bearer. Sometimes the covenant name, as in the case of Judas (praise) must have been a reproach to an unworthy character. In this case it is a revelation and expression of the nature. Look through the name, and it shows us the nature of the bearer. Thus: Jesus is Jehovah; Jesus is salvation.
(c) Jehovah and salvation unite in Jesus. We are saved from sin that we may serve God, and it is God Himself Who saves us.
III. How the name should be treated.Everything depends upon the way in which it is regarded. If as a mere name, it may easily be made a vehicle for superstition. If more than a mere name, we can look through it, and see behind our God and Saviour. Seeing Christ through the name the utmost reverence is only natural (cf. Canon 18). The outward sign of reverence may properly testify to the inward feeling.
1
See the comments at chapter 1:59 as to naming a child at the same time with the rite of circumcision. According to Smith’s Bible Dictionary, “the name Jesus signifies saviour,” which made it an appropriate one to give this child.
And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.
[And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcision of the child.] “The disciples of R. Simeon Ben Jochai asked him, Why the law ordained circumcision on the eighth day? To wit, lest while all others were rejoicing, the parents of the infant should be sad. The circumcision therefore is deferred till the woman in childbed hath got over her uncleanness.” For, as it is expressed a little before, “The woman that brings forth a man-child is prohibited her husband the space of seven days, but on the seventh day, at the coming in of the evening which begins the eighth day, she washeth herself, and is allowed to go in unto her husband.” If she came nigh him within the seven days she made him unclean. On the eighth day; therefore, Joseph addresseth himself to make provision for his wife, and to take care about the circumcision of the child.
THE first point which demands our attention in this passage, is the obedience which our Lord rendered, as an infant, to the Jewish law. We read of His being circumcised on the eighth day. It is the earliest fact which is recorded in His history.
It is a mere waste of time to speculate, as some have done, about the reason why our Lord submitted to circumcision. We know that “in Him was no sin,” either original or actual. (1Jn 3:5.) His being circumcised was not meant in the least as an acknowledgment that there was any tendency to corruption in His heart. It was not a confession of inclination to evil, and of need of grace to mortify the deeds of His body. All this should be carefully borne in mind.
Let it suffice us to remember that our Lord’s circumcision was a public testimony to Israel, that according to the flesh He was a Jew, made of a Jewish woman, and “made under the law.” (Gal 4:4.) Without it He would not have fulfilled the law’s requirements. Without it He could not have been recognized as the son of David, and the seed of Abraham. Let us remember, furthermore, that circumcision was absolutely necessary before our Lord could be heard as a teacher in Israel. Without it he would have had no place in any lawful Jewish assembly, and no right to any Jewish ordinance. Without it He would have been regarded by all Jews as nothing better than an uncircumcised Gentile, and an apostate from the faith of the fathers.
Let our Lord’s submission to an ordinance which He did not need for Himself, be a lesson to us in our daily life. Let us endure much, rather than increase the offence of the Gospel, or hinder in any way the cause of God. The words of Paul deserve frequent pondering:-“Though I be free from all men, yet have I made myself servant unto all, that I might gain the more, and unto the Jews I became as a Jew, that I might gain the Jews: to them that are under the law, as under the law, that I might gain them that are under the law.”-“I am made all things to all men, that I might by all means save some.” (1Co 9:19-22.) The man who wrote these words walked very closely in the footsteps of His crucified Master.
The second point which demands our attention in this passage, is the name by which our Lord was called, by God’s special command. “His name was called Jesus, which was so named by the angel, before He was conceived in the womb.”
The word Jesus means simply “Savior.” It is the same word as “Joshua” in the Old Testament. Very striking and instructive is the selection of this name. The Son of God came down from heaven to be not only the Savior, but the King, the Lawgiver, the Prophet, the Priest, the Judge of fallen man. Had He chosen any one of these titles, He would only have chosen that which was His own. But He passed by them all. He selects a name which speaks of mercy, grace, help, and deliverance for a lost world. It is as a deliverer and Redeemer that He desires principally to be known.
Let us often ask ourselves what our own hearts know of the Son of God. Is He our Jesus, our Savior? This is the question on which our salvation turns. Let it not content us to know Christ as One who wrought mighty miracles, and spake as never man spake; or to know Him as One who is very God, and will one day judge the world. Let us see that we know Him experimentally, as our Deliverer from the guilt and power of sin, and our Redeemer from Satan’s bondage. Let us strive to be able to say, “This is my Friend: I was dead, and He gave me life: I was a prisoner, and He set me free.”-Precious indeed is this name of Jesus to all true believers! It is “as ointment poured forth.” (Song of Son 1:3.) It restores them when conscience-troubled. It comforts them when cast down. It smooths their pillows in sickness. It supports them in the hour of death. “The name of the LORD is a strong tower; the righteous runneth into it, and is safe.” (Pro 18:10.)
The last point which demands our attention in this passage, is the poor and humble condition of our Lord’s mother, Mary. This is a fact which, at first sight, may not stand out clearly in the form of these verses. But a reference to the twelfth chapter of Leviticus will at once make it plain. There we shall see, that the offering which Mary made was specially appointed to be made by poor people:-“If she be not able to bring a lamb, then she shall bring two turtles, or two young pigeons.” In short, her offering was a public declaration that she was poor. (Lev 12:8.)
Poverty, it is manifest, was our Lord’s portion upon earth, from the days of His earliest infancy. He was nursed and tended as a babe, by a poor woman. He passed the first thirty years of His life on earth, under the roof of a poor man. We need not doubt that He ate a poor man’s food, and wore a poor man’s apparel, and worked a poor man’s work, and shared in all a poor man’s troubles. Such condescension is truly marvelous. Such an example of humility passes man’s understanding.
Facts like these ought often to be laid to heart by poor people. They would help to silence murmuring and complaining, and go far to reconcile them to their hard lot. The simple fact that Jesus was born of a poor woman, and lived all his life on earth among poor people, ought to silence the common argument that “religion is not for the poor.” Above all it ought to encourage every poor believer in all his approaches to the throne of grace in prayer. Let him remember in all his prayers that his mighty Mediator in heaven is accustomed to poverty, and knows by experience the heart of a poor man. Well would it be for the world if working men could only see that Christ is the true poor man’s friend!
==================
Notes-
v21.-[Circumcising of the child.] Bishop Hall remarks, “He that came to be sin for us, would in our persons be legally unclean, that by satisfying the law he might take away our uncleanness. Though he were exempted from the ordinary conditions of our birth, yet he would not deliver himself from those ordinary rites that implied the weakness and blemishes of humanity. He would fulfil one law, to abrogate it; another, to satisfy it. He that was above the law, would come under the law, to free us from the law.”
[Named of the angel before he was conceived.] Poole remarks, in his annotations, “We read of four under the Old Testament, to whom God gave names before they were born: Isaac,-Gen 17:19; Josiah,-1Ki 13:2; Ishmael,-Gen 16:11; Cyrus,-Isa 44:28; and in the New Testament we read of two: John the Baptist and Jesus Christ. Which lets us know the certainty to God of future contingencies; for though the parents of Ishmael, Isaac, and John the Baptist, imposed those names in obedience to the command of God, and there was but a small time betwixt the giving of the names and the births, yet the case was otherwise as to Josiah and Cyrus.”
v24.-[Two young pigeons.] Lightfoot says that this was called, in the Hebrew language, “The offering of the poor, which if a rich man offered, he did not do his duty.”
Luk 2:21. Eight days. Comp. chap. Luk 1:59.
Jesus. Comp. Mat 1:21.
Which was to called by the angel. Comp. chap. Luk 1:31. This naming was an act of obedience and of faith on the part of both Mary and Joseph (comp. Mat 1:21; Mat 1:25). Although Joseph is less prominent in the account before us, he must have been convinced. This verse gives the greater prominence to the naming of the Saviour, but the circumcision has a significance. He was made under the law, that He might redeem us from the law. As a sinless Being this rite was not necessary for Him, but as a born Jew, and as One who fulfilled the law for us, He was circumcised.
Two things are here observable, 1. Our Saviour’s circumcision, and the name given him at his circumcision. There was no impurity in the Son of God, and yet he is circumcised, and baptized also, though he had neither filth nor foreskin, which wanted either the circumcising knife or the baptismal water, yet he condescends to be both circumcised and baptized; thereby showing, that as he was made of a woman, so he would be made under the law, which he punctually observed to a tittle.
And accordingly, he was not only circumcised, but circumcised the eighth day, as the ceremonial law required: and thus our Lord fulfilled all righteousness. Mat 3:15
Observe 2. The name given at our Saviour’s circumcision: His name was called Jesus; that is, a Saviour; he being to save his people from their sins. Mat 1:21 The great end of Christ’s coming into the world was to save persons from the punishment and power of their sins. Had he not saved us from our sins, we must have died in our sins, and died for our sins, and that eternally. Never let us then sit down desponding, either under the guilt, or under the power of our sins; and conclude, that they are either so great that they cannot be forgiven, or so strong that they can never be overcome.
Luk 2:21. And when eight days were accomplished That is, not when the eighth day was ended, but when it was come: for the circumcising of the child A ceremony which the law of Moses required to be performed on every male child at that age, and to which Christ was made subject, that he might wear the badge of a child of Abraham, and that he might visibly be made under the law by a sacred rite, which obliged him to keep the whole law. It is true, he had not any corruptions of nature to mortify, which was in part represented by that institution, but nevertheless it was necessary that he should be thus initiated into the Jewish Church, and thereby be engaged to the duties, and entitled to the privileges, of a son of Abraham, according to Gods covenant with that patriarch and his seed; as also that he might put an honour on the solemn dedication of children to God.
Sixth Narrative: Circumcision and Presentation of Jesus, Luk 2:21-40.
This narrative comprises1. The circumcision of Jesus (Luk 2:21); 2. His presentation in the temple (Luk 2:22-38); 3. A historical conclusion (Luk 2:39-40).
XII.
CIRCUMCISION, TEMPLE SERVICE,
AND NAMING OF JESUS.
(The Temple at Jerusalem, B. C. 4)
cLUKE II. 21-39.
c21 And when eight days [ Gen 17:12] were fulfilled for circumcising him [The rite was doubtless performed by Joseph. By this rite Jesus was “made like unto his brethren” ( Heb 2:16, Heb 2:17); that is, he became a member of the covenant nation, and became a debtor to the law– Gal 5:3], his name was called JESUS [see Luk 1:59], which was so called by the angel before he was conceived in the womb. [ Luk 1:31.] 22 And when the days of their purification according to the law of Moses were fulfilled [Purification took place on the fortieth day after the nativity in the case of males, and eighty days in the case of females ( Lev 12:1-5). Until it was performed the mother was not permitted to go to the temple, take part in any public service, or even to leave her house. It seems that the members of her family were also ceremonially unclean, because they came in daily contact with her], they brought him up to Jerusalem [to the temple], to present him to the Lord [When God slew the firstborn of Egypt he spared the firstborn of Israel. For this reason all the firstborn of Israel were regarded as being peculiarly the Lord’s ( Exo 12:29, Exo 12:30, Exo 13:2); and the firstborn male child of each family had to be redeemed with money ( Exo 13:11-15, Num 18:15, Num 18:16). Originally the firstborn or eldest son was priest of the household after his father’s death; but God chose the Levites to serve in his sanctuary in the place of these [33] firstborn or household priests ( Num 3:11-13, Num 8:14-19); but this choosing did not annul the statute which required the payment of redemption money. The redemption money for a male was five shekels of the sanctuary, or about $3.75– Lev 27:6] 23 (as it is written in the law of the Lord [for additional passages see Exo 22:29, Exo 34:19, Exo 34:20], Every male that openeth the womb shall be called holy to the Lord), 24 and to offer a sacrifice [By redemption money and sacrifice the life of Jesus was ceremonially redeemed from God the Father, that his consecration of it to the will of the Father might be perfect. We likewise are redeemed by the blood of Christ, but are expected nevertheless to be more consecrated than ever] according to that which is said in the law of the Lord [ Lev 12:6-8, Lev 5:11], A pair of turtledoves, or two young pigeons. [The required offering was a yearling lamb for a burnt offering and a young pigeon for a sin-offering. But the law allowed a poor mother to substitute doves or pigeons for the lamb. We see here an early trace of the poverty of Him who had not where to lay his head. Knowing the greatness of the child, Joseph and Mary would never have used the lesser sacrifice if they could have afforded the regular and more costly one. Poverty is not dishonorable in God’s sight; for Mary was honored of him above all women.] 25 And behold, there was a man in Jerusalem, whose name was Simeon [the name means “Hearing.” Some think that it was Rabbi Simeon, the son of the great teacher Hillel; but the context forbids such an idea]; and this man was righteous and devout [Right in outward and devout in his inward life. The first prophet to tell the world that its Messiah had come was a thoroughly good man], looking for [Waiting like Jacob ( Gen 49:18), and Joseph of Arimatha ( Mar 15:43), he realized the truth of God’s promise ( Isa 49:23). The Jews waited for a coming Prince, local, carnal, finite, temporal; we wait for a KING universal, spiritual, infinite, eternal, the Son of God. Hence the magnitude of our expected consolation is to theirs as an ocean is to a drop of [34] water] the consolation of Israel [A common name for the era of the Messiah, which was so called because the advent of the Christ would bring comfort to his people ( Isa 40:1). Jews swore by the consolation of Israel, and the phrase, “May I see the consolation of Israel,” was common among them. A prayer for the coming of the Messiah was daily used by them]: and the Holy Spirit was upon him. [ Luk 1:68.] 26 And it had been revealed unto him by the Holy Spirit [probably in a dream], that he should not see death, before he had seen the Lord’s Christ. [A remarkable favor, a notable blessing– Luk 10:23, Luk 10:24.] 27 And he came in the Spirit [moved by the impulses of inspiration– Mat 22:14, Rev 1:10] into the temple [those who go to church perfunctorily see little; those who go in the Spirit–according to the measure in which He is given them–see and hear much]: and when the parents brought in the child Jesus, that they might do concerning him after the custom of the law, 28 then he received him into his arms, and blessed God, and said, 29 Now lettest thou thy servant depart [This hymn of Simeon is called the “Nunc Dimittis” from the two words with which the Latin translation of it begins. Simeon regards his death as now near, since he had seen that for which God had kept him alive. He represents as a sentinel who, seeing the rising of the day-star which is the signal that his watch is relieved, knows his weary waiting is at an end], Lord, According to thy word [God keeps his word, and never disappoints], in peace [to the living the Jews said, “Go in peace” (Leshalom), as Jethro said to Moses; to the dying they said, “Go in peace” (Beshalom)– Gen 15:15]; 30 For mine eyes have seen thy salvation [Only the eye which sees Christ is satisfied with seeing ( Ecc 1:18). To one who has Christ in his arms and salvation before his eyes the world looks poor indeed, and the loss of it appears gain– Phi 1:21], 31 Which thou hast prepared [God prepared the gospel in his counsels before Christ came into the world ( Act 2:23), and foretold it by the [35] prophets– Act 3:18] before the face of all peoples [The Jewish Scriptures were then scattered among all nations, and all people were acquainted with the Hebrew expectations of a Messiah. Simeon saw in the Babe the initial step of God toward fulfilling all these prophecies]; 32 A light for revelation to the Gentiles. [A reference to Isa 49:6. Christ’s light has revealed the Father to the Gentiles. That Simeon should prophesy this is an evidence of the large spiritual knowledge given him, since even the apostles were slow to grasp the fullness of Christ’s world-wide mission–see Psa 98:2, Psa 98:3, Isa 52:10, Isa 42:6] to the Gentiles, And the glory [ Isa 45:25. Israel is doubly glorified in Jesus, in that God chose this people to receive the Word, or divine Son, in that Jesus, as a Jew, presented to the world the picture of the perfect manhood. In his divinity and his humanity Jesus glorified Israel] of thy people Israel. [The Gentiles and Israel are here contrasted. The Gentiles refused the knowledge of God ( Rom 1:28), and Israel abused it– Rom 3:1-9.] 33 And his father and his mother were marvelling at the things which were spoken concerning him [Not because they heard anything which was really new, but because the words caused them to see the truth in a new way. They were also doubtless surprised to find that an utter stranger should speak thus about the child. Such manifestations of inspiration were no more common then than now]; 34 and Simeon blessed them [While blessing the parents, he refrained from blessing the child, lest it might appear that he did it as a superior. He could bless God in the heavens (see Luk 2:28) without fear of being misunderstood; but to bless this little Babe might seem to be presumptuous], and said unto Mary his mother [thus distinguishing between Mary the real parent, and Joseph the supposed one], Behold, this child is set [either as a stone of stumbling ( Isa 8:14, Rom 9:32, Rom 9:33, 1Co 1:23), or a precious cornerstone ( 1Pe 2:7, 1Pe 2:8, Act 4:11, 1Co 3:11). Jesus is the cornerstone of true religion. Those who reject him fall over him and are broken; those who accept him, build upon him, and are lifted up and edified] [36] for the falling and the rising of many in Israel [Jesus has always wrought changes which were like fallings and risings. In his own early lifetime Pharisees, Herodians, Sadducees, Nazarenes, Gadarenes, etc., sank down before his example and teaching; while fishermen, publicans and outcasts were elevated and encouraged by his sympathy. In the ecclesiastical field Jesus has brought down the powers of superstition and priestcraft, and exalted the common worshiper, giving him liberty of conscience. In the political field Jesus has brought down the pride of kings and lifted up the common people, and given them sovereign powers. In the spiritual realm this work of Jesus is most clearly displayed. Not only did he bring down the pride of Judah and lift up the despised Gentiles ( Rom 9:25); but he has worked a leveling and a lifting work in the life of each of his followers. Those proud of their manhood, he has made as children, that they might become truly men ( Mat 18:3); those wise in their own conceit, he approaches with the foolishness of preaching, that they might be instructed in true learning ( 1Co 1:26-31); those strong in self-confidence, he makes weak, that he may fill them with the divine power ( 2Co 12:10, Phi 4:13). Like Paul, we fall and rise in Christ– Act 9:4-6]; and for a sign [Something which challenges attention, and is full of significant meaning. Signs were intended to allay controversy, and to exclude contradiction, but Jesus provoked both. When he was thus first in the temple, opposition was prophesied; when he was last there it was fully realized– Mat 23:38] which is spoken against [during his earthly lifetime Jesus was called “deceiver,” “Samaritan,” “demoniac,” etc., and subsequently his followers were abused ( Act 28:22); later the Jews wrote of him as “the deceiver,” “that man,” and “the hung.” Early Christians were charged by the pagans with committing cannibalism, incest, and every conceivable atrocity, and in this day “Christian” is–after Jew–the most stringing term of reproach known to the Eastern tongue]; 35 yea and a sword shall pierce through thine own soul [Simeon had read and [37] understood the prophecies which told of the suffering Messiah ( Isa_14-43:12). Hence, to prepare the soul of Mary he touches this minor chord. By as much as the prophecies and annunciations concerning Jesus, led Mary to expect honor, and glory for her son; by so much did the rejection, persecution and cruel death of Jesus overwhelm her with piercing anguish and disappointment. It is also probable that at the time of the crucifixion Mary shared with the apostles the doubts as to the mission of Jesus, and these doubts must have been unspeakably bitter to her]; that thoughts out of many hearts may be revealed. [The word here translated “thoughts” is generally used to signify bad or evil thoughts. Jesus often revealed such ( Joh 9:16); but the context shows that Simeon had in mind the evil thoughts which were revealed by the sufferings inflicted on Christ. The human heart is desperately wicked ( Jer 17:9); but its wickedness was never more manifest than when it chose a murderer and crucified its Creator ( Act 3:14, Act 3:15). Men are still revealed by their attitude toward Christ, the sincere being drawn to him, and the hypocrites being repelled from him. But at the judgment he shall shine forth as the perfect revealer of all thoughts and actions– Mat 10:26.] 36 And there was one Anna [the same name as Hannah ( 1Sa 1:20), meaning “He was gracious”], a prophetess [like Miriam, Deborah, Huldah– 2Ch 34:22], the daughter of Phanuel [the same as Peniel, meaning “Face of God”– Gen 32:30], of the tribe of Asher [Asher was the second son of Jacob and Zilpah ( Gen 30:12, Gen 30:13). The name means “happy.” Though the ten tribes were lost and scattered, many individuals belonging to them remained in Judah– Act 26:7, Jam 1:1] (she was of a great age, having lived with a husband seven years from her virginity, 37 and she had been a widow even unto fourscore and four years) [She had been married seven years, and was now eight-four years old. Her long widowhood is mentioned, because young widows who did not remarry were held in especial honor. Anna was about twenty-four years [38] old when Jerusalem was conquered by Pompey, and came under the power of Rome], who departed not from the temple [This may simply mean that she was unusually assiduous in her attendance at all the temple services ( Act 2:46); or it may be taken literally, in which case we may suppose that her prophetic talents had secured for her the right of living in one of the temple chambers. Those who patiently frequent God’s house will sooner or later obtain a blessing], worshipping with fastings. [Moses appointed one yearly fast, viz.: that on the day of Atonement; but the Pharisees introduced the custom of fasting twice a week to commemorate the days when Moses was supposed to have ascended and descended Mt. Sinai; viz.: on Monday and Thursday. They had also otherwise multiplied the fasts– Luk 5:33] and supplications night and day. [In Hebrew idiom night is mentioned before day, following the example of Moses ( Gen 1:5). The Hebrew theory that “God made the world in six days and seven nights,” may have given birth to this idiom. For instances of this idiom, see Act 26:7, 1Ti 5:5. There were probably night services of sacred music held in the temple, at which priests sung anthems– Psa 134:1, Psa 134:2, Psa 119:62.] 38 And coming up at that very hours she gave thanks unto God, and spake of him [Jesus] to all them that were looking for the redemption of Jerusalem. 39 And when they [the parents of Jesus] had accomplished all things that were according to the law of the Lord, they returned. [Luke here adds the words “into Galilee, to their own city, Nazareth.” We have omitted these words from the text here, and carried them forward to Act 9:19-26, Gal 1:17, Gal 1:18.] [39]
[FFG 33-39]
CIRCUMCISION OF JESUS & HIS PRESENTATION IN THE TEMPLE
21-24. And when the eight days for circumcising Him were fulfilled, and He was called Jesus, being called by the angel before he was conceived in the womb. Gabriel brought His name down from heaven, designative of His office and character, which is to save all the people from their sins who will let Him. And when the days of their purification were fulfilled, according to the law of Moses, they brought Him to Jerusalem; as has been written in the law of the Lord, That every male opening the matrix shall be called holy to the Lord; and to offer sacrifice according to that which has been spoken in the law of the Lord, a pair of turtledoves or two young pigeons. The Scriptures setting forth the law of the Lord appertaining to the purification of the mother and the presentation of the child to the Lord are found in Leviticus 12, Exodus 13, and Numbers 8. Thus we see that, as Mary and Joseph were godly people, every ramification of the law was to be rigidly fulfilled, even in case of Him who made the law. Though the circumcision means sanctification by the elimination of the old man of sin, and Jesus had no sin, yet as it behooved Him to fulfill all righteousness, He received circumcision like the sinful men whom He came to save. The purification which the law required of His mother, after thirty days, was to be accompanied by the offering of a lamb; but in case of the poor, they might bring the cheaper offering a pair of turtledoves or two young pigeons. Hence, the parents of Jesus being poor, they offered the cheap sacrifice. We see in everything, that our Lord, His family, prophets, apostles, and friends, rank among the lowly. Still the people all want to get up. Jesus is our Paragon. We ought to want to live and die as He did.
SIMEON & ANNA
Whereas it was the glorious privilege of all Israel to receive Christ and proclaim Him to the world an honor above the angels yet we see but very few; e.g., the shepherds of the field, Zacharias and Elizabeth, Joseph and Mary, Simeon and Anna, the apostles and sainted contemporaries of our Lord, constituting but a handful of the great Jewish nation, were all who enjoyed this exalted honor, the rest being blinded. Whereas it is certainly the glorious privilege of the whole Christian Church to enjoy the transcendent honor and blessing of receiving Jesus at His second coming, descending from the skies, and witnessing to His glory, yet it is highly probable that the proportion of the elect who shall enjoy this privilege will not be greater than at His first advent.
And, behold, there was a man in Jerusalem to whom was the name Simeon: the same man righteous and godly, awaiting the consolation of Israel, and the Holy Spirit was upon him. Simeon was gloriously sanctified, filled with the Holy Ghost, and on the constant outlook for the appearing of his Lord. If we are not in a similar attitude, we will certainly be without excuse, as we live in a much brighter dispensation than he. And it had been revealed unto him by the Holy Spirit that he should not see death before that he may see the Christ of the Lord. O what a wonderful Pentecostal experience Simeon enjoyed, and how should his testimony put to the blush the halting Christians of the present day! Simeon was living in advance of his dispensation i.e., up in ours; whereas so many in our day are back in the dispensation of Moses. Here we see that Simeon was not only filled with the Spirit, but led by Him, as we all ought to be. And he came in the Spirit into the temple. The critics tell us that none but the priests were admitted into the temple proper, and when we read so frequently about the temple in the biography of our Savior, it means other buildings connected with it, which were many and capacious, on the Temple Campus.
And while the parents brought in the little child Jesus, that they may do according to that which is required of the law concerning Him; and he received Him into his arms, and blessed God, and said, And now permit Thy servant, O Lord, to depart in peace, according to Thy Word; because mine eyes have seen Thy Salvation, which Thou hast prepared before the face of all Thy people: a light unto the revelation of the Gentiles, and the glory of Thy people Israel. Thus far, Israel had been the custodian of the Divine Oracles and the dispensers of truth. Now the time has come for them to propagate this heavenly benediction to all the nations of the earth, themselves being the recipients of this unearthly glory; meanwhile the Gentiles, wrapped in heathen darkness four thousand years, are to receive this day-spring from on high, a glorious sunburst from the throne of God, chasing away the dismal night of sin, and revealing the ineffable glory of salvation, rich, sweet, full, and free, to the old, the young, the great, the small, the rich, the poor, the wise and the unwise.
Joseph and His mother were wondering over the things spoken by him. Simeon blest them, and said to Mary His mother, Behold, He is appointed for the fall and the rising of many in Israel, and a sign that shall be spoken against. O how signally and sadly was Simeons prophecy verified! The rank and the of the great Jewish Church, both ministry and membership, rejected Him and fell; while not a few received Him, leaping into life. And O the contradiction which clamored against Him from Dan to Beersheba! How Jerusalem roared with the ejaculation, Crucify Him!
And a sword shall go through thy soul. How was this fulfilled in the case of Mary? She, like his other faithful disciples, failing to apprehend the prophecies relative to His crucifixion, believing that He was the Christ and invulnerable, expected Him to live forever. O how the sword darted through her soul when she saw her beloved Son, whom she had expected to redeem Israel, demonically murdered! Again, she was but a fallen being, like others, needing personal salvation, which she could only receive by the Sword of the Spirit. e., the Word of God going through her soul, thus destroying all the virus of original sin.
In order that the thoughts from many hearts may be revealed. It was absolutely necessary that Christ should come, suffer, and die, to satisfy the penalty of the violated law, in order that the Holy Spirit, the Illuminator, Electrifier, and Sanctifier of the human soul be given. Hence, you see the Holy Ghost, the Revelator of all human thoughts through the words of Christ, is given to all the world, revealing the deep things of the heart, to our unutterable astonishment, simultaneously revealing the glorious remedy, the open, flowing fountain of the Saviors precious blood, and inspiring the consecration and faith requisite to plunge beneath the cleansing wave, and
Rise, to walk in heavens own light, Above the world and sin, With heart made pure and garments white, And Jesus crowned within.
36-38. We see here that Anna was a preacher too i.e., a prophetess identical with the called and sent preachers of the gospel dispensation. She was eighty-four years old; having married at maturity, and been left a widow in seven years, she devoted her life to the ministry of the Word, abiding in the temple day and night. So you see she was no backwoods preacher, but a metropolitan, enjoying a settled pastorate at Jerusalem. Her grand theme was Jesus and the expectation of His immediate appearing.
So, at the present day, the glorious theme of every true gospel preacher is Jesus and the constant watch for His appearing. The glorious dispensation of entire sanctification, in which we are permitted to live, involves the gospel message of entire sanctification, the fullness of experience, and the Constant expectancy of the Lords appearing.
Luk 2:21-24. The Circumcision and Presentation of Jesus.When the babe is a week old He is circumcised and named, and when He is a month old His parents take Him to the Temple in Jerusalem for the double rite of purifying the mother (Leviticus 12), and redeeming the child as a firstborn (Exo 13:2; Exo 13:12). They are too poor to offer a lamb.
Luk 2:22. their: Syr. Sin. has her, which is probably right. Neither the father nor the child was unclean according to the Law. The alteration (of her to their) is due to the difficulty of supposing the Virgin to need Levitical purification. Some MSS. even read his.to Jerusalem. There was no command about bringing the firstborn to the Temple, though parents living near Jerusalem would do so.
2:21 {3} And when eight days were accomplished for the circumcising of the child, his name was called JESUS, which was so named of the angel before he was conceived in the womb.
(3) Christ, the head of the Church, made subject to the law in order to deliver us from the curse of the law (as the name of Jesus well declares) being circumcised, ratifies and seals in his own flesh the circumcision of the flesh.
3. Jesus’ circumcision 2:21
The record of this incident, similar as it is to the account of John’s circumcision and naming (Luk 1:59-66), shows Jesus’ identification with John specifically, and with humankind generally. Jesus’ name was very significant, meaning "Yahweh is salvation [or Yahweh saves]." God specified it before His conception, as He had done for John. Prophecies about John’s future followed his circumcision immediately, but they occurred later for Jesus, namely, at His presentation in the temple (Luk 2:22-24).
Fuente: Everett’s Study Notes on the Holy Scriptures
Fuente: The Popular Commentary on the Bible by Kretzmann
Fuente: Commentary on the Holy Bible by Thomas Coke
Fuente: Heinrich August Wilhelm Meyer’s New Testament Commentary
THE HISTORY OF THE GROWTH
2. In a certain point of view, circumcision had not the same meaning for the child Jesus, as it bore for every other son of Abraham. The spotless purity of His body needed no symbol of the putting off of the sinful Adam; and even without , He would doubtless, in the eye of Heaven, have been sanctified and hallowed in a peculiar sense of the word. But the King of the Jews could not, and would not, omit the token that He belonged, according to the flesh, to that elect people; and when the Son of God appeared in the likeness of sinful flesh, He chose also to receive the emblem of purification from sin, that He might be in all things like unto His brethren, sin only excepted. The principle, afterward so prominently laid down by our Lord at His baptism, also applies in this instance, Mat 3:15. It shows a deep insight into the nature and reality of His incarnation, that the mother of our Lord never thinks of withdrawing either Him or herself from the duties of the eighth or of the fortieth day.
Fuente: A Commentary on the Holy Scriptures, Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical by Lange
THE CIRCUMCISION OF CHRIST
[The Mosaic covenant differed materially from that of Abraham, and yet the same ordinance was a seal to both. The rite of circumcision was absolutely indispensable to all [Note: Gen 17:14 It was equally enjoined by the law. Compare Exo 12:48. with Joh 7:22.]: it was invariably the rite, by which, and by which alone, any persons, whether infants or adults, were initiated into that covenant. And in what light were they taught to view it? We answer, as binding them to an observance of the whole law of Moses, and as suspending their salvation on their performance of this condition. In this light St. Peter viewed it, when that famous controversy respecting circumcision was brought before the whole College of Apostles at Jerusalem: he reproved those who insisted on the observance of that rite, for putting a yoke upon the Christians, which not even the most eminent among the Jews had been able to bear [Note: Act 15:1; Act 15:10.]. Of course, if circumcision had not bound them to the observance of the whole law of Moses, there could have been no foundation for this objection. St. Paul yet more strongly confirms this statement: for he says to those who were in danger of being misled by the Judaising Christians, Behold, I Paul say unto you, that, if ye be circumcised, Christ shall profit you nothing: for I testify again to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law [Note: Gal 5:2-3.] Here then the point is clear; that though circumcision was given primarily as a seal of the covenant of grace, it was eventually (though not expressly called so) a seal of the covenant of works also. From the time that it was first instituted, it continued to be a sign and a seal; but the privileges of which they were a seal, and the obligations of which they were a sign, varied according to the nature of the covenant to which the rite itself was annexed: to Abraham, it sealed the covenant of grace; to Moses and the Jews, the covenant of works.]
We know that this is a point disputed by many; who are fond of bringing forward the controversy on all occasions. Far be it from us to encourage a controversial spirit: we would avoid it, and discourage it, to the utmost of our power. Yet it is necessary that we should instruct those who are under our charge in all things relating to their duty; and therefore, without offence to others, we may be allowed to state with plainness our views and sentiments.
Two reasons in particular are urged for not administering baptism to infants: the one is, that we are not any where commanded to do so; the other is, that children are not capable of all the ends of baptism; since baptism presupposes a knowledge and approbation of those principles, into which we are baptized.
But to this we answer, What occasion was there for renewed orders concerning a thing that had already existed two thousand years? A rite more suited to our dispensation was introduced; but the persons interested in it were not therefore deprived of their birthright. If it was intended to abridge the privileges of children, we might well expect that such an intention should have been expressed: but where has God expressed it? and who but God can take away the privileges which God has given?
Again: If it be any argument against the baptism of children, that they cannot understand the principles which they become pledged to maintain, it is equally so against the circumcision of infants: and whosoever will condemn that, let him answer it to God.
This only we add, that if Jesus Christ submitted to circumcision for the good of his enemies, much more should you consult the benefit of your children by dedicating them to God in baptism.]
Fuente: Charles Simeon’s Horae Homileticae (Old and New Testaments)
Fuente: Hawker’s Poor Man’s Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Fuente: B.H. Carroll’s An Interpretation of the English Bible
Fuente: John Trapp’s Complete Commentary (Old and New Testaments)
Fuente: Henry Alford’s Greek Testament
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
Fuente: The Expositors Greek Testament by Robertson
Fuente: You Can Understand the Bible: Study Guide Commentary Series by Bob Utley
Fuente: Companion Bible Notes, Appendices and Graphics
Fuente: The Greek Testament
Fuente: Spurgeon’s Verse Expositions of the Bible
Fuente: Gnomon of the New Testament
Fuente: Old and New Testaments Restoration Commentary
Fuente: Commentaries on the New Testament and Prophets
Fuente: Discovering Christ In Selected Books of the Bible
Fuente: The Treasury of Scripture Knowledge
Fuente: Church Pulpit Commentary
Fuente: Combined Bible Commentary
Fuente: Lightfoot Commentary Gospels
Fuente: Ryle’s Expository Thoughts on the Gospels
Fuente: A Popular Commentary on the New Testament
Fuente: Expository Notes with Practical Observations on the New Testament
Fuente: Joseph Bensons Commentary on the Old and New Testaments
Fuente: Godet Commentary (Luke, John, Romans and 1 Corinthians)
Fuente: McGarvey and Pendleton Commentaries (New Testament)
Fuente: William Godbey’s Commentary on the New Testament
Fuente: Peake’s Commentary on the Bible
Fuente: Geneva Bible Notes
Fuente: Expository Notes of Dr. Constable (Old and New Testaments)